HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/30/00'~ / B A K E R S F I E L D
· CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
June 30,2000
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COU/N/~IL~-
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Nelson Smith, an accounting supervisor with us has been promoted to the position
of Assistant Finance Director. Congratulations!
2. Jim Foss is continuing efforts to bring us an arena football exhibition game next
season and a franchise at a later date. It is too soon to know the outcome.
3. A memo is included which discusses "double taxation" in relation to the parks, streets
and median landscape maintenance district assessments. The council addressed
that issue some time ago, and now a subsidy flows to each maintenance district to
cover the base level of services that exist Citywide. In other words, no double
taxation.
4. Recreation and Parks is up and running with their new registration software. This will
give them easy access to more information about their programs, providing better
customer service.
5. Memos from Alan Christensen provide information regarding the employment status
for Stier's Leisure Vehicles, Inc. dba Stier's RV Sales, Guy Chaddock & Company,
and Pleasant Holidays.
6. The California Trade & Commerce Agency requires an annual report detailing specific ~
business data and administrative costs for each Enterprise Zone throughout the ':
State. The report is included for your reference. :i,
Honorable Mayorand City Council
June 30,2000
Page 2
7. EDCD staff has been working with Don Anderson, Sr. Real Property Manager, to see
if there would be interest for home builders to develop affordable housing units on five
City properties that have been declared surplus. A memo is attached outlining the
process and projected timeline.
8. An interesting problem - with the City Center moving forward, should we go ahead
with the architectural and feasibility study work for a skating rink that only have value
if the City Center falls through and we go to an off-site location? I think we will consult
the Community Services Committee on that.
9. An update from Development Services is enclosed.
10. The "Q" Street Grade Separation looks great. Tuesday will open an even nicer
Amtrak Facility.
11. Several weeks ago, the City Council approved our participation in the United States
Agency for International Development's Resource Cities program. At that time, we
believed the mentee city would be Raong, Thailand. That has been changed, and the
mentee is now Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Dates for the first delegation exchange have
not yet been set. Their problems are solid waste and planning.
12. A memo from Development Services dealing with a council referral on the Subdivision
Ordinance is enclosed.
13. A report from Development Services dealing the assignments and role of advance
planning is also enclosed.
AT:al
cc: Mayor-Elect Harvey Hall Department Heads
Pamela McCarthy, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
June 22, 2000
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: John W. Stins~A'~sssistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Parks, Street and Median Landscape Maintenance Districts - "Double
Taxation" Issue
At a recent Council meeting several Councilmembers commented about "double taxation" in
relation to the parks, streets and median landscape maintenance district assessments. This had
been a concern for several years, however it was addressed in the early 1990's when the City
created the Consolidated Maintenance District.
When the consolidated maintenance district was created, a subsidy equivalent to the relative
amount of general tax supported parks, streets and median maintenance provided throughout the
city was applied towards the cost of maintaining areas included in the maintenance districts.
This was intended to provide residents with an equitable amount of general tax supported
funding for park and streets and median landscape maintenance throughout the city in order to
eliminate the issue of"double taxation." It was estimated that a 66% subsidy of park
maintenance costs and 7.3% subsidy for street and median landscaping should be supported by
general tax funds. This approach was adopted by the Council and included in the calculation of
these assessments. Therefore, the current assessments include those costs of providing park,
street and median landscaping above the adopted city-wide standard for these facilities and
amenities.
In addition to this base level of general tax funding, increases in general tax support for median
maintenance resulting from the Council's recent adoption of a new median standard will, over
time, cause some increase in the subsidy from general taxes for those who currently pay for
improved medians though maintenance districts.
S:~JOFl~aint. Dist. Memo.wpd .~V~ ~
· I Rhonda Smfley~ - There:::::~s ............. Nothing'"' To Do In Bakersfleld."~'~";~
From: Stan Ford
To: Alan Tandy
Date: Mon, Jun 26, 2000 9:09 AM
Subject: There's Nothing To Do In Bakersfield?
Thanks to our new registration software, we have easy access to more information about our programs.
One interesting bit of trivia. We have approximately 600 different program opportunities for the public this
summer. For example, we may a dance class that is offered on either Monday-Wednesday or
Tuesday-Thursday. The computer considers that two different classes. Counting each section of a class
and each one-time activity, our summerr brochure features over 600 different classes or activities.
There's something to do in Bakersfield.
CC: Department Heads; Rhonda Smiley
JUN 8
B A K E R S F I E L D -'ITYMANAGERSOF~C "F ~J
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
June 28, 2000
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~_
FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Employment Status for Stier's Leisure Vehicles, Inc. d.b.a. Stier's RV Sales
Agreement No. 99-83 between the City of Bakersfield and Stier's RV Sales, provided a $60,000
loan to the company for a term of five years. This loan is not a forgivable loan and will be repaid
at 0% interest in 2004. However, if in any year the company fails to comply with the terms of the
agreement, 20% of the loan (or $12,000) would reimbursed to the city. These terms include,
· hiring eight workers from Bakersfield during the first year, twelve during the second
year, five during the third year, five during the fourth year, and zero during the fifth year
for a total of 30 new jobs over the term of the agreement; and
· of those workers hired each year, at least 51% must be low- and moderate-income
individuals.
During the first year (1999-00), the company exceeded the terms and conditions of the
agreement, with 12 new workers, 80% of which were low- and moderate-income individuals.
Therefore, Stier's RV Sales, Inc., has met the terms and conditions required in the agreement for
the first year and will not be required to immediately reimburse the city for 20% of the loan.
Payment for the entire loan is due on April 14, 2004.
I propose we send a letter confirms to the company that they have met their obligations during
1999-00. With a nod from you we will immediately mail the letter.
attachment
dl:\P:\Stier's~Forgive 20% of Year 1.Stiers.wpd
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
June 22,2000
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Employment Status for Guy Chaddock & Company
Agreement No.96-192 between the City of Bakersfield and Guy Chaddock & Company provided
a $200,000 loan to the company for a term of five years. Twenty percent of the loan will be
forgiven for each year the company meets all terms and conditions of the agreement. These
terms included,
*hiring 35 workers from Bakersfield.
*of those workers hired in the second to fifth years, at least 51% must be low- and
moderate-income individuals.
Exercising this forgiveness is a ministerial action and, thus, requires no Council action.
Based upon the report submitted to our office from the company, the company has exceeded both
conditions noted above. For the third year of the agreement, the company employed 115 new
hires, and 91.3% of these hires were low- and moderate-income individuals. Currently, this
company employs 281. Early projections estimated 85 people would be transferred to
Bakersfield, with an additional 35 local hires.
Therefore, Guy Chaddock & Company has met the terms and conditions required in the
agreement and qualifies to have 20%, or $40,000, of the loan amount forgiven for the third year
of the agreement. For the past two years, the company has met the terms of the agreement and
20% of the loan amount has been forgiven each year.
I propose we send a letter like we did last year, which merely reflects the ministerial action of the
debt forgiveness. With approval from you, we will immediately mail the letter.
dI:\P:\CHADDOCK~Forgive 20% of Year 3.wpd
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
June 23, 2000
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Employment Status for Pleasant Holidays
Agreement No. 99-175 between the City of Bakersfield and Pleasant Holidays provided a
$250,000 loan to the company for a term of five years. Twenty percent of the loan will be
forgiven for each year the company met all terms and conditions of the agreement. These terms
included,
· hiring 150 workers within the first five years, with 50 new jobs in Year 1
· of those workers hired, at least 51% must be low- and moderate-income individuals for
each of the first five years of the agreement.
Exercising this forgiveness is a ministerial action and, thus, requires no Council action.
Based upon the report submitted to our office from the company, the company has exceeded both
conditions. For the first year of the agreement, the company employed 154 new hires, and
83.77% of these hires were low- and moderate-income individuals.
Therefore, Pleasant Holidays has met the terms and conditions required in the agreement and
qualifies to have 20%, or $50,000, of the loan amount forgiven for the first year of the
agreement. I propose we send a letter like we have to other companies, which merely reflects the
ministerial action of the debt forgiveness. With approval from you, we will immediately mail the
letter.
dl2P:\Pleasant Travel~Forgive 20% of Year I.wpd
B A K 'E R S V I E L D ewMl~..s0~-;,::.~!
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
June 26, 2000
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager/Z~
SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD ENTERPRISE ZONE
1999 ANNUAL REPORT
The California Trade & Commerce Agency requires an annual report detailing specific
business data and administrative costs for each Enterprise Zone throughout the state.
Enclosed is the 1999 Annual Report forthe Metropolitan Bakersfield Enterprise Zone which
we recently forwarded to the state. The information within the report is the aggregate data
by both jurisdictions.
Of special note is the category of Vouchered Employees totaling 497 for 1999.
Should you have any questions regarding the report please call.
P:\EZ~ANNUAL\annual report 99 memo - tandy.wpd
southeast
metropolitan
June 15, 2000
bakersfield
·
etZtert l'lS¢ California Trade and Commerce Agency
Enterprise Zone Unit
~ojr~e Ms. Michelle Adams
801 K Street, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95822
RE: 1999 Annual Report
Dear Ms. Adams,
Enclosed herewith is the City of Bakersfield and County of Kern's
annual report for the Southeast Metropolitan Bakersfield
Enterprise Zone for calendar year 1999. Employers' Training
Resource was successful in issuing 497 employment vouchers for
the period.
Should you have any questions, please call Paul Sippel, (661)
862-5029, or David Lyman (661) 326-3765.
Sincerely,
City of Bakersfield Bill Mungary, Director | Alan Christensen, Asst. City Mgr
Economic and Community Kern County Community City of Bakersfield
Development Department Development Program Economic and Community
.515 Truxtun Avenue Department Development Department
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 326-3765
Fax (66i) 861-8326
Attachment
xc: Pat Collins, KEDC (wi attachment)
County of'Kern John Nilon, ETR (wi attachment)
Community Development
Program Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 250
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 862-5029 F:\WP6DATA\ECONDEV~coverltr.wpd
Fax (66 I) 862-5052
ENTERPRISE ZONE
1999 CALENDAR YEAR
ANNUAL REPORT SURVEY
Name of Zone: Metropolitan Bakersfield Enterprise Zone
Name of Coordinator: David Lyman (City) / Paul Sippel (County)
Date: June 15, 2000
1. Number of Building Permits. Indicate the total number of all building permits issued in the
enterprise zone during 1999. Include EVERY and ALL type(s) of building permits issued by the
jurisdictions comprising the zone whether it is for signs, plumbing, remodels, etc. Please
differentiate ONLY between permits issued for businesses and residential construction.
ALL BUSINESS 55 ALL RESIDENTIAL 15
Source(s): Kem County Planning Department Permit Log
City of Bakersfield Development Services Department
2. Value of Building Permits. Indicate the total value of EVERY and ALL building permit(s)
issued in the enterprise zone during 1999.
ALL BUSINESS $__9,122,278 ALL RESIDENTIAL$ 124,679
Source(s): Kern County Planning Department Permit Log
City of Bakersfield Development Services Department
3. New Business Licenses. Indicate the total number of ALL new business licenses (including
home businesses) issued in the enterprise zone during 1999. Please note whether any of the
jurisdictions comprising the zone do not require business licenses. 33
Source(s): *Kern County does not require business licenses
City of Bakersfield Financial Services Department
4. Businesses in the Zone. Indicate the total number of businesses located within the
enterprise zone and whether or not they participate in either program. Please make an estimate
(and so indicate) if an exact number is not possible. 425
Source(s): Reverse street directory, estimate
5. Vouchered Employees. Indicate the total number of individuals vouchered and
subsequently hired in 1999. 497
Source(s): Employers' Training Resource
JTPA 102
Dislocated Worker
Military Dislocated Worker
WOTC
TEA Resident 229
Other 166
6. Hourly Wage Rate. Indicate the average'hourly wage rate of vouchered employees hired
within 1999. $7.42
Source(s): Employers' Training Resource
7. Size of Businesses. Indicate the size, according to the number of employees, of businesses
which have hired vouchered/qualifying employees during 1999. Please take a sampling of
businesses if data is not available for all businesses.
Size 1999
0-50 Employees 70 %
51-100 Employees %
100+ Employees 30 %
If this a sampling, indicate the number of businesses sampled
Source(s): Employers' Training Resource
8. Vacancy Rates. Indicate the vacancy rates in percentages for the following categories:
1999
Industrial 5 %
Source(s): CB Richard Ellis for Metro Bakersfield
Office 12 , %
Source(s): CB Richard Ellis for Metro Bakersfield
Retail 15 %
Source(s): CB Richard Ellis for Metro Bakersfield
9. Local Contribution. Indicate the funds expended by jurisdictions comprising your zone for
your zone program for the 1999 calendar year. Include the direct dollars and the estimated value
of in-kind services. (For example, the estimated value of in-kind services could be based on the
estimated number of hours spent providing special services for zone businesses multiplied by an
average hourly rate.) Please round off to the nearest thousand dollars.
Also include those funds from other than locally-generated funds, but are used and
controlled by the local jurisdiction(s) for the designated purposes. Be as realistic as possible.
Reduction/elimination of permit/construction related fees $
Source(s):
Expedited processing of plans/permits $
Source(s):
Reduced utility rates contribution to utility users tax $
Source(s):
Low-interest loans $
Source(s):
Grants/rebates $
Source(s):
Business workshops/training sessions $
Source(s):
Export Assistance $
Source(s):
Site selection assistance $_25,000__
Source(s): City & KEDC staff est.
Business incubator facility $
Source(s):
Job training/placement assistance $
Source(s):
Land assemblage assistance/writedowns $
Source(s):
Marketing $_5,000
Source(s): City & KEDC est.
Other staffing costs $ 20 000
Source(s): City & KEDC Staff est.
Other administrative costs $_10,000__
Source(s): County & City est.
Other in-kind services $
Source(s):
Other: Vouchering services $__23,500__
Source(s): Employers' Training Resource
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION $ 83 500
10. PUblic InfrastrUcture Improvements. Indicate the amount of funds expended by your
jurisdiction(s) in your zone for public infrastructure improvements for the 1999 calendar year.
Please round off to the nearest thousand dollars. Also include those funds from other than
locally-generated funds, but are used and controlled by the local jurisdiction(s). Be as realistic
as possible. $ 2 513 000
Source(s): County Community Development & Public Works
CiW Community Development & Public Works
11. Business Success Stories. Provide success stories for your zone businesses. These stories
are about businesses retained, newly 16cated, or expanded in 1999. Please rely on the attached
form to include information about:
· the number of new and retained employees;
· the number of vouchered employees
· the square footage of the buildings;
· estimated dollar investment;
· the nature of the business;
· copies of any relevant news articles.
12. Success Stories about Other Improvements (optional). Attach a list describing success
stories about civic improvements in the zone that enhanced the environment in which people live
and work. Examples could include: street tree-lining projects, park developments, major traffic
circulation improvements, graffiti clean-up programs, and new government buildings.
The City of Bakersfield adopted two redevelopment project areas that overlay the
Enterprise Zone. Over the next thirty years the tax increment funds generated by the
project areas will be used to alleviate economic and physical blight conditions that
currently exist. The ability to use redevelopment funds will have a major impact on the
Enterprise Zone.
A major streetscape project for Union Avenue, the main throughfare for the Enterprise
Zone is being designed and funded for the upcoming year. The approximately $1 Million
project .will enhance the main commercial business corridor of the Zone.
Both the City and County have major graffiti removal programs which serve the
Enterprise Zone and surrounding area.
The County is making major improvements to their parks which serve the Enterprise
Zone area (Potomac Park, Belle Terrace Park and Virginia Avenue Park)
13. Challenges (ootional). Attach a list of your comments about the challenges you_face in
making your enterprise zone successful. Include suggestions about what more TCA might do to
support your efforts and what legislative or regulatory changes should be made. Your thoughts
are important to us as we strive to improve these pr6grams.
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
June 23, 2000
TO: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager
FROM: George Gonzales,~Coordinator
SUBJECT: City Surplus Properties
EDCD Staffhas been working with Don Anderson, the City's Senior Real Property Manager, to see
if there would be interest for home builders to develop affordable housing units on City surplus
properties. These properties were former drainage sumps that were no longer needed and have been
declared surplus. Staff has conducted an analysis to determine the feasibility of developing
affordable housing on these properties which resulted in five properties being recommended for
housing development. These properties are listed below along with the value of single-family homes
in each neighborhood where the properties are located.
· 5300 Jonah Street $75,000 - $85,000
· 5304 Jonah Street $75,000 - $85,000
· 329 Clyde Street $60,000 ~ $65,000
· 3531 Adanac Court $90,000 - $100,000
· 406 Eye Street $60,000 - $65,000
Staff will be sending out a letter, as well as advertising in local newspapers, to solicit interest from
non-profit and for-profit developers to acquire and build single-family homes on the properties listed
above. The letter will explain that the properties will be donated to the developer, with the City
holding title, and will include construction parameters set by the City for each single-family home.
Once the bids are received, staff will evaluate each developers proposal and recommend two
developers for the five property project. Once two developers have been chosen, the necessary
paperwork (i.e., agreement, contract, etc.) will be completed to outline the responsibilities of each
developer in the construction of single-family homes on the five properties.
The attached timeline outlines the major steps in this project and the projected completion date of
each step.
Timeline
Activity Estimated Completion
Letter of Solicitation to Developers July 7, 2000
Proposals from Developers Due July 28, 2000
Review Responses and Make Recommendation August 8, 2000
Agreements and Paperwork Signed with Developer August 25, 2000
Council Approves Agreement September 13, 2000
Notice to Proceed October 2, 2000
RECEIVED ,
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTES
JUNE 30, 2000
CiTY MANAGER;S' O~;,..;-:
BUILDING
1.. Some of the building projects of note for the second quarter include:
a) U.C. Merced Extension and Parking Structure, 2000 "K" Street, 137,000 square
feet.
b) U.S. Cold Storage addition, 6501 District Blvd., 70,000 square feet.
This will put a total of six acres under roof for this cold storage facility.
c) St. John Baptist Church . Brundage Lane, 47,000 square feet.
d) Bethany Services addition, 1620 E. Brundage Lane, 3000 square feet.
e) Krispy Kreme, 5300 Stockdale Highway, 4,000 square feet.
2. Code Enforcement's work against illegal dumping took on a new twist in dealing with
septic tank pumpers. In a coordinated investigation involving Wastewater Treatment,
County Environmental Health Services, and City Environmental Services, three
pumpers were caught illegally disposing of Waste in the city sewerage system and on
their property. We are now preparing cases to seek legal remedies.
3. Other Code Enforcement activities include:
a) Order to demolish the burnt body/paint shop at 1922 "V" Street.
b) Notice to the Turner Inn (701 Union) to repair or demolish.
c) Notice to Chaparal to repair or demolish the wing recently burnt.
d) Contract signed to demolish the old restaurant portion of the Bakersfield Inn.
e) Notice to repair or demolish the Brown Building at Kentucky and Baker Streets.
f) Demolition of old building at 2408 - 18t~ Street.
g) Rehabilitation of Columbus Gardens (old JLJ). A new owner began work
without permits and created dangerous conditions in the process. He became
responsive to our correction notices after being served with a notice to repair or
vacate the premises. He plans to invest about $1.2 million in renovating the
property and he has a good track record in San Diego, Riverside and Fresno.
4. The Business Manager, Assistant Building Director and Permits Supervisor are visiting
other cities with good reputations for use of computer technology in building inspection.
Evaluating their systems in operation will be helpful in our consideration of programs
available for our use!
Development Services Notes
June 30, 2000
Page 2
PLANNING
1. The Planning Commission is about to conclude its hearings on proposed changes to
the general plan. They are scheduled for City Council hearing on August 16, 2000.
a) Kyle Carter's proposal to develop part of the former NOR Sanitary District
property. He has done an outstanding job of creating planned transitional
relationships between industrial and residential development. Residential
neighbors to the north and 'west and industrial neighbors to the southeast spoke
in support of the project. The Planning Commission required some additional
buffering between an oil well service company and proposed future apartments.
The Planning Commission did not accept a northeast property owner's
interpretation that an arterial street should run along his property and intersect a
freeway on-ramp from Olive Drive to Highway 99. However Carter offered to
dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way as his half of the street if it should be needed.
b) Castle & Cooke proposed changing 65.44 acres south of Campus Park Drive
and west of Old River Road from planned unit development to single family.
The applicant objected to doing road work past a vacant school-owned property
to link his subdivision to a roadway leading to a junior high school. Public
Works recommended that the work be done for safety of children walking to and
from school. The Planning Commission agreed and also required fencing of
canals within one quarter mile.
c) Halferty Development proposed converting a church property and some
apartments (zoned R-l-Ch and R-3) to planned commercial development at the
southwest corner of Ming Avenue and Canter Way. Reaction from the
neighborhood was mixed for and against. It was referred to committee and
reported back to the Planning Commission recommending approval with
additional conditions including a parking ratio closer to the city's standards.
d) DeWalt Corporation proposed consolidating 3.6 acres of mixed neighborhood
commercial and suburban residential into a Iow medium density residential. No
objections were heard and it was approved.
e) DeWalt Corporation proposed to change 3.93 acres at the northwest corner of
Calloway and Meacham from Iow density residential to general commercial with
a PCD to open a restaurant. Two neighbors to the south and one to the north
objected. The Planning Commission eliminated one of the driveways to protect
the neighbors across the street from the glare of headlights from exiting cars.
The Planning Commission also permitted the playing of outdoor music by three-
piece ensembles. The music should be conditioned to prohibit percussion and
brass instruments and prohibit the disturbance of neighbors.
2. The Heart Hospital's revised PCD is scheduled for hearing on July 6. This would add a
helicopter landing pad and a 38,416 square foot medical office building and revise the
40,000 square fOot hospital wing.
Development Services Notes
June 30, 2000
Page 3
3. Mountain View Bravo's proposal to develop a section of land north of Mesa Marin will
be ready for hearing by the Planning Commission in September with completion of a
draft EIR shortly. There are a couple of unusual problems posed by this project. The
first is caused by its noise exposure. The second is that this project precipitates the
need for another fire station. This raises the question of who should pay for it.
4. Sierra' Pacific Development (Paul Owhadi) the new owner of the "Grand Canal" property
at South "H" Street and Berkshire Road has recently sent a letter stating his intent to
pursue C-2 zoning rather than a revised PCD. Apparently, he has just reviewed the
requirements to develop the property as a commercial center and determined his
project "cannot withstand such unreasonable expenses." A meeting is scheduled for
next week to discuss "whether or not the City of Bakersfield is supportive of the
project."
5. The Tree Foundation's plan is under review by staff to see how it might best be
integrated into the city's landscaping requirement. Any changes would also undergo
public review in hearings by the Planning Commission and consideration by the City
Council. From staff's perspective it would be helpful if there were a way to prevent the
complete removal of landscaping and its replacement by minimum sized trees and
plants. The ordinance requires the treescape to be designed to achieve a certain
coverage at maturity but in some'instances there seems to be a concerted effort to
never let the trees grow up.
6. In response to the City Council's growing interest in various focused planning efforts,
we will put together a coordinated work program to address the following projects.
Councilwoman Carson has asked for a strategic plan(s) for economic development and
elimination of blight in the southeast. This would involve numerous departments, other
agencies and constituents. Councilwoman DeMond also called attention to the need
for attention to the other newly adopted redevelopment area and downtown. She also
understands that circulation planning will affect development. I have been told of a
growing desire for a downtown redevelopment element. Councilman Couch has an
ongoing interest in circulation issues which Public Works and Kern COG are working
on. Councilman Maggard has asked that we review the general plan for the northeast
to ensure that development in that area is coordinated with circulation, preservation of
open space and incorporates its unique features. We are already involved in an
update of the general plan, working with the Vision 2020 group, the downtown Vision
Committee, and a Charrette.
JH:pjt
p:dsn6-30
/
- -- RECEIVED
~ ~,--,~, ~'~
JUNE 29, 2000
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~/
FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRE
SUBJECT: ADVANCE PLANNING
Council members have indicated an interest in pursuing long range strategies or plans for development
of portions of the city. The Planning Director will prepare a work program for your consideration. The
Council also asked for a review of work that each of the Planning Sections does. As we prepare our
focused work program, a review of existing advanced planning projects may be useful. A similar review
of work done by the other two sections will follow.
The Advanced Planning Section is responsible for preparing amendments to the general plan including
all it's elements such as circulation, land use, the Kem River Element, and any specific plans such as the
Riverlakes Ranch Specific Plan. They are also responsible for coordinating the implementation of
CEQA, annexations, and processing concurrent land use and zone changes (eg. Kyle Carter's
annexation, general plan amendment, zone change and E1R)
Current case load for this section exemplifies their work.
GPA 3rd Quarter 2000 Cycle
Application List & Description
06/28/2000
P99-0647 City by the Hills . A to 0-2 on 9G.G acres and A to R-3 on R
Mountain View Bravo LLC - Fr~m LR to HR on 65.5 acres and MUC to 65.5 acres. E
GC on 96.9 acres. Located south of Paladino Drive to State Route 178, D
between Masterson Street and the undeveloped extension of Vineland
Road. EIR in progress.
P00-0234 Castle & Cooke California, Inc. - From HMR to LR on 25.41 acres. R-2 to R-1 on 25.41 acres W
Located at the northwest corner of Ashe Road and Panama Lane. C
P00-0291 East of the 29 acre park on Stockdale Hwy C-O to C-2 on 40.52 acres W
Castle & Cooke California, Inc. - From OC (2010) & 6.25 (Kem River C
Plan Element) to GC & 6.1 on 40.52 acres. Located on the north side
i Stockdale Hwy, between Calloway Drive and Buena Vista Road.
EIR in progress
P00-0468 Castle & Cooke CA, Inc. - From HMR to LMR on 27.91 acres. N~, R
Northwest comer of Buena Vista Road and Ming Avenue (extended) E
D
P00-0474 Lone Palm Farms & Richard Fmehlich - From SR to GC on 12.5 acres E to C-2 on 12.5 acresand C-1 and R-2 M
and from GC and LMR to SR on 10 acres. Located north of Brimhall to to E on 10 acres O
Palm Avenue, between Allen and Jenkins Road.
P00-0477 Fairways property and west of Stockdale Hwy Bridge R-1 to C-2 on 1.29 acres, R-2 to R-1 on R
Castle & Cooke CA, Inc. - From: LR to GC on 1.29 acres, HMR to LR on 10.63 acres, C-2 to R-2 on 2.66 acres, E
10.63 acres, GC to LR on 0.58 acres, GC to HMR on 2.66 acres, LR to C-2 to R-1 on 0.58 acres, R-1 to R-2 on D
HMR on 6.14 acres and OS to LR on 81.11 acres. 6.14 acres and PUD to R-1 on 224.15
acres.
P99-0647 Mountain View Brave LLC - Proposed arterials and collectors, and N/A R
proposed realignments and of arterialS and collectors. E
D
P00-0477 Delete Vermillion Drive as a collector, detete Old Farm Road as a N/A R
Collector and proposed extension of Jewetta Avenue as a collector. E
D
Annexations
First Reading Second Reading
Muni Farm #5 - 476.94 acres Ward Boundary Council July 19 Aug. 16
Allen Road #3 - 144.10 acres Richard Froehlich LAFCO Approved June 27 Council July 19
Stockdale #14 .05 acres Scott Gillian LAFCO Approved June 27 Council July 19
Rosedale #8 - 20.00 acres Clyde Barbeau ~LAFCO
Rosedale #9 - 2.50 acres Valley Boats ~LAFCO (Water Connection Issue)
Alien Road g4 94.60 acres Ron Froehlich ~LAFCO
Hageman g4 - 100.00 acres Jaco Oil Council Aug. 16
Zone Changes
P00-0410 M-3 to M-2 Initial Study prepared and sent June 23, for Planning
Commission hearing Aug 3.
Env. Documents in Preparation
Calloway & Friant - Kern Canal Relocation
SW Kern River Bike Path (Extension to Enos Lane)
EIR/EIS White Lane and Highway 99 Interchange expansion.
City Center EIR
South Beltway EIR
NEPA documents for bridges (5) seismic retrofit.
Mt. View Rio Bravo LLC
Other Advance Planning Projects
2010 Plan Update and EIR
2020 Vision Participation
SG: pas
S:\pat~nemo,sg,6,29.wpd
RECEIVED
E?IVI O R A N D U M JUN 3 0 2000
;ITY MANAGER'S Oi~
June 30,2000
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER .,,,.~ /'
FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIR
SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Councilman Maggard has inquired about the degree of notification and involvement by
CELSOC, BIA, Roger Mclntosh and Fred Porter in development of the subdivision ordinance
amendments to be presented to the City Council for adoption in August. They and many others
were invited to participate in drafting of the ordinance update and then sent notices of the
hearings by the Planning Commission. As a result of their input, changes were made to the -
draft ordinance and by the concluding hearing the only person to speak was Roger Mclntosh
who said he was satisfied with the changes. The BIA's participation was minimal but this was
explained in their letter as a preference to defer until after the Planning Commission's review.
The attached information from the file highlights the four months of public involvement in
preparing the ordinance for Council adoption, the notices and comments and the evolution of
the ordinance.
There was also a question about how this ordinance might relate to the work of the Streamlining
Task Force. Matters that are under deliberation by the task force were not included in this draft.
When the Task Force completes its work if any additional changes are recommended, public
hearings will be scheduled for them.
JH:pjt
cc: John Stinson, Assistant City Manager
Bart Thiltgen, City Attorney
Stanley Grady, Planning Director
m\mat6-30
PUBLIC CON,T-/~CT ~CHRONOLOGY FOR
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
1. March 6, 2000 City sends letter with draft proposed amendments to local
engineers, building industry organizations and individuals known
to City to have interest in Subdivision Ordinance amendments
requesting comments. (City hand delivered letter to BIA.)
2. On or about Phone call from Fred Porter, Porter-Robertson informing city of
April 6, 2000 typo in Section16.28.160 D.2 as shown in March 6, 2000 draft of
proposed amendments. Also indicted CELSOC would submit
comments.
3. April 7, 2000 Letter from CELSOC submitting comments on draft proposed
amendments.
4. On or about City called Brian Todd asking if BIA will submit any comments.
April 7, 2000 (BIA unable to find March 6th letter; secretary declined offer for City
to send other copy.)
5. April 19, 2000 Brian Todd, BIA faxed City copy of draft amendments (sent with
March 6th letter) to verify that those were the amendments they
should be commenting on. (Yes, those were the correct '
amendments circulated for comment.)
6. April 24, 2000 Meeting with BIA to discuss amendments cancelled. Rescheduled
to April 27, 2000.
7. April 27, 2000 Meeting with BIA to discuss amendments cancelled. Unable to
reschedule.
8. May 2, 2000 Letter from BIA (dated May 1, 2000) indicating BIA desire to
monitor progress of amendments but not offering specific
comments.
9. May 8, 2000 Letter sent to CELSOC with City's response to CELSOC
comments dated April 7', 2000.
10. May 11, 2000 Note from staff to Planning Department secretary to send copy of
Planning Commission staff report for proposed amendments to
CELSOC and BIA. (Staff report sent on May 22, 2000.)
P:~ T16~subord-contact. wpd 1
June 29, 2000
Subdivision Ordinance
Public Contact
Page 2
11. May 18, 2000 Notice of public hearing sent to local engineers, building industry
organizations and individuals know to City to have interest in
Subdivision Ordinance amendments.
12. May 22, 2000 A copy of Planning Commission agenda sent to Mclntosh &
Associates and Porter-Robertson listing public hearing on
Subdivision Ordinance amendments.
13. May 22, 2000 Staff report available to public.
14. June 1, 2000 Planning Commission held public hearing. Roger Mclntosh,
- Mclntosh & Associates spoke during June 1't public hearing.
Planning Commission continued item to June 15, 2000 meeting.
15. June 8, 2000 Planning Director memo sent to Planning Commission, Roger
Mclntosh, Mclntosh & Associates; John Wilson, CELSOC; and
Brian Todd, BIA.
16. June 15, 2000 Continued public hearing before the Planning Commission. Roger
Mclntosh spoke during public hearing.
Planning Commission adopted resolution recommending approval
of amendments to City Council.
P:~ T16~subord-contact. wpd 2
June 29, 2000
BAKERSFIELD
Development Services Department
Jack Hardisty, Director
Dennis C. Fidler Stanley C. Grady
Building Director Plannin§ Director
(661) 326-3720 Fax (661) 325-0266 March 6, 2000 (661) 326-3733 Fax (661) 327-0646
Dear Interested Persons (See attached list):
RE: Proposed Amendment to Title 16: Subdivision Ordinance
In a effort to keep the City's Subdivision Ordinance up to date with changes made
by the State legislature, and to clarify podions of the Ordinance, several amendments to the
City's local Subdivision Ordinance are proposed. A copy of the proposed amendments is
enclosed for your information. Please send your comments to this office by March 31, 2000.
A notice of public hearing will be sent to you in a few weeks to inform you of the
public hearing held before the Planning Commission regarding this item.
Your input is valuable and if possible, we would like to address your comments
prior to the hearing. Please send or call Jennie Eng, Associate Planner at 326-3733 with your
comments.
Sincerely,
Stanle
Planmng Director
jeng
P:\T16\LT16.wpd
City of Bakersfield · 1715 Chester Avenue · Bakersfield, California · 93301
BIA AIA BAKERSFIELD ASSOC O~ REALTORS
1326 H STREET 1712 - 19TM STREET PO BOX 9338
SUITE 15 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-9338
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
TERI BJORN ALTA ENGINEERING/HUGHES CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING
CLIFFORD AND BROWN SURVEYING 2505 "M" STREET
1430 TRUXTUN AVENUE #900 218 SOUTH H STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304
DEWALT CORPORATION FAS ENGINEERING & SURVEYING FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
1930 22N° STREET 2003 20TM STREET 2716 L STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS DELMARTER & DEIFEL MclNTOSH & ASSOCIATES
5100 CALIFORNIA AVE 2901 H STREET 2001 WHEELAN COURT
SUITE 203 BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
PASQUINI ENGINEERING PORTER-ROBERTSON ENGINEERING THE LUSICH COMPANY
903 H STREET 1200 21sT STREET 651 H STREET #200
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304
RONALD F RUETTGERS SMITHTECH/USA INC TELSTAR ENGINEERING INC.
CIVIL ENGINEER 1424 17TM STREET 5301 OFFICE PARK DRIVE SUITE 125
1801 21sT STREET SUITE 4 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
WILSON & ASSOCIATES MICHELLE LAMOINE
EASTON BUSINESS COMPLEX MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES
1400 EASTON DRIVE BUILDING E 2001 WHEELAN CT
SUITE 132 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
March 2000
Proposed revisions to Title 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code
are shown as follows: Bold indicates new text; strike out ~) indicates deletion of text.
Italics provides a short note explaining why the revision is proposed and is not to be included in
the actual text of the ordinance amendment.
16.16.030 F INFORMATION SHOWN.
The tentative map shall show the following information.
F. Bearings and distances showing the map boundaries and other
sufficient description to define the location and boundaries of the
proposed subdivision ef~ including its relationship to existing, adjacent
subdivisions and surroundings;
(Note: Necessary to facilitate City's computer mapping system.)
16.16.060 PUBLIC HEARING.
F. If multiple tentative maps covering the same parcel of property are filed-et-the
~, the following shall apply:
1. { The action of the advisory agency shall relate only to one such map, if
multiple tentative maps are filed at the same time, except as
described in the following paragraph.
2. No property or portion thereof shall have more than one approved
tentative map at any one time, except for purposes of phasing as in
the case of a tentative parcel map consisting of large parcels over a
tentative tract map to facilitate sale or financing tentative map
phasing. Further, if the advisory agency approves or conditionally
approves a second tentative map on said property for purposes of
phasing, there shall be no more than two approved tentative maps at
any one time. The tentative map proposed to facilitate phasing prior
to recordation of the subdivision showing the ultimate development
of said property shall be designed to have r. easonable relationship
with respect to phase lines of the tentative map intended for the
ultimate development based on sound engineering practices and
subdivision design features. The advisory agency shall
conditionally approve each tentative map, as needed, to facilitate
orderly development, and provide for the public health, safety and
general welfare.
P:\T16\proposed-amend.wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 2
,3. For purposes of this subsection, a lot line adjustment or parcel map
waiver does not constitute a different tentative map.
(Note: Needed for clarification in the ordinance. Currently, ordinance does not address
the possibility of more that one approved tentative map on the same piece of property at
the same time. This amendment codifies staff's practice to allow a subdivider have two
approved tentative maps where one map is a large lot subdivision in preparation of
phasing or for further subdivision. This provides a subdivider additional flexibility to
structure financing and development schedules.)
16.16.080 EXPIRATION OF MAP APPROVAL - EXTENSION.
A. An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after
its approval or conditional approval; provided, however, that any tentative map
approved or conditionally approved by Kern County for an area which is
subsequently annexed into the City prior to recordation of a final map shall expire
in accordance with the ordinance requirements of Kern County and the
Subdivision Map Act.
B. An extension or extensions of tentative-tr-aet map approval or conditional approval
shall not exceed an aggregate of-3- five (5) years: An~,,,~,~"*^~:,~,,,,, ..... or,,,,,~,'~-~=~,.~,,.,, ,o of
~,~, ~,, .... ~, ..... However, if an extension of time application is appealed in
accordance with Section 16.52, an approved or conditionally approved tentative '
map shall not expire prior to a decision by the City Council in accordance with
Section 16.52.
(Note: Reflects a change in the Subdivision Map Act approved by the State legislature,
· making the number of years a tentative tract map may be extended consistent with
extension on a tentative parcel map.)
C. The subdivider may request an extension of the tentative map approval or
conditional approval by written application to the advisory agency. Such
application shall be filed before the approval or conditional approval is due to
expire, but shall not be filed any sooner than 60 days prior to expiration date of
the tentative map. The application shall state the reasons for requesting the
extension. Consent of the subdivider to new or revised conditions required by the
advisory agency shall be a prerequisite to approval of any extension.
P:\T16~proposed-amend.wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 3
D. Failure to file a final tract map or a final parcel map with the City Engineer within
24 months from the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map or
within the specified time period on any extension thereof, shall terminate all
proceedings. Before such final tract or final parcel map may thereafter be filed
with the County Recorder a new tentative map shall be submitted.
E. If the subdivider whose tract has been approved by the advisory agency for
multiple, or phased, final maps is subject to a requirement of $125,000 or more,
as adjusted pursuant to Section 66452.6(a)(2), to construct or improve or
finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the
boundaries of the tentative map, each filing of a final map authorized by Section
66456.1 of the Map Act shall extend the expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of its expiration
as provided in this section, or the date of the previously approved final map,
whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than
10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
Prior to the filing of the first final map, the subdivider shall make written
notification to the City Engineer of eligibility for such extension of time. Such
notification shall include documentation as determined by the City Engineer by
which eligibility can be verified.
"Public improvements," as used in this subsection, include fees, traffic controls,
streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, over-crossings, street interchanges,
flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting
facilities.
(Note: Identifies the section of the Subdivision Map Act by which the amount may be
adjusted.)
F. A tentative map on property subject to a development agreement may be
extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the
duration of the agreement.
G. After approval of the tentative map, if changes deemed substantial by the City
Engineer and Planning Director are proposed, a filing of a Revised Tentative
Map will be required.
(Note: Provides a collaborative determination between the City Engineer and Planning
Director in determining a substantial change.)
1. The previously assigned tract number will be used with the word
"Revised" added to the number. The procedure for filing a Revised
,!
Tentative Map is the same as for the Tentative Map. A Revised Tentative
Map cannot be filed if the approval on the original map has expired. An
approved revised tentative map supersedes the tentative map for which it
was filed.
P:\T16~proposed-amend.wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 4
2. A Revised Tentative Map will be required to include all the land
subdivided under the originally assigned tract number, as approved
by the advisory agency, except a phase or phases of the original
tentative map which have recorded in accordance with this Chapter
shall be excluded from the revised tentative map.
(Note: Clarifies the boundaries of a Revised Tentative Map and which property shall be
included in a Revised Tentative Map. This amendment codifies staff's policy.)
16.20.110 STATEMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR.
A statement by the Planning Director is required on the final tract map. He shall state
that:
A. The Planning Commission, or City Council upon appeal, approved or
conditionally approved the tentative map and any applicable extensions
thereof and the date such action was taken.
B. The subdivision, as shown on the final map, is substantially the same as it
appeared on the tentative map and in accordance with any conditions
approved by the commission, or City Council upon appeal.
(Note: Specifically allows the Planning Director to sign a final tract map based on a
decision of the City Council on an appeal of a tentative tract map.)
16.24.090 VESTING ON APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP.
C. The rights referred to herein shall expire if a final map is not.approved prior to the
expiration of the vesting tentative map as provided in Section 16.24.080. If the
final map is approved, these rights shall last for the following periods of time:
1. An initial time period of 12 months. Where several final maps are
recorded on various phases of a project covered by a single vesting
tentative map, this initial time period shall begin for each phase when the
final map for that phase is recorded.
2. The initial time period set forth in subsection C., 1., of this section shall be
automatically extended by any time used for processing a complete
application for a grading permit or for design or architectural review, if
such processing exceeds 30 days, from the date a complete application is
filed.
P:~ T16~proposed-arnend. wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 5
3. A subdivider may apply for a I year extension of time before the initial
time period set forth in subsection C., 1., of this section expires. The
application shall be submitted in the form of a written request with
justification for the extension and all applicable fees shall be paid to the
Planning Director and shall be considered by the Planning Commission in
an unadvertised public hearing. If the extension is denied by the
Commission, the subdivider may appeal that denial to City Council within
15 days.
4. If the subdivider submits a complete application for a building permit
during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 1-3 of this subsection,
the rights referred to herein shall continue until the expiration of that
permit, or any extension of that permit. The time limits set forth herein
shall specifically apply only to those building permit applications
submitted during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 1-3 of
this subsection. The expiration and extension of such building
permits shall be governed by the specific provisions of Chapter
15.12 of this Code (Uniform Building Code) pertaining to permit
issuance.
(Note: Clarifies that the vesting rights applies to each building permit which has been
issued prior to the expiration and extension of the vesting rights, and that the vesting
rights remain on each building permit as long as the building permit remains active and
in good standing. Vesting rights do not apply to those building permits which were not
issued prior to expiration and extension of the vesting rights.
16.28.170 LOTS.
B. Lot Frontage. All residential lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 55 feet
except as follows:
1. The minimum street frontage for interior one family dwelling lots in an R-2
zone shall be 45 feet.
2. The minimum lot frontage for corner lots shall be 60 feet except for one
family dwelling lots in an R-2 zone where it is 50 feet. For purposes of
measuring frontage on a corner lot with a radius return, the distance shall
be measured from the point of intersection of the extensions of the street
side property line and the front property line.
3. Cul-de-sac or Elbow lot: 35 lineal feet as measured along the arc.
4. Flag lot: 20 feet.
P:[ T16~proposed-arnend. wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 6
5. Lots proposing access off an arterial or collector street shall have a
minimum street frontage of 100 feet.
D. Lot Width. The lot width is the length of a line between side property lines that is
the perpendicular bisect of the lot depth. The minimum width for residential lots
shall be 55 feet on interior lots and 60 feet on corner lots, except as follows:
1. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting agricultural or
residential suburban zoned property shall be 100 feet'.
2. The minimum width for a lot with a rear yard abutting a freeway or railroad
· right-of-way shall be 85 feet on interior lots and 90 feet on corner lots.
3. The minimum width for a one family dwelling lot in the R-2 zone shall be
45 feet on interior lots and 50 feet on corner lots except as required in
subsection D., 1. and 2.
4. Lots proposing access off an arterial or collector street shall have a
minimum lot width of 100 feet.
H. Double Frontage Lots. Double frontage lots having a depth less than two hundred
feet will not be approved except where, as determined by the advisory agency,
conditions permit no other reasonable form of platting, or where the proposed
double frontage lots abut a-major an arterial or collector street and the advisory
agency deems it to be reasonable due to such controlling factors as traffic,
safety, appearance and setback. Further, no lot for the purposes of single
family development shall front on an arterial street, except where the
advisory agency deems reasonable due to existing conditions and is not
detrimental to the public safety and welfare. Each such lot shall have a six
foot high masonry wall (the height shall be measured from whichever side of the
wall the adjacent finished grade is higher) with landscaping (on the exterior side)
installed by the subdivider adjacent to the rear property line or, where the wall
and landscaping are to be maintained by a homeowner's association or
maintenance district installed within the street right-of-way and additional
landscape easement or adjacent common lot. Alternate wall and landscape
concepts may be approved in areas where, in the opinion of the advisory agency,
topographic or other physical conditions make strict adherence to this criteria
undesirable. Conceptual wall and landscaping plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the advisory agency prior to filing of any final tract or final parcel
map.
(Note: In order to maintain capacity on arterial and co/lector streets, and as a matter of
public safety, the minimum length of the street frontage and lot width of residential lots
fronting along these types of streets is recommended to change from a minimum of 55-
60 feet to 100 feet. ThelO0 foot minimum lot frontage and width would allow for (but not
require) a circular driveway, which is consistent with County of Kern standards. A circular
driveway provides safer vehicle movement along the street and ingress/egress to the lot.
P:~ T16~proposed-amend. wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 7
Access of residential lots to arterial streets is prohibited unless the Planning Commission
makes specific findings based on public safety and welfare. Double frontage lots which
waive access to the collector or artedal street would not be subject to this standard
because they are not proposing access to the major street.
16.28.190 APPROVED ACCESS REQUIRED.
A. Legal access to each lot or parcel of a subdivision shall be provided by:
1. Having frontage upon a public street (other than an alley), with the ability
to access it (per Section 17.04.370); or
2. Having frontage upon a private easement (or private road) determined by
the Planning Commission to be adequate for purposes of access (per
Section 17.04.370); or
3. Dedication, or an offer of dedication, to the city for street purposes from a
public road to each parcel; or
4. Recordation of a covenant of easement in accordance with Section 65870
of the Government Code. Such covenant may be released by direction of
the Planning Commission, following a public hearing thereon, after the
applicant seeking release has paid the fee therefor set by City Council
resolution.
5. Residential subdivisions shall be designed so that all lots or parcels
obtain access from a collector or local street; except the advisory
agency may approve limited access to arterial streets from multiple
family developments if access does not disrupt traffic circulation, is
not detrimental to the public health and safety, observes City
engineering standards, and is based on sound engineering
practices. The advisory agency may require improvements to
provide for the public health and safety; and waiver of direct access
from the remainder of the property along the arterial street frontage.
(Note: The 100 foot minimum lot frontage and width would allow for a circular driveway,
which is consistent with County of Kern standards. A circular driveway provides safer
vehicle movement along the street and ingress/egress to the lot. Access of residential
lots to arterial streets is prohibited unless the Planning Commission makes specific
findings based on public safety and welfare.
P:~ T16~proposed-arnend. wpd
March 7, 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 8
16.32.080 IMPROVEMENTS - IN SUBDIVISIONS FOR WHICH PARCEL MAP IS
REQUIRED.
E. The provisions of subsections C. and D. of Section~ 16,32,060 shall
apply to subdivisions for which a final parcel map is required.
(Note: Corrects a typographica/ error.)
P:i T16~proposed-amend. wpd
March 7, 2000
WILSON &
___ $SOCIA
CIVIL ENGIblEER1NG SURVEYllqG
F,4X TRANSMITTAL CO PER SHEET
ATTENTION:
NUMBER OF PAGES: FAXNO.: _~,~
(Including Cover Sheet)
COMME~S:
If you do not rcccivc all of thc pag~ or it' you have any questions please give m~ a call at (661)
325-4862. We are tranm~ from FAX No. (661) 325-S126.
1400 EASTON DR., 8urI'E 132 · BAKERSFI]U.D, CA 93309
(661) 325-4862 · FAX (661) 32.q-S126
~.a ~.a~m ~ Bakemflelcl, Qll~ml~
March 23, 2000
1cnn/¢ Eng
Development Services Department
1715 Chester Ave
Bakgrs~eld, CA /)3301
RE: Proposed Amendments
Title 16: Subdivision Or~i,~,ice
The following comments were prepared in rcgards to the Proposed amendment to Title 16:
Subdivision Ordinau~.
Bearing and distances showing the map botmctaries ami or other ....... Submittal of dectronic "~
data ma_v satisfy_ this requirement. En~noer/dcvelopcr is not rcsponsible for accuracy of data
submitted and is submitted for informational purposes. :
(City should wait until final map is recorded to update thcir computer mapping, if they want
accurate information.)
16.16.060. F.
(This entire chaug¢ seems unnecessary. The State Map Act allows multiple Tentative Maps.
The cliang= would restrict flexibility and restrict extension of time.
This change could eliminate a Parcel Map on a Phased Tentative Map. The owner may want to
create a smaller parcel for fmanc/ng purposes prior to recordation o£ a Final Map. Is it proposed
to "void"' the previous Tentative upon approval of the next Tentative? A large parcel of land,
could, over the lifo of a pwject, have several approved tentative maps, pr/or to recordation of tho
fit'at tentative map.)
l 6.16.080 Expiration of Map Approval - Exteneion
A. An approval ...... shall expire -24 36 months ...... ~er State Map AcO
(Ally new or r~vised conditiom t,~llfir~ or requested by thc advisory agency and/or the
subdivider should go basle through the proper chmmels. A "vesting map" may not be ~ 'Nested"
map after' alL)
lermie Eh§ 3/23/00
Dovelopmc'nt Services Dcparuueut Pa~e 2 of 2
D. ~ 36 M~
G.2 ........ sh~ b~ cxclud~ ~om ~c re~8d t~five ~, or legal p~ceh sold or ~f~ed
~om ofig~ t~five ~p.
~d ~d bc ~~ but l~d ~uld not ~ add~. ~t abo~ p~els ofl~ so]~ d~,
or ~n~. See pro~s~ "G'.)
16.24.~0 V~E ~ ~p~v~ of V~g T~ve M~
1 & 2 (c~gc 12 mon~ to 36 mon~, p~r S~c Map Act.)
B-5 (cllmi~n~, poor u~fion of~ ~op~)
D~ (~tc, poor ufiH~fion of ~b~ p~pe~y)
H (e~ate old c~ges)
Myou havc ~y ~o~ pl~e ~n~t Io~ W~on.
BtHLDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
OF KERN COUNTY
Phone (661) 633-1316 Fax (661) 633-1317
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET:
Please call if you did not receive all pages.
Thank you.
SUMMAP. Y OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
March 2000
Proposed revisions to TilJe 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code
are shown as follows: Bold indicates new text; strike out (et~eu{) indicates deletion ol~ texL
Italio~ provides a shorf note expleining why the revision is proposed and is not to be included in
the a~tual text of the ordinance amendment.
16.16,030 F INFORMATION SHOWN,
The tentative map shall show the followlng information. ~"
F. Bearings and distances showing the map boundaries' a~d other
sufficient description to define the location and boundaries Of lhe
proposed subdivision end including Its relationship to existing, adjacent
subdivisions and surroundings; 1:::/.~/7...~'~)
(No~e: Necessary to facilitate City's computer mapping system.)
16.16.060 PUBLIC HEARING.
F. If multiple tentative maps covedng ~e same parcel of property are filed-at-the
eeme-time, the following shall apply:
1. t The action ~ the advisory agency shall relate only to one such map, if
.. /,,[ multiple tentative maps are filed at the same time, except as
. described in the following paragraph.
-
· Z. No property or portion thereof shall have more than one app~;oved
tentative map at any one time, except for purposes of phasing as in
the case of a tentative parcel map consisting of large parcels over a
tentative tract map to facilitate sale or financing tentative map
,~ phasing. Further, if the advisory agency approves or conditionally
approves a second tentative map on said property for purposes of
phasing, there shall be no more than two approved tentative maps at
any one time, The tentative map proposed to facilitate phasing prior
to recordation of the subdivision stlowing the ultimate development
i of said property shall be designed to have reasonable relationship
with respect to phase lines of the tentative map Intended for the
ultimate development based on sound engineering prat'does and
subdivision design features. The advisory agency shall
conditionally approve each tentative map, as needed, to facilitate
orderly development, and provide for the public health, safety and
~ general welfare.
P:tT16'~pro~oeed.-em en6..~
March 7.2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 2
3. For purposes of this subsection, a lot line adjustment or parcel map
waiver does not constitute a different tentative map.
(Note: Needed for clarification in the ordinance. Currently, ordinance does not address
the possibility of more that one approved tentative map on the same piece of property at
the same t/me. This amendment codif'~s staff's practice to al/ow a subdivider have two
approved tentative maps where one map is a large lot subdivision In preparation of--/v
phasing or for further subdivision. This provides a subdivider additional flexibility to
~tructure financing and development schedules.) 'Z'~
16.16.080 EXPIRATION OF MAP APPROVAL-EXTENSION.
__,~,1 A. An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire ~4~onths after
01Dfl'~-" its approval or conditional approval; provided, however, that any tentative map
~ approved or conditionally approved by Kem County for an ama which is
~ ~.~/_p~ ~<:~.~fl~ ~ ,fsLlbseqLlerltly anrlexed iht° the city prior t° recordatiOn °f a firla, map shall e''q:)ire,/
in accordance with the ordinance requirements of Kern County and the
Subdivision Map Act.
B. An extension or extensions of tentative-tract map approval or conditional approval
shall net exceed an aggregate of~ five (5) years;-A~ c~,,c,,'~=c,'~ ,,, ~×-t ......
=g~rc~c, tc cf 5 ye~.~.~. Howeve¢, if an extension of time application is appealed in.._
accordance with Section 16.52, an approved or conditionally approved tentative
map shall not expire pr/o( to a decision by the C..ity Cound! in accordance with
Section 16,52.
(Note: IReflec~s a change in the Subdivision Map Ad approved by the State legi$/ature,
making the number of years a tentative tract map may be extended consistent with
extension on a tentative parco~ map.)
C. The subdMder may request an extension of the tentative map approval or
conditional approval by written applica~on to the advisory agency. Such
application shall be filed before the approval or conditional approval is due to
expire, but shall not be filed any sooner than 60 days prior to expiration date of
lhe tentative map. The application shall state the reasons for requesting the
extension. Consent of the subdivider to new or revised conditions required by the
advisory agency shall be a prerequisite to approval of any extension.
P~'r 1611xoposed-am~.~d
Mamh 7. 2000
Proposed Amendments
Page 3
D. Failure to file · final traot map or a final parcel map w~th the City Engineer within.
24 months ~ the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map or
within the specified time period on any extension thereaf, shall terminate all
proceedings. Before such final tract or Final parcel map may thereafter be filed
with the County Recorder a new tentative map shall be submitted.
E. If the subdivider whose tract has been approved by the advisory agency for
multiple, or phased, final maps.is subject to a requirement of $125,000 or more,
a= adjusted pursuant to Section 66452.6(a)(2), to construct or improve or
finance the cons~ruclion or improvement of public improvements outside the
boundaries of the tentative map, each tiling of a final map authorized by Section
66456.1 of the Map Act shall extend the expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of its expiration
as provided in this section, or the date of the previously approved final map,
whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than
10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
Prior to the filing of the first final map, the subdivider shall make written
notification to the City Engineer of eligibility for such extension of time. Such
notification shall include documentation as determined by the City Engineer by
whi~ eligibility can be vedfied.
'Public improvements," as used in this subsection, include fees, traffic controls,
streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, over-crossings, street interchanges.
flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting
facilities.
;
(Note: tdenti§es the section of the Subdivision Map Ac{'by which the amount may be
adjusted.)
F, A tentative map on property subject to a development agreement may be
extend~l for the period of tJme provided for in the agreement, but not beyond Ihs
duration of the agreement.
G. After approval of the tental~ve map, if changes deemed substantial by the City
~IA~ Engineer and Planning Director am proposed, a filing of a Revised TentaUve
Map will be required.
(Note: Provides a collaborative (fetermlnaEon between the City Engineer and Planning
Director in determining a substantial change.)
1. The previously assigned tm~t number will be used with the word
"Revised" added to the number. The procedure for filing a Revised
Tentative Map is the same as for the Tentative Map. A Revised Tentative
Map cannot be filed if the approval on the original map has expired. An
approved revised tentative map supersedes the tentative map for which it
Was filed.
~Tle'~o raposed-am~.,~S
Page 4 2. A ~sed Tentat~e Ua~ill be required to include nil ~e land
subdi~d~ under the originally assigned tm~ number, ~ appr~ed
by ~e advisow agency, ex. pt a ph~e or phases of the oHgi~l
· ten.live ~p which ~ve rec~d~ in accordance wlth this Chn~
· s~ll be excluded from ~e revved tentat~e map, - ~
(N~e: ~a~fies ~e bou~ades ora Re~sed Tenta~e Map and wh~ p~pe~ shall
includ~ ~ a Re~=ed Tentat~ Map. ~is amendment codiF~s sm~s policy.)
16.~.110 STATEMENT OF P~NING DIRECTOR. ~
A statement by ~e ~nning Director is required on the final t~ct map, He s~ll s~te
~ ~e P~nni~ ~mmlsslon, or Ci~ Council upon appeal, approved or
~ndifiona~y appm~ the ten~t~ map end any appli~ble e~ensions
~r~f and the date =u~ action ~s ~ken.
~ B. ~e su~ivis~n, as s~n on the final map, is substantially ~ same as
app~md on the tenta~ve map and In a=cordan~ with any ~ndi~ons
approved by the comm~=ion~ or C~ Council upon appeal
(Note: Specifi~ily allows ~e Planning Di~or to sign a final t~ map ba~d on a
derision of the C~y ~unc~ on an appeal ora mn~t~e ~ct mepJ
16.24.090 ~STING ON APPROV~ OF VESTING TENTATIVE, MAP.
C. ~e Hgh~ referred to heroin s~ll expire if a final map ~ ~t approved p~or to
ex~mfion of~e vesting ten.five ~p as prodded in Se~on 16,24.080. If ~e
final map ~ a~mved, ~e dgh~ sha~ last for ~e follo~ng ~H~s of time:
m~ ~ vad~ phases of a project cover~ ~ a sin~e ves~ng
ten~ ~is in~l time pe~ shall ~gin for each p~se when
map,
fi~l map for that p~ ~ m~ed.
2. ~ ~illal ~me ~ set foRh in subsec00n C,. 1.. of ~{s ~c~n shall be
a~ll~[i~ for a grading ~ ~ f~ design or ar~itectuml re~ew, ~
such pro~lng ex~s ~ da~, from ~ date a ~mplete appli~fion
P.~ TI b~propos ed.emend, wp d
Man,h7,2000
P
roposed Amendments
Page 5
3. A subdivider may apply for a 1 year extension of time before the initial
'1~'~ time period set forth in subsection C., 1, of Ibis se~on expires. The
~.~__ application shall be submitted in the form ora written request v~th
juslilicalion for the extension and all applicable fees shall be paid to the
Planning Director end shall be considered by the Planning Commission in
~'~C'_'/ an unadvertised public hearing. If the extension is denied by the
'~'.~ v/' Commission, the subdivider may appeal that denial to City Council within
4. if the subdivider submits a complete application for a building permit
during tA.e periods of time spe~. ified in subdivisions 1-.3 of this subsection,
permit, or any extension of that permit. The time limits set forth herein
shall specifi~ally apply only to those building permit applications
submitted during the periods of time specified in subdivisions t-3 of
this subsection. The expiration and extension of such building
permits shall be governed by the specific provisions of Chapter
15,12 of this Code (Uniform Building Code) pertaining to permit
issuance.
(Note: Clarifies that the vesting rights applies to each building permit which has been
issued pdor to the expfration and exfension of the vesting rights, and that the vesting
rights remain on each building permit as long as the building permit remains active and
in good standing. Ve~ting rights do not apply to those bur?ding permits which were not
i.~sued prfor' to expiration and extension of the vesting rights.
:
16.28.170 LOTS. :
B. Lot Frontage. All residential lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 55 feet
except as follows:
1. Th~ minimum street frontage for interior one family dwelling lots in an R-2
zone shall be 45 feet.
2. The minimum lot frontage for comer lots shall be 60 feet except for one
family dwelling lots in an R-2 zone where it is 50 feet. For purposes of
measuring frontage on a corner iol with a radius return, the distance shall
be measured from the point of Intersection of the extensions of the street
side property line and the front property line.
3. Cul-de-sac or Elbow lot: 35 lineal feet as measured along the arc.
4. Flag lot: 20 feel
P.'[ T f 61pmposed-amend. wpd
Proposed Amendments ~.~'~ ......
/" 5. Lots proposing access off an erterml or collector street shall have a
~ inimum street frontage of 100 feet.
perpendicular bisect of the lot depth. The minimum widt~ for resldenMal lots
shall be 55 feet on inlerior lots and 60 feet on comer lots, except as follows:
_v/J 1. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting agricultural or
,Ciaot~' residential suburban zoned property shall be 100 feet.
~r~/~ ~* _~/'O~J 2. Tlle minimum width for a lot with a rear yard abutting a freeway or railroad
U~/ ~i~1~ ~j right-of-way shall be 85 feet on interior lots and 90 feet on comer lots.
0~,~2~l~[f~ ~/,,~ subsection45feet on intedorlots and 50 feet on corner lots except as required inD., 1, and 2,... . ...-._ . _
I~" ~t~4- Lots proposing access off an arterial or collector street shali-h'ave a~
.J~intmu la3J~_w_idth of 100 feet.
H. Double Frontage Lo~. Double frontage lots having a depth less than two hundred
feet will not be approved except where, as determined by the advisory agency,
conditions pen'nit no other reasonable form of platting, or where the proposed
double frontage lots abut-e-meier an arterial or collector street and the advlsoh/
~ agency deems it to be reasonable due to such controlling factors as traffic,
~,L~'~ safety, appearance and setback. Further, no lot for the purposes of single
family development sba.Il front on an arterial street, except where the
advisor/agency deems'reasonable due to e~isting conditions and is not
~ detrimental to the public safety and welfare. Each such lot shall have a six
wall the adjacent finished grade is higher) with landscaping (on the exterior side)
Installed by the subdivider adjacent lo the mar property line or, where the wall
and lanclscaplng are to be maintained by a homeowner's association or
maintenance district Installed within the street right-of-way and additional
land,cape easement or adjacent common lot. Alternate wall end landscape
concepts may be approved in areas where, in the opinion of the advisory agency,
topographic or other physical conditions make strict adherence to this cfiteda
undeslmbla. Conceptual wall and landscaping plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the advisory agency prior to filing of any final tract or final parcel
map.
(Note: In order to maintain capacity on arterial and collector streets, and as a matter of
pubflo ,~afety, the minimum length of the street frontage and lot wi~h of re~identie! Iot~
frc~ir~g along the~e types of streets is recommended to change from e minimum of 55-
60 feet to 100 feet. ThelO0 foot minimum lot frontage and width would allow for (bu~
require) e circular driveway, which is consistent with County of Kern ~andard$. A circular
driveway provides safer vehicle movement along the street and ingres~egress to the IoL
P.'t T l Oipropo~cl. amend, wpd
Ma~h ?, 2000
Pmpesed Amendments
Page 7'
Access of resfdential lots to arterial streets is prohibited unless the Planning Commission
makes specif'= findings based on public safety and welfare. Double frontage lots which
waive access to the colleotor or arterial street would not be subject to this standard
because they are not prolx~ing acce=,~ to the major street,
16.28.190 APPROVED ACCESS REQUIRED.
A. Legal access to each lot or parcel of a subdivision shall be provided by:
1. Having frontage upon a public street (other than an aJley), with the ability
to access it (per Section 17.04.370); or
2. Having frontage upon a private easement (or pdvate road) determined by
the Planning Commission to be adequate for purposes of access (per
,.~ection 17.0¢.370); or
3. Dedication, o¢ en offer of dedication, to the cily for street purposes from a
public mad to each parcel; or
4. Recordation of a covenant of easement in accordance with Section 6587'0
of the Government Code. S~ch covenant may be released by direction of
the Planning Commission. f0ilowing a public hearing thereon, after the
applicant seeking release has paid the fee therefor set by City Council
resolution.
" 5. Residential subdivisions shall be designed so that all lots or parcels
Y/"' obtain access fr~m a collector or Iocatstreet; except the advi, ory
agency may approve limited access to arterial streets fro~ multiple
family developments if access does not disrupt traffic circulation, is
not detrimental to the public health and safety, observes City
practices, The advisory agency may require improvements to
provide for the public health and safety; and waiver of dlrect access
from the remainder of rite property along the arterial street frontage.
(Note: ThelO0 foot minimum lot frontage and width would allow for a circular driveway,
which is consistent with County of Kern standards. A circular ddvew'ay provides safer
vehicle movement along the street and hgressfegres.~ to tile lot. Access of residential
lots to arterial ~treets is prohibited unless the Planning Commiesion makes specific
findings based on public safety and welfare.
P:% T f Olpropo.~d-amend. wpd
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
OF KERN COUNTY
Biff NAHB
BAKEfl,~FIELD, CA 93301 PHONE (661) 633-1316 FAX (661) 633-1317 ~TIO{~.
(X' H( )MI-' Iltlt
May 1.
Ms. Jennie Eag
Planning Dcpadment
City ol'Bakersliuld
1715 Chester Argue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Dear Jennie:
Thank you for thc opportunity to review the proposed amendments to'the City's
Subdivifion Ordinance.
l~lA fully supports [he recommendations of thc Development Streamlining Tazk Force, as
well as other oprn~rtuniti~ for improvement voiced by industry rcp~sentativcs during
those meetings. Since thc Planning Commisskm will so<m review the proposed
ordinance changes, we will monitor and actively p.,m, icipatc in that process beforo taking
a formal position on any specific chang0s.
Once Planning Commissioners' review ~nd input is accomplished, r will gl~'tdly
communicate to you any BIA position(e) on lhe final w:rsion of thc ordinance.
Cc: Rogcr Mclnlosh, Ch~,~.an, BIA I,egislative Cornmittce
City Planning Commissioncm ~
BAKERSFIELD
Development Services Department
Jack Hardisty, Director
Dennis C. Fidler Stanley C. Grady
Building Director Planning Director
(661) 326-3720 Fax (661) 325-0266 (661) 326-3733 Fax (661) 327-0646
May 8, 2000
Mr. John Wilson, President
Kern Chapter CELSOC
P.O. Box 176
Bakersfield CA 93302
RE: Proposed Amendments to Title 16: Subdivision Ordinance
Dear John:
Thank you for your organization's comments regarding proposed amendments to
the Subdivision Ordinance. Upon consideration of your comments, staff has made some
revisions and withdrawn some proposed amendments. A copy of the revisions is attached with
the heading "May 8, 2000." The following highlights staff's changes and responds to your other
comments.
16.16.030 F. Staff has revised the proposed amendment incorporating the
intent you indicated in your letter regarding submittal of bearings
and distance data via electronic means for only informational
purposes.
16.16.060 F. In response to your comments, staff is withdrawing amendment to
Section16.16.060 F and no change to this section will be included.
16.16.080 Your request to change the expiration date of approved tentative
maps from 24 to 36 months is being addressed separately through
the "Development Streamlining Task Force" coordinated by John
Stinson, Assistant City Manager.
16.16.080 G.2 Staff has considered your suggested text addition. However, the
amendment proposed by staff is intended to only codify current
policy and practice to require Revised Tentative Maps to include
all land within the boundaries of the original subdivision, except for
the phase(s) that has recorded.
City of Bakersfield · 1 715 Chester Avenue · Bakersfield, California · 93301
John Wilson
May 8, 2000
Page 2
16.24.090 Subdivision Map Act Section 66498.5(b) states: "The rights
conferred by a vesting tentative map as provided by this chapter
shall last for an initial period, as provided by ordinance, but shall
no be less than one year or more than two years beyond recording
of the final map .... "
The current ordinance reflects the City Council's 1997 decision
that the vested rights are automatically extended through the first
year after a map has recorded. A developer's request to the
Planning Commission to extend the vested rights for a second
year is to receive perfunctory approval. Staff could not verify your
reference that the Map Act allows vesting rights to extend up to 36
months.
16.28.170 Staff withdraws the amendment to add these sections.
and 16.28.190 No change is proposed to the current requirements.
16.16.010 G Staff is adding this amendment to clarify that waiver of any
improvements for a .parcel map must be made in writing.
Your insightful comments are appreciated. The BIA has stated that they will
monitor the proposed amendments as they are submitted to the Planning Commission. A notice
of public hearing will be sent to you and other local interested persons at a later date. Please
call me at (661) 326-3733 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Associate Planner
P:\T16\L-CELSOC.wpd
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
May 8, 2000
Proposed revisions to Title 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code
are shown as follows: Bold indicates new text; strike out (~r-ik~-~t); indicates deletion of text;
bold strike out ~{-HEe-out) is new text no longer proposed; ~ indicates text change to the
proposed amendment in response to comments received. Italics provides a short note
explaining why the revision is proposed, and is not to be included in the actual text of the
ordinance amendment.
16.16.010 G FILING
Every person submitting a tentative parcel map who desires consideration of deferral
and waiver of any improvements in accordance with Section 16.32.080 shall submit a
written request which details what deferrals and waivers are requested for
consideration with justification for each requested deferral and waiver.
(Note: Clarifies that a request for waiver of improvements related to a tentative parcel
map must be make in writing)
16.16.030 F INFORMATION SHOWN.
The tentative map shall show the following information.
F. Sufficient description to define the location and boundaries of the
proposed subdivision a~ including ~ the subdivision's relationship to
existing, adjacent subdivisions, ~ the subdivision's surroundings,
and bearings and distances indicating the map boundaries.
Submittal of electronic data may satisfy the requirement for
bearings and distances, Submittal of electronic data may satisfy the
requirement for providing bearings and distances and such data
shall be used for informational purposes only,
(Clarifies that a request for waiver of improvements related to a tentative parcel map
must be made in writing. This information will be used to provide more accurate growth
projections, provide cumulative impact analysis now accomplished through labor
intension hand calculations, and provide development statistics after requested by
marketing firms and currently unavailable.)
P:\T16~amend-May8.wpd
May 8, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 2
16.16.060 PUBLIC HEARING.
F. If multiple tentative maps covering the same parcel of property are filed at the
time, '"-
,,,,~ followlnfi o ..... c, pply:
same
-1. t :l:he action of the advisory agency shall relate only to one such map. ,-r-i-f
.." ,,"'_ _.__A
t~ntat[v~ t,.,..t map t.. ,.,,.,,,..,.~ o..,~ .,, financ[n.3 t~,,t..t,.~ map
appr~¥~s ....... -. .... . ......... ~. ....... ~....~.~..~ .... ~...., ......
G~l~' ~IIG LIIIIG. I IIG LGIILCiJ. IV~;; IllCa,~ ~/I ~,~JVOGM %i Ig~.~,IIL~iLG iJil~;~Olll~.j i,Ji 1%/1
For purposes of this subsection, a lot line adjustment or parcel map
waiver does not constitute a different tentative map.
(Note: Staff has considered CELSOC comments and withdraws the amendment. No
change is proposed to the current standards.)
16.16.080 EXPIRATION OF MAP APPROVAL - EXTENSION.
A. An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after
its approval or conditional approval; provided, however, that any tentative map
approved or conditionally approved by Kern County for an area which is
subsequently annexed into the City prior to recordation of a final map shall expire
in accordance with the ordinance requirements of Kern County and the
Subdivision Map Act.
P:\T16~amend-May8.wpd
May 8, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 3
B. An extension or extensions of tentative-t-r-eet map approval or conditional approval
shall not exceed an aggregate of-'3- five (5) years. A~,~,,,~,~"'~-~,o,,.,, ......., ,.,, ~,,,~,'^-~"~"",o,,.,, ,o of
,:,~, ~ ..... 5 yes, rs. However, if an extension of time application is appealed in
accordance with Section 16.52, an approved, or conditionally approved tentative
map shall not expire prior to a decision by the City Council in accordance with
Section 16.52.
(Note: Reflects a change in the Subdivision Map Act approved by the State legislature,
making the number of years a tentative tract map may be extended consistent with
extension on a tentative parcel map. CELSOC did not object to this amendment.)
C. The subdivider may request an extension of the tentative map approval or
conditional approval by written application to the advisory agency. Such
application shall be filed before the approval or conditional approval is due to
expire, but shall not be filed any sooner than 60 days prior to expiration date of
the tentative map. The application shall state the reasons for requesting the
extension. Consent of the subdivider to new or revised conditions required by the
advisory agency shall be a prerequisite to approval of any extension.
D. Failure to file a final tract map or a final parcel map with the City Engineer within
24 months from the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map or
within the specified time period on any extension thereof, shall terminate all
proceedings. Before such final tract or final parcel map may thereafter be filed
with the County Recorder a new tentative map shall be submitted.
E. If the subdivider whose tract has been approved by the advisory agency for
multiple, or phased, final maps is subject to a requirement of $125,000 or more,
as adjusted pursuant to Section 66452.6(a)(2), to construct or improve or
finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the
boundaries of the tentative map, each filing of a final map authorized by Section
66456.1 of the Map Act shall extend the expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of its expiration
as provided in this section, or the date of the previously approved final map,
whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than
10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
Prior to the filing of the first final map, the subdivider shall make written
notification to the City Engineer of eligibility for such extension of time. Such
notification shall include documentation as determined by the City Engineer by
which eligibility can be verified.
P:\T 16~amend-May8.wpd
May 8, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 4
"Public improvements," as used in this subsection, include Fees, traffic controls,
streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, over-crossings, street interchanges,
flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting
facilities.
(Note: Identifies the section of the Map Act by which the amount may be adjusted.
CELSOC did not object to this amendment)
F. A tentative map on property subject to a development agreement may be
extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the
duration of the agreement.
G. After approval of the tentative map, if changes deemed substantial by the City
Engineer and Planning Director are proposed, a filing of a Revised Tentative
Map will be required.
(Note: Provides a coflaborative determination between the City Engineer and Planning
Director in determining a substantial change. CELSOC did not object to this
amendment.)
1. The previously assigned tract number will be used with the word
"Revised" added to the number. The procedure for filing a Revised
Tentative Map is the same as for the Tentative Map. A Revised Tentative
Map cannot be filed if the approval on the original map has expired. An
approved revised tentative map supersedes the tentative map for which it
was filed.
2. A Revised Tentative Map will be required to include all the land
subdivided under the originally assigned tract number, as approved
by the advisory agency, except a phase or phases of the original
tentative map which have recorded in accordance with this Chapter
shall be excluded from the revised tentative map.
(Note: Staff has considered CELSOC comments to expand the criteria to exclude
property from the Revised Map as a result of a change to ownership. Staff believes it is
important that the decision makers are able to consider the proposed changed to the
original map in the context of the original project and not in a piecemeal fashion. No
change is proposed to staff's amendment because this amendment is only intended to
codify current policy related to recordation of phases, not change in ownership.)
P:\T16~amend-May8.wpd
May 8. 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 5
16.20.110 STATEMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR.
A statement by the Planning Director is required on the final tract map. He shall state
that:
A. The Planning Commission, or City Council upon appeal, approved or
conditionally approved the tentative map and any applicable extensions
thereof and the date such action was taken.
B. The subdivision, as shoWn on the final map, is substantially the same as it
appeared on the tentative map and in accordance with any conditions
approved by the commission, or City Council upon appeal.
(Note: Specifically allows the Planning Director to sign a final tract map based on a
decision of the City Council on an appeal of a tentative tract map. Recognizes the appeal
process. CELSOC did not object to this amendment.)
16.24.090 VESTING ON APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP.
C. The rights referred to herein shall expire if a final map is not approved prior to the
expiration of the vesting tentative map as provided in Section 16.24.080. If the
final map is approved, these rights shall last for the following periods of time:
1. An initial time period of 12 months. Where several final maps are
recorded on various phases of a project covered by a single vesting
tentative map, this initial time period shall begin for each phase when the
final map for that phase is recorded.
2. The initial time period set forth in subsection C., 1., of this section shall be
automatically extended by any time used for processing a complete
application for a grading permit or for design or architectural review, if
such processing exceeds 30 days, from the date a complete application is
filed.
3. A subdivider may apply for a I year extension of time before the initial
time period set forth in subsection C., 1., of this section expires. The
application shall be submitted in the form of a written request with
justification for the extension and all applicable fees shall be paid to the
Planning Director and shall be considered by the Planning Commission in
an unadvertised public hearing. If the extension is denied by the
Commission, the subdivider may appeal that denial to City Council within
15 days.
P:~ T16\arnend-May8. wpd
May 8, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 6
4. If the subdivider submits a complete application for a building permit
during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 'i-3 of this subsection,
the rights referred to herein shall continue until the expiration of that
permit, or any extension of that permit. The time limits set forth herein
shall specifically apply only to those building permit applications
submitted during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 1-3 of
this subsection. The expiration and extension of such building
permits shall be governed by the specific provisions of Chapter
15.12 of this Code (Uniform Building Code) pertaining to permit
issuance.
(Note: Clarifies that the vesting rights applies to each building permit which has been
issued prior to the expiration and extension of the vesting rights, and that the vesting
rights remain on each building permit as long as the building permit remains active and
in good standing. Vesting rights do not apply to those building permits which were not
issued prior to expiration and extension of the vesting rights. CELSOC did not Object to
this amendment. )
16.28.170 LOTS.
B. Lot Frontage. All residential lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 55.~feet
except as follows: %
1. The minimum street frontage for interior one family dwelling lots in an R-2
zone shall be 45 feet.
2. The minimum lot frontage for corner lots shall be 60 feet except for one
family dwelling lots in an R-2 zone where it is 50 feet. For purposes of
measuring frontage on a corner lot with a radius return, the distance shall
be measured from the point of intersection of the extensions of the street
side property line and the front property line.
3. Cul-de-sac or Elbow lot: 35 lineal feet as measured along the arc.
4. Flag lot: 20 feet.
L t ,~. I --. II & & & I~ II L .....
Lot VVidth. The lot width is the length of a fine bebveen side property lines that is
the perpendicular bisect of the lot depth. The minimum width for residential lots
shall be 55 feet on interior lots and 60 feet on corner lots, except as follows:
P:t T16~amend-May8. wpd
May 8, 2000 i
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 7
1. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting agricultural or
residential suburban zoned property shall be 100 feet.
2. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting a freeway or railroad
right-of-way shall be 85 feet on interior lots and 90 feet on corner lots.
3. The minimum width for a one family dwelling lot in the R-2 zone shall be
45 feet on interior lots and 50 feet on corner lots except as required in
subsection D., 1. and 2.
.'n.~n~ .~.u.~. l,.t~ width ,~f~ 100 fe~t~.
H. Double Frontage Lots. Double frontage lots having a depth less than two hundred
feet will not be approved except where, as determined by the advisory agency,
conditions permit no other reasonable form of platting, or where the proposed
double frontage lots abut e-meier an arterial or collector street and the advisory
agency deems it to be reasonable due to such controlling factors as traffic,
ty __ ,_, ,A. ,~. ........... ·
safe , appearance and setback. ,".'.',-ther, ........ , ,,,,~ ~,,,, ~ ...... r,~r, a
'---: '" '~ .... ' ..... ' -'--" f, ,.,, mt '-- ...... -- --~,,- -',,~,--:-,,,' o,,-'---',,~,, except '",, h,, ,~--- the
- -: .... '- th,~ -" :- --~-' .... -' .... "--- Each such lot shall have a six
foot high masonry wall (the height shall be measured from whichever side of the
wall the adjacent finished grade is higher) with landscaping (on the exterior side)
installed by the subdivider adjacent to the rear property line or, where the wall
and landscaping are to be maintained by a homeowner's association or
maintenance district installed within the street right-of-way and additional
landscape easement or adjacent common lot. Alternate wall and landscape
concepts may be approved in areas where, in the opinion of the advisory agency,
topographic or other physical conditions make strict adherence to this criteria
undesirable. Conceptual wall and landscaping plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the advisory agency prior to filing of any final tract or final parcel
map.
(Note: Staff has considered CELSOC comments and withdraws the amendment to add
the requirement for residential lots fronting arterials and collector streets to have
minimum 100 foot lot frontage and width. No change is proposed to the current lot
standards.)
16.28.190 APPROVED ACCESS REQUIRED.
A. Legal access to each lot or parcel of a subdivision shall be provided by:
P:t T16tamend-May8. wpd
May 8, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 8
1. Having frontage upon a public street (other than an alley'), with the ability
to access it (per Section 17.04.370); or
2. Having frontage upon a private easement (or private road) determined by
the Planning Commission to be adequate for purposes of access (per
Section 17.04.370); or
3.Dedication, or an offer of dedication, to the city for street purposes from a
public road to each parcel; or
4. Recordation of a covenant of easement in accordance with Section 65870
of the Government Code. Such covenant may be released by direction of
the Planning Commission, following a public hearing thereon, after the
applicant seeking release has paid the fee therefor set by City Council
resolution.
d~v~Ic, p,m,~nt$ ~f =cc~ss d,,;o nc, t disrupt t,
st:'.ndc, rds ---' :- ,----~-- --..-., ---: ....
fy; ...... : .... -' '~: ......... ' '---- "-
ssf~ ,~,,d ................ ,. ..........· ........ o,,,d .... -
(Note: Staff has considered CELSOC comments and withdraws the amendment to add
this requirement prohibiting residential lots fronting arterial and collector streets because
existing General Plan policies address this issue and local police power may address
specific circumstances related to the public health, welfare and safety. No change is
proposed to the current standards.)
16.32.080 IMPROVEMENTS - IN SUBDIVISIONS FOR WHICH PARCEL MAP IS
REQUIRED.
E. The provisions of subsections C. and D. of Section~ 16.32.060 shall
apply to subdivisions for which a final parcel map is required.
(Note: Corrects a typographical error. No CELSOC objection.)
P:~ T16~arnend-May8. wpd
May 8, 2000
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing accepting testimony will be held before the
Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield. The hearing will begin at 12:15 p.m., or as soon
thereafter, as the matter may be heard on TUESDAY, MAY 30, 2000, in the Council Chambers
in City Hall. The Tuesday portion will be for presentation of staff testimony only. No action to
approve or deny this project will be taken on Monday. The hearing will be continued to take
testimony from others at 5:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on
THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2000, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue,
Bakersfield, California, 93301, to consider the following request:
1. The project to be considered: Amendment to Title 16, Subdivisions, of the
Bakersfield Municipal Code to update the subdivision ordinan'ce to reflect changes in the
Subdivision Map Act and local implementation.
2. Project location: City-wide
3. The name and address of the project applicant: City of Bakersfield
Planning Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield CA 93301
NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Department of the City of
Bakersfield has determined that the proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3), General Rule.~
Staff has found that the proposal will not have a significant effect on the environment. The :~
Notice of Exemption may be inspected at the Planning Department (contact Jennie Eng) in the
Development Services building at 1715 Chester Avenue, or by telephoning the department at
(661) 326-3733.
PUBLIC COMMENT regarding the proposed project will be accepted, in writing, on or
before the hearing date indicated above at the Planning Department. If you challenge the action
taken on this proposal in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the
public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Bakersfield prior to the close
of the hearing.
DATED: May 18, 2000 POSTED: May 18, 2000
jje
P:\T16\NPH.wpd
Eng/Surveyors ,,/,,~. ALTA ENGINEERING BRUCE L. NYBO INC.
~L~T~'~'C~--~'~u~ ~/~'/0~) HUGHES SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND
labels\engsur-nl ~ 218 SOUTH H ST SURVEYING
BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 4200 EASTON DRIVE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING DEWALT CORPORATION JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
2505 "M" STREET 1930 - 22ND STREET 4200 TRUXTUN AVENUE SUITE 20~
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
PASQUINI ENGINEERING PORTER-ROBERTSON
1117-A W. COLUMBUS STREET ENGINEERING
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 1200 - 21ST STREET
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
DELMARTER & DEIFEL JERRY HENDRICKS
2901 "H" STREET 2003 20TH ST
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
TELSTAR ENGINEERING INC. RONALD F. RUETTGERS
5301 OFFICE PARK DRIVE SUITE 125 CIVIL ENGINEER
BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 1801 21ST STREET SUITE 4
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
FAS ENGINEERING & SURVEYING FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
2003 20TH STREET 2716 L STREET
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
SMITHTECH/USA INC
1424 17TH STREET
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
BRIAN TODD CELSOC KERN CO CHAPTER WILSON & ASSOCIATES
BIA P O BOX 176 1400 EASTON BUILDING E #132
1326 H ST #15 BAKERSFIELD CA 93302 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
LUSICH & CO MICHELLE LAMOINE MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES
651H STREET #200 MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES 2001WHEELAN CT
BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 2001 WHEELAN CT BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Council Chamber, City Hall Tuesday, May 30, 2000 - 12:15 p.m.
Thursday, June 1, 2000 - 5:30 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL MICHAEL DHANENS, Chairman
STEPHEN BOYLE, Vice-Chairman
MA THEW BRAD Y
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPER
TOM MCGINNIS
RON SPRAGUE
JEFFREY TKAC
NOTE: Agendas may be amended up to 72 hours prior to the Planning Commission
meeting. A final agenda may be obtained from the Planning Department 72
hours prior to the meeting.
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
ANY PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE AGENDA OR WISHES TO SPEAK
REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING NEED NOT FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD. ALL
OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK BEFORE THE COMMISSION MAY FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S.
CARD AND PRESENT IT TO THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE
MEETING.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Planning Commission decisions on Zone Changes, Parcel Maps and Tentative
Subdivision maps are subject to appeal by any person aggrieved. No permit shall be
issued for any use involved in an application until after the final acceptance date of
appeal.
Such appeal must be filed in writing within 10 days from date of hearing, addressed to
the City Council, c/o Office of the City Clerk, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301. A $334 non-refundable filing fee must be included with filing of the initial
appeal for those appeals filed by the applicant or any person outside the notice area.
All appeals filed on land divisions will require a $334 non-refundable filing fee. If all
appeals are withdrawn prior to the City Council hearing, it will not be conducted and the
decision of the Planning Commission will stand.
If no appeal is received within the specified time period or if all appeals filed are
withdrawn, the action of the Planning Commission shall become final.
Agenda, PC, Monday - May 30, 2000 and Thursday - June 1, 2000 Page 2
3. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - (marked by asterisk (*)
These items will be acted on as a group without individual staff presentations if no
member of the Planning Commission or audience wishes to comment or ask questions
on a case. The items are recommended for approval by staff. The applicant has been
informed of any special conditions and has signed an agreement to conditions of
approval and requested to be placed on the consent agenda.
If anyone wishes to discuss or testify on any of the consent items the item(s) will be
taken off consent and will be considered in the order on the agenda. If not, the public
hearing will be opened and the items acted on as a group.
3.1) Agenda Item 4) - Minutes of May I and May 4, 2000, Planning Commission
meetings.
3.2) Agenda Item 9 - Consistency Finding for the vacation of 20-foot wide
sewer lift station access easement.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of minutes of the regular meetings held May 1 and May 4, 2000.
5. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET FY 2000-2005
DETERMINATION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CONSISTENCY
WITH THE GENERAL AND SPECIFIC PLANS. (City of Bakersfield - Public
Works Department)
(City-wide)
RECOMMENDATION: Find consistent with General and Specific Plans
GROUP VOTE:
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS
6.1) Vestina Tentative Tract Map 5989 (Porter-Robertson)
Containing 24 lots on 4.7 net acres for single family residential purposes,
zoned R-1 (One Family Dwelling). Located on the south side of Cesar
Chavez School, at the northeast corner of Chase Avenue and Mesa
Marin Drive. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 3) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Group Vote.
6.2) Vesting Tentative Tract Map $991 (Porter-Robertson)
Containing 86 lots on 46.82 acres for single family residential purposes,
zoned R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and a modification to exceed the
maximum block length. Located 1/4 mile south of Olive Drive on the
north side of Hageman Road (extended) approximately 2/3 of a mile
west of Highway 99. (Negative Declaration on file)
Agenda, PC, Monday - May 30, 2000 and Thursday - June 1, 2000 Page 3
(Ward4) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Group Vote.
6.3) Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5996 (Mclntosh and Associates)
Containing six lots on 1.82 acres for multiple family residential purposes
(six, 4-unit apartments (total of 24 units)), zoned C-O (Professional and
Administrative Office; a request to. reduce the lot frontage, and approval
of access. Located on the southeast corner of Ardmore Avenue and
Wheelan Court. (Negative Declaration on file)
(WardS)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Group Vote.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ZONE CHANGES
7.1) Zone Change P00-0285 (Timeless Architecture)
Change in land use zoning from an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family
Dwelling) zone to an R-1 CH (One Family Dwelling-Church) zone on
approximately one acre to allow development of church related uses to
an existing church located on property adjacent to the south. Located at
the southwest corner of El Rio Drive and Quailwood Drive, north of
Stockdale Highway. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Roll call vote.
7.2) Revised PCD Zone Chanae P99-0911 (Cornerstone Engineering)
Change in land use zoning from a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone to a Revised PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 10.1 acres for the Bakersfield Heart Hospital to
allow a helicopter landing pad (helistop); revised footprint of the two-
story, 40,000 square foot hospital wing; and a three-story, 38,416 square
foot medical office building. Located at 3001 $illect Avenue (south side
of Sillect Avenue, east of Buck Owens Blvd.). (Negative Declaration on
file)
(Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Roll call vote.
Agenda, PC, Monday - May 30, 2000 and Thursday. June 1, 2000 Page 4
8. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE
Amendment to the text of Title t6 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the
Bakersfield Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield)
Update the subdivision ordinance to reflect changes in the Subdivision Map Act
and formalization of local implementation policy. (Exempt from CEQA)
(All Wards)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Roll Call Vote.
9. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDING
The vacation of the 20-foot wide sewer lift station access easement and portion
of the city lift station parcel at the northeast corner of Ming Avenue and Grand
Lakes Avenue. (Exempt from CEQA)
(Ward4)
RECOMMENDATION: MAKE FINDING
Group Vote.
10. COMMUNICATIONS
A)' Written
B) Verbal
11. COMMISSION COMMENTS
A) Committees
12, DISCUSSION AND ACTION REGARDING POSSIBLE CANCELLATION OF
THE NEXT PRE-MEETING.
'13. ADJOURNMENT
May 17, 2000
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM: ~
FROM: Stanley C. Grady, Planning Director APPROVED ~
DATE: June 1, 2000
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (TITLE 16 OF THE BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE )
Proposed amendments to various section of the local Subdivision Ordinance to reflect
changes in the Subdivision Map Act and local implementation.
APPLICANT: City of Bakersfield
LOCATION: City-wide
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to ADOPT resolution approving amendments with findings set forth in the attached res(~iution and
recommend same to the City Council (Exhibit "A").
Roll Call Vote
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code is known as the Subdivision Ordinance. The Subdivision
Ordinance provides local implementation of the State's Subdivision Map Act (Map Act), and local
regulation of the design and imi~rovement of land division.
From time to time, the State of California adopts legislation amending the Map Act. SUbsequently, the
City must update the local Subdivision Ordinance to reflect recent changes in the Map Act. Staff also
proposes other changes needed to address processing and implementation as well as clarify certain
sections of the ordinance.
In early March, 2000, staff sent a copy of the proposed amendments to the Building Industry Association
(BIA), local engineers, land surveyors, and individuals known to have an interest in the Subdivision
Ordinance. The local chapter of CELSOC (Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of
Prepared by jeng ~ May 12, 2000 ~ S:LIENG~T16~pc-sr. wpd Page 1
Subdivision Ord. Amendments
California) submitted several substantive comments. Staff revised or withdrew some of the original
proposed text amendments in response to CELSOC's comments. In summary, staff included wording
suggested by CELSOC regarding submission of electronic data; withdrew proposed amendments related
to filing multiple tentative maps on the same piece of property; and a change to require a 100 foot
minimum lot width and frontage for residential lots fronting on major streets.
The only other comment submitted was from the BIA. The BIA has stated they "will monitor and actively
participate in the process before taking a formal position on any specific changes." BIA desires to
communicate any BIA position(s) after Planning Commission review of the proposed ordinance.
Exhibit "1" of the attached resolution shows each proposed amendment. Strike-out text indicates text to
be deleted. New text is shown in bold. Immediately following each proposed amendment staff has
provided in italics an explanation for the amendment. Table "A" below summarizes some of the proposed
amendments including a brief comment.
TABLE A: SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS
SECTION PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMMENT
NO.
16.16.030 Requires bearings and distances be Needed to facilitate City's computer
shown on tentative map. mapping system.
16.16.080 B Increases the number of years a Reflects recent change in the Subdivision
tentative tract map may be extended Map Act for tentative tract maps to match
from 3 to 5 years, the number of years a tentative parcel
map may be extended.
16.16.080 E Includes a reference to applicable ' Needed for cross reference purposes.
section of the Subdivision Map Act.
16.16.080 G Adds Planning Director as responsible Provides collaborative determination
staff in determining a "substantial between the City Engineer and Planning
change" which may require application Director. Planning Director is required to
for a Revised Tentative Map. sign final map indicating it is substantially
the same as the approved tentative map
(§ 16.20.110).
16.16.080 G.2 A revised tentative map must include all Codifies existing policy. Requires
land subdivided under the original consideration of the development project
approved tentative map, except for as originally submitted instead of
phase(s) which have recorded, piecemeal changes.
Table continued on next page.
Prepared by jeng ~ May 12, 2000 ~ S:~JENG~T16~pc-sr. wpd Page 2
Subdivision Ord. " "
Amendments ,~
TABLE A: SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS cont.
SECTION PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMMENT
NO.
.16.20.110 Acknowledges that a tentative map may Clarifies that the Planning Director may
be approved by the City Council upon sign a final map resulting from a City
appeal. Council decision of a map which was
appealed.
16.24.090 C.4 Adds text explaining time limits of vesting Clarifies that vesting rights applies to
rights related to building permits issued, each building permit which has been
issued prior to the expiration and
extension of the vesting rights, and the
vesting rights remain on each building
permit as long as the building permit
remains in good standing. Vesting rights
do not apply to those building permits
which were not issued prior to expiration
and extension of the vesting rights.
16.32.080 E Correct citation of Section 16.32.060. Corrects typographical error.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND DETERMINATION:
Staff determined the proposed amendments are exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3), General Rule. Staff has found that
the proposal will not have a significant effect on the environment.
Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield for the project with the
associated determination of exemption from CEQA was advertised in the newspaper and posted on the
bulletin board of the Bakersfield City Planning Department at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Notices
were also sent to local engineers, land surveyors and building industry groups.
Exhibits: (Attached)
A. Resolution with Exhibit: 1. Proposed amendments to Title 16, Subdivisions.
B. Notice of Exemption
Prepared by jeng I May 12, 2000 ~ S:lJENG~T16~pc-sr. wpd Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF TITLE
SIXTEEN OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATED TO SUBDIVISIONS.
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield, filed an application requesting amendment to
Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code related to subdivisions as shown on the attached
Exhibit "1"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, through its Secretary, did set, TUESDAY,
MAY 30, 2000, and, THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2000 at the hour of 5:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a
public hearing before said Planning Commission on said application and notice of the public
hearing was given in the manner provided in Title Seventeen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation
Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines
section 15061 (b)(3), general rule; and
WHEREAS, the facts presented 'in the staff report and evidence at the above
referenced public hearings support the findings contained in this resolution; and
WHEREAS, persons spoke at the June 1, 2000 hearing before the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the local chapter of CELSOC (Consulting Engineers and Land
Surveyors of California) submitted several substantive comments, which have been fully
considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing held June 1, 2000, the proposed amendments
to said Title 16, was duly heard and considered and the Planning Commission found as follows:
1. All required public notices have been given.
2. The proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines
Section 15061 (b)(3), general rule.
3. The proposed ordinance amendments are consistent with the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
4. 'The amendments are necessary for orderly development of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD as follows:
1. That the above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.
2. That the proposed amendments to Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal
Code, as shown on attached Exhibit "1" are recommended for approval to the City Council.
On a motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner
the Planning Commission approved the foregoing, and recommend same to the City Council by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners
NOES:
ABSENT:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st
day of June, 2000.
DATED: June 1, 2000
PLANNING COMMISSION
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
JEFFREY TKAC, Chairman
Planning Commission
JENG
S:~IENG\T16\Res-PC.wpd
May 12, 2000
EXHIBIT "1"
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
May 12, 2000
Proposed revisions to Title 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code
are shown as follows: Bold indicates new text; strike out (str~;~c c, ut); indicates deletion of text;
Italics provides a short note explaining why the revision is proposed, and is not to be included in
the actual text of the ordinance amendment.
16.16.010 G FILING
Every person submitting a tentative parcel map who desires consideration of deferral
and waiver of any improvements in accordance with Section 16.32.080 shall submit a
written request which details what deferrals and waivers are requested for
consideration with justification for each requested deferral and waiver.
(Note: Clarifies that a request for waiver of improvements related to a tentative parcel
map must be make in writing)
16.16.030 F INFORMATION SHOWN.
The tentative map shall show the following information.
F. Sufficient description to define the location and boundaries of the
proposed subdivision end including it's the subdivision's relationship to
existing, adjacent subdivisions, ~ the subdivision's surroundings,
and bearings and distances indicating the map boundaries.
Submittal of electronic data may satisfy the requirement for
bearings and distances. Submittal of electronic data may satisfy the
requirement for providing bearings and distances and such data
shall be used for informational purposes only.
(Clarifies that a request for waiver of improvements related to a tentative parcel map
must be made in writing. This information will be used to provide more accurate growth
projections, provide cumulative impact analysis now accomplished through labor
intension hand calculations, and Provide development statistics after requested by
marketing firms and currently unavailable.)
16.16.080 EXPIRATION OF MAP APPROVAL - EXTENSION.
A. An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after
its approval or conditional approval; provided, however, that any tentative map
approved or conditionally approved by Kern County for an area which is
S:~JENG\T16\pc-ex1 .wpd
May 12, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 2
subsequently annexed into the City prior to recordation of a final map shall expire
in accordance with the ordinance requirements of Kern County and the
Subdivision Map Act.
B. An extension or extensions of tentative-traet map approval or conditional approval
shall not exceed an aggregate of-3- five (5) years.,-,,," ........ ~^,~,,o,,,,,'~- or~^,~,,o,,.,,'^--,o of
s~,~re§ate of ,5 years. However, if an extension of time application is appealed in
accordance with Section 16.52, an approved or conditionally approved tentative
map shall not expire prior to a decision by the City Council in accordance with
Section 16.52.
(Note: Reflects a change in the Subdivision Map Act approved by the State legislature,
making the number of years a tentative tract map may be extended cons/stent with
extension on a tentative parcel map. CELSOC did not object to this amendment.)
C. The subdivider may request an extension of the tentative map approval or
conditional approval by written application to the advisory agency. Such
application shall be filed before the.approval or conditional approval is due to
expire, but shall not be filed any sooner than 60 days prior to expiration date of
the tentative map. The application shall state the reasons for requesting the
extension. Consent of the subdivider to new or revised conditions required by the
advisory agency shall be a prerequisite to approval of any extension. ::.
D. Failure to file a final tract map or a final parcel map with the City Engineer within
24 months from the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map or
within the specified time period on any extension thereof, shall terminate all
proceedings. Before such final tract or final parcel map may thereafter be filed
with the County Recorder a new tentative map shall be submitted.
E. If the subdivider whose tract has been approved by the advisory agency for
multiple, or phased, final maps is subject to a requirement of $125,000 or more,
as adjusted pursuant to Section 66452.6(a)(2), to construct or improve or
finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the
boundaries of the tentative map, each filing of a final map authorized by Section
66456.1 of the Map Act shall extend the expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of its expiration
as provided in this section, or the date of the previously approved final map,
whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than
10 years from its approval or conditional approval.
S:~JENG\T16\pc-ex1.wpd
May 12, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 3
Prior to the filing of the first final map, the subdivider shall make written
notification to the City Engineer of eligibility for such extension of time. Such
notification shall include documentation as determined by the City Engineer by
which eligibility can be verified.
"Public improvements," as used in this subsection, include fees, traffic controls,
streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, over-crossings, street interchanges,
flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting
facilities.
(Note: Identifies the section of the Map Act by which the amount may be adjusted.
CELSOC did not object lo this amendment)
F. A tentative map on property subject to a development agreement may be
extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the
duration of the agreement.
G. After approval of the tentative map, .if changes deemed substantial by the City
Engineer and Planning Director are proposed, a filing of a Revised Tentative
Map will be required.
(Note: Provides a collaborative determination between the City Engineer and Planning
Director in determining a substantial change. CELSOC did not object to this
amendment.)
1. The previously assigned tract number will be used with the word
"Revised" added to the number. The procedure for filing a Revised
Tentative Map is the same as for the Tentative Map. A Revised Tentative
Map cannot be filed if the approval on the original map has expired. An
approved revised.tentative map supersedes the tentative map for which it
was filed.
2. A Revised Tentative Map will be required to include all the land
subdivided under the originally assigned tract number, as approved
by the advisory agency, except a phase or phases of the original
tentative map which have recorded in accordance with this Chapter
shall be excluded from the revised tentative map.
S:~JENG\T16\pc-ex1.wpd
May 12, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 4
(Note: Staff has considered CELSOC comments to expand the cdteda to exclude
property from the Revised Map as a result cfa change to ownership. Staff believes it is
important that the decision makers are able to consider the proposed changed to the
original map in the context of the original project and not in a piecemeal fashion. No
change is proposed to staff's amendment because this amendment is only intended to
codify current policy related to recordation of phases, not change in ownership.)
16.20.110 STATEMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR.
A statement by the Planning Director is required on the final tract map. He shall state
that:
A. The Planning Commission, or City Council upon appeal, approved or
conditionally approved the tentative map and any applicable extensions
thereof and the date such action was taken.
B. The subdivision, as shown on the final map, is substantially the same as it
appeared on the tentative map and in accordance with any conditions
approved by the commission, or City Council upon appeal.
(Note: Specifically allows the Planning Director to sign a final tract map based on a
decision of the City Council on an appeal of a tentative tract map. Recognizes the apPeal
process. CELSOC did not object to this amendment.)
16.24.090 VESTING ON APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP.
C. The rights referred to herein shall expire if a final map is not approved prior to the
expiration of the vesting tentative map as provided in Section 16.24.080. If the
final map is approved, these rights shall last for the following periods of time:
1. An initial time period of 12 months. Where several final maps are
recorded on various phases of a project covered by a single vesting
tentative map, this initial time period shall begin for each phase when the
final map for that phase is recorded.
2. The initial time period set forth in subsection C., 1., of this section shall be
automatically extended by any time used for processing a complete
application for a grading permit or for design or architectural review, if
such processing exceeds 30 days, from the date a complete application is
filed.
S:~JENG\T16\pc-ex1.wpd
May 12, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 5
3. A subdivider may apply for a 1 year extension of time before the initial
time period set forth in subsection (3., 1., of this section expires. The
application shall be submitted in the form of a written request with
justification for the extension and all applicable fees shall be paid to the
Planning Director and shall be considered by the Planning Commission in
an unadvertised public hearing. If the extension is denied by the
Commission, the subdivider may appeal that denial to City Council within
15 days.
4. If the subdivider submits a complete application for a building permit
during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 1-3 of this subsection,
the rights referred to herein shall continue until the expiration of that
permit, or any extension of that permit. The time limits set forth herein
shall specifically apply only to those building permit applications
submitted during the periods of time specified in subdivisions 1-3 of
this subsection. The expiration and extension of such building
permits shall be governed by the specific provisions of Chapter
15.12 of this Code (Uniform Building Code) pertaining to permit
issuance.
(Note: Clarifies that the vesting rights applies to each building permit which has been
issued prior to the expiration and extension of the vesting rights, and that the vesting
rights remain on each building permit as long as the building permit remains active and
in good standing. Vesting rights do not apply to those building permits which were not
issued prior to expiration and extension of the vesting rights. CELSOC did not object to
this amendment.)
16.28.170 LOTS.
H. Double Frontage Lots. Double frontage lots having a depth less than two hundred
feet will not be approved except where, as determined by the advisory agency,
conditions permit no other reasonable form of platting, or where the proposed
double frontage lots abut a-major an arterial or collector street and the advisory
agency deems it to be reasonable due to such controlling factors as traffic,
safety, appearance and setback. Each such lot shall have a six foot high
masonry wall (the height shall be measured from whichever side of the wall the
adjacent finished grade is higher) with landscaping (on the exterior side) installed
by the subdivider adjacent to the rear property line or, where the wall and
landscaping are to be maintained by a homeowner's association or maintenance
district installed within the street right-of-way and additional landscape easement
or adjacent common lot. Alternate wall and landscape concepts may be approved
in areas where, in the opinion of the advisory agency, topographic or other
physical conditions make strict adherence to this criteria undesirable. Conceptual
S:~JENG\T16~pc-ex1 .wpd
May 12, 2000
Exhibit "1"
Proposed Title 16 Amendments
Page 6 ~
wall and landscaping plans shall be reviewed and approved by the advisory
agency prior to filing of any final tract or final parcel map.
(Note: The amendment is correctly reference the types of streets as "arterial and
collector" streets, as defined in the general plan, rather than "major" street. No change is
proposed to the current lot standards.)
16.32.080 IMPROVEMENTS - IN SUBDIVISIONS FOR WHICH PARCEL MAP IS
REQUIRED.
E. The provisions of subsections C. and D. of Section~ 16.32.060 shall
apply to subdivisions for which a final parcel map is required.
(Note: Corrects a typographical error. No CELSOC objection.)
S:~JENG\T16\pc-ex1.wpd
May 12, 2000
'" N"OTIC~ OF EXEMPTION EXHIBIT
TO: _ Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Bakersfield
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
__X County Clerk
County of Kern
· 1115 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Project Title: Amendments to Subdivision Ordinance {Title 16 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code )
Project Location-Specific: City-wide
Project Location-City: Bakersfield Project Location-County: Kern
Description of Project: Proposed amendments to various section of the local Subdivision Ordinance to reflect chan,qes in
the Subdivision Map Act and local implementation.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Bakersfield
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Bakersfield
Exempt Status:
__ Ministerial (Sec.21080(b)(1); 15268));
m Declared Emergency (Sec.21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
m Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
__ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number.
Statutory Exemptions. State section number.
~ Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3), .General Rule.
Reasons why project is exempt: Proiect would not have a si.qn ficant impact on the environment.
Lead Agency: Contact Person: Jennie En.q, Associate Planner Phone:(661) 326-3733
If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?
Yes_ No_
Signature: /" .~~' l//)/~,/~J ~i'//~U'~'~ .... Date:May 11, 2000
~x ency Date received for filing at OPR:
_ Signed by Applicant
P:\T16\noe.wpd
Minutes, PC, Thursday, June 1, 2000 Parle 9
Public portion of the meeting was opened.
Dennis Fox said that one thing he would like to see in the staff report under a
health and safety issue is that the distance from helipads to any structures
and/or power lines should be looked at.
Motion was made by Commissioner Sprague, seconded by Commissioner
Kemper to continue this item until the June 15, 2000, Planning Commission
meeting. Motion carried.
8. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE
Amendment to the text of Title 16 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield) CA# Wa~=)
Staff report given recommending adopting the ordinance and approving amendments
attached to resolution.
Public portion of the meeting was opened. Roger Mclntosh spoke addressing Section
16.16.030 F specifically as it pertains to electronic data. Mr. Mclntosh said the wording
in the proposed ordinance amendment is different than the odginal proposal that he
saw a month ago. Mr. Mclntosh said, the reasoning behind submitting electronic data
does not make sense to him. He said that in accordance with State law a set of plans,
map or report, has to have a signature and a seal. Submitting an electronic document
does not comply with State law, it does not give you an electronic signature which is not
allowed in the State of California. Mr. Mclntosh said that he supports the requirement
for showing bearings and distances. A clarification is not a problem. But to allow the
submittal of electronic data to satisfy that requirement is not satisfying that requirement
as not everyone has the ability to read the electronic data. Mr. Mclntosh said that he
noticed in the clarification it says that "information will be used to provide more accurate
growth projections, provide cumulative impact analysis, now accomplished through
labor-intensive hand calculations and provide development statistics requested by
marketing firms and currently unavailable." Mr. Mclntosh said that what disturbs him is
that the electronic information is not always the final product. It is not their work
product. It is only a means to get to that work product and the tentative map is not
always the final map that gets recorded with the recorders office. Once the electronic
data is in the city's hands, it becomes public information that is released to anyone. Mr.
Mclntosh requested that the sentence "submittal of electronic data may satisfy the
requirement for providing bearing and distances and such data shall be used for
informational purposes only" be stricken.
Public portion of the meeting was closed.
Commissioner Boyle said that he was having a problem understanding the first
sentence that says "submittal of electronic data may satisfy the requirement for
bearings and distance" and the next sentence, the first clause that says "submittal of
electronic data may satisfy the requirement for providing for bearings and distance." It
seems redundant to him and wanted staff to explain the difference between the two.
Mr. Hemandez said that he agrees with Commissioner Boyle analysis and said there is
no intent for the two clauses to have different meanings. He said that unless Public
.Works and/or Planning has a different purpose for the two sentences, he thinks the last
sentence could be eliminated.
Minutes, PC, Thursday, June 1, 2000 Page 10
Commissioner Boyle asked if Public Works had a comment. Mr. Grady said that they
are checking the case file to see if there is a clerical error or if there is something
missing in the language between our office and the City Attorney's office. They should
have an answer in a few minutes.
Roger Mclntosh said that he meant to say that the last two sentences should be
deleted. They both are unnecessary and do not meet the requirements of State law.
Mr. Grady said they could not find anything to clarify this. It appears the sentence was
written twice with a different ending. He made a suggestion to continue this item to a
later meeting. The Public Works Department is really concerned about this and
unfortunately staff from the department in engineering and subdivision were unable to
attend tonight's meeting. Ms. Shaw could clarify the difference.
Commissioner Boyle said that until he understands what they are trying to do, he has a
problem including either sentence.
Commissioner Dhanens asked if the Planning Department would like electronic files or
is it primarily a Public Works requirement? Mr. Grady said that both departments
would use the information. It will be helpful with GIS and save staff time.
Commissioner Dhanens asked how staff is going to track the maps through the system
electronically so that whatever changes are made on the final map will be captured?
Mr. Grady said that typically we would get both, a hard copy and an electronic file. We
would take a disk and map and make sure they are the same. The hard copy of the
map is still the legal document that is recorded.
Mr. Hernandez said he had an answer to the problem now and there is an additional
clause that is contained in Section I that is a typographical error. The sentence reads
"submittal of electronic data may satisfy the requirement for bearings and distances."
That should be stricken. The last sentence should remain.
Commissioner Boyle asked if the electronic data is being submitted to satisfy the
requirement, then why can it only be used for informational purposes? Why can't it be
used for all purposes? Mr. Hernandez said that he believed the "informational
purposes only" was to try to appease concerns that the data might be used for any
other purpose other than for the city's GIS system. Commissioner Boyle asked if that is
the case then why not just ask for both an electronic file and a map and still have the
bearings and distances on the map itself? Mr. Hernandez said he wasn't sure what
the Public Works Department has in mind. It might not meet their needs. Mr.
Hernandez said that he thinks the item should be continued until Ms. Shaw can attend
so that she may explain why they want the electronic data.
Motion was made by Commissioner Sprague, seconded by Commissioner Kemper, to
continue the item to the June 15, 2000 meeting and place it at the front of the agenda.
9. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDING
The vacation of the 20-foot wide sewer lift station access easement and portion
of the city lift station parcel at the northeast corner of Ming Avenue and Grand Lakes
Avenue. (Exempt from CEQA) (Ward4)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING
PLANNING
FAX # 661-327-0646 1715 Chester Avenue
Phone # 661-326-3733 Bakersfield, CA 93301
Date: June 8, 2000
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STANLEY GRADY, PLANNING DIRECTOR
Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet) THREE
RE: JULY 12 AND 15, 2000 MEETING
AGENDA ITEM # 4 SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Staff has prepared the attached memo in response to concerns raised during the last
Planning Commission hearing regarding the proposed amendment to the Subdivision .._:.
Ordinance.
This item has been continued to the Planning Commission meetings to be held June 12
and 15, 2000.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Movius at 326-3778.
cc: Roger Mclntosh, Mclntosh & Associates
John Wilson, President, Local Chapter CELSOC
Brian Todd, BIA
MEMORANDUM
June $, 2000
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ~ STANLEY GRADY, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 4 SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
At the June 1, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, a concern was raised regarding the proposed
revision of Section 16.16.030 F, and the proprietary nature of the subdivision map prepared under
the direction of a professional registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor and the availability
of the electronic data to the public.
Staff is recommending additional text to Section 16.16.020:Form as shown on the attached Exhibit
"A" to state that the "hard copy" of the subdivision map with the physical seal and signature of the
registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor that is submitted to the Planning Department is the
official application.
At the option of the applicant, he/she may provide the subdivision's bearings and distances in one of
two ways:
1. Show the bearings and distances on the "paper" map; or
2. At the option of the applicant, provide the bearings and distances information
electronically.
The combination of the additional text to Section 16.16.020:Form and the proposed text for Section
16.16.030 F clarifies that bearings and distances are required and the applicant has an option to
provide this information electronically. '
Bearings and distance information will be used to provide more accurate growth projections, provide
cumulative impact analysis now accomplished through labor intension hand calculations, and
provide development statistics often requested by marketing firms and currently unavailable.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Motion to ADOPT resolution approving amendments with findings set forth in the attached resolution,
incorporating the revision as shown on the Planning Director's memo dated June 8, 2000, and
recommend same to the City Council (Exhibit "A").
Roll Call Vote
S:",JENG\T16\M-PC.wpd
June 8, 2000
EXHIBIT "A"
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S MEMO
June 8, 2000
SECTION 16.16.020 FORM
The tentative map shall be prepared by or under the direction of a registered civil engineer
authorized to perform land surveying or a licensed land surveyor and shall be in the following
form:
A. The tentative map and all information thereon shall be clearly and legibly drawn,-afld
written, printed or reproduced, and may be rejected by the Planning Director if not
so done. The tentative map shall be submitted on sheets of paper or other
acceptable mediums, such as vellum or mylar, and shall contain a legible
stamp and signature of the registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor.
SECTION 16.16.030 F INFORMATION SHOWN.
The tentative map shall show the following information.
F. Sufficient description to define the location and boundaries of the proposed ·
subdivision ef~d including itzs the subdivision's relationship to existing, adjacent
subdivisions, ~ the subdivision's surroundings, and bearings and distan_~_es
indicating the map boundaries. At the option of the applicant, electronic data
may be submitted to provide the bearings and distances indicating the map
boundaries.
S:~IENG\T16\M-PC.wpd
June 8, 2000
AGENDA
REGULAR PRE-MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Council Chamber, City Hall Monday, June 12, 2000
12:15 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL MICHAEL DHANENS, Chairman
STEPHEN BOYLE, Vice Chairman
MA THEW BRAD Y ~
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPER
TOM MCGINNIS
RON SPRAGUE
JEFFREY TKAC
NOTE: Agendas may be amended up to 72 hours prior to the Planning Commission
meeting. A final agenda may be obtained from the Planning Department 72
hours pdor to the meeting.
Items listed on this agenda will be continued to 5:30 p.m. on the Thursday
following the date listed on this agenda.
2. PUBLIC .STATEMENTS
ANY PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE AGENDA OR WISHES TO SPEAK
REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING NEED NOT FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD. ALL
OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK BEFORE THE COMMISSION MAY FILL OUT A
SPEAKER'S CARD AND PRESENT IT TO THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Planning Commission decisions on Zone Changes, Parcel Maps and Tentative
Subdivision maps are subject to appeal by any person aggrieved. No permit shall be
issued for any use involved in an application until after the final acceptance date of
appeal.
Such appeal must be filed in writing within 10 days from date of hearing, addressed to
the City Council, c/o Office of the City Clerk, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301. A $334 non-refundable filing fee must be included with filing of the initial
appeal for those appeals filed by the applicant or any person outside the notice area.
All appeals filed on land divisions will require a $334 non-refundable filing fee. If all
appeals are withdrawn prior to the City Council hearing, it will not be conducted and the
decision of the Planning Commission will stand.
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 2
If no appeal is received within the specified time period or if all appeals filed are
withdrawn, the action of the Planning Commission shall become final.
3. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - (marked by asterisk (*)
These items will be acted on as a group without individual staff presentations if no member of
the Planning Commission or audience wishes to comment or ask questions on a case. The
items are recommended for approval by staff. The applicant has been informed of any special
conditions and has signed an agreement to conditions of approval and requested to be placed on
the consent agenda.
If anyone wishes to discuss or testify on any of the consent items the item(s) will be taken off
consent and will be considered in the order on the agenda. If not, the public hearing will be
opened and the items acted on as a group.
3.t) Agenda Item 6.t - Consistency Finding for acquisition of 23 acres
3.2) Agenda Item 6.2 .- Consistency Finding for acquisition of I/2 acre
4. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO oRDINANCE
Amendment to the text of Title 16 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield) Update the subdivision ordinance to reflect
changes in the Subdivision Map Act and formalization of local implementation policy.
(Exempt from CEQA) (Continued from June 1, 2000)
(All wa~s)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Roll Call Vote.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - Kyle Carter
Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council certify the Final
EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone Change P99-0482 which has been completed
in compliance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines and the City of Bakersfield CEQA
Implementation Procedures.
(Ward4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and Adopt resolution making findings and
recommend certification of the Final EIR to the City
Council.
Roll call vote,
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 3
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, ASSOCIATED REZONINGS,
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS, AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS:
6.1.a) General Plan Amendment/Circulation Element Amendment File No. P99-
0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle Carter has proposed to
amend the Land Use designations from LI (Light Industrial), SI (Service
Industrial) and HI (Heavy Industrial) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 64.58
acres, LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 91.84 acres and GC (General
Commercial) on 14.48 acres. Aisc, to amend the Circulation Element by
deleting Mohawk Street as an arterial north of Hageman Road to Olive Drive,
change Hageman Road from a collector to an arterial between Mohawk Street
and Knudsen Drive, along with modifying the alignment by swinging it to the
north a few hundred feet, and to establish a collector segment for Hageman
Road between Knudsen Drive to State Route 99/State Route 204, generally
bounded by Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale
Avenue on the west and Downing Road on the south. The approval of this
project shall supercede any previous approvals done in the County, including
any specific plan line alignments. (EIR on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.1.b) Zone Chanqe P99-0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle
Carter has requested a change in zoning from an M-1 (Light Manufacturing)
zone, M-2 (General Manufacturing) zone and an M-3 (Heavy Industrial) zone to
an R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone, R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone
and a C-2 (Regional Commercial) zone on 170.9 acres, generally bounded by
Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale Avenue on the
west and Downing Road on the south. (EIR on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.2.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed
to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 25.41 acres, located at the
northwest corner of Ashe Road and Panama Lane. (Negative Declaration on
file)
(Ward 6)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
.A_genda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 4
6.2.b) Zone Change P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA INC has requested a change in
zoning from an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone to an R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) zone on 25.41 acres, located at the northwest corner of Ashe
Road and Panama Lane. (Negative Declaration on file)
(ward 6)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.3.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed
to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 8.62 acres, generally located
south of Campus Park Drive and west of Old River Road. (Negative Declaration
on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.3.b) Zone Change No. P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed a
change in zoning from a PUD (Planned Unit Development) zone to an R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) zone on 65.44 acres, located south of Campus Park Drive and.
west of Old River Road to Mountain Vista Drive. (Negative Declaration on file)-
(Ward 4) -
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.4.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC
has proposed to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium
Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) on 5.14 acres, located along
the south side of Ming Avenue between Canter Way and Raintree Court.
(Negative Declaration on file)
(Wards 2 & 5)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.4.b) Zone Change No. P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC has
proposed a change in zoning from an R-1 CH (One Family Dwelling-Church)
and R-3 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone to a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 5.14 acres, located along the south side of Ming Avenue
between Canter Way and Raintree Court. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Wards 2 & 5)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
Agenda, PC, Monday -June 12, 2000 Page 5
6.5.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed to
change the land use designation from GC (General Commercial) and SR
(Suburban Residential) to LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 3.6 +/-
acres, generally located along the north side of Brimhall Road approximately
600 feet east of Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.$.b) Zone Change No. P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed a change in
zoning from a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone and an E (Estate) zone to
an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone on 3.6 +/- acres, generally
located along the north side of Brimhall Road approximately 600 feet east of
Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.6.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0253 - DeWalt Corp. has proposed to change
the land use designation from LR (Low Density Residential) to GC (General
Commercial) on 3.93 gross acres, located on the northwest corner of Calloway
Ddve and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: . Approve
Roll-call vote.
6.6.b) Zone Change No. P00-0253 - Dewalt Corp. has proposed a change in zoning
from an R~I (One Family Dwelling) zone to a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 3.93 gross acres, located at the northwest corner of
Calloway Drive and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - Revised PCD Zone Change P99-0911(Cornerstone Engineering)
Change in land use zoning from a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone to a
Revised PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone on 10.1 acres for the
Bakersfield Heart Hospital to allow a helicopter landing pad (helistop); revised footprint
of the two-story, 40,000 square foot hospital wing; and a three-story, 38,416 square
foot medical office building. Located at 3001 Sillect Avenue (south side of Sillect
Avenue, east of Buck Owens Blvd.). (Negative Declaration on file) (Continued from
June l, 2000)
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 6
(Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
8. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
8.1) General Plan Consistency Finding for the acquisition of approximately 23 acres
of land by the City of Bakersfield for a fire station, park site and future Paladino
Drive right-of-way, located generally south of Paladino Drive, east of Morning
Drive. (Exempt from CEQA)
(ward ~)
RECOMMENDATION: Make Finding
Group Vote.
8.2) General Plan Consistency Finding for the acquisition of % acre of land by the
City of Bakersfield for Joshua Park, located generally north of State Route 178,
east of San Dimas Street. (Exempt from CEQA)
(Ward 2)
RECOMMENDATION: Make Finding
Group Vote. ':':
9, COMMUNICATIONS
A) Written
B) Verbal
'10. COMMISSION COMMENTS
A) Committees
'1'1. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Director
June 2, 2000
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Council Chamber, City Hall Thursday, June 15, 2000
$:30 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL MICHAEL DHANENS, Chairman
STEPHEN BOYLE, Vice Chairman
MA THEW BRAD Y
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPEF~
TOM MCGINNIS
RON SPRAGUE
JEFFREY TKAC
NOTE: Agendas may be amended up to 72 hours prior to the Planning Commission
meeting. A final agenda may be obtained from the Planning Department 72
hours prior to the meeting.
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
ANY PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE AGENDA OR WISHES TO SPEAK
REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING NEED NOT FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD. ALL
OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK BEFORE THE COMMISSION MAY FILL OUT A
SPEAKER'S CARD AND PRESENT IT TO THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Planning Commission decisions on Zone Changes, Parcel Maps and Tentative
Subdivision maps are subject to appeal by any person aggrieved. No permit shall be
issued for any use involved in an application until after the final acceptance date of
appeal.
Such appeal must be filed in writing within 10 days from date of hearing, addressed to
the City Council, c/o Office of the City Clerk, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301. A $334 non-refundable filing fee must be included with filing of the initial
appeal for those appeals filed by the applicant or any person outside the notice area.
All appeals filed on land divisions will require a $334 non-refundable filing fee. If all
appeals are withdrawn prior to the City Council hearing, it will not be conducted and the
decision of the Planning Commission will stand.
Agenda, PC, Thursday- June 15, 2000 Page 3
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, ASSOCIATED REZONINGS,
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS, AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS:
6.1.a) General Plan Amendment/Circulation Element Amendment File No. P99-
0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle Carter has proposed to
amend the Land Use designations from LI (Light Industrial), SI (Service
Industrial) and HI (Heavy Industrial) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 64.58
acres, LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 91.84 acres and GC (General
Commercial) on 14.48 acres. Also, to amend the Circulation Element by
deleting Mohawk Street as an arterial north of Hageman Road to Olive Drive,
change Hageman Road from a collector to an artedal between Mohawk Street
and Knudsen Drive, along with modifying the alignment by swinging it to the
north a few hundred feet, and to establish a collector segment for Hageman
Road between Knudsen Drive to State Route 991State Route 204, generally
bounded by Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale
Avenue on the west and Downing Road on the south. The approval of this
project shall supercede any previous approvals done in the County, including
any specific plan line alignments. (EIR on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.t.b) Zone Change P99-0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle .~
Carter has requested a change in zoning from an M-1 (Light Manufacturing)
zone, M-2 (General Manufacturing) zone and an M-3 (Heavy Industrial) zone to
an R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone, R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone
and a C-2 (Regional Commercial) zone on 170.9 acres, generally bounded by
Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale Avenue on the
west and.Downing Road on the south. (EIR on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.2.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed
to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 25.41 acres, located at the
northwest corner of Ashe Road and Panama Lane. (Negative Declaration on
file)
(Ward 6)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
Agenda, PC, Thursday -June 15, 2000 Page 5
6.5.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed to
change the land use designation from GC (General Commercial) and SR
(Suburban Residential) to LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 3.6 +/-
acres, generally located along the north side of Brimhall Road approximately
600 feet east of Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4) ,
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.5.b) Zone Change No. P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed a change in
zoning from a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone and an E (Estate) zone to
an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone on 3.6 +/- acres, generally
located along the north side of Bfimhall Road approximately 600 feet east of
Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
(ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.6.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0253 - DeWalt Corp. has proposed to change
the land use designation from LR (Low Density Residential) to GC (General
Commercial) on 3.93 gross acres, located on the northwest corner of Calloway
Drive and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
6.6.b) Zone Change No. P00-0253 - Dewalt Corp. has proposed a change in zoning
from an R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone to a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 3.93 gross acres, located at the northwest comer of
Calloway Drive and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - Revised PCD Zone Change P99-0911 (Cornerstone Engineering)
Change in land use zoning from a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone to a
Revised PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone on 10.1 acres for the
Bakersfield Heart Hospital to allow a helicopter landing pad (helistop); revised footprint
of the two-story, 40,000 square foot hospital wing; and a three-story, 38,416 square
foot medical office building. Located at 3001 Sillect Avenue (south side of Sillect
Avenue, east of Buck Owens Blvd.). (Negative Declaration on file) (Continued from
June 1, 2000)
Minutes, PC, Thursday, June 15, :2000 Page
PAM TOWNSEND, Recording Secretary
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
None DRAFT
3. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
If anyone wishes to discuss or testify on any of the consent items the item(s) will be taken off
consent and will be considered in the order on the agenda. If not, the public hearing will be
opened and the items acted on as a group.
Commissioner Brady: Did not attend the pre-meeting on Monday, however,
he did listen to the tape, and he will be participating.
Commissioner Tkac: Did not attend the pre-meeting on Monday, however,
he did listen to the tape, and he will be participating. ~.
3.1) Agenda Item 8.1 - Consistency Finding for acquisition of 23 acres. ~.~
Agenda Item 8.2 - Consistency Finding for acquisition of ~ acre.
Agenda Item 7 - Revised PCD Zone Change P99-0911- Continue~Until
July 6, 2000.
Commissioner Sprague: "I'd make a motion to accept the .... or approve the
Consent Agenda." ~' .-
Motion seconded by Commissioner Boyle.
All those in favor say aye.
Aye.
No opposition.
Motion Carded.
4, PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE
Amendment to the text of Title 16 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the
Bakemfield Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield) Update the subdivision
ordinance to reflect changes in the Subdivision Map Act and formalization of
Minutes, PC, Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 3
local implementation policy. (Exempt from CEQ^) (Continued from June 1,
2000)
(All Wards)
Staff Report Given.
Public Portion of Hearing Opened.
Roger Mclntosh brought up this issue at the last hearing. He has reviewed the
language as proposed and is comfortable with the change.
Closed the Public Portion of the Hearing.
Meeting opened up for Commissioner comments and questions.
Commissioner Brady inquired if Staff wanted the information in 'electronic fashion
to which Staff responded that they did because it would be a cost savings to them in
terms of preparing reports, and that it could be for the engineer as well. There is a
requirement that the map be submitted in a paper format by a licensed engineer.
16.020 State Map Act specifies requirements of the form of the map. One piece of
information, the bearings, could be provided in electronic form than putting it in a table
on that particular map. All of the other required material that needs to listed on the map
would be on the map, except this one we are giving them the option of either submitting
it electronically or submitting it on paper.
Commissioner Brady inquired of Mr. Mclntosh if there was a cost factor to what
he produces in paper in electronic fashion and if they would have to go out and
purchase software to which Mr. Mclntosh responded that there is a cost factor for
software because not everyone has the same software and not everyone has electronic
means to put that information into 'effect. If it was mandatory they would be imposing
the requirement.
Commissioner Brady stated that he would support the motion as is presently
structured.
Commissioner Sprague stated that if the engineers do not have the electronic
data capable for submitting they could put it written printed or produced on acceptable
medians similar to the paragraph prior to this and just make it more adaptable, more
legible for someone reading this code. Could support subsection F.
Commissioner Dhanens asked Staff if the bearings and distances are not
required on the map currently to which Staff responded that they are required, and that
they always get them to the best of their knowledge.
Minutes, PC, Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 4
Commissioner Dhanens further clarified with Staff that if an engineer did not
have the capability and they submitted their paper map with all of the requirements they
would satisfy all of the City's requirements as it relates to this ordinance.
Commissioner Dhanens stated that based on the revised wording as shown in
Exhibit "A" prepared by Staff he would support the motion.
Commissioner Kemper made a motion "to adopt Resolution approving
amendment for findings set forth in the attached Resolution incorporating the revision
as shown on Planning Director's Memo dated June 8, 2000, and. recommend same to
City Council with Exhibit "A"."
Seconded by Commissioner McGinnis
Roll Call Vote:
STEPHEN BOYLE Aye
MATHEW BRADY Aye
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPER Aye
TOM MCGINNIS Aye
RON SPRAGUE Aye
JEFFREY TKAC Aye
MICHAEL DHANENS Aye
Motion Carried.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ACT REPORT - K¥1e Carter
Resolution making s and recommending that the City Council certify the
Final EIR for Pla~ ImentJZone Change P99-0482 which has been
completed in com CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines and the City of
Bakersfield CEQA Im on Procedures.
(Ward 4)
Oommissioner Dhanens stated his ~nflict of interest in this agenda item number
as well as Item Number 6.1(a) and 6.1(b) al tumed the meeting over to Vice-Chair
Boyle.
Oommissioner Brady declared a conflict.
8taft Report Given.
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS.
~BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY OF KE~RN
1115 TruxtunAvenue
Bakersfield, California RECEIVED
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 27, 2000 3UN 3 0
9:00 A.M. CITY MANAGER'S OFF~CE
BOARD RECONVENED
Supervisors: McQuiston, Perez, Patrick, Peterson, Parra
ROLL CALL: All Present
SALUTE TO FLAG - Led by Supervisor McQuiston
NOTE: Mc, Pz, Pa, Pe, Pr are abbreviations for
Supervisors McQuiston, Perez, Patrick, Peterson, and
Parra, respect ively. For example, Pa- Pe denotes
Supervisor Patrick made the motion and Supervisor
Peterson seconded it. The abbreviation (Ab) means
absent, and (Abd) abstained.
CONSENT AGEAIDA/OPPOR~JNITY FOR PUBLIC CO~E/TT:
LISTED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) OR A NUMBER SIGN (#) WERE
CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE ;%ND APPROVED BY ONE MOTION.
BOARD ACTION SHOWN IN CAPS
RESOLUTIONS / PROCLAMATI ON~
1 ) Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to the
Bakersfield AIDS Project - MADE PRESENTATION TO AUDREY
CHAVEZ; AUDREY CHAVEZ AND DR. B. A. JINADU, PUBLIC HEALTH
OFFICER, HEARD
PUBLIC REOUESTS
Pz-Pa 2) Request of representatives of the Kern Equestrians for
All Ayes the Preservation of Trails, the Kern River Parkway
Committee, and the Kern River Access Con~nittee to address
the Board regarding the Kern River - CAROLYN BELLI, KERN
EQUESTRIANS FOR PRESERVATION OF TRAILS, HEARD; P-ECEIVED
AND FILED DOCUMENT
Pz-Pa *3) Reappointment of Janis Kessler to the San Joaquin Valley
All Ayes Library System Advisory Board, term tO. expire March 31,
2002 - MADE REAI~POINTMENT
Pz-Pa *4) Reappointment of Raymond Hernandez as Fifth District
All Ayes Child Care Provider Member to the Local Child Care and
Development Planning Council, term to expire June 30,
2003 - MADE P, EAPPOIN~
Summary of Proceedings Page 2
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
5) This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to
address the Board on any matter not on 'this agenda but
under the jurisdiction of the Board. Board members may
respond'briefly to statements made or questions posed.
They may ask a question for clarification, make a
~ 0 ~ ..referral to staff' for factual information or request staff to report back to the Board at a later meeting.
.... ~lso, the Board may take action to direct the staff to
.place a matter of business on a future agenda. 'SPEAKERS
ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
BEFOR]~ MAKING YOUR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU! - NO ONE
BOARD MEMBER AITNOUNC"AT[ENTS OR R~PORTS
6) On their own initiative, Board members may make an
announcement or a report on their own activities. They
may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to
staff or take action to have staff place a matter of
business on a future agenda (Gov. Code Sec. 54954.2(a))
NO ONE HEARD
DEPARTMENT~J~ REOLr~STS
AGINGANDADULT SERVICES
Pz-Pr 7) Revision to ActiOn Plan and goal dates and proposed
All Ayes appointment and member terms to the AB 1682 Advisory
Committee, In-Home Supportive Services, Employer of
Record, for Herminia Damo, Trudy Unger, Catherine Young,
Mary Vasinda, and Dean Rice for the term July 1, 2000 to
June 30, 200.1; and Tonya Padilla, Mary Ann Parker,
Ronetta Kirkhom, Wilfred ~Hezzy" Brown, and Susan Wells
for the term July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2002 - BOB JONSON,
UNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS, HEARD; MADE A~POINTMENTS;
· APPROVED REVISED GOAL DATES, AND R~FERRED BACK TO AGING
~ ADULT SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Pz-Pa *8) Proposed Agreement with California Department of Aging
All Ayes Contract No. CB-0001-33 for $548,042 in funding for
Community-Based Service Programs for Fiscal Year 2000-
2001 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGR~EMENT
540-2000; AUTHORIZED AGINGANDADULT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DIP~ECTOR TO TRANSMIT OLDER AMERICANS ACT TERMS AND
CONDITIONS TO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING
Pz-Pa *9) Proposed Aging and Adult Services Area Plan Update for
All Ayes Fiscal Year 2000-2001 o APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN
Pz-Pa -10) Proposed Agreement with Richard Prado Senior Center for
All Ayes nutrition services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $242,404 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 541-2000
Pz-Pa '11) Proposed Agreement with Adventist Health of Central
Ail Ayes California for nutrition services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$155,262 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGRE~'T~I 542-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 3
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa '12) Proposed Agreement with North Bakersfield Recreation and
All Ayes Park District for nutrition services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$277,653 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 543-2000
Pz-Pa '13) Proposed Agreement with City of Delano for nutrition
All Ayes services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to exceed $145,203 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEM]~NT 544-2000
Pz-Pa '14) Proposed Agreement with City of Ridgecrest for nutrition
All Ayes services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to exceed $149,374 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 545-2000
Pz-Pa '15) Proposed Agreement with North Bakersfield Recreation and
All Ayes Park District for homemaker services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed $70,617
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 546-
2000
Pz-Pa '16) Proposed Agreement with Interim Health Care for homemaker
All Ayes services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to exceed $7,649 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 547-2000
Pz-Pa -17) Proposed Agreement with Valley Caregiver for homemaker
All Ayes services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to exceed $10,801 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 548-2000
Pz-Pa '18) Proposed Agreement with Around the Clock Foundation for
All Ayes homemaker services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $23,734 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 549-2000
Pz-Pa '19) Proposed Agreement with Around the' Clock Foundation for
All Ayes Linkages and Respite Purchase of Service Program, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an~amount not to
exceed $199,558 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 550-2000
Pz-Pa *20) Proposed Agreement with Homemaker Services of Indian
All Ayes Wells Valley, Inc., for homemaker services, from July 1,
2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$7,461 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
551-2000
Pz-Pa '21) Proposed Agreement with Homemaker Service of InclianWells
A~i Ayes Valley, Inc., for case management services, from July 1,
2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$5,596 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
552-2000 '~'
Pz-Pa *22) Proposed Agreement with Homemaker Services of Indian
All Ayes Wells Valley, Inc., for Adult Day Care services, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $7,112 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 553-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 4
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa *23) Proposed Agreement with Homemaker Services of Indian
All Ayes Wells Valley, Inc., for information and assistance, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $21,279 - ;tPPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRF~%N TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 554-2000
Pz-Pa *24) Proposed Agreement with A/zheimer's Disease Association
All Ayes of Kern County for respite services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed $13,622
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 555-
2000
Pz-Pa *25) Proposed Agreement with A/zheimer'S Disease Association
All-Ayes of Kern County for Alzheimer's Day Care services, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $80,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 556-2000
Pz-Pa *26) Proposed Agreement with Kern County Economic Opportunity
Ail Ayes Corporation for Brown Bag services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed $23,842
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 557-
2000
AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER
Pa-Pr 27) proposed Resolution increasing .fees for Phytosanitary
Ail Ayes Inspection and Certification, Plant Quarantine
Inspection, "In Field" Grape Inspection and
Certification, Time and Mileage, deleting fees for
Watermelon and Banana Squash Inspection and Certification
(Section 8.08.010, Chapter 8.08 Ordinance Code of Kern.
County), deleting fee for special computer generated
reports',- and establishing a new fee for Solid Wood'
Packing Material Certification fo~ commodity shipments
exported to Republic of China - OPENED HEARING; .NO ONE
HEARD; CLOSED HEARING; APPROVED; ADOPTED. Pd~SOLUTION 2000-
213
Pz-Pa 28) Notification of anticipated retroactive approval of
All Ayes Agreements w/th California Department of Food and
Agriculture, California Department of Pesticide
RegulationS, and California Crop Improvement Association
for services provided during Fiscal Year .2000-2001 -
RECEIVED ANDFILED
Pr-Pa 29) 'Proposed.retroactive approvaI of Agreement No. 99-0704
All Ayes with California Department of Food and Agriculture to
reimburse Kern County for detection, surveillance and
trapping of Olive Fruit Fly, from May 1, 2000 through
November 30, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $764 -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED'CHAIRMANTO SIGN AGREEMENT 558-2000
Pz-Pa *30) Proposed retroactive Agreement No. 99-0792 w/th
All Ayes California Department of Food and Agriculture to
reimburse Kern County for detection and surveillance of
Glassy-winged Sharpshooter, from March 1, 2000 through
June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed $291,929.15
(prior notification June 6, 2000) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 559-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 5
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/20q0
Pz-Pa '31) Proposed Agreement with Willard B. Christiansen, M.D., to
Ail Ayes evaluate employees who handle pesticides in Toxicity
Category I or II containing phosphates or carbamates as
requestedbytheAgricultural Commissioner, Farmand Home
Advisor, Airports, Parks, and Environmental Health
Departments, at a cost of $25 per hour plus test costs,
to expire June 30, 2001 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 560-2000
Pz-Pa *32) Proposed Agreement No. 00-0013 with California Department
All Ayes of Food and Agriculture to reimburse County for trapping
conducted by county personnel within Kern County, Fiscal
Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $163,411 -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~NAGT~-q~ENT 561-2000
Pz-Pr 33) Proposed retroactive Agreement No. K~R-00 with California
All Ayes Cantaloupe Advisory Board to reimburse Kern County for
cantaloupe surveillance work, from June 1, 2000 through
October 31, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $26,632.40 -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRFJUN TO SI~NAGREEMENT 562-2000
Pz-Pa 34) Proposed retroactiveAmendment No. I to Agreement No. 99-
All Ayes 0082 with California Department of Food and Agriculture
to reimburse Kern County for detection surveys for Red
Imported Fire Ant, from May 12, 2000 through June 30,
2000, in an amount not to exceed $38,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 563-2000
Pa-Pr 35) Notification of anticipated retroactive Agreement with
All Ayes U.S.D.A., Ani~l and Plant Health Inspection .Service
Wildlife Services for control of predatory animals,
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $57,120
- RECEIVED AND FILED
ASSESSOR-RECORDER
Pz-Pa *36) Proposed Agreement with Eric Brown, Dolphin Safe
All Ayes Software, to provide contract analyst support to continue
upgrading the Kern Integrated Property~ystem (KIPS)
pursuant to AB 719, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $135,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 564-2000
COUNTY COUNSEL
Pz-Pa *37) Proposed Resolution requesting extension of time for
All Ayes negotiation of Garbage Collection Agreement for Benz
Sanitation, Boron Sanitation, Mojave Sanitation,
Ridgecrest Sanitation, and Rosamond Sanitation, to
October 31, 2000 -.APPROVED; ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-214
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Pz-Pa *38) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement with Metamor
All Ayes Business Solutions to extend term from June 30, 2000 to
September 30, 2000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 565-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 6
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting.. 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa *39) Proposed addition of one (1) Supervising Human Services
All.Ayes Investigator, two (2) Senior Human Services Investigator,
eighteen (18) Human Services Investigator, one (1) Word
Processing Technician I, one (1) Typist Clerk I, and two
(2) Investigative Aide positions in District Attorney's
Budget Unit 2180, effective July 1,.2000, and deletion of
one (1) Supervising Human Services Investigator, two (2)
Senior Human Services Investigator, eighteen (18) Human
Services Investigator, one (1) Word Processing Technician.
I and one (1) Typist Clerk I positions.in Human Services
Budget Unit 5120, effective July 1, 2000 - A~PROVED;
REFERRED TO PERSONNEL TOAMENDDEPARTMENTALPOSITIONSAND
SALARYSCHEDULE
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Pz-Pa *40) Proposed Agreements with CARE.Ambulance Service, Delano
All Ayes Ambulance Service, Hall ~nbulance Service, Liberty
~m%bulance Service, Mercy Air Ambulance Service, and
Golden Empire Air Rescue, for prehospit&l emergency
medical transportation, from July 1, 2000 through June
30, 2001 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENTS 566-2000 THROUGH 571-2000
Pz-Pa '41) Resignation of Fred Drew, Director of Kern County
All Ayes Emergency Medical Services Department, effective July 6,
2000 - ACCEPTED RESIGNATION
EMPLOYERS' TRAINING .RESOURCE
Pr-Mc 42) Notification of anticipated retroactive Agreements with
All Ayes the State of California EmploymentDevelopmentDepartment
for job placement services for CalWORKs eligible
individuals in eastern Kern County, and with Proteus,
Inc., for job placement services for CalWORKs eligible
individuals in northern Kern County - P. ECEIVEDAND FILED
Pz-Pa *43) Proposed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 463-99 with
All Ayes Kern Community College District to provide classroom
training, supportive services, and payment to JTPA or
Welfare-to-Work eligible individuals, to extend term to
August 18, 2000 - APPROVED; .AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 572-2000
Pz-Pa *44) Proposed Amendment No. i to Agreement No. 400-99 with
All Ayes Delano Joint Union High School District to provide
classroom training for JTPA or Welfare-to-Work eligible
individuals 'in northern Kern County, to extend term to
August 18, 2000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMA~ TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 573-2000
pz-Pa *45) Proposed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 192-99 with
All Ayes Kern County Superintendent of Schools for coordination of
School-to-Career activities in Kern County, to extend
term to September 30, 2000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIPuVJ~N TO SIGN AGREE~TT 574-2000
Pz-Pa *46) Proposed retroactive Amendment No. I to Agreement No.
All Ayes 461-99 with Proteus, Inc., to provide employment and
training sex-vices to dislocated agricultural workers in
Kern, Fresno, Kings, and Tulare Counties, and to extend
term to June 30, 2000 (prior notification June 13, 2000)
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEM]~TT 575-
2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 7
Board gf Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/.~27/2000
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Pz-Pa *47) Proposed Agreement with Intergraph Public Safety for
All Ayes specialized training on computer-aided dispatch system,
from July 10, 2000 through August 3, 2000, in an amount
not to exceed $20,750 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SI~NAGREEMENT 576-2000
Pz-Pa '47A) Request for appropriation of unanticipated revenue to
All Ayes cover payroll costs resulting from out-of-state emergency
response - APPROVED APPROPRIATION OF UNANTICIPATED
REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $605,000 FROM FIRE COST
REIMBURSEMENTS, AND $191,000 FROM EXCESS PROPERTY TAX
REVENUES TO APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES; APPROVED
BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $796,000 FROM
APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES TO BUDGET UNIT 2415
HUMAN SERVICES
Pz-Pa *48) Request to hire retired County employee Judy A. Henderson
All Ayes as Eligibility Technician III, Range 42.9, Step E, in
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, effective June 27, 2000, for a
period not to exceed 120 working days or 960 hours,
whichever is greater - APPROVED
Pz-Pa *49) Proposed Agreement with Kern Economic Development
All Ayes Corporation for economic development and job creation
services, from July 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, in an
amount not to exceed $469,037.21'- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 577-2000
Pz-Pa *50) Proposed Agreement with Kern Community College District
All Ayes for economic development for small business, from July 1,
2000 to December 31, 2000, in an amount not to exceed
$162,500 (State/Federal; no County .cost) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 578-2000
Pz-Pa '51) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes case management services for participant~ in the Cai-
Learn Program, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to exceed $1,169,832 (State/Federal; no County
cost) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
579-2000
Pz-Pa *52) Proposed Amendment No. i to Agreement No. 777-97 with
All Ayes Monetary Management of California, Inc., for food stamp
coupon issuance in the Lamont District, effective August
1, 2000, (State/Federal funds; no County cost) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 580-2000
KERN MEDICAL CENTER
Pr-Pa 53) Notification of proposed retroactive Agreement with
All Ayes Golden. Empire Transit District" for door-to-door
transportation for ElderLifekdult Day Health Care Center
services - RECEIVED AND FILED
Pz-Pa *54) Proposed 30-day reappointment extension of Hormuz Irani,
Ail Ayes M.D., and Richard T. Ling, M.D., to Courtesy Medical
Staff Membership - APPROVED
Pz-Pa *55) Proposed appointment of Jeffory R. Miller, PA/NP, to
All Ayes allied health professional Medical Staff Membership -
APPROVED
Summary of Proceedings Page 8
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa *56) Proposed reappointment of thirty-six (36) physicians and
Ail Ayes 'allied health professionals (Active, Courtesy,
Consulting, and Provisional) to Medical Staff Membership
- APPROVED
WITH- *57) Proposed Agreement with Rick McPheeters, D.O., for
DRAWN' professional emergency medicine physician services, from
July 1, 2000 to September 30, 2006, in an amount not to
exceed $119,811.34 for the first 15 months, to be
renegotiated prior to the end of the 15 months -
Pz-Pa *58) Proposed Amendment No. 3 to Agreement with Central
All Ayes NephrologyMedical Group for nephrology and hemodialysis
services, extending term from July 1, 2000 to June 30,
2002, and'increasing the total maximum contract amount by
$150,000 to $900,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED 'CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 581-2000
Pz-Pa *59) Proposed Agreement with Pacific Geriatric Foundation for
All Ayes educational program in geriatric medicine for medical
staff and resident, house staff, from July 1, 2000 to June
30, 2002, in an amount not to exceed $81,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN. TO SIGN AGREEMENT 582-2000
Pa-Mc 60) Notification of proposed retroactive Agreement with
-All Ayes ClinicaI One for registered nurses interim assignment
services - RECEIVED AND FILED
Pa-Mc 61) Notification of proposed retroactive Agreemen~ with
Al! Ayes stanford University to assist in support of Stanford
'teaching program for physician assistants and nurse
'practitioners - RECEIVED AND FILED
Pa-MC 62) Notification of proposed retroactive Agreement with
All Ayes Harbor UCLA for rheumatology physician services
RECEIVED AND FILED
Pa-Mc 63) Notification of proposed retroactive Agreement with
All Ayes Bakersfield Dialysis Center for professioaal nephro!ogy
and hemodialysis services - RECEIVED AND FILED
MENTAL ~EALTM SERVICES
Pz-Pa *64) ProPosed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 500-98 with
All Ayes Anne Sippi Clinic for increasing numbers of clients
served and increasing compensation for services, for
Fiscal Year 1998.to March 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $300,000' (State, Medi-Cal; Mandated/Budgeted)
APPROVED;' AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGRE~4ENT 583-2000
Pz-Pa *65) Proposed Amendment No. l~to Agreement No. 375-99 with
All Ayes' Valley Catholic Charities, Diocese of Fresno, for
'increased compensation for representative payee services,
from June'15, 1999 to June 30, 2000,..&n an amount not to
exceed $163,300 (an increase of $2,500) (State,
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED C]{AIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 584-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 9
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/~7/2000
Pz-Pa *66) Proposed Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 417-99 with
Ail Ayes Citizens for the Betterment of Community and Country,
Inc., for increased women's residential services and
decreased CalWorks bed days, from July 1, 1999 to June
30, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $953,219 (a decrease
of $21,250) (State, Medi-Cal; Mandated/Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~NAGREEMENT 585-2000
Pz-Pa *67) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 489-99 with
All Ayes Desert Counseling, Inc., for increased service hours and
compensation, from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, in an
amount not to exceed $239,000 (an increase of $39,000)
(State, Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 586-2000
Pz-Pa *68) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 493-99 with
All Ayes College Health IPA, Inc., for additional units of service
for children and adolescents residing in the Ridgecrest
area, from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, in an amount
not to exceed $420,000 (an increase of $70,000) (Medi-
Cal, State;' Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 587-2000
Pz-Pa *69) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 494-99 with
All Ayes College Health IPA, Inc., for additional mental health
units of service for children and adolescent clients
residing in the Lake Isabella area, from July 1, 1999 to
June 30, 2000, in an amount not to exceed $298,000 (an
increase of $20,000) (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted)
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 588-
2000
Pz-Pa *70) Proposed Amendment No. i to Agreement No. 495-99 with
All Ayes College Health IPA, Inc., for additional mental health
units of service for children and adolescent clients
residing in the Mojave/Tehachapi areas, and increasing
compensation for services, in an amount not to exceed
$1,445,000 (an increase of $100,000) (Me'i-Cai, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 589-2000
Pz-Pa .71) Proposed Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 499-99 with
All Ayes Kern County Hispanic Commission, Inc., to reduce
compensation for women's residential services, from July
1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, in an amount not to exceed
$179,399 (a decrease of $750) (State, Mandated/Budgeted)
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 590-
2000
Pz-Pa *72) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 515-99 with
All Ayes Clinica Sierra Vista,.Inc., for additional mental health
services for children and adolescent'clients residing in
the Arvin, Lamont, and Frazier Park areas, from July 1,
1999 to June 30, 2000, in'an amount not to exceed
$1,200,000 (an increase of $435,000) (State,
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 591-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page i0
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa ' *.73) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 535-99 with
All Ayes Henrietta Weill Memorial Child Guidance Clinic, Inc., for
additional outpatient mental health ser~.ices for high
risk adolescent clients in central Bakersfield, from July
1,.1999 to June 30, 2000, in an amount 'not to exceed
$2,125,000- (an increase of $325,000) (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SI~NAGREEMENT 592-2000
Pz-Pa *74) Proposed Amendment'No. i to Agreement No. 537-99 with
All Ayes Henrietta Weill Memorial Child Guidance. Clinic, Inc., for
additional intensive outpatient mental health services
-for high risk pre-school children and their la,Lilies,
. - from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, in an amount not to
exceed $397,934 (an increase of $25,000) (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 593~20.00
Pz-Pa *75) Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 538-99. with'
All Ayes Henrietta Weill Memorial Child Guidance Clinic,. Inc., for
increased compensation for intensified outpatient mental
health services for high risk children, from July 1, 1999
to June 30,' 2000, in an amount not to exceed $563.,800 (an
increase of $35,000) (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted)
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 594-
2000
Pz-Pa '76i Proposed Amendment No. I to Agreement No. 297-2000 with
All Ayes Devereux Texas Treatment Network, inc'., to correct'
language and delete non-relative sections from agreement,
from April 25, 2000 to June 30, 2000, no fiscal impact
(Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 595-2000
Pz-Pa *77) .Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Weill Memorial Child
All Ayes GUidance Clinic, Inc., for substance abuse prevention
services for County .clients residing in the Delano area,
for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount', not to exceed
$88,909.(State,' Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZF~D CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 596-2000
Pz-Pa *78) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Well1 Memorial Child
All. Ayes Guidance .Clinic, Inc., for substance abuse prevention
services for County clients residing in the West
Bakersfield area, for Fiscal Year2000-2001, in anamount
not to exceed $88,909 (State~ Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 597-2000
Pz-Pa. *79). Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Well1 Memorial Chi1d
Alt Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for full continuum of mental
health services for youths incarcerated in Juvenile Hall
and Camp Irwin Owen, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001,-in an
amount not to exceed $295,000 (state, Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) APPROVED; A.L.~H. ORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 598-2000
Pz-Pa ,80) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Wei!l Memorial Child
All Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc.,. for mental health services for
County .children and adolescent clients in the Central
Bakersfield area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $1,968,263 (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED.; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMA~ TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 599-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 11
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa '81) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Weill Memorial Child
All Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for intensive outpatient mental
health services for pre-school aged children and their
families residing in Kern County, for Fiscal Year 2000-
2001, in an amount not to exceed $410,500 (State, Medi-
Cal; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SI~NAGREEMENT 600-2000
Pz-Pa *82) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Weill Memorial Child
All Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for substance abuse prevention
services for County clients residing in the Greater
Bakersfield area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $88,909 (State, Budgeted) - A~PROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~NAGREEMENT 601-2000
Pz-Pa *83)- Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Well1 Memorial Child
All Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for mental health services for
children and adolescent clients in the West Bakersfield
area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to
exceed $1,360,689 (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 602-2000
Pz-Pa *84) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Well1 Memorial Child
All Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for mental health services for
children and adolescent clients residing in the Delano
area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to
exceed $781,289 (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) -
;tPPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGP. EEMENT 603-2000
Pz-Pa *85) Proposed Agreement with Henrietta Weill Memorial Child
Ail Ayes Guidance Clinic, Inc., for intensive outpatient mental
health services for children and their families residing
in Kern County, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $588,800 (State, Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGPd~EMENT 604-2000
Pz-Pa *86) Proposed Agreement with Citizens for the Betterment of
Ail Ayes Community and Country, Inc., for substance abuse
residential services at Jason's Retreat for County
clients, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to
exceed $395,178 (State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI(~NAGREEMENT 605-2000
Pz-Pa *87) Proposed Agreement with Citizens for the Betterment of
All Ayes Community and Country, Inc., for substance abuse
treatment services to Country residents, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $89,000 (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED C~AIRMAN
TO SI~NAGREEMENT 606-2000
Pz-Pa *88) Proposed Agreement with Westcare, California, Inc., for
All Ayes case management services to County parolees, for Fiscal
Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $45,762
(State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 607-2000
Pz-Pa *89) Proposed Agreement with Community Service Organization,
All Ayes Inc., for substance abuse treatment services for clients
residing in Bast Bakersfield, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001,
in an amount not to exceed $164,000 (State, Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~NAGREEMENT 608-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 12
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/.2000
Pz-Pa *90) P~opose~ Agreement with North Bakersfield Recreation and
All Ayes Park' D/strict, Inc., for substance abuse prevention
services for clients r~siding in North Bakersfield, for
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed
$109,944 (State, Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 609-2000
Pm-Pa '91) Proposed Agreement with Kern County Hispanic Commission,
All Ayes for. substance abuse residential services at Casa Serena
and Serenity House residential treatment facilities for
County clients,, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $211,362 (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) -.APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 610-2000
Pm-Pa *92) Proposed Agreementl with The Drug 'Store, Inc., for
All Ayes prescription medication services for County clients
residing in the Lake Isabella area, for Fiscal Year 2000-
2001, in amount not to exceed $92,530 (State; Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 611-2000
Pz-Pa *93) .Proposed Agreement with BakerSfield Memorial HospitaI dba
All Ayes Memorial Center; for substance abuse treatment services
for County clients residing in the West Bakersfield area,
for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not tO exceed
$101,000 (Medi-Cal, State, CalWorks; Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 612-2000
Pm-Pa ,94) Proposed Agreement with Bakersfield Memorial Hospital dba
All Ayes Memorial Center, for substance abuse and mental health
services treatment services for adult clients residing in
the Delano area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not. to exceed $544,090' (State, Medi-Cal;.
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 613-2000
~z.-Pa *95) Proposed Agreement withBakersfield. Memorial Hospital dba
All Ayes Memorial Center, for day treatment intensive services for
children and their fam/lies through the Phoenix Learning
Center, for Fiscal Year.2000-2001, in aH amount not to
exceed $246,620 (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 614-2000
pm-pa *96) Proposed Agre~ment with Bakersfield Memorial Hospital dba
All Ayes Memorial Center, for intensive inpatient mental health
services for children and their families, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, in an amoUnt not to exceed'S18,000 (Medi-Cal,
State; "Mandated/ Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGP~ 615-2000
Pm-Pa *97) Proposed Agreement with Bakersfield Memorial Hospital dba
All Ayes · Memorial .Center, for substance abuse and mental health
treatment ~ervices for adult clients residing in the Taft
area,.'for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to
exceed $332,877 (Medi-Cal, State; Budge=ed) -'APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 616-2000
Pm-Pa *98) Proposed Agreement with Bakersfield Memorial Hospital.dba
All Ayes Memorial Center, for specialty mental health services for
adult Level-II clients, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an
amount not to .exceed $256,086 (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 617-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 13
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa *99) Proposed Agreement with Bakersfield Memorial Hospital dba
All Ayes Memorial Center, for mental health services for county
children and adolescent clients in the Taft area, for
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed
$304,450 (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 618-2000
Pz-Pa '100) PropOsed Agreement with American Health Services dba
All Ayes Bakersfield Medical and Mental Health Services, for
substance abuse methadone services to County clients
residing in the Southeast Bakersfield area, for Fiscal
Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $775,000
(Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 619-2000
Pz-Pa '101) Proposed Agreement with Aegis Medical Systems, Inc., for
All Ayes substance abuse methadone services to County clients
residing in the Bakersfield area, for Fiscal Year 2000-
2001, in an amount not to exceed $1,120,000 (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 620-2000
Pz-Pa '102) Proposed Agreement with Aegis Medical Systems, Inc., for
All Ayes substance abuse methadone services to County clients
residing in the Delano area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001,
in an amount not to exceed $270,000 (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 621-2000
Pz-Pa '103) Proposed Agreement with Anne Sippi Clinic, Inc., for
All Ayes residential beds and augmented boardand care services in
their facility for 18 County clients, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $591,300 (Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 622-2000
Pz-Pa '104) Proposed Agreement with Anne Sippi Clinic, Inc., for
All Ayes outpatient psychiatric treatment services through their
facility for 45 County clients, for Fiscal Year 2000-
2001, in an amount not to exceed $1,290,'Q00 (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 623-2000
Pz-Pa '105) Proposed Agreement with Truxtun Psychiatric Medical
Ail Ayes Group, L.P., for professional psychiatric services for
County clients, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $65,000 (Medi-Cal; Mandated/Budgeted)
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMANTO SIGN AG~REEMENT 624-2000
Pz-Pa '106) Proposed Agreement with Victor Treatment Centers, Inc.,
All Ayes for mental health residential services for five severely
emotionally disturbed adolescent clients residing in
their facility, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $193,600 (State, Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 625-2000
Pz-Pa -107) PropOsed Agreement with Milh6us Children Services, for
All Ayes mental health residential services for high need, high
risk children and adolescents who are seriously
emotionally disturbed, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an
amount not to exceed $165,374 (Mandated/Budgeted) _
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 626-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 14
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa .108) P~opose~ Agreement with Child and Family PsyChology
All Ayes Clinic, Inc., for psychological services for children and
adolescents enrolled in the Human Services Department,
Specialized Placement Program, in an amount not to exceed
$145,000 (State, Medi-Cal; Mandated/Budgeted) -APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 627-2000
Pz-Pa '109) Proposed Agreement with. Turning Point of. Central
All Ayes California, Inc., for substance abuse residential
treatment services for clients residing in East
Bakersfield, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not
to exceed $700,760 (State, Budgeted). - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 628-2000
Pz-Pa '.'110) Proposed Agreement with Turning Point of' California,
All Ayes Inc., for substance abuse treatment services in the East
Bakersfield area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount
not to exceed $66,500 (State, Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 629-2000
Pz-Pa '111) Proposed Agreement with Turning Point of California,
All Ayes Inc., for professional psychiatric services for County
clients residing in Greater Bakersfield, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001., in an amount not to exceed $704,000 (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 630-2000
Pz-Pa '112) prOPosed 'Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes substance abuse prevention services for County clients in
the Ridgecrest area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an
amount not to exceed $69,067 (Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 631-2000
Pz-Pa '113) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes substance abuse preventi°n services for County clients in
the' Tehachapi/Mojave/Rosamond areas, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $69,067 (Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 632-2000
Pz-Pa '114) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes. substance abuse prevention services for County clients in
the Arvin/Lamont areas, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an
amount not to exceed $44,335 .(Medi,Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 633-2000
Pz-Pa '115) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes substance abuse prevention services for County clients in
the Lake Isabella area, for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an
amount not to exceed $52,580 (Medi-Cal;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO.
SI~NAGREEMENT 63'4-2000
Pz-Pa -116) Proposed Agreement w/th Sequest Technologies, Incl, for
All Ayes specialized computer programming and technical training
for Department's Information Technology'System's staff,
for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed
$75,000 (State; Budgeted) -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREF24ENT 635-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 15
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa '117) ~roposed Agreement with College Health IPA, Inc., for
All Ayes mental health services for children and adolescent
clients residing in the Tehachapi/Mojave areas, for
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed
$2,887,279 (Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 636-2000
Pz-Pa '118) Proposed Agreement with College Health IPA, Inc., for
All Ayes mental health services for children and adolescent
clients residing in the Lake Isabella area, for Fiscal
Year 2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $445,910
(Medi-Cal, State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 637-2000
Pz-Pa '119) Proposed Agreement with College Health IPA, Inc., for
All Ayes mental health services for children and adolescent
clients residing in the Ridgecrest area, for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, in an amount not to exceed $440,748 (Medi-Cal,
State; Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN
TO SIGN AGREEMENT 638-2000
Pz-Pa '120) Appropriation of %unanticipated revenue from the State
All Ayes Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs for professional
and special services - APPROVED APPROPRIATION OF
UNANTICIPATED REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $541,164 TO
APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES; APPROVED BUDGET
TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $541,164 FROM APPROPRIATIONS
FOR CONTINGENCIES TO BUDGET UNIT NO. 4123
Pz-Mc 121) Proposed retroactive Agreement with American Health
All Ayes Services dba Bakersfield Mental Health and Medical
Services Inc., for substance abuse outpatient methadone
services to County clients residing in the Southeast
Bakersfield area, from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2000,
in an amount not to exceed $255,314 (Medi-Cal, State;
Mandated/Budgeted) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 639-2000
Pz-Pa '122) Proposed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 504-99 with SKF
All Ayes Drug, Inc., dba Brundage Pharmacy, for increased Short-
Doyle compensation for medication services, from July 1,
1999 to June 30, 2000, in an amount not to exceed
$480,303 (an increase of $20,000) - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 640-2000
p~.~SONN~L DEPARTMENT
Pz-Pa '123) Classifications of positions reco~nended by Civil Service
Ail Ayes Commission, effective July 1, 2000 - APPROVED; REFERRED
TO PERSONNEL TO AMEND DEPARTMENTAL POSITIONS AND SALARY
SCHEDULE
PUBLIC HEALTM SERVIC~ "7
Pz-Pa '124) Proposed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 176-2000 with
All Ayes The Regents of the University of California, San
Francisco for case management services, from April 1,
1999 through March 31, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$21,056 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
641-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 16
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pm-Pa '125) Proposed Agreement with William E, Gullett, Jr., M.D.,
All Ayes for medical services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $10,000 APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 642-2000
Pz-Pa '126) Proposed Agreement with California State Department of
All Ayes Health Services for AIDS Drug Assistance Program, from
July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000, in an amount not to
exceed $4,734 (prior notification June 6, 2000) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN 'TO SI~N AGREEMENT 643-2000
Pz-Pa '127) Proposed Agreement with Sage Cor~nunity Health Center for
All Ayes immunization services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $14,076 - APPROVe. D;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 644-2000
Pz-Pa '128) Proposed Agreement with National Health Services, Inc.,
All Ayes for HIV/AIDS prevention and education services, from July
1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$37,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
645-2000
Pz-Pa '129) Proposed Agreement with National Health Services, Inc.,
Ail Ayes for immunization services, from July 1, 2000 :hrough June
30, 2001, in an amount .not to exceed $65,943 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 646-2000.
Pz-Pa '130) Proposed Agreement with Applied Research Center a
'All 'Ayes Division of California State University, Bakersfield, for
tobacco control evaluation and consulting services, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $17,831 -'APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 647-2000
Pz-Pa '131) Proposed Agreement with Bonita P. Coyle for housing
Ail Ayes resource development for HOPWA, from July 1, 2000 through
June 30, 2001, in an amount not' to exceed $7,000 -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 648-2000
Pz-Pa '132) Proposed Agreement' with' Hans E. Einstein, M.D., for
All Ayes medical services, from July 1, 2000 through' June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $12,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 649-2000
Pz-Pa '133) .Proposed Agreement with Kern County Economic O~portunity
Ali Ayes Corporation for HIV/AIDS education and prevention
program, from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an
amount not to. exceed .$54,645 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
(:mAZmV, AN TO SI~N AGREmMENT 65o-2ooo
Pz-Pa . '134) proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Znc., for
All Ayes HIV/AIDS education and prevention program, from July 1,
2000 .through June'30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$51,002 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT
651-2000
Pm-Pa '135) Proposed Agreement with Neloufa Roshini Merrill, M.D.,
All Ayes for medical services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not'to exceed $10,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 652-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 17
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pa '136) Proposed Agreement with the State of California,
All Ayes Department of Corrections, for transitional case
management services for persons with HIV Disease, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $472,798 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 653-2000
Pz-Pa '137) Proposed Agreement with Planned Parenthood-Mar Monte for
All Ayes HIV/AIDS education and prevention program, from July 1,
2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$51,002 -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMANTOSI~NAGREEMENT
654-2000
Pz-Pa '138) Proposed Agreement with Kern County Economic Opportunity
All Ayes Corporation for i~m~unization services, from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, inanamount not toe, xceed $28,084
- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 655-
2000
Pz-Pa '139) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes immunization services, from July 1, 2000 through June 30,
2001, in an amount not to exceed $186,081 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREF24ENT 656-2000
Pz-Pa '140) Proposed Agreement with Ebony Counseling Center for
All Ayes HIV/AIDS education and prevention program, from July 1,
2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to exceed
$36,430 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT
657-2000
Pz-Pa '141) Proposed Agreement with Care-A-Van, Mobile Health Clinic,
All Ayes for immunization services, from July 1, 2000 through June
30, 2001, in an amount not to. exceed $10,000 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 658-2000
Pz-Pa '142) Proposed Agreement with California State Department of
All Ayes Health Services for AIDS drug assistance program, from
July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not to
exceed $4,633 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIG~N
AGREF26ENT 659-2000 .
Pz-Pa '143) Proposed Agreement with Clinica Sierra Vista, Inc., for
All Ayes housing opportunities for people with AIDS (HOPWA) funds,
from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, in an amount not
to exceed $102,290 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SI~NAGREEMENT 660-2000
Pr-Pz 144) Notification of anticipated retroactive Agreements with
All Ayes the State of California, Department of Health Services;
Solano County; Beardsley School District; Clinica Sierra
Vista, Inc.; E1 Tejon Unified School District; North of
the River Recreation and Park District for Medi-Cal
Administrative Activities (MAA); State of California,
Department of Health Services for Medi-Cal Outreach
Program; Tobacco Control Program; Chlamydia Awareness and
Prevention Project; AIDS Master Grant Agreement and
MOU's; Drummond Medical Group; Norman E. Levan, M.D.;
Friendship House Co~,,unity Center; Kern Superintendent of
Schools; Optimal Hospice Care; Optimal Home Care; Interim
Health Care; and Bakersfield AIDS Foundation for health
related activities - R~CEIVEDAND FILED
Summary of Proceedings Page 18
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
RETIREM~'~TASSOCIATION
Pa-Mc 145) Proposeddeletion of one Departmental Aide II position,
All Ayes effective July 1, 2000 - A~PROVED; P~EFERR~D TO pERSON1FEL
TO AMEND DEPARTMENTAL POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE
Pz-Pr' 146) Proposed employer and employee contribution rates for the
All Ayes retirement system, as reco~nended by the KCERA's actuary
- DAVID DEUTSCH, EXECUTIVE DIP. ECTOR, KCERA AND WARD
WOLLESON, CCAPE, HEARD;'CONTINUED TO TUESDAY, JULY 25,
2000 AT 9:00'A.M.
Pz-Pa .147) Proposed Amendment No. i to Agreement No, 334-99 with
All Ayes Canteen Correctional services Division to establish meal
price for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 at current levels ($0.972
per.al) and increasing level of inmate participation in
kitchen operation -APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMANTO SIGN
AGREEMENT. 661-2000
Pz-Pa ~ '148) Proposed three-year Agreement with City of Wasco for law
All Ayes enforcement services, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003,
(County to receive $1,536,064 in Fiscal Year 2000-2001) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMANTO SIGN AGREEMENT662-2000
CLOSED SESSIONS
COU~TTY ~/DMINISTRATIVE oFFICE
Pr. Pz 149)' Request for Closed Session regarding Meet and Confer,
Ail Ayes CCAPE -
Pr-Pz 150) Request for Closed Session regarding interim appointment
All .Ayes of department head, Director of Emergency Medical
Services
Pr-Pz 151) Request for Closed session regarding department head
All Ayes performance evaluation] Chief Executive Officer,- Kern
Medical Center -
Pz-MC RECONVENED FROM CLOSED SESSION; RECESSED TO 2.:00 P.M.
~en~ se Pennell
rk of the Board
Kenneth W. Peterson
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY OF KER~ i
1115 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 27, 2000
BOARD RECONVENED
Supervisors: McQuiston, Perez, Patrick, Peterson, Parra
ROLL CALL: All Present
Pr-Pz lA) Results of Closed Session from June 27, 2000, at 9:00
All Ayes a.m., Item No. 150, regarding interim appointment of
department head, Director of Emergency Medical Services -
CHAIRMAN PETERSONANNOUNCEDTHEAPPOINTMENT OF RUSS BLIND
AS INTERIM DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES,
EFFECTIVE JULY 7, 2000
CONSENT AGENDA/OPPQRTUNITYFOR PUBLIC COMMENT: ;iLL ITEMS
LISTED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) OR A NUMBER SIGN (#) WERE
CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND APPROVED BY ONE MOTION.
BOARD ACTION SHOWN IN CAPS
KERN SANITATION AUT~ORI~
Pz-Pa 1) Public Hearing to consider report concerning Fiscal Year
All Ayes 2000-2001 Sewer Service Charges for Kern Sanitation
Authority - OPENED HEARING; NO ONE HEARD; CLOSED HEARING;
MADE FINDING THAT PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER
SECTIONS 15273 ARD 21080(b) (8); DIRECTED CLERK OF
BOARD TO FILE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION; ADOPTED R~SOLUTION
2000-215
Pr-Mc %2) Proposed Resolution to establish Fiscal Year 2000-2001
All Ayes Appropriations Limit for Kern Sanitation Authority -
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-216
Pr-Mc #3) Proposed plans and special provisions for Wastewater
All Ayes Treatment Plant Reservoir Improvements at Kern Sanitation
Authority - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N; MADE
FINDING THAT PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTION
15301(b); DIRECTED CLERK OF THE BOARD TO FILE NOTICE OF
EXEMPTION; DIRECTED WASTE MANAGEMENT TO PREPARE
REQUISITION AND PURCHASING TO SOLICIT EIDS
Summary of Proceedings Page 20
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
~ORD CITY-TAFT HEIGHTS SANITATION DISTRICT ' .
Pa-Pr 4) Public. Hearing to consider report concerning Fiscal Year
All Ayes 2000-2001 Sewer Service Charges for Ford city-Taft
Heights Sanitation District - OPENED HEARING; NO ONE
HEARD; CLOSED HEARING; MADE FINDING THAT PROJECT IS
EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTIONS 15273 AND 21080(b) (8);
DIRECTED CLERK OF THE BOARD TO FILE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION;
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-217'
Pr-Mc 85) Proposed Resolution to establish Fiscal Year 2000~200.1
All Ayes Appropriations Limit 'for Ford City-Taft Heights
Sanitation District - ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-218
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
6) This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to
address the Board on any matter not on this agenda but
under the jurisdiction of the Board. Board me, ers may
respond briefly to statements made or questions posed.
They may ask a question for clarification, make a
referral to staff for factual information or request
staff to report back to the Board at a later meeting.
'Also, the Board may take action to direct the staff to
place a matter of business on a future agenda. SPEAKERS
ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
BEFORE MAKING YOUR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU! .- GWEN
SPENCER; MARY BERGLAND AND DUNCAN HARVEY, KERN COUNTY
NEIGHBORS FOR QUALITY AIR, WATER AND GROWTH; 'SONIA
SWENSON-WOOLSEY, PARENTS UNITED FOR A HEALTHY
ENVIRONMENT; AND FRED VOLTZ HEARD REGARDING DAIRIES IN
KERN COUNTY
Pz-Pa RECEIVED'AND FILED DOCUMENTS
All Ayes ~
.~QARD MEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS OR REPORTS
7) On their own initiative, Board members may make an
announcement or a report on their own activities. They
may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to
staff or take action to have staff place a matter of
business on a future agenda .(Gov. CodeSec. 54954.2(a)) -
NO ONE HEARD
Summary of Proceedings Page 21
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
GENERAL PLAN AMENDN~ ~EARINGS
RESOURCE ~NAGE~EN'T AGENCY
Planning Departmen~
AMendment of the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation
Element, Maximum Allowed Land Use Density Table of the
Kern County ~eneral Plan; Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan; Kern County General Plan Circulation
Element; Amend Appendix G of the Kern County~eneral Plan
to include the MetropolitanBakersfield (Ben·) Sanitary
Landfill; Rescind the Pacificana Specific Plan;
Realignment of the West Beltway ·s ·hewn and adopted by
the Pacificana Specific Plan; O~her Items as cited Which
Include Amendments of Certain Zoning ]taps and
Applications and Proceedings
Pr-Mc *8) Request frc~ Kern County Waste Management Department for
Ail Ayes &n amen4ment to include the former buffer exam around
Bakersfield Metropolitan (Be·a) Sanitary Landfill into
the exist£ng 3.4 (Solid Waste Facility) dasi~nation £or
the landfill on ~he Kern County General Plan; in
addition, · sene change ~s requested to delete the GH
(Oeologic Hazard) D~strict fr~m · portion of the
1and£i11, lot&ted at Bakersfield Metropolitan (Ben&)
Sanitary Landfill, 17 m/les east of the City of
Bakersfield, north of Highway $8 ~nd east of Tower Line
Road, 2951 Ne,,mmrkle Road (eD's I & 2)
Specific Request:
(a). Amend the Land Use, Open Space .and Conservation
Element of the Kern County General Plan from Map Code(s)
8.4 (Mineral and Petroleum), 8.4/2.4 (Mineral and
Petroleum Steep Slope), and 8.3/2.4 (Extensive
Agriculture - Steep Slope) to Map Code(s) 3.4 (Solid
Waste Facilities) and 3.4/2.4 (Solid Waste Facilities -
Steep Slope) or a more restrictive'map code designation;
Amend Appendix G of the Kern County General Plan to
include the Metropolitan Bakersfield (~ena} Sanitary
Landfill (GPA %2, Map %105)
(b) Amend the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation
Element of the Kern County~eneral Plan from Map Code(s)
8.3 (Extensive Agriculture), 8.3/2.5 (Extensive
Agriculture - Flood Hazard), and 8.3/2.4 (Extensive
Agriculture - Steep Slope) to Map Code(s) 3.4 (Solid
Waste Facilities), 3.4/2.5 (Solid Waste Facilities
Flood Hazard), and 3.4/2.4 (Solid Waste Facilities
Steep Slope) or a more restrictive map code designation;
Amend Appendix ~ of the Kern County General Plan
include the Metropolitan Bakersfield (Be·a) Sanitary
Landfill (GPA %3,-Map %126)
c) A change in zone classification .from A G~H (Exclusive
Agriculture - Geologic Hazard Combining) to A (Exclusive
Agriculture) or amore restrictive district (ZCC %10, Map
%126)
(Continued on Page 22)
Summary of Proceedings Page 22
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
(Continued from Page 21)
(Environmental Impact Report (Metropolitan Bakersfield
(Bena) Sanitary Landfill); Published Bakersfield
Californian) - OPENED-HEARING; NO ONE HEARD; CLOSED
HEARING; CERTIFIED THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT; ADOPTED SECTION 15091 FINDINGS AND SECTION 15093
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; ADOPTED
RESOLUTIONS 2000-219 AND 2000-220 AND ENACTED ORDINANCE
G-6694 APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, INCLUDING THE
BAK~-RSFIELD METROPOLITAN (BENA) SANITARY LANDFILL INTO
APPENDIX G OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVING ZONE CHANGE
As ~EQU~STED
All AYes Xn~.. to delete m fu~e ee=on~m~ ~ghway
along ~e nor~-lov~ ~ec~ion line of Section 31,
T25S, ~4E, be~we~ 'Pond Road ~d Pe~erson ~oad,
approx~el~ ~les wes~ of McFarl~d (SD 4)
Specific .Re.est:
~nd the Circulation Ble~nt of the Ke~ Co~ty ~neral
Plan to delete a future seconda~hi~hway aliment alon~
~he north-sOuth ~dsection line of Section 31, T25S,
~24E, between Pond Road and Paterson Road (~PA %1, Map
%8) (~neral Rule, Section 15061(b) (3); ~lished Delano
~ecord) ~ OP~D ~ING; NO O~ ~; C~S~ ~ING;
~OPTED ~SOL~ION 2000-219 ~PROVIN~ G~
Pr-Mc '10) Re~est. fr~E~ Erro ~ POrter-~bertson
All Ayes ~d B~eying to c~ge the pe~tted
agr$cul~ural to cmrc~al ~o 'a11~
a ~n~r~ w$~ fasb-food res~a~t located a~ ~he
nor~heas~ uo~er of In~er.~a~e 5 ~d B~a~e ~ou~e 119
(Ta~ Highway). ~outh o~ B~ers~ield
Specific Re.est:
(a) ~nd the Metropolit~ Bakersfield 2010 ~neral Plan
from Map Code(s) R-IA (Intensive Agriculture) =o HC
(Highway .Co~ercial) or a ~re restrictive ~p code
designation (GPA ~4, Map ~122)
(b) A chugs in zone classification from A-1 (Limited
Agriculture) to C-2 PD (~neral Co~ercial - Precise
~velopment Co~ining) or a ~re restrictive district
(ZCC 813, Map ~122)
(c) A Precise ~velop~n= Pi~ for =he cons=~ction of a
convenience store with' fuel isl~ds ~d a fast-food
restarts= (PD PI~ 84, ~p %122)
(Negative~clara=ion; ~lished Bakersfield Califo~i~)
- OP~ ~ING; NO O~ ~; ~S~ ~ING; ~PT~
~TI~ DEC~TION'.~ MITI~TION ~~ MONITORING
PR~; ~P~SOL~IONS 2000-219, 2000-221 ~ 2000-
222 ~ ~~ O~I~CE G-6695 ~PROVING
" ~~ ~ ZO~ ~GE ~ ~Q~S~; ~PRO~
PRECISE D~P~ P~ S~ TO ~ ~CO~ED
CO~ITIONS; ~PT~ ~ SU~EST~ FI~INGS
Summary of Proceedings Page 23
· Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pz-Pr 11) Request from ~eorge Borba a~d James Both& by Tschudin
Ail Ayes Consulting Group to rescind the Pacificane Specific Plan
to establish an Intensive A~riculture desi~nation, amend
*:he Circulation Element of ~e Me~ropoli~
2010 ~eral Pi~, ~d to approve c~tto~l use
~o m11~ ~e cons~c~lon of ~o ~iries on
approx4---te 4,T00-acre li:e located ~ ~e iou~h side of
Taft Highway ~d wes~ o~ ~a V~s~a ~ad, west of
B~ersfield (SD 4)
Specific Re.est:
(a) ~nd the Metropolit~ Bakersfield 2010 ~neral Plan
to rescind the Pacific~a Specific PI~ ~d est~lish a
land use Map Code of R-IA (Intensive Agricult~e) or a
more restrictive ~p c~e desi~ation; a proposed
reali~ent of the West Beltway as sho~ ~d adopted by
the Pacificana Specific Pi~; a re.est ~0 delete the
retirement for future arterial road ali~men=s along
section lines ~d future collector road alights along
midsection lines should the Pacificana Specific Plan be
rescinded (GPA %3, Map 4141)
(b) and (c) ~o Conditional Use Pe~ts =o allow
establishment of a 4,677-acre integrated dai~ operation
(Section 19.12.030.A.2) consisting of two'dairies of
similar design, each occupying approxi~tely 341 acres,
and would consist of a central dai~ ba~, large free
stall ba~s for milking cows, corrals with shade
s=~ctures for suppor~ stock, ~ure separation pits and
wastewater ponds, feed storage facilities, ~d assorted
support buildings. Three to five dwellings would be
const~cted on each site for o~ers and/or e~loyees.
Each facility would support 7,200 dai~ cows, 3,264
cows and bred heifers, 1,092 heifers, ~d 2,730 calves
for a total of 28,572 head of cattle at ~he project site
in an A (~clusive Agriculture) District (~ 412, Map
4141; ~ ~13, Map ~141)
(Environmental I~act Report; P~lished Bakersfield
Califo~ian) - CO~I~D TO ~SDAY, ~Y 25, 2000, AT
2:00 P.M.
DEPARTMENTAL REOUESTE
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Planning Department
Pr-Mc '12) Report verifying contingency associated with June 13,
All Ayes 2000 Board action approving request from Tejon Industrial
Corporation (PP99241) for a Development Agreement for an
approved 320-acre industrial development in order to vest
previous approvals and freeze existing applicable County
Ordinances, regulations, and policies for a ten-year
period of time, located on the west side of Interstate 5
at the Lava1 Road interchange, approximately 20 miles
south of Bakersfield (SD 4) - RECEIVED AND FILED
Summary of Proceedings Page 24
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
R_~SOI~RCE ~AGf~ AGENCy
Community Development Program
Pr-Mc '13) ProPosed Subordination of County loans to United States
All Ayes Department of Agriculture Rural Development loan on the
Shafter Farm Worker HoUsing Project - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZED DIRECTOR TO SUBORDINATE COUNTY'S TWO HOME-
FUNDED LOANS ON SHAFTER FARM WORKER HOUSING PROJECT TO
RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOAN IN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $150,000
THROUGH EXECUTION OF ONE OR MORE SUBORDINATION.AGT~EMENTS
IN A FORM TO BE APPROVED BY COUN~ COUNSEL
Pr-Mc '14) proposed 9u~endment No. 1-toAgreement No. 115-2000 with
All Ayes City of Ridgecrest for use of an additional $37,600 in
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for
construction of Ridgecrest Skate Park Improvement in the
City of' Ridgecrest - APPROVED;.AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AG~tEEMENT 663-2000
Pr-Mc '15) Proposed designation of National Health Services, Inc'.,
Ail Ayes as a Community Housing Develop~nt Organization (CHDO)
under the HOME Program-- APPROVED
Pr-Mc ,16) Proposed Agreement to obligate $140,000 of HOME Program
All Ayes funds for costs in connect/on with City of Wasco Housing
Authority Housing .- APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRF~TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 664.-2000; AUTHORIZED DIRECTOR TO ADMINISTER
PROJECT AGREEMEN~T AND EXECU~ REQUIRED 'DOCU~S TO
IMPLE~ PROJECT, INCLUDING DEED RESTRICTION AGREF2~EN~,
SECURITY AGREEMENT, ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS, AND OTHERS,
IN A FORM APPROVED BY COUNT~ COUNSEL
Pr-Mc '17) Proposed Agreements with the City of Arvin, to provide
All Ayes CDBG funding in the amount of $127,770 for the Arvin
Downtown Revitalization-Adobe Complex/Outdoor Community
"Center Renovation and Improvements activity, and with the
RRM Design'Group, architect for the design, construction
plans and specifications, cOnstruct/on engineering, and
'observation services, contract administration and
construction monitoring of the activity, in an amount not,
to exceed $125,770 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENTS 665-2000 AND 666-2000; AUTHORIZED
DIRECTOR TO TRANSMIT EXECUTED ACTIVITY AGREEMENTS;
AUTHORIZED CO~ TO IMPLEMENT ACTIVITY'
Summary of Proceedings Page 25
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Engineerin~ and Survey Services
Pr-Mc '18) Tract 5842, Phase 2, south of Orange Street and west of
All Ayes 35th Street West, Rosamond area; Agreement Extending and
Amending Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Agreement
Extending Time to Complete Permanent Survey Monuments;
Kaufman & Broad of Southern California, Inc. - GRANTED
REQUESTED EXTENSION OF TIM~ TO COMPLETE THE REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENT WORKANDMONUMENTATIONTOFRIDAY, OCTOBER 13,
2000; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N; RETAINED EXISTING
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Pr-Mc '19) Tract 5201, Unit C, northeast corner of 35th Street West
All Ayes and Holiday Avenue, Rosamond area; Agreement Extending
and Amending Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
Agreement Extending Time to Complete Permanent Survey
Monuments; Barratt American Incorporated - GRARTED
REQUESTED EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE THE REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENT WORK AND MONUMENTATION TO FRIDAY, APRIL 27,
2001; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN; RETAINED EXISTING
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Pr-Mc *20) Tract 5606, Unit C, northwest corner of Jenkins Road and
All Ayes Hageman Road, Release of Laborers and Materialmen
Security; BateyDevelopment, Inc. - RELEASED TH~ LABORERS
AND MATERIALMEN SECURITY LETTER OF CREDIT #NZS316078 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $408,156 AND RETXIRNED SAME TO THE ISSUING
INSTITUTION, WELLS FARGO BANK
Pr-Mc '21) Proposed Request for Proposal for 9ngineering design of
All Ayes the North Beardsley Area Curb & Gutter Improvements -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED ENGINEERING AND SURVEY SERVICES TO
SOLICIT PROPOSALS ~
Pr-Mc *22) Proposed Resolution Initiating Proceedings for Annexation
All Ayes No. 10 (Tracts 5884 and 5918) and Extension of Zones of
Benefit Nos. i and 2 (Tracts 5655, 5884 and 5918) to
County Service Area No. 17 (LAFCO Proceeding 81280) -
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-223 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR
ANNEXATION NO. 10 AND EXTENSION OF ZONES OF BENEFIT NOS.
I AND 2 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREANO. 17; SET PUBLIC HEARING
FOR TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2000, AT 2:00 P.M., TO P-ECEIVE
PUBLIC INPUT AND TALLY BALLOTS; INSTRUCTED ENGINEERING
AND SURVEY SERVICES TO MAIL NOTICES AND BALLOTS TO ALL
PROPERTY OWNERS APFECTEDAND TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC MEETING
IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIII D.: OF TH~ CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION; INSTRUCTED CLERK OF 'THE BOARD TO PUBLISH
NOTICE OF HEARING; APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT 667-2000 WITH LAFCO
Summary of Proceedings Page 26
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
R~SOURCE MA/~AGEM~AG~NCy. ~ -',
Environmental Health Servicem
Animal Control Servicem
Pr-Mc *23) Proposed Join= Powers Agreement with the CitY of
All Ayes Ridgecrest for the City to provide animal shelter
services for Indian Wells Valley, in an amount not to
exceed $60,587 for Fiscal Years 1998-1999 and 1999-2000.,
and $32,087 for Fiscal Year .2000-2001 - APPROVED;
AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SI~NAGREEMENT 668-2000
R~SOURCE MANA~4ENT&~NCY
Roads Department
Pr-Mc .*24) Contract No. 20022, plans, specifications and notice to
All Ayes contractors for construction on Oak Creek Road from one
mile east of Tehachapi Willow Springs Road to 10-.35 miles
east of Tehachapi Willow Springs Road - MADE FINDING THAT
PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTION 15301(c);
AUTHORIZED ROADS TO FILE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION; APPROVED
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N;
ALTTHORIZED ROADS TO PUBLISH PURSUANT TO SECTION 20392 OF
PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE; BID OPENING TO BE WEDNESDAY, JULY
26, 2000, 11:00 A.M.
WITH- *25) Contract No. 20021, accept low bid 'of Sturgeon &' S6h,
DRAWN Inc. for construction on College Avenue from Oswell
Street to Bakersfield city limits at Montello Street, in
an amount not to exceed $174,228.63 -
Pr-Mc *26) Proposed Agreement with Equilon Enterpr%ses, LLC, for
All Ayes pipeline relocation on Calloway Drive-underpass, in an
amount not to exceed $225,000 APPROVED; AUTHORIZED
CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 669-2000
Pr-Mc *27) Contract No. 20020, accept low bid of Granite
All Ayes Construction .Company for construction on Meacham Road
between Renfro Road and Phairfield Street, in an amount
not to exceed $203,505 - ACCEPTED LOW BID; AUTHORIZED
ROADS TO PREPARE NECESSARYCONTRACTDOCUMENTSANDRL~LEASE
~T, OTHER BID ~UARANTEBS
Pr-Mc *28) Contract No. '20028, accept low bid of Granite
;ull Ayes Construct/on Company for construction of Calloway Drive
underpass at Burlington NOrthern Santa Fe Railway, PUC
No. 2-892.6B and the elimination of parking on roadways
in conjunction with this project, in an amount not to
exceed $4,618,808 - ACCEPTED LOW BID; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO
PREPAR~ NECESSARY CONTRACT DOCU~S ARD RELEASE ALL
OTHER BID GUARANTEES
Summary of Proceedings Page 27
. Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pr-Mc *29) Proposed Contract No. 20019 with Griffith Co'any for
All Ayes construction on various northeast Bakersfield streets
bounded by state Highway 184 and Niles Street to the
north and south, and between Mt. Vernon Avenue and
Fairfax Road, in an amount not to exceed $455,000 -
;tPPROI~; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 670-2000
Pr-Mc *30) Proposed establishment of a no stopping zone on the west
All Ayes side of Mt. Vernon Avenue north of Texas Street -
APPROVED; REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSEL FOR PREPARATION OF
ORDINANCE
Pr-Mc '31) Contract No. 20037, plans, specifications and notice to
All Ayes contractors for construction on Malaga Road between Buena
Vista Boulevard and DiGiorgio Road - F~,DE FINDING THAT
PROJECT IS'EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTIONS 15301(c)AND
15302; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO FILE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION;
APPROVED PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMANTO
SIGN; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO PUBLISH PURSUANT TO SECTION
20392 OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE; BID OPENING TO BE
WEDNESDAY, JULY 19, 2000, 11:00 A.M.
S.D.'s ~1 & ~3
Pr-Mc *32) Contract No. 20023, accept low bid of Granite
All Ayes Construction Company for construction on China Grade Loop
between Airport Drive and 300' east of North Chester
Avenue, in an amount not to exceed $487,717 - ACCEPTED
LOW BID; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO PREPARE NECESSARY CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS AND RELEASE ALL OTHER BID G~JARANTEES
Pr-Mc *33) Contract No. 20017, accept low bid of Griffith Company
Ail Ayes for construction on various streets in Oildale (Area 1)
bounded by Seventh Standard Road and Olivm Drive to the
north and south, and between Coffee ROad and North
Chester Avenue, in an amount not to exceed $507,000 -
ACCEPTED LOW BID; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO PREPAR~ NECESSARY
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND RELEASE ALL OTHER BID GUARANTEES
Pr-Mc .34) Contract No. 20027, accept 10w bid of Griffith Company
All Ayes for construction on Alfred Harrell Highway from city
limits at Panorama Drive and through Hart Park, in an
amount not to exceed $925,000.00 - ACCEPTED LOW BID;
AUTHORIZED ROADS TO PREPAR~NECESSARY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
AND RELEASE A/~L OTHER BID G%rARANTEES
Pr-Mc *35) Contract No. 20031, accept low bid of Griffith Company
All Ayes for construction on various streets in southwest
Bakersfield bounded by Stockdale Highway and Ming Avenue
to the north and south, and between New Stine Road and
State Highway 99, in an amount not to exceed $703,000 -
ACCEPTED LOW BID; AUTHORIZED ROADS TO PREPARE NECESSARY
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND RELEASE ALL OTHER BID GUARANTEES
Summary of Proceedings Page 28
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Pr-Mc *36) Public Hearing on proposed amendment to the Siting
All Ayes Element of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management
Plan for closure of Lebec Sanitary Landfill - OPENED
HEARING; NO ONE HEARD; CLOSED HEARING; ADOPTED RESOLUTION
2000-224; DIRECTED CLERK OF THE BOARD TO FILE NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION; AUTHORIZED WASTE MANAGEMENT TO REIMBURSE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR PROCESSING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AND ZONE (~NGE
S.D.'s ~1 & ~2
Pr-Mc *37) Proposed Contract No. 20025 with Bakersfield Well and
All Ayes Pump Company to install a turbine pump and construct an
access road and weI1 pad at Bakersfield Metropolitan
(Bena) Sanitary Landfill, in an amount not to exceed
$168,055 - APPRO%FED; ALFI~HOR I ZED CHAI~ TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 671-2000 ·
Pr-Mc *38) Proposed Amendment No. 2 to Agreement 444-96 with
All Ayes Community Clean Sweep for operation of the Drop-Off
Recycling Program, extending term to June 30, 2003, in an
amount'not to exceed $380,000 (increase of $186,000) -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 672-2000
Pr-Mc *39) Proposed Agreement with the City of Bakersfield for'Waste
All Ayes Disposal incorporating a new formula to calculate gate
fees collected from the City .APPRO%FED; ALF/"AORIZED
CHAIRF~%N TO SIGN AGREEMENT 673-2000
Pr-Mc *40) Proposed Agreement with the City of ~akersfield to
All Ayes process County greenwaste at the. Mt. Vernon facility for
Fiscal Years 2000-2003, in an amount not to exceed
$3,500,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 674-200'0
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
'Pr-Mc '41) Proposed Amendment. No. 4 to Agreement with UNITED
-All Ayes HealthCare for employee health insurance plan
administration, extending, term to September 30, 2000 -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEMENT 675-2000
Pr-Mc *42) Transfer of property tax. entitlement - City of
All Ayes Bakersfield Annexation No. 412 (Rosedale #8).- ADOPTED
RESOLUTION 2000-225 AUTHORIZING AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-COUNTY
CLERK TO TRANSFER A PORTION OF THE COUNTY'S PROPERTYTAX
ENTITLEMENT TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD COMMENCING FISCAL
YEAR 2001-2002 .~ .
Summary of Proceedings Page 29
· Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pr-Mc *43) Proposed application for grant funding from the U.S.
Ail Ayes Department of Justice for Sheriff support positions in
the amount of $75,000 - AUTHORIZED COUNT~ ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICE A/ND SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT APPLICATION
Pr-Mc *44) Proposed establishment of separate capital project fund
Ail Ayes for the Public Health Facility project - AUTHORIZED
ESTABLISHMENT OF INTEREST BEARING PUBLIC HF. JtLTH FACILITY
FUND; AUTHORIZED AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-COUNTY CLERK TO
COMPLETE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENTS TO TRANSFERTHE
PUBLIC HEALTHFACILITYPROJECTFROMTHEGENERALFUND INTO
NEW CAPIT;tL PROJECT FUND; AUTHORIZED ESTABLISHMENT OF A
LINE OF CREDIT FROM THE ACO GENERAL FUND TO THE PUBLIC
HEALTH FACILITY FUND IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$3,000,000
Pr-Mc *45) Proposed Agreement with California Grape and Tree Fruit
All Ayes League for financial contribution to assist in
eradication of Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter, in an amount
not to exceed $150,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN AGREEMENT 676-2000, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL AS TO FORM
BY COUNTY COUNSEL
Pr-Mc *46) Proposed establishment of Tobacco Litigation Settlement
Ail Ayes Special Revenue Fund - AUTHORIZED ESTABLISHMENT OF
INTEREST BEARING TOBACCO LITIGATION SETTLEMENT SPECIAL
REVENUEFUND; AUTHORIZED AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-COUNTY CLERK
TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM THE TOBACCO LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
TRUST FUND TO THE TOBACCO LITIGATION SETTLEMENT SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND; AUTHORIZED AUDITOR-CONTRO~.?~R-COUNTY CLERK
TO ELIMINATE THE TOBACCO LITIGATION SETTLEMENT TRUST FUND
Pr-Mc *47) Proposed Agreement with Kern Economic Development
All Ayes Corporation for economic development services for a one-
year term ending June 30, 2001, in an ~pmount not to
exceed $42,000 in cash plus in-kind contributions -
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AGREEM~NT 677-2000
Pr-Mc *48) Report on telecommunication strategy for the San Joaquin
All Ayes Valley - RECEIVED AND FILED
Pr-Mc *49) Report on credit rating and pricing of Fiscal Year 2000-
All Ayes 2001 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note - RECEI%"ED AND
FILED
Pr-Mc *50) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
All Ayes Reporting received by James A. Rhoades, Auditor-
Controller-County Clerk - RECEIVED AND FILED
Leaislative Matters
Pr-Mc '51) Emergency declaration and expenditure of federal funds in
All Ayes the amount of $7,000,000 to control Glassy-Winged
Sharpshooter (Pierce's Disease) - ADOPTED POSITION IN
SUPPORT; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN APPROPRIATE
CORRESPONDENCE
Summary of Proceedings Page 30
Board of Supervisors RegUlar 'Meeting 06/27/2000
Pr-Mc *52) P~oposed Resolution requesting exclusion of C~ass ~'I
Ail Ayes Waste from local jurisdiction recycling calculations '-
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-226; AUTHORIZED CHAIRF~ TO SIGN
APPROPRIATE CORRESPONDENCE
CO~ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICR
~eneral Services Division
Pr-Mc *53) Proposed .purchase of a fee interest in 37.84 acres of
All Ayes land adjacent to and west of the Mojave Landfill from
Louise Stookey Jones WooIsey, in the amount of $49,400,
plus closing costs - OPEN'SI) HEARING; NO ONE HEARD; CLOSED
HEARING; MADE FINDING THAT PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA
PER SECTION 15061; AUTHORIZED GENERAL SERVICES TO FILE
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION; APPROVED; AU~/4ORIZED CHAIRMAN TO
SIGN SALE ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS; .ACCEPTED GRANT' DEED;
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2000-227; DIRECTED AUDITOR-CON/]{OLLER
TO ISS.UE A WARRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,554.84 TO
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY
Pr-Mc *54) Proposed .License Agreement with State Department of
All Ayes Transportation for installation and operation of
communications equipment at County's- communications
facilities on Brecker~ridge Mountain from june 27, 2000 to
December 31, 2016 (monthly rent of $350) - MADE FINDING
THAT PROJECT .IS'EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTION 15301;'
AUTHORIZED GENERAL SERVICES TO FIL~ NOTICE OF F_~XEMPTION;
APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N AGREEMENT 678-2000
Pr-Mc *55) (3000.7546) Accept 'low bid from 'Piper & DeVries, ~Inc.,
All Ayes d.b.a. Omega Construction, for the demolition and removal
of existing sand bunker building at Greemhorn Mountain
Park and construction of a new building, in the amount of
$191,000 - ACCEPTED LOW BID; 'AUTHORIZED GENERAL SERVICES
TO P, ELF~ASE ALL OTHER BID GUARANTEES AND PREPAR~ CONTRACT
Pr-Mc *5'6) (1650.7256) PrOposed Agreement` with Kern Asphalt Paving
Ail Ayes & Sealing Company to repave parking lot at Kern River
Valley County Building, in an amount not to exceed
$112,279 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SI~N
AGP~EEMENT 679-2000
Summary of Proceedings Page 31
· Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
Pr-Mc *57) Proposed month-to-month office and hanger Sublease
All Ayes Agreement with Mercury Air Center for use by the Kern
County Fire Department of a portion of Lease Site %4 at
Meadows Field to station a helicopter and crew for
duration of fire season, from July 1, 2000 through
October or November, 2000 (monthly rent of $1,750) - MADE
FINDING THAT PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PER SECTION
15301; AUTHORIZED GENERAL SERVICES TO FILE NOTICE OF
EXEMPTION; APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CT{AIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 680-2000, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVALAS TO FORM
BY COUN~/ COUNSEL
Pr-Mc *58) (8994.8221) Proposed assessment of penalty for~nergytek,
All Ayes Inc., under Public Contract Code, Section 4110, for
violation of Section 4106 Subcontracting Listing
Requirement on the Poso A/x-port Project - APPROVED;
ASSESSED FINE OF $500 AGAINST ENERGYTEK, INC.
Pr-Mc *59) (1650.7235)~Accept low bid from Journey Air Conditioning
All Ayes Company for the replacement of two air-conditioningunits
at the Mary K. Shell Mental Health Building, in the
amount of $185,582 - ACCEPTED LOW BID; AUTHORIZED GENERAL
SERVICES TO RELEASE ALL OTHER BID GTJARANTEES AND PREPARE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
Pr-Mc *60) (1650.7240) Proposed Agreement with Piper & DeVries,
Ai~-Ayes Inc., d.b.a. Omega Construction, to' replace one air-
conditioning unit at Reprographics, in an amount not to
exceed $156,000 - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN TO SIGN
AGREEMENT 681-2000
CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES INTRODUCED ON JUNE 20. 2000
Pr-Mc '61) Proposed Ordinance establishing the schedule of Universal
All Ayes Solid Waste Collection Charges for Fiscal Year 2000-2001
i for the South Taft Universal Collection ;trea -.ENACTED
· ' ~ ORDINANCE G-6696
Pr-Mc *62) Proposed Ordinance amending Sections 8.28.060 and
A/1 Ayes 8.28.080 and adding Sections 8.28.081, 8.28.082, 8.28.083
and 8.28.084 to the Ordinance Code of Kern County
regarding illegal dumping and the establishment of
Universal Solid Waste Collection in specified collection
areas - ENACTED ORDINANCE G-6697
W~kTT~RS FOR ~X~CUTIV~ APPRovAL
Pr-Mc *63) Budget Transfers - APPROVED %276 THROUGH %301
All Ayes
Pr-Mc *64) Minutes for week of June 5, 2000 - APPROVED
All Ayes
Summary of Proceedings Page 32
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
*65) ~iscel~aneous Letters and Documents - FILED
Pr-Mc
All Ayes
Pr-Mc *66) Miscellaneous Departmental Referrals by Clerk of the
Ail Ayes Board - APPROVED AND FILED
Pr-Mc *67) Claims and Lawsuits filed with and referred by Clerk of
All Ayes the Board ~ APPROVED AND FILED
Pr-Pz ADJOURNED TO MONDAY, JULY 3, 2000, AT 9:00'~A.M.
D~ni~se Pennell
.k of the Board
Kenneth
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Summary of Proceedings Page 33
· Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
65) MISCELLANEOUS L~TTERS AATD DO~S - FILED
Auditor-Controller
A) Audit of the County Service Areas, Fiscal Years ended
1998 and 1999 - R]~CEIVE AND FILE
B) Kern Medical Center Audit Report for June 30, 1999
RECEIVE AND FILE
Engineering and Survey Services
C) Recorded Irrevocable Offers of Dedication of Tract 5772
for landscape and wall easement and storm drain easements
from the Dewalt Group, Inc.
Environmental Health Servicem
D) Thank you letters to various individuals and companies
for donations to the Bakersfield and Mojave animal
shelters (Copies to each Supervisor)
E) Recorded Irrevocable Offer of Dedication PD Plan %7 Map
%103-35 County Road %3855 from Shakib Dashtipour
F) Agenda of regular meeting for the Planning Commission of
the City of Bakersfield on June 15, 2000(Copy to each
Supervisor and CAO) _
Notice of meeting for CalFed Bay-Delta Advisory Council
Watershed Work Group on June 16, 2000 (Copy to each
Supervisor, CAO and Resource Management Agency)
Notice of meeting for CalFed Bay-Delta Watershed
Ecosystem Roundtable Meeting on J~ne 22, 2000 (Copy to
each Supervisor, CAO and Resource Management Agency)
Newsletter from American Land Rights Association,
National Inholders Association (Copy to each Supervisor,
CAO, Planning and County Counsel)
J) Publication entitled "California Forests 2000 (Copy to
each Supervisor, CAO, Planning and County Counsel)
K) Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board
Minutes of May 24, 2000 (Copy to each Supervisor, CAO,
Planning and County Counsel)
L) Department.of Water Resources D/strict Repor~ entitled
"San Joaquin Valley Drainage Monitoring Pro, ram, 1997"
(Copy to each Supervisor, CAO, ..Engineering & Survey
Services and Resource Management Agency)
M) Not/ce of Hearing on proposed Annexation to the Lost
Hills Utility District (Copy to each Supervisor, CAO,
Planning and County Counsel)
N) T~o (2) letters in support of proposed garbage collection
services for unincorporated Bakersfield (Copy to each
Supervisor, CAO, Waste Management and County Counsel)
Summary of Proceedings Page 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
O) Seventy-three (73) letters in opposition to proposed
mandat~ry garbage collection services for unincorporated
Bakersfield (Copy to' each Supervisor, CAO, Waste
Management and County Counsel)
P) One hundred-two (102) cards in support of the Borba Dairy
Project (Copy to each Supervisor, CA0, Planning,
EnvironmenUal Health Services and County Counsel)
Q) Twelve (12) cards in support of an alternate location for
the Borba Dairy Project {~opy to each Supervisor, CAO,
Planning, Environmental Health Services and County
Counsel)
R) Two (2) letters in opposition to the Borba Dairy Project
(Copy to each Supervisor, CAO, Planning, Environmental
Health Services and COunty Counsel)
S) Letter from Chuck McCollough thanking the Board of
Supervisors for presentation of Certificate of
Recognition (Copy to each Supervisor and CAO)
T) Response to referral by ~eneral Services to Dr. Craig
Swanson re parking citation (Copy to each Supervisor and
CAO)
U) Response to referral by General Services re donation of
property in California City by Nancy Halpin ( Copy to
each SUpervisor and CAO)
V) RePort from California Highway 'Patrol regarding illegal
discharge of hazardous waste (Copy to' each Supervisor,
CAO, Environmental Health Services, Fire - Haz-Mat)
W) Proposed fiscal year 2000-01 operating and. capital
budgets for Golden Empire Transit District (Copy to each
Supervisor and CA0)
X) E-mail from Bob Sellers, Agriswiss/ Inc. re application
of Doug Carman to serve on the Kern County Citrus Pest
Control District (Copy to each Supervisor and CAO)
Y) 'Letter from Don Thompson re share of cost for Medi-Cal
and the tobacco settlement (Copy to each Supervisor and
Z) Resolution 24-00 from Tehachapi City Council seeking a
fair share of tobacco settlement revenue for all county
taxpayers (Copy to each Supervisor, CAO and County
Counsel)
AA) Resolution No..2554-00 from Taft City Council re 'the
tobacco settlement revenue (C~y to each Supervisor, CAO
and County Counsel)
BB) Letter of resignation'from Elizabeth Keogh asa ~ember of
the Citizens Advisory Committee on Annexations {Copy to
each 'Supervisor, CAO and County Counsel)
CC) Minutes of meeting from Kern Council of Governments on
Thursday, May 18, 2000
Summary of. Proceedings Page 35
· Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting 06/27/2000
~ 66) I'.ETTERS 'RECEIVED AND REFERRED BY CLW. RK OF THE BOARD -
APPROVED AND FILED
A) Applications 'for Alcoholic Beverage License for Wizard
Gaming Inc., 118 20th Street W., Rosamond, CA, Hill
Nichol III, 6701 Niles Street, Bakersfield, CA, and
Slaters Pub, 20-22 Tobias Street, Kernville, CA
REFERRED TO PLANNING (Copy to each Supervisor, CAO and
County Counsel )
B) Preliminary Official Statement of ~eneral Obligation
Bonds for Norris School District o REFERRED TO COUNTY
COUNSEL
C) Proposal for purchase of 2000 Tax and Revenue
Anticipation Notes for Kern High School District -
REFERRED TO COUNT~ COUNSEL
D) Request from Shafter City Council to consolidate the
general municipal election to be held on November 7, 2000
-(REFERRED TO ELECTIONS)
E) Letter from California Workforce Investment Board
addressing requirements for the completion of Local
Workforce Investment Act plans - REFERRED TO EMPLOYERS
TRAINING RESOURCE (Copy to each Supervisor and CAO)
67) CLAIMS ARID LAWSUITS FILED WIT~ AATD R~F~.RRED BY T~E CL~.RK
OF THE BOARD - APPRQVED AND PILED
A) Claim in the matter of Tracy Ainsworth vs Kern County -
REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSEL (Copy to Risk Management)
B) Claim in the m~tter of Benjamin G. }{~a~ vs Kern County
- REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSEL (Copy to Risk Management)
C) Claim in the matter of ~ vs Kern County -
REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSEL (Copy to Risk Management)
D) Summons and complaint in the matter'of Jose Martin Romero
and Maria Soledad Romero vs Kern County - REFERRED TO
COUNTY COUNSEL (Copy to Risk Management)"