The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/29/1999 BAKERSFIELD Patricia J. DeMond, Chair Mike Maggard Mark Salvaggio Staff: Darnell Haynes AGENDA BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, March 29, 1999 12:00 noon City Manager's Conference Room Second Floor - City Hall, Suite 201 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT FEBRUARY 8, 1999 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 3. PRESENTATIONS 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS · A. BAKERSFIELD MUSEUM OF ART FUNDING REQUEST - Christensen 6. NEW BUSINESS A. BAKERSFIELD SYMPHONY FUNDING REQUEST - Stinson B. PROPOSED SOUTHEAST BAKERSFIELD PROJECT AREA COMMUNITY OFFICE - Wager C. AMBULANCE MEDICAL SUPPLY COSTS REIMBURSEMENT - Stinson D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ACTION PLAN FOR FY 1999-00 - Wager 7. ADJOURNMENT DWH:jp FILE COPY DRAFT BAKERSFIELD Alan Tandy, City Manager Mike Maggard Staff: Damell Haynes Mark Salvaggio AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 8, 1999 12:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 12:07 p.m. Present: Councilmembers: Patricia J. DeMond, Chair; Mark Salvaggio; and Mike Maggard arriving at 12:15 p.m. 2. ADOPT AUGUST 17, 1998 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Adopted as submitted. 3. PRESENTATIONS None 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS None 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS None DRAFT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 8, lggg Page -2- 6. NEW BUSINESS (Item 6.C. was heard first) A. BAKERSFIELD MUSEUM OF ART FUNDING REQUEST The Bakersfield Museum of Art Board is planning to expand their existing facility currently located in Central Park. A letter from the Board to the Committee stated what they request from the City: (1) The City deletes the "reversionary clause" stated in the current Grant Deed; (2) Commit $500,000 payable in five equal installments to be used in the construction of the new Museum facility; and (3) Donate an additional acre adjacent to the Museum to be deeded to the Museum, free of restrictions, upon the Museum's request on or before 2010. The Board indicated it desires to remain in Central Park if the City of Bakersfield can commit to assisting the Museum. Chairperson Pat DeMond requested City staff to prepare a list of alternatives which could be considered by the Committee when discussing the proposed elimination of the "reversionary clause." City Manager Alan Tandy and City Attorney Bart Thiltgen prepared a memorandum which outlined several options with comments included for each alternative to point out potential ramifications for the Committee to consider. City Manager Alan Tandy recommended option number five (5) as the best alternative which protects the City and allows the Museum flexibility to pursue private sector financing. The Committee directed staff to work with the Museum Board to develop language and find common ground. City staff provided the Committee with the future outlook for the City's budget. After discussion, the Committee did not recommend approving the Museum's application for funding of $500,000 over the next five years. It was reported that the maintenance of the Museum structure and grounds was still being performed by the City. Staff was requested to review these costs and bring the matter back to the Committee at the next meeting. B. CITY INVESTMENTS City Treasurer Bill Descary presented an overview of the City's investment policy, which has not been changed since December 1997. He stated that based on his experience over the last 16 years, it has been found that most local banks do not AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI'I-FEE DRAFT Monday, February 8, 1999 Page -3- want the burden that goes with public deposits because of the collateral and reporting requirements associated with public money. The Committee recommended no changes be made and directed staff to submit the policy to the Council for adoption. C. CONTRACTING FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES WITH AN EMPLOYMENT AGENCY This item was heard first on the agenda so the two people in the audience concerned with this matter could leave. The City has approximately 300 to 500 temporaries at any time. By Charter, we are limited to working those employees 960 hours in a rolling year. This situation creates a constant staffing/hiring mode which results in increased recruitment costs and orientation time for departments. In addition, our records indicate a disproportionate amount of industrial injuries involving temporary employees is occurring. Staff noted that last year's unemployment and workers' compensation costs were approximately $1.3 million. To address the constant staffing situation, the 960-hour limitation and reduce liability to the City, staff is recommending contracting with a temporary agency for this service. The agency would then be responsible for screening and orienting employees as well as any associated workers' compensation claims of the applicable employees. Staff is proposing a pilot program to evaluate cost. The Committee recommended a Request For Proposal (RFP) process be used for the pilot program. The Committee emphasized the program should not develop into a process where the City circumvents hiring permanent employees. Union representative Mr. Chuck Waide was generally supportive of the concept and would be monitoring the. progress of the pilot program. The Committee recommended staff to go forward with the pilot program, which will include bid approval by City COuncil. Once the pilot program has been evaluated and statistics have been gathered, staff will report back on its effectiveness to the Committee. D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG) AMENDMENTS Economic Development Director Jake Wager presented a proposal to reallocate CDBG funds from projects either completed or canceled during the past several months. The funds are proposed to be used for new projects identified during the fiscal year 1999-00 CDBG planning process. The Committee was supportive of the DRAFT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 8, 1999 Page -4- proposed changes and directed staff to bring this item to the Council for consideration at the March 17, 1999 meeting. E. PROPOSED MEETING SCHEDULE Adopted with one change. May 17th will be listed as 1:30 or, shortly thereafter. 7,, ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 1:27 p.m. Staff present: City Manager Alan Tandy, Assistant City Manager Alan Christensen, City Attorney Bart Thiltgen, City Treasurer Bill Descary, Human Resources Manager Carroll Hayden, Assistant to the City Manager Darnell Haynes, Community Development Coordinator George Gonzales, Finance Director Gregory Klimko, Economic Development Director Jake Wager and Deputy City Attorney Virginia Gennaro. Others present: Bakersfield Californian Reporter Michael Green, S.E.I.U. Local 700 representative Chuck Waide, Mr. Dennis Fox, and representatives from the Bakersfield Museum of Art - Charles G. Meyer, Elizabeth Blaine, Terrance Werdel, Linda Robinson, Heather Barentine, Pat Hanenberg, Bruce Maclin and Millie Albin. cc: HOnorable Mayor and City Council DWH:jp S:/Damell/BF99febO8summary BAKERSFIELD - MEMORANDUM March 25, 1999 TO: Budget & Finance Committee FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manage SUBJECT: Requests from Bakersfield Museum of Art Background The City's virtual gift of a $300,000 asset to the Museum for the sum of $5,0.00 was to ensure that the Museum remain in Central Park. The sales agreement, which was approved by both parties in September of 1997, includes a clause reverting the property to the City in the event the it ever ceases to function as a museum. It appears the existence of the reverter clause has now hindered the ability of the Museum to get a loan for expansion. As a result of discussions at the Budget and Finance Committee meeting on February 8, 1999, staff was directed to work with Museum representatives to resolve two issues: 1) develop a mechanism to replace of the existing reverter clause, including acceptable language to an agreement, which would allow the Museum to obtain financing; and 2) determine the annual cost of maintaining the grounds and structure which has been performed by the City but which was scheduled to be eliminated a few months ago. Several different options were discussed with Museum representatives to replace the existing reverter clause. Staff first proposed a second deed of trust and a first right of refusal in the event of a default or proposed sale. Neither of the options, either combined or separate, were acceptable to the Museum representatives. Staff also presented the option of eliminating the reverter clause after a period of years. This concept was also unacceptable to the Museum because it was indicated that it would prevent them from obtaining a bank loan. Museum representatives have stated that elimination of the reverter clause, either immediately or upon completion of the expansion project in January 2001, is the only acceptable option because it is the desire of the Museum to have full and complete control of the new facility and property. Obviously this option does not protect the City's interest to ensure that the property continues to function as a Museum. Staff continues to recommend using the reverter clause or other device to preserve the property for public use for many years to come, not just in the short-term. In regard to the cost of maintenance of the Museum facility, staff indicates that grounds maintenance is $12,750 per year and building maintenance is $6,500 per year for a total of $19,250 annually. The City does not pay for utilities at the Museum and has not for ten years. It should be noted that as a part of the negotiations to sell the property it was expressly understood by all parties that the City's maintenance responsibilities would end as of a date certain. We have gone beyond that date administratively due to the current open discussions. To give money in-lieu of the maintenance now would essentially be paying for the same thing twice. cc Mayorand CityCouncilmembers Alan Tandy, City Manager AyK ERSFI ELD MPHONY RCHESTRA JOHN I:ARRER, Mu,sic Dirffdof _ 1401 19~h Streel, Su;t, 130, 8Gke~fie~, ~ia ~01, 805/323-792ff, FAX February 24, 1999 Mr. Alan Tandy, City Manager CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Tandy: On behalf of the Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra board of directors, we want to thank the City of Bakersfield for its $40,000 gram to the Symphony during the 1998-99 season. These funds are used to help defray the general operating cost of the Orchestra, including seven subscription concerts, twelve Young People's programs, the Nutcracker Ballet, an Academic Decathlon concert, and a Holiday Pops program. We would like to request an appropriation of $75,000 for the 1999-2000 season. This would cover the Symphony's estimated $42,000 cost of using the Bakersfield Convention Center, allow us to restore four educational concerts we canceled five years ago because of a lack of funds, and add two Nutcracker Young People's programs. This will bring an additional 11,000 school-age children, who might not otherwise be able to attend such a concert, to a performance by the Bakersfield Symphony. The Symphony now turns away many young people because we can't afford to offer these additional programs. We will be happy to supply any additional information you may require in this matter. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, Kelly Aqlen Francisco' President KAF:kl~ ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: February 24, 1999 I AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: 8.w. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ~P~PR~.~VED FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director DEPARTMENT HEAD~/~"'" DATE: February 10, 1999 CITY ATTORNEY (-~-./. CITY MANAGER ~_~ SUBJECT: Request by the Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee to establish a community office within the proposed Southeast Bakersfield Project Area RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Budget & Finance Committee for discussion. BACKGROUND: At the January 21, 1999 meeting of the Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee (PAC), the PAC requested two items be placed on its next agenda: 1. the issue of establishing a committee office within the project area, and 2. establishing an operational budget for their PAC operations. Both issues were stated to be relative to Section 33388 of the California Health and Safety Code. Staff placed both requests on the February 4th PAC agenda. At the February 4"' meeting, staff discussed with the PAC that the City Council appropriated $240,255 in the current budget year to establish both the Southeast Bakersfield Project Area and the Old Town Kern - Pioneer Project Area. The funds were used to contract for the services of the consultants and legal counsel being used to research, document, and develop the plans, reports and legal documents required to establish a project area. The contracts were as follows: GRC Redevelopment Consultants $116,500 -Quad/Knopf Environmental Consultants .96,755 Kathryn Reimann, Legal Counsel 23,500 TOTAL $236,755 The $3,500 difference between the appropriated amount and contracted amounts has already been spent on the required legal notices and mailings to both project areas. It was also discussed that the above appropriated funds do not include the substantial costs in staff time and supplies that have been and will continue to be dedicated toward establishing the project areas. The City Council, in appropriating the above DIk:S:~REDVAREA~se pac off spc cc.adm February 12, 1999, 9:06AM ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 funds, determined that these funds were sufficient to form both proposed project areas. On January 21st and again on February 4th certain PAC members referred to Section 33388 of the California Health and Safety Code in requesting the a committee office and PAC operational budget. Section 33388 states: (a) Upon the recommendation of the project area committee, funds as determined necessary by the legislative body for the operation of the project area committee shall be allocated to the committee by the legislative body. This allocation shall include funds or equivalent resources for a committee office, equipment and supplies, legal counsel, and adequate staff for the purposes set forth in Section 33386. (Emphasis added by staff) After reviewing the above section and resources that have been made available to the PAC, the City Attorney's Office and Special Counsel are of the opinion that equivalent resources have been provided as outlined in Section 33388. Staff also concurs with this opinion and believes that establishing an office could have a detrimental effect on the formation process by unnecessarily stretching limited staff and budgetary resources. After discussion by the PAC, a motion was approved to request of the City Council that a community office be established. Funding for the office was not identified by the PAC, however a PAC member offered to donate use of a building for office space. Left unstated, were the issues of office staffing and providing the normal and customary appurtenances associated with a modern functioning office (i.e. telephone, fax machine, furnishings, copier, etc.) On January 21st and again on February 4th the PAC also discussed the need for an operational budget to cam/ on their duties. Certain PAC members have expressed their belief that funds are needed to conduct surveys to determine the needs/issues within their community, or to attend out-of-town workshops/conferences. The PAC was not able to determine a budget or identify funding for their budget, and no formal action was taken. However, the item was requested to be placed on the PAC's February 25th agenda for further discussion. it is uncertain what sources of funds could be made available to fund a PAC office and operational budget. The department's current Community Development Block Grant funding for administrative costs has maximized the 20% administrative costs rule. With no redevelopment funds available to this project area until well after the formation is completed, the only other source of available funding would be the City's General Fund. Should this option be considered, the City Council would then need to consider if the funds being made available would be in the form of a grant or a loan to the CDDA. The obvious risk with a loan is the possibility that the area would not be approved and thus no tax increment funds necessary for repayment would be generated. DIk:S:\REDVAREA~se pac off spc cc.adm February 12, 1999, 11:08AM HALL AMBULANCE ( ( I I GOLDEN EMPIRE SERVICE INCORPORATED AMBULANCE (~) 322-1625 ~ (8~) 022-160~ (~) 32S-91dl [~ (805) 025-1S24 M~ch 22, 1999 Councilwomen, Pat DeMond Chairperson Budget and Finance Committee City Council City of Bakersfield' Dear Chairperson DeMond, Our letter of February 10, 1999 requested that Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance be granted by the City of Bakersfield the means to begin itemized billing for medical supplies and drugs as we are presently doing in the County. Itemized billing would be besides the normal and customary ALS and BLS rates already in place. Hail Ambulance Service, Inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance requests using three categories to bill for medical supplies and drugs. Attachment I specifies those three categories as ALS medical supplies, BLS medical supplies and Drugs/Injections. In addition, we have provided an inventory of items most often included in each category. It is important to remember that the Kern County EMS Agency requires ambulances to carry medical supplies and drugs under County and State established protocols. At times the EMS Agency will change these protocols. Interaction with hospitals or physicians might dictate changing or upgrading particular medical supplies. Such changes to treatment procedures and protocols must allow for a flexibility in these lists. Items in each category are listed as "included but not limited to." This flexible treatment would allow us to make changes in supplies carried on our ambulances as required by the County EMS Agency without petitioning the City Council at every change. An itemized billing for medical supplies and drugs is the only mechanism, in most instances, that payers; i.e. Medicare, MediCal, insurance companies, HMOs, etc., will accept to reimburse ambulance providers. Under our proposal each patient will receive an itemized statement of medical supplies and drugs used. However, we would also propose a maximum dollar amount charged be placed on each category. The maximum that we could charge to any one patient for ALS medical supplies would be $100.00. The maximum amount for BLS supplies would be $100.00. Under the category of drugs and medications, the maximum amount would be $275.00. Overall, we propose a cap of $375.00 for a combination of a patient's medical supply and drug charges for any single transport. Attachment II provides several scenarios on billing for medical supplies and drugs that might help you to understand the process. However, these examples of dollar amounts might be different depending on whether Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. or Golden Empire Ambulance transported the patient. Page -2- Our original intention had been to provide to the City Council, for approval, a list of medical supplies and drugs suggesting a dollar amount for each item on the list. However, the nature of private business made that a difficult, if not impossible, task. Each company uses different vendors for supplies, purchases supplies at different prices and employs different mark up percentages. Approval by the City Council. of the maximum allowable charges and the overall cap on amounts for medical supplies and drugs would give a patient reasonable assurance of fair billing. Any patient, having questions concerning charges for medical supplies, drugs and medications, would have the oppommity to bring those questions to the ambulance companies individually or to the County EMS Agency or to the City Council. Ambulance services must maintain documentation of medical supplies and drugs used for patient care reports and for individual payer reimbursement. Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance Service remain committed to re supplying the fire department with medical supplies that they use in patient care at no cost to the city. Therefore, Golden Empire Ambulance Service and Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. request, under the ordinance, a hearing for the changes to the City ordinance allowing for patient billing of medical supplies and drugs. We would hope this hearing could be scheduled as soon as possible. Yours truly, Harvey L. Hall' ~/ President/Founder ~;e~ssi~' Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. ire Ambulance Service attachments: Page -3- ATTACHMENT I ALS Medical Supplies (including but not limited to): Maximum $100 Name/Description Medicare billing codes Airway (covered only if non reusable) A0398 Bandages/Dressing/Gauze A0398 Cannula A0398 Catheter/IV Tubing A0398 Cervical Collar A0398 Mask (oxygen) A0398 Obstetrical Kit A0398 Restraints (covered only if non reusable) A0398 Linens (covered for diagnosed contagious) A0398 BLS Medical Supplies (including but not limited to): Maximum $100 Name/Description Medicare billing codes Airway (covered only if non reusable) A0382 Bandages/Dressing/Gauze A0398 Cannula A0382 Catheter/IV Tubing A0382 Cervical Collar A0382 Mask (oxygen) A0382 Obstetrical Kit A0382 Restraints (covered only if non reusable) A0382 Linens (covered for diagnosed contagious) A0382 Drugs and Injections (including but not limited to): Maximum $275 Name/Description Medicare billing codes Adenosine (adenocard) J0150 Adrenaline, Epinephrin up to 1 ml ampul JO 170 Aminophylin, up to 250 mg J0280 Succinylcholine Chloride, up to 20 mg J0330 Hydralazine HC1, up to 20 mg J0360 Page -4- Atropine sulfate, up to 0.3 mg J0460 Calcium gluconate (Kaleinate) J0610 Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, up to 4mg/ml J1100 Diphehydramine HCI, up to 50 mg (Benadryl, Benahist) J1200 Glucagon hyrochloride. J1610 Furosemide, up to 20 mg (Lasix) J1940 Lidocaine HC1, 50 cc J2000 Mannitol, 25% in 50 ml J2150 Meperidine HC1, 100mg J2175 Midazolam HCI (Versed) J2250 Morphine sulfate, up to 10 mg J2270 Morphine sulfate (Astramorph PF, Duramorph) J2275 Nalozone HC1, (Narcan) J2310 Oxytocin, up to 10 units J2590 Sodium chloride, 0.9% per 2 mi J2912 Diazepam, up to 5 mg (Valium) J3360 MagneSium sulfate J3475 Potassium chloride J3480 Normal saline solution, 1,000 cc J7030 Normal sale solution, sterile 500 cc J7040 5% dextrose/Normal saline 500 cc J7042 Sterile saline or water up to 5 cc J7051 5% dextrose/water D5W 500 mi J7060 D-5-W, 1,000 cc J7070 Ringer's lactate, up to 1,000 cc J7120 Albuterol sulfate, 0.083% per ml (Proventil) J7620 Albuterol sulfate 0.5% per 1 (Proventil, Ventolin) J7625 EpinePhrine J7640 Bretylium Tosylate, Bretylol 90799 Calcium chloride 90799 Dopamine hydrochloride 90799 Sodium Bicarbonate 90799 Verapamil hyrochloride, Calan, Isoptin 90799 Page -5- ATTACHMENT II The attached page contains three (3) scenarios of patient transports that we deal with on a daily basis. Beside those treatments or procedures that we are requesting the ability to charge for, an amount has been inserted for example purposes. This amount would vary depending on the pricing mechanism of either Golden Empire Ambulance or Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. Had the total ALS Medical Supplies cost more than $100, then the maximum charged would have been $100. The same would hold true for the medications or injections of drugs. Had the actual cost of the drugs exceeded $275, then the maximum cap of $275 would have been charged to the patient. In no scenario was this the case. Finally, had the total cost for medical supplies and drugs combined exceeded $375 then the cap of $375 would have been applied instead of the actual amount. We hope this has been helpful and clarifies any questions you might have about our proposal. Average Paramedic Scenarios with Treatments that are prescribed by the Kern County EMS Department, EMT-Pararnedic Protocols ~4200.3591-.3595 Kern County EMS Department, Prehospital Spinal Immobilization Policies and Procedures ~4200.3295 1) Traumatic Cardiopulmonary Arrest (breathing and heartbeat stops due to some form of trauma, usually severe vehicle accidents or victims of violent crimes). endotracheal intubation (a tube is placed into the windpipe) bag valve mask(used to ventilate a patient that cannot breath on their own) oxygen (administered via the tube that is in the windpipe) ECG monitoring (constant & continuous monitoring of the heart's status) spinal immobilization (cervical collar, head blocks, and backbohrd) IV access (two IV lines are started to replace fluid/blood loss via a fluid challenge) thoracic decompression (cook catheter placed to re-inflate the lungs, one or two) M.A.S.T. application (use of pneumatic trousers to off.set Iow/no blood pressure) bandages/dressings (used to stem the flow of blood) epinephrine (used to improve CPR and help excite a heart that has stopped beating) atrOpine (used to help restart a heart that is not beating) lidocaine (used to control erratic heart behavior if the heart starts beating again) dopamine (used to raise blood pressure if the heart starts beating again) 2) Acute Congestive lteart Failure with Respiratory Compromise (difficulty breathing due to fluid in the lungs from the back up of blood in a weak or damaged heart) oxygen (administered at a high rate via a mask) IV access (necessary for the administration of medications) 0~5'./o 7 ECG monitoring (this condition is directly related to the status of the heart) nitroglycerin (administered usually more than once, increase the size of veins/arteries) lasix (administered to facilitate the removal of fluid from the lungs) morphine sulfate (administered to increase the size of veins/arteries) in severe cases: positive pressure ventilation (bag valve mask used to force pure oxygen into lungs) endotracheal intubation (performed when the patient is to tired to breath on their own) ~ ~ 7 7T/ I ,4 2 JY Z ,euq 3) Decline in level of consciousness(due to vehicle accident find trauma to the head) oxygen (administered at a high rate via a mask) spinal immobilization (cervical collar, head blocks, backboard) o~4. 4~ ? IV access (necessary for medication/fluid administration) ~,5'. 67 ECG monitoring (constant & continuous monitoring of the heart's status) bandages/dressings (to stem the flow of blood loss and protect a wound) glucose analysis (check of blood sugar) in cases where the patient is unconscious: dextrose (administered to rule out low blood sugar) ¥. q~ narcan (administered to rule out medication/drug induced unconsciousness) ..7~.. 33 -770/,,/ WZ,f'/,7,e/_/e~l,.~,/,/o/,'¢~ *'~.~'! 1o'"-7~/ SERVICE INCORPORA TED ]~]-2]~ ~E~ 8AKE~FtEm, CA 93301-4792 27m F ~E~ BAKERSRE~, CA 93301-4792 (Sm) 3=-162S F~ (8~) 8=-16a8 (8~) 325-9141 F~ (8OS) 325-1S24 Feb~ 1 O, 1999 Pat DeMond, Council Member Chairperson Budget and Finance Committee City. Council City. of Bakersfield Dear Chairperson DeMond, Until February 1 of this year, Kern County hospitals and Kern County ambulance providers had a long-standing ageement providing for the restocking, by hospitals. of specific medical supplies and drugs. These medical supplies and drugs would have been used or administered by the paramedic before the patient arrived at the hospital. The hospitals would, in mm, resupply the ambulances after the call. The hospitals then could charge the patient to recoup the costs of these medical supplies and drugs. On February. 1, 1999, the hospitals in Bakei'sfield and the surrounding communities decided that, legally, they could no longer restock ambulance providers with medical supplies or drugs except Morphine and Valium. Hall Ambulance Service, inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance have spent considerable time n-ying to calculate the financial impact that this change will have on our businesses. The resupply ageement between the hospitals and ambulance providers has not covered all medical supplies or drugs. Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance have, over the years, incorporated into the costs of doing business a si~cant portion of these medical supply costs. However, we believe Hall Ambulance and Golden Empire Ambulance will see a substantial increase in the dollar amount of medical supplies and drugs purchased during this ne,ct fiscal year. This is the amount we will no longer receive in resupply from the hospitals. Medical supplies are one of our biggest financial line items. For either ambulance provider to increase its medical expenditures, to the e=ent that we anticipate, is a serious matter. Hall Ambulance and Golden Empire Ambulance both %oree that we must, by necessity., begin charging our patients for these medical supplies and drugs. To bill patients will not be an easy task. Ambulance providers face a myriad of different billing rules for the various pay sources, such as Medicare, MediCal, managed.Fare, insurance companies, city. or county. We also know · that two of our major pay sources, Medic'are and MediCal, will only pay us a small portion of the actual cost of the medical supplies and cirugs. Despite all of the difficulties, we are determined to maintain the kigh standard of ,c.are that the citizens of Bakersfield and Kern County. have come to expect. .. Page -2- The Kern CoUnty Ambulance Ordinance provides only that we notice the EMS Department in writing of any rate changes. We have done so. Our bills to patients in the coUnty will now reflect itemization for these medical supplies and drags to a maximum of. $375.00. The current regulated rate structure, under which we operate within the City Of Bakersfield. does not allow us to charge patients for medical supplies or drugs used in their treatment. Our agreement with the City provides that we can request the City of Bakersfield f.or rates changes once a year by December 3 I. In tact. we submitted a rate change request on December 31, 1998. We did not include a request f.or a method or amount to charge for medical supplies or drugs. At the time, we hoped that we could change the stance of' the hospitals so they would continue restocking ambulances. However, we were Unsuccessful. Because of the nature of this crisis, we respectfully request that the City. of Bakersfield grant us the means by which we can begin billing immediately for medical supplies and drugs. Therefore, this would mean that besides the normal and customary ALS and BLS base rates, we would send each patient an itemized billing of'all medical supplies and drugs used in their care. An itemized list of medical supplies and drugs gives each patient accurate information about their treatment. We will charge patients for only those medical supplies and drugs used by the paramedic bef.ore arrival at the hospital. Billing requirements by such payers as MediCal requires that the ambulance providers document these itemized costs. In addition, because o'f the costly nature of certain of the drugs used, we are willing to place a cap of $375.00 on the charges that any one patient will pay. Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. and Golden Empire Ambulance appreciate any help that you,. your committee and the City CoUncil will give us on this matter. Yours truly, Har~ey L. Hail / -"-" President/Founder / Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. Ambulance _ BAKERSFIELD Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM March 23, 1999 TO: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director FROM: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Proposed CDB Plan for FY 1999/00 Attached is information on all projects that were submitted for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME), or Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funding for FY 1999/00. The overall funding level for FY 99/00 for the three programs, including anticipated program income is up about 1% from last year. CDBG funding is $2,990,000. HOME funding is $1,300,000. ESG funding is $99,000. The proposed Use of Funds for FY 1999/00 will be reviewed by the Budget and Finance Committee at their March 29, 1999 meeting. We will also request based on a favorable review, authorization to publish a public notice for a 30-day review and comment period on April 14, 1999. At the April 14, 1999, City Council meeting, staff will request authorization to submit the Final CDBG Action Plan to HUD at the end of the 30-day review and comment period (May 3, 1999), as has been the practice in prior years. dlk:P:\GEORGE\action plan cover, mem Community Development Block Grant Fund Proposed Uses for FY 1999100 22-Mar-99 IDescriptionRequested99/00 Recommended99100 I JCDDD IHard coslTota, Proj.I FY 1999100 Resources Entitlement Allocation 2,790,000 Program Income 200,000 ESG Allocation 99,000 Total Resources 3,089,000 Administration Planning & Administration 483,912 Redev. Project Areas 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 Sub-Total 493,912 16.52% Public Services Enterprise Zone 15,000 1,000 14,000 15,000 Graffiti 162,000 5,000 157,000 162,000 FH / LGN Events 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 Looking Good Neighborhood 27,000 0 27,000 27,000 Fair Housing 103,500 75,000 28,500 103,500 Sub-Total 319,500 Housing Clearance 50,000 · 0 0 0 Acquisition 91,000 1,000 90,000 91,000 Lead Based Paint Abatement 23,000 4,000 19,000 23,000 Home Access 58,000 8,000 50,000 58,000 Program Costs 85,000 85,000 0 85,000 Sub-Total 307,000 Economic Development Unreimforced Masonry (URM) 50,000 2,000 48,000 50,000 Business Loans 0 0 0 0 Commercial Loans 239,253 2,000 237,253 239,253 Sub-Total 289,253 4,000 Non-Profit Assistance KCEOC 5,000,000 255,000 5,000 250,000 255,000 Bakersfield Police Activities League 521,051 116,500 2,500 114,000 116,500 Friendship House 158,250 23,000 1,000 22,000 23,000 Baker Street Church of Christ 200,000 11,000 1,000 10,000 11,000 Sub-Total 405,500 9,500 ESG Allocation Alliance Against Family Violence 27,400 17,483 County Mental Health System of Care 35,000 22,332 Bethany Services 65,000 41,474 Kern Mental Health Association 20,000 12,761 ESG Administration (5%) 4,950 4,950 0 4,950 Sub-Total 99,000 CD Direct Delivery (CIP's) 22,500 22,500 0 22,500 Total Operating Expenditures 1,936,665 CIP'slDebt Service PWDD CDDD Total Pro Section 108 Loan Payment 342,000 342,000 0 342,000 Union Avenue Median Improvements 60,000 60,000 0 5,000 65,000 Filson Street Cul-de-sac 44,000 38,000 6,000 1,000 45,000 Lake St. Area St. Improvements 140,000 122,500 17,500 2,500 142,500 Casa Loma #6 Street Imprvmt 300,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 Union #10 Street Improvements 181,000 49,000 5,500 3,000 57,500 Chester #3 Water System Impv Ph 3 250,000 24,300 7,000 2,500 33,800 Haley Street Area Sidewalks Ph 3 85,000 43,400 13,600 1,500 58,500 Downtown Streetscape Exp_ansion 197,000 3,000 200,000 MLK - Replace two HVAC units & ducts 14,500 funded by amendment In '98-'99 0 0 *- 0 ADA Playground Imprvmt - Wilson Park 112,546 funded by amendment in '98-'S9 0 0 0 ADA Playground Equip - Jastro Park 70,110 70,110 0 1,500 71,610 ADA Playground Equipment - MLK 90,100 90,100 0 2,000 92,100 Access Imprvmts to 12 Parks 16,325 16,325 0 500 16,825 Kitchen / Conf Rm Remodel - MLK 10,522 funded by amendment In '98-'99 0 0 0 Resurface Tennis Courts - MLK 11,500 funded by amendment In '98-'99 0 0 0 Jefferson Park - Resurface Courts 29,300 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total CIP Expenditures 1,756,903 1,102,735 49,600 22,500 1,174,835 Total Expenditures 3,089,000 Expenditures Under ! (Over) Available Resources 0 BAKERSFIELD Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM March 22, 1999 TO: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director FROM: George Gonzales,~munity Development Coordinator II SUBJECT: Non-Profit Applicdlions for FY 99/00 The following table summarizes the applications received by this department for FY 99/00 CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds. While the complete analysis of each application is not yet complete, the information provided below is an accurate representation of each proposal. If you require additional information, please let me know. Community Development Applications FY 99/00 Public Facilities, Housing and Homeless Projects CDBG, HOME, and ESG Funds "~ ::~ .... """' ~ ~"~'~":" ~"~:~: :~% :~ ~ : ~':' ~:.~,~.EstimatedCoSt*/City .HUD · Applicant Deg~riPtion andLoCation,:;i. CDBG APPLICATIONS Kern County Acquisition of an 8 acre KCEOC - Food Ba~ - $5 million total cost Yes Economic parcel (Casa Royale) to Central Kitchen OppoauniW cons~ct a Cen~al Kitchen Consolidation & Admin Co~oration and Food Ba~Admin Offices Acquisition $120,000 Offices - (Original site is no Demolition $150,000 longer available to purchase. Construction $4,730,000 Applicant will identi~ alternative site. $500,000 City Recommended funding (1999) - $25&000 Applied to County. dlk:P:\GEORGE\np funding 99 00.mem Page - 1- ~' proposalName and ~:,~: Estimated Cost './City, HUD · ..... ::' : ' ',~ ~:Funding :: FundsRequeSted/Other Eligible iI ~~,~?.Rec~mehdation,~i~i~ii::, ?,:i!:SourceS.,~ . ~,: Kem Bridges Acquisition of a 2,750 sq.ft. Kern Bridges Youth $125,000 Total Yes Youth Home, building on a 12,500 sq.ft. Home Admin Office Inc. parcel located at 1615 "V" Street. - Ward 2 City $40,000 County $40,000 Funded in 1997. Agency $45,000 No funding recommended Applied to County. (1999). Kern Medical Expansion of 2,500 sq.ft. ElderLife Adult Day $182,454 Total Yes Center and exterior open space at Health Care Center 1111 Columbus, Suite 4 - Expansion 55.5% City Resident Ward 3 Funded in 1996. Application to State Office of Aging $96,670 No funding recommended Approved 12/14/98 (1999). City $62,000 Other $23,784 Applied to County Valley Acquisition ora 14,400 Primary Living Program $705,000 Total Yes Achievement sq.ft, facility on a 1.45 acre for Individuals with Center lot located at 7300 Ming Autism. Avenue. - Ward 5 Acquisition $700,000 Rehab $5,000 No funding recommended City Share $200,000 (1999). Has not applied to County. Bakersfield Acquisition and Bakersfield Police $521,051 Total Yes Police Activities rehabilitation of a 17,865 Activities League Youth League sq.fi. Building on a 1.89 Center acre site at 301 East 4th Acquisition $114,390 Street. - Ward 2 Rehab $406,661 60% City benefit Recommended funding (1999) - $116,500 Applied to County. dlk:P:\GEORGE\np funding 99 00.mem Page -2- Friendship Rehabilitation of multi- Friendship House $158,250 Phase 1 Total Yes House pu~ose center and offices Communi~ Center CommuniW located at 2424 Co~onwood Rehabilitation PrQect - Center Road. - Ward 1 Phase 1 Funded in 1991. Not part of this Proposal. Funded amendment 1998 - Phase II - $55,500 $13, 038 Phase III - $250,000 New Classroo~Rec. Recommended funding Room (1999) - $23,000 Phase IV - Dev Gym $1,200,000 Baker Street Construction of a 4,400 Precious Years Day Care $200,000 Total Yes Church of sq.~. building on an acre site and A~er School Christ at East California, Gage and Enrichment Center Has submitted Chico. - Ward 2 for separate Has not applied to County. 503 c(3) Recommended funding a999) - $11,000 CDBG Total $2,026, 755 HOME New Directions Acquisition of two homes New Direction Group $286,000 Total Yes Group Home for located at 2875 Belle Home for Girls, Inc. Girls, Inc. Te~ace and 905 CasCo Lane. Outside City limits. Applied to County No funding recommended. Affordable Acquisition of HUD units Homeownership $200,000 Total Yes Home, Inc. and Ba~ Repo'd prope~ies Oppo~unities created (CHDO) for sale to low-income from FHA's Bank Repo's persons, for low-income persons. Has not applied to County. ~dditional information requested. dlk:P:\GEORGE\np funding 99 00.mem Page -3- ApPlicant Descrtp~on and I2ocation ProPosal Name' and: ~ :. ~ Estimated Cost "/City HUD ~.~ '~:"~.:::: ...:;~. ~,~.'~ i''~ ~iFund~ngi:~ :i i~:'i!~!~ i :Funds Requested/Other Eligible Living Rehabilitmion of a 9-bed Cedar House Residential $29,628 Total Yes Connections, licensed residential care Care Facility Inc. home for mentally disabled Rehabilitation PrQect women at 2429 19th Street. - $25,000 City Ward 2 $ 4,628 Agency Funded in 1995 Has not applied to County. No funding recommended a999). Habitat for Direct projects cost Habitm for Humanity $75,000 Total Yes Humanity - assistance. Three single- Single-Family Homes Golden Empire hmily dwellings and (CHDO) acquisition of three Project Cost $38,500 additional lots. Ward 1 & 2 StaffCost $36,500 Additional information Has not applied to County. requested. Restoration Assistance to unde~ake Comprehensive $583,850 Total Yes Community various housing/child care Community Restoration PrQects, Inc. and clean-up prQects. - Program, Block by Block (CHDO) Ward 1 & 2 - Phase I Housing Cost $285,000 Staff Cost $298,850 Additional information Has not applied to County. requested. HOME Total $1,169, 850 ESG Kern Coun~ Operation cost and Operation, Essential $20,000 Yes Mental Health renovation to 345 Chester Se~ices Association Avenue to continue homeless prevention activities. Recommend funding - $12,761 * Alliance 1921 19th Street Homeless Prevention $27,400 Yes Against Family Se~ices, Operation Violence Recommend funding - $1 L483' dlk:P:\GEORGE\np funding 99 00.mem Page -4- Bethany 1600 East Tmxtun Avenue Homeless Se~ices, $65,000 Yes Se~ices Operation Recommend funding - $41,474~ County of Kern 3300 Tmxtun Avenue, Suite Kern Linkage Program $35,000 Yes Mental Health 290 Homeless Prevention System of Care Se~ices Recommend funding - $22,332* ESG Total $94,050 *The recommended funding for ESG is less than that requested by the agencies due to a reduction in the overall funding by HUD. dlk:P:\GEORGE\np funding 99 00Jnem Page -5- Community Development ~lpplications FY 99/00 Public Facilities, Housing and Homeless Projects CDBG, HOME and ESG Funds :'i: ~ DescriPtion: :. i' " Applicant ~i 'Estimated . HUD . C°nPlan ' : % City Comments 'Date Recommended ?:i. ". 'i&~:...:'.::i i: .~'::i /.,~.,.:,~ i':: '. '. '.COst,/ ::,:'; .', :i::~:~. L0cati~'n:: ~i":: :::City FUnds' " .. CDBG Applications Acquisition of an 8-acre KCEOC $5,000,000 Yes Medium 100% KCEOC has multiple activities 10/30/98 $255,000 parcel to construct a $170,000 Low/Mod to be housed by this project. central kitchen and Benefit City funds are needed to acquire administration offices at the property and relocate the 251 South Union current operations to the new Avenue. site. Ward 1 Acquisition of property Kern Bridges Youth $125,000 Yes Medium 100% Kern Bridges requests $40K 11/12/98 $0 at 1615 V Street Homes Office $40,000 Low/Mod 100% each from City and County; Building $85,000 Benefit $45K from private financing. Ward 2 Expansion of ElderLife Kern Medical $182,454 Yes Medium 55.5% State of California Office of 11/24/98 $0 Adult Day Care Center - ElderLife $62,000 Public Facilities 100% Aging announced intent to fund $122,454 $96,670 of project costs. Ward 3 Acquisition.of property Valley Achievement $705,000 Yes Medium 100% $200K to acquire facility from 11/25/98 $0 7300 Ming Avenue. Center $200,000 Low Mod which to teach living skills to Benefit autistic children in the Greater Ward 5 Bakersfield Area. JF\S:\99 00 Funding\99_00APP.TBL March 16, 1999 1 Description AppliCant Estimated.. HUD · i ConPlan % citY . . " .:: " .' Received/ Funding-:' & '~ ' : 'cOst*/:. Eligible: i PrioritY Residents · . · ~. . CitY FUnds ' · ~ (Oue · ! Location · i ,.: · ' '= : ' ' ' .'~ '" : ::' 11-26-98) ' '' ' ' ·' ' : Requested/ · . . .% , : ·: Other . · · ollow-up . : :, · . Low/MOd · ~. :... , SourCes . ..: · ~: .? .. : LCI Cedar House Living Connections $29,628 Yes - High 100% Previously funded by HOME, 11/25/98 $0 Residential Care Facility $25,000 Low/Mod 100% not eligible for more HOME Rehab Project at 2429 $4,628 Housing funding, but is CDBG eligible. 19t~ Street. Ward 2 Acquisition and Bakersfield Police $521,051 Yes Youth 85% Low/Mod percentage is average 11/25/98 $116,500 Rehabilitation of 301 Activities League- $203,350 Low/Mod Centers 63% of C.T's 21, 22, 25, and 26. East 4th Street. Youth Center. $317,701 Benefit High Ward 2 Renovation and Friendship House $158,250 Yes Youth and 95% Project has four phases; phase 11/25/98 $23,000 Expansion of the $158,250 Low/Mod Area Community 97% one is requesting funds to Friendship House at Services rehabilitate the existing facility. 2424 Cottonwood Road. High Ward 1 Construction of Precious Baker Street Church $200,000 Yes Child Care 60% Applicant is a church, but is 11/25/98 $11,000 Years Day Care and of Christ $100,000 LoW/Mod Centers 100% eligible for CDBG under certain After School Enrichment $100,000 Persons High conditions; 570.2000)(1-4) Center (East California between Gage & Chico Street). Ward 1 "~ JF\S:\99 00 Funding\99_00APP.TBL March 16, 1999 2 :....,,.: Estimated HUD ConPlan',·. '~, %1 City ':: cOmmentS: ,,, ·Date Recommended iii:' .: :" DesCription i~ :.," PliCant :..i~. · . ' i i!: .:' , i Received/ · ': ' ' ' ' : "':' ": 'i: 'i' '=:' Funding· ~: ..:: ~ ~: &:,? : =,:':=.,, :, , : · COSt,/ · Eligible PrioritY: :~. Residents · :,i · City Funds · : ?. 0~ue · :..::. ::. ~.. .... . , : .i ' ' ' : : ' : ':~' ": ' "';' " 11-26-98)-· ':... :· "~'~ '"' :':?'::::':~; '~' ' ": :: " Requested/ " ... ::~::'i' ~ ~0/o : · · :':', ~ ·. :.:...i..'-::: "~: :~'. '..' .' ..:.....: Other : .Low/Mod · .. :!i ":" ': .i,: ~i:. :,, .~ ~...: :: :,.':. .,Sources: · .:' :. i....:i~:' "i : : i '. · . :' .:: .... : .:.:. Neighborhood Restoration $124,200 Yes Public 100% Proposal included HOME and 11/25/98 Additional Cleanup/Paint Community Project, Slum and Blight Service 100% CDBG activities; staff separated Information Programs/Minor Home Inc. Medium the activities to clarify request. Requested Repairs. Wards 1 & 2 JF\S:\99 00 Funding\99_00APP.TBL March 16, 1999 3 DeScription ~i' APPlicant ii'. Estimated HUD · ConPlan % City. Comments Date Recommended · ~ CoSt*/ Eligible PrioritY Residents · ~ Received/ ~' ' .... Location ==" = ' 'i~ii. rids ,= · .. ~, ..= ' (rue · .. · ..i · ,:.i '..' Requested/ :. : -i .,.... % Follow_up11'26'gs) .~ ... . .. : .'....: .. Other. : . ~ Low/Mod .: · :~,,~.:"' .' · · ." ' ", .', '... ~ 'i' : SoUrCes' ~'. . ~ ~ · , · HOME Purchase of properties Restoration $459,650 Yes Affordable 100% This is the HOME eligible 11/25/98 Additional for rehabilitation and Community Project, $459,650 L/M Housing Housing 100% portion of RCPI's request for Information sale to first time Inc. High funding. It is requesting Requested homebuyers, operating funds at 28% of total funding request. Purchase property to KCEOC $925,450 Yes Affordable 100% KCEOC proposes to use 11/18/98 Additional rehabilitate and sell to $105,550 L/M Housing Housing 100% $33,000 to pay CHDO operating Information low income first time $819,900 High expenses; 31% of the funding Requested homebuyers request. Purchase property for Habitat for $75,000 Yes High 100% Habitat needs funds to pay soft 11/20/98 Additional single family home Humanity $75,000 Low/Mod 100% costs related to housing Information construction. Housing development 92.206(d)(4),(6) Requested City-wide Acquisition of properties New Directions $286,000 Yes High 0% Property is located in the county 11/25/98 $0 2875 Belle Terrace and Group Home for Low/Mod 0% boundaries; no funds from City 905 Castro Lane. Girls, Inc. Housing unless County is willing to fund this project. None - County property ~' JFXS:\99 O0 Funding\99_00APP.TBL March 16, 1999 4 · : DesCription.i'ii::I -: · ApPlicant · Estimated: , : HUD . ' Conplan % City Comments· · i ." Date Recommended '.~ ~.:& - ii ~ · i: Cost*/: · Eligible ' 'Priority ' Residents ' - Received/. Funding ~ LOcation ,..'i'...' . , City Funds - . . . . = (One ~ · -= . ~ .' 11-26-98) =. : .... ...= .,. = Requested/ =: %. Follow. Up · . ... ...... . . · other. · . · =Low/MOd . ESG APPLICATIONS ESG Alliance Against $27,400 Yes High N/A Funds to support thc operation 11/13/98 $17,483 Family Violence Homeless of the battered women's shelter Services and other homeless prevention activities. ESG County of Kern $35,000 Yes High N/A To cover cost of shelter 11/24/98 $22,332 Mental Health Homeless vouchers to mentally disabled / System of Care Services homeless persons. ESG Bethany Services $65,000 Yes High N/A To cover cost of ESG eligible 11/25/98 $41,474 Homeless activities. Services ESG Kern Mental Health $20,000 Yes High N/A Operation cost to facilitate and 11/24/98 $12,761 Association Homeless administer the payee services for Services mentally ill and homeless clients. '~ JF\S:\99 00 Funding\99_00APP.TBL March 16, 1999 5 BAKERSFIELD Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM January 13, 1999 TO: Jake Wager, Economic,~., ~..._Dcvel°pment Director FROM: Vince A. Zaragoza,~J~c~a') Planner SUBJECT: CIP Proposals Received for FY 1999/00 CDBG Assistance The deadline for submission of CIP proposals for FY 1999-00 was November 25, 1998. We received 15 proposals totaling about $1.4 million. Staff met with other City Departments to determine their priorities for the various projects that were submitted. Below are project descriptions, cost estimates, and CIP recommendations for next fiscal year. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS Filson Street Cul-de-Sac New cul-de-sac wi~ trees & laMscaping for the east eM of Filson Reco~eM Street. The improvements will confine criminal traffic on Filson Street. FuMing - Est~ated Cost - $45,000 (Ward 1) $45,000 Lake Street Reconstruction (Final Phase) Recommend Curbs and gutters aM related improvements along Lake Street between Funding - Miller and Haley Street. Estimated Cost - $142,500 (Ward 2) $142,500 Union glO Street Improvement Project Funding Street material to reconstruct streets and repair curb and gutters. Project from prior years area is bordered by Hwy. 58 on ~e nor~, ~e Sou~ern Pacific R.R. savings (1998) - tracks and Hayes Street on the east, the Branch Kern Island Canal on the $39,500 south and Union Ave. on the west. Project can be phased over two years. Estimated Cost- $184,000 (Ward 1) Downtown Streetscape Expansion Reco~end Install streetscape improvements on 18m Street between Eye and "K" Funding - streets. Estimate of cost is in progress. $200,000 South Union Ave. Median Landscape Project Recommend Installation of landscaping aM lighting improvements along Union Ave. Funding - between Bmndage Lane m Ming Ave. Estimated Cost - $65,000 (match) $65,000 Dlk:S:\DEBBIE'S\C1Pprop99-00.wpd PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS Casa Loma #6 Street Improvement (Phase $) Recommend Curbs and gutters and related street improvements within the recently Funding - annexed Casa Loma #6 Area. Project can be phased over two years. $153,000 Estimated Cost - $ 303,000 (Ward 1) Chester #3 Water system Improvements (Phase 3) Funding with Upgrade water system in Chester #3 Annexation area to meet City fire prior years flow requirements. Cai-Water is the purveyor. Project can be phased savings (1998) - over two years. Estimated Cost - $252,000 (Ward 2) $54,000 Hal~ Street Area Sidewalk Reconsruction Project (Phase 3) Reco~end Replacement of deteriorated sidewalk in the Haley Street Area. Bounded Funding - by Highway 178 and ~e City Limit line on the north, Haley Street on ~e $86,500 east, Kenmc~ street on the South and Alta Vista on the west. Estimated Cost - $86,500 (Ward 2) MLK Tennis Court Resu~acing Funding with Resurfacing of MLK te~is courts and repair of practice walls. Funding prior years of te~is courts are eligible but not practice wall repair. Estimated Cost - savings (1995) - $12,500 (Ward 1) $12,500 M~ Kitchen & Conference Room Remodel Funding with Replacement of 6 kitchen appliances and repair and refinishing of kitchen prior years and conference room cabinets (repair and refinishing is not eligible), savings (1995) - Estimated Cost - $11,500 (Ward 1) $11 ,~00 MLK HVA C Repacement Program (Multi-Year) Funding with Replacement of two 10 ton HVAC units and related duct work for ~e prior years MLK Co--unity Center. Estimated Cost - $15,500 (Ward 1) savings (1995) - $15,500 MLK Playground Improvement Project Reco~end Insallation of outdoor playground equipment, ADA surfacing, and a new Funding - recreation shelter. Estimated Cost - $ 92,100 (Ward 1) $92,100 Wilson Park ADA Payground Improvemena Funding with Installation of ADA exterior playground equipment and surfacing, prior years (wi~in Wilson Park's Zone of Benefit). Estimated Cost - $115,000 savings (1996) - (Ward 7) $115,000 DIk:S:\DEBBIE'S\CIPprop99-00.wpd 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS Jastro Park ADA Playground Improvements Recommend Installation of ADA equipment and surfacing. Estimated Cost - $71,606 Funding - (Ward 5) $71,610 Ci~_ ADA Park Access Improvements Recommend Installation of ADA access improvements for 12 various City parks Funding - (curbs, ramps, walks, and fountains). Estimated Cost- $16,825 $16,825 Jefferson Park Basketball/Tennis Courts Resurfacing Recommend Resurfacing of two basketball/tennis courts and installation of fencing Funding - and backboards. Estimated Cost - $30,300 (Ward 2) $30,300 Please let me know if you have any questions. DIk:S:\DEBBIE'S\C1Pprop99-00.wpd 3 Community Development Applications FY 99/2000 Public Facilities, Housing and Homeless Projects Capital Improvement Project Funds Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (Due Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod 11-26-98) Follow- up Capital Improvement Projects Filson Street Cul- New cul-de-sac with Ricky L. Peterson $38,000 H. Costs* Yes Street 100% City Res. The applicant and 20 neighbors 10/20/98 de-sac Trees/landscaping for the 6,000 NCDDD* Improve.- LM = 81.1% signed a petition to have the City east end of Filson St. 1,000 CDDD* High CT 25 BG 4 build a cul-de-sac on Filson to Right-of-way will need to $45,000 Total 535 People "confine criminal traffic". P.W. is be obtained to implement now working on the design. A the project, proposal is going to the Pig. Commission on 12/17/98 for a General Plan finding. CD previously funded Gorrill and Ralston Streets cul-de-sac installations. Ward 1 Clearance Demolition and Lot Clean- Development $0 H. Costs Yes Code 100% City Res. Refunds from tax liens on 11/25/98 Program up. $40,000 is proposed for Services 50,000 NCDDD Enforce.- Done in LM properties cleared with CDBG abatement of dangerous 0 CDDD Medium areas funds to become CDBG Program buildings and $50,000 is $50,000 Total Income. proposed for lot clean-up Wards 1 and 2 ....... " *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD = Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds DLKS:\99 00 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 · 8:08 AM 1 Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (Oue Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod 11-26-98) Follow- up Lake Street Lake Street between Miller Public Works - $123,000 H. Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. This is the 8th separate funding 11/25/98 Reconstruction and Haley streets. Engineering 18,000 NCDDD Improve.- LM = 79.1% for Lake St. reconstruction. This 99/00 2,500 CDDD High CT 13 BG 6 will likely be the last block to be $142,500 Total 1,001 People reconstructed. The adjoining block (funded last year) and this block to be done together in FY 99-2000. Ward 2 Casa Loma//6 Update street, curbs and Public Works - $260,000 H. Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. Funds have been previously 11/25/98 Street gutters. Casa Loma #6 Engineering 40,000 NCDDD Improve.- LM = 77.1% budgeted for water system and Improvement annexation area. 3,000 CDDD High CT 25 BG's 1, 3 storm drainage improvements and Project (Phase 3) $303,000 Total & 4 for curb and gutter design in the 2,228 People Casa Loma//6 Area. Ward 1 Union//10 Street Material to reconstruct Public Works - $168,000 H. Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. P.W. Street Materials 2 & 3 were 11/25/98 Improvement streets and repair curb and Engineering 13,000 NCDDD Improve.- LM = 51.6% combined into one activity since Project gutter. Bordered by Hwy. 3,000 CDDD High CT 25 BG 5 the proposed areas were adjacent 58 on the north, the $184,000 Total 1,698 People to each other. To be installed by Southern Pacific R.R. the City Streets Maintenance tracks and Hayes Street on Division. the east, the Branch Kern Ward 1 Island Canal on the south and Union Avenue on the west. Chester #3 Water Upgrade water system in Public Works - $230,000 H. Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. Design for this project was 11/25/98 System Chester #3 Annexation Engineering 20,000 NCDDD Improve.- LM = 78.5% budgeted last FY. Improvements, area. 2,500 CDDD High CT 6 BG 1 Ward 2 Phase 3 $252,500 Total 498 People *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD = Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds · DLKS:\99 00 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 · 8:08 AM 2 Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (Oue Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod 11-26-98) Follow- - up Hale¥ Street Area Replacement of Public Works - $70,400 H. Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. This third phase should complete 11/25/98 Sidewalk deteriorated sidewalk in Engineering 14,600 NCDDD Improve.- LM -- 69.7% the proposed work in the Halc¥ Reconstruction the Haley Street Area. 1,500 CDDD High CT 15 BG's 1, 2, Street Area. Project (Phase 3) Bounded by Highway 178 $86,500 Total 4, 5 & 6 Ward 2 and the City Limit line on 1,514 People the north, Haley Street on the east, Kentucky Street on the south and Alta Vista on the west. Resurfacing of Martin Luther King Park Recreation & Parks $12,000 H. Costs Yes and Parks and 82.9%City Res. It is not HUD eligible to repair a 11/25/98 Tennis courts at East California & South 0 NCDDD No Recreat. LM = 75.7% wall. CDBG has funded a weight Martin Luther Owens. To resurface 2 500 CDDD Facilities- CT's 13 BG 4, room addition, parking lot King Parks tennis courts and 2 practice $12,500 Total High 14 BG's 4 & 5, reconstruction, new exterior courts and to repair a 15 BG's 1-5, 2 I, doors, a new office (remodel), practice wall. 22, & 25 BG 5 and two replacement AC units at 15,967 People MLK Ward I MLK Kitchen & Martin Luther King Park Recreation & Parks $11,000 H. Costs No and Parks and 82.9%City Res. See comments above regarding 11/25/98 Conference Room replacement of six kitchen 0 NCDDD maybe. Recreat. LM = 75.7% previous CDBG projects at MLK. Remodel appliances and repair and 500 CDDD See Facilities- CT's 13 BG 4, The proposed cabinet work is refinishing of kitchen and $11,500 Total com- High 14 BG's 4 & 5, HUD ineligible, and there may be conference room cabinets, ments 15 BG's 1-5, 21, a problem with the eligibility of 22, & 25 BG 5 "built in" kitchen appliances. 15,967 People Ward 1 "~ *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD = Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds ~ DLKS:\99 00 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 t 8:08 AM 3 Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (~)ue Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod 11-26-98) Follow- __ up MLK HVAC The replacement of two 10 General Services $15,000 H. Costs Yes Parks and 82.9%City Res. See comments two rows above 12/08/98 Replacment ton HVAC units and 0 NCDDD Recreat. LM = 75.7% regarding previous projects at Program-Multi- related duct work for the 500 CDDD Facilities- CT's 13 BG 4, MLK. A few HVAC units are Year MLK Community Center $15,500 Total High 14 BG's 4 & 5, being installed each year at the 15 BG's 1-5, 21, MLK Community Center until all 22, & 25 BG 5 of the 26 year old HVAC units 15,967 People have been replaced. Ward 1 MLK Playground Martin Luther King Park. Recreation & Parks $90,100 H. Costs Yes Parks and 89.9%City Res. See comments above for MLK 11/25/98 Equipment Five pieces of playground 0 NCDDD Rec. LM = 75.7% projects previously funded. Improvement equipment, 1,700 square 2~000 CDDD Facilities- CT's 13 BG 4, Ward 1 Project feet of ADA surfacing and $92,100 Total High 14 BG's 4 & 5, a new shelter to be 15 BG's 1-5, 21, installed. 22 & 25 BG 5 15,967 People ADA Access Installation of ADA Curbs Recreation & Parks $16,325 H. Costs Yes Accessi- Unknown Installation proposed at Bill Park 11/25/98 Improvements to and ramps, walks and 0 NCDDD bility Limited Clientele Greens, Campus Park North, 12 City Parks fountains to 12 City parks 500 CDDDD Needs- Campus Park South, Challenger, in SW Bakersfield. 11 $17,825 Total High Coral Keys, Corvallis, Garden, curbs and ramps, 2090 Haggin Oaks, Pin Oak, Planz, square feet of concrete Seasons and Westwold Parks. walks and 6 ADA Wards 4, 6 and 7 fountains to be installed. ADA Playground Jastro Park replacement of Recreation & Parks $70,110 H. Costs Yes Accessi- Unknown Ward 5 11/25/98 Equipment playground equipment. Six 0 NCDDD bility Limited Clientele Improvements for pieces of ADA approved 1,500 CDDD Needs- Jastro Park equipment and 1,300 $71,610 Total High square feet of ADA surfacing to be installed. ~ *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD = Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds , DLKS:\99 00 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 '~ 8:08 AM 4 Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (Oue Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod 11-26-98) Follow- up Playground Wilson Park replacement Recreation & Parks $113,000 H. Costs Yes Parks and Unknown Ward 7 11/25/98 Equipment of playground equipment. 0 NCDDD ~., Rec. Limited Clientele Accessibility Six pieces of ADA 2,000 CDDD ".:"' Facilities- Project for Wilson approved equipment and $115,000 Total .~?:!:.~. High Park 1,900 square feet of ADA surfacing to be installed. Resurfacing of Jefferson Park. Recreation & Parks $29,0Q0 H. Costs Yes Parks and 49.2% Ward 2 11/25/98 Jefferson Park Resurfacing of two .0 NCDDD Rec. City Res. Tennis and basketball courts and four 1,00Q"CDDD Facilities- LM = 73.6% Basketball Courts. tennis courts, and the $30,000 Total High CT's 13 & 14 replacement of four B.B. 13,045 People poles and backboards, and the placement of 1,250 square feet of fencing. Anti-Graffiti Removal of graffiti within General Services $302,575 Other F. Yes Cmty. 100% City Res. General Services is requesting 12/08/98 Program various low/mod income Division 0 H. Costs Develop. Done in L/M that CDBG funds pay 35% of areas within the City of 162,925 NCDDD Other areas projected graffiti budget Bakersfield including 2,075 CDDD Public Wards 1 and 2 education and outreach $468,575 Total (General) Services- $165,000 Total High CDBG *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD -w Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds DLKS:\99 00 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 8:08 AM 5 Proposal Name Description Applicant Estimated Cost*/ HUD ConPlan % City Comments Date and & City Funds Eligible Priority Residents Received/ Funding Location Requested/ (Oue 11-26-98) Recommendation Other Sources % Low/Mod Follow- up South Union Ave. To be located in the South Kern County Fifth $1,133,000 Other F. Yes Street 74.5%City Res. About V2 of the public right-of- 11/09/98 Median Landscape Union Ave. public right- Supervisor 60,000 H. Costs Improve.- (Est. See way of South Union Ave. in the Project of-way from Brundage 0 NCDDD High Comments) project area is inside the City. Lane to Ming Ave. 3,000 CDDD LM=59.1% The % of City residents is Activity to include design $1,196,000 Total CT's 20 BG 2, estimated, because the Union # 10 and installation of curbs, 21 BG 3, 25 BG ~ Annexation took place after the gutters and side walks, $63,000 Total 5 & 26 BG 1 1990 Census. The County as drainage improvements, CDBG 4,711 People applicant should be the lead landscaping and irrigation, agency street lighting/furniture, Wards 1 & 2 bike lanes, bus stop shelters, directional/parking signage, decoratix~e concrete pavement and roadway repavement. Downtown Streetscape improvements Public Works - $173,000 H.Costs Yes Street 100% City Res. The Downtown Streetscape Streetscape within the public right-of- Engineering $25,500 NCDDD Improve.- LM=88.4% Expansion Area is an area which Expansion Project way along 18th Street $1,500 CDDD High CT 16 BG's 2, 3, is bordered by 23ra Street on the (Phase I) between Eye to K Streets $200,000 Total 5, 6 & 7 north, M Street on the east, 328 People Truxtun Avenue on the south and by G Street on the west. The Chester Avenue Streetscape Project (Completed 5/13/98) is in the expansion area. Ward 2 $1,889,500 Grand Total CDBG Funds *H. Costs = Hard Costs, NCDDD = Non Community Development Direct Delivery, CDDD = Community Development Direct Delivery, Other F. = Other Funds DLKS:\99 O0 Funding\99_00CIPAPP.TBL.wpd March 23, 1999 8:08 AM 6