The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005 PUBLIC SPEAKER BUDGET AND FINANCE COI~IITTEE 14EETING ON NOVEMBER 7, 2005. Nov. ?, 2005 Good morning Mhyor Hall .and members of the City Council, My name is George Sturges and I appreciate this opportunity to make a public statement regarding concerns associated with the Committee entertaining a potential sale of the City Airport. Although, I rent one of the City's hangers and have invested my time and capital in an additional hanger, my concerns far exceed those of just how myself and'others are affected as tenants. I have alWays been proud of the City of Bakersfield and our community. Bakersfield is often referred to as a growing city, with a small town feel. Our City Council must continue to reflect the ethics and standards from which this City's repuiation was built. The integrity with which the City Council manages its business, defines the integrity of our City. ' The City of Bakersfield, upon a unanimous vote among its City Council, entered into agreement(s) with the Federal government to receive significant funding for the City's Airport. As part of the agreement(s) and in consideration tbr receiving funding from the Federal government, the City was to ensure that the Airport remain open and maintained for specified term(s). Even if a potential sale of the City Airport was determined to be beneficial, and if the City could wiggle out of its agreement with the Federal Government, it goes against the intent of our City's agreement With the Federal Govemment and thoSe that voted in favor of it. This City Council's actions associated with its attempts to breach this agreement, an agreement that was made in good faith, and its entertaining the potential closure of the City Airport, sends a strong messag~ about the integrity of our City and is cause for great concern. Actions of this nature have far reaching effects. They send the message that you cannot trust the City of Bakersfield, that a deal is never a deal with this City, and that Investors, developers, or others living or doing business within our community, should beware, the City of Bakersfield will work diligently towards getting out of its agreement, that was made with you in. good faith, if a perceiVed better deal comes along. In the past I have heard several excuses tbr the actions taken by the City Council relating to the City Airport. For example, I have heard that "The current City Council didn't enter into this agreement with the Federal Government, that the agreement was made before their time, and that they have different ideas as to the Use of that land' or "That on different occasions one member of the City Council has developed a proposal for the use of the land that is counter to the City's agreement with the Federal Government, and the other members out of respect or loyalty all agree to entertain the idea". Neither of those, along with others, are valid excuses. Are we suggesting that an agreement made with the City of Bakersfield is only good for the term of its City Council members? If so. then the City Council shouldn't be allowed to enter into any long term agreements. ApplYing that logic, with staggered four year terms, the Ciiy Council would, at best, only be able to enter into a two year agreement. Although it's important to respect the ideas and contributions presented by each of the City Council members, the others perform the necessary checks and balances, and have an obligation to counter proposals that are detrimental to our City and its reputation. There is never a good excuse for compromising the Integrity of the City of Bakersfield. This City Council's willingness to waffle on this agreement and failure to make a commitment to the City's Airport, has been detrimental to the success of this airport and those surrounding the airport. Only those with faith in the Federal Government's commitment to enforcing an agreement are willing to invest in this area. The surrounding industry cannot trust that the area next door will remain industrial. Having Wrecking Yards, Automotive Paint Shops, Modular construction, etc., etc., next to residential housing, is hardly sound planning, particularly in light of all the non developed land east of the airport and residential area. Even though, in some respects it would be nice to have something in writing from the Federal Government ibrmally notifying the City that it must live up to its agreement, I believe its wrong for the City to formally attempt to get out of its agreement with the Federal Government. Sending such a request only further chips away at the credibility of the City of Bakersfield and Could potentially subject our City to further scrutiny and reimbursement of funding. It~ time that the City lives up to its agreement with the Federal 6overnment and make the commitment necessar~ to comply with the intent of this agreement and to ensure the success of this City's Airport. Its time to quit entertaining ways of getting out of agreements made in good thith, and to move forward with integrity and begin regaining credibility. ' .Thank you very much fbr your consideration, George Sturges, Jr. (661) 282-2665 PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited .to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Company/ Organization: ~ Address: ~ ~,,- ~ Phone: ~ '~ ' _~'~ 7 ;~ ~Fax/e- m ail: Subject: .~; PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date [I ~C1~//o~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: ~ ~01:;;~"..¢_._ ~"'Tu. I"~ ~ ~ j ~{~. Company/ Organization: Address: ~00 ~L~~ I~V, t~~¢~n, Phone: ~ () ~8~-~GGS F~e-mail: ~+~¢.e% ~ Subject: ~O~~ ~ ~ PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Bud,qet and Finance Commit;tee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majodty vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee · gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Organization: Phone: ~ ~ ~C~ -7-~-~ 7 Fax/e-mail: Subject: ..~..~/_~-.v~ PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD "- Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ct- ~i- OS You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: '--~',J S/%,-~t-~ Company/ ~ Organization: Phone: {~(c{- ~- I~g Fa~e-mail: Subject: Request for Release (Closure) Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L45) (1) Instruments of Disposal (2) Property Description (3) Property Condition (4) Purpose of Property Transfer (5) Kind of Release (6) Purpose of Release (7) Release Justification (8) Maps, Photographs, Plans, Etc. (9) Proposed Use (10) Use of Proceeds (11) Instrument of Release (12) Environmental Assessment PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee'Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Company/ Organization: Phone: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budget and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majodty vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Organization: Address: Phone: ~',,~ ~,//4ff..~ d~ Fax/e-mail: Subiect.' , -/ PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budget and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majodty vote, waive .the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and Present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Organization: _ Address: Phone: Fax/e-mail:~ ~' '"'"-~'~'"~'~"~--~ Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are 'limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive .the 'time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill o.ut a Speaker's Card and present it to-the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Company/ Organization: Address: .~. ~)~)~) "' C.j'~'~ Phone: /~ ~ .~ax/e -~ail: · PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Bud,qet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: ~ Company/ Organization: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Bud,qet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Company/ Organization: Phone: .~ o'/~'e"-- Fax/e-mail: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ¢/~~'~-'"-"~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Organization: ¢/1~ ~- ~)f~/,'L~. J~,~ 2dhdorneeS.'s: ~'~' 7~ ~ '~) ' Fax/e-m~ill _(~,,,/~¢- ~' ~ B A K EIt S F I E L D RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AUG 1 5 2005 MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/~ DATE: August 15, 2005 SUBJECT: FY 05~06 Cost Recovery Cycle - Public Works Fees The Budget and Finance Committee met on July 11, 2005 and reviewed the city-wide proposed fee increases. After reviewing the proposed fee increases for the Public Works Department, the Committee recommended to remove six cost centers for further review at their next meeting. All six of these fees referenced "historical cost data"; the Committee directed staff to come back to them with more detail as to what changed in each of these cost centers. In each case, the "historical cost data" was the actual time and direct costs attributed to the project number, based on FY 03~04. Grading Plan Check - Staff proposes to increase the base fee from $300 to $315 and the per acre fee from $16.10 to $18.60. The fee structure is set up so that the base fee - $315 - is applicable to any project of 5 acres or less. For these projects (about 45% of the projects we review) this amounts to a 5% increase. For the remainder of the projects, the fee change amounts to an average of 8%. Staff is asking for the increase based on actual time spent on grading plan checks and to account for the increased complexity of drainage regulations. There are NPDES regulations that are coming into play, as well as the difficulties inherent in dealing with the steeper terrain as we develop into the northeast.' Staff also recommends adding a revision fee (equal to the base fee) for this cost center. This revision fee is similar to the fee structure for improvement plan checks which already has a revision fee. The grading plan revision fee would be charged for those previously approved grading plans that are being resubmitted for review with a design change. Final Tract Maps - Staff is proposing no increase to the base fee and to increase the per lot fee from $29 to $31. This is based upon the actual time spent on this project number in FY 03/04. G:\GROUPDAT~Georgina~Fees~Budget & Finance Committee rev.doc Page 1 of 3 Pages ' The base fee has remained at $600 since at least 2003. The per lot fee has gone from $28 to $31 over the same pedod. Because this fee has two separate components it is difficult to determine the actual percentage increase in the fees paid by developers, and it has been difficult for staff to get the numbers to balance. However, a review of recent activity shows that final maps now have an average of 45 lots per map. This results in an actual change in the fees paid by developers of 7.3%. This compares to a COLA increase over the same period of 7.7% Lot Line Adjustment and Owner Initiated Parcel Merger- Staff proposes to increase this fee from $902 to $970. This is based upon the actual time spent on this project 'number in FY 03/04. This fee was last increased on April 30, 2003. It has been two years since this fee was last adjusted. The change in the fee is 7.54%. The COLA over the same period was 7.7%. Parcel Map Waiver - Staff proposes to increase this fee from $902 to $1,070. This is based upon the actual time spent on this project number in FY 03/04. The parcel map waiver fee was last increased on April 30, 2003. The change in the fee is 18.63%. The COLA over the same time period was 7.7% Staff is asking for an increase over COLA for this fee because of several factors. Because of the increasing pace of development; there is incredible pressure to create new lots. Because of the pressure to create new lots, more engineers are using the Parcel Map Waiver process on property that formerly would have been processed with a Parcel Map. In most cases, this is appropriate, but there are more complex issues relating to property descriptions and title with these transactions than there were formally. Basically, all of the easy stuff is gone and we are left with the more marginal or difficult properties to process. This requires more review time, which relates to a higher fee. Staff is asking for an 11% increase in the fee over the COLA increase to account for this. Street Encroachment Permits - Staff proposes to increase this fee from $150 to $190 per application. This cost center involves staff review of potential problems caused by encroachment of a private use into public right-of-way. This is based upon the actual time spent on this project number in FY 03/04. Until recently, these permits have been non-controversial and non-contentious. This is no longer the case. The encroachment permits have been increasingly complex with much more neighbor interaction than formerly. The additional increase over the COLA is to account for this additional staff time. Right of Way Vacations - Staff proposes to increase this fee from $1,235 per application to $1,730. This is based upon the actual time spent on this project number in FY 03/04. Each right-of-way vacation can vary significantly based upon vadous factors, and we do not have many vacations dudng any given fiscal year. During the 2003 fee cycle, 'a non-summary vacation fee was established. This allowed staff to bill applicants for vacations that took more time than what was included'in the base fee. For non- G:\GROUPOAT~Georgina\Fees~Budget & Finance Committee rev.doc Page 2 of 3 Pages summary vacations, the base fee is still charged, but separate project numbers are set up for each vacation and when the vacation is done an invoice is generated which bills the applicant for time and materials beyond the base fee. The proposed fee of $1,730 is staff's estimate as to the costs involved in processing a typical (summary) vacation. Vacations involve a determination that dedicated right-of-way, such as street right-of- way, easements, etc, is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was dedicated and the right-of-way can be abandoned (vacated). The work staff performs for street vacations include notices and correspondence with utility companies, the Fire Department, and adjacent property owners; preparation of staff reports and headng notices for the Planning Commission; preparation of staff report, plat and legal descriptions and the Resolution of Intention for the City Council meeting; preparation of Notices of Vacation for the City Council headng; and preparation of the staff report and notice of ~headng.for the City Council headng. cc: Jacques R. LaRoche#e, Assistant Public Works Director Marian Shaw, Civil Engineer IV-Subdivisions Georgina Lorenzi, Assistant to the Public Works Director Melanie Dunwoody, Business Manager, Development Services G:\GROUPDAT~Georgina~Fees~Budget & Finance Committee rev.doc Page 3 of 3 Pages PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance . Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ~.~/~ / You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: r~ ~c ~.ic¥~~- '"'r-~ ~-~ [ ~,.~t_.,'~ Company/ j~ Organization: J~~ Fax/e-mai!: ~,'.'4"-.f ~v~.¢,~ ,, O~,' Subject: ~-----..~% ~'~U~~'l IO~ PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Bud,qet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date '-~illlll/D5''-' / You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: ' Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Company/ Organization: Address: Phone: Fax/e-mail: Ill ~ ..... · :'"' i' ~ ' - ': ~il , PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date~_Z~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor -Mike -Maggard Name: ~)~ Organization: ~ ~Z~..~.,~,~,,/ Address: Phone: ~) 7'/--~ ~) ? ~) Fax/e-(;/mail:'~7?--/~'~,<~' Subject: "~~ / , r.j PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited .to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card ~nd present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: ,/,,~/'/ /..-~ X)/~///~.)~? Company/ Organization: Address: //"'/Z',.'70 '~"~'/~'~ ~,"/ Phone: 3 7 ('~/'/'9~'./('" Eax/e-mai,' su,,,ct: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date~'-~/i/D ~-'- You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: .~_~_~ Organization: Address: Phone: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Budqet and Finance Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Vice-Mayor Mike Maggard Name: Company/ Organization: Address: Phone: Fax/e-mail: Subject: MAY-89-~885 i4:88 From:MCIHTOSH & ~I~T ~l ~ ~ To:Rieh~ax P.l~l ~y 9, 2~5 CiW of 8ake~fleld CiW Cle~ 1501 Truxtun Avenue Ba~rsfield, California g3301 A~N: Honorable Council Membe~ ..:n~ Surveying Honorable Council Members: C, ~ E~:~m>rin~ i request has recently ~en made to your CoUncil tO consider funding the e~n to find a vaccine for Valley F~er. T~is request has been refe~ed to your Budget and Finance CommJ~ee..I am writing to p?,,jto~'~mmetry you to request your ~cious consideration o~ ~is effom Please consider Jt from the pe~ctive of one of the Major Employers in t~e So,hem San J~quin Valley and i~ succ~sful development's e~ on the heal~ care costs associated wi~ the il~ness. As an employer, I have had several ' ~ ~ employees contra~ the disease. Recently, I have one employee that has been off work ~r seve~l .wee~. The financial impa~ on'our firm due to the lost time and decrease In ptodu~Jvi~ h~ been si~ifjcant. If you : · :' .', ~ ~; g check with your health insurance or workers com~.nsat~on cost you will probably see a significant aff~ on ~e Ci~ budget. ~.'. :'.:..' -~ ~n' ~ The r~uest for funding fo~ $50,000.00 is an Investment in ~e future of the citizens of this communi~. ?hrou8~ our effo~ and othe~ over $~4 Million has been raised in pu~uit of a vaccine. $2.S Million Is n~d~ to take the project to a point where human trials may be possible. Pl~se seriously consJde~ this request as an Investment In the future of the employe~ and citizens of the Ci~ of Bakersfield. Roger A. Mclntosh 661,854.4814 RAM:rjs Fax 661,83~4-0972 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersflelci, CA 93309 H.,VU~vallm/bwer vaCCine-dec m,=a,-,a~me~tml~omaC ,corn '' ~ ' ~- CiW of Ba~e~fid~ Ci~ ~ 50] Truxtun Avenu~ Ba~rsfield, California A~N: Honorable Council M~mbe~ .,=nO Surveying Honorable 6ouncil Members: S,/i~ E~.jHnooring. A request has recently ~en made to your CoUncil to con~ider fundin8 the e~R to find a vaccine for Valley Fever. ~his request has been refe~ed to your Budset and Finance Commiffee. I am writins to ,~hato~'ammetry you to request your serious consideration of ~is effo~. Please consider it from ~e pem~ctive of one of ~e Major Employers in the So,hem San J~quln Valley and i~ succ~sful development's eff~ on the heal~ care costs assoclat~ with ~e illness. As an employer, I have had : P ~ employees contract the disease. Recently, I have one employee that has been off work ~r several wee~. The financial impa~ on'our firm due to the lost time and decrease In produ~ivi~ h~ been si~ificant. If you : : ., ~ ~ 9 check with your health insurance or worke~s com~.nsation cost you will probably see a significant affe~ on ~e Ci~ budget. ~...: ..:..- -~n'ul The r~uest for fUndins.for $50,000.00 is an Investment in ~e 'future of the citizens of this communi~. ThrouBh our e~o~ and othem over $14 Million has been raised in pu~uit of a vaccine. $2.5 Million is ..... ,-. n~ded to take the project to a point where human trials may be possible. Pl~se seriously consider this request as an investmen~ in the futura o{ the employe~ and citizens of the Ci~ of Bakersfield. Reset A. Mclntosh 661.836,.4814 RAdvt:rjs Fax 661,83;4o0972 2(301 Wheelon Court Baker.flelcl. CA 93309 www. mclnto~hcmo¢.g~rn H.'~l~vallay ~r ~lne~ ~m~~,c~ : B A K E R S F I E L D CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM April 11,2005 TO: Irma Carson, Councilmember- Ward One FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager SUBJECT: Possible Sale of Airport The City could apply to the Federal Aviation Administration and request that they authorize closure of the airpark. The FAA is generally negative to this subject, and has been in the past with respect to the Bakersfield Airpark. The preliminary economics of this, as best we know, would be: The City would have to reimburse federal and state governments $ 9,902,309 Estimated relocation / damage payments to leaseholders (preliminary)$ 3,000,000 Total cost: $12,902,309 The estimated appraised value of the property is $15 - $18 million - possibly less runway removal costs. Also, less the cost of removal of contaminated land, which is now encapsulated. The property is zoned industrial and should be changed to residential and commercial. The GPA would require an EIR. To pursue an application to close the airpark, the City would need security in hand for its COSTS. AT:rs Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L45) General Information Usage- General Aviation · Property purchased beginning in 1985 with most recent purchase in 1997. · Federal Grants funds received through 2005 equals $ 9,978,309.00, State Grant Funds received is approximately $185,000.00 with City matching funds being $2,672,600.00 for a total of $12,835,909.00. · The City has invested other funds for various projects 'totaling approximately $200,000.00. · The City estimates current relocation costs to be $3,0001006.00 · The current total break even cost is $13,163,309.00 and with City investments the break even cost is $16,035,909.00. · Size- 251.88 Acres · Runway-4000' x 75' · Based Aircraft- Approx. 100 · Revenue- Approx. $120,000 + $10,000 State Grant · Operating Expense - Approx. $126,000 · Existing Facilities FBO - Office 1,800 sq. ft. and Hangar 13,300 sq. fi. Hangar/Office - Office 1,250 sq. ft. and Hangar 4,500 sq. ft. (approx.) Shop - 2,400 sq. fi. Restaurant (Under Construction) Office/Shop - 3,200 sq. ft. Hexagonal Hangar - 6 planes T-Hangar - 17 planes · Community Hangar - (8/- planes) Shade Structures Various Owner Hangars Various Land Leases for Owner Constructed Hangars Above Ground 12,000 gallon Fueling Facility · Contamination from a fueling facility exists on the property. The City met all environmental requirements and was allowed to cap the contaminated area with asphalt. Another type' of development may require further cleanUp efforts. ~City/FAA Correspondence- " From March 29, 2000 through January 13, 2003 the City of Bakersfield corresponded with the FAA six times to inquire about airspace modifications and closure of the airport .(L45.). The City based the inquiry on safety concems arising from two near miSses between general aviation aircraft and commercial aircraft flying into Meadows Field. While the FAA took.the City's concerns seriously they did not see the need for either airspace modifications or closure of the airport as federal criteria was not met. In the various correspondences the FAA has stated such things as: · "The (FAA) mission does not include the Promotion of airport closures. Before agreeing to close an airport, the FAA would have to clearly determine that the airport no longer serves the purpose for which it was created, the closure would not p~'event achievement of the purpose for which the airport Was first created, and the loss of the airport will actually protect and advance the civil aviation interests of the United .States." · "L45 remains an integral part of the airspace and airport system." · "With 40,000 operations and more than 100 based aircraft, the L45 is an extremely important airport, not only for the Bakersfield area and the state of California, but also,for the national transportation system.;' Closure Requirements - ·City must be released from the federal obligations agreed to when accepting the federal grant funds. · A formal request providing sufficient justification for a release from the City's obligations requiring it to operate a public airport shall be submitted to the FAA. This shall be done on the City's behalf by any party interested in pursuing purchase of the airport property. · The release request shall be a complete and comprehensive package detailing the justification for closure that will permit the FAA to carefully evaluate the City's justification for a release of all its federal airport obligations. · Guidelines for the release request can be found in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 155.and FAA Order 5190.6A Chapter 7. Financial Considerations- · · FAA Grants -funds in the amount of $9,978,309.00 shall be reimbursed. However, the land "must be disposed of at fair market value and the federal portion, of the proceeds must be deposited in the Trust Fund," and "the amount of the sale proceeds that is proportionate to the federal share of grants awarded to L45 must be returned to the Trust Fund." It is possible that the FAA may require the City to reimburse a larger amount based upon the sale and a percentage of City verses FAA investment. · The City estimates a cost of $3,000,000.00 to relocate the existing tenants at the airport. An additional $500,000 will likely be required upon completion of the restaurant construction. · The current total break even cost is $12,978,309.00 and with City investments the break even cost is $15,850~909.00.. FAA Contacts (Western Pacific Region) - · Mark McClardy, Manager Airports Division (310) 725-3600 · Tony Garcia, Compliance Specialist (310) 725-3634 · John Mi!ligan? Supervisor- Standards Section (SoCal) (310) 725-3621 Summary of Leases - · 12 Owner Hangars ($50/mo.) · 6 Tie-Downs ($40/mo.) · 7 Community Hangar ($100/mo.) · 17 T-Hangar ($160/mo.) · . 6 Hex-Hangar ($180/mo.) · 5 Shadeport-Watts ($65/mo.) · 4 Shadeport-Quad ($75/mo.) · 1 Gate Lease ($50/mo.) · 16 Ground Lease (varies up to $60/mo.) · . 8 Commercial Leases ($3,519.09/mo.) · . Restaurant Ground Lease STREET RECO.ST.UCT~O. ~..UD mG~BLE AREAS ~. WARDS 3, 6, 7 PROJECT S*REET ^REA I WARD Resurface and Sidewalks 38th St. Jewett Ave. to "K" St. I 3 Resurface and Sidewalks San Dimas St. West Columbus St. to38th St. I 3 Reconstruct South "P" St. Planz Road to Byrle Drive 7 Reconstruct Meredith Drive South "P" Street to Sandra Drive 7 Reconstruct Evelyn Drive Merrimac Avenue to Ivan Drive 7 Reconstruct Sumter Drive Plantation Avenue to Merrimac Drive 7 Reconstruct Shenandoah Drive Plantation Avenue to Merrimac Drive 7 Reconstruct Plantation Avenue Monitor St. to Fambrough Drive 7 Reconstruct Carson Avenue Balboa Drive to Sandra Drive 7 Reconstruct Dodge Avenue Balboa Drive to Sandra Drive 7 Reconstruct Emery Avenue Balboa Drive to Sandra Drive 7 Reconstruct Flicker Drive Oriole Street to Old Stine 6 Reconstruct Meadowlark Way Sandpiper Road to the west end 6 Reconstruct Sandpiper Road Wilson Road to Starling Drive 6 Reconstruct Starling Drive ' Sandpiper Road to Oriole Street 6 Reconstruct Phaffie Drive Oriole Street to Akers Road 6 Reconstruct Oriole Drive Parker Avenue to Wilson Road 6 Reconstruct San Marino Drive Parker Avenue to Wilson Road 6 Reconstruct Phaffie Drive Akers Road to Gentry Street 6 Reconstruct Hoffman Avenue Akers Road to Gentry Street 6 Reconstruct Sechrest Avenue Akers Road to the east end 6 Reconstruct Stokes Avenue Akers Road to the east end 6 TOTAL $700,000 The Valley's Premiere Employer www.ci.clovis.ca.us Southeast Redevelopment Project Area Budget and Financing Plan SE Fund Balance 6/05 $1,175,000 CDBG. $500,000 Section 108 $4,100,000 ($3.1 RDA, $1 Fire Station) BEDI ' >.25X3,000 $750,000 Available Annual Tax increment ~445,000 :~600,000 $800~00C Redevelopment Property Acquisition Condemnation Obligations $700,000 California Avenue - Property Acquisitions $1,350,000 $1,500,000 Fire Station $1,000,000 $2,500,000 New Section 108 Debt Svc $0 $330,000 $330,00¢ Old Section 108 Debt Svc *** $0 $390,000 ~390,000 Southeast Redevelopment Project Area Budget and Financing Plan SE Fund Balance 6/05 $1,175,000 CDBG ~5-~ $500,000 Section 108 -~¢-¢z..-,~ $4,100,000 ($3.1 RDA, $1 Fire Station) BEDI >.25X3,000 $750,000 Available Annual Tax increment $445,000 $600,000 $800,00¢ Redevelopment Property Acquisition Condemnation Obligations~--- -- - ~$700,000 California Avenue -property Acquisition~---~.~- $1,350,000 ~$1,500,000 Fire Station ~ ~ , ..... ~,.,~ $1,000,000 $2,500,000./ New Section 108 Debt Svc" b-~,--c. - $0 $330,000 $330,000 Old Section 108 Debt Svc *** $0 $390,000 $390,00¢ Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L45) General Information · Usage- General Aviation · Property purchased beginning in 1985 with most recent purchase in 1997. · Federal Grants funds received through 2005 equals $ 9,978,309.00, State Grant Funds received is approximately $185,000.00 with City matching funds being $2,672,600.00 for a total of $12,835,909.00. · The City has invested other funds for various projects totaling approximately $200,000.00. · The City estimates current relocation costs to be $3,000,000.00 · The current total break even cost is $13,163,309.00 and with City investments the break even cost is $16,035,909.00. · Size- 251.88 Acres · Runway- 4000' x 75' · Based Aircraft- Approx. !00 · Revenue - Approx. $120,000 + $10,000 State Grant · Operating Expense - Approx. $126,000 · Existing Facilities FBO - Office 1,800 sq. ft. and Hangar 13,300 sq. ft. Hangar/Office - Office 1,250 sq. ft. and Hangar 4,500 sq. It. (approx.) Shop-'2,400 sq. ft. Restaurant (Under Construction) Office/Shop - 3,200 sq. ft. Hexagonal Hangar- 6 planes T-Hangar- 17 planes Community Hangar - (8/- planes) Shade Structures Various Owner Hangars Various Land Leases for Owner Constructed Hangars · Above Ground 12,000 gallon Fueling Facility · Contamination from a fueling facility exists on the property. The City met all environmental requirements and was allowed to cap the contaminated area with asphalt. Another type of deVelopment may require further cleanup efforts. City/FAA Correspondence - From March 29, 2000 through January 13, 2003 the City of Bakersfield corresponded with the FAA six times to inquire about airspace modifications and clOsure of the airport (L45). The City based the inquiry on safety concems arising from two near misses between general aviation aircrat~ and commercial aircraft flying into Meadows Field. While the FAA took the City's concerns seriously they did not see the need for either airspace modifications or closure of the airport as federal criteria was not met. Inthe various correspondences theFAA has stated such things as: "The (FAA) mission does not include the promotion of airport closures. Before agreeing to close an airport, the FAA would have to clearly determine that the airport no longer serves the purpose for which it was created, the closure would not prevent achievement of the purpose for which the airport was first created, and the loss of the airport will actually protect and advance the civil aviation interests of the United States." · "L45 remains an integral part of the airspace and airport system." · "With 40,000 operations and more than 100 based aircraft, the L45 is an extremely important airport, not only for the Bakersfield area and the state of California, but also for the national transportation system." Closure Requirements - · ~'City must be released from the federal obligations agreed to when accepting the federal grant funds. · A formal request providing sufficient justification for a release from' the City's obligations requiring it to operate a public airport shall be submitted to the FAA. This shall be done on the City's behalf by any party interested in pursuing purchase of the airport property. · The release request shall be a complete and comprehensive package detailing the justification for closure that will permit the FAA to carefully evaluate the City's justification for a release of all its federal airport obligations. · Guidelines for the release reqUest can be found in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 155 and FAA Order 5190.6A Chapter 7. Financial Considerations- · FAA Grants funds in the amount of $9,978,309.00 shall be reimbursed. However, the land "must be disposed of at fair market value and the federal portion of the proceeds must be deposited in the Trust Fund," and "the amount of the sale proceeds that is proportionate to the federal share of grants awarded to L45 must be returned to the Trust Fund." It is possible that the FAA may require the City to reimburse a larger amount based upon the sale and a percentage of City verses FAA investment. · The City estimates a cost of $3,000,000.00 to relocate the existing tenants at the airport. An additional $500;000 will likely be required upon completion of the . restaurant construction. · The current total break even cost is $12,978,309.00 and with City investments the break even cost is $15,850,909.00. · ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: December 14, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: /,~. ~. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: . Nelson Smith, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD ,,,,'V'_~ DATE: November 2, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY ~ CITY MANAGER _~.~ SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting the Investment Policy of the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND: This resolution places the City in conformance with Section 53646 of the California Government Code that requires staff to annually render to the legislative body a 'statement of investment policy which the legislative .body shall consider at a public meeting. There have been no changes to the. California Government Code since the last investment policy and therefore there are no changes to the current policy. The City's investment policy received certification through the Investment Policy Certification Program of the Association of Public Treasurers of the United States and Canada (PTA US&C) in 2001. Minor changes were made to the investment policy in 2003 to comply with changes in the California Government Code. According to the PTA US&C those minor changes did not require re-certification of the City's investment policy. November 2, 2005, 10:49AM P:\MlSC~Admin report invest policy.doc CITY OF BAKERSFIELD INVESTMENT POLICY I INTRODUCTION This Investment Policy is intended to provide guidelines for the Prudent investment of the City of Bakersfield's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. It is the policy of thc City of Bakersfield to invest public funds in a manner which will provide safety of principal and at least a market rate of return while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City. Investments will conform to all statutes governing the investment of public funds. The primary goals of this policy are: · To assure compliance with all Federal, State and Local laws goveming the investment of public funds under the control of the City Treasurer. · To maintain the principal value of financial assets and ensure ample liquidity to meet operating expenditures. · Within the constraints of safety and liquidity, and within the parameters of this Investment Policy generate a market rate of return. The ultimate goal is to enhance the economic status of the City of Bakersfield while protecting the safety of its financial assets. II SCOPE This policy applies to the investment activities of the City of Bakersfield and related entities. Idle cash in all funds is pooled for investment purposes except tax exempt bond proceeds, which are separated for arbitrage record keeping as required by Federal tax law, and the Firemen's Disability and Retirement Fund which is administered separately under the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 2.92. Investments made on a pooled basis include monies of the City of Bakersfield, the Redevelopment Agency and the Public Financing Authority. The pooled funds are accounted for in the City of Bakersfield's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.'(CAFR) and include: 0XX General Funds 1XX Special Revenue Funds 2XX Debt Service Funds 3XX Capital Project Funds 4XX Enterprise Funds 5XX Internal Service Funds 6XX Fiduciary-Agency Funds Any new fund created, unless specifically exempted. All debt issue proceeds will be invested in accordance with the associated trust indenture, and in such a manner that facilitates arbitrage rebate calculations. III PRUDENCE Investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent person" standard: Investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstance then prevailing which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The prudent investment diversification for the City's temporary idle cash vs. the Firemen's Disability and Retirement Fund (FDRF) is different. Up to 40% of the retirement fund may be invested in securities of a single agency of the four triple A rated United States Government Agencies authorized in this policy. This exception to investment diversification among the highest quality securities is deemed prudent and necessary in order to increase the available options for keeping retirement funds fully invested at or above the six percent actuarial rate of return. IV OBJECTIVE Criteria for selecting investments and the prder of priority are: · Safe ,ty - Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. The City only operates in those investments that are considered very safe. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk, credit risk and market risk. · Credit Risk - Potential loss due to the failure of an issuer of a security. · Market Risk - Potential decrease in the value of securities due to changes in the general level of interest rates. 2 · Liquidi .ty - Liquidity refers to the "ability to easily sell" at any moment in time with a minimal risk of losing some portion of principal and interest. Liquidity is an important investment quality should the need for cash 'occur unexpectedly. · Yield -Yield is the potential dollar earnings an.investment can provide' and is sometimes described as the rate of return. V DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY In accordance with the City of Bakersfield Charter, Municipal Code and subseqUent resolutions, the City Treasurer is authorized to invest the City's funds in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et seq. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials. VI ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST All officials involved with the City of Bhkersfield's investment program shall exercise their fiduciary responsibly as custodians of the public trust. The City Treasurer, or when appropriate the Treasury Supervisor, shall avoid any transactions that might impair public confidence in the City's ability to manage the investment of public funds in an effective manner. The City Treasurer, Treasury Supervisor, or any other official charged with the responsibility of making investment decisions, shall have no vested interest in any investment being made involving public funds of.the City, and shall gain no financial benefit from such investment decisions. VII AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS AND BANKS All financial institutions that desire to do business with the City shall be evaluated by the'City Treasurer to determine if they are adequately capitalized, meet California Government Code requirements and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy. Whenever reasonable and in keeping with Government Code, investments are placed locally. Broker/dealers are investigated to determine if there is pending legal action against the firm Or the individual broker who would be the City's contact and that the firm offers securities appropriate to the City's needs. All broker/dealers, which may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 15c3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule), who desire to become authorized bidders for City investment transactions must supply the City Treasurer with the following: · Current audited financial statements · Account authorization forms · Proof of National Association of Securities Dealers certification · Completed broker/dealer questionnaire · Certification of having read and agreement to abide by the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy All banks that desire to become authorized bidders for time certificates of deposit (TCD) must be a qualified public depository as established by State Law and supply the City Treasurer with the following: · Current audited financial statements · Depository contracts · A copy of the latest FDiC call report · Certification of having read and agreement to abide by the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy Broker/dealer account authorizations and depository contracts will be executed by the City of - Bakersfield Finance Director as required by City Charter. The City Treasurer will maintain a list of authorized broker/dealers and. banks that are approved to do business with the City. An annual review of the financial condition of authorized financial institutions will be conducted by the City Treasurer. VIII A:UTHORIZED & SUITABLE INVESTMENTS The City of Bakersfield's investment program is governed by the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein (Single Asterisk * denotes term or percentage imposed by State statute; Double Asterisk ** denotes term or percentage utilized by the City of Bakersfield which is more restrictive than statute): A. United States Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds United State Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds are securities which have the full faith and credit of the United States pledged for payment of principal and interest. Although there is no percentage limitation of the dollar amount that can be invested in these categories, the "prudent Person" standard shall apply. Maturities are limited to five* years from settlement date. Treasury Bills (T-Bills) are short-term debt obligations of the United States Government, issued weekly with maturities up to One year. T-Bills are considered to have virtually no credit risk and to be the most liquid short-term fixed income instrument. Prices on T-Bills are quoted on a discount basis. The difference between the discount price and the full face value paid at maturity equals the total return. Treasury Note (T-Notes) are initially issued by the auction process with two, five and ten year maturities. T-Notes like Bills have virtually no credit risk and have liquidity through an active secondary market. T-Notes are issued at Par ($1,000) with a coupon or fixed rate of interest. The price or market value will fluctuate above or below par dePending on the coupon rate and whether interest rates are rising or falling. T-Notes mature at par. Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds) are initially issued by the auction process with thirty year maturities and have characteristics similar to T-Notes. B. United States Government Agencies United States Government agencies include the .Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Government agencies issue debt in the form of discount notes, much like T-Bills, and notes and bonds similar to T-Notes and T-Bonds. While agencY debt is not· a direct obligation of the U.S. government, it is rated AAA, the highest rating. At the time of purchase no more than 20%** of the portfoliO may be invested in any single agency name: Maturities are limited to five* years from settlement date. C. Bankers Acceptance Bankers Acceptance (BA) is a time draft or bill of exchange, issued from a letter of credit, and is normally used to finance international trade. When the accepting bank stamps "accepted" on the draft the bank guarantees payment of the draft at a specified future date and thereby creates an acceptance. BA's are considered extremely safe in that there has never been a default on a BA. BA's trade on a discount basis and may not exceed 180' days to maturity. No more than 10%** of the portfolio may be invested in BA's issued by any one bank. No more than 40%* of the portfolio may be invested in this category. Eligible BA's are those issued by banks with a short term debt rating of at least A-1 ** by Standard and Poor's Corporation or P-1 ** by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.. D. Commercial Paper Commercial Paper (CP) is a short-term promissory note. CP is sold on a discount basis. The maximum maturity is 270 days with most issued in the 30-50 day maturity.range. Eligible CP is "prime" quality ranked A-1 by Standard and Poor's Corporation or P-1 by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. CP is issued by domestic corporations having assets in excess of $500 million and having an A or higher rating on its debt, other than CP, as provided by Standard and Poor's or Moody's. Purchases of eligible CP may not exceed 270* days to maturity. No more than 10%* of the portfolio may be invested in CP issued by any one corporation. No more than 25%* of the portfolio may be invested in this category. 5 E. Repurchase Agreements Repurchase Agreements, commonly called Repos, consist of two simultaneous transactions. One is the purchase of securities by an investor (City of Bakersfield) from a bank or dealer. The other is the commitment by the bank or dealer to repurchase the securities at the same price plus interest at some mutually agreed future date. Normally the securities are U.S. Treasury notes or bonds and are held by a Federal Reserve Bank. Repos can be done with banks or dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase contract that specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. The maturity of Repos shall not exceed 90** days. No more than 30%** of the portfolio may be invested in this category. .F. Local Agency Investment Fund Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a State of California managed investment pool for local agencies within the State. Investments may be up to the maximum permitted by State Law or 40%** of the portfolio whichever is less. Due diligende will be exercised in monitoring the performance of LAIF on a continual basis. G. Time Certificates of Deposit Time Certificates of Deposit (TCD's) are similar to a savings certificate that anyone can purchase at a bank where there is a fixed rate of interest and a specified maturity date. In the public funds area, TCD's are collateralized in accordance with California Government Code and are non-negotiable. At the time of purchase no more than 10%** of the portfolio may be in TCD's of any one institution. Maturity is limited to five* years. No more than 40%** o£the portfolio may be invfi-sted in this category. Section 53652 of the California Government Code also specifies that the City will have a deposit contract with each depository. H. Public Agency Savings Account - Demand Deposits Public Agency Savings Account - Demand Deposits are similar to a savings account that anyone can open at a bank. The interest rate is sPecified at the time of deposit, but is subject to change. All funds can be withdrawn on demand. Like public TCD's, public agency savings accounts are collateralized in accordance with California Government Code requirements. No more than 30%** o£the portfolio may be invested in this category. I. Mutual Funds Mutual Funds are money market funds meeting criteria prescribed in California Government Code Section 53601 and related legislation. Investment in this 6 category is limited to funds that invest in U.S. Government Securities and maintain a net asset value of one (daily liquidity). The purchase price of shares shall not include· any commission that these companies may charge. No more than 10%* of the portfolio may be invested in the shares of any one mutual fund. No more than 20%* of the portfolio may.be invested in this category. Mutual funds are used for the investment of bOnd proceeds subject to arbitrage reporting. Due diligence will be exercised in the selection and performance monitoring of mutual'funds on a continual basis. City of Bakersfield Summary Of Maximum Percent and TerTM Limitations By Investment Type: Percent Term U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds 0 to 100% 5 Years U.S. Government Agency Obligations 20% per agency 5 Years Bankers Acceptances(I) 40%(2) 180 Days Commercial Paper(3) 25%(2) 270 Days Repurchase Agreements 30% 90 Days Local Agency Investment Fund 40% N/A Time Certificates of Deposit 40%(2) 5 Years Public Agency Demand Accounts 30% N/A Mutual Funds 20%(2) N/A (1) Short-term debt rating of at least A-1 Standard and Poor's Corporation or P-1 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. (2) No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in any one entity from these categories. (3) A-1 Standard and Poor's Corporation rating or P-1 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating. Should any investment percentage and portfolio limitation be exceeded due to the unexpected fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to avoid losses. When market values are such that no loss is indicated, the City Treasurer shall consider restructuring the portfolio basing .the decision in part on the expected length of time the portfolio will be imbalanced. Any State of California legislative action that further restricts allowable maturities, investment type or percentage allocations, will be incorporated into this Investment Policy and supersede any and all previous aPplicable language. IX UNAUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Ineligible investments are those that are not described herein, including but not limited to, negotiable time certificates of deposit, non-government agency medium term corporate notes and reverse repurchase agreements. X C.OLLATERALIZATiON Collateralization will be required On two types of investments, time certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements. Investment in time certificates of deposit shall be insured up to $100,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Investments in time certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 shall be properly collateralized. When a depository pledges government securities as collateral, section 53652 of the California Government Code requires the securities to have a market value of at least 10% in excess of the City's deposit or 50% in excess of the City's deposit when mortgages are pledged as collateral. Repo collateralization will be at least 102% of market value of principal and accrued interest. XI SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All securi.ty transactions entered into by the City of Bakersfield shall be conducted on a delivery- versus-payment (DVP) basis. Securities shall be delivered to theCity by book entry, physical delivery Or by third party custodial agreement. XII DIVERSIFICATION To reduce credit and market risk in the overall portfolio, the City will diversify its investments by security type, maturity date and issuer. With the exception of U.S. Treasury securities, diversification is also achieved by the portfolio percentages and maturity limitations indicated in the Authorized & Suitable Investments section of this policy. XIII MAXIMUM MATURITIES To the extent possible, and within the five year maximum maturity required by California Government Code, the City of Bakersfield will attempt to match investment maturities with anticipated cash flow requirements. As required by California Government COde Section 53601, any investment term longer than five years requires express authority by the City Council to make that investment. This authority must be granted no less than three months prior to making the investment. Investments with terms longer than five years will be limited to the lesser orS10 million or 10% of the portfolio at the time the investment is made. XIV INTERNAL CONTROL Investment transactions are reviewed by the City's external auditor as part of the annual audit. This review verifies compliance with the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy and the California Government Code. XV PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The cash management system is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus ensuring the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible, including the 8 estimated float for the Active Account and the Payroll ACcount. The City attempts to obtain the highest interest yields possible as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity, do not exceed a term of five years (unless otherwise authorized by the City Council) and are within portfolio percentage limitations. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible thrOugh daily and projected cash flow determinations. The basic premise underlying the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy is, and will continue to be, to ensure that the money is always safe and available when needed. Because the investment portfolio is designed to operate on a "hold-to-maturity" premise (or passive in,vestment style) and because of the safety, liquidity, and yield priorities, the benchmark that will be used by the City Treasurer to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be the yield on the U.S. Treasury Bill or Note maturing closest to the weighted average maturity of the City's overall portfolio. XVI REPORTING The City Treasurer shall provide the City Council monthly investment reports which provide a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio. The Monthly Investment Report shall include the folloWing: · A listing of individual securities held at the end ofthe reporting period by authorized investment category · Final maturity of all investments listed · Coupon, discount or earnings rate Par value and market value · Transactions completed during the month Percentage of the portfolio represented by each investment category XVII INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION The City of Bakersfield Investment Policy shall be reviewed annually by City staff and adopted by Resolution of the City Council. XVIII INDEMNIFICATION OF INVESTMENT OFFICIALS The standard of care to be used by investment officials shall be the "prudent person" standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The City Treasurer and his designees' acting in accordance with established procedures and the City of Bakersfield Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual s ' ' ecunty s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. GLOSSARY ACCRUED INTEREST: Interest earned but not yet received. ACTIVE ACCOUNTS: Funds which are immediately available for disbursement. AGENCIES: U.S. Government-aUthor/zed enterprises that issue debt securities commonly called "agencies". ARBITRAGE: In the public finance arena, arbitrage is interest earnings on invested bond proceeds that exceeds interest payments to the bondholders. The 1986 Tax Act requires arbitrage earnings to be rebated (.paid) to the federal government. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS: A list of permitted investments by investment type maintained a~ a component to an investment policy. Allowable investment listing will generally include descriptions or parameters for investment diversification ratios, terms of maturity, and quality ratings. BENCHMARK: A segment of the securities market with Character/st/cs similar to the subject portfolio. It is used to compare portfolio 'performance to the performance of the appropriate segment of the market. BOND: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of fiiture cash flows, including periodic interest pa3xnents and a principal repayment. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. COLLATERAL: Evidence of&posit or other property, such as securtities, wh/ch a borrower pledges to secure repayment ora loan. Also refers tO securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits ofpublic monies. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report for a municipality. It includes comb/ned statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals (GAAP). It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed statistical section. COUPON: The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. CUSTODY: A banking service that p~-ovides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collecl and pay out income, to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit oft he issuer. DELIVERY VERgUS PAYMENT: There are twomethods ofdelivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery, ofsecurifie~ with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange ora signed receipt for the securities. DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity amount when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling beloTM original offer/ng price shortly after being issued ai~0 is considered to be at a discount. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest beating money market instruments that are issued at a discount (less than face value expressed as the discount rate), and redeemed at maturity for full face x(alue, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. DIYERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety, oi'" securities offering independent returns, to reduce risk inherent in particular securities. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORAIION (FI)I.C): .. Insurance provided to customers of a subscribing bank which guarantees deposits to a set limit (currently $1C}0,000) per account. ..MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCItASE AGREEMENT: A gzirten contract covering all future transactions bem'een the parties- establishes each party's fights in the transactions. A master agreemen! will specifY, among other things, the fight of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller-borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated 'value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (such as T-Bills, commercial paper and bankers acceptances) are issued and traded. ii NOTE: A written promise to pay a specified amount to a certain entity on demand or on a. specified date. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements tothe Federal ReserVe Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state-the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITOR/ES: A financial institution which does not claim exeruption from the payment of any sales and compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than/ts maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by bank trust departments for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE 15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL' RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 t6 I' also called net capital rule and net capitaI.ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and Commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underaCting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily convened into cash. WEIGHTED AVERAGE MAIURITY (WAM): The average marur/ty of all the securities that comprise a portfolio that is typically expressed in days or years. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed asa percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the eu~ent market pr/ce for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income 7ield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date ofmatur/ty ofthebond. i¥ ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: November30, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Consent I TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Alan Christensen, Assistant City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: November 22, 2005 CITY A'n'ORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Health Care Agreements 1. Agreement with Blue Cross of California for Indemnity Health and Dental Services. 2. Agreement with Blue Cross of California for Managed Care Health Plans for Medical Services for employees and retirees. 3. Agreement with Blue Cross of California for Medicare Risk Plan Senior Secure. 4. Agreement with Kaiser Permanente for Managed Care Health Plans for Medical Services for employees. 5. Agreement with Kaiser Permanente for Managed Care Health Plans for Medical Services for Retirees. 6. Agreement with Medical Eye Services and Secudty'Life Insurance Company for Vision Services. 7..~ Agreement with Pacific Union Dental for pre-paid Dental Services. 8. Agreement With Dedicated Dental Systems, Inc for pre-paid Dental Services. 9. Agreement PacifiCare Behavioral Health of California for Employee Assistance Services. 10. Agreement with PacifiCare Behavioral Health of California for Managed Mental Health Care. 11. Appropriate $100,000 additional Vehicle License Fee in lieu of revenues to the non- departmental budget within the General Fund, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the agreements. BACKGROUND: This item first appeared on the City Council agenda of October 25th but was postponed to allow further discussion with the Insurance Committee and the Personnel Committee. The main concern of the employee bargaining gro,ut~)s and the City was the "Out of Pocket" maximum. This item went back to the City Council on November 9 with the agreement of the bargaining units and the Personnel Committee for the PPO plan "Out of Pocket" maximum' to be: In-Network $1,000 and Out-of-Network $3,000 per person, with a three person family maximum. Attached are the health insurance plan changes that will become effective JanUary 1,2006. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 Open Enrollment will be held November 28~ through December Ist. The Open Enrollment packets to the employees and the retirees were mailed on November 16th and 17~. The retiree's packets were mailed registered return receipt in order that we might cOntact any retiree who appears not to have received a packet. We want to ensure that the retirees are aware of not only open enrollment but the plan changes as well. The City will need to appropriate $100,000 to cover these unbudgeted and unexpected premium increases. The City received notice from the State of California that a one time "true up" payment of Vehicle License Fees is due to the City related to a difference between State estimates used verses actual results of the most recent fiscal year. We are proposing that this additional cost be funded by this unexpected one time source of funds. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: November 30, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: /,?,. ¢¢. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council PP~_~VED_ FROM: Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: November 16, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: An Ordinance amending Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code relating to bidding and contract procedures. RECOMMENDATION: Budget and Finance Committee recommends first reading of the Ordinance BACKGROUND: Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code establish a formal bid limit and the threshold above which contracts must be approved by the City Council, both of which are currently $25,000. Previous amendments to Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 were adopted by the City Council in March 1997, upon which the bid limit and contract threshold ce increased from $20,000 to $25,000. ent events such as the increase in pricing for fuel, plastics and other oil-related products caused staff to re-evaluate this dollar threshold. A survey of other cities relative to bid limits was conducted by staff and the s_..urve~, indicates that bid limits for these cities range from $10,000 to $100,000. Staff recom~ehds amending the Municipal Code to increase the formal bid limit and contract threshold to $7..5~O'00. Staff will continue to solicit competitive pricing on the open market for items valued at $75,000 or ~-Ie'ss but, as a practical matter, only bids and contracts greater than $75,000 would come before the City Council for approval. It is anticipated that this change will streamline the procurement process and allow staff to respond in a timelier manner to City Council and departmental requests, while still maintaining adequate internal controls to ensure that public funds are spent wisely. At its meeting of November 7, 2005, the Budget and Finance Committee reviewed the staff recommendation to amend Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to increase the formal bid limit and contract threshold to $75,000. After discussion, the Budget and Finance Committee felt the recommendation to increase the formal bid limit and contract threshold to $75,000, thus amending Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, to be justified. The Budget and Finance Committee recommends for Council approval the amendment of the Bakersfield Municipal Code Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105 to increase the formal bid and contract threshold to $75,000. Purchasing Division DW S:\PURCH~,DMINWmendment to Bakersfield Municipal Code Sections 3.20.060, 3.20.090, 3.20.100 and 3.20.105.doc November 16, 2005 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: November 30, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: /2 .¢. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: November 22, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Amendments to various ordinances relating to: 1. City Seal 2. Council Meetings 3. Personnel Policies 4. Employer-Employee Relations 5. Compensation 6. Ice Cream Vendors RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends First Reading of all proposed ordinance revisions. BACKGROUND: From time to time, City Staff identifies sections within our Bakersfield Municipal Code that should be revised to clarify language, remove ambiguity, reflect what is actually being done, and/or to correct typographical errors. Rather than propose each ordinance revision when discovered, the City Attorney keeps track of the suggested changes and then gathers them together for presentation to the City Council as part of a general "clean-up". Staff is proposing two batches of ordinance revisions. All of the propOsed revisions to Chapters 15, 16, and 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code will be on the public hearing section of the next City Council meeting (December 14, 2005). This will give time for us to publish the appropriate notices. Tonight, Staff is bringing forward the clean-up items to Chapters 1, 2, and 8 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. These include augmentation of the Code with regard to our City Seal, and the deletion of language in the Personnel, Compensation, and Ice Cream vendor statutes to clarify the intent of such provisions and/or to eliminate antiquated language. S:\COUNCIL~dmins\05-06 Admins\Cleanup of Ordinances.doc November 22, 2005 - 9:41 AIM ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1.08.10 AND ADDING SECTIONS 1.08.20, 1.08.30, 1.08.40, 1.08.50, AND 1.08.60 TO THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CITY SEAL. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 1.08.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: 1.08.010 City Seal Adoption ~ -~IDescription The common seal of the city is adopted and described as' follows: Cornucopia proper showing a profusion of fruit above with the word Incorporated and underneath it the words January 11, 1898, surrounded by the inscription City of Bakersfield, Kern County, California. (Prior code § 1.04.010) SECTION 2. Sections 1.08.020, 1.08.30, 1.08.40, 1.08.50, and 1.08.60 are hereby added: 1.08.020 City Seal - Codification - Description. The City Council does hereby codify the Corporate Seal of the City with letterin.q, form, arrangement and desiqn all as set forth and shown as follows 1.08.030 C...ity Seal - Unauthorized use. No .~erson shall malicious~ or for commercial purposes use or allow to be used for any reproduction or facsimile of the Seal of the Cit~.....in an2c_manner whatsoever..provided that the City Council ma'_2__b~ resolution permit the use of a r_~p_~roduction or facsimile of the Ci'~_~eal when the Council deems it to be in the public interest. S:\COUNC!L\Ords\05-06 Ords\l.08 Ci~ Seal Amend Rdln.doc November 21, 2005 -- Page I of 3 Pages -- 1.08.'040 City Seal - Unlawful uses. It shall be unlawful for any person to make or use the Seal of The City or any cut, facsimile or reproduction of the Seal, or to make or use any Seal or any desiqn which is an imitation of the Seal, or of the desiqn thereof, which may bn mistaken for the Seal of the City by an ordinary reasonable person, for any purpose other than for City purposes without the express consent of the City Council. 1.08.0:50 City Seal - Violation - Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation violatinq any of the provisions of thi~ Chapter shall be quilty of a misdemeanor. 1.08.060 City Seal - Custody. The City Clerk shall have official custody of the official Seal of the City SECTION 3. This ordnance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. S:\COUNC IL\Ords\05-06 Ords\1.08 City Seal Amend Rd]n.doc November 21, 2005 --Page 2 of 3 Pages -- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on by the following vote: " AYES: COUNCILMEMBER MAGGARD, CARSON, BENHAM. COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By:. HARVEY L. HALL, MayOr CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: VIRGINIA A. GENNARO Deputy City Attorney VAG:mmm S:\COUNCIL\Ords\05-06 Ords\1.08 City Seal Amend Rdln.doc November 21, 2005 -- Page 3 of 3 Pages -- ORDINANCENO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.04.010 OFTHE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL MEETINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2.04.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2,04.010 Time and Place, The regular meetings of the city council shall begin at five fifteen p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxte.Ljn Avenue, Bakersfield, on such days as are set annually by resolUtion of the city council. Workshop meetings, closed sessions, as authorized by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.), public statements dealing with agenda items, consent calendar items, reports, and deferred business, may be held at five fifteen p.m. as part of any regular or special meeting of the council, provided the same appear on the agenda for such meeting. Agenda items not completed or not addressed at the portion of the meeting beginning at five fifteen p.m., shall be addressed ~* that -'~,~,,,- ,-,~ t~e ,-,,,-~,~,-,~ -,* ........ SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. ..... oo0oo ..... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER MAGGARD, .CARSON, BENHAM, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN SCRiVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By:. HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:do S:\COUNCIL\Ords\05-06 Orals",2.04.010 Council Meetings Time-Place.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.72.230 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PERSONNEL POLICIES BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2.72.230 (J)(5)(c) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.72.230 Reduction in force. J.5.c. ^~*'"~ *~' ....... ~° '"~ ~;°"'~ .....'~* fFailure to provide the manager of human resources with annual notification of intent to stay on said list; SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. ..... oo0oo ..... ! HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Coun,cil of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER MAGGARD, CARSON, BENHAM, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By: HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By:. VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:do S:\COUNCIL\Ords\05-06 Ords\Reduction in force 2.72.230 AmendRdln.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.76.120 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2.76.120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.76.120 City's designated representative. The government=l eff!clency ~nd personnel committee of the council of the city or a representative selected by the government~l efficiency end personnel committee with the approval of the city council is designated as the representative of the city to meet and confer or consult with representatives of employee or labor organizations or individuals who shall consider, as fully as possible, such presentations prior to the recommendations of establishing policy or course of action authorized by the city charter or.municipal code. · SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. ..... oo0oo ..... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote: AYES: COUNClLMEMBER MAGGARD, CARSON, BENHAM, COUCH, HANSON, SULLiVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNClLMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By: HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By:.. VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:do S:\COUNCIL\Ords\05-06 Ords\Designated Rep 2.76.120 Amed Rdln.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.84.150 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING. TO COMPENSATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2.84.150(A)(3) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.84.150 Acting appointments, temporary assignments and rates of pay. 3. The city manager may approve a salary increase for a management employee ,,., +,-, .................... ~- .......... ~ in those instances when the employee is at !cvo! fivo c,qd temper-ar~ assumes significantly more responsibility in the same job classification. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. ..... oo0oo ..... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance Was Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regUlar meeting thereof held on , bythe following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER MAGGARD, CARSON, BENHAM, COUCH, HANSON, SULLiVAN, SCRiVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN; COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By: HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By:. VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:do S:\COUNCIL\Ords\05-06 Ords\.Acting appts. 2.84.150 Amend Rdln.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.16.060 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ICE CREAM VENDORS BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 8.16.060 is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.16.060 Selling--Distance from public buildings, parks and playgrounds. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to sell, vend or peddle pop, soda water or other soft drink, ice cream, ices or other frozen dainties from any wagon, pushcart or other vehicle in the city within three hundred feet from the exterior boundary of property used and occupied by a public building or any public playground or park conducted, maintained and operated by the city, or other public corporation. · ..... ~,~ SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. ..... oo0oo ..... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , bythe following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER MAGGARD, CARSON, BENHAM, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNClLMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED: By: HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor CITY OF BAKERSFIELD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:do S:\COUNClL\Ords\05-06 Ords\lceCreamVendors 8.16.060AmendRdln.doc ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: April 27, 2005 I AGENDAiTEM: [~,SECTION:[. Consent Calendar I TO: Honorable Mayor and, City Council . ~L~OVED FROM: W.R. Rector, Chief DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: March 29, 2005 Cl'l~ AITORNEY /~' ~ CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: Adoption of ResOlution Establishing New Tow Truck Rates . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the new rates for.tow truCk companies. BACKGROUND: The current rates for tow truck services were establiShed in 2002. 'Due to increases in operational costs which include fuel, liability and workers compensation insurance, wages, and updated equipment, a rate increase is requested. The proposed increases align allowable City of Bakersfield tow rates with allowable 'tow rates for the Bakersfield Office of the California Highway Patrol. The proposed rates were calculated using the averaged allowable rates 'from the California" iHighWay PatrOl's 2004-2005 Rate Schedules for the six tow companies who have current contracts with .both the City of Bakersfield and the Bakersfield Office of the California Highway Patrol. Those companies are: Golden Empire Towing, H &S Towing, Barnett's Towing, Louie's Towing, Jim's' Towing and Randy's Towing. (TDT/JCBiplp) March 29, 2005, 8:07AM MC30PD01 CC .- .RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SETrING R~TES AND EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR TOW TRUCK SERVICES PROVIDED PURSUANT TO CONTRACT WITH THE CIIY. WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield has contracted with a number of tow truck services to provide towing services to the City and-to others at the request of the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to these contracts, the tow truck services may charge no more than the rates set by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the equipment used in providing services pursuant to these contracts shall meet the specifications set forth .by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 15-95 entitled "A Resolution Setting Rates and Equipment Specifications for Tow Truck Services Provided Pursuant to Contract with the City" was· approved and .adoPted by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on January 25, 1995; and WHEREAS,..Resolution No. 040-02 modified the tow trUck rates established in Resolution No. 15-95; and WHEREAS, the City· Council desires to update the rates and equipment specifications for tow truck services contracting with the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the CounCil of the· City of Bakersfield as follows:' 1. The foregoing recital is true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. 2. This Resolution supersedes Resolution Nos. 15-95 and 040-02 in their entirety. 3. TOW TRUCK SERVICES. Rates to be charged for toTM truck services .by any bUsiness providing tow services to the City pursuant to contract between the City and the business shall be set forth as follows: A. Light-Duty Tow Services. The towing Of any vehicle or Combination of vehicles in tandem, the gross vehicle rating of which is 10,000 pounds or 'less.. All light-duty towing within a five'mile radius ............... $100.00 S :~COL ,'NCI L'.Reso~\04-05 Resos~BPD.Tov,"rmckRa~esRcso. DOC -- Page 1 0£5 Pages -- All light-duty towing using a car carder ............................... $100.00 Each mile beyond five miles .............................................. $5.00 Standby time for each 15 minutes after the first 15 minutes .......... - ..... '-..~ ............................. $10.00 Inside storage per day ................ :- ..................................... $22.00 Outside storage per day .................................................... $18.00 Service call charge ........................................................... $40.00 Winching per hour ............................................................ $100.00 Setting overturned vehicle on wheels ................................. $35.00 Use of dollies .................................................................... $35.00 After hours release ........................................................... $50.00 B. Medium-Duty Tow Service-~. The towing of any vehicle or combination of vehicles in tandem, the gross vehicle rating of which is 10,001 pounds to 25,000 pounds. All medium-duty towing within five-mile radius .................. .. $150.00. All medium-duty towing using a car carder.~ ................ ......... . $150.00 Each mile beyond five miles ................. .................... '. $8.00 (Refer to Bakersfield City radius map) Standby time for each 15 minutes after the first 15 minutes · · ..................................... $15.00. Inside storage per day .................................... ' ........ . $25.00 · Outside storage per day ............. ........ $20.00 Service call charge ' · ............................ " · ............ $50.00 Winching per hour $100.00 Setting overturned, vehicle on wheels ................................. $35.00 S: 'COUNCIL. Reso s',04-05 Resos\BPD. TowTmckRa~esReso. DOC ' -- Page 2 of 5 Pages -. '" Use of dollies ............................................................. $35.00 .After hoUrs release ..................................................... ; ..... $50.00 · ' C. Heavy-DutY Tow SerVices, The towing of any vehicle or combination of vehicles in tandem, the .gross vehicle rating of which is 25,001 pounds or more. · · Al! heavy-duty towing Within-five-mile radius . Per' hour . ............................................... $300.00 Inside storage per day $50.00 Outside storage per day ...................................... ............. $40.00 Service call charge ...................... ............................ ~ ......... $75.00 After hours release ........... ................................................ $50.00 Vehicles stored twenty-four (24) hours or less shall be charged no more than one (1) day storage. Each day thereafter shall be calculated by calendar day. No inside storage rate shall be incurred unless inside storage is requested or required .by the City or registered owner of the vehicle. .' ~ · '. No car-carrier rates shall be charged unless a car carrier is requested or required by the City or registered owner of.the vehicle towed. Additionally~ no mileage may be charged for towing outside of the five-mile radius unless, the vehicles to be towed are located outside of the five-mile radius and the Police request ,response outside of the five-mile radius. 4. LIGHT-DUTY TOW TRUCK CLASSIFICATION AND EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS: · A. Tow Truck- Minimum of Two Required. 1. Equipment specifications - car carrier (one. car). a. 10,000 poUnds GVWR chassis or greater · b. 4 ton recover equipment rating '~. c. Hydraulic or mechanical winch(es) d. 100 ft. 3/8" 6x19 cable or original equiPment e. Tow chains, 5/16" alloy or OEM specifications, J/T hook assembly" SSCOU~CIL~esos\04-05 Resos~B PD.TowTnickRa~esReso. DOC -- Page 3 of 5 Pages -- f. Safety chains, 5/16". alloy or OEM specifications .. g. Tow sling rating 3,000 lbs. h. Wheel lift safety straps or equivalent mechanical device 1. All required wheel safety straps, or equivalent wheel retention-device, tie down straps, and safety chains shall be sued as required dudng - towing, operations. '. · i. Tow dolly · ' · j, One 3' ton snatch block k. Wheel lift rating - retracted 3,000 lbs., 95" extension 3,000 lbs. .......... 000 .......... S:.COLr~CIL Resos~O4-0:~ Rcsos',~BPD.TowTruckRa~esRe~o. DOC ' -- Page 4 of 5 Pages -- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted bY the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on by the folloWing vote: ' AYES: COUNClLMEMBER COUCH, CARSON, BENHAM;MAGGARD, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNClLMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED By HARVEY L. HALL Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attomey By - VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney VG:dll March 8, 2005 S:"COUNCIL'Aesos,044)5 Resos',BPD. TowTruckl~esReso. DOC ' ' ',,' -- Page 5 of 5 Pages -- · INISTRATIVE ADM REPORT MEETING DATE: June 22, 2005 IAGENDAITEM: I[.SECTION:~. Consent Calendar TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED .,~ FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: June 14, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY .CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Agreement with Kern Refuse Disposal (KRD) for Collection of Household Bulky Items (compensation of $25.00 per call-in per household, limit of one call per quarter). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of agreement and implementation of repOrt recommendations. BACKGROUND: At 'the City/County meeting of February 28~, 2005, staff was directed to develop a ' curbside bulky item collection program .along the lines of the County's program. Staff reported on its findings at the City Council meeting of March 23rd and the program was approved for implementation on JulY 1st, 2005. A primary purpose of the program is to reduce illegal dumping. Household curbside bulky item Collection eliminates a primary rationale for illegal dumping. Through this program, bulky items can be picked up conveniently at the curb at no additional cost to the customer. Funding for the program will come from the refuse fund balance and from the requested CPI rate increase. Consistent with the County program, residents will only need to make one call, to the Solid Waste Division's main number, (326-3114) and from there bulky item collection will be scheduled. Staff will · process the calls, whenever possible utilizing local not-for-profits such as GoodWill, the Salvation Army and St. Vincent's de Paul for those bulky items that can be recycled and reused. Consistent with the City's hauling relationship with Kern Refuse Disposal, approximately 50% of the calls will be dispatched to the contractor, depending on the contractor's capacity to provide service. Residents will be limited to one service call per quarter, with a suggested limit of two items per pick up. The program will be available for single family units up to 4-unit dwellings. Larger apartments and commercial establishments can contact the City for bulky item removal service on a fee basis separately from this program. Notification to the public of this new service Can be made through statements on regular billings, public service announcements, and through inserts in mailings. Besides an additional computer and a part-time clerk typist, no additional equipment or personnel are requested at this time, as equipment currently used for illegal dumping removal will be utilized for the curbside bulky item collection program. The Agreement outlines the relationship between the City and KRD for collection of household bulky items: KRD, acting as an independent contractor, will be provided with a schedule of collections based on their posted availability. KRD's compensation for performing this service will be $25.00 per call dispatched to them by the City with a suggested limit of two items per unit per quarter. KRD will provide their own equipment and be responsible for disposal or recycling of material they collect. SM June 14, 2005, 5:23PM G:\GROUPDA'I'~ADMINRP~005\06-22\Curbside Bulky Item.doc AGREEMENT NO. INDEPEN DENT CONTRACTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered intoon by and between the' CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation, ("CITY herein) and Kern Refuse Disposal, ("CONTRACTOR" herein) to jointly implement a curbside bulky item collection prOgram for the City of Bakersfield beginning July 1, 2005. RECITALS WHEREAS, illegal dumping isa public nuisance and negatively affects the quality of life in Bakersfield; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that many of the items that becorfle illegal dump materials are bulky items that currently are not serviced at the curb by refuse haulers; and WHEREAS, at the joint City/County meeting on February 28th, 2005 it was recommended that the City incorporate a curbside bulky item collection prOgram similar to the county to reduce the occurrence of illegal dumping; and WHEREAS, Kern County has a curbSide bulky item collection prOgram in the metrOpolitan Bakersfield area where bulky items such as mattresses and appliances can be scheduled for pick up at the curb without an additional fee once the resident has requested such service; and WHEREAS, the CITY prOvides necessary waste and recycling services to its residents via a combination of municipal and contracted collection operations; and WHEREAS, the CITY and CONTRACTOR are equipped to engage in bulky item collection at the curb each through use of their own equipment; and WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR have regularly worked together to deliver a solid waste collection and recycling service to the people of Bakersfield; and WHEREAS, the CITY operates a call center for refuse and recycling services which are performed by said collection operations as designated by the CITY; and WHEREAS, City has the infrastructure, personnel and programs in place to accomplish successfully various administrative functions; and Originals Out For Signature G:\GROUPDAT'xAGREEMENTS~.curbside b~lky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc '- WHEREAS, the CITY and CONTRACTOR are prepared to effectively implement the program city-wide commencing With a July 1st, 2005 start-up date; and NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows: SCOPE OF WORK, The scope of'work is as follows: a. CITY responsibilities: . i. Establish a payment system to compensate the .. -. CONTRACTOR for all calls received by CITY, dispatched to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR'S designated representative, and serviced by ' - CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR'S representative. Whenever Possible, CITY will use billing procedures and data bases already in use by the CITY for the 'purpose of expediting and streamlining payments. ii. Inform'CONTRACTOR of daily changes, customer . complaints, and missed pickups from. the CONTRACTOR'S list of services so that routing can be adjusted and customers can be served in a timely and efficient manner. iii. Act as the initial dispatch pOint for all curbside bulky item collection calls in the city. For calls dispatched to CONTRACTOR, CITY will take Calls from customer - ~ and using the protoCol provided to the CiTY by the CONTRACTOR, inform customer of pick up day and inform CONTRACTOR of scheduled bulky item pick -ups. CITY will maintain a record for all calls received for curbside bulky item collection in their data base. Calls from customers outside the City will be referred to the County's hotline for bulky item collection, "iv. Develop informational brochures and educational materials to keep public informed on how to participate .in the Curbside bulky item collectiOn program. v. Workwith CONTRACTOR to ensure successful - - implementation of program. Originals Out For Signature G:\GROUPDAT~AGREEMENTS\curbside bulky it~ra agrmt 5-12-05.doc b. CONTRACTOR responsibilities: i, CONTRACTOR has the responsibility for the household bulky item'collectiOn assigned to them. In, the event CONTRACTOR assigns this collection to another party, the CITY recognizes the CONTRACTOR solely as the responsible party. ii, Notify CITY in advance on planned schedule of collection availability so that CITY customer service staff can inform customers when they call in of their service dates. iii. Provide protocol for CITY customer service staff to be used by City staff when handling calls from customer · for curbside bulky item collection. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that, from time to time, service schedules must be adjusted for operational purposes as service levels may fluctUate. CONTRACTOR will provide to CITY any schedule changes at least two weeks in advance. iii. CONTRACTOR may establish relationships with not- for-profits to facilitate recycling and reuse of items collected at the curb. Said relationship will be independent of CITY. iv, Respond to customer'complaints on missed pickups promptly. CONTRACTOR will arrange for return trips · for missed pick ups directly with customer and will not be compensated for return trip collection. v. Gather and provide to CITY a list of all items collected. This information should be reported annually on or around January 1st of each year. 2; COMPENSATION. For program start up effective July 1,2005, CONTRACTOR will receive $25.00 per household unit with a suggested limit of two items per unit. Commencing on the fiscal year beginning July 1st, 2006 and thereafter at the commencement of each fiscal year, the · Consumer Price Index of the United States Commerce Department for Los Angeles, RiverSide~ and Anaheim shall be consulted and the rates t° be paid to the CONTRACTOR for household bulky item service shall, be revised upward or downward according to the percentage of difference between the cost of living factor reflected by such publication for the Page'3 of lO G:,GROU~D^T~ORFEMENTS~curbs'idcbulkTitemagrmtS. 12.05.doc 0riginols 0ul For SignQttJrP month of January immediately preceding the'fiscal year under consideration and the cost of living factor reflected by the publication for the month of January for the year before. 3. NO WAIVER OF .DEFAULT. The failure of any party to enforce against another party any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that party's right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve to vary the terms of this Agreement. 4. LICENSES. CONTRACTOR shall; at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times dudng the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits and approvals which are legally required for CONTRACTOR to practice its profession.. 5. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. All work by CONTRACTOR .shall be performed' in conformity with all legal requirements and industry standards observed by a specialist of the profession in California. 6. MERGER AND MODIFICATION. This contract sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties and superSedes all other oral or written representations-. 'This contract may be modified only in a writing approved by the .City Council and signed by all the parties. 7. EXHIBITS. In th'e event of a conflict between the terms, conditions or specifications set forth in this Agreement and those in exhibits attached hereto, the terms, conditions, or specifications set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. All exhibits to which reference is made in this Agreement are deemed incorPorated in this Agreement, whether Or not actually attached. 8. TERMINATION. Either party 'may terminate this agreement with 30 days written notice. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS. CONTRACTOR shall, at CONTRACTOR's sole cost, comply-with all of the requirements of Municipal, State, and Federal authorities and with all applicable air pollution control laws now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to this Agreement, and shall faithfully observe in all activities relating to or grOwing out of this' Agreement all Municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes, rules or regulations, and permitting requirements now in force or which may hereafter be' in force including, without limitation, obtaining a City of Bakersfield business tax certificate (Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 5.02) where required. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. -This Agreement calls for the 0riginols Out For Signature G:\GROUPDAT',AGREEM ENTS\curbside bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc performance of the serVices of CONTRACTOR as an independent. contractor. CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of the CITY fOr' any purpose and is not 'entitled to any of the benefits provided by CITY to its employees. This Agreement shall not be construed as forming a partnership or any other association with CONTRACTOR other than that of an independent contractor. 11'. INSURANCE. In addition to any other insurance or bond required under this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement the following types and limits of insurance ("baSic insurance requirements") herein: 1. Automobile liability insurance, providing coverage on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall: 1. Provide coverage for owned, . non-owned and hired autos. 2. Contain an additional insured . endorsement in favor of the City, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers. 2. Broad form commercial general liability insurance, ISO form CG00 01 11 85 or 88 providing coverage on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall: 1. Provide contractual liability c°verage for the terms of this Agreement. 2. Contain an additional insured endorsement in favor of the City, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers. Originals Out For Siar G:\GROUPDAT~AGREEMENTS\curbside bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc 3. Workers' compensation insUrance with statutory limits and employer's liability insurance with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall contain a waiver of 'subrogation and additional insured endorsement in favor of the City, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers. 4. All policies required of the CONTRACTOR shall be primary insurance as to the' CITY, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, or designated volunteers and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, and designated volunteers shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Additional insured endorsement - ' shall use ISa from CG20 10 1.1 85 (in no event.with an edition date later than 1990). '5. .Except for workers' compensation, insurance is to be placed with insurers With a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. Any deductibles, self-insured retentions or insurance in lesser amounts, or lack of certain types of insurance otherwise required by this Agreement, or insurance rated below:Bests' A:VII, must be declared · prior to exeCution of this Agreement and approved by the CITY in writing. All pOlicies shall contain an endorsement providing .the CITY with thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or material change in policy language or terms. All policies shall provide that there shall be continuing liability thereon, notwithstanding any recovery on any policy. Copies of policies shall be delivered to CITY on demand. 7. The insurance reqUired hereunder shall be maintained throughout theterm, at any extension thereof, of this agreement until all work required to be Performed by this 'Agreement is Satisfactorily completed as evidenced by written acceptance by the CITY. 8. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish'the City Risk. Originals Out For signafure G:\GROUPDAT~GREEMENTS\curbside bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc Manager with.a certificate of insurance and required endorsements evidencing the insurance required. The CITY :may withdraw its .offer of contract or cancel this contract if certificates of insurance an d endorsements required have not been provided prior 'to the execution of this Agreement. 9. Full compensation for all premiums which the CONTRACTOR is required to pay on all the insurance described herein shall be considered'as inCluded in the prices paid for the various items of work to be performed under the Agreement, and no additional allowance will be made therefore or for additional premiums which may be required by extensions of the policies of insurance. '10. It is further understood and agreed by the CONTRACTOR that its liability to the CITY shall not in any way be limited to or affected by the amount of insurance obtained and carded by the CONTRACTOR in connection with this Agreement. '1'1. Unless otherwise approved by the CITY, if any part of the work under this Agreement is subcontracted, the "basic insurance requirements" set forth above shall be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if the CITY has approved lesser insurance requirements for CONTRACTOR. '12. CONTRACTOR shall provide, when required by CITY, performance, labor and material bonds in amounts and in a form suitable to CITY. CITY shall approve in writing all such security instruments prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement. '12. INDEMNITY. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents and employees against any and-all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of'them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind 'whatsoever, adsing out of, connected with, or caused by CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR's employees, agents, independent contractors, companies, or. subcontractOrs in the performance.of, or in any way arisi'ng from, the terms and provisions of this Agreement whether or not caused in part by.a party indemi~ified hereunder, except for CITY's sole active negligence or willful misconduct. ' ~. Originals Our For Signature G:\GROUPDAT~AGREEMENTS~curbside bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc 13; EXECUTION.' This'Agreement is effective upon execution. It'is the - product of negot~abon and all parties are 'equally responsible for authorship of ~his Agreement. Section 1654 of the California Civil Code shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement. 14. NOTICES. All notices relative to this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be personally serVed or sent by certified or registered mail and be effective upon actual personal serVice or depositing in the United Statesmail. The parties shall be addressed as follows, or at any other address designated by notice: ...... CITY: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD · . - CITY HALL 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 CONTRACTOR: ' Kern Refuse Disposal, Inc. 6208 Timbercreek Drive Bakersfield, California 93308 15. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of California will govern the validity of this Agreement, its interpretation and performance. Any litigation arising in any way from this Agreement shall be brought in Kern County,' California. 16. FURTHER ASSURANCES...Each party, shall execute and deliver such papers, documents, and instruments, and perform such acts as are necessary or appropriate, to'implement the terms' of*this Agreement and the intent of the-parties to this.Agreement. 17. ASSIGNMENT.. Neither this Agreement, nor any interest in it may be assigned or transferred by any party without the prior written consent of all the parties. Any such assignment will be subject to such terms and conditions as CITY may choose to impose. 18. BINDING EFFECT. The rights and obligations ofthis Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties to the contract and their heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, and whenever the context so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine and' neuter, and the singular number includes the plural. This Agreement may be exeCuted in any number of counterparts;each of which shall be considered as an original and be effective as such· ; .. . Page8ofl0 G \GROUP DAT~AG REEM ENTS\curbside bulky.item agrmt 5 - 12-0 5.doc .19. ACCOUNTING RECORDS. CONTRACTOR shall maintain accurate accounting records and other written documentation Pertaining to all costs incurred in performance of this Agreement. Such records and documentation shall be kept at CONTRACTOR's office dUring the term of this Agreement, and for a period of three years from the date of the final payment hereunder, and said records shall be made available to CITY representatives upon requestat any time during regular business hours. 20. CORPORATE AUTHORITY. Each individual signing this Agreement on behalf of entities represent and warrant that they are, respectively, duly authorized to sign on behalf of the entities and to bind the entities fully to each and all of the obligations set forth in this Agreement. 23. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS. The negotiations leading to the proposal contained herein were based on the available data, projections, and estimates. If there are any changes' in conditions which were not anticipated when this agreement was negotiated, the parties shall meet in good faith and make any adjustment that is deemed just and equitable. 24. TERM; The term of this Agreement shall be effective upon approval by the CITY Council and shall terminate on June 30, 2014 provided that the CITY may terminate this Agreement as stipulated herein. 25; TAX NUMBERS. CONTRACTOR's Federal Tax ID Number CONTRACTOR is a corporation? Yes.. No (Please check one.) " 26. NON-INTEREST. No officer or employee of the CITY shall hold any interest in this Agreement (California Government Code section 1090). ........... oOo ........... ?age0 of]0 Originois Out/:0r, Signature G:\GROUPDA'IZAGREEMENTS\curbside bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, heret° haVe Caused this Agreement' to be executed, the day and year first-above written. .... CONTRACTOR; ~'CITY OF. BAKERSFIELD :' ' ' KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL BY: By:, HARVEY L.' HALL,-" Mayor Title: AppROVED AS TO FORM: .VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: -. ' ~ ROBERT SHERFY Deputy City Attorney II Insurance: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT By: RAUL ROJAS PUbic Works Director COUNTERSIGNED:~ By: GREGORY Ji KLIMKO Finance Director Page 10 of I0 G:\GROUPDATXAGREEMENTSXcurbsid¢ bulky item agrmt 5-12-05.do¢ MAY. 4,8005 8:43AM FREMOMT FIMAMCE MO.G53 P.1 Date: May 4, 2005 To: Damell Haynes, City of Bakersfield Fax: 661-324-1850 Sender:. Kim Pedersen, Executive Secretary/Graphic Artist- Finance DepL Total pages sent, including this cover sheet: 13 Nice chatting with you. Here are two it_em~ with information on Long-term debt. RECF_.~:VED: 5/ 4/05 8:58AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680; PAGE 2 MAY. 4. P005 8: 43AM FREMOHT FmnNCE Ad01~P-'-65..3J Cit?._~ounciI ; ) (,") May 7, 1996 LONG-TERM CAPITAL DEBT POLICY The bag-term capital debt policy sets the parameters for issuing debt and provides guidance in the timing and structuring of long-term debt co~. Ia addition to ~ policy, separate policies will be developed for land.based inancings (typically, local im?rovement districts) and 'debt issued by the redevelopment agency. The City will consider the issuance of loag.term obligations under the following conditions:' 1. The City will use debt financing only for one-time capital improvement projects and unusual equipment purchases, and only under the following circumstances: .a. When the project is included in the City's five-year capital improvement .program and is in conformance with the City's general plan. b. When the project is not included in the City's five-year capital improvement program, but it is an emerging critical need whose timing was not anticipated in the five-year capital improvement program, or it is a project mandated immed/alely by. State or federal require, mem. c. When the project's useful life, or the projected serv/~ 1/fo of the equipment, will be equal to or exceed the term of the fin~n¢iag. d. When there are designated revenues sufficient to service the debt, whether from project revenues, other speciC:~ and reserved resoUrces, or infrastructure cost- sharing revenues. e. Debt financing (other than tax and revenue anticipation notes) is not considered appropr/ate for any recurring purpose such as current operating and m~i_nt~nance expenditures. 2. The project priority process used in developing the City's/ive-year capital improvement program, includ/ng criteria used in evaluating projects and project viability, will be reviewed by the City Council as Part of the b/ennial uIxiate of the five-year capital improvement pro.gram. 3. The following criteria will be used to evaluate pay-as-you-go versus long-term debt financing in funding capital improvements: a. Factors which favor pay-a~-you-go: (I) Current revenues and adequate fund balances are available. (2) Project ptming is feas~Ie. RECE,ZVED: 5/ 4/05 9:OOAM; ->C]:TY OF BAKERSF'rELD; #680; PAGE 3 MAY. 4. ~005 B: 4SAM FREMOMT FIMAHCE MO. GSS P. S i") (3) Debt levels would adversely affect the City's cm~t ratias. (4) Market conditions are unstable or present difficulties in marketing. b.. Factors which favor lon~-tenn financing; (I) l~evcnues avs)lable for debt service are considered suflicient and roi/able so that long-term f'mancing can b~ marketed with an appropriate credit (2) . The project for which fn~ncing is' being considered is of the type that will allow the.City to ~,tain an appropriate credit rat/ag. (3) Market conditions present favorable interest rates and demand for municipal (4) A project is mandated by State or federal requirements and current revenues and fund balances are insufficient to pay project costs. (5) A project is immediately required to meet or relieve capacity needs. (6) The life of the project or asset financed is five years or longer. 4. The following will be considered in evaluatJn~ appropriate debt levels: a. General fund supported debt. service will not exceed 7% of' total budgeted expenditures and transfers out. b. The general ~,-d may be used to provide back-up liquidity to improve the viability of a self-supported debt issue (i.e., not land-based or redevelopment ag~cy f~nancings), but only if the general fund is not exposed to silF~cant risk of loss of assets or impairment ofliquldi~. This .evaluation of risk will consider such as the following: (1) Vohtility and collectibfl/~y of the revenue source identified for repayment of the debt. (2) The likelihood the general fund would be reimbursed with/n one year for any payments it misht potentially need to make in its role as back-up guarantor. If the City Council dete. rm~nes the risk of loss of assets or impairment of liquidity to the general fund to be rehtively minimal, self-supported debt service for debt that relies on the general fund as a back-up guarantor will not exceed 7% of general fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out. RECEIVED:.~ 5/ 4/05 g:OOAM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680; PAGE 4 MAY. 4.2005 8: 4SAM FREMOMT FIMAMCE MO. G53 P. 4 $. The costs of developing and maintaining a land-based long.term debt policy will be ~me by the development community which uses this type 6, The costs of developing and maintaining a redevelopment agency long-term debt policy will be borne by the redevelopment agency and will be developed in conjunction with amendments to existing redevelopment project area plans and/or new proposals to issue debt by the redevelopment agency. 7. The City will follow all State and federal regulations and requirements regarding bond provisions, iss,~ce, taxation and disclosure. 8, . The adoption of resolutions of intent will be considered whenever bond issuance is contemplated to increase the flexibility relate~ to funding costs related to the project (e,g., project development costs, architectural costs, studies, etc.) 9. Costs incurred by the. City, such as bond counsel and financial advisor fees, printing, underwriters' discount, and project design and construction costs, .w~l be charged to the bond issue to the extent allowable by law, 10. The City will seek credit enhancements, such as letters of credit, or insurance, when necessary for cost-effectiveness. 11. The City will monitor compliance with bond covenants and adhere to federal arbitrage regulatiom. Any instances ofnoncompllance will be reported ~ the City Council 12. The City will seek to maintain its current bond rating and w~l ordinarily not consider long- term debt that, through itsissuanee, would cause the City's bond rating to be lowered. 13, The City vaTll maintain good communications with bond rating agencies about its financial condition and will -foIlow a policy of full disclosure in every financial report and bond prospectus (Official Statement). 14. The City va21 generally conduct financings on a competitive basis; however, negotiated finances may be used where market volat~ity or the use of an unusual or complex financing or security structure is a-concern with regard to rmrketability, 15. The City will select a financ~ advisor and/or invesunent, ban~cer and bond counsel on competitive basis; these advisors will be retained for at least four years to provide continuity and allow them to develop an understanding of the City's needs. Other outside service providers may be selected by developers or owners, subject to the City's approval. Trustees and/or paying agents will be selected by competitive bid. 16. Interfimd borrowing will be eomidered to finance high priority needs on a case.by-ease basis, only when plamed expenditures ia the fund m~klng the loan would nnt be affected. RECEIVED: 5/ 4/05 9:01AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #580; PAGE 5 MAY. 4. 2005 8: 46AM FREMONT FINANCE MO. 653 P. S I~ertmd borrowing m~y be used when i~ would reduce costs of iuteres~ deb~ issuance, and/or admini~agon. 17. The term of the long-term debt instrument will not exceed the legal life of the a.~et or ars, whichev is less, 1 $, Bond proceeds will be invested in accordance with ~be provision~ of the bond indeatwe. Funds set aside for debt service will only be USed for ~ ptWPose. 19. In choosing the appropriate long-term debt insW~ment, cost, economic equity, political acceptab'flitT, and flexib'E-ty will be considered.. Refundings will be considered to reduce. interest costs or principal outstanding, or to eliminate restrictive debt convenants.. Pooled t~-a,,¢ings with other government a~¢ncies will be considered, as ~propriate. RECEIVED:~ 5/ 4/05 9:01AM; -:>CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680; PAGE 6 MRY. 4. ~005 8: 46AM FREMOMT FIMAMCE MO. G53 P. G APP__E. ND IX There are many different types of long-term debt instruments a~il_s_ble. Depending on the specific circumstances, the City will consider using the following types offirmncing instruments: a. General Obligation Bonds - Bonds backed by the full faith and cred/t of the City. The tax/ng power .mo_..y. be an unlimited ad valorem tax or a limited tax, usuatly on real estate and personal property. A special ra~e is incorporated in the property tax bill annuaily to pay for debt service. A two-thirds vOter approval is required for authorization. Because it is secured by an unlimited tax levy, this structure has strong, marketabih'ty and lower interest costs. b. Reveuue Bonds ~ Bonds are-secured by revenues generated by-the f~cflity that is financed or by dedicated user fees, Voter approval may or may not be required. Planning is more · complex because costs and* revenues affect each other. Credit enha-c~ement~ (e.g., insurance or letter of credit) may be needed because of the limited Source of debt service payment. c. Certificates of Participation - The City enters into a lease a~reement with another party (a lessor; such as 'a joint powers authority) to lease an asset over a defined period of time at a .prearranged annual payment. Voter approval is generally 'not required. Lease payments are made primarily from general fund revenues. Currant law requires thc lessee to moke lease payments only it~the facility has beneficial use. The les~slatlve body has to appropriate annual debt sereice payments. For the security of the bondholders, a reserve fund .is normally establi~qhed and held by a trustee until all bonds al'e paid. Interest dur/ng project construction m~_*st be capi.tali~,exl. An "asset transfer" structure, whereby an existing facility is used as security to fmarlce construction or acquisition of another project, may be used for flexibility. d. Tax Allocation Bonds, Bonds .are secured by property tax increment (property taxes .generated on assessed value in.excess of the frozen property tax base) in a redevelopment project area, These bonds are issued to promote economic development. Voter appro!ral is not required. e. Assessment Bonds - Bonds are issued to develop facilities and basic ~cture for the benefit of properties within the assessment district, Assessments are levied on properties benefited by the project, Voter approval is not required. Instead, a majority vote of the property owners with a majority of assessments is needed to authorize the issue. The issuer's recourse for non-payment is foreclosure. This type of bond .is normally nol rated. The bonds may be issued under the provisions of the 1911, 1915 or Mello-Roos Bond Act, whichever is most appropriate. f. MaSter Lease Agreements - The City enters into ;~ lease agreement with a provider to lease equipment or facilities whose useful life is too short to finance with long-term debt. RECE,IVEO: 5/ 4/05 9:02AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680; 'PAGE 7 MAY. 4. ~005 8: 4?AM FREMOMT FIHAMCE MO. 653 P. 7 i ) V~rious pieces and types of real and personal property ~om different vendors over a period of time can be acquired under one rn~ster lease agreement. Interest can be fixed or tied to an index. Financing costs are normally min~, but the interest cost rr~y be higher than with other insm~e~. g. Vendor-Financed Leases. A vendor of equipment acts as the lessor and investor, and holds the lease for its full term or may assign the lease. The motivating factor to the vendor is us~!!y to encour~e futm'e sales of its product, · . h.. · .... Marks-Roos Bonds - Bonds are issued by a joint powers authority to buy other bond issucs~ By pooling bond issues, ro~rketability can be improved and administration costs are reduced. I. Bond AnticiPation Notes - Notes are issued to provide temporary fi~n¢ing,.w be repaid by long-term ~whg. The bridge fiv~n¢ing has a maximum maturity of three years. RECE]:VED: 5/ 4./05 9:02AM; ->CTTy OF BAKERSFTELD; #680~; PAGE 8 MAY. 4.2005 8: 4?AM FREMONT FINANCE MO. 653 P. 8 Policies & Practices City of Fremont 2005/06 Propo;ed Operating Budget DevelopmentCost Center Spending Authorization When .rescue estimates for the Development and ];.nvironmental Services cost center exceed the amount identified in the Budget duc to increases in development and fee activity as verified by th~ Chief Financial Officer, the City M_~ager is authorized to increase appropriations for expenditures in an amount not to exceed the amount of increased revenue. Increased appropriations shal!be made in writing by the City Manager, filed with the Chief Financial Officer, and reported to City Council as part of the results of ~e annual financial audit, (Included in the annual resolut/on in prior years and adopted by the City Council on lune 3, 1997.) Development and.Environmental Services Cost Recovery The multiplier rate was established in the 1992/93 fiscal y~ar to recover all departmental costs associated with an employee's direct chargeable hours on a project. The multipl/er concept replaced the fiat rate charging system that applied an average depa~'tmental charge for all employees. The two principal components, of the multipli~ rate are the direct chargeable hours and the departmental budget. Direct .chargeable hours are specifically attributed to a particular project and exclude hours.that are not associated with a project. ChargeabIe hours are determined based on an e~stimated percentage of employee-dedicated hours to a chargeable area. The multiplier used to calculate billing rates for planning serv/ccs provided by the D~elopment and Environmental Services cost center and engineering services is 2.7. Debt Capacity, Issuance & Management Short-Term Operating Debt Current revenues will cover the expenses associated w/th the day-to-day operations of the citY. However,'because the City receives thomajority of its property tax mvermes twice during the year, and sales tax revenues may fluctuate during the year, the City may experience temporary cash shortfalls. In order to -finance these possible cash shortfalIs,-the City may incur short- term operating debt [typically, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRAN$)]. The amount of short-term operating debt will be based on cash flow projections for the fiscal year and will comply with applicable federal and State regulations. Operating revenues will be pledged to repay the debt, which will generally be repaid in one year or less. The costs of such borrowings will be minimized to the greatest extent possible. (Adopted by the City Council on February 26, 1996 and reaffumcd on July 7, 1998.) Long-Term Capita[ Debt Thc long-team capital debt policy sets thc parameters for issuing'debt and provides guidance in the timing and .structuring of long-term debt commitments. In addition to this policy, there is a separate policy for land- based financings (typically, Mello-Roos community facility districts and Iocal 214 RECE.[VED: 5/ 4/05 9:03AM; ->CTTY OF BAKERSFTELD; #680; PAGE 9 MAY. 4. 2005 8: 4SAM FREMOMT FIMAMCE MO. 653 P. 9 'Policies. & Practices City of Fremont 2005106 Proposad Operating Budget ~rovcm~t ~c~) ~ dcbt iss~d by ~c ~dcvclopm~t Ag~, ~c (. .) fo~o~g~o~o~ ~dc ~c ~'s condition of~ lon~bt: 1. ~c Ci~ ~cs debt ~c~g only for ~e-~e capi~ ~rov~ent projec~ ~d ~ equ~ment p~c~scs, ~d o~y ~d~ fo~o~ c~~ces:, a, ~ ~e project is included ~ ~e Ci~'s five-yc~ c~i~l improvem~t pro.am ~d is ~ co~o~ce ~ ~c Ci~'s G~ P~. b, ~en ~ project ~ not ~cludcd ~ ~e C[~'s fiv~ye~ capi~ ~ov~t pm~ but.iris ~ ~ cfific~ need w~se ~g ~ not ~cipated ~ ~c five-ye~ mpi~ ~ro~t pro~ or it is a project ~da~d i~dia~ly By State or feder~ ~q~rcm~. c. ~ ~e.projcc~'s ~c~l~Mc, or ~e~ojected so. cc life e~m~t,' ~ bo equ~ to or ~cecd ~e ~ of~e ~cmg, d. ~ ~c ~c dcsi~d revenu~ ~cient ~ se~ce ~e debt, whc~er from project revenues, o~or specified and ~s~ed reso~ces, or mffa~c~e cost-s~g rev~ues, e, Debt fmmcing (o~ ~ ~ ~d revenue mficipa~on no~s) ,')' ~ c~t op~a~g md ~te~ce ~p~di~es. 2. ~e project ~ofiW ~ocess ~ed h develop~g. ~e' Ciys fiv~ye~ capi~l ~provement pro~a~ ~clu~g ~a used ~ projec~ ~d project ~abi~w, is renewed by ~e CiW Co~cil as p~ of · e bi~ial update of~e five-ye~ capital ~provem~t ~o~ 3. ~e fo~o~ng cfi~ is ~ed to c~uate pay-~-you-go v~s~ long- 't~ ~bt ~mchg h ~g c~i~l ~ovem~ts: a. Fac~rs wM~h hvor pay-~-you-go: (1) ~t rev~ues ~d ade~ate ~d b~ces ~e a~able. (2) Project phasing is ffe~sible. (3) Debt levels would adv~sely~ect~e CiW's creditm~ng. (~) M~ket condi~o~ ~c ~blc or present difficuMes ~g, b. Factors wMch hvor long.t~ fin~c~g.. 215 RECEIVED: 5/ 4/05 9:O3AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680' PAGE 10 MAY. 4.2005 8:48AM FREMOMT FIMAMCE M0.653 P.10 Policies & Practices City of Fremont 200~06 Proposed Operating Budget (1) Revenues available for debt Service are considered { ' ~ sufficient and reliable so that long-term financing can be nurketed with aa appropriate credit rating. (2) The project for which financing is being considered is of the type that will allow the City to maintain an appropriate crcflit rating, (3) Market conditions present favorable interest rates and demand for municipal financings. (4) A project is mandated by State or federal rcquircrnents and current revenues and fund balances are kmtfficient to pay project costs. (5) A project is immediately required to meet or relieve capacity needs. (6) Thc life of the project or asset financed is five years or longer. 4. Thc following is considered in evaluating appropriate debt levels: a. General Fund-supported debt service'will not exceed 7% of ~.-..~ total General Fund budgeted expenditures and transfers out. -.¢ b. The General 17und may be used to provide back-up liquidity to improve the viability.ora self-supported debt issue (i.e., not land-based or redevelopment agency financings),.' but only if the General Fund is not exposed to significant risk of loss of assets or impairment of liquidity. This evaluation ofr/sk will consider such things as the following: (1) voiatility and collectibihty ofthe revenue source identLfied for repayment of the debt, (2) The likelihood the General Fund would be reimbursed within one ye. ar for any payments it might potentially need to make in its role as back-up guarantor. If the City Council determines the risk of loss of assets or impairment of 'liquidity to the General thmd to be relativelym/nimal, self- supported debt service for debt that relies on the General Fund as aback-up guarantor will not exceed 7% of General Fund budgeted expenditttres and transfers out. This limitation is separate from and in addition to the debt ,. limitation for general fitnd supported debt service described in Section 4.a., above. 216 RECET,,VED: 5/ 4/05 9:04AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680; PAGE I 1 MAY. 4. ~005 8: 49AM FREMOMT FIMAMCE MO. GSB ' P, 11 PoJicies & Practices City of Fremont 2005/06 Proposed OPerating Budget 5. The costs of developing and maintaining a land-based long-term debt 'policy will be bomc by the devclopmer~t corornunity, which uses this 6. The costs of developing and maintaining a redevelopment agency Iong- t~'m debt policy will be borne by the redevelopment agency and will be developed in conjunction with amendments to exist'ins redevelopment project area plans and/or new proposals to issue debt by the redevelopment agcucy. 7.The City will follow all State and federal regulations and requirements regarding bond provisions, issuancc, ~axation and disclosure. 8. The adoption of resolutions of intent v,41] be considered .whenever bond issuance is contemplated to increase the flexibility related .to funding costs related to the project (e.g., project' development costs, architectural costs, studies, .etc.) 9.. Costs incurred by the City, such as bond counsel and financial advisor fees, prinl~U~, underaCt-rs' cliscoun~, andproject desig~ and construction costs, will be*charged to thc bond issue to thc ex~nt allowable by law. 10. The .City will seek credit enhanc~mon~s, such as letters of Credit or insurancc, when necessary for Cost-cffectiveness. 11. The City will monitor compliance with bond covenants and a~ere to federal arbitrage and disclosure regulations. Any instances of noncompliance will be ropor~ed to the City Council I2, Thc City will seckto r~ntain its curr~t bond rating and will ordinarily not consider long-term debt that, through its issuance, would cause the City's bond ratin~ to be lowered. 1-~. The'City will maintaiu good communications with bond rating agencies about i~s financial condition and will follow a policy of full disclosure ~n every financial r~por~ and bond prospectus (Official Stateroom). 14. The City will generally conduct financings on a competitive basis; however, negotiated financings may bc used where ~rke~ volatility or the use of an unusual or complex financir~g or security structure is a concern with regard to marketability. 1~. The City will select a financial advisor and/or investment banker and bond cour~el on a competitive basis; these advisors will bc retained for at least four years to provide continuity and allow ~hem to develop an understanding of the City's needs. Other outside service providers may · be selected by develop~s or owners, subject to the City's approval. Trustees and/or paying a§c~ts will b~ selected by competitive bid. ! 6. ~t~rfuncl borrowing.will be consid~ed to finance hi~,t~ priority needs on a case-by-case basis, only when planned exp~ditures in the fund 217 RECEIVED: 5/ 4/05 9:04AM; ->CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; #680' PAGE 12 ' MAY, 4.2005 8:SOAM FREMOMT FIMAMCE M0.653 P.12 ~ Policies & Practices City of F~emont 2005~6 PropOSed Operating Budget making the loan would not be affected. Iuterfun. d borrowing may be -used when it would reduce costs of interest, debt issuance, and/or 17. The term of the long-term debt instrument will not exceed the legal life of the asset or thirty years, whichever is less.' 15. Bond proceeds will be invested in accordance with the provisions of the bond indenture. Funds set aside for debt service will only be used for that purpose. 19. In choos/ngthe appropriate long-term debt in. sa. ument, cost, economic equity, political acceptability, and flexibility will be considered. Refunds will be consid~red~to reduce intere, st costs or principal outstanding, or to elimi~_te restrictive debt cover~,~ts. Pooled firmncinl~s with other govm'nmc-nt agencies will b~considered,.as appropriate. Financing Instruments There are many different types of long-tc-rrn debt instruments available. Depending on the specific circumstances, the City will consider using the following ~pes of financing instruments: a..General Obligation Bonds - Bonds bacl~d by the full faith and credit of-the City. The taxing power may,be an unlimited ad valorem tax or a..limited tax, usually on real e~te and-personal properS. A special rate is incorporated.m the property tax bill annually to pay for debt service. A two.thirds voter approval is required for authorization. Because it is secured bl)' an unlimited tax levy, this structure has strong marketability and lower interest costs, b. Revenue Bonds - Bonds .are secured by r~enues generated by tl~ facility that is financed or by dedicated user fees. Voter approval may or may not be required. Plarmint; is more complex because costs and revenues affect each other. Credit e~l~ncc'ment (e.g., msuranceor letter of credit) may be needed'because oft. he limited source of debt service payment. , c. Certificates of Participation =.Thc City enters into a lease agrccrncnt with another party (a lessor, such as a joint powers authority) to lease an.asset over a defined period oftirne at a prearranged annual payment. Voter approval is generally not r~quired, Lease paym~ts are made primarily from general fund revc-nues. Current law requires the lessc~ to make lease.payments only if thc facility has beneficial use. The legislat/ve body has to appropriate annual debt service payments. 'For the s~urity of the bondholders, a reserve fund is normally established and held by a trustee un~il all bonds are paid, Interest during project construction must be capitalized. An "asset trsns£er" structure, whereby an exist/ng facility is used as security to f'mance construction or acquisition of another project, maybe used for flexibility, 218 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: il. TO: Honorable MaYOr and City CoUncil APPROVED FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT HEAD. j~(~ ' DATE: March 28, 2005 · CITY ATTORNEY ~r~ CITY MANAGER ~'/. SUBJECT: Fire Station and Police Substation on East White Lane (Ward 1) 1. Design Services Agreement with RRM Design Group ($323,491.00) for design of the new Fire Station and Police Substation on East White Lane east of South Union Avenue. 2. Appropriate $52,767 Community Development Block Grant. Funds to the Economic and Community Development, Capital Improvement Budget for design services. 3. Transfer $20,955 Community Development Block Grant Funds from the Economic and Community Development Operating Budget to the .Capital Improvement Budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the agreement, and appropriation and transfer of the funds. ' BACKGROUND: The. current Fire Station #5 at 700 Planz Road was built in 1954 and is now dilapidated, lacks space, has inadequate street access and needs to be demolished. In addition, the existing fire station needs to be better centralized within its fire response area. The number of people, served by Fire Station #5 is 35,547 per the 2000 U.S. Census. The existing fire station was not designed to accommodate the new apparatus and equipment that is currently being used by the Fire Department. The new fire station will be better able to serve it's service area. Currently, the closest City police facility for these residents is at 3945 Hughes Lane. The new police substation will also be better centralized to the · City residents it would serve within a two mile radius. That existing facility will be closed When the new substation is opened. In December 2004, staff began the Qualification Based Selection (QBS) process to select a design consultant to prepare construction documents for the project. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was sent out to interested firms. On January 28, 2005, the City received eleven responses that were then reviewed by a Selection Committee of senior staff from the Fire Department, Police Department and Public Works Department. The Selection Committee determined that. four firms should be invited to interview with the Selection Committee. At the interviews, each firm demonstrated their proposed performance on the project and submitted their fee proposal to rdO the work. The firms invited to interview were: BFGC Architecture (Bakersfield); Milazzo & Associates (Bakersfield); 'RRM Design Group (San Luis ObisPo); and WLC Architects (Rancho Cucamonga). PW / ENGR / ADR March 28, 2005, 1:41PM G:\GROU P DATV~,DMIN RP'r~2005\04-13\EastWhiteLaneFireStationPoliceStation.dot ADMINISTRATI'VE REPORT The interviews of the four firmS were conducted on March 9, 2005. The Selection Committee rated and ranked each of the firms. The Selection Committee then also reviewed the cost proposals that Were submitted by the firms. The Selection Committee found the firm of RRM Design GrOup to have the combination of qUalifications and fee propOsal which is most favorable for the City. Therefore, staff recommends that the City enter into a contract with RRM Design Group for design services for the NeW Fire Station and Police Substation on East White Lane East of South Union Avenue. PW / ENGR / ADR March 28, 2005, 1:41PM G:\GROU PDAT~ADMINRP'I'~2005\04-13\EastWhiteLaneFireStafion PoliceStatton.dot ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: March 30, 2005 I AGENDA SECTION:,Consent Calendar I ITEM: I O. rt. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: AlanTandy, City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: March 14, 2005 CITY ATTORNEy CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Resolution in support of the establishment of a Central San Joaquin Valley EconOmic Development Task Force RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. BACKGROUND: A bill has been introduced in the State of California Assembly to establish a Central San Joaquin Valley Economic Task Force to bring the resources of the state to the aid of the economically depressed San Joaquin Valley. president Bush implemented an executive order signed by President Clinton to establish the Federal Interagency Task Force for the Economic DeVelopment of the Central San Joaquin Valley. AB 31 will compliment .the federal government efforts and will outline the state agencies that should comprise this task force and the duties that they should undertake. A second component of this bill will also include locally led efforts to coordinate and improve existing state and federal efforts for the valley in order to increase the living standards and the overall economic performance of the valley. March 14, 2005, 3:36PM AB 31 :." AB 31 (Parra) · ~' Gentral SanJoaquin. Yalley I~¢onomi¢ Da¥~loprnant Taak For¢~ Assembly Member, Kevin McCarthy Principle co-author Assemb_ly Member, Juan Arrambula, co-author Assembly Member, Mike Villines, co-author i ASsembly Member Matthews,co-author Assembly Member Cogdill, c°-author AssemblYMember Agazarian, co-author The Problem The San Joaquin Valley desperately needs a coordinated effort in the area of economic development; All levels of government and private partners throughout the Valley must work together to bring economic stability and vitality to an area that historically has been depressed. Without a coordinated effort, local agencies are left on their own to work with the State and -Federal Agencies. Existin~ Law Currently at the state level there is not an effort.organizing the area of economic development in the Central San Joaquin Valley. This Bill Assembly Bill 31 will establish a Central San Joaquin Valley Economic Development Task Force to bring the resources of the state to the aid of the economically depressed Central San Joaquin Valley. Summary President Bush implemented an executive order signed by President Clinton to establish the Federal Interagency Task Force for the Economic Development of the Central San Joaquin Valley. AB 31 will compliment the federal government efforts 'and will outline the state agencies 'that should comprise this task force and the duties that they should undertake. Comments A ~econd component to this bill will also include locally led efforts to COordinate and improve existing state and federal efforts for the valley in order to increase the living standards and the overall econOmic performance of the valley. Suooort BIG Coalition Council Member City of Wasco, Larry County of Madera, Board of Supervisors Pearson County of Kern, Board of Supervisors City Manager of Wasco, Larry Pennell Mayor City of Coalinga, Ron Lander McFarland Recreation & Park District, Gary Mayor City of Wasco,Cherylee Wegman Farrell Council Member City of Wasco, Tilo Cortez President Greater McFarland chamber of Commerce, Gary Fan'ell city of Avenal City of Hanford Director Community Development City of Central Califomia Economic Development Coalinga, William Skinner Council Mayor City of Huron, Ramon Dominguez Contact: Vanessa Lugo, 319-2651 RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IN SUPPORT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield is insupp°rt of Assembly Bill 31 that will establish a Central San Joaquin Valley Economic Development Task Force; WHEREAS, this will bring the resources of the state to the aid of the economically depressed Central'San Joaquin Valley; WHEREAS, President Bush implemented an Executive Order signed by President Clinton to establish~ the Federal Interagency Task Force for the Economic Development of the Central San Joaquin Valley; WHEREAS, President Bush believes that the extreme economic depression of the Valley Region requires the particular attention of the federal government; WHEREAS, the State of California can' only benefit from improved economic conditions in the Central Valley; and WHEREAS, AB 31 compliments and enhances the efforts of the Federal Interagency Task Force for the Economic Development .of the Central San Joaquin; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that the City Council encourages Governor Schwarzenegger's administration to support Assembly Bill 31, which Will form a task force that will bring everyone to the same table and is a must needed first step in moving forward as a region. .......... o0o .......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ResolutiOn was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULUVAN, SCRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNClLMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and EX OFFICIO of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED HARVEY L..HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT '-.:~.-.'~, ~.'o~:::?.~' MEETING.DATE: March 30, 2005 I AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar I ITEM: TO: , Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED · FROM: Donna L. Kunz, Economic Development Director DEPARTMENT'HEAD DATE: March 21, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER 'SUBJECT: Agreement with Mark Briggs, Grant Consultant for $46,000 to Prepare Section 108 Federal Loan Applications _and Brownfield Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) Grant Applications. ' RECOMMENDATION: "~ Staff-recommendS approval. BACKGROUND: On February 9, 2005, staff submitted to the Budget and Finance Committee, a financial Plan that identifies sources for funds available t© construct a new fire station in the Southeast and to initiate a new mixed use redevelopment· project planned along· the Kern Island Canal near California Avenue 'and "Q" Streets - the south end' of.the "Mill Creek". One key component.of the financial Plan identified the use of a federal. Section 108 Loan and suggested the submittal of a competitive Brownfield Economic .Development Grant application through HUD. The Budget and Finance Committee directed City staff to proceed with the` required loan and grant applications.. The federal Section 108 Loan program is one of.the most cost effective'finanCing alternatives for.public facilities and economic develOpment activities. CDBG entitlement jurisdictions like Bakersfield may borrow up to.5 times their annual CDBG entitlement amount under this loan program. The Section 108 loan works like borrowing from the block grant. It provides capital funds up front to allow cities to undertake large projects and can be repaid over 20 years. The City of Bakersfield currently has $5.9 million of outstanding Section 108 Loans and a borrowing capacity of $19.5 million (5X.current entitlement). ~ The financial plan approved by the Budget and Finance Committee requires two Section 108 loans, a $1.6 million loan for the Fire Station and a $3.1 million I°an for the economic development projecL The loans are proposed to be repaid over 20 years 'from revenues generated from current and future Southeast Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment. The economic development project'is also eligible for fUnding from a competitive based companion grant called the Brownfield Economic Development Initiative (BEDI). The Notice of Funds a~vailable (NOFA) was recently released by HUD for the upcoming rounds of competitive BEDI Grant applications and it is due June 15, 2005. The BEDI grant Can only be applied for in conjunction with a section 108 loan and is restricted for economic development activities. The financial plan calls for the submittal of $1 million dollars of BEDI grant funds with the $3.1 million eConomic development Section 108 loan. The BEDI S :~Admins\City Council\BdggsSecl08BE DI 3. I m031705, doc 3121/.2005 8:24 AM ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT' Page 2 ' grant funds may be used for property acquisition, relocation, . demolition, construction and may be used to debt service the SectiOn 108 loan while the economic development project is under development. 'You will recall the City received a competitive BEDI grant in the amount of $250,000 for the Baker Street Mixed Use Project which was used for land acquisition in conjunctiOn with a $1.0 million Section 108'loan, The BEDI grant application is lengthy and requires a great deal of expertise. in order to Submit a competitive application. Mark Briggs and Associates is a consulting firm that specializes in the preparation of BEDI grant applications and successfully prepared our previous application for Baker Street.- In order t© increase our chances of .a successful BEDI application, staff would like t© retain Mr..Brigg's services'for this application round. With the future uncertainty of the BEDI program, this may be our final opportunity t© compete for these funds. Mr. Briggs will prepare'both the BEDI application .and the section 108 .Loan application for the economic development project. The Section 108 loan applicatiOn (a much simpler application and non competitive application) required for the Fire Station project will be prepared and submitted by Economic and Community Development staff prior to the June 15; 2005 deadline.. The fire station loan is classified by the HUD as a public facilities loan and is' not evaluated on a competitive basis. S:~Admins\City Council\BdggsSecl08BEDI3.1m031705.doc 3/21/20058:24 AM ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT M EET'NG DATE: March 30, 2005 'J AGENDA -SECTION: Consent Calendar I ITEM:· I0. C-cc.. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Donna L. Kunz, Economic Development Director DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: ': March 14, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY~ CITY MANAGER' ~ SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action Plan Amendment No. 14 (FY02/03), Amendment No. 6 (FY03/04) and Amendment No. 2 (FY 04/05). 0Nards All) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. BACKGROUND: Economic and Community Development staff.is proposing to reprogram CDBG 'and HOME Investment Partnership Program funds from completed or cancelled projects. In compliance with HUD regulations, any significant change or addition to the approved CDBG or HOME annual plan must undergo an amendment process which includes obtaining citizen views and comments on the proposed change for a period of 30 days. A notice waS published on January 30, 2005 and a correction was published February. 7, 2005 requesting comments and to date no comments have been received. A summary of .this amendment include the following program or project changes. These items will have- no budgetary impact: HOME - (1) shifting new construction assistance from "N" Street to the Old Town Kern Housing Project resulting in an increase of $735,000 for a revised total of $1.135 million for baker Street housing. Both of these rental tax credit financed projects have been in the planning and development stages for about 18 months, however, the Baker Street Housing project is now ready to proceed forward and requires budgeted funds be established in the development account in anticipation of the Fall 2005 Tax Credit Application round. The Development Agreement will be considered by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council in May 2004, (2) reprogram CHDO monies originally earmarked for Community Action Partnership of Kern Home Rehab Program to funds available for new CHDO projects and new. construction assistance in the amount of $100,000; (3) shift Indirect Cost Planning charges from other City Departments to the General Management Oversight Coordination line item in the amoun,t of $150,000; and (4) Establish the Southeast Bakersfield Police Satellite Office Construction Project Account as a separate component of the Fire Station #5 Public Facility under the HUD category of slum and blight remediation. Funds for the construction of the project will be allocated at a later date. S:~Admins\City Council\action plan amendment 3-09-04.doc ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 Cancel New Construction Assistance FY02/03 ($258,000) Old Town Kern Housing "N" Street Housing Project FY03/04 ($477,000) Project $735,000 Total - ($735,000) cancel Cpmmunity Action Padnership Community Housing Home Rehabilitation Housing ($75,000) Development Organization $75,000 Program (CHDO) (CHDO Set-Aside-General Cancel Community Action Padnership New Construction Assistance Home Rehabilitation Housing ($25,000) General $25;000 Program (CHDO) Cancel Indirect Cost Planning and General Management Administration (charges from ($t50,000) Oversight and Coordination- $150,000 other City Depadments) Planning and Administration Add Southeast Bakersfield Police ...... Satellite Office Construction $1 Project ' Included in this Amendment are changes and additions to the City of Bakersfield Recapture(HOME) Guidelines for the Infill Housing Assistance Program (Program Specific'Requirements 22 HOME (b) · Recapture Guideline). S:~Admins\City Council\action plan amendment 3-09~04.doc 3/14/20051:34 PM ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: February 23, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Reports ITEM: ia.o.. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Gregory J. Klimko, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD_,,d~.,5' DATE: February 11, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Resolution adopting Council Policy on Audit Reporting Practices and Rotation of Audit Firms. RECOMMENDATION: The Budget and Finance Committee recommends adoption of a Council Policy regarding audit reporting practices and rotation of audit firms, requiring rOtation of audit firms not less than every five years. BACKGROUND: At the September 20, 2004 Budget and Finance Committee meeting staff reported that the City has been audited by the same firm for the past 15 years and while there have been no problems or concerns regarding the work performed, staff recommended implementation of an auditor rotation policy as it is considered "best practice" by many Cities across the nation. Chairman Mike Maggard expressed changing auditing firms every five years would allow for a fresh look and would be a good idea. The committee'requested staff to draft a policy to bring back to the committeefor review and recommendation to the City Council. Staff submitted a draft policy to the BUdget and Finance Committee at their February 9, 2005 meeting. The committee reviewed the draft policy and voted to submit the draft policy to the City Council for their consideration. nks S:~KimG~Forms & Lables~Admin~auditor rotation-revision.doc February 15, 2005, 8:37AM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ADOPTING COUNCIL POLICY ON AUDIT REPORTING PRACTICES AND ROTATION OF AUDIT FIRMS. WHEREAS, the Budget and Finance Committee of the Bakersfield City Council has met and considered the City's policy on outside auditing firms; and WHEREAS, the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) is a nationally recognized association of cities and counties throughout the United States; and WHEREAS, GFOA has long recommended that state and local government entities obtain independent audits of their financial statements performed in accordance with appropriate professional auditing standards; and WHEREAS, GFOA believes it is a good practice to rotate auditors approximately every five (5) years; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield wishes to guarantee that future audits continue to reflect audits of the highest professional quality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The attached "Council Policy Statement/Independent Auditing Services for Annual Financial Audit," attached hereto as Exhibit "A," is incorporated by reference herein as the City's Policy on audit reporting practices and rotation of audit firms. .......... 000 .......... S :~'C OLrNCILX~R-eso s\04-05 R e~o s'xCouncil. C ~. 'Po licyA udits. Reso. DOC -- Page 1 of 2 Pages -- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on by the following vote: -, AYES: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH, CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, HANSON, SULLiVAN, SCRiVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED By HARVEY L. HALL Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney · ROBERT M. SHERFY Deputy City Attorney RMS:dll February 14, 2005 S :\COUNCIL'~Resos\04-05 Reso ~Council. Ci~,Po licyA udit s. Reso. DOC - Page 2 0£2 Pages -- Council Policy Statement Independent Auditing Services for Annual Financial Audit Background - The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) has long recommended that state and local governmental entities' obtain independent audits of their financial statements performed in accordance with the appropriate professional auditing standards. Properly performed audits play a vital role in the public sector by helping to preserve the integrity of the public finance functions and by maintaining citizens' confidence in their elected leaders. It is the City Council's desire to incorporate the recommendations of GFOA into a Council Policy regarding procurement of annual financial auditing services. Recommendations - The City Council makes the following policy statements recommendations regarding the selection of auditing services: - The scope of the independent audit should encompass not only the fair presentation of the basic financial statements, but also the fair presentation of the financial statements of individual funds and component units. The' cost of extending full audit coverage to the financial statements of individual funds and component units can be justified by the additional degree of assurance provided. - The City of Bakersfield shall require in their audit contracts that the auditors of their financial statements conform to the independence standard promulgated in the General Accounting Office's Govemment Auditing Standards even for audit engagements that are not otherwise subject to generally accepted government auditing standards. - The City of Bakersfield shall enter into multiyear agreements not to exceed five years in duration when obtaining the services of independent auditors. Such multiyear agreements can take a variety of different forms (e.g., a series of single-year contracts), consistent with applicable legal requirements. Such agreements allow for greater continuity and help to minimize the potential for disruption in connection with the independent audit. Multiyear agreements can also help to reduce audit costs by allowing auditors to recover certain "startup" costs over several years, rather than over a single year. - The City of Bakersfield shall undertake a full-scale competitive process for the selection of independent auditors at the end of the term of each audit contract, consistent with applicable legal requirements. In order to enhance auditor independence, the City shall require a change in auditors no less than once every five years. The current auditor shall be excluded from the competitive process for the upcoming aUdit term. 1 S:~N'ELSON\council policy draft - audit sen~ices.doc ' .? - The City may desire on occasion to hire an independent auditor to perform certain types of non-audit services for the City. Any non-audit services that require Council approval per Bakersfield Municipal Code section 3.20.105 C (which currently reads "amounts over $25,000) should first be reviewed by the budget and finance committee. Furthermore, The City should routinely explore the possibility of alternative service providers before making a decision to engage their independent auditors to perform significant non-audit services. - The audit procurement process should be structured so that the principal factor in the selection of an independent auditor is the auditor's ability to perform a quality audit. In no case should price be -allowed to serve as the sole criterion for the selection of an independent auditor. -2- S:~NELSONScouncil policy draft- audit services.doc ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: January 12, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: Reports ITEM: TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD ~.3'~ DATE: January 4, 2005 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: Report on the Vehicle License Fee Gap FinanCing Program RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Assistant City Manager, John W. Stinson, will present a brief overview of the Vehicle License Fee Gap Financing Program. January 4, 2005, 10:31AM S:~Admin Rpts~2005WLF Report 011205 dot JVVS:al ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: January 12, 2005 I AGENDA SECTION: Hearing I ITEM: lt. 0,.. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM:· Gregory J. Klimko, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting Fees Pursuant to the Cost Recovery System. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption 'of the Resolution. BACKGROUND: State law requires new fees and charges, as well as increases in exisiting fees and charges, be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing. The. City's procedure is provided for in Chapter 3.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. Staff has recently performed a review of Fireworks Permit Fees to comply with the Fireworks Ordinance (BMC 8.44.040) and determined that fee increases are needed to fund the cost of processing applications, inspections and enforcement of businesses as set forth in Section 3.70.04 of the Cost Recovery System. This information was reviewed by the Budget & Finance Committee on December 17, 2004 and recommended its approval and is being forwarded to the full Council for their consideration. The following is a summary of the fees proposed to change and the increase recommended by staff to the Master Fee Schedule as presented on Exhibit "A". A-INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES A-10 FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION Current proposed Application Fee- Building,City Clerk,Fire Finance $ 0.00 $ 40.00 Permit Fee: · Processing- Finance, Plan/Build, Risk, Traffic 49.00 90.00 Inspections- Fire 52.00 113.00 Enforcement- S:\COREY~ADMIN~FEES.DOC MINISTRATIVE REPORT Fire and Police 0:00 97.00 Total Permit Fee 101.00 300.00 Electrical Permit 40.00 40.00 Clean Up Deposit 100.00 100.00 Total Fees and Deposits $241.00 $480.00 Exhibit "A" prOpoSed Master Fee Schedule for 2004-05: The attached schedule is a ComprehenSive list of all fees authorized under the cost recovery program and is recommended to be adopted by resolution. Exhibit "B" Proposed Master Fee Schedule for 2004-05 - Proposed Changes Only: The attached schedule is a complete list of those fees that staff is proposing to add, increase or decrease. S:\COREY~ADMIN~FEES.DOC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES PURSUANT TO THE COST RECOVERY SYSTEM WHEREAS, state law requires new fees and charges and increases in existing fees and charges be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing on said fees and charges; and WHEREAS, Chapter 3.7 oft_he Bakersfield Municipal Code authorizes the establishment and increase of fees under the cost recovery system; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised twice in the Bakersfield Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, and held on January 12, 2005; and WI:IE~REAS, adoption of new and increased fees and charges, pursuant to Chapter 3.7 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, is necessary for the City to recover the reasonable estimated cost of Providing the services for which the fees are'charged; and WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" including attached hereto and incorporated be reference as though fully set forth herein, do not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the sen, ices for which the fees are charged. NOW THE~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings are tree and correct. 2. The fees set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Master Fee Schedule are hereby Adopted and shall become effective January 13, 2005. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing'Resolution was Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held On , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, scRIVNER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER , ABSENT: COUNCILMElV[BER ~ CrrY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED By HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By Attachment Exhibit "A' and "B" CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INSPECTION FEES &SERVICES A-1 NEW RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION A-2 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR A-3 COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR A-4 SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION A-5 STREET CUT INSPECTION A-6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION A-8 STATE-MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION A-9 OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) A-lO FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION A-12 REINSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS A.13 HOUSING B - LAND USE REVIEW I PERMITS ................................................................................... 3 B-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 13-22 HOME OCCUPATION REVIEW B-23 FIRE SUPPRESSION. PERMIT PROCE$81NG AND PLAN REVIEW FEES B-24 SIGN . PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTIONS FEES B,.25 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REVIEW B.26 MINOR LAND DI~ION REVIEW B.27 PREUMINARY PROJECT REVIEW I]-28 SITE PLAN REVIEW B.29 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW B-30 PUD OR PCD ZONE CHANGE B-3t ZONE CHANGE REVIEW B.32 APPEAl. PROCESSING ................................................................................... 4 B-33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW B-34 CONCURRENT APPUCATION TIERED FEE B.35 ZONE MOOIFICATION REVIEW. MODIRCATIONS ..... .................................................... B,,35 *SIGN REVIEW B.37 MAP& IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING B.38 DEVELOPMENT TIME EXTENSION REVIEW B,.39 TRAFFIC MARIGNG REQUEST REVIEW B-40 CERTIFIEO UNFED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) FEES · B"II CULTURAL RE~)URCE REVIEW ' $. B-42 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ........................................... ~ ........................................ 6 B.43 HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW B.44 WIDE/OVERLOAD REVIEW ..................................................................... · ~. · PUBLIC H~ NOTICE REGUIREMENT8 ...... C - PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES C-M F~E REPORT ~ . C-52 POLICE RECORI~t~ DUPLICATION SERV}CE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" TABLE OF CONTENTS C-53 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPY C.54 DOCUMENT PRINTING AND COPYING C-55 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS C-56 RESEARCH AND CERTIFICATIONS ................... : ................................................................ $ C-57 AGERDNMINUTE MAIUNG SERV]CE C-58 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT C-59 PUBUC WORKS INFORMATION D - PUBLIC SAFETY I)-61 BUSINESS REGULATION B.62 CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT PROCESSING 7 D.63 UMOUSINErrAxirrowiNG REGULATION ................................................................................... ? D.64 WEED ABATEMENT OR FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT ................................................................................... 7 D-65 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RESPONSE ................................................................................... 7 I)-66 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE D-67 POUCE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE D-68 SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY SERVICES I).69 ~ AUTOMOTIVE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION D.70 FINGERPRINT SERVICE ................................................................................... 7 I).71 VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................... 7 I).72 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE D.Z3 PARKING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................... ? D-74 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES ................................................................................... 7 I)-75 ANIMAL REGULATION E - RECREATION I CULTURAL E-82 PARK FACILrr'Y RENTAL E-83 RECREATION CENTER RENTAL E.84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES E.85 C~Y YOUTH PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES E-85 AQUATIC PROGRAMS . RECREATIONAL SWIMMING E.87 LEISURE CLASSES F- MISCELLANEOUS FEES F-91 FIRE HYDRANT DIsTRIBuTiON AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION ................................................................................... 11 F.92 DOWNTOWN OFF-STREET PARKING F.93 PROCESSING SCI. IOOL FACIUTY FEES F.94 COMPUTER DATA ................................................................................... 11 F-95 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES F.96 GEOLOGICAt. SURVEY STREET USE ................................................................................... 11 F-97 CHECK COLLECTION ..................................................................... F-98 CITY COUNCIL C~tAMBER RENTAL F~J9 CITY COUNCIL CtlAMBER BROADCAST FEES F-t00 BuSINESS ~E PROCESSING FEES ................................................................................... Pre~aredby: C. Garberotio P. nf ? CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY' SERVICE CEN"rERS EXHIBIT 'A' INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES -- ' CO N~'Ruc'rIot~ FO R BO~I R~ ANO C~iE~ (~N pER]~.r pROCUrING, TWO GENERAL METHO0~ ARE USED TO ~1~ F.E~ ~EN S~ TO ~E V~S COSTS ~ M ~ - U~MMUM ~E ' * MINIMUM ~ ~IT ~E~ING ~ INS~ON ~E8 . - ~NIUUM ~ *- ~NIMUM F~ 0.~ XV~ ~XV~ ~ ~v~ - MINIMUM ~E 0.~ XV~ ~XV~ ~ * MINIMUM ~ . CITY OF BAKERSFIELD . PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' NUMBER ~=RYtCE CENFE~ {~-.SC;~ION FEE~ ~ - SEPTIC TANK AEA~DONMENT · - - C.~.ASE ~N'~rRCEPTORS NO ~m to *WATER SOFTENERS ~0 ~O to : - SHO~'~ER PAN ~0 ~0 to · SITE ~R SYSTEMS ~0 $40 to - SITE STORM DRAJNAGE SY~ $40 $40 to - MISCELLANEOUS PLUMiUNO EObIRMENT. RXTURES, AF~E$ AND OTHER APPARATUSES .(EACH PER~ ~10 ~0 to · - MINIMUM FEE - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE IS CALCULATED UNDER ,~CE CENTER A-2 OR A.3 A~ A PLUM~ING PERMIT ~,0 $40 to PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES · B. ECTR~CAL CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT PROCESSING ANO INSPECTION FEES (EACH PER~ -TEMPORARY POWER SERVICE < o,- = 6~0 VOLTS AND ~0 AMPS ~,0 H0 to ' PERMANENT FOWER SERVICE < ~- = 600 VOLTS AND 200 RMp~ - MINIMUM FEE . - OTHER l~.lAt~ MINIMUM FEE kS GU-CULA1ED UNDER SEAMCE CENTER A.2 OR A,3 AS A ELECTRICAL pERMiT ~40 ~40 to ~ct,uo~ P~M~m~ B.Ecr. & ~SX'~R PROCESSING AND IN,,RRECTION FEES - OEMOUTION$ OF RESlDENI~L AND COMMERCIAL 8TRU~RE. PERMIT I~OCF.~81NG AND INSREC~ION FEES - IJ~R OR EXTERIOR PAR~ DEM(x.moN $40 ~10 to - MOVED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE. PERMIT PROCES~NG AND INSPECTION FEES - RESIDENTIAL MOVED STRUCTURE - COMMERCIN. MOVED STRUCTURE S40 t40 to · RESIDENTIAL ~TATE APPROVED MO$1LE HOME AND PRE'MANUFACTURED CONSTRUCTION. PE~T PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES ! MO$1LE HOME WITHOUT PERMANENT FOUNDATION - UOEIILE HOME WITH PERMANENT FOUNDATION NO40 ~4~ to - UO~ILE HOME GARAGE Stto $160 to - UOB;LE HOME ACC;SSORy STRUCTURE$ NO40 S40 to - PRE-MANUFACTURED HOUS;NG $40 $40 $160 $1to to - COMM£RCI~. STATE APPROVED UOSlLE COACH AND F~E-UANUFACTUREn CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT PROCESSING ANO INSPECTION FEES - COUM~ COAC~ ~ - COMMERCIAL PRE-UN'4UFACTURED (PERUANF~ $160 $160 to · COMMERCIAL COACH ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $160 $160 to o CONSTRUCTION TRNLEN (TEMPORARY}. PERMIT PROCESSING ANO INSPEC~ON FEES - RESIDENTIAL RE-ROOF - PER.MIT PROCESS]NG ANn INS~-CTiON FEES NO40 NO to - UIN;MUM FEE (EACH PERMIT, REGA~ OF - COMUERCIAJ. RE*ROOF. PERMIT PROCES~ING AND I NSPL=CTION FEES - MINIMUM FEE {EACH PERMIT. REGA.R~.ESS OF ~ - FOOLS AND SPAS. RER~ PROCE~ING AHD INSRECTH~i FEES $~0 $80 to VaRE.~'~'VR.UE & ~=COalERC'~L ~R RE~EN~U. - SWIMUJNG POOLS · POOl. & SPA $160 $160 to ~ct.u{~.s R,Uka~;, Et~'m3C~ & HEA'r~ - SPA/ IN GROUND $2~0 $2{30 to - SPA/FORTAB. E ~0 too to NO40 NO to ·EACH OF T}~ ABOVE ]NC~.UDES STRUCI~JRN.. MECHANJDA~ PLUMBING, i~=CTR~CAL iN$~O~ AND ~ REV;EW ' RE$;DE,~iTIAL AND COMMERCiaL M~C. - I=ERUIT PROCES.~NG ANn INSPECTION FEES - PAT;O AD0ftlON (EACH PER~, REGARD{.ES8 OF ~ - ANTENNA Ol,~ ~0 ~0 - RETAIN{NG WALL ON FENCING to86 ~; - M~NIUUU FEE - OTHER 'n~AN M]NIMUM (LENGT}~ > to UN FT ) NO NO - STORAGE RACKS~HE~.VES (EACH PERUI~ $0.50 P~R FT $0.5{) PER F to R~ ~ Foot' - STORAGE CONTNNER/SEA'PRAIN (EACH PERMIT) $80 ~80 to - REOUERTED PU~N RENEW FEES $40 NO to REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADnlTION~ OR REVISIONS TO APPROVED R.~NS - REQUESTED SU;LDING INSPECTIONS FEES - SPEC;AL INSREC~ONS . - NORMAL BUS]NESS HOUR8 . o~T$1D~ ~ mJ$iNESS ~OUR~ (2 ~OUR ~ANmUU) ~ ~ to - OUT'DE NORMAL BU~NESS HOUR8 (2 HOUR i/,q~ NO ~4~ to · - TEMPORARy SW. ES LOTS o PERMIT PROCES~NG AND IN~ FEES · TEMPORARY SALES LOT~ · A~ INCt. UDES X)4AS TREE S pJMp1GN LOT~ RR~ BOO,~ PARKWG LOT, TEN[ ~N. ES, ETC A~OVE INCt. UDES STRUCTURE~ AND pRORER~y OWNED ~y A PEDERAL STAll:.. COUNTt, OR C~lY AGERCy ' STREET CUT INdireCTION $175 $t76 $0 R~S~UC~I~D,r ~;~:M~) COS1~. - IN.~:~-~T~ON FEE DEPOSIT A.6 PUBUC [I~ROVEME/~ IM~ECT]ON ' *' · PUBUC It, PlM'V~M~IT INSPECTION . idNNTEN~£ 01ST~0T ~ R~pAf~TION FRE$ $18~.I.40% X V~ S'180..1.40% X VAL VAI~ES prepared by: ~. G&"bem]io 2ot't~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE. SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' ;~lcs CSNTE~ DESCRIFIIOa - - -- (REGARDING ,V~NT~E ~ISTRJCT FORMATIONS · NO COMPUTER DISC PROVIOEO " · COMPUTER O~SC PRO.OEO $1./00,41[SO &OT $1.7004t ~.6S~LO?SO · · APPORllONMENT FEE FOR ~NTENANCE. OIST~Cl'S -~TH CAD OlSC PRO~DED - PER LOT FEE (NO DISC: PROVIOEO), MIN. FEE ~SO.~I SO $0 A-? STREET ENCROACHMENT INS~ECTION 114.00~L07 $14.00a. OT A4 STATE44ANDATSD RRE IN~EGI10N SO SO SO · PRE-INSPECTION CONSULTATION REQUESTS FOR IN NOME C.,A.qE FACEJTIE8 · - 25 OR LESS CUENTS - 26 OR MORE CLIENT8 SOO $SO SO FEEOEI~I~O w~rAI~ Ai~}MAy~ A.~ OIL WELL INSFECTION pM~iUAL} $1l]0 $$00 SO ' - OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL} · REIN~PECTION (IF REQUIRED) ~R $~5 $0 - OIL WELL INSTNJ.ATION $70 ~70 .A.tOF!RE SAFETY REYTEWrd~SPECTION ST0 S~0 SO · REINSPECTION FEE Ip~ HO~R - TENT INSTALLATION (ONE TIME FEE) SSO ~0 SO I~ HOUR - REINSPEOTION FEE $90 ~ SO PER HOUR · Nm/ER HOURS TENT INS?ALLATION ~ ~to SO P~R ~ - AFTER HOUNS REINSPECT1ON FEE $t18 $118 SO · PNNT ~OOTH$ (ONE TiME FEE) ti 18 $t 18 SO ~ HOUR - NEW sP~Ay PNNT BOOTHS · REINSPECTION FEE ' $229 $229 - HIGH RISE INSPECTION FEE ~ $90 - REINSPECTION FEE $1~ $157 SO P~R HO~)~ F~R 2 Ill, PECTinS - FIR~ PROTEGqlON EGUPMENT $1g $t67 SO Pa~ HOUR Fan - 81~NKLER SYSTEM IN&OECTION [COM MERCL~.) - MINIMUM FEE · OTHER THAN MINIMUM (IF OVER 20,000 SQ. Fi'.) $150 $ISO SO 0.0~ X SQ. IT 0.0~ X 8~.IT VARIES - REINSFECT1ON FE~ . SPR~NKLi=R SYSTEM INSPECTION (ADDITIONS I REMO0~.S~ ~0 :~0 $0 - MINIMUM FEE - REINSFEC110N FEE - RRE ALARM 8YS1~bl COMPONENT INSPECTION ~SO ~0 ~0 I~R I~ - MINIMUM FEE - OTHER THAN MINIMUM (OVER 30.000 SQ. IT.) 0.0075 X SQ.FT0.0075 X SQ.FT VA~JES . - REfNSPECTION FEE - COMMERCIAL VENT HOO0 INSPECTION ~0 ~90 SO PB~ HOUR - INSPECT[ON OF EACH AOOITION/~. V~NT ~OOD $1~ SIT/ SO -STAN0PtpE INSPECTION ~SO I~0 SO ~ ~ - INSPECTION OF ONE STANDPIPE - CHARGE FOR EACH N~)ITIONAL STANDPiPE $118 $116 · - REINSPECTION FEE ~3~ ~36 SO - EX~.O~VE5 P~JRCHASE, ~N.E$ & STORAGE INACTION SOO ~S0 SO I~R HOUR INSPECTION & PER~T FEE {IF MATSRtAL TYP~ CHANGES) - RRE? iNSPECTION - EXPLOSNES STORAGE PE~SOT ~212 ~12 SO - REINSPECT1ON FEE ~0 ~30 SO · PYROTECHNICS INsPECTIoN ~10 190 SO ~R ~L~ · NORMAL BUSINESS HOUR8 SOO ~0 SO - ALTER HOURS RATE SOO ~SO SO - AePUCAlION FEE- ~RIL~ PERMIT $118 $118 SO t~R HOUR - OANGERO~S GUll. DING INVESTIGATIONS - INITL~ CONTACT ANO INS!~ECTION SO SO SO - F(~J.OW-Up INSPEC'I~ON$ REQUIREO (EACH OCCURrenCE) ~ ~ SO - LEC, N. ACTION REQUlREO - COMPLAINTS N, ID B4FORCEMENT ~ CCST ~ CO~ SO - INITIAL CONTACT N, IO INSI~CTION SO tO - FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONS RE~UIREO (F.~C~N OCOIJ~I~C~ $147 $147 · LEGAL ACTION ~-QUIREO A.13 HOt~ PROOI~iIS ~ ~ AG'TTL~ ~ tO - iNITIAL INSPECTION / OOCUMENTATION SlS2 $1SO SO - RNST 'tiME HOME BUYERS I~TION 3100 $100 SO - ADDITIONN. INSP"cCTION COSTS I FEES - DEPN~d~TAL PROCESSING COSTS $121 S121 SO - ~LUM~NG S76 I~ SO S76 IZ6 SO -FRAME/FLOOR $S6 S~ SO · MA~MUM CHARGE FOR REHAB INSFEC'llOI~ SOl4 SO14 tO LAND USE REV1EW / PERMITS - BGARO OF ZONING ADJU.eTV~B~IT APPROVAL . OIL V,~LL REVIEW Sl.S~0 $1,~20 $0 ~ tJaE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' Pr~a~l b~. C.C~ 4of12 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS ,-' · EXHIBIT I B-~2 HOME OCCUPATION ~ - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT ~0 ~0 SO · LA~GE FNdiLy DAY ~ t30 ~0 SO B-23 F1RE S~PPRESSIGN · Pffit~IT PROCESSI~ ~J~ p~4N i~:Vl~f i~-B - PAINT BOOTH PLAN RE¥1EW · NOH-FLN~MI~I.E MEOICAL ~ SYSTE~ PLAN REVIEW $10Q SI(]0 SO - E~]STING SPRINKLER SYST'~J ADOITION Fi. AN REV1EW {COMUE~ 40%OF PLAN 40%OF PLAN II~C'~ION INSPEC*RON · SPRfNK~ER SYSTEM ~ RE~qEW (COUUERCIAI.) 40% OF PLA~ 40% OF ~ INSPECT]ON INSI:~cCT]ON SO - RRE N. ARU SYSTEU F~AN REV1EW 75% OF PLA~ 75% OF R.~ II~S~EC"R0~ II~SPECTION · COIdU~ VENT HOOD R.,VI REVIEW 125% OF ~ 125% OF R. AN INSFECT]ON II'k.~PECT;ON SO · ,5TAHORPE SYSTEM F~AN R~'VIEW 40% OF PLAN iNSP. ,4~6 OF PLAN IN$P. ~0 I'l Nx)m0N TO ci~l~ ~P, FEE DJ A.~O -PORT, A~.E U~G STORAGE~OI$1~BUTION (ON;: TIUE FEE FOR BU,~N~SSES WA:~RTAW,.E PROPNIEJ $64 ~4 SO - RRE PREVEN~ON OVERSIGHT $tG¢ $104 I0 B.24 ~GN - PERMIT PRO~ESS~NG AND INSI~CT1ONS FE~S - SIGN, BANNER S4O ~q0 SO - SIGN, ~ER.'~ANENT. FACE CHA~ ~ I40 10 ABOVE INCLUDES STRUCTURAl. ELECTRIC..~. INSPECTION8 ~ RAN I~'~1EW - TENTATIVE pN~Cn MAP RENEW -STANDARD I2,'185 12.186 SO - REVISE0 TERTA'nVE PARCEL ~ REVIEW - STA~0ARD · STANDARD $t.,~ $1.53~ SO . WALL AND LANDSCA2E REVTEW -- S~.040 $I,040 SO - ~UBSTANTIAL CONFORUITY REVIEW S110 $110 -STREET NA~NG S4)0 S,100 SO -EXTENSION OF VESTING P2GHTS Sl15 S115 SO B.2S MINOR LA/~ DM$1ON ~ - LOT UNE A0dUS~ENT SS02 S~02 · OWNER INITIATEO PARCEL MERGGR S902 ~02 SO - ~I~T OF WAY VACAllON (SUMMARY VACA'/1ON ONLY) $1,235 $t,235 - R1GHT OF WAY VACATO N (NOP.-SUUMARY VACATION) S~23S *~OWq $t23~ ~'rI,E,'UAT O~X B~.~ B-27 PREUUINARY PRO.CT I~ · REQUESTED LANO USE & ZONING RE~IEW ~5 ~65 · AOMINISTRAT1V~ ~A,L8 - K)STEO S115 1115 - COMPLETERE~ ~=V1EW S13~ $130 · SOUND EQUIPklENT REGI&TRATION - ZONING CHECd( St0 S10 SO o MINIMUM FEE - NO HF..ARJNG REQUIR~=O $2G0 S2~0 · MA~MUM FEE o HO HF~G REOU1RED 12,~0 S2,5C0 10 - OTHER THAN MINIMUM FEE UP TO MA~MUM .0016~ x VAL .~016~8 · YAL SO - SINGLE ELEMENT S4,7S0 14.7~0 SO B-3Q PUD OR PCO ZONE Ct~tNCE t;3,SS0 ~ SO ~ APPEAL PROCESSING WITHfN THE NGT1CE A.qEA E)C~dPT. · Id]NIIdUM FEE - HO NOTICE I~R~ $I(~ $1C2 SO ~...ENERAL PLAH AJ~.NDI~NT REMEW - ZONE MO{~RCATION REvlEW- MOOIFICATI~ $L27~ $I,27~ ~ S~GN REVIEW -COIdI:~EH~,SNE ~ REt4GN $1.040 SI.0~Q SI) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR Cfl'Y SERVICE CENTERS - EXHIBIT 'A' MAP & IMPRO~IIE~F pi.AN CHECIONG . FINN. P.N~CIB. MAPS S~0.~94.OT S600*S2~OT - ~NG FTA~ ~'~IEW Sl,420 $1,G0 SO - PROJECTS LESS THNd 5ACRES IN $1Z~ S:3(X) S300 SO - PROJECTS GREATER ~ 5 ACRES IN SIZE - SU~iVI$10N TR~T$ · ~/~NF.~ IMFI~:~:IdENT~ ~004~ 16. I(Y,N~qE S30O~'tG.II~ACREYades 128S+0J6% S285 * 0iS'& Varies · A~DI'TIONN. PLAN $UBUITrN. ~ SECOND C~ECK ° MildOR RE'~I$ION TO F~ .4r"'~ PLAH N:%~:~T) 10.O~ 0F O~O FEE 10.0~ OFORIG FEEiQ ' MAJOR I;E~I$10N TO FT.AN AF'fER pi.N4 AppROV~ S2~ 3285 - MA,,~R RE'VlS~ON TO ~ OURING CHECYJNG PR0~$; S286 4, 0.65~ ~ + 0.66% V, mes 8-3S DEVWt-OP&KNT TIME ~N I~'ViEW $285+0.86% $285 ,, 0,~6% Va~es · REQUEST FOR CONT~NII4HCE S570 S570 SO 8,*39TRAFRC &a. AJ~QNG ~ REVIEW $105 $105 9-40 CGRTIRED U~FE~ PROGR~I AG~--'y (CUp~ F~S $t52 $152 SO · MATEPJ~. ~ 2 $101 $101 SO · t~ ~ 3 S217 S2'17 SO · MXTER~ T,~E $ S402 ~ SO · MA'TE~ TYI~ 6 $t62 $152 SO - Iv~TE~tAL 'T~ 7 $3O0 S300 SO · MATE~N.'TypE 8 S451 S451 SO · MATERIAL TYPE 10 $2t7 S217 SO -MATE~ TYPE 12 S520 $52O ,SO -MA~'WPG 13 ~ S,~)4 :SO - MA'T'~AJ. TYPE 14 S~C0 S,100 SO · M~TYPE 15 S520 S620 SO · MA~'T'(PE 16 S554 S5~4 SO - MA'~D~N. ~ 17 IN~PECTION FEE S,583 S583 SO - MATE~ TYPE 't6 SUALL QTY GGNERATOR I~0 S60 SO · PERMIT 8¥ RULE St 15 3115 SO · CONDITTONALLy AUTHORJZ~ S242 S242 SO - OVER~iGHT FOR EN~RONMENTAL SG~/IC£8 $182 $192 SO - FOLLOW-Up ON ~$ WASI~ VIOLATION. FEE ~ HO~R S104 $104 SO · ~$)C UGT PR~ON PLAH FEE. CHN~,E pER HOUR Ft;R H(:X,*R C:~t~GE - SITE ,,~SESSMENT & CLEANUP OVER,,R~C4~T. ~ p~ HOUR SI04 $'~04 SQ ' UND~UND ~TORAC~ TAHK ~1~$3Gl.fl'. C~L4,~G ~ HC~JR S104 St04 SO - $ PgJ,. PRE--ON CONTR(~. & COUNTERMEA,~JR~ F~ $104 $';M SO PE~ ~ C:t4N:~3E · F'L~-'N~OUS MA~ HANOL~ ANNL~ iNSPEC'TX~ F~ $104 $104 SO - EACH ADOt'TTON~L 15 MINtJTES (IF NECE~,ARy) $52 $52 SO · UNOERG~OUND STORAGE TANK PERM~P8 S26 $26 - NEW TANX INSTALLATION - REIN-~aECTION FEE S~52 $8~2 SO -ANNUAL OPERATING ~ S~6 ~ SO . TANI( aO0~RCATION $79 ~ SO · MINOR TANK MODiRCATION S852 ~ SO · TANK REMOVAL $150 $150 SO -STATE SURCHARGE ~ ~ SO - ;"I,~TARI~ WASTE PERta?8 FEE SET 8Y STAI~ - OVERSIGHT FOR RISK I/ANAGEUENT Pf~VENT~ON ~ FI~ SET BY 8TAIT - UNDERGROUN~ STORAGE TAHX PE~SETS FEE SET 8Y STATE FEE - ABOVE G~UIdD ~ UQUlD STORAGE TANK INST, AU. AIlON INSPECTION - INSTALLATION IN,~I~:CT1 ON OF ONE TANK - CHA~G~ FOR EACH A~X}ITIONA, L TANK $160 $160 SO o INSPECTION OF TANK REMOVAL S25 S25 SO · ANNUAL FEE F0R GENEI~'I1NG 10 OR MOI~ WASTE '/I~ES; ,fE~ B4t CUL1URAL I~OURCE REVIEW 336 S;6 SO B-(2 EX~IROMEHT.N. REVIEW 1250 S250 SO B-t4 tMOE~OVEI~.OAD REVIEW t2.SO0 t2.500 SO .SINGLE ~p · ANNUAL ~ S16 $18 SO - $PEC~J. SISMCG CHN~GE ~0 SSO SO ~ S~6 SO CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' C. PURLIC INFORMATIOH SERVICES c~1 FIRE REPORT COPY ~ ROUCE RECORDING DUPUCA*I1ON ~ERMCE S5 ~ POUCE PHOTOGRAPH CO~y la - FIRST PRINT -AO0~'nONAL PR;NTB (EAC,) 8 X ~0 ~7 .'~orno~aL P~NTS (EAC,) 5X? t7 · AOOI~ONAL PRINTS (EACH} 4 X $ $6 16 . - DIGITAL IUAG~NG SALE ~5 C-54 0OCUMENT PRINTING ANO ~OP*flNG $7 $7 - PHOTOCOPYING CHARGES · STANOARD & LEGAL 81ZED DOCUMENTS - POUCE CRIME REPORTS .ACT1JAL COST ' ACTU~ COST - REQUESTS BY SUBPOENA - DIRECT LABOR COSTS (TO LOCATE & COMPILE RECORDS) $15 1!6 - PHOTOCOPYING - CO~E; FROM UICRORLU 10 · OTHER nlRECT CHARGES $0 - REQUESTS FOR PU~UC [~ORDS AC'IUAL COST ACTUN. COST - O~RECT LABOR COSTS 0'0 LOCATE & COUPILE RECORDS) ~ $181 HR UAX $16 I - PHOTOCOPYING C~IARGE$ - CORES FROM UICRORLM $0 · OI~ER 01RECT & INDIRECT CHA,qGEs $0 ~0 - HEARINGS ANO APPEN.8 - APPEAL (OTHER THAN PLANNINGXNO CHARGE FOR IaEI~IT 8UBPt;NBtON~"ilON APPEAL) $10! S10l - RESEARCH & CERT1RCATION S334 1334 - AGEROA ! MINUTES UAIUNG SERVICE. CHARGE PER Y.AR - COUNCIL .a~ENDA PACY~=I*. CHARGE P~R PACKET PER MEETING $70 S70 C-~ MUNIOPAL COOE SUPflLEI~Em' ~30 ~ ' PUBUCWOR, KEII~OI~VAT10# $69 - SUBDP,~$ION/0EB~GN UANUAL - TRAFFIC VOLUME BOOIQ.ET . SI$ O - PUBUC SAFETY D-61 BUSIRE~ I~I.MION . - AOULT ENTERTNNV~NT · NEW APPUcA'nON - EUFLOYEE PERMIT $1,:~8 L W~SSAGE ES?AI~sHMENT$ . ~0 ia) ' ~E TECHNiCiAN $134 · NEW APRJCATION ' NEW JLoPUOAT~ON - ESCORT / OA'nNG SERMCES ' $18 $16 - RENEWAL AF~UCA~ION $282 1282 - EMPLOYEE. NEW S135 $135 - EMPLOYEE · RENEWAL S73 S73 - RETAIL 8ALES OF FIREARM8 PERMrr $46 ~6 · UOU~OAT&ON (CLOBEOU'q ~ SS;' - BINGO - NEW PERMIT ~ S;29 · BINGO ' RENEWAL FR~RMrT ~9 - SECONO HAN0 OEALER~ rflNERaNT ~29 MERCHAHTE, PUBUC 0ANCE HN.LB, 0UTOOOR FE~ HOUSE AOOaES8 CU~8 PNNT1N~,EWTLRy~ - BAIL 6ONO OWN F.R/AG B, II'S;SOU Ct TOl~ $15 $t5 o POSHCART FO~D VE~DOR~ 1170 $170 ~,-~ 1~4 13)4 -CONCEA. ED ~ PERUIT · UUOU~NE DRNER PERMIT - TAX] DRIVER PERMIT I;15 $15 - TAXI DRNER PERU[T RE~*WN. $15 $16 - TAX] OR~ PER~IT ~ $10 :' CITY OF BAKERSFIELD :' PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 : FOR CiTY SERVICE CENTERS · EXHIBIT 'A' NUMI]ER SI~/IC~ ,~-.m i ~,,R D~a~, ~ ~)H FEE~ FEES . TAXi DRNER PERUIT DUPUCATE - AMBULANCE VEHICLE INSPECTION $4 H - UIdO 'VEHI(~....E INS PECTfON S2Q S~0 SO 14~ C~YO~NE ~f'Q~ - TAXI VEHliA.E INSPECTION S20 $~} ~ HAZARDOUS MATERIAL R~SPON~ $'194 $194 - PERUIT RENEWAL DEUNGUENCY PENN.'P( $15 $15 - CHARGE AFTER 5TH FALSE ALARU $1 $1 - CH~GE AFTER 10TH FN..3E ALARM $11t $11t SO 0-68 S~ECtAL EVEHT SA.cb'Ty SERVICES $192 S192 · * POUCE · 2ND RESPONSE TO LOUD PART1E~ A~ CO,ST ACTU~ COS. T SO · cHARGE IOER APPUCANT ~.R ·D-71 Y EHICLE CODE ENFORCEkflENT $10 $t0 SO - UNUCENCED DR/VER FEE (INO..UDE$ TOWING CHARGE} S39 $~9 13'72~HOOL CROWING GUARD ~ERVIr_,E D-73 PAI~ONG ORDII~HC~ E['FORCE~ENT SO ~0 D.74 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES WA N/A · LABOR (::0ST PER IN,~ECTOR PER HOUR - COST OF UA]~RIN. S $43 $43 D-?$ ANJMAL REGULATtON ACTUN. COT ,~C1UAL COST SO -OUPUCATE UCE~E $10 $10 ~0 ' NOFEE NOFEE - DANGEROUS A,'~UN. CPER YEAR IN ADDITION TO FEE BELOW) $120 S120 - NON-COMPUANCE - ONE YEAR OPTION · 'IWO YEAR OPTION S~0 S60 SO - THREE YEAR OPTION StZI S120 -.ALTERED DOG S150 St60 SO - ONE YEAR OPTION · - ONE YEAR OPT~0N/SE~R CJTIZEN DISCOUNT SIS S15 SO - '/WO YEAR OPTION S5 S5 · ~ YEAR OT]ON/SENIOR CfllZEN DISCOUNT S25 S~5 - 'I~REE YEAR OPTION $10 SIO S0 ia0 S3) SO · 'It4REE YEAR OPTtON/SENiOR C~H DI~UNT 316 315 - I(ENNEL · KENNEL: PER YEAR FOR OVER 20 DOGS · KENNEL: PER YEAR FOR 11 TO 20 DOGS S100 3100 SO ' · KENKEL: PER YEAR 140 00G3 S'/5 S~5 - CATS S50 ~ · (~,'VN ER I.D. TAG (OPTIONAL):. I:q~R CAT PER YEAR S6 S8 SO - DUPUCATE UCENSE - WTLD OR EXOTIC .~J41MAL8. ADMU'41$TRATIVE FEE S5 S~ SO - ONE (1) OR MORE ANIMALS PER YE, AR 30 - INSPECTTON$ TO E]~URE C~MFUANCE S160 SlE0 SQ - CHAR~E$ FOR OARE AND FEEDING - ANIMALS: UP TO 'II,LBS., PER OAY PER .A~MAL $~$ $15 - IMPOUND FEES - DOG8 UCEI~iED . UNAL~ FIRST IMPOUNDMENT ~5 $~5 -ALIEREO, FIRST 114PO~ND~ $~$ $15 ($UB~EGUEm' ll~E~r$ ~ ~IARGED SAME RA1E ,1~ U~IUCE]~E~ DOGS) - DOG~ UNUCENSED · P, RST IMPOUNDMENT ~40 ~ · SECOND IMPOLWDI4E~T ~0 ~a0 - IN A~q'ION TO CARE AJ~ID FEEDING AND IMPOUN~ FEE~ N~iD FiNE~ ~20 ~20 - ~ Ih4POUh'DME~ $15 $16 30 · SECONO IMPOUI40UENT S50 ~t0 SO - ~COND IMPOUNDMENT - $150 $150 · Tit]RD AND SUGSEOUENT IUFOUNDUF~IT~ $300 ~00 SO CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' ~ - RR~T ~MPOUNDMENT - THIRD ANO SUBSEQUENT IMPOUNDMENTS ~ ·IMPOUND RNES FOR UNALTERED CATS AND DOGS -f~X) ·FIRST OCCURRENCE · THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT OCCURRF. NCES $50 ~0 · REDEUFTION AND ADOPTI0f~ SERVICE CHARGES $'~00 1100 - VACCINATIONS, DOG OR CAT, EACH · FLEA AND TICK DIP, EACH ANIMAL ACTUAL COST ACTUAL · FEUNE LEUKEU~A TEST $5 · ASOFTiON FEES ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST -I~CAT - ADOPTION FEES FOR OTHER ANIUN..8 TO BE DETERMINED 8Y THE O~RECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERV1CES · RESPONSE TO LOOSE, INJURED OR OEAD ANIMALS VARIABLE VARIABLE S,10~OUR ' SUTHANASlA AND nlSPOSAL OF CATS AND DOGS AT OWN~R,S REQUEST - DEUVERED TO THE SHELTER, RER N~ - PICKED UP ~Y ANIMAL CONTROl., PER ANIMAL NO (~ NO CHARGE RECREATION I CULTURAL B82 RAJUC FACiU'Pf RENTAL RESIDENT - CENT~N~J. PLAZA - PARK AREA RENTAL.ONE AREA W/ALCOHOL 1:~-4HR PJOCK - F. ACH ADDIT~ON,~L HOUR ~40 - PARK AREA RENTAl.. EACH ADDITIONAL ARF~ $10 . EACH ADDI*I1ONAL HOUR ~20 - SPORTS RELD RENTAL ~5 ~ , 10% OF GRO~ RECEIPTS IF 'FOR PROR'I' AND ACTUAL CHARGES FOR ANY ~f ONN- COSTS SUCH AS RB-D PREP WORK THAT MAy BE iNCURRED} 'l~l~t - S~RTS RB.D LiGHTiNG -WITH OUT FACIUTY RESERVATION (NON REP, JNDA~J~ $10 $~0 - OPEN TO THE PUBUC. SPECIAL EV~ RESERVATION FEE {~'~ED ON SiZE OF EVENT, ADD~ C~'(ARGE8 WIU. BE INCt~EO BASED ON ACI~AL COST~) $100 S100 - RESCHEDUI. JNG FEE ON FACIUTY RENTALS ~5 - CANCEU.ATION FE~ ON FAClUTY RENTALS ~1 HON-RES1DENT $14 $14 · PARK AREA RENTAL. EACH ADDitiONAL .U:IEA $t2 S12 - EACH ADDmOHN. HOUR ~25 (R-US 10% OF GROSS RECBPTS IF "FOR PRORi- AND ACIUAL CHARGES FORANy ~60 ADDI'nONN. COSTS SUCH AS Finn pREp WOP~ THAT MAy BE INCURflED) · SPORTS RB.D UGHT1NG "UJ$CELt. ANEOUS PARY. S SERMCE8 $8 · ALCOhOl. PE~,UT · W1THOUT FAC~.ITY RESERVA'~ON (NON REr"UNOA~L~J · OPEN TO THE PU~,.IC - SPECIAL EV~ RESERVATION FE~ $12 (&~Sc'D ON SIZE OF EVENT, A~D't. CHARGES WlU. BE INCURRED ~ ON AC'JUAJ. COSTS) $125 $t25 - RESCHEDUUNG FEE ON ;AC~UTY RENTALS $25 -CANC~..LATION FEE ON FACIUTY RENTALS $8 E*,~ RECREATIOH CF~ RENTAL $14 S14 -CA~ A- ~N RRo~'n'. ~ ~ TO ~ ~ ~OVVlNO ~ ~ K'OR ONE I.(QUR ~ R~NTjM.. A 1WO HQUR ~UW R~,4TAL ~ - ULK- ROOU RENTAL - CONFERENCE ROOM $0 ~; CITY STAFF CHARGES ~ '. ~lr '. 8UF'E.~S~ON ( 2 ~QUR . - SILVER CREEK COUUUNIIY CENTER- EACH . - OTHER ~ SURCHARGE AFTER 10 RkL · CHARGE PER HOUR ~0 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD · ' ' . PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CiTY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT "A" CENTER S~ ~.~el r.~ ~.~,,i ;u 4 NUk~ER ~ FEES · CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR MIN]MU~ ACTU~ ~ ~ COST "CATEGORY B ' PRIVATE LrSE - ALL CtlANGE$ TO T~E 9U~UC pRO~BiTEO S0 PER HOUR C~.~RGE R~OUIR~:D, AN EXTENDED HOUR RATE 6CHEDL~.E IS AYNLABLE UPON REQUEST) · I~.K. ROOM RENTAL - WIU. IN~ ;~L .T1PURP0$E ROOM (G,~ ~0 t30 - .to - KITCHEN (WITH ROOM RENTAL) too too SO - ,- SURCHARGE ~ 10 P.M.- CHARGE ~ HOUR ~1 $4 to · · SU~ION { 2 HOUR UIN1 - CUSTOOULL { 2 HOUR UIHIUUU) ACIUAL COST ACTUAL CO81' - to PER HOUR - SILVER CREEK COUMUNITY CENTER. EACH ROOM ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST to · COVERED PAVIUON ~0 150 to - KITCHEN (WITH UEET1NG ROOId RENTAL) ~15 145 to FEE · · TABLE AND CHNR 6ET UP $]2 $12 to FE; Re:t~'ra . OTHER USE SURCHARGE N:TER 10 P,U. CHARGE P~ HOUR ~ L~ to # c; ~ · SUPERMSION { 2 HOUR U~NIMUM) - CUSTODIAL ( 2 HOUR IdINIUUU) ACTUAL CUST ACTUAL COST to PER HOUR E-a4 CITY N)ULT PRCGRN~ AND AC1M11E~ ACTLLaL CCST ~T1W~ COST to , · CITY ADULT VOLLEYB~L PROGRAM · PRIVATE LEAGUES :i100 :11SO to - CITY ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRAM ACTUAL CO~' AC11JAL CCST to '- LEAGUE ENTRY FEE PER TEAU W(TH OFFICIALS · PRNATE LEAGUES $35 to5 SO ~ ;ER ~ . CiTY ADULT BASKETBALL PROG~AU ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST to - UEN8 PROGR*M - CITY LEAGUE - UEN8 PROGRAM. PRIVATE LEAGUES 1350 ~ to KuS · DROP4N$ ATHLETICS PROGRAU 0dLK) ,ACTUAL COST ACTUAL COST to - ADULT FLAG FOOTaALL - CHN:~GE PER TEAU o ADULT $POR?S TOUI~IAUENT$ $23 ~ to ~ ;~R I'EAU - ADLq. T PUSUC COURTS TEAM TENNIS SO.0% OF CO,ST~.0% OF CO~T ~ · PER PLAYER ~ $97 SO - CORF~RATE ~ CHAJ~. CHARGE PER TEAM :116 $16 SO R~SIDENT - CiTY YOUTH FLAG FOOTBALL PROGRAM · CITY YOUTH FLAG FOO11)AU. FROGRAU · C~TY YOUTH 8OFTBaLL PROGRAM $25 $25 to - Cn'Y YOUTH 80FTSALL PROGRA~ - C11~ YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAU ~ 120 $0 lm.S ~ - Cn'Y yOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAU - YOUTH SPORTS TOUI~,AMENT$ .~0 t40 to ~'~ ma mr · CNOSS COURTRY EVENT 50,0~ O~ ,0OTT50.0% OF CO~T tO - YouTH SPORTS CLINICS. C~ARGE P~ER PLAYER ~ CUNIC $20 ~0 to - VARIOUS YOUT~ EXCURSION8 C~ROE ~a ~ 50,0% 0F COST 50.(P& OF COST SO TO P. ECOVER ~mr, ~ EXCt,e~ cam*a A LATE FEE W',U. BE CHARGED OF :11.SO PER MINUTE. Up TO 15 UINUTE$ IF CHI,LO I$ NOT PICKED UP BY Q.0$1NG 11ME. * ~ - YOUTH DAY CAUP - I~.R WEEK ~ $35 ~0 11~ EqU~TEaTO St m DAy · C)J4CEU. AI~CH FEE :1110 S110 SO FEE HM NOT ~C~EA~D amcE 2oee · YOUTH CRO.~ COUNTRY CLUB S75 ~5 · IH-LIHE HOCKEY $10 :110 to .- ~EE W~E SPORTS ' ~9 ~2 to · PART~ MOBILE $20 $20 to · ' NOIlly' :1t2 :112 SO - ~ YOUTH BA~K~ ~ - YOUTH SPORTS TOURJ%U~ENT$ ~0 S50 SO - F)R~ REGIS'f~AT1ON S3 S3 SO - LATE REGISTRATION $4 $4 to - VA.~OUS YOUTH EXCUR,10N$ 50,0~ OF COST 50.0% OF COST $0 ~ ~ A LATE FEE W~LL BE CNA~ OF :11.SO I~R UINU/~. UI~ TO 16 MINUTES IF CHJ1.D ]$ NOT ~ICXED UP BY Q.OSJNG - ULK YOUTI'I DAY GAMP. 7 WEEK ~ $45 $45 to ' YOU'TH DAY CAMP ' PE~ VI~T~T( $14~ :1140 SO · CANCEU.A'T1ON FEE $75 S75 SO - YOUTH CRO,I$ COUNTRY ~UB - ~GH ~CHOO_ 8UM~[R LEAGUE8 ~lO S40 - IN.UNE HOCKEY ~0 tso SO P~by: C. Garbemito 10 of 12 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ~. PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS ~' EXHIBIT 'A' - PARTY MOBILE ~n ~0 · SILVER CREEK AFTER SCHOOl. PROGRAM $100 $~00 ~0 ~ ~ TO E-~ AQUATIC PROGRAJ~ o I~CI~=ATIOHAL $~tI~ING $15 $t5 $0 ~ ~ ~ ~ RESIDENT - RECREATIO~ SWIM o DNLY (61L~'R CREEK, MU( & JEFFERSON) ~2 ~2 ~) - RECREATIONAL SWiU · DNLY o UCUURTREY FACIUTy t3 ~ $0 · RECREA'noNAL 6W~U*MCUURTREY FACiUTY-6EASON p~.~ $1~0 $150 ~0 ,,FAUILY PA,S,,~E~(GOO0 FOR FNdILY OF 4)UCUURTREY FACIUTY -FAMILY DAY PASS -FAMILY 30 DAY PA~8 $10 $10 .-FAM, y SEASON PA88 $2~0 1250 · RECREATIONAL SWiM · PUNCH PASS ~ ~ (SILVER CREEK, MLK, & JEFFERSON) ~5 S56 t0 - RECREATIONAL SW~M. PUNCH PASS - UCMURTREY FACIJ. JTy ~0 $80 - LAP SW1U DAJLy. AIJ. POOL~ -LAP SWIM-ANNUAL pA,SS :~0 ~ ~ - WATER U OM ES ~0 ~300 tO - PER PERSON (~3.00 DISCOUNT FOR FAMILY OF RVE OR MORE) $3 $3 - SPECIAL AOUA'~C EVENT~ (PER PAR~C~pAHT o PER DAY) ~ ~ - SWIM INSTRUCTOR TRNNING · NEW UFEGUARD TRAJNING ~ ~30 10 RERECTa tCRJR.~T ~*rlUUm~ · RENEWAL UFEGUARD TRNNING I60 $60 S0 -AQUAT1C PROGRAM8 ' ~0 150 $0 RB:LEC~ .~m~. CO~T OF *nua4;~ - 8WIUUING LESSONS - SWIM LESSONS - F~ATE LESSoNs * ALL POOLS $40 $40 $0 - COMPETITIVE 81MUUING. ALL POOLS St0 $10 $0 ~E H~a NOT ~ ~.L POOL~ EXCEPT MCMURTREy. MiNiMUM FEE FOR Up TO ~ $.50 $0 ~ S0 PEOI:~E- .SIZE OF POOL PARTY WILL DETERMINE AOO, L COSTS FOR L]FEGUAR08 ADDED TO MINIMUM FEE) - POOL PAR'IY RENTAL.RECREATIONaL POOL. MCMUR~ FAC[UTy '$~0 $~0 (MINIMI.~M FE~ FOR UP TO 50 PEOPLE 8J~ ~ POOL PARTY ~aLL ~ ~ 8wl4 0ETERMINE ,aDDL COSTS FOR UFEGUARD8 ADOEO TO MIN. FEE) ' POOL PARTY R~q'AL.*COUPE11Ti'v~ PO(X. o MCMURT~ FACaJTy $130 $130 $0 [MINIMUM FEE FOR UP ?O 50 PEOPLE. 81~ OF pO~L pAR, Ty W1LL DETERMINE ADOL CO8T8 FOR UFEGUARDS ADDEO TO MIN. FEE) -POOL PARTf RENTAL..SPECIAL PARIY FEE , : ~ $4~HR GOLO LEVEL-FOOD, DRiNKs.a.NO CAXE (15 PEOPLE M~N.) $~8,1~0N $18arRSON $~LVE LEVEL-FOOO AAIO OR]aK8 (15 PEOI4..E MIN.) SIS/P~RSON . $1~0N : bgMM CLUB RENTAL · HOURLY (EXCEPT MC~RTREY) ~w0 ~40. Si) · SWIM CLUB RENT.AL. HOURLy. U¢IdURTREY FACILITY ~ ~0 . $4) (RE~TAL OF 8 - 25 YARD I,.ANE$) ~W~M Ct. UB RENT.~.*~=R L,~IE FEE(FOR 25YI. ANE~ t625~R&,N - $'MM Q.UB REHT~. HOURLY- UCUUR'T~ FAClUTY (RF..NT~L OF $. 50 METER LANEb') S110 Silo ~ .-SWIM CLUB RENT,aL.PER LANE FEE(Iq3R 50Y LANES) $10,'~RA.N - RECREATIONAL SWIM. DAJLY (SILVER CREEK, MU( & JEAN) ~2 =1~ $0 - RECREATIONAL SWIM - OAILY · UCuURTI~ FACILITY $3 ~3 ~ maWR GU~t'W -RECREATIONAL b~l~ OAY PASS-MCMURII~Ey FACII.~Y $85 ~ ..RECREATIONAL 6WIM-6F. ASON PA6S. MCMURTR~ FAC3..[TY $180 $'180 -FAMILY PAS~S{OOOD FOR F.M~LY OF 4~,~URTREY FAC3UTY ,~ -FA/~LY DNLY PA88 $'11 '$'rl -FAMILy 30 OAY pA88 ~300 ~3C0 ..FAMILy SEA~ON PA88 ~700 $7~0 - RECREKrlONAL $1MU - PUNCH PA68 - IdCMUR~ FACJUW SIGQ $1.o ~o F~ m Go~o ~e ~ POOL . - LAP bgMM DAJLy - ALL POOLS ' $3 S3 SO - LAP ~U- PUNCH pA.~ .SI15 · SIIS $4) 4.AP bgMM-30 DAY pA,.~ ~3S ~S PER~ON CS3.00 D/$CO4JNT FOR FAA41t.y OF FIVE C~R ~ ~3 S~ I0 / oSPECUU. AQUATICEVENTS(PERPART~PAHT.P~RDAy) ~ ~w~ $1) .... ~'" - 'iR,~N~NG · SW~ M IN,gTRUCTOR TRN/~ $30 S3Q ~0 ..AOUATIC PRC~ · PRIVATE LESSONS - ALL POOLS $~S $7S ~0 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CITY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'A' - 81MM LESSON~ AT ~ - COIdP~11TIVE b'~IUMING. N.L pOOLS $15 $15 to (ALL PO~LS ~ MCMU R'TREY, MINIMUM FEE FO~ UP TO 50 PEOP',.E- 812~ OF POOL PARI'Y WIU. DE~N~ AOOL CO~T$ FOR UI~ ADOE0 TO MINIML~I FEE) ' POOL PARTY RE~TAL'RECREAT~ONAL POOL ' MCI~ FAC~ $115 $115 tO (MINIMUM FEE FOR UP TO to PEOPLE. 81Z; OF POOL PARTY WlLL DETERMINE AOD~. C01T8 FOR UFEGUA~ AOOEO TO MIN. FEE) · POOL PARTY RE~TAL~-,OIdP~ POOL. I~ClaUR, ii~y FN:ajIy $155 $155 tO (~MUI~ F~E FOR UP TO 50 PC-OPt. F_ ~ OF POQ. PARTY WILL DETERMINE AOO~L CORT8 FOR UF;GUAROSAOOEO TO laN. FEE) - SWIM CLUB RENTAL o HOUrLy. MCMURTREY FACIliTY ~ ~ tO ~EN'i'AL OF 8 · 25 YA.RO LANES) - SWIM CLUB RENTAL. HOURLY - UCMURTREY FACILITY $140 1140 (RENTAL 0F 8 - $5 METER LANE~ LB~URE b'q..A~ES · MLK LF. ISURE Q. ASSE8 · NONatESIOE~T$ $5 tO · CITY PlqOVIOE$ FACILrI'Y I7' $7 tO - CONTRACTOR FRCMOE$ FACILITY tO tO tO F · I~ISCELLANEOUS FEES F-~ PROCES~IHO SCHOOL FAClUI'Y FEES ~7' $5? F-94 coI~I'~R DATA $10 1,10 F~ ECONOMIC 0L~ELOF~IEN7 FEE~ ACIUAL COST AC~ CO~T 0 - FNR HOUSING WORI(SHOP FEE · TOP FLOOR RENTAL 1300 ~300 F-~ GEOLOGICAL ~R~ S'l~ USE $150*$12; HR 11tO~$121 HR 0 F-91 CHE¢I( I:OLLEGq'ION $220 ~220 F.~ CITY COUNCIL (:HAMSER REHI'AL $15 $15 tO F-99 BRO~ CHARGI~; FOR CrW ~OUl~L (;HAM~ to00 13~0 tO - EQUIPMENT CHARGES - ~IDEO FP, ES~II'ATION - STAFF CriNgES $1o0 1'1oo tO c,~ · TAPE OUPUOATTO~I ACTLU~L COST .aCTUAL ~ F-lie BUSlI'~b'~ UCENSE PRO CEb'81N~ FEL~: ACllJAL CO81' ACTLiAL COST 0 . INITI~L BUEINE88 UCEN~E PROCESSING ~ $5 · RENEWAL BUSINE8~ UCENSE PROCE~INO $5 Ss Praeamd by:. C. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2005 FOR CiTY SERVICE CENTERS EXHIBIT 'BI ;. SERVICES A-10 FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION · APPUCATION FEE- FIREWORK§ PERMIT · FIREWORKS BOOTH PERMIT FEE NEW FEE S40 $40 NEW FEE $101 I300 $199 INCREASED FEE FAA Contacts (Western Pacific Region) - · Mark McClardy, Manager Airports Division (310) 725-3600 · Tony Garcia, Compliance Specialist (310) 725-3634 · John Mi!ligan, Supervisor- Standards Section (SoCal) (310) 725,3621 Summary of Leases - · 12 Owner Hangars ($50/mo.) · 6 Tie-Downs ($40/mo.) · 7 Community Hangar ($100/mo.) · 17 T-Harigar ($160/nio.) · 6 Hex-Hangar ($180/mo.) · 5 Shadeport-Watts ($65/mo.) · 4 Shadeport-Quad ($75/mo.) · 1 Gate Lease ($50/mo.) · 16 Ground Lease (varies up to $60/mo.) · 8 Co .mmercial Leases ($3,51.9.09/mo.) · Restaurant Ground Lease