HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/15/00 BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
September 15, 2000
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The Kern County WaterAgency adopted the negative declaration on the"Governor's
Project" on the water / lake program. We are planning a Council workshop on that
for your next regular meeting.
2. Congratulations to SMG. The Tina Turner / Joe Cocker booking for December 3r~ is
a major one. The Tour of World Gymnastics Champions on December 12th, which
was announced at the September 14th press conference, is also major.
Also at the Garden - the new suites are complete and should soon be occupied.
Congratulations also on the new deficit reduction from $1.1 million to $227,000 in
under two years! We received audited financial statements for Ogden Entertainment
operations of the Garden and Convention Center for the year ended June 30, 2000.
The operating lost from operations is $227,624. This is a $910,316 reduction from
the $1,137,940 operating loss the City experienced when the stand alone Convention
Center was operated with City staff in 1997-98. The $594,107 operating loss
experienced last year (1998-99) was .for twelve months' operations of the Convention
Center and nine months operations of the Arena.
Per the request of Councilmember Maggard, we will place an agenda item on the next
Council meeting to acknowledge receipt of the financial report and refer it to the
Budget and Finance Committee.
3. An update on the "City Center" project is enclosed. Some of the issues show better
with pictures, so we'll schedule that for your next meeting, as well.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
September 15, 2000
Page 2
4. On August 22nd, the Ad Hoc Committee - City Center requested an overview of the
financing structures used for the stadium projects we have discussed in committee.
A report is attached.
5. We have been advised that the lessee of the Mesa Marin softball complex will be
leaving shortly. We are unaware of what will happen to the programs there.
6. John Stinson and I will be at the International City Management Association meeting
in Cincinnatti. We both leave on Saturday, and I will be back in the office on
Wednesday, with John returning to the office on Thursday. Alan Christensen will be
in charge during my absence. The office has my telephone number, in the event of
an emergency.
7. Nestles is becoming Ice Cream Partners (Haagen-Daaz / Nestles). They are
proposing a significant plant expansion and want more sewer capacity - we will work
with them!
8. John Stinson will now be dual roling it, as he will lead Risk Management during the
recruitment period for that position. The Civil Service level interviews for the EDCD
Director, by the way, should occur the first week in October. That will provide a list
of three for final interviews
9. A good old idea - the community could use those bus units that are designed to look
like trolleys. In the past, they have been mentioned by the DBA and the County (for
employees, Grand Jury, etc.). We could also use them for big arena events to move
people to and from parking lots to the building. If City Center happens, all the more
so. Preliminary discussions with GET show a couple of them may be grant fundable,
if we do the maintenance. What do you think?
10. Joe Lozano, of our Public Works staff, had the idea of the month. Foryears, we have
chased our storage needs for Police, Recreation and Parks, etc. all over the City. We
rent some space; we have redeveloped and moved ourselves several times, like the
old corporation yard becoming the Amtrack Station. Joe's idea is to build at the
airpark. The land is under utilized. It would benefit from the Police and other traffic
going to the area, and it's unlikely to redevelop soon. We could even build the units
in a form that would allow their conversion to hangars, if our situation ever changes.
Thank you, Joe!
11. Per the enclosed memo from Public Works, automated refuse collection began in
Kern City this week.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
September 15, 2000
Page 3
12. A report is enclosed from Development Services regarding the status of the charette
process.
13. An update from EDCD on the Friese Inn rehabilitation project is enclosed.
14. Responses to Council requests are enclosed, as follows:
Councilmember Carson
· Status of $1.6 million to be received for road repair and projects
Councilmember DeMond
· Results of survey done regarding Beach Park skate park usage.
Councilmember Couch
· Update on citizen inquiry regarding refinery flare burn off.
AT: rs
cc: Mayor-Elect Harvey Hall
Department Heads
Pamela McCarthy, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
BAKERSFIELD CENTENNIAL GARDEN
& CONVENTION CENTER
Attendance breakdown by Venue
Convention Center Centennial Garden
1996 324,527 = 324,527
1997 363,955 = 363,955
1998 293,628 173,691 = 467,319
1999 309,736 430,014 = 739,750
2000* 250,975 560,880 = 811,855
2001' 301,200 626,880 = 928,080
*Anticipated attendance
1001 Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, CA 93301 · Phone 661-852-7300 · Fax 661-861-9904
www. centennialgarden.com
BAKERSFIELD CENTENNIAL GARDEN
& CONVENTION CENTER
Number of Event Days by Venue
Convention Center Centennial Garden
1996 137 = 137
1997 154 = 154
1998 157 48 = 205
1999 163 110- = 273
2000* 181 121 = 302
2001' 197 142 = 339
*Anticipated event days
1001 Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, CA 93301 · Phone 661-852-7300 · Fax 661-861-9904
www.centennialgarden.com
nooper
Accountancy Corporation
I
I
I
I
I
I Bakersfield Centennial Garden
& Convention Center
I Financial Statements
I Year Ended June 30, 2000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I ~
i
CONTENTS
Page(si
Independent Auditors' Report On The
Financial Statements 1
Financial Statements
Balance sheet 2
Statement of revenue and expenses 3
Statement of changes in retained deficit 4
Statement of cash flows 5
Notes to Financial Statements 6 - 14
Independent Auditors' Report on the
Supplementary Information 15
Supplementary Information
Schedule of operating expenses 16
Independent Auditors' Report On Compliance And On
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Based On
An Audit Of Financial Statements Performed In
Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 17
Barbich
Accountancy Corporation
Independent Auditors' Report
Ogden Entertainment, Inc.
Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
Bakersfield, California
We have audited the balance sheet of Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center as of
June 30, 2000, and the related statements of revenue and expenses, changes in retained deficit and
cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the City's
facility management company, Ogden Entertainment, Inc. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller
General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center as of June 30, 2000, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
I
1
5001 E. Commercenter Drive, Suite 350 · P.O. Box 11171 · Bakersfield, California 93389 · Fax (661) 631-0244 o (661) 631-1171
1319 Marsh Street o San Luis Obispo, California 93401 o Fax (805) 5414024 o (805) 541-2500 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated August 24,
2000 on our consideration of Ogden Entertainment, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting
i and our assessment of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and
grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government
Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of
I our audit.
BARB~I/~i[I~NGCRIER HO/OPER & KING
I ^cco?~o~o~ /
I Bakersfield, CalifOrnia
August 24, 2000
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 1 -
I
I
i Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
I Balance Sheet
June 30, 2000
!
IASSETS
Current Assets
i Cash $ 783,705
Accounts receivable, trade 231,738
Accounts receivable, other 91,210
I Prepaid expenses 146,950
1,253,603
Property and Equipment, at cost 25,741
Less accumulated depreciation 5,350
20,391
$ 1,273,994
LIABILITIES AND RETAINED DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, trade $ 84,137
Accounts payable, other 68,911
Accrued expenses 202,832
Deferred revenue 788,527
Advance from City of Bakersfield 951,318
2,095,725
Commitments
Retained Deficit
Unappropriated (821,731)
$ 1,273,994
See Notes to Financial Statements.
I
I Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
I Statement of Revenue and Expenses
For the Year Ended June 30, 2000
!
Net revenues:
Facilities rent $ 1,583,092
Event expense reimbursements 702.665
Suite and premium seats 653.276
Concession commission 532 432
Signage and advertising 401. 958
Parking 123.593
Ticketing fees 109.154
Merchandise 82.311
Other income 19,241
4,207,722
Direct event expenses:
Event labor 1,210,616
Other direct event expenses 200,710
Event advertising 158,975
1,570,301
Gross profit 2,637,421
Operating expenses 2,887,078
Operating loss (249,657)
Nonoperating income (expense):
Interest income 23,298
Loss on disposal of asset (1,265)
22,033
Net loss $ (227,624)
See Notes to Financial statements.
Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
Statement of Changes in Retained Deficit
Year Ended June 30, 2000
Retained deficit, beginning of year $ (594,107)
Net loss (227,624)
Retained deficit, end of year $ (821,731)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
4
I Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
I Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2000
1
Cash flows from operating activities:
i Operating loss $ (249,657)
Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to
I net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation 6,615
Increase in accounts receivable (79,333)
I Decrease in inventory 3,197
Increase in prepaid expenses (107,395)
Decrease in accounts payable (17,645)
I Increase in accrued expenses 101,450
Decrease in deferred revenue (819,313)
I Net cash used in operating activities (I, 162,081)
Cash flows from investing activities:
I. Payments for purchase of property and equipment (25,741)
Interest income 23,298
I Net cash used in investing activities (2,443)
I Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in advances from the City of Bakersfield 381,034
I Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (783,490)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 1,567,195
I Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 783,705
See Notes to Financial statements.
I
I Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
I Notes to Financial Statements
I Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
I Nature of Business:
i The City of Bakersfield ("the City") owns the Bakersfield Centennial Garden and
Convention Center ("the Facilities"). The Centennial Garden is an arena, built by
the City, which was completed and began operations in October 1998. It is the only
i building of its kind in the Bakersfield area.
On August 6, 1997, the City issued a request for proposals for services prior to the
I opening of the Centennial Garden and the operation and management of the
Facilities thereafter. In an agreement dated January 28, 1998, the City contracted
with Ogden Entertainment, Inc. ("the Company") for these services for an initial
I period of five years. The contract term was subsequently extended for an additional
five-year term and the agreement is effective through June 30, 2008. The Company
worked during the January 14, 1998 through June 30, 1998 pre-opening phase and
I assumed responsibilities of the Facilities on July 1, 1998.
management
The Company was hired by the City for its expertise in the management, operation
I and marketing of public assembly Facilities. The Company currently manages
similar Facilities throughout the United States.
I The Company sold its entertainment business division to ARAMARK Corporation
effective June 2, 2000. The operation of the Facility is still being conducted under
I the Company's name. All contracts and leases, with the exception of the
administrative services agreement with the City, are transferable to ARAMARK
Corporation. See Note 4 for terms of the administrative services agreement. The
I City has approved the transfer of the administrative services agreement to
ARAMARK Corporation.
I The activity of the Facilities is recorded in a special revenue fund of the City's
accounting records. The City owns all the assets of the Facilities and accordingly,
all amounts related to the operation of the Facilities belong to the City. The
I Company a responsibility management agreement to
has
fiduciary
under
the
maintain and operate the Facilities in the best interests of the City and the
i community.
I
I
I Notes to Financial Statements
I
I Fund accounting:
I Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations (a) that are financed and
operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises - where the intent of the
governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing
I services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or
goods
or
recovered primarily through user charges or (b) where the governing body has
decided that periodic determination of revenue earned, expenses incurred, and/or net
I income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control,
accountability, or other purpose.
I Revenue Recognition:
I Suite andpremium seat contracts
Revenues from suite and premium seat contracts are recognized over the contract
I period per the contract terms. Contracts are billed twice a year with the entire contract
amount payable prior to the contract period. The suite and premium seat payments are
recorded as deferred revenue until earned and recognized over the contract period.
I Signage and advertising contracts
I Revenues from signage and advertising contracts are recognized the contract
over
period per the contract terms. Contracts are billed according to the contract terms.
Payments are recorded as deferred revenue until earned and recognized over the
I contract period.
i Ticket sales
The Company, through its contract with Ticketmaster, sells tickets to Facility events as
I an agent of the event holder at the on site box office location and through telephone,
internet and outlet locations. All revenues from the sale of tickets belong to the event
holder. The ticket sales are recorded as deferred revenue when sold. After the event
I has occurred, settlement with the event holder takes place. The net of total ticket sales
less event expenses such as facility rent and reimbursement of direct event expenses is
then paid to or received from the event holder. The event ticket revenues are removed
I from the deferred revenue account at the time of settlement.
I
I Notes to Financial Statements
The Facilities earn a ticketing fee on the sale of event tickets that take place through
telephone, internet and outlet locations. Revenues are recorded as deferred revenue at
the time of sale and are recognized at the time of event settlement.
Event revenues
Revenues from Facilities events such as facilities rent, direct event expense
reimbursements, concession commissions, parking and merchandise are recognized at
the time of event settlement.
Basis of accounting:
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of
accounting. Under the accrual basis, revenues are recognized when earned and
expenses are recognized when incurred.
Use of estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents:
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on
hand and amounts deposited with banks.
Categories of deposit risk:
In accordance with the Governmental Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 3,
the City's deposits are categorized to give an indication of the level of risk assumed
by the City at June 30, 2000. The categories are described as follows:
Category 1 - Insured or collateralized with securities held by the entity or by its
agent in the entity's name
-8-
Notes to Financial Statements
Category 2 - Collateralized with securities held by the pledging financial
institution's trust department or agent in the entity's name.
Category 3 - Uncollateralized. (This includes any bank balance that is
collateralized with securities held by the pledging financial institution, or by its
trust department or agent but not in the entity's name).
Catego~ Carrying
1 2 3 Value
Cash and cash
equivalents $ 213,776 $ -0- $ 569,929 $ 783,705
At June 30, 2000, the carrying amount of financial institution deposits was $783,705
and the bank balance was $1,131,320 of which only $300,000 is covered by federal
depository insurance.
Concentration of credit risk:
Credit is extended, in the form of accounts receivable, to customers located
primarily in California.
Property and equipment:
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the
straight line method over estimated useful lives of 3 years.
Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment are charged to operations and
major improvements are capitalized. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition of
property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from
the accounts and gain or loss is included in the statement of income.
I
I Notes to Financial Statements
I
Note 2. Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue at June 30, 2000 consists of the following:
Suite contracts $ 404,151
Advertising contracts 172,249
Ticket sales, future events 132,845
Event deposits 53,130
Event sponsorship 22,133
Ticket rebates 4,019
$ 788,527
Note 3. Advance From City of Baliersfield
During the normal course of business, the City pays expenses that are allocated to the
operation of the Facilities. These expenses include payroll and related expenses for the
City employees and rent and utilities for the office space used by the Company. The
amount of the advance fluctuates throughout the year depending on allocated monthly
expenses and additional cash flow needs. The advance is an inter-company account
that is eliminated in the consolidation for the preparation of the City's financial
statements. The amount due at June 30, 2000 was $951,318.
Note 4. Administrative Services Agreement
The Company provides administrative services for the under
City
original
an
five-year
agreement, which was subsequently extended for an additional five-year period.
Compensation for these services is a base fee of $150,000 for the first year, paid in
equal monthly installments. The base fee increases by 3% per year each year
thereafter until the agreement has terminated.
I
I Notes to Financial Statements
!
In addition to the base fee, the Company receives an incentive relative to the amount
of the reduction, if any, in net operating loss for each fiscal year. The incentive is
calculated based upon the net operating income or loss after the base fee. The
Company receives an incentive of 1) 10% of the first $350,000 in net operating loss
reduced; 2) 20% of the next $500,000 in net operating loss reduced; 3) 30% of any net
operating surplus in one fiscal All of the incentive calculations are based
any
year.
upon a projected annual net operating loss of $850,000. Beginning July 1, 2003, the
incentive is $25,000 for every year the net operating loss is below $300,000. If the net
in fiscal reaches then the incentive fee will
operating
surplus
$350,000,
any
year
cease.
For the year ended June 30, 2000 the Company received $266,344 in management and
incentive fees.
The computation of the incentive fee is based upon the books and records of the
Facilities maintained by the Company. The accounting records for the Facilities must
be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
industry standards. The Company is required under the agreement with the City to
have an annual audit at the end of the fiscal year.
Under the management agreement with the City, the Company has the right to operate
or contract with others to operate concession and catering services for the Facilities
during the initial five-year term of the contract, effective through June 30, 2003. The
City has not extended this portion of the management agreement. The Company has
contracted with its food and beverage division to these services. The food and
operate
beverage division is a related entity under common management at the Company's
corporate level. Operations of this food and beverage division are not included in the
Facilities' financial statements.
The Facility is entitled to receive 35% of the first $1.2 million in gross concession
receipts and 40% of receipts in excess of $1.2 million and 15% of gross concession
receipts to the suites. For the year ended June 30, 2000 the Facility received $571,592
in gross concession and catering receipts from the Food and Beverage division.
The Facility is entitled to receive 75% of the net novelty receipts and the Company
receives the remaining 25%. For the year ended June 30, 2000 the Facility received
$68,287 and the Company received $22,762 in net novelty receipts from the Food and
Beverage division.
I Notes to Financial Statements
1
I Note 5. Commitments
I The Company has entered into various long-term contracts and leases. At June 30,
2000 outstanding commitments consist of the following:
I Ticket sales
The Company has entered into a licensed user agreement with Ticketmaster to be the
I exclusive provider for ticket sales for any event presented by the Company at the
Facilities. Under the agreement, Ticketmaster has the authority to act as an agent for
the Company for ticket sales to the general public by any and all means including
I telephone, internet, and outlet locations. Ticketmaster earns
fees
from
the
ticket
sales
such as inside ticket charges, customer convenience charges, credit card charges,
i handling charges and ticket sales royalties. Some fees are subject to increases
throughout the contract term. Ticketmaster collects these fees as tickets are sold and
the net amount is remitted to the Company weekly. The initial term of the agreement
I is for five years and the agreement is effective through August 31, 2003. The contract
automatically renews for one two-year period unless terminated in accordance with the
provisions of the contract.
I Concertpromoter
I The Company has entered into a booking service agreement with Nederlander-
Bakersfield, Inc. as the exclusive musical concert promoter for the Facilities.
Nederlander has contracted to pay a minimum annual guarantee of $175,000 in
I facilities rent and reimbursement of direct event the concerts it
expenses
through
promotes at the Facilities. Nederlander is entitled to 25-50% of amounts in excess of
the minimum annual guarantee based upon various target levels. The facilities rent
I and annual guarantee amounts are subject to escalation each year over the contract
period based upon increases in the Consumer Price Index, but not more than 4% per
i year. For the year ended June 30, 2000, Nederlander paid $168,642 in facilities rent
less reimbursement of direct expenses with an estimated amount of $-0- due for the
excess of the minimum annual guarantee. The contract year is different than the
I Facilities fiscal year. Therefore, the excess of the minimum annual guarantee is
allocated over two of the Facilities' fiscal years. The agreement is effective through
December 31, 2003 unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of the
I agreement.
I
I Notes to Financial Statements
I
I Personnel services
The Company has entered into an independent contractor's agreement with Staff Pro,
Inc. to provide personnel services for the Facilities, which include ushers, ticket takers
and security. Under the agreement, Staff Pro, Inc. receives the actual wages for
personnel working at the Facilities plus a payroll overhead mark-up of 33.7% of the
wage rate and a management fee of 10% of the actual wages plus overhead mark-up.
The Company guarantees $30,000 for the minimum annual management fee for the
initial The fee is to negotiation the anniversary date of
year.
management
subject
on
the agreement. The agreement is effective through August 1,2001 unless terminated
earlier in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.
Maintenance staff
The Company has entered into an independent contractor's agreement with
Maintenance Staff, Inc. for janitorial, set-up, breakdown and related services at the
Facilities. Maintenance Staff, Inc. receives a contracted hourly rate of pay for
personnel working at the Facilities. The rates are subject to increases based upon
increases in the state or federal minimum wage, FICA or Medicare rates. The
agreement is effective through July 15,2001 unless terminated earlier in accordance
with the provisions of the agreement.
Hockey lease
The City has entered into a lease agreement, which has been assigned to Flying Puck,
for exclusive of the Facilities for West Coast
use
Hockey
League
(WCHL)
games.
Flying Puck has agreed to pay a minimum of $160,000 per season for use of the
Facilities. The $160,000 consists of lease fees of $5,000 per game played plus 7.5% of
ticket sales above certain levels per year, which increase over the contract term. The
lease fees are subject to increase beginning in the third year of the contract and every
two years thereafter based upon the Consumer Price Index adjustments.
Flying Puck receives $5,000 for each suite leased for hockey tickets. For the year
ended June 30, 2000, Flying Puck received $120,000 for the twenty-four suites leased.
The agreement is effective through June 30, 2004 or ten days following the date the
last WCHL playoff game of 2004 is played, whichever occurs first unless terminated
earlier in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The contract has two
options for renewal for terms of seven years each. Prior to the exercise of either
option, the parties shall negotiate new lease fees.
-13-
Notes to Financial Statements
Basl{etball lease
The Company has entered into a lease agreement with the Cal State Bakersfield
Foundation (Cal State) for exclusive use of the Facilities for Cal State University
Bakersfield men's basketball games. A lease fee of $4,000 per game plus 7.5% of
ticket sales above certain levels is charged for use of the Facilities. Cai State receives
$2,500 for each suite leased that includes basketball tickets. For the year ended June
30, 2000, Cal State received $52,500 for suite ticket options. The agreement is
effective through October 31, 2001 unless terminated earlier in accordance with the
provisions of the agreement. The contract has two options for renewal for terms of
five years each. Prior to the exercise of either option, the parties shall negotiate new
lease fees.
- 14-
I Ogden Entertainment, Inc.
Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
i Bakersfield, California
The accompanying information shown on page 16 is presented only for purposes of additional
i analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Our audit of the basic f'mancial statements was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on
I those statements taken as a whole. The accompanying information has been subjected to the
procedures applied in the audit of the basic f'mancial statements.
IIn our opinion, the accompanying information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
I
I Bakersfield, ~a k ]
August 24, 2000 ~
1
I
!
5001 E. Commereenter Drive, Suite 350 · P.O. Box 11171 o Bakersfield, California 93389 o Fax (661) 631-0244 o (661) 631-1171
I 1319 Marsh Street · San Luis Obispo, California 93401 o Fax (805) 5414024 · (805) 541-2500
I Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
I Schedule of Operating Expenses
Year Ended June 30, 2000
!
I Full time ,057,544
staff
$
1
Utilities 563.322
i Management fees 266.344
Equipment rental 157.126
Security 144.858
I Hockey premium 120.000
Supplies 115.408
Part time staff 81.690
I. Contract maintenance 79.506
Insurance 75.222
Credit card fees 52.718
I Marketing 33.688
Travel 27.414
Repairs and maintenance 22,975
I TeIephone 20,418
Office supplies 13,896
Printing 13,342
I Professional fees
12,000
Miscellaneous 9,057
Depreciation 6,615
I Postage 4,566
Uniform 4,550
I Dues and subscriptions 3,366
Training 885
Employment ad fees 568
I $ ..2,887,078
I
Barbich
r
Accountancy Corporation
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance and on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Based on an Audit of Financial Statements
Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards
Ogden Entertainment, Inc. 1
Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center
Bakersfield, California
I
We have audited the financial statements of Bakersfield Centennial Garden & Convention Center as
of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated August 24, !
2000. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the
standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. I
Compliance I
Compliance with laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to Bakersfield Centennial
Garden & Convention Center is the responsibility of the City's facility management company, ·
Ogden Entertainment, Inc. As part of our audit, we assessed the risk that noncompliance with
·
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants could cause the financial statements to
be materially misstated. We concluded that the risk of such material misstatement was sufficiently 1
low and that it was not necessary to perform tests of Ogden Entertainment, Inc.'s compliance with
such provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
1
I
5001 E. Commercenter Drive, Suite 350 · P.O. Box 11171 o Bakersfield, California 93389 · Fax (661) 631-0244 o (661) 631-1171
1319 Marsh Street · San Luis Obispo, California 93401 o Fax (805) 541-4024 · (805) 541-2500 I
I
1
I
I
!
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
I In planning and performing our audit, we considered Ogden Entertainment, Inc.'s internal control
over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
I our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over
f'mancial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over f'mancial reporting would not
necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material
I weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements
in amounts that would be material in relation to the f'mancial statements being audited may occur
I and not within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their
be
det~ted
assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over f'mancial reporting and
i its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, others within the
I organization and the City of Bakersfield and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.
1
· Acc,/ti ~4y Corp~l~tion
I Ba~ fi~Eaq ~ornia }
!
- 17-
I
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM '
September 5, 2000
TO: Ad Hoc Committee - City Center Project
FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager ~.
SUBJECT: Report on Stadium Financing Structures
On August, 22, 2000, the Ad Hoc Committee -- City Center asked for an overview of the
financing structures used for stadium projects we have discussed in committee. This report is
intended to show general similarities and differences in the way the certain stadium and arena
projects were and are proposed to be financed. With an understanding of financing structures,
we feel the Committee will be better able to evaluate the financing plan that is presented at a
later date.
Lancaster Baseball Stadium
The stadium in Lancaster was built in 1996. It is owned by the City. The Lancaster stadium cost
about' $12 million to construct, not including land, which was already owned by the
redevelopment agency. The redevelopment agency financed the stadium by issuing Tax
Allocation Notes of $5 million and using cash from the City of Lancaster General Fund of $7
million. The Agency issues notes with a term of 5 years and later refinancing them with longer
term bonds. The bonds are paid off using only the tax increment revenue generated in their
redevelopment project areas. The Lancaster Redevelopment Agency made a legal finding that
made it possible to combine funds from different project areas to contribute toward the stadium
debt payments.
Centennial Garden Arena
In 1997, the Redevelopment Agency issued the debt of approximately $41 million of Certificates
of Participation (COP's). Of those proceeds, $29 million went for the Convention Center
Expansion Project, which included the Centennial Garden Arena. The remaining $12 million of
the debt proceeds were used to refinance debt the Redevelopment Agency had entered into in
1987 and 1993.
Repayment of the COP's is made on a proportional basis between the Agency and the City.
Annual debt service on the COP's is $3,150,000; the Agency's portion is $1,200,000 and the
City's portion is $1,950,000. The Agency uses tax increment dollars to make their portion of the
debt service, and the City's portion comes from general tax dollars.
As part of the Convention Center Expansion, the City entered into a contract with Ogden
Entertainment to privately manage the Convention Center/Arena operations. Our Convention
Center/Arena, like most facilities of that type, is considered a community amenity. Typically,
cities subsidize or contribute to the operations of convention center facilities, and they feel it this
is an appropriate use of general tax dollars.
Annually, the City of Bakersfield budgets for a contribution to the Convention Center/Arena
operations to support that facility, with no expectation that user fees will cover all its operational
costs. In the same way, funds are allocated to other city facilities and services that provide a
general benefit to the citizens of Bakersfield. For example, annually we allocate funds to
operate City parks facilities and recreation programs. Fees collected for use of these services
only offset a portion of the total cost; therefore, we rely on general tax dollars to make up the
difference.
Since Ogden began to operate the entire facility when the Arena was built, the amount needed
to contribute has steadily declined, thus reducing the overall impact of the facility on general tax
dollars. Operating contributions made by the City to the Convention Center/Arena are as
follows:
1997-98 $1,137,000 City Conv. Ctr-12 months
1998-99 $594,000 City Conv. Ctr-12 months, Ogden Arena-9 months
1999-00 $227,000 Ogden Arena & Cony. Ctr-12 months
As a result of the reduction in general tax dollars used to assist the Convention Center/Arena,
the savings has reduced the impact of the debt payment on the General Fund.
Bakersfield Baseball Stadium (proposed)
The Bakersfield stadium is estimated to cost about $15 million to construct, including land which
is not owned by the City. The initial plan is for the Agency to issue COP's for $15 million, plus
debt issuance costs, to construct the stadium. Estimated debt payments to pay off the COP's
would be $1.4 million annually. The Agency would dedicate the tax increment generated by the
private elements of the Olmsheid development to the debt service on the stadium, which is
estimated to be 25% of the annual debt payments. The baseball team would lease the stadium
from the City and make lease payments to the City equal to another 25% of the debt payments.
The remaining 50% of the debt payments would be the responsibility of the City's General Fund.
Any naming rights commitments, which are unknown at this time, could reduce the City's
General Fund contribution to the stadium.
Similarities and Differences
· Centennial Garden Arena, Lancaster Baseball Stadium & proposed Baseball Stadium are
owned by a City.
· Centennial Garden Arena & proposed Baseball Stadium both use COP's as a debt
instrument.
· Centennial Garden Arena & proposed Baseball Stadium both have Agency issuing debt,
leasing facility to City, and City making lease payments from general tax dollars.
· Lancaster stadium uses only redevelopment tax increment to pay off outstanding debt.
· Lancaster uses General Fund revenues up front to pay for more than ~ of the stadium
construction cost.
· Lancaster planned to used short-term notes to finance portion of stadium, then refinance
within 5 years.
· Lancaster owned entire land site for baseball stadium; Bakersfield must purchase land
for stadium and related parking.
· Lancaster dedicated tax increment revenues from outside the stadium project area to
.assist in making the debt service on the stadium.
· Proposed Baseball Stadium uses only tax increment revenue from the private elements
of the development proposal; all other tax increment growth is kept by the Southeast
Project Area.
Conclusion
Bear in mind that these projects are quite unique. The debt structure for these projects differ
in detailed and technical ways; however, we feel this report provides a broad overview of the
debt structures that will be helpful to the Ad Hoc Committee. If you have any further questions
or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to ask.
file : plrehablrevisedllbp 3memo
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
· DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATL'RITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
~ CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION, 1997
(Convention Center Expansion -Arena Project)
JUNE 30, 2000
Interest Principal
Total
Fiscal Year October 1 April 1 Total April I Requirements
2000-01 $ 1,091.751 $ 1.091.751 $ 2.183.502 $ 965.000 $ 3,148.502
2001-02 1.068.591 1.068,591 2.137,182 1,015,000 3,152,182
2002-03 1,043,724 1.043,724 2.087.448 1.060,000 3,147,448
2003-04 1.017,224 1,017,224 2,034,448 1, I 15,000 3,149,448
2004-05 988,791 988,791 1,977,582 1,175,000 3.152.582
2005-06 958~241 958,241 1.916,482 1.240,000 3.156,482
2006-07 925,382 925.382 1.850,764 1.300,000 3.150.764
o,146._12
2007-08 890,606 890.606 1,781,212 1.365,000 " '~
2008-09 853,751 853,751 1,707,502 1.440.000 3,147,502
2009-10 814,872 814,872 1.629,744 1,520,000 3,149.744
2010-11 773,071 773,071 1,546.142 1.610,000 3.156.142
2011 - 12 727.991 727.991 1,455.982 1,695.000 3.150,982
-., ,no
2012-13 680.5.>2 680.5o- 1,361.064 1.785.000 * 3.146,064
2013-14 628,766 628,766 1,257,532 1,890,000 * 3,t47.532
2014-15 573,956 573.956 1.147.912 2,005,000 * 3,152.912
2015-16 515,811 515.811 1,031.622 2.115.000 * 3,146,622
2016-17 454,476 454.476 908.952 2.230,000 * o,1.>8,9~-
2017-18 389.806 389.806 779,612 2.360.000 ** 3.139,612
2018-19 2_0,481 o_0.481 640.962 2.500.000 ** 3 140.962
2019-20 247.044 247.044 494,088 2.645,000 ** 3.139.088
2020-21 169.347 169.347 338,694 2.800,000 ** 3,138.694
2021-22 87,097 87.097 174,194 2,965.000 ** 3,139,194
S 15.221,31l S 15,221,3ll S 30,442.622 S 38.795,000 $ 69.237.622
J* Term certificates due April I. 2017 subject to mandatory sinking account payments.
· * Term certificates due April 1. 2022 subject to mandatory sinking account payments.
19
· DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
i REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT RA 97-2
(City. of Bakersfield)
JUNE 30, 2000
Total
Fiscal Year December 30 June 30 Requirements
2000-01 S 600.000 S 600,000 S 1.200,000
2001-02 600,000 600.000 1.200,000
2002-03 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2003-04 600,000 600,000 1,200.000
2004-05 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2005-06 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2006-07 600.000 600,000 1,200,000
2007-08 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2008-09 600,000 600.000 1,200,000
2009-10 600,000 600,000 1.200,000
2010-11 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2011-12 600.000 600,000 1,200,000
2012-13 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2013-14 600,000 600.000 1,200.000
2014-15 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2015-I6 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
2016-17 600.000 600,000 1,200,000
2017-18 600,000 600.000 1,200.000
2018-19 600.000 600,000 1.200,000
2019-20 600,000 600,000 1.200,000
2020-21 600,000 600.000 1,200,000
2021-22 600.000 600,000 1.200.000
$ I~._00,000 $ 1~.200,000 S 26,400,000
17
SUMMARY OF RELOCATION ASSISTANCE BENEFITS TO
BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
DISPLACED BY THE CITY CENTER PROJECT
MOVING EXPENSES - will receive either (A) or (B)
(A) A Reimbursement Payment for Actual Reasonable Moving and Related
Expenses.
·Professional mover (acceptable Iow bid/estimate)
· Self-move (mutually agreeable cost; receipts)
In appropriate cases (financial hardship) advance payment is available.
(B) A Fixed Payment in lieu of Actual Reasonable Moving and Related
Expenses, if eligible.
·In-lieu payment not less than $1,000 nor more than $20,000
· Business will unavoidably lose substantial patronage due to relocation
· Business is not operated solely for rental purposes
· Income limits
Example:
The fixed payment for a displaced business is based upon the average
annual net earnings of the business for the two taxable years immediately preceding the
taxable year in which it was displaced.*
1998 Annual Net Earnings: $16,500
1999 Annual Net Earnings: $18,500
2000 Year Displaced
Average: $16,500 + $18,500 = $35,000 / 2 = $17,500
$17,500 Fixed Payment ($20,000 maximum payment by law)
*Regulations allow for alternate 2 year period deemed more
representative of earnings if hardship arises.
REFERRALS TO SUITABLE REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS
· Current and continuing information on available replacement locations
· Referrals to Real Estate Agents/Brokers
· Assistance with Zoning concerns and Land Use restrictions
· Self-help
PAYMENT FOR REASONABLE COSTS OF RE-ESTABLISHING THE BUSINESS, if
eli_oible
· Limited to non-profit organizations and "small businesses" (not more than
500 employees working on site being acquired)
· May not exceed $10,000
· May be available in addition to moving expense payment
· To cover repairs or improvements to suitable replacement property required
in order to conduct business
· May cover signage expenses and required utility connections, licenses, fees
and permits
PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF BUSINESS GOODWILL, if eligible
· Must demonst'rate unavoidable and substantial loss of business patrons
Example:
Businesses at favorable location for several years,
public/patrons familiar with location, location
has large volume vehicle and pedestrian traffic
but due to displacement, must relocate to
more remote area.
· Payment cannot be duplicated by amounts due in condemnation
proceedings
PAYMENT FOR SEARCHING FOR A REpLAcEMENT LOCATION, if eli.qible
· May not exceed $1,000. May cover:
- transportation expenses
- meals and lodging away from home
- time spent searching (based on a reasonable salary of the
displaced person or his/her representative)
- reasonable fees paid to Real Estate Agents or Brokers to find
a replacement site
CLAIMS/INFORMATION ASSISTANCE
· Brochure to be distributed/interviews/meetings
· Preparing claim/documentation for a relocation payment
· Information on federal, state and local programs available to help
re-establish a business (e.g., Small Business Administration programs)
· Grievance/Appeal procedure
BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
September 15, 2000
TO: Ad Hoc Committee - City Center Project
Honorable and City
Mayor Counci~embe~
Bakersfield Redevelopment/
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager
SUBJECT: City Center Update
The following is an update of the status of the City .Center project as of September 15,
2000.
1) Baseball team lease
The Bakersfield City Manager was invited to appear at an owners' meeting of the
California Baseball League. The purpose was to outline the City Center proposal
and to respond to questions.
The proposal was positively received. Both the Commissioner and various team
owners expressed optimism about getting a lease in place. That, however, is not yet
done.
2) Leases
The City Center developers report, generally, that their lease negotiations are going
well with the theatre, housing, primary sports cafe/restaurant and with the
basketball/volleyball facility.
3) Ice Rink
The ice rink part of the sports facility is, to date, the biggest problem. While
contributions exist in the form of offers from the community and City to hep
underwrite the cost, getting adequate financial backing to secure the lease has not
yet been achieved. Several areas remain open to be explored, however.
Ad Hoc Committee - City Center Project
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
September 15, 2000
Page 2
4) Property owner meetin_as
The-City and/or developer have had .meetings with six of the property owners who
have property on the stadium site. While all discussions are conditional, depending
upon whether there is a project, or not, they have gone amicably, and the City has
learned of their key interests. Concepts of "win win" solutions can, at least, be
explored.
5) Soccer compatibility with baseball solved
Community members have asked to make the multi-purposes stadium compatible
with soccer, as well as baseball. Due to differing field dimensions, that is a problem.
However, it is a problem that we have been fortunate enough to find a solution to.
EAB Park, on Long Island, has fences at two depths At 320', they have a six foot
fence. At a greater depth, they have a higher fence. The six foot fence is easily
detached. The grass between the fences is maintained. When the shorter fence is
down, it becomes a soccer field. When the shorter fence is up, from the
grandstands, it looks like one fence depth, rather than two.
An asymmetrical design also helps. There is more seating along the third base line
(and home team) than is along the first base line. That results in more seating-being
along the side of the soccer field, rather than being behind the goal.
We would propose using these two elements, so soccer is a viable use in the new
stadium.
-6) Stadium desiqn
From the stadium tours and research, it appears the following design elements are
desirable:
· 5,000 fixed seats
· Seating for 1,500 on grassy berms above the foul lines
· 12 - 16 suites (budget sensitive)
· Concourse / concessions visible to the field
· Field level (cost sensitive)
Ad Hoc Committee - City Center Project
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency
September 15, 2000
Page 3
· Asymmetrical design - in addition to being good-for soccer, the sun lin the eyes
problem and shading-is improved for more seats, and there are more fans behind
the home team.
· Durable - easyto maintain materials - like Centennial Garden, butwith decoration
and features to make it attractive.
· Major league look, but with all seating being close in.
· Amenities:
Playground
Beer Garden
Batting Cages
Video Game Area
Pool (?)
7) Guaranteed maximum price (GMP)
Assuming that the project goes forward and, at the end of the six months a
development agreement is signed, we can only issue .bonds if we have, in hand, a
guaranteed maximum price (GMP) from the contractor on the sta~lium. This is the
same process used on Centennial Garden. To get a GMP, we need about $95,000
worth of architectural work to be done. We do not want to propose spending that
money, until we have near certainty of a baseball franchise lease or a naming rights
deal. Both of these continue to be worked on.
AT:rs
BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
./~ September 12, 2000
TO: Department Heads
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~/. ~
SUBJECT: Risk Management - Interim Agsignm{~nts
Due to the departure of Risk Manager, Scott Manzer I will be reassigning the functions assigned
to the Risk Manager to Assistant City Manager John Stinson effective September 12, 2000 and
until a new Risk Manager can be recruited.
John will be overseeing workers compensation, liability and property claims processing;
disability retirements; insurance and loss control programs; modified work and safety programs.
He will be working with the Assistant City Attorney Bob Sherfy in the City Attorney's office to
coordinate the review of claims against the city; insurance language in City contracts, and the
process used to review and approve Certificates of Insurance provided to the city. The City
Attorney's office Will assist in these reviews during this interim period.
S:~OHN~ISK~nterim Assignment.wpd
B A K E R S F I E L D -
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM I~ SF.P I 12000
TO: Alan Tandy, CiW Manager
FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director
DATE: September 7, 2000
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON REFUSE COLLECTION IN KERN CI~
Please recall that, in Janua~ 2000, staff repoRed on special conditions needed for
automation of refuse pick up in Kern CiW. After much consideration, the Kern
Board has seRled on the following solution to help make the transition.
1. Substitution of special, 32 gallon refuse ca~s in lieu of the standard 96 or 64
gallon ones, in order to fit in narrow carpo~s/garages. Some residents will still
use 96 or 64 gallon ca~s, if they desire. The smaller 32 gallon automated ca~s
will not be available to customers outside of Kern City, since the smaller
containers require specially-modified equipment to se~ice.
2. Substitution of a second trash pick up per week in lieu of a greenwaste pick up,
for ~o reasons. First, the greenwaste caas will not be warranted due to the
common use of rockscapes in place of lawns. Second, the special 32 gallon
cars used for narrow carpoRs/garages will only hold paA of the refuse held by
standard ca~s.
In addition to the above special accommodations, our standard program provides e~ra
assistance by rolling ca~s out for residents with documented medical needs. This
impo~ant pa~ of our se~ice was well received.
The hauler has ordered special containers per each household's request. The Kern
CiW Association wishes to move ahead with the program. Sewice will begin the week
of September 11, 2000.
KB:stop
SMP
S:~IEMOS~IANAGER~UPD KERN CITY REFUSE COLL 090700.wpd
September 7, 2000
MEMORANDUM__ ......
RECEIVED
SEP I 5 2000
September 14, 2000 CITY MANAGER'S t'
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~ /
FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DII~C~'
~eB~r~nT:DevelopmeCn~mREmtT~'te~ ~sD~r~ed with the selection of Mo/g~vero Notesfine
Associates but expressed concern over scheduling the charrette for the last week in October
due to conflicts with other events.
The consultant's contract has not been scheduled for approval by the City Council due to a lack
of funds. Great Valley Center has told me that $10,000 Js still being reserved for the charrette.
I have received an indication of support from the Superintendent of Schools ($2,500 - $5,000)
and "The Bakersfield CalifOrnian" has contributed $2,500. Randy Rowles is arranging for more
meetings with possible donOrs next week. '
I will continue to work on definition issues to be addressed in the charrette.
JH:pjt
m\mat9~14
MANAGER'S
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
September 14, 2000
TO: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager
FROM: George Gonzale~mmunity Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: RCPI: Friese Inn RIt~Dabilitation Project Progress Update
The rehabilitation of Restoration Community Project Inc. (RCPI) Freise Inn is nearing completion.
Lead-based paint has been mitigated, the plumbing and electrical systems have been replaced,
the fire suppression systems are installed and the work stands at 95% of completion. RCPI Board
Chairman, Gil Anthony, expects to receive Certificate of Occupancy by Friday, September 15,
2000. RCPI's landscape committee is working towards completing design and installation of
landscaping prior to the grand opening. October 20, 2000 has been set as the date of the grand
opening and ribbon cutting ceremony.
RCPI is a nonprofit organization seeking to provide for senior housing needs, community
education, youth and adult programs to meet the holistic needs of their community. RCPI received
$190,000 in HOME funds from the City of Bakersfield to purchase and rehabilitate the property at
721-725 8t" Street, formerly known as the Freise Inn. RCPI will establish Exodus House, a
transitional housing project, at the site. Exodus House will serve homeless women recovering from
drugs and alcohol, and women who are referred from the penal system. The facility will be able
to accommodate up to 20 women and 10 children. The program will provide supportive services,
which include counseling sessions, the 12-step recovery program, and social activities for the
clients.
Funding Source Amount
City of Bakersfield $190,000
County of Kern $240,000
Private Donations $198,000 Total: $628,000
Private donations include some flooring, furniture, decor, and construction management services.
HUD awarded SHP (Supportive Housing Program) funding to RCPI in 1999. RCPI began drawing
SHP funds, which will pay for day to day operations of the facility over a three year period, in July
of 2000.
S:kDEBBIE'SURCPI nearing completion update. WPD September
13, 2000
BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
September 15, 2000
TO: Councilmember Irma Carson, Ward 1
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~ (~
SUBJECT: $1.6 Million in Road Money
This legislation is awaiting the Governor's signature. It is not controversial, and approval
is highly likely.
Based upon probability of signing, the staff has thrown out the recommendation of $1.0
million for repairs, a couple of hundred thousand for a traffic signal, and $450,000+ for
medians.
It is not yet in committee or formally before the Council, because of the status of not yet
being signed.
Please call if you have other questions.
AT:rs
DATE: September 8, 2000
TO: Stan Ford, Director of Recreation and Parks
FROM: ~G~gCronk, Operations Director
SUBJECT: . Council Referral, WF0018440 / 001,
Skate Park Survey
In response to Councilmember DeMond's request, a survey of Beach Park skate park
usage was initiated beginning May 8, 2000. Monitoring concluded August 25, 2000. Data
was compiled for number of skaters utilizing the facility and spectators in attendance.
As expected, as summer daytime temperatures rose, skate park usage and attendance
was minimal. We were advised of larger c~Owds appearing once the sun started to set
and temperature was more conducive to this activity. Not to minimize recreatiOnal value
of this facility, however, attendance appeared to stabilize once "newness" wore off.
Attached are copies Of collected data.
Please advise should you require additional information.
Cc: Jane Gardner
Allen Abe
s:\\Ops 2000-01\Council Referral~Skate Park Survey
BEACH PARK SKATE' PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF May 8, 2000 - May 14, 2000
#1
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY ' I' WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAY I SUNDAYI
'l' I I 'l I · I I
Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators
~:o°:.~ ~ ol ~ o! ~ ~I ~ ~I ~ ol ~~I~,
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Warm - Expected 70-85% COMMENTS:
s:\opsg9-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE* PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF May 15, 2000 - May 21, 2l~00
#3
I I I I I I I
Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Co°l - Monday - Wednesday COMMENTS:
Hot - Thurs - Friday
s:~ops99-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK ·
SURVEY
WEEK.OF May 22 - May 29, 2000
#3
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAY I SUNDAYI
I I I I I I I
Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators
BEFORE 01 1 01 4
.oo. o ol ~ ~1 ~ ol , ~1 -i
~:oo.~ I I I I I I I
~:oo~ I I ! I I I I
,:oo~ i I I I I i i
~:oo~ I I I I I I I
,o,~1 i I Ii I I Iii i
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Warm - Expected 70-85% COMMENTS:
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF May 29, 2000 - June'4, 2000
#4
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY I wEDNEsDAY I THURSDAY I FRIDAY I SATURDAY I SUNDAY I
I I I I I I' l
Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators SkatersSpectators Skaters Spectators SkatersSpectators SkatersSpectators Skaters Spectators
, .,%°o".~ I I I I · I I I
~:oo.~ I I I I I' I I
~:oo~I' I I I I I '1
~:oo~I I I I I I I
,.oo,,~ ~,o~e~ ~ I ~0OI ~ ~1 ~ OI I I I
~:oo~I I I I I I I
~:oo.~ I I I I I I I
· o,~. I DJ ol ~ol ol ~1 ~1 ~l ol o] ol ol ol ol ol
WEATHER CONDITIONS: cOMMENTS:
s:Xops99-2000%skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK ·
SURVEY
WEEK OF June 5, 2000 - June 11, 2000
#5
TIME MONDAY I. TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAY I SUNDAY
I I i I I I I
Skaters Spectators Skaters ~Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators Skaters Spectators
4:00 PM 13
WEATHER CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:
s:~opsgg-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE' PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF June 12, 2000 - June 18, 2000
#6
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAY '1 FRIDAY I SATURDAY I' SUNDAY I
Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectat0rs I Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters SpectatorsI
~%",~ ~ o! ~ ol ~ ol ',I ! ! 'l
~:oo~ !! I~ I ! I I
,..oo,~ ~ ol ~ ~I o oa ~ ~I ~ ol I I
TOTAL 11J ~1 ~1 ~1 ~l ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ol ol ol ol ol
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Hot COMMENTS:
s:~ops99-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE' PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF June 19, 2000 - June 25, 2000
#7
TIME, MONDAY I TUESDAY I 'WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAY! SUNDAY I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Hot COMMENTS:
s N)ps99-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
· sURVEY
WEEK OF June 26, 20°0- July 2, 2000
#8
I I I I I I i
BEFORE NOON 0 01 4 01 6 11 ',7 01 14 11 11 '31 9 '31
~:oo., ~ oI I I I I I I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Hot COMMENTS:
s:~ops99-2000~skateprksu rvey
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF: July 3, 2000 - July 9, 2000
I
~oo~ I
~:oo.~ ~ o!
~:oo.~ I
,:oo.~ I
~:oo.~ I
~:oo.~ I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:
s:~s99-2000~skateprksurvey
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
W~EK OF July 10, 2~- July 16, 2~
# 10
BEFORE NOON 5 II 3 01 9 II 10 II 7 II 7 71 9l , 31
WEATHER CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:
BEACH PARKsuRvEySKATE PARK ~' '*'
WEEK OF: July 24, 2000 - July 30, 2000
#12 ,,
TIME~ MONDAY I' TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAY'I FRIDAY I SATURDAY I SUNDAYI
I I I I I I I
~:oo~ I I I I I I I
~:oo~ I I I I I I 1
,,~:oo~I I I I I I I
~,~:oo~I I I I I I I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:
si~Ops99.2000~skateprksuweY~ · .
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF: J_uuly 31, 2000 -August 6, 2000
#13
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Hot, Hotter COMMENTS:
s:~ops99.21~XAskateprksurvey "
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF: A~ugust 7, 2000 - August 13, 2000
#14
TIME MONDAY"I TUESDAY m WEDNESDAY I THURSDAY""I FRIDAY ! SATURDAYm SUNDAY m
BEFORE m m m m m m --
m m m , m m
. ~ l~m ~'om
m m m m m m m
oN ?m m m
~:oo~m m m m m m m
, m m m m m m
I ~m ,m ~r ~m
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Hot COMMENTS:
s:k0~99-2000~kateprksuwey '
BEACH pARK SKATE PARK
SURVEY
WEEK OF: August 14, 2000 - August 20~ 2000
#15
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAYI SUNDAYI
BEFORE 31 12 5 4 1 71 0
~:oo~I I I I I I I
~oo.~ ~o~I ~ ~I ~o~I ~ ~I ~ ~I ~~I ~ ~oI
~:oo~I I I I I I I
~:oo~I I I I I I I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: HOT COMMENTS:
BEACH PARK SKATE PARK '
SURVEY
WEEK OF: August 21, 2000 - August 27, 2000
#16
TIME MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAYI THURSDAYI FRIDAY I SATURDAYI SUNDAYI
Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I,,Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters Spectators I Skaters SpectatorsI
"' ' I i i i
NOON 12 3 5 I 6 1 3'0 5 12 4 5 2 2
~:oo~ ! I I I I ! l
~:oo~,~ I I I I I I '1
~:oo~ I I I I I I I
,:oo~ ~ ,I ~ ,I ~,I ~ ~I~ ~I~ ~l I
~:oo~ I I II I I I
~:oo~ I I I I I I I
· o,~, ~1 ~I ~ol ~I ~ol ~I ~1 ~ol ~1 ~I ~1 ~I ~1 ,I
WEATHER CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:
s:~ps99-2000~skateprksurvey
~ City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
? WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
REQ/JOB: WF0018440 / 001 PROJECT: DATE PRINTED: 9~08~00
REQUEST DATE: 4/26/00
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 10:02:06
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: ~'1'~1~'1': ~26~
LOCATION ID: ZIP CODE: COMPLETION: 8/30/0
GEN. LOC: FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR:
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER DEMOND ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
· -USER ID: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: SKATEBOARD PARK USAGE
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO RECREATION AND PARKS***
DEMOND REQUESTS THAT·A SURVEY BE DONE ON THE USAGE
OF THE SKATEBOARD PARK NOW ANDAFTER SCHOOL IS OUT
FOR THE SUMMER. REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Job Order Description: SKATEBOARD PARK USAGE
Category: RECREATION & PARKS
Task: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: ·RECREATION & PARKS
INSTRUCTIONS
5-2-uU., .... A survey form was_ prepared to, document
u.s~age o.~ Be.ach, Par.k. Skate Par~k. A~_e.a emp,lgy.ees
Will. ~enu~er lnzo.rmaulon, eve.r, yGay~ ~ ?ac.a wll~. De..
com~p~£e9 every uwo weeks, we w~g De~n cog-ecu~n9
in=ormauion t~e first week of May anG shall con-
tinue through_ the mo,nth of June...,..pa,h
5-~2,4-00.:...Th.e, tracKi.ng on u.s,age na_s begun anG
wig.l c.oncinue,~n,rough nne m_onnn of uune 2000. Th,e
stanisnics wig- De reported .a.t,,the,end of Ju_ne.pan
6-13-99 .... Survey ongoing, wig± a~vise results
' when totals are computed, and the end-of June .......
ah
~-29-00 ..... Re_q~. est received for survey to con-
tin~ue t.hroug,h ~he summer months .... will. update as
i~=orma=ion .Decome.s avai.lab,le...~.~pa.h
7/.18/.00 - Dana conninue ~o De collected. JHG
7/.27/.00 - DATA CONTINUE TO BE COLLECTED. JHG
8/29/00 - Date collection is complete, report is
b~gi co_mpiled. JHG
9_/.8/O.0. Repor,t o_f ska.tepark_ usage submitted to.
tiny ~anager Dy uirecnor of Recreation and ParKs.
JHG
~TART DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /
BAKERSFIELD
FIRE' DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U. M SEP
Date: September 13, 2000 CITY MANAGER'S O?F~C2
To: Alan Tandy, City Manager
From: Ron FraZe
Subject: Council Referral WF0018594
Refinery Fire
Referral from August 30, 2000, Council Meeting
Councilmember Couch's request
Councilmember Couch received a letter from Mr. Don Dean' regarding a refinery flame on the
evening of August 23, 2000.
The flare at Equilon Refinery, which was reported to burn with a large and smokey flame for'-'
approximately 30 minute on the evening of August 23 could only happen due to some upset in the
equipment or operations at the refinery. The smokey flame indicates they were not getting -
complete combustion.' This could be due to aromatics in the slxeam or a high percentage of heavy-.
. . .... end product. .
Environmental Services Director Ralph Huey was able to get an explanation from Ken C0mey of
Equilon who stated that on that evening he believed the refinery had a problem with one of their
compressors and at the same time their boiler was down which would not give them any steam for
the flare.
Although there is no way of Verifying this at this time, elimination of the steam'injection into the
flare gases would make the heavy-end product bum smokey. At the same time, a compressor
upset could cause a much higher volume of product to be exhausted through the flare. With a
higher volume, it is very likely that more of the volume would be heavy-end products that had
been vaporized instead of gasses.
Ralph Huey has talked with Mr. Dean and gave him a very condensed version of this report and
will follow up with the air district to see if they have any record of the incident or are interested in
pursuing this further. The Equilon Refinery is in the County.
RF/kec'
· p:~mcmos~Fraze~Equilon Refinery referral