Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 255-07 . RESOLUTION NO. 2 5 5 - 0 7 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 07-1218, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN, LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF GOSFORD ROAD, GENERALLY BETWEEN PANAMA LANE AND MC CUTCHEN ROAD, NORTH OF BERKSHIRE ROAD (FUTURE ALIGNMENT). WHEREAS, Aaron Hashim for The Davis Family Trust, filed a application requesting a General Plan Amendment, an amendment to the land use designation ofthat certain property within the City of Bakersfield as hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government code, held a public hearing on Monday, September 17,2007, and on Thursday, September 20,2007, on General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the project was duly noticed to all owners or operators of all adjacent industrial properties in order to eliminate the requirement for a masonry wall. Said notice was sent on August 24, 2007 for the Planning Commission hearing; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, is as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218: Aaron Hashim for The Davis Family Trust, applied to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan consisting of a change from HMR (High Medium Density Residential) to OC (Office commercial) on 22.46 acres. The project site is located along the west side of Gosford Road, between Panama Lane and McCutchen Road, north of Berkshire Road (future alignment); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted for General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218 and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 152-07 on September 20, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218 subject to the "Mitigation/Conditions of Approval" listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution and as restated herein; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, November 28, 2007, on General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218 notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and ~McS'-9. ~ ~ - >- m l:;: G o ORIGINfi.\.. WHEREAS, the project was duly noticed to all owners or operators of all adjacent industrial properties, based on the Kern County Assessor's Office, in order to eliminate the requirement for a masonry wall along the west and north boundaries of the site. Said notice was sent at least ten days prior to this City Council hearing; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings: 1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct. 2. The Council has considered and concurs with the following findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 152-07 adopted on September 20, 2007: a. All required public notices have been provided. b. The provisions of CEQA have been met. c. Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, staff has determined that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA. d. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. e. The land use designation change from HMR (High Medium Density Residential) to OC (Office commercial) on 22.46 acres is compatible with the land use designations of surrounding properties and is internally consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. f. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEOA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission. 3. That the infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the type of development. 4. The project was duly noticed to all owners or operators, according to the Kern County Assessor's Office, of all adjacent industrial properties in order to eliminate the requirement for a masonry wall. Said notice was sent at least ten days prior to this City Council hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein are true and correct. 2. The Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218 is hereby approved and adopted. Page 2 of 4 ~~Kf1: cJ- ~ >- ',i ;T; l:;: r- o C:J ORIGINAl 3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary ofthe Planning Commission to the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved. 4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment No. 07- 1218, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property located along the west side of Gosford Road, generally between Panama Lane and McCutchen Road, north of Berkshire Road (future alignment), subject to mitigation/conditions of approval and elimination of conditions as indicated and found in attached Exhibit "A". 5. That General Plan Amendment No. 07-1218, approved herein, be combined with other approved General Plan Amendment cases in this same cycle described in separate resolutions, to form a single Amendment to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. Page 3 of 4 ~M~~ d- .,~ >- ~ ~ g ORIGINAL ---------000-------- AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on NOV 2 8 2001 by the following vote: v' V"./ c/ ,/ V COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, ~, HANSON, SUL(IVAN, SCRIVNER COUNCILMEMBER MYt.-e.....-- COUNCILMEMBER ~ COUNCILMEMBER ~ Y,CMC CITY CLERK and x Officio Clerk 0 Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED NOV 2 8 2001 HARVE L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: !?of;tA:f;'7Yb ~ Exhibit A - Mitigation/Conditions of Approval B - General Plan Amendment Map MO:dc - S:\GPA 3rd 2007\07-1218\ResOrd\CC Res GPA 07-1218.doc Page 4 of 4 ~~c:-?> cJ- ~ >- m ~ G ORIr.INAI Exhibit A Mitigation/Conditions of Approval ~Mc:-?> ~ ~ >- m l:;: [; o ORIGINAl EXHIBIT A Mitigation/Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. 07-1218 Cultural Resources 1. If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. Mitigation for potentially significant cultural resource impacts. 2. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work would cease pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately. Mitigation for potentially significant cultural resource impacts. City Attornev Condition 3. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and/or property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners or boards ("City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for City's sole active negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued. The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or preceding, falling under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party. Public Works Conditions 4. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement plans, or with the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following shall occur: b. Provide fully executed dedication for Gosford Road(s) to arterial standards and Berkshire Road to collector standards for the full frontage of the area within the GPA request. Dedications shall include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the dedication documents. If a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPAlZC area is submitted, dedication can be provided with the map. "K This GPAlZC area is too small to support it's own storm drainage sump. The City will ~ ~ ~<'$>V' o ~ >- ,- ~ G ORIGINAl a. Exhibit A GPAlZC 07-1218 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 5 allow no more than one sump per 80 acres; therefore, this GPAlZC area must be included within the drainage area of adjoining property. Submit a comprehensive drainage study of the entire drainage area, to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The study shall show the development's proportionate share of the necessary ultimate storm drainage facilities. The developer shall participate in the development of a Planned Drainage Area, or shall provide some other method for the construction of the ultimate facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer. Any required retention site and necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City. c. Sewer service must be provided to the GPAlZC area. Submit verification to the City Engineer of the existing sewer system's capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through development under the new land use and zoning. d. In order to preserve the permeability of the sump and to prevent the introduction of sediments from construction or from storm events, all retention and detention basins (sumps) shall have a mechanical device in the storm drain system to remove or minimize the introduction of oil, grease, trash, and sediments to the sump. This device shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and shall provide the greatest benefit to the storm drain system with the least maintenance cost. e. Developer is responsible for the construction of all infrastructure, both public and private, within the boundary of the GPAlZC area. This includes the construction of any and all boundary streets to the centerline of the street, unless otherwise specified. The developer is also responsible for the construction of any off site infrastructure required to support this development, as identified in these conditions. The phasing of the construction all infrastructure will be addressed at the subdivision map stage. For orderly development. 5. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidated Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPA area. For orderly development. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay a major transportation facility fee in the amount of 35~ per square foot for commercial use or the fee in effect at the time of building permit approval. If prior to issuance of a building permit said fee is merged into the regional TIF program then payment of the regional TIF fee will be deemed to have satisfied the intent of this condition. This fee is imposed per City Council approved action plan to pursue funds needed to complete construction of major transportation facilities to serve growth and development within Metropolitan Bakersfield. For orderly development. 7. Payment of the proportionate share of the cost of the median for the arterial frontage of the property within the GPAlZC request is required prior to recordation of any map or approval of any improvement plan for the GPAlZC area. For orderly development. 8. Pay the proportionate share of the following mitigation measures (not paid for by the Regional Transportation Impact Fee nor included with normal development improvements) as indicated in Tables 7 & 8 of the traffic study. An updated estimate, based upon current costs, and fee schedule shall be developed by the applicant and approved prior to recordation of a map or ~i\K~i issuance of a building permit. Proportionate shares from the traffic study as follows: cJ- ~ >- l:;: o t ORln'''-'~. ' Exhibit A GPAlZC 07-1218 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 5 a. Gosford Rd. & White Ln., Add 1 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 WBL, 1 WBT, 1 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 SBL, 1 SBT, 0.65% share2. b. Gosford Rd. & District Blvd., Add 1 EBL, 1 WBL, 0.94% share. c. Gosford Rd. & Harris Rd, Add 1 SBL 1, 1.88% share. d. Reliance Dr. & Panama Ln., Add 1 SBL 1, 1.57% share e. Ashe Rd. & Panama Ln., Add 1 SBL \ 2 SBT1, 0.94% share f. Gosford Rd. & Taft Hwy. (SR 119), Add 2 NBL, 1 NBT, 1.47% share g. Panama Ln., Old River Rd to Gosford Rd, add 2 lanes, 0.84% share h. Panama Ln., Gosford Rd to Ashe Rd, Add 1 lane, 1.08% share i. Taft Hwy. (SR 119), Old River Rd to Gosford Rd, Add 2 lanes, 0.34% share j. Taft Hwy. (SR 119), Gosford Rd to Ashe Rd, Add 2 lanes, 0.58% share Notes: NB - north bound, SB - south bound, WB - west bound, EB - east bound L - Left turn lane, T - Through lane, R - Right turn lane, 1Striping only. For orderly development. 9. Regional Transportation Impact Fee: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate in the RTIF program by paying the adopted residential unit fee in place at time of development. For orderly development. Plannina Condition 10. Prior to Final Site Plan approval by the Planning Department, the developer of the GPAlZC area shall provide important vehicular and pedestrian access to retail and food service uses from the proposed office and residential uses. This will provide significant traffic and neighborhood walkability benefits. For orderly development. 11. PCD Plans shall provide a public vehicular access road serving the proposed C-O development, commercial development to the north and multiple family development to the west. The road shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Planning Departments to provide vehicular and pedestrian access from the adjacent uses to the commercial center. For orderly development. 12. PCD Plans shall depict a ten (10) foot wide landscape area between the commercial development to the north and the proposed offices in lieu of a wall separation. For orderly development. 13. With submittal of any tentative and/or final subdivision map filed on the project site, shall include dedication of a full-width 60-foot local road to City standards along the western boundary of the project site as shown in the attached exhibit. If no subdivision map is filed, prior to occupancy of any building on the site, the applicant shall construct said road referenced above to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Planning Departments. For orderly development and enhanced access to the commercial center for traffic relief and walkability. ~ ~I\~~~ Q. ~ ;:... - I- m - t- o C) ORIGINAl . --- - - -.. -- -------l (\ EXHIBIT I --_. - AH- ~ ~- --- CONCEPTUAL STREET DIAGRAM 'b ... .-.... .'. .. '" . . ... ... .. 'I- . . .... A .. ~2 ,~z FOR GPA/ZC 07-1218 I '=,..," ., , I -- I %." "'f 'b ... ~~ It,,."' ..., .. ... %..J~ ..... '1. ..., ... g, .., TR 6881 ~ .~ ..... i3.2. ... !:.Z4 .... S;;:.fd BERKSHIRE ROAD I ~---~g;-;----~--.- ~,e2 .....--; .~--- -':4]! %.::.24. ~2."P .,. ~ 01- ...JZ I!!:!!l WW r- -~ ~ g ~5: c--.I fEo: (r') :::C:W (" .... < 0 c.. ~~ rt., l.4I 0 _ '-C_ K Z I!!:!!l x'9 ~~ ~..~ ~ T- O C:J ORIGIt-.ltll Exhibit A GPAlZC 07-1218 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 5 Mitiaation/Conditions of Aooroval from GPAlZC 04-0057 that are aoolicable to this Proiect: 14. The agricultural water wells shall be properly removed and abandoned pursuant to the latest procedures required by the local agency with closure responsibilities for the wells. Any associated equipment (i.e. generators and pumping materials) shall be removed off-site and properly disposed of at a permitted landfill. A visual inspection of the areas beneath the removed materials (if present) shall be performed. Mitigation for potentially significant short-term construction impacts. 15. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project applicant shall perform soil tests to determine concentrations of pesticide and fungicide residues that may be present within the Project site. Should contamination levels be in excess of acceptable Federal, State, and/or County levels, the project applicant shall identify and implement remedial action, (subject to approval by the City of Bakersfield and responsible regulatory agencies), to reduce contaminants to acceptable levels. Mitigation for potentially significant agricultural impacts. 16. Prior to filing a final tract or parcel map, the developer/owner shall record a covenant for each lot in the subdivision that prohibits the export of groundwater from the subdivision except by the water purveyor that is serving the subdivision. Additionally, the developer/owner shall pay city fees for inspection of installation of water facilities and City Water Availability Fees. Payment of fees shall be made to the City on a pro-rata basis prior to final acceptance and recordation of each phase of the project, based on the percentage of the gross acreage contained in the particular phase to be accepted and recorded, as compared with contained in the particular phase to be accepted and recorded, as compared with the total gross acreage within the entire Project. All water main, service connections, and fire hydrants shall be installed by the developer and dedicated to the City. Plans and specifications for such water mains and appurtenances shall be prepared by and/or approval of plans for installation shall be by the City of Bakersfield. All improvements must be installed or bonded for prior to the City issuing a letter guaranteeing a water supply. Mitigation for potentially significant water resource impacts. 17. The developer shall include the following disclosure provision in any grant deed to any grantee of any property within the Project site: Grantee hereunder acknowledges and agrees that the subject property is located in the vicinity of active industrial uses and operations, including the production of concrete, asphalt and other construction materials. Grantee also acknowledges that such operations are associated with potentially objectionable elements, including dust, noise, vibration, bright lights, unattractive visual appearance, hours of operation, and heavy truck on Gosford Road, Panama Lane, McCutchen Road and other roads in the area. Grantee hereby covenants to include this same paragraph in any subsequent deed by Grantee of all or any portion of the subject property. Planning Commission condition added for potential land use conflicts. The followina Conditions of Aooroval from GPAlZC 04-0057 shall be eliminated: 18. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy within the area proposed to be designated as HMR and zoned R-2 and/or the area proposed to be designated as MC and zoned C-2, ~ ~M~?> o ~ >- - l;: J!. o <J ORIr,INAI Exhibit A GPAlZC 07-1218 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 5 developer shall construct a masonry wall, not less than six feet high, on the Project site along the southern boundaries of the area proposed to be designated as MC and zoned C-2. The bottom of the wall shall be at grade level of the adjacent residences. Developer, and all future owners of the property(ies) where such wall has been installed, shall be responsible for maintaining such wall in good condition and repair. 19. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy within the area proposed to be designated as MC and zoned C-2, the developer shall install a row of trees adjacent to the masonry wall required by the above condition. At the time of construction of the masonry wall, developer shall install a row of trees adjacent to such wall. All such trees shall be planted and maintained in accordance with City site development, zoning and/or PCD standards, shall be spaced not more than twenty (20) feet apart, and shall be of a size sufficient to exceed the height of the adjacent wall at full growth. MO:\\S:\GPA 3rd 2007\07-1218\ResOrd\Exhibit A.doc X ~Mc:-?> o ~ >- - m l:;: r- o () ORIGINAL Exhibit B General Plan Amendment Map ~M~-9. cJ- ~ >- m l:;: r- v C) ORIGINAL co ~ N ~ I "'" o I- Z W ~ o z w ~ <( Z <( -.J a. -.J ~ W Z w <.9 ~ ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ./' ~~, (G.~' q~' -~~ :P~' ~?;' ~~,? '" "'~ rJ;'":/' '" ./' ./' ./' ./' ,f' j ~ j l5J s a: -' g UJ ~ <( :;: <( ~ u :; ,U/:J ).J.NnO:J 1ii . i i . i . i . i i i i ::; [J c( il: ::; s UJ z :5 ~ <( ~ ).J.NnO:J ).J./:J 4' ./' ./' ./' ~' ./' ,I' " ,I' ,I' ,I' S ,I' ,I' I' a; gJ!. q ~ W :;: a: r-- l<: :; N -' a:: ~I .::::4~ ... ~~ en 0 Z ... 0 8 0 C") N Ii) l- N 0 co N s a: -' s a TrtN'<I~ 3NI.1S a: ::s ,4' ,4' ~' i' g 4 ,f' ,I' ~' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ~~ ,f' r<Y'? q~'? ,~ O~4' '?:J~,I' ~(;j4' .r~f' A.~? ~ !?-.~ 0" "# " 7'<1N'<I~ 3NI.1S a: -' ~' ,I' ,I' ,I' ~' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' ,f' s . i a: -' ./ ~ c( ~ ~ il: u 0 ~ I'.l\{-1> s u ~ ~ () - >- m ,..... . l:;: C) ; o ORIGINAl