Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/18/96 WATER BOARD Mark Salvaggio, Chair Randy Rowles, Vice-Chair Patricia M. Smith CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER BOARD MEETING-' WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 - 4:30pm Water Resources Building Conference Room 1000 Buena Vista Road, Bakersfield, CA AGENDA 1). CALL MEETING TO ORDER. 2). ROLL CALL 3). APPROVE MINUTES OF SPECIAL WATER BOARD MEETING HELD JULY 30, 1996. 4). PUBLIC STATEMENTS. 5). CORRESPONDENCE. A. COMMUNICATION FROM KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY REGARDING "PRINCIPLES TO GUIDE THE CAL-FED PROCESS". 6). DEFERRED BUSINESS A. KERN RIVER OPERATIONS UPDATE. B. "2800 ACRES" RECHARGE FACILITY 1995 HYDROGRAPHIC REPORT. 7). NEW BUSINESS A. RENEWAL OF STORM DRAIN AGREEMENTS WITH KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF KERN TO ALLOW FOR CONTINUED DISPOSAL OF URBAN STORM DRAINAGE WATERS INTO KERN ISLAND AND STINE CANALS. 8). CLOSED SESSION A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) IN THE CASE OF KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT vs. NORTH KERN WATER STORAGE DISTRICT; CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; KERN ISLAND WATER COMPANY - TULARE SUPERIOR COURT CASE FIa. 96-172919. 9). CLOSED SESSION ACTION. G£NE BOGA.¥, urces Managsr POSTED: September 13, 1996 S:WBSE1896 1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD * BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311 · (805) 326-3715 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Held Tuesday, July 30, 1996, Water Resources Conference Room, 1000 Buena Vista Road, Bakersfield, CA 93311. 1. The meeting was called to order by Boardmember Salvaggio at 4:35pm. 2. Present: Mark Salvaggio, Chair Patricia M. Smith Randy Rowies (seated at 5:01pm) 3. Boardmember Salvaggio adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 4:36pm. Boardmember Rowles was absent from the Closed Session portion of the meeting. The meeting reconvened from Closed Session at 5:00pm, with Boardmember Rowles seated at 5:01pm. 4. The Closed Session action was an Ad Hoc Committee was selected to meet with representatives of North Kern WSD and Kern Delta WD. This meeting will take place immediately following the Special Water Board meeting. The Committee would consist of Boardmember Smith and Salvaggio for negotiation purposes. Scheduling conflicts will not allow Boardmember Smith to be available to attend the Ad Hoc Committee meeting. 5. Boardmember Smith made a motion to approve the minutes of the Water Board Meeting held May 15, 1996. Motion carried. 6. There were no Public Statements. 7. Correspondence. 7A. A letter was received from the Water Association of Kern County requesting a contribution of $750 to support the 1996 Water Awareness Campaign. The campaign would consist of short informative water conservation announcements shown on cable networks and Channel 29 running through September, 1996. City Attorney Skousen asked if the money was going to be used for advertisements to sway the election on the November ballot regarding a water bond measure. After some discussion it was recommended that the contribution be made with the stipulation that it could not be used to promote any current or upcoming bond issue. A motion to this effect was made by Boardmember Smith. Motion carried. 8. Deferred Business SA. Mr. Hauptman presented the Kern River operations update for Board information. The peak storage occurred on June 1 lth at 546,149 acre feet, with the latest April-July estimate at 128% of normal. The 2800 Acre groundwater monitoring wells have risen between 50 and 90 feet since last year due to intensive spreading activities in and around the Kern River channel. It is anticipated that groundwater spreading operations will continue through the end of the year. ' 8B. Mr. Core gave some background information regarding the Metropolitan Bakersfield Water Study and introduced Mr. Harry Starkey, Manager of Bookman-Edmondston Engineering, the engineering firm selected for this project to give a brief update. The work on the project started May 6, 1996, with an initial kick-off meeting of the participants. A questionnaire has been completed by the eight participants for their ideas and suggestions. Several workshops will be scheduled to monitor progress and guide the program which is designed to meet the areas future growth. 8C. Mr. Core gave an update on the Improvement District No. 4 of the Kern County Water Agency overhead/administrative cost allocation procedure. An independent auditor was hired to review costs charged to ID4 by the KCWA. These charges are eventually passed on to the purveyors and water users in Bakersfield. A formula was arrived at to resolve this issue, would allow the Agency to spread their administrative costs among the other groups the Agency oversees. The costs have not been adjusted for fiscal years 1994-95 and 1995-96 and the urban purveyors and water users are seeking repayment of these costs. An offer has been made by KCWA in the form of 10,000 to 12,000 acre-feet of underground banked water delivered through the Kern Water Bank. The ID4 Advisory Group have countered that the water be delivered into the district. There has been no response to the counter offer as of this date. Information only, no action required or taken by the Board. 8D. Mr. Core presented for Board consideration, a rescission of covenant offer for water supply [."~' to a proposed urban development located near 7th Standard Road and Snow Road. A .: request was received from Porter-Robertson Engineering, representing the landowners, for an urban water supply. The City Water Board approved the request, contingent upon the recording of a covenant by the landowners, binding the properties to annex into the City. Subsequently, the City Manager notified the landowner representative of the annexation requirement and allowed a two week period in order for compliance. The annexation application was never received. Staff recommends rescinding offer of municipal water supply for the properties and reject the acceptance of covenants relating to City municipal water supplies. A motion was made by Boardmember Rowles-to this effect. Motion carried. 9. New Business 9A. California Water Service Company has requested, by a letter dated July 25, 1996, that the City of Bakersfield provide a water supply for service to a proposed development, within the City limits in northeast Bakersfield. Mr. Morris Taylor, an engineer representing Olcese Water District addressed the Board and expressed concern over Cai-Water servicing this particular area and that the Board should carefully assess the water service proposals. Mr. Bogart, Water Resources Manager referred to a letter received from Mike Geddes of Califarming, Inc., indicating that Califarming had chosen Cai-Water to provide water service to their development in section 17 of T29S/R29E and that Cai-Water would need to contract with the City for a water supply. Califarming based their decision on analyses of proposals received from Cai-Water and Olcese to provide domestic water service to the development. Boardmember Rowles asked of the issue of an adequate water supply capacity to expand ; beyond Section 17. Mr. Bogart explained that the initial development phase would extend 2 a water line into the tract, in conjunction with on-site storage facilities to provide a back up system. As proposed by California Water Service Company, the future water mains serving the area will loop north and westerly to tie into the existing 18" water main located in Morning Drive. This system looping will also benefit future development and provide for the orderly growth of the area. Following Board discussion, staff recommended that a contract be entered into with California Water Service Company for a water supply to serve the development. Boardmember Salvaggio made a motion to recommend approval of agreement to City Council. Motion carried. 9B. Mr. Core presented the Kern County Water Agency's request for response to first right of refusal option to purchase state project water. As part of the re-negotiation of the state contract with the 31 water contractors, there are provisions to allow districts to sell their contract entitlement. The KCWA has a limitation of about 130,000 acre-feet of their 1,100,000 acre-foot entitlement that may be sold. Berrenda Mesa Water District is proposing to sell 25,000 acre-feet to the Mojave Water Agency (outside Kern County) at the price of $1,000 per acre-foot plus annual operations costs. There are provisions for the first right of refusal within the KCWA service area for this water. The City does not need this supply. Staff recommends the Board authorize staffto sign the rejection notice and return to KCWA prior to the August 19th deadline. Boardmember Rowles made a motion to this effect. Motion carried. 9C. A request for a contribution to the 1996 "Water Watchers Series" was brought to the Board by Mr. Core. This program is a series of 2 minute segments tied in with the weather reports to be aired on Channel "17". The focus this year is, "Where water comes from" and 'Xvater conservation." Since the Water Resources department can use this program for satisfying requirements of its "Domestic Water Management Plan" with the State of California, staff requests the Board to authorize a $1,000 contribution. Boardmember Salvaggio made a motion to this effect. Motion carried. 10. A motion to adjourn was made by Boardmember Rowles at 5:35pm. Motion carried. Mark Salvaggio, Chair City of Bakersfield Water Board Stiaror~ Robison, Secretary City of Bakersfield Water Board KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY MEMORANDUM TO: Distribution List (attached) FROM: Tom CI~ DATE: August 12, 1996 SUBJECT: Endorsement of Final "Principles to Guide the CALFED Process" As you know, the Agency has been participating in the development of the attached "Principles to Guide the CALFED Process" along with other water entities in the Central Valley, including the Friant Water Users Authority (FWUA). We have previously faxed you a draft copy of this Principles document (July 19, 1996). We appreciate the consu'uctive comments received on the clrafL as well as your tentative endorsement of the principles outlined in the draft document. Attached is a final version of the Principles document which was transmitted to CALFED, Governor Pete Wilson and Secretary Bruce Babbitt today. You will note that the attached letter of transmittal indicates that a complete list of all organizations supporting the documem will be compiled and provided by the close of summer. With that in mind, the Agency asks that you discuss the Principles document with your governing Boards. We hope that you support the principles outlined in the document, and will take action to endorse it. We ask that you respond by September 13, 1996 if you do not want your organization's name to appear on the list of supporting organizations to be transmitted at the close of summer. Thank you all for your support and assistance in putting this important document together. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or Lloyd Fryer of my stuff at 805/634-1400. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES TO GUIDE THE CALFED PROCESS Recommended by Sacramento Valley and San Joaquin Valle~y Water Users August 1, 1996 In June, 1994, a "Framework Agreement" between the State of California and the United States established CALFED, a consortium of five state and five federal agencies with responsibilities in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary and its tributaries (the "Bay- Delta System"). The Framework Agreement contained a pledge of cooperation among the Federal and State agencies and was also intended to foster coordination and communication among all interested parties. In May, 1995, the "CALFED Bay-Delta Program" was initiated to develop a comprehensive, long-term program for environmental protection of the Bay-Delta System and water supply and reliability for all water users. CALFED was charged with planning, selecting, and implementing this long-term solution. CALFED is currently engaged in its planning process and, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA'), proposes to select a limited number of alternatives for in-depth analysis, from which, by early to mid-1997, a preferred alternative will be selected. CALFED has requested that the public comment and provide recommendations on CALFED's proposed process and upon their preferred alternatives. Responsive to CALFED's request, a number of Central Valley water supply organizations (the "Central Valley Water Users") agreed to develop and provide to CALFED certain Guiding Principles (Part I) and a list of the most important project components which they believe should be evaluated in depth in CALFED's EIR/EIS (Part Il). It should be noted that this document was developed through a cooperative effort among numerous water entities from within the Central Valley. In addition, this document will be circulated in order to develop support from local governments and private interests from throughout the Valley. While agriculture is the Central Valley's primary industry, and is vital to its local economies, the Central Valley's population is currently more than six million people and the Valley is urbanizing at a rate which is among the highest in the nation. Thus, the Central Valley Water Users believe that it is in all of their interests to address the broader needs within the Central Valley, agricultural and urban. Therefore, we have developed a policy which addresses the need to resolve the general problems of the Bay-Delta System as a foundation for meeting the water supply, water quality, and environmental needs of all Californians, both urban and agricultural. PART I GUIDING PRINCIPLES The CALFED Bay-Delta Program must produce a long-term, balanced solution which: a. includes sufficient and reliable urban and agricultural water supplies consistent with local and regional needs and practices; b. provides for a comprehensive, scientifically based program of ecosystem improvements and protection; c. provides water quality levels which protect current users and uses, public health and safety, and allow for enhanced implementation of recycling and conjunctive use programs; d. reduces the vulnerability of Delta levee systems to failure from earthquake, floods, and similar natural disasters; e. includes a continued commitment from urban and agriculture water users to best management practices, as well as a commitment for best management practices for water used for environmental purposes; f. recognizes that the water users who rely on the Bay-Delta System do not all affect the system in the same manner or to the same extent; g. reaffirms California law and commits to the water fights priority system and the area of origin laws; h. is affordable, with beneficiaries paying according to benefits received; and i. includes a system of guarantees to insure that the CALFED Bay-Delta Program is implemented in a manner that is balanced and protects the reasonable needs of all interests. Water Supply Adequacy and Reliability 1. Improvements in water supply adequacy and reliability must be accomplished in a manner that reduces the current conflict between environmental resouw, e~ and water supply needs and is consistent with the goal of developing a balanced solution in the Bay-Delta. 2. Agriculture and urban water users have lost, due to a variety of independent factors, substantial quantities of water that were previously available from the Delta and its tributaries. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program should include improvements that will restore, to the maximum extent possible, those water supplies. The Program should also provide urban and agricultural water users additional water that is surplus to both the environmental needs of the Bay-Delta system and the needs of water users within the area of origin. At the option of urban and agricultural water users, this water will be used to develop dependable water supplies through implementation of measures outside the Delta. 3. The Central Valley Water Users do not expect the CALFED Bay-Delta Program to solve all of California's water supply problems or to meet all of California's urban and agricultural water supply needs. However, the Delta and streams tributary to the Delta are part of California's water supply system and the CALFED Bay-Delta Program must recognize the need for adequate and reliable urban and agricultural water supplies for users in all regions of the State that rely on water from the Delta and its tributaries. 4. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program must provide certainty that "a deal is a deal" and that, at a minimum, this program will protect water supply adequacy and reliability from future endangered species actions and other environmental restrictions imposed by State and Federal regulatory agencies. 5. Water supply adequacy, quality, and reliability are fundamental to California's sustained economic vitality. Ecosystem Improvement and Protection Pro_firms 1. Definitive answers are not presently available concerning the best means of improving ecosystem conditions in the Delta and its tributaries and the benefits of various proposed actions. Therefore, ecosystem programs should be developed and administered utilizing an adaptive management approach which allows for adjustments in the program as additional data are obtained. 2. Other State and Federal ecosystem improvement programs, such as CVPIA restoration efforts, the Category III program, and the Four Pumps Program, should be integrated with, and not duplicated by, the CALFED ecosystem efforts. 3. Water quality protection is an important component of an ecosystem improvement program. Agriculture will continue its efforts to reduce the water quality impacts of its operations and other dischargers should carry out similar efforts. 4. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program must acknowledge trade-offs to be made between competing species, and should design programs which assure that healthy populations of native species are favored over introduced species when conflicts arise. $. A proactive policy should be developed to preclude the introduction of foreign aquatic species as well as to provide measures to control or eliminate existing foreign species. 6. Actions should be included to reduce illegal fishing and to balance ocean harvest with the need for adequate spawner escapement. Water Quality 1. Increasingly numerous and stringent water quality standards demand that high quality waters be available to provide the best assurance that source waters can be successfully treated to meet these standards. The outcome of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program should provide high quality water for all uses. 2. Salinity of source waters must be managed to assure the continued and enhanced availability of recycling and conjunctive use opportunities. System Reliability/VulnerabiliW 1. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program should provide water users with certainty that their water supply needs can be met in the event of seismically induced levee failures. 2. A comprehensive and cost effective levee improvement and maintenance program should be included as part of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Best Management Practices 1. Agricultural Best Management Practices ('BMPs") considered by the CALFED Bay-Delta Program should be based on locally determined actiom and programs. To memorialize their existing programs and to measure the effectiveness of on- going improvements, agencies should develop and execute agricultural BMP plans using standardized evaluation methodologies that measure cost-effectiveness at the local level. 2. Urban BMPs considered by the CALFED Bay-Delta Program should be based on locally determined actions and support of the California Urban Water Conservation Council's efforts to upgrade the performance of urban agencies BMP implementation, improve measurement of BMPs, and develop additional BMPs. 3. An Environmental BMP program should be established as part of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. As part of this program State and Federal environmental agencies shall be required to establish procedures to measure the effectiveness of 4 and to upgrade BIVIPs to ensure that water dedicated to environmental purposes is being used in an efficient, scientifically justified manner. Water dedicated to the environment which is not being used efficiently should be redirected to offset other environmental, urban, and agricultural water supply requirements. In addition, BMP procedures must require that any additional environmental water requirements first be met from existing allocations of environmental water that do not meet BMP's. This would be done before any regulatory agencies reduce the water supply available to urban and agricultural water uses. 4. Water conserved in water supply deficient areas should continue to be used in such areas to offset existing shortages. 5. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program must recognize that fixed definitions of agricultural BMPs are not appropriate because of regional and local differences in crops grown, use of return flows by other users, and similar factors. BMPs should be locally developed to take into account such differences and must be affordable and structured to avoid environmental impacts on other resources, such as increased extractions from overdrafted groundwater basins. 6. Urban water providers should, in concert with wastewater producers, develop wastewater recycling programs which utilize a standardized evaluation methodology and which incorporates a cost-effectiveness analysis. 7. Land retirement is not an appropriate component of an agricultural BMP program. The loss of productive agricultural land resulting from the CALFED Bay-Delta Program would violate the solution principle of no redirected impacts, and thus should not be a part of any CAI~FED alternative. Indeed, the Central Valley Water Users believe that the CAI,FED Bay-Delta Program should result in the preservation of farmland and agricultural production which, in turn, may provide associated wildlife habitat. Costs, Financin~ and Schedulin~ 1. Funding for all elements of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program needs to be integrated and assured. This will include funding for the ecosystem program improvements, such as fish screens and fish passage projects on the Sacramento River and its tributaries. 2. Ecosystem improvement programs and water supply and water quality improvement projects need to be developed concurrently with no one element of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program getting ahead of the others. 3. Costs must be reasonable and affordable and beneficiaries must pay according to benefits received. Cost-benefit analyses of the proposed elements of the CAI,FED Bay-Delta Program should be carried out before they are finally approved. As benefits to the environment are broad public benefits, they should be funded accordingly. Therefore, the State and Federal governments must provide the funding to implement the environmental restoration components of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. 4. Payments by urban and agricultural water users must be based on (a) the actual quantities of additional water delivered due to the implementation of a CALFED Bay-Delta solution, and (b) the water quality benefits received. 5. Cost associated with improving Delta water quality to meet urban water quality requirements must be paid by those entities requesting such improvements and should not affect the cost or availability of water to other .users. 6. Entities that provide funding for programs benefitting the Bay-Delta System that are consistent with elements of the CALFED Program, such as CVPIA restoration or Category III projects, should receive credit toward any potential obligation for the long-term Bay-Delta solution. Guarantees 1. Through the CALFED Bay-Delta process, reaffh'm California law and commitment to the water rights priority system and the area of origin laws. 2. Facilities included as a part of the recommended CALFED Bay-Delta Program must be constructed and operated consistent with California's water right priority system, including the area of origin laws. 3. A system must be developed and included as part of the Bay-Delta Program to ensure that all major elements of the Program -- environmental improvement, water quality protection, and water supply improvements -- are implemented as adopted by CALFED. 4. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program must provide certainty that 'a deal is a deal' and that at a minimum, this program will protect water supply adequacy and reliability from future endangered species actions and other restrictions imposed by State and Federal regulatory agencies. PART II CENTRAL VALLEY WATER USER'S RECOMMENDATION ON SHORT-LIST CALFED ALTERNATIVES FOR EHUEIS EVALUATION Based upon the principles set forth in Part I, and the CALFED workshops and background materials, the Central Valley Water Users recommend that the alternatives selected for analysis in the CALFED Bay-Delta EIPUEIS be as follows: Basic Alterna~iv~ In addition to the no project alternative, three basic alternatives should constitute the short list: 1. No additional Delta transfer facilities. 2. A through-Delta Alternative. 3. A dual Delta transfer facility with a capacity to be determined through the EHUEIS process, based upon analysis of urban, environmental, and agricultural water quantity and quality needs. The conclusion that these alternatives should be selected for evaluation is not based on our position of what is an acceptable CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Rather, it is based on what NEPA and CEQA require to be technically analyzed in order to approve a final Delta program. The capacities of the dual Delta transfer facilities were intentionally omitted from the definition of the third alternative. The Central Valley Water Users recommend that the full range of technically feasible sizes for the isolated portion of the dual facilities be studied, with emphasis on the range from 5,000 cfs to 15,000 cfs. This alternative's ultimate size and configuration would be determined by studies that optimized and balanced benefits related to in- Delta water quality, export water quality, water supply improvements, and environmental resources. Until studies are run and the results are evaluated, it is too early to reduce CALFED's flexibility in choosing the proper size and configuration. Again, what is being dealt with here is the need to fully study this option. The Central Valley Water Users do not necessarily recommend any alternative at this time. Special Pro_re'ams The alternatives listed above focus on methods of carrying out water supply and water quality functions. That is because the Central Valley Water Users view the other major elements of the Delta solution to be special programs that are common to and would be a part of any alternative selected. The three special programs, which would replace the CALFED core actions and essential elements, would be: 1. A comprehensive ecosystem program. 2. Urban and agricultural BMPs and implementation of the recommended "Environmental BMPs. 3. A levee program.. Policies ami approaches related to the ecosystem, best management practices, and levee programs are set forth in Part I, above. The Central Valley Water Users recognize that the exact form each of these programs will ultimately assume will depend on which Delta conveyance alternative is selected. For example, an ecosystem program for an essentially no new Delta facilities alternative would likely look quite different from one associated with a dual transfer facility. CALFED should retain broad flexibility to appropriately structure these programs as part of the EIR/EIS process, constrained only by overriding principles such as those recommended in Part I. Storage In addition to these special programs, the EIR/EIS should analyze various storage projects as features of each alternative. These components would be of various types (surface or groundwater), at various locations (North and South of the Delta and in the Delta), and of various sizes. They should be added to and subtracted from the each of the alternatives so that their impacts on cost, flexibility, water supply, water quality, and environmental values can be studied. As an example, Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley storage will have significant water supply, water quality, and environmental benefits for Northern California and may potentially have additional water supply benefits to water users south of the Delta depending, in large part, upon the other components of the Delta solution. Each alternative should be analyzed with and without Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley storage (at various sizes and locations), resulting in an estimation of the benefits and the costs, who could be expected to pay for the benefits derived, and the comparative value of this storage alternative to other storage alternatives. Economic Analysis With respect to costs, the CEQA Guidelines specifically state that economic information may be included in an EIR or may be presented in whatever form the agency desires. The Central Valley Water Users recommend that all economic evaluations required to choose the preferred Delta program be included in the EIR/EIS. 246412.1 8 CiO' of Bakersfield % ,,, Water Resources September 13, IP~d KERN RIVER NATURAL FLOW, REGULATED FLOW, & ISABELLA RESERVOIR STORAGE 1995-1996 WATER YEAR ,oooo~ _ 6(oo,~o2~., 9500~ - --550,000 - (2603.91 Ft.) --500,000 - (2s9~.38 Ft.) 8000: - -450,000 Average - (;s~4.,2 r~.) C] Isabella Storage --400,000 ~ 6000: ~ I~. UJ -350,000 (/) - (2sa4~ R.) '-- n- Isabella Storage _ Q- 5000: -300,000 ill ).- (2578.s3 Ft.) LU U,, 000 (.) 4000 r~.) Natural Flow 3000 rr O 2500 1- 2000 ow~ 1000 Regulated fl Oct-95 Nov-95 Dec-95 Jan-96 Feb-96 Mar-96 Apr-96 May-96 Jun-96 Jul-96 Aug-96 Sep-96 ISABELLA RESERVOIR DALLY OPERATIONS REPORT (All readings are for date of report (FRIDAY) as of OOOl, except as noted.., cfs in italics) Date of Report: September 13, 1996 ISABELLA RESERVOIR 1 2580.76 Lake Elevation (ft.) 318977 Storage - 1990 Change 301 Inflow to Isabella 2 568075 Storage Capacity 56% % of Capacity 184963 Normal Storage 172% % of Normal Storage For this Date 3 8644 Average Lake Area (Acres) 7456 Inflow (Month) 28507 Outflow (Month) 4 254 North Fork Mean 253 North Fork @ 0700 Hours 908850 Accumulative Inflow (95-96 WY) 5 1187 Mean Outflow 538 Borel Canal 649 Main Dam Outlet 873173 Accum. Outflow (VVY) 6 117 Lake Evap. (cfs) 0.37 Inches Evap. for 24 Hours 3140 Lake Evap. (Month to Date) 7 0 Spillway Discharge for 24 Hours PRECIPITATION AND TEMPERATURE 8 0.00 Inches of Precipitation at Isabella for 24 Hours Normal for Isabella Precip. 9 13.18 Seasonal Precip. Isabella 10.18 this Date 129% % of Normal 10 0.00 Inches of Precipitation at Pascoe for 24 Hours Normal for Pascoe Precip. 11 39.00 Seasonal Precip. Pascoe 35.85 this Date 109% % of Normal 12 0.0 Upper Tyndall Creek 0.0 Pascoe 0.0 Wet Meadow 13 85 Isabella Maximum Temperature 14 57 Isabella Minimum Temperature 87 24 Hour Wind Movement (Miles) NATURAL RIVER FLOW 15 304 Natural Flow (cfs) 7761 Natural Flow (Month to Date) 599331 1996 April-July Runoff 16 311 Mean Flow 98% Natural Flow 243 Median Flow 125% Natural Flow For this Date in % of Mean For this Date in % of Median 17 1487 Max. on Record 81 Min. on Record 961565 Accum. Natural Flow (Water Year) For this Date For this Date KERN RIVER FACTS & FIGURES: On this date in 1990, the natural flow of the Kern River dropped to 81 cubic feet per second, Produced by City of Bakersfield a 97-year record Iow. Depleted by four consecutive dry years in the southern. Sierra's, the ~ Department of Water Resources the Kern River began falling below previous record minimum flows as of September 8, 1990, (805) 326-3715 and continued at or near record lows for the remainder of the year. ITEM 6).B. COMPLETED REPORT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT THE WATER BOARD MEETING. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER BOARD SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF STORM DRAIN AGREEMENTS WITH KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF KERN TO ALLOW FOR CONTINUED DISPOSAL OF URBAN STORM DRAINAGE WATERS INTO KERN ISLAND AND STINE CANALS (Street Drainage). Background: Since prior to 1970, Tenneco West, Inc., and subsequently the Kern Delta Water District, has maintained storm water discharge agreements with the County and the City for discharge and disposal into Kern Delta owned and operated canals. These agreements are a renewal of previous contracts that allow for disposal of storm drainage waters into the Kern Island and Stine Canals by the City and County. These agreements are patterned after the Eastside Canal Storm Drain Agreement that was executed in November, 1994 by the City and County. The term of these new agreements is for twenty years. The annual fee charged by Kern Delta will be $400.00 per outlet into both canal systems. The rates charged by Tenneco West, Inc. per comparable outlet in July, 1970 was $350.00. The City/County share of costs is based upon the portion of the total area lying within the respective jurisdictions draining into the transportation facility. There are currently 58 discharge points on the Kern Island Canal and 10 on the Stine Canal. The operations and maintenance fee received by Kern Delta is used for removal of silt, weed control, maintaining safe carrying capacity, operating storm drain weirs, eliminating trash and debris that accumulates from storm flows and the disposal of the storm water. Recommended Water Board Action: Staff requests Water Board recommend approval of Storm Drain Agreements (Kern Island Canal and Stine Canal) to City Council. o Kern Coun~ STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT (Kern Island Canal) THIS AGREEMENT is made ~ /~ , 1996, by and U between the COtB~TY OF KERN, a body politic and a political subdivision of the State of California (herein called "County"), the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a chartered city and a body politic of the State of California lying within the County of Kern (herein called 'City"), and KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT, a California water district (herein called "Kern Delta"), N X TNES S K TH: WHEREAS, Kern Delta is the owner and operator of the Kern Island Canal system designed and used for the purpose of transporting water for irrigation from Kern River to irrigators south of the City and within the County; and · . WHEREAS, certain portions of the City and the County lie to the east and west of portions of said canal system, wherein the terrain naturally slopes towards the Kern Island Canal system (which said portions shall be referred to as the "drainage area"); and WHEREAS, disposal of storm drainage waters from portions of the Cit~ and County referred to herein as the drainage area is needed; and WHEREAS, City and County have insufficient facilities for the disposition of said storm drainage waters collecting in said drainage area, and desire to obtain means to dispose of the same in some economical and feasible manner; and WHEREAS, City, County and Kern Delta, entered into previous agreements for the limited use of the Kern Island Canal System for the purpose of disposing of storm drainage waters from the drainage area through certain drain inlets listed in the agreements; and WHEREAS, said agreements provided for storm drainage waters to primarily be collected, controlled and disposed of through that portion of the Kern Island Canal System running through portions of the populated, incorporated areas of the City, and the County, hereinafter referred to as the "transportation facility'; and WHEREAS, City and County now need to provide for continued storm drainage flow within the drainage area; and WHEREAS, Kern Delta has agreed to permit the continuation of storm drainage flow in and through the transportation facility, to the extent that the same does not interfere with, or prevent, the simultaneous transportation of irrigation waters through said Kern Island Canal system, for the term, and in the manner, more particularly hereinafter provided in this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing herein and in consideration of the promises and the agreements of the respective parties herein contained, City, County and Kern Delta agree as follows: 2 1. Construction of Facilities= 1.1 Existing facilities authorized by this and prior agreements are set forth in Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The construction of new facilities in addition to those described in Exhibit 'A' is not permitted. City and County acknowledge the limited capacity of said canal to accept, transport and dispose of the storm and drainage waters authorized to be discharged hereunder. Accordingly, the right of City and County to discharge such storm and drainage water into said canal shall be limited to those discharges described in said Exhibit 'A". However, should City or County propose to make alterations to the drain inlets described in Exhibit "A", City and County, at their sole cost and expense, shall provide design, construction and inspection of said alterations. No additional drain inlets, nor alterations to existing drain inlets which increase the capacity thereof, shall be permitted without the prior authorization and written approval of Kern Delta. 1.2 Assuming and following written consent and approval of Kern Delta, City and County may proceed to make said alterations in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to complete the same within a reasonable time thereafter. City and County shall cause the alterations to the transportation facility to be made in a manner that will not interfere with or prevent the scheduled or needed transportation of irrigation water through said transportation facility and the Kern Island Canal System. 1.3 City and County agree to pay the total cost of 3 design, construction and inspection of said alterations, including legal, engineering and personnel expenses reasonably incurred by Kern Delta in connection therewith. The proportioning of such costs between City and County shall be as agreed between City and County. 1.4 As, when and if facilities are altered, the Exhibit "A" to this agreement shall be amended to reflect such approved alteration. Each amendment to Exhibit "A" shall be separately dated and executed by authorized representatives of the parties to this agreement. 2. Use o~ Transportation Facility: 2.1 During the continuance of this agreement, City and County may discharge storm drainage waters into the transportation facility, but only from the storm drain inlets listed and described in Exhibit 2.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the capacity of the transportation facility, as it now exists, to transport storm drainage waters, in addition to irrigation waters, is limited, and that said transportation facility may not be able to handle all of the storm water from the drainage area. When it appears that the combination of storm drainage waters and irrigation flows .will exceed the capacity of the transportation facility or the Kern Island Canal system, all parties agree to use their best efforts, in cooperation with one another, to reduce the rate of flow entering the transportation facility or the Kern Island Canal system. 4 3. Naintenance of the Transportation Facility1 3.1 Except as specifically otherwise provided in this agreement, the performance and control of all maintenance and operation of the Kern Island Canal system and the transportation facility shall be under the exclusive direction of Kern Delta. 3.2 Kern Delta may require City and County to perform major maintenance of the transportation facility and the storm ddain facilities, including inlets and control structures described in Exhibit "A" that is attributable to storm drainage. City and County shall each pay its representative portion of the maintenance required under this paragraph 3.2 based upon its respective percentage of the storm drainage flow to be discharged into the transportation facility. The percentages shall be determined by a pr~ rata portion of the total payment based on the portion of the totpl area lying within their respective jurisdictions draining into the transportation facility. Kern Delta shall notify the City and County of any required major maintenance of the transportation facility or the storm drain facilities. Thereupon each party shall appoint a duly authorized representative, who shall meet with the others as a committee, to determine the nature, amount, and type of maintenance activity to be performed on the transportation facility and the storm drain facilities, and to make cost estimates thereof, and to report their findings to the parties to this agreement. The decision of the majority of said representatives shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless a party objects to said report and serves written notice on the other parties within ten (10) days 5 after receipt of the same, in which latter event the nature, amount, and type of maintenance work, as well as the cost thereof, shall be subject to a further negotiation of the parties. In the event no agreement is reached, any party may perform maintenance work at its expense and seek contribution from the other parties in an action at law. 3.3 Without advance agreement therefor, work of an emergency nature on said transportation facility and the storm drain facilities described in Exhibit "A", which Kern Delta deems necessary to prevent imminent damage to the transportation facility or the Kern Island Canal system, may be performed by Kern Delta and the cost thereof added to the next payment due Kern Delta from City and County; provided, however, that any emergency work performed on any one occasion shall not continue for a period in excess of 48 hours without written approval of the City and County, acting through their respective Storm Drain Contact Person appointed pursuant to this agreement. 4. Compensation: 4.1 As consideration for the use of the transportation facility for disposing of storm drainage water and for Kern Delta performing certain operational duties in connection with the disposition of storm drainage waters through and from said transportation facility, payment shall be made to Kern Delta of the sums, at the times, and in the manner hereinafter provided. 4.2 City and County agree to pay the lump sum of $23,200 per annum for the first five (5) years of the term of this 6 agreement for their respective shares of the following items (see paragraph 4.3 infra for payments to be made beyond the initial five (5) years of the term of this agreement). Said amount is based on a $400 per outlet charge for the 58 existing outlets in the transportation facility. It is understood and agreed that City shall pay 65% ($15,080) of the annual fee and County shall pay the remaining 35% ($8,120) of the annual fee. Said split will be used to determine amounts owing to Kern Delta for the years 1995 and 1996. The split for 1997 and future years is to be negotiated between City and County and shall be applied retroactively. Said annual payment shall be due and payable on January 1st of each and every year (commencing with a payment retroactive to January 1, 1995) and shall constitute payment for said calendar year: 4.2.1 Removal of all future alluvial deposits and berms in the Kern Island Canal to obtain maximum storm drainage carrying capacity. 4.2.2 Building up of Canal banks, where necessary, to provide adequate storm drainage carrying capacity. 4.2.3 Maintenance of storm drain weirs. 4.2.4 All operations performed in regulating the Kern Island Canal System to dispose of actual storm drainage flow or any regulation performed in anticipation of storm drainage flow. 4.2.5 Submergent and emergent weed control, removal of debris, and fence repair on the transportation facility. 4.3 The parties to the agreement shall review and adjust the lump sum payment as appropriate and agreed upon in paragraph 7 4.2 supra. Said review shall occur at five (5) year intervals commencing July 1, 1999, with any adjustments to the yearly lump sum payment to commence January 1, 2000. Every five (5) years thereafter, review and adjustment shall occur in a like manner during the term of this agreement. 4.4 City and County shall pay to Kern Delta two-thirds of all of the costs incurred by Kern Delta for all structural improvements to existing canal structures which may become necessary to maintain storm drainage flow capacity or improve storm drainage operations, storm drainage maintenance, or storm drainage capacity. City and County shall each pay its representative portion of the costs incurred under this paragraph 4.4 based upon its respective percentage of the storm drainage flow to be discharged into the transportation facility. The percentages shall be determined by a pro rata portion of the total payment based on the portion of the total area lying within their respective jurisdictions draining into the transportation facility. Except in the case of an emergency, Kern Delta will endeavor to give City and County one year notice before performing structural improvements. 4.5 City and County shall pay to Kern Delta all of the cOsts, if any, incurred by Kern Delta for maintenance of storm drain inlets, storm drain outlets, or any structures which function for storm drainage purposes. 4.6 Ail costs incurred on behalf of City and County by Kern Delta shall be determined by Kern Delta's established accounting procedures. 4.7 City and County shall be jointly and severally obligated to pay Kern Delta all sums which may become owing to Kern Delta under this agreement. Should City and County agree to apportion said sums, Kern D~lta will bill upon the agreed basis. All costs incurred by or billed to City will be paid to Kern Delta through quarterly credits on the established joint facilities clearing accounts unless and until alternate arrangements are made between City and Kern Delta. City and County shall pay to Kern Delta the lump sum set forth in paragraph 4.2 of this agreement on or before July 15 of each fiscal year this agreement remains in ~ffect (or such pro rata share thereof as is appropriate for any partial fiscal year that this agreement remains in effect). City and County shall pay Kern Delta any other sums owing to Kern Delta within sixty (60) days after billing therefor. 4.8 In-lieu of a portion of City's or County's required annual payment under paragraph 4.2 supra, City or County may install or have installed certain improvements such as headwalls, drive approaches, and sidewalks. The City's improvements shall be at locations within the City limits along the Kern Island Canal. Similarly the County's improvements shall be at locations within the County's boundaries along the Kern Island Canal. The improvements and the locations for the improvements shall be at the mutual agreement of City or County and Kern Delta. Said improvements undertaken by City or County in-lieu of City's or County's payment shall not exceed one-half of the required annual payment under paragraph 4.2 supra. For purposes of calculating the 9 set-off under this paragraph 4.8, Kern Delta will allow one-half of the total cost of said approved improvement to be deducted from the payment due to Kern Delta from City or County. (i.e. if cost of improvement is $10,000.00, then City or County would be entitled to a $5,000.00 set-off for the improvement. It is understood that nothing in this paragraph 4.8 or this agreement obligates Kern Delta to agree to any improvements proposed by City or County and that without Kern Delta's consent to said improvements, City or County shall be required to make the full payment required under paragraph 4.2. 5. Ownership and Use of Storm Drainage Water: 5.1 For purposes of this agreement, "storm drainage water" refers to all waters delivered into the transportation facility through the drain inlets described in Exhibit "A". 5.2 Ail storm drainage water delivered into the transportation facility or the Kern Island Canal system shall be and become the property of Kern Delta, and may be used or disposed of by any lawful manner including, without limitation, by delivery to landowners, by percolation to underground storage, by permitting the same to flow down the Kern Island Canal, or any combination thereof. Water Quality and Monitoring: 6.1 City and County have each adopted a Stormwater Ordinance in compliance with their joint National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit Application. These ordinances are applicable to the stormwater 10 systems served by the storm drain inlets to the transportation facility. 6.2 'City and County Stormwater Ordinances require compliance with the strictest of any applicable Federal or State standards or regulations covering the discharge of stormwater or surface water. 6.3 City and County have instituted a monitoring program to determine the concentration of selected constituents in the discharges measured at representative sites in the City and County, in conformance with the NPDES permit application. Results of the monitoring program will be made available to Kern Delta when it is submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for their review. This is to assist Kern Delta in an effort to establish a background profile of the selected constituents included within the water discharged into the transportation facility by the City and County. 6.4 In addition to the foregoing, and without limiting the same, City and County shall not discharge, and shall not permit others to discharge, into the storm drains or into the transportation facility or said Kern Island Canal system, any sewage, debris, industrial waste waters, waters contaminated with oil, or other substances, which would render the water unfit for irrigation or other like purposes, or tend to or cause damage to crops from use thereof, or tend to or cause damage to the canal facilities. 6.5 In using the transportation facility pursuant to 11 this agreement, City and County shall comply with all present and future discharge requirements imposed by laws, rules or regulations of the State of California or the United States. 7. Indemnity and Insurance: 7.1 City and County shall save, protect, and hold harmless Kern Delta of and from all claims, suits, demands and liabilities whatever to any person or persons or corporations, by reason of bodily injuries, deaths, and by reason of damage to, or destruction of, any property resulting in whole or in part from the exercise of the right of City and County hereunder and the discharge of storm drainage water into and the disposition of storm drainage water through the transportation facility or the Kern Island Canal system. 7.2 City and County shall, at their own expense, carry insurance to protect Kern Delta of and from any and all such claims and the indemnity agreement hereinabove set forth, by obtaining public liability insurance with liability limits of not less than $2,000,000.00 for the injury or death of any one person in any one accident, and $2,000,000.00 for the injury or death of more than one person in any one accident, and property damage insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00, all such insurance to be carried with insurance companies satisfactory to Kern Delta. Regardless of the above, City and County may self-insure any or all of the insurance requirements hereof. 7.3 Except when self-insured, City and County shall, upon demand, procure and cause to be furnished to Kern Delta, a 12 certificate or certificates from said insurance companies, stating that said insurance is in full..force and effect, that the premiums thereon have been paid, that the insurance companies will give Kern Delta at least thirty (30) days' prior written notice of any termination or cancellation of the same, and of any modification of the terms of such insurance. When self-insured, City and County shall, upon demand, provide Kern Delta written acknowledgement thereof. 8. Term and Termination: 8.1 Unless terminated in a manner hereinafter provided, this agreement shall be for a term of twenty (20) years, commencing January 1, 1995. Any of the parties hereto may terminate this agreement subsequent to said twenty-year period by written notice given at least ninety (90) days before the end of each year. 8.2 Kern Delta may terminate this agreement by giving sixty (60) days' written notice to the other parties hereto, if City and County, or either of them, default in making the payments required of them, or if they, or either of them, otherwise default in the performance of their agreements herein contained, and fail to remedy said defaults within sixty (60) days after written notice to do so. 8.3 Upon any termination of this agreement, City and County shall, if requested to do so by Kern Delta, remove, or pay to Kern Delta the cost of removing, all storm drainage facilities from the canal. Removal and restoration shall be completed to the reasonable satisfaction of Kern Delta. 13 9. Miscellaneous: 9.1 This document represents the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This agreement replaces any and all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, whether written or oral, without limitation. 9.2 Kern Delta may assign all of its rights and obligations to any public body or private corporation succeeding to the ownership and operation of the Kern Island Canal system, which assignee shall agree to perform the obligations of Kern Delta under this agreement and, in the event of such assignment, Kern Delta shall be relieved of all further obligation hereunder. City and County, or either of them, may in like manner assign their rights and obligations in this agreement to any duly organized public body or district of the State of California which is authorized to and agrees to pay and to perform City's and County's obligations hereunder, and thereafter City and County shall be relieved of all further obligations hereunder. 9.3 The parties to this agreement shall appoint and designate a person on their respective staffs who shall be identified as the "Storm Drain Contact Person." This person shall be available to all other parties for information and expression of concerns regarding maintenance, increasing storm drainage discharges and capacity, compliance with quality requirements, monitoring, and any other matter relating to this agreement. The object of this provision is to provide a definite and easily 14 instituted method of communication between all the parties to this agreement with the assurance that the individual named as the Storm Drain Contact Persou will hav® sufficient authority to and will respond by action to all concerns expressed to him or her by the other parties. 9.4 Any notice or demand by any party to the others in connection with this agreement shall be deemed to be fully given or" made when written and deposited in a sealed envelope in the United States Mail, registered and postage prepaid and addressed as follows: To: County of Kern Engineering & Survey Services Department 2700 "M" Street, Suite 570 Bakersfield, California 93301 To: City of Bakersfield Water Resources Department 1000 Buena Vista Road Bakersfield, California 93311 To: Kern Delta Water District 501 Taft Highway Bakersfield, California 93307 Any party may change its address by giving the other parties written notice of its new address as herein provided. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year above written. APPROVED AS TO FORM COUNTY OF KERN Office of County CounselKern County ~__/~ By:~_~.~ ~. ~~._~ By: Chairman, Board of ~ Supervisors 15 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Engineering and Survey Services Departn~t 3~ W~lli~m A. ~ilbanks, P.E., '- ' Director APPROVED AS TO FORM CXT! OF BAKEP~SFXELD Office of City Attorney By: By: Mayor APPROVED AS TO CONTENT COUNTERSIGNED: City of Bakersfield Water Resources Director By: Florn Core Finance Director APPROVED AS TO FORM KERN DELTA WATER DXSTRXCT McMurtrey & Hartsock By: By: President and by:. Secretary \UP51 \$TOP, H. AGHT\ 16 DISCHARGED ~ ~ TYPE ~ EBQM KERN ISLAND 34th N. East 14' Concrete Good City 34th N. West 6' Plastic Good City 34th S. West 6' Steel Fair City 30th N. East Bank 6' Steel Good City 30th St. 10' SE 8' Steel Good City 30th St. 120' SE 8' Steel Good City West Niles S. Side 12' City (Monterey Street) 100 yds. N. Golden 12' CMP Good City State Bulk Head 100 yds. N. Golden 24' CMP Good City State Golden State Hwy. 12' Plastic Good City 25' SE 21st. S. Side 8' Submerged Fair City 21st. N. Side 8' Submerged Fair City 21st 330' NE 6' Plastic Good City 21st. 170' NE 6' '* Plastic Good City Central Park ~ Bridge 4' Concrete Good City Central Park @ Bridge 2' Plastic Good City Alley between 18th 8' CMP Good City and 19th W. Bank 19th 130' NE 8' Plastic Good City 16th S. West 12" Concrete Good City 16th S. East 18" Concrete Good City Exhibit 'A ' Page 1 DISCHARGED ~ S~ZE TYPE ~ FROM KERN ISLAND 16th N. West 18" Concrete Good City 16th N. East 12" Concrete Good City Railroad above 13th St. 8" Steel Fair City 13th East Bank 12" CMP Fair City 13th S. Side 12" CMP Fair City West Bank 13th N. Side 12" CMP Fair City West Bank Calif. Ave. N. East 8" CMP Good City Calif. Ave. S. East 6" Steel Good City lOth N. East 8" Steel Fair City 7th N. East 6" Steel Fair City Vernal PI. S. West 6" Steel Good City Vernal PI. S. West 12" Steel Good City Vernal PI. S. West 30" Concrete Good City Terrace Way S. East 24" Concrete Good City (under bridge) Terrace Way S, East 8" Steel Good City Terrace Way N. East 12" Concrete Fair City Chester Ave. N. East 12" Steel Good City Chester Ave. N. East 23" CMP Good City Belle Terrace S. West 30" CMP Good City Belle Terrace N. West 18" Concrete Good County Belle Terrace S. East 18" CMP Good City Exhibit 'A" Page 2 DISCHARGED ~ S~ZE TYPE C_O~iD].~Q~ FROM KERN ISLAND La France Center of 24' Concrete Good City Bridge (E. Wall) La France E. Bank 18" Steel Good City N. Side La France W. Bank 15" Concrete Good County S. Side Mint Street 8" Steel Good County Wilson E. Bank/S. Side 12' CMP Good City Wilson E. Bank/N. Side 12" CMP Good City 300 yds. S. Planz 30" CMP Good City. E. Bank Fairview 4" Steel City CENTRAL Belle Terrace N. East 16" CMP Bad City Belle Terrace S, East 16" CMP Good City Terrace Way S, East 6" Steel Bad City Cantleberry Ln, 18" CiW K.C, Fairgrounds 24" Steel Good County Parking Lot Southgate W, Headwall 16" Steel Good County EAST BRANCH P. Street S. West 10" Steel Good City 200 ft. S. Terrace Way 6" Steel Good City Belle Terrace approx. 15" Concrete Good County 200 ft. west of R.R. tract H:\WI:~OC~\g6\KERNIS LA .WPO Exhibit 'A ' Page 3 STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT (Stine CanaX) THIS AGREEMENT is made , 1996, by and between the COUNTY OF KERN, a body politic and a political subdivision of the State of California (herein called "County'), the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a chartered city in the State of California, County of Kern (herein called 'City'), and KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT, a California water district (herein called 'Kern Delta"), W I TN E S S H T H: WHEREAS, Kern Delta is the owner and operator of the Stine Canal system designed and used for the purpose of transporting water for irrigation from Kern River to irrigators south of the City and within the County; and WHEREAS, certain portions of the City and the County generally lie to the east and west of portions of said canal system, wherein the terrain naturally slopes towards the Stine Canal system (which said portions shall be referred to as the "drainage area"); and WHEREAS, disposal of storm 'drainage waters from portions of the City and County referred to herein as the drainage area is needed; and WHEREAS, City and County have insufficient facilities for the disposition of said storm drainage waters collecting in said drainage area, and desire to obtain means to dispose of the same in some economical and feasible manner; and WHEREAS, City, County and Kern Delta, entered into previous agreements for the limited use of the Stine Canal System for the purpose of disposing of storm drainage waters from the drainage area through certain drain inlets listed in the agreements; and WHEREAS, said agreements provided for storm drainage waters to primarily be collected, controlled and disposed of through that portion of the Stine Canal System running through portions of the populated, incorporated areas of the City, and the County, hereinafter referred to as the "transportation facility"; and WHEREAS, City and County now need to provide for continued storm drainage flow within the drainage area; and WHEREAS, Kern Delta has agreed to permit the continuation of storm drainage flow in and through the transportation facility, to the extent that the same does not interfere with, or prevent, the simultaneous transportation of irrigation waters through said Stine Canal system, for the term, and in the manner, more particularly hereinafter provided in this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein and in consideration of the promises and the agreements of the respective parties herein contained, City, County and Kern Delta agree as follows: Construction o~ 1.1 Existing facilities authorized by this and prior agreements are set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The construction of new facilities in addition to those described in Exhibit "A" is not permitted. City and County acknowledge the limited capacity of said canal to accept, transport and dispose of the storm and drainage waters authorized' to be discharged hereunder. Accordingly, the right of City and County to discharge such storm and drainage water into said canal shall be limited to those discharges described in said Exhibit "A". However, should City or County propose to make alterations to the drain inlets described in Exhibit "A", City and County, at their sole cost and expense, shall provide design, construction and inspection of said alterations. No additional drain inlets, nor alterations to existing drain inlets which increase the capacity thereof, shall be permitted without the prior authorization and written approval of Kern Delta. 1.2 Assuming and following written consent and approval of Kern Delta, City and County may proceed to make said alterations in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to complete the same within a reasonable time thereafter. City and County shall cause the alterations to the transportation facility to be made in a manner that will not interfere with or prevent the scheduled or needed transportation of irrigation water through said transportation facility and the Stine Canal System. 1.3 City and County agree to pay the total cost of design, construction and inspection of said alterations, including legal, engineering and personnel expenses reasonably incurred by Kern Delta in connection therewith. The proportioning of such costs between City and County shall be as agreed between City and County. 1.4 As, when and if facilities are altered, the Exhibit "A" to this agreement shall be amended to reflect such approved alteration. Each amendment to Exhibit "A" shall be separately dated and executed by authorized representatives of the parties to this agreement. 2. Use of Transportation Facility: 2.1 During the continuance of this agreement, City and County may discharge storm drainage waters into the transportation facility, but only from the storm drain inlets listed and described in Exhibit "A". 2.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the capacity of the transportation facility, as it now exists, to transport storm drainage waters, in addition to irrigation waters, is limited, and that said transportation facility may not be able to handle all of the storm water from the drainage area. When it appears that the combination of storm drainage waters and irrigation flows will exceed the capacity of the transportation facility or the Stine Canal system, all parties agree to use their best efforts, in cooperation with one another, to reduce the rate of flow entering the transportation facility or the Stine Canal system. 4 3, ~a£ntenance of the ~ransportat£on Facil£t¥~ 3.1 Except as specifically otherwise provided in this agreement, the performance and control of all maintenance and operation of the Stine Canal system and the transportation facility shall be under the exclusive direction of Kern Delta. 3.2 Kern Delta may require City and County to perform major maintenance of the transportation facility and the storm drain facilities, including inlets and control Structures described in Exhibit "A" that is attributable to storm drainage. City and County shall each pay its representative portion of the maintenance required under this paragraph 3.2 based upon its respective percentage of the storm drainage flow to be discharged into the transportation facility. The percentages shall be determined by a pro rata portion of the total payment based on the portion of the total area lying within their respective jurisdictions draining into the transportation facility. Kern Delta shall notify the City and County of any required major maintenance of the transportation facility or the storm drain facilities. Thereupon each party shall appoint a duly authorized representative, who shall meet with the others as a committee, to determine the nature, amount, and type of maintenance activity to be performed on the transportation facility and the storm drain facilities, and to make cost estimates thereof, and to report their findings to the parties to this agreement. The decision of the majority of said representatives shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless a party objects to said report and serves written notice on the other parties within ten (10) days 5 after receipt of the same, in which latter event the nature, amount, and type of maintenance work, as well as the cost thereof, shall be subject to a further negotiation of the parties. In the event no agreement is reached, any party may perform maintenance work at its expense and seek contribution from the other parties in an action at law. 3.3 Without advance agreement therefor, work of an emergency nature on said transportation facility and the storm drain facilities described in Exhibit 'A', which Kern Delta deems necessary to prevent imminent damage to the transportation facility or the Stine Canal system, may be performed by Kern Delta and the cost thereof added to the next payment due Kern Delta from City and County; provided, however, that any emergency work performed on any one occasion shall not continue for a period in excess of 48 hours without written approval of the City and County, acting through their respective Storm Drain Contact Person appointed pursuant to this agreement. 4. Compensation: 4.1 As consideration for the use of the transportation facility for disposing of storm drainage water and for Kern Delta performing certain operational duties in connection with the disposition of storm drainage waters through and from said transportation facility, payment shall be made to Kern Delta of the sums, at the times, and in the manner hereinafter provided. 4.2 City and County shall pay the lump sum of $4,000 per annum for the first five (5) years of the term of this agreement 6 for their respective shares of the following items (see paragraph 4.3 infra for payments to be made beyond the initial five (5) years of the term of this agreement). Said amount is based on a $400 per outlet charge for the 10 existing outlets in the transportation facility. It is understood and agreed that City shall pay 80% ($3,200) of the annual fee and County shall pay the remaining 20% ($800) of the annual fee. Said annual payment shall be due and payable on January' 1st of each and every year (commencing with a payment retroactive to January 1, 1995) and shall constitute payment for said calendar year: 4.2.1 Removal of all future alluvial deposits and berms in the Stine Canal to obtain maximum storm drainage carrying capacity. 4.2.2 Building up of Canal banks, where necessary, to provide adequate storm drainage carrying capacity. 4.2.3 Maintenance of storm drain weirs. 4.2.4 All operations performed in regulating the Stine Canal System to dispose of actual storm drainage flow or any regulation performed in anticipation of storm drainage flow. 4.2.5 Submergent and emergent weed control, removal of debris, and fence repair on the transportation facility. 4.3 The parties to the agreement shall review and adjust the lump sum payment as appropriate and agreed upon in paragraph 4.2 supra. Said review shall occur at five (5) year intervals commencing July 1, 1999, with any adjustments to the yearly lump sum payment to commence January 1, 2000. Every five (5) years 7 thereafter, review and adjustment shall occur in a like manner during the term of this agreement. 4.4 City and County shall pay to Kern Delta two-thirds of all of the costs incurred by Kern Delta for all structural improvements to existing canal structures which may become necessary to maintain storm drainage flow capacity or improve storm drainage operations, storm drainage maintenance, or storm drainage capacity. City and County shall each pay its representative portion of the costs incurred under this paragraph 4.4 based upon its respective percentage of the storm drainage flow to be discharged into the transportation facility. The percentages shall be determined by a pro rata portion of the total payment based on the portion of the total area lying within their respective jurisdictions draining into the transportation facility. Except in the case of an emergency, Kern Delta will endeavor to give City and County one year notice before performing structural improvements. 4.5 City and COunty shall pay to Kern Delta all of the costs, if any, incurred by Kern Delta for maintenance of storm drain inlets, storm drain outlets, or any structures which function for storm drainage purposes. 4.6 All costs incurred on behalf of City and County by Kern Delta shall be determined by Kern Delta's established accounting procedures. 4.7 City and County shall be jointly and severally obligated to pay Kern Delta all sums which may become owing to Kern Delta under this agreement. Should City and County agree to 8 apportion said sums, Kern Delta will bill upon the agreed basis. All costs incurred by or billed to City may be paid to Kern Delta through quarterly credits on the established joint facilities clearing accounts. City and County shall pay to Kern Delta the lump sum set forth in paragraph 4.2 of this agreement on or before July 15 of each fiscal year this agreement remains in effect (or such pro rata share thereof as is appropriate for any partial fiscal year that this agreement remains in effect). City and County shall pay Kern Delta any other sums owing to Kern Delta within sixty (60) days after billing therefor. 4.8 In-lieu of a portion of City's or County's required annual payment under paragraph 4.2 supra, City or County may install or have installed certain improvements such as headwalls, drive approaches, and sidewalks. The City's improvements shall be at locations within the City limits along the Stine Canal. Similarly the County's improvements shall be at locations within the County's boundaries along the Stine Canal. The improvements and the locations for the improvements shall be at the mutual agreement of City or County and Kern Delta. Said improvements undertaken by City or County in-lieu of City's or County's payment shall not exceed one-half of the required annual payment under paragraph 4.2 supra. For purposes of calculating the set-off under this paragraph 4.8, Kern Delta will allow one-half of the total cost of said approved improvement to be deducted from the payment due to Kern Delta from City or County. (i.e. if cost of improvement is $1,000.00, then City or County would be entitled to a $500.00 9 set-off for the improvement. It is understood that nothing in this paragraph 4.8 or this agreement obligates Kern Delta to agree to any improvements proposed by City or County and that without Kern Delta's consent to said improvements, City or County shall be required to make the full payment required under paragraph 4.2. 5. Ownership and Use of Storm Drainage Water: 5.1 For purposes of this agreement, "storm drainage water" refers to all waters delivered into the transportation facility through the drain inlets described in Exhibit "A". 5.2 All storm drainage water delivered into the transportation facility or the Stine Canal system shall be and become the property of Kern Delta, and may be used or disposed of by it in any lawful manner including, without limitation, by delivery to landowners, by percolation to underground storage, by permitting the same to flow down the Stine Canal, or any combination thereof. 6. Water Quality and Monitoring: 6.1 City and County have each adopted a Stormwater Ordinance in compliance with their joint National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit Application. These ordinances are applicable to the stormwater systems served by the storm drain inlets to the transportation facility. 6.2 City and County Stormwater Ordinances require compliance with the strictest of any applicable Federal or State standards or regulations covering the discharge of stormwater or 10 surface water. 6.3 City and County have instituted a monitoring program to determine the concentration of selected constituents in the discharges measured at representative sites in the City and County, in conformance with the NPDES permit application. Results of the monitoring program will be made available to Kern Delta when it is submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for their review. This is to assist Kern Delta in an effort to establish a background profile of the selected constituents included within the water discharged into the transportation facility by the City and County. 6.4 In addition to the foregoing, and without limiting the same, City and County shall not discharge, and shall not permit others to discharge, into the storm drains or into the transportation facility or said Stine Canal system, any sewage, debris, industrial waste waters, and waters contaminated with oil, or other substances, which would render the water unfit for irrigation or other like purposes, or tend to or cause damage to crops from use thereof, or tend to or cause damage to the canal facilities. 6.5 In using the transportation facility pursuant to this agreement, City and County shall comply with all present and future discharge requirements imposed by laws, rules or regulations of the State of California or the United States. 7. Indemnity and Insurance: 7.1 City and County shall save, protect, and hold harmless Kern Delta of and from all claims, suits, demands and liabilities whatever to any person or persons or corporations, by reason of bodily injuries, deaths, and by reason of damage to, or destruction of, any property resulting in whole or in part from the exercise of the right of City and County hereunder and the discharge of storm drainage water into and the disposition of storm drainage water through the transportation facility or the Stine Canal system. 7.2 City and County shall, at their own expense, carry insurance to protect Kern Delta of and from any and all such claims and the indemnity agreement hereinabove set forth, by obtaining public liability insurance with liability limits of'not less than $2,000,000.00 for the injury or death of any one person in any one accident, and $2,000,000.00 for the injury or death of more than one person in any one accident, and property damage insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00, all such insurance to be carried with insurance companies satisfactory to Kern Delta. Regardless of the above, City and County may self-insure any or all of the insurance requirements hereof. 7.3 Except when self-insured, City and County shall, upon demand, procure and cause to be furnished to Kern Delta, a certificate or certificates from said insurance companies, stating that said insurance is in full force and effect, that the premiums thereon have been paid, that the insurance companies will give Kern Delta at least thirty (30) days' prior written notice of any termination or cancellation of the same, and of any modification of 12 the terms of such insurance. When self-insured, City and County shall, upon demand, provide Kern Delta written acknowledgement thereof. 8. Term and Termination: 8,1 Unless terminated in a manner hereinafter provided, this agreement shall be for a term of twenty (20) years, commencing January 1, 1995. Any of the parties hereto may terminate this agreement subsequent to said twenty-Year period by written notice given at least ninety (90) days before the end of.each year. 8.2 Kern Delta may terminate this agreement by giving sixty (60) days' written notice to the other parties hereto, if City and County, or either of them, default in making the payments required of them, or if they, or either of them, otherwise default in the performance of their agreements herein contained, and fail to remedy said defaults within sixty (60) days after written notice to do so. 8.3 Upon any termination of this agreement, City and County shall, if requested to do so by Kern Delta, remove, or pay to Kern Delta the cost of removing, all storm drainage facilities from the canal. Removal and restoration shall be completed to the reasonable satisfaction of Kern Delta. 9. Miscellaneous: 9.1 This document represents the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This agreement replaces any and all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, whether written 13 or oral, without limitation. 9.2 Kern Delta may assign all of its rights and obligations to any public body or private corporation succeeding to the ownership and operation of the Stine Canal system, which assignee shall agree to perform the obligations of Kern Delta under this agreement and, in the event of such assignment, Kern Delta shall be relieved of all further obligation hereunder. City and County, or either of them, may in like manner assign their rights and obligations in this agreement to any duly organized public body or district of the State of California which is authorized to and agrees to pay and to perform City's and County's obligations · hereunder, and thereafter City and County shall be relieved of all further obligations hereunder. 9.3 The parties to this agreement shall appoint and designate a person on their respective staffs who shall be identified as the "Storm Drain Contact Person." This person shall be available to all other parties for information and expression of concerns regarding maintenance, increasing storm drainage discharges and capacity, compliance with quality requirements, monitoring, and any other matter relating to this agreement. The object of this provision is to provide a definite and easily instituted method of communication between all the parties to this agreement with the assurance that the individual named as the Storm Drain Contact Person will have sufficient authority to and will respond by action to all concerns expressed to him or her by the other parties. 14 9.4 Any notice or demand by any party to the others in connection with this agreement shall be deemed to be fully given or made when written and deposited in a sealed envelope in the United States Mail, registered and postage prepaid and addressed as follows: To: County of Kern Engineering & Survey Services Department 2700 "M" Street, Suite 570 Bakersfield, California 93301 To: City of Bakersfield Water Resources Department 1000 Buena Vista Road Bakersfield, California 93311 To: Kern Delta Water District 501 Taft Highway Bakersfield, California 93307 Any party may change its address by giving the other parties written notice of its new address as herein provided. /// III : III III III III III III III I!1 III .. 15 \ Zn Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year above written. · APPROVED AS TO FORM COUNTY OF KERN Office of County Counsel Kern County By: By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Engineering and Survey Services Department By:. William A. Wilbanks, P.E., Director APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Office of City Attorney By: By: Mayor APPROVED AS TO CONTENT COUNTERSIGNED: City of Bakersfield Water Resources Manager By: Gene Bogart Finance Director APPROVED AS TO FORM KERN DELTA WATER DXSTRICT McMurtrey & Hartsock By: By: .. President and by: Asst. Secretary 16 LOCATION AND VOLUME LIMITATIONS OF DISCHARGE INTO STINE CANAL No. Size Jurisdiction $TINE CANAL I 8" City Corp. Yard in bulk head at railroad crossing. City 18" Chester Lane at No. Stine Road on east benk~ 50' south of City Chester Lane. 18" Southeast corner of intersection of Gnrnsey Lane end City aline Canal. 18" On east side of ¢~naL bank, approximately 788 feet north City of StockdaLe Highway. The drainage area to be served by this outlet shell not exceed the area within Tract No. 2689. 2&" ZnLets on Garnsey Avenue approximately 940 feet north of City Amber~cxxl Lane. Storm dratn to outlets into c~naL west of inlets of Garnsey Avenue. aline Road, west side, near BeLLe Terrace intersection. City The maximum rate of flow from this outlet shaLL not exceed 2,000 gaLLons per minute. - Stine Road, vest side, approximately 1495 feet southerly County of BeLLe Terrace. The maximum rate of flow from this outlet ahatL not exceed 2/000 gaLLons per minute. 12" Park title at aline Road on the east bank. City - aline Road, west aide, approximately 17) feet City northeasterly of Wilson Road intersection. The maximum rate of flow from this outlet shall not exceed 1,500 gallons per mince,, and the drainage area to be aerved by this outlet shell not exceed the area comprising Tract Nos. 25)2, 25)) and FARRERSCANAL 1 18" Crossing at aline Road/ approximately 10 feet from aline City Road on the north bank. ECX)tlBIT "A" \WPSI\KD.EXA\ ITEM 8).A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) IN THE CASE OF KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT vs. NORTH KERN WATER STORAGE DISTRICT; CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; KERN ISLAND WATER COMPANY - TULARE SUPERIOR COURT CASE N°. 96-172919. I CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY 1995 OPERA TIONS During the 1995 calendar year, 148,332 acre-feet from combined Kern River, Federal and State water sources was spread in the 2800 Acre facility. In the 20-year history of the City's 2800 Acre project, only the 1986 year total of 153,131 acre-feet surpassed the 1995 recharge amount. Kern River water deliveries into the 2800 Acres during 1995 amounted to 57,525 acre-feet, a reflection of the 199% of normal Kern River April through July runoff. The City of Bakersfield, Olcese Water District, Buena Vista Water Storage District and the Kern County Water Agency all scheduled water for recharge on the 2800 Acre property during 1995. A new benchmark was established in 1995 when the cumulative recharge by all participants (since inception of the project) exceeded the one million mark during the year, ending at 1,094,057 acre-feet. The City was notified by the Friant Water Users Authority on February 16, 1995, of its plans to commence flood releases from the Friant-Kern Canal into the Kern River channel. The following day, the Friant Authority began releases of 1,200 cubic feet per second out of the end of the Friant-Kern Canal. Full operation of the Kern River channel and 2800 Acre Recharge Facility during this flood release period served to minimize downstream flooding problems while maximizing the recharge of the imported Federal water the Kern River fan for local benefit. high on In July, the Kern County Water Agency's planned use of the 2800 Acre facility for banking purposes was disrupted poor quality Project supplies due to the of State water caused by high turbidity levels. To help circumvent the water quality issue, an arrangement between City and Agency for interim use of the 2800 Acres went into effect on July 15, 1995. The operation resulted in the recharge of high quality Kern River and Federal water supplies acquired by Agency and others in the 2800 Acre spreading area during periods of time that the Agency's Pioneer Property, the Berrenda Mesa Property and the Kern Water Bank were at capacity. Under the terms of this unique operation, future recovery of the water spread by Agency will be from wells located off the 2800 Acre property. All .told, 34,333 acre-feet of additional water was spread in the 2800 Acres under the City/Agency interim use agreement. In August of 1995, the City began producing water from one of its domestic wells situated in the 2800 Acres, delivering the water easterly by pipeline into the City's domestic water system. This event marked the inaugural operation of the City's Agricultural/Domestic Water Interface Project, allowing for water previously spread and banked by City in the 2800 Acres to be recovered and utilized directly by Bakersfield residents. I 1995 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY HYDROGRAPHIC ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Item Page 1. HYDROGRAPH OF 2800 ACRES: Depth to Water ........................... 1 2. RECAPITULATION OF WATER SPREADING: By Entity ..................... 2 3. RECAPITULATION OF WATER SPREADING: By Source .................... 3 4. RECAPITULATION OF GROUNDWATER EXTRACTIONS: By Entity .......... 4 5. WELL WATER PRODUCTION REPORT: 2800 Acre Wells .................... 5 6. CITY-OLCESE WELL WATER PRODUCTION HISTORY: 1977-1995 ........... 6 7. SUMMARY OF 2800 ACRE SPREADING: All Sources, All Entities ............... 7 8. UTILIZATION OF GROUNDWATER STORAGE: All Units ................... 8 9. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD: Recapitulation of Banking, Extraction and Storage ............................. 9 1995 Monthly Status of Account .......................................... 10 1995 Summary of 2800 Acre Spreading:All Sources ............................ 11 10. OLCESE WATER DISTRICT: Recapitulation of Banking, Extraction and Storage ............................. 12 1995 Monthly Status of Account .......................................... 13 1995 Summary of 2800 Acre Spreading: Kern River Supply ....................... 14 Summary of Extraction Fee Rates ..................................... ,... 15 Recapitulation of Extraction Fees: 1995 ..................................... 16 11. BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DISTRICT: Recapitulation of Banking, Extraction and Storage ............................. 17 1995 Monthly Status of Account .......................................... 18 1995 Summary of 2800 Acre Spreading: Kern River Supply ....................... 19 12. KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY: Recapitulation of Banking, Extraction and Storage ............................. 20 1995 Monthly Status of Account .......................................... 21 Member Unit Banking and Extraction Recap: Status as of Decernber 31, 1995 ......... 22 Summary of 2800 Acre Spreading Operations: 1995 ............................ 23 1995 Summary of 2800 Acre Spreading: All Sources ............................ 24 Groundwater Production Summary: 1995 .................................... 25 Fee Recapitulation .................................................... 26 Summaries of Banking and Extraction Operations: By Spreading Block .............. 27-34 13. PROJECT AREA MAP: 2800 Acre Recharge Facility CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY Depth to Water 0 -25 -50 -75- -100- -125- -150- -175- -200- 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Year 20 - Year Operation 1977 -1996 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF WATER SPREADING BY ENTITY 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY (Does not reflect water recovered or sold) Quantities in acre-feet BANKING ENTITIES Calendar City of Olcese Buena Vista Total Other Overdraft Grand Year Bakersfield W.D. W.S.D. K.C.W.A. Banking Spreading Correction Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 104,587 24,328 6,056 0 134,971 0 0 134,971 1979 4,505 0 9,913 0 14,418 0 59,076 73,494 1980 68,804 52,604 0 0 121,408 0 0 121,408 1981 2,603 4,465 0 44,912 51,980 0 7,141 59,121 1982 37,913 14,266 24,465 0 76,644 0 22,232 98,876 1983 113,380 0 0 0 113,380 0 0 113,380 1984 16,058 0 0 0 16,058 0 0 16,058 1985 402 0 0 15,055 15,457 0 0 15,457 1986 64,168 56,197 10,000 22,766 153,131 0 0 153,131 1987 109 0 0 7,379 7,488 0 0 7,488 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1993 32 0 7,849 125,734 133,615 0 0 133,615 1994 0 0 0 18,726 18,726 0 0 18,726 1995 13,089 6,028 20,000 73,337 112,454 34,333 1,545 148,332 TOTALS 425,650 157,888 78,283 307,909 969,730 34,333 89,994 1,094,057 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF WATER SPREADING BY SOURCE 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY Quantities in acre-feet BANKING OTHER SPREADING OVERDRAFT CORRECTION State State State Calendar Kern Friant- Water Kern Friant- Water Kern Friant- Water Grand . Year River Kern Project Other Totals River Kern Project Totals River Kern Project Other Totals Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 134,971 0 0 0 1 34,971 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134,971 1979 4,505 9,913 0 0 14,418 0 0 0 0 6,089 888 52,099 0 59,076 73,494 1980 113.379 0 8.029 0 121,408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121,408 1981 2,603 0 49,377 0 51,980 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.141 0 7,141 59,121 1982 50,242 18,057 8,345 0 76,644 0 0 0 0 2,649 6,835 12,748 0 22,232 98,876 1983 110,970 2,239 171 0 113,380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113,380 1984 14,449 1,609 0 0 16,058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 16,058 1985 331 71 15,055 0 15,457 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.457 1986 93,311 36.792 22,766 262 153,131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153.131 1987 77 0 7,379 32 7.488 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.488 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1993 865 34,822 97,928 0 133,615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133,615 1994 0 0 18,726 0 18,726 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.726 1995 41,397 33,292 37,765 0 112,454 14,583 11,209 8.541 34,333 1,545 0 0 0 1,545 148,332 TOTALS 567,100 136,795 265,541 294 969,730 14,583 11,209 8,541 34,333 10,283 7,723 71,988 0 89.994 1,094.057 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF GROUNDWATER EXTRACTIONS BY ENTITY 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY Quantities In acre-feet CITY OF BAKERSRELD OLCESE WATER DISTRICT BUENA VISTA WSD KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY GRAND TOTAL Well Transfer, Sale Well Transfer, Sale Well Transfer, Sale Well Transfer, Sale Well Transfer, Sale Calendar Water or Exchange Total Water or Exchange Total Water or Exchange Total Weter or Exchange Tc~al Water or Exchange Total Year Produc'~on in Storage Extraction Produc~o~ in Storage Extmc*don Produc'~n in Storage Extraction Produc~on in Storage Exlmction Produc~on in Storage Extraction 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1980 0 13.772 13,772 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.772 13,772 1981 0 100,837 100.837 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,837 100.837 1982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1983 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1964 472 0 472 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 472 0 472 1985 1.615 0 1,615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.615 0 1,615 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 656 0 656 0 0 0 656 5.344 6,000 0 0 0 1,312 5,344 6,656 1988 1,932 3,500 5,432 0 0 0 1,786 3,214 5,000 0 0 0 3.718 6,714 10.432 1989 2,859 0 2,859 873 0 873 3.138 0 3,138 1.086 0 1,086 7,956 0 7.956 1990 23,318 0 23,318 1,400 102,905 104,305 2.242 0 2,242 0 0 0 26,960 102,905 129.865 1991 13,028 44,131 57,159 1.400 22.096 23,496 4.410 0 4.410 33,316 0 33,316 52,154 66,227 118,381 1992 23,816 6,450 30,266 0 6.450 6,450 4,004 0 4.004 28.331 0 28.331 56,151 12,900 69,051 1993 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1994 8,311 0 8,311 1.160 0 1,160 0 0 0 18,416 0 18,416 27,887 0 27.887 1995 1.297 0 1,297 0 0 0 0 0 0 752 0 752 2.049 0 2,049 Totals 77,304 168.690 245,994 4.833 131.451 136,284 16,236 8,558 24.794 81,901 0 81,901 180.274 308,699 488,973 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD SUMMARY OF WELL WATER PRODUCTION 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY WELLS YEAR: 1995 Quantities in acre-feet JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL "'~CITY--OLCESE WELL #1 PRODUCTION + 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 i0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok=ese WO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CrFY-OLCESE WELL #2 PRODUCTION + 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok:ese WO 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista W~D - 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CrFY-OLCESE WELL #3 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 i 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok:ese ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista WSD - 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ClTY-OLCESE WELL #4 PROOUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 0 i 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Olceee WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena VistaWSD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CfTY-OLCE~E Vi4ELL #$ PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For (.~ity of Bakersfield 0: 0: 0: 0 0 I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok:ese 'v%'O 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista WSD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 crrY-OLCESE WELL #6 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 0 0 0 0 I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok:ese ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista iA/SD - 0 0 0 0: 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ClTY-OLCESE WELL #7 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 i0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Otc=ese WO 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista WSD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY-OLCESE WELL #8 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Ok=ese WO - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista ~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY-OLCESE~ WELLS TOTAL PI~:)(XJCTIOfl + 0 i 0 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 I 0 0 0 0 0I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Otcese 'v~.q) - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Buena Vista iA/SD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY DOMESTIC PUMP STATION #22 + 0 I 0 0 0: 0 0 I 0 210 414 441 232 0 1,297 Fo~ City of Bakersfield - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 414 441 232 0 1.297 For Others - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 CITY DOMESTIC PUMP STATION #24 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For City of Bakersfield 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Others - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY IX)MES'110 PUMP S'I'ATION TOTAL + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 414 441 232 0 1,297 For City of Bakersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 414 441 232 0 1,297 For Othem - 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 ' KCWA WELL #1 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #2 PRODUC'rlON + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL ~ PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #4 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA 1NELL #6 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sUBTOTAL (KCWA # 1 -~5) - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL ~ PROOUCTION + 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #8 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #10 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #11 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KC'WA WELL #12 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA WELL #13 PRODUCTION + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KCWA ~4=l_l_._q TOTAL PR(XXJCTK)N - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF BAKERSRELDIOLCESE WATER DISTRICT WELL WATER PRODUCTION HISTORY 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY YEAR: 1995 WELL WATER PROOUC11ON AND PERCENTAGE ElF U'I1UZA'IION TOTAL OLCESE WATER DISTRICT CITY/ OLCESE WD CITY OF Buena V'~IB Water Storage District WELL WATER BAKEFISFIELD O4ceea OLCESE WD/BVWSD CaJennbr PFIOOUCED TOTAL WO W'~hin Set~ce Area Outside Sewice Am~ BVWSD Tolal TOTAL Year Year Accum. Year Accum. Percentage Year Accum. Pemer~oe Year Ac, cum. percen~ge Year Accum. Percenl~ge Year Acccrn. Percentage Year Accum. Percentage 1977 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1978 0 0 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 1979 0 0 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ ' 0 0 0.00% 19~0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1981 0 0 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 1982 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1983 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1984 472 472 472 472 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 19~5 1,615 2,0~7 1,615 2,087 100.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00~ 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1986 0 2,l~7 0 2,087 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 1987 1,312 3,399 656 2,743 80.70% 0 0 0.00% 656 656 19.30~ 0 0 0.00% 656 656 19.30% 656 656 19.30% 1988 2,826 6,225 1,040 3,783 60.77% 0 0 0.00~ 1,786 2,442 39.23~ 0 0 0.00% 1,786 2,442 39.23% 1,786 2,442 39.23% 1989 5,767 11,9~ 1,756 5,539 4~.10% 673 673 7.28~ 3,138 5,580 46.53% 0 0 0.00% 3,138 5,580 46.53% 4,011 6,453 53.81% 1990 8,595 20,587 4,953 10,492 50.97% 1,400 2,273 11.04% 2,242 7,822 37.99~ 0 0 0.00% 2,242 7,822 37.99% 3,642 10,095 49.03% 1991 13,385 33,972 7,575 18,067 53.10% 1,400 3,673 10.81% 4,410 12,232 36.01% 0 0 0.00% 4,410 12,232 36.01% 5,810 15,905 46.82% 1992 10,081 44,053 6,077 24,144 54.81% 0 3,673 8.34% 4,004 16,236 36.85% 0 0 0.00% 4,0~1. t6,236 36.85% 4,004 19,909 45.19% 1993 0 44,053 0 24,144 54.81% 0 3,673 8.34% 0 16,236 36.85% 0 0 0.00% 0 16,236 36.85% 0 19,909 45.19% 1994 7,234 51,287 6,074 30,218 58.92% 1,160 4,833 9.42% 0 16,236 31.66~ 0 0 0.00% 0 16,236 31.66% 1,160 21,069 41.08% 1995 0 51,287 0 30,218 58.92% 0 4,833 9.42% 0 16,236 31.66~, 0 0 0.00% 0 16,236 31.66% 0 21,069 41.08%, Total Water Spread in City of Bakersfield's 2800 Acre R~harge Facility DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND (All Sources. All Entities) Year: 1995 DATE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 0 301 363 292 298 297 58 210 201 140 189 68 2 0 306 357 296 283 283 51 213 196 153 206 73 3 0 290 352 309 281 274 35 208 215 140 119 74 4 0 314 360 310 273 267 20 192 185 145 115 80 5 0 296 370 338 302 260 22 191 211 156 128 65 6 0 112 361 355 288 251 36 212 178 132 139 109 7 0 323 374 330 285 226 39 213 181 152 151 104 8 0 323 237 344 279 236 47 215 196 154 160 109 9 0 377 247 327 302 241 50 206 192 147 123 158 10 0 382 215 307 311 244 46 199 222 154 96 151 11 32 416 297 337 307 269 24 204 230 149 101 185 12 0 382 409 335 306 285 18 167 227 60 91 173 13 0 395 301 338 303 289 23 210 237 0 105 179 14 0 412 179 326 277 314 60 220 245 0 45 161 15 21 463 218 289 229 309 166 223 221 0 25 139 16 0 434 271 294 128 273 257 232 214 0 43 101 17 0 716 285 317 173 266 276 213 238 0 58 69 18 96 743 294 305 267 314 266 201 234 0 39 92 19 228 746 302 243 266 305 266 155 226 0 71 146 20 244 667 273 204 270 296 303 143 165 58 60 102 21 269 291 268 213 251 273 262 197 65 110 70 88 22 265 38 279 296 242 290 229 229 1 26 112 46 54 23 287 230 252 310 267 297 261 251 182 137 59 57 24 228 485 219 309 258 261 237 180 193 142 60 73 25 233 514 168 312 254 245 179 176 202 146 19 77 26 319 409 204 323 253 214 198 212 203 168 24 78 27 333 327 250 320 256 206 262 221 163 188 57 72 28 375 342 269 300 258 166 261 236 198 185 62 41 29 327 - 289 297 276 92 234 234 186 176 31 25 30 263 - 322 316 280 56 220 205 203 145 52 52 31 260 - 319 - 274 - 211 208 - 192 50 3,800 11,034 8,904 9,192 8,297 7,599 4,637 6,376 5,953 3,443 2,544 3,005 MAXIMUM DAY 375 746 409 355 311 314 303 251 245 192 206 165 MINIMUM DAY 0 38 168 204 128 56 18 143 85 0 19 25 123 394 287 306 268 253 150 206 198 111 85 97 AC.FT. 7,537 21,886 17,661 18,232 16,457 15,071 9,197 12,648 11,808 6,829 5,046 5,960 YEAR:- TOTAL, 74,784 MAX., 746 MIN., 0 MEAN, 205 TOTAL AC.FT., 148,332 mm mm mmm mm mm mm m m m mm mmm m mm m m m m mm m UTILIZATION OF GROUNDWATER STORAGE · 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY Year: 1995 Quantities in acre-feet End of Month Unit Storage Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ersfield 167,864 173,469 180.953 180,953 180,953 180,953 180.953 180,743 180,329 179,888 179.656 179,656 Olcese Water District (Gross) 52,680 52,680 52,680 54,452 58,708 58,708 58,708 58,708 58.708 58.708 58,708 58,708 Less: Non-Recoverable Amount 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Olcese Water District (Net) 47,680 47,680 47,680 49,452 53,708 53,708 53,708 53,708 53,708 53,708 53,708 53,708 { Buena Vista Water Storage District I 33,594 33,594 37.293 53,489 53,489 53.489 53,489 53.469 53,489 53,489 53,489 53,489I IKern County Water Agency 1312,189 328,470 334,948 335,212 347,413 362,484 363,286 363,286 368,871 375,700 378,094 378,094I Gross Banked Storage 566,327 588,213 605,874 624.106 640,563 655.634 656,436 656,226 661,397 667,785 669,947 669.947 Groundwater Less: Non-Recoverable Amount 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 Net Banked Groundwater Storage 561,327 583,213 600,874 619,106 635,563 650,634 651,436 651,226 656.397 662.785 664,947 664,947 I I I I I I I I CITY OF BAKERSFIELD I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF BANKING, EXTRACTION AND STORAGE 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY UNIT.- CITY OF BAK~7:ISFIELD Quantities in acre-feet BANKING EXTRACTION GROUNDWATER STORAGE (End of Year) State State Via State Calendar Friant- Water Other Sub- Via Friant- Water Other Sale/ Friant- Water Other Year Kern Kern P~roject Source Total Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Source Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Source Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 104,587 0 0 0 104,587 0 104,587 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,587 0 0 0 104,587 1979 4,505 0 0 0 4,505 0 4,505 0 0 0 0 0 0 109,092 0 0 0 109,092 1980 68,804 0 0 0 68,804 0 68,804 0 0 0 0 13,772 13,772 164,124 0 0 0 164,124 1981 2,603 0 0 0 2,603 0 2,603 0 0 0 0 100,837 100,837 65,890 0 0 0 65,890 1982 35,377 2,536 0 0 37,913 0 37,913 0 0 0 0 0 0 101,267 2,536 0 0 103,803 1983 110,970 2.239 171 0 113,380 0 113,380 0 0 0 0 0 0 212,237 4,775 171 0 217.183 1984 14,449 1,609 0 0 16.058 0 16,058 472 0 0 0 0 472 226,214 6,384 171 0 232,769 1985 331 71 0 0 402 0 402 1,615 0 0 0 0 1,615 224,930 6.455 171 0 231.556 1986 27,114 36.792 0 262 64,168 0 64,168 0 0 0 0 0 0 252,044 43,247 171 262 295,724 1987 77 0 0 32 109 0 109 656 0 0 0 0 656 251,465 43,247 171 294 295,177 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,932 0 0 0 3,500 5,432 246,033 43,247 171 294 289,745 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,565 0 0 294 0 2,859 243,468 43,247 171 0 286,886 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,318 0 0 0 0 23,318 220,150 43,247 171 0 263,568 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,028 0 0 0 44,131 57,159 182,991 23,247 171 0 206,409 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.816 0 0 0 6,450 30,266 152,725 23,247 171 0 176,143 1993 0 32 0 0 32 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 152,725 23,279 171 0 176.175 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,311 0 0 0 0 8,311 144,414 23,279 171 0 167,864 1995 589 12,500 0 0 13.089 0 13,089 1,297 0 0 0 0 1.297 143,706 35,779 171 0 179,656 TOTALS 369,406 55,779 171 294 425,650 0 425,650 77,010 0 0 294 168,690 245,994 mmm m m mm m m m m mm m mm m m m m mm m m m I STATUS OF ACCOUNT: 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY I STORAGE UNIT: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Quantities in acre-feet YEAR: 1995 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Source: Kern River 0 0 589 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 589 Friant-Kern 0 5,605 6,895 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,500 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER BANKED .0 5,605 7,484 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,089 Type: Kern River 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 414 441 232 0 1,297 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Sale/Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 414 441 232 0 1,297 Type: Kern River 144,414 144,414 145,003 145,003 145.003 145.003 145,003 144,793 144,379 143,938 143,706 143,706 Friant-Kern 23,279 28,884 35,779 35.779 35,779 35.779 35,779 35,779 35,779 35,779 35,779 . 35.779 State 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CURRENT STORAGE 167,864 173,469 180,953 180,953 180,953 180,953 180,953 100,743 180,329 179,888 179,656 179,656 City of Bakersfield DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 2800 Acre Spreading Operations Year: 1995 (Afl Sources) DATE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 39 297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 409 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 301 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 218' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 354 285 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 668 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 746 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 667 273 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 291 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 38 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 19 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 2,826 3,773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAXIMUM DAY 0 746 409 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINIMUM DAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC. FT. 0 5,605 7,484 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR:- TOTAL, 6,599 MAX., 746 MIN., 0 MEAN, 18 TOTAL AC.FT., 13,089 I I I I I I I OLCESE WATER DISTRICT I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF BANKING, EXTRACTION AND STORAGE 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY UNI7? OL CESE WA TER DISTRICT Quantities in acre-feet BANKING EXTRACTION GROUNDWATER STORAGE (End of Year) State State ' Via State Calendar Friant- Water Sub- Via Friant- Water Sale/ Recharge Friant- Water Year Kern Kern Project Total Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Transfer Loss Total Kern Kern Project Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 24.328 0 0 24,328 0 24,328 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.328 0 0 24,328 1979 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,328 0 0 24,328 1980 44,575 0 8,029 52,604 0 52,604 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,903 0 8,029 76,932 1981 0 0 4.465 4,465 0 4,465 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,903 0 12,494 81,397 1982 9,432 0 4.834 14,266 0 14,266 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,335 0 17,328 95,663 1983 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 78.335 0 17,328 95,663 1984 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,335 0 17,328 95,663 1985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,335 0 17,328 95,663 1986 56,197 0 0 56,197 0 56,197 0 0 0 0 0 0 134,532 0 i 7,328 151,860 1987 0 0 0 0 5.344 5,344 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,876 0 17,328 157,204 1988 0 0 0 0 3.214 3,214 0 0 0 0 0 0 143,090 0 17,328 160,418 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 873 0 0 0 0 873 142,217 0 17,328 159,545 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,400 0 0 98,005 4,900 104,305 37.912 0 17,328 55,240 1991 0 0 0 0 22,096 22,096 1,400 0 0 22,096 0 23,496 36,512 0 17,328 53,840 1992 0 0 0 0 6,450 6,450 0 0 0 6,450 0 6,450 36,512 0 17.328 53,840 1993 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,512 0 17,328 53,840 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.160 0 0 0 0 1,160 35,352 0 17,328 52,680 1995 6.028 0 0 6,028 0 6,028 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,380 0 17,328 58,708 TOTALS 140,560. 0 17,328 157.888 37,104 194,992 4,833 0 0 126.551 4,900 136,284 mm m m m ,m. .m m mm m m mm m m mm m mm m m m STATUS OF ACCOUNT: 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY STORAGE UNIT: OLCESE WATER' DISTflICT Quantities in acre-feet YEAR: 1995 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Source: Kern River 0 0 0 1.772 4,256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,028 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER BANKED 0 0 0 1,772 4,256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,028 Type: Kern River 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Sale/Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Type: Kern River 35,352 35,352 35,352 37,124 41,380 41.380 41,380 41,380 41,380 41,380 41,380 41,380 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 17.328 17,328 17,328 17,328 17.328 17,328 17,328 17.328 17,328 17,328 17.328 17,328 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL GROSS STORAGE 52,680 52.680 52,680 54,452 58,708 58,708 58,708 58,708 58,708 58,708 58,708 58.708 Less: Non-Recoverable Amount 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL NET STORAGE 47,680 47,680 47.680 49,452 53.708 53.708 53,708 53,708 53.708 53.708 '53,708 53.708 SPREADING FEE CODE: (1) AMOUNT(acre-feet) 0 0 0 1,772 4,256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.028 EXTRACTION FEE CODE: (2) AMOUNT(acre-feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FEE CODE: (1) O&M Fee (2) Extraction Fee + Prorata Share of Energy Charges + OM&R Fee Olcese/La Hacienda DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 2800 Acre Spreading Operations Year: 1995 (Kern River Supply) DATE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 0 0 0 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 - 0 295 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 - 0 312 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 0 893 2,146 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M DAY 0 0 0 312 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINIMUM DA~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC. FT. 0 0 0 1,772 4,256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR:- TOTAL, 3,039 MAX., 312 MIN., 0 MEAN, 8 TOTAL AC. FT., 6,028 SUMMARY OF OLCESE WATER DISTRICT EXTRACTION FEE RATES CrTY OF BAKERSFIELD/OLCESE WATER DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 77-07 W.B. PARAGRAPH C of ARTICLE III All Commodities Extraction Fee Rates Date Price Index Escalator $1.50 $3.03 $6.03 $12.03 7-01-77 65.1 1.000 $1.50 $3.00 $6.00 $12.00 1-01-78 66.9 1.027 $1.54 $3.08 $6.16 $12.32 1-01-79 73.8 1.133 $1.70 $3.40 $6.80 $13.60 1-01-80 85.2 1.309 $1.96 $3.93 $7.85 $15.71 1-01-81 95.2 1.462 $2.19 $4.39 $8.77 $17.54 1-01-82 99.7 1.531 $2.30 $4.59 $9.19 $18.37 1-01-83 100.2 1.540 $2.31 $4.82 $9.24 $18.48 1-01-84 102.9 1.582 $2.37 $4.75 $9.49 $18.98 1-01-85 103.5 1.590 $2.39 $4.77 $9.54 $19.08 1-01-86 103.2 1.586 $2.38 $4.76 $9.52 $19.03 1-01-87 100.5 1.545 $2.32 $4.64 $9.27 $18.54 1-01-88 104.5 1.605 $2.41 $4.82 $9.63 $19.26 1-01-89 110.3 1.694 $2.54 $5.08 $10.16 $20.33 1-01-90 114.9 1.765 $2.65 $5.29 $10.59 $21.18 1-01-91 118.9 1.826 $2.74 $5.48 $10.96 $21.91 1-01-92 115.6 1.776 $2.66 $5.33 $10.66 $21.31 1-01-93 118.0 1.81 3 $2.72 $5.44 $10.88 $21.76 1-01-94 119.0 1.828 $2.74 $5.48 $10.97 $21.94 1-01-95 122.6 1.883 $2.82 $5.65 $11.30 $22.60 1-01-96 126.1 1.937 $2.91 $5.81 $11.62 $23.24 Description of Extraction Fee Rates: $1.50 .....................For Olcese water used inside the City for irrigation or reCreational uses. $3.00 .....................For Olcese water used or sold outside City but within Olcese Water District for irrigation or recreational uses. $6,00 .....................For Olcese water used inside City for municipal and industrial use. $6,00 .....................For City water extracted from the 2800 Acres and sold to Olcese to be used inside City for irrigation and recreational uses. $12.00 ..................... For Olcese water used or sold outside City but within Olcese Water District for municipal and industrial use. $12.00 ..................... For City water extracted from the 2800 Acres and sold to Olcese to be used inside City for municipal and industrial use. RECAPITULATION OF EXTRACTION FEES CALENDAR YEAR OF 1995 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD/OLCESE WATER DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 77-07 W.B. OL CESE WA TER DISTRICT BUENA VISTA WSD TOTALS PRODUCTION WELL AcFt Rate Amount AcFt Rate Amount AcFt Amount Olcese #1 0 N/^ $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #2 0 N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #3 0 N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #4 0 N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #5 0 N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #6 0 NIA $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #7 0 N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 Olcese #8 0 - N/A $0.00 0 $3.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 TOTALS 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 I I I I I I I I BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DISTRICT I I 'l I I I I 'l I I mm m mm m m m mm m m mm m mmm m mm m m mm mm CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF BANKING. EX'I'RACllON AND STORAGE 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY UNIT: BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DISTRICT Quantities in acre-feet BANKING EXTRACTION GROUNDWATER STORAGE (End of Year) State State Via State Calendar Friant- Water Other Sub- Via Friant- Water Other Sale/ Friant- Water Other Year Kern Kern Project Source Total Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Source Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Source Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 6,056 0 0 0 6,056 0 6,056 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,056 0 0 0 6,056 1979 0 9,913 0 0 9,913 0 9,913 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.056 9,913 ' 0 0 15,969 1980 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,056 9,91.3 0 0 15,969 1981 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.056 9.913 0 0 15.969 1982 5,433 15,521 3,511 0 24,465 0 24,465 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,489 25,434 3,511 0 40434 1983 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,489 25,434 3,511 0 40434 1984 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,489 25,434 3,511 0 40434 1965 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,489 25.434 3,511 0 40434 1986 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,489 25,434 3.511 0 50434 1987 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 656 0 0 0 5,344 6.000 15.489 25.434 3,511 0 44 434 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,786 0 0 0 3,214 5,000 10,489 25,434 3.511 0 39434 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,138 0 0 0 0 3,138 7,351 25,434 3,511 0 36 296 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.242 0 0 0 0 2,242 5,109 25.434 3.511 0 34054 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,410 0 0 0 0 4,410 699 25,434 3,511 0 29,644 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 699 3.305 0 0 0 4,004 0 22,129 3,511 0 25,640 1993 865 6,964 0 0 7,849 0 7,849 0 0 0 0 0 0 865 29,113 3,511 0 33,489 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 865 29,113 3,511 0 33,489 1995 20.000 0 0 0 20.000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,865 29,113 3,511 0 53,489 TOTALS 42,354 32,418 3.511 0 78,283 0 78,283 12,931 3,305 0 0 8,558 24,794 STATUS OF ACCOUNT: 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY STORAGE UNIT: BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DISTRICT Quantities in acre-feet YEAR: 1995 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Source: Kern River 105 0 3,699 16.196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER BANKED 105 0 3,699 16,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 Type: Kern River 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Via Sale/Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Type: Kern River 970 970 4,669 20,865 20,865 20,865 20.865 20,865 20,865 20,865 20,865 20,865 Friant-Kern 29,113 29,113 29,113 29,113 29,113 29.113 29,113 29,113 29,113 29,113 29,113 29,113 State 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,511 3.511 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,511 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CURRENT STORAGE 33.594 33,594 37,293 53,489 53.489 53.489 53.489 53,489 53.489 53,489 53,489 53,489 SPREADING FEE CODE: (1) AMOUNT (acre-feet) 105 0 3,699 16,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 EXTRACTION FEE CODE: (2) AMOUNT(acre-feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXTRACTION FEE CODE: (3) AMOUNT(acre-feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FEE CODE: (1) O&M Fee (Billed o Olcese Water District) (2) (Within Service Area - Irrigation Use) Extraction Fee + Prorata Share of Energy Charges (Billed to Olcese Water District) (3) (Outside Service Area) Extraction Fee + Prorata Share of Energy Charges · OM&R Fee (Billed to Olcese Water District) Buena Vista Water Storage District DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 2800 Acre Spreading Operations Year: 1995 (Kern River Supply) DATE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 0 0 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 308 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 337 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 326 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 341 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 306 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 32 0 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 21 0 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 O. 0 317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 301 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 74 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 161 306 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 198 317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 245 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 269 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 - 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 - 316 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 - 313 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 53 0 1,865 8,166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAXIMUM DAY 32 0 316 341 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINIMUM DAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 60 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC. FT. 105 0 3,699 16,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR:- TOTAL, 10,084 MAX., 341 MIN., 0 MEAN, 28 TOTAL AC. FT., 20,000 KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RECAPITULATION OF BANKING, EXTRACTION AND STORAGE 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY UNriP: KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY Quantities in acre-feet BANKING EXTRACTION GROUNDWATER STORAGE (End of Year) State State Via State Calendar Friant- Water Sub- Via Friant- Water Sale/ Friant- Water Year Kern Kern Project Total Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Transfer Total Kern Kern Project Total 1977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1978 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1981 0 0 44,912 44,912 0 44,912 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 44,912 1982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 44,912 1983 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 44,912 1984 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 44,912 1985 0 0 15,055 15,055 0 15,055 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,967 59,967 1986 0 0 22,766 22,766 0 22,766 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82,733 82,733 1987 0 0 7,379 7,379 0 7,379 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90,112 90,112 1988 0 0 0 0 3,500 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 0 90,112 93.612 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,086 0 1,086 3,500 0 89.026 92.526 1990 0 0 0 0 98,005 98,005 0 0 0 0 0 101,505 0 89,026 190.531 1991 0 0 0 0 44,131 44,131 0 0 33,316 0 33,316 125,636 20,000 55,710 201,346 1992 0 0 0 0 6,450 6,450 18,378 6,499 3,454 0 28,331 113,708 13,501 52,256 179,465 1993 0 27,806 97,928 125,734 0 125,734 0 0 0 0 0 113,708 41,307 150,184 305,199 1994 0 0 18,726 18,726 0 18,726 0 0 !8,416 0 18,416 113,708 41,307 150,494 305.509 1995 14,780 18,811 39,746 73,337 0 73,337 0 0 752 0 752 128,488 60,118 189,488 378,094 TOTALS 14,780 46,617 246,512 307,909 152,086 459,995 18,378 6,499 57,024 .0 81,901 STATUS OF ACCOUNT: 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY I STORAGE UNIT: KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY Quantities in acre-feet YEAR: 1995 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP I OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Sourcs:-- Kern River 0 0 0 0 4.543 7,267 802 0 2.168~ 0 0 0 14.780 Friant-Kern 0 2,100 175 264 7,658 7,800 0 0 429 I 377 I 4 I 0 I 18,811 State I 7,432 J 14,181 I 6,303 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 2,988 6,452 2,390 0 39,746 ViaTransfer/Purchase I 0I 0} 0I 0I 0] 0I 0) 0] 01 0l 0 0 0 TOTAL 2800 ACRE BANKING 7,432 16,281 6,478 264 12,201 15,071 802 0 . 5,585 I 6,829 ] 2,394 I 0] 73,337 Source: Kern River 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 5,771 8,090 722 I 0 0 0 14,583 Friant-Kern 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1,079 4,558 5,501 I 0 71 0 11,209 State 0 0] 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 2,581 5,9601 8,541 TOTAL OTHER SPREADING 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 6,850 [ 12,648 6,223 I 0 2,652 5,960 I 34,333 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,545[ 0I 0I 0I 0I 0I 1,545 TOTAL OVERDRAFT CORRECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Type: Kern River 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Friant-Kern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 752 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 752 Via Sale/Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0I 0I 0 0 0I 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER RECOVERED 752 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 0 752 Type: KernRiver 113,708 113,7081113,7081113,708[118,251 1125,518 [126,3201126,3201128,4881128,4881128,4881128,488I Friant-Kern 41,307 43,407 43,582 43,846 51,500 I 59,308 I 59,308 [ 59,308 I 59,737 I 60,114 I 60,118 I 60,118 I State 157,174 171,3551177,6581177,6581177,6581177,6581177.6581177,6581180,646i187,0981189,488 189,488 TOTAL CURRENT STORAGE 312,189 32.8,470' ' ' ' ' "" ' '334,948 335,212 1347,413 1 362.,484 1 363,286 1 363,2861368,871 375,700 378,094 378,094 AMOUNT(acre-feet) 6,018 5,389 2,412 264 12,201 13,042 802 0 429 6,829 2,344 0 49,730 Spreading Fee Code: (2) Spreading Fee Code: (3) 0 0 0 0 0 6,650 12,648 6,223 0 0 0 25,721 Spreading Fee Code: (4) AMOUNT(acre-feet)Spreading Fee Code: (5) 0IoI oI oI ot oI 1,~51 o{ o{ oI oI o 1,545 ,~OUNT~'~,'e-,eeO I 01 O I O I O I O I 01 O I 01 01 , 01 01 01 0 FEE CODE: (1) O&M Fee + Facilities Improvement Fee + Spreading Fee (2) O&M Fee + Facilities Improvement Fee + Deferred Spreading Fee (3) O&M Fee + Facilities Improvement Fee (Spread pursuant to interim use agreement dated July 27, 1995) (4) O&M Fee + Facilities Improvement Fee (Rosedale RBWSD Overdraft Correction) (5) O&M Fee · Facilities Improvement Fee (Spread pursuant to interim use agreement dated January 3, 1996) (6) Extraction Fee (Note: Applies to water spread under Spreading Fee Code (2) above). Note: O&M Fee + Facilities Improvement Fee levied at time water is spread. Spreading Fees may be deferred. Once deferred, an extraction fee will be levied at time water is extracted or assigned. m m mm m m m m m m m mm m m m m mm m m CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY BANKING, EXTRACTION AND STORAGE RECAPITULATION DECEMBER 31, 1995 Quantities in acre-feet K E R N C 0 U N T Y W A T E R A G E N C Y KCWA General Account W'neeler Ridge-Ma~col~ WSD Be~enda Mesa Water District Lost Hills Water District Be~ddge Water Storage District Year Banking Extmcffon Storage Banking Extraction Sa~'age Banking E.2draclfon Storage Bankin¢l ExlmcEon Storage Banking ExtracEon Storage Year 1981 29,812 0 29,812 5,600 0 5,600 9,500 0 9.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1981 1982 0 0 29.812 0 0 5,600 O! 0 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1982 1983 0 0 29.812 0 0 5,600 0 0 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1983 1984 0 0 29.812 0 0 5,600 O: 0 9.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1984 1985 15,055 0 44,867 0 0 5,600 0 0 9.500 O! 0 0 0 0 0 1985 1986 10.000 0 54,867 0 0 5,600 0 0 9,500 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 1986 1987 0 0 54,867 0 0 5.600 0 0 9,500 0; 0 0 0 0 0 1987 1988 0 0 54,867 0 0 5,600 0 0 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1988 1989 0 16.105 38,762 15,019 0 20.619 0 0 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 1990 0 0 38,762 0 0 20,619 0 9.500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 1991 42,096 33,316 47.542 0 0 20,619 0 0 0 2,035 0 2.035 0 0 0 1991 1992 6,450 9,953 44.039 0 0 20,619 0 0 0 0 0 2,035 0 0 0 1992 1993 65,802 0 109,841 11,349 0 31,968 421 0 421 6,302 0 8,337 5.030 0 5,030 1993 1994 0 0 109,841 0 6,261 25,707 4,593 0 5,014 4.922 0 13.259 325 1,197 4,158 1994 1995 0 0 109,841 5.151 0 30,858 23,850 0 28,864 10.700 0 23.959 6.784 0 10,942 1995 Total 169,215 59,374 37,119 6,261 38,364 9,500 23,959 0 12,139 1,197 Total K E R N C O U N T Y W A T E R A G E N C Y Cawelo Wate~ District Improvement District ,~4 Tejon- Ca~ac WD State o~ California Total o~ All Accounts Year Bankir~ Exffac~:~n Storage Banking ~ctJon StO~le Bankin(~l Exl~ction Stora;le Bankin~l Extrac~:~n Stora;le Bankir~l Ext~cEon Storage Year 1981 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 0 44,912 1981 1982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 1982 1983 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 1983 1984 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,912 1984 1985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,055 0 59,967 1985 1986 0 0 0 12,766 0 12,766 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,766 0 82,733 1986 1987 0 0 0 0 0 12,766 0 0 0 7,379 0 7.379 7,379 0 90,112 1987 1988 0 0 0 3,500 0 16,266 0 0 0 0 0 7,379 3,500 0 93,612 1988 1989 0 0 I 0 0 0 16,266 0 0 0 0 0 7,379 15,019 16,105 92.526 1989 1990 0 0 0 0 0 16,266 0 0 0 107,505 0 114,884 107,505 9,500 190.531 1990 1991 0 0 0 0 0 16,266 0 0 0 0 0 114,884 44,131 33.316 201,346 1991 1992 0 0 ! 0 0 3.500 12,766 0 0 0 0 14,878 100,006 6.450 28,331 179.465 1992 1993 34,040 O: 34,040 2,790 0 15,556 0 0 0 0 0 100,006 125,734 0 305,199 1993 1994 0 2251 33,815 10,641 100 26.097 70 0 70 0 12,458 87,548 20,551 20,241 305,509 1994 1995 3,245 O I 37,060 23,607 0 49,704 0 0 70 0 752 86,796 73,337 752 378,094 1995 Total 37,285 225 53,304 3,600 70 0 114,864 2%088 486,339, 108,245 Total KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY RECAPITULATION OF 2800 ACRE SPREADING OPERATIONS (Does not reflect transfers in groundwater storage) 1995 CALENDAR YEAR Quantities In Acre - Feet JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG, SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL 2800 ACRE BANIONG: + 7.432 16.281 6.478 264 12.201 15.071 802 0 5.585 6,829 2.394 0 73.337 KCWA (GENERAL ACCOUNT) - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WHEELER RID GE- MARICOPA WS D - 1,359 955 665 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,172 0 0 5,151 BERRENDA MESA WD - 385 586 408 264 12.201 9.585 421 0 0 0 0 0 23,850 LOST HILLS WD - 2.510 530 388 0 0 3,457 381 0 199 2.170 1.085 0 10.700 BELRI DGE WSD - 1,764 615 429 0 0 0 0 0 230 2.487 1.259 0 6,784 CAWELO WD - 0 2,703 542 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,245 TEJON-CASTAC WD - 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #4 = 1.414 10,892 4,066 0 0 2,029 0 0 5.156 0 50 0 23.607 2800 ACRE TRANSPORTATION LOSS: + 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,850 12,648 6,223 0 2,652 5,960 34,333 KCWA (GENERAL ACCOUNT) - 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.079 4,360 5,501 0 0 0 10,940 WHEELER RIDGE- MARICOPA WSD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.261 2.261 BERRENDA MESA WD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 LOST HILLS WD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,163 2,798 3.961 BELRIDGE WSD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,341 121 1,462 TEJON-CASTAC WD - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #4 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,189 4,045 722 0 148 780 7,884 WESTSIDE MUTUAL WATER COMPANY = 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.582 4,243 0 0 0 0 7,825 2800 ACRE OVERDRAFT CORRECTION: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,545 0 0 0 0 0 1.545 ROSEDALE RBWSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,545 0 0 0 0 0 1.545 TOTAL 2800 ACRE SPREADING: 7',432 16,281 6,478 264 12,201 15,071 9,197 12,648 11,808 6,829 5.046 5,960 109,215 Kern County Water Agency DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 2800 Acre Spreading Operations Year: 1995 (All Sources) DATE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 0 301 363 6 4 297 58 210 201 140 189 68 2 0 306 357 5 3 283 51 213 196 153 206 73 3 0 290 352 4 0 274 35 208 215 140 119 74 4 0 314 360 2 2 267 20 192 185 145 115 80 5 0 296 370 1 2 260 22 191 211 156 128 65 6 0 112 361 33 I 251 · 36 212 178 132 139 109 7 0 323 374 4 2 226 39 213 181 152 151 104 8 0 323 237 3 129 236 47 215 196 154 160 109 9 0 377 247 2 302 241 50 206 192 147 123 158 10 0 382 215 I 311 244 46 199 ~99 154 96 151 11 0 377 0 3 307 269 24 204 230 149 101 185 12 0 378 0 2 306 285 18 167 227 60 91 173 13 0 3.95 0 2 303 289 23 210 237 0 105 179 14 0 412 0 I 277 314 60 220 245 0 45 161 15 0 463 0 2 229 309 168 223 221 0 25 139 16 0 434 0 0 128 273 257 232 214 0 43 101 17 0 362 0 0 173 266 276 213 238 0 58 69 18 96 75 0 4 267 314 266 201 234 0 39 92 19 228 0 0 4 266 305 266 155 226 0 71 146 20 244 0 0 8 270 296 303 143 165 58 60 102 21 269 0 0 7 251 273 262 197 85 110 70 88 22 285 0 0 4 242 290 229 229 126 112 46 54 23 287 211 0 3 267 297 281 251 182 137 59 57 24 228 485 0 5 258 261 237 180 193 142 60 73 25 233 514 7 6 254 245 179 176 202 148 19 77 26 319 -409 6 6 253 214 198 212 203 168 24 78 27 333 327 5 9 256 206 262 221 163 168 57 72 28 375 342 0 0 258 168 261 236 198 185 62 41 29 327 - 0 2 276 92 234 234 186 176 31 25 30 263 - 6 4 280 56 220 205 203 145 52 52 31 260 - 6 - 274 - 211 208 - 192 - 50 3,747 8,208 3,266 133 6,151 7,599 4,637 6,376 5,953 3,443 2,544 3,005 MAXIMUM DAY' 375 514 374 33 311 314 303 251 245 192 206 165 MINIMUM DAY 0 0 0 0 0 56 18 143 85 0 19 25 121 293 105 4 198 253 150 206 198 111 85 97 AC.FT. 7,432 16,281 6,478 264 12,201 15,071 9,197 12,648 11,808 6,829 5,046 5,960 YEAR:- TOTAL, 55,062 MAX., 514 MIN., 0 MEAN, 151 TOTAL AC. FT., 109,215 m m mm m m m m m m m mm m mm mm mm m m mm mm I KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY Quantities in acre-feet GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION SUMMARY YEAR: 1995 As Reported by Kern County Water Agency WEII DESCRIPTION I ,,J.- I Fob I~ I ~ I"ev I ,'-,, I .Jd I~ [~ I~, J No~ [Dec[ Ti + KCWA # 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 + KCWA #4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #6 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #7 Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #8 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 + KCWA #10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + KCWA #12 O~ 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 O i 0 0 0 0 KCWA #13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 + BM #1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O: 0 00 0 + BM#2 O; 0 0 0 O! 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol '0 + BK #1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 + BK #2 O' O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Of 0 + BK #3 00I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + BK #4 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + BK #5 0 0 ! 0 0 0 O! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + BK #6 0, 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + DWR Well 4L1 67: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 67 + DWR Well 5K1 - 30-25-5K1 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 + DWR Well 7G1 71 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 + DWR Well 7P1 28 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 + DWR Well 7R1 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 + DWR Well 8F1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 40 + DWR Well 8J1 - 30-25-8J1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 14 + DWR Well 8P1 - 30-25-8P1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 6 .,. oWRWolf l 24 o o= o o oo° I o o o o o 24' + DWR Well 9L1 - 30-25-9L1 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .52 + DWR Well 15B1 - 30-25-15B1 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 + DWR Well 1.5C1 - 30-25-15,C1 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 + DWR Well 16F1 - 30-25-16F1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 + DWR Well 17F1 - 30-25-17F1 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 45, + DWR Well 18Al 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 + DWR Well 18Cl 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 + DWR Well 18P1 - 30-25-18P1 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 + DWR Well 18R1 - 30-25-18R1 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 + DWR Well 24A1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 40 I = TOTAL GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION a 7.~ [ o a o I o i o i o I o I o I o ] o t o a o a 7~. - RECOVERED FROM 2800 ACRE STORAGE 752 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 752 For ,.-~te of Ca//forn/a 752 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 752 For Berrenda Mesa WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Bekfdge WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For ~ Ridge-Maricopa WSD 0 0 0 O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ForC~woloWO 0 0 0 0i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Kern County Water AjTency (GeneralAccount) 0 o oel o o o o o o o o o = RECOVERED FROM BERRENDA MESA STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- For Berrenda Mesa WD 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Be/ridge WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- For Wheeler P~dge- IVlaricopa WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 For Kern County Water ARency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 mm mm m m mm mm m mm m mm mm m mm mm mm m mm m mm CITY OF BAKERSFIELD / KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY SPREADING AND EXTRACllON AGREEMENT NO. 84-232 OCTOBER 17, 1984 FEE RECAPITULATION July 1977 Base Index -- 65.1 (1982 = 100 Base Conversion Factor) January 1984 Base Index -- 102.9 (1982 -- 100 Base Conversion Factor) Facilities Annual All Commodities Spreading Improvement All Commodities Escalator/ 0 & M Month- Year Price Index Escalator ComPonent Component Month- Year Price Index Deflator Fee 7-77 65.1 1.000 $3.00 $1.50 1-84 102.9 1.581 $4.74 $2.37 1-84 102.9 1.000 $0.50 1-85 103.5 1.590 $4.77 $2.39 1-65 103.5 1.006 $0.50 1-86 103.2 1.585 $4.76 $2.38 1-86 103.2 1.003 $0.50 1-87 100.5 1.545 $4.64 $2.32 1-87 100.5 0.977 $0.49 1-88 104.5 1.605 $4.82 $2.41 1-88 104.5 1.016 $0.51 1-89 110.3 1.694 . $5.08 $2.54 1-89 110.3 1.072 $0.54 1-90 114.9 1.765 $5.29 $2.65 1-90 114.9 1.117 $0.56 1-91 118.9 1.826 $5.48 $2.74 1-91 118.9 1.155 $0.58 1-92 115.6 1.776 $5.33 $2.67 1-92 115.6 1.123 $0.56 1-93 118.0 1.813 $5.44 $2.72 1-93 118.0 1.147 $0.57 1-94 119.0 1.828 $5.48 $2.74 1-94 119.0 1.156 $0.58 1-95 122.6 1.883 $5.65 $2.83 1-95 122.6 1.191 $0.60 1-96 126.1 1.937 $5.81 $2.91 1-96 126.1 1.225 $0.61 :J CI1~ OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACIU'[Y KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1995 GFIOUNDWA TER BANii3NG & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~ (~ubje~t to re(dm~Be Ios~.) ~FF_.N~)INGI BLOCK~ B ~ub~ ~ r~ ~.) ~1~ B~ C ~ubj~ to r~rge I~.) ~ ~-81 ~ lO-e~ ~ lO-~ E~ 10-81 E~ 12-81 E~ 12-~ T~ ~UNT ~ 15,1~ TOT~ ~U~ ~ ~,812 TOT~ ~U~ ~ ~ ~E ~O ~,~7.~ ~ FEE ~L~D ~.~ ~ F~ ~D ~.~ E~ 3-1~ E~ I0-~-89 ~ F~ ~ ~A E~c~ F~ ~ ~.~ ~cU~ F~ ~ $5.~ A~-~ ~D 1,~1 A~-FE~ ~D ~ 1-01-91 ~ 11-01-91 E~ F~ ~ ~. ~ E~c~ F~ ~ ~ ~.48 E~ ~E ~D ~,~.~ ~C~ FEE ~D $197.28 ~ F~ ~ ~.~ 3) ~.~ E~ 3-31-91 E~ FEE ~O ~,7~.~ ~d 4-01-91 E~ 4-~91 E~ F~ ~ ~.~ 3) ~.~ ~C~ FEE ~L~D ~4,~. 10 5-01-91 5-31-91 A~-FE~ ~D 1,~ E~ 6-~91 ~ ~E ~D ~,510.~ ~ 7-01-91 End 7-31-91 8-31-91 E~ FM ~M ~.~ ~ 10-~-91 ~- F~T ~CE ~ ~RE- F~T ~ 0 ~- F~T ~CE 0 1) RefleGts Berrenda Mesa WD sale to State of Caliomln Del~rbTlert of Water Resources. 2) A,s~igned to Whee~ Ridge-IMarkxq:~8 WSD. 3) Ex~ Fee pursuant to City of Bakendield/KCWA Agnmmen~ dated Felxuaqt 22, lg91. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILI'IY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1995 E~ROUNDWA TER BANKING & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~ (~Jbject to r~clmrge Iossel.) ~3PREADING BLOCK: E (Not subject to recharge Io~se~.) ~PREADING BLOCK: F (~ubJeGt to recharge losses.) b"~mf 10-88 ~art 8-68 ,.~l~f 10-23-89 End 12-88 End 8-88 End 10-23-89 'rOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD I) 22,7~ TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 3,500 TOTAl. AMOUNT SPREAD 3) 15,019 SPREADING FEE BILLED $0.00 ~PREADING FEE BILLED N/A ~=READING FEE BILLED N/A DUE DATE ON DEFERFED SPREADING FEE Fe~ 2002 DUE DATE ON DEFERFED ~PREADING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFEPd:~D SPREADING FEE None ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 53~ ACRE-FEET RECOVEFIEO 916 S"ta f 11 -O1-91 ,.~tl f 5-01-92 End 11-30-91 End 5-20-92 EXTR4cTN3N FEE BILLED $2,948.a4 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $4,882.28 ACRE-FEETRECOVEFED 4,016 A CIRE-FEET RECO VEFED 117 S~f 12-01-91 ~f 7-01-92 End 12-27-91 End 7-31-92 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $22,007.6~ EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $62~/61 ACRE-FEETRECOVEFED . 2,530 ACRE-.FEETFIECOVERED 643 S~art 1-14-92 Sial 8-01-92 End 1-31-92 End 8-31-92 EXTRACTION FEE BILZ.ED $13,484.90 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $3,427.19 ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 9~ ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 606 Sial 2-01-92 Slaf 9-01-92 End 2-10-92 End 9-30-92 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $4,9~.92 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $3,229.9~ ACRE-FEET RECOVERED Sa;iff 10-01-92 End 10-31-92 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED ~,712.97 S~l~f 11-01-92 End 11-30-92 EXTRACT/ON FEE BILLED $1,918.80 ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 349 ~f 12-01-92 End 12-31-92 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $1,860.17 ACRE-FOOT BRJ.ANCE 2) 14,758 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 0 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 15,0t9 1) Includes 10,000 acre-feet spread off behalf of KCWA and 12,766 acre-feet spread o~ behalf of ID4. 2) Per KCWA: Balance includes 1,992 acre-feet reserved for recharge losses pursuant to 1991 Emergency Groundwater Fie~oven/Program; sul~ to adjustment upon adeplion of basin-wide recharge loss formula (39,848 AcFt @ 5%; Biock B = 29,812, Block C = 36, Block O = 10,000). 3) Assigned to Whealer Ridge-Maricopa WSD by KCWA effect~/e 10-23-89. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1995 GROUNDWATER BANI(ZNG & RECOVERY OPERATIONS H ~ (Not subject tO recharge Io~ea.) ~PF~._~DING BLOCK H (Not lubJect to recharge Ios~em.) 8P~ING BLOCK~. ! (Not s~oJect to m~harge Ioasem.) b'~art 6-91 ~art 7-91 b'~rt 9-91 End 6-91 End 10 -91 End 9-91 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 1) 22,096 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 2) 20,00 TOTAL AMOUNT ~;PREAD 3) 2,O35 SPREADING FEE BILLED $121,086.(~ SPREADING FEE BILLED NIA SPREADING FEE BILLED N/A DUE DATE ON DEFERFE'D SPREADING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERFED SPREADING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERFE"D SPREADING FEE None ACRE-FEET RECOVE'F~D 9~a Start 2-01-92 End 2-10-92 Extrac~on Fee Rate N/A EX7'RACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FEET RECOVEF~D 2,006 End 5-31-92 Extrac~fon Fee Ram N/A EX7RACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FEET RECOVEF~D 2,177 ~l~rt 6-01-92 End 6-30-92 Extrac/fon Fee Rate N/A EXTRAC 770N FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FEET RE(2OItEF~D 1,353 SMrt 7-01-92 . End 7-31-92 E.~rac/fon Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 22,096 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE la. 501 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE ~Oa5 1) Refle,:ts KCWA purchase of banked Kern River water from La Hacienda, Inc~ 2) Refle~s KCWA purchase of banked Fdant- Kern water from City of Bakersfield. 3) ~ tnmsfer from City of Bakersfield to KCWA of banked Kern River water purchased from City of Bakersfield by Nmlh Kem WSO o~ behalf of Paramount Farming C(x lands located within lost Hills WD. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILI'IY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1 995 GROUNDWATER BANKING & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~ (Not ~ubject to recharge Io~le~.) ~PRE~INI3 BLOCK: K (Recharge Iol~e~ assessed at 7%) SPREADING BLOCK: L (Subject to recharge losses.) Saart 1-92 ..~1# 3-93 S~att 4-93 End 1-92 End 3-e3 End 4-93 TOTAL AMOUNT SPFF..AE) 1) 6,450 TOTAL AMOUNT ~ 2) 2,790 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 3) 1,109 EF~EAD/NG FEE B/LLED N/A SPREAD/NG FEE B/LLED $15,177.60 SP/:~'AD/NG FEE BILLED $6,032.06 DUE DATE ON DEFERRED SPREADING FEE No~e DUE DATE ON DEFERFED SPREADING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERFED SPREADING FEE None ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 6.450 ACRE-FOOT 9ALANCE 2,790 gE-FOOT BALANCE 1,109 1) Reflects transfer from Olcese WD to KCWA effectbe 1-1- 92 (Spreading Fee due at time of Exbactio~). 2) Reflects 1993 Friart-Kem Banking Exchange between City of Bakersfield, ID4, K-'i~VD and RGWD (Spreading Fee billed ~firectly to K-TWD/RGWD). Note: First 2.790 acre-feet of Agency General spreading during Mamh 1993 delbered on behaff of ID4 as payback to K-TWD/RGWD. 3) Refle¢~ spreading of Friant- Kern water by KCWA; assigned to Cawelo WD ('215 Water' purchase by Cawelo WO autho~zed under Bureau of Reu--lamation temporary contract No. 3-07-20- W1063). CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1995 GROUNDWATER BANKING & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~-ADING BLOCK: M (subject to recharge losses.) ~OREADING BLOCK: N (~ubject to recharge I~ses.) SPREADING BLOCK: O (Subject to recharge losses.) b'~l~t 3-93 b-~ttt 9-93 b'~art 12-g~ End 8 - 93 End 12 - 9~ End 12 - g3 TOTAL AMOUNT aPREAD 65,802 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 1) 29,958 TOTAL AMOUNT ~PRE/~O 2) 2,973 ~PREADING FEE BID. ED $0.00 ~PREADING FEE BILLED $16~971.52 ~;PREADI NG FEE BI LLEO $16,173.12 DUE DATE ON DEFERFED E,F'F~ADING FEE Aug 2008 DUE DA ~E ON DEFERF~D ~READING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERRED ~PREADING FEE None AORE-FEETRECOI~CRED 3) 225 ~ta rt 12- ~t End 12-94 ExtracEo~ Fee Flate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 .qCRE-FOOT B, ALY~NCE 65,~ ACRE-FOOT I~q,L.N~ICE 29,733 ~E-F~T M~CE ~973 1) ~ s~ng ~ ~m ~mr ~ KCWA; a~i~d ~ ~ Wa~r Di~b~ un~ ~b WO/~c WSD 1~ ~n~ng Agr~t ~61 spr~d ~ Pi~r, ~,197 sp~d ~ 2~ Acm Facile). 2) ~ s~ng ~ ~ ~ter ~ KCWA; a~ig~d to ~ Water ~ ~ ~r~d ~ P~, 2,7~ spr~d ~ 2~ ~re Facile). 3) ~ ~n~er ~ ~1o WD (~ AcFt) and ~m~opb WSD (181 AcFt) ~ ~D - Spr~ ~k S. crlY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILI'IY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1 995 GROUNDWATER BANI(ING & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~:~)ING BLOCK: P (subject to recharge Io~ses.) SPI:IEN)ING BLOCK: Q (Subject to recharge losses.) 2) I~IPFEADING BLOCK: R (Subject to recharge losses.) Slwt 10-g3 Blast 3-93 5'tsar 1-94 End 12-g~ End 12-g~ End 2-94 TOTALA.MOLINTSPflEAD 1) 13,137 TOTAL AMOUNT SPFEAD 2) 9,965 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 3) 18,726 SPREADING FEE BILLED $71,9~t4.08 SPREADING FEE BILLED $54,510.56 S~;~READING FEE BILLED $50,087.20 DUE DA ~E ON DEFERFED ~FIEADING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERF~D ~PREADING FEE None DUE DAlE ON OEFERF~D ~¥1EADIAI~ FEE Feb 2009 A4~qE-FEET/~E~O VERED 1,476 AO~E-FEET RECO~D 1,500 ACRE-FEET REDOVERED 1 OD S~ft 4-15--94 ~eflects ltansterl~m H~I-MI4/SO to Lost Hi#s VtO - BlockS) ~:~ects trans~rfrom l~4 to get#d~le Vt~O -BlockS) End 4 -30--94 Date of/ransack/on 12-94 Date of/ransack/on 12-94 ExlYac#on Fee Rate N/A Ex,acC'on Fee Rate N/A Exea cfion Fee Rate N/A EXTRAC370N FEE BILLED $0.00 EXTRAC170N FEE BILLED $0.00 EXIRAC TION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 2,334 5'~a rt 5-01-94 End 5-31-94 EJ~mcflon Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 2,107 S~lart 6-01-94 End 6-30-g4 ~ Fee Rate N/A EX1RACTION FEE BILLED $O.93 ACRE-FEET RECOVERED 41 Slatt 7-01-94 End 7-31-94 Exlmc#on Fee Rate N/A ACRE-FOOT BALANCE /', 1/g ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 8,465 ACRE-FOOT BALN~CE 1 ) ~ Kem-Tulere WD/Rag Gulch WD/Westside Spreading Pro~ Imm (1,167 AcFt spread via Pioneer, 11,970 spread via 2800 Acre Faciity, assigned 4-94 as follows: Be~encl~ Meea WD; 172 AcFt, Lost Hills WD; 3,602 AcFt, Belridge WSD; 2,876 AcFt, Wheeler Ridge-Marioopa WSD; 6,487 AcFt). 2) Reflects ID4/Weatskle Spreading Program (2,441 AcFt spread via Kern River channel easterly o~ 2800 Acres (Recharge losses assessed at 7%); 7,524 spread via 2800 Acre Facility (Subject to recharge losses), assigned 4-94 as follows: Kern River channel easterly of 2800 Acres: Berrencla Mesa WD; 61 AcFL Lost Hills WD; 661 AcR, Belridge WSD; 528 AcFt, Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa WSD; 1,191 AcFt, 2800 Acre Facilb/: Barrenda Mesa WD; 188 AcFL Lost Hills WD; 2,039 AcFt, Belridge WSD; 1,626 AcFt. Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa WSD; 3,671 AcFt). 3) Reflects Spring 1994 Banking Program (2,034 AcFt spread via Pioneer; 16,692 spread via 2800 Acre Facilly, assigned 4-94 as follows: Bemmda Mesa WD; 4,593 AcFt, Lost Hills WD; 3,422 AcFt, Tejon-Castac WD; 70 AcFt. Kem Court'y Water Agency on behalf of Improvement District N;x 4; 10,641 AcFt (Spreading Fee Deferred on 9,586 AcFt)). CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILITY KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY YEAR: 1995 GROUNDWATER BANIONG & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~ (9ubJect to rer. harge losses.) .~PREN~NI3 BLOCI~ T (~ubject to recharge Ios~ee.) SPREADING BLOCK: U (~ubject to recharge losses.) End 12-94 End 11-G5 End 9-95 TOTAL AMOUNT SPREAD 1) 1,825 TOTAL AMOUNT ~PREAD 2} 49,730 TOTAL AMOUNT ~PFIEAD 23,607 SPREADING FEE B/U. ED $0.00 ,..~PREADING FEE BILLED $280,974.50 SPREADING FEE BILLED SQ O0 DUE DA TE ON DEI~E'RF~D SPREADING FEE None DUE DA*IE ON DEFERF~D ..';~=READING FEE None DUE DATE ON DEFERFED ~=*READING FEE Sep 2010 ACRE- FOOT BALANCE 1,825 ACRE- FOOT BAI. ANCE 49,730 ACRE- FOOT BALANCE 23,607 1) Reflects spreading by Lost Hills WD (1,500 AoFt b"ansfermd from Spreading Block Q) and Belridge WSD (225 AcR transferred from Spreading Block N; 100 AcFt transferred from Spreading Block R). 2) Includes spreading for Berrenda Mesa WD (1,379 AcFt of SWP; 14,334 AcFI of Friant-Kem; 8,137 AcFt of Kem RiveO, Lost Hills WD (6.472 AcFt of SWP; 1,308 AcFt of Frlsn~- Kern; ?~920 AcFt of Kern River), Belridge WSD (6,384 AcFt of SWP; 420 AoFt of Friar~- Kern). Wheeler Ridge- Maricopa WSD (5.151 Ac Ft of SWF) and Cawelo WD (1,948 AcFt of SWP; 1,297 AcFt of Friertt- Kern). Crl'Y OF BAKERSFIELD 2800 ACRE RECHARGE FACILfly KERN COUN'IY WATER AGENCY/STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES YEAR: 1 995 E}ROUN DWA TER BAN KIN(; & RECOVERY OPERATIONS ~ (13ubJect to re~harge losses.) SPI~EADING BLOCK:B (Subject to recharge losses.) SPFE/~DING BLOCK:C (Not ,~bJ,=t to recharge losses.) S~t 1-87 Start 9-90 ,..~a rt 12-90 End 2-87 End 9-90 End 12-90 TOTAL AMOUNT aPl=lEAD 7,379 TOTAL AMOUNT ~=READ 9,500 TOTAL AMOUNT t~PREAD 98,005 SPFEADING FEE BILLED $0.00 SPFEADING FEE BILLED 2) $0.00 SPt:EADING FEE BILl.ED 3) $518,448.45 DIE DATE ON DEFERRED ,SPREADING FEE Feb 2002 DI..~ DATE ON DEFERF~O ,..ePREADING FEE None DIE DATE ON DET=F__RRED SPREADING FEE None AC/E-FEET FECOI~ERED 2,2B5 ACPE-FEET REOO I~'/~'O 1,011 ACF~-FEET RE(~OI/EIc~D 24 S~rt 9-14-{M S~tt 11-01-94 Ste~l' 2-28-92 End 9-30-94 End 11-30-94 End 2-29-92 Exbac~on Fee Rate $5.48 Exeact/on Fee Rate N/A Extmc~on Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $12,521.80 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 AC'I:~-FEET F~I~OVERED 3,373 ACFE-FEET F~COVEREO 4,447 ACFE-FEET F~I:~OVERED 1,083 ,.q~rt 10-01 -g4 ~a,'t 12-01-94 Stert 3-01-92 End 10-31-94 End 12-31-9~. N/A II End 3-23-92 Extmc~on Fee Rate $5.48 Exbac~on Fee Rate Ext/ac~on Fee Rate NIA EXTRACT/ON FEE BID_ED $18,484~O4 EXTRAC'TION FEE BILLED $0.001 EXTRAC770N FEE BILLED AO:E-FEETRECOI/EI:~D 1,342 ACt~-FEET~COVEF~D 752I . ~-FEETPECOI/E~D 98 Stent 11-01-94 S~att 1-01-95 I S~/t 6-08-92 End 11-30-94 End 1-06-95 N/AI End 6-11-92 Exbac~on Fee Rate $5.48 Ex~ac~on Fee Rate Ex~a(::~,on Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $7,354.16 EXTRACT/ON FEE BILLED $0.00 EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACF~-FEET F~E~OI/EF~D 2,784 End 7-31-92 EJErac~on Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 AC~E -FEE T I:~ CO tlE RED 2,937 S~t 8-01-92 End 8-31-92 Exlrac~on Fee Rate N/A F__XTRAC ~70 N FEE BILLED $0.00 AC~-FEET F~O~'EF~D 3,028 Sta,'t 9-01-92 End 9-30-92 E~ac~on Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED AC~-FEET RECOVEP~D 646 S~rt 10-01-g2 End 10-31-92 E~ac~{fon Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 AC~-FEET RECOI~'FED 1,41 0 ,gm,'t 11-01-92 End 11-30-92 Extmc~on Fee Rate EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACP~-FEET RECOI/EF~D 2,888 ~te~f 12-01-92 End 12-31-92 Ex~c~on Fee Rate N/A EXTRACTION FEE BILLED $0.00 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 1) 379 ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 3,29{] ACRE-FOOT BALANCE 83,127 1) Balen~e of 379 AcR reflects DWR proposal to consider recharge losses associated with 1987 Advanced Storage Program per ten, ns of DWF ~KCWA letter agreement dated August 4, 1992. 2) Spreading Fee of $65,987.00 (5,600 AcFt for WR-MWSD @ $4.37/AcFt plus 9,500 AcFt for BMWD @ $4.37/AcFt) billed to Kem County Water Agency (See KCWA Spreading Block:A). 3) Spreading Fee of $5.29/AcR billed to KCWA pursuant to "Contract for purchase and sale of recharged wate~ among the Depe~tent of Water Resources of the State of California, KCWA, and La Hacienda, Inc~" F ~ ' '~ 8 ~ ~ ' .. . :'~, ~ ~ -% ,~ '%. ~ ........ ~ ,/~ ~ . ~~== ~,~ ' '*'~ ~ * ~_ %. · ~ ~ .~/ ~-~ ~'~ ~~" :,,,.~ . . .,~ ...... :. '% ~ ,~ ~ .~ ,I .....:~,. ~,.s~ ~" . ,~: , 4?[ .- ~~_ _ ~ .. '/~.¢2. ~- , , , · . . .... · ~,,~ ..,.~, . .,~ ~- . ., ,~ ~ ..... ,.. ...~/ ~. : . I I · " ' ~ ~ ' ' ~ . ' "~ , · , ~ " -~', , ~ ~ i ~~' ' ~ ~~E~O ...~~ ' ......~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ' ....... ~ ~. ~ ~ -~ · . ~ ~ ~ , ~ u: ..... r: " ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ · ,. ,, . ~ ~,, ~ I . ,,, ..... ....,, ~;;~ .... ~ ,~ ..~ .~ ., ~ .... . _ . I,. · . .... ,,,. ~ . ,-, ~ ~ .... . ,,,, ...... ,,~ .. o. , .,- ,,~ ,.~.~, :... ! ~__l. , , I /' .f .'-~" .~ I ¢' ~' .' .- ' ~~~ :'~ ~~.~.:~'.:~' ~::::~ ~ ' ~. ~ ~ .~ - ,~ ~4 ,..~ ~,~ '~ ~ . · ~ ~ ~.~ ~: . .Z~ ~:~' ' . .. ~... , ,,~, ,, ~,~. ,~ .- ..,,., ........... ,, ...... . .. ~:: ~ ~ . ~ . b · _ .~. .~ ,. ~ ..,:. ..~ ~, ......... ...~ ~.,.,,,,=,,,,., ..... . .-.. ~ .... 0 , , ~ ~.~,! ............... _... , .___.,. .... , .......... , ....... .,...... ... . .....:, . ...... .,,. . . ........... . .......... . . ... ,~:~' ........ . _ _ . ; ..... ., ..~: ~ .,.. . ~:~. ~ .... .~ ..... , ,,. ] ~; ~. : ~ ~ . . . .. I . .... ~ ,..~ .,,,, ................ ~ ,.._ .,~.. ~~..._~ .,.. ..... .. . . . ,. .,~. ,.., . .~..,~ ,,, ...... ..... . ., ., ~_ . .,, .. ~ .... ., .. .... .................... . -.. ~ ~ . ~~~ · · ..~ r/ · ._,~ ,- ~ ~ , , ,. =~ ~ ~, ' ' ~ ~ " ~--- .~'~,, ~ ........ ' '::' ' '/ ' ' .-' ~--"., ' ~ .~ ' - ;' ; ~ ' '" e ~' -. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ' , ,~ '-' '~ ;~ ~ .' . /,' r~ s s ~,v~ . . ~, ~ ' ..'" ' ~ .... ' , , .' .~r~ ,. ' ,~' ,' '~ ' .~ ' ' . ,~ ~..~ ..... .~ ~......,~. ~ '~ '~. '~ ,6' ~ ' ~ ' ' · % ~ ) r .~ ~ ,~.~.~, .. _ ~. _- . ~-. I ~ ....... ~.<~:, ~. ,. I .. ;.. .~, ~ J ~ . ~ ~ ~i~ . ~ /// ~'i .,,1 ~,:'~ ~ ~J~ '" ~ ~ ..~;/ i ---- ~o,,~,~ ~,~ --., , ..... , ',,,,. u /z~ ~ ~'% ~ :.. ~~~ ~. ~. >~ ~_~ .... .~,~ , :~/~-~ .¢~ ...: :( .-, . · , ,, , .,. , , , ,