HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/20/93 NATER BOARD
M a r k S a lva gg lo, Chair
C o n n i Bru n n i, Vice-Chair
D a n i e 1 J. Kan e
SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1993
WATER RESOURCES CONFERENCE ROOM
1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD
5:15P.M.
Call meeting to order.
Roll Call - Board Members.
1) Approve minutes of Special Water Board meeting held March 16, 1993.
2) Annexation to City Domestic Water Service Area (Ashe Water). FOR BOARD
ACTION and RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
3) The SWRCB Decision 1630 shelved by request of Governor. FOR BOARD
INFORMATION.
4) Adjournment.
TOUR OF CITY'S 2800 ACRE GROUNDWATER
RECHARGE PROJECT.
PAUL DOW, MANAGER
POSTED: April 19, 1993
1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311 · (805) 326-3716
SPECIAL MEETING
WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
TUESDAY, MARCH 16, 1993
5:15P.M.
The meeting was called to order' by Boardmember Salvaggio at 5:15P.M. in the
Water Resources Conference Room.
Present: Salvaggio, Chair: Brunni, Vice-Chair; Kane
A motion was made by Boardmember Brunni to approve the minutes of the Special
Meeting held February 10, 1993. Motion carried.
The State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1630 was brought before the
Board by Mr. Bogart, with an update on this issue by Mr. John Stovall of the Kern County
Water Agency who attended the hearings in Sacramento. At the conclusion of the hearing
the only action taken was to defer action indefinitely, and no hearing date was set to take
action on D-1630. A workshop set to receive more comments from the federal agencies on
the Endangered Species Act ramifications is set for March 29, 1993, and there will probably
be no action taken until after that time. Mr. Bill Balch of the Kern County Water Agency
had some comments regarding the impact of this Decision on ID4. Mr. Balch said that
Berrenda Mesa Water District, had by formal board resolution, decided to sell part of their
water. The City, County as well as the Agency have a very extreme interest in keeping
water in the county, and with some coordination this might be accomplished in an
economical way. Boardmember Brunni asked Mr. Stovall what the City could do to help
in this effort. Mr. Stovall felt at this time another letter might be appropriate to respond
to the changes they have suggested and said he would be glad to work with City staff to help
in this effort. Mr. Dow suggested that City staff could work with the Kern County Water
Agency on drafting another letter opposing D-1630 if necessary. A motion was made by
Boardmember Brunni that this be done. Motion carried.
Boardmember Salvaggio requested that items 5 and 6 be moved up on the agenda
since he would have to leave the meeting early.
Mr. Bogart brought before the Board the 1993-1994 Water Price and Sand Sale
Schedule for the Agricultural Water Division. The recommended rates are very similar to
previous years when there has been an above normal supply of water. The largest change
would be to the miscellaneous water price which has been at $26 during the drought. The
rate is now recommended at $20 per acre-foot which is competitive to the Basic Contracts
and water from the federal Friant-Kern project. Mr. Bogart requested that the Board
authorize the City Manger to execute the Executive Order setting these .rates which would
be effective April 1, 1993. A motion was made by Boardmember Brunni for approval of
these rates. Motion carried.
Mr. Core presented the 1993-1994 Domestic Water Enterprise rate schedule. The
proposed water rates will increase the existing rates by approximately 4%, which will raise
the cost of the average residential customer's bill about $0.70 per month. The increase is
to offset the rising costs to operate and maintain the Domestic Water System, due to the
effects of the drought increases in power use and costs, additional pump taxes and a
contractual increase in the Operations and Maintenance provider costs. Staff asks that
these rates become effective July 1, 1993. Boardmember Brunni expressed concern with this
rate increase, due to the fact that the City had one increase in domestic water rates over
the past 8 years, which was in 1992 and she felt the customers were being penalized for
conserving water. A motion was made by Boardmember Kane for approval of the rate
adjustment, to approve the Schedule of Rates and authorize the City Manager to execute
the Executive Order for the Domestic Water Enterprise rates to be effective July 1, 1993.
Boardmembers Salvaggio and Kane voted aye with a no from Boardmember Brunni.
Motion carried, two to one.
An update on the Interface Project to provide 2800 acre banked water to the City's
domestic water system was brought before the Board by Mr. Bogart. This project is being
done in four phases. Phase 1 was the drilling of the initial two wells in the 2800 acres;
Phase 2 was the 36" water transmission line which is in the ground; Phase 3 is the booster
pump station which will be built behind the Water Operations Building and is scheduled for
construction to begin this fall; Phase 4 would be the completion of the 8 to 10 million gallon
water tank which will be built in about a year to a year and a' half. When this project is
completed it will allow the City to recover its banked water and deliver it into the City
Domestic Water System, which is very important for the future considering D-1630 and the
future shortages of imported water. Boardmember Brunni had one comment and that was
she would like to have the people who are building homes near this tank know that it is
coming. Mr. Core stated that the City had gone through the conditional use permit process
which notified the surrounding landowners. It was suggested by Judy Skousen, Acting City
Attorney, that an informational letter be sent to Castle and Cooke putting them on notice
that this water tank is to be built.
A request from Don Castle of the Water Association for a contribution to the 1993
Water Awareness Campaign was presented by Mr. Core. Staff recommended that a total
contribution of $1,000 ($500 Ag Water and $500 Domestic Water) be included in the 1993-
1994 budget to be payable after July 1, 1993. Boardmember Kane made a motion to this
effect. Motion carried.
Mr. Bogart presented a request from NKWSD to assign its City Basic Contract water
to RRID in 1993. NKWSD has requested a one year transfer, City staff recommends that
this contract be split over a two year period which would'allow NKWSD to transfer half this
2
year and the other half next year. A motion was made by Boardmember Kane to approve
staff's recommendation. Motion carried.
The date and time of the next Water Board Meeting was set for either Monday,
April 19, 1993 or Tuesday, April 20, 1993 at 5:15P.M., pending approval of the Water Board
Chairman, Mark Salvaggio.
A motion to adjourn was made by Boardmember Kane at 6:10P.M.
Mark Salvaggio, Chair
City of Bakersfield Water Board
Sharon Robison, Secretary
City of Bakersfield Water Board
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
DOMESTIC ~ATER DIVISION
SERVICE AREA i~°
Publication of the Kern County Water Agency April 1993
~ chinook and the Delta smelt, supply has finally arrived. On March 19
D 1630 Sh 1d ~, officials told the SWRCB both State and Federal projects received
- (~ V(~ last week that these limitations could, a boost. DWR announced an increase
result in additional diversions of one to from 70 percent to 85 percent in SWP
~overnor Asks ~CB to Stop three million ag (MAF) of water for approved deliveries. The increase is the
Work On D-1650 wildlife purposes, and away from urban fifth siace an initial projection cf 10
and agriculture water uses. percent deliveries in December, 1992.
According to the Department of Under the 8:5 percent allocation the
Water Resources (DWR), one to three Kern County Water Agency will receive
MAF represents more than half of CVP a total of 980,390 acre-feet (af), with
The April 1 request by the Governor and SWP water deliveries in a chT year. 879,240 ag for agricultural use and
to the State Water Resources 'It is the Endangered Species Act 101,150 ag for municipal and industrial
Control Board (SWRCB) to stop work which permits the federal government to use.
on the interim standards for the Delta
preempt the State in the allocation of On the federal side, the Bureau of
was a welcome relief to Kern County water resources,' said Wilson. 'The Reclamation (Bureau) announced on
and other areas of the state. Citing a U.S. SUPreme Court's interpretation of March 19 that CVP supplies available
threat of federal action which would the Act makes clear that it is a blunt from the Delta will increase from 2:5
undermine efforts by the SWRCB to set instrument that can't be used to achieve percent to 40 percent of contract
interim standards for protection of the a judicious balancing of the needs of entitlement. Under the 40 percent
Delta, Governor Pete Wilson asked endangered species and of California's allocation, Kern County CVP
board members to stop work on those endangered economy.' contractors will be receiving :51,320 ag.
interim standards and instead focus their Wilson made clear that he hopes this There was also good news for CVP
efforts toward the creation of permanent federal preemption is not permanent, supplies from the Friant-Kern which
standards for long-term protection of 'It is my strong intention to return were increased to 100 percent of annual
the delta, control of California's water allocation Class I and Class 2 entitlements on
'The federal government has rn_ude process to the State and to your Board, ' March :5. Thus the total supply will
completion of my request to you for he said in his letter to Caffery. 'I equal more than 2.2 million al, or 147 '
interim standards all but impossible,' believe thc wisest course is for the percent of the Friant Division's pre-
Wilson said in a letter to acting board Board to turn now to the effort of drought delivery average of 1.:5 million
Chairman John Caffery. 'There exists a .establishing permanent standards for al. The Class 2 deliveries are the first
threat of federal action that will so protection of the Delta.' in seven years. The new allocations will
undermine essential elements of our Kern County applauds the bring Kern County CVP contractors
comprehensive water policy as to make Governor's intervention and is hopeful approximately 678,000 ag from the
impossible its implementation. ~ i this will serve as a catalyst toward Friant-Kern system.
Wilson had originally asked the finding both an equitable and balanced Other surface .water supplies include
SWRCB to promulgate interim long-term water solution for the the Kern River which (as of the April 1
standards in order to provide additional
protection for fisheries prior to adoption i Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta. forecast for the 1992-93 water year) is
117 of normal percent which amounts to
of a permanent solution recommended 8:52,930 ag.
by the Bay-Delta Oversight Council Even though local water supplies
(1BDOC). That request becameWater Supply
! immaterial when federal fisheries the curren~WP and CVP supplies
agencies, acting under the Endangered : from the Delta are being impacted by
Species Act (ESA), set' limits on the
operations of the Central Valley Project i endangered species pum,ning
(CVP) and the State Water Project I restrictions. With the above-normal
Kern County's long hoped for snowpack, Kern County should be
(SWP) in order to protect the winter-nm i return to near normal water receiving its full SWP entiflemeat.