Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/11/1996 B A K E R S F I E L D ,~:~ Patricia J. DeMond, Chair ~d'an Tandy, City Manager Irma Carson .~Staff: Dolores Teubner Kevin McDermott AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, March 11, 1996 12:15 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 12:25 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Patricia J. DeMond, Chair; Irma Carson and Kevin McDermott 2. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 5, 1996 MINUTES Approved as submitted. 3. PRESENTATIONS None 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS None 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. VALLEY COMMUNITIES WATER PROJECT Staff`presented the compromise plan to the Committee which allows for reimbursement of the requested funds to VCI while still providing for funding to protect the City against any APPROVED AS SUBI. fITTED APRIL 8, 1996 F LE .F., AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, March 11, 1996 Page -2- possible future compliance mandates from the State. A representative of VCI was present at the meeting and concurred that the revised agreement was satisfactory to them. The Committee voted unanimously to recommend the revised agreement between the City and VCI. B. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS POLICY Staff presented a draft policy to the Committee on offerings and issuance of Industrial Development Bonds (IDB's) by the City. The Committee asked that the policy include a minimum financing amount in order for a project to be eligible for IDB's. In addition, the Committee asked that the terms and conditions included in the policy be rearranged so that the General Fund is not at risk, that the project be self-supporting and have at least a BBB rating. Finally it was proposed that the IDB Policy refer to the City's Master Fee Schedule for setting. The fee is proposed to be $10,000 which will be collected up front and will be non-refundable plus 2/10 of 1% of the bond principal to be collected once bonds are issued. Staff was directed to make the specified changes and proceed with putting this item on the March 20 Council meeting. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. ESTABLISHMENT OF CITY LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY The City Attorney began the presentation by clarifying that the issue in question was whether or not the City would discontinue use of the County as the LEA and not the Panorama landfill litigation. Public Works staffthen proceeded to lay out the options the City has which are to stay with the County, discontinue use of the County LEA and work directly with the State or form a City LEA. Staffindicated that dealing with the County LEA had caused significant delay in proceeding with the cleanup and closure of the landfill because the County, as a middleman, is not responding to the City quickly. Further, since the State is the main regulatory body, the County is only adding another layer of bureaucracy. In addition, staff indicated that by going directly to the State, the City might qualify for an expedited remediation program which would speed up the plan review process significantly. Several Panorama residents were present and indicated their concerns with how slowly the remediation process seemed to be going. Residents further stated that the perception was that if the County is no longer the LEA, that the residents on Panorama would have no representation in the matter. The Committee indicated, however, that since the LEA is an independent regulatory agency that elected representation has no impact on the process. The Committee directed staff to research the cost differentials between the County and State LEA options and what the County's delays have cost the City. Staffwas asked to find out AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, March 11, 1996 Page -3- the itemized cost for the service provided by the County. Also, staffwas asked to check with other cities that had independent LEA's about what their reasons had been for the move away from their respective Counties. The Committee took no action and directed staffto address all of the issues raised and bring this issue back to the April 8 Budget and Finance meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 1:18 p.m. cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council