The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/10/1997 BAKERSFIELD Randy Rowles, Chair Irma Carson Kevin McDermott Staff: Dolores Teubner AGENDA BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, March 10, 1997 12:15 p.m. I City Manager's Conference Room Second Floor - City Hall, Suite 201 ~ 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 3, 1997 MINUTES i 3. PRESENTATIONS 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS NONE 6. NEW BUSINESS A. POLICY ON INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER - Rojas B. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE FROM KERN-TECH - Wager C. PROPOSED FY 1997/98 CDBG/HOME CONSOLIDATED PLAN -Wager 7. ADJOURNMENT DBT:jp rILE COPY DRAFT BAKERSFIELD Randy Rowles, Chair Alan T~-/dy, ~ty Man~r / Irma Carson Staff: Dolores Teubner Kevin McDermott AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 3, 1997 12:15 p.m. City Manager's Conference Ro~m 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 12:30 p.m. Present: Councilmembers: Randy Rowles, Chair; Irma Carson; and Kevin McDermott 2. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 13, 1997 MINUTES Approved as submitted. 3. PRESENTATIONS None 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS None 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. CITY ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCLUDING LEA (LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY) Staff presented a proposal for assuming the environmental health inspection and LEA duties from the County. The City Manager indicated that while the proposal AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 3, 1997 Page -2- was feasible and needed, that the timing for implementing such a change was not right. Councilmember Carson voiced concern that identified problems should not go unaddressed especially if the City can provide better and cheaper sen/ice. Staff was asked to continue working with the County to gain improvements in County sen/ices and costs before assuming the services ourselves. Staff will monitor progress with the County and report back on a quarterly basis to the Committee. B, AMENDMENT TO BIDDING REQUIREMENTS The ordinance change is to codify the City's existing practice for handling emergencies and routine maintenance. The City has an excellent record of contracting out repairs and maintenance but also needs the flexibility to respond to emergencies in an efficient manner using City forces. 'Staff was directed to provide a report to the Committee outlining the City's strategy for making the bidding process inclusive, comprising a list of contractors that are representative of the community. The ordinance amendment was recommended for Council approval. C. BID PROTEST ORDINANCE The Committee asked staff to develop an arbitration process and incorporate that into the bid protest process as outlined in the proposed ordinance. Staff will bring back the proposed arbitration process for consideration by the Committee. D. NONRESPONSlBLE BIDDERS ORDINANCE The Committee asked that an arbitration process be incorporated into the process for identifying nonresponsible bidders. The Committee agreed that a prequalification process would be the best way of screening out nonresponsible bidders. Staff will bring back the proposed arbitration process and ordinance for consideration by the Committee. 6. NEW BUSINESS None 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m. cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council DBT:jp BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Budget & Finance Committee FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director/~-~~ _.__.__ / c.._..-.--~ DATE: March 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Administrative Cost for Curb & Gutter Assessments Public Works currently has a program for the construction of curb & gutter in areas that do not qualify for Community Block Grant Funds. The owner requests the City to construct the improvements under the annual contract and contracts with the City to pay the cost of the improvements through his property taxes over the next two years. The City places a lien for the improvement amount on the property and, when the payments are complete, releases the lien. The City has undertaken this type of obligation several times in the past, usually in areas that have been developed in the County without curb and gutter and subsequently annexed into the City. The installation of the curb and gutter benefits both the City and the property owner in that it generally helps solve a storm drainage problem. To date, the City has not charged property owners any administrative or interest charges for work of this sort. In an earlier council referral, staff recommended charging an additional 10% for the administrative fee. After further review, staff feels that 8% would be more appropriate for this type of project. For instance, when estimating the cost of City Capital Improvement Projects, the budget amount includes an additional 4% for design and administration costs and another 4% to 5% for surveying and construction inspection. M:\COUNCIL\CURBGLrYf. REP RMR:mps 'xc: Reading File Project File ~'acques R. La Rochelle Marian P. Shaw BAKERSFIELD Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM F~mary6,1~7 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Request for Assis~nce from Kern-Tech Bakersfield-based Kem-Tech has requested financial assistance for purchase of equipment to expand their manufacturing and specialized tooling business. The company began in 1995 and in it second year brought nearly $1 million to Bakersfield. Until that time, none of the company's customers bought tooling fi.om Bakersfield because the skills were not here. Today, Aerospace Precision now sends 30% of their tooling to Kern-Teclx, Capstone Turbine 100%, Tenneco Packaging 100% of repair work, and Tracor Flight Systems about 15%. According to the company, all of these ratios would increase with the addition of machinery and personnel. The company has been accepted by McDonnell Douglas for their approved contractor fist. Kern- Tech received over $85,000 in purchase orders within the first two months of being an approved contractor. Kern-Tech is located in the Baker Street area at 405 East 19th Street. Purchase of additional equipment will allow the company to bid on projects of even larger scale for their existing customers. Tenneco Packaging is interested in placing their West Coast extrusion die fabrication with Kern-Tech. Tracor Flight Systems has sent RFQs for the company's bid which also cans for larger scale machinery and computer-aided design work as does the Tenneco commitment. These bid packages often require machinery and engineering that is beyond the company's current capacity. The company's Daisy assembly line brings in profits ~om Arkansas and employs an additional five to ten low-income people per season on a piece work basis. Should the company receive assistance to purchase equipment, they project five additional jobs will be created in the first year, eight in the second, three in the third, and two in the fourth, totaling 18 new jobs within 48 months. The company is willing to enter into a first-source hire arrangement with Employers' Training Resource and assure that at least 51% of all new hires be low- and moderate-income individuals. Alan Tandy F~ru~'~ 6, 1997 Page 2 According to the company, this assistance will allow Kem-Tech to purchase this equipment and hire additional employees in time to take advantage of current projects awaiting bid. Without such assistance, the company predicts minimal growth over the next few years. An environmental review is underway and is expected to be completed in mid-March. At that time, we can have a drat~ agreement ready to lend the company $170,000 secured by UCC filings on the equipment, plus personal guaranties fi.om the two partners. The company has made an investment in other machinery and equipment in excess of the $170,000 since inception in 1995. Please advise whether this project should be referred to a Council committee or if it should be sent directly to the City Council for action. A completed project evaluation is attached. enclosure dl~S: ~IER.NTECH~TMPMO. WPD Project Evaluation Kern-Tech page 1 ~ Project description 1. Does the business currently operate within the city limits? g' Yes r~No 2. Where is the project being proposed? r~Downtown g'East Bakersfield []NE [] NW []SE []SW 3. Is the project within the Enterprise Zone? [] Yes ~'No 4. Is Team Bakersfield assistance being requested? [] Yes ~,'No 5. Assistance requested includes (check all that apply)... []Cash assistance g'Loan g'F, quipment purchase []Off-site improvements []Deferred payment schedule tnOther 6. Size of project (square footage, acreage) Not applicable; equipment purchase only 7. Does the business already occupy the project site? ~" Yes []No 8. Will the business g'lease or [] purchase the site? 9. Anticipated decision date: The business has already decided the purchase is necessary. Purchase awaits decision by City. 10. Anticipated / desired commencement of operations: The equipment will be purchased immediately upon approval by City Council. , Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 11. Full time jobs to be retained in ................... 10 llll 12. Full time equivalent jobs to be retained in ........... 13. Full time jobs to be created in ................... 5 8 3 2 14. Full time equivalent jobs to be created in ............ 15. Full time jobs to be transferred in ................. 16. Full time equivalent jobs to be transferred in .......... 17. Total jobs ................................ 15 8 3 2 18. Will jobs be targeted to certain groups defined by income, residency, or some other criteria? g' Yes c~No If yes, by what criteria? Low- and moderate-income 19. Would the business use a first-source hire arrangement? ~" Yes []No 20. What % of jobs being created will provide benefits? 100 % 21. What % of jobs being retained will provide benefits? 100 % 22. What % of jobs being transferred in will provide benefits? Not applicable % 23. What is the pay range of jobs being created? $7 to $20 Average: $11 24. What is pay range of jobs being retained? $7 to $20 Average: $11 25. What is the pay range of jobs being transferred in? Not applicable; no jobs are being transferred 26. in~ ......... - ..... 27. Proposed assistance will directly impact our area's existing businesses (choose one) []negatively ~positively 28. Does the business have competitors in the local economy? [] Yes ~,'No Effects on the community 29. Will the business add diversity to our community's economic base? g' Yes []No 30. Will the business play a pivotal role in strengthening existing clusters or forming a new cluster in our area? ~ Yes []No 31. Will the business produce a product for export outside our area? ~" Yes []No (continued) Project Evaluation Kern-Tech page 2 ;' Return on the community's investment ,31. Annual revenue from property tax generated, if anyBusiness leases location and, therefore, does not pay property tax. 32. Annual revenue from sales tax generated, if any $ 1, 631.52 33. Annual revenue from business license generated, if any $ 216.00 34. What are the performance measures for the company to achieve? Retain lO full time jobs and create 5jobs in Year 1, 8 in Year 2, 3 in Year 3, and 2 in Year 4. 35. Source(s) of proposed assistance requested: CDBG $170, 000 General Fund Redevelopment tax increment Other: Other: Total assistance proposed: $170, 000 Total private financing: Total project valuation: $170,000 36. Is assistance proposed to be provided (check one) ~'at one-time / lump sum? Dover multiple years? (# of years ) 37. Is the proposed ~sistance an investment in our community's future (examples: customized job training, infrastructure, etc.)that provides community-wide benefits even if the company moves or shuts down? [] Yes ~"No Protecting the commnnity's investment 38. Which of the following will be used to protect the city's investment should the business not meet the performance measures listed above? (check all that apply) ,,"Collateral -~--'~ ..... UCC filing) UI [,l U~L9 r'~Recision (cancellation of the agreement) DClawback (recovery of all or part of the subsidy costs) DPenalty (fines or charges for non-performance or relocation) r~Recalibration (adjustments to subsidy to reflect changing business conditions) ~Otber Personal guaran~ o,I' the owners r~Other Other coasJderatious 39. Does the business receive any other type of government assistance? [] Yes If yes, indicate source and amount 40. How important is this incentive in the business' 'decision to locate in Bakersfield? The business is already located in Bakersfield; however, this assistance will allow for the purchase of machinery to increase capacity and thus handle more contracts, service more clients, and create more jobs. Without this new machinery, the company will continue minimal growth and be unable to expand to take advantage of new client opportunities. dl\P: \KERNTECH\EVALORID.WPD February 5, 1997 Community Development Block Grant Funds 10-Mar-97 Proposed Uses for FY 1997198 11:30:07 AU FY 1997198 Resources Allocation 2,828,000 Program Income 225,000 Unprogrammed Funds * 340,474 Total Resources 3,393~474 Operating Budget Administration 596,625 Cap is 20% of Entitlement & Progrard Incom 19.5% Section 108 Loan Payment 339,395 Hotel Loan Repayment Sub-Total 936,020 Public Services Enterprise Zone 11,221 Contractual Agreement Graffiti 156,000 CDBG Eligible costs (30% of program) Looking Good Neighborhood 50,000 Fair Housing 102,706 No Change from prior year Sub-Total 319,927 Capped at 15% of Entitlement $424,200 ' Housing Sewer Connection Fee 100,000 Loan program for residents in newly annexed areas Home Access 80,000 Grants to provide handic'p access to homes Direct Delivery 115,542 Delivery costs for CDBG & HOME hsg. programs Sub-Total 296,542 Economic Development Assistance Business Loan Program * 223,885 Loans to large business prospects ($105,874 prior yr.) Commercial Loan Program 120,000 Loans to small, start-up business prospects Sub-Total 343,885 Non.Profit Assistance Desert Counseling Clinic, Inc. 57,500 Acquis. of Kern Island Bldg for mental health programs Clinics Siena-Vista * 234,600 Acquis.lconstruction of a social services facility (prior yr Center for Blind 150,000 Rehabilitation of facility located at 1124 Baker St. Sub-Total 442;100 Total Operating Expenditures 2,337,474 Capital Improvment Projects Street Lighting, Targeted Areas 52,000 Includes PW & CD costs Chester Avenue Streetscape II 353,000 Includes PW & CD costs Lake St. Project (multi-year) 150,000 Includes PW & CD costs Sidewalk Reconstruction 101,000 Includes PW & CD costs Total ClP Expenditures 656;000 Total Expenditures 2,993,474 Balance Available 400,000 Annexation Areas Casa Loma Annexation Improv 300,000 Includes PW & CD costs Chester #3 Improvements 100,000 Includes PVV & CD costs 400,000 Balance Available after additional projects 0 · Funded using unprogrammed funds from previous fiscal years. Consolidated Plan -HOME Funds Proposed Uses for FY 1997198 FY 1997/98 Resources Allocation 1,033,000 Program Income 110,000 Total Resources 1,143,000 Operating Budget Administration 103,300 Housing FTHB 370,000 32% Single Family Rehab. 300,000 26% New Construction 56,750 5% Sub Total 726,750 Non-Profit Assistance CHDO Set-Aside 154,950 14% Kern Bddges 58~000 5% Multi-Family 1_O0~000 9% Sub-Total - 312,~50 Total Expenditures 1,143,000 100% ' Difference 0 Consolidated Plan ESG Funds Proposed Uses for FY 1997198 FY 1997/98 Resources Allocation 75,000 Operating Budget Bakersfield Homeless Center 47,125 63% Alliance Against Family Viol 24,125 32% ESG Administration 3,750 5% Total Expenditures 75,000 100% Difference 0 SUMMARY OF C~ PROPOSALS FOR FY' 1997-98 ACTION PLAN 0~reliminary Propo~ Review) Proposals for FY 1997-98 CDBG Fundi~) March 10, 1997 Name of Proposal Purpose And Activity Description Applicant/Lead ~ -'~'~~'- ~ ~~----=-=--=-- and Funding Estimated Cost Eligible National % of % of Benedit Comments Recommendation A~ency Objective Bendiciaries inin County Chester Avenue StreetscApe improvements within City Public Works $1,403,000 Other** Yes Slum and Unknown Unknown Design 95% complete. Streetscape the public ri~,ht-of-way along - Engineering $ 336,000 CDBG Blight Improvement Chest~ Avenue between Truxtun $ 8,000 PWDD* Design and construction Project Avenue nnd 24th Street. $_ 9.00Q CDDD* inspection have been paid Improvements include center $1,756,000 Total with other funds. CDBG Funding - Ye~ median islands, street tree funded $332,000 ofthis planfing~ lighting, street furniture **inc. $322,000 in project in FY 96-97. and other design features. FY 96-97 CDBG Sidewalk Removal and reconstruction of City Public Works $ 85,000 H Cost* Yes Yes Unknown CT. 0% Phase I was completed/n Reconstruction dilapidated and substandard - Engineering $12,750 PWDD L/M Benefit 100o,4 Project (Phase mi s/dewalk improvements in tm'$eted Ward I in 9/96. The design Iow/mod income neighbOrhoods. ~ CDDD % is unknown Funding - Yes $101,000 Total of'Phase II to be completed in 1/97. Phase II to be located in Ward I. Location of'Phase 1II has not yet been determined by ~ the Streets Division. *H. Cost = Hard Cost, PWDD -- Public Works Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other -- Fundin8 From Non CDBG Sources SUMMARY OF CIP PROPOSALS FOR FY 1997-95 ACTION PLAN (Preliminary Proposal Review) Proposals for FY 1997-98 CDBO Funding) March 10, 1997 Pase 2 Name of Proposal Purpose And Activity Description Applicant/Lead Estimated Cost Eligible National % of % of Benefit Comments and Funding Agency Objective Beneficiaries in in County Recommendation Qualification City Terrace W~ To extend the storm drahtage pipe City Public Works $206,000 H. Cost Yes Yes LM CT 26 BO 1 0°,4 Public Works completed (PhaseDrain Extension~Union°n TerraCeAvenueWaYtol,880BernetafeetAvenue,from - Engineering $$ 9.00Q8'000 CDDDPWDD Benefit 58.3% 906 the Terrace Way Storm so that storm water can flow to a $223,000 Total Project on Terrace Way Funding - No city sump rather than being from Union Avenue to an pumped into & canal near Berneta existing sump ¼ to the east Avenue. in 11/96. The proposed extension project will tie into that system at Union Avenue. Design for the CDBG proposal (Phase H) was completed in 6/96. -~ ___=__._ Located in Ward I *H. Cost - Hard Cost, PWDD - Public Works Direct De. livery, CDDD = Communi~ D,~vgopm~ Direct Delivery, Other = Fundi~ From Non CDBG Sourers SUMMARY OF CIP PROPOSALS FOR FY 1997-95 ACTION PLAN (Preliminary Proposal Review) -- March 10, 1997 Proposals for FY 1997-98 CDBG Funding) Page 3 # Name of Proposal Purpose And Activity Description Applicant/Lead Estimated Cost Eligible National % of % of Benefit Comments and Funding Agency Objective Beneficiaries in in County Recommendation Qualifi~on City 4. Lake Street Lake Design and construction of 1,665 Public Works - $113,000 H Cost Yes Yes CT 12, BG 5, 0% Lake Street Street Area l.f. o£intill curb and gutter and Engineering $ 27,000 PWDD L/M Benefit CT 13 BG's 5 & Reconstruction between Reconstruction related appurtenances, 1,440 l.f. of $ 10,000 CDDD 73.1% 6 Tulare and Kern Sts. and Project (Phase VI) reconstructed street, 1,500 sq. ft., $150,000 Total 2,174 (100%) between King St. and sidewalk and 825 l.f. of chain link Beale Ave. to be Funding = Yes fencing on Lake Street between completed 3/4/97. Owens Street on the west and $110,000 is budgeted for W'flliams Street on the east. This st. reconstruction on Lake project covers the boundaries of' St. between Beale Ave. Phase I. The funds of Phase I were and Owens Street. reprogrammed on 12/15/96, and are in the process of being Located in Ward II reprogrammed back. *H. Cost = Hard Cost, PWDD = Public Works Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other = Funding From Non CDBG Sources SUMMARY OF CIP PROPOSALS FOR FY 1997-98 ACTION PLAN (Preliminary Proposal Review) Proposals for FY 1997-98 CDBG Funding) March 10, 1997 ---.-==_ Pa~e 4 Name of Proposal Purpose And Activity Description Applicant/Lead Estimated Cost Eligible and Funding National % of % of Benefit Comments Recommendation Agency Objective Beneficiaries in in County ._.___ ------__ Qualification City Casa Loma//6 Street Impm~~ to the Casa Public Works - $292,500 H Cst & Yes yes CT 25 BG's 1, 3 0% The area is currently in the Annexation StreetLoma//6 Annexation Area Engineering PWDD DM Benefit &4 County but is expected to Improvement (improvements to be initiated after $7.500 CDDD 77.1% 2,228 (100%) be annexed into the City by ProjeCt the annexation is completed). $300,000 Total Partial improvements to include July 1, 1997. Funding- Yes storm drainage improvements, curb and gutter infi!! installation, street To be located in Ward I reconsmiofion and street light uplpades. Chester Avenue #3 Street improvements to the Chester Public Works - $97,000 H Cst & Yes Yes CT 6 BG 1 0% The area is currently in the Annexation StremtAvenue #3 Arm (the portion east Engineerin8 PWDD L/M Benefit 498 (100°4) County but is expeoted to Improvement of Chester Avenue). Partial ~ CDDD 78.5% Project improvements to include street $100,000 Total be annexed into the City by reconstna~on and street lightin8 July 1, 1997. Funding - Yes upl~'ades. The project will be initiated after the annexation is To be located in Ward II completed. *H. Cost = Hard Cost, PWDD - Public Works Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other = Fundin~ From Non CDBG Sources SUMMARY OF CIP PROPOSALS FOR FY 1997-98 ACTION PLAN (Prelingnary Proposal Review) Proposals for FY 1997-98 CDBG Funding) March 10, 1997 __.=__ Pa~e 5 Name of Proposal Purpose And Activity Description Applicant/Lead ~ ~ --=-=--=- and Funding Estimated Cost Eligible National % of % of Benefi Comments Recommendation Agency Objective Beneficiaries in in County ------- _____ ---__ Neighborhood Upgrading of existing street lights Public Works - $50,000 Hard C & Yes Yes CT 22 BG's 1 & 0°,4 Phase I to soon be under Street Lighting to City standards and the placement General Services PWDD L/M Benefit 2 construction. Improvement of new street lights and poles to $2.000 (~DDD 85.7% 1,978 Project (Phase I~ existing residential streets (non $52,000 Total commercial) in low income Located in Ward I Funding - Yes targeted areas. Approximately 46 area bounded by east California Avenue on the north, the Southern Pacific Rail Road tracks on the east an on the south, and Lakeview Avenue on the west. .:Sprsh ---- - *H. Cost - Hard Cost, PWDD - Public Works Direct Delivery, CDDD - community Development Direct Delivery, Other - Fundin~ From Non CDBO Sources Develop Community meat Applications FY 97/98 l~blic Facilities, Housing ami Homeless Projects CDBG, HOME atui ESG Funds · ~ii~nd:ii~!?i:iiiiii , ~:i .. !!!i::::!17: ::=:~i :': :.::::.o/~i!: .. :'"!i:" iiiiiiiiii!iiiiiiiii:: ......................... · . :::i::~' !~/::iii ...!'. !~! ........ :::...: :!~ .... ~DBG APPLICATIONS Kern Isiafld Acquisition of~ern Deser~ Counselin~ ~o,0oo ¢~. yes Medium - 40% Ci~ ~uikling ~sland Building to house C1~¢ inc. (D~C) cDI~(~ Have applied for :~i~0,000 in 11-20-96 Acquisition DCC's various Greater $497,ooo DC¢ Health County funds. private funds Facilities 90°,4 +/- L/M 1-24-97 Bakersfield mental health A private non-profit Sso,ooo ci~y Project r~ady to implement 2-7-97 Funding - YES programs corporation CDBG 2920 H Street Ward 2 $7,f~o City DD ~ --------- Total $984,500 CCS Family Lease and rehabilitation California $15,000 City yes Medium- unknown City-owned site. Proposed 11-27-96 Resources & of facility for use as an Community CDBG Other Public Education Center adult literacy/GED Services, Inc.(CCS) operational funding not yet training site Facilities verified. 1-23-97 Funding - NO 720 Lakeview A private non-profit 2-7-97 Ward I corporation Project not rmtdy to No implement * Co~t ~tim~es not verified by sta~. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff direct delivery costs have been estimated for recommended projec~ only. Mamh 10, I~F7 1 CBVI Facility Rehabilitation of facility, Center for the Blind I;143,254 other yes Medium - 90°/6 City Funding for the balance of the 11-27-96 Rehabilitation adaptation for use by and Visually sources Other Public costs not yet established. blind and visually Impaired (CBV~) $125,000 City Facilities 100o/6 Fuudiug - YES impaired, more efficient. CI)BG Applications for additional 1-24-97 use of space, improved A private non-profit $25,000 City presumed grants in progress. No 2-7-97 exterior, energy corporation DB L/M application made to county. efficiency upgrades. 1124 Baker Street $293,254 Total Project almost ready to Ward 2 implement The Garden Play Installation of Bakersfield Garden $26,701 City unknown- H/Eh - unknown - Fleds~ing orga~iT*~/on, 12-2-96 Area playground equipment, Commun/ty CDBG may be Parks & not yet incorporated 11-7-96, 501(cX3) improvement /rrigation system for Enhancement inelig/ble to youth fadlity. Project, Inc. (The make CDBG Recreational providing app. subm/tted same day. No 1-23-97 Funding - NO Garden). funded facilities services, operating funds on hand. Leases 2-7-97 2010 "O" Street, /mprovemen Appears to be facitity from Bakersfield ts to church (old YMCA) A private owned predominately Community Church Ward 2 organi=~_tiOn facility city residents wrrn. DREW Project not ready to implement * Cost estimates not verified by staff. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff direct delivery costs have been estimated for recommended projects only. /F~.~/.~B~_~P.TBL ~ 10, 1997 2 CSV Community Acquisition and Clinica Sierra Vista, $439.222 Privatz Services Building construction of health Inc. (CSV') am, is yes Medium - 45% City Project to house W/C, Acquisition services facility to house *$72,30o cay Health 05-28-96 $ programs. A private non-profit OB(;* Facilities 100% L/M Adolescent Fami/y Life/Cai- Funding. YES 71 l, 713, 725 East corporation $214,r~0 cay Learn, Fami/y Life Education 1-24-97 California Avenue CI~BG Program, Neighborhood Ward 1 $2o~oo cay Partnership, Family Services DD Program. Facility at 815 To~ $735,4OO Lakeview is too snutll for above. $72,300 CDBG funds allocated * part o£9/96 in 96-97 amendment. Did not amendment apply to County. Project nlm0~t tv. ady to Total CDBG S483,801 implement funds requested --=----- HOME APPLICATIONS Single Family/ Leveraging FHA 203(k) Kern County $100,000 yes ~h - At purchase - Homeownership program acquisitions and Economic City HOME Affordable Funding for leveraging FHA 11-27-96 rehabilitation for re-sale Opportunity grant Housing/ 100% 2030c) program of acquisition Funding = to first-time home buyers Corporation CHDO Eligible Large Family and rehabilitation of single family 1-29-97 City-Wide (KCEOC) Leveraged Related homes for re-sale to ~'sttime 2-12-97 amount Renters with - A private non-profit unknown Substandard/ homebuyers. Recieved funds in corporation Overcrow~d previous 2 years. Eligible Project ready to implement * Cost estimates not verified by staff.. ' ~.~-~acu~_~.~t. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff~ delivery costs have been estimated for recommended projects only. Ma~h 10, 1997 3 Canyon Hills Gap financing for Canyon I-fills Senior $270,ooo CHAO yes Medium - Senior Housing LIHTC project to build Housing, Inc. tz~n unknown Applying for Low Income 9-9-96 60 units of congregate $1,0n6,?s5 Lu-n'c Elderly/Cost Housing Tax Credits (LIYFI'C). $2,400,000 Tax Burdened Funding - NO care housing A private ~-xempt Loan Non-profit established 6-20-96 - 1-28-97 corporation SS21,~12 O~y arm of Canyon I-~s Assembly of 2-11-97 6701 Auburn Street tlOM~. God (CHAG). Does not yet have Ward 3 Total $4,276,296 tax exempt status, no Project almost ready to mnsg Women's Acquisition of transitional Desert Counseling $382,000 Co. yes High - 40% City implement Services Center housing facility for Clinic, Inc. (DCC) HOME Facility formerly operated by 11-27-96 Acquisition pre?ant women and $78,825 DCC Transitional Pathways. City provided s60,00o cay Housing for 100% L/M $15,000 grant in 1994 to repair 1-24-97 women with children for A private non-profit HOME Persons Funding - treatment and recovery from parking lot. Pathways now ALTERNATE alcohol and substance corporation with Special operated by DCC. Questions abuse. $520,825 Total Needs 1-12-97 2913 South H Street regarding type of clientele to be Ward 7 resolved. Wellsprings Rehabilitation of I00 unit ABHI Corp, Inc. $ 507,000 Co. yes High - 74% City Project ready to implement Senior Housing senior housing project d.b.a Wellsprinss HoME Applied to County, proposes to 09-26-96 Rehabilitation for flail elderly. $1,44~,000 City Permanent split the $1.95 million A private for-profit HOME Housing for 100% L/M proportionately. Also asking for 1-29-97 Persons Funding - NO 1100 Union Avenue corporation $1.95 Million $250,000 tO retire existing debt. Ward 2 with Special Requesting CDBG if'HOME no Total Needs funds insufficient. Additional info naspons~ ii..- · needed on construction, cost .... e~imates, etc. Project not ready to implement * Cost estimates not verified by staff. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff direct delive~ costs have been estimated for recommended projects only. March !0, 1997 4 KBYH Group Acquisition of group Kern Bridges $$5,000 yes High - unknown Home home for emotionally Youth Homes, County HOIVlE Applied to County as well. Acquisition disturbed foster children. Incorporated S~5,000 Permanent 10-30-96 (KBYH) City HOME Housing for Project ready to implement Funding. YES 4301 De Etta Avenue A private non-profit 53,000 City Persons none Ward 6 corporation DD with Special Needs $113,000 Total Riverside Ranch Renovation of building The Anne Sippi $7~,500 No-HOI~IE High - unknown to house community Clinic Treatment City ltOMl~ residemiai Received $140,000 in city 11-15-96 Day Center rooms, sheltered Group uses only Commercial CDBG multi-family rehabilitation Rehabilitation workshop and therapists' 92.206(a)(4) Industrial funds in FY 96-97 for offices for residential A Private for-profit No - CDBG Rehabilita- 1-27-97 Funding - NO facility housing company Only tion improvements to the residential chronically mentally ill. exterior portion of the facility. County Nor rehab and has contributed over $600,000 to 18200 Kern Canyon Rd. code work date for acquisition of site and Ward 3 eligible rehabilitation of residential 570.202 (a)(l) & (3) portion. Total ItOME $2,260,212 funds requested * Cost estimates not verified by staff. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff direct delivery costs have been estimated for recommended projects only. Mltoh 10, 1997 AAFV Homeless Expansion of Operation, Alliance Against $24,125 yes High - unknown Has several funding sources for 11-2'/-96 Services and Essential Services and Family Violence & Volunteer Emergency operation. Applied to the Operation Homeless Prevention Sexual Assault $24,125 City Shelters County for ESG funds. Activities at shelter site. ESG Funding - YES 1921 19th Street A private non-profit ~ Ward 2 corporation $48,250 Total Project ready to implement Bakersfield Operation and Bethany Services $47,125 yes High - 65% City Has several funding sourc~ for 11-27-96 Homeless Center Maintenance of the In-Kind Emergency 100% L,/M operation. Applied to the Operation Bakersfield Homelesa A private non-profit $47,125 City Shelters County for ESG funds. Center corporation ESG Funding - YES 1600 East Tmxtun Ave. -----__ Ward 2 $94,250 Total Project ready to implement Total ESG funds $71,250 requested * Cost estimates not verified by staff. Amounts provided by applicants. City staff direct delivery costs have been estimated for recommended projects only. IF~.~97-~SBUD~_gsAPP.'rBL l~an:h 10, 1997 6