HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 CITY cOUNCIL REFERRAL
HEETING OF: 11/10/93
REFERRED TO:,. BUDGET/FINANCE J STINSON
ITEM: RECORD¢ 12623
Correspondence received from Charles D.
Lindsay, President, Kern Transportation
Foundation, dated.November 3, 1993, expressing
their appreciation for City's continued support,
and requesting a contribution of $10,O00'for' next
year's planned activities.
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL-
· . RECEIVE AND REFER TO BUDGET AND FINANCE
COHMITTEE. APPROVED. AB:
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: YES'
.DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK:' 11/15/93
NOTE: STATUS CHANGES ARE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL
AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN!.
Kern 1'ransportafion .Foundation
......... ~ ....... .-~ ~ ..........
c~c~_~ r~,, ~.,~.~ YYe're Mo v/n~? Forward
"'"'~'-': .~ ~W"~ ~"dJ
November 3, ]
Mayor Bob Price
Membem. of City Council
City of
~ 50~ Tru~on Avenue
Bakemfield, GA 9330]
Dear Mr. Mayor and Membem of Council:
The purpose of this letter is to thank you for your $5,000 ~ontfibution to the Kern Transpo~ation
Foundation last year and to request your continued supped for our a~ivities that am planned for
ne~ year which is the period from December ], ~OO3, to November 30, ]OO4.
The Foundation's objectives for the past year worn achieve..We C°mplet~ development of our
video and have conducted a number of speakin0 en0a0ements for community or0anizations. In
addition, we were able to sponsor a reception for General dim van Leben 8els, tho Director of
Caltmns, we attended a series of meetinos with Senator Mills and the staff of the San Dieoo
Metropolitan Transit Development Board, and w~ met with various city, ~ounty, and'state clewed
officials and staff member.
The enclosed brochure may se~e as a reminder of the Foundation's mission. Since
tmnspodation issues at tho Federal, State, and Io~1 level am movin0 fo~a~ ve~ fast, the
Foundation Board derided in July that the Foundation must increase it's level of activity in order
to fulfill that podion of it's minion related to the buildin0 of the publiqpfivate paflne~hip
necessa~ to develop and fund a modem, balanced tmnspodation system in Kern County. Hem
am our specific objectives:
~ KemCoG is pmceedinO with transpodation studies for all areas of Kern County includino
the Metro Bakemfield ama, a process that should be ~mplete by the end of ]994.
Ihmu0h a series of meetin0s and wo~shops with the leade~hip of the various
Communities, the Foundation intends to facilitate local padicipation in tho determination
of each community's tmnspodation needs and priorities. Without that Io~al involvement,
we cannot expect supped of a Oovemment developed plan that ne~s citizen approval.
~2 Kern County will not be able to meet it's tmnspoflation needs unle~ it develops the
lundin0 sources that will qualify it as a "self help" county. While KemOO~ is aware of
the various State and Federal lundin0 soumes cu~ently available for tmnspodation, the
issue of local lundin0 alternatives is hi0hly ~mplex. A 0mat deal of wo~ needs to be
done by the Foundation to analyze the applimbility of alternative Io~1 lundin0 soumes
to the Ion0 list of localized and county wide transpodation needs.
City, county and state officials need to be involved in this pincer. In addition, these
complex lundin0 issues must be inte0mtod into the IDolized ~mmunity discussions
noted in ~] above.
~3 The public needs to be a~umd that we am 0ettin0 maximum use of tho existin0
infrastructure-before we ask them to pay mom for new proje~s. Therefore, the
Foundation intends to padicipate in the development and implementation of such
projects as alternative wo~ s~hedules and fide sham plans.
The Kern Transportation Foundation's ob_iective and roll in the above processes is to assist
KernCOG. the County, and the Cities by facilitating the education'of and support from the
private community so that when the time comes to a~t. the residents of Kern County will be
well informed,
For these reasons, the Foundation Board of Dir'ectors acted to employ a full time paid
Foundation President who will be responsible for coordinating the above activities among the
Foundation' Board of Directors and the Advisory Board, KemCOG, and the local community
leaders, elected officials, and staffs in the vadous County communities.
We hope that you agree that the Kern Transportation Foundation is an important catalyst for that
public/private partnership that is necessary for the development of our future transportation
infrastructure.
Again, thank you for last years contribution. Due to our expanded objectives, our budget ~or next
year is double what we have needed to date. In this regard, we are requesting a $10,000
contribution from the City of Bakersfield. This is consistent with requests being made from other
agencies and from the pdvate sector.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please let me or our Chairman,
Ray Watson, know. Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Respectfully,
cc: Mr. Ray Watson. Mr. Alan Tandy
Mr. Ed Schulz
Mr. Ron Brummett
Officers Kern Transportation Foundation Ke/'F~ 'ronsporfof/on Foundofion
Board of Advisors
Charles D. Lindsay Ben Austin Karl Hetlinger Dan Panero
Max Bacerra Ed Hickmann Peter Pankey //'/,/E '/' ~ ////
Sheryl Barbich Bart Hill Charles Parlier
Chairmal! Nancy Sass D. Kirk Hoffner Peter Parra
Raymond A. Watson Carolyn Seck Larry Holochwost Ken Peterson
KGET-TV 17 Kelly Blanton Jack Hunt Leo Pierucci
Lanny Borthick Allan Jaffe Cathy Prout
Chief Financial Officer Jason Brant Sill Jenkins Catherine Reheis
Roger A. Mclntosh Connie Brunni Tom Jones Mike Richardson
Martin-Mclntosh Curtus Bryan Roberta Joughin Joyce Robinson
Jim Burke . Bob Karpe Mel Rubin
Secretary Cathy Sutler Thomas Kelly Steve Ruggenberg.
Ronald E. Brummett Greg Bynum Mai Khachigian Judy Salamacha
Kern Council of Governments M.H. Carrillo Dorothy Knight Mark C. Salvaggio TRANSPORTATION
Larry Carr Ken Knost Ken Sec, or
Ken Carter Pauline La~oed Thomas Shaffer
Board of Directors Warren Carter Nedra Lehr Mary K. Shell
Nathan Calver Tony Manzano Gale Shuck
Roy Ashbum Jim Clark. Jr. . George Martin Dan Smith
Supervisor, County of Kern Les Clark Steve Martin Gene Smith
Morgan Clayton Bob Matthews' Pat Smith
John Spaulding. David Cothran Bart McCarthy Jay Sprague
Operating Engineers, Local 12 Jeff David Kevin McDermott Jerry Stunners
Beverly Davis Me.I McLaughlin Larry Starrh
Roy Weygand Pat DeUond Bill Mead Susan Strahan
Kern County Taxpayers Association Brent Dezember Clarence Medders Nancy Strong
Ray Dezember Harold Meek Jeff Swartz
Karen Wass Sophie Dodge Rosemary Meodoza Gene Tacked
Bakersfield Association of Realtors Barbara Don Carlos David Milazzo Cynthia Tonkin
Lynn Edwards Ned Miller ' Ester Torres
G.D. Darling John Enriquez L. Dale Mills Mike Turnipseed
Automobile Club of Southern California Dwight Ensor Ron Mires David Urne~'
Patricia Farris Dick Moser Marie Walker m/'"~
MAINTAIN
· Michael Fisch Don Mudin Chds Walters
Kern Transportation Foundation Chris Frank Ernest Napolis James Ware KERN,..,~,u,.,,, o
P.O. Box 486 Dean Gay Ved Nash Greg Whitney
Bakersfield, California 93302-0486 Lucio Gonzales Kirk Nelson Mary Jane Wilson
(805) 834-1369 Bill Hample Paul Neufeld I~avid Winegar QUALITY OF LiFE
J. Dale Hawley Karen Northcutt Donald Zachary
Bamie Herman Bean O'N~al
~ Frank Herrera ' Jess Ortiz
~'ransportation and Gtc wth in It's time to take action. Many Kern County residents What You Can Do
,,ll~ern County are recognizing the need to look ahead and em-
brace the inevitable changes. That means design- First of all, be informed. Learn about the choices
Over the years, Kern County residents have been lng neighborhoods that will accommodate growth, we must make as a community. If you're con-
fortunate. We live in pleasant communities and looking at alternative modes of transportation and cerned about specific transportation issues,
enjoy a superior quality of life, isolated from many finding ways to fund the completion of our transpor- talk to your local government representatives
of the traffic-related prob ems. plaguing, our larger tation system, and ask them to become actively involved in
.neighbors to the north and south, moving the transportation agenda forward.
But as Kern County continues to grow, the scene is Meeting the Needs
changing. In fact, since 1970, the Bakersfield met- Through individual vision and commitment, Kern
ropolitan-area population has increased by 42 per- Adequate funding 'is not available through tradi- County will be able to make the transportation
cent. During the 1980s, Bakersfield was the sixth tional sources. To address our growing transporta- planning and funding choices that can shape its
tion issues, a group of concerned citizens formed future for the better. Everyone will benefit. To-
[ / the Kern Transportation Foundation in 1992. A non- gether we can:
Kern County Population profit public benefit corporation, Kern Transporta-
I Growthrrends i tion Foundation is working with the government to
develop a Plan and find funding solutions for Kern ® Build a better economic and business
800,000 ~--------~ ~ County's future needs.. · climate. Lower
600,000 _ ___ _ _ The foundation's mission is to promote a modern,
vehicle
operating
costs
by
in-
1 ~ ' I balanced transportation system that enhances our creasingtheefficiencyofourtransportation
quality of life and supports the economic vitality of system.
/ ~r00,000 [---~--_--_~--_~--_~"Z~i thecommunity. Withinapublicforum, theKern
Transportation Foundation is working to: · Reduce air pollution and improve health.
/2°°'°°°0[- ...... !
· Reduce commute time andrelated stress.
· Create public awareness ofcurrentand future
transportation needs in Kern County. Best of all, we'll be investing in a better quality
[1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 I of life by taking control of our own destiny. How
~)~p~.,,rF~,~ .· Find creative and innovative ways to provide we and our children live in the year 2010 will
depend on the wise choices we make today.
for and fund our transportation needs.
fastest-growing city in the nation. And, we're not
slowing down. By the year 2010, the area popula-
tion is. projected to grow an additional 32 percent! · Build the kind of private and public partnership
that is necessary to develop and fund a modern,
balanced transportation system.
While growth offers residents a healthy economy,
it also increases traffic congestion. The signs are Kern Transportation Foundation
already here -- clogged· intersections, slowing .... ==~ ..........
traffic on rural highways and acloud of air pollution ~~ _ "~. -... ~-~. ~_~.,~.;.~
· on the horizon. /4/ e ' r e M o v / n g F o r w a r d
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MElTING OF: 11/10/93
REFERRED TO: BUDGET/FINANCE J STINSON
REFERRED TO: POLICE DEPT S BRUMMER
ITEM: RECORD# 12659
Costs of Sexual Assault Response Team and
Examiners. (Brunni)
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
BRUNNI REFERRED ISSUE TO BUDGET AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE FOR STUDY.
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED:'YES
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 11/15/93
MEMORANDUM
November
.... ' ~ -~ --------------~ S ¢, 1993
SUOJECT SEXUAL ASSAULT ' RESPONSE TEAM/REF. RECORD
For the pa~t year, Sergeant Hartshorn, Supervisor.of the
department s Sex Crimes Unit, has been informally involved' w~
personnel.of Memorial Hospital who have ex tess
performing examinatl'ons of ........ P. ed an lnterest. Rn
understanding is that examinations performed by a Sexual
Nurse Examiner would cost the Clt a roxi
examlnatlon. ' ¥ DD matel¥ $¢00 per~ -'.
Currently, ~he Bakersfield p~---- - . .:
· ! ~&&u~ De ar=me
with Kern Medical Cente. ~ ..... P__ nt ~s under contraet ·
~ ~ ~ perform this service. The m~ximum
cost to the police department is $250 per exam. Services
provided by a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner are included in the
-! cost. In October of 1991, Kern Hedical Cent
'i S.A.N.E. prO~ram, n ~o __ . er notSfied us that
· _ ur.~ would n
examinations wo,,]~ ~ ..... o longer .De available to use nd
~ personnel. -~ ~= performed by available emergency medic:l
Since January, 199~; the police department has not been billed by
Kern Medical Center for the services which we. are financially
responsible per the contract. It is Sgt. Hartshorn,s contention
that the S.A.N.E. Program does, indeed, provide improved services
for victims, law enforcement and the Distr~ct Attorney's'Office.
We have maintained contact with Ms. Grabbs of the Memorial
Hospital Foundation and we have-offered our support of the
S.A.N.E. Program.
Based on our understanding that S.A.N.E. examSnations would cost
$400 we have not entered into any contractual agreements due to
budgetary concerns. I have attached a letter of support prepared
on August 25, 1993.
The police department will cooperate and provide any assistance
requested in the development of a Sexual Assault Response Team.
Please find attached a copy of our contractual agreement with
Kern Medica! Center dated October 31, 1990. In addition, a
letter of.notification dated October 10, 1991 is attached.
SEB/vrf
Attachment: BPD Letter of Support - Memorial
KMC Letter of Agreement
KMC Letter of Notification
SART
CITY OF BAKERSFIE'LD
CALIFORNIA
$.E. BRUMMER POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHIEF OF POLICE (805! 326-36
FAX 1805) 326-3(::
August 25, 1993
Memorial Hospital Foundation
?.O. Box 2401
Bakersfield, CA 93303
Attention: Shawne Grabbs
Dear Ms2 Grabbs:
The Bakersfield Police Department would like to express our support for the
S.A.N.E. programs with regards to investigations of rapes. We have found that
when a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Performs the rape exam and collects evidence,
the quality of the evidence obtained is very high.
Due to the S.A.N.E. training, the examiner is very skilled, maintains a good
relationship with the victim, and can provide testimony to interpret the evidence
gathered to help substantiate the victim's account of what occurred during the
crime With the intensive training a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner re '
we 'kn~w that the ' '
examiner availabl:~ldence was collected by the most qualified and mostC:~;:;Lenced
Sincerely,
'S. E. BRUM~R
Chief of-Police
By' i~.7,; ..........
Sergeant Bob Hartshorn
Juvenile/Sex Crimes ..
Investigations Division
RM:ddj
I KE N
MEDICAL
I CENTEF
AFFILIATED With UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS
OF MEDICINE AT LOS ANGELES, SAN DIEGO AND IRVINE
October 31, 1990
Lt. Mike Sorrel/
Bakersfield P°llce'Department
P.O. Box 59
Bakersileld, Calllornla 93302
Dear Lt. Soft'ell:
We aPPreciated the opportunity to meet With
October 18th regarding our Sexual Assault you and Sgt. Darbee
Program. on
NUrse Examiner (SANE)
As we discussed, we exten
~e.understandlno ~,, __ ded ~he program ' ._ ·
~na~ the ofilcer=~=~_~0u would Cover th to your Department With
lnforma 4~. ~_. -..¥ w~s manaoln, e cost. It /s uni
t..., uerore he ~-~- - ° ~ the pro ram ~ --~ ortunate
- ' '~-~ your Department. --~ .o[ pass on.this
You stated that you cannot pay these bills now but will consider
the expense tn your next budget cycle.
BelOw are the SANg services KMC Provides With associated costs, as
you requested:
- Examination $190
- Lab
1 slide $ 20
2 Slides $ 40
3 slides $ 60
Range: $210 - $250
Ne will continue to send
account for th- ..... bills ~' ~ ....
vo-- ~ ..... ' ~-c as well as -~ uu~. uarDee as
- -' N=~-r~ment. 'The bills wll~hbee L~o_f_ th? program r:laW~e~ to
to
The costs of the -- --''~n oti however.
~ANE, program,
and we cannot commit to th- P~lmarlly salaries
Your Department ........ ~ same level of ..... are significant
~vuwun~s ~or ap~ro~ .... o==vl~e without lundin-
You are certat--- - r ~aa[eiy 75~ of the cases.
"~Y welcome'to continue brtngtn r
perpetrators to KMC, however, we cannot gUaran
be doing' the exam, nor ca ~e ape victims and
This relates to n we always that a SANE will
Provide Immediate service.
our inability to commit the resources as we have
.... " done in the past.
In our meeting you voiced a concern that we m~ght handle your Cases
differently, than Other /aw enforcement agencies. ! assured you
that this 'Would not Occur. However, Since our meeting. KCSO has
indicated a desire to reimburse call for the SANE,s for KCSO cases
and Consequently they Will receive a higher level of services in
these instances.
We have all agreed that the SANE Program is excellent.· It
Provides law enforcement With special evidential
humanistically, it benefits ~ape victims; and it facilitates and
expedites the examination PrOCess. We will
means of funding such as grants, however look for alternate
Some Point, your Department Will COnclud~e are hopeful that at
worthwhile to fund.
Sincerely, -that t~e 'program is
Barbara Pawley
ASsociate Administrator
~ cc: SEt. Bill Darbee, Bakersfield Police Department
· i Sara Ryals, Deputy District Attorney
Commander Stanley ~oe, Kern County Sheriff,s Department
Gary Eggert, Chief Operations Officer
EUgene Kercher, Chairman, Emergency Department
Carolyn Edwards, SUpervising NUrse Emergency Department
Steve Kasal, ASSociate Finance Director
RECEIVED
KERN
MEDICAL
CENTER
AFFILIATED WITH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS
OF MEDICINE AT LOS ANGELES. SAN C)IEGO ANO IRVINE
October 10, 1991
Sergeant Bill Darby
~ Bakersfield Police Department
· i Sex crime Division
! 1601Truxtun Avenue
~ Bakersfield CA 93301
Dear Sergeant Darby:
.;
'{ We are very sorry to announce that effective 10/06/91, Kern Medical
i Center will no longer be able to provid~'a SeXual Assault Nurse
Examine~ for on call COverage.
This decision has been made as a result of recent staff
resignations and the unavailability of t~ain]ng mot. e staff prior to
September of 1992, when a cla~s will th~n be offered in Santa Cruz.
Victims of sexual assault arriving in the Emet'gency Depa~tmen~ will
be treated by the Emergency Physician on duty.
If you have any further concerns, please feel free to contact us
directly.
Sincerely,
Eugene E. Kercher, M D.
Chairman ·
Department of Emergency Medicine
Carolyn Edward~, R.N.
SupervisSnG Nurse
Department of Emergency Medicine
CE/fa ..~"
OWNED a~n ~.,
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MEETING OF: 09/22/93
REFERRED TO: BUDGET/FINANCE J STINSON
IT'EM: RECORD~'12408
Correspondence received from James A. Rhodes,
Kern County Auditor:Controller, dated September
8,.1993, regarding Alternative Property Tax
Distribution Plan. ("Teeter Plan").
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
RECEIVE AND, REFER TO BUDGET, AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE. APPROVED. AB: KM.
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: YES
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 09/24/93
NOTE STATUS CHANGES ARE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL
AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN!
RECEIVED
!$EP 13 1993 September 8, 1993
FINANCE DEPT.
TO: M.,L · ~ ~ CITIES AND SELF-GOV~I~
~apter 3 of Pa~ 8 of Division 1 of ~e Califo~ia Revenue
Taxation C~e (co~cing wl~ ~lon 4701) pr~ide8
alternative ~e~ for dis~ibution of tax levies. ~e Co~ty
-plea to i~ple~nt ~is alter~tlve pro~y ~ ap~io~ent
pr~ess for all agencies qov.e~ ~ ~e ~ard of Su~isor8 for
~ri~s afar July 1, 199~.
~is alte~ative pr~ess (call~ the 'T~r PI~'~ after 'its
au~or) has ~ee BaJor ~:
· Fiat, the ~ty will 'buy ~' all ~lons of ·
delin~ent s~~.t~es ~ to ~e aff~t~ agencies.
~is will reset in a one-t~ ~nt ~ each aqen~ of
95% of their share of all delin~ent s~r~ t~es as of
~e clue of ~iness on ~e 30, 1993. ~e re~ini~ S%
must ~ plac~ In a ~n~t Tax ~s~ Rese~e
to cover t~ l~s~ ln~r~ ~en ~e sale ~/ce of
pro~y ia less ~ ~e ~t of ~e8 due.
· -S~ond, the ~ty will' ~ar~t~ ~at ea~ agen~ will
r~eive ~e full a~o~t8 o~ a~~ pro~y
all~t~ to it for ea~ ye~ 8~i~ wl~ fi8~l
1993-94. ~i~ each year we will ~ntinue to ap~ion
~ney to aff~ agencies as ~ ~en~ ~e r~eiv~.
In ~ly, foll~i~ ~e end of a fis~l year, we will
up ~y ~fference ~tween ~e ~t ~l~a~
aqen~ ~ ~e ~o~t ap~lo~ d~i~ ~e ~e~.
o~er ~r~, ~e ~ty will ~e each aqe~
d~lng ~e final re~nciliation pr~8 in
. ~i~, ~e Co~ty. will ~ive ~eir ~e of prior
~~ ~e, '~nalties ~. interest whi~ ~ld
no,ally go to each involv~ age~, A ~ion
Co~tY'B revenues from c~r~t ~nalti~ ~
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 2
delinquent penalties and .interest also must be retained
in the Tax Loss Reserve Fund.
The advantages to agencies are the one-time cash payment for
delinquent taxes (distributed using the more-beneficial 1992-93
apportionment factors) and the comfort of a more stable revenue
source since.100% of allocated taxes are assured, protectinq the
agencies from an increase in property tax delinquency.
The County will deal with the uncertain, cash flo~s caused by
changing delinquency and pa~ent rates, and will benefit from
penalty and interest revenues.
Tax payments which will be included in this plan are 'current
secured taxes; debt service payments, secured utility taxes, and
State Homeowner's Exemption rei~bursement a~ounts, ~ are
unsecured tax payments, unitary (utility roll) tax distributions
and special assessment pa~ents~ these will continue to be
distributed to agencies as.in the past. At this ti~e, we believe
supplemental tax payments will be excluded from the alternative
process~ however, this area is under study andthesepa~nents aight
be included.
Cities and public 'districts for which the County treasury is not
the legal depository, which desire to participate in this
alternative tax apportionment process, are invited to do so.
Revenue and Taxation Code (.RTC) Section 4715 requires that agencies
which do not usethe County treasur~as their legal depository must
adopt a. resolution by October 15, if participation in this
alternative process is desired. Self-governed Special districts'
which douse the County treasury as their legal depository, will be
included automatically in the process.
Entities are advised that the couitment to participate .in this
process is virtually irrevocable. RTC 4702 providee for
discontinuance of the entire process by action of the Board o£
Supervisors either on its o~n initiative' or after receipt of a
petition to do so from two-thirds of the participatin~ entities.
There is no provision for withdrawal from the process by an
individual agency at their request.
To aid in deciding whether or not to participate in this process,
the attached listing reflects the amount of taxes receivable for
each entity as of June 30, 1993.
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 3
Further details concerning this alternative process are avail~
from EdJohnston, Chief, Auditing Division, at (805) 861-2331,
3533.
sincerely,
S A.'RHOADES
AUDITOR-CONTROLleR
/
JAR/EEJ:ksw
Attachment
COUNTY OF KERN '
DISTRICT BY D]STR[CT
ANALYS[S
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT DO NOT KEEP
THEIR FUNDS ]N TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT
CITY OF ARVIN 20001 2,428.55
CITY OF BKSFLD 20101 1,147,280.24
BKSFLD CITY BONDS 20104 12,748.25
BKFLD REDEVEL 20160 189,869.39
CITY OF CALZF CITY 20201 47,146.44
CAL CITY R.D.A. 20207 272,765.20
C]TY OF DELANO 20301 64,439.02
DELANO R.O.A 20304 2,527.27
CITY OF HAR]COPA 20351 2,489.47
CITY OF HCFARLAND 20401 7,187.18
CITY OFR]DGECRST 20451 38,665.92
RDGCRST REDEVo 20459 336,830.68
CITY OF SHAFTER 20501 15,929.22
SHAFTER RDA 20502 6,781.72
CITY OF TAFT 20551 22,684.49
TAFT REDEV 20554 48,218.38
CITY OF TEHACHAP! 20601 33,796.90
CITY OF ~ASCO 20651 17,377.23
~ASCO R.D;A. 20654 1'4,015.98
EAST KERN JT HOSP 42160 6,163.18
KERN VALLEY HOSP. 42180 8,039.86
NUROC HOSPITAL 42183 4,437.43
NO KEN SO TUL HOS 42184 15,370.39.
TEHACHAP! HOSP. 42186 19,934.93
TEH VAL HOSP BD 42188 2,681.90
~EST S]DE HOSP. 42190 32,832.14
ANT VAL SOIL CONS 42450 319.74
FRAZ PK UT]L D]ST 42620 1,561.41
FRAZ PK PUD BONDS 42627 5,023.51
LANONT UT~L D]$T 42640 3,308.48
LAH UT 1965 ~EED 42641 133.24
SO SAN JOAQ ~T]L ' 42700. 17,437.00
BEAR VAL CON SERV 60010 31,008.11
ROSAHOHD COHSERV 50360 g,391.99
ROSAHOND CSD BOND 50365 12,814.04
8ERREND HESA ~TR 60010 4,266.10
DEVIL'8' DEN ti'TR' 60043 73.49
HENERY HILLER NTR 60045 2,397.60
KERN DELTA NTR 60050 36,846.65
LOST HILLS NTR 60060 8,284.90
BUTTONN CO NATER 60100 598.43
BUTTONE NTR ll BD 60101 1,153.40
LEBEC CO NATER 60148 978.03
COUNTY OF KERN
O:[STR]CT BY D]STR]CT
ANALYS]S
TEETER PLAN
· AGENCIES THAT OD NOT KEEp
THE]:R FUNDS :IN TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT
RAND CON CO WTR 60150 1,655.00
RAND CO WTR I! BO 60153 838.42
ANT VALE. KRN WTR 60205 18,916.89
AV EK WTR-CL CZTY 60207 ~33 10
AV-EK wTR BOND 60210 97,058:39
AV-EK ~TR CAL BD 60211 35,183.33
AV-EK ~TR DEBT 60215 255,943.00
KERN CO ~TR AGNCY 60220 102,835.1.0
KCWA ZN't? DEBT 60229 129,074.22
KCWA ZN ~17 DEBT 60239 177,061.65
KC~A ZN t18 DEBT 60240 3,659.10
KCWA ZN ~19 DEBT 60241 283,889.46
KERN CO WTR ]HPll 60261 1,042.50
KERN CO WTR ]HPI3 60263 191.58
KCWA ~INP. t4 BO . . 60264 104,504.03
ANT VAL JR COL 69960 24,669.66
A VAL JR COL BOI2 69980 465.25
COUNTY OF KERN
O]STR]CT BY O]STRZCT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENC/ES THAT KEEP THE/R
FUNDS /N COUNTY TREASURY
AGENCY NAHE FUND BUY OUT
NOR SAN/T. 40279 7,385.40
ARV]:N PUBL/C CEH 42000 '1,607.99
KERN R]:V VAL CEH 42010 3,427.60
.EAST KERN CEN 42020 8,907.62
NO 'KERN CENETERY 42030 12,781.63
CENETERY NO I 42035 7.978.57
TEHACHAP]: CEH 42045 11 . 598.38
WEST S/DE CEN 42050 10,892.34
FA]:RHAVEN F/RE 'DT 42080 2,339.72
SO WEST HOSP 42185 2.345.60
DELANO NOSQ ABATE 42305 17,669.76
KERN. NOSQ ABATE 42315 108.032.94
WEST S/DE HOSQ. 42335 36,980.43
BEAR NT REc & PK 42402 10,654.49
BUTNWLD REC & PK 42404 2. 122.68
NCFARLAND REC-PK 42409 21,873.97
N BKSFLD REC & PK 42411 154,182.04.
SHAFTER.REC & PK 42415 8,677.38
TEHACHAP! REC-PK 42420 29,181.49
WASCO REC'& PK 42429 12,309.60
WEST S]DE REC-PK 42438 49,351.10
CUYAHA SO/L CONS 42464 1.18
EAST KERN REC CON 42468 733.22
TEHACHAP] RES CON 42480 396.43
8KSFLD SEP GRADE 4.2530 7,048.82
HOJAVE UT]L D/ST ~ 42650 16,197.14 '
PLAZNV/EW UT]L BD 42660 597.31
KERN R/VER LEVEE 42922 1,635.62
EAST KERN AZRPORT 42950 9,511.20
TULARE LAKE DRN 42970 0.29
BORON CONH $ERV 60040 987.60
BORON CSD ]:HI~ 11 ' 50045 154.28
DESERT LAKE CSD 50220 387.07
E NJ:LES C(X4 SERV 50250 t2,079.44'
GOLD HILL CSD 50270 6~313.14
GOLD HILL HT tl 50274 209.61
GOLD HILL HT t2 50275 90.19
NTN NDOW8 COH SER 50330' 381.96
STAL $PG COH SERV .. 50380 14,989.53
SH-WASCO ZRR DEBT 50580 46,447.69
SAND CANYON I~ATER 60085 1,882.35
GRNFLD CO WATER 60120 I, 107.37
HRTTLER CO* I,/TR 60149 250.63
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENCZES THAT KEEP THEIR
FUNDS ]N'COUNTY TREASURY
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT
TEH CUNN CO WTR 60170 117,861.24
TEH CUM WTR IHP~2 60176 80.52
TEH CUH WTR INPl3 60177 205.23
· TEH CUHN WTR BOND 60179 30,280.95
TEH CUNN ~TR DEBT 60180 64,275.71
T-C ~TR STATE PHT 60182 76,381.06
NOR HUNICZPAL ~TR 60960 11,615.64
NOR MUNI ~TR BOND 60962 11,506,63
NOR NUN! WT-IMP A 60970 1,841.60
BAKERSFIELD
Kevin McDermott, Chair
Patricia J. DeMond
Randy Rowles
Staff: John W. Stinson
AGENDA
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMM1TrEE
Wednesday, September 29, 1993
1:00 p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room
1. Property Tax Distribution ("Teeter Plan")
2. Set Next Meeting
MEMORANDUM
SEPTEMBER 30, 1993
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
. ~,/
FROM: GREGORY J. KLIMKO, FINANCE DIRECTOR~//~ ..
/V
SUBJECT: PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
The Kern County Auditor-Controller has inquired as to the
City's/Agency's desire to participate in an alternative property
tax apportionment process commencing with the 1993-94 fiscal year.
This process is known as the "Teeter Plan" for "secured taxes"
defined as cur'rent secured taxes, debt service payments, Secured
Utility Taxes and State Homeowner's Exemption Reimbursements.
While the County Board of Supervisors have not yet adopted the
alternative process, the Auditor-Controller has set a deadline of
October 15, 1993 for cities and other districts to express interest
in participation.
Generally, the City/Agency would receive a one time lump sum
payment equal to 95% of all prior years secured property taxes
outstanding as of June 30, 1993 detailed below.
Total County Net
Delinquency Reserve Payment
100% 5% 95%·
City General $1,207,663 ·$60,383 $1,147,280
City Bonds 13,419 671 12,748
City Total 1,201,082 61,054 1,160,028
CDDA (Agency) 199,862 9,993 189,869
Total $1,420,944 $71 047 $1,349~897
Additionally, each year the County would turnover 100% "secured
taxes" no later than the July following the fiscal year for·which
taxes were levied.
Under the current property tax turnover process, the City receives
$400,000 - $500,000 and the Agency receives $20,000 - $30,000 prior
year secured taxes annually. Therefore, the net increase for 1993-
94 would be approximately $700,000 City and $165,000 Agency. The
City and Agency also currently share in the 10% delinquent penalty
and the 1}% monthly (18% annually) interest on delinquent taxes.
Honrable Mayor and Council
September 30, 1993
Page Two
Under the "Teeter Plan" the City/Agency would lose an initial
$71,047 of potential future collections of prior year taxes.
Further, although the City/Agency could invest the additional cash
at current short term rates of approximately 3%, they would be
precluded from participating in the much more lucrative 18% charged
by the County. This would equate to a potential on-going annual
revenue loss of $60,000 - $80,000. '.
I recommend against participation in the "Teeter Plan". I believe
the current revenue from the penalties and interest would more than
offset the negative aspects of uncertain cash flows under the
current process.
krc
MGJK.87
Post-it'~routing request pad 7664
ROUTING - REQUEST
~ HANDLE
and
~ FORWARD - / ~
~ KEEP OR DISCARD
~ REVIEW WITH ME
RECEIVED
SEP Z 3 1993
FINANCE DEPT. September 8, 1993
TO: /~!_.~, . ~ ~ CITIES ~ Sla.l~-f~3Vila~l) SPECIAL
DlbWffRICT~
Chapter 3 of Pa~ 8 of Division I of ~e Califo~ia Revenue ~d
Taxation C~e (co~encinq vi~ S~ion 4701) pr~ides
alternative me~ for dis~ibution of tax levies. ~e Cowry
pl~a to imple~nt this alter~tive pro~y ~ ap~lo~ent
pr~ess for all agencies qove~ by ~e ~ard of' Su~isors for
~ri~s after ~uly 1, 1993.
~ts alte~ative pr~esa (call~ the "T~r Pl~"~ after its
au~or) has ~ree ~aJor
~ · F~t, the ~ty w~11 Ubuy ~tu all ~ons
delin~ent s~~ t~es ~ to ~e aff~te~ ageno~es.
~s w~11 reset ~n a one-t~. ~nt to ~ach agen~
~e close of ~ness on J~e 30, 1993. ~e
must ~ plao~ ~n a ~n~t Tax ~ss
to cover t~ l~s~ ~n~r~ ~en ~e sale
199~-94. ~~ eaoh year we w~11 ~nt~nue
~ney to aff~ agencies as ~ ~ents are receive.
In ~uly, foll~i~ ~e end of a flail year,
up ~y difference ~tveen ~e ~t ~l~at~
aqen~ ~ ~e ~o~t ap~io~ d~i~ ~e ~e~.
o~er ~r~, ~e ~ty eill ~e each age~
d~inq ~e final re~nciliation pr~esa in ~uly.
. ~l~, ~e cowry rill .~eive ~eir ~are of prior
~~ ~s, ~nalties ~ interest ~hi~ ~uld
no,ally go ~ each involv~ age~. A ~ion of
Co~ty'a revenues fro~ c~r~t ~naltiea ~ prior
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 2
delinquent penalties and .interest also must be retained
in the Tax Loss Reserve Fund.
The advantages to agencies are the one-time cash payment for
delinquent taxes (distributed using the more-beneficial 1992-93
apportionment factors) and the comfort of a ~ore stable revenue
source since 100% of allocated taxes are assured, protecting, the
agencies from an increase in property tax delinquency.
The County will deal with the uncertain cash flows' caused by
.changing delinquency and payment rates, and will benefit from
penalty~and interest revenues.
Tax payments which will be included in this plan are current
secured taxes, debt service payments, secured utility taxes, and
State v Homeowner' s Exemption_ rei_mbursement~am~_ ounts, _~~- are'..,
. un. secured~_ _tax .- payments ,~ .~un_ ~__tg:~ry _[.util [ty__rol.1)__ tax_distributi0~n%~'
~i'and special assessment. ~payme~nts~ these will continue to be
distributed to ag'e~i-Cie-s' as in the past. At this ribs, we believe
supplemental tax payments will be excluded from the alternative
process~ however, this area is under study and these payments might
be included.
Cities and public districts for which the County treasury is not'
the legal depository, which desire to participate in this
alternative tax apportionment process, are invited to do so.
Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) Section 4715 requires that agencies
which do not use the County treasury as' their legal depository must
adopt a resolution by October 15, if participation in this
alternative process is desired.' Self-governed special distriCts
which do use the County treasury as their legal depository, will be
included automatically in the process.
Entities are advised that the co~itment to participate .in this
process is virtually irrevocable. RTC 4702 provides for
discontinuance of the entire process by action of the Board of
Supervisors either on its own initiative or after receipt, of a
petition to do so from two-thirds of the participating entities~
There is no provision for withdrawal from the process by an
individual agency at their request.
To aid in deciding whether or .not'to participate in this process,
the attached .listing reflects the amount of taxes receivable for
each entity as of June 30,. 1993.
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 3
Further details concerning-this alternative process are available
from Ed Johnston, Chief, Auditing Division, at (805) 861-2331, Ext.
3533.
Sincerely,
S A. RHOADES
AUDITOR-CONTROLleR
JAR/EEJ:ksw
Attachment
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS.
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT O0 NOT KEEP
THEIR FUNDS IN TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NAHE FUND BUY OUT
CITY OF ARVIN 20001 2,428.55
CITY OF BKSFLO 20101 1,147,280.24
BKSFLD CITY BONDS 20104 12,748.25
BKFLD REDEVEL 20160 159,869.39
CITY OF CALIF CITY 20201 47,146.44
CAL CITY R.D.A. : 20207 272,765.20
CITY OF DELANO 20301 64,439.02
DELANO R.D.A 20304 2,527.27
CITY OF NARICOPA 20351 2,489.47
CITY OF HCFARLAND 20401 7,187.18
C[TY OF RIOGECRST 20451 38,665.92
RDGCRST REDEV. 20459 336,830.68
CITY OF SHAFTER 20501 15,929.22
SHAFTER RDA 20502 6,781.72
CITY OF TAFT 20551 22,684.49
TAFT REDEV 20554 48,218.38
CITY OF TEHACHAP! 20601 33,796.90
CITY OF WASCO 20651 17,377.23
HASCO R.O.A.. 20654 14,015.98
EAST KERN JT HOSP 42160 6,163.78
KERN VALLEY HOSP. 42180 8,039.86
HUROC HOSPITAL 42183 4,437.43
NO KEN SO TUL NOS 42184 15,370.39
TEHACHAPI HOSP. 42186 19,934.93
TEH VAL HOSP BD 42188 2,681.90
WEST SIOE HOSP. 42190 32,832.14
ANT VAL SOIL CONS 42450 319.74
FRAZ PK UTIL DZST 42620 1,'561.41
FRAZ PK PUD BONDS 42627 5,023..51
LANONT UT]L DIST 42640 3,308.48
LAH UT 1965 HEED 42641 133.24
SO SAN JOAQ ~TZL
42700 17,437.00
BEAR VAL COH SERV 50010 31.008.11
ROSAHOND COHSERV 50360 9.391.99
ROSAHOND CSD BOND 50365 12.814.04
BERREND NESA NTR 60010 4,266.10
DEVIL'S DEN WTR 60043 73.49
HENERY HILLER HTR 60045' 2,397.60
KERN DELTA NTR 60050 36,845.55
LOST HILLS HTR 60060 8,284.90
8UTTON~ CO NATER 60100 598.43
BUTTONE NTR I1BD' 60101 1,153.40
LEBEC CO HATER 60148 978.03
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS
'TEETER PLAN
· AGENCIES THAT DO NOT KEEP'
THEIR FUNDS IN TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT
RAND. CON CO W?R 60150 lt655.00
RAND CO WTR. ~1 BD 6'0153 838.42
ANT VAL E KRN WTR 60205 18,916.89
AV EK.~TR-CL CITY 60207 433.10
AV-EK WTR BOND 60210 97t058.39
kV-EK ~TR CAL BD 60211 35,183.33
AV-EK ~TR DEBT' 60215 255,943;00
KERN CO WTR AGNCY 60220 102t835.10
KC~A ZN ~7 DEBT 60229 129~074.22
KCWA ZN ~17 DEBT 60239 177,061.65
KC~A ZN ~18 DEBT 60240 3,659.10
KC~A ZN ~19 DEBT 60241 283,889.46
KERN CO ~TR INP#I 60261 1,042.50
KERN CO WTR IHP#3 60263 191.58
KC~A [NP. #4 BD 60264 104,504.03
ANT VAL JR COL' 69960 24,669.66
A VAL JR COL BD#2 69980 465.25
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS-
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT KEEP THEIR
FUNDS IN COUNTY TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT.
NOR SANIT. 40279 7,385.40
ARVIN PUBLIC CEN 42000 1,607.99
KERN RIV VAL CEH 42010 3,427.60
EAST KERN CEH 42020 8,907,62
NO KERN CENETERY '42030 12,781.63
CEHETERY NO 1 -42035 7,978.67
TEHACHAP! CEH 42045 11,598.38 ..
WEST SIDE CEN 42050 10,892.34
FAIRHAVEN FIRE DT 42080 2,339.72
SO WEST HOSP 42185 2,345.60
DELANO NOSQ ABATE .42305 17,669.75
KERN'NOSQ ABATE 42315 108,032.94
WEST SIDE HOSQ. 42335 36,980.43
BEAR NT REC & PK 42402 10,654.49
BUTNWLD REC &.PK 42404 2,122.68
NCFARLANO REC-PK 42409 21,873.97
N BKSFLD REC & PK 42411 154,182.04
SHAFTER REC & PK 42415 8,677.38
TEHACHAPI REC-PK 42420 29,181.49
WASCO*REC & PK 42429 12,309.60
WEST SIDE REC-PK 42438 49,351.10
CUYANA SOIL CONS 42464 '1.18
EAST KERN REC CON 42468 733.22
TEHACHAPI RES CON 42480 396.43
8KSFLD SEP GRADE 42530' 7,048.82
NOJAVE UTIL DXST 42650 16,197.14
PLAINVIEN UTXL BD 42660 597.31
KERN RIVER LEVEE 42922 1,635.62
EAST KERN AIRPORT 42950 9,511.20
TULARE LAKE DRN 42970 0.29
BORON COHH SERV 50040 987.50
BORON CSD ~HI~t ° 50046 154.28
OESERT LAKE CSD 50220 387.07
E NILES COH SERV 50250 12,079.44'
GOLD HILL CSD 50270 6,313.14
GOLD HILL HT ~1 50274 209.61
GOLD HILL NT'~2 50275 90.19
HTN NDOWS COH SER 50330 381.96
STAL SPG COIl SERV 50380 1'4,989.53
SH-WASCO ~RR' DEBT 50580 46,447.69
SAND CANYON WATER 60085 1,882.35
GRNFLD CO WATER 60120 1,107.37
HRTTLER CO WTR* 60149' 250.53
COUNTY' OF KERN
DISTRICT 8Y DISTRICT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT KEEP THEIR
FUNDS IN COUNTY TREASURY "
95~
AGENCY NANE 'FUND BUY OUT
TEH CUNN CO WTR 60170 117,861.24
TEH CUN WTR INP~2 60176 80.52
TEH CUN ~TR INP~3 60177 205.23
TEH CUHH WTR BOND 60179 30,280.95
TEH CUNN WTR DEBT 60180 64,275.71
T-C ~TR. ST*ATE PNT 60182 76,381.06
NOR NUNICIPAL WTR 60960 11,615.64
NOR NUNI NTR BOND 60962 11,506.63
NOR HUNI NT-INP A 60970 1,841.60
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 22, 1993 I AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar I ITEM NO: 8. c. 2.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
FROM: Gregory J. Klimko, Finance Director nEPARTMEI~T
DATE: September 13, 1993 CITYATrORNEY N/A
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Correspondence from James A. Rhodes, Kern County Auditor Controller regarding
Property Tax Distribution ("Teeter Plan").
RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Budget & Finance Committee.
CKGROUND: SB 742 provides a mechanism, known as the "Teeter Plan", for handling the
ocation of revenues attributable to delinquent property taxes. Counties operating under the Teeter
Plan allocate property taxes to jurisdictions based on the total amount of property taxes levied, not the
amount collected. At the time the County adopts the Teeter Plan, the County must als0 forward to
each local agency delinquent, property taxes from prior fiscal years. The City of Bakersfield must
adopt a resolution by October 15, 1993 in order to participate in the Teeter Plan.
krc
SE22FI4.CC
September 1l, 1993, 4:40pm
iqECEIVEi-)
!$EP 1 1993 september 8, 199:
FI~A~CE
S~: ~~TI~ T~ DI~I~I~ ~ (w~r PI~~)
Chapter 3 of Part 8 of Division I of ~e California Revenue ~d
Taxation C~e (co~encing vi~ ~tion 470~) 'prairies an
alternative me~ for dis~ibution of tax levies. ~e Co~tF
plans to imple~nt ~is alternative pro~y
pr~ess for all agencies .gove~ b~ ~e ~ard of Su~rvi~ors for
~ri~s after July l~ 1993.
~ts alternative pr~ess (call~ the ~T~r PI~ after its
au~or) has three ma~or ~:
· First~ the Co~tF will ~buy ~t· all ~lons of
delin~ent s~~ taxes ~ to the afl,ted agencies.
~is will reset Ina one-ti~ ~nt to each a~en~ of
95t of their share of all delin~ent s~ur~ taxes as
~e close of ~ines8 on J~e 30, 1993.
must ~ plac~ in a ~mn~t. ~ax ~ss Rese~e ~d
to cover' t~ l~s~ in--red when
pro~y is less ~an ~e a~t of' taxes due.
. S~cnd', the 'cowry will ~ar~t~ that each agency'will
r~e~ve ~e full a~o~ts of sec~ pro~rty
all~at~ to l~ for each year
1993-94. ~r~ each year we w~ll ~nt~nue to ap~ion
~ney to aff~t~ agencies as ~ ~ents are receive.
In July, foll~i~ ~e end of a fis~l yea~, we will ~ke
up ~y d~fference ~tween ~e
agency ~ ~e ~ount ap~o~ d~
o~er wor~, ~e Cowry w~ll ~ke each .agen~ ~ole
during the final re~nc~liat~on pr~ess in July.
· ~f~, ~e Co~ty will r~e~ve
s~~ ~es, ~nalties ~ ~nterest which ~uld
notably go to each '~nvolv~ age~. A ~on of
Co~ty's revenues from current ~nalt~es
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 2
delinquent penalties and interest also must be retained
in the Tax Loss Reserve Fund.
The advantages to agencies are the one-time cash payment for
delinquent taxes (distributed using the more-beneficial 1992-93
apportionment factors) and the comfort of a ~ore stable revenue
source since 100% of allocated taxes are assured, protecting the
agencies from an increase in property tax delinquency.
The County will deal with the uncertain cash flows caused by
changing delinquency and payment rates, and will benefit from
penalty and interest revenues.
Tax payments which 'will be included in this plan are current
secured, taxes; debt service payments, secured utility taxes, and
State Homeowner's Exemption reimbursement amounts, ~ are
unsecured tax payments, unitary (utility roll) tax distributions
and special assessment payments~ these will continue to be
distributed to agencies as in the past. At this time, we believe
supplemental tax payments will be excluded from the alternative
process~ however, this area is under study and thesepayments might
be included.
Cities and public districts for'which the County treasury is ~ot
the legal depository, which desire to participate in this
alternative tax apportionment process, are invited to do so.
Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) Section 4715 requires that agencies
which do not use the County treasury as their legal depository must
adopt a resolution by October 15, if participation in this
alternative process is desired. Self-governed 'special districts
which douse the County treasury as their legal depository, will be
included automatically in the process.
Entities are advised that the co~mitment to participate ,in this
process is virtually irrevocable. RTC 4702 provides for
discontinuance of the entire process by action of the Board of
Supervisors either on its own initiative or after receipt of a
petition to do so from two-thirds of the participating entities.
There is no provision for withdrawal from the process by an
individual agency at their request.
To aid in deciding whether or not to participate in this process,
the attached listing reflects the amount of taxes receivable for
each entity as of June 30, 1993.
CITIES/SELF-GOVERNED DISTRICTS
September 2, 1993
Page 3
Further details concerning this alternative process are available
from Ed Johnston, Chief, Auditing Division, at (805) 861-2331, Ext.
3533.
Sincerely,
~~s A. ~o~
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
JAR/EEJ:ksw
Attachment
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT DO NOT KEEP
THEIR FUNDS IN TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NAME FUND BUY OUT
CITY OF ARVIN 20001 2,428.55
CITY OF BKSFLD 20101 1,147,280.24
BKSFLD CITY BONDS 20104 12,748.25
BKFLD REDEVEL 20160 189,869.39
CITY OF CALIF CITY 20201 47,146.44
CAL CITY R.D.A. 20207 272,765.20
CITY OF DELANO 20301 64,439.02
DE.LAND R.D.A 20304' 2,527.27
CITY OF HARICOPA 20351 2,489.47
CITY OF HCFARLAND 20401 7,187.18
CITY OF RIDGECRST 20451 38,665.92
RDGCRST REDEV. 20459 336,830.68
CITY OF SHAFTER 20501 15,929.22
SH.AFTER RDA 20502 6,781.72
CITY OF TAFT 20551 22,684.49
TAFT REDEV 20554 48,218..38
CITY OF TEHACHAP! 20601 33,796.90
CITY OF HASCO 20651 17,377.23
WASCO R.D.A. 20654 14,015.98
EAST KERN JT HOSP 42160 6,163.78
KERN VALLEY HOSP. 42180 8,039.86
HUROC HOSPITAL 42183 4,437.43
NO KEN SO TUL HOS 42184 15,370.39
TEHACHAPI HOSP. 42186 19,934.93
TEH VAL HOSP BD 42188 2,681.90
WEST SIDE HOSP. 42190 32,832.14
ANT VAL SOIL CONS 42450 319.74
FRAZ PK UTIL DIST 42620 1,561.41
FRAZ PK PUD BONDS 42627 5,023.51
LAHONT UTIL D]ST 42640 3,308.48
LAH UT 1965 HEED 42641 133.24
SO SAN JOAQ ~TIL
42700 17,437.O0
BEAR VAL COH SERV 50010 31,008.11
ROSAHOND CON SERV 50360 9,391.99
ROSAHOND CSD BOND 50365 12,814,04
8ERRENO MESA HTR 60010 4,266,10
DEVIL'S DEN HTR 60043 73.49
NENERY HILLER HTR 6.0045 2,397.60
KERN DELTA HTR 60050 36,845.55
LOST HILLS HTR 60060 8,284.90
BUTTONW CO HATER 60100 598.43
BUTTONE WTR gl BD 60101 1,153.40
LEBEC CO WATER 60148 978.03
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT DO NOT KEEP
THEIR FUNDS IN TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NANE FUND BUY OUT
RAND COH CO HTR 60150 1,655.00
RAND CO HTR 11BD 60153 838.42 '-
ANT VALE KRN HTR 60205 18,916.89
AV EK HTR-CL CITY 60207 433.10
AV-EK HTR BOND 60210 97,058.39
AV-EK WTR CAL BO 60211 35,183.33
AV-EK HTR DEBT 60215 255,943.00
KERN CO HTR AGNCY 60220 102,835.10
KCHA ZN 17 DEBT 60229 129,074.22
KC~A ZN 117 DEBT 60239 177,061.65
KC~A ZN ~18 DEBT 60240 3,659.10
KC~A ZN ~19 DEBT 60241 283,889.46
KERN CO HTR IHP~I 60261 1,042.50
KERN CO HTR INP#3 60263 191.58
KCHA .ZHP. #4 BD 60264 104,504.03
ANT VAL JR COL 69960 24,669.66
A VAL JR COL BOl2 69980 465.25
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTRICT BY DISTRICT
.ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENCIES THAT KEEP THEIR
FUNDS IN COUNTY TREASURY
955
AGENCY NAME FUND BUY OUT
NOR SANIT. 40279 7,385.40
ARV[H PUBLIC CEM 42000 1,eO7.99
KERN RIV VAL CEH 42010 3,427.60
EAST KERN CEH 42020 8,907.62
NO KERN CEHETERY 42030 12,781.63
CEHETERY NO ! 42035 7,978.57
TEHACHAPI CEH 42045 11,598.38
WEST S/DE CEH 42050 10,892.34
FA]RHAVEN FIRE OT 42080 2,339.72
SO WEST HOSP 42185 2,345.60
DELANO NOSQ ABATE 42305 17,669.75
KERN NOSQ ABATE 42315 108,032.94
WEST SIDE HOSQ. 42335 36,980.43
BEAR NT REC & PK 42402 10,654.49
BUTNWLD REC & PK 42404 2,122.68
HCFARLANO REC-PK 42409 21,873.97
N BKSFLD REC & PK 42411 154,182.04
SHAFTER REC & PK 42415 8,677.38
TEHACHAP! REC-PK 42420 29,181.49
WASCO REC & PK , 42429 12,309.60
WEST S]DE REC-PK 42438 49,351.10
CUYAHA SOIL CONS 42464 1.16
EAST KERN REC CON 42468 733.22
TEHACHAP] RES CON 42480 396.43
BKSFLD SEP GRADE 42530 7,048.82
HOJAVE UTIL DIST 42650 16,197.14
PLAINV]EN UTIL BD 42660 597.31
KERN RIVER LEVEE 42922 1,635.62
EAST KERN AIRPORT 42950 9,511.20
TULARE LAKE DRN 42970 O.29
BORON COHH SERV 50040 987.50
BORON CSO IHl:rtl ' 50045 154.28
DESERT LAKE CSD 50220 387.07
E NILES COH SERV 50250 12,079.44
GOLD HILL CSD 50270 6,313.14
GOLD HILL HT tl 50274 209.61
GOLD HILL NT 12 50275 90.19
HTN NDOWS COH SER 50330 381.96
STAL SPG COH SERV 50380 14,989.53
SH-WASCO IRR DEBT 50580 46,447.69
SAND CANYON WATER 60085 1,882.35
GRNFLD CO WATER 60120 1,107.37
HRTTLER CO WTR 60149 250.53
COUNTY OF KERN
DISTR/CT BY DISTR/CT
ANALYSIS
TEETER PLAN
AGENC[ES THAT KEEP THEIR
FUNOS IN COUNTY TREASURY
95~
AGENCY NAHE FUND BUY OUT
TEH CUNH CO WTR 60170 117,861.24
TEH CUN WTR IHP~2 60176 80.52
TEH CUH ~TR [HP~3 60177 205.23
TEH CUHH ~TR BOND. 60179 30,280.95
TEH CUNH ~TR DEBT 60180 64,275.?1
T-C ~TR STATE PHT 60182 76,381.06
NOR HUN[CIPAL ~TR 60960 11~615.64
NOR HUN! ~TR BOND 60962 11t506.63
NOR HUN! ~T-[HP A 60970 1,841.60
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MEE~ING OF' '09/22/93'
REFERRED TO: BUDGET/FINANCE J STINSON ·
REFERRED TO' POLICE DEPT S BRUMMER
~TEM' RECORD~ 12453
Federa'] Po]ice Hirin9 Supplement Program
(McDermott)
ACTION TAKEN BY COONCIL:
.MCDERMOTT REFERRED ISSUE TO,BUDGET AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED,: YES'
DATE FORWARDED BY CITYCLERK- 09/24/93
27 SEP 9S. '~ ' ~.,~,.r~
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 10/06/93
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION SYSTEM
Record#: 12453 Origination Date: 09/22/93
Project Title:
Description: Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program (McDermott)
Dept/Committee: B&F)(PD Staff':
Ward: W6 WARD6
Completion Date:
Assigned To: Authorized By:
Date ACTION TO BE TAKEN By Done
Date ACTION COMPLETED By Hrs
Footnotes
PD 64-27.59
MEMORANDUM
October 13, 1993
lO Honorable Mayor Price & City Council Members
FROM S.E. Brummer, Chief of Police~
SUSJECI Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program
On September 13, 1993, I provided you with an initial proposal for
submitting a grant request under the Federal Police HiringP
Supplement Program. The initial proposal was for a 1.5 million
dollar grant that would have required matching funds of over 2.5
million dollars from the City over three years.
This initial program involved three store front offices and a gang
suppression component. The program would have covered the
Lakeview, Baker St. and Chester Ave. areas. In order to provide
the Council with additional options, I have prepared the two below
listed optional proposals.
A $1,020,623 grant proposal requiring City matching funds of
$1,618,763 over the three year period would provide the foot beat
coverage for the Lakeview and Baker St. areas during the day, seven
days a week and six evenings a week. There would also be a
supervising Sergeant and a Community Service Specialist to work
with both areas in organizing Neighborhood Watch groups and other.
community events. This proposal eliminates the store front
offices, gang suppression component and the Chester Ave. area that
were in the initial grant proposal.
A $721,295 grant with $1,095,515 in City matching funds over three
years could provide the above foot beat enforcement and Community
Service Specialist for the Lakeview area, but would eliminate the
Baker St. area in addition to the Chester Ave. area.
As with the previously provided proposal, either of the above,
would be restricted to the designated areas. For this reason, the
addition of these personnel, should not be considered as addressing
our City wide staffing needs.
MEMORANDUM
Se~emhe~
TO RONO~LE ~YOR PRICE & CI~ CO~CIL ~ERS "
FROM s. ~. ~R. ch~e~ ~ ~o]~ ~
SUBJECT FEDE~ POLICE HIRING SUPPLANT PROGm
We have received the application kit from the Federal Bureau of Justice, Assistance
for the Police Hiring Supplement Program, recently announced by President Clinton.
As anticipated, this program has numerous requirements and restrictions which must
be considered before we apply for the grant.
The program provides $75 million over three years for jurisdictions with populations
of 150,000 and above. 3urisdictions of 150,000 to 749,999 may apply for a maximum
of $2 million over the life of the grant. Those with populations of 750,000 to
2,000,000 may apply for $3 million; and jurisdictions over 2,000,000 may apply for
$4 million over the life of the grant. It is anticipated that approximately twenty
to forty grants may be awarded from an estimated three hundred or more eligible
jurisdictions.
The goal of this program is to hire "sworn law enforcement officers" and implement
or expand community policing programs. The grant will only pay for the officer's
salary and fringe benefits and will not pay for overtime, non-sworn support staff,
training, equipment or facilities. Only 50% of an officer's salary and benefits for
the three years will be paid, and the city is required to commit to continue the
program and to fully fund it at the conclusion of the three year grant.
We are aware that numerous problems have arisen in community policing programs when
the programs focus on too narrow an area of the community. Animosity may develop
within a department, and there are some well documented cases of animosity arising
within communities when one segment feels that another segment is receiving a greater
share of police resources.
For these reasons, should we apply for a grant, I recommend we focus on the Lakeview,
Baker Street and Downtown areas initially. I would propose three store-front police
substations, each station to be staffed five days a week with a police service tech-
nician who would be available to handle a variety of problems, freeing the residents
from having to travel to the department's main office. In addition, the Lakeview
substation would be staffed with one senior police officer and five police officers;
Baker Street with one senior police officer and two police officers; and Downtown
with one senior police officer and two police officers. These twelve officers would
provide foot beat service to these areas seven days and six evenings a week. They
would also be actively involved in building code and other permit enforcement, and
would possibly also become involved with the schools in truancy and curfew enforce-
ment. A close liaison with our crime prevention unit and'the area neighborhood watch
programs would also be implemented. Two senior police officers would also be included
in the grant to work as gang suppression officers. They would work in all three areas
and would concentrate on gang related crimes and graffiti issues. One sergeant would
also be included in the grant and it would be his responsibility to coordinate the
above units and ensure grant compliance. These. designated units would not be respon-
sible for the bulk of the calls for service in these areas and thus would have a
tremendous amount of flexibility in,meeting with the community and responding to
their needs.
HONORABLE MAYOR PRICE &'CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Sep. 13, 1993
continued . . .
The salaries and benefits paid from this grant for the three year period would total
$1,525,633, which falls within the allowed $2 million limit. It would, however, be
the responsibility of the city to pay the remaining 50% salary and benefits for the
officers, plus overtime, training and equipment; and all costs associated with the
police service technicians and store-front facilities. We estimate city matching
funds necessary to ensure the program for the three'years of the grant would be
approximately $2,518,324. The grant also requires that we describe how we intend
to continue the project and retain the positions at the conclusion of the grant
period.
Concerns have been expressed that if the program were to be funded, additional re-
sources would not be available for future needs caused by annexations; nor for de-
tectives and support staff to cover all areas of the city.
This grant will be restrictive as to our ability to respond to city-wide needs and,
thus, should stand alone and not be considered as part of the overall staffing program
for the department. There is no empirical evidence to indicate that a community
oriented policing program such as this will have any immediate positive effects on
service or crime problems in other parts of the city.
The grant application process will be very involved and will require a considerable
amount of staff time. Without a comm4tment for the required matching fUnds, we cannot
apply; and we will limit staff involvement pending direction by the city manager and
council.
Specific application deadlines have been established and consist of three rounds.
Funding will be distributed over the three rounds. Those applicants not selected
in the first two rounds will be reconsidered during the subsequent round(s). It is
anticipated that awards will be made in November and December, 1993. The following
deadlines have been established for each round:
Round 1: Applications received no later than October 14, 1993, will be considered under Round 1.
Round 2: Applications received no later than November 1, 1993, will be considered under Round 2.
Round 3: Applications received and/or postmarked no later than December 1, 1993, will be considered under Round 3.
SEB:sml
-2 -
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MEETING 0F'.10/27793'
REFERRED TO: POLICE DEPT S BRUMMER
ITEM:' RECORD~ 12585'.
Federal Police Hit ng Supplement Grant.
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: "
MOTION TO SEND CORRESPONDENCE TO FEDERAL
LEGISLATORS REQUESTING REMOVAL', OR CHANGES TO,
RESTRICTIONS IN THE GRANT PROGRAM.APPROVED AA.
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 10/29/93
NOTE: STATUS CHANGES ARE TO' BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL
AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH. EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN!
· A ERSFI LD
FFICF THE CHIEF 0 POLICE
November 15, 1993
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
The State Senate
112 Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Boxer:
It is with great interest we follow your deliberations in
Congress regarding federal fundihg for supplemental hiring of
municipal police officers. We certainly support your efforts
to provide us with this gravely needed assistance. There
are, however, concerns at the local level relative to methods
for disbursement of funds. ",
Recently, our department received an application kit for the
"Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program" which, as you are
aWare, is a three year competitive grant program. It
provides 50% of an officer's salary (excluding overtime,
support staff and equipment), and requires a continuation
plan that insures retention of the program following
expiration of the grant term. As in most jurisdictions, we
are confronted with an uncertain fiscal future that threatens
existing program levels, not to mention newly created ones.
In addition, this grant program contains specific strategy
guidelines that limit project flexibility. A program that is
appropriate for one jurisdiction may not be appropriate for
others. Strategies that may be viable now might require
modification in the future.
We are not requesting program guidelines that lack
accountability or review, however, we believe local agencies
should be granted the flexibility necessary to insure
efficient and effeCtive use of grant funds based on local
needs. The Anti-Drug Abuse Enforcement Program administered
by the California Office of Criminal Justice Planning is one
example of how federal funds can be allocated and utilized in
C£T~ ~AN~£R~ manner that affords compliance, .efficiency and positive
results.
22~0V 9.~ 4:I9
1601 Truxtun Avenue P.O. Box 59 Bakersfield, CA 93302 (805) 326-3821 Fax (805) 326-3070
Post-it'"routing request pad 7664
ROUTING - REQUEST
[~ READ To
~ APPROVE
and
[] FORWARD
[RETURN
KEEP OR DISCARD
~ REVIEW WITH ME
Date ~/~- ~ Fro~'
Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program ~!/?.~'i-?/.~
Page 2 of 2 .'
I ~would ask that you examine the ,Police Hiring supplement
Program" and consider modification as may be .appropriate.'
We appreciate your attempts to enhance partnerships Of
Federal, state and local governments in addressing public
safety issues and we support the intent of this legislation.
We welcome the opportunity to bring, new funding into our
community, but we must insure our ability to comply with'
restrictions associated with such funding programs. If I or
my staff can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to
Congress Representative William M. Thomas
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Police Hiring
Supplement
Program
FY 1993 DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM
APPLICATION KIT
SLO00080
August 30, 1993
Dear Colleague:
I am pleased to send you the application kit for the new Police Hiring Supplement
Program. This program represents the first stage of our efforts to fulfill President Clinton's
promise to put more officers on the street and make America's neighborhoods safe places in ,'
which to grow, live, and work.
Through the Police Hiring Supplement Program, the Department of Justice will award
a total of $150 million to law enforcement agencies throughout the nation to help hire and/or
rehire additional sworn law enforcement officers. This program will target funds to localities
most in need and provide an incentive for communities to develop innovative, locally
designed, long-term public safety plans.
Increasing the number of officers and expanding community policing are key parts of
our overall strategy to combat crime. We all recognize that putting more police on the
streets will not alone solve America's crime problems. But, law enforcement officers can
lead the way, by building partnerships with residents and with public and private agencies to
develop and implement strategies tailored to the unique needs of their communities. Our
program goals are simple: prevent crime, promote problem-solving, and enhance public
safety.
The Department of Justice is committed to reducing crime and violence across the
nation and in your community. I encourage your agency to compete for a grant under the
Police Hiring Supplement Program.
Janet Reno
Police Hiring Supplement Program
Overview · increase the number of sworn law enforcement
officers serving areas where they are needed
The Department of Justice, Office of Justice most.
Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA),
announces a new competitive grant program, the · improve the long-term ability of law enforcement
program requirements, and administrative guidance agencies to engage in community policing by
for jurisdictions eligible to apply for grants under this deploying additional sworn law enforcement
program. The Police Hiring Supplement Program is officers.
hereinafter referred to as the Program.
· improve public safety through innovative crime
The Program will make direct grants to law prevention, including community policing.
enforcement jurisdictions to hire and/or rehire
additional sworn law enforcement officers as part of The objectives are to:
an overall plan or strategy to address crime and
related problems through community policing. An · hire additional law enforcement officers to
applicant's plan should reflect its community's unique increase sworn officer deployment and expand
needs and be responsive to local circumstances. In community policing designed to prevent crime,
general, community policing is designed to forge promote problem solving, and enhance public
effective crime-fighting partnerships between law safety.
enforcement and the community. These partnerships,
using a problem-oriented approach, can result in · rehire law enforcement officers who have been
innovative and tailored strategies for preventing and laid off (as a result of State and local budget
controlling crime. As part of their community reductions) to increase sworn officer deployment
policing efforts, communities have used various and expand community policing.
strategies to address crime problems, including multi-
disciplinary crime prevention teams, public education
programs, neighborhood resource centers, and foot Eligibility Requirements
patrols.
Applications are invited from all law enforcement
A total of $150 million is available for these grants, agencies, or consortia of law enforcement agencies,
beginning in Fiscal Year 1993. Fifty percent of the that can demonstrate a significant need for additional
funds ($75 million) will be awarded to applicants sworn law enforcement officers and are committed to
serving jurisdictions with populations of 150,000 and using community policing to address crime and
above. Fifty percent of the funds ($75 million) will related problems in their jurisdictions. Eligible
be awarded to applicants serving jurisdictions with applicants under this program are law enforcement
populations of less than 150,000. These funds may agencies that recruit and hire law enforcement officers
be used to help pay salaries and fringe benefits of who serve local communities. State law enforcement
newly sworn officers, _excluding overtime, for a 3- agencies may apply if they have law enforcement
year period. Funding will commence at the time, and jurisdiction and provide local law enforcement
not until, a hired or rehired officer is sworn in. The services to communities within their State.
deployment of new hires and the selection of the
officers to implement the individual projects funded
under this £rogram will be at the discretion of the Application Requirements
local jurisdiction.
The application must be developed in consultation
with community groups and appropriate public and
Program Goals and Objectives private agencies and must: A. demonstrate the
jurisdiction's public safety need for additional sworn
The goals of the Program are to: law enforcement officers; B. include a strategy for
1
community policing in the jurisdiction; C. include an 7. The number of officers deployed, by function
implementation plan that specifies how the funds (administrative, patrol, and investigative); during each
awarded under this project will help deploy additional of the last 5 years.
sworn police for community policing activities; D.
describe a plan to continue the project and retain the 8. The actual number of sworn officers laid off
positions at the end of the grant period; E. discuss the and/or furloughed during each of the last 5 years.
availability and use of non-project funds and
resources from other organizations; and F. provide a 9. The actual operational expenditures for police
detailed budget proposal to support the grant request, services and total expenditures by the jurisdiction for
each of the past 5 years.
A. Public Safety Need: (40 ~,ercent of the Setection 10. The expenditures for police overtime and/or the
Criteria) amount of compensatory time granted in lieu of
overtime spending for each of the past 5 years;
Provide a narrative that describes the community's provide an explanation for overtime expenditures.
need for additional sworn law enforcement officers, as
well as the reason(s) local funding is not available to
meet these needs. The narrative should describe the B. Strategy: O0 percent of the Selection Criteria)
jurisdicfion's overall crime situation and highlight
positive steps already taken to improve law Develop a 3-year strategy that specifies how
enforcement effectiveness. These highlights might additional sworn law enforcement officers would lead
include, for example, any efforts already made to to increased community policing targeted against
reduce the number of sworn officers in administrative crime and related problems in the jurisdiction.
positions. It is important to make the strongest case
possible. Include any special conditions or factors The strategy narrative should describe:
that help to document your needs, such as relevant
demographic trends and/or significant unemployment 1. Any community policing activities currently used
problems resulting from plant or military base by the applicant, emphasizing those efforts that
closings, natural disasters, etc. promote law enforcement parmerships with citizens
and non-law enforcement organizations.
In addition to the narrative, provide information on
the following factors, to the extent that it is available: 2. How the applicant, will involve community
leaders and residents in planning, implementing, and
1. The population for the jurisdiction according to coordinating this project with non-law enforcement
the 1990 U.S. Census. organizations.
2. The unemployment rate for the jurisdiction for 3. How the applicant will coordinate this project
each of the last 5 years, with other criminal justice system components,.
including an assessment of the effects of additional
3. The ratio of population to sworn officers, police on these agencies.
expressed as number of residents per sworn officer.
4. The specific geographic area(s) to be served by
4. The number and types of citizen calls for service this project and the crime and related problems that
(i.e., emergency, non-emergency, violent offense, community policing would address effectively.
property offense, etc.) handled by patrol officers for
each of the last 5 years. 5. The specific suategies and innovations that the
applicant will employ to respond to identified
5. The jurisdicfion's Uniform crime Report (UCR) problems.
rates (or their equivalent) for all Part I offenses for
each of the last 5 years. 6. How the applicant will select the officers who
will be assigned to community .policing. (These
6. The actual number of full-time and pan-time officers do not need to be the officers actually hired
civilians and sworn law enforcement officers with these projectfunds.)
employed during each of the last 5 years.
2
7. How thc applicant will assess how well the scheduled salary increases, if any, over the life of the
project was implemented and the extent to which thc grant.
strategy has achieved the Program's goals and
objectives.
Program Evaluation
C. Implementation Plan: (1o percent of the Selection In addition to the assessment referenced in
Criteria) Application Requirements, section B, number 7, a
Provide a plan for implementing the strategy national-level evaluation of this Program may be
described in B. above. Provide a detailed schedule conducted in the future. The evaluation would use
some combination of process and impact measures
that includes milestones for significant tasks. The
schedule and milestones, must include the expected that may include, but would not be limited to, crime
dates when newly hired/rehired officers will be sworn and victimization indices, quality-of-life measures,
and deployed. Also provide the dates when officers community perceptions, indications of changes in
will be assigned to project-related community policing management philosophy, and individual police
activities, perceptions of their own work. Evaluators may visit
sites to collect data for the evaluation. All selected
applicants must be willing to participate in such
national evaluation.
D. Continuation and Retention Plan: (1o percent of
the Selection Criteria)
Describe how the applicant intends to continue this Selection Criteria
project and retain the positions created with the
project funds following the conclusion of the grant Applications will be evaluated based on the extent to
period. If possible, include an endorsement of the which they meet the following weighted Criteria:
jurisdietion's continuation and retention plan by local
budget authorities. Public Safety Need .............. 40 percent
Soundness of Strategy ............ 30 percent
· Clarity and Appropriateness of
E. Additional Resource Commitments: (lOpercent , Implementation Plan ............ 10 percent
of the Selection Criteria) Continuation and Retention Plan ..... 10 percent
Additional Resource Commitments ... 10 percent
Applicants are encouraged to apply other resources,
Federal, Slate, local, or private, in support of this The Department of Justice will award grants to those
project. Describe the sources and the mounts of applicants that best meet all these criteria.
non-project funding or resources that will be available Consideration may also be given to equitable
from all sources. Describe how those resources will distribution of grants based on geographic or other
be used. If no other funds or resources are available, factors.
please explain.
F. Budget Proposal: Federal Share
The application must contain a budget and budget
narrative that specifically identifies salary and fringe For each officer funded under this program, the
benefits costs. Salary and fringe benefits costs are the Federal share may not exceed the greater of (1) 75
only allowable costs. Standard fringe benefits paid by percent of the total salary and benefits over the life of
the jurisdiction should be supported by a list of the grant, up to a maximum of $75,000; OR (2) 50
itemized costs explaining what is included in the percent of the total salary and benefits over the life of
benefits package. Expenditure of project funds for the grant. The authorized Federal share per officer
overtime is expressly forbidden. The budget may be increased upon submission of sufficient
breakdown must show the number of officers to be evidence of exuaordinary economic hardship,
hired, the salary and fringe benefits per officer, and resulting from such factors as .economic dislocation,
the total salary and fringe benefits costs. Estimate a natural disaster, or other severe mitigating
circumstances. An increase in the Federal share will
be grunted only in the most extreme circumstances, available under the grunt will not be used to supplant
If the applicunt agency is requesting un increase in State or local funds, but will be used to increase the
Federal share, include the narrative and amount of State or local funds that would be available
documentation justifying the request as an appendix for law enforcement purposes in the absence of
to the application. Indicate on Standard Form 424-- Federal funds.
Budget Information--in Section F, Block 23, that a
request is being submitted. Grantees may specify In submitting applications which involve a consortium
how the Federal share is disbursed over the life of the of more thun one agency, the relationships among the
grunt, parties must be set forth in the application. In the
event of a consortium submission, one agency must
be designated as the payee to receive und disburse
Distribution 'of Funds project funds and to be responsible for the supervision
and coordination of the activities of the consortium
As stated in the Overview, the total amount available members. Each co-applicant must sign the Standard
'for this program is $150 million, which will be Form-424.
allocated as follows:
The original and three copies of the application must
1. $75 million will be .allocated for grants to be sent to:
applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of
150,000 und above. U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
2. $75 million will be allocated for grants to Control Desk, Room 948
applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W.
less than 150,000.. Washington, DC 20531
Application Process Application Format
All applications must be submitted on 8½ x 11 paper. The following format and guidance are provided to
The program narrative portion of the application assist the applicant in writing and organizing the
should be no more than 30 pages double-spaced and program narrative section of the application.' To
should be printed on one side of the paper only. All assist the application review, the narrative should be
applicants must also submit an Application for presented in the same order as in the Application
Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424), a signed Requirements above:
original and three copies. A copy of this form is
provided in Appendix B of this application kit. Video Public Safety Need Section: This descriptive
presentations will not be accepted. Applications narrative should respond to Section A, page 2.
submitted via FAX will not be accepted. Information relating to items 1-10 should be displayed
in a list format in the order in which they appear.
Executive Order 12372 requires applicants from State
and local units of government or other organizations Strategy Section: This descriptive narrative should
providing services within a State to submit a copy of respond to Section B, page 2.
the application to the State Single Point of Contact
(SPOC), if one exists, and if the Program has been Implementation Plan Section: This descriptive
selected for review by the State. A list of the State narrative should respond to Section C, page 3.
Single Point of Contacts is available in Appendix A
of this application kit. Applicants must contact their Continuation and Retention Plan Section: This
State SPOC to determine if the Program has been descriptive narrative should respond to Section D,
selected for review by the State. page 3.
In addition to the required standard assurances that Additional Resource Commitments Section: This
are part of the Standard Form 424, each application descriptive narrative should respond to Section E,
must include a certification that Federal funds made page 3.
4
Budget: Use Standard Form 424--Budget Maximum Award Amount
Information--to display the total cost for each
allowable category (i.e., Salary and Fringe Benefits) · Eligible applicants serving a jurisdiction with a
of the application. Refer to the Federal Share section population of less than 150,000 may' apply for a
if an increase in the Federal share is requested, maximum of $1 million over the life of the grant.
Budget Narrative: Include an itemization of · Eligible applicants serving a jurisdiction with a
proposed costs for personnel salaries, fringe benefits, population between 150,000 and 749,999 may apply
and any scheduled salary increases. This descriptive for a maximum of $2 million over the life of the
narrative should respond to Section F, page 3. The
grant.
narrative should also provide detail on Federal .and
non-Federal shares.
· Eligible applicants serving a jurisdiction with a
population between 750,000 and 2,000,000 may apply
· *STANDARD FORM 424: Most items on the for a maximum of $3 million over the life of the
cover page of the Standard Form 424 are self-
grant.
explanatory. For purposes of this application, please
include the following information:
· Eligible applicants serving a jurisdiction with a
population in excess of 2,000,000 may apply for a
Face Sheet, Block 7 maximum of $4 million over the life of the grant.
Type of Applicant: If the applicant is
representing a consortium of agencies, specify by No waiver of the maximum award amounts will be
checking Block N and entering Consortium.
granted.
Face Sheet, Block 10
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance: The Application Deadlines
Number for this program is 16.580.
Title: Drug Conlrol and System Improvement.
Discretionary Grant Program Applications for funding under this program will be
considered competitively in three rounds. Funding will
Face Sheet, Block 11 be distributed over the three rounds. Applications
Descriptive Title of AppliCant's Project: List the that are not selected in the first two rounds will be
following information in this order: reconsidered during the subsequent round(s). It is
Police Hiring Supplement anticipated that awards will be made in November
Population of jurisdiction to and December, 1993.
Total number of sworn officers to Round 1: Applications received no later than
be hired: October 14, 1993, will be considered
Name of jurisdiction to be served (i.e., under Round 1.
"County of" or "City of"): ~
Round 2: Applications received no later than
Section F, Block 23 November 1, 1993, will be considered
Indicate if the Applicant is requesting an increase under Round 2.
in the Federal share.
Round 3: Applications received and/or post-
marked no later than December 1, 1993,
Award Period will be considered under Round 3.
Grants will be awarded to help pay for salary and Contact
fringe benefits for a 3-year period.
For further information or to obtain technical
assistance in preparing your application, contact the
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice
Assistance at (202) 307-1480, Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Eastern time.
5
Administrative Requirements
Civil Rights Requirements Disclosure of Federal Participation
Prohibition of Discrimination for Recipients of Section 623 of Public Law 102-141 requires that, for
Federal Funds. No person in any State shall on the awards of $500,000 or more, "when issuing
'grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, statements, press releases for proposals, bid
or disability be excluded from participation in, be solicitations, and other documents describing projects
denied the benefits of, or be subjected to or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal
discrimination under, or denied employment in money, all grantees receiving Federal funds, including
connection with any program or activity receiving but not limited to State and local governments, shall
Federal fmancial assistance, pursuant to the following clearly state (1) the percentage of the total cost of the
statutes and regulations: Section 809(c), Omnibus program or project which will be financed with
Crime Conffol and Safe Street Act of 1968, as Federal money, and (2)the dollar amount of Federal
amended, 42,U.S.C. 3789d, and Department of Justice funds for the project or program."
Nondiscrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42,
Subparts C, D, E, and G; Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Certifications Regarding
Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Subtitle A, Title II of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (Al)A) (1990) and Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension,
Department of Justice regulations on disability and Other Responsibility Matters;
discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39; Title IX and Drug-Free Workplace
of the Education Amendments of 1972; and the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975. Requirements
In the event a Federal or State court or a Federal or Applicants should refer to the regulations cited in OJP
State adminiswative agency makes a finding of Form 4061/6 (3-91) to determine the certification(s)
discrimination after a due process hearing on the to which they are required to attest. A copy of the
grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, form is provided in Appendix B of this application
or disability against a recipient of funds, the recipient kit. Applicants should also review the inslxuctions for
will forward a copy of the finding to the Office of certification included in the regulations before
Civil Rights (OCR) of the Office of Justice Programs. completing this form. Signature of this form provides
for compliance with certification requirements under
28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying,"
Audit Requirement and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment
and Suspension (Nonprocuremen0 and Government-
wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
In October 1984, Congress passed the Single Audit (Grants)." The certifications will be treated as a
Act of 1984. On April 12, 1985, OMB issued material representation of fact upon which reliance
Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local will be placed by the Department of Justice in
Governments," which establishes regulations to
implement the Act. OMB Circular A-128 outlines the awarding grants.
requirements for organizational audits that apply to
BJA grantees. Suspension or Termination of
Institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other Funding
nonprofit organizations are responsible for providing
an audit of their activities not less than every 2 years, BJA may suspend, in whole or in part, or terminate
in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. The funding for a grantee for the following reasons:
required audits are to be on an organization-wide,
rather than a grant-by-grant, basis.
6
· Failure to conform to the requirements or Prior to suspension of a grant, BJA will provide
statutory objectives of Title I of the Omnibus reasonable notice to the grantee of its intent to
Crime Control and Safe Slreets Act of 1968, as suspend the grant and will attempt informally to
amended; or resolve the problem resulting in the intended
suspension. Hearing and appeal procedures for
· Failure to comply substantially with the Act, termination actions are set forth in Department of
regulations promulgated thereunder, or with the Justice regulations in 28 CFR Part 18.
terms and conditions of its grant award.
Appendix A
State Single Point of Contact
ARIZONA FLORIDA
Arizona State Clearinghouse Florida State Clearinghouse
3800 N. Central Avenue Executive Office of the Governor
Fourteenth Floor Office of Planning and Budgeting
Phoenix, Arizona 85012 The Capitol
Telephone: (602) 280-1315 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
ARKANSAS Telephone: (904) 488-8114
Office of Intergovernmental Ser. GEORGIA
Department of Finance and Administration Georgia State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3278 270 Washington Street, S.W.
Little Rock, Arkansas Atlanta, Georgia 30334
Telephone: (501) 682-1074 Telephone: (404) 656-3855
CALIFORNIA HAWAII
Office of Planning and Research Office of State Planning
1400 Tenth Street Office of the Govemor
Sacramento, California 95814 P.O. Box 3540
Telephone: (916) 323-7480 Honolulu, Hawaii 96811
COLORADO Telephone: (808) 587-2802
State Clearinghouse ILLINOIS
Division of Local Government State Single Point of Contact
1313 Sherman Street, Room 520 Office of the Governor
Denver, Colorado 80203 State of Illinois
Telephone: (303) 866-2156 Springfield, Illinois 62706
CONNECTICUT Telephone: (217) 782-8639
State Single Point of Contact INDIANA
Office of Policy and Management State Budget Agency
Intergovernmental Policy Division 212 State House
80 Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Hartford, Connecticut 06106~4~459 Telephone: (317) 232-5610
Telephone: (203) 566-3410
IOWA
DELAWARE Iowa Department of Economic Development
State Single Point of Contact 200 East Grand Avenue
Executive Department Des Moines, Iowa 50309
Thomas Collins Building Telephone: (515) 281-3725
Dover, Delaware 19903
Telephone: (302) 736-3326 KENTUCKY
Department of Local Government
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1024 Capitol Center Drive ,'
State Single Point of Contact Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Executive Office of the Mayor Telephone: (502) 564-2382
Office Intergovernmental Relations
Room 416, District Building
1350 Pennsylvania, Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (20) 727-9111
8
MAINE NEW MEXICO
State Planning Office State Budget Division
State House Station #38 Rm 190, Bataan Memorial Bldg.
Augusta, Maine 04333 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503
Telephone: (207) 289-3261 Telephone: (505) 827-3640
MARYLAND NEW YORK
Deparunent of State Planning New York State Clearinghouse
301 West Preston Sweet Division of the Budget
Baltimore, Maryland 21201 State Capitol
Telephone: (301) 225-4490 Albany, New York 12224
Telephone: (518) 474-1605
MASSACHUSETTS
Executive Office of Communities and Development NORTH CAROLINA
100 Cambridge Sl~eet, 1803 Intergovernmental Relations
Boston Massachusetts 02202 N.C. Department of Administration
Telephone: (617) 727-7001 116 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
MICItlGAN Telephone: (919) 733-0499
Manager Federal Project Review
Michigan Deparunent of Commerce NORTH DAKOTA
Michigan Neighborhood Builders Alliance North Dakota Single Point of Contact
P.O. Box 30242 Office of Intergovernmental
Lansing, Michigan 48909 Assistance
Telephone: (517) 373-6223 Office of Management and Budget
600 East Boulevard Avenue
MISSISSIPPI Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0170
Office of Policy Development Telephone: (701) 224-2094
Deparunent of Finance and Administration
455 N. Lamar Street - Suite 120 RHODE ISLAND
Jackson, Mississippi 39202 Statewide Planning Program
Telephone: (601) 359-6765 Department of Adminis~ation
Division of Planning
MISSOURI 25 Melrose Street
Office of Administration Providence, Rhode Island 02907
P.O. Box 809 Telephone: (401) 277-2656
Room 430, Truman Building
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Atto: Review Coordinator
Telephone: (314) 751-4834 Office of Strategic Planning
NEVADA SOUTH CAROLINA
Department of Administration State Single Point of Contact
Capitol Complex Grant Services
Carson City, Nevada 89710 Office of the Governor
Clearinghouse Coordinator 1205 Pendleton Street
Telephone: (702) 687-4065 Room 477
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
NEW HAMPSHIRE Telephone: (803) 734-0494
Attention: Intergovernmental Review
2 1/2 Beacon Street SOUTH DAKOTA
Concord, New Hampshire 03301 State Clearinghouse Coordinator
Telephone: (603) 271-2155 Office of the Governor
500 East Capital
NEW JERSEY Pierre, South Dakota 57501
State Review Process Telephone: (605) 773-3212
Division of Community Resources
CN 814, Room 609
Trenton. New Jersey 08625-0814
Telephone: (609) 292-9025
t 9
TENNESSEE TERRITORIES
State Single Point of Contact
State Planning Office GUAM
500 Charlotte Avenue Bureau of Budget and Management
309 John Sevier Building Research
Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Office of the Governor
Telephone: (615) 741-1676 P.O. Box 2950
Agana, Guam 96910
TEXAS Telephone: (671) 472-2285
Governor's Office of Budget and Planning
P.O. Box 12428 PUERTO RICO
Austin, Texas 78711 Puerto Rico Planning Board
Telephone: (512) 463-1778 Minillas Government Center
P.O. Boc 4119
UTAH San Juan, Puerto Rico 00940-9985
Utah State Clearinghouse Telephone: (809) 7274444
Office of Planning and Budget
Room 116 State Capitol NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 State Single Point of Contact
Telephone: (801) 538-1535 Planning and Budget Office
Office of the Governor
VERMONT Saipan, CM
Office of Policy Research and Northern Mariana Islands 96950
Coordination
Pavilion Office Building In accordance with executive Order #12372,
109 State Sueet "Intergovernmental Review Process," this listing represents
Montpelier, Vermont 05602 the designated State Single Points of Contact. Upon
Telephone: (802) 828-3326 request, a background document explaining the Executive
Order is available. The Office of management and Budget
WEST VIRGINIA point of contact for updating this listing is: Donna Rivelle
Community Development Division (202)395-5090. The States not listed no longer participate
Governor's Office of Community in the process. These include: Alabama, Alaska, Kansas,
Industrial Development Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,
Building #6 Room 553 Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
Charleston, West Virginia 25305 Washington. This list is based on the most current
Telephone: (304) 3484010: information provided by the States. Information on any
changes or apparent errors should be provided to the Office
WISCONSIN of Management and Budget and the State in question.
Federal/State Relations Office Changes to the list will be made only upon formal
Wisconsin Department of Administxation notification by the State.
101 South Webster Sueet
P.O. Box 7864
Madison, Wisconsin 53707
WYOMING
State Single Point of Contact
Wyoming State Clearinghouse
State Planning Coordinator's Office
Capitol Building
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
Telephone: (307) 777-7574
.10
Appendix B
Application Forms
11
OMB Approval NO. 0348-0043
APPLICATION FOR 2. DATE $UBMITTEO Applicant Identifier '
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
I. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: : 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifier
Appfication : Preapplication
[] Conatructio~t ! [] Construction
4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier
E] Non-Construction i [] Non-Construction
I S. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Legal Name: Organizational Unit:
Address (give city, county, state, and zip code): Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving
this application (give area code)
6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (LIN): 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter appropriate letter in box) []
~'----'] __ [~~~~ A. State H. Independent School Dist.
B. County I. State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning
C. Municipal J. Private University
8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: D. Township K. Indian Tribe '
[] New [] Continuation [] Revision E. Interstate L. Individual
F. Intermunicipel M. Profit Organization
If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es): LI LI G. Special District N. Other (Specify):
A. Increase Award B. Decrease Award C, Increase Duration
D. Decrease Duration Other (specify): 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY:
t0. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT:
ASSISTANCE NUMBER: ·
Tm.E:
'12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (cities, counties, states, etc.):
15. PROPOSED PROJECT: 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF:
Start Date Ending Date a. Applicant :: b. Project
:
:
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12:372 PROCESS?
a. FederaJ $ .00 a, YES, THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW' ON:
b. Applicant $ .0g
DATE
c. State $ .00
b NO, [] PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY ED. 12372
d. Local, S .00
[] OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
e. Other S .00
~ Program Income $ .00 17. I$ THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
g. TOTAL $ .00 [] Yes If "Yes," attach an explanation. [] No
18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL 0ATA IN THIS APPLICATION/PREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OUL¥
AUTHORIZEO BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF TH~ APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWAROED
a. TvPed Name of Authorized Representative I b. Title c. Telephone number
I
d. Signature of Authorized Representative e. Date Signed
Previous Editions Not Usable Star dard Form 424 I, REV 4-88)
Prescnbed by OMB C4r~,u~a¢ A. tOE
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF 424
This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted*
for Federal assista.nce. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have
established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
to be included in their process~ have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.
Item: Entry: Item: Entry:
1. Self-explanatory. 12. List only the largest political entities affected
2. Date application submitted to Federal agency (or (e.g., State, counties, cities).
State if applicable) & applicant's control number
(if applicable). 13. Self-explanatory.
3. State use only (if applicable). 14. List the applicant's Congressional District and
any District(s) affected by the program or project.
4. If this application is to continue or revise an
existing award, enter present Federal identifier
number. If for a new project, leave blank. 15. Amount requested or to be contributed during
the first funding/budget period by each
5. Legal name of applicant, name of primary contributor. Value of in-kind contributions
organizational unit which will undertake the should be included on appropriate lines as
assistance .activity, complete address of the applicable. If the action will result in a dollar
applicant, and name and telephone number of the change to an existing award, indicate only the
person to contact on matters related to this'' amount of the change. For decreases, enclose the
application, amounts in parentheses. If both basic and
supplemental amounts are included, show
6. Enter Employer Identification Number (EIN) as
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service. breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple
program funding, use totals and show breakdown
7. Enter the appropriate letter in the space using same categories as item15.
provided.
$. Check appropriate box and enter appropriate 16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point
of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order
letter(s) in the space(s) provided: 12372 to determine whether the application is
--"New" means a new assistance award, subject to the State intergovernmental review
-- "Continuation" means an extension for an process.
additional funding/budget period for a project
with a projected completion date. 17. This question applies to the applicant organi-
--"Revision" means any change in the Federal zation, not the person who signs as the
Government's financial obligation or authorized representative. Categories of debt
contingent liability from an existing include delinquent audit disallowances, loans
obligation, and taxes.
9. Name of Federal agency from which assistance is
being requested with this application. 18. To be signed by the authorized representative of
the applicant. A copy of the governing body's
10. Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance authorization for you to sign this application as
number and title of the program under which official representative must be on file in the
assistance is requested, applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may
11. Enter a brief descriptive title, of the project, if require that this authorization be submitted as
more than one program is involved, you should part of the application.)
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g., construction or real property
projects), attach a map showing project location.
For preapplications, use a' separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
SF 424 (REV 4-88) Bac~
OMB AI)lX~o~vovalNo:0J48-0044
BUDGET INFORMATION -- Non-Construction Programs f'
SECTION A - BUDGET SUMMARY
Grant Program Catalog of Federal Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget
Function Domestic Assistance
or Activity Number Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (t) (g)
t. S $ $ $
2.
3.
5. TOTALS S S S S S
SECTION B - BUDGET CATEGORIES
GRANT PROGRAM, FUNCTION Off ACTIVITY Total
& Object Class Catego~es (1 ) (2) (3) (4) (57
a. Personnel iS S S S S
b. Fringe Benefits
c. Travel
d. Equipment
e. Supldies ·
f. Cofltractual
g. Construction
h. Other
L Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a - 6h)
J. Indirect Charges
k. TOTALS (sum of 6land 6J) S $ S S $
7. I~og~am Income S $ S $ S
Standard Form 424A (4-88)
Pm~cfibed by ~ C#c~lm A-lO2
SECTION C- NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES
(a) Grant Pro~lram .... (b) Applicant (c) State ~d) Other Sources (e) TOTALS
8. S $ S $
9.
11.
12. TOTALS (sum of lines 8and 11) $ S $ $
SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS
13. Federal Total for 1at Year tat Ouarter 2nd Ouarter 3rd Ouarter 4th Quarter
$ S S ;$ $
14. NonFederal
15. TOTAL (sum of lines 13 and 14) S $ $ $ $
SECT1ON E -BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT
(a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (Years)
(b) First (C) Second I (d) Third (e) Fourth
16. S S $ !$
17.
19.
20. TOTALS (sum of lines 16-19) $ S $ $
SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION
(Attach additional Sheets if Necessary)
21. Direct Charges: 1 22. Indirect Charges:
I
23. Remarks
-.._-...~_ SF 424A (4-88) Page 2
Prescribed by.~..OMB Circular A-102
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF-424A
General Instructions Lines 1-4, Columns (c) through (g.) (continued)
This form is designed so that application can be made For continuing grant program applications, submit
for funds from one or more grant programs. In pre- these forms before the end of each funding period as
paring the budget, adhere to any existing Federal required by the grantor agency. Enter in Columns (c)
grantor agency guidelines which prescribe how and and (d) the estimated amounts of funds which will
whether budgeted amounts should be separately remain unobligated at the end of the grant funding
shown for different functions or activities within the period only if the Federal grantor agency instructions
program. For some programs, grantor agencies may provide for this. Otherwise, leave these columns
require budgets to be separately shown by function or blank. Enter in columns (e) and (ir) the amounts of
activity. For o.ther programs, grantor agencies may funds needed for the upcoming period. The amount(s)
require a breakdown by function or activity. Sections in Column (g) should be the sum of amounts in
A,B,C, and D should include budget estimates for the Columns (e)and (f).
whole project except when applying for assistance For supplemental grants and changes to existing
which requires Federal authorization in annual or grants, do not use Columns (c) and (d). Enter in
other funding period increments. In the latter case, Column (e) the amount of the increase or decrease of
Sections A,B, C, and D should provide the budget for Federal funds and enter in Column (f) the amount of
the first budget period (usually a year) and Section E the increase or decrease of non-Federal funds. In
should present the need for Federal assistance in the Column (g) enter the new total budgeted amount
subsequent budget periods. All applications should (Federal and non-Federal) which includes the total
contain a breakdown by the object class categories previous authorized budgeted amounts plus or minus,.. ~
shown in Lines a-k of Section B. as appropriate, the amounts shown in Columns (e) and
(f). The amount(s) in Column (g) should not equal the
Section A. Budget Summary
Lines 1-4, Column's (a) and (b) sum of amounts in Columns (e) and (f).
For applications pertaining to a single Federal grant Line 5 -- Show the totals for all columns used.
program (Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
numberi and not requiring a functional or activity Section B Budget Categories
breakdown, enter on Line 1 under Column (a) the In the column headings(l) through (4), enter the titles
catalog program title and the catalog number in ofthe same programs, functions, and activities shoWn
Coldmn (b). on Lines 1-4, Column (a), SectiOn A. When additional
For applications pertaining to a single program sheets are prepared for Section A, provide similar
requiring budget amounts by multiple functions or column headings on each sheet. For each program,
activities, enter the name of each activity or function function or activity, fill in the total~ requirements for
on each line in Column (a), and enter the catalog num- funds (both Federal and non-Federal) by object class
ber in Column (b). For applications pertaining to mul- categories.
tiple programs where none of the programs require a
Lines 6a-i -- Show the totals of Lines 6a to 6h in each
breakdown by function or activity, enter the catalog ~olumn.
program title on each line in Column (a) and the
respective catalog number on each line in Column (b). Line 6j - Show the amount ofindirect cost.
For applications pertaining to multiple programs
where one or more programs require a breakdown .by Line 6k - Enter the total of amounts on Lines 6i and
function or activity, prepare a separate sheet for each 6j. For all applications for new grants and'
program requiring the breakdown. Additional sheets continuation grants the total amount in column (5),
should be used when one form does not provide Line 6k, should be the same as the total amount shown
adequate space for all breakdown of data required, in Section A, Column (g), Line 5. For supplemental
However, when more than one sheet is used, the first grants and changes to grants, the total amount of the
page Should provide the summary totals by programs, increase or decrease as shown in 'Columns (1)-(4), Line
6k should be the same as the sum of the amounts in
Lines 1-4, Columns (c) through (g.) Section A, Columns (e) and (f) on Line 5.
For new applications, leave Columns (c) and (d) blank.
For each line entry in Columns (a) and (b), enter in
Columns (e), (f), and (g) the appropriate amounts of
funds needed to support the project for the first
funding period (usually a year).
SF 424A {4-88) 0age3
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF-424A (continued)
Line 7-Enter the estimated amount of income, if any, Line 14 - Enter the amount of cash from all other
expected to be generated from this project. Do not add sources needed by quarter during the first year.
or subtract this amount from the total project amount. Line 15 - Enter the totals of amounts on Lines 13 and
Show under the program narrative statement the 14.
nature and source of income. The estimated amount of Section E. Budget Estimates of Federal Funds
program income may be considered by the federal Needed for Balance of the Project
grantor agency in determining the total amount of the
grant. Lines 16 - 19 - Enter in Column (a) the same grant
program titles shown in Column (a), Sectipn A. A
Section C. Non-Federal-Resources breakdown by function or activity is not necessary. For
Lines 8-11 - Enter amounts of non-Federal resources new applications and continuation grant applications,
that will be used on the grant. If in-kind contributions enter in the proper columns amounts of Federal funds
are included, provide a brief explanation on a separate which will be needed to complete the program or
sheet, project over the succeeding funding periods (usually in
years). This section need not be completed for revisions
Column (,a) - Enter the program titles identical (amendments, changes, or supplements) to funds for
to Column (a), Section A. A breakdown by the current year ofexisting grants.
function or activity is not necessary.
Column (~b) - Enter the contribution to be made If more than four lines are needed to list the program
by the applicant, titles, submit additional schedules as necessary.
Column (c) - Enter the amount of the State's Line 20 - Enter the total for each of the Columns (b)-
cash and in-kind contribution if the applicant is (e). When additional schedules are prepared for this
not a State or State agency. Applicants which are Section, annotate accordingly and show the overall
a State or State agencies should leave this totals onthisline.
column blank. Section F. Other Budget Information
Column (d) - Enter the amount of cash and in-
kind contributions to be made from all other Line 21 - Use this space to explain amounts for
sources, individual direct object-class cost categories that may
Column (e)-Enter totals of Columns (b), (c), and appear to be out of the ordinary or to explain the
(d). details as required by the Federal grantor agency.
Line 22 - Enter the type of indirect rate (provisional,
Line 12-- Enter the total for each of Columns (b)-(e). predetermined, final or fixed) that will be in effect
The amount in Column (e) should be equal to the during the funding period, the estimated amount of
amount on Line 5, Column (f), Section A. the base to which the rate is applied, and the total
Section D. Forecasted Cash Needs indirect expense.
Line 13 - Enter the amount of cash needed by quarter Line 23 - Provide any other explanations or comments
from the grantor agency during the first year. deemed necessary.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Applicants must provide on a separate sheet a budget narrative which will detail.by budget category, the
Federal and non-Federal (in-kind and cash) share. The grantee cash contribution should be identified as to its
source, i.e., funds appropriated by a State or local government or donation from a private source. The nar-
rative should relate the items budgeted to project activities and should provide a justification and explanation
for the budgeted items including the criteria and data used to arrive at the estimates for each budget category.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 26 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden, to the Comptroller, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington,
D.C. 20531; and to the Public Use Reports Project, 1121-0140, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503. ~
SF 424A (4-88) page 4
OMB APPROVAL NO. 1121-0140
EXPIRES: 1/31/96
ASSURANCES
The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including
OMB Circulars No. A-21, A-110, A-122, A-128, ^-87; E.O. 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements- 28 CFR, Part 66, Common Rule, that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted
project. ~l~so'the Applicant assures and certifies that:
1~ It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16
motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological and Histori-
act of the applicant's governing body, authorizing the filing of the cai Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 569a-1 et seq.) by (a) consulting
application, including all understandings and assurances contained with the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of investi-
therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the gations, as necessary, to identify properties listed in or eligible for
official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the inclusion in the National Register of Histodc Places that are subject to
application and to provide such additional information may be re- adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying
quired, the Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties,
and by (b) complying with all requirements established by the Federal
2. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform grantor agency to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such proper-
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 P.L. ties.
91-646) which provides for'fair and equitable treatment of persons
displaced as a result of Federal and federally-assisted programs. 11. It will comply, and assure the compliance of all its subgrantees and
contractors, with the applicable provisions of Title I of the Omnibus
3. It Will comply with provisions of Federal law which limit certain political Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile
activities of employees of a State or local unit of government whose Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act,
principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in as appropriate; the provisions of the current edition of the Office of
whole or in part by Federal grants. (5 USC 1501, et seq.) Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants,
M7100.1; and all other applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or
4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions regulations.
of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act if applicable.
12. It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and
5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their cooperative agreements including Part 18, Administrative Review
positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Systems; Part 22,
motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information;
particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies; Part 30,
Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and
6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General, through Activities; Part 42, Nondiscrimination/Equal Employment Opportunity
any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all Policies and Procedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the
records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. National Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management
and Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regulations
7. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal sponsoring applicable to Federal Assistance Programs.
agency concerning special requirements of law, program require-
ments, and other administrative requirements. 13. It will comply, and all its contractors will comply, with the non-'
discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d), or Victims of Crime
which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990);
of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination
Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations,
consideration for liSting by the EPA. 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice
regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39.
9. It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of
Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State administrative
93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 31, 1976. Section 102(a) agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing
.requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability
m communities where such insurance is available as a condition for the against a recipient of funds, the recipient will fonvard a copy of the
receipt of any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisi- finding to the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs.
tion purposes for use in any area that has been identified by the
Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development as 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if required
an area having special flood hazards. The phrase "Federal financial to maintain one, where the application is for $500,000 or more.
assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance
payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or grant, or any 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act
other form of direct or indirect Federal assistance. (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 USC 3501 et seq.) which
prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of
10. ItwillassisttheFederalgrantoragencyinitscompliancewithSection the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
oJP FORM 4000/3 (Rev. 1-93) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
ATTACHMENT TO SF-424
Approved by OMB
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES 034 040
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
(See reverse for public burden disclosure.)
1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
[~] a. contract I-'-'1 a. bid/offer/application O a. initial filing
b. grant b. Initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ~ quarter
f. loan insurance date of last report
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter
Name and Address of Prime:
[] Prime [] Subawardee
Tier , if known:
Congressional District, if known: Congressional District, if known:
6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:
CFDA Number, if applicable:
8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:
$
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Services
(if individual, last name, first name, MI): (including address if different from No. lOa)
(last name, first name, MI):
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL.A, if necessary)
11. Amount of Payment (check all that apply): 13. Type of Payment (check all that apply):
[] a. retainer
$ [] actual [] planned
[] b. one-time fee
12. Form of Payment (check all that apply): [] c. commission
[] a. cash
[] b. in-kind; specify: nature. I'-) d. contingent fee '
[] e. deferred
value [] f. other; specify:
14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be Performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s),
employee(s), or Members(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in item 11:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF.LLL-A, if necessary)
15. Continuation Sheet(s) SF-ILL-A attached: [] Yes [] No
16. Information recluested through this form is authorized by title 31U.S.C.
section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material represen- Signature:
tation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when
this transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required Print Name:
pursuant to 31 USC. 1352. This information will be reported to the
Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any Title:
person who fails to tile the required disclosure shall be subiect to a civil
penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than $100,000 for each Telephone No.: Date:
such failure. ~
~.-~-: .......~;._a~.~... .................................. ._._._.~=~_~:: ______________________
.~ ~ Authorized for Local Reproduction
:------=:---= Standard Form - LLL
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation
or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 3'1 U.S.C. section '1352. The
filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet for additional infor-
mation if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report.
Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information.
1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the out-
come of a covered Federal action.
2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action.
3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the infor-
mation previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously
submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.
4. Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known.
Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward
recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include
but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards Under grants.
5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks "Subawardee," then enter the full name, address, city, state and
zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.
6. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level
below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.
7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog
of Federal. Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.
8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request
for Proposal (RFP) number; Invitation for Bid (I FB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award
number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). InclUde prefixes, e.g., "RFP-DE-90-O01 ."
9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal
amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.
'10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified
in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.
(b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10 (a). Enter
Last Name, First Name, and Middle. Initial (MI).
11. Enter the amount of compensation paid or reasonably expected to be paid by the reporting entity (item 4) to the lobbying
entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Check all boxes that
apply. If this is a material change report, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be made.
'12. Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If payment is made through an in-kind contribution, specify
the nature and value of the in-kind payment.
13. Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If other, specify nature.
14. Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that the lobbyist has performed, or will be expected to perform,
and the date(s) of any services rendered. Include all preparatory and related activity, not just time spent in actual contact
with Federal officials. Identify the Federal official(s) or employee(s) contacted or the officer, s), employee(s) or Member(s)
of Congress that were contacted. '
'15. Check whether or not a SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet(s) is attached.
16. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection
of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions
for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503.
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Approved by OMB
0348-0046
CONTINUATION SHEET
Reporting. Eptity: Page ~ of ~
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form - LLL-A
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
CERTIFICATIONS. REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND
OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to
attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this
form. Signature of this form provides for comPliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New
Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and
Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material
representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the
covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.
1. LOBBYING public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the. U.S. Code, and public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust
implemented at 29 CFR Part 69, for persons entering into a statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
28 CFR Part 69, the applicant certifies that: statements, or receiving stolen property;
(a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or
paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for in- civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or
fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in
any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con- Id) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica-
nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into tion had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or
of any cooperative agreement,, and the extension, continuation, local) terminated for cause or default; and
renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or
cooperative agreement; B. Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the
statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an
lb) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have explanation to this application.
t)een paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at-
tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS)
complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities," in accordance with its instructions; As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998, and
implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F0 for grantees, as
(c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer- defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620--
tification be included in the award documents for all subawards
at all tiers lincluding subgrants, contracts under grants and A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide
cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all sub- a drug-free workplace by:
recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly, la) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the
unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or
use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's
2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against
RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS employees for violation of such prohibition;
(DIRECT RECIPIENT) (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to
As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and inform employees about--
Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospec- il) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at
28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510-- (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: assistance programs; and
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for
ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace;
benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged
or agency; in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the state-
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- ment required by paragraph (a);
tion been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by
them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the
lion with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a grant, the employee will--
OJP FORM 4061/6 (3-9t) REPLACES OJP FORMS 4061/2. 4061/3 AND 4061/4 WHICH ARE OBSOLETE.
(1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a
violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace
no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
{e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days Check [] if there are workplaces on file that are not indenfified
after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an here.
employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic-
tion. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, Section 67, 630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that
including position title, to: Department of Justice, Office of is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal
Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, fiscal year. A copy of which should be included with each ap-
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531. Notice shall include the iden- plication for Department of Justice funding. States and State
tification number(s) of each affected grant; agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4061/7.
(f) Taking one of the'following actions, within 30 calendar Check I~ if the State has elected to domplete OJP Form
days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with 4061/7.
respect to any employee who is so convicted--
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an
employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or {GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS)
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1985, and
drug abus~ assistance or rehabilitation program approved for implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as
such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforce- defined at 28 CFR Part 67; Sections 67.615 and 67.620--
merit, or other appropriate agency; A. As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage
(g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, posses-
free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), sion, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any
(c), {d), (e), and (f). activity with the grant; and
B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a
site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I
the specific grant: will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days
of the conviction, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W,
code) Washington, D.C. 20531.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications.
1. Grantee Name and Address:
2. Application Number and/or Project Name 3. Grantee IRS/Vendor Number
4. Typed Name and Title Of Authorized Representative
5. Signature 6. Date
U.S. Department of Justice FIRST CLASS MAlL
Office of Justice Programs POSTAGE& FEF_.S PAID
Bureau of Justice Assistance DOJ/]]JA
Permit No. O-91
Washington, D.C. 20531
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
Alan E. Tandy 28787
City Managep
1501 Truxtun Avenue
BakersField ,CA 93301
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MEETING OF: 08/25/93
REFERRED TO' BUDGET & FINANCE J sTINsON
REFERRED TO CITY MANAGER M .DUNNOODY
ITEM: ~ECORD~ 12290
Agreement,with Bakersfield SocietY for the
' Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (S.P.C.A.) for
animal ~acility/replacement'plans. ·
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
MOTION TO REFER TO BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE,
APPROVED, AB: PS,
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: YES
,DATE FORWARDED BY 'CITY C'LERK: 08/27/93
27 Aua.g5 ~5;: ~4
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD-,~"~.
DATE: August 13, 1993 CITYATrORNEY
CITY MANAGER ~//
SUBJECT: Agreement with the Bakersfield S.P.C.A. for Animal Facility/Replacement Plans.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Agreement.
BACKGROUND: The FY 1992-93 Budget contained funds to be used as a grant for the Bakersfield
S.P.C.A. to expand their Edison Facility. Since the time the money was appropriated, they have sold their
Edison Facility and have been in the process of formalizing a plan to replace the facility.
· The S.P.C.A. has opened escrow on the property directly across the street from their Adoption Center
on Gibson and their long-term plans are to build a new adoption center on that property and dedicate
the existing adoption center to animal control purposes.
What this involves is constructing kennels and temporary facilities on the new property and making
modifications and improvements to the Gibson facility for animal control. Any activity involving the new
adoption center would be the responsibility of the Bakersfield S.P.C.A. Proceeds from the sale of the
Edison Facility will be used, in conjunction with the grant monies, to make improvements at the Gibson
site for animal control purposes.
Because the Gibson facility was used for kenneling dogs and not animal control, several improvements
need to be made. It does not contain any facilities for euthanasia, disposal accommodations, or kennels
for isolation or vicious dogs. In addition, some of the existing facilities are inadequate and need to be
updated.
The original agreement was that the S.P.C.A. would finance the money for the expansion and receive
$45,000 a year for ten years which would be applied to principal payments. In return, the contract would
be extended from 5 years to 10 years and depreciation costs on the facilities would not be considered part
of the operating costs.
August 13, 1993, 10:06am
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2
August 25, 1993
Bakersfield S.P.C.A. Agreement
When the project is completed, there will be a total of 88 kennels and 58 cat cages plus kennels for vicious
and "pending" animals, and a separate facility for the isolation of sick/injured animals. The Edison facility
accommodated 30 kennels and 34 cat cages, and the original expansion plan was for an additional 30
kennels.
AU25CM1.CC
JP
August 13, 1993, ll:06am
" THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on , by
and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIR~.~, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter "CITY", and BAKERSFIELD SPCA FORTWR PREVENTION OF
CRUELTY TOANIMALS, hereinafter "SOCIETY".
RECITALS:
~, CITY and SOCIETY entered into Agreement No.
91-113 on June 5, 1991, which was amended by Agreement No. 92-156
on June 15, 1992, and which provided for the performance of the
powers and duties of the Health Officer of the City of
Bakersfield, as set forth in Title 6 of the Bakersfield Municipal
Code; and
WPr~REAS, since that time, SOCIETY has'sold its facility
on Edison Highway and obtained plans to expand its facility at
3000 Gibson Street, but has not yet completed such expansion; and
WHEREAS, SOCIETY needs to expand its shelter facility
to continue to provide quality service to the expanding CITY; and
WHEREAS, CITY is willing, under terms and conditions
set forth below, to grant .to SOCIETY $450,000 for the expansion
of its animal control facilities at 3000 Gibson Street, payable
in ten annual increments of $45,000;
WT~.REAS, one of the.conditions of commencement of
payment of said grant is the completion of construction of said
expansion; and
WHEREAS, CITY and SOCIETY now wish to amend Agreement
No. 91-113, as amended by Agreement No. 92-156, to allow
expansion of the animal control facilities on Gibson Street, as
well as amending the annual payment for animal control and other
minor provisions;
NOW, ~~ORE, CITY and SOCIETY agree to amend
Agreement No.. 91-113, as amended by Agreement No. 92-156, as
follows:
1. Paragraph 14 is hereby amended to read as follows:
14. For and in consideration of the services agreed to
be performed by SOCIETY hereunder, CITY agrees to pay to SOCIETY
the annual sum of $414,000, said sum to be paid in equal monthly
installments. 'SOCIETY agrees to not include in its request for
funding any amounts for depreciation or other costs associated
1
with the facilities constructed with grant funds. Each payment
shall be made on or before the 10th day of every month,
commencing July of 1993. SOCIETY shall submit on a monthly basis
a claim for payment to the City Manager's office.
2. Paragraph 22 is hereby amended to read as follows:
22. SOCIETY shall procure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement the following types and limits of
insurance, otherwise referred to aS "basic insurance
requirements":
a. Automobile liability insurance, providing coverage
on an occurrence basis for bodily injury,
including death, of one or more persons, property
damage and personal injury, with limits of not
less than one million ($1,000,000) per occurrence;
and
b. Broad form commercial general liability insurance,
providing coverage on an occurrence basis for
.bodily injury, including death, of one or more
persons, property damage and personal injury', with
limits of not less than one million ($1,000,000)
per occurrence; and
c. Workers' compensation insurance with statutory
limits and employer's liability insurance with
limits of not less than one million ($1,000,000)
per accident.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests'
rating of no less than A:VII. This requirement may be waived at
the CITY's sole discretion.
All policies required of SOCIETY hereunder shall be
primary insurance as respects the CITY, its mayor, council,
officerS, agents, employees and volunteers and any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its mayor, council,
officers, agents, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the
SOCIETY's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
The automobile liability policies shall provide
coverage for owned, non-owned and hired autos.
The liability policies shall provide contractual
liability coverage for the terms of this Agreement.
The liability policies shall contain an additional
insured endorsement in favor of the CITY, its mayor, council,
officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
2
The wor-kers' compensation policy shall contain a waiver
of subrogation endorsement in favor of the CITY, its mayor,
council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
All policies shall contain an endorsement providing the
CITY with thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or
material change in policy language or terms. All policies shall
provide that there shall be continuing liability thereon,
notwithstanding any recovery on any policy.
SOCIETY shall furnish the City Risk Manager with a
certificate of insurance evidencing the insurance required under
this Agreement. The CITY may withhold payments to SOCIETY if
certificates of insurance and endorsements required in this
Agreement have not been provided.
SOCIETY shall be responsible for any deductibles or
self-insured retentions under all required insurance policies.
If any part of the work under this Agreement is
subcontracted, the "basic insurance requirements" set forth
hereinabove shall be provided by or on behalf of all
subcontractors. SOCIETY shall be responsible for determining and
guaranteeing all subcontractors are insured as set forth in this
paragraph.
3. .Paragraph 25 is hereby amended to read as follows:
25. T~-~ ~. The term of this'Agreement shall
be ten (10) years and shall commence on JULY 1, 1993, and shall
terminate on JUNE 30, 2003. SOCIETY and CITY shall have the
option to terminate this Agreement at any time on not less than
six (6) months prior written notice. 'ShOuld this Agreement be so
terminated by SOCIETY, no further payments of any kind shall be
due to SOCIETY from CITY, including, but not limited to, payments
for expansion of the animal control facility and SOCIETY's
services to CITY for animal control. Should CITY terminate this
Agreement, CITY will continue with grant payments, pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement, for expansion of the animal control
facility, but shall NOT pay for SOCIETY's services for animal
control.
4. Paragraph 32 is hereby added to read as follows:
32. In addition to the payment for ongoing animal
control services set forth in Paragraph 14,~CITY grants to
SOCIETY the sum of FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($450,000)~ hereinafter, the "grant", for the construction costs
of the expansion of SOCIETY's animal control facilities at 3000
Gibson Street, for the direct benefit of CITY.
3
5. Paragraph 33 is hereby addedlto read as follow~=
33. SOCIETY agrees, to use..~he g~ant funds se~ forth
Paragraph 32 for cons=ruction of real prop~.rty /mprovements:for
animal control purposes,, and fo= no other ~uxPOses, a~. its G~bson
street animal control facility locate~ a~ ~000 Gibson Street~
During the ten (10) year term of this Agreement, should the
improvements be used for any purpose.o~her~itha/~ a~/Jaal control,
SOCIETY shall, within ninety'(90)days, repay to CITY the entire
amount of the grant which has been paid up~!=~ =he date of
discovery of improper use.
SOCIETY shall use the expanded p~operty at 300.0 Gibson
exclusively for animal control purposes. SOCIETY shall not sell
or otherwise dispose of, mortgage or'other~ise encumber said'
Broperty or facilities other than the firs~ deed of trust to
finance the expansion described herein, un,ess prior approval of
CITY has been given in'writing. I~ ~he even~ of a sale during
the~t~rm of this Agreement, SOCIETY shall ~pay the entire
of the grant funds paid by CITY =o SOCIETY~I Sa£d funds s~all be
paid ~o CITY from =he escrow opened for the sale or, if no escrow
is opened, within ten (10) days from~th~ c~osang of the
transaction.
6. Paragraph 34. is hereby'added itc read as foll~ws~
34. The grant se= forth in Paragraph 32 shall be. paid
in sums of $45,000 annually commenciUg wiZArd' fiscal year 1993'-
1994. CITY's oDligation =o pay will~no= c,ammence un~il and
unless the construc~ion of the real proper..~ improvements is
completed to the satisfaction of cITY. No~lfication of
completion shall be made from SOCIETY to
The first payment shall be made Within 30 days of
receipt of said notice, if said workis satisfactory =o CITY.
SubSequent payments shall be made on AUg~S~ 1 of the following
fiscal year and annually thereafter until t~e grant ~o=al of
$450,000 is paid. No interest or other fe6s shall be paid by
CITY on the grant amount. CITY's obligati.~n to make said a~nual
payment is contingent upon SOCIETY annuall~ submitting a proper
'reqUest for said payment, prior =o June-15 ~f =~e previous f~scal
year. Absent said request., CITY. is not ob!~gated to ma~e any
annual grant payment in the following fiscal year.
7. Paragraph 35 is hereby 'added .~o read as follow~z
35. CITY Shall have the r~ght to! review and approve
all~plan~s and specifications for cunatruc=i~n, and to mona=or and
inspect said construction of the expansion Of the animal con~ol
facilities. CITY shall have the r~ght =o W~thhold grant
payments if plans and specifications approved by CITY are
followed or if inspection shows shoddy work~anship or other
4
construction problems. Ail expenditures for construction and all
construction-related bills shall be submitted to CITY for review.
8. Paragraph 36 is hereby added~to read as follows:
36. .Should the construction of the expanded animal
control facility cost less than the amount of the grant as
described in Paragraph 32, SOCIETY's grant shall be reduced by
said amount; provided, however, that the amount of the aru3ual
payments shall remain the same, but the number of payments and
'the amount of the final annual payment shall be reduced to
reflect the new lower grant amount.
9. Paragraph 37 is hereby added to read as follows:
~ 37. ~SOCIETY shall maintain accurate accounting records
and other written doCumentation pertaining to the costs incurred
in performance of this Agreement, including the construction
costs of the new facilities. Such records and documentation
shall be kept at SOCIETY's office during the period of this
Agreement, and after the term of this Agreement for a period of
three years from the date of the final payment under this
Agreement, and shall be made available to CITY representatives
upon request at any time during regular business hours.
10. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of
Agreement No. 91-113, as amended by Agreement No. 92-156, shall
remain in full force and effect.
o0o
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
.,'//~ August 5, 1993
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER /"/'Y~/-/,//
FROM: M.A. DUNWOODY, ADMINISTRATIVe'ANALYST 'ii
SUBJECT: BAKERSFIRID SPCA - ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY REPLACEMENT/EXPANSION
PLANS
As you are aware, the FY 1992-93 Budget contained funds to be used as a grant for
the Bakersfield SPCA to expand their Edison Facility. Since the time the money
was appropriated, they have sold their Edison Facility and have been in the
process of formalizing a plan to replace the facility.
As it looks now, they are ready to present their proposal. Earlier this year,
a plan to absorb animal control at the adoption center was being considered.
However, since then, the SPCA has opened escrow on the property directly across
the street from their Adoption Center on Gibson. Their long term plans are to
build a new adoption center on that property and dedicate the existing adoption
center to animal control purposes.
What this involves is constructing kennels and temporary facilities on the new
property and making modifications and improvements to the Gibson facility for
animal control. Any activity involving the new adoption center would be the
responsibility of the Bakersfield SPCA. Proceeds from the sale of the Edison
Facility will be used, in conjunction with the grant monies, to make improvpmmnts
at the Gibson site for animal control purposes.
Because the Gibson facility was used for kenneling dogs and not animal control,
several improvements need to be made. It does not contain any facilities for
euthanasia, disposal accommodations, or kennels for isolation or vicious dogs.
In addition, some of the existing facilities are inadequate and need to be
updated.
The original agreement was that the SPCA would finance the money for the
expansion and receive $45,000 a year for ten years which would be applied to
principal payments. In return, the contract would be extended from 5 years to
10 years and depreciation costs on the facilities would not be considered part
of the operating costs.
The SPCA and their contractor have made a preliminary presentation to Laura
Marino and myself and are prepared to make a presentation to Council or city
staff, as desired. I have asked for additional information and details on their
plans and am expecting to receive something in a week or so. Meanwhile, unless
directed otherwise, the Attorney's office is drafting a contract for Council
approval.
For some time, the SPCA has been concerned about the size and location of the
Edison Facility. ~]~e facility is located in east Bakersfield off of Highway 58
and Weedpatch Highway and has only 30 kennels which are often filled with three
or more dogs. One of their goals has been to relocate to a larger facility in
a more centralized location. In the past, the City and the SPCA have both worked
towards providing the public with quality animal control and I look forward to
seeing this continue at a new location.
cc:
Henry Ross III
John Stinson
Laura Marino
mad:spcawp\expnplns
Page 2
CTTY COUNCTL REFERRAl'
HEETING OF: 08/25/93
REFERRED TO: BUDGET & FZNANCE J, STZNSON
ITEH: RECORD~ 12270
Communication received from Economic Development
Director Wager, dated August 12, 1993,'regarding
a request for purchase of prOperty on behalf of
the Bakersfield Senior Center.
ACTZON TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
RECEZ.VE AND, REFER TO BUDGET AND F[NANCE
COHHITTEE.APPROVED. NS: CB. AB: Ps; LE.
BACKUP WATER,AL ATTACHED: YES _
· DATE FORWARDED BY C~TY CLERK: 08/27/93
MEMORANDUM
August 12, 1993
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Directo
SUBJECT: Request for purchase of property on behalf of Senior Center.
At your request I have reviewed the letter sent to you by Robert Severs on behalf of the
Bakersfield Senior Center (attached). At present the City has $98,000 available from the 1992-93
CDBG allocation. These funds were originally intended to be used for m-construction of an
existing building into a classroom facility. This project has been delayed due to higher than
expected cost to the project as originally envisioned. As a result of these higher cost the project
has been revised three times.
The current proposal as described in the August 6, 1993 correspondence is CDBG eligible. A
preliminary review does suggest that it may be possible to complete the acquisition wi_thin the
amount currently available. I recommend that the proposal be forwarded to the Budget and
Finance Committee for discussion. Approval of the request would require a CDBG amendment.
~., I I~ I __ _ I II 'II .
BAKERSFIELD SENIOR CENTER
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
August 6, 1993
Mr. A1 n'Tandy, City Manage~
City of B~ersfteld
1501 ~ruxtun Avenue
Bakersfteld~ CA 93301
Dea~ Hr, Tandy~
Rreeently Co~lty Develo~en~ f~ds have been
allocated and approved for cons~c[ton ora
building at the B~ersfteld Senior Center, ~e'
pro~y ad~olntnq our property is now available
fo~ purchase, ~Js proper~y ~[~er suits our
lone-range ne~e th~ the bu[ldtn9 thai ~as
ortg~nally re.est.. .
~is.~e~es~ [~ tha~ the funds now all~at~ for
new const~ot~on at 530 Forth Street,
~edtrect~ toward.the purchase of ~e p~operty
looa~ed at ~10 Fourth street, presently
oooup~ed by ~e Ke~ Cowry S~ety for .Crippled
Children and Adults Co~[ty ~velopme~ staff
are aware of o~ re.est.
Your cons~deratfo~ of th~s re.est w~11
appreo~ated.
BaAe~teld ~ento~ cen~ez
6' AL~ 95 4)Auni!~lW~yAgency ~ S30FOURTHSTREET:aAKERSFIELD,¢A$$304 ~ (805)3~-'1113
ADMINIST T1VE REPORT
TO: HOnorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
FROM: Carol Williams, City Clerk DEPARTMENT HE~
DATE: August 13, 1993 CITY ATrORNEY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Communication from Economic Development Director Wager, dated August 12, 1993,
regarding a request for purchase of property on behalf of the Bakersfield Senior Center.
(Receive and refer to Budget and Finance Committee)
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
ass
AU25CC2.CC
August 13. 1993, 3:31pm
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
March 29, 1993
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOHN W. STINSO~,k~SISTANT CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: PROJECT CLEAN AIR MEMBERSHIP
The matter of City.membership in Project Clean Air was referred to the Budget and
Finance Committee~for review. The Committee suggested that I contact Project
Clean Air to see if the City's $15,000 contribution made by the City in 1992
included membership. I was able to contact Linda Urata, their Executive Director
who indicated that based on our contribution they would consider the City a
sponsor and have included us on their letterhead as we had requested.
I explained that it 'is difficult to have the City be a member of a non-profit
organization as we could be asked to be members of every non-profit in the
Community. She agreed and suggested that it might be more appropriate for the
City Manager to be an individual member rather than the City as an organization.
She said the City has been very supportive of Project Clean Air and said she
would send me a copy of the video we funded in 1992.