HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/22/02 BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
February 22, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager /~7-'~/,
SUBJECT: General Information
1. There is a significant memo enclosed from Public Works detailing a two phase plan
to enhance our internal street repair plan. We will do a report on this at the next
Council meeting.
2. Councilmember Benham and staff had a positive meeting with the group of Veterans
who are looking at a Veterans' memorial for Central Park or to have Central Park
expanded for that, per the charrette concept.
3. Work is continuing on the future 40-acre park site, located immediately north of the
Kern River and Stockdale Highway bridge. The excavation of the 10-acre recharge
lake is approximately 90% complete and earthwork will begin next week on the
westerly playing field and recharge pond areas. This excess dirt (approximately
100,000 cubic yards) is being relocated to the new 32-acre Rio Vista park site,
located just south of the Kern River channel, to shape and contour the park and future
"aqua-theatre" area. Using our current estimates, rough grading for this earthwork
should be completed by mid-March.
4. EDCD has good news to report - a developer has purchased the property at 710
Brundage Lane for use as a 78-unit affordable multi-family housing project. Per the
enclosed memo, the project will include an activity room to provide educational
classes and after-school programs for the tenants. It will be a very positive addition
to the area.
5. The Solid Waste Division mailed the attached flyer with their commercial refuse
billings this month. It provides information about the County's program to assist
businesses recycle of economically dispose of small amounts of hazardous waste.
6. The latest CIP status report from Public Works is enclosed for your information.
7. A response to a Council request is enclosed:
Councilmember Couch
· Additional information regarding award of contracts for the design of the Fire and
Police Substation.
AT:rs
cc: Department Heads
Pam McCarthy, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
BAKERSFIELD ....
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER /~ /~
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR y~.....~
DATE: February 21,2002
SUBJECT: STREET MAINTENANCE
This memo describes increased maintenance efforts proposed by the Street Division. A
second memo is forthcoming, which will describe a plan to increase our street maintenance
effort and funding improvements to major arterial streets for the very near future.
The Public Works Department, Street Division is composed of four maintenance sections
and they all provide a valuable service. However, the following topic concentrates on the
Street Maintenance section which is responsible for maintenance on all City streets and
alleys.
Due to the City's growth through new development and annexations, the street mileage
that this section is responsible for maintaining has increased from 657 miles in 1992 (25
employees and two supervisors) to approximately 900 miles of streets and 200 miles of
alleys as of December 31,2001 (26 employees and one supervisor). Work on an annual
basis involves resurfacing, reconstruction, penetration sealing, section repairs, pothole
patching, crack sealing, median island modification, concrete work, alley clearing, assisting
with leaf collection, and flood control during major storms.
In addition, this section responds to calls from the Police and' Fire Departments for
barricades, delineators and equipment as needed for emergencies and special events.
While this section's primary focus is on residential streets, general street surface
maintenance such as penetration sealing, section repairs, pothole patching and crack
sealing are done on major streets. The main objective is to perform preventive
maintenance that will result in a 20-year life span on all streets. A detailed summary of
employees, equipment and work performed is attached hereto.
The Streets Division gas tax funding for maintenance has increased dramatically from
$400,000 in FY 95/96 to over $1.2 million in the current fiscal year. Even with this
increase, the resurfacing backlog exceeds ten years. With our current efforts, the number
of streets needing these repairs is growing faster than our crews can resurface or
reconstruct them. In other words, we may resurface twelve street miles per year only to
have an additional eighteen miles requiring resurfacing the following year.
G:\GROUPDAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February 21,2002, 1:50 pm Page 1 of 8 '"-- -~ages
Additionally, more streets must be reconstructed rather than resurfaced due to extreme
deterioration. Of the 900 miles of streets, nearly 350 miles are in need of reconstruction.
Street reconstruction is more expensive than resurfacing because more material and labor
are required. The Streets Division is continually seeking out and experimenting with new
street maintenance technology to provide more efficient and cost effective street
maintenance. Examples are:
· Reconstruction by pavement reclamation and soil stabilization. This involves
pulverizing the existing asphalt and base to a depth of ten inches, grading,
compacting and removing any excess material prior to placing new asphalt
concrete. This process has reduced the time required to reconstruct a residential
street by two to three days:
· Penetration sealing is an important street maintenance process which helps prevent
further deterioration of the pavement. Using a new product, TOPEIN-C, allows this
to be done in weather conditions above 70 degrees rather than the 90 degrees
required for the former product. This has extended the period when this
maintenance work can be done. The new product also does not require sanding of
the streets, thereby reducing staff time, cost and citizen concerns. Use of this
product for the past two years has increased the amount of streets receiving sealing
from 50 miles per year to 180 miles per year.
· Crack filling with hot-pour mix rather than the former cold-pour dries much quicker;
consequently no sanding and no bumps are created. This product has been used
for the past three years and has reduced the number of staff required to perform
this maintenance.
These new street maintenance technologies assist in prolonging pavement life and
reducing manpower, allowing more time for other street maintenance activities. However,
the efficiencies gained from the new methods, required more funds for maintenance
materials.
The following information summarizes our current major maintenance methods, personnel
and equipment.
Street Resurfacinq
This process involves grinding headers along the edge of the street next to the gutter and
at the ends of the street segment to be paved. This is done in conjunction with our annual
contractor and City forces working together. The contractor is responsible for the machine
and the grinding of the asphalt, with the City responsible for trucks to haul off the material,
traffic control, sweeping, notifying residents, moving vehicles and ramping the end cuts with
cold mix. City crews prepare 30 to 45 streets in this manner each time. It takes two to
three days of grinding to complete this work. The City crew that works on this job is the
same crew that paves the streets. The resurfacing of these streets takes approximately six
weeks to complete, barring equipment failure or other difficulties. Employees used for this
is as follows: One H.E.O., six L.E.O., six S.M.W. Equipment used is as follows: Full Size
Pick-up, Paving Box, Oil Truck, Motor Sweeper, Large Steel Roller, Rubber Tire Roller, two
Super Dump Trucks, six 10-Yard Dump Trucks. To perform this operation a total of 13
people are needed.
G:\GROUPDA'r~12002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance,wpd
February21,2002, 1:50 pm Page 2 of 8 Pages
Street Reconstruction (Di_a_ain_a Out}
This process consists of digging up and hauling off the old asphalt to an asphalt recycling
site, reworking and compacting the old aggregate base. As is often the case, if there is no
aggregate base the grade is cut down and excess soil hauled off. The street is then
reshaped and compacted with native soil, aggregate base is hauled in and compacted
followed by paving of the street. This takes about five to seven days to complete barring
equipment failure or other difficulties. Employees needed to complete this are as follows:
One H.E.O, six L.E.O. and six S.M.W. The equipment used is as follows: Large Motor
Grader, two Skip Loaders, Water Truck, Rubber Tire Roller, two Super Dump Trucks, six
1 O-Yard Dump Trucks, and associated paving equipment. To perform this operation a total
of 13 people are needed.
Our current effort of resurfacing and reconstruction during the year includes working long
hours during the week (6 A.M. to 6 P.M.) and at times on Saturdays. We are limited to the
hours worked in a day by the operation hours of the asphalt batch plant where the material
is purchased. In working extended hours and thus increasing the use of the paving
machine, we have experienced more equipment failure. During this past paving season,
we did not pave approximately 45 days due to breakdown of the existing paving machine.
The current paving machine was purchased in 1997 and is now having some major work
done on it by the Equipment Division. Having this key piece of equipment unavailable for
an extended time frame substantially reduces the amount of work that can be done by the
Street Division. The need exists to purchase a backup paving machine that will allow
continual work throughout the paving season.
Phase 1
This initial phase provides an additional paving machine and an alternative to the current
method of street reconstruction. The current paving machine, being five years old, would
become a backup to the new paving machine, thereby increasing the number of productive
paving days.
An alternative street reconstruction process consists of grinding up (pulverizing) the
existing pavement and mixing it with the old aggregate base and/or soil in one operation.
The street is then shaped, the materials compacted, and any excess is hauled off. This
is followed by paving the street. The entire process takes 'two to three days, barring
equipment failure or other difficulties. This new method is being done as time permits on
a trial basis using a private contractor to do the pulverizing. Using a private contractor for
this service has limited the use of this process as we are controlled by their schedule and
other commitments. We have found this process to be successful, as mixing of the
pavement with the base material gives the street a thicker and stronger base. The
pulverizing machine would also be used to do section repairs on major streets, giving us
the ability to do them quicker and more efficiently, eliminating 32 man hours that are used
under the current method.
This phase recommends the City purchase the paving machine, pulverizing machine and
dump trucks and increase personnel to perform the additional work. In doing so, street
resurfacing would be increased from 12 miles annually to approximately 18 miles annually,
and street reconstruction would be increased from two miles annually to approximately 10
miles annually.
G:\GROUPDAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February21,2002, 1:50 pm Page 3 of 8 Pages
The following additional equipment, personnel, and associated costs would be required:
One-time Cost Annual Cost
EQUIPMENT i ~ _ ~
Paving Machine $ 285,000.00 $ 42,020.00
Pulverizing Machine $ 250,000.00 $ 45,000.00
(2) lO-Yard Dump Trucks $184,000.00 $ 37,456.00
Subtotal $ 719,000.00 $124,476.00
PERSONNEL
(1) H.E.O. $ 60,438.00
(2) L.E.O. $103,322.00
(6) S.M.W. (Time Six Months) $ 90,000.00
Subtotal $253,760.00
Subtotal - Equipment & Personnel $378,236.00
MATERIALS
Asphalt Concrete $300,000.00
TOTAL $ 719,000.00 $678,236.00
Phase 2
This phase recommends the City purchase the equipment and manpower to have an
additional paving crew. Adding the paving crew would allow one crew to be dedicated to
paving on a daily basis during our resurfacing season. The plan would be to prepare by
grinding 40 to 50 street at one time, then have both paving crews begin resurfacing
immediately. When there are about six streets remaining from the first phase, one paving
crew would work with the annual contractor to start grinding the second phase; when complete
the crew would go back to resurfacing. In addition, one crew would be used to pave streets
that have been pulverized and prepared for paving. This would increase our resurfacing
program from 12 miles to approximately 30 miles of streets resurfaced annually and
reconstruction could increase another three to four miles annually. All these figures are
contingent on weather, difficulties or priorities that may arise.
G:\GROUPDAT~STREETS\StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February 21,2002, 2:8 pm -- Page 4 of 9 Pages
The following personnel and equipment would be required:
One Time Cost Annual Cost
i Paving Machine $ 285,000.00 $ 42,020.00
I Paving Machine Trailer $ 17,500.00 $ 3,973.00
i(7) l-Yard Dump Trucks $ 644,000.00 $131,096.00
(2) 21-Yard Dump Trucks $ 340,000.00 $ 45,586.00
Large Steel Roller $ 82,000.00 $ 8,372.00
Roller Trailer $ 17,000.00 $ 3,973.00
Rubber Tire Roller $ 58,000.00 $ 7,362.00
Oil Distributor Truck $ 150,000.00 $ 19,485.00
(2) Full size Pick-ups $ 44,000.00 $ 7,307.00
WaterTruck $ 15,000.00 $ 13,000.00
Subtotal $1,752,500.00 $282,174.00
(1) H.E.O. $ 60,438.00
(6) L.E.O. $309,966.00
(6) S.M.W. $271,200.00
Subtotal $641,604.00
Subtotal - Equipment & Personnel $923,778.00
Asphalt Concrete $700,000.00
TOTAL $1,752,500.00 $1,623,778.00
While the additional staff in either phase will be used to increase efforts during paving
season, at other times they will perform other important functions. During the non-paving
season these additional employees will clean alleys, perform leaf collection, street section
repairs, concrete repairs, crack sealing, pothole repairs and median island modifications.
Council has allotted additional funding and while the City Streets Division functions as
efficiently and productively as possible, City streets continue to degrade faster than
completed maintenance efforts. One of the City Council goals has been to improve street
conditions throughout the city. Streets Division staff is fully supportive of this goal and
continues to review new technologies and products that can aid in the achievement of this
goal. We believe that either of these options will further the effort made to improve the
G:\GROUPDAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February21, 2002, 1:50 pm -~'age 5 of 8 Pages
condition of City streets. Phase 1 focuses on the reconstruction efforts, while Phase 2
deals with both reconstruction and resurfacing efforts.
I recommend we pursue the implementation of Phase 1. This option allows for full
utilization of the paving season by having a backup paving machine increasing the number
of miles paved each year. The pulverizing machine will allow for increased productivity in
the areas of street reconstruction and section repairs. It is our intent to dedicate much of
this recaptured paving time to the maintenance of arterial and collector streets such as:
Gosford Road, Ming Avenue, White Lane, Mt. Vernon Avenue, Columbus Street, etc.
Should it be decided to implement Phase 1, the paving machine and pulverizing machine
should be purchased immediately to take advantage of the upcoming paving season. To
expedite the process, this equipment should be purchased through sole sourcing.
G:\GROUPDAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February21,2002, 1:50 pm Page 6 of 8 Pages
The following table compares the amount of work for the various street maintenance
operations currently being done with the estimated amounts from the two phases.
Street Maintenance Programs
Process Current Phase 1 Phase 2
Street Resurfacing 12 miles 18 miles 30 miles
Street Reconstruction 2 miles 10 miles 14 miles
Street Penetration Sealing 180 miles 180 miles 180 miles
Section Repairs 1/2 mile 3 miles 4 miles
Alley Resurfacing 1/8 mile 1/4 mile 6 miles
NON-PAVING SEASON ~ ~:,~ ......... ®~ ~ ~: ~:~'~;~,~
Crack Sealing 8 miles 8 miles 8 miles
Pothole Repairs 30,000 each 30,000 each 30,000 each
Concrete Repairs:
Curb & Gutter 10,000 In ft. 10,000 In. ft. 15,000 In. ft.
Sidewalk 25,000 sq. ft. 25,000 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. fi.
Handicap ramps 36 each 36 each 45 each
Median Islands Modification
Exposed 70,000 sq ft. 70,000 sq. ft. 70,000 sq. ft.
Aggregate
Median curb 5,700 In. ft. 5,700 In. ft. 5,700 In. ft.
River Rock 660 tons 660 tons 660 tons
Additional work:
Alley Cleaning 40 miles
G:\GROUP DAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February21, 2002, 1:50 pm Page 7 of 8 Pages
Street Division ! Street Maintenance
Field Employees:
5 Heavy Equipment Operators (H.E.O.)
10 Light Equipment Operators (L.E.O.)
11 Service Maintenance Workers (S.M.W.)
Dedicated Equipment: (6) Full Size Pickups
(4) Patch Trucks
(4) Skip Loaders
(2) Lg Motor Graders
(2) Sm Motor Graders
(1) Paving Machine
(1) Lg Steel Roller
(2) Rubber Tire Rollers
(4) Sm Steel Rollers
(2) Super Dump Trucks
(7) 10-Yard Dump Trucks
(3) 5-Yard Dump Trucks
(1) Motor Sweeper
(1) Water Truck
(1) Backhoe
(2) Bobcats
(1) Crack Sealing Machine
(4) Air Compressors
(1) Concrete Saw
Rec~ular Work Performed:
Street Resurfacing 13 employees March to November
Grinding Headers 12 employees March to November
Street Reconstruction 12 employees March to November
Street Penetration sealing 6 employees March to October
Section Repairs 8 employees February to December
A.C. Patch Crew 3 employees All Year Long
Cold Mix Patch Crew 2 employees All Year Long
Median Island Modification 3 employees All Year Long
Crack Sealing 6 employees October to March
Leaf Crew 4 employees October to February
Concrete 3 employees All Year Long
Sidewalk Crew 3 employees All Year Long
Alley Cleaning 8 employees November to March
Alley Resurfacing 10 employees March to November
c: Brad B. Underwood, Public Works Operations Manager
Luis A. Peralez, Streets Maintenance Superintendent
G:\GROUPDAT~M2002_CityManager~StreetsMaintenance.wpd
February21, 2002, 1:50 pm -~'age 8 of 8 Pages
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
February 20, 2002
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Donna Kunz, Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Multi-family Affordable Housing Project at 710 Brundage
A priVate developer has recently purchased the property at 710 Brundage Lane for the
purpose of developing a seventy-eight unit affordable multi-family housing project. The
projects non profit developer is Corporation for Better Housing and has been in existence
since 1995. Corporation for Better Housing has eight completed projects in California, a
ninth project recent is under construction in Arvin.
The project planned for Brundage Lane will include a 1,500 square foot activity room where
various educational classes and after school programs will be provided. The classes will
include computer training classes and English as a second language and will be available
to the tenants at no charge. In addition, other amenities include on-site laundry area, tot
lot playground and an outdoor activity area with barbeques and picnic tables. The two
bedroom units are anticipated to be 750 square feet and three bedroom units are planned
at 1,025 square feet. The projects design includes stucco buildings with stone accents.
Rents for the two bedroom units in the project are expected to range from $275 to $502
and will be from $318 to $580 per month for the three bedroom units. The project's
anticipated funding includes nine percent tax credits and private investment. To qualify for
the tax credit program, tenants must meet various criteria, including income limitations.
The maximum allowable yearly income for a two bedroom unit is $22,165 and for a three
bedroom is $25,685. Occupancy for the two bedroom units will be limited to four persons
and the three bedroom units will allow up to six people. The developer intends to submit
a tax credit application in the Spring 2002 funding round to the California Tax Credit
Allocation Committee.
This Brundage Lane site was identified in the Southeast Economic Development Strategy
as a potential development site for commercial uses. Last fall, the Department provided
the developer a copy of the strategy to assist him in identifying potential sites in the
Southeast.
REC a~:'~?'~:~.
BAKERSFIELD
I FEB 2 2
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M ICITV,., ,~ANAGE~~
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director
DATE: February 15, 2002
SUBJECT: Small Business HazmatAssistance
To help businesses economically recycle or dispose of small amounts of hazardous
waste, the Solid Waste Division has inserted the attached flyer in this month's
commercial refuse billing. The flyer describes a program which is part of the County's
local Special Waste Facility on the corner of Standard and Foster Streets. The program
is funded by a combination of landfill fees and state grants.
attachment
KB
G:\GROUPDAT~SOLIDWASTE\Smalt Business Help.wpd
February 15, 2002
BUSINESS
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
DISPOSAL
XEMPT
MALL
UANTITY
KERN COUNTY
· SPECIAL WASTE FACILITY
BUSINESS HAZARDOUS
WASTE PROGRAM
The Kern County Special Waste Facility
serves the hazardous waste disposal needs of
Kern County residents and businessesl The
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generator (CESQG) Program allows eligible
businesses to bring hazardous waste to the
County's Special Waste Facility.
This program is sponsored by tile Kern
County Waste Management Department and
grants received from the California Integrated
Waste Management Board.
BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY
State and Federal hazardous waste laws limit
the use of this collection program to
businesses that qualify as Conditionally
Exempt Small Quantity Generators
(CESQGs). To qualify as a CESQG, a
,business must generate less than 27 gallons
or 220 pounds of hazardous waste per month.
This includes a maximum of 1 quart or 2.2
pounds of acutely hazardous waste.
Businesses that generate more than these
amounts are required to use a licensed
hazardous waste hauler to manifest and
transport their waste.
Businesses are required to sign a waiver
declaring that they are a CESQG.
BUSINESS APPOINTMENTS
All businesses must register and set an.
appointment to use the Facility. To register
for an appointment please call Waste
Management at (661) 862-8922.
Waste will not be accepted without an
appointment!
GATE FEES
Gate fees for disposal are based upon the
weight and category of waste the business
generates. The method for calculating the
mount to be charged to a CESQG shall be
based on the actual weight of the hazardous
waste (including container) as measured by a
scale at the time of disposal. Businesses will
be billed within 30 days.
QUANTITY LIMITATIONS
The Facility will accept a monthly maximum
of 220 pounds of hazardous or 2.2 pounds of
extremely hazardous waste from each
participating CESQG.
Note** Historical accumulations may require
the use of a private hazardous waste disposal
tm.
TRANSPORTATION &
LABELING
State laws limit the amount 'of hazardous
waste that may be transported by a CESQG.
Prior to the appointment, the business will be
issued packaging and labeling information and
a variance allowing transport of the waste to
the Facility.
Please use caution when transporting
hazardous waste to the Facility. Bring the
products in original containers when available.
If contents are different than listed, please
label container clearly. Containers should
have a secure fitting lid and be packed
upright, in a leak-proof box.
Regulations for packaging and labeling can be
found in the' Department of Transportation
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49,
Transportation, Parts 100-199.
Sponsored by:
Kern County Waste
Management Department
California Integrated Waste
Management Board
Printed on Recycled Paper
~' '~'~-'~ EXCLUDED WASTE
The Special Waste Facility is not
permitted to accept the following
waste:
~ Asbestos
)~ Explosives
~ Radioactive waste
~' Biohazardous waste
}, Unknown chemicals
~' Containers larger than 5
gallons
REMINDERS
To Qualify:
~' Generate less than 220 pounds
of hazardous waste or 2.2
pounds of extremely hazardous
waste.
~ Business must be located in
Kern County.
To Transport:
Properly label and seal each
container.
Pack in an upright position.
Protect from breaking, leaking,
and mixing with other waste.
> Variance must accompany
waste being delivered the day
of appointment.
To Dispose:
} .Call the Kern County Waste
Management Department at
(661) 862-8922.
} .Contact private waste disposal
fu-m if business doesn't qualify
for the CESQG program.
REDUCE DISPOSAL COSTS
Buy only what you need
Use all of the product
Use non-toxic alternatives
Give lett over products away for reuse
BRING TO APPOINTMENT:
Complete appointment packet
· Letter
· Cost Estimate Worksheet
· Transportation Variance
· Packaging & transportation info
· Program Rules
FACILITY LOCATION
The Kern County Special Waste Facility is
located in Bakersfield at 4951 Standard
Street. Southwest comer of Standard and
Foster Street.
.... HAZARDOUS- BUSINESS
KERN COUNTY SPECIAL WASTE FACILITY
4951 STANDARD ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA
BUSINESS 0 N LY BUSINESS Foster St. ~ 1
CALL (661) 862-8922 X -~ N
0
BUSINESS WASTE DISPOSAL
BUSINESS WASTE ACCEPTED: Gilmore St.
Pesticides & Weed Killers t ~ !11 BY APPOINTMENT ONLY
Automotive Products / / ~ CALL (661) 862-8922
Industrial Cleaners ~
Paint & Paint Products ',,[
Batteries i Rosedale Hwy.
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL RULES: //HAZARDOUS· RESlDENTIA
· A maximum of 5 gallons, or 50 pounds of waste may be r
transported, per vehicle, per visit. KERN COUNTY SPECIAL WASTE FACILITY
· The contents of any single container of waste may not 49,51 STANDARD ST,, BAKI:RSFIELD,
exceed five gallons.
· Containers must be closed, labeled and not leaking. (661) 862-8922
I OPERATING HOURS:
Do
not
mix
waste.
FosterSt. ~l, RESIDENTIAL Thursday & Friday: 10 am to 4 pm RESIDENTIAL
Saturday: 8 am to 4 pm
Gilmore St. RESIDENTIAL WASTE ACCEPTED:
~ Pesticides & Weed Killers
Automotive Products
Household Cleaners
Paint & Paint Products
Batteries
Rosedale Hwy
Pu/ / c wor ,s Cal ita[ Imt roveme t Prooram Sc e [e Fiscal Year zoo -zooz
02_~/.7/02
NUM NUM BEGIN test.) END (est.) BEGIN (est.) END (est.)
T1 K031 KROLL WY BRIDGE - W OF GOSFORD RI 5 in design Jul-2001 Mar-2002 Apr-2002 Jun-2002
T2K033 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; WHITE/ 6 survey-data collection phase Jan-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002
DOVEWOOD
T2K020 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; COFFEE RD/ 4 street right-of-way from PG&E required for project Mar-2002 May-2002 Sep-2002
DOWNING
E9K011 MOHAWK SEWER CONSTRUCTION 4, 5 in design Feb-2000 Oct-2001 Feb-2002 Jun-2002
PHASE II
TOK144 SOUTHWEST BIKE PATH 4 bids to be opened, awarded 3110102 Feb-2001 Dec-2001 Apr-2002 Jul-2002
T9K015 SIGNAL NEW, COMANCHE/SR 178 3 being reviewed by CalTrans (2nd review) Mar-2000 Jan-2002 Jul-2002 Sep-2002
T1K028 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; COLLEGE/ 3 in design May-2001 May-2002 Jun-2002 Aug-2002
FAIRFAX
TOK013 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION - OLIVE/ 4 in design Jun-1999 Jun-2002 Jul~2002 Feb-2003
CALLOWAY
T1K007 RESURFACING VARIOUS STREETS VAR in design, plans and finance documents submitted to Caltrans Jan-2001 Nov-2001 Jul-2002 Sep-2002
00-01 for approval
T1K032 WIDEN TRUXTUN AVENUE 2 in design Sep-2001 Mar-2002 Jul-2002 Sep-2002
E9K014 MT VERNON TRUNK SEWER IMPROV · 1 in design Mar-2000 Jan-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002
T1K011 SIC NEW AUBURN AT EISSLER 3 bid awarded, construction to begin??? May-2001 Oct-2001 Mar-2002 Apr-2002
T1K009 SIG NEW MT VERNON AT PANORAMA 3 in design NOV-2001 Jan-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002
T1K024 SIG NEW VERDUGO AT HAGEMAN 4 in design Oct-2001 Mar-2002 May-2002 Jun-2002
T2K036 FS #11 MEDIAN & SIC MOD 5 in design Dec-2001 Mar-2002 Apr-2002 Jun-2002
T2K028 SIC NEW BRUNDAGE AT WASH 1 in design Feb-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002 May-2002
T2K023 SIG PLANZAT REAL 6 in design Jan-2002 May-2002 Jun-2002 Jul-2002
T2K027 SIC PLANZ AT WILSON 5, 6 tied up for conformity determination at State level. Feb-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002 Aug-2002
ELK002 SEWER IMPROVGWENDOLYN 7 under construction Ap.r-2001 Jul-2001 Sep-2001
E2K004 SEWER MAIN BRIMHALL RD 4 under construction Jul-2001 Nov-2001 Mar-2002 Jun-2002
Page 1 of 3 G:\GROUPDAT~Dani\CIP\ClP PW 2000-01_RevFeb19_2002.wb3
W°ri s Capita[ Improvement Prooram Sc e /e Fiscal Year zoo -zooz
02/?2/02 . . · ,
PROJ IPROJECT TITLE WARD COMMENTS I DESIGN PHASE I CONSTRUCT'ON PHASE
NUM NUM BEGIN (est.) END {est.) BEGIN (est.) END (est.)
E7K005 SEWER REHAB MAIN/SO CHESTER 1 study by Ruettgers & Schuler in progress Sep-2001 Mar-2002 Mar-2002 Jun-2002
P1K003 HVAC UPGRADE, CITY HALL 2 project advertised late November; no bids received, project May-2002 Feb-2002 May-2002 Feb-2003
re-advertised late December
ELK003 SEWER IMPROV PACHECO #10 7 in design Mar-2002 May-2002 ^ug-2002 Jan-2003
P1H004 FS ~ ELEC UPGRADE 2 in design Nov-2001 Jan-2002 Feb-2002 Apr-2002
T1K034 MING INTERSECTION EXPANSION 3 in design Dec-2000 Feb-2002 Jul-2002
AT ASHE AND NEW STINE
T2K022 MING INTERSECTION EXPANSION 4 in design, applying for encroachment permit for CalTrans; Property Nov-2001 Feb-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002
AT SR99 Management acquiring ROW.
TOK009 STORM IMPROVEMENTWHITE/HUGHES 5 in design NOV-2001 May-2002 Jun-2002 ^ug-2002
T1K027 ST IMPROV RR CROSSINGS 3' in design Jan-2002 Mar-2002 May-2002 Jun-2002
T8K002 BRDG WIDENING WHITE LANE AT SR99 7 project report currently being prepared, soq to be reviewed, Mar-2002 Nov-2002 Feb-2003 Dec-2003
interview & select design firm
TOK007 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; BRIMHALL RD 4 project awarded, design complete Ju1-~1999 Nov-2001 Mar-2002 Jun-2002
T2K031 TRAFFIC SIG OLD RIVER RD AT 4 in design Feb-2002 Mar-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002
RIDGE OAK DRIVE
T7K021 INTERCHANGE ON SR178 3 project report currently being prepared, rfq for consultant Jul-1999 Jan-2003 ^pr-2003 Nov-2004
AT F^IRFAX to prepare construction plans to have been released 12/01.
TOK006 STWIDENING ROSEDALE HIGHWAY 2 in design ^ug-2001 May-2002 Aug-2002 Nov-2002
P1C020 RIOVISTA PARK 4 in design Mar-2001 Jun-2002 ^ug-2002
TOK012 BRIDGE CONST, HAGEMAN AT SR99 2 in design Jul-2001 Jun-2002 Sep-2002 May-2003
P5C002 LANDSCAPE MEDIANS 6 under construction Jan-2002 Feb-2002 Feb-2002 ^pr-2002
COLUMBUS/PANORAMA
T1K022 LANDSCAPE MEDIANS 2 in design Feb-2002 ^pr-2002 May-2002 Jun-2002
STOCKDALE HWY/ASHE
T1K022 LANDSCAPE MEDIANS 3 in design NOV-2001 Feb-2002 Mar-2002 May-2002
UNION/PANORAMA
E7K002 SEWER CONST MAIN - 4 under construction Mar-2000 Sep-2000 Mar-2001 ^pr-2002
BUENA VISTA II
T1K033 ENTRY MONUMENTS VAR under construction Dec-2000 Sep-2001 Oct-2001 Mar-2002
Page 2 of 3 G:\GROUPDAT~Dani\CIP\CIP PW 2000-01_RevFeb19_2002.wb3
? worlds Capita[ Improvemem rooram Sc e /e Fiscal Year _oo -zooz
02/~2/02 _
NUM NUM BEGIN (est.) END (est.) BEGIN (est.) END (est.)
T9K012 NORTHEAST BIKE PATH 3 under construction, grading complete, project suspended for Ju1-1998 Apr-2000 Mar-2002 Apr-2002
CalWater work. Paving to begin mid-March.
P8H001 FS #15 4 in design, soqs from architechts received and reviewed. Aug-2001 Jul-2002 Oct-2002 J'ul-2003
interviews in early January.
POC009 CENTENNIAL GARDEN SMOKE 2 design completed, waiting for transfer of funds Nov-2001 Feb-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002
HATCH MODIFICATION
T1K023 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; HAGEMAN 4 addition of landscaped medians from Calloway tO Verdugo Sep-2001 Feb-2002 Mar-2002 May-2002
T4K055 STREET IMPROVEMENTS; LAKE STREE'I' 2 under construction
TOK138 CASA LOMA #6 STREET IMPROV'S I under construction Jan-2002 Feb-2002 Apr-2002 Jun-2002
T9K012 NORTHEAST BIKE PATH 3
Q9K003 NATURAL GAS FUELING STATION 2 )re-qual of contractors and vendors 2/19/02 May-2002 Sep-2002
TOK011 STREET RECONSTRUCTION-WHITE LAN 6 )reconstruction meeting to be held in February Apr-2002 Jun-2002
T2K026 TRAFFIC SIG-STINE @ BEECHWOOD 6 in design Feb-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002
T2K043 TRAFFIC SIG-STOCKDALE @ McDONALr 2,5 re-program CMAQ funds for project Mar-2002 May-2002
TRAFFIC SIG-MT VERNON @ CHURCH 3 in design Feb-2002 Apr-2002 May-2002 Jul-2002
E7K012 WWTP#3 HEADWORKS ~n design by Carrollo Engineers
POC009 CENTENNAIL GARDEN BULLET 2 work started on teller windows, control room glass to be Sep-2001 Oct-2001 Feb-2002 Apr-2002
RESISTANT GLASS ~dded to contract
Page 3 of 3 G:\GROUPDAT\Dani\CIP\CIP PW 2000-01_RevFeb19_2002.wb3
B A K E R S F I E L
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: February 19, 2002
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACTS: FOLLOWUP
Council Referral #WF0019106 (Ward 4)
Councilmember Couch requested that staff meet with the two citizens who sent letters
regarding the award of contract for the design of the Fire and Police Substation. Give
specifics as to why one firm is chosen over the other and possibly revisit the manner in which
the City awards contracts and give more to local contractors.
The response to this Council Referral #WF0019106, dated January 29, 2002, stated that
City Attorney's Office staff and Public Works Department staff would be continuing to review
the issue of incorporating a "local preference" element in the selection of the consultants.
This memo is a followup response to that Council Referral.
City Attorney's Office staff has informed Public Works Department staff that the only
available legal basis to support a "local preference" element is the one percent tax benefit
given to local vendors when the City purchases supplies. In place since the mid-1990's, this
local vendor preference is founded on the sales tax directly related to that purchase.
However, due to concerns expressed by both the local professional community and various
council members, Public Works staff proposes to continue its current policy of utilizing a 5%
local incentive for professional consultant work.
Staff is working on a report regarding the total dollars of agreements awarded to consultants
over the last five years and tracking that by local versus out-of-town firms.
c: Bart Thiltgen, City Attorney
Jacques R. LaRochelle, Assistant Public Works Director
G:VSROUPDA'I~RcfcrralsX2002~CC Mtg 1-23\WF0019106-FoHowup Ted.wpd