HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/27/1995 BAKERSFIELD
Patricia J. DeMond, Chair
Irma Carson
Kevin McDermott
Staff: Gail E. Waiters
AGENDA
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, March 27, 1995
12:15 p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room
Second Floor - City Hall, Suite 201
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA
1. ROLL CALL
2. APPROVAL OF MARCH' 6, 1995 MINUTES
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. CONVENTION CENTER HVAC - R. Rojas
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. CONSOLIDATED PLAN - Wager
B. POLICY ON CDBG REHABILITATION LOANS - Wager
C. SENIOR CENTER LEASE - Andersen/Wager
D KMC SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINER PROGRAM - Sgt. Rector
7. ADJOURNMENT
GEW:jp
Amended 3-23-95
FILE COPY
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 21, 1995
TO: JAKE WAGER, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
You requested an update on the total amount of loans made since the beginning of the loan
program, and the number of those loans that have been foreclosed upon. According to the
records available to me, 505 rehabilitation loans (not counting the Section 312 HUD loans) have
been made by this department to date. Of the 505 loans I can only account for three loans that
have gone bad: Mayallar Worscheimer, a.k.a. Mary Madkins, Maria Gray, and Eduardo Lopez.
The amount the City was at risk to lose in these defaults is $60,500; the actual amount lost was
$27,000, because you were able to work out an arrangement with Stanley Clark (Ms. Madkins
ex-husband) to redeem the property from the City, and the foreclosure on Maria Gray's property
was deferred by a Chapter 13 filing. The $27,000 loss equals one-tenth of one percent of the
total rehab loan amount to date. Other than these three I was unable to find evidence of any
other defaults on home improvement loans.
Number of Loans to Date 505 Approximately $4,120,276
Number of Active Loans (175) Approximately $1,737,387
Number of Defa~fltexl Loans (3) (0.1%) Approximately $60,500 *
· Only $27,000 of this amoum i~ umeeovetabla at ~ time.
Number of Loans Paid Off 327 (56%)
After consulting with various banks and mortgage companies, I learned that default rates ranged
between 0.7 percent and 3 percent for home loans. As you can see, our ratio of less than one
percent is well below the industry experience. This ratio is based on the best information
available to me at the time.
The home improvement loan program is marketed especially to low income residents who have
little or no other choices for loans to fix their homes. The loan proceeds are used primarily to
fax defective systems in the house that have to do with health and safety codes. When we are
able to solve the problems of deferred maintenance and alleviate potentially dangerous conditions
in housing, we have essentially improved the housing stock in the city and assisted in stabilizing
of property values of that neighborhood. The home improvement program is used in conjunction
with code enforcement whenever it is possible, to alleviate the problem of unsafe structures in
the community.
We are a lender of last resort. Since we are working with individuals whose incomes are well
below the median income level for the Bakersfield area, the underwriting criteria and terms of
the loan are somewhat more lenient than those of conventional banks. Instead of a debt to
income ratio of 40 percent, we set our maximum at 50 percent. The loan to value (LTV) ratio
of 80 percent is more conservative than area banks for home improvement loans (90 percent),
but we offer the 90 percent LTV in the target census' tracts. Where we differ significantly from
institutional lenders is in the interest rate we charge. The City charges a maximum of 4 percent
interest on its owner-occupied rehabilitation loans. Conventional lenders charge approximately
10.5 percent. The purpose in providing a lower rate is to allow greater access to the program,
and by providing an affordable interest rate, ensure repayment of the loan.
Understanding the intent of the program (to provide decent safe, sanitary and affordable housing
for low income persons), we make stipulations on the loan to insure that only those who meet
eligibility criteria will benefit from the loan. The stipulations are: 1) the loan is not assumable;
any time the property is sold or fire changes hands, our note may be called; 2) all loan proceeds
must be used to physically improve the house; 3) the bon'ower must occupy the home as Ms/her
principal residence for the duration of the loan period; 4) the City handles all loan funds for the
borrower. --
The table below compares the City's loan evaluation criteria with those of conventional lending
institutions.
Underwriting and Interest Rate Comparisons
City of Bank of Bank of Community
Bakersfield Stockdale America First Bank
Loan To Value of 80 or 90%* 90% 80% 80%
Property
Debt To Income 50% · 40% 40 40%
Annual Percentage Rate 0-4% 10.5% 11.62% 9.507%
variable
Maximum Term of Loan 15 years 15 years 15 years 15 years
*Targeted Census Tracts Only
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 21, 1995
TO: JAKE WAGER, ED DIRECTOR
FROM: GEORGE GONZALES~, '~OORDINATOR
SUBJECT: HOME IMPROVEMENI LOAN DEFAULTS
You requested a summary of the cases of defaulted housing loans that were reported in a
memorandum reporting the status of our housing loan portfolio. The three default cases are
Mayola Madkins, Maria Gray, and Eduardo Lopez.
Mayola Madkins received a $15,000 rehabilitation loan on 10/28/85. The rehab was completed
in February of 1986 and nothing of consequence happened until a letter was received from Ms.
Madldns in December 1990. She was dissatisfied with the rehab work that had been performed
at her house and was speaking of a law suit against the City. Several unsuccessful attempts were
made to contact her and talk about the problem. We were never able to get together. In August
of 1991 the City received a Notice of Default and Notice of Trustee Sale on Ms. Madkins'
property. After investigating the situation a decision was made to purchase the property and sell
it to recover the loan funds. The City obtained title to the property at the Trustee sale for
$26,500. The property was sold for 46,500 in November 1991, and the City was able to recover
its investment.
Maria Gray received a $18,450 rehabilitation loan on April 24 1991. The work was completed
August of 1991. Mrs. Gray made payments on her loan (total of $1,122) until she began to mn
into financial difficulty. In May of 1992 the City received a Notice of Default and Election to
Sell from Mrs. Gray's fu'st trust deed holder. The sale never took place, because Mrs. Gray filed
Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and is currently under the protection of that action. Since the City fried
its proof of claim, our investment is protected and no further action is necessary at this time.
Eduardo Lopez received his $27,000 rehabilitation loan on 2/18/94. Prior to the rehab he lived
in the house at 1409 E. 10th; once the rehab began, he and his family moved into a relafive's
home until the rehab on his house was completed. The rehab was completed on 5/23/94, but Mr.
Lopez never moved back into the house; this was discovered in August of 1994. Mr. Lopez was
notified that he must move back into the house because of the conditions of the loan. In the
meantime, the unit had been occupied by renters and Mr. Lopez had to give them a notice to
vacate. He committed to staff that he would re-occupy the premises by November 1994.
During October staff was unable to monitor Mr. Lopez performance due to his statement that he
had a serious illness. We were finally able to contact him on October 27, 1994. By this time
the first notice of default had been received. He promised to bring all payments current
immediately.
The second notice was received in December 1994 and by this time it was evident that Mr.
Lopez was not going to pay.
The situation was evaluated and housing staff, with input from Finance and City Attorney's
office, decided that it was not in the City's best interest to purchase this property. It was decided
to sue Mr. Lopez to recover the funds lost due to Trustee's sale of his property, which occurred
on January 11, 1995.
On 12/27/95 during a conversation with Hanford Home Loans, it was discovered that Mr. Lopez
owned several properties in Bakersfield.
Information on the properties owned by Mr. Lopez was gathered and submitted to the attorneys
office for further action.
On January 27, 1995 the attorney's office asked for permission to institute a lawsuit against Mr.
Lopez to recover the money lost from the Trustee's sale.
The City Attorney's office is currently preparing a demand letter in preparation of a lawsuit
against Mr. Lopez.
oz,~lrx'~o ~ ~:~7 CITY OF BAKERSFIEL~ ~r 881
Property to make repairs. Although Lender may take actibn under
this paragraph, Lender does not hay to do so.
Any amounts disbursed by Lende under this Paragraph shall
become additional debt of Borrower soured by this Security
Instrument. Unless Borrower and Le ~der agree to other terms of
payment, these amounts shall bear i.terest from the datel of
disbursement at the Note rate and slall be payable, Wtthl
interest, upon notice from Lender t¢ Borrower requestingl payment.
6. Condemnation. The proceed~ of any award or claim for
damages, direct or consequential, i~ connection with any.
condemnation or other taking of any )art of the Property~ or for
Conveyance in place of condemnation are hereby assigned!and
shall be paid to Lender to the exte .t of the full amountiof the
indebtedness that remains unpaid un~ er the Note and thisiSecurity
Instrument. Lender shall apply sucl proceeds to the redUctiOn of
e indebtedness under the Note and this Security InstrUment,
~rst to any delinquent amounts app ied in the or
paragraph 2, and th~- ~ ....... t ' _ der provided in
a--lfc ..... ~" ~ Fz=~ymen~ cz princl al. A ~
PP a=aon of t~e proceeds to the ~rinc~-~ ~=-,~ n~ i
' ~ ~F~& ~nu~l ~ot eKtend or
postpone the due date of the paymen~:s~ which are referred to in
Paragraph 3, or change the amount o~ such payments. Any!excess
proceeds over an amount required to
pay all outstanding:
indebtedness under the NOte and thi~ Security Instr%~ent shall be
paid to the entity legally entitled thereto.
7. Inspection. Lender or its agent may make reasonable
entries upon and inspections of the Property. Lender shall give
Borrower notice at the time of or p~ior to an inspection
specifying reasonable cause for the ~lnspection.
8. ~rounds for Acceleration ¢.f Debt.
(a) Default. Lender may, require immediate payment in full
o~ all sums secured by this Securlt~ Instrur~ent if:
{i) Borrower defaults by failing to occupy the Property
as Borrower.s Pri~cipal residence, cr
(ii) Borrower defaults by failing, for a period of
thirty days, to perform any other olllgations contained in this
Security Instrument.
~ (iii) Borrower defaults i~, during the loan ap~llcation ~
process, Borrower gave mater~ally false or inaccurate information ~
or statements to tender (or failed to provide Lender w~th any ~
~terial informatlon) in connection'with the loan evidenced by
the Not~, including, but not limited! to, representationsi ~
concerning Borrower's occupancy of the Property as a principal ./
residence.
(b) Transfer of th~'Propemty-~r a Beneficial Interest ~n
BorrOwer. 'If all or any part of th~ Property or any.interest in
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
Hatch 2~, ~995
TO: BUDGET AND FINANCE COr~I1-FEE
FROM'.'~ O.B. TEUBNER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
THROUGH: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~~IONF
SUBJECT: SENIOR CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE PARKS DIV
Staff has been asked to provide options for resolving an inequity in the lease
agreement between the Bakersfield Senior Center and the Community Services Parks
Division for the use of a storage facility on the Bakersfield Senior Center site.
To summarize, the City purchased the subject property with CDBG funds and leases
the Senior Center facility and adjacent storage area to the Bakersfield Senior
Center for one dollar per year. The lease for the main facility is a 55 year
lease, however the lease for the storage area is on a year to year basis. In
return for the lease the Senior Center agreed to provide services to low income
seniors in the area. The storage area lease allows the Senior Center to sublease
the property to bring in additional income. Because the property was purchased
with CDBG funds it must be sublet at a market rate to any group which does not
provide low/mod income services.
Several years ago the Parks Division was in need of additional storage space for
park maintenance equipment, rather than building a new facility it was decided
that they would lease space to meet their needs on the short term. Since the
Senior Center needed operating revenue and had available space to lease and the
City needed space and felt it appropriate to support the Center, a lease
agreement was entered into. The lease agreement provides for the City to pay the
Senior center $15,972 per year to lease the storage area for Park Maintenance.
The net result is that the City pays a lease payment to the Senior Center of
approximately $16,000 per year for property it owns and lease back to them for
one dollar per year. The lease agreement last appeared on the Budget and Finance
Committee agenda on February 28, 1994. The Committee recommended that the
Council approve an extension of the Parks Division's leaseback for an additional
year to coincide with the 10 year review of the lease that the Senior Center has
on the property. The leaseback agreement is now set to expire on March 27, 1995.
The City has several options for correcting the inequity of the leaseback
agreement. Among them are negotiating for a lower lease rate, replacing the CDBG
funds with other funds so that the City is not restricted as to the use of the
property, deed the property to the Senior Center in exchange for a long term
lease or vacate the premises. Staff has met with the Center's Interim Executive
Director, John Pounds, to discuss the options. Mr. Pounds understands that the
practice of paying rent on a facility the City already owns is not acceptable.
He is willing to find a resolution to the situation, one which does not
negatively impact the Senior Center. At this time, the Senior Center is in a
very poor financial position and must deal with several other critical issues
which threaten their stability.
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 1995
PAGE 2
Staff recommends that the City extend the lease for three months with no lease
payment due and use the time to negotiate a reasonable and mutually acceptable
resolution to both parties. The lease will expire on March 27, 1995 and the
Parks Division can vacate the facility immediately and find temporary quarters
elsewhere if the City does not wish to extend the lease for the short term. The
result would be that the Parks Division would not have their equipment in a
central location and therefore would decrease their efficiency. It is also
anticipated that the Senior Center will strongly oppose that action because of
their current dependence on the income received from the City's lease payment.
A three month negotiation period would give both the City and Senior Center staff
time to work out a mutually agreeable solution. The Senior Center has agreed to
forego the lease payment during the three month extension and include that issue
as part of the negotiation.
PO 64.2759
MEMORANDUM March 21, 1995
TO Honorable Mayor' Price and Counc~ Members
FROM S.E. Brummer, Chief of Police ~
Sexual Assault Response Team
SUBJECT
I have enclosed for your review a series of documents that provide
background relative to the City's agreement with Memorial Hospital
for services provided by their Sexual Assault Response Team
(S.A.R.T.)
You may recall that in March, 1994, the police department surveyed
various medical providers to determine if any had planned to
formalize a S.A.R.T. program in the future. At that time Bakersfield
Memorial Hospital was the only provider to ~uarantee the services of
a trained Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner for all sexual assault
victims.
When the Council appropriated $20,000 in 1994 to cover the costs of
these exams, it was understood that the program would be evaluated
after one year. I recently received written correspondence from Kris
Petty, R.N., Cindy Thum, R.N, and Frances Watson, R.N., Sexual
Assault Nurse Examiners at Kern Medical Center, describing the
program offered by Kern Medical Center. The program overview
indicates that Kern Medical Center Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners
will be available to offer 24 hour coverage comparable to that
offered by Memorial Hospital S.A.R.T. personnel.
It would appear that both programs offer professional services,
however, the issue of cost remains unclear. There seems to be some
confusion in the interpretation of Penal Code Section 13823.95 which
states in part, "Bills for these examinations shall be submitted to
the law enforcement agency with jurisdiction in the case, and who
requests the exam." Based on this provision, it would appear that
our department would incur costs associated with sexual assault
examinations regardless of'whether they were performed at Kern
Medical Center by S.A.N.E. staff or at Memorial Hospital by S.A.R.T.
personnel. Currently, S.A.R.T. examinations cost $500 each.
The proposal submitted by Kern Medical Center indicates that Kern
Medical S.A.N.E. services cost the county $250 per examination
however, there is no discussion of costs to the City of Bakersfield
for examinations requested by the police department.
SEB/vrf
Attachments
cc: Coun¢ilm~mher Carson Councilm~mher Rowles
Councilmember Chow Council~-mher Salvaggio
I Councilm-mher DeMond Councilmember Smith
Councilmemher McDermott
Page 1 of 1
BAKERSFIELD POLICE
.-
March 25, 1994
To: GAIL WAITERS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
From: SERGEANT W. RECTOR, JUVENILE/SEX CRIMES UNIT
Subject: S.A.R.T PROGRAM (SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE TEAM)
On 02/03/94, I received information that staff members at Memorial Hospital wished to re-
introduce a Sexual Assault Response Team concept at Memorial Hospital. The effort was initiated
by several nurses at Memorial Hospital in conjunction with the Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
Foundation. Kate Mackey, a social worker at Memorial Hospital, is the chairperson for the
program.
This is not a new concept. The Bakersfield Police Department has participated in the past with the
S.A.N.E. (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner) program at Kern Medical Center for approximately a
one year period, from 1989 until 1990. This occurred until the point when Kern Medical Center
staff could not provide a S.A.N.E. nurse for sexual assault exams without billing the Bakersfield
Police Department for more costs. Eventually the S.A.N.E. program at Kern Medical Center was
discontinued for a variety of political reasons.
Currently, the Bakersfield Police Department's method of operation concerning exams of sexual
assault victims is the following. Officers or detectives will bring the victim, or meet the victim at
Kern Medical Center, wait for an on-duty physician to exam the patient. If we are fortunate, a
S.A.N.E. nurse will be on duty at Kern Medical Center. At this time, there is one S.A.N.E. nurse
currently working at Kern Medical Center who will volunteer to do the sexual assault exam.
In the proposed S:A.R.T. program, the projected base cost is $500.00 per exam. This includes an
evidence exam, with colposcope, lab work, medications, and a two week follow-up exam, with
comparison photographs (see attached chart showing a comparison analysis of S.A.R.T. programs in
California).
The S.A.R.T. program hopes to divert county funds going to Kern Medical Center to cover costs of
sexual assault exams into a common entity for law enforcement to use to cover costs of the
projected exam.
As of 02/01/94, according to PC 13823.95, "A victim is not to be charged for the cost of a sexual
assault examination. Bills for these examinations shall be submitted to the law enforcement agency
with jurisdiction in the case, and who requests the exam." Prior to 1994, PC 13823.95 delegated
costs of exams, if done in the county hospitals, to be the responsibility of the county, to pay .the
Page 1 of 2
~exukl Assault Response Team'':~ ....
~illiam Rector - March 25, 1994 _
expense for the exam. This no longer applies and it appears we are going to be held accountable to
pay for the bills for the exams no matter, what hospital they are conducted at.
I have made'contact with the District Attorney's Office Major Crimes Unit to discuss the S.A.R.T.
program issue. Deputy District Attorney, Michael Bush, advised me the District Attorney's Office
would be endorsing the S.A.R.T. program. They feel if the nurses associated with the S.A.R.T.
program have prior S.A.N.E. training, they will take a more enthusiastic approach to evidence
collection and doing the follow-up exams. District Attorney staff said they were extremely pleased
with the performance of S.A.N.E. nurses in the past and have, by far, out-performed physicians who
have gathered evidence. Assistant District Attorney Michael Bush indicated they had never had any
problems with evidence gathering by physicians, such as impacting a case negatively, but he
indicated the sexual assault trained nurses do a much more thorough job.
Detectives from the Bakersfield Police Department Sex Crimes Unit all voice the same opinion of
past experience with S.A.N.E. nurses. They were very positive they did a very thorough and
professional job. The detectives advise physicians now completing sexual assault exams have
gathered inadequate evidence, and did not seize important evidence such as the victim's clothing, or
to take the required blood samples and have, on one occasion, left a completed sexual assault kit in
a common area of the hospital, not notifying the Bakersfield Police Department to pick up the
sexual assault kit. The detectives attribute this behavior to the lack of interest on the doctor's part.
The doctor basically does not want to participate in the exam, or the doctor lacks training regarding
the seizure of evidence and chains-of evidentiary custody.
For the year ending 1993, the Bakersfield Police Department completed 30 sexual assault
examinations. At the proposed figure of $500.00 per exam, projection of costs for 1994 would be
$15,000.00. Based on these projected figures, sexual examinations of victims could be a very
significant budgetary item.
WR:ddj
Attachments
Page 2 of 2
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CALIFORNIA SART PROGRAMS ',.
COUNTY AMT EXAM INFORMATION COUNTY HOSPITAL (Y/N) SART START
CONTACT / PHONE NUMBER DATE ,
CHGD/EXAM ~
Proposed $500 Evidence Exam w/colposcope, Bakersfield Memorial Hospital (N)
Kern . lab, medications & 2 week Becky Pratt 1994
'; follow-up exam w/comparison 805-327-1792
pictures ----------- -------'
$650 Evidence Exam (law Tulare District Hospital (N)
enforcement charge) Angie Zakula 10/89
Tulare $350 Medical Exam (patient charge___L._) 209-688-0821
-------- --------' Pomcrado District Hospital (N)
San Diego $580 Evidence Exam Palomar Pomcrado Hospital Health System 9-90
Bev Miller
619-485-6511
------- w/colp $550 Usc colp most of the time for Pioneers Memorial Hospital (Brawley) (lq) 10-92
San Diego w/o colp $275 Victim (also do Perp). CurrentlyAmy Byrd
negotiating witness fees w/DA 619-351-3333
'-'---- Level I * $150 Level ! - Call out, no exam Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Y) 1990
Santa Clara Level 2 * $500 Level 2 - basic exam (98%) San Jose
Level 3 * $750 Level 3 - in hosp, not SART Sandra McKcnnan 408-299-6466 ~
Level 4 $200 Level 4 -mcd exam only, no Nurse Call $5/Hr, $100 fiat fee/trip :'
· +lab fees $160 evidence collection
follow-up $ 87 Follow-up to start 1/94 '.
----'-- approx $300 up to 13yrs of age San Mateo County General Hospital (Y)
San Mateo non-acute cases only, over 72°. Children's Sexual Abuse Forensic Evaluation 7-93
20 police jurisdictions. Center (SAFE)
Only take referrals as part of Peggy Camerino 415-573-2222
investigations, no custody cases.
San Luis Obispo in county $700 Children, Adults, & San Luis Obispo General HOspital (Y)
80~-549-4878 , ·
out of county $900 Perpetrators. ~ ~
MEMORANDUM
March 30, 1994
To: Alan Tandy, City Manager
From: Steve Brummer, Chief of Police
Subject: Sexual Assault Response Team Proposal
Our staff recently contacted local emergency medical providers with regard to the Sexual
Assault Response Team proposed by Bakersfield Memorial Hospital. Discussions with
representatives of local hospitals addressed two issues:
1. Does the provider anticipate establishing a SART/SANE Program in the future?
2. If so, would the provider be interested in submitting a proposal to contract with
the City of Bakersfield sometime in the future?
Carolyn Edwards, Nursing Supervisor for Kern Medical Center advised that KMC did
not intend to establish any type of program in the near future. Although Kern Medical
Center intends to employ four Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners, they cannot guarantee
that a trained SANE nurse will be readily available to conduct sexual assault
examinations since they have other job duties.
Kim Hashim, Emergency Room Nurse Supervisor for Mercy Hospital said she was
familiar with the SART Program at Memorial Hospital. She indicated that Mercy
Hospital would not create any similar program in the near future.
Jackie Seaton, Emergency Room Nursing Supervisor at San Joaquin Hospital said her
facility has no plans to initiate a Sexual Assault Response Team Program.
Based on the information provided by representatives of local hospitals, it appears that
Memorial Hospital will be the only provider for Sexual Assault Response Services.
SEB/vrf
BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
SART Program
Summary Report
Date From= 05-01-94
Date To : 12-31-94
Total # of Cases: 48
Female: 47
Males: 1
Age Data:
Minimum: ; 4
# <= 14 yrs: 9
# > 14 yrs: 39
Maximum: 55
Average: 24
Agency Breakdown
BPD 40
KCSO 8
Other 0
Race Breakdown (
Black 19%
Caucasian 44%
Hispanic 35%
Other 2%
Outcome Breakdown
NA 0%
Plead 6%
Trial Convict 4%
Trial Acquit 0%
1994 BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL SART SURVIVOR LIST'
Name Date Agency Outcome Name Date Agency Outcome
Lydia Va=quez 5/7 BPD ~' Linde Provoncio 8/29 KC
[- Debra Alexander 5/16 BPD I Diana Anderson 9/1 gPO
Rosa Orllz 5129 KC 2 D/anna Weisner 9/3 gPO,,,
IKrystal Hinojosa 8/1 KC 3 V/v/an Apalala 9/10 BPD
Thomas McPhe,sonr'J~L~ 8/3 BPD ~- Lynda Simpson 9/27
Meredith ,Landry 6/3 BPD j Karl Jennings , 9127 BPD '~'
Dena Webb 6/23 BPD 2 , Esp,eranza Mo,narrez ,,, 9128 BPD ~1
$" Trisha Manners 6t24 .... BPD ~- Jess/ca Villaloro 10/1 BPD
Lynda Simpson 6/25 BPD ~ Selene Stevenson 10}io BPD I
Laflsha Devote 6127 BPD ~' !AIIc!a. Meza 10/11 BPD
Jennie Agui!ar 7110 KC 2 !Aha Pimentel 10113 BPD
Donna Wallace 7/16 BPD I IKalhleen wilbur 1~)15 BPD
Chdsten Brown 7/26 DPD ~ Michelle Owens 10/19 BPD
Lori Adams 7/19 [~PD I Gen.e.va Powell 10/21 ...BPD ~>
Laguana Manning 7/28 KC Antonio Ac~evedo 10124. BPD 7....
Batty Ellis 7/31 KC Mandy You,no 20/24 BPD J ,
June Rahbergor 8/5 BPD ~ Fei/cia Dardcn 11/1 KC
~o~icela Ochoa 816 BPD / Donna Hinds 11/8 BPD ~--'
Carl Anderson 8/18 ,, ,KC Tan/esha Cross 11!_2.1..., BPD
Darlene Hawkins 8/19 BPD ~Z Blanca Cordova .atis,a 11/22 BPD
Gina Roberls 8/19 BPD [ Morger!,ta Malice ,: 12/5 BPD
Sara Bias .... 8/25 BPD ~ Michelle Salazar 1216 BPD Z..
Diana Ga'cia 8128 BPD 3 Cecilia DeLeon 12/18 BPD
Eisa Flores 8128 BPD ~ N/cole Emmons 12!22 .... BPD ~
Outcome Code:
i =Case Closed - 13 '~.~. 1~.3-(~-.(--T~; - (~ ~./1(_.Tl~44 ,,-)o A¢./7/o-5 -
2=Plead - ~r' (--o,.~-~5,-1 J'4.. r~T- -
3 =Triel/Convt'cted- · ~
4 =Tda~/Aqultted.. ~
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CALIFORNIA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
S.E. BRUMMER (805) 326-3800
CHIEF OF POLICE FAX (805) 326-3070
February 21, 1995
Bakersfield City Council Members
RE: Memorial Hospital S.A.R.T. Program
For the last nine month period, the Bakersfield Police Department has
utilized the Memorial Hospital S.A.R.T. Program. During this period,.there were
fifty-three (53) sexual assault exams conducted 'by the nurses at Memorial
Hospital.
The detectives and officers who have had contact with the Memorial Hospital
S.A.R.T. personnel have complimented the staff/nurses many times. The program
is an asset to the victim, police department, and the community.
Sincerely,
S. E. BRLrMMER, Chief of Police
Sergeant W. Rector
Juvenile/Sex Crimes
SEB: WR: ddj
I R{31 TRI I~X'TI IN AVENUE o P.O. BOX 59 ° BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93302
February 28, 1995
TO: Steve Brummer
Chief Of BakerSfield City Police Department
FROM: Kris Petty, R.N. and Cindy Thum, R.N., Frances Watson, R.N.
Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners
Re: KMC Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Program
The sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program was introduced to Kern County in 1987 by
the KMC emergency department. This program has continued at KMC since its origin and has
developed into a team of qualified and experienced SANE nurses providing a valuable service
to Kern County residents.
The SANE team has established a close working relationship with the investigators and officers
from the Kern County Sheriff' s Office, Bakersfield Police Department, law enforcement agencies
from outlying areas, and the Kern County District Attorney's Office. Since KMC is a publicly
supported hospital, the sexual assault examinations have been provided at no cost to the victim
or any law enforcement agency at the expense of the county, pursuant to Penal Code Section
13823.5 and 13823.7. These guidelines regulate public hospitals to provide these services free
of charge to the victim. Public hospitals must also provide victims of sexual assault with
venereal and pregnancy testing without charge pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1491.
If the examination is provided at a private hospital or in the office of a physician, the expense
must be paid by the local government agency whose jurisdiction the alleged offense was
committed.
All examinations are completed in a private and timely manner in order to minimize the trauma
previously experienced by the victim. Each examination is performed utilizing the highest
standards of care in order to collect and preserve forensic evidence vital to the investigation.
Our main goal is to provide efficient quality of care with the support and compassion of the
SANE team.
The new KMC emergency care center is completely operational and includes a designated
examination room with bathroom and shower facilities that is utilized exclusively for victims of
sexual assault. An adjoining consultation room is available for law enforcement and family
members of the victim to utilize. This area was allotted during the 1988 planning phase of the
new emergency care center with the support of KMC administration, physicians and nurses.
Page 2 of 2
The SANE team works directly with Carolyn Edwards, R.N. Supervisor, Eugene Kercher, M.D.
Emergency Department Director and Jess Diamond, M.D. Kern County Child Abuse Expert.
These reputable consultative team members have proven invaluable to the success of the KMC
SANE program. If at any time additional medical treatment is required beyond the capacity of
the SANE nurse a medical consultation by an experienced physician is immediately available.
In 1994, the Bakersfield City Council designated Greater Bakersfield Memorial Hospital as the
receiving facility for all sexual assault examinations requested 'by the Bakersfield Police
Department at a rate of $500.00 per examination. This facility proposes to offer 24 hour SANE
coverage and this fee only includes the evidential examination.
Presently, this service is being provided by the KMC SANE team at a cost to the county of
$250.00 per examination. The KMC SANE team offers 24 hour coverage to include a medical
legal sexual assault examination, emotional support, advocacy, counseling referrals and expert
medical and consultative treatment at no cost to the victim. With an average of two hundred
examinations per year, this is a. savings to the County general fund of $100,000.00.
If you have any questions or we could be of further assistance please contact us at KMC
emergency department 326-2667.
PD 64-2759
MfiMOR^NDUM
MARCH 6, 1995
TO S.E. BRUMMER, CHIEF OF POLICE
FROM SERGEANT W. RECTOR, 3UVENILE/SEX CRIMES
SUBJECT KERN MEDICAL CENTER SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAM
Over the past year (1994-95), the Bakersfield Police Department has used Kern
Medical Center for acute sexual exams approximately twice a month. This would
occur if the victim had initially responded to Kern Medical Center or preferred
Kern Medical Center complete the exam. The police department has not received
any bills from Kern Medical Center for this procedure. Prior to (1994-95) the
cost of a sexual assault exam at Kern M~dical Center was $275.00.
Detectives and officers have often complimented the nursing staff dealing with
victims of sexual assault at Kern Medical Center. Problems in the past occurred
when an on-duty Emergency Room doctor did the sexual assault/evidence collection;
instead of a S.A.N.E. nurse. Nurse Cindy Thum of Kern Medical Center recently
contacted the police department and advised Kern Medical Center staff wished
to make a presentation before the City Council. Thum indicated Kern Medical
Center could staff a S.A.N.E. nurse twenty-four hours a day; guarantying the
police department a S.A.N.E. nurse for sexual assault exams. Kern Medical Center
also has a new sexual assault room for victims. This room as an interviewing
area, exam area, and a bathroom with a shower.
It should be noted during (1994-95) when Kern Medical center was utilized only
once was a S.A.N.E. not used for the exam. Sergeant Ferguson of the Kern County
Sheriff's Office Sex Crimes Unit advised during the course of last year, a S.A.N.E.
nurse at Kern Medical Center did all their acute sexual exams.
Thus, the main concern would be a S.A.N.E. nurse always complete the acute sexual
assault exam.
In May of 1994, when the police department began to use the Memorial Hospital
program, this was an endorsement of that program. No M.O.U. was ever written
or followed by either involved party. A protocol was established in order to
simplify the process. The City Council was to review the program at year end.
Also, if any other hospitals developed similar programs, those programs would
be evaluated. The choice of which hospital(s) to be utilized was to rest with
the City Council, after evaluating all sexual assault programs.
Respectfully submitted,
7
Sergeant W. Rector
Juven±le/Sex Crimes
WR: ddj
BAKERSFIELD
Al~Y~y-~--City ~fl~agej/ Patricia J. DeMond, Chair
Staff: Gail E. Waite~// Irma Carson
Kevin McDermott
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI'i-rEE
Monday, March 6, 1995
12:15 p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room
1. ROLL CALL
Call to Order 12:25 p.m.
Present: Patricia J. DeMond, Chair; Councilmember Irma Carson;
Councilmember Kevin McDermott
2. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 6, 1995 MINUTES
Approved as submitted.
3. PRESENTATIONS
None
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
None
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, March 6, 1995
Page -2-
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. FIREWORKS ORDINANCE
The Committee reviewed a draft which amends the fireworks ordinance to address
the matter of the City's growth and how it affects the number of permits as well
as the manner in which new permits will be issued. Staff will also include any
needed cleanup language before taking the ordinance to Council for approval.
B. ORDINANCE ON SEWER LINE REPAIRS
An amendment to the sewer ordinance was reviewed. Staff will revise wording to
indicate that the fee for the "discounted service" to residents will be set annually
during the cost recovery fee setting process, instead of setting a flat fee. After the
change has been made, staff will take the ordinance before Council for approval.
C. AMBULANCE ORDINANCE
Final discussion occurred on the revisions to the ambulance ordinance. Earlier
discussion regarding an April 1995 rate review is no longer necessary because
of other provisions in the ordinance. January 1 of each year will be the deadline
for any application requests for rate changes. Staff will fax or mail a copy of the
final wording of the ordinance to the Committee prior to its going to Council for
adoption.
D. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DISCLOSURE NOTICE
The Committee concurred with the final draft of the disclosure notice submitted
by Castle and Cooke. The Committee will recommend to the Council that a
permanent policy be established that will allow the notice be used for all general
assessment district proposals. Regarding Mr. Mettler's inquiry, the Committee
determined that because assessment districts facilitate affordable housing, it is
appropriate to retain the current City policy. The Committee asked staff to
respond to Mr. Mettler's letter dated March 3, 1995 and to attach the following
documents: 1) City Attorney transmittal letter of disclosure notice; 2) copy of
disclosure notice; and 3) copy of letter to developers asking for voluntary
compliance.
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, March 6, 1995
Page -3-
E. ORDINANCE ON SPREADING FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
The City Attorney presented the request from Castle and Cooke to spread
assessments over more or different areas than authorized by current law. The
particular request from Castle and Cooke is for areas in Silver Creek, Seven Oaks
and Brimhall. The Committee recommended approval of Castle and Cooke's
request, and indicated that the City does benefit from those improvements that
can be built right away, instead of waiting until the development is completely
built out. Staff will draft an ordinance and fax or mail it to the Committee pdor to
its going to the Council for approval at the March 22 meeting. Staff will follow up
with the Committee regarding the possible ramifications of this approval setting
a precedence, which may involve developers wanting to assess for improvements
that are not connected with the specific development.
6. NEW BUSINESS
None
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
GEW:jp
MEMORANDUM
Februar~ 26, 1995
TO: BUDGET ~ND FIN~a~CE CONMITTEE
: JUDY K. SKOUSEN, City Attorney ~S
FROM
BILL DESCARY, Treasurer 67 ~ ~
SUBJECT: DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.44 OF THE BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FIREWORKS.
AttaChed h~reto i~ a proposed ordinance amenuin~hap=er o.44'
of the Bakersfield Municipal Code relating to Fireworks.
BACKGROUND:
On January 23, 1995, the Budget and Finance Committee
considered alternatives to the fifty permit limit currently in the
ordinance. It was determined a formula of one permit per 4,000
population, or portion thereof, would be an equitable method to
accommodate City growth. Issuance of permits to new applicants
from the formula method will be determined by a lottery system.
This amendment clarifies that priority between applications
made by the same location shall be given to the applicant who held
a permit for that location the prior year. The amendment also
clarifies that entities holding permits for locations that are
subsequently annexed to the City will be issued City permits for
the annexed locations which could result in more than one permit
per 4,000 population. This may occur because this amendment will
provide for one permit per 4,000 population plus one permit for
each permit previously issued by Kern County and subsequently
annexed to the City.
The format of the ordinance is reorganized and includes a
revocation and appeal process that is lacking in the current
ordinance.
WD/meg
COUNCIL95-1/ORD-REF/FIREWRKS.~F
cc: Mike Kelly, Fire Chief
Gregory Klimko, Finance Director
Robert Tobias, Fire Marshal
Dennis Fidler, Building Director
THIS MEMORANDUM IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE AND IS PROTECTED
BY THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGE
D J FF
March 3, 1995
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ~MENDING CHAPTER 8.44
OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO FIREWORKS.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield
as follows:
SECTION 1.
Chapter 8.44 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Chapter 8.44
FIREWORKS
Sections:
8.44.010 Definitions.
8.44.020 Permit required.
8.44.030 Application - Issuance - Fee.
8.44.040 Regulations.
8.44.050 Revocation.
8.44.060 Appeal.
8.44.010 Definitions.
Whenever used in this chapter, unless a different meaning
clearly appears from the context, the words set out in this section
shall have the following meanings:
A. "Person" means any individual, partnership,
corporation or association of any nature whatsoever.
8.44.020 Permit required.
It is unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale
or expose for sale within the city any fireworks in violation of
this chapter or without having a valid permit therefor in
accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
8.44.030 Application - Issuance - Fee.
A. A permit for the sale of safe and sane fireworks may
not be issued applicants unless they meet the following
qualifications:
DRAFT
Ma~h3,1~5
1. A nonprofit organization or corporation
organized and existing primarily for veteran, patriotic, religious,
welfare, charitable or civic-betterment purposes, organized and
established in the City at least one year prior to the filing of
application for permit under this chapter and having a bona fide
membership of at least thirty-five members; provided:
2. Retail (for profit) business establishments
which have, for a period of at least one year prior to the filing
of an application for permit under this chapter, held a valid.
business tax certificate issued by the city under Chapter 5.02 of
this code; provided, no such permit shall be issued to any such
retail business establishment unless such establishment was issued
a Permit the previous year.
3. Any entity which held a permit issued by Kern
County for a particular location the previous year, which location
was subsequently annexed to the City within the past year, shall be
treated as if it had held a permit from the City for purposes of
this section.
4. A permit shall not be issued unless the person,
applying for the permit has first obtained a permit or license from
the State Fire Marshall under Part 2, Division 11 of the Health and
Safety Code of the state.
B. Ail recipients of Fireworks permits except those
specifically exempted in paragraph C herein, shall be selected by
a drawing (by lot) conducted by the City Manager or his/her
designee.
C. The total number of fireworks permits to be issued
shall not exceed one permit per 4,000 population, or portion
thereof, in the City of Bakersfield, as set forth in the annual
report of the State Department of Finance, but not less than fifty.
Provided, however, any person applying for a fireworks permit who
had such a permit in 1994 and also in the previous year shall be
issued a permit if otherwise qualified without being included in
the drawing, notwithstanding the fact that such issuance may
increase the number of permits to more than that allowed herein.
D. Applications for ~Fireworks Permits shall be
submitted after March 15th and before May 15th of each year. No
applications shall be accepted nor processed by the City after May
15th of each year.
E. Applications for Fireworks permits shall be made on
forms to be furnished by the city manager or his designee, shall be
signed under penalty of perjury by the applicant and shall require
- 2 -
Ma~h3,1~5
the following information and documents:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the
nOnprofit organization or retail business establishment for.which
application is made;
2. The applicant's business tax certificate number
if it is a retail business establishment, and the name and address
of all owners of such business;
3. The location of the proposed fireworks sales;
and
4. The purpose of the nonprofit organization or
corporation, its principal and permanent meeting place; the
approximate date of its establishment in the city; the total number
of its local membership; the names and addresses of its
officers.
5. A plot plan drawn to scale, showing the
location of the temporary fireworks stand, utilities, location of
permanent and temporary structures, curb cuts and/or driveways and
identifying the nearest available sanitary facilities, and fire
hydrants;
6. A written authorization from the owner of the
location or person in lawful possession thereof, if other than the
applicant, for the locating of the business upon his or her
property.
7. Evidence, satisfactory to the city manager or
his designee, of (1) general liability insurance providing coverage
on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death of one or
more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits as
required by the city; and (2) workers' compensation, with statutory
limits and employers liability insurance with limits as required by
the city. All policies required of the applicant hereunder shall
be primary insurance as to the city, its mayor, council, officers,
agents, employees and volunteers and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by the city, its mayor, council, officers,
agents, employees and volunteers shall be considered excess
insurance, over and above the applicant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it. The applicants shall save, hold harmless and
indemnify the city, its officer, agents, employees and volunteers
from all claims, demands, damages, judgments, costs or expenses in
law or equity that may at any time arise from or is any way related
to any work performed by applicant, his agents or employees under
the terms of any permit issued under this chapter.
- 3 -
March 3, 1995
8. Cash bond in the sum of one hundred dollars, to
be forfeited to the city in the event the permittee fails to remove
said stand, equipment and rubbish from the premises upon which the
stand is located before twelve noon on July 15 of the year for
which said permit is granted. The cash bond shall be returned to
the applicant upon full performance of the requirements of this
chapter.
9. Approval from the Public Works Department of the
City that operation of the Fireworks stand at the proposed location
will not present any substantial hazard to vehicular or pedestrian
traffic.
F. Location of temporary stands may not be changed
after an application is filed except as required by the city, or
where there is evidence of change in property ownership or
management and prior approval or consent has been revoked by the
new owners or managers.
G. No one organization or business may receive more
than one permit for fireworks sales during any one calendar year.
I. All permits issued under this chapter shall remain
in effect from noon on July 1 to noon on July 5 unless earlier
suspended or revoked.
J. The applicant shall pay a fee not to exceed the cost
of processing any such application and inspecting such business as
set forth in Section 3.40.070.
K. Permits may be issued with conditions to ensure that
the business will be operated in a safe and legal manner, will not
disturb the peace and quiet of the neighborhood and will not
constitute an undue burden on city resources.
8.44.040 Requlations.
A. Those fireworks which are classified as "dangerous
fireworks" under Section 12505 of the California Health & Safety
Code are prohibited, except that such fireworks as are defined and
classified as "safe and sane fireworks" in Section 12529 of the
California Health and Safety Code may be displayed, sold and Used
pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and not otherwise.
B. No permit holder shall shout, make any outcry, blow
a horn, ring a bell or use any other sound device including any
loudspeaker, radio or amplifying system where sound of sufficient
volume is emitted or produced therefrom capable of being plainly
- 4 -
March 3, 1995
heard upon the streets, alleys, parks or other public places.
C. Any permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be
non-transferrable, and shall be valid only as to the applicant and
location provided on the application for such permit.
D. Except as expressly permitted by and in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 12.44 of this code, the sale, offer
to sell, advertising or display of merchandise on any street or
sidewalk in the city is prohibited.
E. All retail sales of safe and sane fireworks shall be
permitted only from a temporary fireworks stand and the sale from
any other building or structure is prohibited.
F. No fireworks stand shall be located within one
hundred feet of any gasoline storage or gasoline pump or any garage
or within thirty feet of any other building, or within six hundred
feet of any other fireworks stand.
G. Fireworks stands need not comply with the provisions
of the building code of the city except that the building official
shall have authority to require that stands be constructed in a
manner which will reasonably insure the safety of attendants and
patrons. -
H. Fireworks stands shall be located only in a C-1
zoning district or a zoning district less restrictive than C-l,
unless located upon property owned and occupied by a church and/or
school, which church or school is either a legal or legal
nonconforming use of such property, and the fireworks stand is
located no less than three hundred feet (300') from the property
line of any residence.
I. All temporary stands for the display and sale of
fireworks shall obtain an electrical permit from the city building
department.
J. If a toilet is not immediately available during all
open or sale hours of the fireworks stand, then an approved
chemical one must be provided.
K. Each stand in excess of twenty-four feet in length
must have at least two exits. Each stand in excess of forty feet
in length must have at least three exits.
L. Each stand shall be provided with not less than two
2A 10 BC-type fire extinguishers, underwriter approved, in good
working order and easily accessible for use in case of fire.
- 5 -
DRAFT
March 3, 1995
M. No person shall light, or cause or permit to be
lighted, any fireworks or any other article or material within any
such stand, or within fifty feet thereof'.
N. No smoking shall be allowed in any stand, nor within
fifty feet thereof. "No Smoking" signs shall be prominently
displayed.
O. All weeds and combustible material shall be cleared
from the location of the stand, including a distance of at least
twenty feet surroundin? the stand
P. There shall be at least one adult in attendance
during the open or sale hours of the fireworks stand. No minor
under the age of eighteen shall be permitted in a stand.
Q. All permits must be posted in a conspicuous place.
R. Fireworks shall be sold only between the hours of
twelve noon, July 1st, to twelve noon on July 5th.
S. Permittee shall strictly comply with all provisions
of the State Fireworks Law (Sections 12500 et seq. of the Health
and Safety Code).
T. The fireworks stand shall be removed from the
temporary location by twelve noon on July 15th, and all
accompanying litter shall be cleared from said location on or
before said time.
U. Night watchman accommodations shall not be closer
than twenty-five feet from the fireworks stand.
V. No fireworks shall be placed in any fireworks stand
until a permit for such'stand has been issued by the city.
W. Any person who receives a notice to correct any
violation of these regulations or any other condition of the
permit, and who fails to correct such violation within the time
prescribed in the notice, may be assessed a fee not exceeding the
city's cost of reinspection in accordance with Section 3.70.040 of
this Code.
8.44.050 Revocation.
Any permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall.be
immediately revoked by the city manager or his designee whenever he
finds:
DRAFF
Ma~h3,1~5
A. That misrepresentations were made on the
application; or
B. That any of the terms or conditions of said permit
have been violated, or that the business has been operated in
violation of local, state or federal law.
8.44.060 Appeal.
A. Should any applicant be dissatisfied with the
decision of the city.manager or his designee not to grant a permit
or to revoke a permit, then said applicant may, no later than ten
days after notice of such decision is deposited in the United
States mail, addressed to the applicant or permittee at the address
provided on the application, make written objection to the city
council setting forth the grounds for dissatisfaction, whereupon
the council shall hear said objections at a regular meeting no
later than three weeks following the filing of the objection with
the city clerk. The applicant shall be 'given written notice no
less than three days prior to said hearing. The council may, upon
said hearing, sustain, suspend or overrule the decision of the city
manager or his designee, which decision shall be final and
conclusive.
B. Pendingthe hearing before the council, the decision
of the city manager or his designee shall remain in full force and
effect and any reversal thereof by the city council shall not be
retroactive but shall take effect as of the date of the council's
decision.
SECTION 2.
This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with
provisions _of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become
effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage.
o0o
- 7 -
I HEREB~ CERTIF~ that the foregoing Ordinance was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on , by the following
vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY K. SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
By:
LAURA C. MARINO
Assistant City Attorney
JKS/meg
ORD 95-1\FIREWRK4.ALT
March 3. 1995
- 8 -
BAKERSFIELD ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®, Inc.
r~EALTOR.The Voice for Real EstateTMin Bakersfield .4800 STOCKDALEposTHIGHWAY,oFFicESUITEBox 9338100
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-9338
TELEPHONE (805) 635-2300
FAX (805)635-2317
March 1, 1995
Members, Budget & Finance Committee
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Ladies and Gentleman:
Concerns have been raised by our Local Government Relations
committee regarding special assessments on individual homes,
specificly their effect on the resale of existing homes.
The Association supports the full disclosure of special assessment
costs, to avoid an unexpected and serious financial impact on home
buyers and their property values. Accordingly, we would support
requiring deed restrictions for properties in assessment districts,
mandating full disclosure of the costs of these assessments.
Any communication on this subject may be directed to Brian Todd,
Governmental Relations representative. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
GLENDA ANSON
President
GA/bhs
cc: City Council Members
Mayor Price
The following documents pertain to the:
BUDGET & FINANCE COMMITTEE
meeting of Monday, March 27, 1995 at
12:15 PM.
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JANUARY 1994
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULF 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 5
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULF 1
POSS SIAI'U]ORY RAPE 1
RF FRAPEZIUS SFRAIN 1
SIP' SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
Count: 11
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
FEBRUARY 1994
PRI DIAG Count
AgU-gE~R--P~S~T'R'~F~Z-I'NAS--PA~N ~ i
ALLEGED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT
ALLEGED SEXUEL ASSAULT
L--T~R~PE~-I-US--~FrRA~N
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
T~APEZtUS SFRAIN ........ __1
Count: 12
Paqe 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MARCH 1994
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 4
ASSAULT-PHYSICAL/SEXUAL 1
~u--~RAPE-~I~t~S--S-T-R~N 1-- ·
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
POSSIBLE SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
S/P ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL] 1
S/P RAPE WHILE INTOXICATED 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT'
SEXUAL ASSUALT EXAM 2
SEXUAL MOLESTATION W1]'H 1
[RAPE-Z-I~~US-F~X--D-I-S-~AL--U~NA--
Count: 17
Page I
· SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
APRIL 1994
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULt 3
ALLERGED SEXUAL ASSAUL] 1
~F-T--PRAPE-Z'~D-S~RAblN__ 1-
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULt 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT' 3
Count: 11
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MAY 1994
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 4
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAUULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT LAST WEEK 1
SUB~H~RAPEU~-I'C--~I-LANT-I-N .......... 1~
Count: 10
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JANUARY 1993
PRI DIAG Count
ALEDGED SEXI. JAI_ ASSA~JL_T 1.
AL.L. EGED SE'XUAL. A~'tLJSIF 1
AI._I._I'ZGED SI='XUAI._ m~c~dJl..T 3
AL. LEGFD SEXLIAL ASSAUL. j' VICTIM 1
HX OF- SEXUAL ABIJ,SE 1
NO PHYS EVIDFNCF OF SEXUAL. 3
NO I:'HYSICAL EVID SEXUAL MOLES
FHY.. EVIDENCE OF:' SEXUAL 1
PHYSICAL EVIDI=-NCIE OF SEXUAL 2
POSSIBLE'" SEXUAl. ASSAULT 1
~.~~,..:-~-¥0 ~ ................ _ .... ~.
Count: 17
Pa n e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
FEBRUARY 1993
PRI DIAG
I!"XPOSURI.:.' TO SI~XUALI..Y 'TI~AN.S-
Iq O E V I D E N [.'. [-- O F:' M O L E S T A T I O I-q i
NO I:'HY EVIDENCE OF- SEX ABIJSE ].
I::'HYS EVID[.'NC'.E OF SEX/ASSAULT 1
PHYS EVIDENCE OI-- SEXUAl- 1
PHYSICAl_ EVIDENCE OF S[.-XLIAL 1
POS,S SEXUAL ASSAULT .1.
C o u n t: '7
I:'~ g e 1
SEXUAL ~SSAULTS/~PE
MA~CH 19~3
PRI DIAG Count
A C U T E "1' R Al:' E Z I U S S T R A I N
ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSF 1
AL. LEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
LE"'FT TRAPFZIUS STRAIN ~--
LOW r4A(,K STRAIN R 'T~APEZIAS
NO EMZDE:'NCE OF SEXUAL MOLEST 1
NO PHYS EMI~I-"'NCE TF SEXUAL .1.
NO PI.-IYS EMIDENCE OF' SEXL.I~L 2
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SEX 1
NO I::q.-IY$1'C~L E."MZDENCEOF MOLE."ST 1
POSS SEXUAL AS,S~UL_T 1
S/P SE-"XLIAL_ ~SS~ULT EXAM 1
SEXUAL :, TE COU SE
STR~TN LOW ~CK AN~ TRAPEZIUS ~'J"
SUSPECTED SEXUAl_ ASSAULT 1.
Count: 18
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
APRIL 1993
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
ALLEGE-".D SEXUAL ASSAULT FXAM 1
AL.L_I~RGI~D SEXUAL ASSAULT
L TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
LOW BACK PAIN/TRAPEZIUS STRAI
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 2
POSS SEXUAL ABUSE 1
R TRAPEZINE STRAIN
R TRAPEZIURS SPASM
R TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT BY HX 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSUALT
STRAIN R TRAPEZIUS
SUBTHERAPEUTIC ANTICONVULSANS
THERAPEUTIC LITHIUM LEVEL
TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
Count: 23
P~n~ I
SEXUAL ASSAULTS?RAPE
MAT 19~3
PRI DIAG Count
ALU?GED SEXUAL. ASSAU/.T 3
BII.AT TRAPEZIUS ~1~,~
HX OF SEXUAL ASSAUI_T 1
NO PE OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
POSSIBLE RAPE 1
POSSIBI_E SEXUAL ABUSE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 4
SEXUAL ASSAULT EVIDENT EXAM 1
TRAPEZIE/SCAPULAR M/S ~
TRAPEZIUS STRAIN ~
C o u n t: 16
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JUNE 1993
PRI DIAG Count
AI..I...EGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 5
AI...LEGED SEXUAL ASSUAL_'f 1
MEDICAL EXAM AI'"TEIR SEXUAL 1
NO PE OF-- SEXUAL MOLESTATION 2
NO PHYS EVIDENCI-_- OF SEXUAL 1
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCF MOLE."ST 2
POSS SEXUAL ASSAUI..T 2
F[.o.~I[L.E SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SE:XUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
SHOULDER/TRAPEZIUS STRAIN ~
S ti P R A T H 0 R A P E C T I C ~
suspEc E ) SEXUAL
Count: 21
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JULY 1993
PRI DIAG Count;
AC~JTE L TRAI:'EZIUS SF'ASM .'t"-
AL. LEGFD SEXUAL ASSAUI...I' 4
L '¥RAPEZIAS S'¥RAIN
L TRAPEZILIS RHON]'OID STRAIN ..$
MUSCUI.OSKEI..ETAL PAIN TRAPEZIS
MVA/CFRVICAL AND TRAPESIN A--
NO PNYS EVID OF" SEX ABUSE 1
NO PHYS EVIDENCE- OF SEXUAL 1
NO PHYSCIAL EVID OF SEX ABUSE 1
PHYS EVID OF' SEX MOLEiSTATION 2
PHYSICAL/SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
PRESUMF. D SEXtJAL ASSAUI_T
R I'RAPEZIUS SEVERE SI'RAIN VS "1"'
RAPE VICTIM 1
RECK SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
REPORTED HX OF SEX CHILD ABSE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
TRAPEZOID CERVICAL STRAIN
Count: 28
Paoe
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
AUGUST 1993
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 5
GSW TO-R TRAPEZIUS
HX OF SEXUAL ASSAULT
INTRAPERITOEAL BLEED ak
INTRAPERITONEAL BLEED
NO PNSICAL ~:VID OF SEX ABUSE 1
NO PHY FVID OF SEX MOLESTATIO 1
NO PHYS EVID OF SEX ABUSE 2
NO PHYSCIAL EVID OF SEX ABUSE 1
NO PHYSICAL EVIl) OF SEX ABUSE 6
PNYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
POSS SEXUAL ABUS~~' 1
POSS SEXUAL TRANSMITTED DZ
RAPE BY HISTORY 1
S/P ASSAULT/SEXUAL ABUSE
S/P RAPE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
SEXUAL MOLESTATION BY HX 2
SUBTHERAPEUT I C ~I~-
TRAPEZIUS M SPASM
TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
Count: 35
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
SEPTEMBER 1993
PRI DIAG Coutnt
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT
ALLFGED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUi._T 3
EVAL FOR POSS SFX ASSAULT 1
EVAL SEX ASSUALT AND NEGLECT 1
NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL ABUSE 1
NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL MOLEST 1
I::'OSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
POSSIBLE SEXUAL~ASSAULT
, POST SEXUAL. ASSAULT 1
RAPE SUSPECT E~JAL 1
S/P ALLEGE SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE ~--
'¥HERAF-'EUTIC LITHIUM LEVEL -1~.
TRAPERIUS STRAIN
TRAPEZIUS STRAIN
TRAPEZUS STRAIN
Coutnt: 22
PAn~
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
OCTOBER 1993
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SUSPECT SEXUAL ASSAT 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
ALLERGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
L TRAPERZIUS STRAIN
POSS PHYSICAL & SEXUAL ABUSE 1
POSS SEXUAl. ASSAULT 1
POSSIBLE SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
R TRAPEZIS STRAIN
SEXUAL ASSAULT ! 1
SEXUAl.
ASSAULTT 1
Count: 1 1
Pa ~e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
NOVEMBER 1993
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE 2
ALL. E."GED SEXUAL ABUSE:' E:'VAL 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
ALLERGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
INTRAPERITONIAL GASTRIC ~1~
POSS SEXUAL.. ASSAUL. T 1
POSSIBLE SEXUAL ABUSE 1
R TRAPEZIOUS NEW STRAIN ~
SFXUALLY TRANSMIT'¥ED DZ ~
TRAPEZ I[)US STRAIN ~
Count: 11
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
DECEMBER 1993
;'RI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
RAPE BY HI~]ORY 1
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DZ tls
Count: 5
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JANUARY 1992
I::' H Y S E V I D E N C: E 0 F' S E: X U A t... 2
I. 0 .... SEXLIAI~ ASSALIL. T ,.~
C o u n t: .1. 4
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
FEBRUARY 1992
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED RAI"'E VICTIM 1
EVIDENCE OF:' SEIXUAL. MOLESTA'T'IN 1
HX OFr AI._LEGI.:]D SEX ASSAULT
H)< SEXUAl.. AS~.iAU[.T
PHYSIC. AL EVIDENC. E OF SEXUAL. 1
POS SEXUAL ASSAULT .'1.
I:~EI::'ORT OF' SF'XUAL 2SSAUL. T 1
F<Ej::'ORTED SEXUAl... ASSAUL'/ .].
SEXUAl... MOL. ESTATION EXAM 1
,'"'?~'T] L'{ I I"il::.i:~g~'L~U'¥' i[ C 17-1~"1- .'[ ("_:OigV~,J[_.~g}'¥/
,3 U s [:, es: c..'t' Is: ]) s es: x o g k. g s s ~.~ U L.. T 1
"i~APEZE ;:~U,'-g×C',...E STR;'; I H 'l
C o u n t: 1 3
.............................................................................
F'a g e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MARCH 1992
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
APRIL 1992
PRI DIAG Count
AI._I.. EGIE I) RAI:'E 1
ALI._EGE:[) RAPE V];CTIM 1
AI._Lf.-'_'GFD SF'X Al._ ASSAULT
C'. 0 i'~ S E N T I N G S E X U I;;I L.. I N'T' E R [.'. [.I U R S E 1
I- (Joo I BI..E I'IOLI.-. o FA TI ON 1
I:;,L...2]'1::,,5C:~'"," 'l'l lc: ~,l~ i,",~',l ,"-
............................. S[-::A31;i J.
S .... i~
.I::,,,I._HI_ ASSAULT B'f I--IX 1
SEXLIAL ASSAULT EXAM 4
S U ,'-3 I:' E C T IF D M 0 L E ,S T ici T I 0 N ].
C. o u n t: 14
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MAY 1992
AI...I.~Ii.:DGIED SEXUAl.. ASSAUt...'F IEXAM. ].
AI...L. EGE:D SEXUAL. ASS-C.d..L.T 2
EVIDIENCIE 01:; SEXtJAI.. MOI._I?S'¥A'¥IN
NO EVII) EN[.'.IE OF' SEX M[LE~."I 1
1'40 IEVIDIENCE OF SEXtJAI.. MOLES'f' :1.
NO EVI]DEhlCIE [~ SIEXUAI... MOLEST
NO I:-'H'¥S EVIDENCE OF SEXtJAI._ 2
N 0 I::' H Y S C I A L E V I D E N C E S E X U A L
S/P oI:XLAL ASSAIJLT
S Ii!: X U A L A S S A U L T 1
S. ..
.~AfUo I:'OST SEXtJAL ASSAULT ].
· ~.LtJ~:~ ,*~'i'l:(A:[N CHRONZC ].
Count: ]. 5
.........................................................................
P a g e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JUNE 1992
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED '~ ......... '"q'
c.-,t:Xl.J~-Ii._ Ho..'.HI. JI._ r 2
A I... L.. E G E D C F'I I L. I) SEE X U A L A B L.I S FE 1
AL_L_IL'GED SIEX ASSAUI._T ].
AL.I...EGI:ED SEXL~L. ABL,':~E 1
ALL. EGED .SIE×~JAL_ ASSAULT 4
CL..OSED I"tE~D IN~U~Y/I::'OgS SEXUL 1.
I:'HY$ IEVIDliENCE OF' SIEXI. JA/. ].
::'OSS $1:EXL.I~L~ ABUSE] 1
I-'(]S$ ,SEXUAL_ ASSAUL..T 2
· ' · c.q" '{
I. 0,:~,.. Ii'.'l...E ,SEXUAL ASS~UL.T 1
~X ,q [J,~:' I L L/SUB T HE F:~P[E UT I C
S/I:' SI?XUAL ASSAI. JL_'¥
SEXLIAL ASSALJL. T 2
SEX[JAL MOL. ESTATION 1
SUSI:'FCTED ,SEXUAl_ ASSAULT ].
Count: ;26
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JULY 1992
PRI DIAG Count
A I.~ I._ E G E D R A PI:Z V I C T I M 2
A I... L. E G E D S E X U A L. ' ''~ ~' .....
A o o F.~ U L. T 6
L.T TRA[::EZiA F
NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
-P 0 S S'-T R A~~-"'S~-~
~~',._ Z I U S S T R A ~ N ~-
~,~-, ~, .-..~.,~.~ ...... , ....
~ ........... [..S,~,~'"
SEXUAL ASSALJL. T 2
SEXUAL ASSAUL_T EXAM ].
SUSPECTED SEXUAL. ASSAULT 2
~:Z i LiS
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
AUGUST 1992
PRI DIAG Count
A L. L.. E:' G E D C'. I--I I L. D PI C.IL.. ii: S T A 'i' I 0 Iq :1..
A I._ L_I~-: G L:' D I'-< A P I£ 2
AL..L_EC.~ED RAPE SLISPE[.'.T :1.
AI..I_EGED SEXAUL. ASSAUI..T
AL. LEGED SiEXLIAL ASSALILT 4
ASSAUI.. T/SI-_-XUAL. .1.
HX [.iF:' SEXLIAL. ASSUAL. T 1
POSS SE'XUAL ASSAUL. T 1
RAPE EXAM .1.
SE:XUAL. ASSAULT 1
Count: 17
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
SEPTEMBER 1992
PRI DIAG Count
-A(~l~-i'~:Ai::iEZii,iE STRAIN
'~- ~.~ C L.~ T [il R T ~ R R P E Z ~. u u ~ ~ I.< ~l J. t,I 2
AI._I..EGED RAPE VICTIM ].
AI._L. EGED SEXUAL. ABLJSEE 1
AL. LEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAl.. ASSAUI_T 4
'F'i~qEZ.[A i'iUSCi._E SF:~SM ].
C o u n t: ]. 4
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
OCTOBER 1992
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED CHILD RAPE VtCTIM
AI...L.E:GED SEXAUL. ASSAUL. T 1
AI_I_E(]~I~D ol=XtJ~4L q~ t JoE .1.
c~% ·
AI...L. EGED SEXUAl._ A ....~U[.. T 6
HX OF SEXUAl_ ASSAUI_T ].
NO EEVIDENCE OF:' SEXUAL MC)LEEST
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OF :~EXLHI. ].
POSS CHIL. D MOLEESTATION 1
POSS MOI..ESTATION ].
~:[ T~;,~C~C:"7 TI lC~
........... ~ ~L EL__SE~H
~EXUAI.. ASSAULT
SUSF'ECI'ED SEXUAL ASSAULT
~'-""'- .....I
Coun~: ].
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
NOVEMBER 1992
PRI DIAG Count
~---F'"Z B---.~:~tJ,t~ ~ i-~FZRAPi.::UT i C D :[ G i._iEVi., ~~
AI...LE:GED SEXUAL. ASSAULT 3
ALi._IEGIED SEXUAL ASStJAI..T :1.
NO EVIDENCE MOLESTATION 3
NO IEVIDENCE OF MOLESTATION ].
NO SIGNS OF SEXUAL ABUSE 1
I:'HYICAL EVIDENCIE OF SEXUAL ].
I 0o,.. SEXUAL ABUSE 1
SEXUAL ASSAUI...T I
SLISPECTE:D CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
SUSI:'ECTED SIEXUAL ASSAULT 3
Count: 17
[-:' a g e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
DECEMBER 1992
P R I D I A G _C_o..u
ALI,..EGED SEXUAL ASSALUT 1
ALL, F'GED SEXUAL ASSAUL'T' 2
~ ....... ~r~ S]'RAJ:N F< i
NO EVIDENCE OF SEX I"IOLEST
PHYSiCaL E:VZDENCE OF SEX ~O[.. 1
PHYSICAL EXZDENCIE/SIEX ~OI_I:.:T 1
POSS CHRONIC SEEXUAL. ASSAULT 1
POSS SIEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SE:XUAL ASSAULT '1
,SEXUAL ASSUI._T EXAM 1
SUSI:'ECTED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
Count: 15
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JANUARY 1991
PRI DIAG Count
EVIDENTIAL RAPE EXAM 1
H/O SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
L~ TRAPEZIUS SFRAIN ~
MUSCLE S]RAIN L TRAPEZIS ~-
MVA - LFT TRAPEZIUS STRAIN ~
NO PHYSICAL EVID OR SEXUAL - 1
PHYSICAL EVID OF SEXUAL - 1
Count: 7
Pa~e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
FEBRUARY 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT RECHK 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL] 1
LF~' [RAPEZIUS SFRAIN ~
NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 2
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT' 1
SEIZURE/SUB[HERAAEUrIC ~
SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
Count: 1 1
~'aqe 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MARCH 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL~F 2
L TRAPEZIOUS MUSCLE SPASM ~
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULF 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAL ASSAULTED i
SEXUAL MOLESTA]ION-DOUB]FUL 1
TRAPEZIUS ~ENDONI~IS ~
Count: 9
Page 1
'SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
APRIL 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
H/O RAPE 1
LF'F TRAPEZIUS SFRAiN ~
NO EVDNCE OP SEXUAL ABUSE 2
NO PHYSCL EVDNCE OF SEX ABUSE 1
NO SEXUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 1
F'OSSIBLE CHILD MOLESFAFION 1
RAPE EXAM/ASSAUL1 V1CllM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULF 2
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
Count: 12
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MAY 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
EXAM FOR SEXUAL ASSAULF 1
LFT ]RAPEZ1A CONTUSION
NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 2
POSS CHILD MOLESTATION 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAUL"r 2
RAPE VICTIM 1
RT TRAPEZIUM STRAIN
RT TRAPEZIUS S]RAIN
SEXUAL ASSAULT 6
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
FRAPEZINE MUSCLE SPASM
Count: 21
Page 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JUNE 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAUL~' 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULt 4
CONTUSSION RI TRAPEZ1US ,~
HISFORY OF POSS SEX ASSAULF 1
HX QUES]IONABLE SEXUAL ABUSE 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULf' 1
POSS. MOLES]A]ION '1
QUESTIONABLE HX OF SEXUAL 1
RT TRAPEZ1US S"~RA1N ~ ~
R~ FRAPEZIZ MUSCLE S~RAIN ~
SCRAPED L ELBOW ~
SEXUAL ASSAULT 4
TRAPEZIA/NECK CONTUSIONS ~1-
FRAPEZIUS S~'RAIN ~
Count: 22
Pa~e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JULY 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULt 3
H/O SEXUAL 'ABUSE 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULt i
RAPE SUSPEC~l EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULt 4
SEXUAL ASSAULT' EXAM 2
SEXUALLY TRANSMIT rED DISEASE ~i-
SUSPECl~ED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
~RAPEZ IUS SPASMS --1'
Count: 15
Paoe i
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
AUGUST 1991'
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED RAPE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL1 5
CONFUSED R INFRAPEFULLAR ~
EVALUAI'ION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
HX OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULl 1
POSSSEXUAL ABUSE 1
R TRAPEZ STRA1N ~'
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULF 5
SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAL ASSAUL[ EXAM 3
SPRAIN L7 7RAPEZIAS ~
FRAPEZIUS PAIN RESOLVED ~
TRAPEZIUS VS SUP'RASP1NAIUS ~
Count: 25
Paoe t
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
SEPTEMBER 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ACU~'E rRA~IEZUS/BACK SFRAIN ~
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL~ 1
HX OF SEXUAL ABUSE 2
HX OF SEXUAL ASSAUL1 1
POSSIBLE SEXUAL ASSAULt 1
R/O SEXUAL ASSAUL] 1
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
SEXUAL ASSAULT 4
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 4
SEXUAL ASSULT 1
SEXUAL FRANSMITYED DISEASE ~
Count: 20
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
OCTOBER 1991
PRI DIAG Count
4 X 6 INDURATION L TRAPEZIUS
ALLEGED RAPE 2
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULf' 5
H/O SEXUAL ABUSE 1
POSS SEXUAL ABUSE 1
R TRAP'EZ1NE CONTUSION ~t~
R/O SEXUALLY rRANSMI.TFED DZ
SEXUAL ASSAUL] 3
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 3
TRAF'EZIUS S]RA1N
Count: 19
paqe 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
NOVEMBER 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULt 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL] 2
CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE MOLES]A]ION 1
SiP' RAPE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
TRAPEZIOUS & CHEST WALL PAIN -1~
TRAPEZIUS CON]USION
Count: 9
Page I
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
DECEMBER 1991
PRI DIAG Count
ALEGED SEXUAL MOLESFATION 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL¥ 2
EVIDENTIAL SEXUAL EXAM 1
HX OF POS SEXUAL ASSAULt 1
HX O~ SEXUAL ASSAULT' 1
MYOFASCIAL STRAIN L TRAPEZIUS ~_
RECHK S/P SEXUAL ASSAULT ~
SEXUAL ASSAULt 2
SEXUAL ASSAUL] EXAM 1
SEXUAL MOLESFATIOM 1
Count: ~ 13
Pa~e 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JANUARY 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ACUf'E AUS'FERIOR ['RAF'EX PlUS ST ~
ACUTE SEXUAL ABUSE WORKUP' 1
ALLEDEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
ALLEGED RAPE SUSPECT 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULF 7
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT SUS 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSUALT 1
SUBTLERAPEUIIC D1ALNTIN LEVEL ~
Count: 14
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
FEBRUARY 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED RAPE 1
ALLEGED RAPE SUSPECT 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
NO PHYS EVID OF SEX MOLESrAT 2
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
RAPE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTED 1
SEXUAL MOLESTA]ION 1
~rRAPEZIUS S~RAIN ~
Count: 14
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MARCH 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULt'
ALLEGDED SEXUAL ASSAUL]
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULt
INTRAPER1]ONEAL BLEED
NO EVID OF SEXUAL MOLES
NO EV1D OF SEXUAL MOLES'I
NO AHYS EVIDENCE /SEXUAL ASS
NO PHYS EVIDENCE/SEXUAL ASS
R ~rRA~EZIUM MUSCLE STRAIN
R TRAPEZ1US SIRAIN
SEXUAL MOLESTATION
SEXUALLY TRANSMI]TED DISEASE
SZ DISORDER/SUB 'FHORAPEU'~'IC
Count: 16
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
APRIL 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED RAPE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASS SUSPEC] 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 16
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT/SUSPCT 1
AFFEMPrED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
L TRAPEZINZ S]RAIN o ~.
L TRAPEZIUS ATROPHY '1~'
L TRAPEZIUS SPASM ~1~
POSS RAPE 1
POSS SEXUAL ABUSE BY HX 1
R FRAAEZIUS SFRAIN ~
R TRAPEZU1S SPASM ~
R/O SEXUAL MOLESFATION 2
RAPE SUSPEC] 1
SEXUAL ASSAULF 2
SEXUAL ASSAUL] SUSPEC] 1
Count
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
MAY 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ACUr'E L TRAPEZINE FX
ACUTE SPRAIN LT ]~RAPEZIUS
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL1 5
L TRA~EZ STRAIN -1-
RAPE EXAM 1
RAPE SUSECr 1
TRAPEZIUS MUSCLE RHMA]'O1D
rRAPEZiUS SFRAIN
Count: 14
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JUNE 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ACUFE L FRAPEZiUS MUSCLE S~RN ~
ACUTE TRAPEZIUS S'IRAIN ~
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAUL[ 1
ALLEGED RAPE SUSPECT 1
ALLEGED sEXUAL ASSAULt 8
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT SUSPT 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULf'ED 1
ATEMPTED RAPE VICTIM 1
L TRAPEZURE STRAIN ~
NO PHYS EV OF SEX MOLESTA]ION 1
NO PHYS EV SEXUAL MOLES [AT I ON 1
NO PHYSICAL EVID OF SEX ABUSE 1
PHYS EV SEXUAL MOLESTATION 1
POSS SEXUAL ABUSE 1
POSS SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXAUL ASSAUL1 EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULt SUSPECT EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULTED EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAUTLED 1
SEXUAL MOLESTA]ION 1
SUBFHERAPEU~IC SZS ~
Count: 32
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
JULY 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT i
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 6
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT SUSPC~' 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULTED 1
NO AHYS~EVIDENCE OF SEX MOLES 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SUBrHERAPEU~IC DILAN LEVEL ~
SUSPEC1 IN RAPE CASE 1
SUSPECFED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
TRAPEZIUS SPAN ~
Count: 16
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
AUGUST 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ACUFE MUSC Sf'RAIN R f'RAAEZIUS ~
ACUTE R 7RAPEZIUS STRA1N ~
ALLEDGED RAF'E SUS¢ECf' 2
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
ALLEGED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 7
NO PHY EVI OF SEXUAL MOLES['AF 1
NO PHY EVI SEX MOLESTA]ION 1
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEX MOLES 2
NO PHYSICAL EVID OF SEX ASSL] 1
NO PHYSICAL EVID SEXUAL ASSAU 1
PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEX MOLES] 3
PHYS EVIDENCE SEX MOLESF 1
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
POS SEX MOLESTATION 1
S/P RAPE 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 3
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT SUSPECt 1
Count: 33
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
SEPTEMBER 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 7
EXAM FOR POSS MOLESTATION 1
INTRAPERIFONEAL BLEED/STAB ~.
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OR SEXUAL 1
NO PHYS EVIDENCE SEXUAL MOLES 1
R TRAPEZ1US MUSC SPASM ~'
R rRAPEZIUS SPASM ~
SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
SEXUAL ASSAULt EXAM 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT POSSIBLE 1~
SEXUAL ASSAULt RCHK ~
SEXUAL ASSAULT SUSPEC] ~
TRAPEZE MUSCLE STRAIN ~
Count: 20
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
OCTOBER 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULt 2
ALLEGED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXAUL ASSAULT SUSP t
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT' 3
MO PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE O~ SEXUAL- 1
POSS RAPE W/OUT EVIDENCE - 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
Count: 11
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE
NOVEMBER 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEOED SEXUAL ABUSE 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
HISTORY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
HX OR SEXUAL ASSAULT 2
NO PHYS EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
NO PHYSICAL EVID SEX MOLEST 1
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL 1
POSS SEXUAL ABUSE 1
S/P SUSPECTED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
FHERAPEUFIC MED LEVELS ~
Count: 12
SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPE DECEMBER 1990
PRI DIAG Count
ALLEDGED SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
ALLEGED SEXUAL ASSAUL'I i
HX OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 1
LEFT ]RAPEZIUS S~IRA1N ~
NO PHYSICAL EViD OF SEXUAL - 1
NO PHYSICAL EV1D SEXUAL - 1
S/P SEXUAL ASSAULF 3
SEXUAL ASSAUL~l 1
SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM 1
Count: 11
Page i
MEMORANDUM
TO' Frank Fabbri, Park Superintendent ~~~~'~
FROM Neil Tierney, Supervisor
SUBJECT BARC FACIUTY LEASE
DATE 20 October 1994
The current BARC faciiity sits on approximately one (1) acm (see attached drawing) and has approximately
11,000 sq~Jare feet of storage.
I contacted Mr. Wayne Kress of C. B. Commercial Properties (633-3819), and he gave me the following list of
properties and prices.
1). 4730 Armstrong Court (rent or lease) $ .29 a foot $ 2900/month
10,000 sq. ft. building on .5 acres (Stockdale Ind.)
2). 5051 Stine Road (lease only) $ 2000/month
6,000 sq. ft. building on 1.0 acm
3). 400 Old Yard Road (sale) $ 285,000
5,000 sq. ff. building on 2.4 acres (Air Park area)
4). 2101 "Q" Street (sale) $1~0,000
6,000 sq. ft. building on 7200 sq. ft. lot
5). 4501 District Blvd (sale) $ 300,000
8,800 sq.'ft, building on .7 acres
6). 300 Watts Drive (sale) $ 239,000
5,625 sq. ft. buildng on .5 ams
7). 431 Brown ~tmet (saie) $ 250,000
14,000 sq. ft. building on .8 acres
~- .~ber 1994
.,RC FACiUTY. ! FA,SE
8). Sonora and Chico (sale) $ 295,000
16,000 sq. ft. (3 buildings) on .8 acres
9). Shady Lane (east of Old Corp. Yard) (sale) $ 350,000
7,500 sq. ff. building on .92 acres
Mr..Kress further eXPlained that this was all that was available in the City limits. He also indicated that the area dictates
the pdce as much as the property itself.
NT:pah
bam.memodisk
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 23, 1995
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct~ _
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Assistance Program
Since the inception of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
programs, rehabilitation has been one of the major components in their effort to
improve the living conditions of Iow and moderate income populations and help
promote neighborhood stability.
According to the 1990 Census information, 42% of all the housing units in Bakersfield
are rental units. The City's effort in implementing HUD's rental rehabilitation programs
have included assisting those projects in the most impacted, targeted neighborhood.
By eliminating rental rehabilitation assistance, almost half of the existing housing stock
would be affected.
Bakersfield property owners with rental units within these neighborhoods have been
able to access CDBG and HOME funds. The. Rental Rehabilitation Assistance
Program provides half of the' rehabilitation cost. The balance of the rehabilitation cost
is provided by the property owners as an equity contribution. In order to benefit the Iow
and moderate tenants, property owners agree to maintain affordable rents for up to
fifteen years.
In the past, the assistance provided has made a positive impact on living conditions of
both tenants and the overall neighborhood .....
Im:MD/RENTAL.MEM
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 23, 1995
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct _
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Assistance Program
Since the inception of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
programs, rehabilitation has been one of the major components in their effort to
improve the living conditions of Iow and moderate income populations and help
promote neighborhood stability.
According to the 1990 Census information, 42% of all the housing units in Bakersfield
are rental units. The City's effort in implementing HUD's rental rehabilitation programs.
have included assisting those projects in the most impacted, targeted neighborhood.
By eliminating rental rehabilitation assistance, almost half of the existing housing stock
would be affected.
Bakersfield property owners with rental units within these neighborhoods have been
able to access CDBG and HOME funds. The-Rental Rehabilitation Assistance
Program provides half of the rehabilitation cost. The balance of the rehabilitation cost
is provided by the property owners as an equity contribution. In order to benefit the Iow
and moderate tenants, property owners agree to maintain affordable rents for up to
fifteen years. ·
In the past, the assistance provided has made a positive impact on living conditions of
both tenants and the overall neighborhood.
Im:MD/RENTAL.MEM
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 23, 1995
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct~ -
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Assistance Program
Since the inception of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
programs, rehabilitation has been one of the major components in their effort to
improve the living conditions of Iow and moderate income populations and help
promote neighborhood stability.
According to the 1990 Census information, 42% of all the housing units in Bakersfield
are rental units. The City's effort in implementing HUD's rental rehabilitation programs
have included assisting those projects in the most impacted, targeted neighborhood.
By eliminating rental rehabilitation assistance, almost half of the existing housing stock
would be affected.
Bakersfield property owners with rental units within these neighborhoods have been
able to access CDBG and HOME funds.' The Rental Rehabilitation Assistance
Program provides half of the rehabilitation cost. The balance of the rehabilitation cost
is provided by the property owners as an equity contribution. In order to benefit the Iow
and moderate tenants, property owners agree to maintain affordable rents for up to
fifteen years.
In the past, the assistance provided has made a positive impact on living conditions of
both tenants and the overall neighborhood.
Im:MD/RENTAL.MEM
B A K E.R S F I E L D
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 23, 1995
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct~ _
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Assistance Program
Since the inception of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
programs, rehabilitation has been one of the major components in their effort to
improve the living conditions of Iow and moderate income populations and help
promote neighborhood stability.
According to the 1990 Census information, 42% of all the housing units in Bakersfield
are rental units. The City's effort in implementing HUD's rental rehabilitation programs
have included assisting those projects in the most impacted, targeted neighborhood.
By eliminating rental rehabilitation assistance, almost half of the existing housing stock
would be affected.
Bakersfield property owners with rental units within these neighborhoods have been
able to access CDBG and HOME funds. The Rental Rehabilitation Assistance .-
Program provides half of the rehabilitation cost. The balance of the rehabilitation cost
is provided by the property owners as an equity contribution. In order to benefit the Iow
and moderate tenants, property owners agree to maintain affordable rents for up to
fifteen years.
In the past, the assistance provided has made a positive impact on living conditions of
both tenants and the overall neighborhood.
Im:MD/RENTAL.MEM
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 23, 1995
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct~ _
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Assistance Program
Since the inception of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
programs, rehabilitation has been one of the major components in their effort to
improve the living conditions of Iow and moderate income populations and help
promote neighborhood stability.
According to the 1990 Census information, 42% of all the housing units in BakerSfield
are rental units. The City's effort in implementing HUD's rental rehabilitation programs
have included assisting those projects in the most impacted, targeted neighborhood.
By eliminating rental rehabilitation assistance, almost half of the existing housing stock
would be affected.
Bakersfield property owners with rental units within these neighborhoods have been
able to access CDBG and HOME funds. The Rental Rehabilitation Assistance
Program provides half of the rehabilitation cost. The balance of the rehabilitation cost
is provided by the property owners as an equity contribution. In order to benefit the Iow
and moderate tenants, property owners agree to maintain affordable rents for up to
fifteen years.
In the past, the assistance provided has made a positive impact on living conditions of
both tenants and the overall neighborhood.
Im:MD/RENTAL.MEM