The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/20/2002 B A K E R S F I E L D Mike Maggard, Chair Harold Hanson Mark Salvaggio Staff: Darnell Haynes MEETING NOTICE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI'n'EE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT MAY 16, 2002 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding application of the business license ordinance to commercial and residential rental property businesses 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding request from Kern County for the City of Bakersfield to provide sewer services to the Rexland Acres neighborhood 6. COMMI'I-I'EE COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT S:~Damel~002Bud&FinanceCom mittee~bf02jun20agen.doc BAKERSFIELD D AFT /~lan-Tandy; City Msl~ager Harold Hanson Darnell Haynes, Assistant to the City Manager Mark Salvaggio AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room 1501 Truxtun Avenue - Suite 201 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 4:03 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Mike Maggard, Chair; Harold Hanson and Mark Salvaggio 2. ADOPT APRIL 18, 2002 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Adopted as submitted. 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding application of the business license ordinance to commercial and residential rental property businesses Committee Chair Maggard explained since the Committee's last meeting, he has acquired a new client and this may create a conflict of interest, so he excused himself and requested Committee Member Hanson to chair in his absence on this item. City Manager Alan Tandy explained this is not a new tax. The tax has been in place since the 1960s. There has not been a rate increase since the early 1990s and there cannot be a rate increase under California law without a referendum. The majority of California Ci:ties, both large and small, usually impose the tax at a rate many times higher than does Bakersfield. This issue has surfaced because new technology is available that is identifying AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 Page -2- more property owners who were unaware of the existence of the tax and have not paid it, so from their perception it is a new tax, although technically it is not. The revenue collected from this tax is typically $25, so the City has not aggressively enforced the tax, which left many individuals not aware of it. The only Budget and Finance Committee discussions on this subject have been on exempting some groups from the tax who technically have been subject to it for over 30 years. In March the Committee sent reports to the City Council. The majority report recommended those who rent four or fewer residential units should .be exempt from the tax. The minority report recommended a broader application of the exemption to the tax based on the passive income criteria contained in IRS rules and regulations. Several groups, including the Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors and others, expressed concerns, so the City Council took no action and referred the issue back to the Committee. Due to concerns in the community about this tax, using the passive income criteria for exemption may be the best remaining alternative. Staff has devised a form and is willing to recommend that those who claim their real estate investment as passive income under Section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code, be exempted from the business license tax. This would allow prospective payers of the tax an opportunity to identify on the form whether it is passive income under the IRS Code. (The form was displayed using an overhead projector.) It was further recommended if an ordinance is adopted along this line, an educational campaign be conducted to increase awareness about both the tax and the exemption. It was clarified that once the exemption is enacted, it cannot be removed under Proposition 218 without a vote of the citizens of Bakersfield. Chris Frank, Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber of Commerce does not have an official position. She expressed the proposal as outlined by the City Manager, does seem to be a workable solution to their concerns, but wanted assurance'that there is not an exclusion for a sector of businesses in the community. Leo Hinds, CPA and Attorney at Law, stated in principle he agrees with the direction taken by staff to recognize realty investments as passive activity, but expressed concerns regarding the form: (1) the wording on the form refers to Section 469 of the IRS Code and there are people who do not know what is in it, (2) Congress makes changes to the IRS Code, and (3) the way the form is worded requires the signer to make legal conclusions. City Manager Alan Tandy responded staff is amenable to making the wording more understandable. However, the City does not have a set of standards to identify passive income, so it would be necessary to use the reference to the IRS definition. AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT DP~A~T BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 Page -3- Greg Bynum, speaking on behalf of the Bakersfield Associations of Realtors, expressed opposition to using the reference to Section 469. He suggested other wording, "Owners of real property are exempt because the rental or leasing of real property is considered a passive investment activity." He expressed everybody that performs services and are in business in real estate pays a business license tax now, so the person who owns the property should not also pay a tax. Chandler Wonderly, Kern County Apartment Association, spoke in opposition to the wording on the form. Richard Watson, apartment owner, spoke in opposition to the business license tax on owners of rental property, but would like to check with his-CPA as to whether he is exempt under staff's proposal to exempt passive property investment. Committee Members Hanson and Salvaggio requested staff to meet with Leo Hinds, Greg Bynum and Chris Frank to work out the details and agendize the item for the June 20th Budget and Finance Committee meeting. (Committee Chair Maggard absent for this item) B. Staff report and Committee recommendation regarding four items deferred at the-last meeting from the Cost Recovery Program (This item heard first) Staff provided overviews of the four fees, which were removed from the Master Fee Schedule for further review at the Committee level. B-23 Fire Suppression-Permit Processing - Fire Prevention*Oversight Darnell Haynes explained .often contractors and engineering companies request the Fire Department to review their fees prior to getting a building permit. The Fire Department review often results in changes being made to the plans. In the past the City has not charged for providing this review prior to their submittal for a building permit although it is a direct benefit to the requestor. This new fee would recover the cost for providing this service. B-26 Minor Land Division Review - Owner Initiated Parcel Merqer. Marian 'Shaw explained this fee 'resulted from the efforts of the Development Streamlining Task Force. Local developers had concerns when they wanted to create a single lot from two or three lots, which would require going through a parcel map waiver. This new Lot Merger process is much faster. It is equivalent to the Lot Line Adjustment process, so the same fee is being proposed. This new fee would recover the cost to review the application request, prepare the environmental determination, notice of decision and to record a certificate of merger. D-61 Business Regulation- Public Convenience and/or Necessity Approval Darnell Haynes explained the State passed legislation requiring the local governing agency on some types of Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses to indicate the issuance of the license meets with the COmmunity's public convenience and/or necessity. This new fee would recover the cost for the City's review of the application by several departments, including City AGENDA.SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 Page -4- Manager's Office, Planning, Public Works, and Police Department background checks and district reports for oversaturation of similar types of establishments. B-34.Concurrent Applications - Maps This is an increase to an existingplanning fee. Stan Grady explained this-fee was created for zone changes and general plan amendments when they are combined. The current fee is not recovering the cost to provide this service. The Building Industry Association requested the fee be increased in stages. There-have been no objections from the community and staff is recommended moving forward with the fees. The Committee unanimously approved forwarding the fees to the Council for adoption. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding request for funding from the Bakersfield Museum of Art Charles Meyer, Bakersfield Museum of Art, thanked the Council for underwriting the Russell and Remington Exhibit last year. They are here today to formally request a $25,000 contribution. The City Manager read a portion from the-Council Policy regarding applications for contributions from nonprofit organizations: "Council .will not consider assistance to nonprofit groups for ongoing operation and maintenance with the exception of the following groups with which the City has had an ongoing relationship: Bakersfield Senior Center, Bakersfield Museum of Art and the Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra. The sources and amounts of fundsto be contributed annually to these three organizations is to be recommended by the City Manager as part of the City's Annual Budget, subject to City Council review and approval." The City Manager further stated the application from the Bakersfield Museum of Art does fit within the CoUncil's policy. There was discussion regarding the budget cuts being proposed by the Governor and if implemented by the legislature, there will need to be matching cuts in the City's proposed budget. Committee Chair Maggard and Member Salvaggio both expressed that the Council had approved a $25,000 a year contribution to be included in the budget for the Bakersfield Museum of Art. The Museum's request is subject to review each year and requires approval by the City Council. Committee Member Hanson made a motion to support'the request from the Bakersfield Museum of Art for a $25,000 contribution. The Budget and Finance Committee unanimously approved the motion. Staff will include the $25,000 contribution in the fiscal year 2002-03 budget for Council review and approval. AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 Page -5- B. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding request for funding from the Golden Empire Gleaners Phil Zander, Golden Empire Gleaners, stated the Gleaners put their application in for City CDBG funds too late for consideration in the current Action Plan. They have a desperate need for two trucks, which will cost approximately $40,000 each. They have a request in at the County for HUD money for one truck and would like the City to consider funding for the other one. Staff explained the time is closed for CDBG applications for this cycle and CDBG funding is not available. Staff indicated the City has reached its cap under federal regulations for funding to nonprofits for operation and maintenance costs of public services,~which is 15% of the total budget allocations. Committee Chair Maggard expressed the Gleaners organization is a beacon in the community and performs a very worthy function. However, the Committee did not want to make an exception to the City's relatively new policy for contributions to nonprofits, and therefore, did not recommend supporting the Gleaners' request. It was explained to Mr. Zander that the Gleaners could submit an application in the next CDBG funding cycle. The Committee requested the City Manager to have Community Development Coordinator George Gonzales respond to the Gleaners in writing regarding the time lines and process for submitting an application for the next funding cycle. C. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding request for funding from the Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra Milt Younger spoke regarding the significance of the symphony as a community asset that helps attract people to the City. He requested an outright contribution of $50,000 and not to take it back in the form of rent for the Centennial Garden/Convention Center. John Farrer, Bakersfield Symphony Music Director, clarified how the $46,000 contribution from the City was allocated last year. The Centennial Garden/Convention Center received $19,035 directly for concert rental and rehearsal rental days and the Symphony received the balance of $26,965. However, the Convention Center bills them for items above the rent. They would like to perform two more concerts this year by performing the Saturday night concert again on Sunday afternoon so others could attend who do not drive at night. Jim Foss spoke about the importance of having a broad brush of entertainment for the community and the Symphony performing at the Convention Center is a vital part. Committee Member Salvaggio made a motion to recommend to the Council to increase the contribution from $46,000 to $50,000 to cover the cost of the two extra concerts. The Committee unanimously approved the motion for the contribution and staying with the past practice of the rent being paid out of that amount to the Centennial Garden/Convention Center with the balance being paid to the Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra. DRAFT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 16, 2002 Page -6- D. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding a long-term financial plan for the City This item was .deferred to the next meeting. 6.. COMMI~EE COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:10 'p.m. Staff :present: Mayor Harvey Hall; City Manager Alan Tandy; Assistant City-Manager John StinsOn; City Attorney Bart Thiltgen; Assistant to the City Manager Darnell Haynes; Public Works Director Raul Rojas; Finance Director Gregory Klimko; Public Works Civil Engineer Marian Shaw; Assistant Finance Director Nelson Smith; Deputy City Attorney 'Michael AIIford; City Treasurer.Bill Descary; Planning Director Stan Grady; Jim Foss, Ed Dorsey, and Steve Womack from the Centennial Garden. and Convention-Center. Others present: Chris Frank, Chamber of Commerce; Peter J. Rudy, KUZZ News; Ken Takahashi, KGET-TV; Greg Bynum, Bynum and Associates; Milt Younger, Esq.; John Farrer, Bakersfield Symphony Omhestra; Al Engstrom; Charles Meyer, Bakersfield Museum of Art; Greg Hardin, Bakersfield Museum of Art; Douglas R. Hanson, Landmark Real Estate Group; ~Richard Earl Watson; Leo Hinds, CPA and Attorney at Law; Greg Hanvey, Bakersfield Association of Realtors; Michael Freedman; Kern County Apartment Association; Cassie Daniel, Bakersfield Association of Realtors; and James Burger, reporter, The Bakersfield Californian; Chandler Wonderly, Kern County Property Association; and Phil Zander, Golden Empire Gleaners. cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council S:~DamelA2002Bud&FlnanceCommlttee~bf02rnay16summa~y,w~l MEMORANDUM June 11, 2002 To: Budget and Finance Committee From: William C. Descary, City Treasurer Subject: Business License Tax The applicability of the business license tax ordinance to commercial and residential rental property businesses was a Deferred Business item on the May 16, 2002 Budget and Finance Committee Agenda. Staff proposed that those who claim their real estate investment as passive income under Section 469 of the internal Revenue Code be exempt from business license tax, and presented a revised business license application form that provides a means to claim the exemption. After inconclusive discussion and public comment, the Committee requested staff to meet with Leo Hinds, Gregory Bynum and Chris Frank to work out the details of staff's proposal. This meeting was held on June 3, 2002. Attendees included Councilmember Hanson, Gregory Bynum, Leo Hinds and Gregory Hanvey. Chris Frank had a conflict. Staff attendees included Alan Tandy, Bart Thiltgen, Gregory Klimko, Nelson Smith and Bill Descary. In the final analysis, it was agreed that the revised application form as presented is adequate to implement the exemption. Alan Tandy has spoken with Chris Frank and she agrees with the consensus. Attached for the Committee's approval and recommendation to the City Council is a an amendment to the business license tax ordinance [Municipal Code Section 5.02.060(C)] which establishes the passive income from real estate exemption and a revised business license application form. Attachments Cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager Gregory J. Klirnko, Finance Director S:LKimG~Forms & Lables~Vlemo - Blank-Logo.doc 6/11/2002 2:41 PM 5.02.060 Certificate Required - Exemptions C. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed or construed to apply the payment of such taxes as are prescribed in this chapter to any person transacting or carrying on any business exempt from payment of such taxes by virtue of the Constitution or applicable statutes of the United States or of the'state or to any person transacting or carrying on the business of "rental real estate" as a passive activity in accordance with section 469 of Title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code S:Winance~BusLicOrd rental real estate exemption.wpd CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MAIL TO: CALIFORNIA PREMISES MUST CONFORM TO ZONING.. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BUILDING, FIRE AND HEALTH CODES. P.O. BOX 2057 CHANGE OF NEW BAKERSFIELD, CA 93303 OWNERSHIP [] BUSINESS [] CHANGE OF ADDRESS [] APPLICATION FOR BUSINESS TAX CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN INK BUSINESS NAME DATE BUSINESS LOCATION (Separate Certificate Required for Each Location) STREET C[I'Y ST ZIP MAILING ADDRESS STREET CITY ST ZIP KIND OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION TELEPHONE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS/CORPORATIONS LIST OFFICERS - INCLUDE TITLES NAME HOME ADDRESS TELEPHONE STREET CITY ST ZIP STREET CITY ST ZIP STREET CITY ST ZIP TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: PARTNERSHIP []' CORPORATION [] FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER INDIVIDUAL [] Name SSN I claim exemption from the Business License Tax for the organization or individual named above since it is [] Tax Exempt under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(C)(3) or under State of California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 23701 or; [] Considered a passive investment in the rental of Real Property under Internal Revenue Code Section 469. I understand I may be required to provide proof of continued exemption from the Business License Tax upon request. DATE COMMENCED BUSINESS IN BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER, IF ANY SALES TAX PERMIT NO. ( .... ) ALPHA NUMERIC SUB Sales or use tax may apply to your business activities. You may seek written advice regarding the application of tax to your particular business by writing to the nearest State Board of Equalization office. For general information, please call the Board of Equalization at 1-800-400-7115 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GROSS RECEIPTS IN BAKERSFIELD I SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. TITLE DATE Signature Owner, Partner, Agent or Officer of Corporation License I Code Sect. I Kern County Administrative Office County Administrative Center 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fifth Floor · Bakersfield, CA 93301-4639 SCOTT E. JONES Telephone 661-868-3198 · FAX 661-868-3190 · TTY Relay 800-735-2929 County Administrative Officer June 11, 2002 Alan Tandy, City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue ~ ,.x .. .. Bakersfield, CA 93301 We have received your letter of May 21, 2002, regarding the provision of sewer services to the Rexland Acres neighborhood. We appreciate your willingness to refer this matter for consideration to the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee. While you outlined a fairly complete summary of terms, we are providing some clarification of the built environment in the area that requires servicing. There are actually 677 users proposed to be connected to the City's facilities, representing what we believe to be 755.2 "equivalent single-family dwelling units" (ESFDUs). As you know, the difference between the number of users to be connected and the resulting ESFDUs is a result of applying a factor to adjust for the differences in flow between a typical home and other uses. Proposed are 677 residential properties representing 680 ESFDUs, the difference being due to three parcels that have second dwelling units located on the affected properties. Also proposed are 11 commercial properties representing 75.2 equivalent dwelling units. The commercial properties are the school, several small businesses and churches, and the Rexland Acres park and recreation center, all within the area proposed to be served by the sewers. Our calculations for the commercial properties are based on what we believe to be correct, but we suggest that your staff calculate the commercial uses ESFDUs according to the City's ordinance, especially the calculation for the school. For our discussion, we will use the 755.2 ESFDU rate. Therefore, the reference in your letter to "homes" would be more correctly 'stated as properties, and the cost in your letter would be increased according to the increased equivalent dwelling units and the City's fee ordinance. The change noted above would affect the enumerated general terms as follows: 1. The City would allow for sewage flows from 755.2 ESFDUs in Rexland Acres to flow to Treatment Plan #3 under our intergovernmental agreement. 2. The County would be obligated to pay the full amount of the connection fees within nine months after the physical connection, and 25% of the total- should be paid at the time of the connection. Those fees are $2,400 per EDU in 2003 and $2,500 in 2004. Application of these fees results in the following amounts: 755.2 ESFDUs x $2,400 = $1,812,480 or 755.2 x $2,500 = $1,888,000, depending on time of connection. 3. The County would also pay the City the trunk sewer fee for that area of $400 per acre x 150 acres, or $60,000. Alan Tandy, City Manager Rexland Acres June 11, 2002 Page 2 4. The County would be obligated to pay the annual costs for the 755.2 ESFDUs for our operation and maintenance charges at the out of City rate as it would be established for each year. It is currently $146.255 x 755.2, or $110,488 annually. In most years, there is an inflationary increase added. This amount would be adjusted per Item 5 below. 5. The County would own and maintain the lift station and the lines serving Rexland Acres. To offset the costs associated with that service, the rates billed would be 79% of the above rates (21% in our system is normally allocated to the costs for services you are providing) or $119.85 x 755.2 = $90, 5.10.72, plus future increases. 6. Only the 755.2 ESFDUs in Rexland would be served. There would be no additional connections to the system, and both parties would agree in the document that this is a one- time action for special circumstances. This does not establish a precedent for future cases. We have enclosed for your information the proposed assessment diagram which identifies the exterior boundaries of the area we are proposing to serve. (Attachment A) I hope this information will be useful to you. Your May 21 letter suggests that the County proceed with the CDBG contribution to the Jefferson Park swimming pool project independent of the Rexland Acres sewer issue. I have discussed this with Supervisor Pete Parra and he has advised that funding from his district's CDBG entitlement can be "freed-up" only if he is not required to spend these monies on the more expensive sewer connection alternative. This explains the nexus between the two issues. In response to your comments about past cooperation on joint County/City projects, I did ask our Community Development Department to identify the amounts of County CDBG funds allocated in the past for projects within the City of Bakersfield. This information, which is attached for your review, confrere the on going mutual, reciprocal cooperation between the City and the County on projects benefiting our citizens. I hope this information is helpful in clarifying the proposal, and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Scott E. Jones County Administrative Officer SEJ:Taadyltr Attachments cc: Members, Board of Super;visors Dave Price, RMA Director Chuck Lackey; Director, Engineering & Survey Services ATTACHMENT A ~ I' I I ~oea LLA I I I ACRES .: PARK .' PROPOSED ASSESSM£NT DISTRICT BOUNDARY · PROPOSED ASSESSMENT' OO~m-T-¥ o~ ~-~ REXLAHD ACRES D/STP/CT BOUNDARYENGINEERING AND SURVEY SERVICES DEPARTMENT WA S TEWA TER S YS TEW KERN COUNTY CDBG PROJECTS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD* YEAR IACTIVITY#1 PROJECT NAME I LOCATION I FUNDS SPENT , C.OUNTY I CITY CD Area #3 East Bakersfield (within City when funded) 1979 3 79 1 i Baker Streei Libra i1400 Baker Street 1985 3.85.2 iBaker Street L brary Restoration [1400 Baker Street 1986 3 86 1 iBaker Street L bra ;1400 Baker Street ; $202,758; 1988 3.88.1 iBoys & G r s Cub Improvements - Land Acquisition i808 Monterey.. Street 1988 3 88 1 iBo s & Girls Cub m rovements ;808 Monterey Street ; $24,583; $100 000; 1989 3.89 2 iBaker Street Library Restoration Improvements ~1400 Baker Street i ! i SUBTOTALi $1,101,872i $100,0001 i i i i i .. : CD Area ~ Bo~wardt, Milham area (unincorporated at time of fundin~l - now in City) 1975 i 75-1e iCurb and'Gutter Im rovements iLiggett, Wilkins & Marcus Streets .......................... ~. ............................. i ............................................. .P. ......................................................................................... L....,,., ................................................................................. 1976 i 76-7f [Curb and Gutter Improvements iTexas, Bliss & Marsh Streets 1976 ; 76-23a ;F re H drant Im rovements iArea-wide (CDArea #6) 1977 ! 77-1d [Curb and Gutter Improvements [E 4th, Woodbu~, E. 6th, Wallace, ; ~ ~ Villa Tulare& Lloyd Streets 1978 ; 78-10 [Wi kins Street Sewer Line Extension [between Milham Dr. & S K n.~ Street : ~ ................................................................... E ......................................................................................... ......... ....... [ ....... ........ ........... ................ ; .................... ; ...................................................................... i E. 3rd Street 1980 ~ 6 80 1 ~Curb and Gutter Imorovements ;Rodman, Daniels, Hoover & Whitlock ; ; i Streets 1981 ; 6 81 1 ~Curb and Gutter Imorovements ;Texas, E 3rd, E 4th Streets, Melba i i i Lane, Milham Drive, & S. Kin~., ! i ; ; i Wilkins & Woods Streets 1981 i 6 81 2 i6th & Wallace Street Drainage Improvements i6th Street and Wallace Street 1982 ; 6 82 I ;Curb and Gutter Imorovements (Phase I) ;Tulare, 8th, 7th, Wallace, Board, 11th, i i i 10th & 9th Streets 1983 ; 6 83 I ."Curb and Gutter Improvements No of 6th St (Phase II) ;Kern, Sansome Baker, 11th, 10th i ~ i & 9th Streets 1983 ' 6 83 2 ~Milham Drive Draina e m rovements ~Between Wilkins & State Hwv 58 1983 i 6 83 3 iBorgwardt Area Drainage Study i4th & Kin~. Streets 1984 .= 6 84 1 !Bor wardt Curb & Gutter Imos (Ph. III) East of Baker St. iBounded bv E. Cahforma & Potomac ; ; i Avenues Kin.g. and Baker Streets ~ ; [ . SUBTOTALj $1,800,859j s a.a 9; ......... '; ............................ :j ..................................................................................................................... 4 ................. i ........................................................................................... i ............ I.:.~la r~r~ir~i.\C,. DB(~if~. i*~ ; , ; : : KERN COUNTY CDBG PROJECTS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD* =' '- I YEAR IACTIVlTY #1 PROJECT NAME I LOCATIOi~I~ I FUNDS SPENT cou,.NTY I C~TY CD Area #7 Colonel Baker/Casa Loma/within City when fUnded) .......................... ;_ ............................. '=. .................. i .......... i ....... i ........ Fa t im rovements 1530 Fourth Street ! $147,330! $75,0001 1998 ~. 7 98 1 [Bakersfield Senior ..C....e..n..!..e..r. ...... !.c......:.y. ........ p... ......................................... i ........................................................................................... ; ................................. ; ................................ ; · ' ~ '. · CD Area #7 Colonel Baker/Casa Loma (each jurisdiction funded within its own boundaries) ........ :;',=,~;:; ....... :' ....... :Y"~;;~":; ........ ~&~;~;;./i:~/.j~i~;:;~][~.;;`.;;~;.'¥~.~.~;:;:`~;:`;;;~;~i~r~vements ."Union Ave from Brundaoe Ln to MinQ: $272,000i $60,000! .......................... t ............................. ~ ................................................................................................................... ! SUBTOTALi $419,330i $135,000i I CD Area # 8 C~stal Heights, Ca~versville (;unincorporated at time of funding - now in City) I He hts/Carversville Fire Im s !Planz, Hale Brook & Madison Ave. i $37,600[ ' 1986 8861 ,C sta .p. · . ............ ~ ................................................................ ~ ................................. { ................................ : ..................................................... ,......ry.. ................. B. ......................................................................................... . . .. , i 1986 ~ 36.86.3 [SEEZ Area Infrastructure Im.p...s... .................................................. L.S....E.....M....e..t..r..o.....B...a...k..e...r..s..f.!..e.!..d. ......................................... i ........... ..$..1...0...2..;..0...0..0..~ ................................ i ........ ~'~'1~ ............... ~i'1~§~'~ ........ i~'i"~'~'~'~'r~;~'~'~j"jS,'~'~j"~i~i!~'l~'l~i~'~d Water Sy..ste..m...!..m.. ~v~:~i~P~a~c~h~e~c~R~d~.~&~S~:~C~t~t~n~w~d~P`~d~: ............ i ........... ..$..1...4...0..;..5...0..2..i ................................ 1991 8.91.1 iE. Planz Road and " '" ' " · , d~son Street Curb and Gutter Phase I "E. P anz Rd to Brook St i $29,8571 · " ." Ma ' ). .. · · . ........... , ............................ , ........................... .......................... · ............................. ~ .................................................................................. .(..,.: ............................................... ! .......... : ............................................................... ~ ; : ........ ?..~.?. ....... i ....... ..8.:..0...~....2.. ....... L.C....o.!.Lo,.,n.,,,w.9..od. ~.o,,a..d..,[m,p.,,s..ip.h.~s...e...!.:...D....e..s..~g..n..) ............................ j..H...a...c.!..e..n...d...a.....D...r.:..Lo....B..r..o...o...k....8..[.. ............................... i .............. .$J..8..'Z.2...7..i ................................ ~ lanz Rd and ~Madison 8t to Cottonwood Rd & ~ ~ 1992 8.92.1 .'P · · ............................. i ........................... : ............................................ '. .................. ~ ................................. ~ ................................ .... ...................................................... ............................ i ........... ................................ · ' ~ ................................... i .............................................................................. ~ ................................. ~ ................................ ~ .......................... ~ ............................. .. .................................................................................................. -' SUBTOTALi $540,538j $0i ..' = [ .................................. ~ ............................................................................ ~ ................................. . ................................ . I CD Area #11 Jewett area (unincorporated at time of funding - now in City) J ~ . 2 1 ~36th Street Storm Drain Im s Phase I, Desian~ ~36th & Jewett Streets ! $32,749i 1982 ~. 11_8. i P....,...( ............................................................. ~ ........................................................................................... ~ ................................. ~ ................................ in Im s Phase II Construct on i36th Jewett, "M" and "K" Streets , $251,043i 1983 ~ 11 83.1 i36th Street Storm Dra . .(. , ) · . ................................... ~ .............................. , ................................ .......................... ~ ....................... } .............................................. '; .......... 'P' ..................................... ;' .............................. ; .........................ii . . . ; · ' . 1 ;34th Street Storm Dra~n Im s Phase Desan~ ..'34th between M and. K Streets ; $13,000[ 1984 .. 11_84. ; p.....;...(, ....................... ,~...,. ............. ~ .................................................................................... ~ .................................................................. .......................... ~. ............................. . . i' ......................................... "'n ............. Im s Phase II Construcbon' -'35th ......... between M and K Streets .." $47,376'~ .." 1985 ~ 11851 ,34thStreetStormDra p.....(, .... ).... ~ .................................................................................. , ................................. ; ................................ ; ............... '"'"~'"":' .......................................... ~ ewett Area' ................................................................................................ Curb & Gutter Im rovements ~Phase I~ ~Bounded' bv Chester Ave., 36th, 'O" ..= ." 1986 : 11_86_1 .:J .......................... .p. ............................ , ............ :.....,. ................ ~ .......................... ,. ................................. ; ............................. : ................................. : ................................ : ........................................................ · .' ................................... ."and 34th Streets & a Dna Jewett Ave. '.. i i ~between 36th & 40th Streets i $174,466i ~ .......................... ? ............................. ... ...................................................................................................................................... F"§i~i¥;";~';;'~i' ~,'~ii~"§~?'&~i'~ ............................. 7""i ........... ~'~i'~°i~i~i'i ................................ j =_ ~ j . SUBTOTALJ $730,195i $0i ; .; [ ~. j I I'~lanmr~\GDBGir~. i~, BI~t.~tI02 ......... ~. ............................. i ...................................................................................................................................... · ........................................................................................... : ............ '" =. : j I · KERN COUNTY CDBG PROJECTS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD* I YEAR I ACTIVITY #1 PROJECT NAME I LOCATION I ,FUNDS SPENT COUNTY I ,CITY CD Area - Metropolitan Bakersfield (within. City when funded) ; ~ Chester Ave $16 601 i ........ 1.9.8..2. ....... L......3...9..:..8...2....1. ....... i..H...a...v...e...n.....H...o...u...s...e.. · ......................................................................................... 'iCit ........................................................................................... of aakersfie d '`' ......... $21,901 i ..' [ 1983 i 39.83.1 iFamdy. V~olence Shelte.r. ................................................................................. ~ ....... Y.. ......................... .. ....................................................... i ........ :;'~'~;~ ....... ..'"'"';~'~"~'~'",7'"'".."E~',:;;'ii;';'~i~i',;',:;;::~'~'~'~'ii~: "City of Bakersf eld i ........ ....... ....... ....... 11600 E mruxtun i ~106,uuu~ ~450,uuuI Wa " '-800 Fourteenth Street ..' $355,279[ $224,000[ [ 1991 [ 40 91 1 iKern Count Foodbank rehouse Facd~ty ..' ..................................................................................... · . ........... ~ ........................ ~ ............................................................................................... ! ; ; ; : ........ ;;'~'~ ....... ? ....... ~",;;,~ 4 "~,.,;,-,,~ A ....... I~a~Hi~n /~ncl.~r.~r)~. Imn vements :Un on Avenue-20th to Brundage Ln. ! $31,174~ $50 000: : · .. ,,,,. _ .... ro · . .................................................................................... · " ......................... ~ ............................. .: .................... : .......................................................... ":1611 F ' rst Street .". ,',~,-, ~, ~ ........ ", : g 3 · 43 93 1 ,KCECO Fam Heath Center ............................................... , .............. ~..:~...; ................... . : 19 .. · · ~ ~ ............................................................................................... , ............................ · , . ~ ........ ;'~';;',~ ....... t'"'";;'~"~;;;"~'"'",'~";:.';';-;"~;:i;';i;,"Ti;;,=,-,, Counc Facility i331 18th Street ! 1994 [ 43.94.2 [Golden Emp. ire G eaners Surp. us Food Center j3100 Chester Avenue ~ .......................... '`'"'";i':~"~'"'i ....... ~iii':;~'~'"a':~'~'~'l~m'ii'"'~:~'~:e-Outreach Center [19 ....................................................... ~ ................................. i ................................ : .. 1995 .... .....~. ............ Y. ........................................................................................... , . · ' .......................... ~ ............................. ' ...................... · [4301 DeEtte Ave . $55,000: ..' i 1996 ! 43.96.1c iKern BndgesYouth Home ........................................................................... ~ ........................................ :. ................................................. i ........ :;'g',~ ....... .~'"'";;';.;"~;;~"~ ....... ='~_";~',';i'~',:;"E~';:,'i;::-T~i~;'~;~;:~".~urn us Food Center !3100 Chester Avenue ] '~.?.~.~.,.~2Y..';. ....... .~.~..'2.~.,.~2.~.i :, /~ :. ',~,o.o~./ ,~.,~,~ ~,H,~.,,,., ~-,,,,-,.~,,..,.,~,,,,.,~...,-~,,.....~. .................................................................. ! ........................................................................................... : ........... ~'~ .... i ........ ....... ....... Or~.anization Facili!~. Reno.v...a..!!..o...n. .......... i..7...1...3....L...a...k...e....S..!..r..e...e.!. ..................................................... j ........... ~.~-?~.i ............................... .i ':..'" .............. 1997 ~.' ........ 49..:'97 ................ 1 ..Anne"~ ................................... S ' ~. i' Chnlc/R' ~ ........ ........................................................... '"vers ................................................... de Ra n c h Water S y..~ .......... stem ................................. ,.:" ...................... 18200 H...wy... 17 ........................................................................... 8 ~ ........ ~'{~'{~'~'""'~'"'"~'~"{~§'§'""i'l~'~'~:~'~iP~l'~i"i~'~'~'~less Transition Services Cntr. Rehab ..i..1...6...2...0. ~~a~~~n~~~d~~~~1~~6~~~2~~~6~~~~~E~~~a~~s~~t~~~~T~~~r~~u~~~x~~t~~u~~~n~~~~~A~~~v~~~e~~~n"~u~~e~~~~~~~i ........... ~.~.~.;..2;~;0..I ......... .~.~.;2.;6..'.x0..~.~,." i .......................... ~ ........... :.......: ......... ; .................. : ................ ': .............. '.'"'. .................................................................. :": ....... : rth Street ! ~ ~t),ouu: ;~-~ m,uuu.: ~ 1999 [ 47.99.1 [Bakersfield Pohce ActLv~!~t~y~L~e~a~)~u~e~Y~u~t~h~c~e~n~t~e~r~F~a~.c~!!~i~t~ ....... i..3...0...l.....E.:....F...°..,u. ................................................................. ~ .......................... :~ ............................. ~ ......................................................................................................................................... ~ ...................... SUBTOTAL~ $2,765,593~ $1,531,340j : .......................... ~. ............................. . .............................................................................. : i .......................... ';' ............................. i ............................................................................................................ i GRAND T O..T....A...L.. L~.~..~$~~~7~~~~~3~~~5~~~8~~;~~3~~8~~~7~~~[..~.~~$~~1~.~.~7~~~6~~~6~~~.~3~~~4~.~~~~~:~ *This table does not include any funding that the City may have incurred subsequent to incorporation of CD Areas 6, 7, 8 and 11 6/11/02 3 I:\Planning\CDBGinCity