HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/08/78 AGENDA
WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1978
4:00 P.M.
Call Meeting to order
Roll Call - Board Members: Rogers, Chairman; Barton, Ratty, Bergen
Hoagland
1. Approve minutes of recessed meeting of October 5, 1978.
2. Scheduled Public Statements.
3. Letter to Cawelo Water District regarding water supply.- BOARD
TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CHAI~N TO SIGN.
4. Staff Comments
5. Board Comments
6. Adjournment
AGENDA
WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1978
4:00 P.M.
Call Meeting to order
Roll Call - Board Members: Rogers, Chairman; Barton, Ratty, Bergen
Hoagland
1. Approve minutes of recessed meeting of October 5, 1978.
2. Scheduled Public Statements.
3. Letter to Cawelo Water District regarding water supply.- BOARD
TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIrmAN TO SIGN. ~
4. Staff Comments
5. Board Comments
6. Adjournment
MINUTES
WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
RECESSED MEETING
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1978
11:30 A.M.
The meeting was called to order at 11:30 A.M. by Vice-Chair-
man Ratty in the City Hall Caucus Room.
The secretary called the roll as follows:
Present: Barton, Ratty, Hoagland
Absent: Rogers, Bergen
Staff Present: Bogart, Chafin, Hostmyer, Oberholzer, Stetson
Others Present: Stanley Hatch
The minutes from the recessed meeting of August 4, 1978, were
approved as presented.
An Agreement between the City of Bakersfield and Hatch and
Parent, a professional law corporation, to retain their
services, as special counsel was presented to the board for
approval.
A discussion followed in regard to the retainer fee and Mr.
HatCh's policy regarding the charge of his time while in
travel. Mr. Hatch explained he charges full time for travel
between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.-, and usually half time is
charged at other hours. However, he does not always bill in
this manner,, he just uses his own judgement as to whether or
not he is doing something useful for the client.
After further discussion a motion was made by Mr. Hoagland
that the board approve the agreement as modified, omitting
the clause requiring the retainer fee, and authorize the
Chairman to sign. The motion was passed by the following
roll call vote:
Ayes: Barton, Ratty, Hoagland
Noes: None
Absent: Rogers, Bergen
Mr. Hatch at this time addressed the board stating that he
and Mr. Stetson had gone over various problems that he will
be needing to get some background on. His intention would
be to work with Mr. Chafin and Mr. Stetson to develope some
background and strategy in that regard, and bring back to the
board some information to indicate where he should begin to
establish a priority list.
There being no further business to come before the board,
Vice-Chairman Ratty adjourned the meeting at 11:55j~_~4.
Donald A. Rogers,' Chairman
City of Bakersfield ~ater Board
~?~~y e r ,~S~a~y ~
City of Bakersfield Water Board
'"~, 0 F "; , ---'-- ' -- ,
CALIFORNIA ~ ~___.,.~ =._---
DEPARTMENT OF WATER ~ -: ~
.
November 8, 1978
Board of Directors
Cawelo Water District
1415 18th Street, Room 305
Bakersfield, California 93301
RE: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONTRACTUAL
WATER DELIVERIES DURING 1978
Gentlemen: "
We are in receipt of a letter dated September 27, 1978 from your
engineer, Mr. R. L. Schafer, advising us that certain deliveries
of Kern River,water to your district under our Agreement No. 76-62
are vagrant waters, not subject to ownership or allocation of any
entity. We are dismayed by this unsolicited advice which has no
legal basis in the contractual document regulating the relationship
between the City and your District.
Mr. Schafer's assertions are both factually and legally wrong on
many counts, among which are the following:
1. The water delivered was at all times under control
at the diversion point.
2. Your District has no means of diversion from the Kern
River except through its contracutal arrangements.
3. Article',VI, Section 6.la, of Agreement No. 76-62
specifies the point of delivery of Kern River water;
Section 6.lb provides that water deliveries" . .
will be determined by City on the basis of the
quahtityof City nonutility water in storage in Lake
Isabella and the forecast of natural runoff of the
Kern River for that year"; and Section 6.1c provides
the only means by which the district can revise its
monthly delivery schedule.
1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE · ' BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 · (805) 861-2715
~age 2
4~ Article VI, S~ction 6.2 provides for the means of
transportation of Kern River Water to the district.
5.- Article VIII, Section 8.1 provides that the district
agrees that nothing in Agreement No. 76-62 shall"'
affect or~ change the existing Kern River rights'or
Lake Isabella storage rights of City; and that the
district further agrees that it will not claim'any
right against City to the use of Kern River water,
including Released Water, other than that provided '
in Agreement 76-62.
6. Article VIII, Section 8.1 goes on to say that if the
district claims its receipt or use of waters of the
Kern River creates, constitutes or establishes a
'right to the use Of such water against City at any
time or in any manner or for any purpose except pur-
suant to and in accordance with Agreement No. 76-62
that the claim shall.be void ab initio; and if the
district endeavors to establish any right to any
such water as against City, then City may terminate'
its deliveries of water to the district under the
agreement.
7. Flood waters do not include high waters flowing in
the natural channel of a stream because they have
not escaped from the stream.
Earlier this year, Mr. Schafer and Mr. John Jones, your Manager,
met with Mr. Gene Bogart of our Water Department and discussed the
matter of diversions of Kern River water to Cawelo Water District
during the so-called "mandatory release" period of operations of
Lake Isabella. Mr. Bogart advised then at that time that the only
water being delivered to Cawelo was water scheduled for delivery
under Agrcement No. 76-62; and that CaQelo had no physical facil-
ities of its own to divert Kern River Water.
Mr. Schafer's.letter comes perilously close'to constituting a
'violation of Section 8.1 of Agreement No. 76-62. To the extent
that it'involves a claim'of prior right to Kern River water deliv-
ered by the City to the District under the contract, it is void
ab initio. The City does not take kindly to Mr. Schafer advising
the City of the' quantities of water which he erroneously thinks
are chargeable by the City under Agreement No'. 76-62. Further,
he is'not even the Administrative Agent of Cawelo under the terms
of the agreemen~ (Section 11.7).
~age 3
We reluctantly note that this is the second time in two years that
Cawelo, or its representatives, has attempted to unilaterally mod-
ify its agreement with the City -- last year it was on the subject
of the price of water after the City had undertaken extraordinary
efforts %o make additional water available to Cawelo in one of the
driest years in history~ We have not had such problems with our
other contractors. We would ask you to insure that in the future
your employees adhere, strictly to the terms of Agreement No. 76-62
with the City. It is only in this way that the spirit of coopera-
tion and mutual benefit which inspired the contract originally can
be continued.
Sincerely,
Donald A. Rogers, Chairman
City of Bakersfield Water Board
DAR:lh
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
PC~['r~'~lit F (DFFIC[ VIC. ALIA OFFICE
~ o.~, ~' ~ ~ R.L. SGItAFER & ASSOGIATES, ING. ~.o. eo~2~
881 WSs~ ~Aor~o~ St. ' ' - 2~4 Wes~ Main St.
Porterville, Califo[nia93257 ' GIVIL ~ GONSULTING ENGINEERS Visalia. Californio932~
Ph. (2~) 781-0102/688-~49 Ph. (2~) 734.1348[
September 27, 1978
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: Mr. Gene Bogart, Water Superintendent
Dear Mr. Bogart:
Your letter of August 16, 1978 set forth monthly quantities
in acre-feet of the "status of City Kern River deliveries to
Cawelo Water District in 1978". We do not disagree that the
quantities of~ Kern River water were-utilized by the District,
but ddring the period April 5, 1978 through June 25, 1978,
the Corps of Engineers required flood releases from Isabella
Reservoir and such waters are vagrant and not subject to
ownership or allocation of any entity. Therefore, the
quantities chargeable by the City to Cawelo Water District,
~January through July, 1978, under the agreement should be
as follows:
City to Cawelo W.D.
Month (acre-feet)
January. 202
February - 34
March ~, 458
April 67
May 0
June 1.,
July 9',780
City to Cawelo W.D.
Jan.-July '78 12,094 acre-feet.
Very trul~ours,
R. L. Schafer
RLS/dc
cc: Mr. Stephen Wall
Ca,,,elo Water District
sEP 2
O ' . MEMORANDUM .
October 2 1978
John' chef in
FROM ................................... , ............................................................... ~ ......................... : ................................... ' ...........
5UBJFCT Memo from Gene Begat% concerning Cawel'o water supply via the
Beardsley Canal during the period o2 mandatory ~oo~ control' ·
release in 1978.
-I discussed %his situation with Tom Stetson' and we both agreed
that in our opinion Cawelo Water District could divert into
the Beardsley Canal only that water under the City/Cawelo basic
contract.
Attached find Gene Bogar~'s memo to me and the letter he received
from R. L Schafer, who is the consulting engineer for Cawelo
Water District.
lh
cc: K', Hoagland
T, Stetson
G. Bogart
. .:. ,-....~:.? ..... .~ ...~., ....... -. .......... ; ............. . ..... .-. .
' MEMORANDUM
.... - .... . .. . .... .~.~.~...~.~...~.~.~.~. ..................
· 0 ......... ' .... '..'~;.~.~g.~...~.,...~.~..'~.~;..~.;.~ .... : ....... ::..-~..:.~ ........ ~...~ ...... ....::: ..... : .... : .................... : .... :..=~:~.~-:~..=~== .....
.-.~.
FROM
geDe
District received during ~he "mandatory release" opera~ion of
the Kern River was .chargeable %o %he Cawelo basic contract. I
said yes. ' ~ ..,
Dick S~afer %hen offered_a~ l'i_~tl'e ...background on %he opera%ion..'of-'~'.
' - %he Tule River during'the periods of flood release j---Dick-then ............
wen% on %o say. ~ha% %he Kern River during flood release periods
contained "vagrant" wa%ers and as such were "up for grabs, so
speak..." I told Dick Schafer that Cawelo Wa%er District did
no% have '%he .physical facilities ~%o divert'Kern River wa%er
directly from %he River Channel. Dick Schafer did not ~ues~ion
%his point but did request %hat since Kerb River water was leaving
%he Coun.~y via %he Intertie that some consideration be given
Cawelo Water District'.
I explained %o both John Jones and Dick Schafer that since the
City/Cawel0 ba~-ic contract con,.al'ns'no provisions nor makes any"-
reference %o "flo6'd' ~ele~se" or "mhndatory release" wa%ers, %hat
I had no Choice. but ~o consider Cawelo~ deliveries as "Basic Contract
Water"' and that any other interpretation would be a decision coming
from "over my head." With %hat the meeting concluded, %hey~ thanked
me f~r'my time and 1%old'them I would pass their request for con-
sidera%ion on %o ~he Wa%er Manager.
lh
WATER BOARD - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1978
4:00 P.M.
3. ~,~
a. Letter from William T. Balch, Tenneco West, IncC'Ito Donald
A. Rogers, Chairman; City of Bakersfield Water Board regarding
the 2800 acres owned by the City. - FOR DISCUSSION - BOARD TO
DETE~[INE ACTION.
T~n~o West, Inc. P.o. Box 9380
A Tenneco Company Bakersfield, California 93309
(805) 832-9010
William 'r. Balch
Executive Vice President
October 31, 1978
City of Bakersfield Water Board
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Attention: Mr. Donald A. Rogers, Chairman
Gentlemen:
We have been informed that the City of Bakersfield is
replenishing the groundwater on its 2800 acres in the
Kern River Fan with some water that may be owned by others
than the City of Bakersfield. This tends to lead us to
the conclusion that there may be plans to extract and
export the water from the underground basin. After making
several preliminary studies on the underground water basin,
we believe that several operational requirements should
be established in order to prevent any adverse groundwater
effects. Therefore, we respectfully request a meeting with
either your board or your staff before your plans are fin-
alized in order to assist in working out an acceptable
overall program. In this way, we would hope to be helpful
in minimizing future conflicts as well as the adverse condi-
tions on one or more areas within the groundwater basin.
Very truly yours,
WTB/d
DEPARTMENT OF WATER
November 8, 1978
Mel Jans, Vice-President
Tenneco West, Inc.
P. O. Box 9380
Bakersfield, California 93309
Dear Mr. Jans:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that effective March 1,
1979, the City of Bakersfield Department of Water will discontinue
service under Agreement No. 78-03 W.B. regarding the operation and-.
maintenance of the Pioneer and Little James canals. After that
time City will continue to operate and service only certain por-
tions of those facilities as follows:
1) James, Little James - City will remain responsible for
the operation of those facilities owned by the City,
namely the Big James canal to the Little James head-
gate, thence westerly approximately 1. (one) mile to the
· point of new construction located in Section 12 of 30/26,
M.D.B.&M.
2) Pioneer Headgate - Located in Section 1 of 30/26, this
will provide the Pioneer diversion to be coordinated
with all other Kern River operations on an orderly
scheduled basis.
Since it is our understanding that the Pioneer and Little James
surface water facilities are soon to become part of the'James-
Pioneer Improvement District of the North Kern Water Storage District,
it is assumed that North Kern would perform the operation and main-
tenance services of James-Pioneer Improvement District. In light
of this the Department of Water is willing'to assign City personnel
experienced in the Pioneer and Little James operation to assist in
1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 · (805) 861-2715
November 8, 1978
~el Jans, Vice-President
Tenneco West, Inc.
Page 2
the training of North Kern Water Storage District personnel. The
same rate schedule for service that is now in effect would apply
through March 1, 1979. This should provide an orderly transition
for North Kern Water Storage District operation of James-Pioneer
Improvement'District facilities.
We have enjoyed the opportunity to service these facilities during
the initial year of operation.
Sincerely, ~
Donald A. Rogers, Chairman
City of Bakersfield Water Board
DAR:lh
cc: C'.Hi' Williams, North Kern Water Storage District
' ~ ~" 525 N. MAIN STREET -:- PHONE (805) 7~4-5~!0
· P.O. ~ox 755
, BU~ONWILLOW, CALIFORNIA' g3206
DIRECTORS HAROLD K. RUSSELL
~ ~ FREEBORN. pRESIDE~ ENGINEER-~ANAGE~
GARY GAMBLE. VICE PRESIDENT
GINO TORIGIANI~ SECR[TAR~ H. JOHN FISHER
ROY BELLUOMINI TREAS. & ASST. SEC~.
TED BLO~HOF Nove~er 3, 1978
City of Bakersfield
Water Board
1501'Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Temporary Arrangement for Spreading and Recovery of Water
Gentlemen:
As you know, negotiations are currently under way for a long-
term arrangement for spreading and recovery of water between the
.Buena Vista Water Storage District ("Buena Vista" herein), the City
of Bakersfield ("City" herein), and others. It is not anticipated
'~: 'that this long-term arrangement will be consummated within 'the next
few days, whereas Buena Vista is informed that spreading capacity
upon lands owned by the City of Bakersfield will become available for
use by Buena Vista on or about November 6, 1978. This letter is
written to inform you that Buena Vista would like to enter into a
temporary arrangement with the City such that it c~n take advantage of
the availability of spreading capacity even though we have not reached
complete agreement with respect to a long-term-arrangement.
It is to be understood that Buena Vista water will be spread
under this temporary arrangement with the intention that Buena Vista
may later recover the same. To this end, it is agreed that any water
spread pursuant to this temporary arrangement shall be' credited to
the water bank account of Buena Vista, if any, which may hereafter
be created in accordance with the terms and provisions of the long-term
arrangement currently being negotiated. Should no such future
agreement materialize, it is further agreed that the parties hereto
will cooperate with one another in the making of some equitable and
reasonable accommodation which will allow for Buena Vista's recovery
of its water or some form of compensation to Buena Vista in lieu thereof.
It is further agreed that this temporary arrangement shall bind
the parties hereto, their respective heirs, successors and assigns.
City of Bakersfield .November 3, 1978
Water Board .Page Two
In addition, Buena Vista sh'a~l indemnify City, and City shall indemnify
Buena Vista, their respective officers, agents and employees for any
liability for injury to or death of any person, or damage to property,
caused by a negligent or wrongful act or ommission occurring in either
party's performance of this agreement.
If the foregoing arrangement is satisfactory please indicate
your approval thereof by signing and returning the enclosed copy. of
this letter. It is anticipated that spreading of Buena Vista water
will commence hereunder on or about November 6, 1978 and that
approximately 5,000 acre feet will be spread. It is understood that
spreading by Buena Vista is at all times subject tO City's prior
right of use.
Very truly yours,
BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DISTRICT
Harold K.' Russell';
Engineer/Manager
Gene-~f McMurtrey, Attorney
Approved and Accepted on Behalf of
the City of Bakersfield
By: