HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/23/1998 BAKERSFIELD
Randy Rowles, Chair
Irma Carson
Kevin McDermott
Staff: Dolores Teubner
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, March 23, 199,8
12:15 p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room
Second Floor - City Hail, Suite 201
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA
1. ROLL CALL
2. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 2, 1998 MINUTES
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. BID APPEAL PROCESS - Rojas
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ACTION PLAN FY 1998-99 -
Wager
B. KERN COUNTY MUSEUM AUTHORITY BOARD CONTRIBUTION REQUEST - Teubner
C. BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1997 THROUGH JANUARY 1,
1998 - Haynes
D. MEADOWS FIELD AIRPORT TERMINAL FUNDING
7. ADJOURNMENT
FILE COPY
DRAFT
BAKERSFIELD
/<
AlagTandy, C~ Man~er Randy Rowles, Chair
Irma Carson
S~ff: Darnell Hayn~ Kevin McDermo~
/
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI~EE
Monday, Februa~ 2, 1998
12:15 p.m.
Ci~ Manager's Conference Room
1. ROLL CALL
Call to Order at 12:30 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers Randy Rowles, Chair (arrived at 12:40 p.m.);
Irma Carson; and Kevin McDermott
2. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 5, 1998 MEETING MINUTES
Approved as submitted.
3. PRESENTATIONS
None
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
None
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
Staff presented the Committee a conceptual time line outlining the major
milestones involved in the redevelopment project area adoption. In addition, staff
reviewed with the Committee payback and break-even analysis which assumed
one and two percent growth rates occurring within the redevelopment areas. In
order to pay off the cost of establishing and operating the redevelopment areas
over a period of 40 years, the Committee stressed that there must be a minimum
of one half of one percent growth occurring. If no growth occurs, no projects will
be proposed. In addition, state policy requires the City to set aside or target 20
DRAFT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, February 2, 1998
Page -2-
percent of redevelopment tax increment from the proposed new areas. Currently
$1,000,000 of housing set aside is available in the existing redevelopment area
for Iow- to moderate-income housing.
The Committee directed staff to prepare an information package and
administrative report including the conceptual time line, 40 year break-even
analysis, graphs and payoff analysis for Council consideration at the February
11, 1998 meeting.
B. COST RECOVERY SYSTEM
Staff presented a proposal to streamline the cost recovery system to simplify
the formula for fee calculation and to make it more understandable for both the
City Council and the public. The proposed changes to the cost recovery system
do not significantly increase or decrease revenues; however, they do result in
significantly less time spent by staff to prepare and review fees. The Budget and
Finance Committee considered the proposal and unanimously recommended it
be forwarded to the full Council for consideration.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. DISCUSSION OF BID APPEAL PROCESS
Staff presented to the Committee a series of concerns regarding the Alternative
Dispute Resolution Committee (ADRC) process. Based on recent experience,
staff felt the process consumed far too much City staff time, there were concerns
regarding the ADRC composition, legal issues regarding California contract law
definitions versus City of Bakersfield Charter definitions, and the appeal process
in general.
The goal of staff is to revise the ADRC Ordinance so that it is fair, equitable and
practical for all parties involved. The Committee suggested that staff review the
contract safeguards in place in the City's capital improvement program to
determine if any could be incorporated into the annual contract process. The
Committee directed staff to further refine and research their concerns and bring
this issue back to the next Budget and Finance Committee meeting for additional
discussion.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:35 p.m.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DWH:jp
ORDINANCENO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 3.20.065
AND SUBSTITUTING A NEW SECTION 3.20.065 AND
AMENDING SUBSECTION C OF SECTION 3.20.068
TO THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE DETERMINATION OF
RESPONSIBLE BIDDERS AND BID PROTEST.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the~Ci.tY of Bakersfield ~as follows:
SECTION 1.
'Section 3.20.065 of the Bakersfield Municipai:iC0de:::is hereby reoealedand a new
Section 3.20.065 is hereby added to read as follows:
3.20.065 Determination of responsible bidder.
A. The Vice Mayor, with the approvali:iio[ilthe City 'Council, shall appoint an
advisory ad hoc Alternative Dispute Resolution Cbmmittee consiSting of four (4) persons
as follows: one (1) professional licensect civil:~:engineeror' architect; one (1) licensed
general contractor; one (1) City PUblic Works' employee familiar with construction
practices; one (1) City employee from Finance or Lega!~:!?.'No member shall have any direct
involvement with the'dispute between the::~idder or:COntractor.
B. ..... :'::~:.The Altem~ti~eD sputa ReS0t~t on' Committee shall hear and decide the
issue ol~!!wheth~r or nOt.~the:c0ntractor'i~ili~i:i~ not, a responsible bidder. A responsible
bidder sha!l I~edefined as::a:~nt!~actor with a demonstrated ability to perform successfully
under the terfms:and:.conditi:.(~ns.:~fi!the contract including but not limited to: a successful
record of tim:eily~:peEO[mance::::°n::iS:i~ilar work in the past, proven financial resources,
proven tech~!~liiprofi~ie~y no past Violations of law or regulations and no past practices
that have:¢eSulted ...... in'additiOnal costs... ................ to City for work performed. The Alternative Dispute
ResolUtion Committeeiii~h~!~ii!i[ake evidence only on the issue of the contractor's quality of
wor;k?and fitness to perf0rm the contract under the definition of responsible bidder. The
C[[~imust show, by prePOnderance of the evidence, that the contractor is non-responsible.
::.%?:~: C. The .hear ng before the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee shall
C~D~iiSt?::9~:::.::a:ii~ne-hour presentation by each side followed by a 15-minute closing
Pre~::~ntati:~qnii:::~'Any cross-examination of witnesses shall count against the time of the
crosS~×amining side. After both sides have finished their presentations, the Alternative
Dispute Resolution Committee shall have a total of forty-five minutes to question either
side.
D. Written material setting forth each side's position must be presented to each
member of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, and the opposing side, at least
three (3) working days before the scheduled hearing. Any rebuttal written material must
be given to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee at the time of the scheduled
hearing. Rebuttal written material may not address any subject matter not specifically
contained in the original materials submitted to the Alternative Dispute Resolution
Committee. No other written material may be presented without the express:authorization
of the Committee. :~: ::iii?
E. The Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee shali:i~e;~a~written advisory
decision to the City Council setting forth their findings::iof'fact and::~Ul~i~t~i:decision, said
decision shall be transmitted to the City Council for::'consideration at~the~next, reg~!~i~iy
scheduled City Council meeting following the issuance of the'written de¢isior~?iSUbject to
agenda deadlines. ' ..... ~":'
SECTION 2...:
Subsection C of Section 3.20.068 of the ~Bakersfield MUnicipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Section 3.20.068(C) Bid ProtestS.
The City Council shall hear:and determ ne theil~ d protest at the time the contract
comes before the Council for;a~ard of:?tfie projeCtii:and before awarding the project;
provided, however, the City COUncil ma~!by majodtY vote continue the matter to obtain
additional information as?the~Council dee~s:::.necessary or may refer the protest to the
Alternative!DiSpute ResO?!i6~ 6ommittee;f0ran'adv sory decision. The advisory decision
of the Altered[lYe: DispUteiBeS01ution Committee shall be received and reviewed by the
City Coun'ci[~hoiWill then ~ke:~e final decision.
~:~:~:::~: '~:::':' ;;:::::::::::~: SECTION 3.
~::ti~is Ordinan~i!.~:!ii:i~e posted in accordance with provisions of the Bakersfield
Mur~i¢ipal Code and shailbe¢ome effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its
passage.::~:~"
':~:~:::i~:: ...... - ......... 000 ..........
Page 2 of 3 Pages
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 9, 1998
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direc(o~
SUBJECT: Proposed Action Plan (CDBG, HOME, and ESG) for FY 98/99 - $4,339,000.
The proposed Community Development Block Grant for the City of Bakersfield from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for FY 98/99 is $2,773,000. This represents
a 2% reduction from that of FY 97/98. The HOME Investment Parmership Program entitlement for
FY 98/99 is $1,108,000 (a 7% increase) and the Emergency Shelter Grant's $108,000 (a 44%
increase from FY 97/98).
Staff estimates $235,000 of loan repayments and additional CDBG revenue will be collected during
FY 98/99. In addition, approximately $115,000 of HOME repayments will also be available for
eligible HOME projects in FY 98/99. Total available CDBG funds for FY 98/99 is estimated at
$3,008,000. Total available HOME funds for FY 98/99 is $1,223,000 and ESG funds is $108,000.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
During the non-profit proposed submission period of the application process for FY 98/99 a total of
seven projects for public facilities requested $1.6 million from CDBG. In addition, twenty capital
improvement projects were submitted from Public Works, Fire, the Convention Center and Parks
and Recreation. The total estimated cost for the submitted CIP projects was $1.3 million. A detailed
analysis of each project is attached for review. Activities proposed for CDBG funding included the
following:
Operating Budget
· Administration, $601,592 - for salaries, benefits, supplies, consultant, and other
outside services. This also includes $70,000 towards environmental impact reports
for the establishment of redevelopment areas for Baker Street and Southeast
Bakersfield (subject to a twenty percent cap).
DIk:P:\G EORG E\BFCDBUP.M EM
Section 108 Loan repayment, $341,058 - the fifth of ten annual payments on the
Holiday Inn Hotel assistance. Last year's payment amount was $339,395.
Total $942,650
Public Service (subject to a 15%cap)
· Enterprise Zone Marketing/Vouchering, $15,000 - to continue the City/County
support of the Enterprise Zone.
· Fair Housing Services, $103,500 - to continue the City Housing Education program.
· Graffiti Removal Program, $146,000 - to continue the City's efforts to remove
graffiti within CDBG eligible areas.
· Looking Good Neighborhood, $27,000 - to continue the City's efforts to expand
- neighborhood improvement activities in targeted areas.
Total $291,500
Housing
· Code Enforcement, $50,000 - to assist the Building Department remove substandard
structures, tires, and lot clean-up in the newly annexed Casa Loma area.
· Home Access Grant Program, $30,000 - a grant of up to $2,500 each to low/mod
residents for handicap accessibility improvements.
· Housing Service direct delivery costs, $85,000 - staff cost and services for CDBG
and HOME funded housing programs.
· Lead Based Paint Abatement, $23,000 - to assist in the identification and removal of
health hazards in eligible single and multi-family dwellings as required by the federal
government.
· Bakersfield Sign Project, $I0,000 - to assist in the rehabilitation or removal of the
public pedestrian walk (over Union Avenue).
Total $198,000
Economic Development Assistance
· Business Loan program, $250,000 - fund ongoing efforts by the City to attract and
retain larger businesses who employ low/mod income residents.
· Unreinforced Masonry (URM), $100,000 - to provide financial assistance for
rehabilitation of commercial buildings for correction of seismic safety hazards.
Total $350,000
DIk:P:\GEORGE\BFCDBUP.M EM 2
Non-Profit Assistance
· Kern County Health Department, $300,000 - to provide financial assistance to
construct a 50,000 square foot.facility. An additional $50,000 will be considered in
FY 99/00 CDBG Action Plan for this project.
,, Bakersfield Homeless Center, $55,000 - to provide financial assistance to acquire and
rehabilitate the adjacent property to expand the homeless services.
· Kenya Community Center, $2,850 - to assist in the acquisition of City-owned
property on Lakeview Avenue to develop a community grocery store to serve as a
training facility.
Total $357,850
Capital Improvement Projects
· Casa Loma #6 Storm Drain Improvement, $275,000 - to alleviate drain problems in
newly annexed area.
· Casa Loma #6 Fire Hydrant and Water System Improvement Phase II, $101,000 -
replacement of undersized water mains and fire hydrants in newly annexed area.
· Casa Loma #6 Curb and Gutter Design, $16,500 - design and engineering costs for
street improvements in newly annexed area. Construction is proposed for FY 99/00
CDBG funding.
· Southgate Street Light Improvements, $51,500 - to upgrade and install needed street
lighting to the proposed annexed area.
· Southgate Fire Hydrant/Water System Improvements Phase i Design, $42,000.-
design and engineering costs tbr replacements of undersized water mains and fire
hydrants in the proposed annexed area.
· Chester Avenue #3 Fire Hydrants and Water System Improvements Design Phase 1,
$45,000 - design and engineering to replace undersized water mains and fire hydrants
in newly annexed area.
· Lake Street Area Street Reconstruction Project Phase VII, $138,500 - to continue
street improvement along Lake Street between Robinson and Miller.
· Haley Street Area Sidewalk Reconstruction, $88,500 - reconstruction of deteriorated
section of sidewalks in the residential area bounded by Hwy. 178, Haley, Kentucky,
and Alta Vista.
· City Parks ADA Improvement Project, $110,000 - installation of ADA approved
playground equipment and barrier removal at 17 existing city parks.
Total $868,000 .'
DIk:P:\GEORGE\BFCDBUP.MEM 3
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME)
During the application process for FY 98/99 three proposals were received requesting HOME
Investment Partnership program assistance totaling $280,000. Activities proposed for HOME
funding include the following:
Operating Budget
· Administration, $122,100 - reflects salaries, benefits, supplies, and other outside
service for HOME eligible projects (subject to a 10% cap).
Total $122,100
-Housing
· First Time Homebuyers Assistance, $96,500 - ongoing funding to eligible first time
homebuyers with downpayment assistance. The major funding for this program for
FY 98/99 is $360,000 excess surplus housing funds from the Central District
Development Agency approved November 26, 1997.
Single Family Rehabilitation Loan program, $435,000 - housing loans for eligible
low and moderate income homeowners.
New Construction Assistance, $146,000 - to purchase vacant tax delinquent
properties from the County of Kern for resale to affordable housing developers.
· Rehabilitation of Multi-Family Dwellings, $85,000 - to provide assistance to
property owners to make needed repairs to promote safe and decent housing.
· Lead Based Paint Abatement, $85,000 - to assist in identifying and removal of health
hazards in eligible single and multi-family dwellings. New HUD mandated
initatives.
· Home Access Grant Program, $30,000 - a grant of up to $2,500 each to low/mod
residents for handicap accessibility improvements.
· Housing Program Service Direct Delivery, $41,000 - staff cost for CDBG and
HOME funded programs.
Total $918,500
Non-Profit Assistance
· Community Housing Development Organization (CHI)O) Set-Aside, $182,400 - to
provide assistance to qualified CHDO's in developing, acquiring, or rehabilitating
affordable housing projects.
Total $182,400
DIk:P:\GEORGE\BFCDBUP.M EM 4
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG)
During the FY 98/99 application process for ESG only three proposals were submitted. The purpose
of the ESG program is to improve the quality of existing emergency shelters for the homeless, help
meet the costs of operating the shelters and providing essential social services, as well as, fund
preventive programs and activities. The two proposals submitted were:
Operating Budget
· Administration, $5,400 - represents salaries, benefits, supplies and outside services
(subject to a 5% cap).
Total $5,4OO
Non Profits
· Alliance Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault (Alliance), $27,900 -
assistance to allow Alliance to cover the cost of a child care coordinator for clients
participating in counseling, case management, social service costs, medical and other
appointments.
· Kem County Mental Health Association (KCMHA), $17,200 - funds will be used to
help reduce KCMHA's annual operational cost including utilities and maintenance.
In addition, the funds will allow for the implementation of their Homerun Program
which provides transportation and referrals fbr homeless clients.
· Bethany Services, $57,500 - funds will be used to help support operational costs
necessary to maintain the Bakersfield Homeless Center. These costs include utilities,
janitorial and maintenance supplies~ insurance and other basic business expenses.
Total $102,600
The Action Plan will require a 30-day public notice and comment period. The HUD deadline for
the Action Plan is May 16, 1998. The Action Plan is currently scheduled for Budget and Finance
Committee review on March 16. The Action Plan could be placed on the March 25, 1998 City
Council agenda and authorize staffto publish the public notice to initiate the 30-day review period
on March 25, 1998. Staff would schedule a public meeting to receive public comments on April 14,
1998 at the Convention Center, 5:30 p.m. City Council could then approve the FY 98/99 Action
Plan and authorize the submission to HUD, subject to the end of the 30-day public review period
on April 22 or May 6, 1998. The approved FY 98/99 Action Plan muSt be submitted to HUD no
later than May 16, 1998.
DIk:P:\GEORGE\BFCDB UP.M EM 5
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community DeveloPment Department
MEMORANDUM
March 6, 1998
TO: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator
FROM: k',Jan Fulton, Development Associate
SUBJECT: '.~ on-Profit Applications for FY 1998-99
The following table summarizes the applications received by this department for FY 1998-99
CDBG, HOME and ESG funds. While the complete analysis of each application is not yet
complete, the information provided below is an accurate representation of each proposal. If
you require additional information, please let me know.
Community Development Applications FY 98/99
Public Facilities, Housing and Homeless Projects
CDBG, HOME and ESG Funds
Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD
and & City Funds Eligible
Funding Location Requested/
Recommendation Other Sources
CDBG APPLICATIONS
Bakersfield Rehabilitation of Bakersfield $150,000 yes
Senior Center facility Senior Center applied to
430 4~h St. County-
estimates
$273,000
JF\S:\JF\98_99APPmem.xvpd
January 13, 1998 I
Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD
and & City Funds Eligible
Funding Location Requested/
Recommendation Other Sources
KCEOC Central Rehabilitation of' KCEOC $654,644 multi- yes
Kitchen Gleaner's kitchen, year
Rehabilitation 3100 Chester Avenue
for use as central
kitchen for Headstart
Program
PAL Center Construction of a PAL $345,650 yes
community/youth
activity center.
500 Homemaker
+Mt. Elgon Acquisition of City- Kenya $83,000 YES -
Grocery Store owned property for Community acquisition
development of a Center Actual CDBG of city-
grocery store/hand-on needed = owned
employment training +/- $10,000 land could
center, be done
with little
407, 417 and new $
unaddressed parcel
north of 417 Lakeview
Cedar House Rehabilitation of Cedar Living $42,558 yes, but
Rehabilitation House licensed adult Connections usually a
care facility. HOME
2429 19th Street. activity -
not eligible
for HOME
+Homeless Acquisition and Bethany $54,000 yes
Shelter infrastructure Services applied to
Expansion, improvements at 1636 County
Acquisition E. Truxtun - in
conjunction with HUD
SHP grant
Water System Anne Sippe Clinic 18200 Kern unknown no - not a
Upgrade Riverside Ranch Canyon Road public
facility
+Demolition and Casa Loma area Cityof $50,000 yes
Clearance Bakersfield
Program Dev. Services
JF\S:LIF',,98_99AP Pmem.wpd
January. 13. 1998 2
Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD
and & City Funds Eligible
Funding Location Requested/
Recommendation Other Sources
TOTAL REQUEST $1,379,852
TOTAL ENTITLEMENT $2,773~000
*ESG
+Homeless 1600 East Truxtun Bethany $50,125 yes
Services, Services 7375
Operation
+Homeless 1921 19th Street Alliance Against $24,340 yes
Prevention Family Violence 3560
Services,
Operation, etc.
+Operations, 345 Chester Ave. Kern County $15,000 yes
Essential Mental Health 2200
Services Association
TOTAL REQUEST $89,465
additional funds 13135
admin 5400
TOTAL ENTITLEMENT $108,000
'- HOME
<HOME FHA 203 K program KCEOC $70,000 YES -
PARTNERSHIP Acquisition, rehabilitation, CHDO
and homeownership eligible
Application opportunities for low/mod
Part I first time homebuyers.
Various sites
DCC TNT Rehabilitation of Desert $10,000 YES
Facility property. Counseling applied to
Rehab Project 2105 F Street Clinic (DCC) County
<Home- Ownership Homeownership Affordable $200,000 YES
Opportunities opportunities. Homes, Inc. CHDO
Created from FHA Various sites, applicant
and Bank KEOs and
Tax Collector Sales
TOTAL REQUEST $280,000
TOTAL ENTITLEMENT $1,106,000
+ Recommending funding
< Recommending funding with prior year funds
*Because the City received an ESG entitlement in excess of projected amounts, I have prorated
additional funds to each of the applicants in relationship to the amounts they requested. A summary of
J F\S:~3 F".95_99A P Pmem.wpd
January. 13. 1998 3
these proposed modifications to their requests is illustrated at the end of the ESG segment of the table.
JF\S:\JF\98_99APPmem.wpd
January 13. 1998 4
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 6, 1998
TO: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director
George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator
FROM:
SUBJECT: CIP Proposal Received for FY 1998/99 CDBG Assistance
The deadline for submission of CIP proposals for FY 1998/99 was November 26, 1997. We
received twenty proposals totaling $1.3 million. Staff met with Public Works and Parks and
Recreation to determine their priorities for the various projects that were submitted. Below are
project descriptions and cost estimates for the CIP's submitted for FY 1998/99 CDBG funding.
Staff is currently reviewing the proposals, and an administrative report outlining staff findings will
be completed by February 1998.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS
Flood Drain Improvements
Casa Loma #6 - Storm Drain Improvements (Phase II)
Alleviate storm drain problems in the newly annexed area bounded by Madison, Casa Loma,
Cottonwood, and East White. Approximately $14,730' budgeted FY 1997/98. FY 98/99
project cost $245,500. Public Works design and engineering cost $22,100. CD direct delivery
cost $7,400. Total $275,000.
Ward 1
Southgate #1 Storm Drain ImproVement Design (Phase I)
Design and engineering plans to alleviate storm drain problems in the newly annexed area
bounded by Belle Terrace, South Union, Planz, and South "H." Public Works design and
engineering cost $20,000. CD direct delivery cost $1,000. Total $21,000.
Ward 1 or 7
dlk:P:\G EORGE\fy9899cipreq.mem Page - !-
Parks, Recreation Facilities
Beale Park Swimming Pool Improvements
Improvements to the existing Beale Park Pool including ladder step, lifeguard stand, and
bathroom roof. Project cost $2,26 i. CD direct delivery cost $339. Total $2,600.
Ward 1
Wayside Park Pool Improvements
Reconstruction of existing pool decking. Project cost $8,348. CD direct delivery cost $452.
Total $8,800.
Ward 1
Saunders Park Pool Improvements
Reconstruction of existing pool decking and vertical in-line pump. Project cost $7,810. CD
direct-delivery cost $390. Total $8,200.
(NOTE: Service Area does not qualify as low~mod.
Ward 5
dastro Park Pool Improvements
Reconstruction of existing pool decking. Project cost $3,250. CD direct delivery cost $150.
Total $3,400.
(NOTE: Service Area does not qualify as low~mod.)
Ward 5
Water/Sewer Improvements
Chester Avenue #3 - Fire HYdrant and Water System Improvement (Design Phase)
Design and engineering cost to replace of undersized water mains and fire hydrant upgrade in
the newly annexed area bounded by Chester, 34th, "Q," and 40th. Public Works design and
engineering cost $40,000. CD direct delivery cost $5,000. Total $45,000
Ward2
Casa Loma ~ - Fire Hydrant and Water S¥'stem Improvements (Phase H)
Replacement of undersized water mains and fire hydrant upgrade in the newly annexed area.
Area bounded by Madison, Casa Loma, Cottonwood, and East White. Approximately
$189,750 budgeted from FY 97/98 for design and project cost. Project cost FY 98/99 $85,000.
Public Works design and engineering $12,750. CD direct delivery cost $3,250. Total
$101,000.
Ward 1
Southgate #1 - Fire Hydrant and Water System Improvement (Phase 1)
Replacement of undersized water mains and fire hydrant upgrade in the newly annexed area
bounded by Belle Terrace, South Union, Planz, and South "H." Public Works design and
engineering cost $40,000. CD direct delivery cost $2,000. Total $42,000.
Ward 1 or 7
dlk:P:\G EORG E\fy9899cipreq.mem Page -2-
Street Improvements
Lake Street Area Reconstruction Project
Reconstruction of curb and gutter, fencing, and resurfacing along Lake Street between
Robinson and Haley streets. Project cost $232,727. Public Works design and engineering cost
$33,273. CD direct delivery cost $11,000. Total $277,000.
Ward2
Casa Loma #6 - Curb and Gutter and Street Improvements (Design Phase I)
Design and engineering cost for street improvements in newly annexed area bounded by
Madison, Casa Loma, Cottonwood, and East White. Public Works design and engineering
cost $15,652. CD direct delivery cost $848. Total $16,500.
Ward 1
Southgate #1 - Street Lighting Improvement Project (Phase I)
Upgrading of existing street lights to City standards and placement of new street lights in
newly annexed area bounded by Belle Terrace, South Union, Planz, and South "H." Project
cost $34,000. Public Works design and engineering $16,000. CD direct delivery cost $1,500.
Total $51,500.
Ward 1 or 7
Sidewalk
Haley Street Area Sidewalk Reconstruction Prq[ect
Replacement of deteriorated section of sidewalks in the area bounded by Highway 178, Haley,
Kentucy, and Alta Vista. Project cost $71,400. Public Works design and engineering
$13,600. CD direct delivery cost $3,500. Total $88,500.
Ward2
Removal of Architectural Barriers
Convention Center Access Ramp Improvements
Removal of architectural barriers along the west corridor meeting rooms area. Project cost
$22,500. Public Works design and engineering cost $3,500. CD direct delivery cost $1,000.
Total $27,000
Ward 2
Ci~_ Park and Recreation Q[l~ce Improvement Project
Removal of architectural barriers at the City's Park and Recreation office. Project cost $5,940.
CD direct delivery cost $460. Total $6,400.
Priority #5
Ward 5
dlk:P2GEORGE\fy9899cipreq.mem Page -3-
American's with Disabilities Act Swimming Pool Access
Portable lifts fbr eight existing locations at pools for American's with Disabilities Act access.
Beale, Jastro, Jefferson, MLK, Planz, Saunders, Siemon, and Wayside parks. Project cost
$10,400. CD direct delivery cost $100. Total $10,500.
NOTE:' Portable equipment not eligible.
Wards 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Architectural Barrier Removal at Ci~ Parks.
Removal of architectural barriers at 12 existing City parks. Installation of American's with
Disability Act curb and ramps, walks, and fountains at 12 City parks. Project cost $16,325.
CD direct delivery cost $775. Total $17,100.
Priori~. #3
Ward 4, 6, and 7
American's with Disabilities Act Playground Equipment Installation Project
Playground equipment and American's with Disabilities Act compliance improvements at 17
existing City parks. Project cost $105,000. CD direct delivery cost $5,000. Total $110,000.
Priority #1
Ward 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
Sling L~ft Improvement..for Three CiO, Parks
Installation of"sling lifts" at three existing city pool sites. Siemon, Jastro, and Jefferson
parks. Project cost $76,220. Public Works design and engineering cost $12,780. CD direct
delivery cost $3,000. Total $92,000.
Priority, #2
Wards 2, 3, and 5
Ci_ty Council Chamber American's with Disabilities Act Improvement Project
Removal of handicap barrier at the City Council Chambers. Project cost $85,000. Public
Works design and engineering $15,000. CD direct delivery cost $3,000. Total $103,000.
Ward2
Grand Total ]
$1,306,500
I
dlk:P 5G EORG E\t'y9899cipreq.mem Page -4-
~" January28..1998-- _
City Council · ·-.
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield. CA 93301
j" REQUEST FOR CONTRIBUTION FOR METROPOLITAN
~' RECREATION CENTER MASTER PLAN
Coll lty The Kern County Museum Authority respectfully requests that the City of Bakersfield
MUSEUM" share in the cost of consultant services for master planning the Metropolitan
Recreation Center.
UTHORITY
B O A R D It is requested that the City. of Bakersfield contribute 1/3 of the cost of the Request
for Qualifications (RFQ) up to a maximum of $35,000. As you know, the County of
Kern and the Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office are also contributing to
John C. Bernard the costs for the consultant services for master planning of the Metropolitan
":~'"'"~'"' ~ '"' ' ........ ~"'"""' Recreation Center.
Kelly F. Blanton
Pat DeMond The Recreation Center consists of nearly 110 acres of property that is now used to
:'~,,~:~r,.,,,.,~ ~....,,, ........ ,, provide cultural, educational and recreational opportunities to the citizens of
Ke,,in Findlev Bakersfield. The master planning effort will include receipt of extensive public and
~,,,. ...... ~, ....... ~,, ..... community input as to the desires of the citizenry for the ultimate development of this
Milo E. Hall area.
To,,, lone$ A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for consultant services was issued by Kern
.... .,.,, ~..::,, ,./,,,,,. ~>,.,,,.,,., County. A copy of the RFQ is attached for your information. As you will note, the
Douglas Miller potential for expanding the uses at the park and Museum sites is great. Attendance to
'" ........... ~3"~"" ~ '""'" the expanded uses will be an increased need for infrastructure and ingress and egress
~ '~;totl .~choo/ t)istrtct
Peter Varra from Chester Avenue. or potentially the extension of "F" Street. As such. the City's
~,,~,; ,,~ ,,,,.,,,, ..... participation in developing the master plan is critical to the success of this effort.
[ )z~'trtrt ~
13arbara Patrick Thank you for your consideration of this request for a financial contribution for
o,.,,,, ~ master planmng the Metropolitan Recreation Center and to participate in developing
~ the master plan.
[Ltkcr~rtcld. 1:.\
-- ~ - Sincere
"~ .......... ""~ ~" ~'" Milo E. Hall, President
~..~,.. ......... . Kern Counw Museum Au~oriw Board
. MEH:mah
colaRuperI [nr,quez
COUNTY OF KERN
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
METROPOLITAN RECREATION CENTER SITE MASTER PLAN
The County of Kern (hereinafter "Count~') is seeking a qualified consultant to provide proposals
to conduct a study of the Metropolitan Recreation Center site, assessing current uses, and
providing recommendations as to the appropriate future development and uses of the site.
All inquiries concerning the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) are to be directed in writing to the
official cOntaCt person:
Adel Klein, Director of Policy Analysis
Kern County Administrative Office
1115 Truxtun Avenue, 5~ Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301'
FAX: (805) 868-3190
All responses to inquiries concerning this RFQ will be provided in writing to all consultants receiving
this RFQ. No oral responses to inquiries will be made,
Five copies of each proposal are to be mailed or delivered to County at the above address pursuant
to the rules governing this RFQ process as specified within this RFQ.
Envelopes containing proposals are to be marked:
PROPOSAL: Metropolitan Recreation Center Master Plan
Proposals are clue at the above address not later than: 5:00 p.m., February 25, 1998
Proposals submitted after this time are ineligible for consideration.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
All consultants may participate in a pre-proposal conference to be conducted on February 11,1998
at 2:00 p.m. in the County Administrative Office, located at the address above. The pre-proposal
conference may provide consultants with additional information as the conference is an opportunity
to receive responses to questions in order that consultants can provide an informed, researched
proposal. All responses to questions will be recorded and furnished in wdtten form to all
consultants receiving a RFQ.
BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Recreation Site consists of approximately 104 acres. The site is bounded on the
north and west sides by the Kern River. Business uses bound the site to the east and south.
Current uses of the site include a large developed picnic area, batting range, BMX race track,
gymkhana facility, a professional baseball stadium, two community baseball fields, ten other
baseball fields (JBA), a race track for radio controlled cars, sundry maintenance facilities, and a
military administrative and recruiting facility. The Kern County Museum occupies 18 acres of the
site. The Museum's facilities include 56 historical buildings and other outdoor exhibits in a park-like
setting. With the exception of the picnic area, community baseball fields and maintenance facilities,
all uses of the site are managed through leases or other agreements. (Attachments 1 and 2)
In October 1997, the Kern County Board of Supervisors entered into a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) with the County Board of Education. This JPA provided for the establishment of a Kern
County Museum Authority for the operation and maintenance of the Museum. At this juncture, it
is anticipated that the Museum may experience future exhibit and development growth. As the
Museum location enjoys a shared, coordinated, and compatible use with other recreational and
organized sport uses, it is appropriate to master plan the area to assure continued compatible uses
and to create a vision for the future uses of the entire site.
In the performance of the master planning activity, input shall be sought from at least the following:
all interested and or affected public agencies; sport, recreational, and cultural organizations;
tourism and business promotion organizations; interested community groups and foundations; and
private individuals. Public meetings shall be conducted to any extent necessary to ensure the full
and complete input and contribution of the public and interested parties.
The result of the master planning activity will be recommendations as to the best and most
appropriate uses of the site in consideration of the wishes and desires of the community and the
growth and development opportunities anticipated for both recreation and cultural programs and
facilities. The master plan will include a phased implementation plan and an accompanying
financial analysis.
SCOPE OF PROJECT
The geographical scope of this project is limited to the area encompassed by the Metropolitan
Recreation Center. Consideration of the impact of implementation of the master plan and on the
surrounding community and infrastructure is limited to a two mile boundary surrounding the site.
The Consultant shall also consider opportunities for community development and expansion of the
Metropolitan Recreation Center within tt3e two mile boundary.
MANAGEMENT OF PROJECT
This project will be managed by the Kern County Administrative Office, in coordination with the
Kern County Parks Department, and the Kern County Museum Authority. All actions regarding this
project require the approval and consent of the Kern County Board of Supervisors.
PROJECT COORDINATOR
The County will designate a project coordinator who will be the County Administrative Officer or his
designee. The project coordinator will confer with, meet, and provide information and input to the
selected consultant regarding the needs of the County and all services required to be performed
under this RFQ.
SERVICES REQUIRED
The County requires an in-depth, comprel3ensive assessment as to the most appropriate
alternative uses of all of the Metropolitan Recreation Center properties. The required assessment
is to include and address the following.
1. Facilitated meetings of all stakeholders to ensure the maximum possible input into the
development of the plan.
2. Identification of thematic use options for the site.
3. Identification of options for the placement of activities and facilities on the site.
4. Creation of a master plan inclusive of schematic drawings, and a phased implementation
plan accompanied by a financial impact analysis for each option.
Additional recommendations or option development may be required from the consultant on other
subject areas as deemed appropriate by the Project Coordinator. All recommendations must be
supported with background documentation which clearly details the key provisions which led to the
recommendation(s).
MILESTONE PRODUCTS
The required milestone products of this project are:
1. a comprehensive work plan and work schedule;
2. periodic progress reports;
3. an Audit Findings Report;
4. a draft report;
5. a Final Report;
6. presentation of the report to the Board of Supervisors, Kern County Museum Authority, and
the Kern County Parks and Recreation Commission.
WORK PLAN AND TIMELINE
Within two weeks of a contract being awarded, the successful consultant shall prepare and submit
for approval to the Project Coordinator a work plan tor the performance of the study ancl a schedule
for the completion of each phase of the study. The work plan shall contain at least the following
components.
Phase I -Initiate Project
This phase organizes the project, reviews relevant background information and material, allows the
successful consultant to become familiar with the present environment, identify stakeholders and
to finalize the project work plan and schedule.
Pha e - Assess Current O erations Re eive Public In u
This phase of the project entails assessment of the current operations, placement of activities and
facilities, scheduling of public and other meetings to receive input as to the desires and preferences
of all staket3olders.
Phase 3 - ¢indinqs Report
A Findings Report is issued at this phase of the project. The findings reports details the current
uses of the site, identifies the stakeholders, and outlines all potential issues and conflicts in the
development of the Final Master Plan. The Findings Report will be presented to a Review
Committee for review and correction as needed. The Project Coordinator shall provide direction
as needed for development of the draft report.
phase 4 - Development of Draft Report
The successful consultant shall prepare a draft report that poses a selected number of options for
the use of the site. The draft report will be presented to the Review Committee for review and
comment.
Phase 5 - Develop Final Report
After the Review Committee's review, the report will be finalized. Ten copies of the final report are
required (9 bound, 1 unbound). The Final Report is to be delivered to the Project Coordinator.
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The successful consultant will present the Final Report to the Board of Supervisors, the Kern
County Museum Authority, and the Kern County Parks and Recreation Commission. One
additional presentation may be requested.
SCHEDULE
The successful consultant will commence services within three weeks of the effective date of the
Agreement and perform services in accordance with the following proposed project schedule.
Phase I - Initiate Project: 2 weeks
Phase 2 - Assess Current Operations, Receive Public Input: 4 weeks
Phase 3 - Analyze Findings, Develop Options: 4 weeks
Phase 4 - Development of Draft Report: 2 weeks
Review of Draft Report: 3 weeks
Phase 5 - Develop Final Report: 2 weeks
Consultants are encouraged to sut~mit alternative project schedules for consideration.
PROGRESS REPORTS
Progress reports must be submitted to the Project Coordinator monthly and at the completion of
each phase, unless the completion of the phase falls within the reporting period. Progress reports
are to include the following information:
a. report period
b. summary of hours worked and by whom
c. current project status
d. areas of concern
RULES GOVERNING PROPOSAL PROCESS
This is a competitive process wherein the terms, conditions and resulting activities of the RFQ are
conducted in accordance with the laws and regulations of the federal government, the State of
California, and the County of Kern. All instructions and rules specified within this RFQ must be fully
complied with or the proposal may be rejected as nonresponsive.
Acceptance of Proposals: The County reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive
any informality, technical defect or clerical error in any proposal as the County may deem prudent.
Oral Communications: Any oral communication by the official contact person concerning the RFQ
is not binding on the County and will in no way modify the RFQ or the obligation of the County or
respondent.
Amendments: If the County deems it necessary to amend the RFQ, such amendment will be
mailed to all consultants receiving an RFQ.
~: The cost of developing the proposal is the sole responsibility of the respondent
and is not chargeable to the County,
Proposal Submission: The delivery of the proposal package is the sole responsibility of the
respondent. It may be delivered in person, by U.S. Mail or commercial messenger service by the
6
time deaaline as established in this RFQ.
RFQ as Basis for ProposaL: This RFQ and any information provided during the pre-proposal
meeting represent the most definitive statement the County will make concerning information upon
which proposals are to be based.
Any person contemplating the submission of a proposal will have thoroughly examined the RFQ
and addenda to the RFQ, if any. If there is any doubt as to the meaning or intent of these
documents, the consultant shall request, in writing, at least one week prior to the deadline for
receipt of proposals, an interpretation of language or issue in question. Written requests are to be
directed to the official contact person. Any interpretation or change to the RFQ will be made only
in writing in the form of an addendum to the RFQ and will be furnished to all consultants receiving
an RFQ.
Consultant's Understanding: Each consultant must inform himself/herself of the conditions relating
to the execution of the required work, and it is assumed that he/she will make himself/herself
thoroughly familiar with all proposal documents. Failure to do so will not relieve the successful
consultant of his/her obligation to complete the contemplated work in stdct accordance with the
contract between the County and the respondent.
Withdrawal and Submission/Modification of Proposal,,;: A respondent may withdraw a proposal
by submitting a written notification of withdrawal signed by the respon(3ent or authorized agent.
The respondent must retdeve the entire sealed package if another proposal is to be submitted prior
to the deadline. Submission packages must be retrieved in person.
Disposition of Proposals: All materials submitted in response to this RFQ become the property
of the County and will become a public record after an award has been made or the RFQ process
has been terminated excepting those materials which contain trade secrets or are otherwise not
subject to disclosure under the Public Recorcts Act.
Proposal Binding: All proposals submitted shall be binding on the consultant for sixty calendar
days and shall contain a statement to that effect.
News Release: News releases pertaining to any award resulting from this RFQ may not be made
without prior written approval of the project coordinator.
FORM OF PROPOSAL
Ten copies of the proposal shall be submitted as specified on the title page of this RFQ and in the
form of a written statement containing the information requested in the RFQ, including the following
elements.
1. The legal name, address, and telephone number of the consultant. Proposals shall be
signed above the typed or printed name and title of the signer. The signer shall have the
authority to bind the consultant to the submitted proposal. Acceptance of the proposal by
the Kern County Board of Supervisors shall bind the consultant to perform as provided for
in the proposal.
2. A declaration of the consultant's ability to perform the services required and to meet the
qualification, terms and conditions contained in the RFQ.
3. A description of the consultant's experience in conducting similar studies, with particular
emphasis placed on studies assessing further uses of cultural and recreation sites and the
funding of same.
4. A description of the consultant's staff size.
5. Identification of the consultant's facility(s) and location.
6. The number of years the consultant has been in business.
7. References are to include the company name, address, phone number and contact name
for like pro~ects only.
8. The identification of the individuals that would be assigned or contracted with to perform the
services required and the qualifications of same.
9. Consultants are to submit as a part of their proposal any changes or modifications that they
may wish the County to consider. Consultants are encouraged to be creative with their
proposals.
10. The materials submitted for consideration must specifically identify the individuals to be
assigned to the project, the function of the inclividuals in relation to the project, the number
of hours each individual is committed to the project, and the hourly rate proposed to be
charged for t~e inclividual.
11. Consultants may submit a proposed price for the services required to be performed. If a
price proposal is submitted. The price proposal is required to be detailed for each phase
of the project, inclusive of travel expenses, duplicating and other proposed expenses.
EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL
Proposal Openinq and Validation Check: Proposals will be opened and checked for the presence
of the required information as outlined in this RFQ. The absence of required information may
render the proposal nonresponsive and may be cause for rejection.
Validation Aqainst Requirements: Each proposal will be checked in detail to determine compliance
with RFQ requirements.
.Consultant's Ability to Perform: If, during the evaluation process, the County is unable to
determine a consultant's ability to perform, the County has the option of requiring from the
consultant any information which the County deems necessary to determine the consultant's ability
to perform. If the information submitted by the consultant, or available from other sources, is
insufficient to satisfy the County as to the consultant's ability to satisfactorily perform the required
services, the County may reject the proposal. The County's determination of a consultant's ability
to perform, for the purposes of this RFQ, shall be final.
Qualifications: ~ The successful consultant will have conducted similar master planning studies.
Preference will be given to the consultant who:
1. Demonstrates current knowledge of planning for the provision of recreational, cultural, and
educational services to the general public;
2. Has knowledge of the management practices and management positions associated with
the provision of the desired services;
3. Has developed capital improvement plans with identified funding for implementation of the
developed capital improvement plan;
4. Has a documented history of providing recommendations that are creative, while taking into
account all facets of the existing development ancl fiscal environment, and are practical to
implement;
9
5. Does not have a history of consistently recommending a particular course of action that
does not account for a diversity in use options;
6. Has a documented history of effectively interfacing with governing bodies and members of
the public;
7. Is able to demonstrate, either through past performance or knowledge of accepted
practices, the ability to perform comprehensive and clear cost/benefit analyses.
SPECIFIC PROPOSAL CONDITIONS
Selection Process: After an initial screening of ali proposals received by the deadline specified
on the title page of this RFQ, those firms deemed most qualified to fulfill'the obligation of the RFQ
will be selected for further evaluation. Those consultants whose proposals are selected for further
evaluation will be required to give an oral presentation.
Methocl of Award: The award will be made to the consultant whose proposal is determined to be
not only technically complete, but whose professional qualifications and experience meet the terms
of the RFQ and demonstrates the best ability to fulfill the requirements of the RFQ. The selection
process may, however,.include a request for additional information to support the written proposal.
Award shall only be made upon agreement of price for service terms. The County staff responsible
for evaluating the proposals received will make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors, with
which the authority for final awarcl of any contract rests.
Responsibility of Consultant: It is the consultant's responsibility to gather and examine information
related to the requirements of the RFQ. The consultant's lack of knowledge regarding data,
conditions or requirements that exist or that may be encountered in the performance of the ensuing
contract will be accepted in the event of failure or omission on the part of the successful consultant
to fulfill in every respect all of the requirements.
The submission of a proposal will be considered as a representation that:
1. the consultant has carefully investigated all conditions which affect, now and at
some future date, the performance of the work covered by the proposal;
2. the consultant is fully informed concerning the conditions to be encountered,
l0
quantity and quality of work to be preformed; and
3. the consultant is familiar with all federal and state laws, and County Ordinances
which may affect the work to be conducted and the persons employed in the work.
,Access to Information: The County will provide the consultant access to all available information
necessary for performing and completing the services required in this RFQ, including, but not
limited to maps, surveys, stakeholder information, and all pertinent background information.
Satisfactory Performance: The successful consultant will perform all services required by this RFQ
and ensuing Agreement according to the professional standards of the industry and to the
satisfaction of County. All reports and documents produced and submitted by the successful
consultant pursuant to the Agreement must meet with and shall be made to the County's
satisfaction.
~: The successful consultant must agree that no data or information obtained in the
performance of the ensuing Agreement and no reports or recommendations produced under the
Agreement will be released to any third party at any time without the prior wdtten consent of the
County.
Conduct of Contractor: At all times while on County premises, Contractor and Contractor's staff
shall comply with all of the rules, regulations, directives, and bulletins of the County.
Access To and From Facilities: Contractor and Contractor's staff shall utilize designated entries
and exits into any and all County facilities and shall be required to wear such identification badges
as County deems necessary while on the premises.
Project Completion Date: Full performance of this project.shall be completed within 210 calendar
days from the date of execution of .the contract unless an extension is mutually agreed to by the
parties.
Standard Terms and Conditions: The following clauses, in substantially the form presented, will
be made part of a professional services agreement the successful consultant will be expected to
sign. It is anticipated that modifications and additions may be required once a consultant has been
selected.
A. Termination and Breach of Contract: The County may terminate the agreement tor
the breach of any covenant, term and condition of the contract by the Contractor,
its officers, agents or employees, provided the breach is not cured within ten
working days after written notice thereof is presented to Contractor.
In the event that the agreement is for any reason terminated for cause by the
County, Contractor shall be liable to the County for the expense of the County
obtaining any services provided herein from an alternative source.
County may terminate this agreement after thirty days' notice for any reason. If
County terminates this agreement without cause as provided for herein, County
shall be liable for the reasonable value of contractor's work up to the effective date
of the notice. County's determination of the reasonable value of the Contractor's
work shall be final.
B. Time of the Essence: Time shall be of the essence with respect to each term and
condition of this Agreement.
C. Indemnity: Contractor agrees to fully indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the
County of Kern, its officers, employees, commissions and agents and the Kern
County Museum Authority, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all loss,
damage, liability, claim, demand, or cause of action whatsoever resulting from any
injury to any persons or property arising out of or resulting from or alleged to have
arisen out of or have resulted from any act or omission of Contractor, its officers,
agents, commissions, employees, independent contractors, or representatives in
the pertormance of this Agreement.
D. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties
relating to the rights herein granted and the obligations herein assumed. Any oral
representation or modifications concerning the Agreement shall be of no force or
effect excepting a subsequent modification in writing, signed by the party to be
charged.
E. Governing Law: The terms of this Agreement shall be constructed and interpreted
under, and all respective rights and duties of the parties shall be governed by, the
laws of the State of California.
F. Independent Contractor: In the performance of the work herein provided for
Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor and is not an agent or
employee of the County. The County has and shall retain the right to final approval
of the services to be rendered to the County. The Contractor shall be solely
responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees, and all other
regulations governing such matters.
G. Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of any successors to or assigns of the parties. Contractor shall not assign,
sublet or transfer this Agreement, or any part hereof, without written consent of tl~e
County, nor shall contractor assign any monies due to become due to it hereunder
without the previous written consent of the County.
H. Modification: This Agreement may be amended at any time by the written
agreement of Contractor and the County.
I. Waiver: No waiver of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute
a waiver of any other breach, or such provision. Failure of the County to enforce
at any time, or from time-to-time, any provision of the Agreement shall not be
construed as a waiver thereof. The remedies herein reserVed shall be cumulative
and additional to any other remedies in law or equity.
J. Partial Invalidity: Should any part, term, portion, or Provision of this Agreement be
finally decided to be in conflict with any law of the United States or the State of
California, or otherwise be unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining
parts, terms, portions, or provisions shall be deemed severable and shall not be
affected thereby, provided such remaining portions or provisions can be construed
in substance to constitute the agreement which the parties intended to enter into in
the first place.
K. Venue: If either party to this Agreement initiates any legal or equitable action to
enforce the terms of this Agreement, to declare the rights of the parties under this
Agreement or which relates to this Agreement in any manner, the County and the
Contractor agree that the proper venue for any such action is the Superior Court of
the State of California of and for the County of Kern.
L. Notice: Any notice or notices required or permitted to be given pursuant to this
Agreement may be personally served on the other party by the party giving such
notice or may be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following
addresses:
The effective date of a notice personally served shall be the day following the date
of service. The effective date of a notice served by certified mail shall be effective
five calendar days after mailing.
M. Contractor Records: At any time during normal business hours, and as often as
the County or any appropriate state agency, or duly authorized representative
thereof may deem necessary, Contractor shall make available for examination all
of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. Such records
shall be retained and access to the facilities and premises of the Contractor shall
be made available during the period of performance of this Agreement, and for
three years after the County has made final payment under this Agreement.
N. Signature Authority: The individual executing this Agreement on behalf of
Contractor warrants that he/she is authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf
of Contractor and that Contractor will be bound by the terms and conditions
contained herein.
O. Insurance Requirements: In addition to any other form of insurance or bond
required under the terms of this Agreement, the contractor shall procure and
maintain for the duration of this Agreement the following types and limits of
insurance, otherwise referred to as "basic insurance requirement":
1 .- Professional liability insurance, providing coverage on an occurrence basis
for errors and omissions, with limits of not less than one million dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence; and
2. Automobile liability insurance, providing coverage on an occurrence basis
for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage
and personal injury, with limits of not less than one million dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence; and
3. Broad form commercial general liability insurance, providing coverage on an
occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons,
property damage ancl personal injury, with limits of not less than one million
dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and
4. Workers' Compensation insurance with statutory limits and employer's
liability insurance with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)
per accident.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of not less than A;VII.
This requirement may be waived in individual cases and at the County's sole
discretion.
Except for professional liability, all policies required of the contractor hereunder shall
be primary insurance as respects to the County and the Museum Authority, their
officers, .agents, commissions, employees and volunteers and any insurance of self-
insurance maintained by the County and the Museum Authority, their officers,
agents, commissions, employees and volunteers shall be in excess of the
contractor's insurance ancl shall not contribute with it.
The automobile liability policies shall provide coverage for owned, non-owned and
hired motor vehicles.
The liability policies shall provide contractual liability coverage for the term of this
Agreement.
Except for professional liability, the liability policies shall contain an additional
insured endorsement in favor of the County and the Museum Authority, their
officers, agents, commissions, employees and volunteers.
The WOrkers' Compensation policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation
endorsement in favor of the County and the Museum Authority, their officers,
agents, commissions, employees and volunteers.
All policies shall contain the following endorsement: an endorsement providing the
County with thirty calendar days' written notice of cancellation or material change
in policy language or terms. All policies shall provide that there shall be continuing
liability thereon, notwithstanding any recovery on any policy.
The insurance required under this Agreement shall be maintained until all work
required to be pedormed under the terms of this Agreement is satisfactorily
completed as evidenced by formal acceptance by the County.
The Contractor shall furnish the County's Administrative Officer With a certificate of
insurance evidencing the insurance required under this Agreement. The County
may withhold payments to contractor if certificates of insurance and endorsements
required in this Agreement have not been provided.
Any deductibles, self-insured retentions or insurance in lesser amounts, or lack of
certain types of insurance otherwise required by this Agreement of contractor, must
be declared to and approved by the County.
However, unless otherwise approved by the CountY, if any part of the work under
the Agreement is subcontracted, the "basic insurance requirements" set forth herein
above shall be provided by or on behalf of all subcontractors even if the County has
approved lesser insurance requirements.
~.~,~ ,~i!~~ ,,
~ .... ':' ' .',:' t~ CHINA GflADE
,.o.o~, ~ ffi I~ ~ ....,. '~'u"~? .... -'~
"
IAIVE
..... , ............ II ,:~ --
/'Ir ,
R'[.CREATION
Gull St
'
EJs~ Gib -- $C~ '
METRO I:LEC~I-ON' CENTER .............
5805 Ches~. A.e.
~c3te 1" = 3~' refuge confiner
d~n~n~ foun~in o
A~r~ 107 liKht~le , 4'~
~ence
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEt:lING DA It::: February 11, 1998 I AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM: .8. e.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
FROM: Dolores B. Teubner, Assistant City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD ~
DATE: January 30, 1998 CITY ATTORNEY i~
CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: Amendments to Fiscal Year 1997-98 Operating, Capital Improvement Program, and Central
District Development Agency Budgets for the period of June 30, 1997 through January 1, 1998.
1. Amendment No.1 to Resolution No. 110-97 and Amendment No. 1 to Resolution No. 111-
97, Operating, Capital Improvement Program, and Central District Development Agency
Budgets.
.COMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption.
BACKGROUND:
On June 25, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolutions No.110-97 and 111-97 which approved the Operating,
Capital Improvement Program, and Central District Development Agency Budgets. Between June 30, 1997 and
January 1, 1998, Council has taken action to transfer and/or appropriate funds for specific services and as a
result, the respective budgets must be amended to reflect these changes for the last six months of the fiscal year.
The fiscal year 1997-98 Amended Budget is $267,044,690, with the Operating and Debt Service (which includes
the Community Development Block Grant) Budget totaling $185,171,062, the Capital Improvement Program
totaling $76,090,533, and the Central distdct Development Agency Budget totaling $5,783,095. A detailed
listing of the items approved by Council action, which amends the 1997-98 budgets, is attached.
DVVH:jp
JA28CM1 .CC
February 3, 1998, 3:19PM
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 110-97
AND 111-97 ADOPTING THE OPERATING, CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND CENTRAL DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1997-98.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Charter of the City of Bakersfield and
applicable ordinances, the City Council of said City adopted Resolution Nos. 110-97 and
111-97, adopting the Operating, Capital Improvement Program and Central District
Development Agency Budgets for the City of Bakersfield, California, for the fiscal year
1997-98 on June 25, 1997; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to make amendments thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield as follows:
1. That the Operating, Capital Improvement Program and Central District
Development Agency Budgets for the City of Bakersfield, California, for the fiscal year
1997-98, as adopted by Resolution Nos. 110-97 and 111-97, are hereby further amended
to reflect the changes included in Exhibit "A".
2. That the said Budgets for said fiscal year 1997-98, so amended, shall
be the Budgets for the City of Bakersfield, California, for said fiscal year 1997-98 as
contemplated to be made by this Council.
3. That the said Budgets for said fiscal year 1997-98 shall total
$267,044,690, with the Operating and Debt Service (which includes the Community
Development Block Grant) Budget totaling $185,171,062, the Capital Improvement
Program totaling $76,090,533, and the Central District Development Agency Budget
totaling $5,783,095.
4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution, and
henceforth and hereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
.......... O00 ..........
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FISCAL YEAR 1997- 98 BUDGET AMENDMENTS
DATE FUND ITEM AMOUNT COMMENTS
AMENDMENTS AND TRANSFERS:
07/0t/g7 3t 1 Reduce Approprilalion Io Cap?Iai Oullay Fund ($46,377j Reduce for ilems accrued back Io FY 9§-97.(Finance Adjuslmenl)
07/16/97 fSI Appropf~ale Gas Tax Fund Balance $50,000 Funding for Alia Visla area slreel improvemenls. (Bids ilem 3 )
07116197 121 Appropriale Slale Grant Revenue lo ISTEA Fund $188,240 Resurfacing various slreels - 1996-97. (Bids llem 4.)
07/16/97 333 Appfopriale Road and Bndge Bond Funds lo Coffe Road Bridge . $808,000 For Final payment on SOG vs PG&E per Agreement 97_150 (Misc. itemS)
07/16/~7 333 Reduce Approprialion Io Road and Bridge Bond Fund for Coffee ($808,000) July 1997 paymenl was accrued Io F.Y. 1996-97 when judgemenl occurred
08/06/97 ! 2t Appropr~tale ISTEA Fund Balalnce $500,000 For local share of Q Slreet Grade Separalion Projecl (Consenl Misc ilem 3)
08/08/97 411 Reduce Approprialion Io Ihe Sewer Enlerprise Fund j$272,000) Project re-evalualed and priority lowered, projecl deferred (Consent Misc ~len) 3)
08/06/97 333 Reduce Approprialion lo the Coffee Road Overcrossing Fund ($265,600) Project developer now required to construct with subdivision (Consent Misc ilem 3)
08/06/97 155 Appropriale Gas Tax Fund Balance $10,000 Funding for Beech St. al 241h St Signal (Misc. item 3)
0B/20/97 412 Appropriate Sewer Enterprise Fund Balance Io PW Operalions $100,000 Allorney Relainer Agreement Cily vs. Kenko (Consent item 8k)
08/20/91 151 Appropriate Gas Tax Fund Balance $30,000 Funding for Endeavor School Flashing Beacon (Consenl. item 8x)
09/04/97 151 Reduce Gas Tax Appropriations Io Fund Esl?mated De[m~t ($150,000) Modil~calions to CIP program cover eslimaled fund deficil. (Misc. ~lem 3)
09/08/91 t 51 Transfer horn Gas Tax compleled projecls Io Chesler Avenue $210,000 Add~lional funding for Chesler Avenue Slreelscape project
09110/97 011/411 1-ransler General and Sewer Fund Balance lo Gas Tax Fund $210,000 ToconslruclChesterAvenueSIreelscapeprojecl(ConsenlBids ilemr 1)
09/10/91 121 Appropriate Environment Enhancemenl Grant Funds to ISTEA Fund $250,000 To conslrucl Chesler Avenue Slreelscape project (Consenl Bids. ilem r 1)
09110/97 411 Appropriale Sewer Enlerprise Fund Balance $1,670,160 To consl~ucl Buena Visla Trunk Sewer project- phase 1 (Consenl Bids ilem 81)
09/10/97 411 Appropdale Sewer Enlerprise Fund Balance $60,390 To conslruct Bank Streel Sewer Lift Sial?on modifications. (Consent item
09/10/97 3t5 Appropriale Blue Cross premium Surplus $300,000 Transfer to Arena Pedeslrian Project (Consent Misc. item 8x)
09/10/97 315 Appropdale I Transfer Blue Cross premium Surplus $800,000 Transfer Io Convention Arena Expansion Project (Consent Misc. ilem 8x)
09124/97 151 Appropriale Developer Conlribution Io Ihe Gas Tax Fund $49,757 To resurface various slreets (Consent ilem 8q)
09124197 315 Appropriale funds I'or Pedeslrian Skybridge $270,000 For plans and design o! Pedestrian Skybridge at convention Center (ilem ?)
09/25197 395/3t5 Reduce Appropriation lo Ihe Arena and Centennial Plaza Funds ($29,934,670) To correct budget errors in Finance and City Manager's F.Y. 1996-97 Year End process
09/26/97 655 Reduce Appropriations in Assml. Dist Fund 93 1-A ($20,000) To reduce Public Works Carryovers for F.Y. 96-97
10/22/97 151 Appropriate Developer Contribulion Io the Gas Tax Fund $26,750 To construct the Iraffic preemplion project. (Consent Bids. item 8n)
11105197 655 Appropriale Assessment Dislrict 93-1A Fund Balance $16,947 For change orders #12 & #13 on Northeast Trunk Sewer project (Consenl M,sc ilem §w)
! 1119197 151 Appropriale Developer Conlribuhon Io Ihe Oas Tax Fund $79,200 To conslrucl road ~mprovemenls on While Lane (Consenl Misc. ~lem Bp)
12103197 411 Appropriate Sewer Enterprise Fund Balance and Stale Loan $29,239,800 To conslrucl vwv'rP #2 upgrade and expansion. {Consent Bids. ilem 8j)
12117/97 121 Appropriale State Grant Revenue to ISTEA Fund $497,200 For seismic relrofit design of 6 bridges (Consent ilem Bm)
12118197 412 Reduce Approprialions for actual 1997 sewer revenue bond proceeds ($1,925,000) To appropriate fund balance for bond Inleresl due in F.Y. 1997-98.
07101197 5111521 Reduce Approprilalion Io Cap?Iai Oullay Fund {$22,402! Reduce for ilems accrued back Io FY 96-97.(Finance Adjuslment)
O?101197 521 Reduce 97-98 Budgel ~or Risk Management ($137,000) Budget Adjustment per City Manager's Office.
07116/97 112 Appropriale ED/CD Operating Budgel in Ihe Home Fund $127,051 To provide first time home buyers assislance. (Consenl item 4)
08106197 011 Appropriale Asset Forfeilure Funds Io Police Operaling Budget $9,000 To purchase 1 police service dog. (Resolutions ilem 1)
08/06/97 OIt Appropriale Heart Smart Granl Funds Io Recrealion Division $20,000 To conduct community educalional oulreach program (Misc. item 4)
08/20/97 511 Appropriale Equipmenl Mgml. Fund Balance Io PW Operalions $510,000 Loan Io Kern Refuse Disposal for automated refuse equipment (Consent item e/
08/20/97 011 Appropriale General Fund Balance lo Police Operalin9 Budgel $34,000 To fund cost of Police Telecommunicelor Posilion (Consenl ilem 8x)
08/20/97 012 Appropriale General Fund Balance Io Englneerlng Operaling Budgel $8,200 For on-call consultanls for plan checking and Inspections ( Consenl ilem §y)
08/20/97 012 App[opriale Development Fees Io Engineering Operaling Budgel $11,800 For on-call consullanl$ for plan checking and Inspections ( Consenl ilem By)
08/20/97 OI2 App[opriale Developer Shares lo Dev. Svc~, Operating Ot~dgel $24,780 Developer's share of EIR Fees for Cardiac Hospital (Con'~enl item 8p 1)
09/10/97 012 Appropriale Developer Shares Io Dev. Svcs, Operaling Budgel $19,1)20 Developer's share of EIR Fees for Cardiac Hospllal (Consenl ilem 8p t)
09/10/97 Ot 1 Appropriate Blue Cross Premium Surplus $200,000 Employee one-time rebale from Blue Cross (Consent Misc. ilem 8x)
09124/97 3t5 Red~mo and Transfer Approprialions for Pedeslrian Skybridgo ($"170,000) For plans and design of Pedeshian Skybddge at Convention Cenler
09/25/97 3t 5 Reduce Appropriation lo Ihe Arena and Cenlennial Plaza Funds ($1,024,940) To correct budgel errors in Finance an.d City Manager's F.Y. 1996-97 Year End precor,;
10122197 511 Appropriate Asset Forfeiture Funds to Public Works Operating B~dget $140,000 For 7 used replacemenl police vehicles Ihrough Iho Eqt~ipment Fund (Consenl ~le~
11105197 011 Appropfiale Asset Forfeilure Funds to Public Works Operaling B~dgel $50,000 To construct second shooling bay al Pistol Range. (Consenl Resoluhon ilem 8c)
I 1/19/97 51 I Appropriate Equipmenl Mgml. FunO Balance Io PW Operations $552,480 Loan lo Kern Refuse Disposal for aulomaled refuse equipment (Consenl ilem 8 i2)
12/03/97 011/521 Appropriale General Fund Balance lo Self Insurance Fund $100,000 For property acquisllion of Panorama Drive Homes (consent Misc. ilem 8 o)
t 2103197 O I 1/521 Transfer General Fund Balance 1o Self Insurance Fund $100,000 For property acquisition of Panorama Drive Homes (consent Misc. ilem 8 o)
12117197 011 Reduce Translers and Approprialo Funds Io MIS Operating Dud§el ($4,000) To fund two addilional positions for MIS. (Consenl ilem 8dd)
12117/97 012 Appropriate Developer Contribution to Dev. Svcs, Operaling Budgel $8,500 Developer's share of EIR Fees for Cardiac Hospilal (Consent ilem 8p 1)
12/18/97 412 Reduce Approprialions for actual 1997 sewer revenue bond proceeds $475,000 To appropriate fund balance for bond inleresl due in F.Y. 1997-98.
12117/97 392 Appropriale Fund Balance !o CDDA Housing Fund $256,198 To use set-aside monies outside Ihe Downtown Redevelopment Area (Consent ~[en)
TOTAL AMENDMENTS AND TRANSFERS $3,231,384
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FY 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET
Departmental Appropriations by Fund
· ~ General'. ,:- · ,, .... , -~' · Public Water Communi
I
Government ' :~/A~Police ~ ~ ~?~.~?~.~'~, Fire Works' ResourC~'~'~ ~ :~' Se~ice~ ~
Budget Summa~
Operating Budgets
City of Bakersfield $11,625,909 $33,106,200 $17,787,567 $48,585,786 $8,146,232 $9,991,385 $7,916,069 $46,452,625 $183,611,773
Central District Develop. Agency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,547 $5,447,350 $5,526,897
Total Operating $11,625,909 $33,106,200 $17,787,567 $48,585,786 $8,146,232 $9,991,385 $7,995,616 $51,899,975 $189,138,670
Capital Improvements
City of Bakersfield $151,200 $40,000 $235,450 $39,015,666 $2,378,000 $5,524,765 $1,020,000 $0 $48,365,081
Central District Develop. Agency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,309,555 $0 $0 $26,309,555
Total Capital Improvements $151,200 $40,000 $235,450 $39,015,666 $2,378,000 $31,834,320 $1,020,000 $0 $74,674,636
Total Appropriations $11,777,109 $33,146,200 $18,023,017 $87,601,452 $10,524,232 $41,825,705 $9,015,616 $51,899,975 $263,813,306
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FY 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET
Departmental Appropriations by Fund
City of Bakersfield
Operatin,q Budfiet
General Fund $6,783,040 $33,106,200 $17,787,567 $9,922,009 $0 $9,991,385 $4,759,244 $4,754,555 $87,104,000
Transportation (TDA) $0
Gas Tax $2,476,399 $2,476,399
Traffic Safety $200,000 $200,000
Municipal Improvement Debt $339,395 $339,395
Public Financing Authority $9,000 $12,870,000 $12,879,000
Capital Outlay Fund $0
Arena Project Fund $1,524,940 $1,524,940
Transportation Development $2,039,595 $2,039,595
Agriculture Water $3,050,108 $1,131,900 $4,182,008
Domestic Water $5,096,124 $928,380 $6,024,504
Parking Lots/Structures $143,720 $143,720
Park Improvement Fund $190,000 $190,000
Refuse Collection $18,759,656 $408,890 $19,168,546
Aviation Fund $113,368 $113,368
Self Insurance $4,140,377 $1,000,000 $5,140,377
Supplemental Law Enforce. $495,000 $495,000
Equipment Management $473,492 $11,397,686 $11,871,178
Wastewater Treatment Plant $5,916,668 $14,772,890 $20,689,558
Community Dev. Block Grant $3,013,105 $339,395 $3,352,500
Assessment Districts $220,000 $5,457,685 $5,677,685
Total Operating $11,625,909 $33,106,200 $17,787,567 $48,585,786 $8,146,232 $9,991,385 $7,916,069 $46,452,625 $183,611,773
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FY 1997- 98 ADOPTED BUDGET
Departmental Appropriations by Fund
General ~:,:~i:= : ii~i~ ~i~: :~i= ;~;:,i ::.~'.~ :~.~,: Public ~: .... Water:,==`::' :commdnity~D~l~pm~!~:
City of Bakersfield
Capital Improvements
Surfact Transportation (ISTEA) $2,399,000 $623,000 $3,022,000
Transportation (TDA) $0
Gas Tax $2,895,223 $2,895,223
Park Improvement $184,250 $184,250
Captial Outlay Fund $138,000 $40,000 $235,450 $95,400 $44,000 $552,850
Arena Project Fund $31,504,670 $31,504,670
Transportation Development $372,900 $372,900
Road and Bridge Bond Funds $1,967,203 $1,967,203
Agricultu re Water '- $4,500 $130,950 $481,000 $ 50,000 $666,450
Domestic Water $1,897,000 $1,897,000
Parking Lots/Structures $0
Refuse Collection $5,700 $360,000 $365,700
Aviation Fund $0
Federal Grants $0
Public Facilities $0
Equipment Management $0
Wastewater Treatment Plant $3,000 $30,225,890 $30,228,890
Community Dev. Block Grant $664,500 $353,000 $1,017,500
Assessment Districts $0
Total Capital Improvements $151,200 $40,000 $235,450 $39,015,666 $2,378,000 $31,834,320 $1,020,000 $0 $74,674,636
Total City of Bakersfield $11,777,109 $33,146,200 $18,023,017 $87,601,452 $10,524,232 $41,825,705 $8,936,069 $46,452,625 $258,286,409
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FY 1997- 98 ADOPTED BUDGET
Departmental Appropriations by Fund
. ,:?~:~.::::::: ~,~:~: Pubhc,::: , ~,Water ::~:~.Communl~,,~ Develo me~t:~::~:,~,~Non. ~;~ :.. :~,, ~
I
Government '~ PoliC~ "~ .....Fire ....~' '"~ W~' .......... Re~0U~:~'~ ::: S~i~e~?~Se~~ De ~en~l ~ ~o~1
Central District
Development Agency
Operating Budget
Operating $79,547 $1,551,500 $1,631,047
Debt Service $3,895,850 $3,895,850
Total Operating $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,547 $5,447,350 $5,526,897
Capital Improvements
Capital $26,309,555 $26,309,555
Total Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,309,555 $0 $0 $26,309,555
Total CDDA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,309,555 $79,547 $5,447,350 $31,836,452
FY 97-98 PROPOSED BUDGET CHANGES
Expenditure Revenue
Program Item Changes Changes Comments
CIP Fire station $100,000 Staff suggests increasing the reserve amount for FY
1997/98 to $100,000.
Operating Two additional positions in the Police Department According to the Police Chief, these positions allow the
Clerical $23,000 department to match the growth in sworn officer positions.
Telecommunicator $0 Grant money will fund a telecommunicator position.
Workload Review $41,000 Staff also will be commissioning a workload review
to identify ongoing and future administrative
staffing issues.
Operating Two additional positions and a reclassification in Public Works Staff has determined that an additional Traffic Engineer
Traffic Engineer $0 would be needed when the Traffic Operations Center
comes on line during the 1998/99 fiscal year.
Clerical, Graffiti $0 Staff will collect data to justify a clerical position to
Planning Technician, Graffiti $0 support the expanded Graffiti program. $70,000 of temporary
money has been proposed to cover potential workload
increases. A reclass audit for the Planning Tech
will be done as appropriate.
Operating Convention Center asbestos mitigation $20,000 Contingency funding for remediation of minor asbestos
problems.
Gas Tax 24th Street traffic signal $0 Staff will begin the design phase in 97/98. Cost adjustments
will be made to other projects to fund $8,000 for this project.
Funding Source Increase in 1996/97 Motor Vehicle in Lieu $84,000 Final in-lieu payment for 1996/97 has been received.
Funding Source Fee-for-service insurance rate reduction 1997/98 $100,000 Premiums to be reduced effective 1/1/98~
Total $184,000 $184,000
CDBG Year-round recreation program in Lowell Park area $50,000 $50,919 will come from unprogrammed funds; $57,500 is
Rental use of former Crippled Children's Society building $15,000 available because of a project being canceled due to lack
Renovation of former Crippled Children's Society building $10,000 of County funding. The balance remaining is $23,419 and will
Total CDBG $85,000 be reserved for the Business Loan Program.