The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/18/2002 BAKERSFIELD Mike Maggard, Chair Harold Hanson Mark Salvaggio Staff: Darnell Haynes BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI'n'EE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield ~ Thursday, April 18, 2002. 4:00 p.m. 'City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT MARCH 14, AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. DiscusSion and Committee recommendation regarding application of the business license ordinance to commercial and residential rental property businesses 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Staff report and Committee recommendation regarding Cost Recovery Program - Haynes B. Staff report and Committee recommendation regarding a request from Cornerstone Group for $26,000 forgivable loan (Community Development Block :Grant Funds) to rehabilitate additional office space for a southeast incubator program - Kunz C. Discussion andCommittee recommendation regarding a long-term financial plan for the City- Stinson 6. COMMI'I'rEE COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT S:~Damel~002Bud&FinanceCom mittee~bf02aprl 8agen.wpd BAKERSFIELD ~[t'~ ~ Mike Maggard, Chair Alan Tandy, city ~nager Harold Hanson Darnell Haynes, Assistant to the City Manager Mark Salvaggio AGENDA' SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room 1501 Truxtun Avenue - Suite 201 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 4:06 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Harold Hanson and Mark Salvaggio Absent: Councilmember Mike Maggard, Chair 2. ADOPT FEBRUARY 21, 2002 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Adopted as submitted. 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. .DEFERRED BUSINESS 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Staff report and Committee recommendation regarding acceptance of Financial. Statements for Fiscal Year 2000-01 Transportation Development Act Funds Public Works Director Raul Rojas explained this is an audit of the Transportation Development Act Funds, which is routinely sent to the Committee for approval. The compliance audit is to ensure the monies have been spent on appropriate expenditures. The audit was clean and in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Committee unanimously approved the Audit Report for FY 2000-01 Transportation Development Act Funds. (Committee Chair Maggard absent) AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, Maroh 14, 2002 Page -2- B. Staff report and Committee recommendation on-Fiscal Year 2002-03 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Annual Spending Plan Bakersfield is an entitlement City and expecting to receive approximately $3,110,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, $1,411,000 in Home Investment Partnerships(HOME) funds, and $106,000 for the Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) program, for a total of approximately $4,627,000 frOm HUD to improve Iow-income neighborhoods in the City. A Notice of Funding Availability was sent out to non-profits, agencies and City departments for possible projects for the next fiscal year. A total of 21 proposals were submitted from non.profits and agencies totaling about $8 million. City departments submitted 25 projects totaling $6 million to improve infrastructure in Iow-income neighborhoods. After reviewing all the proposals and projects, staff prepared a proposed budget and an action plan-for the Committee's review and recommendation to Council. After the Budget and Finance Committee recommendations on the proposed plan for fiscal year 2002-03, staff will prepare a 30-day public notice identifying the proposed projects and requesting input and comments from the public as required by HUD regulations. The Notice will be published March 24, 2002. During the 30-day public notice period, two public meetings will also be held to receive input.. The meetings are scheduled for April 16th at the Boys and Girls Club and April 18th at Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Center. The 2002-03 CDBG, HOME and ESG Annual Spending Plan will be on the May 8th City Council agendafor action and submittal to HUD no later that May 16, 2002. Funds will be released to the City by HUD on July 1,2002 for implementation. Economic Development Director Donna Kunz gave an overview of available funds and staff's recommended proposed spending plan for 2002-03 as outlined in the memorandum of March 8, 2002 included in the Committee packet. Committee Member Salvaggio supported the CDBG proposed spending, but requested staff to be diligent in trying to fund the remaining phases of the Public Works Capital Improvement Program funding for Pacheco Sewers. This was an annexed area and many homes do not have sewer service. Donna Kunzpointed out HUD has some new requirements regarding cities spending funds in a timely manner, so multi-year.projects as we have done in the past, may have to be funded and completed in 24 months under the new regulations. Each item proposed for funding was reviewed separately by the Committee with staff. Mr. Dennis Wallace, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity - Golden Empire, presented a letter to the Committee; however, he apologized as some of the facts quoted in the letter AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, March 14, 2002 Page -3- regarding City funding of $195,000 for job training are incorrect. He explained how their program works with volunteers, donated materials and funds to build houses for Iow-income families. The houses are sold to the families at no interest and no profit. A 20-year loan is made from a lender and house payments run just under $300 per month. To qualify you must have-an income source from a job or disability. Corporations and churches donate approximately $50,000 ~per house. They have received HOME funds in the City's program for the last two years.to buy land, pay building permits and school fees; however, Habitat for Humanity - Golden Empire was not recommended-for funding in the 2002-03 proposed spending plan. He explained the merits of their program and asked the Committee to consider them for funding. Committee'Member Salvaggio requested.Mr. Wallace rewrite their letter summarizing their work and send it to the .Mayor and City Councilmembers. The Committee discussed they would like to find some 'funding for Habitat for Humanity. Staff recommended ~adding Habitat for Humanity - Golden Empire to the spending plan for $50,000 to purchase five lots. Since the Single Family Rehab is a year-around program, $50,000 could be taken from the 'HOME entitlement for Proposed .Housing Programs, Single Family-Rehab (est. 18 loans @ average of $24,000 each) tOtal $431,000. This is a year- round program and if there are savings from the pool projects, the funds could be replaced in the Single Family Rehab program. The Committee unanimously approved staff's recommendation to add'Habitat for Humanity- Golden Empire to the Annual Spending Plan for $50,000 as recommended by staff; moving forward with the :public meetings and 30-daypublic notice to be first published on March 24, 2002; and forwarding the Fiscal Year 2002-03 Community Development Block G-rant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME), and .Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Annual Spending Plan to the Council at the May 8"' meeting. (Committee Chair Maggard absent) 6. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m. Staff present: City Manager Alan Tandy; City Attorney Bart Thiltgen; Assistant to the City Manager Darnell Haynes; Community Development Coordinator Director Donna Kunz; Public Works Director Raul Rojas; Economic Development Director Donna Kunz; Community Services Coordinator George Gonzales; Assistant to the Public Works Director Georgina Lorenzi; and ED/CD Business Manager Rhonda-Barnhard. Others present: Dennis Wallace, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity; Eileen O'Donohue, Habitat for Humanity; Laverne Mashado, Habitat for Humanity; Vanessa Perez, Cai State University Bakersfield; and Daniel Alvarado, Bakersfield College cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council DWH:Jp S:~Damell~002Bud&FlnanceComrnlttee~bf02marl 4summary.wpd ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: March 20, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Reports ITEM: ].0.a. · TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Gregory J. Klimko, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD_x~~ DATE: March 13, 2002 CITY Ai.I. ORNEY~f ~' ..~,t:~ CITY M.~IAGER_~~/~/1 SUBJECT: Budget and Finance Committee Majority Report No.1-02 and Minority Report No. 1-02 regarding Business License Taxes. 1. Ordinance amending Section 5.02.010 (A) of the Bakersfield Municipal Code relating to Business License Taxes. (First Reading) RECOMMENDATION: The Budget and Finance Committee recommends acceptance of the reports and Council determination on First Reading of the Ordinance. BACKGROUND: on September 5, 2001, the City Council referred the issue of application of the business license ordinance to owners who rent or lease commercial or residential property to .the Budget and Finance Committee for review and recommendation. Councilmember Hanson had been contacted by Anthony L. Leggio, Esq. on behalf of Truxtun Business Plaza after they were notified by the City's Treasury Division to obtain a business license for renting/leasing of commercial property. Mr. Leggio did not agree with this application of the business license ordinance. He interpreted the ownership of their rental property to be a "passive investment," as defined by the Internal Revenue Service because they spent less than 750 hours annually leasing/renting the property and, therefore, outside the scope of the business license ordinance. The City Attorney;s Office responded to the initial complaint. Municipal Code Section 5.02.010 broadly defines business as all activity carried on for the purpose of profit without distinguishing how much time is required to produce revenues or gross receipts. The owners of Truxtun Business Plaza complied and applied for a business license for rental or leasing of property, but requested review of the ordinance. The business license tax ordinance has historically been applied to all business activity which generates "gross receipts" unless otherwise exempted by State or Federal law. This tax is a fee imposed for the privitege of conducting business in the City and generates revenue to compensate the City for providing municipal services. March 13, 2002, 4:32pm ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 The Budget and Finance Committee met on December 6, 2001, January 17, and February 21,2002. The Committee and staff reviewed the fairness issue at length and considered how to apply the business license tax to owners who rent or lease commercial or residential properties and still provide for the equal protection under the law issue. Staff surveyed several other cities, including the 10 usual survey cities. Eight of the 10 survey cities have a business license tax for leasing or renting of commercial and residential property. For residential properties, some of the cities provided for a minimum number of units allowed before the business license tax was applicable. The position of the City Attorney's Office in regard to this business license ordinance as currently written, the licensing is for use of the property for commercial concerns, and not related to the ownership interests of the property. The original concern of Mr. Leggio was their operation is a passive investment. From a legal standpoint, it was the City Attorney's opinion the investment is an ownership interest and is not a use interest. The City is actually taxing the use of the property as a use for commercial rentals. The City Attorney had concerns regarding the equal protection issue when applying the ordinance. Normally business licensing is based upon the nexus of the fact the public entity is providing services to businesses. If the City attempts to separate out "passive investments" and determine it should not' be taxed, others paying the tax and receiving identical services could have a legal challenge that this is not equal application of the ordinance. Therefore, the City Attorney recommended to apply the business license tax to property owners who rent or lease commercial properties. For residential properties, he recommended to determine if a person owns four or more residential rental units (or some set number), that person is conducting a rental business and, therefore, subject to the business license tax, and ownership of less that four residential · rental units shall not be subject to the business license tax. It was determined the business license tax has been in the Code for years and is not subject to Proposition 218. The Finance Director agreed with the City Attorney, but his reasoning was based upon the fact the business license ordinance is not regulatory; it is a revenue raising measure. The amount of revenue last year was approximately $20,563 from businesses that renffiease properties. Current staff should be able to handle enforcement for 2002-03. The Finance Director recommended to apply the business license tax as broadly as we legally can to raise revenue. The Finance Director believes passive investment measurement is a net income approach, while the City ordinance is based on gross receipts. City staff currently performs gross receipts audits at minimal cost. Audits on a basis other than gross receipts is more costly add, therefore, not practical. Committee Members Hanson and Salvaggio felt the method used to apply the tax needs to be fair and equitably enforced and agreed with the recommendation of the City Attorney. Therefore, the Majority Report recommends to apply the business license tax to property owners who rent or lease commercial properties, and amend the existing ordinance for residential rentals to apply the business license tax t~o owners who rent or lease five or more units (four units or less would be exempt from the business license tax). Committee Chair Maggard dissented from the Majority Report. There are very few property management businesses in Bakersfield the size someone makes a living from it, and he would like to set a threshold for application of the business license tax so the casual renter of commercial or residential property would be exempt. ~, Committee Chair Maggard stated he does not think the majority report recommendation applies the law fairly. If people are in the property management business or renting/leasing properties such as the March 13, 2002, 4:32pm ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Marketplace or Valley Plaza, they should have a business license because they are clearly in the business of managing properties. In contrast, there are many people in Bakersfield who own a few residential rentals or a commercial property as passive investments that are not in the business of actively making a living managing or renting properties. Many of these are retirees and should not be subjected to having a business license and paying tax on gross rental income. The business license tax should not apply to passive rental of property, whether on a commercial or residential basis. It should apply at the purpose of the property. If someone leases a building to run a business, then they should have a business license to run that business, which pays for the services being received from the City. However, by subjecting the owner of the same building to a business license, there are two business licenses for the same business and the services are being paid for twice. If the purpose of the property is residential, it does not consume the same level of City services as does a business and, therefore, the casual investor in residential property should not be subject to a business license because it is not a business. Therefore, the Minority Report recommends application of the business license tax for renting or leasing properties be applied to property management businesses who are clearly in the business of renting and leasing properties. And further, casual investors who own and rent or lease commercial or residential properties be exempt from the business license tax. S:~)amell~2.002Bud&FinanceCommittee~adminbusinesslicense.wpd March 13, 2002, 4:32pm CITY Of BAKERSFIELD BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MAJORITY REPORT NO. 1-02 MARCH 20, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES, MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.02.0t0 (A) The Budget and Finance Committee met on December 6, 2001, January 17, and February 21, 2002 and carefully reviewed and considered the application of the business license tax to owners who rent or lease commercial or residential property. The City Attorney had concerns regarding the equal protection issue when applying the ordinance. Normally business licensing is based upon the nexus of the fact the public entity is providing services to businesses. If the City attempts to separate out "passive investments" and determine it should not be taxed, others paying the tax and receiving identical services could have a legal challenge that this is not equal application of the ordinance. Therefore, the City Attorney recommended to apply the business license tax to property owners who rent or lease commercial properties. For residential properties, he recommended to determine if a .person owns four or more residential rental units (or some set number), that person is conducting a rental business and, therefore, subject to the business license tax, and ownership of less that four residential rental units shall not be subject to the business license tax. It was determined the business license tax has been in the Code for years and is not subject to Proposition 218. The Finance Director agreed with the City Attorney, but his reasoning was based upon the fact the business license ordinance is not regulatory; it is a revenue raising measure. The amount of revenue last year was approximately $20,563 from businesses BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MAJORITY REPORT NO. 1-02 FEBRUARY 20, 2002 PAGE -2- that rent/lease properties. Current staff should be able to handle enforcement for 2002-03. The Finance Director recommended to apply the business license tax as broadly as we legally can to raise revenue. Committee Members Hanson and Salvaggio felt the method used to apply the tax needed to be fair and equitably enforced and agreed with the recommendation of the City Attorney. Therefore, the Majority Report recommends to apply the business license tax to property owners who rent or lease commercial properties, and amend the existing ordinance for residential rentals to apply the business license tax to owners who rent or lease five or more units (four units or less would be exempt from the business license tax). Respectfully submitted, Councilmember Harold W. Hanson Councilmember Mark C. Salvaggio S:~Damell~2.002Bud&FinanceCommittee~VlajorityRpt No 1-02.wpd CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MINORITY REPORT NO. 1-02 MARCH 20, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES, MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.02.010 (A) The Budget and Finance Committee spent several meetings considering the issue of the application of the business license tax to investor who own and lease or rent commercial or resident properties. However, with respect to his colleagues and staff, Committee Chair Maggard does not agree with the majority report recommendation. The research and legal analysis provided by the City Attorney is appreciated, but there must be some legally defensible, way to exempt the casual investor who owns and leases or rents commercial or residential properties. According to the Internal Revenue Service, it requires more than 500 hours per year working on an activity to constitute it as "active." The Finance Department needs to be commended for their efforts to find ways to raise revenue. However, Committee Chair Maggard feels his job as a Councilmember is to make sure that it is done equitably and the citizens are represented appropriately. His charge is to bring balance between taxing to raise revenue and what is best for the community. There are very few property management businesses in Bakersfield the size someone makes a living from it, and there should be a threshold to exempt the casual investor in commercial or residential property. BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MINORITY REPORT NO. 1-02 FEBRUARY 20, 2002 PAGE -2- If people are in the property management business or renting/leasing properties such as the Marketplace or Valley Plaza, they should have a business license because they are clearly in the business of managing properties. In contrast, there are many people in Bakersfield who own a few residential rentals or a commercial property as passive investments that are not in the business of actively making a living managing or renting properties. Many of these are retirees and should not be subjected to having a business license and paying tax on gross rental income. The business license tax should not apply to passive rental of property, whether on a commercial or residential basis..It should apply at the purpose of the property. If someone leases a building to run a business, then they should have a business license to run that business, which pays for the services being received from the City. However, by subjecting the owner of the same building to a business license, there are two business-licenses for the same business and the services are being paid for twice. If the purpose of the property is residential, it does not consume the same level of City services as does a business and, therefore, the casual investor in residential property should not be subject to a business license because it is not a business. Therefore, the Minority Report recommends application of the business license tax for renting or leasing properties be applied to property management businesses who are clearlY in the business of renting and leasing properties, and casual investors who own and rent or lease commercial or residential properties be exempt from the business 'license tax. Respectfully submitted, Councilmember Mike Maggard S:~Damell~2.002Bud&FinanceCommittee~Vlinority Rpt No 1-02.wpd ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5.02.010(A) OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 5.02.010(A) of the Bakersfield Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.02.010 Definitions. A. "Business" includes professions, trades, and occupations and all and every kind of calling whether or not carried on for profit. inclUdes' the :mana.qement Of.a~o~!'bff~rin.ci residential "reaI PropertYl. property.: For PurPoses.of this sectiOn:,~i::De~;s°n§'!w~o':Sffer ~fb~;re'nt:or lease or Wh° manage a total.offour o?fewer residenti~i ~eliing dhits shall not.be deemed to"be'in' bUsineSs; SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. --oo0oo- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield' at a regular meeting thereof held on by the following vote: ' AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By: HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney By: MICHAEL G. ALLFORD Deputy City Attorney MGA:Isc · C:~ocuments and Settings~descary~Local SettJngs\Temp~.02.010(A).BusLJcTax.wpd February 27, 2002 i i APR IO BAKERSFIELD ' ....... Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM April 9, 2002 TO: Budget and Finance Committee ~{~ ~ ~//~/ FROM: Donna L. Kunz, Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Request from Cornerstone Group for $26,000 forgivable loan to rehabilitate additional office space for a southeast incubator program. Request: Stephanie Campbell, owner of the Cornerstone Group, has made a request for funding to rehabilitate additional office space to increase business incubator tenants. The company currently leases a 3,000 square foot office building at 201 California Avenue. The company currently has five small business tenants and would like to rent out additional office space within the building, that is currently unrentable due to improvements needed. Attached is the request letter from Cornerstone Group and her outline for the incubator program. Background: Ms. Campbell has been an advocate of a business incubator site and program for southeast Bakersfield since her initial involvement in the formation of the Southeast Bakersfield Redevelopment Project Area in 1999. She is currently the Chair of the Southeast Project Area Committee. From her submittal, Ms. Campbell indicates involvement in various southeast community programs for a number of years. On her own initiative, Ms. Campbell leased the vacant commercial building last December, renovated as much of the office space as financially possible and started her own business incubator type program. In essence, the Cornerstone Group is a start up business itself. Ms. Campbell has been operating the Cornerstone Group for approximately three years. As such, there is limited company and financial history to rely upon in order to evaluate the potential security or success of the proposal. Performance of company: Ms. Campbell projected within her application that the business incubator could create 20 to 25 jobs over the next two years of operation, with the majority of jobs being for Iow and moderate income individuals. With no history of operating a business incubator, except for the past three months, staff cannot determine the viability of the Cornerstone Group or their projection of jobs to be created. Though with 11 offices available to rent (after improvements) for incubator clients, it has the potential to create that number of jobs over the next two years. Security: Other forgivable business loans have been secured by either personal guarantees or liens on the equipment financed. There is no available security for the proposed loan. Ms. Campbell has a five year lease on the building. Staff is meeting with the owner of the property to discuss the acceptance of a lien on the property to secure the loan. Budget and Finance Committee April 9, 2002 Page 2 Repayment requirement: The proposed financial assistance to Cornerstone Group would be a forgivable loan. Some economic development loans made by the City of Bakersfield are repayable and some others are forgivable. Typically in a forgivable loan, one-fifth of the loan amount is forgiven for each year the company meets the requirements of the agreement. The proposed agreement would be tied to Iow and moderate jobs created by the business incubator, under Community Development Block Grant guidelines. Financial analysis: As part of the Community Development Block Grant Business Loan application, Ms. Campbell submitted past tax records, a financial statement, and a profit and loss statement on the project. Past tax records indicate annual gross income between $22,000 to $44,000. The financial statement indicates minimal available savings (less than $1,000) or personal assets (no residential ownership, or securable equipment). The profit and loss statement provided by Ms. Campbell indicates with full rental of office space, the project would have a $2,675 loss the first year and net profits of $6,555 annually the second and subsequent years thereafter. A copy of the Cash Flow Projection and Profit and Loss Statement is attached. Conclusion: This forgivable loan would certainly be outside the normal business loan criteria and practices in the past. It would be an unsecured loan. It is essentially a start up business loan, with the positive aspect of the business already in operation at the location. The funds will be going toward improving a previously vacant, dilapidated building and putting it back into commercial use. (Funds would be paid directly to a contractor, not Ms. Campbell, via the CDBG bid process on work completed.) The project will also continue the revitalization of the Union and California avenueS, with its location next to the Food 4 Less currently under construction. This will add to the exposure the business incubator will get from thousands of daily grocery store customers. Recommendation: Although outside the parameters of the traditional city business loan policies, there is a benefit to Bakersfield's southeast residents that will be provided with this project. Within the $1 million in CDBG funds set aside to improve southeast Bakersfield, there is approximately $400,000 budgeted for economic development projects to benefit the area. This project could be an excellent opportunity to provide office space and an incubator atmosphere for the budding entrepreneurs within the southeast community. The operator of the facility, Ms. Campbell, has been an advocate of providing incubator space and business counseling for southeast entrepreneurs for many years. Funding this reasonably small project would provide the southeast community an effective start on developing an incubator facility for their entrepreneur needs. As important as providing the office space, is the individual willing to assist her tenants in making them successful in their endeavors. With Ms. Campbell's nurturing and a facility to get their businesses started, southeast entrepreneurs can hopefully grow to the point of needing larger office space or their own buildings in the southeast community. While the funding of this type of facility, operated by a start up business is a very risky proposition, staff acknowledges the use of CDBG funds as acceptable for this project on the premise that there may be the potential of creating a viable business that may spawn other successful businesses for the southeast community. The City has put a lot of time, resources and efforts into revitalizing the California and' Union avenues with streetscape work, construction of Food 4 Less, demolition of old motel structures, new senior housing, and the proposed community activity center. Rehabilitating this building to become a viable economic asset on California Avenue would assist in continuing our efforts of removing blight in the southeast community and continue Councilwoman Carson's Budget and Finance Committee April 9, 2002 Page 3 improvement objective of "Putting a new face on Southeast Bakersfield". Staff is seeking concurrence from the Budget & Finance Committee that the proposed assistance meets the Council directive of using the southeast CDBG set aside funds to directly benefit the southeast community. With input from the committee, staff will develop a CDBG forgivable loan agreement, not to exceed $26,000 (with the final loan amount based on getting as least three competitive bids for the improvement work) and bring the item to the Council for their review and recommendation. attachments: Letter and incubator program outline dated January 7, 2002 from Cornerstone Group Cash Flow Projection and Profit and Loss Statement, December 10, 2001 S:~Admins\Stephanie Campbell loan request to B & F.wpd THE CORNERSTONE GROU~~ GREATER BAKERSFIELD PARTNERS IN PROGRESS 201 CALIFORNIA AVENUE ~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93304 Phone 661-326-7300 ~ Fax 661-326-0701 January 7, 2002 Attn: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator City of Bakersfield Economic and Community Development Department 515 Truxttm Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: Application for City of Bakersfield Business Assistance Program Loan Dear Mr. George Gonzales The Cornerstone Group and our umbrella organization Greater Bakersfield Partners In Progress, is submitting the following application to the City of Bakersfield Business Assistance Program for a Business Loan in the amount of $26,000.00. The request is being made to rehabilitate an office building at 201 California Avenue in Bakersfield California for use as a Small Business Incubator Program. We are requesting that our project and application be presented at the next City Budget and Finance meeting on January 17, 2002. We have attached the Application Form and all backup documents from your checklist. If you have any questions, please call me, at (661) 326-7300. Stephanie Campbell President/CEO cc: Donna Kuntz Alan Tandy Budget and Finance Committee Members GREATER BAKERSFIELD PARTNERS IN PROGRESS 1408 VIRGINIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 (661) 324-7445 ~BUSlNESS -INCUBATOR-PROGRaM The Cornerstone Group is an interdisciplinary consulting firm specializing in strategies for business/organizational development, promotion and marketing. Cornerstone uses an innovative approach to dealing with the problems that new businesses face. We help new businesses avoid the inherent problems associated with launching a new business enterprise, while we work at stabilizing and growing existing businesses. We directly address underdeveloped management skills, under - capitalization, and growth limitations. Cornerstone accomplishes this by providing strong management support through consultation programs, alliances with local economic and development agencies as well as support from academic representatives. Our goal is to correct faulty management strategies before they create problems that can result in business failure. Undercapitalization is combated by minimizing the cost associated with operating a business. We help business owners to spend less time worrying about monthly lease payments and allow them to spend more time generating goods and services. We encourage growth by reducing errors made by owners, with realistic approaches to expansion until the business owner is sure that the business has a firm foothold on the market. The Cornerstone Group belieVes in both economic prosperity and community vitality, where key benefits are directly related to informing business owners of realistic alternatives. Cornerstone promotes a synergy among businesses that creates unparalleled success. GREATER BAKERSFIELD PARTNERS IN PROGRESS 1408 VIRGINIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 (661) 324-7445 ~BUSINESS INCUBATOR PROGRAM Cornerstone has Four Main Objectives in their Business Development Programs: 1.) Creating new jobs in communities! 2.) Helping businesses start up, grow, and prosper! 3.) Reducing failure rates of new businesses! 4.) Promoting and Marketing businesses, business programs and the community! Cornerstone concluded that the best way to assist small business owners and the community was to become a "Community Development Corporation", so we created "Greater Bakersfield Partners in Progress" (GBPNP), a Non-Profit 50 !(C) 3 organization to fill the void. GBPNP mission is to design and operate Small Business Development Programs in low income communities. ( See Appendix - A: Community Development Corporation Profile) Our first project is the "GBPNP Business Development Center" which will house a Small Business Incubator Program. GBPNP leased a 3,000 square foot commercial/office building located at 201 Califomia Avenue in Southeast Bakersfield. The building has eleven (11) separate offices that GBPNP will lease out to ten (10) individual business owners. The Incubator Program will serve as a tool to stimulate start-up and development of small businesses in the Southeast Area of Bakersfield. GBPNP will provide support to small businesses within the program and assist residents wishing to open businesses. GBPNP focus will be on providing Bakersfield residents with training and employment skills along with business ownership opportunities. Our goal is to nurture them through their first several years of businesses ownership. 2 GREATER BAKERSFIELD PARTNERS IN PROGRESS 1408 VIRGINIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 (661) 324-7445 ~BUSlNESS INCUBATOR PROGRAM GBPNP has also completed Part One of a Three Part Application to establish a Communi~ Development Credit Union. The Credit Union will help provide venture capital to tenants and establish a financial institution for Southeast Residents. (See Appendix - B: Community Development Credit Union Summary) The Business Center will provide low cost access to training/counseling in business development, office space, secretarial service, conference rooms, and Intemet access. We are requesting technical assistance from the Weill Institute - Small Business Development Center (SBDC), and the Business Research and Education Center of Cai State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). It is expected that companies will grow and exit the program in 24-36 months and move from the incubator program to other commercial office space within the Southeast Area. GBPNP is currently soliciting funds in the amount of $26,000.00 for initial remodeling and upgrading of the building, purchasing equipment and opening the program on January 2, 2002. CONTACT PERSON: Stephanie CampbelL - President 201 California Avenue Bakersfield, California 93304 (661) 326-7300 3 CASH FLOW PROJECTION FACTORS DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV YEAR1 YEAR2 YEAR3 CASH BALANCE(OPENING) 0 10,000 16,725 .: 13,711 11,959 19,389 19,318 19,248 19,177 19,107 19,036 18,966 16,895 10,000 18,825 25,380 PLUS: RECEIPTS CASH SALES 0 0 1,661 2,923 12,105 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 53,525 62,755 62,755 MORTGAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 BANK LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0. 0 CDBG FUNDS 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 COUNTY 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CASH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECEIPTS 0 30,000 1,661 2,923 12,105 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 83,525 62,755 62,755 LESS:EXPENDITURES PURCHASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 OPTIONAL 0 ' ' 0 : "0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " SALARIES 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 6,000 6,000 PAYROLL TAXES 0 75 75 75 '75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 900 900 900 ADVERTISING 0 200 200 ' 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 2,400 2,400 2,400 DUES & SUBSCRIP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEGAL & ACCT 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100. 100 100 100 100 ~100 1,200 1,200 1,200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 TELEPHONE 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 UTILITIES 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 COMMISSIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 INSURANCE 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 ., 1,200 1,200 RENT 0 6,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 ' 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 33,500 30,000 30,000 TAX & LICENSE 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 ~100 100 INTEREST-LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 INTEREST-MTGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 GIFTS/DONATIONS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AUTO EXPENSES 0.00 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUTSIDE SERVICES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL' 0 8,275 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 59,700 56,200 56,200 LOAN PAYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OWNER DRAW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MORTGAGE PAYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL PURCHASES 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 15,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 23,275 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 ' I 4,675 74,700 56,200 56,200 ENDING CASH (0) 16,725 13,711 11,959 19,389 19,318 19,248 19,177 19,107 19,036 18,966 18,895 ! 18,825 18,825 25,380 31,934 NET SALES FACTORS DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV YEAR1 YEAR2 YEAR3 SPACE RENTED (SF)' -~ ................... 0 3 6 ' 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 OFFICE RENT 10 10 10 10 $320.45 0 961 1,923 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 31,725 38,455 38,455 OFFICE RENT-CREDiT UNION $1.00 0 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 tI 400 4,400 4,800 ' 4,800 COUNSELING $25.00 0 300 600 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 . 1,000 9,900 12,000 12,000 MINORITY BUS CONFERENCE 0 0 0 7,500 0 0 0 0 0' O 0 0 7,500 7,500 7,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 TOTAL SALEs 1100 0 1,661 2,923 12,105 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 53,525 LESS: COST OF SALES 62,755 62,755 PURCHASES (INVENTORY) 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES ' 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OPTIONAL 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL COST OF SALES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GROSS PROFIT 1.00 0 1,661 2,923 12,105 -=~ ======================== ............................ 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 4,605 ~=[,605 4,605 4,605 53,525 62 755 62 755 LESS: EXPENSES ' DEC JAN MAR APR MAy JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV YEAR1 YEAR2 YEAR3 ........................... ; ........... -_'===;FEB CONTROLLABLE EXPENSES = ..... ============ SALARIES 0.00 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 6,000 6,000 PAYROLL TAXES 0.15 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 · 75 75 75 75 900 900 900 ADVERTISING 0.00 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 2,400 2,400 2,400 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEGAL/ACCOUNT(PROF FEES) 0.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 ' 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100. 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 TELEPHONE 0.00 100 100 100 100. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 UTILITIES 0.00 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 COMMISSIONS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GIFTS/DONATIONS 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AUTO EXPENSES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUTSIDE SERVICES 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CONTROLLABLE EXP. 0.47 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 '' 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 FIXED EXPENSES 24,900 24,900 24,900 DEPRECIATION 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN S U RA NC E 0.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1,200 1,200 1,200 RENT 0.00 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 TAXES & LICENSE 0.00 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 INTEREST-LOAN 0.00 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST*MORTGAGE 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OPTIONAL 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OPTIONAL 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 OPTIONAL 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 OPTIONAL 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FIXED EXPENSES 0.58 2,700 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 31,300 31,300 31,300 TOTAL EXPENSES 1.05 4,775 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 4,675 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT lMEETING DATE: April 10, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar , ITEM: 8.pp. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD. DATE: April 1,2002 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Cost Recovery Program Update RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends refer to Budget and Finance Committee. BACKGROUND: State law requires new fees and charges, as well as increases in existing fees and charges, be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing. The City's procedure is provided for in Chapter 3.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. The City's biennial review process includes a thorough review of all fees every two years to check assumptions for labor costs, materials usage, etc. Staff has performed a thorough review of all fees for calendar year 2002 and is recommending some adjustments to fees in cases where warranted. The rate increases generally are consistent with inflation. In cases where that does not apply an explanation or justification is provided. Based on the April 2001 Building Valuation Data tables the residential and commercial construction fees are proposed to be reduced to keep cost in line with revenues. The City of Bakersfield will continue to have some of the lowest building fees for comparable cities as building activity continues to be strong. City staff has reviewed the proposed changes with Building Industry representatives and they have indicated they are not opposed to the proposed changes. This administrative report refers the proposed fees to the Budget and Finance Committee for their review and input prior to the public hearing. Staff will schedule the required public hearing for May 8, 2002 for the purpose of receiving additional input, and Council may then conSider the adopt!on of the fees by resolution. Recreation/Cultural fees are proposed to become effective Septerhber 1, 2002. Development ServiCes fees require a sixty (60) day waiting period and shall become effective on July 15, 2002. All other fees are proposed to increase or decrease beginning June 1,2002. April 2, 2002, 4:31pm . ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 2002 Cost Recovery Overview Staff has prepared a detailed worksheet indicating proposed new fees, reduced fees, restructured or unusual increased fees, development fees and fees recommended for removal from the master fee schedule for your review.. Some of the more noteworthy proposed fees are briefly summarized below. New .Fees B-23 Fire Suppression-Permit Processing. This ~is a new $85 fee to be charged to businesses to recover the staff cost for reviewing the risk management and spill prevention control plans, and hazardous waste violation follow up as required by law. B-26 Minor Land Division Review. This is a new $890 fee proposed by Public Works for an owner initiated parcel merger. A property owner can apply to merge contiguous parcels under common ownership without 'reverting to acreage. This fee is for the cost incurred by staff to review the application request, prepare the environmental determination, notice of decision and recording a certificate of merger. This fee was recommen, ded by the Development Streamlining Task Force. Prior to the adoption of the ordinance for Lot Mergers, the developers had to use the Parcel Map or Parcel Map Waiver process to merge lots. The Lot Me-rger process is much faster and is equivalent to the Lot Line Adjustment process. The fee for this process is equivalent to the current' fee charged for a lot line adjustment. D-61 Business Regulation, This is a new $300 fee proposed by the City Manager's Office to recover .the City's cost of processing the alcohol license application. The State of California has passed legislation requiring in certain circumstances the person seeking the Alcoholic Beverage Control license must have a statement from the local governing agency indicating the iSsuance of the license meets with the community's public convenience and or necessity. The City developed a Process to accommodate this new legislation, absorbing the costs involved in the process at no cost to the applicant. However, this service is very specific to the individual wishing to obtain the approval and requires the involvement of several departments, including police background searches on applicants and related reporting district reports. Staff is proposing a $300 non-refundable application fee be charged for this service. Reduced Fees A-1 New Residential and Commercial Construction; A-2 Residential Addition, Alteration, Remodel or Repair; and A-3 Commercial Addition, Alteration, Remodel or Repair. Development Services is proposing to modify building fees to incorporate the April 2001 Building Valuation Data which is designed to account for all aspects of construction costs from plan checking to the final inspections. The valuation data reflects national aVerage costs per square foot and each jurisdiction applies a regional modifier to account for loCal construction costs in their area. Based on this data the City of Bakersfield is proposing to reduce fees to only recover the cost of providing building inspection and plan checking services. In order to hold revenues at an equal or lower level, we are proposing to reduce the "fee factor" from 0.0066 to 0.0055 for residential construction; from 0.0088 to 0.0078 for commercial April 2, 2002, 4:31 pm ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT construction under $1,000,000; and from 0.0078 to 0.0068 for commercial construction over $1,000,000.' The impact on residential would be a decrease of $84.51 on a 2,000 square foot home valued at $120,680. This would decrease the fee for a single family residence from $851.32 to $766.81. B-37 Map & Improvement Plan Checking - Grading Plan Review. Public Worksis pr°Posing to · reduce the fee from $304 plus $15 .per acre to $270 plus $15 per acre to standardize the fee for all grading plan checks for subdivision tracts just as in commercial projects and other multi- familyplans, parcel maps and parcel map waivers in excess of 5 acres in size. The standard time involved in all categories are similar. Restructured or Increased Cost Fee-~ A-10 Fire Safety Review/Inspection. The Fire Department is proposing to increase various inspection and reinspection fees to reflect the actual cost. Many of the fees in this category are currently 50% of the actual cost and this request is to recover the true cost. It is anticipated that fee increases .in this category will provide greater incentive for businesses to bring their facility into compliance based on the first inspections and reduce the necessity for multiple inspections for the same =issue. B-34 Concurrent.Applications - Maps. Development Services-is proposing to increase this fee ii' from $4,166 per application to $7,000 per application. A ConcUrrent Application represents a blended process that includes both a general plan amendment and a zone change. This · ··.. increase is requested because of the increased staff time required to work on complex generalPlan amendments and zone changes which continually require more~project analysis- and management involvement. The fee for a typical zone change .is $2,537 or $3,045 for a PCD/PUD zone change and a general plan amendment is $4,060. If combined, the cost of these services would be either $6,597 or $7,105 depending on th'e nature of the zone change. The Concurrent Application fee is presently set at $4,166 which does not adequately recover the costs to process the application which averages $7,653. Staff is proposing to move toward full recovery for this fee, however, if desired the fee increase could be implemented incrementally. D-75 Animal .Regulation - Dog Licenses and Impound Charges. The SPCA has an agreement with the City to provide animal control services. The SPCA has been experiencing increases in operating .costs in addition to costs incurred through new state mandates requiring additional kenneling stays and related costs. The City recently increased the contract with the SPCA to help cover a portion of the increases. To ensure that a portion of costs are borne by those who use the SPCA services, the SPCA has requested increases in City licensing and animal control fees. The last increase in fees was in 1993. The SPCA is proposing to increase the current fee for altered animals from $14, $28, and $42 for one, two and three-year periods to $15, $30 and $45, respectively; offering senior ~ ..... discounts on altered animals ($10,$20, and $30); increasing the licensing late fee from $10 to $20; increasing medical fees from $5 to $10. A survey of fees of other agencies was conducted to ensure the proposed fees were in keeping with those charged by others. Aprtl 2, 2002, 4:31pm ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page4 E-83 Recreation Center Rental- Charge after 10 p.m. Recreation and Parks 'are proposing to increase the fee from $1.0 per hour to $50 per hour. Currently when a recreation center rental is scheduled to end at 10 p.m. or-later, a charge of $10 per hour is charged for every hour over the specified rental time. This is charged in addition to the regular hourly rental fee for the facility. If the .renter does not vacate, the facility at the specified time the a Recreation Specialist must be called out, incurring a cost which is substantially more than the hourly cost of part-time personnel. Development Fees In general the development fees are proposed to increase approximately 3 to.6% which reflects the increase in the consumer price index since the last fee update occurred in June. 2000. Fee Removed From Master Schedule A-11 Sewer ,Stoppage Investigation. Staff is proposing to ,remove this fee because it is never ,charged to the customer. E-83 'Recreation Center Equipment Rental. Tables and chairs are most commonly rented by Non-,Profit and private groups. Staff is proposing to remove this fee because the nominal (' amount of rental revenue earned does not offset the administrative work involved in ! calculating the charges and ensuring the correct number of tables and chairs are set up. Other types of equipment is rarely requested and an increase in rental requests in not anticipated-with the deletion of the fee City staff, is recommending the proposed changes to the Master Fee Schedule be reviewed by the Budget and Finance Committee as presented. S:\Darnell~Cost Recovery Admin.wpd April 10refer to B&F Comm April 2, 2002, 4:31 pm 2002 Cost Recovery Overview Page 1 of 4 New Fees Existing Proposed % Increase Notes/Justification B-23 Fire Suppression-Permit Processing Fire Prevention Oversight $0.00 $85.00 n/a Fee for risk mgmt.and spill prevention control Plans, and hazardous waste violation follow up. B-26 Minor Land Division Review Owner Initiated Pamel Merger $0.00 $890.00 n/a Fee charged for application review, enviromental determination, notice of decision and recording a certificate of merger. This fee recommended by the Development Streamlining Task Force. D-61 Business Regulation Public Convenience And/Or Necessity Approval $0.00 $300.00 n/a Need to create a fee to recover the cost of processing application for alcohol beverage control license. D-75 Animal Regulation Dog Licenses Senior Rate-Altered (Sprayed/Neutered) One Year License $0.00 $10.00 n/a Fees for senior discount on altered animals. Two Year License $0.00 $20.00 n/a Three Year License $0.00 $30.00~ n/a Impound Charge Dogs 2nd Small / Medium / Large $0.00 $60.00 n/a Fees on sliding scale for repeat offenders. 3rd Small / Medium / Large $0.00 $100.00 n/a · E-85 City Youth Programs and Activities Youth Day Camp Cancellation Fee $0.00 $75.00 n/a Fee is for staff time incurred when a cancellation occurs on short notice and the reserved spot cannot be filled. E-86 Aquatic Programs - Recreatiional Swimming Aquatic Programs - City Residents Renter Is Qualified To Provide Own Lifeguards $0.00 $35.00 n/a Fee created for hourly rentals by aquatic clubs and similar groups that provide their own certified lifeguards and insurance. Pool Security Fee $0.00 $90.00 n/a Fee covers the cost for staff call-outs beyond normal business hours to address security situations like loss of keys, gates left open, uncovered pools, etc. Aquatic Programs - Non Residents Renter Is Qualified To Provide Own Lifeguards $0.00 $35.00 n/a Fee created for hourly rentals by aquatic clubs and similar groups that provide their own certified lifeguards and insurance. Pool Security Fee $0.00 $90.00 n/a Fee covers the cost for staff call-outs beyond normal business hours to address security situations like loss of keys, gates left open, uncovered pools, etc. Reduced Fees Page 2 of 4 A-1 New Residential and Commercial Construction Permit Processing and Inspection Fees Other Than Minimun (Valuation > $6,001) 0.0066 x Val 0.0055 x Val 0.0011 x Val -16.67% Reduced "fee factor" and incorporated the April 2001 New Commemial (Valuation $4,501 - $1,000,000) 0.0088 x Val 0.0078 x Val 0.0010 x Val -11.36% Building Valuation Data to hold or slightly lower building New Commemial (Valuation > $1,000,001) 0.0078 x Val 0.0068 x Val 0.0010 x Val -12.82% revenues. A-2 Residential Addition, Alteration, Remodel or Repair Residential,Mechanical,Plumbing and Electrical Other Than Minimun (Valuation > $6,001.00) 0.0066 x Val 0.0055 x Val 0.0011 x Val -16.67% Reduced "fee factor" and incorporated the April 2001 Building Valuation Data to hold or slightly lower building revenues. A-3 Commercial Addition, Alteration, Remodel or Repair (Valuation $4,501 - $1,000,000) 0.0088 x Val 0.0078 x Val 0.0010 x Val -11.36% Reduced "fee factor" and incorporated the April 2001 (Valuation > $1,000,001) 0.0078 x Val 0.0068 x Val 0.0010 x Val -12.82% Building Valuation Data to hold or slightly lower building Residential,Mechanical,Plumbing and Electrical revenues. Other Than Minimun (Valuation > $4,501) 0.0088 x Val 0.0078 x Val 0.0010 x Val -11.36% A-10 Fire Safety Review/Inspection Explosives Pumhase, Sales & Storage Inspection First Inspection $164.00 $150.00 -$14.00 -8.54% Reduced to reflect actual costs Reinspection Fee $82.00 $75.00 -$7.00 -8.54% Reduced to reflect actual costs B-23 Fire Suppression-Permit Processing Commemial Vent Hood Plan Review $150.00 $100.00 -$50.00 -33.33% Reduced to reflect actual costs B-37 Map & Improvement Plan Checking Grading Plan Review Pamel Maps and PM Waivers > 5 Acres Subdivision Tracts $304+$15/Acre $270+$15/Acre -$34.00 -11.18% Base fee standardized for all grading plan checks; additional fees recovered on a per acre basis Restructured or Increased Cost Fees A-10 Fire Safety Review/Inspection Private Party/Insurance Requests Reinspection Fee $28.00/hr $60.00/hr $32.00/hr 114.28% Fee proposed to reflect actual cost; The current fee is 50% of the actual cost and this request is to recover the true Tent Installation (One-Time Fee) cost. Increasing the fee will provide the incentive for Reinspection Fee $31.00/hr $66.00/hr $35.00/hr 112.90% businesses to bring their facility into compliance based on the After Hours Reinspection Fee $41.00/hr $92.00/hr $51.00/hr 124.39% first inspection. High Rise Inspection Fee Reinspection Fee $53.00/hr $111.00/hr $58.00/hr 25.26% This service requires 2 hours of Fire inspector time; 1/2 hour of clerical and 15 minutes of the Environmental Services Director time on average. Sprinkler System Inspection (Additions/Remodels) Page 3 of 4 Minimum Fee $95.00/hr $119.00/hr $24.00/hr 25.26% This service requires 2 hours of Fire Inspector time; 1/2 hour Reinspection Fee $47.00/hr $60.00/hr $13.00/hr 27.66% of clerical and 15 minutes of the Environmental Services Director time on average. B-34 Concurrent Applications Maps $4,166.00 $7,000.00 $2,834.00 68.03% Fee has been historically undercharged; Application cases are usually large, time consuming and complex; the proposed fee would recover 100% of the cost. Examples include Riverwalk Crossings, City In The Hills, 7 Oaks West and South of Brimhall EIR. C-57 Agenda/Minute Mailing Service Council Agenda Packet-charge Per Packet $18.00 $30.00 $12.00 66.67% Proposed fee reflects actual cost of service. Each agenda costs $34.04 per packet based on pdnting costs estimate provided by Paragon Thermographers. D-69 Automotive Accident Investigation Standard Report $12.00 $0.25/page n/a varies Police are recommending this fee be changed to conform Short Form $2.00 $0.25/page n/a varies with the standard copy charge per page by the rest of the city and adopted as part of the master fee schedule. E-83 Recreation Center Rental Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Facility Charge After 10 P.M. - charge per hour $10.00 $50.00 $40.00 400.00% Charge covers the cost for staff call-outs after 10 p.m. A Recreation Specialist must be called out instead of Silver Creek Community Center hourly part time personnel. Charge After 10 P.M. - charge per hour $10.00 $50.00 $40.00 400.00% E-85 City Youth Programs and Activities Youth Day Camp - Two Week Session $156.00 $170.00 $14.00 8.97% Fee increase is due to increase in minimum wage and reducec counselor-to-c, hild ratio for this program. Development Fees Existinq Proposed % Increase Notes/Justification A-5' Street Cut Inspection Street Cut Inspection $124.00 $130.00 $6.00 4.84% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Inspection Fee Deposit $62.00 $65.00 $3.00 4.84% Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. A-6 Public Improvement Inspection Public Improvement Inspection $114+ 0.90% x val $120+ 0.94% x val $6+ 0.04% x val 5.26% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. A-7 Street Encroachment Inspection Street Encroachment Inspection $140.00 $145.00 $5.00 3.57% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. B-39 Traffic Marking Request Traffic Marking Request $145.00 $150.00 $5.00 3.45% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. B-26 Minor Land Division Review Page 4 of 4 Lot Line Adjustment $870.00 $890.00 $20.00 2.30% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Parcel Map Waivers $862.00 $890.00 $28.00 3.25% Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. Right of Way Vacation $390.00 $410.00 $20.00 5.13% B-37 Map & Improvement Plan Checking Final Tract Maps $573+$27/Lot $600+$28/Lot $ 27+$1.00/Lot 4.71% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Final Parcel Maps $1,319.00 $1,400.00 $81.00 6.14% Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. Street/Sewer Improvements Minor Revision to Plan After Plan Approved $211.00 $220.00 $9.00 4.27% All Development Fees increased by 3-6% for CPI adjustment. Last Fee update occurred in June 2000. Fees Removed From Master Schedule A-11 Sewer Stoppage Investigation $101.00 $0.00 rEa Staff recommends removal, the fee is never charged B-37 Map & Improvement Plan Checking Grading Plan Review Single Family, One Duplex or OneTriplex With Earth Movement Less Than 100 Cubic Yards $50.00 $0.00 rEa Staff recommends removal, this fee category is not used Single Family, One Duplex or One Triplex With Earth Movement Greater Than 100 Cubic Yards $101.00 $0.00 rEa Staff recommends removal, this fee category is not used E-83 Recreation Center Rental Category A - Non-Profit Equipment Rental (Includes Set-Up and Take Down) Tables (Per Table) $1.00 $0.00 rEa Staff recommends removal, the nominal amount of revenue Chairs (Per Chair) $0.25 $0.00 rEa collected does not justify the cost of providing the service. Scoreboard-Per Hour (Operator Included) $10.00 $0.00 rEa An increase in requests is not anticipated with deletion of Piano $15.00 $0.00 rEa the fee. P.A. System Two Speakers and a Microphone $15.00 $0.00 rEa Additional Speakers (Per Pair) $10.00 $0.00 rea Overhead Projector $5.00 $0.00 rea Portable Storage $10.00 $0.00 rea Category B - Private Use Equipment Rental (Includes Set-Up and Take Down) Tables (Per Table) $2.00 $0.00 rEa Staff recommends removal, the nominal amount of revenue Chairs (Per Chair) $0.35 $0.00 rEa collected does not justify the cost of providing the service. Scoreboard-Per Hour (Operator Included) $12.50 $0.00 n/a An increase in requests is not anticipated with deletion of Piano $20.00 $0.00 n/a the fee. P.A. System Two Speakers and a Microphone $20.00 $0.00 rea Additional Speakers (Per Pair) $12.50 $0.00 rea Overhead Projector $10.00 $0.00 rea Portable Storage $12.50 $0.00 rea CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES ALL CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING: NEW, ADDITIONAL, ALTERATION, REMODEL, REPNR, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION) FOR BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROCESSING, SERVICES, AND INSPECTION FEES ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: I%VO GENERAL METHODS ARE USED TO CALCULATE FEES. THE USE OF A FLAT FEE AND THE USE OF THE ESTIMATED REGIONAL MARKET VALUE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION MULTIPLIED BY A "FEE FACTOR'. THESE METHODS REPRESENT THE ESTIMATED COST OF PROVIDING ALL PLAN REVIEW AND VARIOUS INSPECTION FEES REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. VALUATION DATA IS BASED UPON THE APRIL 2001 "BUILDING STANDARDS'. ALTERATIONS & REMODELS WILL BE VALUED AT $30 PER SQUARE FOOT OR BY AN OFFICIAL CONTRACT APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DIRECTOR. THE REVENUE GENERATED FROM THIS IS THEN SPREAD TO THE VARIOUS COSTS CENTER AS FOLLOWS: PLAN CHECK 32.40% CHANGE TO: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 33.80% BUILDING PERMITS: 57.00% PLUMBING INSPECTION 13.30% PfAff CHECKING FEES: 43.00% MECHANICAL INSPECTION 8.10% THIS METHODOLOGY IS USED IN SERVICE CENTERS Al, A2., A3, AND A4. A-I NEW RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION - NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION -PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0066 X VAL 00055 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION AROVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - NEW COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION -PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES * MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM [VALUATION · $4,501.00) - VALUATION $4~01.00 TO $1,000,000.00 0.0088 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION - VALUATION $1,000,001.00 AND GREATER 0.0078 X VAL 0.0068 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW A-2 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR - RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPNR - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $3.00 · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $§,001.00) 0.0066 X VAL 0.0(365 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW · MECHANICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPNR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 INCLUDES PERMIT.aAID ISSUANCE FEE · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0066 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION - PLUMBING (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $$,001.00) 0.0066 X VAL 0.0~ X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION - ELECTRICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $3.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0066 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION A-3 COMMERCIAL ADDmON, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR - COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REP/UR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 1 of 17 3/1/2002 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FE~ SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501.00) - VALUATION $4,501.00 TO $!,000,000.00 0.0088 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL VARIES VARIES WTI'H VALUATION - VALUATION $1,000,001.00/VID GREATER 0.0078 X VAL 0.0068 X VAL VARIES VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUDES STHUC~JRAL, MECHANICN.., PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS N~D PI_AN REVIEW · MECHANICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPNR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501.00) 0.0088 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL $0.00 VARIES wm-I VALUATION . PLUMBING (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPNR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - OTHER THNq MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4.501.00) 0.0088 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL SO.00 VARIES WITH VALUATION · ELECTRICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPNR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501.00) 0.0088 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL SO.00 VARIES WITH VALUATION A4 SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION - MECHANICAL. CONSTRUCTION · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) - NR CONDITIONER, NJ. SIZES $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER - WALL HEATER INSTALLATION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER - FIREPLACE INSERT INSTALLATION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · COOLER INSTALLATION $40.00 $40.00 SO.iX) INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · KITCHEN HOOD INSTALLATION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES & OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERMIT) ', - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATEO uNDER SERVICE CENTER A·2 OR A-3 AS A MECHANICAL PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) · GAS LINE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - SEWER LINE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · WATER LINE $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 · PiPE LINE REPNR (GAS, SEWER, WATER, ETC) $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 o WATER HEATER REPLACEMENTS $40.(,~O $40.00 SO.00 · SEPTIC TANK $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · SEPTIC TANK ABANDONMENT $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - GREASE INTERCEPTORS SO0.00 SO0.00 $0.00 - WATER SOFTENERS $40,00 $40.00 SO.00 - SHOWER PAN $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - SOLAR $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - SITE SEWER SYSTEMS $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - SITE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - MISCELLANEOUS PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES AND OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERMIT) - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATEO UNDER SERVICE CENTER A-2 OR A-3 AS A PLUMBING PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) · TEMPORARY POWER SERVICE < or = 600 VOLTS AND 200 AMPS $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRtCN. & HEATER - PERMANENT POWER SERVICE < or = 600 VOLTS AND 200 AMPS $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · SITE ELECTRICAL AND OTHER SITE POWER APPARATUSES $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 2 of 17 3/1/2002 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" I SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSEi;) AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) · MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL EOUIPMENT, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES N~D OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERMIT) - MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATED UNDER SERVICE CENTER A-2 OR A-3 AS A ELECTRICAL PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · DEMOLITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL. STRUCTURE- PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · ENTIRE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · MOVED RESIDENTIAL ANO COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE · PERMIT PROCESSING ANO INSPECTION FEES - RESIDENTIAL MOVED STRUCTURE $40.00 $40.00 SO.O0 - COMMERCIAL MOVED STRUCTURE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 · RESIDENTIAL STATE APPROVED MO61LE HOME AND PRE*MANUFACTURED C(~STRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MOBILE HOME WITHOUT PERMANENT FOUNDATION $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - MOBILE HOME WITH PERMANENT FOUNDATION $160.00 $160.00 SO.00 · · MOBILE HOME GARAGE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - MOBILE HOME ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, B.ECTRICAL & HEATER - PRE-MANUFACTURED HOUSING $160.00 $160.00 SO.00 · COMMERCIAL STATE APPROVED MOBILE COACH NqD PRE-MANUFACTURED CONSTRUCTION · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - COMMERCIAL COACH (PERMANENT) $160.00 $160.00 SO.00 - COMMERCIAL PRE-MNqUFACTURED (PERMANENT) $160.00 $160.00 SO.iX) - COMMERCIAL COACH ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER - CONSTRUCTION TRNLER (TEMPORARY) - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · CONSTRUCTION TRAILER (TEMPORARY) $40.00 $40.00 SO,00 - RESIDENTIAL RE-ROOF - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE (EACH PERMIT, REGARDLESS OF SIZE) $80.00 $80.00 SO.00 VARIES WNALUE & IF COMMERCIAL ON RESIDENTIAL · COMMERCIAL RE-ROOF- PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · MINIMUM FEE (EACH PERMIT, REGARDLESS OF SIZE) $80.00 $80.00 SO.00 VARIES WNALUE & IF COMMERCIAl. Off RESIDET~FL~. - POOCS AND SPAS - PERMff PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - SWIMMING POOLS $160.00 $160.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER · POOL & SPA $200.00 $200.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, B. ECTRICAL & HEATER · SPA I IN GROUND $80.00 $80.00 SO.00 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL & HEATER - SPA I PORTABLE $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 EACH OF THE ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND ~ REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL ARD COMMERCIAL MISC. · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - PATIO ADDITION (EACH PERMIT), REGARDLESS OF SIZE $80.00 SO0.00 $0.00 · ANTENNA DISH $40.00 $40.00 SO.00 - OIL WELL PERMIT FEE $688.00 $686.00 SO.00 · RETNNING WALL OR FENCING · MINIMUM FEE $40.00 $40.00 · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (LENGTH > 80 LIN FT) $0.50 PER FT $0.50 PER FT SO.00 PER LINEN. FOOT · STORAGE RACKS/SHELVES (EACH PERMIT) $80.~O $80.00 SO.00 · STORAGE CONTNNER/SEA TRNN (EACH PERMrl) $40,00 $40.00 SO.00 · REOUESTED PLAN REVIEW FEES RE-EVALUATED PLAN REVIEW PROCESS . EXPED/TE PLAN REVIEW $45.00 $45.00 S0.1X) PER HOUR CHARGE · ADDITIONAL PLAN REV1EW $45.00 $45.00 SO.00 PER HOUR CHARGE REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS · REQUESTED BUILDING INSPECTIONS FEES Prepared by: L. Simpso~ 3 of 17 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) · SPECIAL INSPECTIONS · NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $45.00 $45,00 $0,00 PER HOUR CHARGE - OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2 HOUR MINIMUM) $45,00 $45,00 60,00 PER HOUR CHARGE - RE*INSPECTIONS · NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $45.00 $45.00 $0.00 PER HOUR CHARGE - OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2 HOUR MINIMUM) $45,00 $45.00 $0.00 PER HOUR CHARGE - TEMPORARY SALES LOTS - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - TEMPORARY SALES LOTS $40.00 $40.00 $3.00 ABOVE INCLUDES XMAS TREE & PUMPKIN LOTS, FIREWORKS BOOTHS, PARKING LOT, TENT SALES, ETC - GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 EXEMPT ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURES AND PROPERTY OWNE? BY A FEDERAl., STATE, COUNTY OR CITY AGENCY A-5 STREET CUT INSPECTION · STREET CUT INSPECTION $124,00 $130.00 66.00 · INSPECTION FEE DEPOSIT (ACTUAL OVERTIME COSTS WILL ALSO BE CHARGED IF $62.00 $65.00 $3.00 OEVELOPER REQUESTS INSPECTION OUTSIDE THE STANDARD WORK DAY (7:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. MON-FRI) A-6 PUBUC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION - PUBUC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION 6114+0.90% X VAL $120+0,IN% X VAL VARIES BASE FEE PI. US % OF YALUATION - MNNTENANCE. DISTRICT MAP PREPARATION FEES (REGARDING MNNTENANCE DISTRICT FORMATIONS & ANNEXATIONS) - NO COMPUTER DISC PROVIDED $1o624+$13A. oT 61,700+$13,65A. OT VARIES $1,700 BASE FEE + $13.65 LOT FEE - COMPUTER DISC PROVIDED 61,502+$3A.OT 61,575',$3,15A. OT VARIES $1,575 BASE FEE + $3.15 LOT FEE - APPORTIONMENT FEE FOR MNNTENANCE, DISTRICTS - ~TTH CAD DISC PROVIDED $0.00 60.00 $0.00 - PER LOT FEE (NO DISC PROVIDED), MtN. FEE $90.00 $13.88/LOT $14,004.OT VARIES A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION $140.00 $145.00 $5.00 A-8 STATE-MANDATED FINE INSPECTION - PRE-INSPECTION CONSULTATION REQUESTS FOR IN HOME CARE FACILmES - 25 OR LESS CLIENTS $,50.00 $50.00 $0.00 FEE DETERMINED BY STATE ANO MAY C~E - 26 OR MORE CLIENTS $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 FEE DETERMINED BY STATE AND MAY CHANGE A4 OIL WELL INSPEC*nON (ANNUAL) - OIL WELL iNSPECTION (ANNUAL) $59.00 S69.00 $0.00 ANNUAL INSPECTION · REINSPECTIOfl (IF REQUIRED) $50.00 653.00 $5.00 - OIL WELL INSTALLATION $50.00 653.00 $3.00 A-10 FIRE SAFETY REV1EWANSPECTION · SAFETY INSPECTIONS * PRIVATE PARTYflNSURANCE REQUESTS $56.00 $50.00 $4,00 - RE1NSPECTIOfl FEE 628.00 $60.00 VARIES CHARGE PER HOUR - LIOUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS INSTALLATION $126.00 $134.00 $8.00 - REINSPECTION FEE 663.00 667.00 $4.00 · TENT INSTALLATION (ONE TIME FEE) $62.00 $66.00 VARIES CHARGE PER HOUR · RE-INSPECTION FEE $31,00 $56.00 VARIES CHARGE PER HOUR - AFTER HOURS TENT INSTALLATION $84.00 $32.00 VARIES CHARGE PER HOUR - AFTER HOURS REINSPECTIOfl FEE $41,00 $32.00 VARIES CHARGE PER HOUR · PAINT BOOTHS (ONE TIME FEE) · NEW SPRAY PAINT BOOTHS $160.00 $164.00 $4.00 - REINSPECTION FEE $78.00 $82..00 $4.00 - HIGH RISE INSPECTION FEE $113.00 St 11.00 -$3.00 - ADDITIONAL HOURS · FIRE INSPECTOR $35.00 $35.00 $0.00 - ADDITIONAL HOURS * FIRE CAPTNN $62.00 $62.00 $0.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 4 of 17 3/1/'2002 CITY OF BAKERSFII~LD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) · REINSPECTION FEE $53.00 $111.00 $,58,00 IMPROVED METHOD TO CALCULATE REINSPECTION o FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT · SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (COMMERCIAL) o MINIMUM FEE $386.00 $408.00 $22.00 · OTIIER THAN MINIMUM (IF OVER 30,000 SO. FT.) 0.025 X SQ.FT 0.025 X SO.FT $0,00 - REINSPECTION FEE $193.00 $204.00 $11.00 · SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (ADDITIONS / REMODELS) · MINIMUM FEE $95.00 SHg.00 $24.00 ·. - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (IF OVER 5,000 SO. FT.) 0.01g X SO.FT 0.019 X SQ.FT S0.1X} · REINSPECTION FEE $47.00 $60.00 $13.00 · FIRE ALARM SYSTEM COMPONENT INSPECTION - MINIMUM FEE $156.00 $165.00 $9.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (OVER 30,000 SQ. FT.) 0.005 X SQ. FT 0.005 X SQ.FT S0.1X) - REINSPECTION FEE $78.00 $83.00 $5.00 · COMMERCIAL VENT HOOD INSPECTION $! 17.00 $124.00 $7.00 · INSPECTION OF EACH ADDITIONAL VENT HOOO $11.IX) $12.00 $1.00 - REINSPECTION FEE $58.00 $62.00 ~1.00 · STANDPIPE INSPECTION · INSPECTION OF ONE STANDPIPE $77.00 SO2.00 $5.00 - CHARGE FOR EACH ADDmoNAL STANDPIPE $23.00 ~,5.00 $2.00 - REINSPECTION FEE $38.00 $41.1X) $3.00 · EXPLOSIVES PURCHASE, SALES & STORAGE INSPECTION (IF MATERIAL TYPE CHANGES OCCUR THEN BOTH A NEW INSPECTION FEE AND NEW PERMIT FEE WILL APPLY) - FIRST INSPECTION $164.00 $150.00 414.00 TIME RECALCULATED - EXPLOSIVES STORAGE PERMIT $11.00 $14.00 $3.00 - REINSPECTION FEE $82.00 $75.00 -$7.00 TIME RECALCULATED - PYROTECHNICS INSPECTION - NORMAL. BUSINESS HOURS CHARGE IS PER INSPECTION · FIRST INSPECTION $150.00 $159.00 $9.00 - SECOND INSPECTION $121.00 $128.00 $7.00 · THIRD INSPECTION $93.00 $98.00 $5.00 . AFTER HOURS RATE · FIRST INSPECTION ~.04.00 ~216.00 $12.00 · SECONO INSPECTION S163.00 $17'3.00 $10.00 - THIRD INSPECTION $120.00 $127.00 $7.00 - FIREWORKS BOOTH PERMIT FEE S101.00 $101.00 SO.00 A-'I'I SEWER STOPPAGE INVESTIGATION $101.00 SO.00 -$101.00 REMOVE FEE FROM SCHEDULE A-12 REINSPEC11OH OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS - DANGEROUS BUILDING INVESTIGATIONS · INITIAL CONTACT AND INSPECTION SO.00 SO.00 S0.1X} - FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS REQUIRED (EACH OCCURRENCE) $340.00 $340.00 SO.00 - LEGAL ACTION REQUIRED ACTUAL COST ACTUAL CO~T SO.00 · COMPLAINTS AND ENFORCEMENT · INITIAL CONTACT AND INSPECTION $0.00 SOJX] SO.00 - FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS REQUIRED (EACH OCCURRENCE) $147.00 $147.00 SO.00 · LEGAL ACTION RE(XIIRED ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST SO.00 A-13 HOUSING PROGRAMS · REHABILITATION INSPECTIONS · INITIAL INSPECTION/DOCUMENTATION $152,00 $152.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 5o~ 17 3/I/20G2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF I CENTER SERVICE CENTER OESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMEI~ITS NUMBER 06/28/00 ' 12/28/01 I (OECREASE) · FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS INSPECTION $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 · ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS I FEES · DEPARTMENTAL PROCESSING COSTS $121.00 $121.00 $0.00 - ROOF REPLACEMENT $5S.00 $55.00 $0.00 - ELECTRICAL $76.00 $76.00 ' $O.00 - - PLUMBING $76.00 $76,00 S0.1X) · MECHANICAL $76.00 $76.00 $0.00 - FRAME I FLOOR $55.00 $55,00 $0.00 · MAXIMUM CHARGE FOR REHAB INSPECTIONS $514.00 $614.00 $0.00 ' LAND USE REVIEW I PERMITS 1t-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL · OIL WELL REVIEW $1,647.00 $1,647.00 $0.00 REG. USE PERMIT + $300 FOR FIRE - GENERAL REVIEW (ALL ZONES) $I,3'12.00 $1.342.00 $0.00 B-22 HOME OCCUPATION REVIEW - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 - LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 B-23 FIRE SUPPRESSION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND PLAN REVIEW FEES · PNNT BOOTH PLAN REVIEW Sl00,00 $100.00 $0.00 - NON-FLAMMABLE MEDICAL GAS SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW $100.00 $100.00 S0.00 - EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM ADDITION PLAN REVIEW (COMMERCIAL) · MINIMUM FEE $50.00 $53.00 $3.00 · OTHER THAN MINIMUM 0.01 X SQ.FT 0.01 X SQ.FT $0.00 - SPRINKLER SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW (COMMERCIAL) · MINIMUM FEE $150.00 $159.00 $9.00 · OTHER THAN MINIMUM 0.01 X SQ.FT 0.01 X SQ. FT $0.00 · SPRINKLER SYSTEM PLAN REWEW (RESIDENTIAL) $45.00 $48.00 · RRE ALARM SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW - MINIMUM FEE $150.00 $157.00 $7.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM 0.005 X SQ. FT 0.005 X SQ. FT $0.00 - COMMERCIAL VENT HOOO PLAN REVIEW $150.00 $100.00 -$50.00 TIME RECALCULATED - STANDPIPE SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW (WET, DRY OR COMBO SYSTEM - FEE IS PER SYSTEM) N/A N/A N/A · FIRE PREVENTION OVERSIGHT NEW FEE $85.00 $85.00 NEW FEE B-24 .SIGN - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTIONS FEES - SIGN, BANNER $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 INCLUDES PERMIT AND ISSUANCE FEE · SIGN, TEMPORARY $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 INCLUDES ~ ~ I~UN~CE FEE · SIGN. PERMANENT $80.00 $80.00 $0.00 INCLUDES PERMff, ELECTRICAL ~ ISSUN4CE FEE ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW B-25 TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP REVIEW - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $1,875.00 $I,875.00 $0.00 · OPTIONAL DESIGN OR YARD/LOT AREA MODIRCATIONS $1,703.00 $ !,703.00 $0,00 - REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW · STANOARD $512.00 $5`12.00 $0.00 · TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $2,3'14.00 $2.314.00 $0.00 - OPTIONAL DESIGN OR YARD/LOT AREA MOOIFICATIONS $2,884.00 $2,884,00 $0.00 Prepared by: L. S/mpso~ 60f 17 3/'1/2002 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 '' FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $1,319.00 $1,319.00 $0.00 - WALL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW $893.00 $893.00 $0.00 B-26 MINOR LAND DMSION REV1EW · LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $870.00 $8g0.00 $20.00 · PARCEL MAP WNVERS $862.00 $890.00 $28.00 - OWNER INITIATED PARCEL MERGER $0.00 $890.00 $890.00 NEW FEE - RIGHT OF WAY VACATION ~3gO.00 $410.00 $20.00 B-27 PREUMINARY PROJECT REVIEW · REQUESTED LAND USE & ZONING REVIEW $55.00 $55.00 $0.00 - ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS - ADVERTISED $343.00 $343.00 $0.00 - POSTED $101.00 $101.00 $8.00 - SOUND EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION · ZONING CHECK $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED IN D61 B-26 SITE PLAN REVlEW · MINIMUM FEE - NO HEARING REQUIRED $I03.00 $103.00 $0.00 · MAXIMUM FEE - NO HEARING REQUIRED $1.539.00 $1,539.00 $0.00 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE UP TO MAXIMUM .001668 x VAL .001868 x VN- $0.00 - LEGAL ADVERTISING FEE - IF HEARING REQUIRED $334.00 $334.00 $0.00 B-29 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW - INITIAL PREPARATION FEE $4,567.00 $4,567.00 $0.00 - SINGLE ELEMENT $4,060.00 $4,060.00 - MULTIPLE ELEMENTS $4,567.00 $4,567.00 $0.00 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $2,030.00 $2,030.00 $0.00 8-30 PUD OR PCD ZONE CHANGE ~3,045.00 $3,045,00 $0.00 B-31 ZONE CHANGE REVIEW $2,537.00 $2,537.00 $0.00 B-32 APPEAL PROCESSING APPLICANT OR NON*APPLICANT OUTSIDE THE NOTICE AREA, WITHIN THE NOTICE AREA EXEMPT. $334.00 $334.00 $0.00 - LAND DMSIONS $334.00 $334.00 $0.00 · WEED ABATEMENT APPEN-S · MINIMUM FEE - NO NOTICE REQUIRED $'t01.00 $101.00 $0.00 - LEGAL ADVERTISING FEE * IF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED $334.00 $334.00 $0.00 B-33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW - SINGLE ELEMENT $3,552.00 $3,552.00 $0.00 - MULTIPLE ELEMENTS ~4,060.00 $4,0~O.00 $8,00 B-34 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS - MAPS $4.166.00 $7,000,00 $2.834.00 - TEXT & MAPS $4,567.00 $4,567.00 $0.00 B-35 ZONE MODIRCATION REVIEW- MODIFICATIONS - ZONE MOUIFICATION RE~*qEW- MOOIFICATIONS $1,096.00 $1,096.00 $0.00 B-36 SIGN REVIEW - COMPREHENSIVE SIGN REVIEW $693.00 $893.00 ~0.00 - COMPREHENSIVE SIGN REVIEW - REVISED $,324.00 $324.00 B-37 MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING · FINN. TRACT MAPS $573+$27/LOT $600+$28/LOT VARIES - FINN. PARCEL MAPS $1,319.00 $1,400.00 $81.00 - GRADING PLAN RE%qEW - SINGLE FAMILY, ONE 0UPLEX OR ONE TRIPLEX WITH $50.00 $0.00 450.00 RENIO~E FROM NUL~rcR FEE ra~ULE EARTH MOVEMENT LESS THAN 100 CUBIC YARDS. Prepared by: L. Simpsoel 7of 17 3/1/2002 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/CoMMENTs NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/'01 I (DECREASE) - SINGLE FNVlILY, ONE DUPLEX OR ONE TRIPLEX WITH $101.00 $0.00 4101.00 REMOVE FROM MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EARTH MOVEMENT GREATER TH/~1100 CUBIC YARDS. · COMMERCIAL PROJECTS AND OTHER MULTI-FAMILY PLANS, $260.00 $270.00 $10.00 PARCEL MAPS AND PARCEL MAP WNVERS LESS THAN 5 ACRES IN SIZE · COMMERCIN. PROJECTS AND OTHER MULTI-FAMILY PLANS, $253+$15/ACRE $270+$15/ACRE VARIES $270 PER PtAN <. $15 PER ADDITIONAL ACRE PARCEL MAPS AND PARCEL MAP WNVERS IN EXCESS OF 5 ACRES IN SIZE IN EXCESS OF $ ACRES - SUBDIVISION TRACTS $504+$15/ACRE $270,$15/ACRE VARIES $270 PER PLAN PLUS $15 PER ACRE - STREET/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - N.L OTHERS $220 + 0.80% $220 + 0.80% $0.00 $220 PLUS 0.80% OF VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT - ADDITIONAL PLAN SUBMITTAL AFTER SECOND CHECK 10.0% OF ORIG FEE 10.0% OF ORIG FEE $0.00 10% OF ORIGINAL FEE FOR EACH ADDmONAL CHECK - MINOR REVISION TO PI.AN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $21 !.00 $220.00 $9.00 · MAJOR REVISION TO PlAN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $220 + 0.80% $220 + 0.80% $0.00 BASED ON CURRENT IMPROVEMENTS - MAJOR REVISION TO PLAN DURING CHECKING PROCESS $220 + 0.80% $220 + 0.80% SO.iX) BASED ON REVISED PORTION B-38 DEVELOPMENT TIME EXTENSION REVIEW $497.00 $497.00 $3.00 B-39 TRAFFIC MARKING REQUEST REVIEW $145.00 $150.00 $5.00 B-40 CERTIFEO UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) FEES ANNUAL FEE - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER FEES 6% INCREASE ON ALL HM HANDLER FEES · MATERIAL TYPE 1 $77.00 $82.00 $5.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 2 $166.00 $170.00 $10.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 3 $231.00 $245.00 $14.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 4 $307.00 $,325.00 $18.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 5 $11IL00 $123.00 $7.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 6 $229.00 $243.00 $14.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 7 $344.00 $365.00 $21.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 8 $396.00 $420.00 $24.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 9 $166.00 $176.00 $10.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 10 $307.00 $325.00 $18.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 11 $396.00 $420.00 $24.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 12 $424.00 $449.00 $25.00 · MATERIAL. TYPE 13 $229.00 $243.00 $14.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 14 $396.00 $420.00 $24.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 15 $424.00 $449.00 $25.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 16 $445.00 $472.00 $27.00 - MATERIAL TYPE 17 INSPECTION FEE $53.00 $56.00 $3.00 · MATERIAL TYPE 18 SMALL QTY GENERATOR $53.00 $56.00 $5.00 - HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS - CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT $88.00 $93.00 $5.00 · PERMIT BY RULE $140.00 $148.00 $8.00 · CONDITIONALLY AUTHORIZED $185.00 $1 g6.00 $11.00 - OVERSIGHT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - FOLLOW-UP ON HAZARDOUS WASTE VIOLATION - FEE PER HOUR $80.00 $85.00 $5.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - RISK MGT PREVENTION PLAN FEE - CHARGE PER HOUR $80.00 $85.00 $5.00 CHARGE PER HOUR · SITE ASSESSMENT & CLEANUP OVERSIGHT- CHARGE PER HOUR $80.00 $85.00 $5.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT- CHARGE PER HOUR $80.00 $85.00 $5.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - SPILL PREVENTION CONTROl. & COUNTERMEASURE PI. AN $80.00 $85.00 $5.00 CHARGE PER HOUR · HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER ANNUAL INSPECTION FEE (ADDITIONAL CHARGE TO BUSINESSES IDENTIRED AS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL HANDLERS-ANNUAL INSPECTION) - 30 MINUTE ANNUAL INSPECTION $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 COVERS FIRST 30 MINUTES OF INSPECT}ON - EACH ARDII'IONAL 15 MINUTES (IF NECESSARY) $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 $25 FOR EACH AROITIONAL l$ MINUTES REQUIRED Prepared by: L. Simpso~ 8of 17 3/1/2'OO2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF r CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) · UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMITS - NEW TANK INSTALI. ATION $650.00 $689.00 $39.00 SALARIES INCREASED AND OPERATING CO~TS · REINSPECTION FEE $30~00 $53.00 $3.00 - ANNUAL OPERATING PERMIT $75.00 $79.00 - TANK TIGHTNESS TESTING $00,00 $04.00 · TANK MODIFICATION $550.00 $689.00 $39.00 - TANK REMOVAL $509.00 $039,00 $30.00 - STATE SURCHARGE - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS FEE SET BY STATE EEE SET BY STATE EEE SET BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA - OVERSIGHT FOR RISK MANAGEMENT PREVENTION PLAN FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA · UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMITS FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE FEE SET BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA · FILE RESEARCH FEE $30.00 $32.00 $2.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - ABOVE GROUND R, AMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION INSPECTION · INSTALLATION INSPECTION OF ONE TANK $126.00 $134.00 $8.00 - CHARGE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL TANK $30.00 $20.00 $0.00 - INSPECTION OF TANK REMOVAL $81.00 $86.00 $5.00 · ANNUAL FEE FOR GENERATING 10 OR MORE WASTE TIRES I YEAR $35.00 $35,00 $0.00 B-41 CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW $250.00 $250.00 $0.00 B-42 ENVIRONMENTAL REV1EW ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $8.00 $2'500 MINIMUM DEPOSIT B-43 HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW $2,500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 8.44 WIDFJOVERLOAD REVIEW - SINGLE TRIP $16.00 $16.00 $0.00 - ANNUAL TRIP $80.00 $90.00 $8.00 - SPECIAL SERVICE CHARGE $45.00 $50.00 $5.00 IF ADomoNAL REVIEW WORK IS REQUIRED PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES C-~1 FIRE REPORT COPY $4.00 $3.00 $1 C,.$2 POLICE RECORDING DUPLICATION SERVICE $8.00 $8.00 $0.00 C-53 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPY · FIRST PRINT $7.00 $7.00 $0.00 - ADDITIONN. PRINTS (EACH) 8 X 10 $7.00 $7.00 $0.00 · ADDITIONAL PRINTS (EACH) 5 X 7 $8.00 $8.00 $0.00 · ADDITIONAL PRINTS (EACH) 4 X 5 $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 - DIGITAL IMAGING SALE S7.00 $7.00 $8.00 C-$4 DOCUMENT PRINTING AND COPYING - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES - STANDARD & LEGAL SIZED DOCUMENTS $0.25 $025/PAGE $0.00 PER COPY CHARGE - COPY OF MICROFILMED DOCUMENTS $0.25 $025/PAGE $0.00 PER COPY CHARGE - SPECIAL MAPS & OVERSIZED DOCUMENTS ACIUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 ACTUAL COG1' BASED ON LABOR ~ MATERIALS · PRINTED DOCUMENTS (IE BUDGET) ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 ACTUAL COST BASED ON LABOR AND MATERIALS - POI. ICE CRIME REPORTS $7.00 $0.,25/PAGE VARIES ELIMINATE N'JD USE COPY CHARGE $025 PER PAGE C-55 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS · REQUESTS BY SUBPOENA - DIRECT LABOR COSTS (TO LOCATE & COMPILE RECORDS) $16.00 $16.00 $0,00 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES - STANDARD & LEGAL SIZE $0.10 $0/10 $0.00 FEE SET SY LEGISLATION - COPIES FROM MICROFILM $020 $0.20 $0.00 FEE SET BY LEGISCATION - OTNER DIRECT CHARGES ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION Prepared by: L. Simpso~ 9 o~ 17 3/1/2002 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) · REOUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS - DIRECT LABOR COSTS (TO LOCATE & COMPILE RECORDS) MAX. $16/HOUR MAX. $16 / HOUR $0.00 MAXIMUM CHARGE PER HOUR - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES · STANDARD & LEGAL SIZE $025 $0.25 $0.00 $025 PER PAGE · COPIES FROM MICROFILM $025 $0.25 $0.00 $025 PER PAGE - OTHER DIRECT & INDIRECT CHARGES ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 C-56 RESEARCH AND CERTIRCATIONS - REARINGS AND ,APPEALS - APPEAL (OTHER THAN PLANNING) $101.00 $101.00 $0.00 - ,APPEAL Wrrrl MAILED NOTICE & PUBLICATION $334.00 $334.00 $0.00 - RESEARCH & CERTIFICATION $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 FEE IS CHARGED PER DOCUMENT C-57 AGENDA~INU1E MAILING SERVICE - AGENDA/MINUTES MNUNG SERVICE - CHARGE PER YEAR $70.00 $70.00 $0.00 · COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET · CHARGE PER PACKET PER MEETING $18.00 $30.00 $12.00 C-58 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT $69.00 $69.00 $0.00 C*.59 PUBLIC WORKS INFORMATION · SUBOMSION/DESIGN MANUAL $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 PLUS TAX - TRAFFIC VOLUME BOO*V, LET $5,00 $5.00 $0.00 PLUS TAX PUBLIC SAFETY D-61 BUSINESS REGULATION - ADULT ENTERTNNMENT - NEW APPLICATION $469.00 $481.00 $12.00 - ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL $I~134.00 $1 ~170.00 $36.00 · EMPLOYEE PERMIT $39.00 $30.00 · $1.00 - MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS $128.00 $132.00 $4.00 · MASSAGE TECHNICIAN $71.1X) $72.00 $1.00 - CARDROOMS - NEW APPLICATION $6'16.00 S657.00 $11.1X) - RENEWAL APPLICATION $1,334.00 $1,170.00 $36.00 - CARD DEALERS · NEW,APPLICATION $142.00 $145.00 $3.00 - RENEWAL ,APPLICATION $16.00 $16.00 $3.00 · ESCORT/DATING SERVICES - NEW ,APPLICATION $267.00 $278.00 $1 I - RENEWAL.N~°UCATION $127.00 $133.00 $6.00 · EMPLOYEE - NEW $70.00 $72.00 $2.00 · EMPLOYEE - RENEWAL $42.00 $4S.00 $3.00 · RETNL SALES OF CONCEALED V~r. RPONS PERMIT $54.00 $56.00 $2.00 - LIQUIDATION (CLOSEOU1) SALE-PERMIT $28.00 $29.00 $1.00 - BINGO- NEW PERMIT $28.00 $29.00 $1 · BINGO- RENEWAL PERMIT $28.00 $29.00 $1.00 - SECOND HAND DEALERS. ITINERANT PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED AMPLIFIED MUSIG. 8PEEGH. MERCHANTS, PUBLIC DANCE HALLS, AND SOUND NOW INCLUDED IN OUll:)OOR FESTIVALS, CABARETS, TEMPORARY PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES, HOUSE ADDRESS CURB PNNTING, $28.00 $29.00 $1.00 INCLUDES NEW HOUSE ADDRESS CURB PNNllNG · BAJL 8ONO OWNER/AGENTS/SOLICITORS $15.00 $15.00 $0JX) · PUSHCART FOOD VENDORS $28.00 $39.00 $1.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson IOof 17 3/1/2OO2 , , CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A' SERVICE ADOPII~D PROPOSED AMOUNTOF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - MOTION PICTURE PERMIT $167.00 $168.00 $1.00 · RESIDENT SOLICITATION $20.00 $20.00 SO.00 · PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND/OR NECESSITY APPROVAL NEW FEE $300.00 $300.00 NEW FEE D-62 CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT PROCESSING - CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT $30.00 $30.00 SO.00 - RENEWAL $6.00 $8.00 SO.00 D,63 LIMOUSINE/TAXI/TOWING REGULATION · LIMOUSINE DRIVER PERMIT $'15.00 $t5.00 SO.00 o TAXI DRIVER PERMIT $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 SET BY ORDINANCE · TAXI DRIVER PERMIT RENEWN. $10.00 $10.00 SO.00 SET BY ORDINANCE · TAXI DRIVER PERMIT TR,N~ISFER $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 SET BY ORDINANCE o TAXI DRIVER PERMIT DUPLICATE $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 SET BY ORDINANCE - AMBULANCE VEHICLE INSPECTION $19.00 $20.00 SI.iX} INSPECTIONS CURRENTLY DONE BY CHP · LIMO VEHICLE INSPECTION $19.00 $20.00 $1.00 - TAXI VEHICLE INSPECTION $19.00 $20.00 $1 - TOW1NG VEHICLE INSPECTION $31.00 $32.00 $1.00 D-64 WEED ABATEMENT OR FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT $192.00 $192.00 $0.00 D*.65 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RESPONSE ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0.00 BILLED WITH LABOR/EQUIPMENT RENTAL FEE D-66 RRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE $343.00 $343.00 SO,00 BILLED UPON 3RD N.ARU WITHIN 12 IdOlS D-67 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE · INITIAL ALARM PERMIT $30.00 $30.00 $0.00 · ALARM PERMIT RENEWAL $15.00 $15.00 SO.00 · PERMIT RENEWAL DELINQUENCY PENALTY $1.00 $1.00 SO.00 SI/PERMIT/MONTH (MAXIMUM 10 MONTHS) · ALARM REVOCATION $50.00 $50.00 SO.00 · CHARGE AFTER 5TH FALSE ALARM $1 ! !.00 $ i 11.00 $0.00 - CHARGE AFTER 10'1¥1 FALSE ALARM $~92.00 $192.00 SO.00 D-68 SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY SERVICES - POLICE · SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY (LABOR AND/OR EQUIPMENq~ ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST SO.00 · POLICE · 2ND RESPONSE TO LOUD PARTIES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST SO.00 · FIRE - SPECIAL EVENT SERVICES (LABOR AND/OR EQUIPMENT) ACTUAL COST ACTHAL COST SO.00 D*.69 AUTOMOTIVE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION · STANDARD REPORT $12.00 $025/PAGE VARIES ELIMINATE ~ USE COPYCHARGE $025 ~ PAGE - SHORT FORM $2.00 $0.25/PAGE VARIES ELIMINATE AND USE COPY CHARGE $025 ~ PAGE D-70 FINGERPRINt' SERVICE · CHARGE PER APPLICANT PER FUNCTION S10.00 $10.00 S0.00 D-7! VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT - UNUCENCED DRIVER FEE (INCLUDES TOWING CHARGE) $96.00 $9[00 $2.00 D-72. SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE $0.00 SO.O0 SO.00 D-73 PARKING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT · VEHICLE TO&MNG $49.00 $50.00 · PARKING VIOLATION WA N/A $0.00 FEES SET BY RESOLUTION 074 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES · LN~OR COST PER INSPECTOR PER HOUR $43.00 $43.00 SO.00 - COST OF MATERIALS ACTUAL COST ,~AL COST S0.1X) D-75 ANIMAl. REGULATION · DOG LICENSES - ALTERED (SPAYED I NEUTERED) · ONE YEAR LICENSE $14.00 $15.00 $1.00 - TWO YEAR LICENSE $28.00 $30.00 $2.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 11 of 17 3/1/2OO2 · . CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVlCE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTESfCOUUENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 /(DECREASE) * THREE YEAR LICENSE $42.00 $45.00 $2.00 - UNALTERED · ONE YEAR LICENSE $20.00 $30.00 $0.00 · 'IWO YEAR LICENSE $60.00 $60.00 $0.00 · THREE YEAR LICENSE $9!.00 $91.00 - SENIOR RATE .ALTERED(SPAYED/NEUTERED) (65ARDOVER) · ONE YEAR LICENSE NEW FEE $10.00 $10.00 NEW FEE - TWO YEAR LICENSE NEW FEE $20.00 $20.00 NEW FEE - THREE YEAR LICENSE NEW FEE $30.00 $30,00 NEW FEE · LATE FEES (PAST 30 DAYS) $10.00 $20.00 $10.00 - REPLACEMENT TAG $7.00 $7.00 $0.00 o CAT TAGS · ONE YEAR $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 - LIFETIME $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 - OWNER TURN-IN · AT OWNERS LOCATION $45.00 $45.00 $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR · 1 HOUR MINIMUM · DOG I PUPPY $15.00 $15.{X) · CAT I KITI'EN $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 - IMPOUND CHARGE -DOGS - 1ST · SMNL/MEDIUM/LARGE $45.00 $45.00 $5.00 - 2ND · SMALL I MEDIUM I LARGE NEW FEE $60.00 $60.00 NEW FEE - 3RD - SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE NEWFEE $100.00 $100.00 NEWFEE · GIANT BREEDS $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 - FEMALE IN HEAT $60.00 $60.00 $0.00 - VlC~3iJS $101.00 $101.00 $0,00 - CATS $25.00 $25,00 SO.IX) - RN3BITS I GUINEA PIGS $10.00 $'10.00 SO.iX) · SNN(ES I TORTOISES $10.00 $10.00 · BIRDS- SMALL DOMESTIC $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 - BIRDS- LARGE DOMESTIC $20.00 $20.00 $0.00 · POULTRY $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 - SHEEP / GOATS / PIGS $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 - HORSE I CATTLE $101.00 $101.00 $0.00 · BOARDING- (CHARGES ARE PER DAY) -DOGS - SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 - GIANT BREEDS $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 - FEMALE IN HEAT $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 - VICIOUS $25.00 $25,00 $0.00 · CATS $16.00 $15.00 $0.00 · RABBITS I GUINEA PIGS Sl0.00 $10.00 $0.00 - SNAKES I TORTOISES $5.00 $5.00 - BIRDS · SMALL DOMESTIC $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 - BIRDS - I.ARGE ~ESTIC $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 - POULTRY $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 -SHEEP/GOATS/PIGS $10.00 $10.00 $5.00 · HORSE / CAT[LE $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 · MEDICAL FEES $5.00 $10.00 $5.00 Prepared by: L. SJrnpson 12 of 17 3/1/2OO2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - RECREATION I CULTURAL E-82 PARK FACILITY RENTAl - CENTENNIAL PLAZA - FACILITY RENTAL $28.00 $28.00 $0.00 - PARK PICNIC FACILITY - ONE FACILITY $28.00 $28.00 $0.00 - EACH N~)DITIONAL FACEITY $18.00 $18.00 $0.00 - SPORTS FIELD RENTAL $28.00 $28.00 $0.00 (PI. US 10% OF GROSS RECEIPTS IF 'FOR PROFIT' AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS SUCH AS RELD PREP WORK THAT MAY BE INCURRED) - SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING $4.00 $6.00 $2.00 CHARGE PER HOUR · 2 HOUR MINIMUM -MISCELLANEOUS PARKS SERVICES - ALCOHOL PERMIT - WITH FACIUTY RESERVATION $4.00 $4.00 $6.00 · WITHOUT FACILrlY RESERVATION (NON REFUNDABLE) $8.00 $6.00 $6.00 - OPEN TO THE PUELIC $60.00 $60.00 $6.00 PI.US ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED - SOUND PERMIT $25.00 $25.00 $6.00 - RESCHEDUUNG FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 - CANCELLATION FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $14.00 $14.00' SO.iX) E-83 RECREATION CENTER RENTAL -CATEGORY A- NON PROFIT- NO CHARGE TO THE PUI~.IC (THE FO[LOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A TWO HOUR MINIMUM RENTAL IS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE SCHEDULE IS AVNLABLE UPON REQUES~ - OR, MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., FACILITY (MU0 - STRONG ROOM $10.00 $I0.00 $0.00 · GREEN ROOM $10.00 $10.00 $6.00 · STRONG/GREEN ROOMS $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 · YOUNG (GAME) ROOM $12.00 $12,00 $6.00 $15 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REQUIRED - BROWN (WEIGHT) ROOM $15.00 $15.00 $6.00 $25 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REQUIRED - YOUNG / BROWN ROOMS $20.00 $20,00 $6.00 $40 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REQUIRED · WILLIAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 · WILLIAMS ROOM (GYM) W/~LEACHERS $20.00 $20.00 $6.00 - CONFERENCE ROOM $2.00 $3.00 $6.00 - KITCHEN 0NITH ROOM RENTAL) $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 · SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M.- CHARGE PER HOUR $10.00 $50.00 $40.00 · · CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAl. COST ACTUAL COST $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - EQUIPMENT RENTAL (INCLUDES SET-UP AND TAKE-DOWN) - TABLES (PER TABLE) $1.00 $0.00 -$1.00 DELETE · CHNRS (PER CHNR) $6.25 $0.00 -$025 DELETE - SCOREBOARD - PER HOUR (OPERATOR INCLUDED) $10.00 $0.00 -$10.00 DELETE - PIANO $15.00 $6.00 .$15.00 DELETE . P.A. SYSTEM - TWO SPEN(ERS AND A MlC $15.00 $6.00 415.00 DELETE . ADDFr~NAL SPEAKERS (PER PNR) $I0.00 $0.00 410.00 OELEIE - OVERHEAG PROJECTOR SS.iX) $0.00 -$6.00 DELETE - PORTABLE STAGE $10,00 $6.00 -$10.00 DELETE Prepared by: L. Simpso~ 13 of 17 3/1/2OO2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSEDMASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES~COMMF. NTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/91 I (DECREASE) - SILVER CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER - MEETING ROOM #1 $12.00 $12.00 $0.00 - MEETING ROOM #2 $12.00 $12.00 $0.00 - MEETING ROOM #1 & 12 $20,00 $20.00 S0.00 - COVERED COURT AREA $8.00 $8.00 $0.00 · COVERED COURT AREA W/LIGHTS $12.00 $12.00 SO.00 · KITCHEN (WITHOUT MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $8.00 $8.00 $0.00 - KITCHEN 0NITH MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $4.00 $4.00 $5.00 - SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $10.00 $50.00 $40.00 - CITY STAFF CHARGES o SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAl. COST $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - CUSTODIAL (2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTHAL COST ACTUAL COST SO.00 CHARGE PER HOUR -CATEGORY O · PRIVATE USE, ALL CHARGES TO THE PUBLIC PROHIBITED (THE FOLLOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A'IWO HOUR MINIMUM RENTAL IS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR HATE SCHEDULE IS AVNLAB~E UPON REQUESI~ - DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., FAClUTY (MI.K) · STRONG ROOM $25.00 $25.00 ~0.00 · GREEN ROOM $25.00 $25.00 ;0.00 · STRONG / GREEN ROOM $40.00 $40.00 ~0.00 - YOUNG (GAME) ROOM $30.00 $30.00 ;0.00 $15 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REOUIRED · BROWN (WEIGHT) ROOM $40.00 $40.00 ;0.00 $25 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REQUIRED - YOUNG / BROWN ROOMS $55.00 $55.00 ~0.00 $40 PREPARATION FEE MAY BE REDUIREO - WILLIAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $35.00 $35.00 ~0,00 · WILLINdS ROOM (GYM) W/BLEACHERS ~0.00 SO0.O0 ;0.00 · CONFERENCE ROOM $5.00 $5.00 ~.00 · KITCHEN (wrlH ROOM RENTAl.) $4.00 $4.00 ;0.00 · SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $10.00 $30.00 ~10.00 - CITY STAFF CHARGES o SUPERVISION (2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0.00 CHARGE PER HOUR - EQUIPMENT RENTAL (INCLUDES SET-UP AND TN(E-DOWN) · TABLES (PER TABLE) $2.00 $0.00 -$2.00 DELETE - CHNRS (PER CHAIR) $0.35 SO.00 -$0.35 DELETE - SCOREBOARD - PER HOUR (OPERATOR INCLUDED) $12.50 $0.00 -$12.50 DELETE · PA SYSTEM - TWO SPEN(ERS AND A MIC $20.00 SO.tX) -$20.00 DELETE - ADDITIONAL SPEN(ERS (PER PNR) $12.50 $8,00 -$12.50 DELETE - OVERHEAD PROJECTOR $10.00 $0.00 410,00 DELETE - PORTABLE STAGE $12.,50 $0.00 -$12.50 DELETE - SEVER CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER - MEETING ROOM I11 $30.00 $30.00 SO.00 - MEETING ROOM #2 $30.00 $.10.00 $0.00 · MEETING ROOM I I & 12 $45.00 $45.00 $0.00 · COVERED CQURT AREA $12.00 $12,00 $5.00 - COVERED COURT AREA W/LIGHTS $15.00 $15.00 SO.00 - K/TCHEN 0WITHOUT MEETTNG ROOM RENTAL) $12.00 $12.00 $0.00 - KITCHEN (W1TR MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 - SURCHARGE AFTER l0 P.M, - CHARGE PER HOUR $10.00 $10.00 SO.00 Prepared by: L. Simpso~ 14 of 17' 3/1/2OO2 · CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDUL. E FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST CHARGE PER HOUR' - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST CHARGE PER HOUR E-84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES · CITY ADULT VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM · WITH OFFICIALS $200.00 $200.00 $0,00 · WITHOUT OFFICIALS $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 · PRNATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS · CiTY ADULT SOF'TSALL PROGRN~I · LEAGUE ENTRY FEE PER TEAM WITH OFFICIALS $431.00 $448.00 - RESCHEDULING FEE $35.00 $35.00 $0.00 $35.00 PER GAME · PRIVATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 - CITY ADULT 8ASKETSALL PROGRAM · MENS PROGRAM · CITY LEAGUE $350.00 $350.00 $0.00 PLUS $39.001 EACH ADDmONAL GAME - MENS PROGRAM - PRIVATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COSTS ACTUAL COSTS $0.00 - DROP*INS ATHLETICS PROGRAM (IdLK) - EVENT DAY - REGISTRATION $2,00 $3.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER · ADULT FLAG FOOTBALL · CHARGE PER TEAM $263.00 $263.00 $0.00 CHARGE PER TEAM · ADULT SPORTS TOURNAMENTS 85.0% OF COST 85.0% OF COST TO RECOVER 85% OF TOURNAMENT CO~TS - ACULT PUBLIC COURTS TEAM TENNIS - PER TEAM $97.00 $97.00 $0.00 · PER PLAYER $'16.00 $16.00 - CORPORATE TEAM CHALLENGE - CHARGE PER TEAM $294.00 $394.00 $0.00 CHARGE PER 'T~ E-85 CITY YOUI'I'I PROGRAMS AND ACI'~ -CITY You*rtl FLAG FOOTSALI.. PROGRAM - CHARGE PER PLAYER WITH COACHES PROVIDED $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER · CHARGE PER PLAYER WITHOUT COACHES $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER · CiTY YOUTH SOFTBALL PROGRAM - CHARGE PER PLAYER WITH COACHES PROVIDED $40.00 $40.00 $3.00 CHARGE IS PER Pt. AYER · CHARGE PER PLAYER WITHOUT COACHES $20.00 $20,00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - CI~Y YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM - CHARGE PER PLAYER WITH COACHES PROVIDED $55.00 $55.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER Iq..AYER - CHARGE PER PLAYER WITHOUT COACHES $30.00 $30.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - YOUTH SPORTS TOURNAMENTS 50.0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0,00 TO RECOVER 50% OF TOURNAMENT COSTS - CROSS COUNTRY EVENT - PRE REGISTRATION $3,00 $3.00 $3.00 · LATE REGISTRATION $4,00 $4,00 $0.00 - YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS · CHARGE PER PLAYER PER CLINIC $20.00 $20.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER · VARIOUS YOUTH EXCURSIONS 50.0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0,00 TO RECOVER 50% OF EXCURSION COSTS - YOUTH DAY CAMP A LATE FEE WILL BE CHARGED OF $1.00 PER MINUTE- UP TO 15 MINUTES IF CHILD IS NOT PICKED UP BY CLOSING TIMF_ · 5 DAY SUMMER PROGRAM $88.00 $88.00 $0.00 · 10 DAY SUMMER PROGRAM $'156.00 $170.00 $'14.00 - CANCELLATION FEE New Fee $75.00 $75.00 NEW FEE - YOUTH TALENT CONTEST $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 · YOUTH DANCE PROGRAM $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 - CHILDREN'S CARNIVALS $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 · YOUTH CROSS COUNTRY CLUB $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 Prepared by: L. Simpson 15 of 17 3/1/20(~ · CiTY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) - HIGH SCHOOL, SUMMER LEAGUES $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - PER ACTIVITY - IN-LINE HOCKEY $60.00 $60.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER PARTICIPANT - YOUTR 'I~-BALI. $20.00 $20.00 SO,00 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - MLK/I. OWEM. DROP-IN YOM'IH PROGRAM $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - SPECIAL EVENT FEE $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 E-86 AQUATIC PROGRAMS- RECREATIONAL SWIMMING · CHARGE PER DAY $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 - S~N. PASS $30.00 $30.00 SO.00 - SWIM FOR FITNESS - CHARGE PER DAY $2.00 $2.00 $0.00 * SEASONAL PASS SO0.00 SO0.00 SO.00 - WATER MOVIES - PER PERSON ($3.00 DISCOUNT FOR F/~ILY OF FIVE OR MORE) SO.00 $3.00 SO.00 - SPECIAL AQUATIC EVENTS (PER PARTICIPANT · PER DAY) $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 PER PARTICIPANT- PER DAY - TRNNING · SWIM INSTRUCTOR TRNNING $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 · NEW LIFEGUARD TRNNING $75.00 $75.00 SO.00 - RENEWN~ LIFEGUARD TRNNING $60.00 $60.00 S0,00 -AQUATK~ PROGRAMS · CiTY RESIDENTS - SWIMMING LESSONS · CiTY RESIDENTS - ONE SESSION (10 DAYS) - CITY RESIDENTS $28.00 $28.00 SO,00 - PRIVATE LESSONS $,50.00 $,50.00 SO.00 * SEMI-PRIVATE LESSONS $31.00 $31 .IX) $0.00 · - ONE SESSION (10 DAYS) AT MLK CENTER- CITY RESIDENTS $,5.00 $5.00 SO.iX) * COMPETITIVE AOUATICS. CITY RESIDENTS $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 - SWIM POOr. RENTAL - CITY RESIDENTS (RATES ARE PER HO*JR, 2 HOUR MINIMUM REQUIRED) $15/HOUR/ODITIONAL FEE FOR EACH - LARGE POOLS - JEFFERSON POOl., SILVER CREEK F'OOL & CALIFORNIA (MLK) NUMBER OF UFEGUARDS NEEDED 1 - 50 PEOPLE $45.00 $45.00 SO.00 3 LIFEGUARDS 51 - 100 PEOPLE $50.00 $,.~.00 SO.00 4 LIFEGUARDS I 01 · 2O0 PEOPLE $55.00 $55.00 $0.00 5 LIFEGUARDS - ALL O'~IER POOLS 1 - 50 PEC)~E $40,00 $40.00 $0.00 2 LIFEGUARDS 51 - 100 PEOPLE $45.00 $45.00 SO.00 · 3 LIFEGUARDS 101-130 PEOPLE $50.00 $50.00 SO.00 4 LIFEGUARDS - RENTER IS QUALIFIED TO PRovIDE OWN LIFEGUARDS NEW FEE $35.00 $35.00 NEW FEE - POOL SECURITY FEE NEW FEE $g0.00 $g0.00 NEW FEE -AQUATIC PROGRAMS - NON RESIDENTS · SWIMMING LESSONS - NON RESIDENTS - ORE SESSION (10 DAYS) - NON RESIDENTS $41.00 $41.00 SO.00 - PRIVATE LESSONS $50.00 $50.00 SO.00 - SEMI*PRNATE LESSONS $34.00 $34.00 SO.00 - COMPETfflVE AQUATICS - NON RESIDENTS . SSi.iX) $51.00 S0.00 - SWIM POOl. RENTAL - NON RESIDENTS (RATES ARE PER HOUR. 2 HOUR MINIMUM REQUIRED) $204'1OUR ADDITIONAL FEE FOR EACH · LARGE POOIS- JEFFERSON POOL, SILVER CREEK POOl. & CALIFORNIA (MU0 NUMBER OF LIFEGUARDS NEEDED I - 50 PEOPf. E $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 3 LIFEGUARDS 51-100 PEO~E $55.00 · $55.00 $0.00 4 LIFEGUARDS 1Of - 200 PEOPLE $00.00 $00.00 SO.00 5 UPEGUARO$ - NJ. O"[HER POOLS I - 50 PEOP/,.E $45,00 $45.00 SO.00 2 LIFEGUARDS Prepared by: L. Simpson 16 of 17 3/1/2OO2 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2002 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED' PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES FEE INCREASE NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 06/28/00 12/28/01 I (DECREASE) 51 - 100 PEOPLE $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 3 LIFEGUARDS 101 - 130 PEOPLE $55.00 $55.00 $0.00 4 LIFEGUARDS · RENTER IS QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE OWN LIFEGUARDS NEW FEE $35.00 $25.00 NEW FEE - POOL SECURITY FEE NEW FEE $90.00 $90.00 NEW FEE E~7 LEISURE CLASSES A PERCENTAGE OF CLASS REGISTRATION FEE - CITY PROVIDES FACILITY $0.35 $0.35 $0,00 o CONTRACTOR PROVIDES FACILITY $0.30 $0.30 $0.00 ' MISCELLANEOUS FEES F-9! FIRE HYDRANT DISTRIBUTION AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION $912.00 $967.00 $55.00 FEE PER HYDRANT - HYDRANT FLOW AND TESTING $,16.00 $47.00 -,AFTER HOURS TESTING $04.00 $64.00 $0.00 F-92 DOWNTOWN OFF-STREET PARKING - MONTHLY PARKING $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 CHARGE IS PER VEHICLE PER MONTH F-93 PROCESSING SCHOOL FACILITY FEES $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 F-94 COMPUTER DATA ACTUAL. COST ACTUAL COST F-9S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES - FAIR HOUSING WORKSHOP FEE $300.00 $300.00 $0.00 - TOP FLOOR RENTAL $150 *$121HOUR $150+$121HOUR $0.00 F.96 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STREET USE $220.00 $220.00 $0.00 F-97 CHECK COLLECTION $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 Prepared by: L. SImpsotl 17of 17 3/!/20(~