The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/11/2005 B' A K E R S F I E-L D Mike Maggard, Chair Irma Carson Harold Hanson Staff: John W. Stinson MEETING NOTICE BUDGET AND .FINANCE COMMITTEE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield Monday, July 11,2005 - 10:00 a.m.- City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT MAY 23, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Review and Committee recommendation on Park Development Fees - Stinson B. Staff report and Committee recommendation regarding Fees Pursuant to the Cost Recovery Program - Stinson C. Staff report and Committee recommendation on Promoting Curbside Recycling - Barnes 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT S:~JOHN~Council Comrnittees\05Budget&Finance\05jull lagen.doc B A K E R S F I E L D . ~ ~ Mike Maggard, Chair Staff: John W. Stinson Irma Carson For:. Alan Tandy, City Manager Harold Hanson AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SPECIAL MEETING BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMI'I-rEE .Monday, May 23,.2005 · 10:00 a.m. City Manager's Conference Room - City Hall 1. ROLL CALL Called to Order at 10:05 a.m. Present: Councilmembers Mike Maggard, Chair; and Harold Hanson Councilmember Irma Carson arrivedat 10:15 a.m. 2. ADOPT MAY 11, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Adopted as submitted. :~. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Review and Committee recommendation on City Auditor Proposals At the May 11th Budget and Finance Committee _meeting, the Committee reviewed proposals and interviewed representatives from the accounting firms-of M. Green and Company, and Mayer Hoffman and McCann. The proposals to audit the City of Bakersfield were for fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, with optional years 2006 through 2009. M. Green and Company proposed to perform a full scope audit for an annual fee of $43,268 with an estimated 513 hours to perform the' audit. Mayer Hoffman and McCann proposed to perform the full scope audit for an annual fee of $72,230 with an estimated 746 hours to perform the audit. Both firms agreed to use CPI fee adjustments for future optional contract years. Finance Director Gregory Klimko stated based on the proposals and experience, both firms were qualified to perform the audit for the City. However, due to the AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, May 23, 2005 Page - 2 - annual cost difference of approximately $30,000 between the high and Iow 'bid, which would be $150,000 over five' years should the City exercise the optional four years in the contract, staff recommended the contract be awarded to the Iow bidder, M. Green and Company. Committee Member Hanson made a motion to approve staff's recommendation to award the contract to M. Green and Company. The Committee. unanimously .approved the motion (Committee Member Carson absent). Staff will forward an administrative report, with the Committee's recommendation and the proposed agreement to the City Council. B. Staff report and Committee recommendation on requests for funding a. Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra City Manager Alan Tandy explained at the last Budget and Finance Committee meeting on May 11th, the Committee requested information on the rental costs for the Symphony. A spreadsheet provided by SMG was included in the packet, whiCh showed the Symphony concerts are a breakeven proposition without "profit' to give back. Committee Member Carson spoke in favor of funding the request from the Symphony. Committee Member Hanson'spoke ,in support of recommending'a $50,000 contribution to the Symphony. He questioned if there were money in the proposed budget that could be allocated to the contribution. The City Manager explained there is $200,000 Council Contingency in the proposed 2005-06 fiscal year budget. It was noted there was also a request from The Californian for the City to resume televising the Planning Commission meetings, and ~there 'may be other requests. Committee Member Carson made a motion that the Committee make a recommendation to the Council to approve a contribution to the Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra to finance the rent at the Convention Center to put on concerts up to the requested $50,000. And, further that this recommendation be considered by the Council during the fiscal year 2005-06 proposed budget process. The Committee unanimously approved the motion. Milt Younger spoke regarding the importance of the Symphony to the community' and thanked the Committee for its recommendation to the Council for a 'contribution to the Symphony Orchestra.~ AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, May 23, 2005 Page - 3 - b. Valley Fever Vaccine Project of the Americas City Manager Alan Tandy spoke and explained staff recognized the importance of the problem, but due to the City's financial circumstances and the need for others to participate in the project, staff did not recommend granting the request for a contribution. Pauline Larwood spoke on behalf of the Valley Fever Vaccine Project and , requested th'e Budget and Finance Committee not make any recommendation to the Council on the request for funding if the Committee were not going to recommend a contribution Committee Member CarSon suggested the Valley Fever Vaccine Project apply for a grant from the Federal Government as there are many different grants available to fund health projects. As the request was withdrawn, the Committee unanimously agreed not to take any action at this time. C. Committee-discussion and recommendation regarding setting next meeting date/meeting schedule The Committee reviewed the draft calendar and unanimously adopted the meeting calendar subject to change if scheduling conflicts arise. Meeting time and dates are: Monday, July 11,2005 at-10:00 a.m. Monday, August 22, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. Wednesday, September 21,2005 at 10:00 a.m. Monday, October 31,2005 at 10:00 a.m. Monday, December 5, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. 5.. COMMITTEE COMMENTS None. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:40 a.m. Attenda, nce: Staff: City Manager Alan Tandy; Assistant City Manager John W. Stinson; City Attorney Ginny Gennaro; Finance Director Gregory Klimko; and Assistant Finance Director Nelson Smith AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT ~ '~"~ ';.:'' BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, May 23, 2005 Page - 4 - Others: Milt Younger and John Farrer, Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra; Pauline Larwood and Sandra Larson, Valley Fever Vaccine Project; Jerry E. Randall; Ben Reyes and Jennifer Hoffman, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.; Justin Morales, Jr. and Ken White, M. Green and Company cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council S%lOHN\Council Com m ittees\05Budget&Finance\05m ay23sum mary.doc B'A K E R S F I E L D OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM July 7, 2005 To: Alan Tandy, City Manager From: John W. Stinso~,!~A~'sistant City Manager Subject: ' AdjuStment to Park Development Fee As background material for the Budget and Finance Committee, attached is a draft administrative report for the public hearing scheduled for the City Council meeting of July 20, 2005. Staff is recommending an increase in the fee from $1,275 to $1,430 per dwelling unit which reflects the addition of a cost component for wet playground areas, a cost of living adjustment based on the construction cost index, and adjustment for increased playground equipment costs. Also attached is correspondence with the Building Industry Association regarding questions they had about the proposed fee, as well as staff responses. Staff also met with their representative on July 5th to discuss and respond to their concerns. S:~JOHN~ark Dev Fees.doc ADMI:NISTRATIVE REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT HEAD //'//-.__.~ DATE: July 5, 20O5 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Hearing to consider a Resolution approving and adopting an adjusted fee for the development and improvement of parks within the City of Bakersfield. (All Wards) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution. BACKGROUND: In accordance with Section 15.82.060 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, the following is the Public Works Director's annual report to the City Council with updated, new, or additional information re9arding the fee amount collected for the development of parks within the City. Staff recommends.increasing the current $1,275 per dwelling unit fee to $1,430 per dwelling unit (12% increase). New this year is the addition of a cost component for wet playground areas in park sites. Wet playground areas have been added to various parks throughout the City. These wet play areas have been very well received by the Community. Staff recommends that wet playgrounds be provided at'a rate of 1 per 24,000 population. This ratio would allow for one wet playground in every 4 sections of land and be within about a one mile radius of any residence. A ten acre park site serves a population of 4,000. Since staff proposes funding wet play areas at 1 per 24,000 population, the costs used in the calculations reflect 1/6ths of the costs to construct a wet play area. The 12% proposed rate increase is due to the following 3 items: · Addition of cost component for wet playground areas as explained earlier. · A cost of living adjustment based upon the Construction Cost Index. · · Costs for the playground equipment (item #13 on the attached schedule) were adjusted to better reflect costs of these improvements. The park development fee was last adjusted in September, 2003. Informational notices were mailed to the Building Industry Association (BIA), American Institute of Architects, and North Bakersfield Recreation and Parks District. Included with this packet is a letter from the BIA listin9 3 questions they had on the park development fee. Staff responses are also included with this adminislrative report in a letter dated June 22, 2005. In addition, City staff met with Brian Todd, Executive Vice President of the BIA, to discuss the BIA's concerns and questions regarding the park development fee. GL: July 6, 2005, 10:34AM G:\GROUPDAT'~ADMINRPI~_005\07-20\Pafk Dev Fee Admin.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN ADJUSTED FEE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF PARKS WITHIN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WHEREAS, Chapter 15.82 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code requires the Public Works Director submit an annual report to the City Council with updated, new or additional'information regarding the park development and improvement fee amount to be collected for each new dwelling unit, and that a public hearing shall be conducted if the City Council determines that the fee schedule should be adjusted; and WHEREAS, on July 20, 2005, said Public Works Director's report was submitted to the City Council to consider adjustment of a'fee for the purposes of developing and improving parks and recreational facilities within the City of Bakersfield; and WHEREAS, on July 20, 2005, the City Council held a Public Hearing to receive public comment regarding the proposed adjusted Park Development and Improvement Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, informational notices were mailed to the Building Industry Association, Architects Association, and North Bakersfield Recreation and Parks District; and WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and the City of Bakersfield local implementation procedures have been duly fOllowed by the City staff; and WHEREAS, for the above described'resolution, City Council approved a Negative Declaration on October 17, 1990; and WHEREAS, new residential development generates a need for improved public parks and recreational facilities; and WHEREAS, the fee addresses the City of Bakersfield's particular needs for the provision of improved local public parks for new residential deYelopment; and WHEREAS, Policy Three of the Parks Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan requires new residential development to provide improvements and/or in-lieu fees for parks; and WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 66001 of the Government Code have been met; and G:\GROUPDA'FxADMINRPTx2005';07-20\Park Der Fee Rcs. DOC 8. There is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee will be imposed because the fee is calculated in relationship to the number of people residing in the development and the current estimated cost of developing, improving or enhancing of public parks and recreation facilities. 9. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of parks and recreational facilities or portion thereof attributable to the residential development which the fee is imposed; 10. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for parks and recreational facilities and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed because new residential dwelling unit development creates or contributes an additional demand for developed parks and recreational facilities at the level of service (standard rate) required by the General Plan. 11. The requirements of Section 66001 of the Government Code have been met. 12. The requirements of Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 15.82 relative to the Public Works Director's Annual Report have been met. 13. Such fee as stated above is hereby approved and adopted, effective sixty (60) days (September 19, 2005) upon adoption of this resolution. ---' ............. o0o ................ G:\GROUPDATL&DM IN RPTZ2005x.07-20~Park Dev Fee Rcs. DOC Park Development Fee Summary of Proposed Fee Changes Proposed fee with wet playground Current Fee area * $'s $1,275 $1,430 $ increase over current fee n/a $155 % increase over current fee n/a 12.16% 'k 1) CCI of 4.9%, 2) costs increased for playground equipment by $58,000, . and 3) costs of $34,364 added for wet Reasons for increase n/a playground area. * Staff ~'ecommends wet playgrounds be provided at a rate of 1 per 24,000 population. This ratio would allow for 1 wet playground in every 4 sections of land and be within about a 1 mile radius of any residence, an easy 15 minute walk, 6 minute bike ride or very short drive (A typical urban section of residentially zoned land contains a population of 6,000). PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE WORKSHEET With Wet Playground Area Method Used to Calculate Fee: 1. A 10-acre park serves 4,000 people based upon the General Plan and'Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 15.80 standard of providing park land at a rate of 2.5 acres per 1;000 population. 2. Cost of developing a 10-acre park is divided by 4,000 people to obtain a cost per person. a) $1,895,881 + 4,000 =- $473.97 · 'cost to # pop. Served cost per Person develop by 10-acre park to develop park 10-acre park 3. Number of persons per dwelling unit type: Type of Unit 2000 Federal Census Persons Per Unit Single Family (SFR) 3.01' Multiple Family (MFR) 2.77 Note: Consistent with the Planning Division, permits are categorized into 2 type of units as identified above.- In prior calculations, 1990 Federal Census Persons Per Unit data was used for the duplex and mobile home units. The 2(~00 Federal Census recategorized ' many of the unit types. Mobile Home and duplex information are now included with multiple family. 4. Based on last 5 years of building permit data, the ratio of type of building permits is: For every 100 permits there are 99 permits for single family and 1 permit for multiple family. 5. Weighted average of persons per dwelling unit: 99 SFR X 3.01 persons per unit = 297.99 1 MFR X 2.77 persons per unit = 2.77 (297.99 + 2.77) + 100 = 3.01 weighted average persons per unit (pp/du). 6. Calculate the fee using the weighted average persons per unit: 3.01 pp/du X $473.97 (cost/person to develop park) = $1,426.65, per unit 7. Rounded amount $1,430.00 per unit Analysis of Development Cost for Typical 10 Acre Park With Wet Playground Estimate Item# Description of Items Qt¥ Unit Unit Price Extension Total 1 * Earthwork / Grading (Flat, Hilly Playfield, Etc. - Subject to $135,000 ;specific site conditions) Clear arid Grub Site 10 Acre $1,500 $15,000 Rough Grade Site (1.5 foot average over site) 24,000 CY $5 $120,000 2 Utility (Electrical/Water/Sewer - Subject to specific design $43,100 re¢uirements) .6"Water Service/.Meter / Backflow Prevention / Connection 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Electrical Meter & Panel 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 4" Sewer'Service Line 300 LF $17 $5,100 Sewer Cleanout 2 EA $1,500 $3,000 3 Irrigation System $258,400 a Automatic Irrigation System 380,000 SF $0.68 $258,400 b Booster Pump (Not required for 10 acre park) $0 c Maxicom System (Included in Automatic Irrigation System) $0 4 Security Light System (20 poles for 10 acre) $50,000 5 Restroom Facility with Storage Room - ADA Accessible $120,000 Restroom600SF I 1 LS 15120,00015120,000 6 Parking Lot (36-40 Cars: w/landscaping) $22,440 ~40 Stall Parking Lot (16,000 SF) 4" AB and 2" AC Aggregate Base 380 Ton $18 $6,840 Asphalt Concrete .200 Ton $42 $8,400 Curb & Gutter 400 LF $13 $5,200 Commercial Driveway 2 EA' $1,000 $2,000 7 Concrete Work interior/Driveway & Mowstrip- minimum $46,500 hardscape '4' Wide Sidewalk 12,000 SF $3 $36,000 Mow Curb 1.,400 LF $7.50 $10,500 8 Picnic Facilities (BBQs, tables, shade structures, etc.) $50,000 Picnic Facilities 10 EA $5,000 $50,000 9 Landscape Plant Materials (Trees, Shrubs, Grass and $149,340 Ground Cover) Soil Amendment' 380,000 SF $0.19 $72 200 24' Box Trees 136 EA $200 $27,200 5 Gallon Plants 200 EA $13.20 $2,640 Hydroseed Turf 380,000 SF $0.10 $38,000 Mulch 3" Deep 300 . CY $31 $9,300 10 Drinking Fou'ntains (Combination Standard/ADA) $3,000 Drinking Fountain 2 EA $1,500 $3,000 $18,000 11 Multigame Slab (60x60; ¼ Court; wire reinforcement footing; .... no lighting) Game Court 3,600 SF $5 $18,000 G:\GROUPDAT~Georgina\Park Development Fees\2005\Copy of 10 Acre Park Costs-a.xls ~ · Analysis of Development Cost'for TyPical 10 Acre Park With Wet Playgro'und Estimate Item # Description of Items Qt¥ unit unit Price Extension Total Features & Distribution. System 1 EA, $112,350 $112,350 Utiliiies 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 Area Lighting 2 EA $3,000 $6,000 Shade Structure, with 900 square foot pad 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Benches ' 2 EA $750 $1,500 Subtotal $155,200 Adjustment Factor (See above note) 0.1667 Adjusted Costs - $25,872 Subtotal - Construction Costs (includes wet play area) $1,427,353 23 Mobilization (5% of Construction Costs) $71,368 24 Contingency (10% of Sum of Construction Costs Plus Mobilization Costs) $149,872 25 . Design / Development / Administration, Including Construction Inspection (15% of ALL Costs) $247,289 TOTAL COSTS FOR TYPICAL 10 ACRE PARK $1,895,881 G:\GROUPDAT/Georgina\Park Development Fees\2005\Copy of 10 Acre Park Costs-a.xls BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (661) 326-3724 RAUL M. ROJAS, DIRECTOR · Clq"Y ENGL'NF..ER June 22, 2005 Mr. Brian Todd Building Industry Association of Kern County 1415 18th Street, Suite 420 'Bakersfield, CA 93301-4442 Subject: Park Development Fee Dear Nlr. Todd; This letter is in response to your June 16, 2005 regarding the aforementioned subject. The questions listed in your letter, plus responses, follow: 1. When the Park Development Fee was doubled to $1,275 two years ago, staff represented this as adequate to fund fully-equipped park facilities. BIA verified this by comparing those costs with recently-built private parks. What has changed in this short time than justifies an even higher fee? Response: The park development fee was last adjusted in September, 2003. Staff reviewed the cost components comprising the park development fee and found that costs for playground equipment .had increased significantly since the last fee adjustment. In addition, subsequent to September, 2003 the City received formal bids on 2 projects involving playground replacement (Planz Park and Wayside Park). Based upon this information, costs for line item 13 (playground equipment with ADA requirements) were revised. The only other adjustment proposed for the park development fee is a' cost of living factor based upon the Construction Cost Index and the addition of wet playground areas, which is addressed under item number 3 in this memo. 2. Why are park maintenance costs being funded by the Park Development Fee? BIA has always understood that only capital costs are to be funded with this fee. Response: Your question concerns line item 12 (360 Day Maintenance) on the worksheet suminarizing the cost components of the park development fee. The cost for this line item makes up $57,000 of the total $1,895,881 shown as the cost to develop a 10 acre park site. The policy of imposing a 360 day maintenance period as a requirement of new park development has been in place and practiced since the late 1980's. Apparently,'we are misleading in referring to line item//12 as 360 Day Maintenance. In fact, what it more closely reflects is the cost to provide a plant establishment period.. Plant establishment includes the monitoring of water applications, mowing, fertilization, erosion control, disease and insect control, trench subsidence, and tree staking. Plant material requires special cam, by the same contractor that installed it, for a period beyond its initial, planting. It has been the department's experience that there is no effective way to s_eparate the respens~'bility for the planting and establishment phases until the plant material has gone through at least one full season of growth or 360 days in this case. The cost of plant establishment has been estimated by park staff at about ½ of the total annual maintenance cost. An establishment period must be completed prior to the City accepting the landscaping. Once the city accepts the landscaping, city forces begin to maintain the area. We would be amenable to changing the "Description of Items" heading for this line item to 360 Day ~li.~hmfinL 3. The proposed increase would fund, in part, a "Wet Playground" feature in each pazk. Does the updated General Plan require this? If so, when did the Council vote to adopt this as a city-wide standard? Response: TO clarify, the proposal would not fund part of a "Wet Playground" in each park. Rather, it would fund a "Wet Playground" in one park for each four sections of land. Typically, four sections of laud would generate a park demand of about 60 acres. Built at our minim~ $izo standard of 10 acres, this would fund one "Wet Playground" in every six parks.' The provision of "Wet Playgrounds" is consistent with goal numbers 1, 4, 7 and 9 and policy numbers 17, 19, 21, 22, 32, 34 and 53 ofthe Parks Element ofthe General Plan. In addition, the provision of "Wet Playgrounds, is consisten~ with City Council Goal Number 3 item 7.B and Goal number 6 item 3.C. Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions or need information. Also, my staff is available to meet with you on this issue if so desired. Sincerely, Raul Roj~, Public Wori~ ~ Cc: City Managers Office Ken Trone Georgina Lor~i Diane Hoover O:~GROUPDAT~o~ De~OlmSmt Feca~Response to BIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF KERN COUNTY' 14.15 EIGHTEENTH STREET. SUITE 420 BAKERSFIELD. CA o~'~ . :: '-" 93 PHONE (661'1633-1316 FAX (66i)633-1317 "~'.'~ June 16. '/ ~h'. Raul Ro~as Public Works Department. City of Bakersfield ','tl~l~ U ~ iCL' ['l'('~llt'l~l ' ~ ..:. ]50l Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield. Calilbrnia 93301 ... X~.'I": .,i~ ,.. .... .'., S.e~t by Facsimile and U.S. Mail .... .i iL:.' J'- Dear Mr. Rojas: ""'~' ~ '/"' X~'~-. ~ received.v~'"'~-., proposed ~',o,'~a¢-~s in ~l,,~,,.. p?.,., r~, ,~,,.. .......... .,,,~,,,;~,, ,:,., ~:~-, . have the Ibllowing questions: ' '; ~',. .:,,c. t :q... ~",- · , ~ ...... ~. LLI'~ l. When the Park Development Fee was do~bled to Sl.275 t~vo ...:-u,',.r ~ a?. staff' represented this as adequate to fund fully-equipped park , ~,: .... ... 4.. fiscilities. BIA verified [l~is by comparing those costs with recentlv- buil.[ private parks. What has changed in this short time that justifies .,.~.,-~i:~tc l'a,l l'r,.sidcnt an even higher the? .... ~ ,~'~ . /,.. 2. Why are park mah~tenance costs behm funded by the Park .~ .~ ~:i:~,,.t,,t.- Development Fee? BIA has always understood that only capital costs arc to be funded with this tbe. 3. The proposed increase would tkmd. in part. a "Wet Playground" Ibature in each park. Does the updated General Plan require this? II' so. xx'hen did the Council vote to adopt this as a city-wide standard? .~ Please contact my office so xx'e may meet and discuss these issues. '" ., Sincerely. ~ B ri ma J. 'l'odd · .:.. . 1Executive Vice President .... "..'".', Cc: Budget and Finance Committee ~/" '" ' AlanTandv. Managcr '., ',~v,.'<', ' I.l.~' '. / .,, v',/~ hv I} .~x [..kcr it ., 1/ .',',,,.L. I I.~ ' AD. OPTION DATES Fourth Ward IRMA OARSON HAROLD W. HANSON First Ward Fifth Ward SUE BENHAM JACQUIE SULLIVAN Second Ward Sixth Ward MIKE MAGGARD MARK SALVAGGIO Third Ward Seventh Ward TANDY / ADOPTED: December 11,2002 RESOLUTION NUMBER: 222-02 dEF~ Ti~O, Vid~ Ohairman W. EDWARD (TED) BLOOKLEY MURRAY TRAGISH DAVID S. GAY TOM McGINNIS BURTON R. ELUSON STANLEY C. GRADY, PLANNING DIRECTOR ADOPTED: October 28:2.002 RESOLUTION NUMBER: .135-02 CHAPTER Xl - PARKS ELEMENT Development improvements of mini-parks would typically consist of playground or tot lot area and equipment, pionic tables, barbecues, fountain, landscaping and secudty lighting. 2. Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks provide both active and passive recreational activities for surrounding residential development. The minimum site size Standard for neighborhood parks is 10.0 usable acres. The location Should provide adequate street frontage, parking and good accessibility. The service area covers the neighborhoods within three- quarters (3/4) of a mile of the park site. Development improvements include a variety of facilities including single and/or group areas, barbecues, fountains, playground area and equipment, tennis and/or game courts, open tuff area, landscaping, parking and security lighting, restroom facilities, parking lots and picnic areas. 3. CommunitY Park Centers Community park centers provide a wide range of recreational opportunities, facilities and equipment servicing the population comprised of several neighborhood units. The park would typically have a service area of a 3 to 5 mile walking radius. Joint development and/or use with schools should be recommended. The minimum size standard for community parks .is 20 usable acres. These parks may contain specialized facilities not found in other parks. Typical development includes indoor recreation fa, cilities, group picnic areas, barbecues, fountains, playgrounds and equipment, tennis and game courts, softball diamonds with lighting and/or other athletic fields, swimming pool, landscaping, parking, security lighting and restrooms. 4. Regional Parks Regional parks serve the population of a large region - usually within an hour travel time. The .responsibility for these parks generally rest with a county, regional a~hofity or state. Regional parks may range in size from 20 acres to 1,000 acres or more. Features typically found in regional parks include campgrounds, picnic areas, nature study areas and trail systems. In addition, a few of these parks may have scenic vistas, gardens, a goff course, sports fields, water features or be related to items of historical significance or special interest. SIGNIFICANT ISSUES SUMMARY Significant issues regarding the planning area's parks and recreation resources are as follows: In comparison to National Recreation and Park Association standards, there is a shortage of local parks in the planning area, CHAPTER Xl - PARKS ELEMENT 8. Provide safety, accessibility, and compatibility betw_een parks and adjacent residential areas through "good neighbor' park practices. 9. Coordinate efforts by volunteer agencies, civic organizations, private enterprise and all government entities to assure the provision of a "~ recreation for all residents of the planning range of opportuflJtJes area. POLICIES Goals will be achieved through the following policies which set more specific directions " and guide actions. 1. Require that neighborhood parks be developed at a minimum rate of 2.5 acres per 1,000 population. This requirement may be met ail or in part by on-site recreation for such developments as Planned Unit Developments. The City of Bakersfield may allow credit to meet the neighborhood parks requirement. 2. Allow the formation of special park districts which provide higher park standards than the minimum stated in Policy I (I-1). 3. Require developers to dedicate land, provide improvements and/or in-lieu fees to serve the needs of the population in newly developing areas (1-1). 4. Require developers of new subdivisions to show and adhere to park locations (depicted on the Land Use Element). Park locations identified in master plans approved pdor to adoption of this general plan are reflected in this plan. Variations may be allowed based c~n certain constraints. See Policy 6 (1-9). 5. Establish as a target that mini-parks and neighborhood parks within the City of Bakersfield jurisdiction be situated within three-quarters of a mile of residents they are intended to serve (P9). 6.' Provide additional neighborhood and' community parks and recreation acreage in areas substantially, developed or in the process of redevelopment or improvement, using a combination of public funds, in lieu developers fees, and benefit assessment districts (I-1). 7. Provide mini-parks in developed residential areas where neighborhood standards are not met and where it is impossible to acquire-sufficient acreage for neighborhood facilities. Use the same funding mechanisms.. indicated in Policy 6 (t-1). CHAPTER X! ~ PAi~IKS ELEMENT 17. Attempt to locate parks and design facilities to meet the needs of all / population segments-including children, seniors and the disabled (I-2). ' 18. Attempt to provide special recreational programs for seniors on fixed incomes, latch-key children, and the economically disadvantaged (I-2). · 19. Locate and design local park and recreation areas for access to all age ~ groups where practicable. Provide facili'des for both active (play areas and courts) and passive (turf, w-.a. lk-ways, trees and picnic facilities where possible) recreational activity (t-2). 20. Operate programs at times convenient to the users (1-2). ,,.,,._~ 21. Establish both passive and active park development in local parks to accommodate programmed activities and drop-in use. Some usable area should be held as open tuff for free play (1-3). ,,~22. Attempt. to provide and promote the use of alternative public funding for - the acquisition, development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities in Iow and moderate income neighborhoods in which there is a recognized shortage of parks (I-1). 23. Encourage the development of parks adjacent to schools in order to provide a wider range of programs (1-7). 24. Monitor program needs through surveys of neighborhOOd residents or other participation mechanisms and through pedodic reviews of park and recreational needs (I-2). 25. Promote the preservation of existing parks and encourage the development of other facilities near downtown (1~8). 26. Encourage the further development of the City of BakersfieId's specific trails plan (I-11). 27. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle linkages between residerrtial and commercial uses (1-11). 28. Encourage the establishment of equestrian trials where they link. residential development to the Kern River in areas of the northeast and northwest where horses are permitted by zoning (1-2, l-11). 29. Design equestrian trails, hiking-and bicycling rights-of-way to minimize user conflicts between them (I-2, I-11). 30. Evaluate the feasibility of using utility easements for recreational activity Encourage the .development of priwte and commercial recreation f~¢ilitie$ under lease or cor~e~ion agr~ment~ where such facilities ~re consistent with planned development and offer expanded recreation opportunities to the public (I-2). 44. Study the feasibility of a recreation and land management program allowing for the generation of supplemental revenue to offset the cost of necessary further land acquisition, development and operational cost. This could include establishing concessions, rentals user fees and land leases (I-10). 45. DevelOp lighted playing fields on community, park sites (I-3). 46. Permit major traffic generating activities on community park sites only (~-3). 47. Community parks should be located adjacent to or near arterials. Neighborhood parks should be located adjacent to collector or local streets, rather than arterial streets (I-1, 1-3). (CC 11/6/91) 48. Situate swimming pools near high schools, wherever possible, and with convenient access to elementary schools (I-3). 49. Design vegetation, earth form and activity areas to buffer noise, light, etc., from adjacent residents (I-3). 50. Allow the physical integration of canals in park areas where design measures can be incorporated to ensure public safety (1-3). 51. Enforce all regulations regarding public safety, littering and drinking in public parks (I,6). 52. Ensure that all park facilities'be developed consistent with policies in applicable 'planning documents and elements of the General Plan (I-8). '~ 53. Coordinate the provision of park facilities with other public services and - / facilities; especially schools and, public roads (I-7, I-8). 54. Coordinate the location, planning, and'functional uses of all park and. recreational facilities with affected local governmental entities and where feasible, promote joint acquisition and/or development to assure effective coverage of all needs (I-8). 55. Seek out and encourage the provision of volunteer assistance from civic organizations, special interest groups, and individuals to provide program leadership or facility development to augment recreation opportunities (I-2). Special taxes - Benefit Assessment Districts - State and Federal grants and loans '-Donations, endowments or trust funds c) Implement the parkland dedication ordinance with in-lieu fee provisions where developers contribute on a per unit basis. -.. d) Establish a dedication program where gifts of parkland and/or recreational facilities may be accepted. e) Consider the use of eminent domain only where there is insufficient vacant land and where the need for parks and recreation facilities has been identified. f) Establish the administrative and legal mechanisms to allow for bhe creation of benef'r[ assessment districts, community facilities districts, and special taxes, particularly for the development of community centers. g) Utilize general funds for park acquisition, development and maintenance in the following instances: Where developer's fees and grant funds are insufficient to purchase land for parks; Where reSidents of low income areas cannot afford to contribute to benefit assessment districts for acquisition, development'or maintenance. 2. Consider recreational programming opportunities when developing park sites. a) Work with the private sector to promote:, a) the development of more outdoor recreation and sports programs for children and. adults; and b) the development of private and commercial recreation facilities under lease or concession agreements. b) Communicate with civic organizatior~s, special interest groups, and individuals to seek volunteer program leadership. CHAPTER Xl - PARKS'ELEMENT 1) Up to seven tenths (0.7) of one acre per 1,000 population credit for on-site recreation or park-like development in P.U.D.s, open spaces, or publicly owned lands; 2) Up to one and one-half (1.5) acre per 1,000 population credit for on-site recreation or park-like development located within land encumbered with electrical transmission line easements and incorporated as a functional design cemponent of the residential development. c) Require developers to show park locations on development plans. d) Establish as a target mini-parks and neighborhood parks within the City of Bakers'field's jurisdiction be accessibly located within three-quarters of a mile of residents they are intended to serve. e) Require, where feaSible, parks be developed with the following minimum acreage standards: Mini-parks 2.5 usable acres , Neighborhood Parks 10.0 usable acres Community Parks 20.0 usable acres; f) Allow neighborhood park acreage requirements to be met by community parks when community parks are within or at ,.~ boundaries of neighborhoods .... ....... g) Neighborhood parks may range in size from 6 to 10 acres at the ...... discretion of the Director of Recreation and Parks. Reason for a ...... : size less than 10 acres may include Master park planning for a :'- given area, land availability in areas with fragmented ownership or ~ ' ~:~ restrictions to a typic~tl park service area. 10. Conduct studies in order to evaluate the feasibility of the following: .- a) The use of publicly-owned lands and utility rights--of-way as public open space. b) -The inclusion of new regional Parks as a component of existing and proposed groundwater recharge areas. c) A recreation and land management program allowing for the; generation of supplemental revenue to offset the cost of necessary further land acquisition, development, and operational costs. ' Cir ¥ of Bakersfield I ! iI _1oo3 ~ city council Goats and Guiding Principles ]~ Adopted September 7_4, 2003 "1~ 239 GOAL #6: PROMOTE COMMUNITY PRIDE AND IMAGE 1. 'lmptement a ptan to improve the image of the City and create a process and structure to ensure focus and comptetion of activities in a cottaborative fashion to measurabty improve tl~e i.ma§e of Greater Bakersfietd among internat (resident.s) and targeted externat audiences. Create a focus on activities which promote a sense of ptace, tOcat history, and unique identity for our community. * 2. Continue the campaign against tittering (Keep Bakersfietd Beautifut and CUB Programs)' and graffiti. · 3. Facititate devetopment and encourage corporate capita[ investments towards cuttura[ and recreationat faciUties inctudiog: A.. Performing and cutturat arts center. B. Community recreation buitdings. · ~ C. Aquatics Fadtities. D. Mufti-purpose stadium. 4. Estabtish'a comprehensive community retations program and exptore participation with Kern County human retations efforts. ~-~1~ -~.~ :T,-~ ~,.:xL: !.: .? ;: .::~.':.!~i~';?!:i:~ 5. Create landscaped gateways, freeways ~;.:L~ "" '" ?:"~~ and artedat roads. ' Increase freeway ~--' "~ ~'! ': ....... ': ' and entry point landscape standards. Support ~mptementation of the !' ::' '" ' highway [andscapb improvement ptan · .,:,¥~ ' by securing ' -funding to comp[ere ~~. ~ ":' improvements in cooperation with Cd[rahs and oth~ [ocat agencies, and encourage community involvement.- * 6. Continue efforts to enhance the city's urban forest .bY promoting the planting,, proper care and maintenance of trees througho.u, t the city. 2003 Cily Council Goals - Adopted 9/24/03 Page 10 249 (Vision 2020 related Items are sl~own wilh a '.) BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WOl~gg DEPARTMENT l~01 TRUX'rUN AVF. JqI~ B~inm' n, CALII~RNIA 93301 ~1) 32~37~ ~u~din~ ~ ~s~on ~ay 19, 2~5 ~4~5 18~ S~et, Sui~ 4~ A~n~on: ~ T~ To Whom It May Concern: ' As required by Section 15.g2.060 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, the Public Works Director is to submit an Am~ual Report to the City Council with updated, new or additional ixfformation regarding the fee amount collected for the development of parks'within ~he Cit~. City staff ~ommends the following cl~uies to this fee: PER UNIT COST Proposed Fee Cur~nt Fee Single Family Dwelling $1,430 $1,275 Duplex Dwelling Unit $1,430 $1275 ~ Multiple Family Dwelling Unit $1,430 '$1,275 Mobile Home $1,430 $1,275 The Resolution is scheduled to go before Council at its regularly scheduled meeting on July 6, 2005. The proposed fee is based upon the amenities typical of a 10 acm neighbo&ood park and the associated costs' as modified by the construction ~ost index. - Please call Georgina Lorenzi at (661) 326-3572 if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, ~Public Worl~ Director cc: John W. Sfinson, City of Bakersfield Oeorgina Lorenzi, City of Bakersfield North Bakersfield Recx~ation and Park District 405 Galaxy Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Dave McAtthur/Colon Bywater American Institute of Architects 5500 Ming Avenue, Suite 280 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Attention: Joe Coring, ton G fiGROUPDAT~eo~a~ Development Fees~200Syhlevfeeltz-Buildlng Ind Assoc._2005.DOC Park Development Fee Summary of Proposed Fee Changes Proposed fee with wet playground Current Fee area * $'s $1,275 $1,430 $ increase over current fee n/a $155 % increase over current fee n/a 12.16% 1) CCI of 4.9%, 2) costs increased for playground equipment by $58,000, and 3) costs of $34,364 added for wet Reasons for increase n/a pla¥~lmund area. * staff recommends wet playgrounds be provided at a rate of 1 per 24,000 population. This milo would allow for I wet playground in every 4 sections of land and be within about a I mile radius of any residence, an easy 15 minute walk, 6 minute bike ride or very short drive (A typical urban section of residentially zoned land contains a population of 6,000). DRAFT PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE WORKSHEET W'~h Wet Playground Area Method Used to Calculate Fee: 1. A 10-acre park serves 4,000 people based upon the General Plan and Bakersfield 'Municipal Code'Chapter 15.80 standard of providing park land at a rate of 2.5 acres per 1,000 population. 2. Cost of developing a 10-acre park is divided by 4,000 people to obtain a cost per person. a) $1,895,881 + 4,000 = $473.97 cost to # pop. Served cost per person develop by 10-acre park to develop park 10-acre park 3. Number of persons per-dwelling unit type: Type of Unit 12000 Federal Census Persons Per Unit Single Family (SFR) 3.01 Multiple Family (MFR) 2.77 Note: Consistent with lhe Planning Dlvisk)n, perm~ are categortzed into 2 t3q3e of units as identified above. In paler calcufabons, 1990 Federal Census Persons Per Unit date was used for the duplex and mobile home units.. The 2000 Federal Census recategorized many of the unit types. -Mobile Home and duplex informa~on ara now included wffil multiple family. 4. ~ Based on last 5 years of building permit data, the ratio of type of building permits is: .... For every 100 permits there are 99 permits for single family and 1 permit for multiple family. 5. Weighted average of persons per dwelling unit: ~ 99 SFR X 3.01 persons per unit = 297.99 1 MFR X 2.77 persons per unit = 2.77 (297.99 + 2.77) ~-. 100 = 3.01 weighted average persons per unit (pp/du). 6. Calculate the fee using the weighted average persons per unit: 3.01 pp/du X $473.97 (cost/person to develop park) = $1,426.65 perunit 7. Rounded amount $1,430.00 per unit DRAFT DRAFT Analysis of Development Cost for Typical 10 Acre Park With Wet Playground Estimate Item # i Description of Items ' ~- Qty Unit J Unit Pdce Extension Total I Earthwork / Grading (Flat, Hilly Playfield, Etc. - Subject to $135,000 .specific site conditions) Clear and Grub Site 10 Acre $1,500 $15,000 Rough Grade Site (1'.5 foot average over site)' 24,000 CY $5 $120,000 2 Utility (Electrical/Water/Sewer -Subject to specific design $43,100 requirements) 6" Water Service / Mete~; i Bacldlow Prevention / Connection 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Electrical Meter & Panel 1 LS $5,000' $5,000 4" Sewer Service Line 300 LF $17 $5,100 Sewer Cleanout 2 EA $1,500 $3,000 3 i lrrigation System $258,400 a Automatic Irrigation System 380,000 SF $0.68 $258,400 b Booster Pump (Not required for 10 acre park) $0 c Maxicom System (Included in Automatic Irrigation System) $0 4 jSecudty Light System (20 poles for 10 acre) $50,000 Convenience Lighting 120 5 Rest~oom Facility with Storage Room - ADA Accessible $120,000 Restroom 600 SFJ I I'S.I, 0,0001 6 Parking Lot (36-40 Cars: w/landscaping) $22,440 40 Stall Parking Lot (16,000 SF) 4" AB and 2" AC Aggregate Base 380 Ton $18 $6,840 Asphalt Concrete 200 Ton $42 $8,400 Curb & Gutter 400 LF $13 $5,200 Commercial Driveway 2 EA $1,000 $2,000 7 Concrete Work Interior/DriveWay & Mowstrip- minimum $46,500 hardscape 4' Wide Si~lewalk 12,000 SF $3 $36,000 Mow Curb 1,400 LF $7.50 $10,500 8 Picnic Facilities (BBQs, tables, shade structures, etc.) $50,000 Picnic Fac~hbes 10 EA $5,000 $50,000 9 Landscape. Plant Materials (Trees, Shrubs, Grass and $149,340 Ground Cover) SOil Amen~dment ~ 380,000! SF $0.19 $72,200 24' Box Trees 136 EA $200 $27,200 5 Gallon P~lants 200 EA $13.20 $2,640 Hydroseedr Turf 380,000 SF $0.10 $38,000 Mulch 3" Deep 300 CY $31 $9,300 10 Drinking Fpuntains (Combination Standard/ADA) $3,000 Drinking Flountain' ' 2 EA $1,500 $3,000 11 Multigame~ Slab (60x60; ~ Court; wire reinforcement footing; $18,000 no lighting) Game Cobrt 3,600 SF $5 $18,000 G:\GROUPDAT~Georgina\Park Development Fees~005~Copy of 10 Acre Park Costs-a.xls [. Analysis of Development Cost for Typical 10 Acre p~RA'FT With Wet Play~lround Estimate Item # Description of Items I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Extension Total 12~ 360 Day Maintenance $57,000 Landscape& lrrigation System 1380,0001SFI $0.15.1 $57,000 13 Playground Equipment with ADA Requirements. $182,000 a · Slides, Swings, Sand, Trashcans, etc.. Tot Lot Equipment 2 to 5 years 1 LS $38,500 $38,500 Tot Lot Equipment 5 to 12 years 1- L $77,000 $77,000 Washed Sand. 400 CY $30 $12,000 Resilient Rubber Surfacing 600 SF $25 $15,000 Trash Receptacles 10 · EA $500 $5,000 b Shade Structure (size not specified) Shade Structure 900 SF 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 c Concrete - Amount can vary per park site Tot Lot Concrete Perimeter Edge 500 LF $15 $7,500 d Benches - 2 per acre Park Benches 16 . EA $750 $12,000 14 Sign/Monument Wall (5'x12') 1 EA $3~600 $3,600 $3,600 15 Civil Site Work - Storm Drain System $41,000 18" PVC Storm Drain 1,500 LF $25 $37,500 24" Christy Box Catch ·Basin .7 EA $500 $3,500 16 Architectural - Trash Enclosure $8,500 Trash Enclosure (Walls and Slab) I 1 ILS $8,500 $8,500 I I 17 Site Furnishings - Basketball Pole & Backboards $5,000 Basketball Pole & Backboardsi.. = 1 ,000 18 Site Lighting - Parking Lot, Basketball Court, Electrical $45,000 Parking Lot Lighting 4 EA $2,500 $10,000 Basketball Court Lighting (30 foot tall poles, 2 ~ 1000 watt 4 EA $6,250 $25;000 lamps per pole) Electrical Distribution to Parking Lot & Basketball Court 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 19 Double Size of Game Court · $18,000 Game Court 3,600 SF $5 $18,000 20 Two USTA Tennis Courts $80,136 Reinforced Concrete Slab 12,960 SF $3.90 $50,544 10' High Fencing. 456 LF $32 $14,592 Lighting Poles with 12,000 watt illumination 12 EA $1,250 $15,000 Subt~ia; - Construction Costs (excludes wet play area) $1,336,016 21 Construction Cost Index (CCI; 4.9% Applied to Construction Costs) $65,465 22 Wet Playground (1,600 square feet; 9 features). Important $25,872 Note: A ten acre park site serves a population of 4,000. Wet playgrounds will be provided at I per 24,000 population; therefore, the total cost shown for this item is adjusted to reflect 1/6th of the actual cost. New -; Concrete Pad & Sidewalk 2,500 SF $4.14 $10,350 Item G:\GROUPDA~Georgina\Park Development Fees~2005~Copy of 10 Acre Park Costs-a.xls An.l¥.i. of Dev, lopment Co.t for Typical 10 ACre ., RA.FT With Wet Playground Estimate Item # Dee~ption of Items Qty. Unit .Unit Price Extension Total Fentures & Distribution System 1 EA $112,350 $1i2,350 Utilities 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 Area Lighting 2 EA $3,000 ' $6,000 Shade Structure, with 900 square foot pad 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Benches 2 EA $750 $1 r500 Subtotal $155,200 Adjustment Factor (See above note) 0.1667 Adjusted Costs $25,872 Subtotal. Construction Costs (includes wet .play area) $1,427,353 '23 Mobilization (5% of Construction Costs) $71,368 24 Contingency (10% of Sum of Construction Costs Plus Mobilization Costs) ~ $149,872 25 Design / Development / Administration, Including ConstruCtion Inspection (15% of ALL Costs) $247,289 TOTAL COSTS FOR TYPICAL 10 ACRE pARK $1,895,88t G:\GROUPDAT~Georgina~Park Development Fees~005\Copy of 10 Acre Park Costs-a.xls MEMORANDUM To: John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager From: Nelson K. Smith, Assistant Finance Director Date: July 7, 2005 Subject: Proposed Fee Increases - Master Fee Schedule Attached is a draft Administrative Report and Resolution related to the adoption of new and increased fees that is scheduled to be heard by the City Council at their July 20, 2005 regular meeting. This information is being provided for review and discussion at the Budget and Finance Committee meeting on Monday, July 11, 2005. Attachments ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council .~¢~ APPROVED FROM: Nelson Ki Smith, Finance Director _~E~ARTMENT HEAD. DATE:, July 7, 2005 ~i~"~r~¢'~~ CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Resolution adopting -fees .pursuant to the cost recovery program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution following the public hearing. BACKGROUND: State law requires new fees and charges, as well as increases in 'existing fees and charges, be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing. The CitY's procedure is provided for in Chapter 3.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. The fee ordinance provides for a biennial review process. This process..includes a'thorough · -. review of all fees every two years to check assumptions for labor costs, materials usage, etc. This comprehensive review was performed during the last fee cycle. This year the fee cycle involves staff applying a cost of living adjustment using a Consumer 'Price Index (CPI) unless ...... there is some circumstance that warrants a complete review of anY particular fee. A 3% CPI factor is being used for this fee cycle. Each City'department has reviewed their existing fees to determine whether a CPI adjustment is the appropriate action or whether some of their fees warrant a more complete review. ~-~. The full master fee schedule (Exhibit A)' is attached for your review~ which includes all. · ~- applicable fees and charges regardless of whether there is any proposed change to a fee. We are also providing a listing of all new fees or fees that are proposed to change (Exhibit B). Public Works has identified eleven (11) fees that, during their review, warranted a proposed fee increase of more than the basic 3% CPI factor. A summary sheet and additional cOrrespondence is attached (Exhibit C) from Public Works staff and the Building Industry Association (BIA) that provides additional information regarding these particular proposed fee increases. Staff also met with the BIA on July 6, 2005 to further review these specific proposed fee increases and provided answers to their questions. nks July 7, 2005, 3:44PM S:~KimG~Forms & Lables~Admin~fee resolution july 2005.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES PURSUANT TO THE COST RECOVERY SYSTEM ;VHEREAS, state law requires new fees and charges and increases in existing fees and charges be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing on said fees and charges; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3.7 of the Bakersfield lviunicipal Code authorizes the establishment and increase of fees under the cost recovery system; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised twice in the Bakersfield Californian, a newspaper of general circulation,, and held on July 20, 2005; and WHEREAS, adoption of new and increased fees and charges, pursuant to Chapter 3.7 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code,. is necessary for the City to' recover the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged; and WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" inckiding attached hereto and incorporated be reference as though fully set forth herein, do not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct. 2. The tees set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Master Fee Schedule are hereby Adopted and shall become effective according to the following schedule: a. All development fee changes will be effective October 1, 2005; b. All Parks and recreation fee changes will be effective on January 1, 2006 c. All other fee changes will be effective August 1, 2005. .............. oOo .............. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing.Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council.of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereofheld On . by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of BakerSfield APPROVED By HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By .. Attachment Exhibit "A" EXHIBIT 'A' MASTER FEE S.CHEDULE CITY 'OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" TABLE OF'CONTENTS A- INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES A.1 NEW RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION A-2 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR ' ' .................. : ............................................................... 1 A-3 COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR A-4 SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION ............................ i ...... : ............................................... 2 A-5 STREET CUT INSPECTION A"6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION ................................................................................... 3 A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION ................................................................................... 4 ~ A;8 STATE-MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION ................................................................................... 4 A-9 OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) ................................................................................... 4 A-10 FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION A-12 · REINSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS ................................................................................... 4 A-13 HOUSING PROGRAMS B. LAND use REVIEW / PERMITS ................................................................................... 5 9-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9-22 HOME OCCUPATION REVIEW ................................................................................... 5 9-23 FIRE SUPPRESSION. PERMIT PROCESSING AND PLAN REVIEW FEES ................................................................................... 5 9-24 SIGN · PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTIONS FEES ................................................................................... 5 9-25 TENTATNE SUBDNISION MAP REVIEW ................................................................................... 5 9-26 MINOR LAND DNISION REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 9-2? PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 9-28 SITE PLAN REVIEW 9-29 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 ....... ............................................................................ 6 9-30 PUD OR PCD ZONE CHANGE 9-31 ZONE CHANGE REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 ................................................................................... 6 9-32 APPEAL PROCESSING ................................................................................... 6 9-33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 9-~ CONCURRENT APPLICATION TIERED FEE ................................ ................................................... 6 9-35 ZONE MODIFICATION REVIEW. MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................... 6 9-36 SIGN REVIEW ................................................................................... 6 9-37 MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING ......................................... : ......................................... 6 9-38 DEVELOPMENT TIME EX"TENSION ~EV1EW ................................................................................... 7 9-39 TRAFFIC MARKING REQUEST REVIEW ................................................................................... 7 9-40 CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (cUPA) FEES ................................................................................... 7 9-41 CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW ................................................................................... 8 9-42 ENVIRONMENTAL RENEW ................................................................................... 8 9-43 HISTORIC blSTRICT REV1EW ................................................................................... 8 9-44 WIDE/OVERLOAD RENEW ................................................................................... 8 9-45 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 8 C - PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES C-Sf FIRE REPORT COPY ................................................................................... C-$2 POLICE RECORDING DIJPUCATION SERVICE ................................................................................... 8 Prepared by: C. Garberolio 1 of 2 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED ;MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR. 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERs EXHIBIT "A" TABLE OF CONTENTS '. C-53 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPY C-54 D~CUMENT PRINTING AND COPYING ........................ : .......................................................... 8 C-55 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS ................................................................................... 8 C-56 RESEARCH AND CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................... 8 C-57 AGENDA/MINUTE MAILING SERVICE .................................................................................... 8 C.58 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT ................................................................................... 8 C.59 PUBLIC WORKS INFORMATION ................................................................................... 8 D - PUBLIC SAFETY 0-61 BUSINESS REGULATION ................................................................................... 8 0-62 CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT PROCESSING .................................................................................... 9 0-63 LIMOU S IN E/TAXI/TOWING REGULATION ................................................................................... 9 0-64 WEED ABATEMENT OR FIRE HAT. RRD ABATEMENT · · .................................................................................. 9 D-$5 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RESPONSE ......................................................................... : .........9 D-66 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE ................................................................................... 9 0-$7 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE ................................................................................... 9 0-68 SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY SERVICES ....................................................... : ........................... 9 0-69 AUTOMOTNE'ACClDENT INVESTIGATION ................................................................................... 9 0-70 FINGERPRINT SERVICE ................................................................................... 9 0-71 VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................... 0-72 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE ................................................................................... 1 0 0-73 PARKING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT ........ : .......................................................................... 10 0-74 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES ................................................................................... 10 0-75 ANIMAL REGULATION ................................................................................... 1 0 E - RECREATION I CULTURAL E-82 PARK FACILITY RENTAL ................................................................................... 11 E-83 RECREATION CENTER RENTAL .............................................................. : .................... 11 E.84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTNfflES ................................................................................... 12 E-85 CITY YOUTH PROGRA~ AND ACTNfflES ................................................................................... 12 E-86 AQUATIC PROGRAMS. RECREATIONAL SWIMMING ................................................................................... 13 E-87 LEISURE CLASSES ................................ :; ............... '..: ............................... 1 5 F - MISCELLANEOUS. FEES F-91 FIRE HYDRANT DISTRIBaJTION AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION ................................................................................... 1 5 F-92 DOCUMENT iMAGING FEE(PW) .................................................................................... 15 F-93 PROCESSING SCHOOL FACILITY FEES ......................................................... : ......................... 1 5 F~94 COMPUTER DATA ................................................................................... 1 5 F.95 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES ................................................................................... 1 5 F-96 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STREET USE ................................................................................... 1 5 F-97 CHECK COLLECTION ................................................................................... 1 5 F-98 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER RENTAL ................................................................................... 1 5 F-99 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER BROADCAST FEES ................................................................................... 1 5 F. IO0 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING FEES ................................................................................... 16 Prepared by: C. GaFoerolio 2 of 2 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE · CENTER · SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION NUMBER FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS 1112/05 (DECREASE) A- INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES . ALL CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING: NEW, ADDITIONAL, ALTERATION, REMODEL, REPAIR, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION) FOR BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROCESSING, SERVIcEs, AND INSPECTION FEES ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: TWO GENERAL METHODS ARE USED TO CALCULATE FEES. 'THE USE OF A FLAT FEE AND THE USE OF TH.E ESTIMATED REGIONAL MARKET VALUE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION MULTIPLIED BY A "FEE FACTOR". THESE METHODS REPRESENT THE ESTIMATED COST OF PROVIDING ALL PLAN REVIEWAND VARIOUS INSPECTION FEES REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. VALUATION DATA IS BASED UPON THE APRIL 2001 'BUILDING STANDARDS". ALTERATIONS & REMODELS W1LL BE VALUED AT $30 PER SQUARE FOOT OR BY'AN OFFICIAL CONTRACT APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DIRECt'OR. THE REVENUE GENERATED FROM THIS IS THEN SPREAD TO THE VARIOUS COSTS CENTER AS FOLLOWS: BUILDING PERMITS: 55.00% PLAN CHECKING FEES: 45.00% THIS METHODOLOGY IS USED tN SERVICE CENTERS Al, A2, A3, AND A4. NEW RESIDENTIAL A'ND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION - NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION -PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES ' MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0055 X VAL ' 0.0055 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE iNCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - NEW COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION -PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501..00) - VALUATION $4,501.00 TO $1,000,0(~.00 0.0078 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION - VALUATION $1,000,001.00 AND GREATER 0~0068 X VAL 0.0068 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE $65 $65 ' $0 A-2 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEI~ OR REPAIR - RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0055 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - MECHANICAL (ONLY) ADDITION. ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES INCLUDES PERMIT AND - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 ISSUANCE FEE - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0055 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION - PLUMBING (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES -.MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $6,001.00) 0.0055 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION - ELECTRICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION. REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · S6.001.00) 0.0055 X VAL 0.0055 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION A-3 COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR - COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION. REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501.00) ' . - VALUATION $4,501.00 TO $1,000,CX~.00 0.0078 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION - VALUATION $1,000,001.00 AND GREATER 0.0068 X VAL 0.0068 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION ABOVE INCLUOES STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - MECHANICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION > $4,501.00) 0.0078 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL $0 VARIES VVlTH VALUATION - PLUMBING (ONLY)ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION · $4,501.00) 0.0078 X VAL 0.0078 X VAL $0 VARIES WITH VALUATION - ELECTRICAL (ONLY) ADDITION, ALTERATION. REMODEL OR REPAIR Prepared by: C. Garberolio 1 of 16 7/6/2005 ,~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD : PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" l SERVlCE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1/12/05 (DECREASE) PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - MINIMUM FEE . $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (VALUATION > $4,501.00) 0.0078 ;~ VAL 0.0078 X VAL $(3 VARIES W~TH VALUATION A-4 SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION - MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - AIR CONDITIONER, ALL SIZES $40 $40 $0 & HEATER INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - WALL HEATER INSTALLATION $40 $40 $8 &HEATER - FIREPLACE INSERT INSTALLATION $40 $40 50 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - COOLER INSTALLATION $40 $40 $0 & HEATER INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - KITCHEN HOOD INSTALLATION $40 $40 $0 & HEATER · - MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTi FIXTURES, APPLIANCES & OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERMI' INCLUDES PLlJMBING, ELECT. - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 & HEATER OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATED UNDER SERVICE CENTER A-2 OR A-3 AS A MECHANICAL PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) - GAS LINE $40 $40 $0 - SEWER LINE $40 $40 $0 - WATER LINE $40 $40 50 - PIPE LINE REPAIR (GAS, SEWER, WATER, ETC) $40 $40 $0 -WATER HEATER REPLACEMENTS $40 $40 $0 - SEPTIC TANK $40 $40 $0 - SEPTIC TANK ABANDONMENT $40 $40 50 - GREASE INTERCEPTORS $80 $80 $0 - WATER SOFTENERS $40 $40 $0 - SHOWER PAN $40 $40 $0 - SOLAR $40 $40 50 - SITE SEWER SYSTEMS $40 $40 $0 - SITE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. $40 $40 $0 - MISCELLANEOUS PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES AND OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERM - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATED uNDER SERVICE CENTER A-2 OR A-3 AS A PLUMBING PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES (EACH PERMIT) INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - TEMPORARY POWER SERVICE < or = 600 VOLTS AND 200 AMPS $40 $40 $0 & HEATER INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - PERMANENT POWER SERVICE < or = 600 VOLTS AND 200 AMPS $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - SITE ELECTRICAL AND OTHER SITE POWER APPARATUSES $40 $40 $0 - MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES AND OTHER APPARATUSES (EACH PERMIT) INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 50 & HEATER - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CA~.CULATED UNDER SERVICE CENTER A-2 OR A-3 AS A ELECTRICAL PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - DEMOLITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION $40 $40 $0 - ENTIRE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION $40 $40 $0 - MOVED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - RESIDENTIAL MOVED STRUCTURE $40 $40 $0 - COMMERCIAL MOVED STRUCTURE $40 $40 $0 - RESIDENTIAL STATE APPROVED MOBILE HOME AND PRE-MANUFACTURED CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - MOBILE HOME WITHOUT PERMANENT FOUNDATION $40 $40 $0 - MOBILE HOME W1TH PERMANENT FOUNDATION $160 $160 ' $0 - MOBILE HOME GARAGE $40 $40 $0 INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECT. - MOBILE HOME ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - PRE-MANUFACTURED HOUSING $160 $160 $0 - COMMERCIAL STATE APPROVED MOBILE COACH AND PRE*MANUFACTURED CONSTRUCTION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - COMMERCIAL COACH (PERMANENT) $160 $160 $0 - COMMERCIAL PRE-MANUFACTURED (PERMANENT) $160 $160 $0 · - . Prepared by: C. Garberolio 2 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER sERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES NUMB~=R INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS 1/12J05 (DECREASE) INCLUDES PLUMBING. ELECT· - COMMERCIAL COACH ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $40 $40 $0 & HEATER - CONSTRUCTION TRAILER (TEMPORARY). PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - CONSTRUCTION TRAILER (TEMPORARY) $40 $40 $0 - RESIDENTIAL RE-ROOF - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES VARIES WNALUE & IF COMMERCIAL OR - MINIMUM FEE (EACH PERMIT. REGARDLESS OF SIZE) $80 $80 $0 RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL RE-ROOF - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES VARIES WNALUE & IF COMMERCIAL OR - MINIMUM FEE (EACH PERMIT, REGARDLESS OF SIZE) $80 $80 S0 RESIDENTIAL - POOLS AND SPAS - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES INCLUDES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL - SW1MMING POOLS :S160 $160 $0 & HEATER INCLU[~ES PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL - POOL'& SPA :S200 $200 $0 & HEATER INCLUDES PLUMBING. ELECTRICAL - SPA / IN GROUND $80 $80 $0 & HEATER - SPA/,PORTABLE $40 $40 $0 EACH OF THE ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL PLUMBING. ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL MISC. - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - PATIO ADDITION (EACH PERMIT), REGARDLESS OF SIZE $80 $80 $0 - ANTENNA DISH $40 $40 $0 - OIL WI~LL PERMIT.FEE :S686 $686 $0 - RETAINING WALL or FENCING . - MINIMUM FEE $40 $40 - $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (LENGTH · 80 LIN FT ) $0.50 PER FT $0.50 PER FT $0 PER LINEAL FOOT - STORAGE RACKS/SHELVES (EACH PERMIT) $80 $80 $0 - STORAGE CONTAINEPJSEA TRAIN (EACH PERMIT) $40 $40 $0 - REQUESTED PLAN REVIEW FEES RE-EVALUATED PLAN REVIEW PROCESS - EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW $45 $45 $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW $45 $45 $0 PER HOUR CHARGE REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO APPROVED PLANS - REQUESTED BUILDING INSPECTIONS FEES - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS - NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $45 $45 $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2 HOUR MINIMUM) $45 $45 $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - RE-INSPECTIONS - NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $45 $45 $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2 HOUR M N MUM) $45 $45 :SO PER HOUR CHARGE - TEMPORARY SALES LOTS - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - TEMPORARY SALES LOTS $40 $40 $0 ABOVE INCLUDES XMAS TREE & PUMPKIN LOTS, FIREWORKS BOOTHS, PARKING LOT. TENT SALES, ETC - GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES - GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES $0 $0 $0 EXEMPT · ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURES AND PROPERTY.OWNED BY A FEDERAL, STATE; COUNTY OR CITY AGENCY A-6 STREET CUT INSPECT!ON RESTRUCTURED / INCREASED - STREET CUT INSPECTION :S176 $200 $24 COSTS ACTUAL O.T. COSTS CHG'D IF DEVELOPER REQUESTS - INSPECTIONFEE DEPOSIT $88 $100 $12 INSPECT AFTER STANDARD WORKDAY 7AM-4PM MON-FRI I INCREASED COSTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION :S180+1.40% X VAL $185+1.61% X VAL $5+.21 X VAL INCREASED COSTS' - AFTER HOURS OVERTIME RATE $8 $57 $57 NEW FEE - MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT MAP PREPARATION FEES (REGARDING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FORMATIONS & ANNEXATIONS) - NO COMPUTER DISC PROVIDED $1,700+$13.65 $1,7004513.65 /LOT /LOT :S0 - COMPUTER DISC PROVIDED $1.575+$3.15 /LOT $1,575+$3.15/LOT - APPORTIONMENT FEE FOR MAINTENANCE. DISTRICTS - WITH CAD DISC PROVIDED $0 ' $0 :SO - PER LOT FEE (NO DISC PROVIDED), MIN. FEE $90.00 $14.00/LOT $14.00/LOT Prepared by: C. Garberolio 3 of 16 - 7/6/2005 .~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD = PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" i SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE I CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1/12J05 (DECREASE) A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION $150 $190 $40 INCREASED COSTS A-8 STATE-MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION - PRE-INSPECTION CONSULTATION REQUESTS FOR IN HOME CARE FACILITIES - 25 OR LESS CLIENTS $90 $93 $3 COLA INCREASE FEE DETERMINED BY STATE - 26 OR MORE CLIENTS $100 $100 $0 AND MAY CHG A-9 OiL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) ANNUAL INSPECTION I COlA - OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) $88 $88 $3 INCREASE - REINSPECTION (IF REQUIRED) $70 $72 $2 COLA INCREASE - OIL WELL INSTALLATION $70 ' $72 $2 COLA INCREASE A-10 FIRE SAFE'FY REVIEW/INSPECTION PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA - SAFETY INSPECTIONS . PRIVATE PARTY/INSURANCE REQUESTS $90 $93 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA - TENT INSTALLATION(ONE TIME FEE) $90 $93 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE / COlA - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA - AFTER HOURS TENT iNSTALlATION . $118 $122 $4 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA - AFTER HOURS REINSPECTION FEE $118 $122 $4 INCREASE - PAINT BOOTHS (ONE TIME FEE) - NEW SPRAY PAINT BOOTHS $229 $229 $0 - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 COlA INCREASE PER HOUR FOR 2 INSPECTORS · HIGH RISE INSPECTION FEE $157 $162 $5 WORKING TOGETHER I COLA INCREASE PER HOUR FOR 2 INSPECTORS - REINSPECTION FEE $157 $162 $5 WORKING TOGETHER I COLA INCREASE - FiRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT - SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (COMMERCIAL) - MINIMUM FEE $150 $150 $0 - OTHER'THAN MINIMUM (IF OVER 20,000 SQ. FT.) 0.03 X SQ.FT 0.03 X SQ.FT VARIES ' - REINSPEC .TION FEE ' $90 $93, $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (ADDITIONS / REMODELS) - MINIMUM FEE $150 $150 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (IF OVER 5,000 SQ. FT.) 0.03 X SQ.FT 0.03 X SQ.FT VARIES - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR / COLA INCREASE - FiRE ALARM SYSTEM COMPONENT INSPECTION - MINIMUM FEE · $150 $150 '$0 ' - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (OVER 30,000 SQ. FT.) 0.0075 X SQ.FT 0.0075 X SQ.FT VARIES - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR / COLA INCREASE - COMMERCIA!J VENT HOOD INSPECTION $177 .... $177 · $0 - INSPECTION OF EACH ADDITIONAL VENT HOOD $36 $36 $0 - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE -STANDPIPE INSPECTION - INSPECTION OF ONE STANDPIPE $118 $118 $0 - CHARGE FOR F-.ACH ADDITIONAL STANDPIPE $36 $36 $0 - REINSPECT1ON FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - EXPLOSIVES PURCHASE, SALES & STORAGE INSPECTION INSPECTION & PERMIT FEE (IF MATERIAL TYPE CHANGES) - FIRST INSPECTION $212 $218 $6 COLA INCREASE - EXPLOSIVES STORAGE PERMIT · $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE ONE TIME FEE PER EVENT I - PYROTECHNICS INSPECTION $60 $62 $2 COlA INCREASE - NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - AFTER HOURS RATE $118' $122 $4 PER HOUR I COt. A INCREASE - APPLICATION FEE- FIREIA/ORKs PERMIT $40 $40 $0 - FIREWORKS BOOTH PERMIT FEE $300 ~ $0 A-12 REINSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS . . . - DANGEROUS BUILDING INVESTIGATIONS Prepared by: C. Garberolio 4 of 16 716/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE =SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1/12J05 (DECREASE) - INITIAL CONTACT AND INSPECTION S0 $0 $0 · - FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS REQUIRED (EACH OCCURRENCE) $340 $340 - LEGAL ACTION REQUIRED ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - COMPLAINTS AND ENFORCEMENT - INITIAL CONTACT AND INSPECTION $0 $0 $0 - FOLLOW.UP INSPECTIONS REQUIRED (EACH ocCuRRENCE) $147 · $300 $153 INCREASED COSTS - LEGAL ACTION REQUIRED ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 A-13 HOUSING PROGRAMS - REHABILITATION INSPECTIONS - INITIAL INSPECTION / DOCUMENTATION $152 $152 $0 - FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS INSPECTION $100 $100 $0 - ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS / FEES - DEPARTMENTAL PROCESSING COSTS $121 $~21 $0 - ROOF.REPLACEMENT $55 $55 $0 - ELECTRICAL $76 $76 $0 - PLUMBING $76 $76 $0 - MECHANICAL $76 $76 $0 - FRAME / FLOOR $55 $55 $0 - M.~()MUM CHARGE FOR REHAB INSPECTIONS · $614 $614 $0 B - LAND USE REVIEW I PERMITS B-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL REG. USE PERMIT + $300 FOR - OIL WELL REVIEW $1,920 $1,920 $0 FIRE - GENERAL REVIEW (ALL ZONES) $1,565 $1,565 $0 B-22 HOME OCCUPATION REVIEW - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $30 $30 $0 - LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE $30 $30 B-23 FIRE SUPPRESSION - PERMIT PROCESSING AND PLAN REVIEW FEES - PAINT BOOTH PLAN REVIEW 62.5% OF PLAN 62.5% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECTION $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-10 - NON-FLAMMABLE MEDICAL GAS SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW $100 $100 $0 - EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM ADDITION PLAN REVIEW (COMMERCIAL) 40% OF PLAN 40% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECTION $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-10 - SPRINKLER SYSTEM pLAN REVIEW (COMMERCIAL) 40% OF PLAN 40% OF PLAN iN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECTION $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-lO - SPRINKLER SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW (RESIDENTIAL) 40% OF PLAN 40% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECION, $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-lO - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW 75% OF PLAN 75% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECTION $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-10 - COMMERCIAL VENT HOOD PLAN REVIEW 125% OF PLAN 125% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSPECTION INSPECTION $0 INSPECTION FEE IN A-10 - STANDPIPE SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW 40% OF PLAN 40% OF PLAN IN ADDITION TO ORIGINAL INSP. INSP. $0 INSP. FEE IN A-10 BUSINESSES W/PORTABLE PROPANE) ' $64 $66 $2 COLA INCREASE - MAIL OUT INSPECTION $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE · FIRE PREVENTION OVERSIGHT $104 $107 $3 COLA INCREASE B-24 SIGN - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTIONS FEES INCLUDES PERMIT AND - SIGN, BANNER $40 $40 $0 ' ISSUANCE FEE INCLUDES PERMIT AND - SIGN. TEMPORARY $40 $40 $0 ISSUANCE FEE INCLUDES PERMIT, ELECTRICAL AND ISSUANCE - SIGN, PERMANENT $80 $80 $0 FEE - SIGN, PERMANENT - FACE CHANGE $40 $40 $0 ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL. ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND PLAN REVIEW B-25 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REVIEW -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $2,185 $2,185 $0 - REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $595 $595 $0 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW - STANDARD $2,695 $2,695 ' $0 - REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP RE~qE'VV - STANDARD $1,530 $1'.530 $0 - WALL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW $1.040 $1,040 $0 Prepared by: C. Garberolio 5 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED ' AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS I NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE) - SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY REVIEW $110 $110 -STREET NAMING $400 $400 $0 -EXTENSION OF VESTING RIGHTS $115 $115 · $0 B-26 MINOR LAND DIVISION REVIEW - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $902 $970 $68 INCREASED COSTS - PARCEL MAP WAIVERS ' $902 $1,070 $168 INCREASED COSTS - OWNER INITIATED PARCEL MERGER $902 $970 $68 INCREASED COSTS · CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE NEW FEE $970 $970 NEW FEE - RIGHT OF WAY VACATION (SUMMARY VACATION ONLY) $1,235 $1,730 $495 INCREASED COSTS $1235 + - RIGHT OF WAY VACATON (NON-SUMMARY VACATION) TIME/MAT OVER $1235 + TIMF_/MAT BASE FEE OVER BASE FEE $0 B-27 PRELIMINARY PROJECT'REVIEW - REQUESTED LAND USE & ZONING REVIEW $65 $65 $0 - ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS - ADVERTISED $400 $400 $0 · POSTED $115 $115 $0 - COMPLETENESS REVIEW $130 $130 $0 - SOUND EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION - ZONING CHECK $10 $10 $0 B-28 SITE PLAN REVIEW - MINIMUM FEE - NO HEARING REQUIRED $200 $200 $0 - MAXIMUM FEE - NO HEARING REQUIRED $2,500 $2,500 $0 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE UP TO MAXIMUM .001668 x VAL .001668 x VAL $0 - LEGAL ADVERTISING FEE - IF HEARING REQUIRED $390 $390 $0 B-29 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW - INITIAL PREPARATION FEE $4,790 $4,790 $0 - SINGLE ELEMENT $4,790 $4,790 $0 - MULTIPLE ELEMENTS $5,390 $5,390 $0 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $2,395 $2,395 $0 B-30 PUD OR PCD ZONE CHANGE $3,550 $3,550 $0 B-31 ZONE CHANGE REVIEW $2,955 $2,955 $0 B-32 APPEAL PROCESSING APPLICANT OR NON-APPLICANT OUTSIDE THE NOTICE AREA, $390 $390 $0 WITHIN THE NOTICE AREA EXEMPT. - LAND DIVISIONS $390 $390 $0 - WEED ABATEMENT APPEALS - MINIMUM FEE - NO NOTICE REQUIRED $102 $102 $0 - LEGAL ADVERTISING FEE - IF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED $338 $338 $0 B-33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW - SINGLE ELEMENT $4,140 $4,140 $O FEE IS PRESENTED IN THE B-34 CONCURRENT APPLICATION GPA/ZONE CHANGE $7,000 $7,000 $0 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE B-35 ZONE MODIFICATION REVIEW- MODIFICATIONS - ZONE MODIFICATION REVIEW- MODIFICATIONS $1,275 $1,275 $0 B-36 SIGN REVIEW - COMPREHENSIVE SIGN REVIEW $1,040 Sl,040 $0 - COMPREHENSIVE SIGN REVIEW - REV1SED $375 $375 $0 B-37 MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING - FINAL TRACT MAPS $600+$29/LOT $600+$31/LOT $2/Lot INCREASED COSTS PER LOT - FINAL PARCEL MAPS $1,420 $1,460 $40 COLA INCREASE - GRADING PLAN REVIEW - PROJECTS LESS THAN 5 ACRES IN SIZ~ $300 $315 $15 INCREASED COSTS $315 PER PLAN - PROJECTS GREATER THAN 5 ACRES IN SIZE $300+$16.101ACR $315+$18.601 $5+2.51 ADDL ACRE IN EXCESS OF 5 E ACRE ACRE ACRES I INCREASED COSTS - SUBDIVISION TRACTS $300+$18.101ACR $315+$18.60 $3+2.51 E /ACRE ACRE INCREASED COSTS - REVISION FEE NEW FEE $315 · $316 NEW FEE - STREET/SEWeR IMPROVEMENTS $290 PLUS 0.93% OF VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT I INCREASED - ORIGINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL $285 + 0.85% $290 + 0.93% $5 + .08% COSTS 10.0% OF ORIG 10.0% OF ORIG 10% OF ORIGINAL FEE FOR - ADDITIONAL PLAN SUBMI3-rAL AFTER SECOND CHECK FEE FEE $0 EACH ADD'L CHECK - MINOR REVISION TO PLAN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $285 ' $290 $5 INCREASED COSTS Prepared by: C. Garberoiio 6 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE AD~PTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERvIcE CENTER DESCRIP~I1ON FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE) - MAJOR REVISION TO PLAN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $285 *' 0.88% $290 + 0.93% $5 + .08% INCREASED COSTS - MAJOR REVISION TO PLAN DURING CHECKING PROCESS $285 + 0.85% $290 + 0,93% $5 + .08% INCREASED COSTS B-38 DEVELOPMENT TIME EXTENSION REVIEW $570 $570 $0 - REQUEST FOR CONTINUAKICE $105 $105 $0 B-39 TRAFFIC MARKING REQUEST REVIEW $152 $155 $3 COLA INCREASE B-40 CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) FEES ANNUAL FEE - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER FEES - MATERIAL TYPE 1 - MATERIAL TYPE 2 $101 $104 ' $3 COLA INCREASE $217 $224 $7 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 3 $272 $280 $8 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 4 $402 $414 $12 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 5 $152 $157 $6 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 6 $300 $309 $9 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 7. $451 $465 $14 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 8 $520 $536 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 9 $217 $224 $7 COLA INCREASE · MATERIAL TYPE 1~ $402 $4!4 $12 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 11 $520 $536 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 12 $554 $571 $17 COLA INCREASE* - MATERIAL Type 13 $300 $309 $9 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 14 $520 $536 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL'TYPE 16 $554 $571 $17 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 16 $583 .$600 $17 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 17 INSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 18 SMALL QTY GENERATOR $70 $72 $2 COLA INCREASE ' HAZARDOUS*WASTE PERMITS - CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT $115 $118 $3 COLA INCREASE - PERMIT BY RULE $242 $249 $7 COLA INCREASE · CONDITIONALLY AUTHORIZED $182 $187 $5 COLA INCREASE - OVERSIGHT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA · FOLLOW-UP ON HAZARDOUS WASTE VIOLATION - FEE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA - RISK MGT PREVENTION PLAN FEE - CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 INCREASE. ' PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA - SITE ASSESSMENT& CLEANUP OVERSIGHT . CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA ' UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT . CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 INCREASE PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA - SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL & COUNTERMEASURE PLAN $104 $107 $3 INCREASE - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER ANNUAL INSPECTION FEE COVERS FIRST 30 MINUTES OF - 30 MINUTE ANNUAL INSPECTION $52 $52 $0 INSP, - EACH ADDITIONAL 15 MINUTES (IF NECESSARY) $26 $26 $0 - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMITS - NEW TANK INSTALLATION $852 $878 $26 cOLA INCREASE - REINSPECT~ON FEE $55 $93 $38 COLA INCREASE - ANNUAL OPERATING PERMIT $90 $93 $3 COLA INCREASE - MANDATED LEAK DETECTION TESTING $79 ' $81 $2 COLA INCREASE - TANK MODIFICATION $852 $878 $26 COLA INCREASE - MINOR TANK MODIFICATION $150 $155 $5 COLA INCREASE - TANK REMOVAL $855 .$675 $20 COLA INCREASE - STATE SURCHARGE FEE SET BY STATE OF - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER FEE SET BY STATE CALIFORNIA FEE SET BY STATE OF - HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS FEE SET BY STATE CALIFORNIA FEE SET BY STATE OF - OVERSIGHT FOR RISK MANAGEMENT PREVENTION PLAN FEE SET BY STATE CALIFOR*NLA FEE SET BY STATE OF - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMITS FEE SET BY STATE CALIFORNIA PER HOUR CHARGE I COlA - FILE RESEARCH FEE $33 $34 $1 INCREASE - ABOVE GROUND FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION INSPECTION - INSTALLATION INSPECTION OF ONE TANK $160 . $.165 $5 COLA INCREASE - CHARGE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL TANK $28 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - INSPECTION OF TANK REMOVAL $89 $93 $4 COLA INCREASE o ANNUAL FEE FOR GENERATING 10 OR MORE WASTE TIRES I YEAR $36 $37 $1 COLA INCREASE Prepared by: C. Garberolio 7 of 16 7/612005 CITY OFBAKERSFIELD .~ ' PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" CENTER SERVICE CEN'~'ER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE) B-41 CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW $250 $250 $0 B-42 ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW - ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 · $2,500 MINIMUM DEPOSIT - COUNTY CLERK FILING FEE $25 $25 - $0 - ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS $255 $255 $O B-43 HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW $2,500 $2,500 $0 B-44 WIDE/OVERLOAD REVIEW - SINGLE TRIP $16 $16 $0 - ANNUAL TRIP $90 $90 $0 IF ADD'L REVIEW WORK IS - SPECIAL SERVICE CHARGE $50 $50 $0 REQUIRED - PER HOUR FEE B-45 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REQUREMENTS $285 $285 $0 C - PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES' C-51 FIRE REPORT COPY $5 $5 $0 C-52 POLICE RECORDING DUPLICATION SERVICE $8 $8 $O C-53 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPY $0 - FIRST PRINT $~. $7 $0 - ADDITIONAL PRINTS (EACH) 8 X 10 $7 $7 $0 - ADDITIONAL PRINTS (EACH) 5 X 7 $6 $6 $0 - ADDITIONAL PRINTS (EACH) 4 X 5 $5 $5 $0 ' - DIGITAL IMAGING SALE $7 $7 $0 C-54 'DOCUMENT PRINTING AND COPYING - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES - STANDARD & LEGAL SIZED DOCUMENTS $0.25/PAGE $0.25/PAGE $0 PER COPY cHARGE - COPY OF MICROFILMED DOCUMENTS $0.25/PAGE $O.25/PAGE $0 PER COPY CHARGE ACTUAL COST BASED ON - SPECIAL MAPS & OVERSIZED DOCUMENTS ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 LABOR AND MATERIALS ACTUAL COST BASED ON - PRINTED DOCUMENTS (IE BUDGET) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 LABOR AND MATERIALS ELIMINATE AND USE COPY - POLICE CRIME REPORTS $0..25/PAGE $0..25/PAGE $0 CHARGE $0.25 PER PAGE C-55 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS - REQUESTS BY SUBPOENA - DIRECT LABOR COSTS (ORIGINAL PLAN RETRIEVAL COSTS) $16 $16 $0 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES - STANDARD & LEGAL SIZE $O $0 $0 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION - COPIES FROM MICROFILM $0 $0 $0 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION - OTHER DIRECT CHARGES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 FEE SET BY LEGISLATION - REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS - DIRECT LABOR COSTS (TO LOCATE & COMPILE RECORDS) MAX. $16 / HR MAX. ${6 / HR $0 MAXIMUM CHARGE PER HOUR - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES - STANDARD & LEGAL SIZE $0 $0 $0 $0.25 PER PAGE - COPIES FROM MICROFILM $0 $0 $O $0.25 PER PAGE · OTHER DIRECT & INDIRECT CHARGES ACTUAL cOST ACTUAL COST $0 C-$6 RESEARCH AND CERTIFICATIONS - HEARINGS AND APPEALS - APPEAL (OTHER THAN PLANNING,~.NO CHARGE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSI $101 $101 $0 - APPEAL WITH MAILED NOTICE & PtJBLICATION $334 $334 $0 FEE IS CHARGED PER - RESEARCH & CERTIFICATION $5 $5 $0 DOCUMENT C-57 AGENDA/MINUTE MAILING SERVICE - AGENDA / MINUTES MAJLING SERVICE - CHARGE PER YEAR $70 $70 $0 - COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET - CHARC.~E PER PACKET PER MEETING ~O $30 $0 C-58 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT $69 $69 $0 C-59 PUBLIC WORKS INFORMATION - SUBDIVISlONJDESIGN MANUAL $15 $15 $0 PLUS TAX - TRAFFIC VOLUME BOOKLET $5 $5 $O PLUS TAX PUBLIC SAFETY D-81 BUSINESS REGULATION - ADULT ENTERTAINMENT - NEWAPPLJCAT~ON $487 $487 $0 - ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL $1,388 $1,388 $0 - EMPLOYEE PERMIT ~30 $30 $0 - MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS $134 $134 $0 Prepared by: C. Garberolio 8 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE - MASSAGE TECHNICIAN $73 $73 $0 - CARDROOMS - NEW APPLICATION $666 $668' $0 - RENEWAL APPLICATION $1.388 $1,388 $0 - CARD DEALERS - NEW APPLICATION -' $147 $147 $0 - RENEWAL APPLICATION $16 $16 $0 - ESCORT / DATING SERVICES - NEWAPPLICATION $282 $282 $0 - RENEWAL APPLICATION $135 $135 $0 - EMPLOYEE - NEW $73 $73 $0 - EMPLOYEE - RENEWAL $46 $46 $0 - RETAIL SALES OF FIREARMS PERMIT $57 $57 $0 - LIQUIDATION (CLOSEOUT) SALE-PERMIT $29 $29 $0 - BINGO - NEW PERMIT $29 $29 $0 - BINGO - RENEWAL PERMIT $29 $29 $0 PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED - SECOND HAND DEALERS, ITINERANT AMPLIFIED MUSIC, SPEECH AND SOUND NOW' MERCHANTS, PUBLIC DANCE HALLS, ouTDOOR FESTIVALS INCLUDED IN 8-27 CABARETS, TEMPORARY PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES, HOUSE ADDRESS CURB PAINTING. JEWELRY AUCTIONS, INC NEW HOUSE ADDRESS SPECIAL EVENTS, HOTELS & LODGING HOUSES $29 $29 $0 CURB PAINTING - BAIL BOND OWNEPJAGENTSISOLICITORS $15 $15 $0 - PUSHCART FOOD VENDORS $29 $29 $0 - MOTION PICTURE PERMIT $170 $170 $0 - RESIDENT SOLICITATION $20 $20 $0 PERMIT) $304 $304 $0 FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE D-62 CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT PROCESSING - CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT $30 $30 $0 - RENEWAL $6 $6 $0 D-63 LIMOUSINE/TAXI/TOWING REGULATION o LIMOUSINE DRIVER PERMIT $15 $15 - - TAXI DRIVER PERMIT $15 $15 $0 SET BY ORDINANCE - TAXI DRIVER PERMIT RENEWAL $10 $10 $0 SET BY ORDINANCE - TAXI DRIVER PERMIT TRANSFER $4 $4 $0 SET BY ORDINANCE - TAXI DRIVER PERMIT DUPLICATE $4 $4 $0 SET BY ORDINANCE INSPECTIONS CURRENTLY - AMBULANCE VEHICLE INSPECTION $20 $20 $0 DONE BY CHP - LIMO VEHICLE INSPECTION $20 $20 $0 - TAXI VEHICLE INSPECTION $20 $20 $0 - TOWING VEHICLE INSPECTION $32 $32 $0 D~4 WEED ABATEMENT OR FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT $194 $194 $0 BILLED WI LABOR/EQUIPMENT D.65 HAZARDOUS'MATERIAL RESPONSE ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 RENTAL FEE BILLED UPON 3RD ALARM VVITHIN D-66 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE $343 $343 $0 12 MONTHS D-67 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE - INITIAL ALARM PERMIT $30 $30 $0 - ALARM PERMIT RENEWAL $15 $15 $0 SI/PERMIT/MONTH (MAXIMUM - PERMIT RENEWAL DELINQUENCY PENALTY $1 $1 $0 10 MONTHS) - CHARGE AFTER 5TH FALSE ALARM $111 $114 $3 COLA INCREASE - CHARGE AFTER 10TH FALSE ALARM $192 $197 $5 COLA INCREASE D-68 SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY SERVICES - POLICE - SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY (L~9OR AND/OR EQUIPMENT) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - POLICE - 2ND RESPONSE TO LOUD PARTIES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - FIRE - SPECIAL EVENT SERVICES (LABOR AND/OR EQUIPMENT)' ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $3 D-69 AUTOMOTIVE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION - STANDARD REPORT $0.25/PAGE $0.25/PAGE $0 - SHORT FORM $0.25/PAGE $0.25/PAGE $3 D-?O FINGERPRINT SERVlCE - CHARGE PER APPLICANT PER FUNCTION $10 $10 $0 D-71 VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT - UNLICENSED DRIVER FEE (INCLUDES TOWING CHARGE) $99 $101 $2 COLA INCREASE Prepared by: C. Garberolio 9 of 16 7/6/2005 ., CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ~ PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" i SERWCE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION ' FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1/12J0~ (DECREASE) D-72 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE $0 -$0 $0 D-73 PARKING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT - VEHICLE TOWING $51 $51 $0 - PARKING VIOLATION N/A N/A N/A FEES SET BY RESOLUTION D-74 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES - LABOR COST PER INSPECTOR PER HOUR $43 $43 $0 - COST OF MATERIALS ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 ADOPT EXISTING COUNTY FEE D-75 ANIMAL REGULATION SCHEDULE - UCENSE AND PERMIT FEES: FOR ANIMAL CONTROL - DELINQUENT PENALTY $10 $10 $0 -DUPLICATE LICENSE $5 $5 $0 - SERVICE DOG NO FEE NO FEE - DANGEROUS ANIMAL (PER YEAR IN ADDITION TO FEE BELOW) $120 $120 $0 - NON-COMPLIANCE $20 $20 $0 - NATURAL DOG . - ONE YEAR OPTION $60 $60 $0 - ~ YEAR OPTION $120 $120 $0 - THREE YEAR OPTION $150 $150 - ALTERED DOG - ONE YEAR OPTION $15 $15 $0 - ONE YEAR OPTION/SENIOR CITIZEN DISCOUNT $5 $5 $0 - ~ YEAR OPTION $25 $25 $0 - TWO YEAR OPTION/SENIOR CITIZEN DISCOUNT $10 $10 $0 - THREE YEAR OP¥1ON $30 $30 $0 - THREE YEAR OPTION/SENIOR CITIZEN DISCOUNT $15 $15 $0 - KENNEL - KENNEL: PER YEAR FOR OVER 20 DOGS $100 $100 $0 - KENNEL: PER YEAR FOR 11 TO 20 DOGS $75 $75 $0 - KENNEL: PER YEAR ~1-10 DOGS $50 $50 $0 - CATS - OWNER I.D. TAG (OPTIONAL): PER CAT PER YEAR $6 $8 $0 - DUPLICATE LICENSE TAG .$5 $5 $0 - W1LD OR EXOTIC ANIMALS - ADMINISTRATIVE FEE $0 - ONE (1) OR MORE ANIMALS PER YEAR $150 $150 $0 - INSPECTIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE - COMPLIANCE INSPECTION FEE (PER OFFICER, PER HOUR AFTER INIT $40/HOUR $40/HOUR $0 - CHARGES FOR CARE AND FEEDING - ANIMALS: UP TO 100LBS., PER DAY PER ANIMAL $15 $15 $0 - ANIMALS: OVER 100LBS., PER DAY PER ANIMAL $25 $25 $0 - IMPOUND FEES - DOGS LICENSED - UNALTERED FIRST IMPOUNDMENT $25 $25 $0 - ALTERED, FIRST IMPOUNDMENT $15 $15 $0 (SUBSEQUENT IMPOUNDMENTS ARE CHARGED SAME RATE AS UNLICENSED DOGS) - DOGS UNLICENSED - FIRST IMPOUNDMENT $40 $40 $0 - SECOND IMPOUNDMENT $80 $80 $0 - THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT IMPOUNDMENTS $160 $160 $0 - FEMALE DOG IN SEASON PER DOG - IN ADDITION TO CARE AND FEEDING AND IMPOUND FEES AND FINES $20 $20 $0 - SMALL ANIMALS (UNDER 25 LBS. EXCEPT DOGS) - FIRST IMPOUNDMENT $15 $15 $0 - SECOND IMPOUNDMENT $50 $50 $0 - THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT.IMPOuNDMENTS $75 $75 $0 - LARGE ANIMALS (OVER 25 LBS. EXCEPT DOGS) - FIRST IMPOUNDMENT $50 $50 . - SECOND IMPOUNDMENT $150 $150 $0 - THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT IMPOUNDMENTS $300 $300 $0 - DANGEROUS ANIMALS - F~RST IMPOUNDMENT $100 $100 $0 - SECOND IMPOUNDMENT $200 $200 $0 - THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT IMPOUNDMENTS $400 $400 $0 i - IMPOUND FINES FOR UNALTERED CATS AND DOGS - FIRST OCCURRENCE $35 $35 $0 - SECOND OCCURRENCE $,50 $,50 ' $0 Prepared by: C. Garberolio 10 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE . ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASEJ NOTE~/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE - THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT OCCURRENCES . $100 $100 $0 - REDEMPTION AND ADOPTION SERVICE CHARGES - VACCINATIONS, DOG OR CAT, EACH ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - FLEA AND TICK.DIP, EACH ANIMAL $5 $5 $0 - FELINE LEUKEMIA TEST ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - ADOPTION FEES INCLUDES: $25 SPAY/NEUTER - FEMALE CAT $40 $40 $0 FEE & $10 CORE VACCINATIONS FEE INCLUDES: $15 SPAY/NEUTER - MALE CA~T $30 $30 $0 FEE & $10 CORE VACCINATIONS FEE INCLUDES: $40 SPAY/NEUTER - DOG $60 $60 $0 FEE & $10 CORE VACCINATIONS FEE - ADOPTION FEES FOR OTHER ANIMALS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES VARIABLE VARIABLE $0 FEE IS PER HOUR PER - RESPONSE TO LOOSE, INJURED OR DEAD ANIMALS $40~OUR $40/HOUR $0 OFFICER - EUTHANASIA AND DISPOSAL OF CATS AND DO.GS AT OWNER's REQUEST - DELIVERED TO THE SHELTER, PER ANIMAL NO CHARGE NO CHARGE $0 - PICKED UP BY ANIMAL CONTROL, PER ANIMAL ~ $40 $0 E - RECREATION I CULTURAL E-82 PARK FACILITY RENTAL RESIDENT - CENTENNIAL PLAZA - PARK AREA RENTAL-ONE AREA W/ALCOHOL PERMIT-4HR BLOCK $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE - EACH ADDITIONAL HOUR $10 $10 $0 - PARK AREA RENTAL -' EACH ADDITIONAL AREA $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE - EACH ADDITIONAL HOUR $5 $.5 $0 - SPORTS FIELD RENTAL $48 $49 $1 COLA INCREASE (PLUS 10% OF GROSS RECEIPTS IF 'FOR PROFIT" AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS SUCH AS FIELD PREP WORK THAT MAY BE INCURRED) CHARGE PER HOUR - 2 HOUR - SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING $6 $6 $0 MINIMUM -MISCELLANEOUS PARKS SERVICES - ALCOHOL PERMIT -WITHOUT FACILITY RESERVATION (NON REFUNDABLE) $10 $10 $0 - OPEN TO THE PUBLIC - SPECIAL EVENT RESERVATION FEE $100 $103 $3 COLA INCREASE (BASED ON SIZE OF EVENT, ADD'L CHARGES WILL BE INCURRED BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS) MINIMUM FEE - SOUND PERMIT $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - RESCHEDULING FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $8 $8 $0 - CANCELLATION FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $14 $14 $0 NON-RESIDENT - CENTENNIAL PLAZA · PARK AREA RENTAL-ONE AREA W/ALCOHOL PERMIT-4HR BLOCK $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - EACH ADDITIONAL 'HOUR $12 $12 $0 - PARK AREA RENTAL - EACH ADDITIONAL AREA $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE' - EACH ADDITIONAL HOUR $6 $6 $0 - SPORTS FIELD RENTAL $60 $62 $2 COLA INCREASE (PLUS 10% OF GROSS RECEIPTS IF 'FOR'PROFIT" AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS SUCH AS FIELD PREP WORK THAT MAY BE INCURRED) CHARGE PER HOUR - 2 HOUR - SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING $6 $6 $0 MINIMUM -MISCELLANEOUS PARKS SERVICES - ALCOHOL PERMIT - WITHOUT FACILITY RESERVATION (NON REFUNDABLE) $12 · $12 $0 - OPEN TO THE PUBLIC . SPECIAL EVENT RESERVATION FEE $125 $129 $4 COLA INCREASE (BASED ON SIZE OF EVENT, ADD'L CHARGES WILL BE INCURRED BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS) MINIMUM FEE - SOUND PERMIT $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - RESCHEDULtNG FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $8 $8 $0 - CANCELLATION FEE ON FACILITY RENTALS $14 $14 $0 E-83 RECREATION CENTER RENTAL -CATEGORY A - NON PROFIT - NO CHARGE TO THE PUBLIC (THE FOLLOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A TWO HOUR MINIMUM RENTAL IS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST} Prepared by: C. Garberolio 11 of 16 71612005 ,.' CITY OF BAKERSFIELD · ~ PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" l SERVICE ADO~I ~:u PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCRE~_.SF.J NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1/12J05 (DECREASE · MLK - ROOM RENTAL $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE - WILLIAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $40 $4! $1 COLA INCREASE - KITCHEN (~/ITH ROOM RENTAL) $4 $4 $0 - SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $$0 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION (2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0. PER HOUR CHARGE - SILVER CREEK COMMUNI'FY CENTER. EACH ROOM $35 $36 $1 COLA INCREASE -COVERED PAVILION $30 $31 . $1 COLA INCREASE FEE REFLECTS COST TO - KITCHEN (W1TH MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $8 $8 $0 OPERATE - TABLE AND CHAIR SET UP $36 $37 $1 COLA INCREASE · - OTHER USE SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE -CATEGORY B - PRIVATE USE - ALL CHARGES TO THE PUBLIC PROHIBITED (THE FOLLOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A TWO HOUR MINIMUM RENTAL IS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST) - MLK - ROOM RENTAL $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE PROPOSED FEE INCLUDES - WILL.lAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $60 $62 $2 BLEACHERS I COLA INCREASE - KITCHEN (VVITH ROOM RENTAL) $4 $4 $0 - SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. · CHARGE PER HOUR $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - SILVER CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER - EACH ROOM $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - COVERED PAVILION $45 ~ $1 COlA INCREASE FEE REFLECTS COST TO - KITCHEN (WITH MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $12 $37 $25 OPERATE I COLA INCREASE - TABLE AND CHAIR SET UP $36 $52 $16 COLA INCREASE - OTHER USE SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. * CHARGE PER HOUR $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - CITY STAFF CHARGES - SUPERVISION ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MINIMUM) ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 PER HOUR CHARGE E-84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES - CITY ADULT VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM -WITH OFFICIALS $200 $206 $6 COLA INCREASE - WITHOUT OFFICIALS $100 $103 $3 COLA INCREASE - PRIVATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - CITY ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRAM - LEAGUE ENTRY FEE PER TEAM WITH O~=FICIALS $450 $464 $14 COlA INCREASE $36.00 PER GAME I COlA - RESCHEDUI:ING FEE $35 $36 ~ $1 INCREASE - PRIVATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - CITY ADULT BASKETB~,LL PROGRAM PLUS $39.00/EACH ADDITIONAL GAME / COLA - MEN'S PROGRAM. CITY LEAGUE $350 $361 $11 INCREASE - MEN'S PROGRAM - PRIVATE LEAGUES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - DROP-INS ATHLETICS PROGRAM (MLK) CHARGE PER TEAM I cOLA - ADULT FLAG FOOTBALL - CHARGE PER TEAM $263 $271 $8 INCREASE TO RECOVER 85% OF - ADULT SPORTS TOURNAMENTS 85.0% DF COST 85.0% OF COST $0 TOURNAMENT COSTS - ADULT PUBLIC COURTS TEAM TENNIS - PER TEAM $97 $100 $3 COLA INCREASE - PER PLAYER $16 $16 $O CHARGE PER TEAM I COLA - CORPORATE TEAM CHALLENGE o CHARGE PER TEAM $294 $303 ' $9 ' INCREASE · E-~5' CITY YOUTH PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES RESIDENT - CITY YOUTH FLAG FOOTBALL PROGRAM - CITY YOUTH FLAG FOO'I'EI, ALL PROGRAM $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - CITY YOUTH SOFTBALL PROGRAM - CITY YOUTH SOFTBALL PROGRAM $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE Prepared by: C, Garberolio 12 of 16 716/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE~FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED 'AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCRE.ASE~ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER . 1/12J05 (DECREASE) - CITY YOUTH 'BASKETBALL PROGRAM - CITY YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE TO RECOVER' 5~% OF - YOUTH SPORTS TOURNAMENTS 50.0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0 TOURNAMENT COSTS - CROSS COUNTRY EVENT - PRE REGISTRATION $3 $3 $0 - LATE REGISTRATION $4 $4 $0 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER/ - YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS - CHARGE PER PLAYER PER CLINIC $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE TO RECOVER 50% OF - VARIOUS YOUTH EXCURSIONS 50.0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0 EXCURSION COSTS A LATE FEE WILL BE CHARGED OF $1.00 PER MINUTE - UP TO 15 MINUTES IF CHILD IS NOT PICKED UP BY CLOSING TIME. - MLK YOUTH DAY CAMP . 7 WEEK PROGRAM $35 $36 $1 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH DAY CAMP . PER WEEK $110 $113 $3 COLA INCREASE · CANCELLATION FEE $75 $77 $2 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH CROSS COUNTRY CLUB $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - PER - HIGH SCHOOL SUMMER LEAGUES $10 $10 $0 ACTIVITY CHARGE IS PER PARTICIPANT - IN-LINE HOCKEY $60 $62 $2 I COLA INCREASE - YOUTH TEE BALL $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE - SPECIAL EVENT FEE $2 $2 $0 - PEE WEE SPORTS $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE PROGRAM SERVICES TO - PARTY MOBILE $80 $82 $2 COMMUNITY I COLA INCREASE - SILVER CREEK AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM $12 $12 $0 FEE IS PER WEEK NON-RESIDENT - CITY YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE TO RECOVER 50% OF - YOUTH SPORTS TOURNAMENTS 50,0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0 TOURNAMENT COSTS - CROSS COUNTRY EVENT - PRE REGISTRATION $3 $3 $0 - LATE REGISTRATION $4 $4 $0 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER/ - YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS . CHARGE PER PLAYER PER CLINIC $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE TO RECOVER 50% OF - VARIOUS YOUTH EXCURSIONS 50,0% OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0 EXCURSION COSTS A LATE FEE WILL BE CHARGED OF $1.00 PER MINUTE - UP TO 15 MINUTES IF CHILD IS NOT PICKED UP BY CLOSING TIME. - MLK YOUTH DAY CAMP - 7 WEEK PROGRAM $45 $46 $1 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH DAY CAMP - PER WEEK $140 $144 $4 COLA INCREASE - CANCELLATION FEE $75 $77 $2 COLA INCREASE · YOUTH CROSS COUNTRY CLUB $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE CHARGE IS PER PLAYER - PER - HIGH SCHOOL SUMMER LEAGUES $10 $10 $0 ACTIVITY CHARGE IS PER PARTICIPANT - IN-LINE HOCKEY $$0 $62 $2 I COLA INCREASE - YOUTH TEE BALL $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE - MLK/[.OWELL DROP-IN YOUTH PROGRAM $0 $0 $0 - SPECIAL EVENT FEE $2 $2 $(3 - PEE WEE SPORTS $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE PROGRAM SERVICES TO - PARTY MOBILE $100 $103 $3 COMMUNITY I COLA INCREASE - SILVER CREEK AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM $15 $15 $0 FEE IS PER WEEK E-86 AQUATIC PROGRAMS - RECREATIONAL SW1MMING RESIDENT - RECREATIONAL SWIM -DAtLY $2 $2 $0 (SILVER CREEK, MLK & JEFFERSON) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - RECREATIONAL SWIM - DAILY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $3 $3 $0 FACILITY - RECREATIONAL SWIM-MCMURTREY FACILITY-SEASON PASS $150 $150 $(3 - -FAMILY PASSES(GOOD FOR FAMILY OF 4)MCMURTREY FACILITY Prepared by: C. Garberolio 13 of 16 7/6/2005 , CITY OF BAKERSFIELD " PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" I SERVICE . ADOPTED pRoPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION ' FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 (DECREASE' -FAMILY DAY PASS $10 $10 $0 -FAMILY 30 DAY PASS $250 $250 $0 -FAMILY sEASON PASS $600 $600 $(3 FEE IS GOOD FOR 30 POOL - RECREATIONAL SWIM - PUNCH PASS $55 $55 $0 ADMISSIONS (SILVER CREEK, MLK, & JEFFERSON) FEE IS GOOD FOR 30 POOL - RECREATIONAL SWIM - PUNCH PASS - MCMURTREY FACILITY $80 $80 $0 ADMISSIONS - LAP SWIM DAILY - ALL POOLS $3 $3 $0 FEE iS GOOD FOR 30 POOL t LAP SW1M - PUNCH PASS $80 $80 $8 ADMISSIONS -LAP SWIM-ANNUAL PASS $300 $300 $0 - WATER MOVIES - PER PERSON ($3.00 DISCOUNT FOR FAMILY OF FIVE OR MORE) $3 $3 $0 - SPECIAL AQUATIC EVENTS (PER PARTICIPANT - PER DAY) $5 $5 $8 PER PARTICIPANT - PER DAY - TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST OF - SWIM INSTRUCTOR TRAINING $30 $30 $0 TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST OF - NEW LIFEGUARD TRAINING $60 $60 $0 TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST OF - RENEWAL LIFEGUARD TRAINING $50 $50 $0 TRAINING -AQUATIC PROGRAMS - SW1MMING LESSONS - SWIM LESSONS $40 $40 $0 - PRIVATE LESSONS - ALL POOLS $60 $60 $0 - SV'vlM LESSONS AT MLK $10 $10 $0 - COMPETITIVE SWIMMING - ALL POOLS $65. $65 $0 - POOL PARTY RENTAL $50 $50 $0 (ALL POOLS EXCEPT MCMURTREY. MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE ADD'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MINIMUM FEE) HIGHER QUALITY SV~M - POOL PARTY RENTAL-RECREATIONAL POOL - MCMURTREY FACILITY $90 $90 $0 FACILITY (MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE ADD'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MiN. FEE) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - POOL PARTY RENTAI'-COMPETITIV~ POOL - MCMURTREY FACILITY $130 $130 $0 FACILITY (MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE ADD'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MIN. FEE) -POOL PARTY RENTAL-RECREATION POOL AREA FEE $40MR $40MR -POOL PARTY RENTAL-SPECIAL PARTY FEE GOLD LEVEL-FOOD, DRINKS AND CAKE (15 PEOPLE MIN.) $18/PERSON $18/PERSON SlLVE LEVEL-FOOD AND DRINKS (15 PEOPLE MIN.) $15/PERSON $15/PERSON - SWIM CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY (EXCEPT MCMURTREY) $40 $40 $0 HIGHER QUALITY SW1M - SW1M CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $50 $50 $0 FACILITY (RENTAL OF 8 - 25 YARD LANES) -SWIM CLUB RENTAL-PER LANE FEE(FOR 25Y LANES) $6.25/HPJLN $8.25/HR/LN HIGHER QUALITY SW~M - SWIM CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $110 $110 $0 FACILITY . (RENTAL OF 8 - 50 METER LANES) -SWIM CLUB RENTAL-PER LANE FEE(FOR 50Y LANES) $10~-{PJLN $10/HPJt. N - POOL SECURITY FEE $90 $90 $0 NON-RESIDENT - RECREATIO .NAL SWIM - DALLY $2 $2 $0 (SILVER CREEK, MLK & JEFFERSON) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - RECREATIONAL SWIM - DALLY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $3 $3 $0 FACILITY -RECREATIONAL SWIM-30 DAY PASS-MCMURTREY FACILITY $85 $85 · $0 -RECREATIONAL SWIM-SEASON PASS-MCMURTREY FACILITY $180 $180 $0 -FAMILY PASSES(GOOD FOR FAMILY OF 4)MCMURTREY FACILITY -FAMILY DALLY PASS $11 $11 $0 -FAMILY 30 DAY PASS $300 ~00 $0 -FAMILY SEASON PASS $700 $700 $0 FEE IS GOOD FOR 30 POOL - RECREATIONAL SWIM - PUNCH PASS $70 ,$70 $0 ADMISSIONS (SILVER CREEK, MLK, & JEFFERSON) Prepared by: C. Garberolio 14 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A'.' SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112./05 (DECREASE) FEE IS GOOD FOR 30 POOL - RECREATIONAL SWIM - PUNCH PASS - MCMURTREY FACILITY $100 $100 $0 ADMISSIONS - LAP SWIM DALLY - ALL POOLS $3 $3 $0 FEE IS GOOD FOR 30 POOL - LAP SWIM - PUNCH PASS $115 $115 $0 ADMISSIONS -LAP SW1M-30 DAY PASS $85 $85 $0 -LAP SWIM-ANNUAL PASS $350 $350 $0 - WATER MOVIES - PER PERSON ($3,00 DISCOUNT FOR FAMILY OF FIVE OR MORE) $3 $3 $0 - SPECIAL AQUATIC EVENTS (PER PARTICIPANT - PER DAY) $5 $5 $0 PER PARTICIPANT - PER DAY - TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST OF - SWIM INSTRUCTOR TRAINING $30 $30 $0 TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST CF - NEW LIFEGUARD TRAINING $60 $60 $0 TRAINING REFLECTS ACTUAL COST OF - RENEWAL LIFEGUARD TRAINING $50 $50 $0 · TRAINING -AQUATIC PROGRAMS - SWIMMING LESSONS - SW1M LESSONS' $50 $50 $0 - PR!VATE LESSONS - ALL POOLS $75 $75 $0 - SWIM LESSONS AT MLK ' $15 $15 $0 SPLIT FROM CITY RESIDENTS FEE ADJUSTED TO RECOVER - COMPETITIVE SW1MMING - ALL POOLS $80 $80 $0 COSTS - POOL PARTY RENTAL $65 $65 $0 (ALL PO~)LS EXCEPT MCMURTREY. MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE ADD'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MINIMUM FEE) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - POOL PARTY RENTAL-RECREATIONAL POOL - MCMuRTREy FACILITY $115 $115 $0 FACILITY (MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY W1LL DETERMINE ADD'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MIN..FEE) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - POOL PARTY RENTAL-COMPETITIV~ POOL - MCMURTREY FACILITY $165 $165 $0 FACILITY (MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE. SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE ADD*'L COSTS FOR LIFEGUARDS ADDED TO MIN. FEE) -POOL PARTY RENTAL-RECREATION POOL AREA FEE $50 $50 $0 - SWIM CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY (EXCEPT MCMURTREY) $50 .$50 $0 HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - SWIM CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $65 $65 $0 FACILITY (RENTAL OF 8 - 25 YARD LANES) HIGHER QUALITY SWIM - SWIM CLUB RENTAL - HOURLY - MCMURTREY FACILITY $140 $140 $0 FACILITY (RENTAL OF 8 - 50 METER LANES) - POOL SECURITY'FEE $90 $90 $0 A PERCENTAGE OF CLASS E-87 LEISURE CLASSES REGISTRATION FEE - MLK LEISURE CLASSES - RESIDENTS $5 $5 $0 - MLK LEISURE CLASSES - NON-RESIDENTS $7 $7 $0 - CITY PROVIDES FACILITY $0 $0 $0 - CONTRACTOR PROVIDES FACILITY $0 $0 . $0 F - MISCELLANEOUS FEES F-91 FIRE HYDRANT DISTRIBUTION AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION $1,087 $1,087 $0 FEE PER HYDRANT - HYDRANT FLOW AND TESTING $75 $77 $2 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - AFTER HOURS TESTING $97 $100 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE F-92 DOCUMENT IMAGING FEE (PW) $0 $1.401PG $1.401pg NEW FEE F-93 PROCESSING SCHOOL FACILITY FEES $10 $10 $0 F-94 COMPUTER DATA ACTUAL COST 'ACTUAL COST $0 F-95 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES - FAIR HOUSING WORKSHOP FEE $300 $300 $0 - TOP FLOOR RENTAL $150 + $12 / HR $150 + $12 1 HR $0 F-96 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STREET USE $220 $220 $0 F-97 CHECK COLLECTION $15 $15 $43 F-98 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER RENTAL $300 $300 $0 F-99 BROADCAST CHARGES FOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Prepared by: C. Gart)erolio 15 of 16 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD · PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" SERVICE ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1112J05 iDECREASE) - EQUIPMENT CHARGES - VIDEO PRESENTATION SYSTEM $34 $34 $0 CHG PER HOUR - BROADCASTING EQUIPMENT $100 $100 $0 CHG PER HOUR · - STAFF CHARGES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 - TAPE DUPLICATION ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST $0 F-100 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING FEES: $5 $5 $0 - INITIAL BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $5 $5 $0 - RENEWAL BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $5 $5 $0 Prepared by: C. Garberolio 16 of 16 7~6~2005 EXHIBIT 'B' CHANGES ONLY TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE CiTY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'B' ' ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE C~T~, SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS I 1 II 2~05 ~DECREASE} INSPECTION FEES& SERVICES A-$ STREET CUT INSPEC~ON ' STREET CUT INSPECTION $176 $200 $24 RESTRUCTURED I INCREASED COSTS · ACTUAL O.T. COSTS CHG'D IF DEVELOPER ' INSPECTION FEE DEPOSIT $88 $100 ' $12 REQUESTS INSPECT AFTER STANDARD WORKDAY ?AM-4PM MON-FRI I INCREASED COSTS A-6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION - PUBLIC iMPROVEMENT iNSPECTION $180+1.40% X $185+1.61% X $3+.21 X - AFTER HOURS OVERTIME RATE VAL VAL VAL INCREASED COSTS $0 $57 $57 NEW FEE A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT iNSPECTION $150 $190 $40 INCREASED COSTS A-8 STATE-MANOATED FIRE INSPECTION - PRE-INSPECTION CONSULTATION REQUESTS FOR IN HOME CARE FACILITIES FEE DETERMINED BY STATE AND MAY CHG/COLA - 28 OR LESS CLIENTS $90 $93 $3 INCREASE A-9 OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) - OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) $85 $88 $3 ANNUAL INSPECTION / COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION (IF REQUIRED) $70 $72 $2 COLA INCREASE - OiL WELL INSTALLATION $70 $72 $2 COLA INCREASE A-10 FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION - SAFETY iNSPECTIONS - PRIVATE PARTY/INSURANCE REQUESTS $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE $90 * $93 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - TENT INSTALLATION (ONE TIME FEE) $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE · * $90 * $93 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA INCREASE o AFTER HOURS TENT INSTALLATION $118 $122 $4 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - AFTER HOURS REINSPECTION FEE $118 $122 $4 PER HOUR CHARGE / COLA iNCREASE - PAINT ~OOTHS (ONE TIME FEE) - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 COLA INCREASE - HIGH RISE INSPECTION FEE $157 $162 $5 PER HOUR FOR 2 INSPECTORS WORKING TOGETHER I COLA iNCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE $157 $162 $5 PER HOUR FOR 2 INSPECTORS WORKING - FiRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT TOGETHER I COLA INCREASE - SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (COMMERCIAL) o REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION (ADDITIONS / REMODELS) - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - FiRE ALARM SYSTEM COMPONENT INSPECTION - REiNSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR 1 COLA INCREASE - COMMERCIAL VENT HOOD INSPECTION - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COLA IN(~REASE -STANDPIPE iNSPECTiON - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3. PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE INSPECTION & PERMIT FEE (IF MATERIAL TYPE CHANGES) - FIRST INSPECTION $212 $218 $6 COLA INCREASE - EXPLOSIVES STORAGE PERMIT $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR I COlA INCREASE - PYROTECHNICS INSPECTION $60 $62 $2 ONE TIME FEE PER EVENT I COLA iNCREASE - NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS $90 $93 $3 PER HOUR / COLA INCREASE - AFTER HOURS RATE $118 $122 $4 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE A-12 REINSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE ~OLATIONS . - DANGEROUS BUILDING INVESTIC.-;-;-~TtONS - FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS REQUIRED (EACH OCCURRENCE) $147 $300 $153 INCREASED COSTS LAND USE REVIEW/PERMITS B-25 FIRE SUPPRESSION o PERMIT PROCESSING AND.PLAN REVIEW FEES W/PORTABLE PROPANE) $64 $66 $2 COLA iNCREASE - MAIL OUT INSPECTION $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE - FIRE PREVENTION OVERSIGHT $104 $107 $3 COlA INCREASE B-25 MINOR LAND DIVISION REVIEW · LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $902 $970 $68 INCREASED COSTS - PARCEL MAP WAIVERS $902 $1,070 $168 INCREASED COSTS - OWNER INITIATED PARCEL MERGER $902 $970 $68 INCREASED COSTS -CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE NEW FEE $970 $970 NEW FEE - RIGHT OF WAY VACATION (SUMMARy VACATION ONLY) $1,235 $1,730 '$495 INCREASED COSTS B-37 MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING - FINAL TRACT MAPS $600+$291 LOT $600+$31 I LOT $2/t. ot INCREASED COSTS PER LOT - FINAL PARCEL MAPS $1,420 $1,460 $40 COLA INCREASE - GRADING PLAN REVIEW - PROJECTS LESS THAN $ ACRES IN SIZE $300 $31S $15 INCREASED COSTS - PROJECTS GREATER THAN S ACRES iN ~tZE $300+$16.101 $315+$18.60 1 $5',$2.5/ $318 PER PI. AN + $18.80 PER ADDL ACRE IN ACRE ACRE ACRE EXCESS OF $ ACRES I INCREASED COSTS - SUBDIVISION TRACTS $300+$16.101 $315+$18.601 $5+$2.5/ ACRE ACRE ACRE INCREASED COSTS - REVISION FEE NEW FEE $315 $315 NEW FEE - STREET/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $290 PLUS 0.93% OF VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT I - ORIGINAL PLAN SUBMI1'TA~ S288 + 0.8S% $390 + 0.93% S.S+.08% INCREASED COSTS Prepared by: C. Gsr'oerolJo 1 of 3 716/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "B" sEm~c~ ADOPTED PROPOSED AMT OF FEE ' CENTER SERVICE CENTER DESCRIPTION FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES~COMMENTS NUMBER 1112/05 ~DECREASE) * MINOR REVISION TO PLAN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $285 ' $290 $8 INCREASED COSTS - MAJOR REVISION TO PLAN AFTER PLAN APPROVED $288 + 0.85% $29~ + 0.93% $8+,08% INCREASED COSTS - MAJOR REVISION TO PLAN DURING CHECKING PROCESS $285 + 0.~5% $29~ + 0.93% $8+.08% INCREASED COSTS B-$9 TRAFFIC MARKING REQUEST REVIEW $152 $158 $3 COLA INCREASE B-40 CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) FEES ANNUAL FEE - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER FEES - MATERIAL TYPE 1 $101 ;104 L$3 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 2 $217 ;224 $7 COLA INCREASE · - MATERIAL TYPE $ $272 1280 $8 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 4 $402 ;414 $12 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 8 $152 ~157 $5 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 6 $300 ;309 $9 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 7 $4S1 ;488 $14 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 8 $820 ;536 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 9 $217 ~224 $7 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 10 $402 ;414 $12 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 11 $520 ~836 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 12 $554 ~571 $17 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 13 $300 ~309 $9 COLA INCREASE * MATERIAL TYPE 14 $520 ;$36 $16 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 15 $564 ;571 $17 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 16 $583 ;600 $17 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 17 INSPECTION FEE $90 $93 $3 COLA INCREASE - MATERIAL TYPE 18 SMALL QTY GENERATOR $70 $72 $2 COLA INCREASE - HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS · CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT . $116 $118 $3 COLA INCREASE - PERMIT BY RULE $242 $249 $7 COLA INCREASE - CONDITIONALLY AUTHORIZED $182 $187 $8 COLA INCREASE ' - OVERSIGHT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES . ~ ' FOLLOW-UP ON HAZARDOUS WASTE VIOLATION - FEE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - RISK MGT PREVENTION PLAN FEE - CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - SITE ASSESSMENT & CLEANUP OVERSIGHT. CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT - CHARGE PER HOUR $104 $107 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL & COUNTERMEASURE PLAN $104 $107 $3 PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA iNCREASE - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMITS - NEW TANK INSTALLATION . $882 $878 $26 COLA INCREASE - REINSPECTION FEE $85 $93 $38 COLA INCREASE - ANNUAL OPERATING PERMIT $90 $93 $3, COLA INCREASE - MANDATED LEAK DETECTION TESTING $79 $81 $2 COLA INCREASE - TANK MODIFICATION $882 $878 $26 COLA INCREASE - MINOR TANK MODIFICATION $180 $158 $$ COLA INCREASE - TANK REMOVAL $865 $675 $20 COLA INCREASE - FILE RESEARCH FEE $33 $34 $1 - PER HOUR CHARGE I COLA INCREASE - ABOVE GROUND FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION INSPECTION - INSTALLATION INSPECTION OF ONE TANK $160 $165 $5 COLA INCREASE - CHARGE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL TANK $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - INSPECTION OF TANK REMOVAL $89 $93 $4 COLA INCREASE - ANNUAL FEE FOR GENERATING 10 OR MORE WASTE TIRES I YEAR $36 $37 $1 COLA INCREASE D-67 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE - CHARGE AFTER 8TH FALSE ALARM $11t $114 $3 COLA INCREASE - CHARGE AFTER 10TH FALSE ALARM $192 $197 $5 COLA INCREASE D-71 VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT - UNLICENSED DRIVER FEE (INCLUDES TOWING CHARGE) $99 $101 $2 COLA INCREASE RECREATION I CULTURAL ............ FEE INCREASES IN RECREATION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2006 E~2 PARK FACILITY RENTAL RESIDENT - CENTENNIAL PLAZA - PARK AREA RENTAL-ONE AREA W/ALCOHOL PERMIT-4HR BLOCK $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE - PARK AREA RENTAL - EACH ADDITIONAL AREA $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE - SPORTS FIELD;RENTAL $48 $49 $1 COLA INCREASE (PLUS 10% OF GROSS REOEIFTS IF "FOR PROFIT" AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS SUCH AS FIELD PREP WORK THAT MAY BE INCURRED) -MISCELLANEOUS PARKS SERVICES - OPEN TO THE PUBUC - SPECIAL EVENT RESERVATION FEE $100 $103 $3 COLA INCREASE (BASED ON SIZE OF EVENT, ADO't. CHARGES WILL BE INCURRED BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS) MINIMUM FEE - SOUND PERMIT $28 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE NON-RESIDENT - CENTENNIAL PLAZA - PARK AREA RENTAL-ONE AREA W/ALCOHOL PERMIT-4HR BLOCK $80 $82 $2 COLA INCREASE o PARK AREA RENTAL - EACH ADD~FtONAL AREA $2S $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - SPORTS FIELD RENTAL $60 $62 $2 COLA INCREASE (PLUS 10% OF GROSS RECEIPTS IF 'FOR PROFIT" AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS SUCH AS FIELD PREP WORK THAT MAY BE INCURRED) -MISCELLANEOUS PARKS SERVICES - OPEN TO THE PUBUC - SPECIAL EVENT RESERVATION FEE $125 $129 $4 COLA INCREASE (BASED ON SiZE OF EVENT, ADD~. CHARGES W~LL BE INCURRED BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS) MINIMUM FEE Prepared by: C. Gsrberolio 2 of :~ 7/6/2005 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT SEmaCE ADOP~.L~ PROPOSED AMTOF FEE CE,TER SERVICE CENTER DESCRiPTiON FEES FEES INCREASE/ NOTES/COMMENTS NUMBER 1117J05 (DECREASE) - SOUND PERMIT $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE E-83 RECREATiON CENTER RENTAL -CATEGORY A - NON PROFIT - NO CHARGE TO THE PUBLIC (THE FOLLOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A TWO HOUR MINIMUM RENTAL iS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST} - MLK · ROOM RENTAL- $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE PROPOSED FEE INCLUDES BLEACHERS I COLA - WILLIAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $40 $41 $1 INCREASE - SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $50 $$2 $2 COLA INCREASE - SILVER CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER. EACH ROOM $35 $36 $1 COLA INCREASE - COVERED PAVILION $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE # OF REQUESTS FOR THIS SERVlCE/ COLA - TABLE AND CHAIR SET UP $36 $37 $1 INCREASE - OTHER USE SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $50 $52 *$2 COLA INCREASE 'CATEGORY B - PRIVATE USE - ALL CHARGES TO THE PUBLIC PROHIBITED (THE FOLLOWING CHARGES ARE FOR ONE HOUR OF RENTAL, A TWO HOURMINIMUM RENTAL IS REQUIRED, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST} - MLK - ROOM RENTAL $30 $31 $1 COLA iNCREASE PROPOSED FEE INCLUDES BLEACHERS / COLA - WILLIAMS MULTI PURPOSE ROOM (GYM) $60 $62 $2 INCREASE - SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR. $$0 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - SILVER CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER - EACH ROOM $50 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE - COVERED PAVILION , $45 $46 $1 COLA INCREASE - KITCHEN (~NITH MEETING ROOM RENTAL) $12 $37 $25 COLA INCREASE # OF REQUESTS FOR THIS SERVICE / COLA - TABLE AND CHAIR SET UP $30 $52 $16 iNCREASE - OTHER USE SURCHARGE AFTER 10 P.M. - CHARGE PER HOUR $$0 $52 $2 COLA INCREASE E-84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVTT~ES - CITY ADULT VOLLEYBALL PRCGRA*M -WITH OFFICIALS $200 $206 $6 COLA INCREASE - WITHOUT OFFICIALS $100 $103 $3 COLA INCREASE - CITY ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRAM - LEAGUE ENTRY FEE PER TEAM WITH OFFICIALS $450 $464 $14 COLA INCREASE - RESCHEDULING FEE $35 $36 $1 $36.00 PER GAME I COLA iNCREASE - CITY ADULT BASKETBALL PROGRAM PLUS $39.001 EACH ADDITIONAL GAME I COLA - MEN'S PROGRAM - CITY LEAGUE $350 $361 $11 INCREASE - DROP*iNS ATHLETICS PROGR~.M (MLK} - ADULT FLAG FOOTBALL o CHARGE PER TEAM $263 $271 $8 CHARGE PER TEAM I COLA INCREASE - ADULT PUBLIC COURTS TEAM TENNIS - PER TEAM $97 $100 $3 COlA INCREASE - CORPORATE TEAM CHALLENGE. CHARGE PER TEAM $294 $303 $9 CHARGE PER TEAM I COLA INCREASE E-aS CITY YOUTH PROGRAMS AND AC'i~/TTIES RESIDENT - CITY YOUTH FLAG FOOTBALL ~-~ROGRAM - CITY YOUTH FLAG FOOTBALL PROGRAM $25 $26 $1 COLA INCREASE - CiTY YOUTH SOFTBALL PROG~...~,M - CITY YOUTH SOFTBALL PROC~RAM $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE · CITY YOUTH BASKETBALL PRc~RAM - CITY YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS - CHARGE PER PLAYER PER CLINIC $20 $21 $1 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER I COLA INCREASE - MLK YOUTH DAY CAMP - 7 WEEK PROGRAM $35 $36 $1 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH DAY CAMP - PER WEEK $1t0 $113 $3 COLA INCREASE - CANCELLATION FEE $75 $77 $2 COLA INCREASE - YOUTH CROSS COUNTRY CLUB ' ' ~ $41 $1 COLA INCREASE - iN-LiNE HOCKEY -* $60 $62 $2 CHARGE IS PER PARTICIPANT I COLA INCREASE - YOUTH TEE BALL $30 $31 $1 COLA INCREASE -PEE WEE SPORTS $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE - PROGRAM SERVICES TO COMMUNITY / COLA - PARTY MOBILE $80 $82 $2 iNCREASE NON-RESIDENT - CiTY YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM $50 $52 $2 COlA INCREASE YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS - CH,~RGE PER PLAYER PER CUNIC $20 $21 $1 CHARGE IS PER PLAYER I COLA INCREASE MLK YOUTH DAY CAMP - 7 WEEK PROGRAM $45 $46 $1 COLA INCREASE YOUTH DAY CAMP - PER WEEK $140 $144 $4 COLA INCREASE CANCELLATION 'FEE $75 $77 $2 COLA iNCREASE YOUTH CROSS COUNTRY CLUB $40 $41 $1 COLA INCREASE IN-LINE HOCKEY $60 $62 $2 CHARGE IS PER PARTICIPANT I COLA INCREASE YOUTH TEE BALL $40 $41 $I COLA INCREASE PEE WEE SPOR~S $20 $21 $1 COLA INCREASE PROGRAM SERVICES TO COMMUNITY I COLA - PARTY MOBILE $t00 $103 $3 INCREASE - MISCELLANEOUS FEES F-91 FIRE HYDRANT DISTRiBUTION AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION - HYDRANT FLOW AND TESTING $75 $77 $2 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE - AFTER HOURS TESTING $97 $100 $3 PER HOUR I COLA INCREASE F-92 .DOCUMENT IMAGING FEE (PW} $8 $1.401PG $t.40/pg NEW FEE Prepared by: C. Gsrberolio 3 of 3 7/6/2005 EXHIBIT 'C' PUBLIC WORKS "NON-CPI" CHANGES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ~ 0 Exhibit 'C' BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WO~K.~ DEP~ 1~ol TRUXTUN AV~dE BAI~it. SP'F~ ~ ~1 1415 18 S~t,S~ 420 B~field, CA 933014~2 Subj<t: ~ M~r ~s le~r ~ ~ ~s~ suMi~sion f~s ~ ~j~d %e f~s ~t we~ ~ a ~t ~e ~1~ ~e fo~o~g: · lmpmve~m · F~ T~t Maps No o~er su~sion o~er suMi~ion fe~ ~m:i. ~~. S~ ~ea s~ ~ ~m ~mi~le me ~ ~e~g ~ of &e su~io~ f~s ~ e~ges m ~mme~. As pm of next ye~'a bMget level of ~ ~e ~. ~ve~ ~ · S~t ~t M~ou~ ~ ~ F~ T~t Map ~ O~g ~ ~<~ ~ ~g~ M Ap~, 2~, s~ ~ ~c~ ~e ~r lot f~ ~ ~r <~ f~ ~ ~n ~ e~ive ~ of ~mfi~ ~omfion. Yo~ le~r mt~ ~ s~ gave you ~e ~ion. ~t ~ ~ ~ M 2~, ~ ~s ~d ~ llmi~ to CO~'a. We ~lo~ for f~s ~y ~ ~es ~e f~s ~d go do~. m~ or ~ less. As ~ ~er, o~y 4 f~ ~thi.~'-Su~io~ S~on ~ Mj~ l~t y~. Ple~ f~l ~ ~ ~nmt m d you ~ve ~y ~fio~ ~fio~ or ~ ~omfion. M~, my s~ ~ av~able to m~t ~ you on ~ ~ d ~ d~. S~ly, . ~ffi~e Wo~ D~or Cc: Ci~ M~gem M~ G:~GROUPDAT~ud~e~0~061~~ to BIA Exhibit 'C' BUILDING INDUSTRY AsSOCiATION ' OF KERN COUNTY BAKERSFIELD, CA93301 PHONE (661) 633-1316 FAX (661) 633-1317 President David Cares Lc.ox Home.~' Executive Vice President Bri:m J. Todd First Vice President June' 16, 2005 Roger Mclntosh Mchlto.~.ll & Associates Second Vice President Mr; Raul Rojas Michael Hair, Jr. Public Works Department, City of Bakersfield I;tterstate Land Development. Inc. 1501 Tmxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Secretary. Calvin R. Stead, Esq. B,t'ttm. Petrini & Conron. LLP Dear Mr. Rojas: Treasurer We are in receipt of your proposed development fee increases for the Public David Dmohowski Project Des(~n Consultant.~ Works Department. hnmediate Past President Pat Henneberry As we have previously agreed, we understand the reasoning behind the Ca.wle c{' Cooice. Inc. allnual. COLA increases based upon the Cost of Construction as they Board of Directors concern deyelopment fees. Dovid Turner However, when we met regarding last year's fee increases, you stated that I),tv/d A. Tttrner Homes they brought development fees in your department to "100 percent cost Ron Ray recovery," and that future fee increases would be limited to COLAs. I),,.'nitt.e Development, Iht'. Therefore, we do not see a justification for increasing fees that already Greg Hash recover the city's costs of providing services. I:',llgattc~'-R/Iodex h1.w,'am.e Agencies Please contact my office"if you have any questions. Mike Granlee I"idelitv National Title Fir.vt Anlerican Title Mike Kane ( )';'a;lite Construction (]:try Grumbles I.e.mlr Communities Bfi~ J. Todd A,seph A. Leal Executive Vice ~ident McMillin Homes ,t Corky McMillin Co. Van Roberls Cc: Alan Tandy, Manager S'.K. Y Management. LLC Glenn Davis Valley hldependent Bank Darryl Tucker W//lis Matlock. LLC Exhibit 'C' BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORK~q DEPARTMENT 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 ¢661) 326-3724 26, 2005 ~,~.M. RoJ~.D~scro,.crrx~Gn~-~ Building' Industry Association 1415' 18th Street, Suite 420 Bakersfield, CA 93301-4442 Attention: Brian Todd Subject: Annual Master Fee Schedule Cycle - Development Fees Dear Mr. Todd; The City of Bakersfield is 0urrently in the process of updating the city-wide Master Fee Schedule which summarizes various user fees, including development related fees. We are planning to take the Schedule to the City Council in either June or July of this year, and wanted to give you ample time to review the,proposals. Attached you will find a schedule summarizing proposed fee increases for all fees within the "Inspection Fees & Services", "Land Use Review/Permits", and "Miscellaneous Fees" categories. Development related fees would fall in these categories. The schedule excludes proposed fee increases wi{hin the "Public Information Services", "Public Safety", and "Recreation/Cultural" categories since development related fees would not be included within these categories. The schedule lists several line items that are proposed to increase by a COLA factor of 3%. There are several fees which staff .proposes an increase greater than COLA. Justifications for the proposed increases greater than COLA are summarized on a separate schedule. The only Department recommending fee increases greater than COLA is the Public Works Department. Please'contact Georgina Lorenzi with the Public Works Department if you have any questions or need additional information on the proposed fees. We are also available to meet with you if you so desire. Sincerely, aul Rojas Public Works Director cc: John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager Public Works Department FY 2O05-O6 Summary of Recommended Fee Changes P Fee Current Fee Percent Increase Additional infonltatJon ...... IncJudes 50% of a new $185, plus 1.61% of valuation. 2.78% increase in base oonsin~"tlon Inspector position Alse included an hourly $180, plus 1.40% of fee. 15% incremm In and 50% of a new park Puldic Improvement Inege~on overtime rote of $57 valuation valuation fee.. lechnlcJan poal0on. No incasese in baas fse~ 0.90% irmmaee in per Iol Proposed increase based upon :inal Tract Maps r~, plus $31 per lot. Se00, plus :r~2.9 per lot fee. Netodcal data. PrcC.:,se~, .'.~,c~-ease based upon, historical data. Also 5% incmaM in base fee recommended Is tbs Inclusion ~q00, plus $16.10 per acre 18.53% Increase In per of a revision fee for gracllng Grading Plan Check .$315, plus $18.60 per acre fee fee acm fee. plan checks. · ' ' Includes 50% of a r.='.: park 1,'~5% Increase In base technic~an position and 30% of Improvement Plan Check fee. 9.41% increase'In a new engineering technician Slmet/S~-;.~..o Impiovementa) $290, plus .93% of valuation $285, p!v~_ .85% of value§on valuation fee. po.altton Lo~ Line Adjustment and Owner ' Proposed inca-Miss be.sad ~. r,,~a~:l Pa~ua; Melger . :r~)70 $902 7.54% increase historical data. . " Proposed fee Is to reCOver"- costs involved in the process tO Issue a Certificate of :e,-~,,ceta of Compliance ~970 N/A New Fee Compliance an exJetlng lots. ..... " Proposed in--ease baaed Parcel Map Waiver $1,070 . ~.,2 ._ 18.63% increase historical data. ere sed in(=,ase.based upo Right-of-Way VacalJon, Summary Vaca(k)n Only ...... $1,730 $1,235 ..... 40.08% increase hi~odcal data. Includes 50% of a new . constnJCUOn inspector, position $200; $t00 for each Inspection $176; $88 for each i and 70% of a new engineering .Street Cut Inspect]on over 2 Inspection over 2 13.64% Increase technician pesitlon Street Encroachment Permit $190 $150 26.67% Increase historical data. , ' .......... This item would cha~e a document imaging fee to al improvement plan submittals. The plans will be digitally scanned for archival and Document Imaging $1.40 per p~_~.e N/A New fee research purposes. G:~GROUPDAT~Geoq~Ina~Feet~2(}05 - Summary o~ Recommeml~ F~e Change~,xLs B A K E R $ F I E L D CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Real Rojas, Public Works Directo~....~L_' DATE: July 7, 2005 SUBJECT: Budget & Finance Committee Report on Curbside Recycling Attached is a report for distribution to members of the Budget and Finance Committee meeting on July 11th, along with the letter from the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful (KBB) Committee which prompted this item last year. Please note that Sandy Garrigan, who was the representative for former Council Member Salvaggio, and who was the chair person of the KBB Recycling Subcommittee who originated the letter, no longer serves on the KBB Committee. S:'~FILINGkS00 CORRES'~VlANAGER~Budget & Finance Com Report on Curbside 7-7-05.doc July 7, 2005 City of Bakersfield Curbside Recycling Program Review July 6, 2005 This review is to report the progress of Bakersfield's curbside recycling program after the first two years of operation, to report on efforts to improve the program, and to consider suggestions made by the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful (KBB) Committee's June 9, 2004 letter to the City Council (attached). Pro.qram Status Curbside recycling service was offered to all single family homes, beginning in July 2003, after completion of a pdor one year pilot program. The pilot program included various neighborhoods representing one tenth of the City. About 10 percent of the pilot area homes participated, paying $6 per month for the optional service. Following the first two years of citywide service, about 4 percent of homes participate by paying the new rate of $6.67 per month. About 3,050 homes currently subscribe to the service. New signups continue, at a slow but steady pace. A few dozen residents have left the program after service was interrupted for nonpayment,. Citywide participation is currently about 4 percent, which is much lower than in the ten percent participation rate in the pilot program. Low participation seems to · be caused in part by the need to pay a service fee, and in part by limited public awareness. A primary challenge has been to build public awareness at the least expense, to avoid increasing the service fee. Kern County implemented a similar curbside program in the metropolitan unincorporated area in January 2005. To date, only about one percent of the County households have signed up for the service. Consideration of Suq.qestions by the KBB Committee The KBB Committee letter suggested that the City increase publicity, incentives, and education for curbside recycling through four proposed steps, listed below with staff's response: t Provide the community with additional awareness by advertising more, and by creating promotions to foster sign-ups. An example might be to 9ive a subscriber a month o£f their service if they get a neighbor to sign up for the service. Several advertising and promotional efforts (listed below) have been made, including this suggestion by KBB. a. Several large newspaper ads donated by the Bakersfield Californian b. Several news features and public service announcements by various television and radio stations c. Paid television ads were used d. Program flyers mailed directly to all homes, with postage paid by a curbside motor oil recycling grant (Note: the state oil grant is well funded, compared to curbside recycling which has very limited grant opportunities) ¢. Program discount coupons included as a full pagead in the annual Parks and Recreation handbook mailed to all homes f. Program flyers included in startup packets sent to all new homes g. Several gift certificates for service distributed through community and sporting events h. Promotional booth at community events i. Billing inserts with discount coupons for existing customers for getting new sign ups Results from these promotional efforts have been limited, and community feedback indicates reluctance to pay an additional fee. Due to the cash redemption valueof beverage containers, a popular notion is that most recyclables are worth lots of money. Without realizing the high cost of transportation and the Iow economic value of other recyclables, most people assume that recycling should pay its own way. Staff continues to search for and use cost effective methods of promoting the curbside program. 2. Provide parity between the cost o£ a second tan cart ($$.95/mo.) and the cost O£ a blue cart ($&67/mo.). Curbside recycling (blue) cart service was established as a self-supporting program, with no funding from regular refuse fees. Therefore, the City's cost of $6.67 per month is charged to the users. In contrast, the cost of an extra trash cart is partly subsidized by refuse fees. Although the actual cost is $6.11 per month for service and billing, only $4.14 per month is charged to the user. The subsidy was a policy decision made in favor of large households, during the early stages of the automated refuse program in 1995. Approximately 2,200 households pay for extra refuse carts. Another option for extra trash service, that of trading in the basic green cart for a second trash cart for free, was also established in the early stages of the program in 1995. This option is based on the premise that some households do not need a greenWaste cart because their gardener removes the material. However, this is a difficult policy to enforce, because residents are freely given extra greenwaste carts. Approximately 6,000 households haVe free extra trash carts in lieu of greenwaste carts. These are also subsidized from basic refuse fees. Achieving parity between the fees for different service types would require a change in City Council policy relativeto subsidy of the rates for extra service. 3. Provide neighborhoods w/th high recyc//n9 percentages a reduced rate. Although this is logical, it may be counterproductive by causing rates in some neighborhoods to be relatively high, reducing overall participation. Staff does not recommend this. 4..rncrease education of recycl/n9 at events and schools...and encourage the use of KBB volunteers and staff to spread the Keep America Beautiful "Fl/aste in P/ace" raessage in our schools. The KBB subcommittee for education has promoted the Keep America Beautiful '~Vaste in Place" program to our local school system, and has offered training for interested teachers. This effort is ongoing. Summary In summary, the voluntary curbside recycling program is working a very modest level. It collects roughly the same amount of recyclable material as the community drop off centers operated by the City. According to the tonnage figures, 'about ten percent of residents choose to recycle .in one way or another. About half of those do not choose to pay for the convenience of the cUrbside program, and continue to use the free drop off centers. The City has thus far been able to comply with the 50 percent state recycling mandate. Pending legislation (Senate Bill 928) may increase the mandate to a higher percentage in the year 2011. Depending on this, additional efforts to increase recycling may be necessary. Ward I Kmth Smiler Ward 2- Dana Karcher, Vice Chair Ward 3- Sherry Core June 9, 2004 Ward 4- Kevin Burton Ward 5- David Taylor Wad 6- John Entiquez, Chair To Council Members and Alan Tandy, wad 7- Sandy Oarrigan The Bakersfield residents take pride in their community and work hard to keep it clean. Curbside recycling is a positive step for our community and its environment. Currently, nearly 2,500 homes have subscribed to do curbside recycling, but the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee and Recycling Subcommittee would like to see more residents in Bakersfield participate in cmbside recycling. The Keep Bakersfield Beautiful program sponsors boast of having the "beat participation for our Great American Clean-up, event with over 3,100 people turning ~) out to cleanup our community. We have students all over the city participating in recycling efforts at their school sites and in community organization, citizens lug tons 1 · of recyclables to drop-off sites and the city and county respond with a variety of recycling events that collect hazardous and hard to dispose of items. Everyday we see 1 · more individuals signing up for the blue carts but the pace is slow. In order for the program to be successful, the numbers of participants need to increase. In order for 1 participation rates to increase, some important changes need to occur;, the community .. can do it if only given a better chance. We feel that curbside recycling needs a positive boost from you, the City Council, if we are to remain on track with the state mandate of AB939, which requires landfill waste to be reduced by $0% by 2000. We identified the following support that would expand curbside recycling in Bakersfield. Increase the publicity surrounding curbside recycling. Extend incentives to tho participants in curbside recycling. · Increase education on recycling and also the harmful effect to our environmeht of not recycling in our community. The committee is well aware that the economic times are hard and that curbside recycling is expensive and out of reach for many citizens but we do realize that the program has to pay for itself. We Would like to propose some additional steps that .. could be taken that would reduce the cost and increase thc usage of the blue carts. City of Bakersfield. Solid W~s~e Division 4101 Tru~un Avenue, B,~cersfle~d, CA 9330~ Phone: 661-06-CLEAN Fax: 661-852-2114 Email: kbbl~ci.bakerdlelcLca, us KeepBakersfi®ldBeautiful · Provide the community with additional awareness by advertising more, and by creating promotions to foster sign-ups. An examplcmight be to give a subscriber a month off their service if they get a neighbor to sign-up for the set, ice. · Provide parity between the cost of a second tan cart and the cost of the blue cart. Currently it is either free or it costs $47.40 for the second tan cart compared to $80.00 for a blue cart. (Residents can keep their green , cart and second tan for $47.40 or residents can turn in their green cart and get the sccond tan free). This encourages excess waste and discourages recycling. Proposal, have both carts cost the same. · Provide neighborhoods with high percentages of recyclers at a reduced rate as the cost of the sentic~ in those areas declines.' As participation is ' the key to reducing cost, reward those neighborhoods where participation is high with a lower per household charge. · hicrease education of recycling at events and schools. Promote mini mai cost recycling programs (such as blue carts, at fairs, and concerts) and encourage the use of Keep Bakersfield Beautiful volunteers and 1 staff to spread the KAB "Waste ~n Place" message to our schools. 1 Thank you so much for your support of Keep Bakersfield Beautiful and for the city's curbside recycling program. It is making a difference in our community and thc 1 environment. Help us to heighten everyone's awarene~ and participation so wc can all continue to ~Cl~.~p BAKERSFr~.I~ BEAUTIFt~. Sincerely, Keep Bakersfield lt~utiful Committee Endorsed, " John ]~riquez, ~h~X City of Bakersfield. Solid Wute Division 410l Truxtun Avenue, Bakerdhdd, CA 93309 Phone: 661-86.CLEAN Fax: 661-852-2114 Email: kbbi~ci.bakerdleld.ca.u$