Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/31/01 / BAKERSFIELD CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM August31,2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Tandy, City Manager ~'7-(~, FROM: Alan SUBJECT: General Information 1. We have good news regarding our funding allocation from the 2000 Parks Bond Act! You may recall that Bakersfield, along with five other California cities, missed out on some per capita funding from one component of the bond act, the Roberti- Z'Berg Harris (RZH) Program. We were left out, due to a language problem in the legislation. (Cities under a population of 200,000 and over 300,000 received funding, but the six cities in between got nothing.) We received notification this week that an adjustment has been made, and we will receive $402,865. That is in addition to the $614,260 block grant already allocated from the RZH Program and our per capita distribution of $1,357,000 from the bond act. 2. Recreation and Parks reports that this year's Rockin' by the River concert series was very successful. Overall, staff estimates that total attendance for the three events was up 4,000 over last year. Thanks, also, to Water Resources for arranging the water in the river - a popular and important part of the events. The kick-off for the River Front jazz concert series is next Thursday, September 6th at Yokuts Park. The first show will feature local musicians, the Kris Tiner Trio, and will begin at 7:00 p.m. 3. It's good to have another opportunity to bring attention to the excellent work done by our employees. I received two letters of appreciation this week; one from Moorefield Construction to recognize Development Services staff for their assistance on the Northwest Promenade project; another from the Allen Group for "Team Bakersfield's" efforts towards the University Square building downtown. Our thanks and congratulations to each of them for a job well done. 4. A status report from Recreation and Parks on the various median projects is enclosed. 5. Development Services' latest activity report is attached for your information. 6. Public Works has provided the enclosed LEA Activity Report for the second quarter of 2001. Honorable Mayor and City Council August 31,2001 Page 2 7. Responses to Council requests are enclosed, as follows: Councilmember Benham · Contact of Downtown School principal and actions to modify parking restrictions and time limits at the school site. Councilmember Couch · Citizen request regarding clean up of the area at Calloway and Hageman; · Comparison of Bakersfield to other California cities' architectural standards; · Follow-up regarding traffic concerns in the area of Liberty High School; Councilmember Maggard · Report on statement regarding allegations of an incident in a Police Department holding cell; Councilmember Salvaggio · Citizen concern regarding rodent problem on Clark Avenue; · Status report on feasibility of stop light at Pacheco and Akers Road; · Action taken regarding dangling wire on Fairview Road; · Report on possibility of removal or relocation of the recycling drop-off facility at Valley Plaza; · Report on the impact of Tract 5001, Phases 3 and 4 may have on sewer access for Tract 6044; · Time schedule for the Truxtun Plaza traffic signal project. AT:rs cc: Department Heads Pam McCarthy, City Clerk Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst AUG. 24,2001 9'42AM 310 390 1500 #2 N0,4240 P. 1 OOREFIBLD ONSTRUCTION, INC. ~ ~ ..... ~ .....'~, ,'.... ' 341 $ S, SEPULVEDA BLVD., SUITE 550 i' ~ ........... LOS ANGELES, C.A 90034 .: .o..4o0 'EL. ~A- UC NO, ' F~','''' ',.~ 7.:: ~' '' ': " ~uly 25, 2001 ~ .: ~ (661) 325-0266 Mr, De~is Fidl~ CITY OF B~RSFI~LD 1715 Chester Av~uc ~ersficld, CA 93301 NO~T~E8T PROM~N~E BA~RS~IELD~ CALI~O~IA Dear Mr. Fidler, TMs lc~cr is sent m m~e you aw~e of Moore~eld Cons~ct~on, Inc,'s appreciation of yo~ entire s~ffthat has been involved wi~ ~e above-referenced project. The success offs pro~ect is greatly con~buted to ~e coop~ation ~d a~ention offered by all involved. ~d Mushy - for expediting ~c pl~ check process, allowing us to obtain ~e pe~t ~d begin cons~ction. T~a Lopez, How~ 8ti~ ~d Beverly Bro~ for all of help ~d assist~ce ~t ~ey continue ~ offer. · Russ Combs ~d E~c Poorc for ~c assist~cc ~at ~ey lend wi~ engineering issues ~d i~ediate revisions. Chiles Lovcll for his coop~ation ~d ~ders~ding to provided t~ou~out ~e day ~d dealing wi~ each super~t~d~nt individu~ly to maintain co~unica~on ~d lessen confision, Wi~out ~s assls~ce. ~is project would be ex~emely di~cult ~d potontially bound schedule. Moom~eld Cons~ction, Inc. will delive~ ~ ~e developer ~d ~e Ci~ of a~crsfield a ~p q~ity center ~d wi~ ~e ongoing support of ~e staff members mentioned abov~ deliver ~ cen~r on schedule. Th~k you again for yo~ assis~ce and best wishes on yo~ continuing gm,h. Sincerely, MOO~FI~LD CONSTRUCTION, ~C. Don H~ Project D~ gnclos~e CC: Mike Moore~eld - Moore~eld Cons~ctlon, Inc, August 22, 2001 Mr. David Lyman Principal Planner City of Bakersfield 515 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Team Bakersfield - University Square Dear David: Just a quick note to thank you for your assistance and guidance through the development process for our University Square building in downtown Bakersfield. The vagaries of infill development can be, at best, a challenge.., and, at worst, a nightmare. With your team's highly capable and forthright leadership, we managed to create a project of which we can all be proud. Your ability to fairly and expeditiously resolve "issues" was manifest numerous times along the way. Again, thanks to you and Team Bakersfield for their help. Looking forward to working with you again. Sincerely, THE ALLEN GROUP Cen~g~Division HM/jc cc: Alan Tandy ) THE ALLEN GROUP 111 South Johnson " Visalia, California 93291-6115 * Telephone S59 732 1000 - Facsimile 559 732 7160 - allengtoup.com From: Greg Cronk To: Alan Tandy Date: 8/28/01 10:02AM Subject: Median Update South "H" Street median project of Wilson to Ming irrigation system and trees are installed. Will add shrubbery ( not on original alans) at each tree well within next two weeks via annual Irrigation and Landscape contract. Advised by Public Works this project will grow in length by 2 blocks to the south. This will require additional time to install water service and meter ( 4-6 weeks depending on service size) by Cai Water. Expect plans for Union Avenue today from Public Works. Requires separate bid since project is CDBG funded and has minimum 21 day bid cycle. White Lane demo and new curbing is complete. Hardscape install has started. Irrigation system start 1-2 weeks +/- away. The above is slightly behind estimated project schedule. White Lane project delayed due to buried road and base material. Union Avenue was found to contain old road bed as well under asphalt cap. This causes additional demo time as removal is very laborious. CC: Allen Abe; Jack LaRochelle; Stan Ford; Ted Wright Development Services Report August 30, 2001 Building Inspection The following are some higher valued projects currently in plan review. 1731 Chester Avenue -"Crocker Bank" remodel to a Goodwill store valued at $850,000 601 24th Street - Kern County Housing Authority Central Office valued at $2.4 million 3800 Rosedale Hwy. - New Costco store valued at $7.2 million !. 601 Rosedale Hwy. - New Home Depot store valued at $6 million 3701 N. Sillect Ave. - New Time-Wamer Cable office building valued at $3.3 million ' 6801 White Ln. - Boulder Creek Business Park Development valued at $2.4 million In addition, housing construction continues to boom at rates higher than our historic average for the second Year in a row. As a result, we have had to reassign code enforcement officers, permit technicians and plan checkers to inspection to keep up. Code Enforcement The damaged portion of the El Rancho Inn should be demolished in the next couple of weeks. We were cOntacted by GBLA about complaints that people were being evicted from the Chapparal. They had the impression we had posted the building and caused the evictions. We explained we had not posted it and evictions were between the landlord and tenants. You may receive comments about some drop off in activity. Of the nine field officers, two have been out on extended medical leave and one is being utilized in building inspection. We have been unsuccessful in our search for temporary help. The code enforcement officer doing building inspection is transferring back to building inspector. We should be able to fill his position from an active list of code enforcement applicants. Planning We have called for bids for housing element update. There should be a consultant contract to Council by late September, 2001. State law requires this to be done by 2002. Draft policy document and DEIR for 2010 update should be done in November, 2001. The Planning Commission will hear it first, then the Board of Supervisors, and Council should review General Plan Update in May-July The Northeast Open Space Plan policies and focus map will go to Planning Commission September 20th GPA cycle. To City Council November 14th. Several meetings with interested parties have been conducted. Council Urban Development Committee is schedule to meet with Planning Commission on October 1,2001. Initial topics proposed for discussion include planning for northeast, Vision 2020, minority reports. Parks element amendment for expanding Central Park will go to Planning Commission September 20th GPA cycle and to City Council November 14th. Planning Commission committee is reviewing the City's petroleum extraction ordinances as they relate to urban/oil extraction interface. The environmental reviews associated with segments of alternative 15 transportation system will begin in early 2001. Costco and Home Depot recently submitted for building permits (both going through 2nd site review). The Home Depot is the one in phase 1 of the NW Promenade. The Home Depot next to East Hills mall will resolve its final issues with us and a building permit is anticipated to be issued next week. A new AIbertsons anchored shopping center at the NW corner of Olive Drive and Coffee Road was recently approved. Building permits being reviewed for a new Walgreens at Ming and Stine in the Food-4-Less Center (replaces existing pet store building). We are coordinating the environmental documentation for: a) The State Highway 99 and White Lane interchange expansion. b) State Highway 178 and Fairfax Road interchange project which includes a separation of grade for Fairfax Road. c) Environmental review for the consolidation of the canals and the Olive Drive bridge at Calloway Drive. d) Widening of Rosedale Highway just west of State Route 99 to Gibson Street, widening from 4 lanes to 6 with several left hand turn lanes and deceleration lanes and the access points necessary for the new Costco. We are preparing the CEQA and NEPA documents for the seismic safety retrofit projects at Manor Street and Beale Street Bridges. We are actively processing 12 annexations, two of which are inhabited. 2 Our new better than ever ward reapportionment program is ready for the City Council's use. The Borba Dairy Supplemental EIR is under review. General We are in the training phase of moving from Sierra to the HTE computer programs for the department. We should be operational in HTE in late January or February. This will allow internet transactions and complete integration with the rest of the city's computer service. Our annual fee for service study should begin next week. BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M /3-,I I~ 2 9 2001 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: AUGUST 29, 2001 SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION Attached is a copy of the 2001 second quarter Activity Report describing the status of the Local Enforcement Agency's (LEA) regulated projects within the City of Bakersfield from April 1, 2001 - June 30, 2001. Attachment PROGRESS OF PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF BAKEF[SFIELD Activity For April1, 2001 - June 30, 2001 Bakersfield Sanitary ,,,,,,,o,~,o,~'--A-':-'~ ,..,,,~,,.'"^-" Gas levels were reported to be in The City of Bakersfield and the Landfill/Burn Dump Re,,,~,,,o,,,.,,, ,.,,,,,~,,, ,, ,c~,o, ,~,, ,,, compliance at all perimeter,I Kern County Waste Management Closure. ,=,.,,,,.=,=,,,,,,,,o,= ,,,= ,,=o,,,, ,,o,,o monitoring probes during , Department will coordinate ..... :~'^-~ '-':'~' '- ...... " second quarter of 2001 I development and submittal of SWIS #: 15-AA-0044 Completed 5/1/1998 ~ closure/postclosure maintenance LEA WO #: 102 and 319 The Regional Water Quality ! plans for the landfill as per the ,,~,,,~,.,,,-,,, ,,,,~ ,o,,,~,,,,,,,,~,,,~,,,~ Control Board (RWQCB) adopted agreement entered into on May 22, Sections 10, 11, 14, and ~,-o ~,, ,, ,~ ,~,~,,,,y ~,,,,,,,,~o, y ,,., Waste Discharge Requirem nts 1996. 15, T29S, R28E ,~oo ,, ,,,,, .., ,,, ,.,, ,, ,~ -,~v,~, which stipulate that a final cover I'--..~IAA;,.~ I ;~;/" /I I'--I \ 4200 Panorama Drive ~,,~,,,.,o,~ ,_,,,,,, ~,_-/. system is to be constructed ~IY The LEA has requested Completed 8/29/97 December 31,2003. The '! abandonment of damaged, Property Owner: RWQCB has agreed that the! City substandard and/or out-of service City of Bakersfield Long Term Goal: may use the results from the gas probes located within the Closure of the sanitary landfill China Grade test pad to design facility. and burn dump in compliance the monolithic cover for this ;ite. with Title 27, California Code of Regulations (CCR). China Grade Burn ,,'---^'~:A'-, ,,, ,~,~,=,~ ,.,,.,o,.'-'A-" The Waste Management The Local Enforcement Agency Dump/Landfill Closure ~'----':-':-- -' ~' ...... 'A-:-' Department has constructed ~the will continue to inspect the facility · ":'":-vv,,,,,,, ,~,,,,.,,,,,'-~-'~"' ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,~o,"' .... -'~-:-- '-,,., test pad. The test pad will be every month to determine SWIS #: 15-AA-0048 ,'^"~,., ~,,.~, ~,,,'^':-:--'-, ,,, ,~,,~ '~'-,, ,~ ," ^-"~',~o,,,, ,-:-"-,o,,o monitored for 24 to 30 months, compliance with State Minimum LEA WO #: 108 ooo,.,,~,~.~,.,:-'^'" '":'~'w,,,, ~',.,,,, ......,, ~,o,~',. . Standards, Title 27, CCR. Completed June 4, 1997. Location: Sections 1 & 12, T29S, Long Term Goal: R29E Closure of the sanitary landfill and burn dump in compliance Property Owner: with Title 27, CCR. Kern County Page 1 Soilrem Corporation ,,'--^":-'^,,, ,,~,,,,~,~ ,.,,.,o,.'"-~'- The owner has retained Vertlex The Local Enforcement Agency ;' z l Facility Compliance Plan o~_., ...... :,, .... ,A,^ _ ~A:,-.,.. t~o will continue to inspect the facility ,.,,.,,,,~,,, v,,,, ,.,,.,,,,~,,~,~ ,=, ,~,..,,,,y Engineering Services, Inc., I ----~I;~AA nl~-- ;-- I;~,, AS , ,o,, ,,, ,,~,~ evaluate the site and develop a every quarter to determine SWIS #: 15-AA-0356 ....F,~,,,,,,o ,,,,,,, ,, ,,,,v,,-,'o, ,~' "-'~o, protocol for restoration of th compliance with State Minimum LEA WO#: 450 '-~" "~:-- *"~ ' ~' ~,,,.,,,,,,,~ ,,,~ ,_,,~,,, Enforcement site. Vertex has sampled the Standards, Title 14, CCR. ~ Completed April 28, 1999 soils left on site and has 408 E. Pacheco Rd submitted a final investigatio Bakersfield, CA 93307 Long Term Goal: report, dated July 20, 2001. Compliance with State Minimum Several procedures for site Property Owner: Standards, Title 14, California restoration were provided in ~e Glenn MacQueen Code of Regulations (CCR), report. Section 18224. K and D Salvage Landfill Immediate Goal: Drainage from gutters Iocate~ on The LEA will continue to conduct Fence the facility to prevent Daniels Lane to the landfill ~ quarterly inspections. SWIS # 15-AA-0103 public access, property continues to occur. ~ LEA WO#: 267 Most of the drainage originates Long Term Goal: from a nut packing company 600 South Union Ave. Closure of the burn dump in located on Daniels Lane. W~eed Bakersfield, CA 93307 compliance with Title 27, CCR. growth is evident in drainage at Daniels Lane and on landfill Property Owner: property. Nathan & Roberta Daniels City of Bakersfield Immediate Goal: The greenwaste facility and The Local Enforcement Agency Greenwaste Concurrence and issuance of a expansion area have been will provide the approved Final Facility/Expansion area Full Solid Waste Facility Permit operated substantially in Negative Declaration to the to include expansion of the compliance with State Minim~Jm California Integrated Waste SWIS #: 15-AA-0311 composting processing area. Standards Management Board. The permit 15-AA-0365 process will resume, and the 15-AA-0366 Future Goal: revised Solid Waste Facility Permit Location: Compliance with State Minimum should be issued within 70 days. Section 9, T30S, R28E Standards, Title 14, CCR. 2601 S. Mt. Vernon Ave. August 24, 2001 Page 2 BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3 0 200 MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: August 28, 2001 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN SCHOOL PARKING Council Referral # WF0018993 / 001 (Ward 2) ouncilmember Benham requested that Public Works Staff contact Angie acquett, Principal of the Downtown School, regarding restricted parking at the chool site. The Public Works Traffic Engineer contacted Principal Pacquett regarding parking at Downtown Elementary School. Traffic Staff will be working with her to modify parking restrictions and time limits on the streets around the school. G:\GROUPDAT~Refenals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0018993 -Traffic.wpd ? AUG 3 I 2001 ' B A KE R S F I E L D ; TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jack Hardisty, Development Services Dire or ~¢~~. DATE: August 30, 2001 SUBJECT: Council Referral No. WF0019005 / 001 ICouncilmember Couch referred a request from Dave Pickens regarding clean-up of the area around 7-11 at Calloway & Hageman. On August 29, 2001, a notice of violation for weeds and junk was mailed to the property owner of the vacant lot at 9815 Hageman Road. A reinspection of the property will be conducted on September 4, 2001. The Fruitvale Community Church was mailed a notice of violation for weeds at the corner of Hageman and Calloway. A reinspection of the property will be conducted on September 4, 2001. The 7-11 store at 4104 Calloway Road was mailed a notice of violation and information about the City's graffiti removal program for graffiti on their retaining wall. A reinspection of the property will be conducted on September 4, 2001. B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIREC'I' ~'L~'~ .. DATE: AUGUST 31, 2001 SUBJECT: C-2 ZONING COMPARISON Council Referral No. WF 0018840 (Ward 4) Councilmember Couch requested staff compare Bakersfield with other cities' architectural standards. I The cities requested for this comparison were asked to be those where it appears new commercial development is subject to specific architectural or design requirements. Staff surveyed the cities Laguna Nigel (requested by a constituent), Mission Viejo, Santa Barbara and Monterey since these cities have or appear to have established architectural standards that are consistently applied to developments. In general, none of the cities surveyed have actual ordinances that require a specific architectural design or style. Instead, they have developed general guidelines which address basic design issues to help the decision-making bodies review a proposal. Although flexibility has been built into many of these communities' design guidelines, their staffs noted that the process is very subjective and inconsistent. Santa Barbara and Monterey have the most strict review which mainly focuses on the preservation of their historical districts. Bakersfield: (population 254,400) New commercial development is subject to the city's site plan review process which assures that minimum ordinance standards are satisfied. Small in-fill projects (usually 5 acres or less) go through an administrative review by staff. Larger projects are reviewed at a public hearing by the Development Services Director. Developers have flexibility in the overall architectural design. However, project design is affected by city ordinance requirements such as landscaping, street frontage improvements, parking, equipment screening and building setbacks. Projects within a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone may have conditioned specific architectural requirements at the discretion of the Commission or Council though this has usually not been a significant component of existing PCD developments. The Riverlakes Specific Plan area is the only part of the city that has specific architectural elements that apply to projects within its boundary, though these are mostly administered through a private architectural review committee. Laguna Niguel: (population 63,200) Commercial development is subject to a site development permit through staff. Larger projects are reviewed by the Planning Commission where some other discretionary permit is required. The city has developed an informal set of general architectural guidelines (not ordinance) which allows a developer flexibility in developing a project's overall design. Design issues are very subjective and ALAN TANDY, CItY MANAGER August 31, 2001 Page 2 the city usually attempts to assure that the project is basically compatible with the surrounding development. City staff commented that since many of the projects are relatively new, developers have not deviated significantly from the Mediterranean/Spanish/Mission styles that dominate the southern California area so it appears that the city has adopted this architectural standard when in fact, nothing exists in the code to require it. Mission Viejo: (population 96,600) The city requires design review through a public hearing process with a Design Review Committee. Staff conducts a preliminary review to head off any major problems. General guidelines exist similarly to Laguna Niguel which allows quite a range of architectural diversity and lets the developer take the lead in the initial project design. The trend has been to follow the Mediterranean/Mission type of architecture but there is no ordinance that limits design to this style. It's just what is currently popular in the area. Santa Barbara: (population 94,200) The major emphasis of the city's architectural review is historic preservation which began in 1922. The city requires a formal review of all architectural elements through either an Architectural Review Board or their Historical Landmark Committee. The process examines how new projects or changes are compatible with the existing historical elements in the neighborhood. Architectural standards will differ throughout the city and these areas each have their own specific guidelines since what occurs along State Street (downtown) has different issues than development along the ocean front. The review process is time consuming as a building permit is only granted after a series of up to four different levels of review. These review levels consider nearly every exterior feature including lights, doors and windows (including hardware), paving, color, landscaping, sign, etc. As with the other cities surveyed, the process is very subjective since the city recognizes many different architectural styles as appropriate for an area. Again, the standards are only guidelines, not ordinance so compatibility with the neighborhood will drive the approval process. Monterey: (population 297'00) Similar to Santa Barbara, the main emphasis is toward a historical perspective and a similar process exists though it's not as extensive. Design guidelines have been developed but still permits much latitude for a developer. Since Monterey does not experience significant new growth (like Santa Barbara), most of their issues are how the new project fits into the existing neighborhood character. P:\Corres\cornparison.ref.wpd TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: ERIC W. MATLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICEUct~/' DATE: August 31,2001 SUBJECT: Iron Creek Way Issues Council Referral No. WF 18982/02 (Ward 4) Council Member Couch requested that staff follow-up with Karen Christiansen, Principal of Liberty High School regarding Iron Creek Way... I Operations staff contacted Karen Christiansen regarding traffic problems in the residential area east of Liberty High School and in the general area surrounding the school. Traffic Sergeant Gary Moore, and Traffic Officer Blaine Smith responded to Liberty High School on separate occasions prior to August 27, and spoke with Mrs. Christiansen about perceived problems with students driving in the area. Mrs. Christiansen advised them she has prepared handout materials for students instructing them to follow all traffic laws while driving to and from school. Officers were assigned to monitor traffic in the neighborhood during the first three days of school and citations were issued to four drivers for seat belt violations, however no speeding vehicles were observed. During the morning hours before school is in session, there is a considerable back up of vehicles westbound on Brimhall Road waiting to turn south on Jewetta. Many westbound drivers are turning into the neighborhood east of the school and winding. through the area eventually reaching the school. It appears there will continue to bea high volume of traffic through the neighborhood during the academic year because them are only two routes to reach the school. Staff will utilize the SMART trailer in the area, and traffic officers will continue to monitor the neighborhood as time permits. In addition, Ryan Starbuck of Traffic Engineering advised he would have the left turn light signal time lengthened to help decrease traffic congestion. TO: ALAN TANDY, OITY MANAGER FROM: ERIC W. MATLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE DATE: August 31,2001 SUBJECT: Terry Swisher Complaint Council Referral No. WF19003/001 (Ward 3) Council Member Maggard requested Police Chief Matlock respond to accusations against the Police Department regarding abuse in a holding cell that were mentioned by Terry Mack Swisher in his public statement. Maggard is requesting a written report from Chief Matlock regarding these issues. On August 23, 2001, staff was assigned to investigate the allegations of Mr. Terry Swisher. Please refer to the attached memorandum by Lt. J. Molinar for details of our investigation. BAKERSFIELD POLICE MEMORANDUM August 31,2001 To: Eric W. Matlock, Chief of Police ^ A From: Lieutenant J. Mol/nar, #459, Internal Affairs .~' / Subject: Response to Council Referral/Terry Swisher Allegation On Wednesday, August 22, 2001, a regularly scheduled Bakersfield City Council meeting was convened at City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue. During the "public statements" portion of the meeting, Terry Mack Swisher was called to address the Council, after he had apparently requested an opportunity to speak about a police matter. Mr. Swisher walked to the podium and gave the following brief, uninterrupted statement. "I'm Terry Swisher. And I recently witnessed the most atrocious police brutality I ever witnessed in my life. I've been beat up by the cops many times. That's nothing compared to what I witnessed at the holding tank, downtown here. Peace Officers were sodom/zing a young lady w/th a police baton. I know the talk on the street is there is going to be a lot of blood shed, man. Sure, I don't want no violence. I hate violence. But what I saw there broke my heart. It could have been my own daughter, man. They beat me up too. ~1 was hand cuffed me and beat me up. ~ I don't care about that, that much. I¥,e been beat up before. But to have some young lady being sodom/zed with a police baton, and begging for mercy and not getting any, is beyond my control I cannot take that. And further, this town better wake-up because it is happening every day. Thank you." On Thursday, August 23, 2001, I went to the Bakersfield City Clerk's office and obtained a tape-recorded copy of Mr. Swisher's statement before the Council. I called Mr. Swisher to further discuss the matter and he told me he did not want to talk about his complaint. However, he did give me some information about his allegation. He said he was in a holding cell and he could hear a woman screaming. He asked another guy in the same cell what he thought was happening, and this other person told him what the police were supposedly doing to the woman. Swisher told me he did not personally see anything. Swisher, Terry Council Referral Response August 31,2001 A check of local records revealed that as of August 24, 2001, Swisher had last been arrested by our department on June 14, 2001. The arrest was for public intOxication and it occurred at the Restoration Village, 1700 Golden State Highway. On Monday, August 27, 2001, Detective M. Hutton went to the downtown jail facility to view the inmate reception area and the holding cells. This facility is located at 1415 Truxtun Avenue and it is where prisoners are received for booking. Detective Hutton spoke to on duty jail personnel who explained several inmate reception procedures. When arresting officers arrive at the jail with a prisoner, they first must enter the booking area. The booking process is completed with the assistance of jail personnel. After the booking process is completed, jail personnel escort the prisoner out of the booking area and down a hallway to a holding cell. The booking area and the holding cells are both within what is known as the Inmate Reception Center(IRC). These two areas are separated by iron bars with a sliding door. Detective Hutton was told it would be very unusual for an arresting officer to leave the booking area. Typically, only jail personnel are permitted in the area where the holding cells are located. Moreover, arresting officers are never allowed to bring weapons of any type into the jail. This, of course, would include police batons. This is a long standing and strictly adhered to policy for jail facilities everywhere. So it is unlikely that Mr. Swisher, or any other prisoner, would have seen an officer holding a baton while in a holding cell. There are four holding cells in the reception area. One cell is for female prisoners only. Another cell is used to isolate a prisoner when it is necessary to do so, and the two remaining cells are used for male prisoners. The holding cells are made of solid walls and solid doors. Each door has an approximate 4" by 6" window made of thick glass, located about five feet from the bottom. These windows allow for viewing of the prisoners by jail personnel. Although it might be possible for a prisoner in one cell to hear a prisoner in another cell screaming, it is impossible for prisoners to see into another cell from their own cell. Once prisoners leave the initial booking area, male and female prisoners are always kept separated from each other. On Monday, August 27, 2001, at about 1630 hours, Sergeant Maxwell called the Kern County Sheriff's Department Internal Affairs Division to inquire as to whether they had received a complaint regarding the same allegations made by Swisher. They informed him they had not received any complaints from Swisher, or any complaints with allegations of a similar nature. Terry Swisher's allegations appear to be unfounded. EWM/JM/bab/vrf B A K E R S F I E L D !I AU{;312001 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jack Hardisty, Development Services Dire or~~, DATE: August 30, 2001 SUBJECT: Council Referral No. WF0019001 Councilmember Salvaggio referred correspondence received from Cherrilyn Miller regarding a severe rat problem. I On July 5, 2001, Code Enforcement Officer DeMarco responded to a complaint regarding rodent infestation and overgrown vegetation located at 1700 Clark Avenue. Upon arrival, he contacted the reporting party, Cherrilyn Miller and she stated her concerns. Officer DeMarco observed a pile of tree clippings adjacent to the rear fence line, fruit trees and a large tree encroaching overhead electrical wires. During his investigation, he was advised that Ms. Miller had been in contact with Kern County Health Department and Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District. Ms. Miller presented a copy of Vector Control's investigation. The investigation recommended clearance of vegetation from fence line. Officer DeMarco asked Ms. Miller who the property owner was at which time she informed him the property owner was Eleanor and John Patterson. Officer DeMarco informed Ms. Miller that he would contact the property owner. On July 5, 2001, a 7-day violation notice was mailed to Patterson Trust requiring the following corrective action: remove accumulation of vegetation; remove tree clippings and brush accumulation at backyard fence. Officer DeMarco was contacted by John Patterson. He requested an extension of time to cut back three trees and remove a small pile of tree clippings adjacent to the backyard. Mr. Patterson was given 30 days to complete the scope of the work. Officer DeMarco conducted a follow up inspection of the property and determined that the corrective action taken by Mr. Patterson exceeds Bakersfield Municipal Code requirements. After the e-mail to the City Clerk's Office, the Chief Code Enforcement Officer investigated the allegations and talked to both parties and found no violations per the Bakersfield Municipal Code. B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM , AU$ 3 0 2001 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: August 28, 2001 SUBJECT: STOP LIGHT (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) AT PACHECOIAKERS Council Referral # WF0018998 / 001 (Ward 7) ICouncilmember Salvaggio referred to staff the feasibility of a stop light at the intersection of Pacheco Road and Akers Road and requested a status report back. The intersection of Pacheco Road and Akers Road was evaluated for a Traffic Signal a few years ago. It is a warranted future signal location and is currently ranked in the top third of thirty-three intersections. At this time, the future signal is unfunded. It will be considered in the upcoming budget process for funding in the next budget. A re- evaluation of ranking will be done in advance of the budget process. G:\GROUPDA'I-~Referrals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0018998 - Tmffic.wpd BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 3 0 2001 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER -- - FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ~ DATE: August 27, 2001 SUBJECT: 1713 FAIRVIEW ROAD Council Referral # WF0018997 / 001 (Ward 7) t ouncilmember Salvaggio referred to staff the is;u~ of a dangling electrical wire 1713 Fairview Road and requested staff contact PG&E. During a field investigation at 1713 Fairview Road, it was determined the dangling wire was a Pacific Bell Phone cable that is routed along Fairview from pole to pole. The lashing that attaches the cable to the messenger had broken allowing the cable to sag in front of this residence. A Pacific Bell construction supervisor was notified via phone message. G:\GROUPDAT~Referrals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0018997 - Brad.wpd BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER - FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ~ DATE: August 30, 2001 SUBJECT: RECYCLING DROP-OFF Council Referral # WF0018996 / 001 OVard 7) tCouncilmember Salvaggio referred to Public Works the issue of the possible emoval of the recycling drop-off facility at Valley Plaza and requested staff ollow-up with Alan Clark, General Manager, regarding options. Staff discussed with Alan Clark, General Manager, Valley Plaza regarding options. Based on those discussions, Valley Plaza~ has agreed to keep drop off recycling at its current location. The exact location is adjacent to an empty building (the old Payless) on the northwest side of the mall parking lot. Should that location be leased, Mr. Clark indicated it may be necessary to move the recycling bins to other locations on the mall property. Mr. Clark indicated his concern regarding litter and garbage near the locations had been addressed satisfactorily for the time being. Operation Clean Sweep personnel have been reminded of the need to be vigilant 7 days a week to keep those areas clean. City staff will also survey and notify appropriate personnel in the event litter issues present themselves. Possible other locations were discussed on mall property, and a site survey and discussion with Traffic Engineering took place to determine ways to alleviate traffic concerns and parking concerns. Future discussions are to be held in the event the recycling drop off location does need to be moved at a later date if the old Payless building gets leased. It is expected that in the event this is necessary, that location will nevertheless be at Valley Plaza. G:\GROUPDAT~Referrals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0018996 - Solid Waste.wpd BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ~ DATE: August 29, 2001 SUBJECT: TRACT 5001 Council Referral # WF0018999 / OOl (Ward 7) te COUncilmember Salvaggio referred to staff the issue of Tract 5001, Phases 3 & 4, I garding the impact it would have on the other tract regarding sewer access, tc., and requested a report back before the next Council Meeting. Tract 5001, Phases 3 and 4, recorded on September 18, 2000. However, construction of the improvements has not yet commenced. Public Works staff has been informed that the tract has changed ownerehip and that the new owner was unaware of the time constraints. In a letter to the engineer for the tract, Moreland Consulting, the City has sent a Novation agreement to change the ownership of the tract as well as informing the engineer of the specific steps that must be taken to relieve the original owner of his obligations under the improvement agreement. As the new owner has planned to move forward with the tract imprevements, there should be no impact on Tract 6044. G:\GROUPDAT~Referrals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0018999 - Madan.wpd BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ,, 0 2.00I 1 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER -. FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR~_~ ~ DATE: August 30, 2001 SUBJECT: TRUXTUN PLAZA SIGNAL Council Referral # WF0019002 / 001 (Ward 7) :ouncilmember Salvaggio requested Public Works staff try and meet the time chedule for the Truxtun Plaza traffic signal project. I The project is currently advertising and bids open on September 5, 2001. Award is anticipated for the City Council meeting of September 19, 2001. The anticipated schedule is as follows: · Wednesday August 22, 2001 - Advertise for Bids. · Wednesday September 5, 2001 - Bid opening. · Wednesday September 19, 2001 - City Council to award project. Following award, Contractor is allowed ten (10) days to deliver contract, bonds and Insurance to CITY. · Tuesday October 2, 2001 - Contractor given notice to proceed. Following notice to proceed, Contractor is allowed up to 15 days to mobilize. · Wednesday October 17, 2001 - Contractor mobilizes. Contractor has 30 working days to complete the work. · Wednesday November 28, 2001 - Signal and median work is complete. cc: Jacques R. LaRochelle, Assistant Public Works Director Ted Wright, Civil Engineer IV Derrill Whitten, Civil Engineer III Stuart Patteson, Construction Superintendent G:\GROUPDA~Referrals\CC Mtg 8-22-01\WF0019002 - Ted.wpd