Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/09/02 B A K E R S F I E L D CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM August9,2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and City CO~ FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager SUBJECT: General Information 1. We met with Rossetti - the designer of the ice rink and aquatic complex this week. They have more follow-up work to do, but we are on our way to having the cost issues clarified and what I think will be a very high quality design. 2. We already had a full slate of General Plan public hearings for the meeting, of August 21st, and then we get three appeals. It is also the only August meeting. I am sorry, but it will be 'a long one. 3. We have new summary information on the success we have experienced with the Enterprise Zone. Enclosed please find a report on that, which also covers successes in Southeast Bakersfield in terms of grants received, projects underway, and related. 4. Since the proposed Airpark rate increase, there have been a number of articles, letters to the editor, etc., about the Airpark. Please remember that Ray Bishop of the Kern County Airport has expressed serious concerns to us about safety because of. conflicts in traffic between the City Airpark and Meadows 'Field. To alleviate those' concerns, we formally requested that the Federal Aviation Administration extend tower control over the Airpark as a safety effOrt. They refused. Based upon City Council goals, we are now exploring closing the Airpark, if the FAA will waive the repayment requirement on past grants. Safety is the overriding consideration. Under those conditions, major new investment is unproductive. Please also be aware that the FAA controls the uses allowed, and for the vast majority of the property, they can only be airplane related. The rate increase is needed to break even so the general taxpayer does not have to subsidize a service that is for a small group. 5. The Kern River Parkway Committee has formed a compromise position on the issue of a Veterans Memorial in the new 32-acrea park, which is enclosed. Thanks are due to Rich O'Neil and the Committee for their efforts! Honorable Mayor and City Council August 9, 2002 Page 2 6. As an update on the mOld issue, the County is still working on the questions we posed. Dr. Jinadu is out of town this week attending a conference on mold and indoor air quality, but sent a message that he will get the information we have requested when he returns. 7. A summary report of the Lakeview Business Association meeting' held this week is enclosed for your information. 8. Per the attached memo from Recreation and Parks, it will be. necessary to close one of the neighborhood pools a week early this year, and others may also be affected before the season ends. Based on average daily usage, Saunders pool will close on Monday, August 12th. Because so many of the summer lifeguard staff have resigned before the end of their signed commitments, it is likely that there won't be adequate staff to keep all the facilities open for the entire season. Please do not forget that when the. new aquatic complex opens, we should' permanently close one or two of our deteriorated, underutilized; pools. 9. The monthly activity report from Recreation and Parks is enclosed. 10. On Monday, August 12th, there will be a joint meeting held of the City and Kern County Planning Commissions. The topic is a General Plan Update, which will reflect the community development issues and policy changes that have occurred since adoption of the Plan in 1990. 11. Attached is a sample ballot envelope and vote pamphlet that will be used for the October 8, 2002 Special Election. Each registered voter within the proposed Allen No. 5 area will receive one. 12. In accordance with the Annexation Pre-Application Process that was adopted by Council last February, we are considering making application to LAFCO to annex a small area within Ward 2. We became aware thai the City limits divided some properties in the area, and as a result of that, some portions of the properties are both in the City limits and in the unincorporated Kern County. On occasion, it is difficult and confusing for both City and County agencies to provide services to the neighborhood in the most .economical way. The enclosed letter was sent to the residents within the affected area in order to solicit their feedback prior to commencing the application process with LAFCO. 13. John Stinson will be covering the regular meeting of August 21st for me. I am delivering my daughter to college orientation, and then will be taking vacation the 22nd through September 2nd. During my absence, Alan Christensen will be in charge. 14. The lakes at the 32-acre park are being dug out now. Of course, the water will follow considerably later. Honorable Mayor and City Council August 9, 2002 Page 3 15. Responses to Council requests are enclosed, as follows: Councilmember Benham · Response to citizen regarding pediatric critical care inquiry. Councilmember Couch · Report on ChartedCode Requirements for Street Maintenance Repair; · Amendment to the Specific Plan and General Plan concerning access to Coffee Road and local streets; · Supplemental information concerning Staff action to minimize traffic problems between North Shore Drive and Olive Drive at Headwater Drive, Mossrock, and Seaward Drive; · Status of draft ordinance amendment for recommendation to improve the quality of multi-family projects, typically tri-plexes and fou[-plexes on individual subdivision lots; · Report on clean-up and removal actions completed at the new Costco site; · · Status update regarding flashing red light on White Lane near Stockdale High; Councilmember Salvaqgio · Status of citizen request for crOsswalk from Hughes Lane to Patti Court, with a handicapped ramp and feasibility of a median and speed limit reduction in the area; AT:rs cc: Department Heads Pam McCarthy, City Clerk Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst B A K E R S F.I E L D CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM August 8, 2002 TO: HonOrable Mayor and City Coun~il...~ FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager /~' i///'/ SUBJECT: Southeast Bakersfield - Progress Report The purpOse of this report is to provide you with an update on the positive activities that have been taking place in southeast Bakersfield. The first part is a summary of information recently compiled on the Enterprise Zone for the past 5 years. The second part focuses on the positive improvements that have been happening and are planned for southeast Bakersfield. Enterprise Zone - Performance from 1997 through 2001 · 513 building permits were issued. · The valuation of building permits has risen from $2.2 million in 1997 to $13.1 million in 2001 - a 495% increase. · 127 new business licenses have been issued. (Because Kern County does not issue business licenses, the actual number of new businesses in the Zone is larger than this figure.). The number of businesses operating in City and County portions of the Enterprise ZOne continues to rise steadily, from 385 in 1997 to 463 in 2001 - a 20.3% increase. · 3,185 employee vouchers were issued. Vouchers are issued for each employee that is 1) a member of a group targeted for employment, and 2) hired by an Enterprise Zone employer. That number represents only the new hires that met the criteria for vouchering. It' is estimated that for every vouchered employee hired, an additional 1.899 new hires were made. That brings the estimated number of new hires to over 6,000. Honorable Mayor and City Council August 8, 2002 Page 2 Significant Projects in Southeast Bakersfield · The new Food 4 Less Supermarket at Union and California Avenues will be 55,000 square feet and should be completed in October. · Site work has begun and a building permit is anticipated to be pulled soon for the construction of the Albertsons store at the corner of Brundage Lane and Chester Avenue. Building. plans indicate the grocery store will be 46,920 square feet. · At 4th and Union, the burned out motel site was demolished earlier this year and will be the site of the Kozee Apartments, a 38 unit apartment complex. Groundbreaking should take. place this fall, with completion in Spring of 2003. · California Avenue. Senior Housing at 1119 California Avenue will provide 180 units of apartments.. It will also have a fall groundbreaking and is expected to be completed in October 2003. ~ Bakersfield Family Apartments is a 78 unit project planned for 710 Brundage Lane. With groundbreaking expected in the next few weeks, it should be completed in January 2003. · The new Police Department neighborhood substation at 1630 East 11th Street opened on July 24th. · In-fill housing is actively taking place. Empty lots throughout the Lakeview area are being transformed into single family homes. Agreements have been made with four developers, lending them $500,000 in CHAFA HELP (Housing Enabled by Local Partnerships) funds to build no less than 10 homes per year, collectively. An additional $100,000 in CDBG funds was granted to those developers to offset property acquisition costs and other CDBF eligible development costs. To date, three homes are under construction and permits have been taken out on two others. The homes under construction should be completed and available for occupancy by late October, 2002. We have also made an agreement with Maranatha Affordable Housing to build 14 to 20 new homes in the in-fill project area. Maranatha will use $100,000 of HOME funds to purchase lots in the area and build affordable housing. They are currently negotiating for property in the area. · The 14th Street Aquatic Center project is in the preliminary stage of design. The primary beneficiary area surrounding the pool site is described as having .about 52,000 people, and of those, about 62%, or 32,000, are considered Iow income residents. · Construction on the MLK Swimming Pool Rehabilitation Project is anticipated to begin in early 2003...In addition to a general rehabilitation, a water slide and water spray elements will be added. Honorable Mayor and City Council August 8, 2002 Page 3 Funding for the projects mentioned above will come from variOus sources. In addition to private funding, sources include Southeast Tax Increment dollars, HOME Funds, Downtown Affordable Housing Funds, CHAFA, Section 108, CDBG, and Federal .Tax Credits. Grants and non-CBDG Funds Obtained Through Leverage Project Funding Source Amount California Avenue Sr. Housing Project (CVE) Federal Tax Credits $17,500,000 ($1.757M @ 10 years) Bakersfield Senior Center HUD Section 202 Program $ 6,200,000 Southeast In-Fill Housing Project CHFA (Loan) $ . 500,000 Aquatics Center Section 108 Loan $ 3,300,000 Southeast Community- Special Projects Section 108 Loan $ 800,000 Southeast Training Center Section 108 Loan $ 200,000 710 Brundage Lane (Bakersfield Family Apts.) Federal Tax Credits $10,000,000 ($1.0M @ 10 years) Funding to match the $10,000 budgeted and expended PG&E Grant $ 4,400 by the City to contract with the Small Business Dev. Center to provide business assistance and technical planning assistance to small businesses and non-profits TOTAL: $28,514,400 Additional Southeast Area Improvement Projects The California Avenue sidewalk reconstruction project was completed in May. Deteriorated sidewalks in the area bordered by California' Avenue on the north, Union Avenue on the east, Brundage Lane on the south, and Chester Avenue on the west were rebuilt. The southeast street light improvement project is scheduled to begin in September and be .completed in December. Two areas will be upgraded. Area #1 is bordered by California Avenue on the north, Washington Street on the east, Brundage Lane on the south; and Union Avenue on the west. Area #2 is bordered by Casa Loma Drive on 'the north, Cottonwood Road and Hale Street on the east, White Lane on the south, and Union Avenue on the west. The Union Avenue street light improvement project will include the installation of 15 new street lights and the upgrade of 11 existing lights in an area bordered by California Avenue on the north, Lakeview Avenue on the east, Brundage Lane on the south, and Union Avenue on the west. Installation is scheduled to start in October and be completed by November. AT:rs Mr. Dale-Wilson, Chairman Kern Veterans Memorial Park Committee American Legion Post 26 .2020: "H" Street - · ' · Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr~. Wilson." Thank. you! for the presentati°n Your'C°mmittee made to the Board of the Kern River parkwayFoundation yesterdayevening. Themembers of the Board found the presentatiOn to. be very inter'esting. ........... ~ss ~r~e'~e'~e~'~''s~lJ~i~ ~r~l~ei~s-'~i~ y(>~' pro~o-sal t~at we ~ei ~eed to be addressed.' First, we feel the Veterans Park concept does not fit 'with the long-standing theme that-we have pursued for well over 'the last two decades. We have assiduously avoided' memorial proposals and naming parks for anything not related to the river. We feel that the. proposed twelve memorial/monuments for this-parks site would be a distraction from the Kern River Parkway theme and'-is a departure from the long-stated policy that has been-developed by 'the Kern River Parkway Foundation and the City of Bakersfield: AdditiOnally, the proposed project does not appear to be fully "thought-out" at this time. At our previous meeting at. Lorene's restaurant there was no mention of.twelve memorials: In fact, Mr. John Fallgatter Spoke about a "couple" ofm0numents. Also; we Came away from that meeting with the understanding tha~ your groap had met with Castle and Cooke (land developerS) regarding the museum element of the project plan and that this was secure. Now it appearsthat this has changed.. In the spirit of compromise and cooPeratiOn the Kern River ParkWay Foundation. Board unanimously VOted to support the conceptofa Veteran:sMemorial at thepark site under ~the folloWing.conditions: · 1. Th6 memorial must confOrm to.the goals and'policies of the Kern.River Plan and theKern River ParkWay plan 'and with all ordinances and regulations related to-these plans. 2, A single memorial site, notto exceed 10,000 square feet, shall be located at the west end of the park, west of the lakeand adjacent to Stockdale Highway. We feel that this particular site would provide the memorial with outstanding visibility to people within the park and those traveling on ~ Stockdale Highway.- ' 3'. The me~f~i theme · element coUld be:inCorporated within the design of the memorial. 4. The name of the park will cOnformto existing Policy and be river related. 5. The final design of the mem°rial will be reviewed and'approVed by the following parties: a. TheKern'River Parkway Foundation b. The City of Bakersfield, Parks Department c..The Bakersfield Arts Council 6~-~- ~Full-fUnding for-the-e0nstmction-of-the memorial an&a-funding-_source for maintaining the mOnUment.into perpetuity must be demonstrated prior to acceptance. We believe that a single.well-planned memorial site would be aesthetically pleasing and could be designed to complement the Parkway's river theme. We feel that.twelve memorials would distract l?om the river theme and over-whelm the park site. -We hope you accept our ideas in the spirit of which they are offered. As you know, We have been~working on the ~Kern River Parkway project since 1975. We feel that with some compromise a:Veteran's Memorial could be realized'at this site. Rich O'Neil, President KernRiver Parkway Foundation cc: City 'of Bakersfield County of ~Kern Veterans Kern River Parkway Committees AUG - 6 2002 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS DATE: August 5, 2002 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Stan Ford, Director of Recreation and Parks SUBJECT: Pool Closure Each year, like many agencies that operate aquatic facilities during the summer, we experience difficulty with recruiting and maintaining enough staff to operate the facilities for the entire season. This nation-wide problem has existed for several years. In an effort to ensure that we have sufficient staff for the entire summer, we require that the staff commit, in writing, to working until the pools close. We also attempt to hire and train "extra" staff to replace anyone who may resign early. Despite our best efforts, .we are now faced with a difficult situation that is similar to the one we had last summer; closing a pool early. You probably recall that we closed Planz pool one week early last year. By the end of this week, 20 of the aquatics staff will have resigned. This large number of resignations will result in the need to close one of our pools. Based on daily usage for this year, I intend to close recreation swimming only at Saunders pool effective' Monday, August 12. This closure will be seven days sooner than the pool was scheduled to close for the year. The pool will remain open for swimming lessons until the session is complete. If this pattern of resignations continues, it may be necessary to close additional pools. I will keep you informed of the situation. If you require additional information, please let me know. c: Citizen's Community Services Advisory Committee AUG_ 5 ?O02 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS. DATE: August 5, 2002 TO'. Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Stan Ford, Director of Recreation and Parks SUBJECT: Monthly Report for July Attached are the monthly activity reports from each division. Of note in July was: Regatta: The annual Bakersfield Regatta wasa great success! This was the third year we have held the event. Note: The 2001 event was canceled as a result of the lack of water. Thanks again to Gene Bogart and his department for their support. This year we had 153 boats entered and approximately 1,000 people in attendance. The number of entries represents a 58% increase from the 2000 event. More Responsibility: In July, we accepted an additional 1.76 acres for maintenance which includes turf, 208 trees, and 2,236 shrubs. c: Citizens Community Services Advisory Committee · CITYOFBAKERSFIELD Recreation gcParlcs JULY 2002 Monthly Report Submitted by: Holly Larson, Supervisor Josh Romine, Specialist Beigher Taylor, Coordinator Leisure Classes: Registered Monthly Attendance East Coast Swing 11 44 Nightclub Two-step 11 44 Beginning Tap/Acro. 1 4 Total 23 92 Aquatics Training: Completed Training Mid season In-service (lifeguard olympics) 133 Aquatics Program Attendance: See 'attached report Accident/Incident Reports 283 (year to date) _ Rescue Reports 25 (year to date) Daily Rec Swim Attendance 2002 June 2002 17 103 0 182 200 83 43 40 . 221 117 989 18 178 0 254 153 119 55 89 173 152 1173 19 169 0 .202 206 98 56 57 167 148 1103 20 157 0 273 178 113 72 62 143 108 1106 21 273 0 349 zlu 135 163 92 181 74 1540 22~ 140~ 0 232 143 132 101 67 139 144 1098 23 142 0 206 91 107 59 68 84 61 818 24 120 44 244 108 53 16 38 155 112 890 25 198 75 178 153 92 42 87 165 129 1119 26 209 89 260 160 86 95 93 184 0 1176 27 193 90 271 217 108 62 64 133 113 1251 28 201 100 303 254 109 103 132 188 109 1499 i,,29 133 41 155 95 71 61 86 223 51 916 30 109 40 175 65 78 48 45 107 31 698 232~ ~TQ ~n~ 2296 1384 976 1020 2263 1349 !1, Monthly Total= II 15376 II Ju I 138 57 211 134 67 34 41 173 6~ 941 ~ 140 34 202 135 83 60 66 138 82 960 .~3 149 83 176 99 66 61 45 83 66 828 4 143 53 84 27 73 57 13 1__.__,..__~ 102 656 .~5 111 42 233 65 94 53 87 116 90 891 ~ 99 72 218 59 93 63 51 171 45 871 7 80 24 167 57 73 45 114 75 25 660 8 93 __~~ 40 181 94 77 53 35 143 186 ~~~ ' 90 806 105 50 ~~~ 140 87 51 78 98 80 875 ~~~~~10 95 89 254 113 13~1 35 98 144 99 11 94 55 216 85 ~~~ 1058 ~ 100 45 59 145 76 875 ~12 ~153 ~106 ~311 ~~~127 90 69 ~70 ~~-------125 91 1142 13 140 66 214 92 92 28 25 109 70 839 14 76 34 230 52 54 47 56 165 17 731 15 ~~~~~~109 41 119 112 125 36 71 ' 167 93 873 --~16 106 ~~~~32 127 115 132 ~~~~~48 122 136 85 903 17 93 82 139 98 159 60 57 162 102 952 18 97 56 132 81 111 57 68 215 863 --~~~~~~~~~---------19 125 91 181 182 120 59 61 73 99 991 ~~~20 134 93 ~~180 85 ~27 ~67 ~~74 106 ~84 ~850 21 91 34 145 23 59 47 20 84 25 528 22 98 48 117 84 79 20 0 130 89 665 23 96 41 95 62 77 32 61 138 68 670 24 71 ~~~~60 134 80 111 29 m~O 172 72 729 25 ~~~~~~73 55 166 77 133 30 ~~~~0 125 50 709 26 65 70 119 98 107 17 ~ 128 74 678 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 75 42 99 31 50 35 34 112 15 493 29 83 35 95 58 64 28 28 172 22 585 ~~30 70 24 115 41 41 27 46 89 ~--'~- ~""~"~'~~~ 29 ' 482 31 132 25 13 46 ~~ 43 4~4 22 ~~ ~~ 89 43 457 3134 1634 48F.9 ~ ~4 ...... 8 1337 1525 3887 2015 Monthlv Total: II 23561 II Rec Swim Grand Totals Monthly Rec Swim Grand Totals Monthly Rec Swim Year Comparison I.?~?:: i~ 2oo27~: :i~ ?:::::ii?.~2oo i :~!2500o !June ' '~537~' '~ ''-'~' 13076 July 23561 23673 2oooo August 0 10928 i Grand Total: 38937 47677 ~5ooo 10000 Pool Rec Swim Grand Totals 50o0 ..... _ June Jast ro 211 3 Ju~y ^ugus~ Jefferson 8143 13Series1 12002 EI2001 'MLK 4848 Planz 4002 Saunders 2313 Siemon 2545 S. Creek 6150 Wayside 3364 Pool Rec Swim Grand Totals 10000 : ................................... : ...................................... 8000 : .oeo .... i®__, ..... ® 4000 200o Beale Jastro Jefferson MLK Planz Saunders Siemon S. Creek Wayside 2002 Summer Aquatic Program Attendance Infant 0 7 0 2 2 8 10 23 0 52 Preschool 0 7 1 4 5 10 10 23 0 60 Journey 4 23 19 50 44 44 48 128 0 360 · d ult 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 Challen~le 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 11 Jr. Life~lUard 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 0 8 Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 Pool Totals 4 38 20 56 51 63 73 201 10 !Infant I 2 0 0 2 6 9 24 0 44 Preschool 2 7 1 3 5 I 0 10 24 0 62 ,Joume¥ 6 23 21 74 39 41 48 121 0 373 Adult 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 6 Challen~le 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 8 0 16 Jr. Life~luard 0 2 0 0 0 I I 2 0 6 Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 Pool Totals 9 36 24 77 47 58 72 184 6 Infant 1 2 2 2 0 3 3 24 0 37 Preschool 2 7 6 5 4 9 10 22 0 65 Journey 5 24 33 73 45 45 45 126 0 Adult 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Challen~le 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 7 0 13 Jr. Life~luard 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 2 0 4 Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 Pool Totals 8 34 43 80 49 57 63 185 10 " Infant ...... 0 Preschool 0 Journey 0 Adult 0 Challenge 0 Jr. Lifeguard 0 Private 0 Pool Totsls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spring IJr' Lifeguard I 26 I 0 ILess°ns I 0 I 7~ I 7~ I Swim Totals July ?~':':'.,Jastro!..~.: ~.'jeffe~n7 !~-S~Cmbk:? :?~as~:~ !i~J~ffersoni'~i S:.-Cmbk 17 0 0 ' 10 I 0 0 2 18 0 0 23 2 0 1 8 19 0 0 19 3 0 0 0 20 0 1 8 4 0 I 3 21 0 0 8 5 0 2 2 22 0 0 I 6 0 0 0 24 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 25 0 I 8 9 0 3 14 26 0 0 13 10 0 0 5 27 0 0 7 11 0 2 2 28 0 1 4' 12 0 0 0 29_ _ . 0 0 2 June Total 13 0 0 0 Total: 0 3 105 108 15 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 August 17 1 0 5 ~ ~effbrs°ni.'~ ~!iS~ c~ek: i 18 0 2 17 1 19 2 0 11 2 20 0 0 2 3 22 0 0 0 5 23 2 2 2 6 24 0 0 3 7 25 0 0 9 8 26 0 0 4 9 27 0 0 3 10 29 0 0 0 12 30 0 0 4 13 31 0 0 17 July Total 14 Total: 5 14 113 132 15 16 17 I~,ugust Total Total: 0 0 0 0 Lap Swim Totala Grand Totals Pool Totals ~:~:~ : ~;Je,,=,F:~rt?.. :.~:~MEK:"? ::~PIAnz. ~de~; ::' iLeaaons I at I I I, ........... [ , I I ~0~ I 87 j 239 I 147 I 178 I ~oB I s4g ! 2e I IProgra~Jr, g* J 21 J 227 J 112 I 239 I 158 I 257 I 295 I 953 Class Totals Infant 133 P~I ~n TaMs ?eschool 187 Challenge 40 Jr. Lifeguard 18 IJu~Y I 132 IAugust I 0 Total: 240 P~I Pr~ramlng T~als Jastro 1 58 .... : . :. : . : Jefferson 8 : -.'... Planz 11 Saunders I 65 Saunders 2 14 Siemon I 3 ~ ~ Siemon 2 64 Siemon 3 20 S. Creek I 21 ~sslon Totals S. Creek 2 65 Total: 385 ~ ....................................... ~ ........... : .......... - ................................. Session Totals Session 1 516 ~ . Session 2 513 · Session 3 529 Session 4 0 '~ ' - _ _ . Grand Totals Session To~ls 1558 Sprin~ Lessons lO5 Swim Team Totals 385 Lap Swim To~ls 240 Program Total: 2288 *Programing to~ls include lessons, lap swim, and swim team "" CITY OF RA K R FIELD Recreation gc Parks dUlY 2002 MONTHLY REPORT Adult and Youth sports Submitted By: Dean Jones, Supervisor I Adult Sports Softball SUmmer softball is at capacity in all leagues. We have a total of 72 teams (66 last summer), 42 men's and 30 Co- recreational, 1206 adults are participating. With the additional teams in this summer's league plus the Dogger program (law league) 10 additional teams we added. We put Patriots park south diamond back in the rotation of fields used. In the past we only use Beach, Dr Martin Luther King Jr and Wayside fields. New programs We will be adding a senior adult softball league for men and women 55 years of age and older. Our plan is to offer the first league in the spring March 2003. Youth spOrts Basketball High school summer league basketball ended another successful season on July 18. All schools in the Bakersfield area competed in all three leagues, varsity, junior varsity and sophomore/freshman. There were 11 varsity, 11 junior varsity and 12 sophomore/freshmen teams, 578 boys participated. Tee- Ball The program ended on July 18. This summer was the most successful summer we have ever had, 208 youth participated, compared to 140 in 2001. For the first time during this program we instituted our code of conduct policy. All participants, parents, and Volunteer coaches are expected to exhibit appropriate behavior at all youth sports programs at all times. Each parent and volunteer coach is required to attend a 1 hour meeting prior to their child participating or coaching in our youth sports program. The policy sets boundarieS of behavior and offer guidelines to everyone involved. Our end of the program evaluation indicates that 85% of those who participated agree that the meeting is needed and thinks that it will help offer a safe, and fun youth sports program. ~ Golf. Our July session ended, Saturday July 28. The instructor at Valley Grande golf course had an illness and could not complete the session. We offered all participants a refund and free entry in the next session. New program. We are in the process of planning a new Pee- Wee sports program. The first event will be tiny dribblers a fundamentals of basketball for'children ages 4 and 5. Recreatton &Parks Jul 2002 Monthl RO orr Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Center Submitted by: Linda McVicker, Recreation Supervisor David Stricker, Recreation Specialist Susan Roussel, Recreation Specialist Dr. Martin Luther King CommunityCenter.-~'-'~~ ~' ........ ~--------~ ........ ~- ....... --~-~-~ ' ~ The Center had a total of one rental for the month of July: The Center has reopened its Sunday pick-up basketball games from 11 am - l pm. Activity Monthly Attendance Registered Participants Weight Room 401 * Game Room 966 * Camp King 2,325 100 Basketball Gym 1,026 * Tennis Class 175 35 Aerobics 132 25 Intemet 440 * Lunch Program 4,126 * Cheerleading/Hip-Hop . 189 24 Sunday Basketball 36 23 Quilting Class 48 20 9,864 227 * Drop-in program (Registration not required) DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. CENTER - RENTALS DATE AGENCY ATTENDANCE July 2 l~t Gym Rental 30 Total Attendance 30 Monthly Attendance of all programs including rentals .................. 9,894 CAMP KING Camp King began June 17 and ended August 1. We had a total of 100 campers registered. Activities included speakers from various organizations; field trips, swim lessons, talent shows a Hawaiian Luau and a trip to Clovis Lakes Water Slides. We had an excellent staffwho proved to be great role models for the campers. LOWELL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER Total~attendance~fo~the~Eow.~elLCenter~was~gS0:.pa~ieipants~The~.-.Eowet~S U-rnm~:~Fii~;~C~-fi~.~? ~..~ program started on Monday,' June 17, and concluded on Friday; ' July' 17'.- Activities included sports,'games; drama;' music, dance, arts hiid'crafts, toumhm~nt§, swimming hnd a trip to a ~ater" " park. Total attendance for the program was 369. The Lowell After School Program resumed on : Monday July 15. Staff members implemented fun new ways to teach children about fire safety. BAKERSFIELD REGATTA The third annual Bakersfield Regatta took place on Saturday, July 6 at 5:00 pm. A total of 153 boats were entered in this year's event which is a 58% increase over the last event. Approximately 1,000 people attended the event. Activities included building model boats, floating them down the Kern River, awards, food, games and live music. The event was held at Beach Park and Yoktus'Park. 'SUMMER GAME CENTERS The Summer Game centers ended on July 26. We conducted programs at five locations The program was held from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Activities included arts and crafts, sports tournaments, games, swimming and music. Total attendance for the program was 8,408. Jastro Park / Franklin School ................... 2,448 Jefferson Park & School ......................... 775 Planz Park .................................... : ..... 1,058 Siemon Park / Nichols Schools .................. 571 Wayside Park ...................................... 3,555 BEALE BAND CONCERTS The Beale Band 'Concerts ended on July 28. These traditional concerts are Still popular after 50 years. We had an average of 350 to 400 participants at each concert. £ITY OF BAKERSflELD aecreat n &Parks - Jul 2002 Monthl Re ort Silver Creek Community Center After School 'Programs Leisure Classes Submitted by: Terri Elison, Recreation Supervisor Colleen Cashmore, Recreation Specialist Amanda Greene, Program Coordinator Bakersfield B.E.S.T. After School Program We continue to work on staff recruitment for the 2002-03 After School Programs. Staff orientation is scheduled for August 17th through August 21st. Greenfield's After School Program will start on August 26, 2002. Keep America Beautiful Program A Waste in Place workshop was presented on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 1:00 to 4:00 throughout the month of July at E3 Garden Center. Approximately 50 children participated each day in curriculum that is based upon the importance of recycling, beautification, and litter prevention. On Saturday, July 29th, KBB committee members along with 40 volunteers planted red, white, and blue flowers for the Liberty Gardens downtown project at City Hall. KBB Committee Member Burton continues to work on the larger Liberty Gardens project at Fire Station 15. KBB members with the help from Probation volunteers cleaned up several areas of Bakersfield. KBB also is working with Cai Trans on freeway beautification. KBB is also working hard to get the 86-CLEAN number operating. The goal is this program is to get the public more involved in litter prevention by identifying areas in need of clean-ups and having one phone number where they can call for assistance. Through effective communication, we hope to achieve measurable results in litter reduction by promoting community pride and accountability. KBB committee members are also preparing to do their Litter Index Survey in August. Other projects they are working on are the "Cool in the Shade" event in September, Adopt an Area, and Adopt a Highway. ATTENDANCE FIGURES Silver Creek Rentals .......... ~ .................................... ~...$336.50 (F~gure doo, not,.c,udo ~,,o,i~1 The Silver Creek multi-purpose room and or pavilion was rented one time during the month of July. The center was rented for a wedding reception. Total attendance was 100. Classes at Silver Creek: # Registered Total Attendance Ballet & Gym (6 -11) 8 '32 Calligraphy Workshop 9 9 Chess 7 28 Clogging 13 52 Dance & Gym (4-5) 10 40 Dance & Gym (2-3) 11 44 Dog Obedience 8 32 Drawing no class no class German no class no class SC Gymnastics (Mom & Me) 6 24 SC Gymnastics (3 -5) 5 20 Jazzercize 5 105 Kardio Kick 11 88 Karate 38 304 Photography. no class no class Pressed Flower Workshop no class no class Scrapbooking 2 8 Spanish no class no class Tennis (Child-Beg) 16 128 Tennis (Child-lnt) 16 128 Tennis (Adults) 9 72 Upholstery 10 40 Watercolor 14 56 TOTAL 213 1270 Classes at Other' Facilities # Registered Total Attendance Siemon Park Tennis (Child) 13 104 Tennis (Adult) no class no class All Star Dance Studio Dance & Gym (2 ½ - 4) 2 8 Dance & Gym (4 - 5) 3 12 American Academy of Gymnastics Gymnastics (3 - 4) 5 20 Gymnastics (K - 6yrs) 6 24 Jastro Park Tennis no class no class TOTAL 29 168 Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Pro_clram Waste in Place (E3 Gardens) 50 Students/2 Leaders 300 Students/12 Leaders Total Attend Probation Clean-Up Project 9 Volunteers Liberty Gardens Project 40 Volunteers Silver Creek Day Camp ........................ 1180 Session 2 ...... 43 The theme for the first week of Session 2 was "All Creatures, Great and Small" and highlights included a field trip to Hart Park and C.A.L.M. and a demonstration by Sherry Parker from "For the Birds and More". The 2® week theme was "It's a Small World After All" and their field trip was to Rosemary's Creamery, Jastro Park for lunch, and Pacific Theaters to see a movie. At the parent show, campers performed various ethnic dances. Campers also enjoyed swimming, making paper mache piggy banks, Japanese fish kites, Chippewa dream catcher, foreign songs and games. Session 3 ...... 51 Theme for the first week of Sessions 3 was "The Good Old Days" and the field trip was to Farmer John's Egg Ranch and Southwest Lanes for Bowling. The Sweet Adeline's also came and performed for the campers. The 2nd week theme was "The Great Outdoors" and their trip was to Harvey Auditorium to see Peter Pan, Beale Park for lunch, and Baskin Robbins for ice cream, They also had a demonstration from William Towes of the Boys Scouts. At the parent show, campers performed dances and skits of the 60's, 70's, 80's, and 90's. Campers made tie-dye shirts, crystal rock candy, shrinky dinks, lemonade, lava lamp goo, carve soap critters, and nature games and songs. SkyHawks Basketball Camps ...................... 350 Liberty High School- July 15 - 19 ............ 46 Participants Highland High School - July 22 - 26. ...... 24 Participants This camp targeted 7 to 14 year olds and ran from 9:00 to 3:00 each day. The players learned new skills and techniques and finished the week off with a tournament. Each player received a basketball, t-shirt, and evaluation. · SkyHawks Flag Football Camp ................... 115 Silver Creek Park - July 29 - Aug 2 ......... 23 Participants This camp is for 7 to 14 year olds and ran from 9:00 to 12:00 each day. The players focused on the skills and strategies of the game. Each player received a football, t-shirt, and evaluation. Musicfest Concerts'. ................................. 1750 July 9th - Reggae and Ska Mento Buru ......................................... 700 Attendance July 16th - Country fun with Karen.Konnoff & and Two Marks ............ 150 Attendance July 23rd - Dixieland Jazz with Southside Chicago Seven ................. 300 Attendance July 30th - Latin Sounds of The Majestics ...................................... 600 Attendance Families enjoyed these free concerts on Tuesdays from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at Silver Creek Park. These concerts are sponsored by the Department of Recreation and Parks and Castle and Cooke. Attendance Silver Creek Center: Rentals ......................................... 100 Classes ........................................ 1270 Registrations Taken: 474 Camp Fun .............................. 1180 # of Guests Served: 638 T-Ball Program ............................. 210 (The # of Guests served does not incJude.registration) ............................... S ~-~)R~i~-S~?F i a~.~F-5~St-~,ll~C~ ~ ~: i~i-~-~, ............................................................................ ~ ............................ .: Musicfest Concerts ................... 1750 TOTAL .................... 4,625 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Recreation &Parlcs PARKS DIVISION JULY 2002, MONTHLY REPORT WE KEEP GROWING AND GROWING Parks Division accepted maintenance responsibilities for two locations in July. Total acreage accepted is 1.76 all of which located in southwest Bakersfield. In addition to turf and ground cover;208 Irees and 2.~2-3.6. shrubs are included ~within:thisne~w~aimenao~.,area.,..: STILL POPULAR Even with the inevitable July hot streak of 100 plus degree days, park reservations remained on a brisk pace. We documented 127 reservations attracting approximately 11,000 persons to visit our parks. NORTHEAST DEVELOPMENT The first major development project in decades has broken ground in northeast Bakersfield. One distinct difference from most other recent development locations occurred eons ago. The difference is terrain. From steep slopes to rolling hills to flat lands and everything in between can be found over many square miles in northeast Bakersfield. Difference in terrain will offer unique challenges and opportunities for landscaping of rights-of-ways. In consultation with the developer, Tract 6,000, located northeast of the intersection of Alfred Harrell Highway and Highway 178, is proposed to provide a more natural look. Current recommendations forwarded to Planning Commission include planting drought tolerant trees and shrubs in clusters along the Alfred Harrell alignment and our first use of above ground irrigation. CENTENNIAL PLAZA FOUNTAIN Staff members continue to pursue resolution of problematic situations of Centennial Plaza's pop jet fountain. A dryer system was installed in all five control pods located under the field of pavers. A s' mall a ir conditioning unit w as ins tailed for t he vault room containing cornputer control system and pumps after we found 150 degree temperatures in the subterranean enclosure. Moisture contaminated controllers are on order and should be installed in August. Once problematic control functions are returned to working order, the first 10 - 20 of 100 pop jet valve assemblies will be replaced. We hope to begin this aspect of the project'by September. GOSFORD MEDIANS · Parks division will direct installation of new median turf once the Gosford Road paving project from Ming Avenue to Stockdale Highway is 'complete. Expectations are installation of sod will occur mid September. - Parks Division will have approximately 40,000 square feet of E1 Toro Zoysia grass installed ..... within a 3-4 days time frame. E1 Toro Zoysia is a hybrid turf grass created by University of ..... California Riverside. It is known as a very hardy grass, requires less water than other hybrids, and has slower and less aggressive "runners" than Bermuda but can still mend itself. We believe this grass may allow us to extend duration between mowing and edging schedules resulting in potential for maintenance operation savings. include using less of our natural resources (water), revenue savings due to using less water, and better control of irrigation water from coming in contact with pavement. B A K E R S F I E L D OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM August 7, 2002 To: Alan Tandy, City Manager From: Darnell W. Haynes, Assistant to the City Manager~ Subject: Lakeview Business Association Meeting - August 6, 2002 Attached is the agenda from the Lakeview Business Association meeting I attended. There were about 30 to 35 community members in attendance. The focus of the meeting was to begin the process of establishing a business association and develop ideas for spending the $2 million dollars of CDBG funds allocated for reconstructing and rebuilding the southeast commUnity. I have also included comments from Council member Carson which were distributed at the meeting along with a list of ideas that resulted from the discussion. The next meeting is scheduled for August 20, 2002. S:XDarnell\SE PACXlakeviewassoc..doc August 6, 2002 Lakeview Business Association Meeting Page 2 Ideas Discussed for Spending the $2 million dollars: 1.. Recreation Center 2. SpOrts Center for Youth 3. Job Training Center 4. Recycling Center 5. Establishment of Newsletter by the Lakeview Business Association 6. Trade School 7. MKL, Jr. Children's Center (Psychiatric Center/Foster Home) 8. Community Clean Up (Use Co~mmunity Labor Force) 9. Youth Mentor Program 10. Day Care Center 11. Establishment of a Business Incubator District 12. Micro Lending Program 13. Ownership of Vacant Lots (Individuals Need Help to Purchase) 14. Incorporate Efforts of the PAC, Charrette and Community Meetings 15. Support Programs Already In Place 16. Dry Cleaners 17. More Bus' Routes 18. Role Models S:XDamell\SE PAC~lakeviewassoc..d°c LAKEVIEW BUSINESS ASSOCIATION MEETING AGENDA August 6, 2002 1. Prayer: Minister James Jordan 2. Welcome: 3. Introduction: 4.Overview: This first meeting is to discuss support we need from the community for Lakeview Ave/Dr Martin Luther King Business Association. A. We would like to collect some ideas and plan for the further reconstruction and Building of the Southeast Community. A representative of the Business AssOciation Meeting will take these ideas and information to the City Counsel. We are aware that there has been a Charette in the past and some great'ideas came from that. B. DiscussiOn of Ideas 5. Closing Thank You For Attending IRMA CARSON SPEAKS OUT The Bakersfield CaHf0rnian once again is pressuring the community to hasten the spending of the 2 million dollars earmarked for the Southeast Redevelopment Project Area of Bakersfield. Their articles fail to inform the community of all the planning and collected information that has been accomplished by our Ward One CouncilWoman Irma Carson in the last three years. She was the guiding force to revitalizing the area with the formation of the Redevelopment Project Area and the Project Area Committee leading the way for revitalization in the community. We do not need to be pressed to do anything hastily that is not planned or does not have community involvement. Because they have ignored all of the long hours of hard work and commitment to revitalization in the Southeast RedeveloPment Area, as your representative I need to inform you of the work that has been done to revitalize our community. It is great to think outside the· box but to get the job done we must work inside the box! First, interested investors must have the capacity to deliver, and as a community we must offer them sustainability for them to stay. This means we must spend our dollars in the community that we live and work in, we must recycle our dollars back into the community. Second, there must be a commitment to revitalization and redevelopment to assure their sustainability and all funding sources must be shared with the goal of creating tangible results within' the community. Thirdt businesses involved in economic development must create jobs and encourage tax increment growth for the-area. ... Fourth, Support non-profits that encourage growth and jobs. · Fifth, we must not duplicate non-profit and government services that are already being offered in the area but encourage new needed programs and business services to enhance the community. Sixth, we must continue to work .together as one united front and not as isolated individual entities with small pockets of self interest' that do not lead to positive revitalization and redevelopment for the area. Seventh, we must understand the boundaries of the redevelopment area and what needs should be prioritized for our community. We must learn the,' demographics of the area, what monies.are being spent in the area'and what funds are available or upcoming for redevelopment projects. The Southeast Redevelopment Project Area encompasses a large geographic area and we must understand where .our potentially most profitable commercial and residential corridors are within the area. Finally, I am egtablishing a community advisor for those who are interested in developing a business and .learning how to submit plans. Everyone needs to understand that the City of Bakersfield Economic Development Department is available for technical assistance but they DO NOT WRITE YOUR BUSINESS PLAN! The Small Business Development Corporation, Mr. Jeff Johnson is the agency that will help you .write a business plan. Soon everyone will be invited to attend the Charrette Results Informational meeting. This meeting will give us an opportunity to prioritize projects defined by the Charrette. Currently, the following are ~developments occurring in the Southeast Project Redevelopment Area: Food 4 Less Grocery Store (Comer of Califomia and Union Avenue) · Capitol Vision Equities - Senior Housing Development Calif. Ave. · The Infill Housing Projects - Southeast area · Bakersfield Senior Housing Project- 4th Street · Countrywide and Fifth District, First African Methodist Episcopal Church (Mortgage Loan Program) · Affordable Housing Development on.Bmndage Lane · . Establishment of Police Sub-station · Pending Housing Development on Comer of Watts and Lotus Lane · D&D planned Community on Pacheco and Cottonwood Road ·Comerstone Group Residential and Commercial Developments · Streetscape Improvement Plan for Lakeview Avenue There has been a great deal of interest in other business opportunities along Union, Brundage, and California Commercial Corridors. I want to assure you that I am committed to see that those who are currently doing business in the Southeast Area and businesses who wish to locate there will have .funding to improve and expand their biasiness for job creation and tax increment growth. -' There has been a feasibility study done for our commercial corridors and a specific study commissioned by the Housing Authority of the County of Kern for Robinson and California, so we are moving forward with planned redevelopment and revitalization for the Southeast Area. I can assure you that the money we have for economic development will be spent to develop the Southeast project by project to improve the quality of life for all Southeast Residents. 3 AGENDA- CITY/COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CONCURRENT MEETING Monday, August 12, 2002 - 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 1. ROLL CALL CITY PLANNING COMMISSION KERN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RON SPRAGUE, Chairman DOUG zIMMERMAN, Chairman JEFFREY TI(AC, Vice Chairman KAY PITTS, Vice Chairman TED BLOCKLEY CHRIS BABCOCK BURTON R. ELLISON ROSS MCCLINTOCK DA VID GA Y VERNON STRONG TOM MCGINNIS MURRAY TRAGISH 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON THE ADEQUACY OF THE DRAFT. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update intends to amend the text, land use, circulation and bike way plan maps. It is the intent of this update program to reflect the community development issues and policy changes that have occurred since adoption of the plan in 1990. Proposed revisions include the concepts of the Greater Bakersfield ViSion 2020 Program. RECOMMENDATION: Receive Comments and Refer to Staff for Preparation of,the Final EIR. ROLL CALL VOTE - Both Commissions 5. COMMISSION COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT (Kern County.Planning commission adjourns to August 22, 2002) STANLEY GRADY, Secretary Planning Director August 8, 2002 t3 .~. K E R S F I E L D CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM August 8, 2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Pamela A. McCarthy, City Cler~,_.~ SUBJECT: Allen No. 5 Annexation Election Materials Attached are samples of the ballot envelopes and voter Pamphlet that will be used for the October 8, 2002 Special Election. Each registered voter within the proposed Allen No.5 area will receive a ballot, voter pamphlet and a postage-paid envelope in which to return their ballot. The ballots are scheduled to be mailed on September 11, 2002. If you have any questions regarding this 'matter, please contact me. :proc Cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager PAMELA A MCCARTHY CMC CITY CLERK CITY HALL 1501 TRUXTUN AVE BAKERSFIELD CA 93301-5201 661/326-3767 i~[."oS~,.~°~~DENT~F~CA¥~©~ & ~F~U~ ENVELOPE. o. You. a^,,oT FOR VOTE BY MAlL BALLOT WILL NOT BE COUNTED. POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ACCEPTED. PAMELA A MCCARTHY CMC CITY CLERK~ 1501 TRUXTUN AVE CITY HALL BAKERSFIELD CA 93301-5201 · ploqesnoq ecu~s · u! 5u!p!se~ uos~ed ~o ~elslS '~eqlo~q 'lumi~dpum5 'lue~d 'Pl!qO 'esnods (euo elo~!o) :d!qSUOlleleEI I I ( ~ e~eH leq~, UOl~SOd t) lOlleg 5u!~nle~ uosJed Jo eJnl~uSIs lOll~g Gu~nle~ uosJed to e~eN lu!Jd ~  :e~ Joj lOlleq ~ ~nleJ ol uo~ed 5ul~OllOi eleuSisep ~ eq~ I I~O!s~qd JO sseUJl~ oi · JeioA e~l ua~i Je~o euoe~os ~q ~ap uol~oele uo ~BId ~UlllOd · o) Jo I~lOl~ SUOl~ela e~l oi peJ~lleP pu~ si ~o11~ Sl~t ~ ~NO ~o1~ e~eld~oo - ~N~HOd~l I '* · ' Aq pesseullM'~Jew e e~em Acm eqsp '~ ol elqeun si Jelo~ eql il ~ ~ ~O ~ 'iOeJJOO pU~ emi Je!leq pue eSPel~ou~ ~m ~o lseq eql oi si uo~l~JEioep 5u!oSeJoj eql leql ~n[Jed jo ~lleued eql Jepun eJeloep I 'uo!loele emus eql JOj uo!lo~pspn[ Jeqlo ~ue ~oJj lOll~q Jelon luesq~ ue Joj ~ldd~ ol pue~u~ Jou peydd~ : lou eAeq I 'edoleAue eqi uo smedde emeu esoq~ uos~ed eqi pue 'lou!oeJd eql u! JeloA e pus jo luep!seJ e me I :' :~ZVO aNY N~IS '~O~81~ZVIS avia :a~oA VOTE YOUR BALLOT AND MA~ ~MM~D~ ~ ~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD TO: VOTER PAMELA A. McCARTHY INFORMATION CITY CLERK '1501 TRUXTUN AVE PAMPHLET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TUESDAY, OCTOBER 08, 2002 Voted ballots must be at the address E×^~PLE received listed above on or before 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, OCTOBER 8, 2002. Ballots received after that time will CompiledandPrepared by not be counted. PAMELA A. MCCARTHY CITY CLERK VOTE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED OFFICIAL BALLOT BY MAIL OR IN PERSON TO THE CITY CLERK BY 8:00 P.M. OCTOBER 8, 2002 IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS If you vote yes on Measure A, and the majority of your neighbors, who vote, do the same, the subdivision known as Belsara will be annexed to both the City of Notice to the Voters: Bakersfield and the NOR Sanitary District (Sewer). Most of the government services you receive and responsibilities you share will not change. Several CITY OF BAKERSFIELD property related local services will change. The annual per lot cost to owners will be: A special election will be held on Tuesday, · Street lighting- decrease from $50.00 to $0 October 8, 2002 within the boundaries of the · Sewer- decrease from $130.00 to $126.00 subdivision of Belsara. The election will be · Street Sweeping- decrease from $10.00 to $0 conducted by mail ballot. There will be no · Storm Drainage- decrease from $25.00 to $0 · Landscaping/walls -. decrease from $171.00 to polling places. All ballots must be received at $69.00 ~ the office of the City Clerk located at 1501 · Refuse collection - increase from $142.00 to Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield no later than 8:00 $144.00 p.m. on October 8, 2002. If you vote no on Measure A, and the majority of your A POSTMARK DATE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. neighbors, who vote, do the same, the subdivision known as Belsara will remain outside the City of Voters must use the enclosed Identification Bakersfield and the NOR Sanitary District. Most Envelope provided to vote and return their Governmental services will remain the same. Several property related services will change. The annual per lot ballot. POSTAGE HAS BEEN PAID FOR cost toownerswitlbe: YOU, YOU DO NOT NEED TO ADD A STAMP. Your ballot may also be delivered to · Street lighting -increase from $0 to $50.00 · Sewer- increase from $126.00 to $130.00 the office of the City Clerk by YOU THE · Street Sweeping-increasefrom $0to$10.00 VOTER in the Identification Envelope. Your · Storm Drainage- increase from $0 to $25.00 · Landscaping/walls - increase from $69.00 to signature and residence address is required $171.00 on the envelope for your vote to be counted. · Refuse collection - decrease from $144.00 to $142.00 Questions? Call (661) 326-3074 for more Kern County provides your property related services and information, has not yet charged for them. The Board of Supervisors has agreed that all those services listed above except refuse collection are special services extended to your INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: neighborhood. The Board has also agreed that, unless you annex to the City of Bakersfield and the NOR Sanitary District, you will be charged for them starting in To vote on the measure, punch out the circled 2003. cross (+) in the voting square after the word The amounts listed above are budget estimates from "YES" or "NO". county and city and NOR staff. If you wrongly punch, tear or deface the ballot card, you may return it to the City Clerk with a written statement indicating you have spoiled your ballot and another ballot will be issued to you. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A The purpose of this election is to determine whether the residents of Allen Road No. 5 wish to annex into the City of Bakersfield. The following are changes to services and benefits that residents ~vill receive if Allen Road No. 5 decides to join the City: · Property taxes will not increase with annexation. The County has informed us that you will receive a property tax bill in September which will include charges for various County Service Area districts. Upon joining the City, your taxes will decrease because of the elimination of some, if not all of these County Service Area districts. · Annexation will not result in changes in elementary, middleor high school districts. · The entire area will receive garbage collection, street sweeping, leaf collection and recycling at a reduced cost, which will eventually be assessed on your annual property tax bill. · Joining the City will mean that City police will respond to your calls for service. City police protection will result in faster response times due to a contiguous service area. This is a more efficient use of your tax dollars. The Bakersfield Police Department will also provide ,traffic patrol to help with issues such as illegal truck parking and speeding. · You will receive services from our Code Enforcement division which will maintain your beautiful neighborhood by preventing illegal dumping and public nuisances. · No changes in fire services. · No changes in water or sewer services or cost. Annexation will not cause any significant change to your area or your way of life other than better, more affordable services. Please join your surrounding neighbors and become residents of the City. On behalf of the City Council, we look forward to working with you as your City representatives. David Couch Councilmember, Ward 4 NO ARGUMENTS AGAINST WERE FILED B A K'E R S F I E L D Alan Tandy · City Manager July 29, 2002 Dear Resident: We have discovered that the Bakersfield city limits divides some properties in your neighborhood. As a resUlt, a portion of some properties are in both the City and the unincdrporated area of Kern County. Because of this unusual condition it is sometimes difficUlt and confusing for City and County agencies to provide services to your neighborhood in the most economical way. To correct this problem we-propose adjusting the city limits by annexingyour property to the City of Bakersfield. At.this time we would like to hear your opini~ons and.answer questions you might have about annexation. Our desire is to 'create a more logical boundary for the neighborhood that will contr~ute to better services for you and your neighbors. We have attached a map showing the. existing city limit and a proposed city limit. If annexed to the City of Bakersfield, most of your taxes, assessments, and services would not change. There would be no increase to your base property taxes. Services such as water, schools, fire, garbage, and streets would continue as they exist today. Other services may change in some respect. Police service, for instance, would become the responsibility of the Bakersfield-Police Department. Because of the number of police officers that patrol near your neighborhood, you would see faster response times on emergency calls for police service. Garbage-service would continue to be collected by the same private hauler you have now. The garbage collection fee would increase 17 cents per month from $11.83 to $12.00. But City residents receive extra green, waste recycling cans at no charge' and a 50% rebate of garbage fees for seniors 65 years and older. The cost of street lighting would change in that you would no longer pay $20 per year on your property tax bill for that service. Please call Martin Ortiz at 326-3788, if you have any opinions or questions. If you are interested, we would be happy to arrange for a neighborhood meeting to answer questions and gauge neighborhood interest. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Alan Christensen Assistant City Manager MO cc Councilmember Sue Benham Alan Tandy, City Manager- City of Bakersfield · City Manager's Office · 1501 Truxt~n Avenue Bakersfield ° California · 93301 (661) 326-3751 · Fax (661) 852-2050 ~ City Boundary Line ........... t' ........... Area Under Consideration ..... · ~'~-'~'""---.~ ~ County Jurisdiction ". S ~ ~ City Jurisdiction ~ //o,.3 B A K E R S F I £ L D Alan Tandy * City Manager August 6, 2002 Ms. Vicki Avila 2i0 Warren Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93308 Dear Ms. Avila: Your thoughtful letter to Council Member Benham relating to the need for local pediatric critical care has been referred to me. Pediatric critical Care as well as other complex medical care issues have for some time been issues of concern within the community. Medical care is not an area which the City of Bakersfield has authority over nor is responsible for. 'This is due to a number of reasons, including state and federal funding which funnel through the County of Kern. State and federal sources serve as major funding revenue streams for Kern Medical Center. Many private hospitals also depend on these funds to provide necessary and/or mandated services and to seek reimbursement for services provided to the indigent, Medicare patients, and other specialized groups. Serving the community's complex health care needs, including pedriatrics, is a complex issue of concern to many of our residents. KMC .dedicates an entire department·to pediatrics, Information can be accessed through the Kern Medical Center website at www. kernmedicalcenter.com. I am forwarding your letter to Dr. B. A. Jinadu, Kern County Health Director. I am sure he will be interested in your comments on.the need for local pediatric critical care' ~nd perhaps will be able to utilize your generous offer to assist in possible.fundraising activities on behalf of pediatric care. Sincerely, City Manager / L020O062-AVILA / cc: Mayor and City Council Dr. B. A. Jinadu, County Health Officer T. Slater City of Bakersfield · City Managees Office · 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield · California · 93301 (661) 326-3751 · Fax (661) 852-2050 AUG - 6 MEMORANDUM CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ~ , August 6, 2002 TO: ALAN TANDY, City Manager FROM: BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney ~ SUBJECT: Charter/Code Requirements for Street Maintenance/Repair QUESTION Does the Charter or the Bakersfield Municipal Code ("Code") require all street maintenance/repair projects be awarded by contract pursuant to bidding requirements, even when being performed by City forces? ANSWER No. The Charter contains an exception for street maintenance and repair and the Code provides the process authorizing such work to be performed by the City. ANALYSIS Initially, resurfacing, maintenance and repair of streets legally is included in the definition of "public works." Section 136 of the Charter (Public Work to be Done By Contract) provides, in pertinent part: "... The City Council shall establish, by ordinance, · . . requiring bidding and award of a contract, if awarded, to the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid." The section continues, in pertinent part: "Projects for the resurfacing, maintenance or repair of streets, drains or sewers are exempted from the requirements of this paragraph, if the city council determines that such work can be performed more economically by a city department than by contracting for the doing of such work." Pursuant to the above charter limitation, the City Council adopted Section 3.20.060 of the Code, which provides the process for bidding associated with public works projects. In accordance with the attendant charter authorization, the City Council adopted Subsection D, which contains multiple exceptions to this bidding process. The pertinent provisions of this subsection are as follows: D. Bidding Exceptions: Bidding may be dispensed with pursuant to the procedures prescribed in this section and Section 136 of the city charter. ALAN TANDY, City Manager August 6, 2002 Page 2 1 .... projects for the improvement, repair or maintenance of all public buildings and works, and for furnishing any supplies and materials for the same if provided for in the council adopted budget, may be performed by a city department.., as determined by the city manager to best serve the needs of the city. Thus, the City Council complied with the Charter by enacting the appropriate ordinance allowing for an exception to the bidding process for maintenance/repair of streets when performed by City forces. Further, the City Council placed a limitation on such activity by requiring such work must have been approved in the council adopted budget. The argument has been raised that the Council must approve each project individually. However, this contention has no merit as the action of the Council in adopting the ordinance, combined with the ordinance requirement for the approval via the council adopted budget, results in a lawful delegation of such individual project approval responsibility to the city manager. BJT:las S:\PUBLIC WORKS\MEMOS\STREET MAINTENANCE CHARTER&CODE REQS.DOC B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ' FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRE DATE: August 5, 2002 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT FOR COFFEE ROAD ACCESS Council Referral No, REF000138 COUNCIL MEMBER COUCH REFERRED TO STAFF A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN CONCERINING ACCESS TO COFFEE ROAD AND LOCAL STREETS. This item is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission in September as part of the third quarter GPA cycle. JH:djl CC: Rhonda Smiley, Office AdministratodPublic Relations P:\CCReferral~Ref000138.doc fRIVEP, L'AKE tRAI CH RIVERLAK£S MASTER ASSOCIATION VICINITY MAP OLWE : yE LOT 8 TRACT 536.3 R- 1 TRACT 3807 R-1 ~0~ 4 S.P.A. NO. TRACT 5.365 KIMBE~LY 02-0484 R- 2 TRACT 3807 TRACT 5478 : R-1 R-~ PEANUr VENUE 4012 R-2 S.P.A. NO. HIOH-MED 02-0426 DENSITY NUMBER 2 RESIDENTIAL ~ WILLOW ~ Z CREEK ~ LO~ ~ ~ TRACT 5363 DRIVE ~ C-~ C-1 ~: ~1~-~ GRAPHIC SCA~ ~ ~" N '. t ' 1 1 COFFEE ROAD ..... '* COFFEE ROAD NO~ TH ~N T~ANC~ o .... ~~'~"'~'~ B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER // FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRE~OR~ DATE: August 6, 2002 SUBJECT: MINIMIZE TRAFFIC IN WARD 4 Council Referral No. REF000139 COUNCIL MEMBER COUCH REFERRED TO STAFF THE ISSUE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS TRAFFIC PROBLEMS BETWEEN NO. SHORE DRIVE AND OLIVE DRIVE AT HEADWATER DRIVE, MOSSROCK AND SEAWARD DRIVE, AND REQUESTED STAFF WORK WITH NEIGHBORS TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. The Traffic Engineer is working on this issue. Strategies to address this issue which may include barriers, diverters and other traffic calming devices in the streets, as well as traffic controls on Riverlakes Drive at Northshore Drive to encourage drivers to not shortcut through minor streets. Decisions regarding the extent of the problem, and which devices may be appropriate to address the problem will be made by the Traffic Engineer. Planning's role is minimal if any. Staff can be made available to support this effort as requested. JH:SG:djl CC: Rhonda Smiley, Office Administrator/Public Relations P:\CCReferral~Ref000139.do¢ Metastorrn e-work client Page 1 of 1 ID: lRef000139 i ~;~nt~[~;~l Requester: IDavid Co.ch W~r.- I~ i Referral Created: aeq. Completion Date: ],,7,./~,4,,/,~002~ .......... Meeting: 16[~9(200,2~,__ 1~!28/2o02 Initial Referral Information Short Description: Long Description: ***DUAL REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LEAD*** COUNClLMEMBER COUCH REFERRED TO STAFF THE ISSUE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS TRAFFIC PROBLEMS BETWEEN NO. SHORE Attachment A DRIVE AND OLIVE DRIVE AT HEADWATER DRIVE. MOSSAROOK AND SEAWARD DRIVE. AND REQUESTED STAFF WORK WITH NEIGHBORS TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Sent for re-assignment in error by Development Service. Attachment B Returning to Development Services as a response from both departments is required. DS, please prepare a written response and forward to City Manager's office. Attach same to the e-work referral. Enter the date you forward Attachment C information to Manager into the response section of the Referral and close ......... Pam McCarthy, City Clerk Attachment D Assigned To: Response?  Reassigned To: Response? R2 (2) i~!!~,,,,W,,~,~-~ :, IDev. Servi'c~s & Planning (3) J i J Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: http://ew~rk/scripts/e~eb.d~~/F~~derPage?Page=Referra~%2524Disp~ay&F~~der~D=EW~RK.. 8/5/2002 B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER /..~/ FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRE DATE: August 5, 2002 . SUBJECT: REVISE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ORDINANCE Council Referral No. REF000137 COUNCIL MEMBER COUCH REQUESTED STAFF DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR A PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING AND A RECOMMENDATION TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS, TYPICALLY TRI-PLEXES AND FOUR-PLEXES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS FOR SUBDIVISION. This item was heard by the Planning Commission on August 1,2002. It was continued to August 15, 2002. If acted on by the Commission on August 15th it could by heard by the City Council in October. Summary comments from the meeting along with the staff report and proposed ordinance is attached. JH:djl CC: Rhonda Smiley, Office Administrator/Public Relations CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Stanley C. Grady, Planning Director AGENDA ITEM DATE: August 1, 2002 APPROVED SUBJECT: Amendment to the text of Title 1§, Subdivision Ordinance and Title 17, Zoning Ordinance concerning regulations for the development and construction of multiple family housing projects such as apartments, duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes in the R-2, R-3, and R-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone districts. APPLICANT: City of Bakersfield LOCATION: Citywide RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution APPROVING the proposed text revisions to Titles 16 and 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code as contained in the attached Exhibit "A". BACKGROUND: In i998 the City Council directed staff to Prepare changes to the regulations effecting the development of multi-family projects with four or less units for review by the Planning Commission. Recommendations from the Planning Commission addressed mechanisms for encouraging amenities, methods to promote clustering, limiting numbers of projects at one location, architectural and site design and lot size proposals that would support more open space. After review by the City Council, an ordinance was adopted which implemented recommendations of the Commission. A summary of those issues and recommendations follows: 1. Mechanism for amenity in the project a. Added a new section which used a floor area ratio to manage lot size to building coverage but provided that the FAR would increase if on site amenities are provided. Prepared by:'"SCG'~August 5, 2002\C:~lyFiles\Revised 4plex Report.doc Page 1 2. Limit on number at one location a. The discussion concerning this issue centered on regulating the number through sites through zoning and setting the maximum acreage for projects with four or lesS units within a given area. The intent was to control the designation of 1:{-2 to control the number and location of potential projects. This matter was not · pursued. 3. Promoting clustering a. Added a section which allowed no more than two adjacent buildings to be perpendicular to the street, effectively requiring the units on either side to be parallel to the street effectively breaking up the row effect common to four-plex subdivisions. This addition was later found to be impracticable and was deleted in September of 1999. 4. Minimum lot size a. Amended a section to include a Floor Area Ratio of .25 for two to four units. Rather than establish set square feet of land per unit, the land requirement is based on the size of the building. The intent was to provide more open space for each complex around each building. 5. Architectural design a. Added a section to require that utility meters & AC units are not to be visible from the street and that elevations for adjacent units shall .not be the same. The entry and windows for the end unit next to the street must face the street except on an arterial. 6. Site design a. Added a section to require the front yard setbacks to be fifteen feet with an average setback of twenty feet or every third lot setback twenty feet. · b. ,~mended a section to require a wall and landscaping along arterial streets At the June 26, 2002 City Council meeting, in response to current issues concerning fourplex projects within the Riverlakes Ranch Specific Plan Area, Councilmember Couch referred to staff a request to draft ordinance amendments to address the quality of multi-family projects particularly tri-plexes and four-plexes on individual lots. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Since adoption of the referenced ordinance changes, new issues as well as problems with the implementation of some provisions of the existing ordinance have arisen. New issues concern guest parking, tenant parking, and design of drive aisles. Provisions of the old ordinance that Prepared by: "SCG"~August 5, 2002\C:UVlyFiles\Revised 4plex Report.doc Page 2 need to be revisited concern open space around the buildings, landscaping, on site amenities and treatment of street fronting end units and street fronting side units. Also, it should be noted that current ordinances do not require on site recreational amenities for multi:family apartments projects. This means that a series of duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes could be built on a common lot without being required to provide on site amenities. Recommendations concerning these issues are as follows: 1. Parking for tenants and guests a. Parking for fourplexes is configured in three typical layouts: 1.) detached covered or uncover parking areas, 2.) attached single car garages with tandem parking in front of the garage, and 3.) attached two car garages without tandem parking. The garages are often used for storage requiring the tenants to park on the street when spaces are not provided outside of the garage on site. It is recommended that tandem spaces be provided in front of the garage or that one space per unit be provided on site. These spaces can be used to satisfy guest parking requirements. b. Currently guest parking applies to multi-family parcels with 6 or more units. For a 6 unit project with 2 bedrooms per unit, one additional space would be required for guests. Because duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes fall below that threshold, guest parking is not required. It is recommended that the current 10% requirement for guest spaces be amended to include the requirement for a minimum of two guest parking spaces for all multi-family projects having three or more units where application of the 10% rule would result in less than two guest spaces being provided. 2. Design and treatment of drive aisles servicing garages a. Typical fourplex site layouts have two rectangular shaped buildings parallel to each other With a drive aisle shared between them. This results in one design type A which has landscaping between the drive aisle and the buildings and type B which does not have landscaping and has very little space between the drive aisle and the building. The design type B does not promote a residential feel for these projects. It is recommended that design type A become the standard. 3. Open space a. The previous ordinance used a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) as a means to achieve a higher percentage of open space compared to building space. In practice this would require a bigger lot for projects that did not provide an onsite amenity. The type of amenity that would qualify was minimal and not specifically defined. The result was developers would offer park like barbeque grillS as the amenity or some other minimal option. While these projects are not as high in unit density as apartment projects, they are higher in the density of use of the available land. And unlike apartment projects, these projects are Iow on open space and those Prepared by: "SCG'~August 5, 2002\C:~lyFiles~Revised 4plex Report.doc Page 3 projects approved prior to 1998 have no on site amenity. It is recommended that 'the F.A.R. and the ability to use more of the land for buildings with a minimal onsite amenity be replaced with a requirement that a set percentage of the ,', project land be maintained as useable open space. 4. Landscaping a. In support of item 2 above, the landscape requirements should be amended to require a landscaped area measuring 15 feet between buildings and drive aisles. One tree per unit should be required to be planted in the area between the drive aisle and the buildings. 5. On site amenities a. In support of item 3 above, on site amenities shall be required of all multi-family projects and acceptable amenities will be specified. 6. Design and use of street facing end and sides of units a. The intent of the provisions addressing end units was'to give a residential feel to these projects. There are projects were living room units have their entrance on the street side and there are projects were a door and window face' the street but the living room entrance is off the drive aisle. The later follows the letter or the law but not the spirit. The current ordinance should be amended to require the living room entrance to be directly from the street side. The same should be true for units were the side of the building faces the street. Changes to adoPted ordinances required to accomplish these recommendations are contained it the attached Exhibit "A". ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND DETERMINATION: This project has been found to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures in accordance with Section 15061 (b) (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The amendment makes modifications to development standards for multi-family projects of four units or less. It can be seen with Certainty that the proposed ordinance amendment will not effect the environment and the general rule under CEQA would apply. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared. Prepared by: "SCG"~August 5, 2002\C:UVlyFiles\Revised 4plex Report.doc Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ADDING AND AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING, OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, AND ONSlTE PARK LIKE AMENITIES FOR MULTIPLE-FAMILY PROJECTS WITH FOUR OR LESS UNITS WHEREAS, the City Council, through its Secretary, did set, WEDNESDAY, @ at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said City Council on said ordinance, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title Seventeen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the ordinance was found to be exempt from the provisions of CEQA and the law and regulations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation the matter of design, location, and lack of amenities for multi-family dwellings with four units or less: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, through its Secretary, did set, MONDAY, July 29, 2002 and, THURSDAY, August 1,2002 at the hour of 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said Planning Commission on said ordinance, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title Seventeen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the amendments were duly heard and considered and the Planning Commission recommended their adoption by the City Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. That the text additions and amendments to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code are hereby approved as follows: SECTION 1 Section 17.14.026 (E)is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.14.026 Additional requirements E. For multiple-family dwellings with four units or less, the living room, · '*-'~'~*o,,,..,.,, ,.., ,,~""'~ ,~, ,,,' '"~* main 'eP~f 'entrance and windows for the street facing end unit and side units must face the street and be accessible from the public sidewalk, utility and other mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the street, and n,~ .,.. ~, ,-- sc. mc-be architectural elevations for adjacent buildings shall -' "^ '~'^ significantly different (i.e.: different elevation, roof types, colors, etc.). REFUSE CONTAINERS SHALL NOT BE LOCA TED WITHIN THE FRONT YARD, AND IF VISIBLE FROM THE STREET SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A MASONRY ENCLOSURE WITH METAL GATES. . SECTION 2 Subsection (Fi is hereby added to section 17.14.026 to read as follows: 17.14.026 Additional requirements F. EaCh multi-family development shall provide and maintain' at least one common open space for the use of all occupants. Common open space is defined as an open area or recreational facility which is designed and intended to. be used for outdoor living and/or recreational use. The open space shall have the following characteristics: 1. Not less than twenty feet (20') in width or depth at any point 2. A minimum of thirty (30) percent of the gross area of the site must be provided as open space. Open space shall not be deemed to include buildings, driveways, parking areas, or other surfaces designed or intended for vehicular travel. Required front building setbacks and street frontage setbacks shall not be included in calculating usable open space. 3. Located on land with less than a five percent (5%) slope. 4. Cleared sufficiently of obstructions so that recreational use is possible. 5. Includes at least one hundred (100) square feet of area for each dwelling unit. C:\MyFiles~Aplex Ordinance.doc SECTION 3 Subsection (G)is hereby added to section 17.14.026 to read as follows: 17.14.026 Additional requirements G. All multifamily developments shall provide recreational amenities within the site which may be combined with paragraph F and may include: a swimming pool; spa; clubhouse; tot lot with play equipment; picnic shelter - barbecue area; court game facilities such as tennis, basketball; Or, improved playfield. The type of amenities shall be approved by the Planning Director. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LOT LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET THAT IS NOT PART OF OR ADJACENT TO MUL TIFAMIL Y SUBDIVISIONS OR OTHER MUL TIFAMIL Y PROJECTS THAT EXISTED PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. SECTION 4 SUBSECTION (H) IS HEREBY ADDED TO SECTION 17.14.026 TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 17.14.026 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS H. FOR MULTI-FAMILY DEVEL°PMENT PROPOSED WHERE THE REAR OR SIDE PROPERTY LINE SEPERATES A LOT ZONED R-l, E, R-S, MH OR A PUD PROJECT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY CHARACTER, SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE SEPERATED BY A SOLID MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 6 FEET FROM HIGHEST GRADE. ANY WALL LOCATED WITHIN OR ALONG THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET. SECTION 5 Subsection (Q) is herby added to Section 17.58.050 (Q) is hereby to read as follows: 17.58.050 General standards as to location and arrangement of off-street parking Q. If garages are provided for multi-family projects with shared access off a common drive aisle, one of he following shall be provided: (1.) Tandem space(s) shall' be provided in front of the garage for each space provided within the garage, or (2.) one space per unit shall be provided on site subject to the approval of the Planning Director C:\MyFiles~4plex Ordinance.doc SECTION 6 Section 17.58.110 is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.58.110 Schedule of parking requirements ~-c~iie-d 'U'se .............. 'Requ,red: ............. Off-Street Parking Facilities ~-- -(~ne~a'~'ily dWeliing~ .... ?"~p~;e~'~er d'~'~iiing unit 2~--~-~p~g':-~'~'ii~;'~;i'i;~-~d ~;-~r~ominiur~-(-~ci'~-~-y--ll-l/2 space per unit, plus and one bedroom units). ]an additional 10% for /guest parking on parcels /containing 6 or more I ~nits. A minimum of 2 guest spaces shall be provided for projects with three units or more. condom~mums (2 or more 2 spaces per umt. plus 3~. -- ~-~ t~p i~i,~ii'~'-d~,';iii n gs"a n ~i . . . I bedrooms). ian additional lO%'for Iguest parking on parcels !containing 6 or more iunits. A minimum of 2 guest spaces shall be provided for projects with three units or ..................................................................... _i._,?_ ............... SECTION 7 Section 17.61.030 is hereby added to read as follows: 17.61.030 Minimum landscape standards O. Multi-family projects where parking is provided in garages using a common drive aisle with shared access to the garages, a 15 foot landscape area shall be provided between each building and the drive aisle. A minimum of one tree per unit shall be provided within the landscape area. C:\MyFiles\4plex Ordinance.doc SECTION 8 Section 17.14.070 is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.14.070 Minimum lot area. A. For multiple-family dwellings with five units or more per lot the minimum lot area shall be not less than six thousand square feet, and the minimum lot area shall be not less than two thousand five hundred square feet per dwelling unit. When a nonconforming lot has less than six thousand square feet and was recorded in the office of the county recorder at the time of'the passage of the ordinance codified in this section, said lot may be occupied by not more than one dwelling unit for each two thousand five hundred square feet. {~. ,~C;' ~'"~;~'^ ~;~" ~ .... "; ...... ;~' ~ ....... ;~ ~' '^~ ~'~ --;~;~' ~ '~ ..... C. ~iiiiiiii~ii, ,~, ~iGu i~i ,liuiLi~,~ I~ii'ii2 ~ii~iiiii'~ ..... Il ,~, ~,"LO .... O~ ~, B. ~ For one-family dwellings the minimum lot size may be reduced to four thousand five hundred square feet per dwelling unit in accordance with Section 16.28.170(C)(3). C. ~ Minimum lot area for multiple-family dwellings on a single lot with adjacent properly zoned for a use other than multiple-family shall be the same as set fo~h in subsection B of this section C:\MyFiles\4plex Ordinance.doc ......... 000 ........ I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers @ NOES' @ ABSENT: @ CITY CLERK and E.x Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVEDastoform: CITY ATTORNEY BY: C:\MyFiles~4plex Ordinance.doc B A K E R S F I E L D FIRE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U.M DATE: August 7, 20t}2 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manage~? FROM: Ron Fraze, Fire Chief RE: Counsel Referral I.D. No. 000161 (COSTCO Site Clean-Up) Counsel Meeting 7-31-02 Councilmember Couch requested information on the clean-up and remowtl actions completed at the new COSTCO Site on Rosedale Highway. The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest was also requested. The records state extensive environmental site assessments and clean-up efforts were completed prior to construction. The site involved eight separate parcels, removal of a 2.1 million gallon above-ground crude oil/sludge tank, five separate underground storage tanks, a clarifier (oil water separator) discharging to a dry well, possible soil contamination associated with a previous oil sump, and several other areas of stained soil and debris. In addition, this site contained three properly abandoned oil wells. The reports covering this clean-up are over eight inches high. I have selected the most succinct report of the work completed on this sight, the Soils Engineering Remedial Action Report. and included it for your reference. The specific concern about the residue found in thc 2.1 million gallon above-ground storage tank is addressed on pages 3 and 4 of this Report. The clean-up of the site was completed fourth quarter of 2(101. I have also included the "No further action required" letter from the City's Environmental Services staff sent on December 1 20111. Feel free to contact me if there are any further questions concerning this site. REH:db Enclosures: (Remedial Action Report-pages 1-29; attachments 12 pagcs) December 17, 2001 Mr. Todd Bartok Costco Wholesale 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: PropoSed Costco Facility at 38® Rosedale Hwy in Bakersfield Dear Mr. Bartok: FiRE cHIEF PON FRAZE This is to inform youi that this department has reviewed the result of the aOlnINISTlaATWE SERVICES Remedial Action Report dated December 3, 2001 associated with the above 2101 'H' Street Ba~emfl~d. CA 9030~ referenced site. VOICE (661) 326-304~ FAX (661) ~95-1349 Based upon the info .rmation provided, this department has determined that SUPPRESSION SERVICES appropriate response actions ,have been Completed, that acceptable remediation 21Ol 'H' Strew1 practices were implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 or removal action or monitoring is required at thc above stated address. FAX (661) 395-1349 Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. satisfaction or release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result I · Bak~e~. ca 9a301 of past, current, or future ope,rations at this location. Nothing in this determination VOICE (661) 326-3901 FAX (661) a~6-0s?s is intended or shall be constm'ed to limit the rights of any parties with respect to claims arising out of or relatiflg to deposit or disposal at any other location of ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES substances removed from thc 'site. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall 1715 Chester Ave. . Bakersfield, CA 93301 be construed to limit or preclude the Regional Water Quality Control Board or any VOICE (661) 326-3979 other agency from taking any !further enforcement actions. FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION This letter does not reheve the land owner of any responsibilities mandated 5642 victor Ave. under the California Health arid Safety Code and California Water Code if existing, Bakersfield, CA 93308 I . . VOICE (661) 3994697 additional, or previously unid,cntificd contarmnatlon at thc site causes or threatens to FAX (661) 3~-~ cause pollution or nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or water quality. Changes in land use may require further assessment and mitigation. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please, contact me at (661) 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, ID Hazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services cc: J. Whiting, RWQCB B. Becket, SEI SOILS ENGINeeRING, iNC. December 3, 2001 File No. 01-9775 Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: Remedial Action Report Former Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties 2800 Standard St., 3650 & 3880 Rosedale Highway Bakersfield, CA. Dear Mr. Wines: 1.0 INTRODUCTION Soils Engineering, Inc. (SED has prepared this Remedial Action Report (RAR) following the completion of remedial activities at the subject site per ENSR's Removal Action Workplan (RAW) dated February 28, 2001 and SEI's Addendum #1 to ~this RAW dated September 26, 2001. The Bakersfield Fire Department Off ice of Environmental Services (BFDES) approved both ENSR's RAW and SEI's Addendum #1 to the RAW prior to conducting the work. The following summarizes the scope of work performed by SEI and the remedial contractor Foss Environmental Services (FOSS) at the future Costco facility in Bakersfield, CA. (see Plate 1 for a Location Map). This report contains analytical results of soil samples, manifests, plot plans, chain of custody documents, a description of work conducted at each area of the site and conclusions and recommendations for the site. 2.0 SITE HISTORY & PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES The approximately 20-acre site consists of multiple properties referred to as the Sparks parcel (comprised of two parcels), Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel, Seaton parcel and the Glenn Rose parcel. These parcels are addressed 2800 Standard Street (Sparks parcel), 3650/3660 Rosedale Highway (Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel) and 3800/3880 Rosedale Highway (Glenn Rose parcel) as shown on the General Plot Plan, Plate 2.. No street address' has been assigned to the Seaton parcel. The Seaton parcel is located between the Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel and the Glenn Rose parcel.' The Sparks parcel was formerly the site of Sabre Transportation, which installed the 5 underground storage tanks, the 2.1 million gallon above~ound storage tank (AST) and the truck 4400 YEAGER WAY ° BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93313 ° PHONE (661) 831-5100 ' FAX: (661) 831-2111 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. ~,~ Remedial/lction Report File Number 01-9775 1 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 2 '1 service building at 2800 Standard Street. The last company to occupy the building was Minyard Trucking in the early 2001. In addition, oil field activities have been on-going since the 1930's on this parcel, which included 3 oil wells and a large oil sump Which have all been abandoned. The Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel was occupied by residential buildings prior to the construction of the current on-site building in 1982. This building was occupied by Maaco Auto paint from 1982 to approximately 1998. The building was last used by MoneyMart up until early 2001. The Seaton parcel has been vacant or used as truck parking or for storage since the 1930's. The Glenn Rose parcel was used to store oil field equipment prior to 1964. The current building (3880 Rosedale Highway) was built in 1964 and occupied by Glenn Rose Engine Shop up until 2000 servicing large and small engines. 2.1 Site Characterization Work Previous environmental investigations concerning soil, asbestos and lead paint have been conducted at this site by SEI and others to determine possible environmental liabilities and appropriate remedial action at the subject site. The most complete historical summary of these investigations was prepared by ENSR and is dated March 5, 2001 titled Site History and Subsurface Investigation Report (Summary Report). SEI has attached ENSR's Summary Report (minus analytical laboratory rePorts) to this Report as Appendix D for reference. In general oil field activities have impacted multiple areas on the Sparks parcel at non-hazardous concentrations. These include areas around the three (3) abandoned oil wells, a large oil sump, multiple surface oil-stained areas, and the 2.1 million gallon AST, which is approximately ½ full of non-hazardOus petroleum products and water. Other areas with petroleum-impacted soil include the dispenser island area and the Class V dry well area both at the 2800 Standard Street ~J portion of the parcel. All of these areas will be remediated by excavation and disposal of non- hazardous waste, except for the AST's contents, which will be removed by vacuum trucks with the non-hazardous wastes transported to appropriate disposal/recycling facilities. The majority of the maintenance building has already been demolished, with the removal of asbestos containing materials (ACM's) taking place in early 1999 by Asbestos Services Inc. (ASI) under appropriate permits. The Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel had hazardous concentrations of metals and non-hazardous concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons identified in two (2) floor drains within the former Maaco building, which will be excavated and disposed of as hazardous waste. A septic tank will also be removed from this portion of the site. The building will be demolished, with the removal of asbestos containing materials (ACM's) taking place under appropriate permits. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial/tction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. Page 3 parcel some non-hazardous petroleum impacted soil identified at two (2) The Seaton has had locations, which will be excavated and disposed/recycled. The Glenn Rose parcel has multiple surface stained areas, a steamcleaner sump, and a septic tank with petroleum hydrocarbons present in the soil at non-hazardous concentrations. Hazardous concentrations of metals were identified in the waste from the steamcleaner sump. These areas will be excavated with the resulting waste disposed of appropriately as either non-hazardous or hazardous waste. The building will be demolished, with the removal of asbestos containing materials (ACM's) taking place under appropriate permits. 2.2 Recent Assessment Reports SEI has recently completed two (2) assessment reports for this site. The first is the Groundwater Well Sampling Report dated October 10, 2001, which describes recent and historical groundwater sampling events at the site. The recent analytical results of the four (4) groundwater wells at the site indicate no significant petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the groundwater beneath the site at the well locations. A letter dated October 25, 2001 from the Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services (BFDES) concurred with SEI's recommendation to properly abandon the groundwater and monitoring wells at the site. The second recent report for the site is the UST Closure Report dated October 29, 2001 prepared by SEI. This UST Closure Report described the removal of the five (5) on-site UST's, soil sampling activities and results, remedial excavations in the area of the dispenser islands, with conclusions and recommendations for the UST areas. SEI recommended that the UST areas be granted closure with no additional work required. As of the date of this report no response form the BFDES has been received on the UST Closure Report. 3.0 REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 3.1 FORMER SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY - 2800 Standard St. and Parcels 39 & 40 ~ 3.1.1 Profiling of Waste Streams from the AST Oil, water and sludge samples of the AST contents were collected and analyzed for profiling purposes by FOSS and MP Environmental (MPE) prior to the project start to evaluate the appropriate disposal/recycling methods for each waste stream within the AST. The analytical results were consistent with historical sampling events conducted by other environmental consultants, which characterized each phase of the liquids as non-hazardous waste. Completed waste profile sheets were sent to each permitted waste facility for acceptance of the wastes. 3.1.2 Evacuation, Decontamination'and Dismantling of 2.1 Million Gallon AST SEI oversaw the evacuation of the contents of a 2.1 million gallon above-ground storage tm~k (AST) by FOSS from October 8 to November 5, 2001. FOSS acquired a Removal Permit for the SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, Cd. Page 4 Above Ground Storage Tank (# BR-0285) from the BFDES prior to conducting the field work (see Appendix A for a copy of the permit). A 40 ml HDPE liner was installed by FOSS at the northern side of the AST where the loading of the tanker trucks was to take place to protect the underlying soil from incidental spills. A window was cut in the side of the AST by FOSS just above the height of the oil. The oil was then skimmed off the top of the AST contents utilizing a skim-pac and vacuum hose attached to a 'MPE vacuum truck. A total of 84,800 gallons of non-hazardous crude oil was removed and taken to Atlantic Oil Company/Premier Oil Company storage tank facilities in Edison, CA. for recycling (see attached Bill of Ladings in Appendix F). Next the water phase was removed by pumping the water and a slight amount of remaining oil into a Fractank for separation of the oil and water. The water was then removed by MPE vacuum tankers from the bottom of the Fractank or directly from hoses inside the AST. The remaining oily water was transported to Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility in McKittrick, CA. for disposal as non-hazardous liquids (see attached manifests). The non-oily water was transported to either the Waste Management/McKittrick Waste Facility or to the Santa Clara Waste Disposal facility in Santa Paula, CA. as non-hazardous wastewater (see attached manifests in Appendix F). A total of 348,050 gallons of water was removed and disposed of from the AST..Next the oil/sludge material was removed from the AST by pumping it out with vacuum trucks from hoses within the AST. Once the. sludge material became less pumpable it was thoroughly mixed with a bobcat and approximately 15,000 gallons of hot water. FOSS personnel working within the AST utilized air-purifying respirators and full-body Tyvek for their protection, when applicable. Lower explosion limits (LEL) and oxygen content were tested inside the AST everyday prior to tank entry by FOSS personnel to ensure safe working conditions. The oily sludge was transported to EnviroCycle, Inc. in McKittrick, CA. as non-hazardous waste for recycling into asphaltic materials. Approximately 677,400 gallons of sludge was transported to EnviroCycle, Inc. under non-hazardous waste manifests (see attached manifests in Appendix F). The AST interior was then decontaminated by FOSS between 11/5/01 and 11/8/01 by high- pressure hot-water steam-cleaners and degreasers. The resulting rinsate was pumped out by MPE vacuum trucks and disposed of at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility as non- hazardous waste (see attached manifests). At the end of the decontamination process the interior of the AST had only a trace oily odor remaining. Sierra Metals then dismantled the AST by cutting it up with hydraulic shears into loadable size pieces. The metal was taken to Sierra Metals in Bakersfield, CA. for recycling. See Appendix D for a few pictures of the remedial activities that took place at this location. 3.1.3 Assessment and Remediation of AST Pad Area The AST pad area consisted of a 6" thick layer of l"-diameter gravel covering the entire area. Trace amounts of oily material were evident within the gravel near the northeas! comer of the former AST. Once the gravel was removed the underlying soil was assessed by trenching north- south and easl-wes! to a depth of approximately 2' to 3' below grade. Oily stained soil was Remedial ~Jction Report File Number 01-9775 SParks Estate and ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. Page 5 obvious in some areas to a depth of approximately 1' to 2', especially on the southern ½ of the AST pad. FOSS removed the stained soil areas with an excavator and stockpiled the removed soil adjacent to the AST pad. On November 13, 2001 a composite soil sample (AST-ST) was collected by SEI from the stockpiled soil, along with 5 discrete soil samples from the base of the excavated areas (AST-NW-2', -SW-2', -NE-2', -NW-2', and AST-Mid-2') to confirm the removal of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil above 1000 parts per million (ppm). A composite sample of the stockpiled gravel (GRVL-1) was also collected for analysis. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples and 1 gravel sample were analyzed for Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarlsons (TRPH), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gasoline through motor oil range), and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Methods 418.1, 8015m and 8020, respectively at Positive Lab Service, a State certified analytical laboratory. Soil sample' AST-ST was also analyzed for volatile organics by EPA Method 8260 and for CAM 17 Metals by EPA Method 6010 and 7471. See attached Chain of Custody documents in Appendix The analytical results of the soil samples indicated 3200 parts per million (ppm) of TRPH, 1100 ppm TPH as motor oil (TPHmo), 510 ppm TPH as diesel (TPHd) with no volatile organics or elevated metals in the AST-ST soil sample. The 5 bottom soil samples in the AST pad area had no elevated TRPH, TPH, BTEX or total lead concentrations. The highest TRPH result was 420 ppm in the AST-NE-2' soil sample. The gravel sample (GRVL-1) had only 86 ppm TRPH reported. See Table 1 and the attached analytical reports in Appendix E for more detail. See attached Plate 2 for soil sample locations. The AST pad area was then backfilled and compacted with clean fill up to match existing grade. The removed hydrocarbon-impacted soil from this area (approximately 500 tons) was transported as non-hazardous soil to both the Waste Management/McKittrick Waste facility and to EnviroCycle, Inc. under non-hazardous waste manifests (Appendix F). See Appendix D for a few pictures of the remedial activities that took place at this location. 3.1.4 Removal of 5 UST's from 2800 Standard Street The 2800 Standard Street parcel had five (5) UST's consisting of 1 - 10,000 gallon diesel, 1 - 10,000 gallon gasoline, two (2) 8,000 gallon diesel, and 1-1,000 gallon waste oil. A three (3) unit dispenser island was located just east of the main UST cluster. Previous site assessment activities have been conducted in the area of the UST's indicating no significant petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil surroUnding and beneath' the UST's. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected beneath the dispenser island to a depth less than 10' below ground surface (bgs). in September 1998. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) of 980 parts per million (ppm) were reported in the 1' bgs. soil sample (B10-1') with only minor ethylbenzene (0.0062 ppm) and xylenes (0.018 ppm) reported in the 8020 analysis. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 6 On October 3, 2001 the UST's were decontaminated (triple rinsed) with a high pressure steamcleaner and a degreaser by Foss Environmental. The rinsate was removed by an MP Environmental vacuum truck. The rinsate was disposed/recycled at DeMenno/Kerdoon's facility in Compton, CA. under a Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest. The UST's were inerted with dry ice prior to removal. A lower explosion .level (LEL) meter was utilized to determine hydrocarbon vapors and oxygen content prior to removal. The LEL levels and oxygen levels were at safe concentrations prior to removal. The UST's were removed on October 4, 2001 under permit #BR-0284 obtained from the Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services (BFDES) by FOSS (see Appendix A for copy of permit). A crane was used to remove the UST's, which were then placed on a truck, marked and transported to Sierra Recycling for disposal/recycling. Soil samples were collected by SEI from the excavator bucket at approximate depths of 2' and 6' beneath the bottom of the former UST locations, at the dispenser islands, and along the piping run. The soil samples were sealed, labeled and placed in iced storage. The soil samples were delivered to a Positive Lab Service mobile laboratory for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as diesel (TPHd), and or TPH as gasoline (TPHg) and for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX) and MTBE by EPA Methods .8015m and 8021b, respectively. Soil samples collected beneath the waste oil UST were analyzed for Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method 418.1, for Volatile organics by EPA Method 8260, and for Total Lead by EPA Method 6010. See attached Chain of Custody documents in Appendix E. The excavations were backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and or import fill. The analytical results of the soil samples are shoTM in the attached Table 1 and indicate that no significant TRPH, TPHd, TPHg, BTEX and MTBE concentrations of concern were present in the soil samples beneath the UST's. Minor TPHd at 660 ppm was reported in the T3-W~2' soil sample, but the T3-W@6' soil sample had no TPHd reported, indicating only a 'minor amount of diesel fuel in this area. This minor diesel fuel staining was removed along with other stained soil on the west end of tank #3 and stockpiled for future disposal/recycling. The soil samples collected beneath the dispenser islands and the piping run indicated TPHd concentrations down to a depth of at least 6' bgs.. This soil was removed down to a depth of 8' bgs. and stockpiled for future disposal/recycling. Soil sample Dis-BTM-8' collected at the base of this excavation had 850 ppm TPHd reported, which is less than the 1000 ppm cleanup level for this site approved in the Removal Action Workplan dated February 28, 2001 prepared by ENSR. The piping run stained soil was also removed during the dispenser excavation and the oil well drilling sump excavations conducted in this area. See Plate 3 for soil sample locations and the former locations of the UST's. SEI concludes that the former UST's, associated piping and dispenser islands have been successfully removed per BFDES regulations. Petroleum stained soil discovered at the west end SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. Page 7 of Tank in the of the dispenser islands and associated piping has been removed to //3, area concentrations less than 1000 ppm TPHd with no significant volatile organics remaining. The stockpiled soil (approximately 800 tons) was disposed/recycled at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility as non-hazardous waste (see attached manifests in Appendix F). Based on the above information SEI recommends the closure of this UST site with no additional assessment or remedial action recommended in the area of the former UST's, dispensers and associated piping. For more detail refer to SEI's UST Closure Report date October 29, 2001. See Appendix C for a few pictures of the remedial activities that took place at this location. 3.1.5 Class V Shallow Disposal Well & Clarifier Removal On October 10, 2001 FOSS removed the Class V dry well and associated clarifier from the 2800 Standard Street parcel. Petroleum hydrocarbon stained soil was also removed by excavation and stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. The dry well extended to a depth of approximately 10' bgs.. Petroleum staining and odor was evident to a depth of approximately 14' bgs. beneath and surrounding the dry well. The main excavation was approximately 15' by 20' and 15' deep. Soil samples were collected out of the excavator bucket by SEI from all 4 sidewalls (CL-S-13', CL- N-12', CL-E-13', and CL-W-13'), from the base of the excavation (CL-BTM-16') and from the stockpiled soil (CL-SP1). After additional over-excavation on the south sidewall, soil sample CL-S2-14' was collected on October 15, 2001. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 3 for soil sample locations and the former location of the dry well/clarifier. The initial 6 soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPHg, TPHd, volatile organics (VOC's), semi-volatile organics and CAM 17 Metals by EPA Methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 8270, 6010 and 7471, respectively at Positive Lab Service in Los Angeles, CA.. The CL-S2-14' soil sample was analyzed only for TRPH to confirm the removal of any remaining petroleum hydrocarbons over 1000 ppm. The analytical results of these soil samples indicated elevated petroleum hydrocarbons in the stockpiled soil of 84000 ppm TRPH, 12000 ppm TPHd, 42 ppm TPHg,' benzene at 1100 parts per billion (ppb), toluene at 1500 ppb, xylenes at 3800 ppb, tetrachloroethYlene (PCE) at 1200 ppb, naphthalene at 14000 ppb, no elevated CAM 17 metals and no significant concentrations of semi-volatile organics or other volatile organics. Additional analysis was performed on soil sample CL-SPI to characterize the soil as non-hazardous. This included Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for benzene and TCLP PCE which were both None Detected (ND) and an aquatic bioassay, which' was negative (no fish deaths). The analytical results of sidewall and bottom soil samples from the excavation indicated only one (1) soil sample had petroleum SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial.4ction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. Page 8 hydrocarbons concentrations over 1000 ppm which was the south sidewall sample CL-S-13' at 3500 ppm TRPH. After over-excavation of the south sidewall an additional soil sample CL-S2- 14' was collected and analyzed for TRPH with the result being only 89 ppm TRPH. The over- excavated soil was added to the stockpile. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. After confirming that the stockpiled soil (approximately 150 tons) was non-hazardous it was disposed/recYcled at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and or import fill. An Inventory of Injection Well notification has been sent to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) describing the former dry well and it's permanent closure. A of this form is copy attached as Appendix B. See Appendix C for a few pictures of the remedial activities that took place at this location. 3.1.6 Removal of SepticSystems Two (2) septic systems were removed by FOSS fi.om the 2800 Standard Street parcel after obtaining abandonment permits fi.om the City of Bakersfield (see Appendix A for permit). The first concrete septic tank (Sep-1) removed was located just south of the dispenser islands and had a capacity of approximately 1000 gallons. The second concrete 1000 gallon septic tank (Sep-2) was found just east of the former mobile home trailer after following undergroUnd piping fi-om the trailer area. The septic tanks were pumped out by Knights Pumping Service with the contents disposed of appropriately. Once removed the septic tanks were decontaminated, broken up and disposed of approPriately. Soil samples were collected fi.om the sidewalls and bottom of the resulting excavations by SEI fi.om the backhoe bucket. At Sep-1 only a south and east sidewall was collected since the north and west sidewalls were already removed during the UST and dispenser excavations. A leach- field soil sample (Sep-2-LF-S-3') was also collected at Sep-2 where gravel was uncovered along the piping run east of the septic tank. The leach field for Sep-1 was removed during the excavation of the Trico #1 oil well sumps and the dispenser island. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 3 for former septic tank and soil sample locations. The septic tank excavation soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPHg, TPHd, VOC's. and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471, respectively al Positive /ab Service. In addition, the bottom soil samples and the stockpile soil samples were analyzed for senti-volatile organics (SVOC's) by EPA Method 8270. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and ,4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C,4. Page 9 The analytical results of the soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present in the soil surrounding or beneath the two (2) septic tanks at this location. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The stockpiled soil from the septic tank excavations was reused as backfill material. The excavations were backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and or import fill. 3.1.7 Surface Oil Staining Areas EB-1, ES-10 Minor surface oil staining is present at multiple locations on the former Sparks parcel and includes two (2) locations identified as ENSR soil boring locations EB-1 and ES-10 where shallow petroleum contamination was encountered. SEI utilized FOSS to excavate the surface soil in the area of borings ES-10 and EB-1. Initially a soil sample ES-10-EX-SP was collected fi'om the ES-10 stained area on October 11, 2001 to evaluate the material for petroleum hydrocarbons, BTEX and CAM 17 metals. The analytical result was 3000 ppm TRPH with no elevated BTEX or metals. Further excavation of the oil-stained material was conducted on November 12, 2001 resulting in approximately 250 tons of oil-stained material being stockpiled adjacent to the excavation (an area approximately 50' by 50' and averaging 2' deep). In some areas the oil-staining was as deep as 3' bgs.. Sidewall (4) and bottom (1) soil samPles were collected from the final excavation area to evaluate the soil left in-place. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), BTEX, and total lead by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8020, and 6010, respectively at Positive Lab Service. See Plate 6 for the ES-10 excavation and soil sample locations. The analytical results of the soil samples indicated elevated TRPH concentrations remained in the west sidewall soil sample (ES-10-W-2') at 1200 ppm. The other, sidewall and bottom soil samples only had trace concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons reported. On November 15, 2001 the west sidewall area was over-excavated approximately 4' to the west and an additional .soil sample ES-10-W-2'-2 was collected from the west sidewall and analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), BTEX and total lead. The analytical results of this soil sample were 21 ppm TRPH with no TPHg, TPHd, TPHmo, BTEX or elevated total lead reported. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. 'ENSR's boring EB-1 was located near the northeastern comer of the Sparks parcel and identified elevated petroleum hydrocarbons at a depth of aPproximately 1' bgs.. SEI utilized FOSS to excavate an area approximately 15' by 15' and 1' deep to evaluate the stained soil in this area. SEI observed asphalt/c-like staining in the top l-fool of soil in this area, which is similar lo the majority of the northern portion of the 2800' Standard Street parcel. The BFDES has indicated to SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial/lction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate attd Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C/I. Page 10 SEI that the top 1-foot of this parcel is not an environmental concern as long as it will be covered with asphalt. Therefore, SEI left some of this asphaltic-like material in-place. One (1) bottom soil sample (EB1-BTM-2') was collected fi.om the base of the excavation and analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), BTEX and total lead by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8020, and 6010, respectively by Positive Lab Service. The soil sample was collected in a brass sleeve, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil sample was shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 6 for the EB,1 excavation and soil sample location. The analytical results of this soil sample indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or lead are present at a depth of 2' bgs. in this area. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. After confirming that the stockpiled soil from both areas was non-hazardous it was disposed/recycled at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility and EnviroCycle, Inc. facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). The excavations were backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and or import fill. 3.1.8 Disposal of Miscellaneous Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste FOSS gathered all of the drums of waste oil, oil filters, solvents and oily water fi.om the entire site and combined like products into DOT approved drums. The drums were profiled and labeled as Non-RCRA hazardous liquids. A total of 16 drums of Non-RCRA hazardous liquids were transported off-site for disposal at Crosby & Overton, Inc. facility in Long Beach, CA. on November 21, 2001 'under hazardous waste manifests #98394845 and #98395066 (see Appendix F). Two (2) 10 yard roll-off bins of Non-RCRA hazardous waste solid debris fi.om the AST containment berm area, oily personal protection equipment (PPE) and other oily debris from the project were transported off-site to Chemical Waste Managements Kettleman City facility under hazardous waste manifest #98395083 (see Appendix F). 3.1.9 Removal & Disposal of Non-Hazardous Soil Around 3 Abandoned Oil Wells Previous assessment activities by SEI in 1998 had identified small drilling sumps surrounding abandoned oil wells Bitner #1 and Bitner #2 containing petroleum stained soil. Nothing was previously known about the soil conditions surrounding the Trico #1 oil well .since the oil well was located adjacent too or under the UST's. 3.1.9.1 Trico #1 Drilling Sump Once the UST's were removed at the 2800 Standard Street parcel, dark oil stained soil remained along the northern, western and eastern edges of the UST excavation. These oil stained soil areas appear to be related to the abandoned Trico #1 oil well drilling'sumps. Tile stained' soil surrounding the abandoned Trico #1 oil well were excavated and SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. Report File Number 01-9 775 Remedial /lction Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 11 stockpiled adjacent to the excavation by FOSS utilizing an excavator. Soil was removed until no further staining or odor was observed by SEI. The resulting excavation is shown on Plate 3 and extended the original UST excavation approximately 5 feet to the west, 10 feet to the northeast and 10 to 15 feet to the east. The depth of the excavation ranged from 3' to 8' bgs. with the total amount of stained soil excavated and stockpiled estimated at 300 tons. Soil samples were collected by SEI from the sidewalls and bottom on the western portion (SP1-BTM-4', SP1-S-3', and SP1-N-2') and along the northeastern and eastern portions (SP2-SE-5', SP2-S-BTM-8', SP2-NW-4', and SP2-N- BTM-6') of the resulting excavation. Soil samples were also collected from the stockpiled soil from this excavation (SP1-ST and SP2-ST). The soil samples were collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were overnighted by courier to a State certified analytical laboratory under a chain of custody document. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH and BTEX by EPA Methods 418.1 and 8020, respectively by Positive Lab Service. The analytical results indicate no petroleum hydrocarbons remain in-place over 1000 ppm TRPH, with the highest concentration of 560 ppm TRPH reported in the SP2-BTM-8' soil sample. The analytical results of the stockpiled soil indicated Concentrations ranging from 2900 ppm (SP1-ST) TRPH to 61000 ppm (SP2-ST) TRPH. The only BTEX concentrations reported in the soil samples were in the SP2-ST soil samPle with benzene at <50 ppb, toluene at 1200 ppb, ethylbenzene at 990 ppb, xylenes at 4000 ppb and MTBE at <100 ppb. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. After confirming that the stockpiled soil was non-hazardous it was disposed/recycled at EnviroCycle, Inc.'s facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). 3.1.9.2 Bitner gl Drilling Sumps After uncovering the abandoned Bitner #1 oil well casing the former drilling sumps were removed by excavation. Three areas of oil-stained soil were removed and stockpiled adjacent to the excavations. The first drilling sump removed was approximately 30' north of the former oil well and was approximately 8' by 8' and 5' deep. Sidewall soil samples were collected on the north (Bit#I-NS-N-4') and south (Bit#I-NS-S-4') sidewalls and at the bottom of the excavation (Bit#I-NS-BTM-5'). The second drilling sump was located approximately 15' south of the oil well and was approximately 10' by 8' and 3' deep. Sidewall soil samples were collected on the east (Bit#I-SS-E-2') and west (Bit#I-SS-W-2') sidewalls and at the bottom of the excavation (Bit#I-SS-BTM3'). The third oil stained area was located approximately 25' east of the oil well and was an area approximately 3' by 3' and 3' deep. One soil san~ple (Bit#I-ES-BTM-3') from the base of the excavation was collected by SEI to verify the removal of stained soil in this area. bi addition a composite soil sample (Bit#l-ST) from the stockpiled soil was collected for analysis.. The estimated amount of oil-stained soil excavated and stockpiled was approximately 60 tons from this area. The soil samples were collected in brass SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. /lction Report File Number 01-9 775 Remedial Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. Page 12 sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were overnighted by courier to a State certified analytical laboratory under a chain of custody document. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), BTEX and CAM 17 Metals by EPA Methods 418.1, 8015m, 8020, and 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively by Positive Lab Service. The analytical results indicate no petroleum hydrocarbons remain in-place over 1000 ppm with the highest concentration of 980 ppm TRPH reported in the Bit#I-SS-E-2' soil sample. No elevated BTEX, TPH or metals were reported in the sidewall or bottom soil samples. The analytical results of the stockpiled soil indicate concentrations of 5400 ppm TRPH, TPHd at 410 ppm, TPHmo at 1600 ppm and total lead at 140 ppm. A soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) analysis for lead on soil sample Bit#l-ST indicated the stockpiled material was at non- hazardous concentrations for lead (<0.1 mg/1). See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. After confirming that the stockpiled soil was non-hazardous it was disposed/recycled at EnviroCycle, Inc.'s facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). 3.1.9.3 Bitner #2 Drilling Sump After uncovering the abandoned Bitner #2 oil well casing the former drilling sump was removed by excavation. The drilling sump removed was approximately 25' north of the former oil well and was approximately 20' by 15' and 10' deep. Sidewall soil samples were collected on all 4 sidewalls (Bit#2-S-N-8', Bit#2-S-E-6', Bit#2-S-S-8', Bit#2-S-W- 8') and at the bottom of the excavation (Bit#2-S-BTM-9') by SEI to verify the removal of stained soil in this area. In addition a composite soil sample (Bit#2-ST) from the stockpiled soil was collected for analysis. The estimated amount of stained soil. excavated and stockpiled was approximately 170 tons from this area. Two additional soil samples were collected from the north sidewall (Bit~2-S-N-8'(2)) and from the base of the excavation (Bi~2-S-BTM-11 ') after over-excavation to remove soil with petroleum hydrocarbons over 1000 ppm. The soil samples were collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were overnighted by courier to a State certified analytical laboratory under a chain of custody document. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), BTEX'and CAM 17 Metals by EPA Methods 418.1, 8015m, .8020, and 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively bY Positive Lab Service. The initial analytical results indicated petroleum hydrocarbons remain over 1000 ppm at the north sidewall (1100 ppm TRPH) and at the base of the excavation (1500 ppm TRPH). After over-excavation in these 2 areas the resulting soil samples were only 46 ppm TRPH (Bit#2-S-N-8'(2)) and 29 ppm TRPH (Bit#2-S-BTM-11 '). No elevated BTEX, TPH or metals were reported in the sidewall or bottom soil samples. The analytical results of the stockpiled soil indicate concentrations SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate attd Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 13 7500 ppm TRPH, TPHd at 100 ppm, TPHmo at 460 ppm and total lead at 5.2 ppm. of See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of CustOdy documents. After confirming that the stockpiled soil was non-hazardous it was disposed/recycled at EnviroCycle, Inc.'s facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). 3.10 Removal of Large Oil Sump at 2800 Standard Street Previous assessment activities conducted in 1998 identified a large abandoned oil sump beginning approximately 100' north of the abandoned Trico #1 oil well. This previous assessment identified an area approximately 100' east-west by 45' north-south with an average depth of 5' bgs. with oil stained soil. FOSS utilized an excavator to expose this area under the direction of SEI. During the removal of this former oil sump it became evident that the extent of the sump was much larger then originally estimated. It appears that the sump was actually divided into two (2) main areas each with dimensions of approximately 110' east-west by 45' north-south. A small zone of clean soil apparently divided the two sumps. An additional area (30' by 15') was removed east of the northeastem comer of the oil sump where a 2' to 3' thick area of oil stained soil was uncovered. SEI removed the oil stained soil in the two sumps until no significant staining or odor was present and petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were less than 1000 ppm. The northern sump was referred to as S-Sump and the southern sump was referred to as S-Sump2 in the soil samples collected to define the areas of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. A total of 23 soil samples were collected from the S-Sump area and 8 soil samples were collected from the S-Sump2 area. Of these s0il samples 10 were bottom samples, 4 were to characterize the oil-stained soil in various areas, and 17 were from the sidewalls of the excavation. The soil samples were collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory or to an on-site mobile analytical laboratory. Three (3) deeper areas within the large oil sump were identified and removed that contained oily sludge-like material to depths as great as 11' to 16' bgs.. Two (2) of these deeper areas were within the S-Sump (one west and one east) and the other within the western portion of the S- Sump2. See Plate 3A for a Plot Plan shgwing the large sump area and all of the soil ~sample locations. The majority of the soil samples collected from the large oil sump were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), 'and BTEX by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m and 8020, respectively. Selected soil samples were analyzed for CAM 17 Metals, or total lead by EPA methods 6010 and 7471 (mercury only) at Positive Lab Service. Soil sample S-Sump-ST was also analyzed for pH, Flash point, and reactivity. Soil samples S-Sump-ST, S-Sump2-ST and S-Sump-E-6'-ST were analyzed for aquatic bioassay to confirm that the oil stained material from the large sump was non-hazardous. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial,,lction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and,4 djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C/I. Page ]4 The highest petroleum hydrocarbons reported within the large oil sump were 62000 ppm TRPH, 400 ppm TPHg, 11000 ppm TPHd, 18000 ppm TPHmo, <600 ppb benzene, 1600 ppb toluene, 2900 ppb ethylbenzene and 3300 ppb xylenes in soil samples S-Sump-ST or S-Sump2-ST. No elevated CAM 17 metals or hazardous characteristic concentrations were reported in any of the soil samples. The aquatic bioassay results for the three (3) stockpile soil samples were all negative (no fish deaths). The sidewall and bottom soil samples were all less than 1000 ppm for petroleum hydrocarbons, except for soil samples S-Sump-NECRNR-I' at 3400 ppm TRPH and S-Sump-NSWW-2' at 1300 ppm TRPH. Both of these soil samples were in areas approved to be left in-place as is by the BFDES. Soil sample S-Sump-NECRNR-I' was collected in the top 1 foot of soil which is very asphaltic. This asphaltic-like material is common in this portion of the Sparks Estate and as long as it will be covered by asphalt in the future it is acceptable to the BFSES to leave in-place. Soil sample S-Sump-NSWW-2' was collected along the western portion of the northern sidewall of the S-Sump excavation at a depth of approximately 2' bgs.. It is approximately 4' south of a high-pressure water line that SEI, FOSS, and the California Water Service did not want' to expose or remove. The BFDES approved leaving the last 4' to 5' of the northern sump in-place, since it was decreasing in thickness (only 2' to 3' thick) and petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as it proceeded northerly. The estimated amount of oil-stained soil removed from the large oil sump area was approximately 2250 cubic yards. After confirming that the stockpiled soil from this area was non-hazardous it was disposed/recycled at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility, Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility and EnviroCycle, Inc. facility under non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative' density up to match existing grade with imported clean soil. See Appendix C for a few pictures of the remedial activities that took place at this location. 3.11 Abandonment Of 2 Water Wells And 3 Monitoring Wells Two (2) water wells and 3 monitoring wells were present on the former Sparks Estate parcels. The following is a description of these wells: · One 60 foot deep water well that is 16 inches in diameter (North well) · One 140 foot deep water well that is 6 inches in diameter (South well) · Three (3) groundwater monitoring wells, designated MW-l, MW-2, and MW-3, each 35 feet deep consisting of 2-inch diameter PVC casing. A water-sampling event was conducted by SEI on the 4 on-site water supply wells on September 24, 2001, which included the 2 water wells on the former Sparks Estate.' The three (3) monitoring wells were dry during this sampling event and were not sampled. SE1 completed a Groundwater Sampling Report dated October 10, 2001, which included historical and recent water sampling results for this site with a recommendation to abandon these wells. Permission SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial/lction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate attd Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, Cd. Page 15 from the BFDES to abandon these wells was granted in a letter dated October 25, 2001 (see attached in Appendix A). Well abandonment permits were acquired by SEI from the Kern-County Environmental Health Services ~Department (KCEHSD) prior to the work being conducted on the wells. On October 18, 2001 the three (3) monitoring wells were abandoned by filling the PVC casing with bentonite chips and concrete and drilling out the top 10' of the PVC casing with a hollow-stem auger drilling rig. The former well locations were then backfilled and compacted up to match existing grade with clean native soil and sand. On OCtober 18 and October 19, 2001 the north and south sparks water wells were abandoned by filling the steel casings with clean peagravel up to 50' from the surface and then filling the top 50' of casing with concrete slurry until a mushroom caP formed over the steel casing. The well casings had been cut down t° a depth of approximately 10' bgs. prior to filling with gravel and concrete. The excavations were then backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density to match existing grade by FOSS. Inspectors from the KCEHSD witnessed the abandonment of all of the wells. See Appendix A for copies of the well abandonment permits. 3.12 Re-Abandonment of 3 OilWells FOSS Environmental subcontracted MMI Services to re-abandoned three (3) oil wells located on the former Sparks Estate per current Division of Oil & Gas (DOG) regulations. The three (3) oil wells were exposed and additional Steel casing risers were attached to bring the well casings to workable elevations. Blow-out preventer equipment was then attached to each oil well casing. A drilling rig was then utilized to drill out the surface cement plugs of each oil well and try to seal off appropriate deep water zones per current DOG regulations. Bitner #2 was the first oil well to be re-abandoned. Drilling proceeded to a depth of 197 feet before difficult drilling prevented any further advancement. A variance was received from the DOG to stop the re-abandonment. Appropriate surface seals were placed within the oil well casing and the DOG performed a leak-test on the oil wellhead. A letter from the DOG dated November 14, 2001 states that the wellhead leakage test was successful, but that the re- abandonment of the oil well is not up to current DOG standards (see attached letter in Appendix E). According to DOG personnel no further re-abandonment of the oil well is necessary. See attached History of Oil or Gas Well document in Appendix A describing the work conducted by MMI on this oil well. Bitner #1 was the second oil well to be re-abandoned. Drilling proceeded to a dePth of 192 feet before difficult drilling prevented any further advancement. A variance was received from the DOG to stop the re-abandonment. Appropriate surface seals were placed within the oil well casing and the DOG performed a leak-test on ,the oil wellhead. A letter from the DOG dated November 14, 2001 states that the wellhead leakage test was successful, but that the re- abandonment of the oil well is not up to current DOG standards (see attached letter in Appendix E). According to DOG personnel no further re-abandonment of the oil well is necessary. See SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 16 attached History of Oil or Gas Well document in Appendix A describing the work conducted by MMI on this oil well. Trico #1 was the last well to Drilling proceeded oil be re-abandoned. to a depth of 490 feet before difficult drilling prevented 'any further advancement. 'A variance was received from the DOG to stop the re-abandonment. Appropriate surface seals were placed within the oil well casing and the DOG performed a leak-test on the oil wellhead. A letter from the DOG dated November 14, 2001 states that the wellhead leakage test was successful, but that the re- abandonment of the oil well is not up to current DOG standards (see attached letter in Appendix A). According to DOG personnel no further re-abandonment of the oil well is necessary. See attached History of Oil or Gas Well document in Appendix A describing the work Conducted by MMI on this oil well. The oil well casings were cut down to a depth of approximately i0' bgs. by MMI Services at each location. The excavations were backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS utilizing native and or import fill. These three (3) oil wells will be located in planters for future accessibility, if necessary. Per a BFDES letter dated November 13, 2001 the oil wells will be located on a hyper accurate foot print map showing fixed longitude and latitude to identify the abandoned oil wells. This map will be kept with the property owner on site, and a copy will be furnished to the BFDES. 3.2 FORMER GLENN ROSE ENGINE COMPANY ~- 3880 Rosedale Highway 3.2.1 Removal of Steamcleaner Sump Sludge within the metal steamcleaner sump had elevated metals detected at Non-RCRA hazardous concentrations during previous assessment activities. FOSS removed the steamcleaner sump on October 24, 2001. The sludge and petroleum hydrocarbon stained soil beneath the steamcleaner sump was stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. · The resulting excaVation was approximately 10' by 9' and 5' deep. See Plate 5 for the steamcleaner excavation and soil sample locations. Sidewall (GR-SC-E-4' and GR-SC-W-4') and bottom (GR-SC-BTM-5~) soil samples were collected from the final excavation area to evaluate the soil left in-place. An additional soil sample was collected from the stockpiled soil (GR-SC-ST) to evaluate this soil for disposal. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, and 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 17 Lab Service. In addition soil sample GR-SC-ST was analyzed for STLC lead and TCLP lead to define the stockpiled waste as either Non-RCRA or RCRA hazardous waste. T~e analytical results of the soil samples indicated no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals remmned~ in the soil left in-place. The analytical results of the stockpiled soil were 1200 ppm TRPH, 54 ppm TPHd, 830 ppm TPHmo, with no VOC's reported. Lead was reported at 68 ppm. STLC lead was reported at 12 mg/1 and TCLP lead was reported at 0.059 mg/1. This indicated thhti the stockpiled soil was at Non-RCRA hazardous concentrations. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. Thee stockpiled soil (approximately 35 tons) was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility on November 29, 2001 under a hazardous waste manifest (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade wilh imported clean soil and native soil. 3.2.2 Removal of Septic System A septic system was removed by FOSS from 3880 Rosedale Highway after obtaining an abandonment permit from the City of Bakersfield (Appendix A). The concrete septic tank (GR- Sep) removed was located just west of the former building location and had a capacity of approximately 2000 gallons. The septic tank contained no liquids, but did have oily sediments. No leach field line was detected coming from the septic tank. The septic tank was broken up and the oily sediments removed and stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. Once removed the I. septic tank was decontaminated and disposed of appropriately The resulting excavation was approximately 15 by 10 and 5 deep. The estimated amount of stockpiled soil was 25 tons. Soil samples were collected from the sidewalls (GR-Sep-N-5', GR-Sep-W-5', GR-Sep-E-4', GR- Sep-S-5') and bottom (GR-Sep-Btm-6') of the resulting excavation by SEI from the excavator bu6ket. A soil sample was also collected from the stockpiled soil (GR-Sep-ST). 'Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 5 for former septic tank and soil sample locations. Th{ septic tank soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471, respectively at Positive lab Sera, me. In addition, the bottom soil sample and the stockpile soil samples were analyzed for semi-volatile organics (SVOC's) by EPA Method 8270. To further characterize the stockpiled sol!I, sample GR-Sep-ST was analyzed for STLC lead, STLC cadmium and TCLP lead. Thei analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present in the soil surrounding or beneath the former septic tank at this location. t' ' =; SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial.4ction Report File Number 01-9775 I' Sparks Estate attd ,,ldjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C~4. page 18 i analytical results of the stockpile soil were 27 ppm TPHg, 380 ppm TPHd, 1700 ppm The TPHmo, 2200 ppm TRPH, with no VOC's, no significant SVOC's, and elevated lead (260 ppm) and cadmium (10 ppm). STLC analysis for lead was 5.8 mg/1 and ND for cadmium· The TCLP result for lead was 0.098 ppm. This characterized the stockpiled soil as Non-RCRA hazardous waste due to lead concentrations. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The stockpiled soil (approximately 25 tons) was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility on November 29, 2001 under a hazardous waste manifest (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and import fill. ii 3.2.3 Removal of Surface Stained Areas (GR-EX1 & GR-EX2) Minor surface oil staining .is present adjacent to the concrete pad north of the building and in an area approximately 20' north of the concrete pad. The first area excavated was designated GR- EX1 and was a waste oil stained area approximately 6' in diameter that extended to a depth of approximately 2' bgs.. The removed soil (5 tons) was stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. Soil samples were collected from the northeast (GR-EX1-NE-I') and southwest (GR-EX1-SW- 2') sidewalls and bottom (GR-EX1-Btm2') of the resulting excavation by SEI from the backhoe bucket. A soil sample was also collected from the stockpiled soil (GR-EX1-ST). An additional soil sample (GR-EX1-SW2-3') was collected from the southwestern sidewall after over- excavation in this area on October 15, 2001. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 5 for excavation area and soil sample locations. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. Soil sample GR-EX1-SW2-3' was only analyzed for TRPH and VOC;s. To further characterize the stockpiled soil, sample GR-EX1-ST was analyzed for STLC lead and TCLP lead. The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present at this location, except for the 1400 ppm TRPH, which was reported in the southwestern sidewall soil sample (GR-EX1-SW-2'). After over-excavation in this area the TRPH concentration was only 91 ppm in soil sample GR-EX1-SW2-3'. The analytical results of the stockpile soil were 470 ppm TPHd, 47000 ppm TPHmo, 46000 ppm TRPH, with no VOC's and elevated lead (150 ppm). STLC analysis for lead was 6.3 mg/l. The TCLP result for lead was 0.14 ppm. This characterized the stockpiled soil as Non-RCRA hazardous waste due to lead concentrations. See Table I for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical repons and Chain of Custody documents: SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate attd ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 19 The stockpiled soil (approximately 5 tons)' was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility on November 29, 2001 under a hazardous waste manifest (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by import FOSS with native and fill. The next excavation area was along the northern border of the concrete pad where oily run-off liquids would collect. This area was designated GR-EX2 and was an oil stained area approximately 10' by 2' that extended to a dePth of approximately 2' bgs.. The removed soil (3 tons) was stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. Soil samples were collected from the east (GR-EX2-E2') and west (GR-EX2-W2') sidewalls and bottom (GR-EX2-Btm3') of the resulting excavation by SEI from the backhoe bucket. A soil sample was also collected fi.om the stockpiled soil (GR-EX2-ST). An additional soil sample (GR-EX2-E3') was collected from the eastern sidewall after over-excavation in this area on October 12, 2001. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 5 for excavation area and soil sample locations. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. Soil sample GR-EX2-E-3' was only analyzed for TRPH and VOC's. The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present at this location, except for the 9900 ppm TRPH, which was reported in the eastern sidewall soil sample (GR-EX2-E2'). After over-excavation in this area the TRPH concentration was only <5 ppm in soil sample GR-EX2-E3'. The analytical results of the stockpile soil were 480 ppm TPHmo, 26000 ppm TRPH, with 12 ppb PCE and no elevated metals. This characterized the stockpiled soil as non-hazardous waste. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The stockpiled soil (approximately 3 tons) was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility under a non-hazardous waste manifest (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and import fill. 3.2.4 Removal of Asbestos Containing Materials An estimated 200 square feet of sheet flooring in the office area which contained 5% asbestos and an estimated 37 square feet of drywall joint compound which contained 2% asbestos were removed by AsbeStos Services Inc. (ASI), a licensed asbestos removal contractor, on October 8, 2001. The waste materials were disposed of in accordance with all Federal, State and local regulations at the La Paz Landfill in Parker, Arizona under hazardous waste manifest # AZC950823111. ASI acquired a Demolition Pencil Release for the site from the San joaquin SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial/lction Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate attd ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 20 Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. See Appendix A for a copy of the demolition permit and Appendix F for a copy of the manifest. 3.2.5 Abandonment of Water Well One (1) water well was present on the former Glenn Rose parcel. The following is a description of this well: * One 280 foot deep water well that is 8 inches in diameter (GR-Well) A water-sampling event was conducted by SEI on the 4 on-site water wells supply on September 24, 2001, which included the GR-Well water well on the former Glenn Rose parcel: SEI completed a Groundwater Sampling Report dated October 10, 2001, which included historical and recent water sampling results for this site with a recommendation abandon to these wells. Permission from the BFDES to abandon these wells was granted in a letter dated October 25, 2001 (see attached in Appendix A). Well abandonment permits were acquired by SEI from the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) prior to the work being conducted on the wells. On October 18 and October 19, 2001 the GR-Well water well was abandoned by filling the steel casing with clean Peagravel up to 50' from the surface and then filling the top 50' of casing with concrete slurry until a mushroom cap formed over the steel casing. The well casing had been cut down to a depth of approximately 10' bgs. prior to filling with gravel and concrete: The excavation was then backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density to match existing grade by FOSS. Inspectors from the KCEHSD witnessed the abandonment of the well. See Appendix A for copies of the well abandonment permits. 3.3 FORMER MAACO AUTO PAINT/ROSEDALE HOTEL - 3650 ROSEDALE Hwy. - PARCEL 41 3.3.1 Removal of Two (2) Floor Drains Previous assessment of two (2) floor drains within the former Maaco shop building had identified elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons, lead, copper, cadmium and mercury in the sludge within the drains. On October 11 and 12, 2001 FOSS broke out the concrete surrounding the floor drains and removed the drains and associated sludge and any stained soil beneath the drains. The northern floor drain excavation (FD-N) was approximately 12' by 12' and 12' deep. The southern floOr drain excavation (M-FLDS) was approximately 10' by 10' and 4' deep. Piping between the floor drains and a former dry well was also removed. The waste materials were stockpiled on and covered with plastic adjacent to the excavations. An estimated total of 10 tons of this material was stockpiled. Soil samples were collected from all 4 sidewalls and the bottom of each resulting excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. A soil sample was also collected from the stockpiled soil (M- FLD-ST). Two (2) soil samples (M-FLD-PLE-I ' and M-FLD-PLN-1 ') were collected 1' beneath SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. Remedial/lction Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and/ldjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 21 the floor drain piping after removal. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 4 for excavation areas and soil sample locations. The soil samples were analyzed for TPH (carbon range), VOC's and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. Soil sample M-FLD-ST was also analyzed for STLC cadmium, copper, chromium and TCLP lead and mercury along with pH, flash point, and reactivity. The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present at this location. The analytical results of the stockpile soil were 1200 ppm TPHg, 1700 ppm TPHd, 2400 ppm TPHmo, 2i ppb benzene, 3100 ppb ethylbenzene, 350 ppb xylenes, no VOC's, 330 ppm total lead, 22 ppm STLC lead, 2.2 ppm TCLP lead, 47 ppm mercury, ND for TCLP mercury, 660 ppm copper, 0.4 ppm STLC copper, 340 ppm chromium, 7 ppm STLC chromium, with a flash point >212, and no reactivity. This characterized the stockpiled soil as Non-RCRA hazardous waste due to the elevated lead and mercury concentrations. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The stockpiled soil (approximately 10 tons) was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility under a hazardous waste manifest on November 29, 2001 (see Appendix F). The excavation was backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS with native and import fill. 3.3.2 Removal of Septic SysteTM & Northern Dry Well The septic tank located just north of the former Maaco building was removed by FOSS on October 11, 2001 under a City of Bakersfield permit # B01-06301 (Appendix A). The concrete septic tank (Sep-3) had a capacity of approximately 1000 gallons. The contents of the septic tank were removed by Knights Pumping Service and disposed of properly. Once removed the septic tank was decontaminated, broken up and disposed of appropriately. The resulting excavation was approximately 18' by 13' and 12' deep. No stained soil was observed during the excavation activity. A 4"-diameter clay pipe running approximately 8' north of the septic tank connected to a 3'-diameter concrete dry well which extended to a depth of approximately 14' bgs.. On November 12, 2001 this dry well was removed by FOSS with an excavator, with the resulting extent of the excavation approXimately 15' by 15' and 15' ,deep. No staining or petroleum odor was observed in the removed soil. Soil samPles were collected from the sidewalls (Sep-3-N-10', Sep-3-W-I 0', Sep-3-E-10', Sep-3- S-10') and bottom (Sep-3-Btm-12') of the resulting septic tank excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. Soil samples were also collected from the sidewalls (M-NDW-N-14', M- NDW-W- 14', M-NDW-E- 14', M-NDW-S- 14') and bottom (M-DW-Btm- 15') of the resulting dry well excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. A stockpile soil sample (M-NDW-ST) SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 22 was also collected from the stockpiled soil. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 5 for former septic tank and soil sample locations. The soil samples were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. In addition, the bottom soil samples were analyzed for semi-volatile organics (SVOC's) by EPA Method 8270. The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are present in the soil surrounding or beneath the former septic tank and the former dry well at this location. The analytical results of the stockpile soil sample indicated no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals were' present. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The stockpiled soil was used as clean backfill material and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS. 3.3.3 Removal of Asbestos Containing Materials An estimated 25 square feet of roof mastic containing 10% asbestos, and an estimated 5 linear feet of cement pipe on the roof containing 20% asbestos were removed by Asbestos Services Inc. (ASI), a licensed asbestos removal contractor, on October 8, 2001. The waste materials were disposed of in accordance with all Federal, State and local regulations at the La Paz Landfill in Parker, Arizona under hazardous waste manifest # AZC950823111. ASI acquired a Demolition Permit Release for the site from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. See Appendix A for a copy of the demolition permit and Appendix F for a copy of the manifest. 3.3.4 Removal of SOuthern Dry Well and Clarifier During the demolition of the former Maaco building a dry well was uncovered east of the former building with a diameter of approximately 2' made of brick, which extended to a depth of approximately 12' bgs.. This dry well was removed on October 24, 2001 by FOSS, with the resulting extent of the excavation approximately 12' by 12' and 15' deep. Only minor petroleum odor and staining was observed in the removed soil attached to some of the bricks. A small amount of this stained soil was stockpiled separatelY. During the excavation of the dry well a clarifier was uncovered just north of the dry well with a capacity of approximately 1000 gallons and made of concrete. Piping connecting the dry well and clarifier suggests that the dry well was used for the disposal of fluids from the clarifier. The clarifier was nearly full of liquids and had some oily sludge on the bottom. A water sample' was collected from the clarifier (M-CL-W) by SEI to evaluate the liqUids for disposal. The water sample was analyzed for TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 1.7 Metals by EPA methods 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. The analytical SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial ~4ction Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 23 results indicated no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals in the liquids within the clarifier and the liquids were pumped out and disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Waste Managements/McKittrick Waste facility. The clarifier was removed on October 30, 2001 by FOSS with an excavator. Soil samples were collected from the sidewalls (M-DW-N-13', M-DW-W-13', M-DW-E-13', M- DW-S-14') and bottom (M-DW-BTM-15') of the resulting septic tank excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. Soil samples were also collected from the sidewalls (M-CL-N-7', M-CL- W-7', M-CL-E-7', M-CL-S-12') and bottom (M-CL-BTM-8') of the resulting dry well excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. Soil sample M-CL-S-12' also served as the over- excavation soil sample for the northern portion of the dry well which had TRPH concentrations over 1000 ppm (1200 ppm TRPH). A stockpile soil sample (M-DW-14') was also collected from the stockpiled soil. Sample M-CL-SLD was collected fi'om the sludge removed from the clarifier. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 4 for dry well, clarifier and soil sample locations. The soil samPles were analyzed for TRPH, TPH (carbon range), VOC's, and CAM 17 Metals by EPA methods 418.1, 8015m, 8260, 6010 and 7471 (mercury only), respectively at Positive lab Service. In addition the bottom soil sample from the dry well was also analyzed for SVOC's by EPA Method 8270. The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are left in the soil sun'ounding or beneath the former clarifier and the former dry well at- this location. The analytical results of the stockpile soil sample M-DW-14' indicated elevated petroleum hydrocarbons at 8000 ppm TRPH, TPHg at 130 ppm, TPHd at 2100 ppm, TPHmo at 2800 ppm, with no elevated VOC's or metals. The analytical results of the clarifier sludge sample (M-CL-SLD) indicated elevated petroleum hydrocarbons at 6600 ppm TRPH, TPHg at 620 ppm, TPHd at 190 ppm, TPHmo at 550 ppm, with some VOC's and metals. Additional analysis on sample M-CL-SLD included STLC and TCLP for lead and STLC for Cadmium. The STLC result for lead was 10 mg/1 and the TCLP for lead was 0.51 mg/1 indicating a Non-RCRA hazardous waste. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The excavation was backfilled with clean import and native material and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS. The stockpiled soil/sludge (approximately 6 tons) was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Kettleman City facility under a hazardous waste manifes! on November 29, 2001 (see Appendix F). See Appendix C for some pictures of this area. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial 4ction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C4. Page 24 3.3.5 Abandonment of Water Well One (1) water well was present on the former Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel. The following is a description of this well: · One 280 foot deep water well that is 8 inches in diameter (M-Well) A water-sampling event was conducted by SEI on the 4 on-site water supply wells on September 24, 2001, which included the M-Well water well on the former Rosedale Hotel/Maaco parcel. SEI completed a Groundwater Sampling Report dated October 10, 2001, which included historical and recent water sampling results for this site with a recommendation to abandon these wells. Permission from the BFDES to abandon these wells was granted in a letter dated October 25, 2001 (see attached in Appendix A). Well abandonment permits were acquired by SEI from the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) prior to the work conducted the wells. On October being on 18 and October 19, 2001 the M-Well water well was abandoned by filling the steel casing with clean peagravel up to 50' from the surface and then filling the top 50' of casing with concrete slun-y Until a mushroom cap formed over the steel casing. The well casing had been cut down to a depth of approximately 10' bgs. prior to filling with gravel and concrete. The excavation was then backfilled and compacted to 90% relative density to match existing grade by FOSS. Inspectors from the KCEHSD wimessed the abandonment of the well. See Appendix A for copies of the Well abandonment permits. 3.4 FORMER SEATON PROPERTY - Vacant Lot, Parcel 8 3.4.1 Removal of Stained Soil Areas B-15 and B-16 Two (2) petroleum hydrocarbon stained areas (B-15 and B-16) were identified in the assessment of the property in 1998 by SEI. These two (2) areas were investigated by FOSS by scratching the surface with a backhoe to uncover any staining in the near surface soil. Staining and odor was encountered in the soil in the approximate area of boring B-16. This soil was excavated by. FOSS on October 8, 2001, with the removed soil (approximately 50 tons) stockpiled adjacent to the excavation which was approximately 12' x 12' by 6' deep. Once the stained soil was removed soil samples were collected from the sidewalls (S-EX1-N4', S-EX1-W5', S-EX1-E4', S-EX1-S5') and bottom (S-EX1-BTM-6') of the resulting excavation by SEI from the excavator bucket. Each soil sample was collected in brass sleeves, sealed with Teflon-lined caps, labeled and. placed into an iced cooler. The soil samples were shipped overnight by courier under chain of custody documents to a State certified analytical laboratory. See Plate 6 for S-EX1 excavation area and soil sample locations. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial ~,lction Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 25 The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are left in the soil at this location. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The excavation was backfilled with clean import material and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS. The stockpiled soil (approximately 50 tons) was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Mckittrick Waste facility under a non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix No stained soil was identified within a 15' radius of the suspected location of boring B-15. This minor petroleum hydrocarbon staining may have dissipated over time. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusions Based on field observations and analytical results of waste materials cOllected during this Remedial Action the following is concluded by SEI: 1) The 2.1 million gallon AST has been emptied, cleaned and dismantled per all local, State and Federal regulations. The resulting non-hazardous waste streams were approximately 84,800 gallons of oil, 348,050 gallons of wastewater, and 677,400 gallons of oily sludge which were taken to variOus permitted disposal/recycling facilities under non-hazardous waste manifests. The soil beneath the AST pad had petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a depth of approximately 1' to 2' bgs., which was removed and disposed of as non-hazardous waste at permitted facilities. Estimated quantity of this non-hazardous soil is 500 tons. 2) The five (5) UST's, multiple oil well drilling sumps, a large oil sump, one (1) Class V dry well/clarifier, two (2) septic tanks, and two (2) minor oil stained areas were excavated and removed from the former Estate during this remedial Sparks parcels action. Soil samples were collected from all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. Only two (2) small areas along the northern extent of the large oil sump still contain petroleum hydrocarbons greater than 1000 ppm. Both of these areas (S-Sump-NECRNR-I' at 3400 ppm TRPH and S-Sump-NSWW-2' at 1300 ppm TRPH) were approved to be left in-place by the BFDES based on the area being covered by asphaltic surfaces in the future. In addition, further excavation northward would have encountered a live high-pressure asbestos/concrete water line near the northern property line at the 2800' Standard Street site. An estimated 4000 tons of petroleum-impacted soil was · removed and disposed of from these excavations at permitted facilities under non- hazardous waste manifests. Remedial /lction Report File JVumber 01-9 775 Sparks Estate attd Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 26 3) Petroleum impacted soil limited to the top 1-foot at the site can be left in-place, but must be covered by asphaltic surfaces in the future. 4) A total of 4 water wells and 3 monitoring wells have been abandoned per Kern County Environmental Health regulations. 5) Three (3) abandoned oil wells were re-abandoned during this remedial action. Variances were granted by the DOG to stop the re-abandonment's at shallower depths then proposed due to difficult drilling conditions. Surface seals and a well-head leak test were approved by the DOG. The three (3) abandoned oil wells do not meet the current DOG abandonment regUlations. According to DOG personnel no additional abandonment work is required on these wells. The BFDES has requested that a map of the three (3) oil well locations be prepared to identify their exact location at the site. The oil wells must be placed in planter areas for any future access. 6) Miscellaneous oily waste debris, drums of waste oil, oil filters, solvents and other liquids were disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at appropriate permitted facilities under hazardous waste manifests. This included sixteen (16) 55-gallon drums and two (2) 1 O-yard roll-off bins. 7) At the former Glenn Rose facility a steamcleaner sump, a septic tank, two (2) oil- stained areas and asbestos containing materials were removed under appropriate permits. Soil samples were collected from all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. Non-RCRA hazardous soil due to elevated lead concentrations were identified at the steamcleaner sump, the septic tank and in soil from excavation GR-EX1 totaling an estimated 65 tons. This soil was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at an appropriate disposal facility under hazardous waste manifests. Non-hazardous soil (3 tons) from the GR-EX2 excavation was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at appropriate disposal/recycling facilities. 8) Asbestos containing materials (sheet flooring, mastic, drywall joint compound, asbestos/concrete pipe) were removed from both the former Glenn Rose facility and the former Maaco facility by ASI under appropriate permits. The resulting waste was disposed of at a permitted facility as Non-RCRA hazardous waste under a hazardous waste manifest. 9) Two (2) floor drains, a sePtic tank, two (2) dry wells, and a clarifier were removed from the former Maaco facility during this remedial action under appropriate permits. The two (2) dry wells and the clarifier were not originally identified at the site by previous investigations. They were encountered during the demolition or remedial activities being, conducted at the site. Soil samples were collected and analyzed from "}' Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9 775 Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 27 } all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons ~ above 1000 ppm and to characterize the removed soil. Stained material (soil and sludge) from the two (2) floor drains and the clahfier were identified as containing metals (lead or lead and mercury) at Non-RCRA hazardous concentrations. An estimated total of 16 tons of soil/sludge were disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at appropriate permitted facilities under hazardous waste manifests. 10) Approximately 50 tons of non-hazardous soil was removed from excavation S-EX1 at ..-]:1 previous soil boring B-16. Soil samples were collected and analyzed from the excavation to'verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. The removed soil was disposed/recycled at an appropriate permitted facility under non-hazardous waste manifests. No staining in the near surface soil was identified in. the former area of boring B-15. This former stained area may have dissipated over time or have been removed by previous activities at the Site. 11) The estimated total of all non-hazardous petroleum-impacted soil disposed/recycled from the site during this remedial action is 5,662 tons (213 loads). Official final totals are pending receipt of a few more non-hazardous waste weigh tickets from the transporters. Total of all Non-RCRA hazardous soil disposed of during this remedial action is 82.73 tons. 4.2 Recommendations SEI has the following recommendations for the site: 1) Based on the above conclusions the site has been successfully remediated in compliance with ENSR's RAW and SEI's Addendum #1 to the RAW both approved by the BFDES prior to conducting the field work. .i 2) If significantly oil-stained soil is encountered deeper than 1-foot bgs. during future .4 grading or construction activities, the stained area should be evaluated by SEI personnel to determine the appropriate remedial action. ,t :1 -~ 3) No other additional remedial activities are recommended at this time at the site. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. l ' Remedial Action Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate attd ~4djacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, CA. Page 28 5.0 LIMITATIONS This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Costco Wholesale as it relates to the property described. The discussion and conclusions presented in this report are based on: The observations of field personnel. - The results of laboratory tests performed by Positive Lab Services of Los Angeles, California - Our understanding of the regulations of the CalifOrnia Regional Water Quality Control Board, the DTSC and the EPA. Possible variations in the soil or groundwater conditions which may exist beyond the points explored in this investigation might effect the validity of this' report unless those variations or conditions come to our attention and are reviewed and assimilated into the conclusions and recommendations of this report. Also, changes in the hydrologic conditions found could occur with time due to variations in rainfall, temperature, regional water usage, or other factors, any of which could affect this report. The services performed by SEI have been conducted in a manner consistent with the levels of care and skill ordinarily exercised by. professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in California. The absence of contamination on or beneath the property cannot be guaranteed by this report. SEI is not responsible for any contamination or hazardous material found on the property. No other warranty expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions concerning this Remedial Action Report please contact SEI at (661) 831-5100. Sincerely, ] Project Geologih~' ! R~bert J. Becl~r, R.G. 5076, E.G. 2238, REA II 20074 Environmental Division Manager '. Attachments: VOLUME 1 of 2 Plate 1, Location Map Plate 2, General Plot Plan SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial,4ction Report File Number 01-9775 Sparks Estate and ,qdjacent Properties December 3, 2001 Bakersfield, C/I. Page 29 Plate 3, 2800 Standard Street UST, Clarifier & Septic System Excavations Plate 3A, 2800 Standard Street, Large Oil Sump Excavation Plate 4, 3650 Rosedale Highway/Former Maaco Plot Plan Plate 5, 3880 Rosedale Highway/Former Glenn Rose Plot Plan Plate 6, Miscellaneous Small Excavation Areas (ES-10, EB-1, B-16, Drilling Sumps Bitner #1 and Bitner #2) Appendix A - Regulatory Letters and Permits Appendix B - U.S. EPA Inventory of Injection Wells forms Appendix C - Pictures of Field Work Appendix D - ENSR Site History and Subsurface Investigation Report (Summary Report) dated March 5,2001. , VOLUME 2 of 2 Appendix E - Analytical Reports & Chain of Custody Forms Appendix F - Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Waste Manifests cc: Costco Wholesale, C/O MulvannyG2 Architecture, Attn: Mr. Jeff Wilson Costc. O W~.~ 01esale, Todd Bartok .1 TABLE l Soil Sample Analytical Results For Petroleum Hydrocarbons & Metals COSTCO - BAKERSFIELD 2800 Standard St., 3650 to 3880 Rosedale Hwy., Bakersfield, CA. TPH TPH Ethyl Other CAM EPA Method 8270 Diesel Gas TPHmo TRPH Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead 17 Metals SVOC°s (ppm) and DATE (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) Other VOC's (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) Other Analysis Detection Limit 10 0.1 100 5 5 5 5 10 10 4 to 80 0.5 0.1 to 10 0.2 SPARKS ESTATE AREA UST SAMPLES T 1-W (~, 2' 1014/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T1-W~ 6' 10/4/2001' ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T1-E(~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T1-E~ 6' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T2-W [a~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA NO ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T2-W~ 6' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T2-E(~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T2-Ek~, 6' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND · NA NA NA NA T3 -W(~, 2' 10/4/2001 660 NA NA NA ND 'ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T3-W(~ 6' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T3 - E('~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T3- Ek'~, 6' 10/4/2001 ND NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA T4-WL~~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA 1.1 NA NA T4 -W ~,, 6' 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND 12 ND NA 1.6 NA NA T4- E(~ 2' 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA 2.1 NA NA T4-E(~, 6' 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA 1.5 NA NA T5- 2' (Waste Oil) 10/4/2001 NA NA NA 24 ND ND ND ND ND NA 4 NA NA TS- 6' (Waste Oil) 10/4/2001 NA NA NA 22 ND ND ND ND ND NA 3.1 NA NA PL-2' (Pipeline) 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA PL-6' (Pipeline) 10/4/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA DI~ 2' 10/4/2001 23000 ND NA NA <50 82 560 2900 ND NA NA NA NA DI~ 6' 10/4/2001 1100 ND NA NA <50 <50 <50 <100 <100 NA NA NA NA D2~ 2' 10/4/2001 990 ND NA NA <50 <50 <50 <100 <100 NA NA NA NA D2~,, 6' 10/4/2001 480 ND NA NA <50 <50 <50 <100 <100 NA NA NA NA ST- 1(Stockpile 1) 10/4/2001 760 ND NA NA ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA TRICO #1 Drilling Sumps SPI-ST (SP 1 Stockpile) 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 2900 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA SP1-BTM-4' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 14 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA SPI-S-3' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 13 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA SP1-N-2' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 11 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA SP2-ST (SP 2 Stockpile) 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 61000 <50 1200 990 4000 <100 NA NA NA NA SP2-SE-5' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 10 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA SP2-S-BTM-8' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 560 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA SP2-NW-4' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 8 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA SP2-N-BTM-6' 10/5/2001 NA NA NA 29 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA DISPENSER ISLAND EXCAVATION Dis-S-6' 10/9/2001 ND ND NA NA ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA Dis-E-6' 10/9/2001 ND 0.11 NA NA ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA Dis-BTM-8' 1019/2001 850 ND NA NA ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA TPH TPH Ethyl Other CAM EPA Method 8270 Diesel Gas TPHmo TRPH Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead 17 Metals SVOC's (ppm) and DATE (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) Other VOC's (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) Other Analysis Detection 'Limit 10 0.1 100 5 5 5 5 10 10 4 to 80 0.5 0.1 to 10 0.2 SEPTIC TANK Excavations _ SepI-S-6' __ 10110/2001 ND ND NA 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated NA __ SepI-E-5' _ 10/10/200' ND ND NA 52 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.6 No Elevated NA _. Sep-1-BTM-12'~ 10/11/200' ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.8 No Elevated ALL ND Sep-I-SP 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated ALL ND Sep-2-W-10' 10/11/200~ ND 0.13 NA 6.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated NA _ Sep-2-S-10' 10/11/200' ND ND NA ND ND ND ND 4.2 ND ND 1.3 No Elevated NA __ Sep-2-E-10' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND' 1.3 No Elevated NA Sep-2-BTM-10' 10/11/200' ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated ALL ND Sep-2-N-10' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated NA Sep-2-LF-S-3' 10/22/200' ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4 No Elevated NA Nap=14000, Fluorene=4100, Phenanthrene=7200 2-Methylnap =47000, DRY WELL/CLARJFIER 1100, PCE=1200 (TCLP = bis(2-Elhylhexl) EXCAVATION TCLP = ND) =hlhalate=8400, CL-SPl(Stockpile) 10/10/2001 12000 42 NA 84000 ND 1500 <500 3800 <500 Nap = 10000 6.7 No Elevated Bioes_~n_y >750 CL-S-13' 10/10/2001 ND ND NA 3500 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.6 No Elevated None CL-S2-14' 10/15/2001 NA NA NA 89 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CL-N-12' 10/1012001 ND ND NA 550 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.3 No Elevated None CL-BTM-16' 10/10/2001 ND ND NA 280 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.2 No Elevated None CL-W-13' 10/10/2001 ND ND NA 57 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.6 No Elevated None CL-E-13' 10/10/2001 ND ND NA 34 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 0.99 No Elevated None ES-10 & EB-I Excavations ES-10-EX-SP 10/11/2001 NA NA NA 3000 <5 <5 80 130 NA NA 3.7 No Elevated NA ES-10-BTM-3' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 8.8 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 3 NA NA ES-10-N-2' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 8.5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 3.1 NA NA E$-10-S-2' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 8.5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 3.1 NA NA ES-10-E-2' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 43 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 5.4 NA NA ES-10-W-2' 11/12/2001 98 ND 380 1200 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 19 NA NA ES-10-W-2'-2 11/15/2001 ND ND ND 21 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 3.4 NA NA EB1-BTM-2' 11/19/2001 ND ND ND 5.3 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 2.6 NA NA 91, STCL = 5.9, Cad=l 1 OD-1 (Oily Dirt Drums) 10/15/2001 NA NA NA 64000 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 Nap=14 TCLP = iSTLC=0.98) NA BITNER #1 Drilling Sumps Bit #1-NS-Btm5' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.4 No Elevated NA Bit #1-NS-S-4' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.6 No Elevated NA Bit #1-NS-N-4' 11/5/2001 ND ND 5 5 ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.8 No Elevated NA Bit #l-SS-Btm3' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND 7.6 ND ND ND ND NA NA 4 No Elevated NA Bit #1-SS-E-2' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND 980 ND ND ND ND NA NA 19 No Elevated NA Bit #1-SS-W-2' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA 3.7 No Elevated NA 140 (STLC Bit #1-ST (Stockpile) 11/5/2001 410 ND 1600. 5400 ND ND ND ND NA NA =ND) No Elevated NA Bit # 1-ES-Btm-3' 11/5/2001 ND ND ND 230 ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.4 No Elevated NA TPH TPH Ethyl Other CAM EPA Method 8270 Diesel Gas TPHmo TRPH Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead 17 Metals SVOC°s (ppm) and DATE (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) OtherVOC°s (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) Other Analysis Detection Limit 10 0.1 100 5 5 5 5 10 10 4 to 80 0.5 0.1 to 10 0.2 BITNER #2 Drilling S~.uump BiFf2-S-N-8' 11/12/2001 250 ND 250 1100 ND ND ND ND NA NA 5.9 No Elevated NA Bit~2-S-N-8'(2~ 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 46 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA BiI~2-S-BTM-9' 11/12/2001 540 ND 530 1500 ND ND ND ND NA NA 5.2 No Elevated NA Bit~2-S-BTM- 11' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 29 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA Bit~2-ST 11/12/2001 100 ND 460 7500 ND ND ND ND NA NA 5.2 No Elevated NA Bit~2-S-E-8' 1111212001 ND ND ND 12 ND ND ND ND NA NA 3 No Elevated NA Bit~2-S-W-8' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 7.8 ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.6 No Elevated NA Bit~2-S-S-8' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 10 ND ND ND ND NA NA 4.4 No Elevated NA AST PAD AREA AST-ST(Stockpile) 11/13/2001 510 0.17 1100 3200 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 12 No Elevated NA ' AST-NW-2' 11/13/2001 ND ND ND 76 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA AST-NE-2' 11/13/2001 ND ND ND 420 ND ND ND - ND NA NA NA NA NA AST-Mid-2' 11/13/2001 ND ND ND <5 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA AST-SW-2' 11/13/2001 ND ND ND 300 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA AST-SE-2' 11/13/2001 ND ND ND 35 ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA Gr¥l-1 11/13/2001 ND ND ND 86 'ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA Large Oil Sump Area NA, Ph = 8.3, Flash >212, React Sulphide = 1.6, Cyanide = ND S-Sump-ST(Stockpile) 10/25/2001 11000 400 18000 31000 <600 1600 2900 3300 NA NA 3 No Elevated B~._-.~;~y >750 S-Sump-Btm-12' 10/25/2001 ND ND ND 9 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 3.5 No Elevated NA S-Sump-SW-5' 10126/2001 ND ND NA <5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 1.4 No Elevated NA S-Sump-E-6'-ST (dark material) 10/26/2001 130 ND NA 11000 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 1.8 No Elevated NA, Bioassay >750 S-Sump-N E-3' 10/26/2001 ND ND NA 8 <5 <5 <5 < 15 NA NA 2.2 No Elevated NA S-Sump-E-Btm-.8' 10/26/2001 ND ND NA <5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 2.1 No Elevated NA S-Sump-SE-4' 10/26/2001 ND ND NA 6.5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA 2.1 No Elevated NA S-Sump-17'm 10/29/2001 NA NA NA 9.1 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump-W-4' 10/29/2001 NA NA NA 630 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump-SW-11' 10/29/2001 NA NA · NA <5 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump-SW-6'ST 10/29/2001 NA NA NA 1500 <5 <5 <5 <15 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-ST 10/30/2001 5200 NA 17000 62000 <100 180 390 1000 <100 NA 3.3 No Elevated NAt Bioassay >750 S-Sump2-Btrn-12' 10/30/2001 ND NA ND <5 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA 1.8 No Elevated NA S-Sump2-S-3' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 5.1 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-W-4' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 5.6 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-SE-2' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 17 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-SECRNR-ST 10/31/2001 <50 NA 900 3200 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA 8.2 No Elevated NA S-Sump2-SECRNR-2' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND <5 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-SE-3' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 11 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump-NESW-2' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 55 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA NA NA NA S-Sump-E-Btm-5' 10/31/2001 ND NA ND 11 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 NA 1.8 No Elevated NA S-Sump-EM-13'BTM .11/1/2001 ND ND ND 300 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump2-BTM-5'-E 11/1/2001 ND ND ND 8 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump-NECRNR-I' 11/1/2001 ND ND ND 3400 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 2.4 No Elevated NA S-Sump-NESW-2' 11/112001 ND ND ND 9.2 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA NA NA NA S-Sump-NSWE-2' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 190 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 30 NA NA S-Sump-NSWW-2' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 1300 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 4 NA NA TPH TPH Ethyl Other CAM EPA Method 8270 Diesel Gas TPHmo TRPH Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead 17 Metals SVOC's (ppm) and DATE (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) Other VOC's (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) Other Analysis Detection Limit 10 0.1 100 5 5 5 5 10 10 4 to 80 0.5 0.1 to 10 0.2 S-Sump-NSWM-2' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 55 <5 <5 <5 <10 ' NA NA 15 NA NA S-Sump-NSWNW-2~' 11114/2001 ND ND ND <5 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 2.2 NA NA S-Sump-NW-BTM4' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 270 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 4.2 NA NA S-Sump-NE-BTM4' 11/14/2001 ND ND ND 15 <5 <5 <5 <10 NA NA 5.6 NA NA Glenn Rose Excavations 150, STLC -- 6~3, TCLP GR-EXI-ST (Stockpile) 10/8/2001 470 ND' 47000 0 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None = 0.14 No Elevated NA GR-EX1-SW-2' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 1400 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 22 No Elevated NA GR-EX1-SW2-3' 10/15/2001 NA NA NA 91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GR-EX1-BTM2' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 410 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 13 No Elevated NA 88, STLC = GR-EX1-NEI' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 270 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3.0 No Elevated NA GR-EX2-ST (Stockpile) 10/8/2001 ND ND 480 26000 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 12 PCE 16 No Elevated NA · GR-EX2-W2' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 35 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.5 No Elevated NA GR-EX2-E2' 10/8/2001 ND 0.52 ND 9900 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 4.7 PCE 4.8 No Elevated NA GR-EX2-E3' 10/12/2001 NA NA NA ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA NA NA GR-EX2-BTM3' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 420 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 24 No Elevated NA 68, STLC -- 12, TCLP = GR-SC-ST 10/24/2001 54 ND 830 1200 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 0.059 No Elevated NA GR-SC-E-4' 10/24/2001 ND ND ND 5.6 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.2 No Elevated NA GR-SC-W-4' 10/24/2001 ND ND ND 6.4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4 No Elevated NA GR-SC-BTM-5' 10/24/2001 ND ND ND 5.9 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3 No Elevated NA 260, STLC = 5.8, TCLP Cad=10, Miscellaneous GR-Sep-ST(Stockpile) 10/25/2001 380 27 1700 2200 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None = 0.098 · STLC = ND Constituents GR-Sep-Btm-6' 10/25/2001 ND 0.11 ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.7 No Elevated ALL ND GR-Sep-N-5' 10/25/2001 ND ND ND 5.1 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4.8 No Elevated NA GR-Sep-W-5' 10/25/200 ! ND ND ND 6 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4.3 No Elevated NA GR-Sep-E-4' 10/25/2001 ND ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3.6 No Elevated NA GR-Sep-S-5' 10/25/2001 ND ND ND 9.9 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 5.4 No Elevated NA Seaton Excavations S-EX1-N4' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 31 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA No Elevated NA S-EX1-W5' 10/8/2001 ND ND . ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA No Elevated NA S-EX1-E4' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA No Elevated NA S-EXI-S5' 10/8/2001 ND ND ND 63 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA No Elevated NA S-EX1-BTM6' 10/8/2001 'ND ND ND 16 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None NA No Elevated NA TPH TPH Ethyl Other CAM EPA Method 8270 Diesel Gas TPHmo TRPH Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead 17 Metals SVOC°s (ppm) and DATE (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) Other VOC's (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) Other Analysis Detection Limit 10 0.1 100 5 5 5 5 10 '10 4 to 80 0.5 0.1 to 10 0.2 Maaco Excavations Sep-3-BTM-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA 6.3 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None ND No Elevated All ND __ Sep-3-N- 10' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2 No Elevated NA Sep-3-E- 10' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA 16 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.4 No Elevated NA Sep-3-S-10' __ 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.3 No Elevated NA · . Sep-3-W-10' 10/11/2001 ND ND NA ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3.1 No Elevated NA FD-N-BTM-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4.3 No Elevated NA FD-N-N-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.4 No Elevated NA FD-N-E-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3.6 No Elevated NA FD-N-W-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.5 No Elevated NA .. FD-N-S-12' 10/11/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.4 No Elevated NA M-FLDS-N3' 10112/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 17 No Elevated NA M-FLDS-S3' 10/12/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.8 No Elevated NA M-FLDS-E3' 10/12/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4.2 No Elevated NA ... M-FLDS~W4' 10/12/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.4 No Elevated NA M-FLDS-BTM4' 10/12/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 4.8 No Elevated NA Cad--16, Cu=660 (STLC = 0.4), Chrom=340 330, STLC (S'i'].C = 7), NA, pH! = 22, TCLP Hg=47 (TCLP = 7.4, Flash >212, M-FLD-ST (Stockpile) 10/12/20OI 1700 1200 2400 NA 21 <20 3100 350 <20 None = 2.2 = ND) React = ND M-FLD-PLE-I' 10/12/2001 ND 1.1 ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.6 No Elevated NA M-FLD~PLN-I' 10/12/2001 ND ND ND NA <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 2.3 No Elevated NA M-DW-BTM-16' 10/24/2001 ND 0.4 ND 97 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 9.3 No Elevated NA M-DW-N-13' 10/24/2001 ND 0.23 ND 1200 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 3 No Elevated NA M-DW-S-14' 10/24/2001 ND 0.18 ND 260 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 8.2 No Elevated NA M-DW-W-13' 10/24/2001 ND 0.13 ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.8 No Elevated NA M-DW-E-13' 10/24/2001 ND ND ND 5.4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 None 1.5 No Elevated NA M-DW-14' 10/24/2001 2100 130 2800 8000 <4 <4 7.7 26 <4 Nap=33 3.1 No Elevated NA 1,2- Dichloro - M-CL-W (Water) 10/24/2001 <1 <0.05 <10 NA <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 benzene = 2.4 0.017 No Elevated NA M-CL-BTM-8' 10/30/2001 140 ND 200 160 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 6.7 No Elevated NA M-CL-S-12' 10/30/2001 ND ND ND ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 2.2 No Elevated NA M-CL-N-7' 10/30/2001 ND 0.55 ND ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 6.3 No Elevated NA M-CL-E-7' 10/30/2001 ND ND ND ND <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 1.6 No Elevated NA M-CL-W-T 10/30/2001 66 0.18 ND 240 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 3.5 No Elevated NA STLC=I0, Nap=550 & minor TCLP ~ Cad=12, M-CL-SLD 11/1/2001 190 620 550 6600 <100 <100 4200 29730 <100 conc. of others 0.51 STLC=0.17 NA, pH=8 M-NDW-BTM-15' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 0.58 No Elevated All ND M-NDW-N.14' 11/12/2001 ND ' ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND · 1.7 No Elevated NA M-NDW-S-14' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 1.2 No Elevated NA M-NDW-E-14' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND <5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 1 No Elevated NA M-NDW-W-14' 11/12/2001 ND ND ND 6.4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 2 No Elevated NA M-NDW-ST(Stockpile) 11112/2001 ND ND ND 24 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 All ND 3.2 No Elevated NA TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, gas = gasoline, mo = motor oil, ppm = parts per million (mg/kg or rog/I), ppb = parts per billion (ug/kg), MTBE = Methyl Tertiery Butyl Ether, TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons, ND = None Detected, NA = Not Analyzed, SVOC's = Semi-volatile Organic Compounds, VOC's = Volatile Organic Compounds, STCL = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, TCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, Bold = Hazardous Concentration. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Location Map Sparks Estate & Adjacent Properties ,2800 Standard St., 3650 attd 3800 Rosedale Hwy.., Bakersfield, California Ii FRUi~VALEy I ~N :./0 FIELD T I I I I I v, tlgv I LOCATION MAP Sparks Estate & Adjacent Properties PLATE 1 2soo St~.,~.~ra St., 36S0 .~.a 3soo Ro.~,,a~., .,¥:,. - Bakerslieid, C.lifornia Former Concrete Foundations I ~ ~ NW'n [ "~- "~- ~J.lSee ' "" Plate 6 Abandoned Water Well Femr~ D~peme~ j Ph~ll~ ~1 ~11~ · ~I-ES SPAR~ ~ ~ ~ I I~} L~ ~ , - ·+ / , ' ~, ~-,.,/~ t .71 ,.,. ,' ' ' ' , ~- ' I , /X -- ~l- ~ ,~ ~/~-~._ ' ~~ ~ I GLEN I ' ''~ ~ ~/ ~ ~J I ~ ROSE i~ h.~l I~P~d I I e,RccL[ ........ ~. .~ 17T ~ ' 4 I I' ~, ~ · ~,,, / ,.~,-.- ~ · ~~~ -- , ~ - Adjacen I~ ..~ I ~o~d Water Well ~ ~ - .os~ ~ ~"~' ParceJs ~ -. ~ ""1 ~ GENE~L PLOT P~N ~~ ~1 ~t ~~e6 42 ~-~[ ' _ J,r~,~ · ~ll~mpleL~ With Remedial Excavation; ~T~ ~ I X ts J,, s~E P~TE 5 ~ ~ I ~" Soils EngJn~ring, Inc. Fm UmE DET~L m.,.~ I- -~ I I ~ [ ~o ~ az~ ,.. ~m~ L~a~n ~. 3/1~1 T4-W'2 T4-E-2 i~ SP2'N'BTM-6'~,. Dispenser _..! .... ~ '. -6' ~-6'[' -- ~ SP2-ST '~sxlan.,~qs..~ Dispenser Excavation ~~'~_1'~ ~..a~.:..~..~.'...~.~ ...... ~i i_1_ Dis-E-6' ~ ,~ .......... ~ .~___ ~ i 46:~ Former S~l-~-~,'-~ i ........ ~'~:~:~;'"'~:~:~ ........... ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Sho~ ~ld~n~ ' 0 ~ ................................................... ; .................. S~-~6 ~ ~ , / ~ / 8KDi~elUST/ ~ ki ~ k; .......... -~...~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R~~M-R' ~~'~'-...Fo~er /. ~ ........ ~ ........................................ k--~ ~?" ~ ..... '~ ~ ~s~p.c / I ~ Sepl-~6' ~ (Se~l) · ~ , . ~ ~mco ~ Sump (2S x S' x 4' d~ep)~ ~ U~T Excavation ~ Former Ciarifier . · ~ ..... , T1-E-2~ (40' by 40' x 12' deep~ C~N-12~ / -'-~ ti-w-z ' -6 ~' ........ ~ ........ '' -6' CI-BTM-16' _ ~ ': Former l000 gal. ~~[~. -6' ~ ~ ...... Legend c~-,~ ~ ~ ~ Soil Sample Location ~ / ~ Excavation Area F~er D~ Well ~ ~ __ ~ ......... ~ Former Tank or Struc~re c~$~3' / ~ ~ ......... : Former Septic c~s2-~4'~ ~ Not To Scale Tank (Sep-2) / Over-Excavation ~,.~ ~2-BTM-10' (5'x 5'x 15' deep) .............................. :....~ .......................................... .?.?:~-~ i i Former ~ ~g r~_ Se~2-~-~0' · - ~ Mobile Home ~ ~.~ [i~ ~~2-LF-S-~' ' ~ ............................. '_ ........ S~2-W-~0',i ~ ~' ~Leachline .............................................. , ~s~-~0' SOILS ENG~N~mNG, ~NC. COSTCO Bakersfield PLATE 4400 Yeager WaY 2800 St~dard St. Bakersfield, CA 93313 Bakersfield, California ~[- (~61) s~- ~1oo~ DATE: 10/2001 " ' PROJECT: 01-9775 UST, D~ Well, & Septic Tank Excavations .. l~orth Property Line ~- AC Water' t~ne/~'S_Sumn_NgWW_2,(131loiS-Sump-NSWM-2'/ (55) S-Sump-NS~2' (190) N =~S-Sump-NS~-2' (55) / ~ =~ S-Sumo-NE~BTM4' (15)/ ........__..................,,,, --- . ~-BTM4'(270) ~< """"""" S-Sump-17'm 9 1) ' , S-Sump-E-Btm-5~ (11) ~ S-Sudp-NE 2m-l' (3400)  ' ~ S-Sump-NE-3' (8) S-Sump l~ S-Sump-Btm 12' (9) ~x ~ / ' ~. ~ SumwE-6'-ST (11000) S-Sump-S~ 31000)~' /~ ~ Sump-E-Btm-S' ~D) S-Sump-EM-13'BTM (11) S-Sum~ , . -~ · S. Sump-SEM' (6.5) 90' S-Sump-SW 11 ~)~-- , S-Sump2-ST (62000) 00~ ~ x~ S-Sump2-BTM-5'-E (8) ~ -- Approximate S-Sump-SW~'ST 15 . . /~ ~ ~ 70 Bounda~ Be~een ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -i S-Sump & S-Sump2 / , ~ S-Sump2-BTM-12' S-Sump2-W-4' 5.6) ~ '- S-Sump2-SEC~-ST (3200) ~ } S-Sump2-SE-2' (1~ ' '90' S-SumpS-S-3' (5.1) f' ~ S-Sump27SEC~R-2'~D) < 110' // S-Sump2~E-3' (11~ Approximate Extent Of Excavation T~COgl Oil Well Legend ~ Soil Sample Location ~ Excavation Area App S 1 , 'x Deeper Oily fOX. ca I I ' ' Area -- 30' x_~ 1 SO~LS rNG~~G, mC. COSTCO Bakersfield PLATE 4400 Yeager Way 2800 Standard St. ~akers~ela,(661) 8Zl CA. S10093313 Bakersfield, California 3 m DATE: 11/2001 PROJECT: 01-9775 LARGE OIL SUMP o SPARKS ESTATE PARCEL DIRI SURFACE ~ Oa~ Motor ~ ~ormer · ~ Hazardous Material Storage Area F !~ M-NDW-N-] 4' ~ M-NDW-Sl' ~ 3' Diameter n ! ~DryWell , .c : M-NDW-W-14'--- ~1 ~'~M-NDW-E-14 e M-NDW-BTM-15'-'"~_ ~ I!I ~ (~) Catch,Basin M'NDW'S'14' ~ '~t~ I ! f I~'~$oe?~-3;TE' ! 10 2' Former Aband Sep-3-W- 10' ~ ~ .... ~F.D,-~-I~- 12' Dry. Well FD-N~TM--~2;~.~ ¥-FLD/,L.N4 , M-CLam (S~udge) ~ M-FLD-PLE-I~ ~r.D ra_i-Gs.~ DIRT AREA , ~-"j Former Clarifler ~ M-FLD~-E3'-- !~' ~ / ~-- M-CL*W (Fluids) HUNGRY HUNTER ~ M-FLDS-N3' ~1~ 2'-diameter , M-DW-W-13' r.~rmer I Dry Well Maac~ Building ROSEDALE HIGHWAY e Soil Sample LocationApprox. Scale: 0 Excavation ~ Stockpiled Soil 1"'= 50' sort,s ~.NCIm~m~c, ~NC. COSTCO Bakersfield/Former Maaco Facility !PLATE 4400 Yeager Way 3650 Rosedale Highway Bakersfield, CA 93313 Bakersfield, California (661) 831 - 5100 PLOT PLAN ?~OJECT: 0]-~775 GR-EX1 Excavation (8' x 8' x 2' deep) GR-EXI-S 2~¥2.~ ~ GR-EXI-NEI' R-EX GR-EXI -SW2-3~ GR-EX2 GR-SC _ Foyer GR-E~-~'~0' X 3s x 3s deep, Steamcleaner -~ ~R2E~ Excavation . GR-SC-W~.------~ ~ ~ GR-E~-E2 ..... ~ ~ ~ Fomer GR-SC-~M-5~ m ~ Conc~te ~ GR-Se~N-5~ ~ GmSC-ST Exmvation ~ GR-Se~M-6'~ ~.....~ GR-Se~5'~ ~ ~ ~Former ~ Septic Tan~ GR-Se~ST ~ Former { Shop  , Former Office A~a ROSED~E ~IG~WAY Soi Approx. Scale: ~' Excavation Area SOreS E~G~EmG, mC. COSTCO B~ersfield PLATE 4400 Yeager Way Fomer Gle~ Rose Parcel Bake~field, Ca 93313 3 880 Rosedale Hi.way 5 (~) 8~ - ~00 Bake~field, California DATE: 11~001 Glenn Rose Remedial Excavations · PROJECT: 01-9775 See Plate 2 for Actual Excavation Locations Sparks Parcel ES-10 Excavation (Approx. 45' x 50' and 2' to 3' deep) ' ~ ES:.r~J"i~'~"~}'~'.... Sparks Parcel = ES-10-N-2' EB-1 Excavation ? ~ ~ "i'O ~ (15, x 15' and 2' deep) ~ " '7, ~ ~ ES-10-BTM-3' ~ ~ ~ EB1-BTM-2' ~ ' 25' ES-10-S-2' Sparks Parcel - Bitner #2 Drilling Sump Excavation S-EX1-N4' (20' X 15' and 8' to 11' deep) s-EXI-w5 Bit#2-S-BTM-9~ 'Bi~2-S-N-8' Xl-SS' S-EX1-BTM-6' ~ }) Bit#2-S-E-8' Bit#2-S-W-8'~ / SEATON PARCEL Bit#2-S-S-8' % ' I~ Bi~2-ST ................. "\ S-EX1 Excavation (B-16) (12' x 12' and 6' deep) (x~itner#2 ~ ..' ~-~ Oil Well " ................. " Sparks Parcel - Bitner #1 Drilling Sump Excavations (..~ ~,~Bit#1-NS- Bill North Sum~ Excavation (8' x 8' x 5' deep)~ Bit#l-NS-BTM5' Bitner #2 Oil W~l ' Bit#l-ES-BTM-3' Bitgl South Sump "~ O~- Rit~l F~a~f ~mn Excavation (8 x 8 x2 dee , , , ~ E x cTv ~;iom~ .~ 7 ~ ~'u:3P' d e ep)~ Bit~I-SS-BTM3' ....................... ~ Soil Sample Location Approx. Scale: ~'} Excavation Area ...........'~" Stockpiled Soil 1" ---- 3 0' SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. COSTCO Bakersfield PLATE 4400 Yeager Way 2800 Standard St., Parcels 39, 40 & 8 Bakersfield'(661) 831 CA_ 510093313 Bakersfield, California DATE: 11/2001 PROJECT: 01-9775 Miscellaneous Remedial Excavations B A K E R S F I E L D CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM August 7, 2002 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR,~-,.-~ SUBJECT: STOCKDALE HIGH SCHOOL FLASHING BEACON Council Referral #000171 Councilmember Couch requests status update regarding flashing red light on White Lane near Stockdale High. General Services contracted with A.C. Electric to install the flashing beacon on White Lane at Stockdale High School. The contract papers were completed and work was scheduled to begin during the week of August 5, 2002. Per the contract, the installation is to be completed by August 19, 2002. School resumes on August 26, 2002. G:\GROUPDATLReferralsk2002\CC Mtg 7-31\171-Traffic.doc AUG - 7 2002 ~B A K E R S F I E L D-~':'~ _'~':, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM August 7, 2002 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR~ _ ___.~ SUBJECT: CROSSWALK AT HUGHES AND PATTI Council Referral #000167 Councilmember Salvaggio referred to Public Works a request from Lupe Religatto requesting a crosswalk from Hughes Lane to Patti Court, with a handicapped ramp. and for staff to explore the feasibility of a median and speed limit reduction in that area. An "Engineering and Traffic Survey for Prima Facie Speed Limit" analysis was recently completed by the Traffic Engineer for the Hughes Lane segment between White Lane and Planz Road, as required by California State Law. The analysis determined that the existing speed limit of 45 miles per hour is appropriate and can be enforced by the Police Department under statutes of the California Vehicle Code. No changes are proposed. A painted median to control traffic turn movements on Hughes Lane between White Lane and Tricia Court/Teal Avenue (north of Patti Court) will be installed by City crews. A work order is being prepared by the Traffic Engineer to General Services. Although a crosswalk would normally be located at a four way intersection such as north at Tricia Court/Teal Avenue and Hughes Lane, most of the pedestrian activity is in the area of Patti Court and Hughes Lane due to the location of the retail center. A work order is being prepared. When the Streets Division completes their construction of handicap ramps on Patti Court, a painted crosswalk and signs will be installed across Hughes Lane. Cc: Traffic Engineering General Services Street Maintenance G:\GROUPDAT~Referrals~2002\CC Mtg 7-3 l\167-Traffic.doc