HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/23/1990 B A K E R S F I E L D
Kevin McDermott, Chair
Patricia DeMond
Ken Peterson
Staff: John Stinson
AGENDA
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, April 23, 1990
12:00 p,m.
City Manager's Conference Room
1. Signal at Stockdale and Village Lane (Ed Schulz)
2. City Investment Policy (Bill Descary)
3. CDBG Budget 90-91 Entitlement (George Gonzales)
Correspondence from the Arthritis Foundation (George Gonzales)
4. DBA Budget (DID) (Jake Wager)
MARCH 13, 1990
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT POLICY
California Government Code requires an annual review of the Investment Policy.
Staff has reviewed the City's current Investment Policy and is recommending no
revisi-ons. Attached for your approval is the City's proposed Investment Policy.
Government Code limits the types of investments that are legal for local agen-
cies. The City of Bakersfield Investment Policy is more restrictive than Code
and excludes allowable investments in such instruments as Small Business
Administration loans, negotiable certificates of deposit, medium term corporate
notes, and reverse repurchase agreements. It is felt investments in these
instruments would not be prudent.
krc
BD031390
cc~: Dale Hawley
Attachment
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Page 1 of 2
Investment Policy
SCOPE
This investment policy applies to the investment activities of the City of
Bakersfield except for its Firemen's Disability and Retirement Fund which is
administered separately under Municipal Code Section 2.92. The idle cash in
all other funds is pooled for investment purposes.
PURPOSE
This policy is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the
City's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for maximizing the effi-
ciency of the City's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to enhance
the economic status of the City while protecting its pooled cash.'
POLICY
The City of Bakersfield operates its temporary pooled idle cash investments
under the prudent man rule Civil Code Section 2261, et seq. states in part "in
investing . . property for the benefit of another, a trustee shall exercise
the .iudgment and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, which men of
prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own
affairs .... " This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment oppor-
tunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under
current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600
et seQ.) and other imposed legal restrictions. Investments may be made in the
following instruments:
- Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies
- Certificates of Deposit (Time Deposits) placed with commercial banks,
savings and loan companies and federal savings banks.
- Bankers Acceptances
- Commercial Paper
- Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits
- Repurchase Agreements (Repos)
- Passbook Savings Account Demand. Deposits
- Mutu~ Funds meetinQ criteria prescribed in Government Code
S536u1 and related legislation
Exhibit "A"
PaQe 2 of 2
Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are:
1. Safety. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the
potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of these amounts.
The City only operates in those investments that are considered very safe.
2. Liquidity. This refers to the "ability to easily sell" at any moment in
time with a minimal risk of losing some portion of principal and interest.
Liq,uidity is an important investment quality especially when the need for
unexpected funds occurs occasionally.
3. Yield. Yield is the potential dollar, earnings an investment can provide,
and sometimes is described as the rate of return.
SafekeeDina. Securities purchased from brokers/dealers shall be held in third
party safekeeping by the trust department of the City's bank or other desig-
nated third party trust, in the City's name and control, whenever possible.
Investment Objective. The Cash Management system of the City of Bakersfield
is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus
insurina the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible, including
the estimated float for the Active Account and Payroll Account. The City
attempts to obtain the highest interest yields possible as long as investments
meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity and do not exceed a term
of five years.
The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near
100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Cash
management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the City
Treasurer. The City holds its Treasurer and his designees harmless for
responsible investment transactions undertaken in accordance with the
Investment Policy. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philos-
ophy is, and will continue to be, to insure that the money is always safe and
available when needed.
April 23, 1990
TO: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director
FROM: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Application
Time Schedule
In order to meet the HUD regulations for notification of the public of the final
CDBG application, the following time schedule will need to be followed:
1. May 2, 1990 - notice must be submitted to the
newspapers that the City Council will act on the CDBG
application (final statement).
2. On May 6, 1990 - notice must appear in the newspaper (final statement).
3. May 16, 1990 - City Council action.
4. May 31, 1990' - final CDBG application (final
statement) submitted to HUD for their review.
5. April 1, 1990 - funds available and authorization from
City Council to accept the funds.
gm36
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Meeting Date:
A p r i 1 18
Agenda Section:
Consent Calendar
Agenda Item:
4. k.
.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
Approved
FROM: Economic/Community Development ~Department Head~
D~TE: ~pril 10, 1990 Cigy
'SUBJECT.: The 1990-91 Application for Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Funds for the City of Bakersfield.
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer to Budget & Finance Committee. Group Vote.
BACKGROUND:
Annually the City must file an application for CDBG
Entitlement. (The 1990-91 Fiscal Year Entitlement is
$1,201,000.) The application has to be approved by the City
Council before it is submitted to the U.S. Department of
Ho.using and Urban Development (HUD) for final approval and
funding. These funds are to be used for projects that will
benefit the low and moderate income population of the City of
Bakersfield.
Application is due to HUD by ~iay 31, 1990.
jjc
C:CC41890.~
~?~'~i!~.!?~7!~!!??~!?~TO:'~'~?i?i'~.~ Dale Hawley, City Manager ...... ~'~ .....~"~.~ ~' -'-~-'~ ................
-~/ ~ ~ ~...i ii.i~ ' . Community DevelOpment Coordinator ~
"'i~?~;-!:'~?~. !... ii FROM: :" ~' 'George Gonzales,~'.90 91 CDBG 'Ent~['~nt and Program~Inc°me
..ii'i~::,I¥!~ ?'::I':'II'I.? SUB'CT': '.' ProPOsed use of for
~i · I. Request for CDBG Funds from Other Agencies
.~ 1. The Alliance A~ainst Family Violence (AAFV) Counselin~ Center
· AA}"V· is requesting $100,000 for the acquisition of a 2,180
~ square foot building at 2211 17th Street that they currently
occupy. This building will be used as an outreach counseling
center. Estimated total acquisition cost for the building is
$154,000. The agency is willing to generate up to $84,000 in
"' matching funds. Low tO moderate income benefit is up to 100%.
Staff Recommendation - $70,000 for acquisition only. $70,000
2. The Arthritis Association of Kern County (AAKC) Adsotive
Acuatic Center
The AAKC has submitted a proposal for construction of a 7,091
square foot adaptive aquatic center. This facility will
include the construction of a therapeutic pool, locker room and
administration offices. The association is requesting $150,000
from the City and has submitted a similar request to the County
of Kern. The site for the center is on Westwind Drive and 19th
Street.
According to the Arthritis Association, the acquisition of this
9,840 square foot parcel was completed using agency funds of
$150,000. The total cost of the project is approximately
$774,000~ They are proposing .to generate ~_n additional
funds for design and construction of the
$324,000
of
matching
project. Low to moderate'income benefit is up to 100%.
........ · ' 'Staff Reco~endation -' No funds are reco~ended for this
' "' project.
'..' .' 4. Baker Street Library Restoration I~rovements - Phase II
-.':..-.'..'~ The County of Kern is requesting funds to reh~ilitate the
.~....~... ' "' . interior spaces of the main floor of the libra~ at 1400 B~er
.... .~:'-.:.:..' ' Street. The total floor space involved in the restoration
project is approx~ately 5,000 s~e feet. The proposed
': .- project' is est~ated to cost $325,000. of which the City is
~ asked to contr~ute $100,000. Low to moderate income benefit
is approx~ately 71.11%.
Staff Reco~endation - No funds are reco~ended for this
project. This project will be considered if reprogr~ed funds
are
available at the end of ~ 89-90.
5. Graffiti Removal'Program
The CD Division proposes to coordinate the removal of graffiti
in low-income neighborhoods within the City of Bakersfield.
The program is primarily for private properties where
permission has been received to remove graffiti. Low to
moderate benefit will be 51%+.
Staff Recommendation - $40,000
-'~.,~.'~-'-',~'< 6. Kern County Economic Opportunity rp {. ) . ............... ....-
' ~.'~7<d{~':.l"~ilr...-']t<"~'~ '~. Health Clinic ' :: '," ' :":':. ~i'.:;;"..;...~'..... ,~'... '~ " ]-:'..--' " '"
,':-'~i~._,~'~"KCEOC is' requesting assistance for the ac~lsltlo~ an~ . · ..
.~'.~~~;//..'d, ';. ,'~' conSt~ctiOn' of ,~ a,. medica!'~ facility's: to~} replace.,~hel~. ~ ' '".:'.,'.~.'- .
~:~:<<)~<~)~,~,: ~?~?.;'~:~ .-..~.;? The '~ :site ~'~n ~inc~as~" tne' °~e'ration from 3 ", 000 s~'~' f~e~ :~' '~.'~. ~: .";..'. ~ ";' ..-; '.-
'~?"""~"~?,<~?~,~".~.':.:-;".'.~,,,~.'.'<" to a ~,00~ square foot facilitY;":~':'K~OC is re~esting $250,000 ''"' -
$ 0,o0o rom ount $ 0,000 a ·
~'~)',~?~ ?~?~.'~)~?~"~ ~< "'for :"an '" est~atea 'tota~ cost' of ~ $~ ~'2701000~<'. Low to moderate '"" "' "~':'; "' ";' '~
benefit'will be 63%+. '.' "~":' "~ ..... ' ....
';. Staff ReCo~,endation - No funds are reco~ended for this
project.
7. Fair Housinq Proaram
'Continued promotion of fair housing program through
educational, c0unseling, -and remediation of tenant, landlord
and housing related issues.
Staff Recommendation - $65,000
II. Requests for CDBG Funds from City Departments
1. City of Bakersfield Curb and 'Gutter Improvements - Design
and construction cf approximately 15,046 1.f. of infill curb
and gutter in the following proposed residential locations:
A. Brundaae Lane Curb and Gutter Project
Construction of infill curb and gutter for the area bounded by
Palm, Brundage, A and H Streets for an estimated cost of
$125,000. Low to moderate income benefit for the eligible area
is approximately 49%. An income survey will be conducted by
CD staff prior to design for verifying those streets that
qualify for CDBG assistance (e.g., at least 51% low/moderate
income benefit). ~0~
Staff Recommendation - ~'
"";"'"': ....... -':~;':~'"~""'" ...... '"' ~rb and Gutter for the area'bounded by 4th, 2nd;' H and Chester .'
.... ' ..... "'' ' Avenue for an est~ated cost of $45,000. ~w to moderate
%
, .: ...... '. -,': ' ~rb and ~tter,on Kern Str'eet from Flower Street to Highway
': ..... 178 for' an est~ated cost of $15,000. 5ow to moderate i~come
-. :":' '. ' benefit is approx~ately 56%. ... '
Staff Reco~endation - $15,000
D. Sonora Street Area Curb and gutter. Pro~ect
Cross drains, curb and gutter for the area bounded by East
California, Tr~tun Avenue, Sonora Street and ~er Street,
~ .;.~.' . totaling $200,000. Low to moderate income benefit is
approx~ately 61%. ~ea is predominantly co~ercial in land
use.
Staff Reco~endation - No funds are reco~ended for this
project. ..
E. S~ner Street ~ea ~rb and Gutter Project
Cross drains, curb and ~tter for the area bounded by East
T~tun, S~er, Beale and Haley for a total est~ated cost of
$70,000. Low to moderate income benefit is approx~ate!y
61.29%. Area is predominantly co~ercial in land use.
Staff Reco~endation - No funds are reco~ended for this
project ·
2. Union Avenue Infrastructure Improvements
Sidewalk median landscaping, street lighting, and curb and
gutter along the right-of-way on Union Avenue between
California and Terrace Way for a total estimated cost of
$323,520 of which $161,760 is requested from the City. Low to
moderate income benefit is approximately 54.2%.
Staff Recommendation - No funds are recommended .for this
.) project.
4
>}, -~,', "-' ,.' 3. Jefferson Park Improvement
Construction of a new restroom facility at Bernard and Beale
~.~::; ,~'~:,.~i..'~'~... · Avenue to replace an out-dated 40 to 50 year-old substandard
.:;:.~..:..:.:..-: ....... :. restroom.:..~;.iEstimated~.square footage of new.facility is 500
'::i-{~. ::~";:."'i:ii'~.":.~'.::':::.~"t)/...:')~-!?.:'.':' :"~ }.' square feet~.:'': Total funds needed"- :", $50,000. . Low to moderate
..... Staff Recommendation - No funds ar.e recommended for this
· ./.. :--':..'.': ~.....~,'.~ , ....... project.~ ~ . :.'., ,...... ::.'...' · ..
4. Martin l.uther Kin~ ,Jr. Community Center ~ei~ht Room Addition
The addition of a 750 square foot build'inA to the Community
Center facility for an estimated' cost of $20,000. Low to
moderate income benefit is approximately 74.42%.
Staff Recommendation - No funds are recommended for this
pro3ect.
5. Neighborhood Business Revitalization Pro, ram
Funding of special Economic Development activities.designed to
~ enhance economic activity, encourage the growth of small ~
businesses, and promote commercial revitalization in targeted
areas of the City. Goals of the program are: 1) predominantly
create or retain permanent jobs for low/moderate (LM) income
persons; 2) primarily serve a L/M income residential area; or
3) encourage redevelopment of a blighted area.
Staff Recommendation - $84,360
6. Bakersfield Senior Center Rehabilitation Pro6ect (PA. II~
Retrofitting of the main facility at 530 6th Street.
Improvements to include roof and heating/cooling replacements.
Low to moderate income benefit is approximately 100% (clients
are senior citizens).
Staff Recommendation -. $30,000
5
'~ I~I. Source of Funds
Sou rce Amou n t
.' ,'.,~ ~ .:-.: :-.':, :";;:. :,~ -..,.,.'.:...',;..' -, ..~;.. ?-: ;.:; ~.;:..~:~., · -,; %. : ,.~ t~ ;.;-,.:, :. :;, · ~,?..-'.... ',, ,..:
Total
.ore: See attache~ 1990 CDBG ~pplication Projected Use of ~nds Sheet.
6
dcdbgmem ·
DRAFT
1990 CDBG APPLICATION
. . PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
ENTITLEMENT $1,201,000
90/91 PROGRAM INCOME
TOTAL $1,500,000
Admin and Planning $292,177
HOUSING
Direct Delivery Cost $181,636
Housing Loan Program~ $200,000
Housing Access Program $ 75,000
Subtotal $456,636
b~J/ikIBQ~HQ OD RS]LTgIA~&T IQN
Direct Dellvery Cost $116,827
Neighborhood Business Revitalization Program $ 84,360
Ar%hrltls Association Adaptive Aquatic Center $150,000
Alliance Against Family Violence Counseling Center $ 70,000
Fair Housing $ 65,000
Graf£1tti Removal Program $ 40,000
Subtotal $526,187
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Direct Delivery Cost $ 25,000
Brundage Ln. Area C/G Project $i~u,~vu
Chester Ave. Area C/G Project $ 45,000
Kern St. Area 'C/G Project $ 15,000
Senlor Center Rehabilitation (Ph.2) $ 30,000
Subtotal $225,000
Total $1.5mil.
SUMMARY OF CDBG FY 1990-91 PROPOSALS PAGE ONE 3-13-90
(Preliminary Proposal Review)
Ob % of Beneficiaries % of Benef.
Name of Proposal Activity Description Applicant/Lead Agency Estimate'd Cos[ Eligible Quaiificatlon
~ru'ndage Lane Area curd ~ Des~g~ and construction of --city Public w6~ks Design/~n-struction YES Does qualify not c.'r.B1. Grps.l~'02 0%
and Gutter Project infill curb and gutter
$125,000 Low/Mod 2,3* & 4 2837
bounded
by
Palm
Street
on
$116/person) Benefit (100%)
1 lot zoned C-1 other the north, "It" Street on 48.9%
lots zoned R-1 & R-2. the east, Brundage Lane on
All project lots have the south and "A" Street on
residential uses. the west. 4,056 L.F of C&G
and related appurtenances, o~
chester Ave. Area curb Design and construction ot city Fublic"WorKs Design/con- y~ Does not CT 1~.02
and Gutter Project infill curb and gutter struction qEalify BI. Grps.
bounded by 4th St. on the $45,000 L/M Benefit 2 & 3**
R-3 & R-3-P Zoning. All north, Chester Ave. on the 48.7% 1615
pro~ect lots have east, 2nd St. on the south ($237/person) (100%)
residential uses. and nH" Street on the west.
.... 1,330 L.F. of C & G
and related appurtenances.
Kern ~t. Curb and Gutter Design and construction city Fublic WorKs Design/con- y~ L/M C.T.14 O~
Project of infill curb and gutter on struction Benefit B1. Grp.
55.9% 3
Kern St. between Flower St. $15.000
R-1 Zoning. and Highway 178. 500 L.F.' ($115/person) 811 l
Ail project lots have of C & G. and related app- (100%)
residential uses. urtenances.
~ ~t. ~;r~. ~ qualities. Est~matea cost ot smaller pro]ect ~s ~,)~0 .Approx. 8~Z L.F.
** BI. Grp.- qualifies. Estimated :DSt of smaller project ~s ~00 .Approx. 559 L.F.
SUMM.3
SUMMARY OF CDBG FY 1990-91 PROPOSALS PAGE TWO 3-13-90
(Preliminary Proposal Review)
Ob % of Beneficiaries % of Benef.
~# Name of Proposal . Activity Description Applicant/Leadczty Public WorKs Agency EstimatedDesign~con_COS~ Eligible ?ES -L-TM--BenefitQqalificati°n C'¥'° ~1) ~ ..... 0% in County .._
4 Sonora St. Area Curb and Design and construction of &G
Gutter Project infill curb and gutter bounc struct~on 61.4% BI. .
996
ed by highway 178 on north, $200~000 3 ~ps
M-1 & M-2 Zoning. 62% of Baker St. on the east, E. ($366/person) (100%
project lots ha~e resident- California Ave. on the south
~al uses and 37% of projecl and Sonora Street on the
lots have commercial & Ind. west. 7,160 L.F. of C & G
uses. and related appurtenances. L/MOa ~ene-
5. ~umner ~t. Area ~ur~ and Design and construction ot city public WorKs Design/con- Y~
Gutter Project infill curb and gutter struction fit 61.3% Bi. Grps.
bounded by Sumner Street on $70.000 1 & 2 1284
M-1 & M-2 Zoning. All the north, Haley St. on the ($238/person) (100%)
project lots have resident- east, E. Truxtun Ave. on the
zal uses. south and Beale Ave. on the
west. 2,000 L.F. of C & G
i~6' and related appurtenances.
~ oetferson par~ Restroom Design and construction ot city community ~er- Design/con- Y~ L/M ~enefit Unknown at th~s UnKnown at
Improvements a new restroom to replace vices Department struction 51% (+) time this time
existinR facility which is $50,000
40 to 50 years old and is
beyond repair. (Located
near the S.E. corner of
Bernard Street and King
Street.)
SUMM.5a
SUblblARY OF CDBG FY 1990-91 PROPOSALS PAGE TIIREE 3-13-90
(Preliminary Proposal Review)
Ob % of Bene :iaries % of Benef.
# Name of Proposal Activity Description Applicant/Lead Agency Estimated Cosy Eligible Oualifi~ation in ~ in County
~.! weight-Room Adaition at Design and construction of --C~I-~S~r- Design/con- "ylyS'---q~Pf-B-~it Unknown at t~s unknown at
the Martin Luther King Jr. a 750 sq. ft. addition to vices Department struction 51% (+) time this time
Community Center the Community Center, at $20,000
1000 Owens Street (PhaseI).
:~., C.T '/ ~ O~J C't' ll.0Z 4,65r9-
.~ BaKer Street Liorary Rehabiltation work to the county Fublic works 'Renabll~tation ·
Restoration Improvements- interior spaces of the main Dept. $100,000 City YES L/Mod Bene- Block Grps 4 g Block Grps
Phase II floor and to the basement ir $225,000 Co. fit 55.5% CT 12 916 1,2.3 & 4
CT 11.03 2,527
Block Gr~s
library (apx 5,000 sq.ft.) '
Located at 1400 Baker St. $325 000 Total 3,4,5 & § Block Grps
' CT 13 2,193 1,2 & 3
Block Grps. CT 12 4,892
($14/person) 3,4 & 5 Block Gr~s
CT 14 2,881 1,2,3,4,~
&6
Block Grps,
g ~3~54 a 5 CT 13 1,578
2,459 Block Grps
Block Grips 2,3 & 5
1 2,3,4 & CT 23.01 674
5' Block Grp 3
Total 10,142 CT 23.02 366
Block Grp 1
4O.8%
Total 14,7~q~
~-- L/Mod ~enefi't city wide
Outreach counseling Center Acquisition o~ a 2.180 sq. The Alliance Against Acquisition
ft. building ~t 22~1 17th Family Violence $100,000 City 100% 3,999 (84%) 95 (2%) live
C-O Zoning. Street for a counseling (AAFV) $ 54~000 AAFV (presumed outside Kern
'~:~ompatible use, center for people who have benefit) County
experienced family violence. $154',000 Tota
The building is now leased
for that purpose. ($32/person)
SUMM. 6a
SUMMARY OF CDBG FY 1990-91 PROPOSALS PACE FOUR 3-13-90
(Preliminary Proposal Review)
,aL. O~J=~L. % of Beneficiaries % of Benef.
...# Name of P{oposal . Activity Description Applicant/Lead Agency Estimated Cos~ Eligible Qualification in City in County
lo Aaaptxve Aquatic Center Construction o~ an 71091 sq The Arthritis ' Construction "YES £/M~ene~it C%ty wiae )o% est.
ft. aBuatic center which Association of Kern $150,000 City 100% 50% est.
~ M-1 Zoning. In business' will ~nclude therapeutic County $150,000 Co. (presumed
park which has medical pool, locker room and adm. $323~000 Other benefit)
uses. May require a center near S.E corner of
Westwind Drive and 19th St. $623,000 Total
C.U.P.. Physically handicapped ~eo- C~ ~] ~"~
pie who can benefit by y- ~,~
drotherapy are treated in
the warm water therapy pool ..... 20%
i1. wisterxa House Rehaoilitatzon o~ a vacant Aunt Cherie's Home Rehamilitatior YES Clients will 80~ ~trom
church at 701 Wisteria (in I 95'000 City be screened applica0ts
-2 County Zoning Oildale) into a center for 5~000 Othe~ for income records)
CDBG eligibi-
I ay require a C.U]P.. unwed teenage mothers. $100 000 Total lity. Man~ o~
' them are aous-
ed children.
L/Mod Benefit
51% (+)
12.i Ba~erstiel~ ~enior Center Design an~ construction city Fublic Wor~s Des~gn/con- yE~ L/Moa Benefit Unknown Unknown
~ Rehabilitation Project of storage room addition strnction and 100%
· · presumed
(Phase II) (east si~e of d~n~ng room) rehab. (benefit)
and exterior improvements at $58,200 City
530 6th street. Clients are 0 other I
predominantly senior citi-
zens $58,000 Total
SUMM. 7
SUMMARY OF CDBG FY 1990-91 PROPOSALS PAGE FIVE 3-13-90
(Preliminary Proposal Review)
· ~ Nat. Object. % of Beneficiaries % of Benef.
# Name of Proposal ~ Activity Description Applicant/Lead A~encyI Estimated Cost~ Eligibl~ ~ualification in City in County
13 KU~OU ~'amily Healt~ clin~lc Acqu~s~tion~ design and con- Kern county ~qua~ ~ $ i50,OOaO~qu~E~ / o2~?%--L-/M~d C'~' z2 C T 2!
$ 59,000 desi~ Benefit.(from all blks 4079 all Blks 290(
struction or a facility Qpportgnity Commissio~ $ 878,000 cons~ the six C.T's Total
~.C. County Zoning. immediately to the west of (KCEOC)
~ompatible use. the existing clinic at 699 $ 65,000 equi~ where 80% of 18.7% C T 23.01
E. Brundage Lane. · / $ 118,000 adm ~ their clients all Blks
fin. live.) Applicant reports
The clinic provides primary 41% of patients C T 23.02
health care to the residenta $1,270,000 Tot seen in 9/89 were all Blks 231]
of Southeast Bakersfield. City residents
This area is medically unde~ Applicant didn;t C T 24
served, and it contains a ($46/person identify C.T. all Blks 250'
large number of lower in- location for 20%
come residents, clients (5,464). C T 25
I 250,000 City all Blks 4971
650,000 Co.
370,000 Bond
for
30 yrs. Total 17,77~
at 8%
81.3%
$1 270 000 Tot
~OO ~
'f££AL COS'I' O~' FROFO~AL~ ~UBMI'I"iMD (CI'I'Y CDBG) $i.i53
TOTAL COST OF ~LIGIBLE/QUALIFIED PROPOSALS SUBMITTED $983~200
By.Category
(City)
Curb and Gutter $285,000
Park Imps $ 50,000
Recreation ~mps $ 20,000
(CouDty)
Library Imps $100,000
(Non-Profits)
Counseling $100,000
Treatment of Handicapped $150,000
Care of Pregnant Minors $ 95,000
Senior Citizens Center I 58,200
Health Clinic 125,000
SUMM.7a