Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987
-- /.~'~'N PHOE.;IX 4~ · WALNUT CR._K. CA '5~: ~! ,,-:;.;r: ~.~' J ~ FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CA · VISALIA, CA Wa;~r-r;', %. ~' SANBERNARDINO CA * TU~SON ~ J ~ ~ SAN DIEGO. CA · BAKERS~IELD~ CA 3 w',,,,am~r~oc .P~ ~ '. SACRAMENTO. CA Georpr.~ E Sh,,~e~. F. Ga:cC. O(,:.' PE. December 9, 1987 ., ...... WO.¢ 3031A. i1 Denms K. WOod. Chade~ & Gti~im, Jr, OOh~ ~ Puzauskas. J:., R E. Mr. Ed Schulz, AssisSan~ DirecLor of Public Works City of Bakersfield Jame{ DemCr 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Mr, gregory g. KZ&mco, Treas~er Public Faci!izies Cor~ration ~/ ~ty Bakersfield !501 Truxtun Avenue ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 Subjee:: Ne~ Counection Fees For ~asteuaZer Treatment Plant 3 1988 Expansion Gert t leme:: The Eollowlng report presen:s ne~ se~er connection ~ees based on ~lst- i~ deb: semite and the ~ditional debt op:ions required for the Wastewater Treatment Plant 3 !988 Expansion as discussed in Rauscher Pierce Refsnes' (RPR) report, dated December 3, 1987. Addition~ deb~ semite is based on a total project cost of $8,749,000. In 1984, Wastewater Treatment Plant Xo. 3 was upgraded and expanded to its current capacity of 8.0 million gallons per day (MGD). This e>:pan- sion was financed by leasehold mortgage revenue bor. ds. Due to the rapid growth in southwest Bakersfield and the wastewater contribution expected by the new Carnation plant, Treatment Plant 3 requires additional expan- sion at this time. Construction will ~be initiated in the spring of 1988 and is expected to be complete by mid 1989. The total project cost is estimated to be $8,749,000. Of this amount $1.5 million will be funded by a grant obtained from the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration (EDA). The remaining $7,249,000 may be financed by a combination of bond proceeds remaining from the 1984 expansion, existing reserves, and the sale of parity leasehold mortgage bonds similar to those sold in 1984. 450 NORTH WIGET LANE WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94598 ~-L-PHON.. f415) §~2-1710 Mr. Ed Schulz City of Bakersfield December 9, 1987 Page No. 2 BOND I~qSUE REQUIREMEh~S Bond issue requirements for the Plant 3 1988 Expansion have been deter- mined by Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., (RPR) based on the estimated $8,749,000 project cost, $1.5 million EDA grant contribution, and using three alternative financing options. The size of the total bond issue includes capitalized interest, cos.t of issuance, and a provision for a five month coverage on debt payments. The interest rate used is 8.75 percent for a term of 20 years. The total bond issue required is estimated to be range from $7,430,000 to $9,660,000 depending on the financing option utilized. Average annual debt service ranges from $835,000 to $1,085,000. Annual debt service required to be recovered from new connection fees has been reduced by the annual connection payment of $136,000, required by agree- ment %~ith the Carnation Corporation. Therefore, the net annual addi- tional debt service ranges from $699,000 to $949,000. The additional net annual debt service is then added to existing debt and a new connec- tion fee is developed based on a given level of building activity. Table I summarizes the net annual debt service needed for the 1988 Plant 3 project for each of the financing options developed by RPR. TOTAL ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE Existing annual debt service for Wastewater Treatment Plan+~ 2 totals $345,000 and Plant 3 (1984 project) totals $1,848,306. Of the $1,848,300 debt, $924,000 is attributed to plant expansion and collected from connection fees. The balance is attributed to plant facility upgrading and funded by sewer service charges. The total existing debt attributed to connection fees is $1,269,000 per year. The !988 Plant 3 Expansion would add from $835,000 to $1,085,000 per year depending on the financing option selected. The estimated new total annual revenue required from connection fees after the 1988 expansion of Plant 3 ranges from $2,104,000 to $2,354,000 excluding annual fees paid by Carnation. Table II summarizes total annual wastewater debt requirements for finan- cing options 1, 2 and 3, and Table III presents revenues from connection fees for the last four years. HISTORICAL BUILDING ACTIVITY Table IV and Figure 1 summarizes the City's annual building activity from 1981 through 1987. Fixture units per residence are those used by the City and typify plumbing fixture units in residential units as shown. Single family dwelling units average 22 fixture units, multiple Mr. Ed Schulz City of Bakersfield December 9, 1987 Page No. 3 family dwelling units are 16 fixture units, and single family dwellings or multiple family dwellings with two bedrooms or less, 14 fixture units. During the period 1981 through 1987 shown in Figure 1, the number of new fixture u~nits constructed within the City of Bakersfield reached a peak of over 76,000 in 1984. Building has been somewhat slower during the period 1985 through 1987, averaging 45,500 fixture units. CALCULATION OF NEW GDNNECTION FEES New connection fees are calculated by dividing net annual debt service presented in Table !I by the estimated annual number of new fixture units .to be added to the sewer system. In estimating the number of new fixture u~i~s to be constructed in a given year a conservative approach should be taken so as to provide a certain level of confidence that' adequate revenue will be collected to meet debt service requirements. Recognizing that' building activity may be somewhat variable, coverage factors of 25 percent are commonly used in calculating required fees according to Rauscher Pierce Refsnes. Three alternative approaches have been developed for estimating annual new fixture units and resulting connection fees. These alternatives are described below: Alternat ire De script ion 1 Fee based on 90 percent of average annual fixture ,u~,its constructed over the last three years. 2 Fee based on average annual fixture units constructed over the last 7 years plus 25 percent coverage factor. 3 Fee based on an increase in existing fees in propor- tion to the increased annual debt service. The new connection fees for single family residential units resulting from each of these approaches using the financing options developed by Rauscher Pierce Refsnes' are summarized as follows: Single Family Residential Alternative New Connection Fee* Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 1 $i, 190 $1~110 $1,060 2 $1,170 1,095 $i, 040 3 $1,160 1,080 $1,030 *~ Existing fee = $662/unit Mr. Ed Schulz City of Bakersfield December 9, 1987 Page No. 4 Each of these alternatives results in approximately the same fee per single family unit. Therefore, based on this analysis, and using the three financing options, Option 1 fees would total $1,200, Option 2 - $1,100, and Option 3 - $1,050 per Single family residential unit. Required future new connection fees for the three .options, showing various user categories compared to existing rates are shown on Table V. ESTIMATED CONNECTION FEES FOR FUTURE PLANT 2 EXPANSION In order to estimate connection fees for Wastewater Treatment Plant 2, a correlation between the cost per fixture umit per million dollars of project costs has been developed based on Plant 3 costs exclusive of the impact from Carnation cash contributions or cash contributions to offset reserves. This ~unit cost was then used to estimate the cost per resi- dential dwelling unit. For every million dollars in project costs for the Plant 2 expansion, connection fees would increase by approximately $3.60 per fixture unit based on any of the three connection fee alternatives discussed herein. The increase for a single family dwelling unit would be approximately $80. Therefore, a $10 million expansion of Plant 2 would increase single family residential connection fees by $800. We appreciate the cooperation we received from the City staff in obtain- lng the pertinent building and financial information needed to complete this report and look forward to meeting with you to present the informa- tion presented herein. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGI.~'EERS Partner Joy D. Parsons GCD: JDP: lw Enclosures: Tables I through V and Figure 1 RPR Submittals cc: Mr. Ernie Bodner, RPR BOND ISSUE REQ. UIRSMENTS WASTEWATER TREA.TMENT PLANT 3, 1988 EXPANSION Ootiom !1) Ootior~ ~) .Opt ior~ I~ I: em A~oun ..- ~ A~oun t~ amount ~ Estimated Project Cost $ 8,749,000 $ 8,749,000 $ 8,749,000 Less EDA Grant (!,500,000) (!,500,000) (1,500,000) Less Construction Fund Balance -0- (!,000,000) (1,000,000) Less Con...ou._on to Fund Reserve Fund -0- -0- (725,000) Net Cost to Bond $ 7,2)-.'9,Q00 $ 6,249,000 $5,524,000 Total Bond Issue (2) S 9,660,000 S 8,355,000 $ 7,430,000 Annual Deb= Service $ !,085,000 $ 938,000 $ 835,000 Less Annual Carnation Paymen: (!36.000) (!36,000) (136,000) Net Annu-~_t Debt Service $ ~49,000 $ 802,000 $ 699,000 (!) Based on information provided 5v Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. (2) Includes project cost plus capi--a!ized bond interest and issuance costs. TABLE II TOTAL ANNUAL WAS%~EWATER DEBT SER~rlCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Total Total Total Annual Annual Annual Re ti r eme nt De bt De bt De bt Bond Issue Dane Service(!) Service[l) Service(1) Plant 2 2005 $ 345,000 $ 345,000 S 3~5,000 Plant 3 (1984 Expansion) 2004 $ 924,000 $ 92~,000 $ 924,000 Plant 3 (1988 Expansion) (2) 2008 $!,085.000 $ 938~000 $ 835,000 Total Annual Debt Se~¢ice $2,354,000 $2,207,000 $2,!0A,000 Less Carnation (!36,000) (t26,000) (i36.000) New Tonal Annual Debt Se~ice $2,218,000 $2,~71,000 $1,968,000 (1) ~-'~.ount attributed to connection fees on!v. (2) Assumes $1.5 million EDA gran~_. See Rauscher Pierce Refsnes report, da~ed December 3, !987. ~ TABLE III HISTORICAL CONNECTION FEE RE'VENIIE Tot al Year ' ' Revenue 1984 $ 937,858 1985 $1,547,359 1986 $1,!69,302 1987 Sl,0°~ ~59 AVERAGE $! , 186,470 (i) Based on Sl,045,923 collected ~- ~' . ~,~ou~n_ O~oo_.-~- '=" 30, 1987, less Carnation' payment, extraoolated fo" ~ months. -~ ~:~ .... .-.nanc~=~ irfo.-mation :rovided by the Ci ry. ' TABLE I~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD HISTORICAL BUILDING ACTIVITY Res identiai Units Commercial To t al Single Multi- Fixture Fixture Year Family Family Condos(1) Units Units(2) t981 677 142 712 NA 27,134 (4) 1982 1,780 882 342 ' :~A 58,060 (4) !983 1,372 1,728 581 >IA 65,966 (4) !984 1,734 2,040 267 ! ,956 76,482 i985 1,195 ! ,002 182 6,900 51,770 !986 I ,22I 18I 245 7,003 40, !9! 1987(3) 1,1 49 407 458 6,37~ 44,577 Annual Average Fixture Units 52,026 (i) includes mobile homes.. (2) Based on 22 fixture units per single family residence, 16 fixtures multi-family, and 14 per condo. · (3) Estimate based on connections from January through ~ = ~ ~uoust, 1987 and extrapolated to the end of the year. (4) Excludes commercial fixture units. NA= Not available TABLE V PROJECTED N~W CONNECTION FEES User Category Proiected Connection Fee Existing Option i Option 2 Option 3 New ~'f.~nnec=ion Single Family Dwe!!i~ Units (Per Dwelling) $I,200 $1,I00 $!,050 $662.50 · ' Multiple Family Dwelling Units (Per Dwelling) S 880 S 800 $ 770 Sidle Family Dwelling or Multiple Family Dwellings with 14 or Less Fixture Units (Per Dwelling) $ 770 $ 700 S 670 $420 Commercial (Per Fixture Uni?) S 55 $ 50 $ ,AS S30 100,000 - * EXCI.UDES COMMERCIAl_ FIXI'URE UNITS .80,000- , 60,000- , __ 7 YEAR AVERAGE = 52,000 ~' ~ 3 YEAR AVERAGE 45 500 , 20,000 - I I I ! I ~ ~ ~ 1980 198.1 1982 1983 198,1 1985 1986 1987 1988 YEAi-! CITY OF BAI(EFISFIEI_D I'IIST.OlllCAL BUILDING ACTIVITY FIGURE I PIERCE E>, INC. December 3, 1987 Mr. Gregory J. Klimko Finance Director ~-; City of Bakersfield ' 7 lo~ ~" 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Klimko: Pursuant to our discussions of December 1, we have prepared analyses of three alternative bond scenarios the city of Bakersfield may wish to consider in fLnancing the proposed 1988 expansion project at Wastewater Treatment Plan= NO. 3. 1985 Project Financing Structure. Prior to discussing the three alter- native bond scenarios and the 1988 expansion project at Plant No. 3, we believe it will be helpful to briefly review the principal features and financing constraints of the bonding program used to finance the 1985 expansion project at Plant NO. 3. On December 19, 198&, the City of Bakersfield Public Facilities Corpora- tion (the "Corporation") sold $15,010,O00 of 1985 Leasehold Mortgage Revenue Bonds to finance the 1985 expansion project at Plant NO. 3. From a financing structure perspective: 1. The City leased the 1985 proj'ect site to the corporation; 2. The Corporation issued its Bonds to fund construction of the 1985 project; 3. The 1985 project site and 1985 'project improvements -.-ere leased back by the Corporation to the city pursuant to the Proj ecl Lease; 4. The Project Lease obligates the City to annually budget and appropriate in its General Fund sufficient monies to make base rental payments to the Corporation to pay interest and prin- cipal on the Corporation's Bonds; 5. To protect interests of the Corporation's Bond holders, the Corporation's rights, title and interest in all real property encompassed in the Site Lease and Project Lease, including the Corporation's rights to receive City base rental payments, have been assigned (mortgaged) to the Trustee pursuant to an Indenture between the Corporation and Security Pacific National Bank; and One California Street, Suite 2630 · San Francisco, California 94111 · (415) 989-2300 Member New York Stock Exct~anooe, Inc. Mr. Gregory J. Klimko City of Bakersfield December 3, !987 Page No. 2 6. Title to the Project Site and 1985 Project improvements will pass from the Corporation to the City when all of the Corpora- tion's Bonds have been paid. Ail outstanding 1985 Project Bonds of the Corporation are scheduled t.o be retired by January 1, 2004. Advantages of 1985 Project Financin_~ Structure.. The City's selection of the 1985 Project Financing ~tructure was based on several distinct advantages associated with this financing structure. First, the Corporation's Bonds are secured by the City's pledge to annually budget and appropriate General Fund monies to pay debt service. In effect, the Corporation's 1985 Bonds are secured by the City's excellent General Fund credit rating of AA. The Corporation's Bonds ~,ere sold at an average interest rate Of 9.67 percent. By comparison, the Bond Buyer's Index of 20 municipal general obligation bonds and 25 municipal revenue bonds, rated AA-A, at the time-of sale (December 19, 1984) was 10.00 percen: and 10.44 percent, respectively. Second, the 1985 Project Financing Structure affords the City the flexi- bility to apply sewer enterprise revenues to pay debt service on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Other alternative financing structures (sewer revenue bonds or certificates of participation secured by sewer enter- ._~_~-~se revenues) would have reauired· the City to set service charge and connection fee rates to produce net revenues equal to 125 percent of debt service. The extra 25 percent "debt service coverage requirement" which would have had to be produced from charges to presen: users, is required to afford pro~ection to Bond holders against potential shortfalls in sewer en:erprise revenues resulting from conditions beyond the City's control, i.e., siow-do~m in new construction and resulting reduced connection fee and service charge revenues. !988 Pro~ect Bondiny Alternatives. The economic advantages associated ~-i:h the !985 Project Financing Structure results in our recommendation that the 1988 Project be financed within the same Financi~ Structure, i.e., the issuance of additional parity Leasehold Mortgage Revenue Bonds. This Financing Structure also affords the City the option to utilize unspent monies in the 1985 Project Construction Fund (currently estimated at $1,000,000), and/or other sewer enterprise funds to reduce the amount of Bonds the Corporation would otherwise have to issue to finance the 1988 Project. Funding Requirements. The issuance of parity Leasehold Mortgage Revenue Bonds can be sized according to the availability or non-availability of funding sources other than Bond proceeds. If no funding sources other RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC. Mr. Gregory j. Klimko City of Bakersfield December 3, 1987 Page No. 3 than Bond proceeds are available, the issue would have to be sized to produce sufficient funds to pay the City's share of 1988 Project costs, capitalized interest on the Bonds during the construction period plus approximately five to six months to compensate for possible delays in completion of the 1988 Project, plus a Reserve Fund requirement equal to 10 percent of the amount of Bonds issued. The capitalization of interest on the Bonds during the construction period, plus five to six months, is necessary due to statutory requirements that the City cannot make base rental payments until the 1988 Project is complete and ready for use by the City. The Reserve Fund requirement is necessary to provide a source of funds to pay debt service in the event there is a shortfall in revenues to pay debt service. 1988 Project Cost Estimate. John Carollo Engineers have estimated total 1988 Project Costs at $8,749,000. This estimate includes allowances for construction costs, construction contingencies, engineering and design costs. The City has obtained a grant from the Economic Development Administra- tion in the amount of $1,500,000 to reduce the City's share of 1988 Project Costs to $7,249,000. Alternative Bond Szz~n= Options. As indicated earlier, we have prepared analyses of :~ree alterna:ive bond issue scenarios for the City's consi- deration. Ootion.. No. 1. This option, designated as "No Offset of Funding Requirements ," assumes all 1988 Project Costs to the City ($7,249,000) plus capitalized interest 'plus Revenue Fund require- ments will be funded from Bond proceeds. Option No. 2. Under the 1985. Project Indenture between the City and T~as:ee, it is permissible to apply any unspent !985 Project Construction Funds toward ~he 1988 Project. At this time, the City estimates an unspent balance of $1,000,000 in the 1985 Project Construction Fund. This option, designated as "Application of Construction Fund Balance," therefore assumes the application of these unspent funds to reduce the City's share of Project Costs to be funded from Bond proceeds. ($7,249,000 less $1,000,000 or $6,249,000). ' Option No. 3. The City has available moneys in its sewer enter- prise fund which may be applied to further reduce the amount of funds needed to finance the 1988 Project from Bond proceeds. This Option, designated as "Application of Construction Fund Balance Plus contribution to Fund Reserve Requirement," assumes the City's share of 1988 Project Costs under Optioh No. 2 ($6,249,000) plus the use of available sewer enterprise funds to meet the Reserve Fund requirement (10 percent of the amount of Bonds needed). RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC. Mr. Gregory J. Klimko City of Bakersfield December 3, l'q 57 Page No. 4 Estimated Bond issues Sizings. The tabulation below summarizes selected features of alternative bond issue sizings associated with the t~hree previously described options. Bond sizing parameters and assumptions that are common to all three options are as follows: t. 1988 Project Bonds, ~ith a final maturity on January 1, 2008, will be issued on or about February 1, 1988 at an estimated interest rate of 8.75 percent. We believe this to be a conservative estimate. If 1988 Project Bonds were marketed under current conditions, we believe the interest rate would be approximately 8.40 percent to 8.50 percent. The use of the 8.75 percent interest rate estimate is designed to afford some .degree of protection to compensate for bond market vola- tility. A measure of the volatility of the tax exempt bond market experienced in 1987 shows the Bond Buyer's Weekly G.O. Bond Index fluctuated within a range of 6.54 percent to 9.17 percent. 2. Interest payable on the Bonds for a period of 23 months (February 1, 1988 through December 31, 1989) will be capital- ized in the Bond issue. This requirements stems from the fact that the City cannct begin to pay debt service until the 1988 Project is completed and ready for City's use. 3. Moneys in the Construction, Capitalized Interest, and Reserve Fund will be invested at an average interest rate of 6.50 per- cent during the construction period. 4. Costs cf issuance ($150,000) plus an allowance for a Bond underwriti~ discount of two percent of the par value of the issue are estimated in all cases. Bond Sizing Ootion Item No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 Par Value of Bonds issues $9,660,000 $8,355,000 $7,430,000 Disposition of Bond Proceeds Net Deposit to Construction Fund $6,894,234 $5,943,!75 $5,943,174 Debt Service Reserve Net Deposit 880,182 761,276 * Capitalized Bond Interest Net Deposit 1,541,668 1,333,399 1,185,776 Issuance Costs/Discount 343,916 317,150 30!,050 TOTAL $9,660,000 $8,355,000 $7,430,000 RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC. Mr. Gregory J. Klimko City of Bakersfield December 3, 1987 Page No. 5 Sources of Funds to Pay Pro~ect Costs Net Deposit to Construction Fund $6,894,234 $5,943,175 $5,943,174 Interest Earnings Construction Fund 354,766 305,825 305,826 EDA Grant 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Unspent 1985 Project Constr. Fund -- .1~000.000 1,000~000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $8,749,00 $8,749,000 $8,749,000 Estimated Annual-Base Rental Obligations to Service Debt Commencing 1990/1991 $1,085,000 $ 938,400 $ 834,600 * Deposit of $743,000 to Debt Service Reserve Fund from City's sewer enterprise fund. Summary Our analyses of three alternative funding options indicate annual debt service costs could range from a high of $1,085,000 to a low of $834,600 depending on the source and use of funds obtained from Bond proceeds and external sources. We hope our analyses will assist the City in its consideration of alter- native sources and uses of funds to finance the 1988 Project at Plant No. 3. Our financing analysis data has been forwarded to John Carollo Engineers for purposes of completing the connection fee study. The connection fee study indicates connection fee requirements per single family dwelling unit could range from a high of $1,200 to a low of S1,050 depending on the alternative bonding option that may be selected by the Please advise me if you have any questions or need for additional infor- mation. Best regards. Very truly yours, . Ernest B, Bodnar Senior Vice President EBB: j rb RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC. NO OFFSET OF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS Bond Sizing Subroutine D1 Dated Date 02/01/88 D2 De[ ivory Date 02/01/88 D3 Final Maturity 01/01/08 B1 Bond Principal, (0 to solve) 0 82 Average Coupon - % 8.750 B] Years of RC~ Interest Only 1.917 84 # of Maturities per year 1 £1 : underwriters Oiscouqt - % 2.000 E2 Cost of issuance as % of Bonds .OOO E3 Cost of issuance - $ 150,000 £4 Cost of issuance as % of Total D/S ' .000 Pl Net Project Proceeds, (0 to solve) 7,249,000 P2 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 P3 Ncmmer of equal draws 18 P4 Mot~ths ~etween draws 1 C1 # of years of Capitalized Interest 1.917 C2 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 Debt Service Reserve as % of ROtes IC.OCO Debt Service Reserve as % of 1 years D/$ .050 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 R4 For how long, in years 1.500 SCURCE OF FUNDS 8ordProceeds 9,660,000.00 Totals: 9,660,000.00 USE OF FLI~DS Eamings Desired Fur~ing Net Proceeds 6,894,2.34.20 354,765.80 7,249,C00.00 Debt Service Reserve 880,182.23 85,817.77 966,000.00 Capitalized 8ord Interest 1,541,668.05 ~,422.62 1,620,090.~ Underwriters Disccx~t 193,200.00 Fixed Issuance Costs 150,715.52 Totals: 9,660,000.00 O?~l~N i $9,660,000 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLID FACILITIES CO, POrTION 1988 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND OPTION (NO OFFSET OF FUNDING REQUIREHENTS) iveryDate 02/01/88 Date Princioal C ob-cx~n Interest Total .Annua[ 07/01/88 352.187.50 352,187.50 01/01/89 422.625.00 422,625.00 774,812.50 07/01/89 422 625.00 422,625.00 ' 01/01/90 422 625.00 422,625.00 845,250.00 07/01/90 422 625.00 422,525.00 .01/01/91 240,000.00 8.750 422 625.00 662,625.00 1,085,250.00 07/01/91 412 125.00 412,125.00 01/01/92 260,000.00 8.750 412,125.00 672 125.00 1,084,250.00 07/01/92 400,750.00 400 750.00 01/01/93 285,000.00 8.750 400 750.00 685 750.00 1,086,500.00 c~7/01/93 38~ 281.25 388 281.25 01/01/94 310,000.00 8.750 388 281.25 698,281.25 1,086,5~2.50 07/01/94 374 718.75 374 ~718.75 01/01/95 335,000.00 8.750 374 718.75 709 718.75 1,084,437.50 07/01/95 360.052.50 360 042.50 01/01/96 365,000.00 8.750 360.052.50 725 052.50 1,085,125.00 07/01/95 344 093.75 344 093.75 01/01/97 395,000.00 .8.750 344 093.75 739 093.75 1,G83,187.50 07/01/97 326 812.50 326 812.50 01/01/98 430,000.00 8.750 326 812.50 756 812.50 1,08~,625.00 308 000.00 308,000.00 470,000.00 8.750 308 000.00 7T~ 000.00 1,085,000.00 07/01/99 287 437.50 287 437.50 01/01/00 510,000.00 8.750 287 437.50 797 437.50 1,084,875.00 07/01/00 265 125.00 265 125.00 01/01/01 555,000.00 8.750 265 125;00 820 125.00 1,035,250.00 07/01/01 240 843.75 240 .~,3.75 01/01/02 605,000.00 8.750 240 843.75 845 .~3.75 1,C,55,687.50 07/01/02 214 375.00 214 375.00. 01/01/03 655,000.00 8.750 214.375.00 869 375.00 1,083,750.00 07/01/03 185 ~718.75 185 718.75 01/01/04 715,000.00 8.750 185 718.75 900 718.75 1,0&5,437.50' 07/01/04 154 437.50 154~437.50 01/01/05 775,000.00 8.750 154 437.50 929,437.50 1,0EG,875.00 07/01/05 120 531.25 120,531.25 01/01/06 845,000.00 8.750 120 531.25 965,531.25 1,086,052.50 07/01/05 83 562.50 83,562.50 01/01/07 915,000.00 8.750 83 562.50 g98,562.50 1,082,125.00 07/01/07 4;], 531.25 43,531.25 ' 01/01/03 995,000.00 8.750 43,531.25 1,038,531.25 .1,082,062.50 Totals: 9,(>50,000.00 11,486,125.00 21,146,125.00 . 21,146,125.00 Less Accrued Frcxa 02/01/88: ' .00 .00 Net Cost: 11,486,125.00 21,146,125.00 [ues From Dated Date: Average Interest Rate 8.75000000 Bond Years 131,270.00000 Average L i fe 13.58903 Values From Delivery Date: OPTION 2 APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTION FUND BALA2gCE Bor~ Sizi~ SumrcxJtine 01 Dated Date 02/01/8~ · ' D2 Delivery Date 02/01/8S D3 Final Maturity 01/01/08 81 Send Principat, (0 to solve) 0 82 Average CcxJ:xao - % 8.750 83 Years of Bc~'~d Interest Only 1.917 134 # of Maturities per year 1 E1 ' unaerwriters Discouqt - % 2.000 E2 Cost of issuance as % of Bor~Ls .OOO E3 Cost of issuance - $ 150,000 E4 Cost of issuance as % of Total D/S ~000 Pl Net Project Proceeds, (0 to solve) 6,249,000 P2 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 P3 Norther of .equal draws 18 P4 Months between Oraws C1 # of years of Capitalized Interest 1.917 C2 Adjusted by ear~ings at a rate of 6.500. R1 Debt Service Reserve as % of Boncls 10.000 Debt Service Reserve as % of 1 years D/S .OOO Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 R4 For how long, in years' 1.500 SOJRCE OF FUNDS Bond Proceeds 8,355,000.00 Totals: 8,355,000.0D USE OF FUNDSEarningsDesired Fcr~ing Net Proceeds 5,943,174.16 305,~25.84 6,249,000.00 Debt Service Reserve 761,275.6~ 74,224.37 EGS,500.O0 Capitalized Borcl Interest 1,35~,399.2.~ 67,828.25 1,401,227.49 Underwriters Discount 167,100.00 Fixed Issuance Costs 150,050.98 Totals: 8,355,OOO.OO OPTION 2 $S,~55,000 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION 19~8 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND OPTION (APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE) Delivery Date 02/01/8~ Date Principal C o~z~:~n )nrerest Tota[ At,qua[ 07101188 304,609.38 304 60~.38 01/01/89 365,531.25 365 531.25 670,140.EG 07/01/89 365,531.25 365 531.25 O1/O1/~O 365,531.25 365 531.25 751,062.50 O?/O1/~O 365,531.25 365 531.2.5 01/01/91 21 O, 000. O0 8.730 36'. ,531.25 575,531.25 941,062.50 07/01/91 356,343.75 356.3~3.73 01/01/92 225,000.00 8.730 356,3~3.73 581 ~3.73 ~37,687.50 07/01/92 3z~,500.00 01/01/~3 2~5,000.00 8.730 3~6,500.00 591,500.00 938,000.00 07/01/93 335,781.25 335,781.25 01/01/94 255,000.00 ~".~0 335,781.25 600,781.25 936,562.50 07/01/94 324,187.50 324,187.50 01/01/~ 290,000.00 8.750 324,187.50 614,187.50 07/01/~ 311,500.00 311,500.00 01/01/~6 315,000.00 8.750 311,500.00 626,500.00 938,000.00 07/01/96 2~7,718.73 297,718.75 01/01/97 345,000.00 8.730 297,718.75 642,718.75 940,437.50 07/01/97 282,525.00 281,625 0~'/01/98 375,000.80 8.750 282, .625.00 657,625.00 )7/01/98 2(~,218.75 26~,218.73 )1/01/99 405,000.00 8.7~0 256,218.7~ 571,218.75 937,437.50 07/01/99 248,500.00 2&B,50O.O0 01/01/00 440,000.00 8.730 244),500.00 688,500.00 937,000.00 07/01/00 229 250.00 229,250.00 01/01/01 4~0,000.00 8.730 229.250.00 709,250.00 07/01/01 208.250.00 208,250.00 01/01/02 520,000.00 8.730 208 250.00 728,250.00 936,500.00 07/01/02 185 500.00 185,500.00 01/01/03 565,000. O0 8.750 185,500.00 730.500.00 9!~, 000. O0 07/01/03 160. 781.25 160 7'81 01/01/04 615,000.00 8.750 160 781.25 775 781.25 936,562.50 07/01/04 113 875.00 133 875.00 01/01/05 570,000.00 8.730 1'(3,875.00 803.873.00 937,730.00 07/01/05 104,562.50 104 562.50 01/01/06 7'50,000.00 8.750 104,562.50 834 562.50 939,125.00 07/01/06 72,625.00 72 625.00 01/01/07 7~,000.00 8.730 72,625.00 867,625.00 07/01/07 37, 843.73 37 ,843. 73 01/01/08 _ 865,000.00 8.730 37,843.75 ~.)02,84~.75 . Totats: 8,355,000.00 9,936,390.6~ 18,291,3~0.(x) 18,291,390.53 Less '-,=crued From 02/01/8~: .00 .00 Net Cost: 9,936,390.~ ~k[ues From Dated Date: ~Average Interest Rate 8.75800000 Bond Years 113,558.75000 Average Life 13.59171 Values From Delivery Date: OPTION 3 $7,430,000 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION 1988 LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND OPTION (APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE PLUS CONTRIBUTION TO FUND RESERVE REQUIREMENT) Delivery Date 02/01/88 Date Principal ~.oLpon Interest Tota[ Ar~nua[ 07/01/88 270,8~5.42 27'0,8~5.42 01/01/8~ 325 062.50 325,062.50 595,947.92 O7/01/b~ 3P.5 042.50 325,062.50 01/01/90 3?-5 06~.50 3?.5,06Z.50 650,125.00 07/01/90 325 062.50 325,062.50 01/01/91 185,000.00 8.750 325 06~.50 510,062.50 835,125.00 07/01/91 316 968.75 316 968.75 01/01/92 200,000.00 8.750 316.968.75 516 ~8.75 833,937.50 07/01/92 308218.75 308 218.75 01/01/93 220,000.00 8.750 306 218.75 52S.21E.75 836,437.50 07/01/93 298 593.75 298.593.75 01/01/94 2-35,000.00 8.750 298 593.75 533.592.75 832,187.50 07/01/94 288312.50 28831C.50 01/01/95 260,000.00 8.750 288 312.50 548 312.50 836,525.00 07/01/95 276 937.50 276 937.50 01/01/96 280,000.00 8.750 276.937.50 556 937.50 833,875.00 07/01/96 264687,50 264 687.50 01/01/97 305,000.00 8.750 264 687.50 569.687.50 834,375.00 07/01/97 251 343.75 251.3;3.75 /01/98 330,000.00 8.750 251,343.75 581 ~,3.75 832,687.50 01/01/99 360,000.00 8.750 236,906.25 596 906.25 P-J3,812.50 07/01/99 221,156.?.5 221 155.25 01/01/00 390,000.00 8.750 221,156.25 611 156.?.5 832,312.50 07/01/00 204,093.75 204 093.75 01/01/01 425,000.00 8.750 204,093.75 629.0~3.75 P-33,187.50 07/01/01 185 500.00 185.500.00 01/01/02 465,000.00 8.750 185 500.00 650 500.00 836,000.00 07/01/02 165 156.25 165 156.25 01/01/03 505,000.00 8.750 165 155.25 670 156.25 &35,312.50 07/01/03 143.062.50 143 062.50 01/01/04 550,000.00 8.750 143 86~.50 693 062.50 836,125.00 07/01/04 119000.00 119 000.00 01/01/05 595,000.00 8.750 119 000.00 714.000.00 833,000.00 07/01/05 92,968.75 92,968.75 01/01/06 650,000.00 8.750 92,968.75 742,968.75 835,937.50 07/01/06 64,531.25 64,531.25 01/01/07 705,000.00 8.750 64,531.25 769,531.25 07/01/07 33,687.50 33,687.50 01/01/08 770,000.00 8.7~0 33,687.50 803r687.50 837~375.00 Totals: 7,430,000.00 8,8-~8,/~7.92 16,268,447.92 16,268,447.92 Less Accrued From 02/01/88= .00 .00 Net Cost: 8,838,447.92 16,268,447.92 From Dated Date= Averege Interest Rate 8.75000000 Bond Years 101,010.83333 Average L(fe 13.59500 OPTION 3 APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTION FUND BAI_ANCE PLUS CONTIBUTION TO FUND RESERVE REQUIREMENT Bored Sizing Subroutine D1 Dated Date 02/01/~ D2 Del ivery Date 02/01/?:~ D3 Final Maturity 01/01/08 S1 Sord Principal, (0 to so[ve) 0 S2 Average Co~m~n - % B3 . Years of Bocd Interest Only 1.917 ~ # of Maturities per year El Underwriters Discc,Jnt - % 2.000 E2 Cost of issuance as % of Bor~s .000 E3 Cost of issuance - $ 150,000 E4 Cost cf issuance as % of Total D/S P1 Ne'", Project Proc-?.s, (0 to solve) 6,249,000 P2 Adjusted by earnincjs at a rate of 6.500 P3 Norther of ecxJa[ draws 18 P4 Mc~ths between draws 1 ~I # of years of Capitalized Interest 1.917 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of 6.500 Debt Service Reserve as % of Scrods .000 R2 Debt SerYice Reserve as % of 1 years D/S R3 Adjusted by earnings at a rate of .000 R4 For how long, in years SOURCE OF FUNDS Bored Proceeds 7,430,000.00 Tota[ s: 7,430,000. O0 USE OF FUNDS Earnings Desired Fuading Net Proceed~ 5,943,174.16 305,825.84 6,249,000.00 Debt Service Reserve .00 .00 .00 Capitalized Bond Interest 1,185,775.74 60,318.~5 1,246,094.59 Underwriters Disc~t 14~,600.00 Fixed Issuance Costs 152,450.10 ?,430,000.00 JERRY C. FOX, M.D. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3807 B UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 October 9, 1987 James Childs, Vice Mayor Councilman Ward I City Council Office 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Sir: As per our recent correspondence, I plan to submit a request for financial assistance, in the form of a loan, to develop a comprehensive medical center. The plans to be completed in detail within the next thirty (30) days. The planned site is in Census Tract #22, an area targeted for urban renewal by the City of Bakersfield's Community Development Program. Specifically, the site is located on the south side of California Avenue between Robinson Street on the East and Owens Street on the West. This site location will be available and accessible to more than 19,000 Medi-Cal/Medicare recipients residing within a two mile radius. Thirty four (34) jobs will be created, providing income to many health care professionals, living in the area. The total cost of the project is estimated at $860,000.00. The Developer is requesting assistance from the City, in land aquis- tion, construction cost and predevelopment fee (s), associated with this project. We look forward to meeting with you and the council, to discuss this proposal and the importance the consideration of this matter will affect the development of this medical center. Respectfully, ~ Jerry C. Obstetr~/Gyn~ol ogy cc: George Caravalho, City Manager George Gonzales,- Program Coordinator JCF:mv ALSO OPERATING BRUNDAGE MEDICAL CLINIC · BAKER MEDICAL CLINIC · CHESTER MEDICAL CLINIC · WASCO MEDICAL CLINIC Rosoaalo School Dts tc 12439 ROSEDALE HWY. 'OSEDALE SCHOOL BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 ROSEDALE NORTH Jim Dickerson James M. Henderson Gary M. Mullhofer ~'~"'~ · ............~ (805) 598-3927 (805) 589-2571 (805) 589-9314 October 8, 1987 Carol Williams City Clerk's Office 1501Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA. 93301 Dear Mrs. Williams, The following is the annual report that you requested pursuant to Chapter 15.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code: A. The District received $166,936.00 in voluntary fees from the City during the 1986-87 school year. B. Facilities leased during the 1986-87 school year were 10 portable trailer classrooms at a cost of $139,283.00. C.The attendance areas within the City will'continue to be over- crowded during the current school year. The Rosedale Union School District has two schools within areas of the City: Rosedale North which houses students in grades K-3, and Rosedale Elementary which houses students in grades 4-8. The District presently has an enrollment of 1,412 students. In grades K-3 there are 661 students which (based on District adopted classroom size goals of 25 students per classroom) necessitates a total of 27 classrooms. At present there are 22 regular classrooms available. In grades 4-8 there is an enrollment of 751 students which (with 27 students per classroom size goals) requires 28 classrooms. Presently there are 25 classrooms available. The District is presently eight classrooms short of adequately housing all of its students. D. Of the $116,936.00, plus the fees carried over from the prior year, $35,840.00 was spent to hire an architect to draw plans for a new school to relieve' overcrowded conditions in the District. The cost of the new school"will be approximately $1,600,000.00. The remaining fees will be used towards this project. Sincerely, ~lhofer District Superintendent GM:sr ' FILE Greenfield Union School District 1624 FAIRVIEW ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CALIF. 93307 805-832-2450 DON L. WILL'Iu~, $ ROY TULLIS P~es~dent JIM GOODGAME SEBASTfAN LAMB Clerk ASSISTANT SLIPFRINTEN,r)FNT GARY COATES TEDDI FANUCCHI cAROLYN MARTIN LEON OLLIVtER CITY C LE R K TOM NICHOLS BUSINESS MANAGER October 7, 1987 Bakersfield City Council Carol Williams, City Clerk 1501Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield,Ca. 93301 Re: Annual Report of Fees collected pursuant to Chapter Dear' Ms. Williams, Enclosed is the information you have req~sted. The district presently has 18 portable classrooms leased and eleven (11) additional portable classrooms rented. Our enrollment continues to climb at an accelerating rate. We have begun phase four (4) and have received our plans for eight (8) additional portable classrooms. The site preparations are under way. Sincerely., Tom Nichols Business Manager cc;Steve Hartsell SLS TN;jg BUENA VISTA SCHOOL ROUTE 7, BOX 548 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311 (805) 831-0818 October 2, 1987 Carol Williams City Clerk ~F- 1501'Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, Ca 93301 Dear Ms. Williams, Rursuant to Section 15.70.090 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, the Governing Board of the Buena Vista School District files the following report: The total fees collected by the district during the preceding fiscal year (July 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987) were $44,100. The Buena Vista School District attendance 'area will continue to experience growth during the current school year. The future growth predictions con- tinue to fluctuate as housing development plans increase and time lines are adjusted; but, the original estimate of one-thousand new students in the next eight to ten years is still a realistic projection. The balance of our fees, plus all new fees, will first be used to lease temporary'classrooms to increase the capacity of our present site. In future years the fees will be~applied to the expense of an additional site and the construction of a new facility. Sincerely, Doris Duquet District Superintendent DAD:bls GREENFIELD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1987 Restricted- Voluntary- city Developer Collected Negotiated Total Balance July 1 ~ 310,543.00 182,583.00 493,126.00 Increased by Revenues: Fees -0- 304,417.00 304,417.00 Interest 14,628.00 15,954.00 30,582.00 Total 325,171.00 502,954.00 828,125.00 Decreased by Expenditures: Facilities leased & <141,721.00> <25,232.00> <166,953 00> rented ' Additional Work on New < 10,548.00> < 10,548 00> Portables. ' ArchiteCt, Engineering, < 89,026.00> < 89,026.00> Inspection & Filing Fees Classrooms Supplies -0- <116,212.00> <116,212.00> Balance - June 30 83,876.00 361,510.00 445,386.00 r (.~,. 1' A t~ L. E ' ": L..r ~ ~ ?:; N (-~ ~) "'i r, · 4 Pot t,::~.L":, I c~,::, I -~ J~. t'ti~h : $148,'.?,¥6. O0 - 7 ,I,- P't,~nz Star ted - 2/85 PHASE 2 (I 'c'" ~- · 5 Pc:,rt.F~bles ~ - Jr. High : $250,000.00 ].-- P].antation Balance ~;248,274. O0 Started - 10/85 Payo~:f - 1.0/91 PHASE 3 (] ~:?8~,"-E,'' "7) 9 Portables 5 - Jr. Hl,gt~ = $5'~2,000.0 :: 7 years; (E $ 71,525.00 5- Planz 5 - Plankat~.on Balance $427 ,158 . 00 {:~tar ted - 10/86 Payoff ...... 10/92 Total District Obliga'kions now '~/11/'86 $893,030.00 After 10/86 $780,128.00 Total yearly premiums :~141,721.00 PHASE 4 (1987-88) 8 Poi-tables : $ 45,600.00 $548,800.00 With Down payment of $200,000.00 Approximate Balance $148,800.00 : 7 years ~ $ 29,000.00 per year' MEMORANDUM May I1, 1987 TO: BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE // SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF VENDORS For many years the city has followed a policy that releases payments to vendors only on the tenth and twenty-fifth of each month provided the warrants have been approved by the City Council. In the current economic and financial environment, this policy has become out- dated due to the length of time it takes for the city to pay its bills. For example, once the city department receives an invoice, it could be as many as five weeks or longer before payment is actually sent out by the Finance Department. Verification and approval by supervisors, division heads, depart- ment heads and auditing by the Finance Department combined with meeting City Council agenda deadline makes preparing and approving bills a lengthy process. The city tries to deal with as many small vendors as possible, but their cash flow requirements cannot withstand a long delay in receiving payments. We are finding that vendors are trying to assess the city finance charges for untimely payments. The city does not usually pay finance charges but it is getting increasingly difficult to avoid such payments. In order to carry out the operations of the City, we currently release some payments before council appro- ves them. These payments are essential to carry on effective operations. The early release checks have steadily increased over the past five years. Staff has contacted nine California Cities with a population range of 128,500 to 182,000. The results were that six of the City Councils have authorized staff to pay all bills of the City. Two (2) cities require Council approval for unbudgeted purchases or large large dollar purchases. One city requires Council approval before paying bills, but releases checks weekly to vendors. Staff is recommending that the Finance Director be allowed to make payments for services, equipment and supplies received. In conjunction with this request we will be releasing payments weekly and sending to Council a report of all pay- ments made the previous month. GR/GJK/ld GR-S012.1 cc: Richard Oberholzer ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SURVEY ~arden San Huntington City Bakersfield Pasadena Modesto Grove Torrance Bernadino Glendale Fremont Stockton Beach Population 155,399 128,526 152,511 152,766 152,207 157,576 152,459 153,551 181,625 182,280 Claims spproved by City Council before payment released X X City releases claims with Finance Director approval. Council does not approve claims X X X X X City pays all claims and aends council a listing for approval X City get council approval only for large dollar items X City get council spproval for unbudgeted items X No. of days per month checks released 2 12 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 No. of checks per month 1,100 1,200 1,800 2,000 1,600 1,600 6,600 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ANALYSIS OF LAG TIME BETWEEN ~ VENDORS'S INVOICE DATE AND DATE PAYMENT MADE DATE TIME BETWEEN DATE PAPERWORK INVOICE DATE OF REC'D BY DATE AND PAYEE INVOICE FINANCE DEPT. CHECK ISSUED - PAYMENT DATE AUDITORIUM Pantuso, Inc 3-23-87 3-25-87 4-10-87 18 Pantuso, Inc. 2-26-87 3-04-87 3-26-87 28 Serban Sound Systems 3-01-87 3-05-87 3-26-87 25 Serban Sound Systems 12-01-86 12-05-86 12-24-86 23 Urner's 3-04-87 3-25-87 4-10-87 37 ADMINISTRATIVE Vagabond Inns, Inc. 2-24-87 3-04-87 3-26-87 30 SERVICES Bakersfield Pre-Sort 2-13-87 3-18-87 4-10-87 56 Jobs Available 8-06-86 8-13-86 9-11-86 36 Kelly Services 1-19-87 1-27-87 2-26-87 38 Tap Drafting Service 10-03-86 10-08-86 10-24-86 21 pUBLIC WORKS Assoc'd Truck Parts 3-19-87 3-23-87 4-10-87 22 Carollo Engineers 9-30-86 10-23-86 11-10-86 41 Civic Center Towing 1-26-87 1-29-87 2-26-87 31 Cole's Services 3-20-87 3-25-87 4-10-87 21 Muititronics 1-31-87 2-04-87 2-26-87 26 FIRE Permanent Dead Man Co. 8-04-86 12-17-86 1-09-87 158 Permanent Dead'Man co. 11-13-86 11-20-86 12-11-86 28 Satellites Plus 10-20-86 1-23-87 2-10-87 113 Sorbus 3-01-87 3-05-87 3-26-87 25 Tool Shack 8-12-86 8-28-86 9-11-86 30 POLICE VWR Scientific 1-16-87 1-29-87 2-26-87 41 Haines & Co. Inc. 6-05-86 6-27-86 7-10-86 35 H & H Canvas Co. 1-05-87 3-02-87 3-12-87 66 Safeguard Specialists 7-23-86 1-12-87 1-23-87 184 Sun Badge Co. 12-23-86 12-30-86 1-23-87 31 COMMUNITY Burke, Williams & Sorenson 2-13-87 3-02-87 3-12-87 27 SERVICES Denio, Inc. 11-03-86 11-07-86 11-25-86 22 Quad Consultants 10-31-86 11-21-86 12-11-86 41 Prentice Hall 12-05-86 12-19-86 1-09-87 35 Pyramus. Inc. 2-06-87 2-10-87 2-26-87 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ANALYSIS OF LAG TIME BETWEEN VENDORS'S INVOICE DATE AND DATE PAYMENT MADE DATE TIME BETWEEN DATE PAPERWORK INVOICE DATE OF REC'D BY DATE AND PAYEE INVOICE FINANCE DEPT. CHECK ISSUED PAYMENT DATE DEVELOPMENT Gnu Graphics 8-07-86 8-13-86 9-11-86 35 SERVICES SEEZ 8-18-86 9-08-86 10-10-86 53 SEEZ 8-12-86 No Date 9-11-86 30 TRW 3-06-87 3-24-87 4-10-87 35 TRW 8-01-86 8-13-86 9-11-86 41 CITY ATTORNEY Typing 7-31-86 9-11-96 9-25-86 56 PIP 12-17-86 12-24-86 1-09-87 23 Day-Timers 1-09-87 2-04-87 2-26-87 48 Callaghan & Co. 2-22-87 3-23-87 4-10-87 47 Attorney's Messenger Ser. 3-31-87 4-13-87 5-08-87 38 ACP-SO31.D RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES RECEIVED. WHEREAS, the City's present procedure, which requires prior City Council approval of payments to vendors, results often in delays exceeding thirty (30) days from date of invoice to date of payment; and WHEREAS, such procedure creates a hardship for any busi- ness requiring early payment, especially any small business for which cash flow is a problem; and WHEREAS, unless this procedure is revised as specified below, such businesses will likely not bid City projects or other- wise do business with the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 40 of the Charter of the City of Bakersfield, the Finance Director is hereby authorized to make payments due for services, equipment and supplies purchased received. 2. Claims for reimbursement of expenses submitted by or on behalf of any Councilmember shall be approved by the Council prior to payment. 3. Not less than once each month, the Finance Director shall provide the Council with a register of all payments. 000 ......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the following vote: , by CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to'form: CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield AJS/GR/meg R RES 4 FINANCE MEMORANDUM April 27; 1987 TO H~nor~ble MAyor and C~unc{lm~mber.q FROM Mmrv T,_ ~rrCnn~ Dopu~y C~rv H~nnger SUBJECT Cn~uniry Dov~lnpmonr Budgpr ~nd CDBR Appl{c~ri~n rY 87/88 Community Development held two public hearings on the proposed use of funds for fiscal year 87/88. Legal Notices of the meetings were advertised .in the Bakersfield News Observe, E1Mexicalo, and the Bakersfield Californian. The meetings were held on February 17 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council -" Chambers and on February 19 at 6:00 p.m. at the Bakersfield Senior Center. .~.' .... Other than staff, no one attended the meetings. · '~":'.' .... '. " Subsequent to the meetings and prior to the cut-off date for fil- ..,.:'~;~ ~.:..-:. · ...- .,...... . .... "'.' zng'app!ica'tions,.we received one request for CDBG funding. The Boys' Club of . '=': Bakersfield requested $400,000 to restore and rehabilitate their former church ?i-' building, rehabilitate the adjoining classroom-buildings and acquire the two ,'.'.'...adjoining lots to the east. They were directed to seek participation in the ...' project from the County. As the project becomes more fully developed, their proposal may be re-submitted. .. '" Community Development received one late application from -'?':":'":'Aunt Cherie'S Home.: They are asking for $150,000 for acquisition and $10 000 '" ............ ' for rehabilitation~ They want'tO' acquire the building that they have been : "'"i. -- ' '"''~'. ,,.',~ '. '~:i!:;~?'/!!i'0perating from'since 1984.., Aunt Cherie's Home provides residential care and ....... ":=" · ' counseling for u~wed pregnant women~along with community outreach to other · .'.' i pregnan~ women. They were informed that their application was submitted late and therefore would not be considered for funding as part of the FY 87/88 application.. Except for these two proposals, no other requests were submitted for funding. Communit~ Development Budget April 27, 1987 Page 2 Community Development is entitled to receive $1,213,000 in block grant funds for fiscal year 87/88. In addition, $91,105 in prior years' pro- gram income is available for expenditures in the upcoming program year. Therefore, the total amount available for fiscal year 87/88 is $1,304,105. The new entitlement is slightly above the current entitlement by .33% or $4,000. The amount is insignificant and basically represents a funding level comparable to the current year. Exhibit "A" summarizes the proposed budget. A listing of proposed projects is included in the summary. Exhibit "B" pre- sents the projected use of. funds statements for the block grant application. · / ~ . This information will be presented to the Budget and Finance Committee for study and recommendation.'~ MEMO2 ' -. EXHIBIT "A" Community Development Division Summary of Proposed Budget FY 87/88 I. ENTITLEMENT Current Budget Entitlement: $1,209,000 New Budget Entitlement: $1,213,000 Funding Change: $ 4,000 Percentage Change: .33% Program Income $ 91,105 91,105 Total Funds Available $1,304,105 $1,304,105 II. PROGRAM BUDGET Sub Program Amounts Percent 651-Administration & Planning $ 185,992 14% 652-Housing Programs & Loans 564,379 43% 653-Neighborhood Revitalization 398,734 31% 765-Capital Improvement Projects 153,000 12% TOTAL $1,304,105 100% III. BUDGET DETAIL 651-Administration & Planning Personnel $ 149,132 Operations 36,860 TOTAL $ 185,992 652-Housing Programs & Loans Programs and Loans $ 400,370 Personnel 132,359 Operations 31,650 TOTAIJ $ 564,379 653-Neighborhood Revitaliation City/County Joint Fair Housing Program $ 45,000 Neighborhood Revitalization Loans 91,105 Homeless~Day Center 175,000 Personnel 83,279 Operations 4~350 , TOTAL $ 398,734 765-Capital Improvement Projects #1157 Curbs & Gutter - Kentucky/Wms./Quincy/Beale $ 46,000 #1491 Lowell Add. Curbs & Gutters "K" to "M" Street 21,000 #1492 Hughes Lane Curbs & Gutter 38,000 #1530 Baker Street Landscaping - E. Truxtun to 178 50,000' TOTAL $ 155,000 BUDGET TOTAL $1,304,105 Ri3.1 EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS CD Objectives National Funds Description Applicable Objectives Budgeted Housing Rehabilitation 1,2,3,4, & 6 Low/Mod $ 564,379 Programs & Services - City Wide Public Works & Facilities 1,2, & 4 Low/Mod $ 155,000 ~1156 Curbs & Gutters-Kentucky/Wms./ Benefit Quincy/Beale #1491 Lowell Add. Curbs & Gutters "K" to "M" ~1492 Hughes Lane Curbs & Gutters ~1530 Baker Street. Landscaping E. Truxtun to 178 Neighborhood Revitalization 1,2, & 4 Low/Mod $ 398,734 Fair Housing Program Benefit Neighborhood Revitalization Loans Slums/Blight Homeless Day Center General Administration PUL $ !85,992 TOTAL BUDGETED FY 86/87 $t,304,105 S.UPLV~ARY OF PROGP~AM FUNDS Source of Program Funds FY 87/88 -' CDBG Entitlement $1,213,000 Program Income (FY 85/86) 9!.105 TOT~ PROGRAM FUA~S FY 87/88 $1,304,105 Proposed Use of Program Income Neighborhood Revitalization Loans ~:' $ 91,105 R13 O MEMORANDUM March 20, 1987 %0 Stanley C, Grady, Community Development Coordinator FROM David Bates, Associate Planner ~ SUBJECT Applications for Community Development Block Grant Funds After publishing the availability of CDBG funds for the 1987 to 1988 fiscal year, we have received funding requests from the City Public Works Department, the City Fire Department and the Boys Club of Bakersfield. You sent a memorandum to all the City departments on January 8, 1987, notifying them that they had until February 27, 1987, to file an application for CDBG funds. Non legal advertisements were placed in the January 28 issue of the Bakersfield News Observer, the January 29, issue of E1Mexicalo and the February 2 issue of the Bakersfield Californian. The notices announced that a CDBG public hearing was to be held at 6 P.M., February 17 in the City Council Chambers and another CDBG public hearing was to be held at 6 P.M., February 19 at the Bakersfield Senior Cente~. Except for staff members, no one attended either meeting. Following is a description of the projects which were submitted as a result of the City's Publicity of the availability of CDBG funds, as well as, a project which the Community Development division is committed to do in Fiscal Year 1987-88. 1. The Public Works Department A. To install the east to west curbs and gutters for the area bounded by Kentucky, Williams, Quincy and Beale. Public Works proposes to do the project design at no cost to the Community Development (C.D.) Division. However, if C.D. wants an outside firm to design the project, then $17,500 should be budgeted for that purpose. NOTE: The north to south curbs and gutters for this. area were done in the current fiscal year. Engineers Estimate $175,000 B. To install two wheel chair ramps on the south side of Columbus Avenue at the Mount Vernon Avenue intersection. ' ' Engineers Estimate $ 1,000 CDBG Applications March 19, 1987 Page 2 2. The City Fire Department A. Extend water main to the intersection of "T" and llth Streets and install a new fire hydrant at the southeast corner. Fire Dept. Estimate $17,800 B. Extend water main to The intersection of Butte and Kern Streets and install a fire hydrant at that location. Fire Dept. Estimate $11,000 3. Boys Club of Bakersfield T~z~[ ~f:~.~l~ The Boys Club proposes to do the' following work at their faci- lity at 800 Monterey Street. Phase I Restore and rehabilitate, the former church building $180,000 Phase II Rehabilitate the adjoining classroom buildings $ 20,000 Phase III Acquire the two adjoining lots to the east $ Z2,000 Construct a new gymnasium $128,000 Total requested from Boys Club $400,000 At the City C.D.'s request~ the Boys Club has also made and an application for County C.D. funds. The Boys Club will not know how to design Phase I unless they know if they can acquire the land for Phase III. If the land is not purchased then the gymnasium would have to be placed in the Phase I building rather than on the newly acquired land. Three options for partial 'funding are as follows: a. Rehabilitate the classroom buildings $ 20,000 b. Acquire the two lots $ 72,000 c. Do both 1 and 2 above $ 92,000 '4. The Community Development Division Project The division is committed to a self help housing project. The estimated cost of 10 lots is $170,000. Up to $130,000 of that amount could be recaptured through a state grant. Probable Cost to City $ 40,000 CDBG Applications March 19, 1987 Page 3 Recapitulation 1. Public Works Department Partial Project Full Project a. Curb and Gutter Project $ 17,500 design $175,000 (Beale & Kentucky) b. Wheel Chair Ramp NA $ 1,000 2. Fire Department Partial Project Full Project a. Fire Protection Improv. NA $ 17,800 (Intersection of "T" and llth Streets) b. Fire Protection Improv. NA $ 11,000 (Intersection of Butte and Kern Streets) 3. Boys' Club Headquarters Partial Project Full Project a. Phase I Rehab Old NA $180,000 Church Building b. Phase II Rehab $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Adjoining Classrooms c. Phase III Buy Land $ 72,000 $ 72,000 Build Gymnasium NA $128,000 Boys' Club Sub-Total $ 92,000 $400,000 4. Self Help Housing NA $ 40,000 Grand Total of Ail Projects $109,500 $644,800 JDB/jlm cc: George Gonzales, Principal Planner M20 MEMORANDUM --'- April 6, 1987 TO Stanley C. Grady, Community Development Coordinator FROM J. David Bates, Associate Planner SUBJECT Late Applicant for Community Development Block Grant Funds on March 31, 1987 we received a late application from Aunt Cherie's Home. At that time, George Gonzales, Principal Planner, told the person who delivered the application that it had been submitted past the dead- line, and that it could not be part of the 1987-88 FY application. That per- son replied that they would speak to'their councilman (the facility is in Pat Smiths' Ward). Following is a brief description of the application. Aunt Cherie's Home provides residential care and counseling for unwed pregnant women and community outreach to other pregnant women. The facility is located at 3811 Mt. Vernon Avenue. Aunt Cherie's has been at that location since November 1984, and they now want to acquire the building on July 1, 1987. They are asking for $150,000 acquisition and $10,000 for rehabilitation. Last year they served 106 pregnant women at the center and 191 women on an outreach basis. JDB/jlm. M24 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT '~A'PPLICATION .... ' ...... ~'~'" . 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE . BAKERSFIELD,~LIFORNIA ' ': ...... 93301 " (8051 326- 3764 A~I.I- CATK)~ ,. ~ ~ -8 -MC-06-0510 a ~ ~T/RECI~ENT 5. E~YER I~NTIF~T~ ~R (EIN) · .~~ . C~ty of'gakersf~eld 95-6000672 ~ ~~u~ . Community Beve]opment :.s~/.o.~ 1501 Truxtun Avenue '* ~ ~"" · ~ . Bakersfield .~ Kern ,.~ . California ,~ 93301 t~~ ~[~ ~~t~ .Stanley C. Grady ~ Community Developm: ar~~ (805) 326-3764 Block Grant/[nt~t]ement Community Development Block Grant Program. This project ~ ~ .... is designed to address local housing needs, upgrade the ~ physical environment and provide for a viable urban ~~ ' community. C4ty o~ Bakersfield, Kern, C~ 32~000 ~ I ~TION . · ~T ~ ~E~ ~ c. STA~ -0- .~ ~ ~E~ ST~T l~. ~E~ il. T~ Is!.213.000 .m~ ~~' ~087 6 1 ~'~~T°~R~*U.S Dept. HUD, L.A. CA 90015-3801 .... ~-86-~C [ ~E~ 21. ~. To ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ YES. ~lS ~ ~ INTENT/~L~T~/A~T~ W~ ~ AV~ TO T~ ~ATE ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T BEEN ~O BY STA~ ~ R~I~ ~ ~, L ~D ~ ~0 ~ /~ ~RE [ RE~E- ~T~ George Caravaiho, City Hanager I I RE~IVED l0 ' 27. ~ TAKEN ~. FU~I~ ~w ~l* ~y I~' I STARTI~ AWAR~D ~ ~ DATE~ 19 1OA~ 19. ~ ~ R~E~ED I ~ c R~RNED ~ L ~RAL $ ~ 31. ~NTACT F~ A~ITI~AL INF~. 132 ~EN~E~ b. ~ .~ ~TE ~ ~ R~RNED F~ EO. t~72 SU~MI~ c STA~ ,~ ~. RE~RKS BY A~ONT TO a. L~L STA ~ ~ · ~FERRED e. OTHER ~,. WIT~AWN , TOTAL , ., ~ y. H.~.~ 7.~,a.4~-01-OO&-8162 424--t03 STANDARD FO~,~ 424 PAGE ~ (R~ 4~ ~Ev~5 EDITI~ ~d b~ OMB C,~, a-lO1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 is the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent, housing, suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate incom~. Consistent with this, the following objectives will be used for the 1987-88 Community Development Program: 1. The elimination of slums and blight and the prevention of blighting influences, deterioration of property and neighborhood and community facilities of importance to the welfare of the community, principally for persons of low and moderate income; 2. The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare, through code enforcement, demolition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related activities; 3. The conservation and expansion of the City's housing stock in order to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for all persons, but principally those of low and moderate income; 4. The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of community services, principally for persons of low and moderate income, which are essential for sound community development and for the development of viable urban communities; 5. A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources and the better arrangement of residential,.commercial, industrial, recreational, and other needed activity centers; 6. The expansion of housing opportunities throughout the City and the revitalization of deteriorating neighborhoods; 7. The restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, architectural, or aesthetic reasons; and 8. The alleviation of physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in areas with populations out-migration or a stagnating or declining tax base. -2- CERTIFICATIONS The grantee certifies that: A. It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and tO execute a community development and housing program; B. Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act of resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final state- ment and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and direct- ing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional information as may be required; C. Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has: (1) Met the citizen participation requirements of §570.301(a)(2) and has provided citizens with: (a) the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate income; and (b) its plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities; (2) Prepared its final statement of Community Development objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with §570.301 (a)(3) and made the final statement.available to the public; D. The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352; 42 U.S.C. §2000d et seq.); and (2) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub.L. 90-284; 42 U.S.C. §3601 et seq.); E. It will affirmatively further fair housing; F. It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other Community Development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under section 106 of the Act and, if applicable, under Section 108 of the Act, during the 1987, 1988, and 1989 program years shall princiPally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 51 percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; G. It has developed a Community Development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (F) above, that identifies Community Development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term Community Development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Act; H. It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been approved by HUD pursuant to §570.306; I. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds provided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occu- pied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless (1) funds received under section 106 of the Act are used to pay the proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title 1 of the Act; or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1); and J. It will comply with the other provisions of the Act and with other applicable laws. George Caravalho, City Manager City of Bakersfield Community Development Expenditure Fiscal Year 1985 Project Expended Community National 7-01-85 to Development Objective 6-30-86 Objective Applicable Applicable Senior Center Rehabilitation 530 4th Street CT 22 164,900 1,2,4 Low/Mod Benefit Public Facilities Panama School Dist. - Child Care 64,000 4 Low/Mod Rehabilitation Program & Services Loans, Grants~ Housing Admin. 964,200 1,2,3,4,6 Low/Mod City Wide Demolition of Substandard Buildings CT 15, 20 & 22 19,400 1,2,3,4,6 Low/Mod Economic Development Sidewalks on south side of 5,400 4 Low/Mod E. Brundage Lane Land Acquisition (Lakeview Avenue) CT 22 51,200 1,2 Prevention/ elimination of slums & blight Neighborhood Revitalization Program CT 22 Loan Development Assistance 124,000 1,2,3,4,6 Low/Mod General Administration-Planning and Management 243,600~ ALL 1,636,700 Proposed Budget FY 87/88 Attachment A I. ENTITLEMENT Current Budget Entitlement: $1,209,000 New Budget Entitlement: $1,213,000 Funding Change: $ 4,000 Percentage Change: .33% Program Income $ 91~i05 91~105 Total Funds Available $1,304,105 $1,304,105 II. PROGRAM BUDGET Sub Program Amounts Percent 651-Administration & Planning $ 185,992 14% 652-Housing Programs & Loans 564,379 43% 653-Neighborhood Revitalization 398,734 31% 765-Capital Improvement Projects 155~000 12% TOTAL $1,304,105 100% III. BUDGET DETAIL 651-Administration & Planning Personnel $ 149,132 Operations 36~860 TOTAL $ 185,992 652-Housing Programs & Loans Programs and Loans $ 400,370 Personnel 132,359 Operations 31~650 TOTAL $ 564,379 653-Neighborhood Revitaliation City/County Joint Fair Housing Program $ 45,000 Neighborhood Revitalization Loans 91,105 Homeless Day Center 175,000 Personnel 83,279 Operations 4~350 TOTAL $ 398,734 765-Capital Improvement Pro~ects #1157 Curbs & Gutter - Kentucky/Wms./Quincy/Beale $ 46,000 #1491 Lowell Add. Curbs & Gutters "K" to "M" Street 21,000 #1492 Hughes Lane Curbs & Gutter 38,000 #1530 Baker Street Landscaping - E. Truxtun to 178 50~000 TOTAL $ 155,000 BUDGET TOTAL $1,304,105 PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS Attachment B CD Objectives National Funds Description Applicable Objectives Budgeted Housing Rehabilitation 1,2,3,4', & 6 Low/Mod $ 564,379 Programs & Services - City Wide Public Works & Facilities 1,2, & 4 Low/Mod $ 155,000' #1156 Curbs & Gutters-Kentucky/Wms./ Benefit Quincy/Beale #1491 Lowell Add. Curbs & Gutters "K" to "M" #1492 Hughes Lane Curbs & Gutters #1530 Baker Street Landscaping E. Truxtun to 178 Neighborhood Revitalization 1,2, & 4 Low/Mod $ 398,734 Fair Housing Program Benefit Neighborhood Revitalization Loans Slums/Blight Homeless Day Center General Administration ALL $ 185,992 TOTAL BUDGETED FY 86/87 $1,304,105 SUMMARY OF PROGRAM FUNDS Source of Program Funds FY 87/88 CDBG Entitlement $1,213,000 Program Income (FY 85/86) 91~105 TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDS FY 87/88 $1,304,105 Proposed Use of Program Income Neighborhood Revitalization Loans $ ' 91,105 Meeting Date: ':, ........ · ......... Agenda Section: · x'- Reports x.\ ._ Agenda Item: TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Approved FROM: Budget and Finance Committee Department Head ~.~'~.f DATE: March 3, 1987 City Manager SUBJECT: Report No. 10-87 from the Budget and Finance Committee regarding Purchase of 10 R-1 Lots for Self-Help Construction. RECOFFE. NDATION: ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO COUNCIL: I_MPL!CATIONS OF ALTERNATIVES: BACKGROUND: 'ALL pertinent background material is available in the Clerk's Office and will be available at the Council Meeting. This material should be reviewed. RPT. BUDGET AND FINANCE coMM2TTEE REPORT NO. 10-87 · . ........................ -March ]1, 1987. ~: ........ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR A~ F~MBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF 10 R-1 LOTS FOR A SELF HELP HOUSING PROJECT On January 7, 1987, the City Council referred this proposal to the Budget and Finance Committee. The Committee considered this item on January 14 and January 27 also on February 11 and 25, 1987. Following is a sunm~ry of the self help housing program which the City proposes to do in association with Self Help Enterprises (SHE) of Visalia: Since 1965 SHE has helped over 3,000 low income families construct their own residences in the South Joaquin Valley. An appli~ati'on will ~b~ ~de to the California Self Help Housing Program (CS~iHP) for funds to pay for the technical and support costs for carrying out the self help program, as well· as, to provide up to $15,000 per house of low interest mortgage assistance. The interest on this assistance can be quite low. The loan can be rolled into a 20 year deferred payment loan which can be forgiven at 10% per year after 10 years of continued occupancy. An application will be made to the California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) for~-~$5~ 30 year mortgages of up to $15',000 per house. SHE will handle almost all the details of. application for funding, recruitment of applicants and construction supervision. The City of Bakersfield will be responsible for the following: 1. Review prepared housing plans and select design. 2. Acquire residential lots and carry land financing until construction is completed and CHFA funds are released. This interim loan would·be subordinated to the construction financing. 3- Subsidize a portion of the land purchase tO the home' owners if the cost of each finished lot exceeds $13,000 per lot. (The lots .will cost $15,000 each) ............ 4. Offer~ an additional lot subsidy if~it becomes .............. ..'~..'~ . .....-. necessary to supplement the financing-package to the homeowners. Attached is a map of the lots for the project which is near the intersection of Pacheco Road and Gaylene Avenue and a letter of commitment from SHE. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council authorize the staff to Purchase~10 R-1 lots for $150,000.00, subject to a self help housing grant being obtained from the state and authorize the Citypto enter into an agree- ment to sell the lots to Self Help Enterprises to construct ten (10) single family homes. Respectfully submitted, Councilmember James H. Childs, Chair Councilmember Donald K. Ratty ~Councilmember Rollie Moore -2- Self-Help ~ 733-9091 ENTERPRISES p.o. Box 251. 220 Soulh Bnooe S~eet. Vmsaha. Calitorm,~ S,,:79. (299) ........ -- .- k~Cf~¥~D .... ... · ..... ~.-, . .- ~ Stanley ~v Program Coordinator City of Bakersfield C~UNiTy DEv. 1501Tru>:tun Avenue Bakersfield, CA S3301 Dear Mr. Grady: This let%er rill serve to confirm our commitment %o york vi%h Zhe City of Bakers- field to prov~e ney housing opportunities for e~ghZ to ten icy-income families in Bakersfield. Self-Help =_n%erprises is commiZted %o ~orking vi%h %he C~.y to complete all facets of %his Project f~nan:ing rill consist of a couple of elements, individual family mcr%gage financing rill be provided through %he California Housing Finance Agency's home mortgage program. Par%i~iDa%ing families ~i!l ge% preferred rates because %hey are icy-in=omo ~n~ are building %heir house bY %he mu%ual se!f-help me%hod. Other financing,, in order %o insure affordabilily %o %hose families, be provided as a subsidy from %he State of ga!ifornia's Self-Help Program f~nding. in addition, %he California Se!f-Help Program rill provide f~nding to pay for %~-~-:"~ ass!stance costs incurred by ~r-~=~ Lnterprises. The DarIiculars of %he resDcnsibS!i%ies of both %he Ciiy ~nd SetfTNe!p Ln%e.-Drises can be Gevetoped later. We should 3oin%!y approach %he State's Housing an~ mun~ly Development Doper%men% %0 develop %he California Self-HelD After %his, ~e can discuss formalizing our re]-%ionsh!D= and vhether %hat re.~u!re a con%fao% of some sort. A% %his time, hoverer, ~ %he City goes forvard vi%h %he land purchase, Se!f-HelD Lnterpr!ses rill move forvard vi%h %he, project. ~ am Dl~ninE %0 al%end %he Cily Co .... 1 meeIing cf J~nuary ?, 1BET, and vi!l be available %o answer any .cues%ions. If you. need ~nv other information from me %his time, please don'% hesiZa%e %o c~l!. 7homY'ichor Progu-,am H~nager for Ney Housing cc: David Be%es, Asso=ia%e Pl~ner nonprofit corporation serving Fresno, Kern. Kings, Maoerz. Merced. Slanislaus and 7ul~re Counties " -, _'J'RACT Fl" 4 5.~/ ",. ..,/. ,~ ., _'_'_' '__ ~'.,: ~, -~, ,.,.,, .~,,, ....... ~ ,~--.'~ ,'./-/ '~'."'. '"'r' '#"; COIISqSTII~ Of 2 511££T$ ~d Till:' CITY .~]!.~,~ ~,~ C£RTIf'IC ATE ,-~~~t-, ............... , ......... .,,..,~ , ..... q , .,,. .... . ~ ~ ............. . .... ~ .... _..~,.,,,,.,,..,.,o" ,, ,, ,-,,. ,.~,,..,,., ,,,, . '~ :. I ____=___ . /. ; ..... '.i ._.,, · .,I ; , ,, ~ . ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~.o .,, , ,.~, , (,,..., · ¢..-..., ~ -:'~ , . .-..~-' ~.' ..... ~' "." ..... ~ .... '~'~' '"'"'"' '"'=-~-~ ' ' --~ ...... ~ .......... ~--'"----'~ ~ ~ -;=T',,-. I · '-:~ ' ~ - ! ':'~'"'" I~ ---J--~---"~,----~--r----'-'r" .... ,'---'-r'~".,'~'"T'.~"T'-~---I .~.,. /,~.~- I -~,- /.~,'- I -~-- I L ,- !: I~ I,.-- I'~ I'~- I'~ h I~ I~ ~ h ~ I , ,.,. I~, I'~ [~ I~ I~ I~ I~, i'~ i~ [ " " ' '~J~ I~' ' '~ ~, ~, ? I ~ h, · ~ ~ z I.', IZ I.', /:! I~ It I.~ /$ I.', /~ I.', 17 I,~ Ii I.,, · i.,~..,~lt,.i.//i :z'z ,.. :.~_ .~. ]. J J~ .~ I~, .r - .....'"'1~ ,,,.,, j~ I~ i",-:'i I~ ' ' I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~/ Iii I~ I~"~'-~ ~ · I~'~1.~_~[I,~ ..~. ~l Z ~ '~ -- "~ ,~-,-~"~'~ ~. '., I.~'1.~ ,,,.., I."~',.,,,' 1~ ::_~1. :'., 1. ~,, ~.";';' ~= ,,:~j. ,,.,,..,, ,~ .,~ .- r..:~.~ -=_ .... --- ,' :7"= ' ~ ~/.,.~iI3'"~ ,,:,,; ¢.,~ ............ .~,,~..,.. LOT ..~ OF.S. ILES /I/.'l,z:)/V'g / L/IA/DS OF ~/ /~.//,,,qGG/,A/ ,.,~',~'.,',,,,,..~,,~., ...... ,,.,.:'." ..... '"' °' : C ~ - ,~-- )""-"-"/~ '~""~ ~ ~-.,u',~'~,~' ' ~) ~-,,,',,~'~" I~ ,.J' /*,'/~',~' i~ ~.~-j#'.4]' SELF HELP HOME CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM July 21, 1986 Attached is a Proposed program from Self Help Enterprises (SHE) for 10 potential home owners to construct their own houses in Bakersfield. Following is a summary of that proposal: Since 1965 SHE has helped over 3,000 low income families construct their own residences in the South San Joaquin Valley. An application will be made to the California Self Help Housing Program (CSHHP) for funds to pay for the technical and support costs for carrying out the self help program, as well as, to provide up to $15,000 per house of low interest mortgage assistance. The interest on this assistance can be quite iow. The loan can be rolled into a 20 year deferred payment loan which can be forgiven at 10~ per year after 10 years of continued occupancy. An application will be made to the California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) for 9.15~ 30 year.mortgages of up to $15,000 per house. SHE will handle almost all the details of application for funding, recruitment of applicants and construction supervision. The City of Bakersfield will be responsible for the following: 1. Submit funding applications after they have been prepared by SHE. 2. Review housing plans and select design (see attached mater~al). 3. Acquire residential lots and carry land financing until con- struction is completed and CHFA funds are released. This interim loan would be subordinated to the construction financing. 4. Subsidize a portion of the land purchase to the homeowners if the cost of each finished lot exceeds $1~3,000 per lot. 5. Offer an additional lot subsidy if it becomes necessary to sup- plement the financing package to the homeowners. R19 Federal Asset Disposition Association 1 Market Plaza Spear St. Tower 38th Floor San Francsico, CA 94105 ATTN: Steve Hawley RE: Purchasing Lots in Presidio S. & L. Receivership Dear Mr. Hawley: The City of Bakresfield is interested in pu~chasidg 10 lots for Self Help Home Construction. Enclosed is a map of Tract No. 4551 on Gaylene Avenue in the City of Bakersfield· tract No. 4551 was owned by Presidio Savings and Loan ~en it went into receivership. Twenty-five of the forty-nine lots have homes built upon them, so there are 24 vacant lots. .We are interested in acquiring the following lots on an all cash sale: 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49 (Please refer to the enclosed map). The City would be willing to pay the appraised value of the land ~ich~ should range between $12,000 to $20,000 per lot. It is possible that the City would be interested in acquiring the remaining 14 lots at a later date. Please respond as soon as possible to the following: 1. Your ability to sell us the lots. 2. Your willingness to sell the ten (10) lots. 3. The procedure you would need to follow in disposing of the lots. 4. The length of time it would take to sell the lots to the City. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Very truly yo~s, ,~_~ ~, ~ ~~ · David Bates Associate Planner JDB/ld 150~ TRUXTUNAV~NU= · BAKERSF~LD."'' FORNIA 93301 ..... . ,._,~1 ~ (805) 326-3764 Self-Heipl ENTERPRISES Plo. Box 351, 220 South Bridge Street, Visalia, California 93279, (209) 733.9091 December 23, 1986 Mr. Stanley Orady Community Development Program Coordinator City of Bakersfield f,~UNIT¥ DEV. 1501Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Grady: This letter will serve %o confirm our commitment to work vith the City of Bakers- field to provide new housing opportunities for eight to ten low-income families in Bakersfield. Self-Help Enterprises is committed to working with the City complete all facets of this project. Project financing will consist of a couple of elements. Individual family mortgage financing will be provided through the .California Housing Finance Agenc~"s home mortgage program. Participating families will get preferred rates because %hey are low-income and are building their house by the mutual self-help method. 0ther financing, in order to.insure affordability to these families, will be provided as a subsidy from the State of California's Self-Help Program funding. In addition, the California Self-Help Program will provide funding to pay for technical assistance costs incurred by Self-Help Enterprises. The particulars of the responsibilities of both the City and Self-Help Enterprises can be developed later. We should jointly approach the State's Housing and Com- munity Development Department to develop %he California Self-Help application. After this, we can discuss formalizing our relationship and whether that will require a contract of some sort. At this time, however, if the City goes forward with the land purchase, Self-Help Enterprises will move forward with the project. I am planning %o attend the City Council meeting of January 7, 1987, and will be available %o answer any questions. If you need any other information from me at this time, please don'% hesitate %o call. ,.~ n~ Thom~s~d. Collishaw Program Manager for New Housing TdC/jas cc: David Bates, Associate Planner A nonprofit corporation serving Fresno, Kern. Kings, Madera, Merced. Stanislaus and Tulare Counties Self-H p[ ENTERPRISES p.o. Box 351, 220 South Bridge Streei, Visalia, California 93279, (209) 733.9091 July 18, 1986 Mr. Stanley Grady Community Development Program Director City of Bakersfield City Hall, 1501Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Grady: Enclosed you w~ll find our proposal %0 work with the City on developing a self- help housing projet% for low-income people in Bakersfield. Ihherent in this proposal is a commitment by Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) to devote staff time and resources in the development and completion of such a project. As you will see, the City now needs to make some decisions relative to location, targeted income group, and level of subsidy. Hopefully, the proposal will outline various possibilities of this nature. We look forward to continuing our relationship and hope that we can see a success- ful fruition of such a project. If there are any questions or clarifications needed, please don'% hesitate to call. Tom Coltishaw Program'Manager for New Housing TC/jas. Enclosure cc: David Bates, Associate Planner A nonprofit corporation serving Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Stanislaus and Tuiare Counties SELF-HELP ENTERPRISES ~ntroduction By .bringing together State'~nd i'ocal pub~i~"~'n~ 'Pr-iva{~ res'ourcesl Se'if-Help ' Enterprises (SHE) and the City of Bakersfield can, cooperatively,'bring homeowner- ship to ten low income Bakersfield families through the sweat-equity construction of their own homes. Resources would include California Self-Help Housing Program (CSHHP) technical and mortgage assistance, California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) mortgages, and if needed, no-interest Deferred Payment Loans from the City to write down the cost of the building lots. Combining these resources with the very significant sweat'equity contribution of family labor new housing can be made affordable to the low income. ' ~r~anizational Ability Operating in a seven-county area of the San Joaquin Valley, Self-Help Enterprises is a private, nonprofit corporation which has for'21 years worked with predomi- nantly rural, ,low income families in the construction of t · counties in SHE s service area ar . . . he~r own homes. The and Tulare. ',~,~_~, ....... ~.Fresno, Kern, Kings, Naaera, Herced, Stanislaus .... ~=~ ~s aeIlned b SHE as · · · fa ........ Y the participation of low income m~les ~n airect services, decision making, and developing skills for self- sufficiency which further the purpose of improving their living conditions. SHE pioneered this approach to rural, low income housing; an approach which has now been adopted by over 60 programs across the na%4on. While the agency 'has developed successful Housing Rehabilitation and Community Development programs, it ~s the New Self-Help Housing program for which SHE rema.ins best known. To date, SHE has supervised over 3,000 low income families in the construction of {heir own homes. SHE's New Housing program is funded primarily by a Technical AssiStance grant from Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). The standard existing loan source for the families is the FmHA Section 502 Loan Program. The City of Bakersfield, however, exceeds the maximum population limits for FmHA eligibility. In its Housing Rehabilitation Program, SHE contracts with small cities and rural counties to implement housing rehabilitation programs funded through the Community Development Block Grant program. In addition, the rehabilitation program is funded by the Department of Labor to provide construction and packaging assistance to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Under a variety of federal grants and con- tracts with private utility companies, the rehabilitation department also weather- izes a substantial number of homes in several sections of SHE's service area. More than 1,000 families annually are benefiting from these housing rehabilitation and weatherization services. The SHE Community Development program provides development assistance to small cities and unincorporated areas to improve inadequate or dangerous water and wastewater facilities. In addition, the Community Development program assists local housing authorities and other developers of rental housing for farmworkers and other low income rural residents. SHE's Community Development program also manages a 37-unit farmworker rental project near Planada, California. The services provided by Self-Help Enterprises to the San Joaquin Valley employ over 120 clerical, accounting, skilled trades and professional staff. Building Sites The city of Bakersfield will need to take the lead role in identifying and securing suitable building sites. Lots within the Redevelopment Area would be suitable . if they were concentrated in one area and preferably contiguous. The .... City could also choose a'location in'a new subdivision .to secure the lots for the pro3ect. The cost of the finished lots is a crucial factor in maintaining affordability to low income families. If the developed lot cost is' over $13,000, the City will have to subsidize the cost from another source. Ihe City will carry the cost of the lots during construction, which can be accomp- lished by taking back a note from SHE. The City will almost certainly need to subordinate its lien to the construction financing SHE secures on individual lots. ^ cost analysis is attached as Exhibit ^, outlining various possibilities for the pro3ect. FinancinK 1. Primary Mortgage - CHFA offers 30-year fixed-rate loans currently at 9.15 percent for income eligible self-help borrowers. They will also waive dis- count points for eligible low income borrowers, thereby making the original down payment more affordable. 2. Mortgage Subsidy - CSHHP offers, mortgage assistance up to $15,000 per iow income family according.to their ability to pay monthly housing costs. This can also decrease the amount necessary for construction financing and later be rolled into 20-year deferred payment loans to the families. The loans are forgiven by 10 percent each year following the tenth year of continued home- owner occupancy. 3. Additional Subsidy - Depending upon overall costs, a further subsidy may be necessary to enable low income families to participate. The City may there- fore need to offer deferred loans on the land or some type of equity sharing program to supplement the financing package. 4. ~ Technical Assistance - California Self-Help Housing Program will award tech- nical assistance grants of up to $100,000 for the loan packaging, construc- tion supervision, and support services necessary to assemble and direct a building group from start to finish. SHE estimates the cost for these ser- vices to be $6,500 per assisted unit. A portion of the technical assistance cost can also be borne by individual CHFA mortgages if necessary. 5. Construction Financing - As CHFA makes loans only at the completion of the · building process, interim construction financing for materials and subcon- tracts will be needed. Construction financing has typically come from private lenders for SHE's CHFA houses. SHE Technical ^ss~stance Self-Help Enterprises would provide complete services for the following activi- ties: CSSHP application preparation, recruiting, loan application processing, counseling, materials purchasing and construction supervision. SHE staff will recruit and screen eligible applicants who express interest in buildin§ their own'homes. Public service announcements and news releases will be. .submitted to media serving the Bakersfield area. The Loan Packager will .evaluate recruited families for eligibility and credit rating and Prepare loan dockets predetermine family eligibility for obtaining a CHFA mortgage. When CH?A's local participating lender, All Valley Mortgage, secures the prequali- fication from CH?A, SHE staff will pro3ect the CSHHP mortgage assistance amount for which each individual family will be eligible. CSHHP mortgage assistance is limited %o a maximum of $15,000 per family. 0ncc recruited, families will be formed into a group which will work together the construction of their homes. In %he self-help process, families work cooper- atively under the supervision of a SHE Construction Supervisor. The families will dig the footings, form, pour and finish the concrete, frame the house, install wood siding, the electrical wiring and the ducting, install windows and complete the finish work (carpentry, paintin~ and floor tile). Families also complete their own landscaping. To increase cost effectiveness and decrease technical assistance costs, the following work is subcontracted: plumbing, drywall, roofing and fencing. Initially, groups will meet %o discuss their needs and to select a house plan which is of appropriate size and design. Many agencies nationally have promoted the design of simple houses that are esthetically pleasing, adequate in space, sanitary, safe', and readily expandable. SHE designed house plans have centralized plumbing, minimum hall space, forced air heat, substantial insulation, and a one or two-car garage, depending on lot size. The roof has asphalt shingles and %he.house is cooled by an evaporative cooler. The birch cabinets are built a% the SHE Cabinet Shop. Samples of floor plans are attached aS Exhibit B, and estimated costs are included in Exhibit A. Prior to actually beginning construction, %he families will meet several t~mes in groups with the assigned Cons%ruction Supervisor to discuss contruc%ion techniques and safety practices. Each family is supplied with a basic set of tools necessary to actively participate in construction. Schedules are arranged so that adult members can maintain their regular 3obs while participating an average of 40 hours per week (per family) in %he construction of the houses. When the houses are ready for occupancy, final application will be made for the individual family mortgages. City of Bakersfield/SHE Coordination The general responsibilities of the City will be as follows: 1. Submit CSHHP application. 2. Secure land and carry during construction. 3. Review plans and select design. 4. Subordinate %o construction financing. The general responsibilities of SHE will be as follows: 1. Develop CSHHP application with the assistance of the City. --. -"2. Secure-CHFA loan commitments · ............... 3. Recruit families (all low-income). 4. Complete loan applications. 5. Provide technical assistance during construction and purchase all materials and subcontracts. Tentative Program Plan and Time Frame: 1. City and SHE agree in concept. 2. City secures (and develops) land. 3. SHE secures take out and construction financing. 4. CSHHP and other secondary financing secured. 5. SHE and City enter into a contract for project implementation. 6. Families prequalified for CHFA loans. 7. Constructionkprocess - sweat equity contribution.- 8. Loans closed, families move in. 9. Open house. 4 'EXHIBIT A M Series Costs/House Type N Series O Series Ilouse* 22,500 22,500 22,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 27,000 27,000 27,000 Fees* 6,500 6,500 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 Land Cost 2__0,00~ ~4,000 ~,OOQ 20,000 14_~QO___~O 8_~OOQ 20,000 ~4,~00 ~,ooQ TOTAL 49,000 43,000 37,000 51,500 45,500 39,500 54,000 48,500 42,500 SWEAT Appraised Value Less cost CA Self-Help ': Subsidy [Max.) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,O00 15,OOO 15 000 15,000 15,000 Amt. to be ' Financed 34,000 28,000 22,000 36,500 30,500 24,500 39,500 33,500 27,500 Min. Monthly PI 280 230 181 300 251 202 324 Payment PITI 325 285 236 355 ' 275 226 (Inc. Taxes,Ins.~ 306 257 379 330 28i Min. Monthly Income to 1,083 950 787 Qualify 1,183 1,020 857 1,263 1,100 937 Min. Annual Income 13,000 11,400 9,440 14,200 12,240 10,280 15,160 13,200 11,246 % County Median 49% 43% 36% 54% Family of Four 46% 39% 57% 50% 43% '~Estimated -'~'i??~ Burton Armstrong, CPA : ' - - ~ ' .... . ,.,er, v,e~ . · '._ i~ 8~nlamm P. Re~, CP^'.:~.fi '~'.~[L: ~' · . 4100 Tnaxtun Avenue, Sutte 200 Bakenfield, Cahfom~a 93309 ....... :. :,:'. :".' ?~-. - '~/':~:'::~ .... tlonorable }{embers of the City Council' _ - _ = :'-~ ' Pa "' Bakersfield, California ' ' Pa = ..... pa -.~',,'" : As a party-in-interest in the auditor selection for the City of '..':'-.',.:5~ ..... "/.55'i.~,.--.' -: ' ' Bakersfield's financial statement audit for the year ended June' 30,' 1987; we' ' ' ~ ..... respectfully disagree with the recommendation of your Budget and Finance ¥' ...... ~:' -'~ "' ".- '-~-':~ Committee in its Report No.. 16-87 to select the firm'of Peat Mawaick., ................ . :~.:~;~?~.~? feel~ngs.or qualifications to them,' Always ~n past audit b~dd~ng ..... ..:.~ ............ ~, .... ...-: ....... :! :'-'!!5)[z~?procedures';~ firms were invited to meet with the committee memberslSf~ some !'- < i".!!~:.~'~!~?~,:reaso~';:-'this year we were not afforded a chance to meet with them. ~'~'::--,:'~17~=.-,-":'~.i':?'~ ,,'!:~,-~:?~'..'.' The' mssue ~s:??.why not select a Bakersfield audit f~rm rather than a CPA ..... :': ','?;?i,i~,~:;;.?' peOple ~':. with 'its. f ine::reputation of quality' auditing 'of Kern` County" ;:/"..,:.i:-~ -'. )!5 ':7:7'.~.:~'~'),:'%.Districti .Kern' County Water· Agency and California State College Bakersf'ield/'/i::;:'::':!';i'7577'. ..: ..... ---~ ~nsignificant difference'.that' should not. preclude the selection of, a quality :" ":":':' :.":/':'!.-We" can' do the"job'~-' we want the' j°b~', and would appreciate. the MEMBER of The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and The California Society of Certified Public Accountants · IdENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN KERN COUNTY 2022 L STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (8os) 322.o36s May 18, 1987 Dear Sir/Madame: I represent the Mental Health ~ssociation in Kern County, a non-profit volunteer agency dedicated to assisting the mentally ill adults in Kern County. For the past several years, we have leased a building in the redevelopment area at 2022 "L" Street. Our major effort from this location has been the Kilburn Center, a socialization program for the chronic mentally ill. From the attached association office, we have administrated and/or funded a variety of other needed mental health programs such as a payee program, and "I'm Thumbody", a self awareness program for second graders. We have maintained all of these programs through our own fundraising efforts, but hard times are on us and we have had to close the Kilburn Center. We are working hard to preserve our other programs, as well as to "mothball" the Kilburn Center until we are able to secure a stable funding base. We would like to request your assistance in this process. We have been paying $600 a month as rent on the building. We would request that this be reduced to only a nominal fee or to no rent at all. We do agree to continue our current levels of liability insurance on the building. If you have any questions regarding this request, or need any further information, please call Joyce Haack at 322-0365, or myself at 861-2251. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ¥6urs truly,. Fred Hawley PRESIDENT FH:jyh A Non-Profit Educational and Service Organization Chapter of the California Division of the National ~4ssociation for Mental'Healt'h FEBRUARY 6, 1987 TO: BUDGET REVIEW AND FINANCE COMMITTEE SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT REGARDING SEEZ CONTRACT NEGOTIATION Since November 13, 1986, when the Budget Review and Finance Committee first discussed the 'subject of a new contract for services with the SEEZ Corporation, extensive discussions have taken place. The SEEZ request was for a continuation of financial support for their market- ing effort in the "Enterprise Zone" for a period of one year at a funding level of $65,500. After a series of meetings between City and County staff, and repre- sentatives and staff of the SEEZ Corporation, an implementation schedule for a marketing program, as designed by SEEZ, was prepared (attached "Schedule A"). This schedule has been accepted by the SEEZ board with some reservations based on the magnitude of the work program. Simultaneously, City management met with the Board of Director's of SEEZ to negotiate a contract that would accomplish two basic goals: 1. To properly and adequately market the "Enterprise Zone" area; and 2. To establish a mechanism for financial independence for the SEEZ Corporation. A proposal was made which would provide SEEZ the requested funding level for a six month period and then reduce this support to a level equal to fifty percent (50%) of the requested amount for the next six months. At the end of this one year period SEEZ would be independent and would not request additional funding. SEEZ has approved and accepted the proposal for the first six months (ie: full funding) but has submitted a counter proposal for the second six months (attached). A contract has been prepared and is currently being reviewed by County Counsel. This contract covers the first six month period. After review by the City Attorney's Office, with the approval of the Budget Review and Finance Committee, the contract will be presented to City Council on February 25, for approval and execution. Your direction regarding the counter proposal from the SEEZ Corporation for the second six month period is requested. bz 4: BFCR. 1 SCHEDULE "A" CD Activity #36.86.2 - Employment and Economic Incentive Act Marketing Program PURPOSE The SEEZ Corporation prepared a Program Area marketing plan and initiated implementation of marketing efforts pursuant to a previous agreement between the CITY, COUNTY and SEEZ. This agreement is to enable SEEZ to continue the Program Area marketing program in order to facilitate location of new business and promote expansion of existing businesses within the Program Area and thereby create new employment opportunities for area residents, principally those with low and moderate incomes. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY SEEZ Task 1.0 NEWSLE~ PUBLICATION SEEZ shall publish and distribute a quarterly newsletter to inform and educate the targeted audience prescribed herein regarding new developments, programs, and incentives which effect Program Area businesses and area residents. A. PRODUCT: Form: Two pages printed both sides on 8.5 x 11 inch paper stock with area provided for addressing and postage purposes (can be printed on 8.5 x 22 inch paper folded). Schedule: First issue to be published within 60 days of agreement execution and quarterly thereafter. Quantity: SEEZ shall cause to be published a sufficient number of copies to distribute to the selected distribution list and to satisfy documentation requirements of CITY and COUNTY specified herein. Quality: Newsletter shall be written in a professional manner. Suggested editorial guidelines include the U. ~S. News and World · Report 'Stylebook, ~Assoctated Press Stylebook, United Press .I. nternational Styleguide, or other appropriate professionaI ' styleguide. Printing should be offset on 24 pound or better paper stock. All photographs should be screened. Documentation: Twelve COpies of the finished newsletter and a copy of the mailing list shall be delivered to both CITY and COUNTY within five days of publication. B. DISTRIBUTION: : - Identified Existing Program Area Businesses; - Businesses and residents that have requested information regarding the Program Area and the incentives available therein; -- Local, state and federal government representatives with interest in the Program Area; CITY and COUNTY reserve the right to identify additional representatives to receive copies which ...... may-not have--COmmunicated-a- psecific--interest. -- -Service agencies which provide services to Program Area businesses and High Density Area employees; and - Others as requested by CITY and COUNTY. C. '-CONTENT~: ~--~onten~s should'be written to address the concerns of the entities on the distribution list. Included in the contents shall be: - A calendar of Program Area related events WORKING PAPER ~ - Inform about specific entities whi, -could provide assistance to Program Area businesses and or residents of the High Density Unemployment Area - Other topics as outlined in the SEEZ marketing plan, an ex.tract of which is attached to and incorporated herein as Attachment 1. D. CCPE~: SEEZ shall provide for all writing, editing, layout, graphics, addressing, postage', distribution, and any other task or cost associated with the publication and distribution of the newsletter. SEEZ shall be responsible to prepare and maintain an appropriate addressee list for distribution purposes. 2.0 CALL-ON BUSINESS PRCERAM SEEZ shall conduct a "call-on business program" to acquaint local businessmen with the benefits available to business located within Program Area and to encourage their application to the State for Qualified Business certification. A. PRODUCT: ~requency: A minimum of twenty-six businesses shall be visited monthly. Of these, at least twenty-one shall ~e located within the Program Area. Format: Businesses shall be provided information, brochures, and qualification forms. The benefits of the Employment and Economic Incentive Act shall be briefly explained and the business shall be encouraged to qualify. A follow-up telephone call should be made within one week of the personal contact to all businesses with any potential for benefit pursuant to the Employment and Economic Incentive Act. Documentation: A copy of a completed contact form, attached hereto as Attachment 2, for each contacted business, shall be furnished to COUNTY and CITY within two weeks of the visit to the business. Other: Any Businesses which needs information regardin~ financing, the qualification process or which has any related questions shall be referred to the appropriate public agency possessin~ specific expertise. This referral shall be documented on the contact form. 3.0 WCRKSHOP REGARDINC PROGRAM AREA BENEFITS SEEZ shall organize and sponsor a workshop regarding the Program Area, its benefits to assist businesses located within the Program Area and business contemplating locating to the Program Area. · A. PRODUCT: Agenda: The format of the meeting should follow that outlined in that section of the MarketinE Plan, attached hereto as Attachment 3 or otherwise as approved by CITY and COUNTY. Schedule: The workshop shall he held within five months of execution of this agreement. Other: SEEZ shall have all responsibility including, but not limited to, arranging for speakers professionally knowledgeable regarding the Employment and Economic Incentive Act and its provisons regarding incentives to business, preparation and distribution of - invitations.,-and securing- a site-for the workshop. Documentation: COUNTY and CITY shall be furnished for the list of those invited and .those who attended. 4.0 ~ SPEAKERS BUREAU SEEZ shall develop an-~ ~00~r-~i~a~e ';--~'~iedgeable group of speakers from within the SEEZ organization to promote the Program Area and its benefits to various audience as specified herein. ORKING PAPER Schedule: A minimum of one presentation per month should be made to one of the targeted audiences. Targeted Audience: Trade organizations; professional organizations; with business orientation, service clubs; and public affairs programs. Documentation: Report monthly on presentations conducted, to include name of group, list of speakers, topics discussed number of persons in audience, any questions from audience which need follow-up by a government entity. 5.0 INFRASTRUCIURE ASSESSMENT SEEZ shall investigate, analyze and make recommendations to the COUNTY and CITY staff regarding financing mechanisms to develop infrastructure necessary to effectively market land designed for industrial and commercial land uses within in the Program Area. PRODUCT: The CITY and COUNTY shall be furnished a report recommending and justifying infrastructure financing mechanisms. Included in this report should be an assessment of feasibility, rough cost estimates, and prioritization of improvements. Schedule: This report should be completed 150 calendar days of execution of this agreement. Include a draft after 100 calendar days fro review by County and City Engineering staff and final within calendar days. 6.0 TARGETED MARKETING SEEZ shall refine the targeted marketing study presented in the marketing plan and distribute information to businesses within identified industrial sectors. PRODUCT: Study: SEEZ shall review accepted standards of site location in comparison with conditions in the Program Area in order to compile a targeted industry list. (COUNTY or CITY will supply references dealing with standards and relevant information regarding corresponding portions of the program area located within their jurisdiction. ) Dissemination of Information:. SEEZ shall use the targeted industry list to mail Program Area tax information and marketing brochures to identified industries with 50 °r more employees listed in the California Manufacturer, s Re~ister. Documentation: SEEZ shall furnish COUNTY and CITY a copy of the targeted industry list and all analytical documentation utilized to generate the list and a copy of the mailing list used for distribution within five days of mailing of information. Follow-up: SEEZ shall respond to all requests for additional information and or refer to governmental entities with specific required expertise. Documentation: SEEZ shall furnish COUNTY and CITY with copies of a completed contact form for-each follow-up contact (Attachment 2-). - Schedule: Targeted industries Bhall be identified within 90 calendar days of of agreement execution; mailings should be completed within 120 calendar days of agreement execution. ?.0 !~QUIRy_ RESPONSE/_ON SI ..~.~_.CQNTACT SEEZ shall provide a coordinated response to inquiries and 'otherwise demonstrated interest by business representatives concerning the P~ogram Area and provide written information, and other assistance as necessary which may include on-site tours for serious Program Area prospects. --3-- WORKING PAPER PRODUCT: Format: SEEZ shall follow the guidelines deVeloped in the marketing plan for identifying and Handling Prospects on Site, an extract of which is attached .hereto as Attachment 4. Prospect Identification: In addition to the prospect identification specified in Attachment 4, prospects should be identified via the other tasks performed pursuant to this agreement. Schedule: As deemed necessary by SEEZ, COUNTY and CITY. Documentation: A completed contact form (Attachment 2) shall be submitted to COUNTY and CITY within five days of contact. Follow-up: SEEZ shall respond to all requests for additional information and/or refer to governmental entities with specific required expertise. 8.0 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES SEEZ shall coordinate with other agencies involved in economic development efforts within the COUNTY and CITY so as to supplement their efforts to market the County and City with Program Area information and to avoid duplication of efforts. PRODUCT: Distribution of Information: SEEZ shall provide brochures and other Program Area information to the Board of Trade, CTmmber of Commerce, and other appropriate economic development and employment development agencies. Site Inventory Documentation: SEEZ shall maintain and update the site inventory data bank at the Bakersfield C1m~mber of Commerce for sites in the Program Area. SEEZ shall update and supply copies of business inventory information to COUNTY and CITY. SEEZ shall provide copies of ail site information to County Community Development Program Department and City Economic Development Division. Frequency: ~agoing as new sites and other sources of information are identified and/or produced. IMPACT To qualify the proposed ~Snployment and Economic Incentive Act Program Area pursuant to State Law, the HUD Pocket of Poverty criteria was used utilizing 1980 Census Data. Of the 15,051 persons identified as being unrelated individuals or members of families, ~0,559 or 70.02 percent were of low or moderate income. Additionally, 5,054 persons (55.2 percent) were identified as having incomes below the poverty level. The impact of this community economic development effort will be to make new jobs available to community residents and stimulate the well being of the community. BUDGET ESTIMATE · SIX MONTH . · ..... BUDGET General Operating Costs: Liability Insurance (1 year policy) . $ 250.00 (Present coverage expires July 17, ~987) Personnel Costs: .............. Salary~ and Benefit~' L-(pr~je~t-c60'r-dih-at~5~r based on 40 hour work week) 18,000.00 Office Help, approx. 8 months. Balance by SEEZ 4,130.00 WORKING PAPER Office and Utiliti . Office Space and Utilities 1,200.00 'Telephone Service 1,500.00 Office Furniture and Rental 850.00 Equipment and Services: Graphic Arts, Reproduction, and Mailing Costs 3,000.00 Office Supplies (expendable) 600.00 Office Equipment Insurance, Maintenance and Rental 450.00 Travel (Reimbursed at rate of County) 1,000.00 Interest on Operating Capital Loan 50.00 SUBTOTAL $31,030. O0 Contingencies $ 1,720.00 TOTAL $32,750. O0 SEEZ NEWSLETTERS OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the newsletter are: 1. To provide education on the incentives offered. 2. To develop an optimism about the program area by demonstrating businesses that are benefit- ing from participation in the program. 3. To generate increased interest by those who may have been considering the enterprise zone. 4. To foster a sence of collective spirit about the program area. FORMAT: The newsletter should be 2-4 pages iN length, FREQUENCY: The newsletter should be published quarterly. AUDIENCE: The newsletter will be targeted specifically to those businesses currently in the program area, and can be distributed to those who have expressed an interest in the program area. CONTENTS: Contents of the newsletter should include the following: 1. Each newsletter should highlight one SCHEDULE "A" - ATTACHMENT 1 particular facet of the tax incentives in some detail~ 2. Each newsletter should profile a business that is cur- rently operating in the program area, and should 9ortray how that business has been improved through participa- tion in the Employment Incentive program (Entirely dif- ferent types and sizes of businesses will be profiled to assure identification by a variety of business owners.) 3. SEEZ may want to highlight a qualified community service program currently operating within the program area. This will provide both human interest and education. 4. SEEZ should provide insight as to ways in which SEEZ cab assist businesses interested in the program (such as suggestions as to financial resources, incubator infor- mation, enterprise zone workshops, etc.) 5. The tone should be optimistic while providing factual information about growth in the area. This will help to change perceptions both within the'program area and held by.the entire business community. -2- SOUTHEAST METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD "ENTERPRISE ZONE" CONTACT RECORD L~Cal C:':~t. Cc~tac-t: Date: Company Contact - -- Name Ti'~le' Ph-o'6e# Company Name Address .... Street City state z'i'p ..... Other Related Contact {If Applicable) · Name Fitie F~o'n'e-~ Type of Business -'- Proposed for: expansion of existing E.Z. business start up expansion of local (non E.Z.) business expansion of non local business _ Current # of Employees in EJZ~ Proposed I of Employees in E; Z: Proposed new E~Z; Jobs: Number Type: Current Project Status: Type of Assistance Requested: Actions Taken: Date Action By {Initial CDPEZ-O01 SCHEDULE "A" - ATTACHMENT 2 SOUTHEAST ENTERPRISE ZONE GOAL: TO assist those who are considering the Enterprise Zone by providing education in legislation, incentives and the certification process. OBJECTIVE: Develop the concept for an Enterprise Zone Workshop to meet the above stated goal. Prospective Agenda I. Welcome and Introductions II. Southeast Enterprise Zone: How it can help your ~usi- ~e$s A. Incentives 1. State 2. Local III. Key Facets of the Legislation A. Qualified Community Service Program B. Requirements for Certification IV. The certification Process A. Procedures B. Explanation of Form C. Mock Form Completion and Certification Process SCHEDULE "A" - ATTACHMENT3 SOUTHEAST ENTERPRISE ZONE, cont... V. Public Assistance Available A. Permitting Process B. Public Works City County (as appropriate) C. Job Training Opportunities D. Financing Availabilities (Portion V would briefly explain some of the oppor- tunities available in the Enterprise Zone. -2- HANDLING PROSPECTS ON SITE The handling of prospects on site will be done in a structured fashion, to assure that the prospect receives all appropriate. information in a timely manner, and to assure the site visit will be arranged according to the specific information. The Process will be as follows: 1. Identify Prospect: The prospect will indicate the intention to view potential sites. 2, Determine Prospects Needs and Requirements: The purpose of this is two-fold. First, when the prospect arrives the necessary information and/or agency representatives can be at hand. Secondly, specific site visits will be preselected. 3. Arrange Site Locations in Advance: Locations will be selected according to (2) above, and the best appearing transportation routes from site to site will be determined. - 4. A Site Committee will then be appointed. This will vary, but may include for example representatives from the Board of Trade, Chamber of Commerce, County Community development and/or City Economic Development Departments or other agency representatives. The goal is to provide as much information through as few commit- tee members as possible. 5. Site Visit Occurs: After greeting the prospect, a brief- i-ng is held to acquaint the prospect with the sites to be examined. After all sites have been viewed, a final briefing is held, with a question an answer period. 6. Evaluation:. After the prospect departs an evaluation of the prospect and the visit is made by the Site' Committee. Initial determinations can be made as to potential negotiation points. 7. Follow Through: The prospect is then contacted to determine which course of action should be taken. Actions for follow through may be multiple, until pros- pect has made a commitment. SCHEDULE "A'l - ATTACHMENT 4 SEt Z 'CORPOR ION (805) 322-1801 Office: ~ Mailing Address c/o 1326 E. California Ave: 2000 S. Union Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93307 Bakersfield, CA 93307 ~,~.,~ co~.~,~ February 2, 1987 BILL LEWIS President (805) 832-2S21 George Caravalho JAMES 'Curly~' BARTON City ~ager Vice Pr~ident City .of ~ersfield ~8os) 8~o98 1~ T~tun Ave. ~OWA~O S,LV~R ~ersfield, C~ifornia 93~1 (805) 83.1122 D. S. (Don) BRINDLE ~ ~. Carav~ho, (805) 831-2253 LI~DA EVlSTO~ ~e~ ~e~ev o~ ~he ~o?o~e~ ~e~ e~o~ ~om · Proj~tC~rdinator ~ ~d Co~ ~e~ ~u~ed ~o ~,~,~,~, ~ecem~e~ (805) 322-1801 ~s ~e ~ o~ ~ec~o~8 o~ ~.~.~. ~ou~ ~e ~0 su~t a co~ter propos~ red,ding the l~t six months of fin~cing b~ed entirely upon satisfactory perform~ce during the first six months. The City/Co~ty contribution of the l~t six months m~ be reduced by ~ amount up to 5~ of S.E.E.Z. Inc. fin~cial net worth b~ed on ~ audit of S.E.E.Z. Inc. fin~ces. ~erefore, fin~cing representing S.E.E.Z. contribution ~d the bal~ce from the ~ents, will be gun,teed. We are aware that under the proposed budget it will not be ~ossible to ~erform ~l t~ks within the proposed budget and we ~e prepped to use our best effort in order to co~lete-~l items on the "~st of Responsibilities". Yours truly, Bill Lewis President, S.E.E.'Z. B (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -Employer Sponsored Child Care Project JA[4 0 2.~,~ ~ -Respite Care [C~7 - Child Care Information Service CITY IV, ANA~-R S OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : John Stinson DATE: December 31, 1986 FROM: Wendy Way/~ SUBJ: ?RESENTATI'ON TO CITY COUNCIL BUDGET COMMITTEE RE THE CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE INITIATIVE PROJECT Enclosed please find the following materials to be distributed to the Budget Review Committee. 1. California Child Care Initiative Funders 2. Budget Income Sheet 3. Child Care Supply & Demand Data 4. Information on California Child Care Initiative Partici- pants related to ethnic background, age, geographic area and income level. I will be bringing a map demonstrating the distribution of new child care providers (trainedl- through':the' project) at the January 7, 1987 Meeting. ww/js Attachment 420 18th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 805/322-7633 322-7418 Decemb6r 1986 CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE INITIATIVE FUNDERS YEAR 1 YEAR 2 PRIVATE SECTOR BankAmerica Foundation $100,000 $100,000~ Mervyn's' lO0,O00. . lO0,O00 Pacific Telesis Foundation 50,000 lO0,.O00 Ford Foundation - lO0,O00* Chevron U.S.A. Inc. lO0,O00 50,000* American Express Foundation 50,000 75,000* Wells Fargo Foundation 35,000 50,000 Pacific Gas & Electric Company 25,000 15,000' Northrop' .25,000' TRW 25,000* The Clorox Company Foundation 25,000 20,000 California Community Foundation 25,000 20,000 Security Pacific Foundation 20,000 - McKesson 15,000 25,000* General Telephone of California 15,000 30,000* The Ahmanson Foundation lO,O00 15,000 The Fritts Family/Bakersfield 5,000 ** Californian Foundation Times Mirror - 25,000* Packard Foundation 15,000' Pfassinger Foundation - lO,O00* TOTAL PRIVATE $575,000 $800,000 PUBLIC SECTOR US Dept of Health & Human Svcs - $150,000 State of California $100,000 250,000*** City and County of San Francisco 25,000 ** Los Angeles County lO,O00 ** Contra Costa County lO.,O00 ** Sacramento County ~ lO,O00 ** City of Sacramento 10,000 ** Kern County-~ - lO,O00 City of Bakersfield - lO,O00* City of Santa Monica - 5,000 City of Walnut Creek 5,000* TOTAL PUBLIC $165~000 $430,000 GRAND TOTAL $740,000 $1,230,000' GOAL $700,000 $1,250,000 NOTE: The San Francisco Foundation acts as fiscal intermediary for the Initiative. Its services are donated as an inkind contribution. * PropOsal s pending ** Not yet approached for continuing support " ~ *** 4-to-1 match requirement CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE INITIATIVE PROJECT BUDGET 1986-87 '$43,341 INCOME City of Bakersfield ? County Of Kern $10,000 Mervyns Bank of America [contributions combined Pacific Telesis to supply the remainder Pacific Gas & Electric of the Community Connection Wells Fargo For Child Care budget] Chevron COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE SummaryFindings - Greater Bakersfielc~ Area Child care Information Project July, 1986 SUPPLY FACTS o In 1986, there are 233 active family day care homes and 93 group child care centers with the capacity to serve 6,831 children in the Greater Bakersfield area. o Almost t~ in 5 child care.'spaces are in child care centers rather than family day care homes. ° Chly 19 percent of the total capacit'y in day.care .homes and centers is subsidized for low income families with public dollars. Almost all of the subsidy is in child care centers. o In 1986, child ,'care fees average $2,#50 'a year for full-time care (8-10 hours/ day) for one preschool child in private care. Average:.full-time infant care fees are Sg,000 annually in centers and almost $3,000 in homes. o Seventy-t~o percent of.all centers in Greater Bakersfield are private, non-profit, The .remaining are for-profit businesses, mostly "mom and pop" in nature, rather than chain operations. o Only 66 percent of child Care centers are open year-round and only four centers and thirteen Family Day Care Homes offer employed parent.s child care. services during non-traditional Working hours. o There are only 277 licensed spaces for children under the age of two in child care centers in Greater Bakersfield. * There are currently no services available for children who are mildly ill.. Data compiled from surveys conducted by Community Connection for Child Care during the summer o£ 1986. COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE Summary Findings Greater Bakersfield Child Care Information Project DEMAND FACTS * There are '70,$32 children 0-13 years living in the Greater Bakersfield Area; ' 35, t~00 under the age of 6 and another 35, t~00 between the ages of 6 and 12. ° In 1986, child care centers and family day care homes in Greater Bakersfield are able to serve~only 61% of the children from birth - 1'3 years needing care while their parents work.' OVer 10,000 children cannot be served by existing licensed services. * Based on the increasing number of infants and preschoolers, the rising number of single parent families, .and the fact that 60% of all mothers work outside the home, the need for child care spaces will continue to grow. * In 198:5, CommUnity Connection for Child Care handled child care requests for over 3,600 children, over five percent of. the entire Greater Bakersfield population Of children under !3 years. · Twenty-four percent were infants and toddlers under 2; eighty-two percent, had working parents and over half needed care full-time. o Ol those parents seeking child.care last year, '72% of parents preferred care ina family.. 'day ~ae.e home;' I~ is believed that this preference relates .. to the infant boom, and parents desire to h~'ve their children in a home-like setting. ~ Statistical information p~ovided by the Kern County. Council of Governments CALIFORNIA CHILD'CARE INITIATIVE DATA YEAR 1 of Co nunity Connection For Chi.ld "Care Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percen~ 93268 ~ I 2.0 2.0 2.0 93280 2 4.1 4.1 6~1 93304 10 20.4 20.4 '26.5 93305 2 4.1 4.1 30.6 93306 4 8.2 8.2 38.8 93307 4 8.2 8.2 46.9 93308 4 8.2 8.2 55.1 93309 12 24.5 24.5 79.6 .93311 I 2.0' 2.0 81.6 93313 I 2.0 2.0 83.7 93527 3 6.1 ' 6.1 89.8 93555 3 6.1 6..1 95.9 93561 2 4.1 4.1 100.0 TOTAL 49 100.0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing cases 0 need to earn income · Valid Cum Value LabeI Value Frequenc~ Percent Percent Percent very important I '24 49.0 49.0 49.0 somewhat important ' ' 2 17 34.7 34.7 83.7 not very important 3 3 6.1 ·6.1' 89.8 no~ a~ all important 4 5 10.2 10.2 100.0 TOTAL' 49 100.'0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases 0 can fulfill community need Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very'important I 37 75.5 ' 75.5 75.5 somewhat important 2 10 20.4 20.4 95.9 not very important 3 I 2.0 2.0 98.0 not at all important 4 I 2.0 , 2.0 100.0 TOTAL 49 100.0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases 0 ~ Cai. Child Care Ir~Iiative Data " ., Ye~'r i of COmmunit~wConnection for Child Care age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent .Percent 21-25 yrs 2 6 12.2 12.2 12.2 26-35 yrs 3 27 55.1 55.1 67.3 36-45 yrs 4 12 24.5 24.5 91.8 46-55 yrs 5 2 4.1 4.1 95.9 56-65 yrs 6 2 4.1 4.1 100.0 TOTAL 49 100.0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases 0 married? ,~ Valid 'Cum ValueLabel Value Frequency Percent' Percent Percent yes · I ' 44 89.8 89.8 89.8 no 2 5 10.2 10.2 100.0 TOTAL 49 100.0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases ~ . spouse employed? · · ' ..... ' .... Va~lid. .... Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent , Percent yes 1 43 ' 87.8 -.' 97.7 97.7 no 2 I ' 2.0 . 2.3 100.0 · 5 10.2 MISSING · TOTAL ' 49 100.0" 100.0 Valid Cases 44 Missing Cases '5 -call Child Care In ative Data Year 1 of Community Connection for Child Care ethnicity ~ , Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent white 1 35 71.4 71.4~ 71.4 black 2 9 18.4 18.4 89.8 hispanic 3 3 $.1 $.1 95.9 native american 5 -. 1. 2.0 2.0 98.0 other 6 1 2.0 2.0 '100.0. TOTAL 49 100.0 100.0. Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases 0 highest education '~ . Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent some HS'or less I 5 10.2 10.2 10.2 HS or GED 2 12 24.5 24.5 34.7 voc-tech school 3 3 6.1 6.1 '40.8 some college 4 26 53.1 53.1 93.9 bachelors degree : 5 I '~ ' 2..0 2.0 95.9 some grad school 6 1; 2.0 2.0 98.0 graduate degree 7 I 2.0 2.0 ...100. TOTAL 49 , 100 0 100.0 Valid Cases 49 Missing Cases 0 . · - .' '~ '. household income ' . .... Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent .Percent Percent. under $10000 " I 7 14.3 ·14'.6 14.6 $10000 to $14999 2 ' 10 '20.4 20.8 35.4 $15000 to $19999 '3 5" 10.2 10.4 45.8 $20000 to $24999 4 9 .. 18.4 18.8 64.6 $25000 to $29999 -' "5 6 12.2 '12.5 77.1 $30000 to $34999 6' 3 . 6.1 6.3 83.3' $35000 to $39999 '7 . $40000 to $49999 ' 8 3 '' .6.1 6.3 .. 97.9 $50000 or more '- 9 I ' ·'·2.0 2..1 100.0 .. . I 2.0 ·MISSING TOTAL 49 '" 100.0 100.0 . Valid Cases ' 48 ·'.Missing Cases :1 '~ ' ' '' At the City Council meeting of December 10, 1986, Sister Margaret of 322 Lakeview submitted petitions with 656 names regarding the property of 510 Lakeview. This issue was referred to the Budget and Finance Committee for further study. OW Pursuant to Section 2.08.080 of the Municipal Code (Ordinance No. 1595 N.S.) Anyone wishing to speak before the Council regarding a subject other than Public Ilearings shall fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Clerk before the meeting. Address: Telepho.e Number: Subject Matter: ~": 322 Lakevlew Avenue November 11, 1986 · . Bakersfield, California 93307 TO: ~,E~BE~3 OF THE CITY CO%%qCIL OF ~i~ CI'~ OF B~E~F~ELD ~, the ~dersi~ed residents and l~d.o~ers in the lakeview ~ area, Bakersfield, Califo~ia, ur~ the city of B~ersfield ~o make it possible for King's 5~ission, Inc. to have possession of that ce~ain real property located at 510 Lake- view Avenue, on the' co~er of Lakev~ w and l{alston. The subjec~'.pr~erty to ~ used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing the h~eless and the needy. The progr~s lnlEla~e by the mission '~11 include self helps ~ich ~ ea~estly believe %~11 ~ a grea~ ~nefit to the pe~le in ~he comm~i~y · and help to heautify.Lakeview Avenue. 322 Lakevlew Avenue Bakersfield, California 93307 '-' i::~ November 11, 1986 " ' ~::' City CounciL?Members ,~ Bakersfield, 'California ' ' '"' We, the undersigned residents and landowners ix the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge the city to make it possible for King's 5~ission, Inc., to have poss,ssion of that. certain proper~y located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on' %he corner of Ralston and Lakeview Avenue, Bakersfield, California." The subject property to be used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing the homeless and the needy. The prog%-ams initiated by the missi'on will include self helps which we e,,;.rnestly believe will be a great benefit to the people in ghe commmity and help ..,,.,. to beautify Lakeview Avenue it ........ . ' . b,~ · ', · ~'~' · '. ' .~ .... '. ,~ ~ .... ::. ~¥. ,,! . ~ ,. ':: ". , " ", .t · '... '.."q- . , '.~ - '' ."~' : *"~ ' '." ' ' '..:~ "::" "--' . :~ ~'1"'" :': ".L,~I' ~ .'~"~'./. '~",'"~ :: . "~1~ · ; }' ' '. .... '. '. ~' . ':: ' '"~ .......'. : ~'" ~ '".'~: ~":.':~i~ ' ' ~ · ','": '. (':'.." j ~::.:','' ... '. .: /2 ','[. :..'. .'.. ',"~.' '. :: ','~.:~. "[ J'.'~'21.'.'.' ~:"','7'ftf~?~'.'".~,"..." ; ,..',.~ ..": · ':" ' ?.,? .'." '"' ' ' " ''~" "", '"~' ':'": ~ : '"?.~'~ ":'.' ' '~ .... "'? ;: "' .' ':'"::""' ' ' ' 'i,"."" ,' 't ~.. · ' · ' · · ' .' ' ~ :' ' ' ' ' '~ ' .' ~ ' ~,' " . . .. . . ... ,. ....? . . ~':~ ... .. , .~-~ ~. ... ..,,,~. ~'. ;~: . .. . - '"" ~" "~ ........ ~'~ :~~' ,, :.'..."' ".' ' .. ' · .." .. i · :. .l ~~" :' '.. "..:..~.,~~' ".,:.' ~' i".'. .. ' .... ... · ~. . '.. ' j :~ ...'. :.....;:... ,......~ :..'... ~.~__; _.~.~ ...... ~_. TO::' B~EMBEI{s", THE ITY, COUNCIL :OF:THE CITYi OF~,BmERSFIELD "l~b, th~ rmdor~d re~dent~' ~d' l~ndomor~ '~n'th~' L~keV~ow to m&e ik posSi'bl~ for I~ing's b~ission, ..In~.' to l~ave possession of that ~er~in.'~al pr~erky:~looa~ed ~at..:510 Lakeview '~e ~ubjeot p'r~erky~S 'ko ~ used as :a'~soue mis~i'0n, .feeding' and: housing 'khe hmeles~ 'and the 'needy. "~ The' progr~s ~nik~aked TO: MD~BE~$ OF THB CZ~ COUNCTL OF ~E 'CI~ OF B~E~FZELD '.¢: , reszden[s and lando~ers i'n ~he Lakevie~ ~ :" area, Bakersfield, Califo~ia, u~e ~he city of Bakersfield ~.. %o make i~ possible for ~ing's ~ission, Inc. to have possession of that certaia ~al pr~e~y l~a%ed a% 510 Lakeview :. Avenue, on th~ corner of L~eview ~d ~alston. -'.ii;. ~ The s~jec[ pr~e~y is .to ~ used as a rescue mission, .feedi'~ :.. ~d housing the h~eless Cd the needy. The pr~r~s initiated by the mission ~11 .include self helps ~ich ~ earnestly ..... ~lieve will ~ a.grea~ ~nefit to the pe~le in ~he c~m~i~y '~ ., and help to ~au~ify Lakeview Aven~. .~. .::' ": .... : :,ri .! !. :~ · I r":l,'~i'..~:i::. '~! i TO, Mt-~BERS OF:THE CITY COUNCIL OF, THE CiTW::oF: B/KE~$FIEtD ~'~ '~ne ~oers~ea res~dents~and,lilando~r~ in;the Lakevie~ area, Bakersfield~. California, 'u~e the city.of~.Bakersfield .: to make it.poSSible for King'.s Misslon,"Inc 't° have on of'that ce~ain: ~al prser~Y l~oca%ed a5 510 Lakeview nae, on the.:co~er of"Lakeview and;Ralston.. . .:i .... - .~, ,. . . . sUbj~c~ 'pr~er[y .iS '[8~ ~'. usea asa`` r~sCUe}~miSsion,.' feedin~ ' ~d.~ous~ng.thO h'~e~ess ':and ihs n'eedy.: l~e pr~r~s [niSi. ake~ Dy the mlSSl. On:~.ll Include self ~helps .~ich.~' ea~estly . ' ~li~ve .~ll'~'~,'9rea~..~nefit %q~h9. pe~le in ~he c~m~ity lp ~o ~ ify LakeView.~ Avenue.:[ i'.' ' ' ~" N~E,. .:~ ' ,., ' :~ ~":'['"~ ' ' ' ,,:~ ~ .. , .; . ,. il: ,. ', ,, . . -- .- . ~ I I:: " " ';' ~ ' ' · ';' ',L, ~.~ ":' ~::.' , ... ~-:.:l: ~. ." '" ?,~. : . . .:,, ',,:i : ':ii:~ .. . ., ' ~:. J::' , " ' "~; !,:l. ' ... :~ ',' ::i' : "'~ . ' .: . ·. , , ,'~', i ': . .:. '~.~ ... -- .... _ - ,;,~. · ..... : ...... ~ ~ [ ~.! .... :: (. . ,? ,. ".Ii? . ' .. . ~ .:~ ~ ~ "' .j,~:' ":~'::i'::"'::'v ' ~: :'~:""' :"~':"'~:-:~,~:;. i,. '~ ' ': i::.:':":i. ,. l~': ~- ,~ · ,. . . ...... ' .... ~:~.: .............. :-: ............. :,.: .................................. ~ ................ "f':..:'. :~/:'!-,: '- : 'k:?'.~.'~.~it,",.',:-' ::,-'::: ..'?}% -~...'.''.' ". :'":'~.;!:>~i:~, · ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ em r 11, 1986 :,,. TO: MEMBEi~ OF THE CI'iS[. COUNCIL OF THE :CITY OF B;KEi~FIELD · . :" ha, the undersigned residents 'and' landowners in the LakeView area, Bakersfield, California, u~ge the city of Bakersfield to make it possible for King's Mission, Inc. to .have possession of that certain real property located at 510 Lakeview i," A~enue, on ~h.e corner of Lakeview and i~alston. !:i.' ~il, , .: '. ..':' The subject proper~y is to be used as:.a;rescue mission, feeding if." ~. and housing the ]'~omeless and the;needy. The programs initiated :. -'. by the mission will include self helps which we earnestly ..... believe will be a great benefit to the people in the community '.:., and .help to beautify Lakeview Avenue. · :! i!i~', i' "N/NE ~ '. ADD ,'i?i~' \~ ~].~, .... '~----- ",'. ~ ~- - - '-- · ~.. ','?.. :,~. ',: , ~:~.. ,~' . , ~',~. :: - ., , ,, , ..~.~. :.q.v:~ , .~ . . ~: , .': ' .; ~,~ " ~; ~ . . ,. , ~ v ~ .................. ............................. -.~ .................................................................................. '~, · .,~ ~, ?,. ~',,~ '!~. ':'" ' . -' '¢ · 'i' · . .~:i ' ' ,:.. TO: ~rEMBEi{S OF ~E CI~ CO~CI'L. OF' ~E~CITM OF.'B~ER.~FIELD' '' ~, %he %mdersi~ed residen%s ~d lando%ners'~n' %he Lakeview · ~rea, BakerSfield, California, urge '~he oily of Bakersfield · ~o make 'i~ possible for. ~in~'s ~,Tission,.Inc. %o have ~ possession of %bat oert~in real pr~ertv loca%ed~ at 510 Lakevlew Aven,~, on %he corner of Lakeview ~d · ~e subjec% pr~er~Y is. '~o ~ used~ as a..~scue mission, feeding and housing ~he h~eless 'and %he needy. .The progr~s ini~ia%ed by ~he mission ~11 include self ·helps ~hich ~ earnes'tlY ~lieve will ~ a great ~nefit %o'~he pe~!e in %he .comm~i%y .'~:'.~' ~; ~and help %o ~.au~ify~Lakeview Avenue...~ b,,:,~ ::':.~.: .,.';;:.: :' N~e '~3.. ,il.~ . . . ~....,.... ~'~'-' o'/~ ~ ' "'. ' ..... .'..' ' ..... · x _.' ..... . . ~ ~J ,~.-" .'. ~ ~x~ ~-.~,~ ~' ~_._ .~, . ~ . . '..: ~'~ ~ . .~ '- ... a~ . t' '.' - ~ ---~. - ' .I. --~".' '(~ ~- ~ .~ ~/~ .~o,-, /, ' '. . ~ ~ 9~ ~--,'---:- -_:__,____--,--- ~ ......... ~:i" · /. -" ~ , c.~' ~ '. i ' '~ ,_~X ...... - " '" ~ L -~H ...... X .~ ..~~4~¢x ' - .......... ~ ~ ~~;~--- .......... ~__--.~ .--~ - ......... '"'" .... - .......... '.: ?~ .... ii ' ' ' .... · " : I ~ .... ~:' ';"' ' '' ' /' " ' ' I . :.!''.. · ' ' ... :.,' ". ~ . ;....': :,..i~ ..... '.:i ~ii :' ~:..'~" :. :',.',..~/-, I.:.... . .. r' :' , . . ' ' ' "" ':~' : :~ '"'" -" · ' ' ',' i" ~'~ ~"'"~ : : i.'.' ':";" "~'" : .... ' ' ~ . ..i .' .- .. .. ~:; . , '. .'~,' .,~ .' . , . ~ ;..': ; ,~1: . .~ ' ~,,~ ~. ,~.';: . .~-~' .. ',; ~ , · .. ~ ... , · . , :. · . ,- . · , , ~ · , ~ ,~ ..t. ~ . . r ,. ...,., · · ~ :'~'.t)..' ' ' . ' "? ' ::':"~ ' .... ; ':' :'~ .... "' ''>'~ ~ "': ...... ' ' ~ '.:' ~":~'.: '. · ~' '~ ~' ~BE[~S OF,.~E CI~ CO~CIL OF: ~E CI~ OF,, ,B ~E ~FI ELD ...... :, ;... ~.. :.. TO. ~ , : . . .~ .... ~:. ~.,,, .. '. .~.~ .. , ~ : ~ , . , '- · . : ~.' ,', ' .. , -:~ .... '. :, , ,~.. ' ....'~ .: .., ~-<j, .:~' : 1' ', '.;. .~ ...' ,:.' .. ~ . '. ~ ~ .'" . .: :.. . :.-... :. . .. .',,, . ,. , .., .~ ~ : ..~: :.;' ~....~ .:' ~ :_ "~. ..~ , : , ...... :i~': ~:~' ' ' ' '~' ' '.' ~ · ' : : ""haloS'erst'in'the Lakev~ew ' , ',.~. "'~ ..the tmdersi~ed residen~s:~d la . :, .~ ' . , -..' ~ . ': ~; '~ar~a Bakersfield,' California, urge.:.'khe ..~itY":gf ~ake'rsf.~eld.. :......... ~... .. '~'". ~ ' ' ' ' ; 'sion 'lnc.': ~o nave ' . '' ' . .'~'~.:' ~:to make i'k possible for ~..ing s ~.is , -. .... ~-. _ . ' ~,. ': "possession ~f that certain ~al Pr~erky l~ate~ a'~ olu ~a~evlew ' ~ {~:'..Aven,~, on the co~er of Lakeview ~d i~alst~, ~, '' · ' ' ' .' . ,' ' ]~,~ '...,. . :' .' · "... ' t' '~ '.". :.:;'.i.".': ':.' : · ' . : ;~': .','_.. ~ _h_l'.; ~..~'~ ~'~ ,~sed;"as.':a'' ~scue'~ission,' feeding'' ?: ' C:.' ..: and housing the .h~ele'ss. and the neeoy. ~'ne'pzu~,, ' · ?~::.'' ',:'. "'. by the missioB ~11 include self .helps. which ~ earnestly. ...'.. ~?:. ..' .'.'~lieve will--~.'a'great '~nefifi ~o the:Ps~le in'the comm~ity ' : ~?.:.].)~.'. ':..,~ ~,,~ ~n ~-~tifv Lakeview Avenue. ;'~ .' ':"..:' :.' :. '.' .' :: . .' ~,~:, '.;: ,'.. ',, ~A~. a,~ -- -- ---- ~ . ~ : · '.. , . :i . .: .'. ' ' ' ', ' . . .'' ~t~.'.' :il'!;'.,,: .' '"~ ~,~.b.., ~ ~, ~%~.~t~.~--~ _. · ~ , . · = - - . . . ~" . . . .., . . ~t~:i."":'~ "~'.,. · ' ,~ ..: . ' >" '. ': . :'.,. ' ...'.......: ' ' . .' :. ' ' ' ,.,.,.~...~.....,...... ,-...:. . . ... ...... . . ... .. ~ ,~Q ..~: "~: ~":'~' ' ': ':Zf ' """ ' '' ' ," / "' '"~-~'"/' ~'' ' ' ' " .... '"'~ "' ............ ~ / t ~.~' -T,-/--- ' " ....~.~..........:~....:..._ ff~..-:.Z:'-~_~ .... --~ .·~,-.'. ~' ....:......: .. ::.' :. :.. · .' ~'..' :'.-~~- ' ...... ~ * /v ~. ~' .. . . . .. f . . . ' . . : ,_ _ . .. .... .... ....... .:%.... [~...... ~.. ~ ~/ , . ~ .. ,. . ~- . . . __..:.. ,. :.~...... ~..~ ..' Zj~,..~h~2~- ...... .---~~~- ..... ----.....' .. .,,::..:,.,....... . : i -~'~~ . , . .~ . . . . . .. ..~, ~, [.. . . ,. , .. ....~ . . · , . . :. .. .:.~: ~..... ,.... ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ _~ .... ,~_~-. ~--,,-~.... .. .~..i.,:...:.. ~[:.. ~~-~ .~ ....... -- , . · .. ':q:}~ "'i ~''~'' ''~ ' ' ' :'.. '" ' ' ' ' ' ' ":" ' ": '" ' "~ .'~,'.,. .'; ). '. . . ~~--~ .... ~--~ ... ,..... .:.. I ~, .. ~ ............. ~ · .:~....,,... ~.~ .... :fz~ . _ . :.~ ~s~...,.... .':'"~t': :::." ' ~ ...... ' ....... . . , ' · . '.. '. .' . "'...' · ." ;"?. '... ,h?[. , -'.. - . · .':. .. . ' . : . '~ · '/.~.. · ~r:'.'.'' ,t.;.. · " ' ~ ' . ~ :?:;'. .;;;. · __ · . . : . ..... . ~ : . ,' ". .." i,?j}i~ k :.i'i~:'., . ',. : .......... '...' ............. ~..: ....... .t.~ ;,..',,.: ...... .,:.,,,.:;..h,,,;.'.,.; :. ,::.' ....... ' .... ~ .................... . ~.-.~ TO: [: i.'.WBE~S .OF '.fi-ii.l ~CI?)' COb]~CIL OF [RE CIIf OF. B;[E2SFIELD ,. ~%, the r. ndersiqned residents and lendo~ers in the Leke'vie,., area, ?akersfiel¢.~, ~elifornze, uroe ~n~.: c~y of ]3akersfield ~o m'~]:e i~ ~.ossibl~' Por )Tinq;'~ ~:ission, Inc. ~o l, ave . La~..evie '~,~ ' ' ct ' ~, .. su~,3e proper~y x.~ to ]'e ,~sed es a ~scue misSy>n, . and ltousinq t]'~e ]'~w~les3 amd the ner~d5, '~ e .. . . . -by t'= ' ' n... mission will include self helps which ~.,e earnestly l~li-eve' will b~ a Orao~ }a~n,'~fit to k]~e pe~!e in 'bhe com,,unity La~.e vie w Avenue ... 'and ],elp 'ko k~aukify '" . 'Nm, e ~td~ss ' ',' ' ,,"P~. ......... .... . :.-. ~ :.. ~ , . ~_.z~__., ~ ..... - ., ~=~-l~--J~----.~. .,. ,,. ......... }~ ..... , 0%. " ~"' ~ .'~' ~-~'~ ~::'~..'"'"~ 'J .... ~"' e~"O>' ' ' ~-'. ' :'~.-.:":- .'__~:: ' .i.:: ~. N" "~"'"" "'~. '" '" '. .... ': .... ':' '~- · " ' , ~_~,. ,'/~..~__~u~.~-.,: .... ~_~,..~_z_,~,..M.~2~z~.~ .... ~ ..... .~- .............. · ' "~. '~,-7"- -~. -";F'"' ........ - --;-'~ -''t ,,:~' ~'~ '. > ., · . ,~' r , A t . 'o~ ' ~ ~' ' .' "'~ 0',1, [ ~1~.. ~ ,~;~ " ,' . ' L-,.~:;, - d~. ~,; .-. -~.~ . .~,.--,~-. ................... zu.. ...... _A.. ....................... ,November 1] 1986 ' ' ' idents end lendo~mers in the L~k~:vie,,, erea, ?.ekersfield, Co].ifornia, ure, e t~e ci[y of u ~-- ~'~ ' ' - .. ~]',e h~:~].ess and the new, dy. ',Tl~e proc~rams initia'hed .by [he mission will. inclu~.fe self helps wi, ich w~ earnestly [relieve will 1~ e c~ra~o~' }:enefit 'ko thc .peq~le in 'the co~,,~uniky · and ],elp 'to ~auti[y. I,a,:~evzew Avenue. ~ .... .I' m~r 1986 · '~':! ' '.~ N e 11, :(i?:~' ~:: .; : :!!:i', ii':. ... i:,.~.~ :~ TO: MEMBEt~3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL-OF THE CITY OF B/~EERSFIELD. ~.,. ;.:~: : '~ .~.~.' ~, the ~dersi~ed residen~s ~d lando~ers in the Lakeview .. ::' area, .Bakersfield, California,. urge ~he ci~y of Bakersfield' ~: ' ~o make i~ possible for King's Mission, Inc. ~o'have "..' 'L.' possession.'of %ha~ certain real pr~e~y l~ated at 510 E~eview · ~.. ~'. Avenue, on the corner of. L~eview and ~als~on. '~t" 'k.~ The subject pr~er[y is %o ~ used as a rescue mission, feeding "[."~ ~d housing %he h~eless and .%he needy. ~e pro~r~s initiated by %he mission ~11 include self helps ~ioh ~ ea~estly .: ~lieve ~11 ~ a great ~nefit to ~he pe~le in %he c~m~i%y ~..[:~.':~. [.~ and help.to ~autify LakevieW Avenue. .: "~.:b~{ · ~ ['.{" · .j~tt....~ .~.. '~"~": ~:;~ " ~D~SS _ ' ..', z-:z · bet 11, 1986 ' fO: E~;':BE~,:J OF T.T:IB' CI'EY cOuNciL oF '.~lg CITY 'OF BX.E.2~I;'IELD i ~he und~rs~gnec residents and landowners in the L~keview area, Bakersf~el , California, urge thecity of Bakersfield to make it possible for t(ing's I~%ission, 'Inc. 'ko have possession of tbs%' certain real p.roperty"loca[ed ak 5].0 Lakeview Avenue, on kt~.e corner of Lakevl~w and i~als%on. '~he subjec~ pr°Perry is ko be use('] as a rescue ·mission, feeding an~ housin9 'the ].~eless and '~b.e needy. 'fhe ~r~_jr~s ini[ia~ed }W h!'~o ~¥~ission ,>&ll include se·if helps ~,b. ich ~ earnestly ~:elieve ~,ill P~ a' grea[ ~nefit %o.[he people in 'the c~nmuni~y .and help ~o ~au[ify Lakeview .Avenue'. , ' , ---" ~ ' "0 n :. ,' · .4 ' Y-~ ....... / ' . · · 2 , . ~, . . ~. . ... ./ , · ,I , ~.~. ~ ;. ~&-,~.~ .~>~.~_~~~ .......... ~1-~ ~ ~._ /-~.- ................ ~ t . ' ~' '/. ~">"'" , · . ( ~.,,~ .~...~. . .,:,~, ~/~) j~ ~ ~ ~....~.~,~..~~o~~ ~.~.'~.~_~_~:~ _:..z.~)>L ......... : ~ .......... :~ .... '-~ ..... ~-'- .... ~ ............. .,, ....... ~. - ... .... · . ~ .. . , . ~.,. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ................................ {,. L._.::~ ........... ~ ............ ~-~'- . . : ......... ~': T- = .......... ~ ..... .~ :' · ~ . ' ' f'~ ; , --- ' /'~Z " . . , , --.~ / , ' , ~( ',,_ .. _ ,~. ,..~'. ~.., .~ .,/~ t / P ~'- ~.~~,~.~ ~~ ~ -'~_'.'~ ~' ~ "~-~-~'~~~~ ...... :'~- "h ,' -'~--- -~-~-' ~ ~ ., ~ .~ --~~---- '~7 ----- ' >, ~ ~ ~_/~~14 ~~~ ~ . ,,'. ~ /~ . . ~ . ~ .,,~ . , . ~/ ~ , ' _~: _~ ~-~: .... u__/.~. · .... . .... .......... . ........... I . -,, ...... ~'"'?~" ' . . .. v, ~:: .... ~ ..'- , :':':"'~.m~":, .':c" L'",': '-':".: ......... , ...... '.':':>:t:. ,'?.~:~.. "fC'?.:..':::~;::.'.~).?,'::> '..~?:F. '":'~ :"" ' . ~ · :::.:'~' ..',.....:j :..:. ::.~ ..... '- · .,N ovem~be r 1986 ... TO: ~,EMBE~S OF THE CITY COUNCIL bF'. ~E CITY OF B/~ERSFIELD 1~, bhe Undersized resid.enks ~d lando~ers zn ~he Lakeview rsfiel , California~ urge 'khe city of Bakersfield ' sre ~, Bake d ' to make it possible for t[ing's k~ission, Inc. to.have possession of %ba't certain real pr~erty located et 510 Lakeview Aven,~, on %he corner of Lakevie~ and i~alst~. ' "~e subjec'[ pr~erty is to'~ used as a ~scue mi'ssion, .feeding and housing '~he ~tomeless and %he needy. The progr~s ini[ia%ed by the mission ~11 include self helps. which ~ earnestly ~lleve will ~ a great ~nefit %o-the pe~le in the comm~i%y and help %o ~autify Lakeview Avenue.~ .. ~--~__~ - ~ / · , ~ , ) ~-.- ~'. ~ 0 V 8Ill L~.~ l' £i, /;Juu TO: EEN!BEI~S OF THE CI~Cf COUNCIL OF ~E CI~ OF. B~ER.~FIELD ~, the undersi~ed'residents ~d l~ndo~ers in the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California,~ ur¢e the city of Bakersfield to make ih possible for Kin~'s 57ission, Inc. [o have possesoxon of %ha'[ certain ~eal pr~erby loca~~ed e't 510 Lakevie Aven~, on the co~er of Lakeview ~d i~alston. .. '~e subjec'E pr~er~y is to ~ used as a.~Scue mission, feeding 'and housing 'bhe h~eless 'and the needy. The progr~s initiated by the mission %~11 include self helps which ~ earnestly ~lieve will ~ a grea[ ~nefit to the pe~le in the comm~ity and t. elp to ~autify Lakeview Avenue. .. N~e ~d.~ss V - :'n '~[;;'~?" ..;¢. :~ ~¢~:,.:........ :;.,,.. :c.."~.. ,. ::.7. ,~ Nove.ber 11, ,198b TO: .~E~'.BE,'{S OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF B;KER~FIEL ' d idents and landowners in t'he Lakeview ~,~, the underslgne res area, Bakersfield, California, urge 'the ci%y of Bakersfield · bo make it possible for ~.ing's ~;ission, Inc. Lo have possession of tha'~ cerffein real property located a't 510 Lakeview Aven,~, on the co,er of Lakeview and ., .'~e subject' pr~er~y is '~o ~ used as a ~scue mission, feeding ' and housing '~he h~eless and the needy. The. progr~s ini~ia~ed by the mission ~11 include self helps which ~ earnes'tly l~lieve will ~ a great ~nefit to 'the pe~le i.n the comm~ity and t, elp to ~autify Lakeview .Avenue. . ~d.~ss ' · ~ . ...... ~ · . ~ ~' ,~'~q~/~ ~-.~ ,., · " ~ ~'~'~-~ ~ .... ~ ...... · .r. ~.~,~ ~ ....'" ~ , ~. ~- ,.~._ _ ~ ........ ~ ~'~.--'~ ....... ~ ' ' ~1 ~ ' ~/) ~/~3'/ ,.~, , .... ~~-~'~'~ ........ ~~-~----~--~ ~- "-~' ~q~~. ~~-~--~ ........ ~ ..... ~ ,-., ~ ,-- -72' Z' ,., ¢ '-~'~'~-~=-~-~ ..... ~ o -~ j [~' . ~__.~.~?/~~_ ~ ~ ..... u_._.~~~.-- . ~ '~ ~ t ............ ~ ... ,...~ ~.~,. . . · ¢,"'.~f.~9.['V~' .'. ...,:,.;.... .............. : ..... :: ~7'~, ' · . ..~..:.: '~..:..,.::...'./. r :~ '. ~..:. ...'.:...:;. ' :.~: ,]: :,'.' .:~ ~ .. ~ .::.., .~ I~ evembe,r 1~986 · TO: ~g~!Bg~g OF. ~E CITY CO~CIL OF ~g CI~ OF B~B~.SFIELD ~, ~he unde'~i'~ed' ~esiden~s ~d l~ndo~ers in ~he Lakeview' area, Bakersfield, Califo:nla, urqe 'bhe ~iky of Bakersfield %o mmke i'k possible fo~ Kinq's b~ission, In~. ~o h~ve possession Of ~ha'h cer~i,n real pr~er~y located ~'~ 5,10 Lakeview Aven,~. on %he co.er of Lakeview ~d :~e .subjec't pr~erky is 'to ~' used as a ~scue mission, feeding 'and housing ~hhe h~eless .and %he needy. The progr~s inihia~ed by the mission %~11 include self helps which ~ earnes'tly ~lieve will ~ a great ~nefit %o ~he pe~le in %he com,n~i%y ' and ),elp %o ~aukify Lakeview Avenue. N~e ?"' ." N ove~%.k~- r ] 1986 .... · .,.~ C©UNCiL OF [lie CITY' OF TO: }:":"~'-':' "~ OF. :'*":': CI'"*" 1.' 'the u.ndersion'ed residents end len¢lo~.ners'in tke Lakevie,,: 8rea, l~,.akersfield, California, urcm ~ne ~l[y' of TM t- ' ' possessJ..,Jr'~ o.~ tl.ot ce.rtein re~l pro[,er~y loca~e,., ~n~ 510 and }tousino k]~e ],~neless and ffhe ne~qrly.. '21~e progr~s inikia'ked by kke miss'ion will incluc',:~ self helps' which wz. earnestly ........ "k }:enefi[ 'ho h]~c peq>le J.n ~he and ],elp 'ko ~au~i~y I, akeview ~v~nue, , ...... ;~ ..... ~.. ~ ' ~ ' , [~. ...... ember 11, 1986 :fO: bIE%,IBE~S OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF '~g CITY OF B/KEBSFIELD " We, the undersigned residents and landowners in the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge the city of Bakersfield to make it possible .for King.'s Mission, Inc. to have possession of tha'h certain real Property located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the corner of Lakevlew and. Ralston. ~he subject property is to be used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing--~he homeless and the needy.: The programs initiated by the mission will include self helps which we earnestly believe will be a great benefit to 'the people in the community and. help '~o beautify Lakeview Avenue. ' '~ No bet 11, 1986 · ; ~,EblBEga O.F THE CI CODICIL OF 'THE '~ITY OF B~rER~FIELD .%%, '~he ~mdersigned. res].d n~s end. land. o~,~ers in the Lakev].ew area, ~ake.rsfield, ualifon~ia, urge the city of Bakersfield %0 m~¥.eJ.~'"' possible for t(in¢,'s_ [.,!issi.on, Inc. . to have possession of that certain real proper'ky locaked at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the corner of Lakeview and 2slston. The subject proper'[y is to ]~. used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing-t-he.homeless and- the needy. The programs ini%iated by the mission will include self helps which we earneshly. believe will be a grea[ benefi~ [o the people in the community and help to beautify Lakeview Aven,u. N ovem be ~ 1986 TO: MEMBE~ OF 'I~E CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY. OF B/[EP~3FIELD "' ~'~, the undersigned residents and landowners in the Lakeview , area, Bakersfield, California, urge the city of Bakersfield to make it possible for King's ~iission, Inc. '~o have possession of %hat certain real property located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the cOrner of Lakeview and ~alston. Tb.e subject prOperty is to be used. as a rescue mission, feeding and .housing ~he homeless and the need).. The'programs initiated by t].~e mission .~,,'il]. inc].u¢ie self 1,elps which ~ e'arnes%ly and help 'to t.~2a~hify I.,skeview Avenue. ~D .i~,. " N r lt, 1986 .~.' :.~' TO: ~EMBF, P~"0F THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THB CITY OF B/KBRSFIF, LD · ,.i~' 2~, the undersigned residents and landowners in theLakevlew "~.!~. area, Bakersfield, California, urge %he ci%y~of Bakersfield t-o make i~ possible for King's Mission,, Inc. to have possession of that cerLain real property located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the corner of Lakeview and. Ralston. The subject property is %o be used as 'a rescue mission, feeding and housing· the homeless and the needy. The programs initiated by the mission will include self helps, which we earnestly. believe will be a great benefit to the people .in the community ~.,~ and help to beautigy Lakeview Avenue. ;i. .1:~' ' ~ · ~.~ !~,i',~ N t~'IE ADDI{ESS (.~_,~. ' ~ f~ ....... · ,,----x~._ ~,,~'~ ~_w ..... · ,~,~. ~. ~d'" ~.= ~..,¢,,~_~.~ ...,7n~ - · - , . ' - . . ' .4.h . ~ .' '.,. . . ................ .....~¥. "',; ~"~¥~,,,.":'"'..',""," ' ~ ':'.~': '.¥:? ~':~,':?,~':,' ::. '~ ~:w.~,- ...'~,~'~,*'~ ,,~-',~ · ~a.~.~. '""~?U,.~?:~':~'~'::~'?~?:· ' ",f':";~}); ['~[%?~"f~ ~. '.~'~'~) t .~ Nov. em bet .1986 TO: ~E~!BBi{$ OF THE CITY. coUNcILOF THE CITY OF B/KEn'FIELD ~,~, the undersigned residents and lando%~ers {n the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge 'the .ci%y of Bakersfield 'to make it possible for I~.ing's [c]ission, Inc. tO have possession of ~ha't certain real prOperty located at 510 Lakeview Aven,m, on ~he corner of Lakeview ~d Rals't~. · ~e subjeck pr~er~y is ~o ~ used as'a ~scue mission, feeding "and housing '~he h~eless and %he needy. The progr~s initia%ed by ~he mission ~11 include self helps which ~ earnestly ~lieve will ~ a grea~ ~nefi~ %o ~he pe~le in the comm~i~y and help to ~au~ify Lakeview AvenDe. ·?t.!- '. '. .~ November. .. 11, 1986 · ~. TO: MEMBE~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY.OF B~KEI~FIELD 'We, the Undersigned residents and landowners in the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge the 'city. of Bakersfield · : to'make it possible for King's Mission, Inc. to have 'possession of that certain real proper~y located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the corner of Lakeview and ~alston. The subject proper~y is' to be used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing the homeless and the needy. The programs initiated ,;'~ belleve will be a great benefit'to the people in the community :.: and help to be. au~ify Lakeview Avenue. '" !i' ' ~":' ' ADD~ESS ' 'i,,' NINE ': .. ! !'"~ ~//,' ..~.... /~/ '.l. ' ...! ...~ "_~_-,:- ~~4~_~~_o :? ' ~- ... ,. _ .... . _ . . ... . . ,.. .. t:: ....~..:-:.~. ...... .... :~:_..=-...,, ,,_.--..,-;_, _ '"'" _ ........ -_2L I .... :"?:':':':'. :':': i ..... - .......... .... ---'x--- .. ______~,,,~__~ ....... .~,q'--,,~,_~.. --___,~._ ,~, ~ ~~,..~~' - ' " I ./Z..' ~...:., ................... . ..... . ...... · ...... :.~~.u..:.... .... < .............................. . ......... ,.- ...... _~~ . .... ~: .~.~,, ........ ~ .. .... , ....... . ..... ,:~:....... :...~,,-... ....... ...~,~.. .., .,,~ .............. , ...... .,,..?:>.::.., :...':~:?: November 11, 198,.6 ~,,BE~,~.~ OF CIi~' COUNCIL OF )?HE CI'.igY OF B;KI;i~oFIELD "~v~, [he ~ndersigned. residents and lando~ rs in.~he Lakeview area, Bakersfield, 'California, uroe the city of Bakersfield. to make i~c possible for ~(inq's 5~ission,.. Inc. to have possession of [ha~ certain real pr~er[y located at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on ~he co,er of Lakeview ~d .l{~s'~on. The subject' prOper~y is t'o ~ used as a rescue mission, feeding ~d housing the homeless end .'the'needy. The pr~r~s initiated .by the mission ~11 include self helps' which ~ earnestly ~lieve will 1~ a gres~ k~nefit to [he'pe~le in the c~,m~iky and help ~o ~autlfy Lakeview Avenue. ' N ~i E ADD'SS · ,. -.. r 11, 1986 TO: ~EMBER$ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'HE CITY OF B;KEP~FIELD We, the undersigned residents and landoWners in the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge the city of Bakersfield to make it possible for King's Mission, Inc.' to have possession of tha'~ certain real proper~y located .at 510 Lakeview Avenue, on the corner of Lakeview and Ralston~ The subject property to be. used as a rescue mission, feeding · and housing the home and the needy. The programs initiated by the mission will incl self helps which we earnestly will be a great to the people in the community help be au%if' Arena. ~ ~o..vem b~.. r 11, 386 TO: It(' ~,''~ ~''~''~ , . ~.~n~o OF THE CI%~f CO~CIL OF ~E CI~ OF B~E2~FIELD ~,' khe undersized residenYs ~d'lando~ners in the Lakeview area, Bake ' ~' ornia, rsf~elo, Calif . urge ~he city of B~kersfield '[o make i'[ possible for King's ~ission, Inc. possession of [ba'[. cer[sin real properky loca~ed ~'~ 5].0 Lakevie~, Avenue, on '[he corner of Lakeview and ~:~alston. : ~e subjec[ p'r~erky is' ko.~ used as a ~scue mission, feeding and 'housing [he h~eless and the needy. '~he prOgr~s inikiated -' .. by [he mission ~11 include self helps which ~ earnes'kly " ~lieve will ~ a greak ~nefi[ ~o 'the pe~le in %he comm~i[y and ],elp '[o ~au[ify L ~ a~.evlew Avenue; .' · . . . ..~ . .- .--~ ~. ........ __ ..... --~ . - : ~ ....... '/~&:~:/,~~~?~z__~~ ~~~z~- ...... _ Z · · g~ ' .. ~,~ .~ ~% ~ / , I. ,, ~ ~ ~ .) ' '/~k~._l ..... ~3or~~__ .... _~Z_Ll_ r~---7~~,z~ .... :~--'~"~~~ ........... - ~ ...../~ ~--~~ ~2~-/~'-: .... ,'?-~ .... ~_._ ._ ~ .............. ., _.,' ..................... ~_,, ~'%: ~ ...... ,. ~_~~_.~~ ...... .. ........ _- ...... ~:~ .... L ........................... ~ ~ ~ f ' . ,-~ ~ ~ · · .~ . · .. l t~r~ ' --~-~.' - "~ "' ' ..... ~ : ................ -'-- - .' . · .,, '~ ~?.:v ' ~" '~-" ' "; '~' -' ", :":~t :.t~".'" ' .:.r'¥":t~. ::g:.~'t":~'?,'::.~..'";.?.'~:z..~L,:.:'',,'%f:.>,u ".:.'.r:'~tL:' ~:~'b:' ":~.',".':' . "'~'.?m:~: '. ' .:: '.' :'::":'" .... .'and' housing ~he ],~eless ~n~.¥ the ~o make i~ possible for.~iflg,'s. Mission,"Inc..~o have"pos~ession of ~hak ce~ain real pr~e~y l~aked, ~ · a ~view en The subjec~ pr~erky ko'~.~ Used s a rescue mission,':'.feeding:. ~d housing ~he.h~eles~ and ~he[ ~ needy .. J::: Th~p=ogr~ ~ini~aked. and help ~o ~au~zfy Lakevzew ~venue. :'~ ' ,~ i m r 11, 1986 :!~, ~,:: TO: NR~BER3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF.B~ERSFIELD ':' L'~ ~, the ~dersigned residents ~d lando~ers in .the Lakeview' area, B~:ersfield, Califo~ia, urge ~he clhy .of Bakersfield to make it possible for ~ing's }~issi0n, Inc. to have .~. possession of ti'tat certain ~al pr~erky located ak 510 Lakeview ':' Avenue, on the corner of Lakeview and Ralston. The subject prope~y is %o '~ used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing the h~eless and the needy. Th~ progr~s ini~iated b.y ~he mission ~11 include self helps ~ich ~ ea~es~ly ~lleve ~11 ~ a great ~nefi% ~o ~he pe~le in ~he ~d help ~o ~au%ify L~eview Avenue. i~ : / ..... ,"~ . c.c~,~' ]/ o '~-~ 4 ~~.. .. :: TO.: MBMBERS OF THE CITy COUNCIL oF THE CIT~ F/B~BR'SFI . . . ~f>," :, ,... V.~, 'the tmdersi~e'd residents '~d'iand°~erS in the Lake~iew area, Bakersfield Califo~ia, urge '~he city of Bakersfield " ' n ' 'Nission, Inc.' to have -to make i'k possible for Li ~ s .. · ' possession ~O'~t~a't certain real pr~erty 1°cated at 510 Lakevlew Aven,~ on the co~er of Lakev~ew ~d Ral'S~- '.~ . , . .. ~ ' '' . ' ~ used 'aS a ~scue missiOn, ~- ,,,h~c't ~r~erty ~s to ~__ -~-- The mro~r~s ~n~n~.a . 'rn~ Z--~,__ f~ h~eless and t~ ~e~uY'_i~,_~..~ earnes.tlF and ~ous~n~.-,,~ ,,~. ~-~l,,~e sel~ Beeps w~? , ~ ..... ,,~i~v : ~lieve wxll ~ a grea · .,. . and help to ~autifY Lakeview Avenue. y:: ..)?'.-. . . ~d~ss":.. : ' ' ''- ' ': ; '? ' ~ . · .., .. . . · __ ~ . ~ :~ ~'---' /" ':' '~"l ' ' __ ' ----- ' ~'""'~' ., . - ~.7~ -,, ?~ ,.:,,.~., [. ,: :~ ;' ,.'.;: .'. ~77 7..~.''' '/ ' '" ~~~~_.... ,-:~ .~ k~m_ -..... _ --._ ,:~.' .,:',:.::: ... _~ ~.. ,'., ,_. :-- . · . ,.~( ,' !. ovember 11, 1986 TO: ~iH','iBEi~3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH.E. i cITY OF B/K. ER3FIELD '~.~, the undersigned residents and landowners in the Lakeview area, Bakersfield, California, urge the city of Bakersfield .to maize it possible' for I[ing's 5]ission, Inc. to have possession of that certain real Proper~y located at 510 Lakeview Av. enue, on the .corner of Lakeview and Ralston. The subject property is to be used as a rescue mission, feeding and housing the homeless and the needy. The programs initiated by the mission will include self helps which we earnestl~ .believe will be a great benefit to the people in the community " and help to beautify Lakeview Avenue. ?.,.',2, 'l:2:e ~;.r',.di2rsi,.~ned residen't's and ].ando~te rS in -the Lakev:i_ew . area, i:.~a.her~:[ielct, Ca].ifomia, urge 'the ci[¥ of EekersfJ. eld to mako i~: possible :[or King's ~.:is$ion, Inc. ~o l-,.ave pos:Cession of tha[. certain real property loca. ted at 510 '[,akex, iew Avenue, or,. tTt',e corner of Lakeview and :~als'ton. The subject propez'[¥ 'is to be used as a rescue mission, feeding and ho~tsing the homeless and i-he needy. The pr%frans initiated by 'the missj, on ~all include ae].f }'..elp~ whic}~ ~m earnest].y t~].ie~,e wi.]..1 k~ a great: kenefit:: to the people in the co~,,,nuni~y and ]telp [o L~autify i, ake~iew ~:¢enue. WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE? Our goal is to create choices in child care for parents and children by raising the level of awareness and involvement among local employers. What Can We Provide For You? · Worksite Parent Education ,Seminars · Referral to Local Child Care Resources · Proactive Planning and Needs Assessment · Program Cost/Benefit Analysis · Technical Information About Child Care Options · Coordination of Efforts Within the Community - Employer Sponsored Child Care Project - Respite Care -- - Child Care Information Service WENDY WAYNE (805) 322-7418 PLANNING FOR CHILD CARE GIVES DEVELOPERS AN EDGE "PROVIDING CHILD CARE FACILITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL TENANTS MAKES GOOD BUSINESS SENSE", SAID DAVID MILAZZO, THE PRINCIPAL OF MILAZZO & ASSOCIATES, A.I.A. AND MEMBER OF THE .CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION. BY ALLocATING SPACE FOR CHILD CARE IN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS, DEVELOPERS GAIN A COMPETITVE EDGE IN ATTRACTING TENANTS, AS WELL AS IMPROVING COMMUNITY RELATIONS. THERE ARE A GROWING ~ER OF FIRMS DISCOVERING THAT CHILD CA_RE ' IS AN ATTRACTIVE AMENITY FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL TENANTS, PARTICULARLY IN AREAS WHERE OFFICE VACANCY RATES ARE HIGH AND CHILD CARE CENTERS ARE FEW. "WE NEED TO START PERCEIVING CHILD CARE 'AS NOT ONLY, OR NOT EVEN, A WOMEN'S ISSUE, BUT A BUSINESS ISSUE AND A COMMUNITY ISSUE", WENDY WAYNE, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE SAID. "IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES TO ENTER THE CHILD CARE BUSINESS. WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS TO PROVIDE FACILITIES FOR, OR PARTNERSHIPS WITH, CHILD CARE PROVIDERS". 420 18th Street Bakersfield, GA 93301 805/322-7B33 322-7418 A PRESS CONFERENCE WAS ORGANIZED BY THE COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE TO INTRODUCE "A DEVELOPER'S GUIDE TO CHILD CARE" W}{ICH PROVIDES STEP-BY-STEP INFORMATION ON HOW TO INCORPORATE CHILD CARE FACILITIES IN EMPLOYMENT CENTERS AND RESIDENTIAL DEVEL0~MENTS. THE CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK PUT TOGETHER THIS INFORMATION PACKET WHICH INCLUDES INFORMATION ON STATE REGULATIONS GOVERNING CHILD CARE FACILITIES, 'PLAN AND DESIGN 'CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHILD CARE AND EXAMPLES OF WHAT DEVELOPERS ARE DOING TO MEET THE CHILD CARE NEED IN CALIFORNIA. THE GUIDE ADVISES DEVELOPERS TO INCORPORATE CHILD CARE PLANS .INTO A PROJECT FROM THE START. PLANS TO ALLOCATE SPACE FOR CHILD CARE SHOULD NOT BE THROWN IN AS AN AFTER-THOUGHT. IT ALso SUGGESTS THAT A CHILD CARE CONSULTANT SHOULD BE HIRED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM. ("A DEVELOPER'S GUIDE TO CHILD CARE" CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING coMMUNITy CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE AT 322-7418.) IN BAKERSFIELD, REALTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES SET AN EXAMPLE FOR LOCAL DEVELOPERS' BY INCLUDING A CHILD CARE FACILITY AT ITS APARTMENT COMPLEX ON WHITE LANE ·AND H STREET. MERCY, MEMORIAL AND 'SAN JOAQUIN HOSPITALS NOW HAVE CHILD CARE CENTERS FOR THEIR WORKFORCE AND~ SURROUNDING COMMUNITY,· RECENTLY, A LOCAL PHYSICIAN ESTABLISHED A PRESCHOOL NEXT DOOR TO HIS OFFICE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF HIS OFFICE STAFF AND NEIGHBORING FAMILIES. IN ADDITION TO ON-SITE CHILD CARE CENTER, OTHER OPTIONS -FROM · CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO NEAR-SITE CENTERS - ARE AVAILABLE TO DEVELOPERS INTERESTED IN MEETING THE NEEDS OF PROJECT TENANTS. THESE A-RE 2 DESCRIBED IN THE'"DEVELOPER's GUIDE" WHICH IS BEING INTRODUCED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE COMMUNITIES OF BAKERSFIELD AND SACRAMENTO.' ~ACCORDING TO JULIE PARSONS, PROJECT COORDINATOR, "THE~ INTENT OF THIs GUIDE IS TO WORK PROACTIVELY TO MEET THE FUTURE CHILD CARE NEEDS OF OUR COMMUNITY. - Employer Sponsored Child Care Project - Respite Care - Child Care Information Service S£P 4 1986" Cl~ ~ANAGE~,S OF~CE Ken Pulskamp City of Bakersfield ]501Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 9330] Dear Mr. Pulskamp; Thank you for taking the time to meet with me regarding the Co--unity Connection for Child Care and child care issues that are affecting both City of Bakersfield employees ,and the co--unity at large. As you suggested, I am enclosing some examples of the results of Task Force studies conducted in other cities in California as well as detailed information on the City of Irvine Child Care Coordinator pOsition. You might also want to check with Lydia Deborg of Concord as they had a budget in 1985 of $400,000 for implementing their task force recommendations. I look forward to pursuring some creative solutions to the child care problems in Bakersfield. Since~ly, , ~ ~:tw 420 18th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 805/322-7633 322-7418 - ' ] i . fConcord ! · , ~.' ~: : ::~."F~OR'yOUR:iNFoRMATioN '"-,'/?:; ::~:~-."~' ::_. · · . :'" mpliments of:, '":"'::.:'~:',:'i{':'!?:""-.' .- . -... !.'... ::' '~. '.. .. · . '. ... . ..' .......... · .; :.~::~:.?:S~.~,.~??:~..,,~?.~ ~'~ ?Z...'~,:~.:~,.-.?.;~.:,/ ~- ~-,~,:.~.;:,.~'.c-'... ~:~.::.:?~ *,'~.. ;~.;.:.~- ?.:.,,,~'~, ~,:-'~: ::;::%:.T.; ~ :'.,...:. ~... :............:- ...,:~.:.::..:-: :.:..... '..::':..~ ......:...-.:. ': ..]......... .,:. ~. LYNN ~ DAN~KER ,. . . .. , ..:., ....',:..~ :. :...: . .;.. ... ..:. . ... .. .... ~ . Assistant To The City Mana~er Cl~ O~ CONCORD · . ~ Concord, California 9451~ ... '. ,..':...:...,,.:~ :..:...:,.."'.. ,...; . .:,. ,....::: .-:.: ,-:-:: :;~,, .' .::; '~.- -..:.--::...:; ,-..~ .',.,.~::,. : ~ · . .: .. : ..... ..~::...:..~.~? .-. - .. .... .....:: -~.... ~. ,- ....... . ;.~..~..:~_ · .: .:~- : : ., ~ :-.., ' '..' , - . .,'.... : ' ---" "~ '---.',::',.,.~:'.,~'.-' ;-: '~.:,.:,'": -'~ .... ','.. ':-~-',:.'~.':~.'.., ....... ;': '?L.. ~-1.:~,:-... -'-.:..".:' '~-'-'. · , .. . . . . . . - .. . . . :. . : ;. · , - ... - , ...... . .-'. ._ ., ,:.:.:.'., . ... . ,~.- , . .,.,..~.,~ :.... :..,.~.-.: ~-....;..~: ~ '.:: ,, ::::.. ~.:.?, .:,... ,..: :...; .... ~ -~.: . ' :..',..; :~::...;:-:~ ,~:?.::.... : ,.:~:.:...,c,..~::.~:..'./i~...'~]:~.: .~'-;;...;_~ ,~<:~. : . : . . ~... ~'::~,' ;,<: ,~:-' ~-' :':-'~:~'~'7; ~ ~';~? ~,~? ~D'?~<~ :~~ ~. ~.~z~.~;:?;~ ~:,.,.~'~ · ~.~.-~--:~::~',, ~:~:~' .::',., ~-..: ~:- ~.:. ~-.~:~'~ ~:~:- -:~ ~<, :,-~ ~'~:~,.', ':~:~,~:~:~? ~ ,~,~,-~,~.,:~ ~'~ ~ ::~,'~ ~ ~ ~ .~:~ ~ ?~;~;~ - EXECUTIVE SLrMMARY AND CONCLUSION Introduction The Concord Childcare Task Force, chaired by C°uncilmember, Colleen Coil, requested the formation of the Sub-Committee for Needs Assessment. This Sub-Committee then proceeded to develop 'and compile the information from two surveys. The surveys were successful in yielding useful information. PART I - CORPORATE EMPLOYEES AND CHILDCARE NEEDS SURVEY This non-random survey was administered to ten businesses in'the Concord community. The respondents were asked'what their current childcare arrangements were, what their desired arrangements~ are, what problems they might have related to childcare, and what actions the City of Concord should take to create more childcare, if any. '~ To avoid repetition the~current childcare arrangements will· be covered in Part II. The corporate employees were clear on what their desired childcare arrangements are. Due~to the fact that there is little or no childcare available for sick children or in an emergency situation, the parents felt that this was their primary concern. 71% of parents have missed 1-4 days in the past six months. Infant care was'listed as the second priority (0-2 years). School age childcare was listed as the third priority. Increasing the available of quality, affordable childcare was fourth out of twelve choices. 66% of the Parents were willing to change their work schedule if childcare were available-outside of the traditional hours of 7:00 am ~ 6:00 pm. An overwhelming majority of respondents (91%) felt that the City of Concord needed to take action to create more childcare. When asked to define the roles in creating more childcare, the results are as listed below. THE CITY CAN... ...streamline the Zoning and permit process for licensed family daycare homes. ..... encourage non-governmental support in the Creation of childcare. That is., through foundations, businesses and agencies. ...act as the catalyst in' the creation of a vendorf~voucher program for low income families. ...spent tax dollars to create more childcare (13~%). (Executive Summary and Conclusion ContinUed) THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY·CAN... ...proVide emploYees with a flexible work schedule policy in order ~J~·. to allow them to adjust their schedules to available childcare. ...develop a childcare resource and referral component at the work site. This will aide and encourage employees in securing quality childcarel.· ...develop childcare at the work site. The issue here was location of childcare not necessarily sponsoring the children. PART II - CHILDCARE PROVIDERS SURVEY This survey was funded and administered by the Contra Costa Children's Council. There are 34 centers in Concord with 2,1120 childcare slots. The average.·cost for infant care is $360 per month. Care for children ages 2 - 5 years is $245 per ·month. School age childcare $180 per month. There are 161 licensed family daycare homes representing care for 746 children~aged 3 mo. - 12 years. The average cost is $58.~50 · per child per week. The childcare.providers reported that there were 75% of the children in their care resided in the city of Concord. There was a total of 781 children on waiting lists although we can not know if children are on more than one list. The childcare community, is challenged to address themselves to the desired types of care listed in the Corporate Employee and Childcare Needs Survey. The issue of quality is also,directly~ related to emplOyee turnovers, therefore, the childcare ~dommunity · needs to.address themselves to employee edUcation and wage increases. SUB,COMMITTEE FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONCLUDES... ...that both survey responses support the original premise that accesfible,, affordable, quality childcare is needed in the City of Concord. Also, that the steps outlined above and taken from Corporate .Employees and Childcare Needs verify the direction the Childcare Task Force is headed in intrOducing the vendor/voucher programs and low interest loan programs. Quality of care is primary issue which relates directly to the wages of childcare Workers and their training. Therefore, particular attention must be given to. promoting ~the economic and intrinsic value of those-who care for our.children. REPORT OF THE OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHILD CARE IMPACT COMMITTEE To The Oakland City Council · . .., October 9, 1984 The Oakland Community Child Care Impact committee · .. · '. Was Chaired and Staffed By · :' ' -' -Funded By A Grant From The Wallace Alexander Gerbode FoUndation.. ' '' . EmPlo~ent growth due to new development is creating greater .demand' for ~'"~:..:' ".}. ' child care in Oakland. Affordable, accessible, ~uality child care programs .. ~r~ barr~r~ ~o ~h~ ~xpan~on of ~h~o p~o~am~ won ~hou~h demand '~ ' ~on~. I~ ~ ~hor~fo~ n~c~7 for Oakland to !mplemon~ · v~o~ou~ and employers, '~';developers, '-: employees, unions, foundations, service ..... -'This report presents'PractiCal reC°~endati°ns 'for action, along Wi~h ~he ' ' - .-conclUsions of more than a year of research and discussion. It is the work :.-.-"--':.:'...'..':'.. child care providers, a review.of emplo~ent trends in Oakland, and .Other ......... ~': ~' ~ ." .":;,+ The demand for child care will grow as the number of people employed · ' '~:-'".:'r..Workforce may inCrease by. an average of 3,000 employees per year, · .._ ':.' '..: '.'.'i'?' :and roughly a 'third of all employees will need child care at any " .-'~ '. ':--~ : ':"i given time. Based on current employment patterns, 60%, of the new ' '""" e .The child Care s~stem in Oakland and the East Bay is saturated, with -. ' long waiting lists .for many programs. Almost a third of surveyed --.._._.- " .... parents say that they "were forced to take whatever they could -- :' ' find."_:' Only a third think they 'have had an adequate degree of choice. Single parents, lower income parents, and Oakland residents face even more limited choice than other working parents. Care for children under two. years old is especially difficult to 'find, " ' *. Many.of the parents using child care would 1 i ke to see . Improvements . .... · -...-... in their current situation. Half of the parents whose children are ,.,, .... "..: _'.-..' ...... . ..-..... care, 40% report dissatisfaction with the location of the care, and - .......... ;~.. ..... "'..' ;..needs: for care beyond their regular child care programs, such .:as · '.' ' ..... in the past two years failed to open, primarily due ,to'lack of '":'.' ":' .'"' · .:., . suitable, affordable, facilities. Even well organized programs with '" ','good reputations have been derailed .or :,seriously. delayed .by .the '. ",'....:.. "-'.?,~' ~'~."~CiTY ~.OF IRVINE ;'[.:;.. .. ,~, "The legitimate object of'any government is to do for the community of people Whatever they need to have done, but cannot do at all ~"".:-:~ ..... '-"~' " in their .separate and individu~ capacities." ??'~,;'".'-~-"".~."..' ':-.'~ :'.::' "'"' '.?'"- - :"" - A Lincoln , . .,.:. ., f.'-". . ' ' ' ..- . · i", '" ..,,"?'" In' 19.79, the Irvine City Council' recognized the need for child, care in the community and formed the Irvine Child~Care Committee. The committee membership included a member from each. of the following: . .. - City Council ~' '... . - Community Services Commission - ~Planning Commission . - Irvine Uhified S'chool District - Greater Irvine Industrial League '.. . ~ . " - ~ Irvine Association for Coordinated Child Care ·. ~'.' · - Community Services Department Staff Liaison The Committee's first task was to document the child care need in Irvine. Members 'of the Committee~spent' over 800 hours in collecting all data. The report revealed a severe shor't' age of licensed child care spaces in day care centers and day care homes which would worsen -.with the growth of the community. If the problem was not addressed, the Irvine community· could expect~l,300 children under the age of two years, 1,200 pre-schoolers,~ and 5,600 school- age children under the age of ten years with employed mothers with no licensed~child'care place to go by the .year 1988.. " The~quality °f~ child care being received in licensed facilities in conjunction with lack of ' programs--tO'meet'special needs such as the handicapped, before and after school care,, and ·10w- income families was ~another major concern. There 'was extremely limited services to help par-~ ~j~'.~-{~ ents choose child care. ~ In 1983, the Child Care Committee recommended that City Council enter contract with BerkeleY Planning Associates to develop a cOmprehensive child care program. This group was selected because of completion of a similar child care· project in Hercules, Califor- nia, and their knowledge in.working with municipalities. The firm entered into a contract · '~with the City of Irvine and completed the ~report in March .1984. report outlined'sevoral altornativoS, some of which ~ncludod.'tho followin9 major rocommondations:' .:..~.~,.j , '. 1. ExPand high quality licensed family day care by offering · ' ' ' ' '~ " 2.~'Expand high quality, day Care centers by simplifying the ~"~' ' ' ,~'.' . . - assistance and developing land use standards that encourage -:/'.'~..}?:~ .".?.: j:' j/.'..~ :?..- :~ ~. ~..~ '~-.: ,'~ .. ~4'' Expandchild careinf0rmati°nfor theirandchildren.aSsistance ..t°" parents in choosing "' ~'" " 5 Provide a broad based co--unity effor~ to develop improve- '~' ' ~"'.- ments-in the child ca~e system of Irvine. .... ' '' ~' ~"-' 6.'".identify one organization to''lead and coordinate the . "~..~ comunity-wide effort to improve Irvine's child care The. Irvine Ch'~ld Care committee .additionally-rec0~ended to' the City. Council to allOcate monies to fund a Child Care Coordinator for %he co--unity. This was approved and in November 19B4, Nancy Noble was hired as the Irvine Child Care Coordinator. The~'co~unitY of Irvine "qUickly' responded to the recommendations made by the Irvine Child care Committee and the Berkeley:Planning Associates Report by.starting up programs to '".--"address tho child ca~e.need sucB as Kids Klub,. tho Irvino Child Care ~rojoct .{~oint of ~uthOrit7 h~reement), development of ~rainin~ pro~rams for potential famil~ day earo ~. :.~' provider s',and.fund deve lop~entt, of. eechnica 1: assisea~ce~..., packets~.:_: to~. propare, a' ~ aci lie~. f°r l~eensin~, "?.This'P0rtf°li0.. outlines the features o~.'the'~Irv~ne''child Carej Program"emphasiZing the Irvine Child.Care 'Co~ittee,.' Kids Klub, the Irvine:~Child-Care Pr°ject,~ and the'Child: Care Coordinator. Uniq cl/O ue An r Innovative .... -- FeatUres '- .,, . i ~ · ', Irvine Child Care Committee I I£hild Care CoordinatorI ,'?~e ~ICCC was eStahlish~ in 1979 to identify ~d dmnt Bas~ u~n ~e IC~ a~ ~rkeley Pla~ gs~iates ~e child c~e n~s in I~ine. M~rship at ~at t~ r~o~nda~ons, ~ ~lo~nt de.ch for a ~ild ~ris~ of represen~ves rrm ~o City Co.oil, ~- C~o C~rdim~r was ~nduct~ m~ So.ices C~ssion, Plying Cmssion, Greater s~ific res~ibilities of ~e Child C~e ~rdin~tor I~ine Indus~ial ~a~e, I~ine U~fi~ Sch~l District, is ~ c~rdinate child ~e in ~e Ci~ a~ to offer_ ::::~ ~o Imino ~s~ia~on for Child C~o. ~ n~s assoss- t~ical assis~co ~ c~ent ~ ~t~tial providers rant was d~olo~ by ~s C~ttoo, and ~is info~on of ~ild ~e somicos ~ou~h ~nsul~on, ~uca~oml .' ms present~ ~ City ~cil. ~is info~on rosult~ pr~, ~d info~on dess~~on. ~ ~e f~din~ by ~e Ci~ for an ac~on pl~ re. re b7 ~rkele7 Plamin~ '~s~iates ~ ~o hir~ of a child c~o ~rdimtor. Tho Cmtt~' s fmc~on rm~s to '~';~.;~'. re~rt, ~ advise Ci~ Co~cil on child c~e ne~s. Irvine Child Cam Project ~ Joint Powers o[ Authority (JPA) I Kids Klubl ~o I~ ms devolo~ ~d~ ~oint ~mrs of au~ority ~is Ca~t~ty 8e~ices De~ne pr~r~ ~ ~n 'a~rmnt ~n ~e sch~l dis~ict ~d ~o Ci~ wi~ 8eptmr 1083, ~ ad. ods ~o child c~e no~ for ~o p~se ~ p~te ~ild c~o op~rt~ities ~u~h ~fore ~d aft~ schml c~o ~ou~. pr~rm at ~k plac~ents of relm~le smctmes on s~l sitos, sitos .. ~l~le ho~s vidors for rovi~ '~d u~n approval will allomto sitos . . sch~l sites.~ ~d facili~te pr~r~. The ~A will ass~e ad~te ~ :.~, : ,,. ilities and e~e ~e ~o pr~rm ~ self-sufficient~ '-.:~ : ,' .... ~:~:'~'~e ~A'will additiomlly sOlicit, .r~ive, ~d allomte~ ." ~ ~'. ",'."?, additio~l f~i~g ~d provide op~~ for p~'tici .... . :~, ~ ~tion-~ 1~ in~ f~lies. ' .< ..._ ,., ','" .:.:'..:~.':'-,. .. Co munity Ne d B g :.. The City of Irvine is convinced of 'the POsitive social impact in providing the needed expansion of .. i~ .~ .' ': '~ quality child care services in the con~uni~. A com~tment of the citizens and City to encourage ' i~'..!i:" :'~" '. :' the develo~m~ent of child care programs will facilitate: Freedom of parents, to work and provide '. · ':' for their families; encourage solutior~ for social, oconcanic, and child welfare issues; divert :" .' ~.. juvenile drug/alcohol use, gang act~.vities, and run-ins with 'authorities; and increase performances' '" ~ in school.: The Irvine Child Care Program is a holistic approach to address the needs and. concerns " of the citizens both with and without children. ... "' .. '.' - IncreaSe buying power of cons~er - Worker availabilitY will. - Reduction in the number · :~ ' '"' by allo~ing parents to enter the incr~e as more families -.of children.victims of:.-' ': ,~'~ ':' .;' ~: mrkforce, can find affordable quality ' .crime · ~:':i~ ":'~"' fioo'tax monies tobO-u~ed elSe- - Econm~c expansion will in- nc:~jlect ..... : ,. accidential injuries · · ,'.. ' where. . . · '. crease the tax base., separation from society · :-" ,-- .... - ~arl¥ ChildhOOd deVelot::m~nt will ' - Worker productivity will '- improve performance at school, increase due to parents , :'"': ' " child care. Need Being Met Resource and Referral Expanded Child Care Slots rams , {/, Child Care Coordinator , , Irvine Child Care Project' " Irvine Child Care Project' ~' !~'~ An up-to-date information and - The first year this project WillI -' JPA actively solicits, receives, 'and · ..~x ~ referral system will be made , : provide an additional 240 slots · allocates additional funding to facili- "'.Y-~:~' available to the public regard- and 1400 slots by 1990.~ tate and support the Irvine Child Care' ,~ ?/.~ " Project.' The. Irvine.'Cc~pany c~m,itted i.'~,i?/.~i.~ ing.child care programs in the ' ~ '' ' ' . $250,000 in 1984 -'?'?i/- criteria ~Or nigh'quality Pr~r~s ~ ' -Tn ~, ~0 ch~aren ~tic~a~ea - O~portuni~ie.~ '~or ~w-inC~e ~amnies..i ~ ~'"¥~ '~ is included in packets for child at one park site. ' In less than are provided. ,. .... ',-~," :' care provider applicants. , ' one year that number increased to . .. . ., .' ...~, ., ' ~/i'~' . 180 children with 40 on a waiting Kids' Klub ~i 5,.' ,j ?i'!ii! '..' ,' -. list. . - This program is 100%' self-Sustaining '.%' '/" ~ . ' ~' . through fees.' The C~,~umity DeveloP-.', · :..:., ... . ment BlOCk Grant funds from the state' :!. "' ... provides scholarship opportUnities, for .~' ,..~ ~ ' ~ .' i. low 'income children. . .- ii ii I Educational and-.Technical I Accessible and APprOpriate ~ Assistance - ' Pro§rams' Sites For Child Cam '.... ~'~:~!': Child Care' Coordinator . '. Irvine Child Care Project. ' Remendations to the :City Council and "ii'" _ ..How licensed family '"' - The Irvine Unified School Distric% '. The Irvine Company have been made in -~i. to become.a regards to the ratio of child care · · ~ ~'.' day care, provider" class is offered along with the Child Care Coordin- spaces ~o be required Per percentage · ,./~, .. through the Community serVices .~.~ ~ _ atOr. developed, a. pplic, ation and ~.i of population. ! i~', ~' Departmen~ and taught by the Child , i:' . review process !nsur~ng accep atone .. ~ · . . · .:' '' Care Coordinator.' - ' ." ~ '.: ~ · of only high quality programs a ~.. ~ ~ ~, ~ ~. ~/..~>~.',~'.., _ _ .' _ ..... ~ ,~i ," -~ ~'~ ~ ~-rdinatOr ' ' '~ "-, ~ ' - The Cormmlnlty Development Departme t ~! ~},~'.i-~' ¢~'.'~ for: D~rec~. r.s.: Of. .cen~t~,bas..xLV,.....' ??~ i'~&,',-.'Workea ~itn P~anning i Depar~ent land ~ ~.' the Child Care CaOrdina~or developed Desirable Features .. , 'nd · -~?~..'.'. ~i'. .... i ,~....Documented Need and Fu ed Report' Shared By Community ~ .. .. Make Child Care Recommendations In 1979, ~e City Co~cil r~iz~ ~e pressing n~ ::'. ' Pr~r~ a~ proj~ ~at'ha~ ~d ~ ~ing devel°~ .~. '~: ~e -bas~ on .d~nt~ n~. (~let~ by ~e I~ine for child care ~ ~ co~tt~ ~ addressing ~e , .' '. . ?,:f3: :n~ ~rough ~e develo~nt of ~e I~ine Child'C~e '"' ' Child C~e C~ttee) a~ ~e Berkeley Pla~ing' ': ~tt~.. P~ont Muiso~ ~mups, ~e Imine Child hss~iates R~nda~on. Re,re. ~o d~n~ wo~0 '~ ..' C~o C~ttee, Saddl~ack ~ll~e, Universi~ of. .. :~ a ~~ effort wi~ ov~ 800 .~l~teer ho~s' ~o~ng ' I~ne, ~e ~li~~ ~d b~iness c~t~,r~ty ~ntinue ... ~. ~ ~ards ~e c~letion of ~is re~rt .... ~e Irvine- ~at c~~nt ~ough ~l~n~tion of child ~re '~ Child C~o C~ttee ~ntinue ~eir successes in ~i~' .'~ pr~r~ such as ~e I~ine Child Care Proj~t. '~;' ~r[inent r~o,~r~a~o~ a reali~.: ~ ~le of . ... ~is is ~o Child C~o C~rd~r ~sition. .~. ~ion. of child c~e slo~. ,. , '- . ~ , · , , , ',. ... ~'- , . 2 . · .~:~ . .... ~ ~':~ ... '. ~. '.':.:.~.. . ~ ..'.. . ~. '*'~ ~ . /.~ :.:'~.~'. · .~ '. ~. -. ., . :.." ~ . · · ., · '.,21~..'~ · , '~ ~'~'"'~ Centralized Coordination of Child.Care~ ~Self Sufficient Programs [.' . ,..~ . ~r~ ~e ~~g of I~e's c~~t to ad, ess .:~ ~e I~ine ~ild ~re Cmttee, ~e 8ch~l ~is~ict, . ~o child c~o n~s C~ ~ additioml cm~nt . ~o b~iness ~ty, and ~e Ci~ ~rk. to turk ~ pr~id~ self-mfficimt pr~r~, wi~ ~o Child C~e C~rdi~r ~ de, lop .a~ ~nd ~e I~e ~ild ~e Proj~t ~co~a~ ~e child c~e-facili~es in I~ine. In ~ effort ~tive ~ "~licit ~d all~a~ fmd~g, for ~ . '; ."., · :..:. 'assist ~ents ~d child c~e providers ~e Ci~ of ~e ~p~ of child c~e'~ i~e.'' wi~in . , , ~' I~ine C~~' Se~ices ~~nt will act as a ?, ~e first year of o~ation, ~.~e I~e C~y . cle~ingho~e~ for ~e diss~~on of child c~e c~t~ $250,000 ~d ~o~A ~d Kids Ki~. ' "~ .~'~'. ..' ~.~'~"' info~on for ~en~. . n~ing child ~re. T~icai ::?~i~:~:~.~ich realiz~ 100% self-~ffici~. ~ .:~.~: .'~... · ~ ~ .~.. _~ ??~. ~ ~./~?. assis~ce for facility. ~ pr~r~ develo~nt will. ~?}?-?~ ' ....' . . , ~; ,~.~ ,. ' :, ~ '. ~ .. ~'~'~.~,:~ :.". .: ~ ': ':' ~.~':: :':. ~;::.:>~,~j ;~? ~ avaxl~le ~ pros~~ child,-c~e cent~ O~ra~rs. Program. EValuation . ' i/'Irvine Child Care Committeel' I Kids KlubI I ~rvine Child Care Project I. Each-year The Irvine Child Care Kids' Klub staff conduct q~,~terly Applicants to the Child Care Pro- Cc~-~i,,~ttee develops measurable .. evaluations by reviewing.performance, ject will be reviewed by the goals, and objectives. Additionally, budget, participation and program Joint Powers of Authority Board . cc~mittee membership is revised content. Participant evaluations ' (JPA) The JPA in conjunction~ . on an as needed basis to include · are also received and reviewed on a with the C~ild Care Coordinator those important child care related quarterly basis., will reView programs 'within the.-~.' elements of the c~,,,,unity. The , ~ -' Irvine Child Care Project on an committee also review and makes annual basis in conjunction with recon~nenda.tions to City Council on the Child Care Services State Child Care matters, concerning plan- ' : Licensing Department of Social ning, facilities, and capacity of .. ' Services.. buildings. . Pro§rams Use Of VOlunteers .. Irvine Child ~Care Committeel ! Kids KlubI ., I rvine Child Care 'Project I The Irvine Child Cato Ccm'ai. ttoo Voluntoors with Kids" Klub~ '~ 'Iho five-mr. ~overning. board l~jan :in 1979 ccmpr'ised of six - which includos Univers'it¥ of Cons±ses of one membor frcan ~.'?~"volunteors; The voluntoer com-- Cal±fornia~ Ir~ine students~' ,' of the following: Irvine .City mittee has grown to thirteen 'senior citizens, parents, and ' Council~ City of-IrVine staff, members, including 'representa- . ".. business professionals, assist Irvine .Unified School District tives frc~ Saddleback College, .. i. '~' with program' development and . .Board, Irvine Unified School District the University of California -.. · implementation. CC~X~unity i.'~ staff, and one member-at-large. ,~.,il.. Irvine, the military cc~munity, ':' "" 'professionals such as doctors ' Pro~rams will utilize parent support and c~,ii~nity providers. In ... .. and dentists, provide educa- i': 'groups to implement child care d°cument~g the child care. need, ' ~.. .. tional sessions on health and~ .. consortiums at the designated school over 800.volunteer. hOurs .were ' . ."- "i~.hygiene. In 1984, approximately · sites..... .. ' · ~-"i~i.'~?"spent.by .the-cQ,,i~ttee to'colleCt,` '~ ' 1900 volUnteer hours ~re con- - .?/'i~; the'data; Currently, the cc~- ' .. tributed toward, the Kids! Klub' '~' ... . '. mittee .meets once .a month and. . program. ' · ' ~ . volunteers 80 hours'a month... ' Impact' Of Program' ii,.'.' ' ',.' OF I RV I.H'E. , :', :,~,~ :?.'i~" Irvine Child Care 'Committee'] IKids KlubI [Irvine Child Care 'Project ] " Since 1979, 'documentation of the '~ ' In September 1983, the Kids'. The'Joint Powers of Authority - . .'.'. .~ j~?'.:i child care need in Irvine was ... " Klub began at one park sit~ , established a five-member board '~ . ... c~pletc:-~l through.the'efforts of with enrol~t of only 10 t.~ pr~to.tomporary ~child care. .' '~' 'the. Irvine Child Care Cc~mi'ttee. . participants. That number has facilities on school sites pro-' This documo, ntc::~t nood lod to city increased to 180 partici~ts viding 240 child care slots in' .~- '.: funding of the Berkeley Planning ~-on a daily basis at four park . the first 'year of operatiOn. Each .. l~port and the hiring of the Child sites' with t2'ansportation yoar for the noxt five yoars, six ~a.re Coordinator. 2tae efforts of l~ing provided to and rrm additional portable units will. the c~an.i.tteo and the Ch±id Care school sit. os. hsa result placed with an ultSmato goal of i.' Coordinator will increase 1.icensod of this vory noeded pro:jram~ prov±ding 1400 child care slots. . '. center-baso ccmmn.~ty child care cmmm±t¥ awarenoss of the A goa} of ~ units for each school . .'~ slots rrm 1271 to 1568 slots, child cmo nood has boon s'ito has beon set by tho guthority. 2'hi-q is an incroaso of 197 child incroasod with groator part. i- . which w±ll houso a var±et¥ of' child .'.:. care slots, cipation of volunteers in the - care programs. Kids Klub. In 1984, over 1900 volunteer hours rare c0n-~ toward support of the pro:jram. ..' ~' "':,~.' :' ':~:: · ' · ~' ~ : - ' .i'Rcvenues, Expenditures' ' .. ! CITY "0F'' IRV Cost Per participant ' ATTENDANCE BY PARTICIPANT HOURS: JPA 40 participants x 1690 hours/year x 6 sites = 405,600 hours/year KIDS KLUB ~ " Fall/Winter/Spring ., ~.'. ' --.' ~% "' Long Day: ', 15'participants x 1170 hrs/yr, x 4 sites = 70,200 hours, ' _- , . ,~':.-u. -., Short D~.y: 30 participants x 780 hrs/Yr, x 4 Sites = 93,600 hours .. · >... -~ · Schai-~r : ' . . · .". · .... , · Long Day: '10 participants x 585 hrs/yr, x' 4: sites = 54,600 hours ' Short Day: ' 30 participants x 455 hrs/yr, x 4 sites = 23~400 hours ' 241,800 hours/year . ~" i~"'" CHIT/) CARE CO~fEE AND COORDINATOR :' 260 days/year, x '20 contacts/day 'x .25 hrs/contact, ' ' = 1;300 hours/year .!"', '!., ',!. TOTAL - IRVINE CHILD CARE PBEk/iL~ = 648,700 participant hOurs/year ..': ~' i~ . ~,;: Total Program Cost ... ' TOtal Participant Hours = Cost Per Participant Hour i~:'~':!'" '- $497,250/yro' .. '" 648,700/hrs/yr. = $ .77.-Per Par[icipant,Hour ,:~ ~.~ .., . . -~ '.' , . :, ~. - ,' ,'Total Program Cost Minus Revenue ~' Total PartiCipants = Cost Per Participant Hour ~' ~ ~"" :'.. $ 78 910/yr. · ~ .. = 648,700 . . -- $ .12 Per Participant. . Hour · .*.-~ . .<.'..; ,' , -'~ '~. · . ,. : .: . , . . '.. . ?"~:' '' - '.'/" '~ '. ' ": ,"." ' t . ".. :'~ '' ;, .: ... .. child~ care prOgram which include the Joint Powers Agreement, Kids' Klub, Irvine Child C.a~e Cc~tee, ~ and Child Care cOOrdinator, track program service by contact hours with child care prov~oers an~/or ~ - participants enrolled in programs per day. Combining the different tracking systems made it necessary ~- to use the co~on unit of measurement which is the hours of service provided per year to participants ../':" ' *I.~J day indicates Use of bofore schOOl care during Fall-Winter-sPring or bofore normal, procyram op0rating ..- hours during Suraner. . ~ .~ .. -'~. -.. Short .day 'indicates normal pro:yram operating hours year-round., . :. "~ . : . ..... <,,: ~ ?i '~.' Salaries 0- 7,576 83,800 . .. 71,292 : -162,6'7'7 ' SarvicesZSupplies ~' -0' 1,334 227,531 9,342 ' · .i. i · '238,207 Capital F_qui~t 72~000. 20~000 -0- 4~366 .. . 06~366 · Totals. '. " '~.' .72,000 ' 28,910 311,340 '85,000 ..407'250 ~;~'~ ....... of-Mr:~:lular BU:ildings .: .' $ 32,000 -~ .. ~'~ '" ~"i~.~:~I:II Kids Klub Program Fees. . : .... 311,340 .: :' ~. . ~,. .. IRV HI ., EC 'IRVINE CHI EED'S 5800 ~I 'en "ne~de'd-"~ Ch i I d' 'Cdre :,;}~.z:~.' :.'more than; if; :'?~,"-''"'~'""~' "':':"h'e'* re.~tI":~'~ ...... ',' be":~s.,000 chll~P n ~'~d '"iS Y~a; ln~,: ...... :.., :/....... ;~;: F.;~ "~, ~')i'~ ";' .;~ "~:F ;'~ '~'~:~?: ~ ",i-~ ~'} '~.{;:i-;~ '~' ~ ~:. k~- .~?~ ~. ~:~,,':~ ~ ~,T;'~'~ ~" ~e .:~oo' 'Ch ~idren'un~er-' 27~:ve~s :; ifi'~: ~o88 ;~ d6d. S~oo' sc . ears ':'~'"'"' '? .?'..'.;~: :':'":~'-:~.. more .::"~"B:[~ i d't ~a ~'e:~., centers .' al :yz seven '; (187) :are' cen~erS':are :needed 'to serve 601 of:~'~Irvlne:Chll'~renne'edlng:"~hlld'core'~'. . . - ' 2 ' . ~ ' . , ./~ , ' . . '.'? . ~. :' * ,~ · ; ' ' :.: · ' '" : ',L'~-, ' ~,' ' , ,.? ... -~ '. - . ~: '~' :~,~{,'>,:' ~.:.',: :..,~ .~ ',. · v..' ,'~ , ":'":',''.. .... ' · ~ ,~ ,~ .- , .; - t ~ ., "- : ' ,~' ~ , -'. t~ ' ": i'' · ' ' , ',"; c ~[ ' -" ~s~rve ~;neW ; ~ l[ : de9elopment'; ~an~ edd I t l onal .t~ent~-flve':.~'(25).. ne~ centers'.' ;~.hfind'~ed .~:~ I f~Y.~::(i50) 11 censed''? day': care'~, homes ?, are ,. , :.~,,;?..;~,'.... ? ", .,~ , . .: ~ "'~ "1 ' ? ears'.are.~:'ln ib~° r "~''' ~ ~'~:~: ~' :: ~':'~' "~ .'cense( ~chl'ldr ~:15I ~Of~' IN H ILDi' :iCARE R EC '.; '!>... '.i-,~ . ~ ;!-! ' ' ' ~ "-"?'":-~ :" · :' . 'c~re opP6~t~nlt'les~'utl]izlng Irvlne:~Un .: I "~'sl'tes i~e:n~:;'and ~.,66.~e'hts~ -0f ,'ch'i 1 dr'~'n W:~thl'n: the'~;~:] ur lsdl~t 16n-of':any;and" ' al l"'',.th , , ~ ~':,. ,.' .~. .........-.... ..... , '.,..'~;. , : ~. n~ol'ved~:i' lrvlne Child Care ProJect ,.~:~,... .... ~r:" "':':' ?~-:;'..?'-:-".'"~.::'?.'~.: :?"~';~":¥'a je Irvlne.Chl'ld Care Pro e w n Is em I.,.of. the,.f, ol lowlng..:,:~,~,,;~.,~,,.,.. ~, .'~.- ,. -,' ,. ~-~-', ........ .~:.::,.: ,-..~:,~ ~::,:.~:~'. ,?:.. ,:"..;.::~:.?,~:~::.:':?:~:::'~ : ~ CltY~:.Councl 1 .:(~:~. ~..~::~:.?.:~: ~;..~.~.. ,::.':?.: CItY of.,', lrvlne Employee l'rV'i:de Un I f I ed ~ Schoo 1· D I s t r 1 c t '.-'~ ....... ~,' I rv 1 ne, ~n I f I ed. SchOo 1" DI ~'t r'lc t ~.the "I rVlne' Chi Id Core Pro ex '~fi'h ~ 1 o~:' 'S~'oU I'd addlt 1 ona 1~: en t't t I es? w I sh. to ~: become 1 nv° 1 Ved :". :,: ':'::~-~ ::.'~ :' ,;,~;.;-~ ...:'...~,.~.i:..-. . ' ..... ~ .... ::. ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ';.' ' ' :~ r;:~$ ;: ~..'~-~:~':'~?.f,;-~:'t. '~;[~-A~?~{~}.~'' - :.'/~P L?~" ~ :CS .', .' .:. ;',-;..?': ~;~, ,' '~',~ ~ ~ : ~i tf~'~d:ff ~ ~}'; '~;r;:~:'~';¢'~;~;~':~}~i'~;'l~ lng 'ch I'l d ?ca re :: fac I l I t I eS :',on .:: I ........ rvtne. Un I f led ' School, District .: 's I te s j ."."" ' ' ,.?,. .... ~Oll'~g,~Pro~roms~;ond'provlsl'on.~:':for.:opportunltles for. lo~.:;'lncOme.chl . :, · . . ilT~'l t'at~'i d:-~'a"l l'O'c~t'l'On.:''~°f :.funding' for ~:'~he '~UpPort.."of':'.chl ld. care, 'In' I rvlnel ~:~; ~:,:,...~,~, ..~. ~.~bp~l~te?~iuSD~i tes,~ fo~'~:, l'O~t lon".of-, te~o¢~r~ ,~f~cl 1 ltle~l~ ~t'~.~n ~ r~vtew':~a~iicatlonsand ~1 iocOte sites PR'O ::,. IRVlNE HIL -~ '~' '; ..... ~ '.. - = .'~ "V~' ~ .... .' ~;~"~% ,~F~',r · ' ', ' *' '~ f, ~ ¢~.~'-~' ~' ]rvlne' Unified' School District,.. In ,'CooPeration with' seven'r~ .'groups non-~roflt o~encles',' ~roVlde chi ld c~re. dol lV. for.qSq-528'chlldren~.?,:': ' , ., , ..,' ~,~,',-..-.,- ,,;.,4',. :,., .' ~ . ~:.: · .... ; ';.~,,' '':;~;' · ';:. - ,,..'-. -: ~ ,;-; ....... ~"~::" y SerVlCe~"~e'part~'nt prO¢ldes, extended-day care ..recrea.tlon programs. for 160-188 children.on a'dally basis 'at.q sltes,:~. ,'~ ·, ,~? - , , ~ . _ ~-~. , ,~ , ,. , ,. ,, .y , ....... .t~e~e"'-'Were ;:68 ~:'~.'l'ice'n'sed ':80y ' ~'o'~e;;'h'0ee~' :'ahd' 16 1 lC~h~'es:, day' · '. survey...' n e "~b'~'9'?"~'~' ': i'68i .<e s~' 1 ~ t'e8'' .58o0':;: ir ' '";': :' :~ :~' '*-::chl 'cn[[u care, ::~ ?,~.?,'.~ .... ".-:.. ::. .::,:~ - , :. .? ?. :,'.:--~,~:.~..',::.-',.. · ";:.:.-:.,-.:'. ..~.;~.,.:.:',?.;:;:' :-,:'.' '.'.,.:~.,. ¢.] nfO rmat lan,-,'" ' ~'''' ' '?' "' '" ' :': ' ':'"'ther"' '?¥~""" reda i ~s."':"":'"' '<':' ¥~''; :' 5800" "' '" Child<:''' '-" ren-" ' nee8 ing'',''' '''''~'' .... :' ';'- "C h l' " 'l d? '"'"'"";'care'": ":""¢~ ~,,:.~,. , ...,~. .:,,'*~ ~ ~ ::~::::.J :, -37th ANNUAL CALIFORNIA AND PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RECREATION AND PARK CONFERENCE CHILD CARE COORDINATOR IMPACT ON A MUNICIPAL AGENCY CHILD CARE COORDINATOR HIRED In' April 1984, the Irvine Child Care Committee recommended to 'the Irvine City council to allocate monies to fund a child care coor- dinator for the community' City Council approved a one-year con- tracted position and in NoVember 1984, Nancy'Noble was hired as the Irvine Child Care.Coordinator. Nancy Noble is the first per- son hired by local government in Orange County, and one of the Very few in the nation to serve as a child care coordinator. CHILD CARE COORDINATOR RESPONSIBILITIES The Specific responsibilities of the child care coordinator is to coordinate child care in the City and to offer technical assistance to current and potential providers of child Care services through'''~' consultation, educational programs, and information dissemination° IMPACT OF CHILD CARE COORDINATOR In the four months that Nancy Noble has been with the City of Irvine~ a more centralized and coordinated effort to develop and expand child care facilities has evolved. Ms. Noble has begun interfacing with other city departments 'and existing community service programs to meet .the child care need in the. community. · Zoning ordinances for large family day care homes have been developed in conjunction with the Community Devel- opment Department. · Technical assistance packets have been developed for dis- tribution to potential day care providers through, the Co'unity Development Department. · Training for day care providers is being provided through the Fee Classes program.. · The .Community Services Kids Klub staff have begun to inter- face with day care providers through Ms. 'Nobie's efforts to provide more training and expanded programs. · A computerized resource and referral program is being deVet- '.oped to assist parents needing child care and child care pro- ' · viders needing technical assistance.~:. .A greater awareness of childi'~are legislation 'has assisted Community Services staff to be more responsive to the com~ munity. ' ~ PLEASE NOTE: COPIES OF THE IRvINE CHILD CARE PROJECT, AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS, MAY BE OBTAINED BY CONTACTING:.' DEANNA MANNING DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF IRVINE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 19575 IRVINE, CA 92713 New beginnings. Happy endings. That's what Community Connection for Child Care is all about. The staff works hard to find solutions for those who turn to the agency for help with their child care needs. At CCCC, you'll find people who understand that the search for quality child care can be a nightmare of frustrating experiences. For parents, it can mean days of worry, anxiety and missed work time. For their employers, it can mean a less productive work force, an increase in absenteeism and tardiness and a decrease in employee morale. Of course, the children themselves are affected the most. Community Connection works to improve child care by providing a variety of services for children, parents, employers and child care providers. Serving the counties of Kern, Inyo and Mono, CCCC helps to create new options--giving communities more choices in quality care for their children. Services provided by CCCC Child care information Respite care program service This program helps parents needing tem- Community Connection refers parents porary, short-term, emergency child care looking for child care to licensed centers andbecause of family crisis, stress or medical needs. family day care providers, and offers informa-~Services are available to assist families tion about existing children's services. 'C ~1~ whose children are at risk of The staff also offers consumer information ~ abuse, neglect or exploitation. on choosing child care; a multimedia resource library on parenting, child development and Calif.,,r.,:a related topics; a bimonthly newsletter; and in- ciilre Initiative project formational meetings for directors of child care In the spirit of public/private partnership, centers. '" a variety of major corporations apd public 1~'~~ agencies fund Community Connection to recruit, train and offer support ser_vices to family day care providers. The project also Employer distributes a "developer's kit" contfiining infor- sponsored chi marion on local zoning ordinances and careproject regulations affecting child care facilities. CCCC can help businesses interested in Alternative payment assisting their employees with child care. Corn- CCCC administers a child care subsidy munity Connection shares information on program for income eligible parents who are various options available, ranging from child training, seeking employment or currently in care referral services to salary reduction plans the work force. to starting an on-site child care center. Community Connection can assist Child caredevelopment fund employers in investigating the feasibility of Administered through CCCC, the Child establishing various programs. As a service to Care Development Fund provides child care employers, worksite parenting seminars for assistance for parents who are participants in employees are also offered. ~tj~ Employer's Training Resource programs. Child nutrition program ~~ Self. care program Through the child nutrition program,~BI~ CCCC offers educational programs on self- Community Connection offers licensed family care for school-age children and their parents. day care providers nutrition education and The goal is to provide training and maximize reimbursement for food served to children in the safety, security, comfort' and quality of life their care. of these children during periods of unavoidable phOne friend ~g' parental absence. Phone Friend is a helpline for latchkey Children's self. help project children. It is staffed afterschool hours and Through this project, Community Connec- weekdays during the summer. Children call tion offers child abuse prevention programs for when they are lonely, bored, scared or just children, parents and teachers of subsidized want to talk with a friendly adult., child care centers in Kern County. Xoueb¥ XeM Pe~!uFI V ~ Creating Choices in Child Care New beginnings. Happy endings. That's what Community Connection for Child Care is all about. The staff works hard to find solutions for those who turn to the agency for help with their child care needs. At CCCC, you'll find people who understand that the search for quality child care can be a nightmare of frustrating experiences. For parents, it can mean days of worry, anxiety and missed work time. For their employers, it can mean a less productive work force, an increase in absenteeism and tardiness and a decrease in employee morale. Of course, the children themselves are affected the most. Community Connection works to improve child care by providing a variety of services for children, parents, employers and child care providers. Serving the counties of Kern, Inyo and Mono, CCCC helps to create new options--giving communities more choices in quality care for their children. Services provided by CCCC Child care information Respite care program service This program helps parents needing tem- Community Connection refers parents porary, short-term, emergency child care looking for child care to licensed centers and because of family crisis, stress or medical needs. family day care providers, and offers informa- ,..a~l~ Services are available to assist families tion about existing children's services. .~'~ ~. whose children are at risk of The staff also offers consumer information '~~"%' abuse, neglect or exploitation. on choosingchildcare; a multimediaresource lif.o p! .ch library on parenting, child development and Ca r a ild related topics; a bimonthly newsletter; and in- care~mtmt~ve project '~.~;~.. formational meetings for directors of child care In the spirit Sf public/private partnership, ~~ centers. "..,,~, .~_.~,,~. a variety of major corporations and public agencies fund Community Connection to recruit, train and offer support services to family day care providers. The project also Employer distributes a "developer's kit" containing infor- sponsoredchil m~io~ on local zoning ordinances and careproject regulations affecting child care facilities. CCCC can help businesses interested in Alternative payment assisting their employees with child care. Corn- CCCC administers a child care subsidy munity Connection shares information on program for income eligible parents who are various options available, ranging from child training, seeking employment or currently in care referral services to salary reduction plans the work force. to starting an on-site child care center. Communi.ty Connection can assist Child care development fund employers in investigating the feasibility of Administered through CCCC, the Child establishing various programs. As a service to Care Development Fund provides child care employers, worksite parenting ..seminars for' assistance for parents who are participants in employees are also offered. .~~ Employer's Training Resource programs. Child nutrition program ~~ Self. care program Through the child nutrition program, CCCC offers educational programs on self- Community Connection offers licensed family care for school-age children and their parents. day care providers nutrition education and The goal is to provide training and maximize reimbursement for food served to children in the safety, security, comfort and quality of life their care. of these children during periods of unavoidable parental absence. phOne friend ~]~- Phone Friend is a helpline for latchkey Children's self. help project children. It is staffed afterschool hours and Through this project, Community Connec- weekdays during the summer. Children call tion offers child abuse prevention programs for when they are lonely, bored, scared or just children, parents and teachers of subsidized want to talk with a friendly adult., child care centers in Kern County. Xouafi¥ XeM pa~,!uFI ¥ ~ Creating Choices in Child Care COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE Summary Findings Greater Bakersfield Area Child Care Information Project 3uly, 1986 . SUPPLY FACTS o In 1986, there are 233 active family day care homes and 95 group Child care centers with the capacity to serve 6,831 children in the Greater Bakersfield area. ° Almost ~ in ~ child care spaces are in child care centers rather than family day care homes. o Only 19 percent of the total capacity in day care homes and centers is subsi- dized for low income families with public dollars. Almost ail of the subsidy is in child care centers. ° In 1986, child care fees average S2,~50 a year for full-time care (8-10 hours/ day) for one preschool child in private care. Average full-time infant care fees are S#,000 annually in centers and almost S3,000 in homes. ° Seventy-two percent of all centers in Greater Bakersfield are private, non-profit. The remaining are for-profit businesses, mostly "mom and pop" in nature rather - than chain operations. ° Only 66 percent of child care Centers are open year-round and only four centers and thirteen Family Day Care Homes offer employed parents child care services during non-traditional working hours. . ° There are only 227 licensed spaces for children under the age of two in child care centers in Greater Bakersfield. ° There are currently no services available for children who are mildly ill. Data compiled from surveys conducted by Community Connection for Child Care during .the summer of 1986. COMMUNITY CONNECTION FOR CHILD CARE Summary Findings.. .... Greater Bakersfield Child Care Information Project DEMAND FACTS o There are 70,832 children 0-13 years living in the Greater Bakersfield Area; 35,400 under the.age of 6 and another. 35,400 between the ages of 6 and 12. In 1986, child care centers and family day care homes in Greater Bakersfield are able to serve only 61% of the children from birth - 13 years needing care while their parents work. Over 10,000 children cannot be served by existing licensed services. Based on the increasing number of' infants and preschoolers, the rising number of single parent families, and the fact that 60Z of all mothers work outside the home, the_need for child care spaces will continue =o ' grow.. · In 1985, Community Connection for-Child Care handled child care requests for over 3,600 children, over five percent of the entire Greater Bakersfield population of children under 13 years. Twenty-four percent were infants and toddlers under 2; eighty-two percent had working parents and over half needed care full-time. ' More than one of every five calls received bY the Community Connection for Child Care in 1985 was from a parent living in the Southwest o By 1990, it is anticipated that there will be a ten percent increase in children due td the recent "baby boomlet" produced by the large..· number of women of childbearing age and the influx of families seeking employment in the area. * Statistical information provided by the Kern .County Council of Governments