Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display ID:}Ref°°°312 David Couch I~ i Referral Created: Requestor: ] ~ Ward: Req. Completion Date: 1'i'213012002 I Meeting: 1i2/11/2002 ........................................ i [12/18/2002 ~] Initial Referral Information Short Description: IORDINANCE RE:MOLTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Long Description: ***REFERRA.U TO URBA_,~ DEVE.UOPY-~ COI~,I'rT~i"R.E*** Er.EME~T$'OF THE ORDI~Ai~CE ~ ~2ARKTIqG BY THE URBA~ DEVEI~OPYIEI~ COlVR~I'rTTEE. Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Lead: ~ Assigned To: Response? ~ I (1) urban Dovolopmont Corem Reassigned To: Response? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: · ../F°lderPage?Page=Referral%2524Display&FolderlD=EWORKSEwoRK$00000158&Laura2~25~2003 Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display ' ,D: iRefooo31o Requestor: [D,?..v.!d.~....C...,o,?,C,b ........................................................ i .......... RefermlCreated: Req. Completion Date: 1~.~.~,.,2..~,,2. ........... 1 Initial Referral Information Short Description: GENERAL PLAN POLICIES Lon§ Description: ***~'R.R_.~ ~'~0 U'R~A~ D'~V~T,OP~RN"2**., ' ~.". COUNC'r~,Y~ENB]~RSi.'OOUC~,' B~.NFJ~ & HAGGARD ~L~.R~]~D :'ADDTr2TO~A~ D~TN~?3'O~ O~ "~NcoURAG~-.-"~" 0~': COUN'2¥ T$~.&N-D ANN~2TON; ~ 0U-~S .~'O]Z SUS s~O~s;' UAYS ~0 US~ ~Z,~.C~.T¢ C~S ~ . SOT.AR US~. OP?TO~S. 9¥ D~;V~LO2]~RS; LzG~ 20~,UT:~O~ C0~C]~NS; A~c~t B ~ GRO~E 90~A~SS ~ ~S~A~ ~5;. ~N~0~O~ k~R QU~; US~ O~ ~ 9~O~RS; A ~O~OR~ 0~ ~OWS ZN ~W CO~RC~ DS~O~S; ~ ~C~ O~ " ~d:-- ~sisn~ To: E~po~e? Rmssi~ To: R~pome? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Ad~s: Add.s: Phone: Phone: .../FolderPage?Page=Referral%2524Display&FolderID=EWORKSEWORK$00000155&Launt2/25/2003 December 4, 2002 Honorable Congressman William "Bill" Thomas United States Congress - 21st District 4100 Truxtun Avenue - Suite 220 Bakersfield CA 93309 Subject: City of Bakersfield Municipal Airport Dear Congressman ThomaS: The Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L-45) lies in close proximity to the ILS outer marker of Meadows Field (BFL). This creates a potential conflict for inattentive or unfamiliar pilots departing L-45. and flying into the ILS flight path of BFL. There have been several incidents requiring evasive action from pilots of commercial airlines over the past several years. It may be only a matter of time before a tragic accident occurs due to the proximity of these airports. We initially requested the change from Class "D" airspace to Class "C" airspace from Mr. William C. Withycombe, Administrator, Western Pacific Region, FAA in March 2000. This would require pilots using L-45 to notify the tower at BFL of their movements. His response was that BFL does not meet the criteria for Class "C" airspace and therefore.could not be changed. We requested he reconsider the decision and the response again was that the airspace designation could not be changed.' A copy of the most recent request for airspace modification is attached hereto. We believe that the safety of the flying public should be considered a priority when considering this change, rather than entirely adhering to limiting criteria. The traffic control staff at BFL control tower has been supportive of the change in airspace classification, as they too are concerned about the safety of the commercial airlines on their approach to BFL. Due to the safety concerns, the City of Bakersfield has even considered closure of the airport. However, this option appears highly unlikely. Therefore, we are requesting your assistance to change the airspace at BFL to Class "C" which would resolve the safety concerns. Since it appears this cannot be done through normal-channels, would you present special legislation to accomplish the airspace change, or is there another approach through the FAA that we may take? We look forward to a positive response regarding our request. --- ECEIVED HARVEY L. HALL - Mayor ~ / Attachment ~ 0~-(~ I 0 c: Alan Tandy, City Manager, City of Bakersfield Raul Rojas Public Works Director, City of Bakersfield ,~iTY ~IANAGER'S OFF~___C_.[.~., 1501 Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3770 ° Fax (661) 326-3779 E-mail address: mayor@ci.bakersfield.ca.us BAKERSFIELD a~truM, ao~^s PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT aa~on.u/~awoou m~a~roa, crrv ~O~ PU~UC woar, s ona~o~s November 25, 2002 Mr. William C. Withycombe, AWP. 1 Regional Administrator Federal Aviation Administration, Western Pacific Region ,'i~ii.. :.:. '.:.":,"... P. O. Box 92007, WWPC Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Air Safety .::.. ,. Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L-45) ....... " Dear Mr. Withycombe: As you are aware the City of Bakersfield is concerned with air safety between traffic of Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L-45) and Meadows Field (BFL). In the past we had requested that the airspace designation at BFL be upgraded to Class C, which would incorporate L-45 and allow air traffic controllers to monitor traffic at both airports. You have previously denied the designation change because it has not met minimum FAA guidelines. We are requesting that you review the conditions again for changing the BFL airspace to Class C or Class C from 1500' - 3000'. We believe this change in airspace would alleviate our safety concerns and protect the ILS to Meadows Field. We would accept any other ideas that you may have to control traffic that would further protect the ILS into Meadows Field. The City of Bakersfield remains concerned about aircraft safety and would like a remedy to the conflict of airspace between BFL and L-45. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yo~ur~e~~ ad B. Underwooc},/ Airport Manager c: Alan Tandy, City Manager Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS 4101 TRUXTUN AVENUE (661) 326-3781 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 Fax (661) 852-2113 Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 ................................................................................. ] Ref~l Cr~t~: Initial Referral Informtion Sho~ D~c~pfion: ~IDE YArD SEIBACKS ~ng D~cfiption: CO~CI~EMBER COUCH ~FE~D TO THE URB~ .DE~LOPMENT CO~ITTEE TO T~E UP THE ISS~ OF THE SIDE~ SETBACK NOTIFY B~ BOE ~ P~TIES OF THE ~ DE~LOPME~ CO~I~EE MEETING. Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D I2,ad :~1 Assigned To: Response? i (1) Urban Development Comm R1 I Reassigned To: Response? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: .../FolderPage?Page=Referral%2524Display&FolderlD=EWORKSEWORK$00000136&Laun(2/25/2003 Metastorm e-work diem Page 1 of 1 R~q,~esto~: IDavid Couc, Req. Completion Date: 1111412002 [ Meeting: 11/6/2002 Initial Referral Information Short Description: IP?~CmENT O[ STOP StGNS Long Description: ***REb'~.RR3~ TO URBJkN 'DEVEI~OPOlVlENT COlVlNITTEE*** CoNlVlITTEE THE ISS~ OF OBtaINING NORE BOC~ CON,ROB REG~ING INS~D~/ON OF S~OP SIGNS A~c~mtA Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Lea( --i I Assigned To: Response? Urban Development Comm ........ I l O) [ : .......... Reassigned To: Response? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: I ' I Address: Address: Phone: Phone: .../FolderPage?Page=Referral%2524Display&FolderlD=EWORKSEWORK$00000110&Laura2/25/2003 B A K E R S F I E L D '~ ~~~.~~.f~ ~ 1990 Tree Maintenance Professionals, 10/28/02 Bakersfield City Council and Urban Development Committee asked City staff to review the City's tree ordinance and make recommendations for proposed uniform standards for the selection, installation, maintenance, and removal of trees within the public right of way. City staff has been working with community groups and other governmental agencies to make recommendations for the needed changes to city ordinances. One revision being proposed would be a requirement for private contractors to obtain an annual permit for tree work within the public right of way. The city is recommending this change to provide for safe and consistent tree maintenance within the public right of way. The permit process would include and educational component providing information and requirements for city tree maintenance methods and standards to those performing such work. We will be conducting a meeting on Tuesday November 12th at 7:00 P.M. at the City of Bakersfield Corporation Yard lunch room, 4101 Truxtun Ave. to discuss the proposed permit process including requirements for obtaining a permit, permit costs and other related information. Also at this meeting we will be sharing information about the work of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Tree Advisory Ad-Hoc Committee; information regarding free educational materials and workshops on proper pruning techniques; tree worker and arborist certification and an update of activities of the Tree Foundation of Kern. Urban forestry has become an important component of our community and there has been increased public interest in the proper maintenance of trees throughout the city. Many new trees are being installed and maintained within the public right of way in Bakersfield. It is' vital that this important resource be-properly maintained by trained professionals. We welcome your input and your attendance at this important industry meeting. Sincerely,__~ /~ ~j Paul D. Graham, Urban Forester, City of Bakersfield RECREATION AND PARKS 4101 Truxtun Avenue o Bakersfield o California o 93309 (661) 326-FUNN o Fax (661) 861-0864 Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display Requestor: I?.~?r,~ I Wa~:l~ ................................... R~. Compl~ion Date: [1011012002 I Me~ing: [.?~.~ Initial Referral Information Sho~ D~cfiption: IOFF ROAD VEHICLE RECR~TIONAL FACILIW ~ng ~cfiption: **~DU~ REFE~B TO ~B~ DE~BOPH~ CO~I??EE. CHRISTENSEN-CITY ~AGER' S OFPICE*** CO~CI~HEHBER ~ REFERRED TO THE ~B~ DE~BOP~NT ' CO~IT?E8 A REQUEST PROH DICK TAYBOR, KE~ OFF HIG~AY Amc~entA SITES FOR A S~B OFF RO~ ZHICSE REC~AT[ON~ FACIhI?Y. A~c~t B .... Amc~mt C A~c~t D - ~d: --- ~si~ To: R~po~e? (~>1 ........................................................................................... ~ I .......................................................................... Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: I I Addr~s: Add.s: Phone: Phone: ~/F~derPage?Pag~=R~ferra~%2524Disp~ay&F~derID=EW~RK$E~RK$~52&Laum2/25/2~3 , ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: 'October 2, 2002 I AGENDA SECTION: Reports ITEM: 10.b. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager DEPARTMENT'HEAD DATE: September 27, 2002 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER. SUBJECT: Urban Development Committee Report number 3-02, regarding the sale of real Property at 515 Truxtun Ave. RECOMMENDATION: Urban Development Committee recommends approval. BACKGROUND: Currently the Greater Bakersfield Convention and Visitors Bureau (Bureau) leases office space at 1325 "P" Street from the City. This property happens to be within the project boundaries of the proposed Ice Rink/Aquatics Center and needs to be vacated for the project. Further, the City of Bakersfield acknowledges the importance of the activities carried out by the Bureau and desires to assist them in their goal of constructing a new Visitor's Center to better serve the public. The City owns property located at 515 Truxtun Avenue that will be becoming surplus when the Economic and Community Development Department moves to 900 Truxtun Avenue. The Bureau desires to acquire a portion of the surplus property to construct its' new Visitor's Center and administrative building. To assist them the City will be donating the land and contributing $150,000 of Transient Occupancy Tax to their project. On September 19, 2002, the Bakersfield Planning Commission found this transaction consistent With the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. This item was referred to the Urban Development Committee to 'review the proposed agreement with the Convention and VisitoFs Bureau. The Committee reviewed the proposed project including issues of the visual compatibility of the new building to the existing Amtrak station, parking, circulation and future development of city owned property west of the site as an open space area. The Committee recommended adoption of the resolution declaring real property, located at 515 Truxtun Avenue, surplus to needs of the City and approval of the agreement with the Greater Bakersfield Convention and Visitors Bureau to acquire a portion of 515 Truxtun Avenue at no cost to build a new Convention and Visitors Center and business offices. Staff will be providing additional information at a later date regarding possible changes to parking along 'T' Street and conceptual plans for the future development of the adjacent open space area by the City. September 27, 2002, 1:40PM P:~/lyFilesV~dmin Reports\CVB.doc ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I'MEETING DATE: September 18, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calender · ITEM: 8.1. TO: - Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Gregory J. Klimko, Finance Director DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: September-5, 2002 CITY ATTORNE~ f'/~--~ (~..-'2~ / CITY MANAGER ~_/~/, '~ SUBJECT: Surplus Property 1. Resolution declaring real property, Iocate~d at 515 Truxtun Avenue, surplus to needs of the City. 2. Agreement with the .Greater Bakersfield Convention and Visitors Bureau to acquire a portion of.515 Truxtun Avenue at no cost to build a new Convention and Visitors Center and business offices. (Ward 2) RECOMMENDATION: Staf[recommends adoption of the resolution and approval of agreement. BACKGROUND: Currently the Greater Bakersfield Convention and Visitors Bureau (Bureau) leases office space at 1325 "P" Street from the City. This property happens to be within the project boundaries of the proposed Ice Rink/Aquatics Center and needs to be vacated for the project. Further, the City of Bakersfield acknowledges the importance of the activities carried out by the Bureau and desires to assist them in their goal of constructing a new Visitor's Center to better serve the public. The City owns property located at 515 Truxtun Avenue that will be becoming surplus when the Economic and Community Development moves to 900 Truxtun Avenue. The Bureau desires to acquire a portion of the surplus property to construct its' new Visitor's Center and administrative building. To assist them the City will be donating the land and contributing $150,000 of Transient Occupancy Tax to their project. On September 19, 2002, the Bakersfield Planning Commission will be asked to find this transaction consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. DMA/s September 11,2002, 10:37am P:'A4yFiles~dmin Reports\CVB admin.wpd RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING REAL PROPERTY SURPLUS TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE ITS SALE WHEREAS, on July 21, 1986, the City' acquired a fee ownership in 515 Truxtun Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the Greater Bakersfield Convention and Visitors Bureau has requested the City donate a portior~ of this property described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit 'B" attached hereto to construct its new Visitors Center and administrative building. WHEREAS, on September 19, 2002 the Planning Commission will be asked to find the sale of this property to be consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65402. WHEREAS, Bakersfield Municipal Code 3.20.125 authorizes the negotiated sale of City property deemed to be "surplus". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The foregoing findings and recitals are true, correct, and incorporated herein. 2. Real Property located at 515 Truxtun Avenue is heCeby declared surplus to the City's needs and the Finance Director is authorized to negotiate its sale. The real property is more fully described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set for[h. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and ~ adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting,thereof held on September 18, 2002, by the following vote: Ayes: Council Member Noes: Council Member Abstain: Council Member .. Absent: Council Member CITY CLERK.AND EX OFFICIO of the C.ouncil of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED HARVEY L. HALL Mayor ._.. APPROVED AS TO FORM: BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney ALAN D. DANIEL Deputy City Attorney II P:~City Center~Entertainment~CVB~Resolu~on sign I~age. Exhibit "A" Identification of "The Property" Address: 515 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California Assessor's Parcel Number: 006-141-01 Legal Description: All of Lots One (1), Two (2) and Three (3) and and the Easterly Twenty-Six and one-half (26.5) feet of Lot. Four (4) in Block Seven (7) of the First Subdivision of the Kruse Tract, in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California, as per Map recorded August 3, t911, in Book 2, Page 30 of Maps, in the Kern County Recorder's Office. · ~ 'I'RUXTUN AVENUE SETBACK , .~. E~STING PARKING AREA ' ~ : Greater Bakemn e Baker~eld ' Convention & Visitom Bureau Bli~ s~s ~ a~[,~ "'"' ':,' PRE~MINARY S~E P~N ~,821 SF / 230 = 21 ~ng s~ 09/03/02 AGREEMENT NO. CONTRACT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into on , by arid between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a California municipal corporation and charter c!ty, (herein "CITY") and THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU, a California corporation (herein "BUREAU"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield acknowledges the importance of the activities carried out by the Bakersfield Conventi6h and Visitors BUreau, and; WHEREAS, the City benefits financially fr°r~ the Bureau's activities, apd; WHEREAS, the City i's acquiring properties for a proposed Aqua/Ice Rink facility, and; · WHEREAS, the Bureau is currently leasing office space at 1325 "P" Street that is !.. within the project boundaries which needs to be acquired for the project, and; WHEREAS, the City has certain real prOperty at 515 Truxtun Avenue ".hat will be becoming surplus to the City's needs, and; 'WHEREAS, Bureau desires to acquire a portion of the surplus property to construct a new building to enhance its operations, and; WHEREAS, CITY has declared The Property as surplus to the needs of the City of Bakersfield and authorized its sale; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to set forth all the (~ovedants and conditions for the sale by CITY and the purchase by BUREAU of The P~operty. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the aboverecitals herein, CITY and BUREAU mutually agree as follows: 1. AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE. CITY agrees to sell and BUREAU agrees t° purchase The Property in accordance with all 'of the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Cont~ctToS ollRealProperty · CVI~ agreement.~vpd sop~.~,s, 2002 Page 1 of 5 2. :~'.'~:'I CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSING. . ,~?:?'i~'.The Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield finding the sale .,,, of The Property to be consistent w~th the City's General Plan b. The completion of the demolition of the improvements presently located on The Property c. An irrevocable commitment from a bona fide lender to the BUREAU of sufficient funds to complete the construction of BUREAU's new building d. Ap_,pr-ov.al by CITY's Put:~li~ Works Director of BUREAU's site plan and architectural el.evations of BUREAU's new building 3. ESCROW. CITY and BUREAU agree that this transaction will be consummated without the use of an independent escrow agent and agree to take all steps necessary to complete this transaction in a timely manner. Further each party will bear their respective costs associated with this transaction. 4. CLOSING DATE. Escrow shall close no later than ten (10) days after the satisfactioh of all conditions precedent to closing as set forth-herein, unless extended by Tnutual written agreement of all parties. ,5. CITY'S RIGHTTO REMOVE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTs. It is understood that the follOwing impr~ovements currently in place on The Property are not included in this transaction: All of the improvements that comprise the building and appurtenances situated on the property commonly known as 515 Truxtun. CITY will have the right to full use of the same, without payment of rent or other consideration, until the close of escrow and transfer of possession of The Property as provided in this Agreem.en_t. " .. CITY may remove such improvements, or any of them, until the close of ' escrow, provided that CITY takes reasonable means to assure that no damage to the land or other improvements results from such removal, and that CITY removes from the premises all debris .resulting from the removal. Any of the above listed improvements that are not removed by the above specified date will become the property of BUREAU, and CITY will have no further rights with respect to them. 6. CONVEYANCE OF TITLE. CITY agrees to convey to BUREAU marketable fee simple title to The Property, subject only to the permitted exceptions as set forth in the title policy or elsewhere in this Agreement. CITY shall execute a Grant Deed which f~_ conveys marketable fee simple title to The Property to BUREAU and shall delivgr same to Escrow Holder. Conb-actT°S ellRealPropert7 CVB agre~menLwpd sep,,,,,b,, s. 2002 Page 2 of 5 7. NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT. The failure of any party to enforce against another party any provision' of this Agreement shall not constitute a Waiver of that party's right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve to vary the terms of this Agreement. 8. BINDING.EFFECT. The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding .upon, the parties to the ccntract and their heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 9. ~GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State -of California w_ill govern the val*idity of this Agreement, its interpretation and performance. Any litigation arising in any Way from this Agr.~ement shall be brought in Kern County, California. 10. TIME. Time is of-the essence in this Agreementl 11. MERGER AND MODIFICATION. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all other oral or written representations. This Agreement may be modifiedOnly in a writing approved by the City CoUncitand' signed by all the parties. ,..-'-~. 12. CORPORATE AUTHORITY. Each individual sigr, ing this Agreement on ., !. - behalf of entities re~'resent andwarrant that they are, respectively,-(luly authorized to sign on behalf of the entities and to bind the entities fully to each and all of the obligations set forth in this Agreement. 13. EXECUTION. This-Agreement is effective upon execution. It is the product of negotiation and all parties are equally responsible for authorship. Section !654 of the California Civil Code shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement. 14. EXHIBITS. In the event of a conflict between the terms, ~onditions, or specifications set forth in this Agreement and those in exhibits attached hereto,, the terms, conditions, or specifications set forth in this Agreement shall pre,'ail. All exhibits to which reference is made in this A~r~ement..are incorporated, whether or not actually attached. 15. ASSIGNMENT. Neither this Agreement, nor any interest in it, may be assigned or transferred by any party without the prior written consent of all the parties. Any such assignment will be subject to such terms and conditions as CITY may choose to impose. 16. NOTICES. All notices relative to this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be served or sent .by certified or registered mail and shall be effective upon .. actual personal service or depositing in the United States mail. The parties shall be addressed as follows, or at any other address designated by notice: ContractToSellRealProperty CVB agreemenLwpd September5,2002 Page 3 of 5 ' To CITY: City of Bakersfield ("'~',. . ' 1'501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Attention: Don Anderson Telephone: 326-3061 To BUREAU:- Bakersfield Convention & Visitors Bureau 1325 P Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attention: Don Jaeger Telephone: 325-5051 Either party may ~:hange its address for no'tibe by deiivering written noti.ce to the other party as provided herein. 17. FURTHER-ASSURANCES. Each party shall execute and deliver such papers, documents, and instruments, and perform such acts as are necessary or appropriate, to implement the terms of this Agreement and the intent of'the parties to this Agreement. '18. BROKERS AND FINDERS. The parties acknowledge and represent that CITY shall pay no commission to any broker Or finder in connection with the purchase and sale of The Property. ' 19. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. CITY is transferring property AS IS. CITY knows of no hazardous materials upon the property. BUREAU has the right of entry during escrow to examine The .Property to determine the existence of hazardous materials. Should hazardous materials be found on The Property, BUREAU may either accept the full responsibility and costs of clean-up or cancel the escrow. Once escrow closes, BUREAU takes the property AS IS and assumes all responsibility and liability for hazardous materials of every kind found on The Property including, but not limited to, clean-up costs. .. 20. WATER AND MINERAL 'RIGHTS. Unless otherwise agreed herein, conveyance of The Property does not include the water and/or, mineral rights, ditches, appropriations, franchises, privileges and easements on, connected with, or usually had and enjoyed in connection with The Property. 21. TAX EFFECT. None of the parties (nor such parties' counsel or accountants) has made or is making in this Agreement any representation to any other party (or such party's counsel or accountants) concerning any of the tax effects or consequences on the other party of the transaCtions provided for in this.Agr~eement. Each party represents that it has obtained, or may Obtain, independent tax advice with respect thereto and upon'which it, if so obtained, has sOlely relied. Conb'actT~q ellRealPropedy CV~ agre~ment.wpd se,~m~,,s, 2oo2 Page 4 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed, the day and year first-above written.. "CITY" "BUREAU" CITY OF BAKERSFIELD THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD CONVENTION and VISITORS BUREAU By: By: DON, ~GEI~, Executive DirectOr HARVEY L. HALL, Mayor.... APPROVED AS TO FORM:~ BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney ALAN D. DANIEL Deputy City Attorney II COUNTERSIGNED: By: GREGORY J. KLIMk~(~ -' Finance Director ~ TRUXTUN AVENUE EXISTING TREES TREES '~!',~L ' ...... , ' , ...... ~"' ~ ~'" ..... ~ ....... ~ .... ,. ., { ..~.. ~ ~.~ ~-~ ~-~ ~-~ ~-. ~-~ ~, ,,~ .~ ......... ~... , ]_ ~ , { ..... ~ .~ . . , ~. ~ ~= ...... , ,,. ~ ~ x..~ _Z~ . - ~'-~ ..... · ... ._ _ Greater Bakersfield ConvenUon & Visitors Bureau / Bakersfield Bli~ pRE~MINARY S~E P~N 1" 30' 0m,~KE~Em, . ~ - 09/27/02 4,329 SF / 230 = 19 ~ng s~c~ r~uir~ 25'~ng s~c~ pro~d~ O~ ME~Y ~CH~S, INC. Greater Bakersfield Convention & Visitors Bureau / Bakersfield Blitz szs TRUXTUN ^V~NUE PRELTMTNARY ELEVATZONS 1/16"= 1'-0" B*~RS~EL~,09/27/02CA ORDTZ I~IELBY ARCHITECTS, ][NC. .--- ..... -.__ pr t director ~!i ' open , waitin ": office _ , ; ' storage / ,' ~ : blitz display ,/- ...... J----~~', "~" a rea , public art / display -- . , ~,' conf ~ b~r~k I I I I .j I I Greater Bakersfield Convention & Visitors Bureau / Bakersfield Blitz 515'TRuXTUNAvENUE PREITIVlINARY FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 09/27/02 ~x~ ORD~Z MEI_BY ARCHITECTS, INC. PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ~-,~ ~'?~,~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majodty vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: Company/ Organization: ~]~'~ ~ /~/(.~ ~ t~ Phone: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ~-~.~~_ _ _ ~,/~~, , _ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majodty vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Company/ Organization: ~ Address: ~)~ '"~t.~.~ ~ Phone: ~-.~ - '~ Fax/e-mail: ~~_~i~ Subject: ~.~ ~ ~[.~, · ~.t.e4~ v Urban Development Committee Referrals 9/27/02 [] Freeway Status Report Standin8 Referral (Status - staff to provide updated information on phasin8 of freeway projects - No chanses from 4/8/02 meetin8 per Raui 5/1/02) Public Works [] Transportation Development Fees Referred 6/16/99 (Status- 5/14/01 Staff to meet with BIA and review proposed method°logy for adjustments to the fees. Update on status for 10/7/02 meetins) Public Works [] Shellabarger Road Referred 3/15/00 (Status - On Hold per Coundlmember Couch pendin8 development of alternatives) Public Works [] Leaf Blowers - Referred 7/31/02 by Hanson (Status - staff prepadn8 information on issue. John to contact Councilmember Hanson and provide backsround matedals)Trudy [] Commercial and Industrial Development Referred 6/27/01 Couch (Status - need direction from Committee, issues re. wall heights and other standards on hold per Couch) Planning Landscape Ordinance Enforcement Referred 7/18/01 Benham (Status -Benham requested the Urban Development Committee look into the issue of landscape ordinance enforcement. Staff to meet with tree tdmmin~ industry re. proposed permit requirement for work in public d~ht-of-way. Tree advisory committee continuin~ review of ordinance chan§es and technical manual.) Recreation ~t Parks [] Minimum Residential Lot Sizes - Referred 9/19/01 by Couch (Status - need direction from Committee, Plannin~ to meet with Developers and Real Estate professionals ) Planning [] City Space Needs - Referred / /02 - (Status - went to Committee April 8, staff to come back with research re. closin~ Eye Street and makin~ it a pedestrian mall. Report made to Council- September 18, 2002) Public Works Incentives for Developers to include water and art in projects. Referred 3/20/02 - Couch (Status - was reviewed by Committee at 4/8/02 meeting. Staff provided information on Brea ptan and will bdn~ this back to Committee for further discussion.) [] iFuture operation of Bakersfield Airport. Referred 8/21/02 - Ma~ard (Status - requested committee discussion re~ardin~ future plans for the airport.) [] Brundage Lane change from arterial to collector status. Referred 9/02 - (Status - report /headn~ back to Council on October 16, 2002) Sidewalk Inspection Pro~ram. Referred 7/31/02 - City Attorney (Status - discussion on ~10/7/02 meeting) o iReview of sale of property at 515 Truxtun Avenue. Referred 5/20/02 ~ Ma~ard (Status - to be discussed and report to ~o back to Council at 10/2/02 meeting) D ~Joint City/County Plannin~ Commission. Referred 9/9/02 - Couch (Status - Hardisty to prepare memo re. issue and discuss with Committee. May be ready for 10/7/02 meeting) BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA September 13, 2002 CITY COUNCIL ]~ar~y~.~a, Mr. Clarence Cullimore · tayo,. 10 Oleander Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93304 Mark Salvaggio Wwe. Mayor v,,,~-~ ? Dear Mr. Cullimore: lrmaCarson This is just a short note to thank you for your comments at the Ward~ September 9~ 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting regarding SusaaM.~nham changing the arterial designation on Brundage Lane. Your participation wa~2 at the Committee level is very much appreciated, and I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions you may Mike~ have contributed were taken into consideration by the Committee. Ward3 The citizens of Bakersfield are encouraged to take advantage of all the DaviaCou~ opportunities available to address the City Council whenever possible, Ward4 whether it is at a Council Committee meeting or the regular City Council HaroidW. Hanson meetings held in the Council Chamber. Ward5 On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSumvan Please do not hesitate to contact me at 326-3767 if you have any Ward6 further concerns. David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Tmxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA September 13, 2002 CITY COUNCIL Ms. Dana Karcher, Executive Director HarveyL. Kall Tree Foundation of Kern ,u,,yor 2300 TrUxtun Avenue #207 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Mark Sah, aggio Vice-Mayor W~d? Dear Dana: ~maCar~n This is just a short note to thank you for attending the September 9, W~d~ 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting regarding trees in public S,s~,h~,m right-of-ways. Your participation at the Committee level, especially Ward~ regarding tree issues, is very much appreciated. I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions you may have ~ik~M.~ara contributed were taken into consideration by the Committee. WarE3 The citizens of Bakersfield are encouraged to take advantage of all the David Couch Ward4 opportunities available to address the City Council whenever possible, whether it is at a Council Committee meeting or the regular City Council RaroldW. Rsnson meetings held in the Council Chamber. wa,~ s On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSullivan Please do not hesitate to contact me at ,326-3767 if you have any Ware 6 further concerns. Sincerely David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Tmxtun Avenue * Bakersfield, California 93301 * (661) 326-3767 * Fax (661) 323-3780 B A K E R $ F I E L D CALIFORNIA September 13, 2002 CITY COUNCIL l~u'veyLltrsll Mr. Ron Sprague, Chairman Ma.~or Planning Commission MarkSalvaggio 2601 Oswell Street, Suite 201 V'~e-Mayor Bakersfield, CA 93386-0679 Dear Ron: Irma Carson w,~r This is just a short note to thank you for your attendance at the SusanM.~en~m September 9, 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting. Your w,,,-,~2 participation at the Committee level is very much appreciated, and I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions M~keZV~,,.~ard yOU may have contributed were taken into consideration by the w.,~ 3 Committee. ~a~COU~w~.d4 Your duties on the Planning Commission are very time consuming and time is very valuable. I appreciate your making the extra effort to attend a~ok~W.]~nson the Urban Development Committee meetings. On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSumvan Please do not hesitate to contact me at 326-3767 if you have any w,~ 6 further concerns. David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four · Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Truxtun Avenue * Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA September 13, 2002 CITY COUNCIL ]~veyLm. Mr. Clarence Cullimore Mayor 10 Oleander Avenue MarkSaivaggio Bakersfield, CA 93304 Wtce-Mayor Ward ? Dear Mr. Cullimore: [rmaCarson This is just a short note to thank you for your comments at the w,~ September 9, 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting regarding SusanM.~enham changing the arterial designation on Brundage Lane. Your participation w,,.,~2 at the Committee level is very much appreciated, and I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions you may Mike~ have contributed were taken into consideration by the Committee. w,~ra OavidCou~h The citizens of Bakersfield are encouraged to take advantage of all the Ward4 opportunities available to address the City Council whenever possible, whether it is at a Council Committee meeting or the regular City Council itaroldW, ltanson meetings held in the Council Chamber. Ward5 On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSullivan Please do not hesitate to contact me at 326-3767 if you have any Ward 6 further concerns. sinc David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Tmxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA CITY COLTNCIL Ms. Dana Karcher, Executive Director ~=,-,~yL.~ Tree Foundation of Kern Mayor 2300 Truxtun Avenue #207 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Mark Salvaggio Ifwe. Mayor w,,.~ z Dear Dana: ~maCarson This is just a short note to thank you for attending the September 9, Wa,'d~ 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting regarding trees in public SnsanM.~enham 'right-of-~ways. Your participation at the Committee level, especially w,,rd2 regarding tree issues, is very much appreciated. I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions you may have MikeMaggard contributed were taken into consideration by the Committee. The citizens of Bakersfield are encouraged to take advantage of all the Ward4 opportunities available to address the City CounCil whenever possible, whether it is at a Council Committee meeting or the regular City Council i~ar~ldW. Ha~son meetings held in the Council Chamber. Ward5 On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSullivan Please do not hesitate to contact me at 326-3767 if you have any W,~d6 further concerns. Sincerely David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Tmxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (66 I) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA September 13, 2002 CITY COUNCIL ",,,'veyL.]~ai~ Mr. Ron Sprague, Chairman · ~"Y°" Planning Commission MarkSalvaggio 2601 Oswell Street, Suite 201 ~f~e. Mayo~' Bakersfield, CA 93386-0679 Ward7 Dear Ron: Irma Carson W,~.dJ This is just a short note to thank you for your attendance at the Sasaa~..~e~,~, September 9, 2002 Urban Development Committee meeting. Your W~-d2 participation at the COmmittee level is very much appreciated, and I want to personally assure you that any comments and/or suggestions M~.~,,~.,gara you may have contributed were taken into consideration by the w~,.d ~ Committee. DavidCoUChward4 Your duties on the Planning Commission are very time consuming and time is very valuable. I appreciate your making the extra effort to attend l:l'~roldW, l:l~n~on the Urban Development Committee meetings. On behalf of my fellow Committee members, I again extend my thanks. JacquieSullivan Please do not hesitate to contact me at 326-3767 if you have any Wa~d~ further concerns. David R. Couch Councilmember - Ward Four ' Chairperson, Urban Development Committee DRC:jp 1501 Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Company/ ' Organization: Phone: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ,~E::~-)~Vf Company/ Organization: C/~F¥'~ /~.~J~ Address: Phone: ~..~_,~ ~'~).2.- ~-- Fax/e-mail: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ~ ~ /~_~7'-C~'~ i~' Company/ Organization: ~'~ ~ £~'j") ~/~ '(~ y~ ~/(~' ~,/ Address: ,'~' ~/~ (") 7'"/~/.4'. ,~//'7/-~/~ Phone: (~,~.~- ~//~ ~--I/~ Fax/e-mail: ~-]~g./'~[~///'~ ~~~, . Subj~t: DATE: September 6, 2002 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Stan Ford, Director of Recreation and Parks By: Paul Graham, Urban Forester '-,~¢. SUBJECT: CONTRACTOR ANNUAL PERMITS IN TREE ORDINANCE The Urban Development Committee requested that staff prepare draft ordinance language which would require commercial tree companies have a City issued permit to work within the Public Right-Of-Way. The draft ordinance language has been prepared with discussion to briefly address permit issuance and insurance requirements, work standards in public right of ways, permit fee and administration, and contractor education. The proposed ordinance language would require all private contractors performing tree trimming work within the public right of way to have a city permit. This permit would be issued on an annual basis and be valid for one calendar year along with several other requirements. We would require the contractor to add the city to their insurance on an "additional insured endorsement" for liability coverage of one million dollars, as we require for encroachment permits. The Urban Forester would provide the contractor city adopted information on tree maintenance standards and require the contractor to provide his signature that he has received and understands these standards. The tree trimming standards required by the city permit will be outlined in the associated technical manual which explains Best Maintenance Practices (BMP's) and standards for tree care in public rights of way. The purpose of the manual is to provide a readily available document that states in clear language the requirements for tree care to those in the trade and to developers and property owners needing to know the standard. Staff is not currently recommending that property owners who perform their own tree trimming be required to have a permit. We anticipate very few homeowners trimming their own trees due to the required equipment needed to trim trees as well as disposing of trimmings. This is the primary reason why tree contractors are called in to trim homeowner trees. To require a home owner to obtain a permit to trim their own tree would also be a very difficult enforcement issue. It is estimated a $20.00 proposed fee for the permit would cover the cost of processing the permit. This proposed new fee would have to be added to the Cost Recovery Program and approved by Council for its enactment. Staff expects that initially the potential for permit violations is going to be high but over time violations should diminish. Staff will be drafting several educational letters to notify local tree contracting professionals of the upcoming change and prepare them for the transition. This would include the tree technical manual, instructions for obtaining an annual permit, and educational material for professional development. We would also propose to schedule a meeting with the local tree contractors to discuss their ideas regarding this permit issue prior to adoption. The street tree ordinance, BMC Chap. 12.40, is currently under review by the Metropolitan Bakersfield Tree Advisory Ad-Hoc Committee. The committee began reviewing the ordinance and other tree related documents in May of 2001 and expect the review to be completed date by mid-September 2002. At that time the committee will submit their recommendations of ordinance Changes and a technical manual for trees and their care to the Urban Development Committee for their review. Chapter 12.40 STREET TREES Sections: 12.40.010 Title. 12.40.020 Definitions. 12.40.030 Establishment of comprehensive plan. 12.40.040 Jurisdiction and control. 12.40.050 Duties of adjacent owners to maintain. 12.40.060 Interfering with planting or caring for trees prohibited. 12.40.070 Killing or injuring trees prohibited -- Harmful substances. 12.40.080 Inspection and removal. 12.40.090 Duty of private owners -- Removal of hazardous trees Charging costs of work done by city. 12.40.095 Permits for commercial tree contractors. 12.40.100 No liability upon city. 12.40.110 Types prohibited. 12.40.010 Title. This chapter shall be known as the "tree ordinance" and may be cited as such. (Prior code § 12.36.010). 12.40.020 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the words set out in this section shall have the following meanings: A. "Director" means Director of Recreation and Parks or designee. AB. "Parkway" means and includes that area between sidewalks and that portion of streets ordinarily used for vehicular travel, or any other public area adjacent to sidewalks and streets ordinarily and usually used as and for planting areas. BC. "Public place" means and includes streets, avenues, highways, alleys, parks, parkways, sidewalks, sidewalk spaces, or any other place open to or for the use of the public. CD. "Sidewalk" means and includes that portion of a street, other than the roadway, set apart for pedestrian travel. DE. "Street" means and includes any way or place, of whatever nature, publicly maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian travel. (Prior code § 12.36.020). 12.40.030 Establishment of comprehensive plan. A. It is for the best interests of the city that a comprehensive plan for the planting and maintaining of trees within the city should be developed and established, and this - - Page 1 of 4 Pages - - chapter is adopted for the purpose of providing for such a plan, and for the purpose of establishing regulations relating to the planting and maintaining of trees in the streets of the city and other public and private places therein. B. The city planning commission is charged with the duty of determining the types and varieties of trees for planting along the streets. Such determination shall be made by the commission after consultation with city urban forester. When such determination has been made, the commission shall report its determination in writing to the city council in a report to be designated "Official Tree Planting List, Bakersfield, California." Said report shall be placed on file in the office of the city clerk, and after such filing, the same shall be the official determination of the commission. Thereafter said commission may, from time to time, file subsequent reports covering the same subject, each of which shall be complete in itself and each shall also be filed in the office of the city clerk. The latest of such reports so filed shall constitute the official list until supplanted by a subsequent list. C. The director of publ!c works shall from time to time, at the request of the city council, prepare plans which shall designate, by means of a complete map of the city streets, a uniform method of street tree planting, the zoning of certain streets for certain types and varieties of trees, selecting suitable types for residential areas and special types of trees for nonresidential areas. Such plans shall show the intervals between said trees, and the place where each tree is to be planted. The director '-~ ""~-'; shall submit such plan or plans to the city council for its approval or modification, together with the recommendation of the city planning commission. D. When the uniform plan in its original or modified form is adopted by the city council, it shall become the tree planting plan for the streets of the city, and shall be strictly adhered to in all future street planting projects. The director ''~ '-,,~-" ..... ~'o and the city planning commission shall develop such plans together. Copies of such plans shall be made and kept on file in the office of the city clerk where they may be obtained by the public. (Prior code § 12.36.030). 12.40.040 Jurisdiction and control. The director of pub!!c '.'.'crks of the ci,~! shall have full jurisdiction and control of the designation of types and varieties, planting, setting out, locating and placing of all trees, shrubs and plants in the streets, parks, parkways and public places of the city, and shall likewise have supervision, direction and control of the removal, relocation and replacement thereof; provided, however, that in making such determinations and exercising such control, he shall be limited to the trees, shrubs or plants designated on the then current official tree planting list. (Prior code § 12.36.040). 12.40.050 Duties of adjacent owners to maintain. It is made the duty of all owners, agents, tenants or other persons having possession or control of real property within said city to properly cultivate, care for and maintain all trees, Shrubs and plants now or hereafter planted or set out within any parkway or public place immediately adjacent to their respective real properties, subject, however, to the general supervision, direction and control of said director ef- ~'tllt~''~ ...... lit' I't.~ (Prior code § 12.36.060). 12,40.060 Interfering with planting or caring for trees prohibited. - - Page 2 of 4 Pages - - "Paul Graham - 1240cit~'Wpd ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ~Sa e 3 No person, firm or corporation shall interfere with the director ,,~ ,,,,~," ...... ~'o or persons acting under his authority while engaged in planting, mulching, pruning, trimming, spraying, treating or removing any tree, shrub or plant in any street, park, parkway or public place within the city, or in the.removing of any stone, cement or other substance from about the trunk of any tree, shrub or plant in any such street, park, parkway or public place. (Prior code § 12.36.070). 12.40.070 Killing or injuring trees prohibited -- Harmful substances. A. No person, firm or corporation shall, in any way, harm, injure, destroy or kill any tree, shrub or plant growing upon any street, park, parkway or public place, by any method whatsoever. B. No person, firm or corporation shall cause, authorize or allow any brine water, oil, liquid dye or any other substance deleterious to tree or plant life, to lie, leak, pour, flow or drip on or into the soil about the base of any tree, shrub or plant in any street, park, parkway or public place in the city at a point from which such substance may, by lying upon or by flowing, dripping or seeping into such soil injure, destroy or kill such tree, shrub or plant. C. No person, firm or corporation, without the approval of the director of pub!lc works, shall place or maintain any stone, cement or other substance which might impede the free access of water or air to the roots of any tree, shrub or plant in any street, parkway or public place in the city. (Prior code § 12.36.080). 12.40.080 Inspection and removal. A. The director "~, ,..~,,v""~'" ...... ..~,,.~'o may inspect any tree, shrub or plant upon any street, park, parkway or public place of the city, to determine whether the same or any part thereof constitutes a hazard or an impediment to the progress or vision of anyone traveling on said street or public places. B. If the director "~, ~..w,,~""~'"" works determines that any tree, shrub or plant is hazardous to the traveling public or impedes the progress or the vision of said public on any such street or public place, he may cause the same, or such parts thereof as are hazardous or impeditive, to be trimmed or removed so as to remedy such hazardous or impeditive condition. (Prior code § 12.36.090). 12.40.090 Duty of private owners -- Removal of hazardous trees ~ Charging costs of work done by city. A. It shall be the duty of every person, firm or corporation having charge or control of any lot or premises, either as owner, agent, lessee, tenant or otherwise, to trim or cause to be trimmed, or remove or cause to be removed, all trees, shrubs or plants or any part or parts thereof, growing or standing on said property, which may constitute a hazard or an impediment to the progress or vision of anyone traveling on any street or public place. B. Whenever.it comes to the attention of the director ''~, r.-w,,v""~'~; ..... ..~,,.~'o that any tree, shrub or plant growing or standing on any private property constitutes a hazard or an impediment to the progress or vision of anyone traveling on any street or public place, he shall give notice of such hazard or impediment to the owner or occupant of said - - Page 3 of 4 Pages - - premises together with a request to remove or correct such condition. Such notice and request may be given either by personal service or by mail, to the owner or occupant or other person in charge or control of said premises, or by posting notice upon said property and mailing a copy thereof to the owner or occupant. The owner or occupant of said premises shall, within ten days after the service or posting and mailing of said notice, remove or cause to be removed, such hazardous or impeditive condition. C. Should any person, firm or corporation fail, neglect or refuse to conform with the provisions of this chapter, the director of p'--'b!Jc works shall have the power to carry out such provisions and the cost thereof shall be charged to and become a valid claim against such person, firm or corporation, recoverable in any court of competent jurisdiction. (Prior code § 12.36.100). 12.40.095 Permits for commercial tree contractors. All contractors that perform any type of work or maintenance on trees within the streets, parks, pathways and public places of the city are required to obtain a city-issued permit from Director prior to performing said work. The cost of said permit shall be set by resolution by the City Council and the permit does not supplant the requirement for an encroachment permit. 12.40.100 No liability upon city. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to impose any liability upon the city, its officers or employees, nor to relieve the owners of any private property from the duty to keep any tree, shrub or plant upon his property, or under his control, in such a condition as to prevent it from constituting a hazard or an impediment to the progress or vision of anyone traveling on any street or public place within the city. (Prior code § 12.36.110). 12.40.110 Types prohibited. It is unlawful fo~ the owner, lessee, agent, tenant or any other person having charge or control of any lot, piece or parcel of land within the city, to plant, grow or permit to be planted or grown any female Populus fremontii wats tree or trees commonly known as female cottonwood trees or trees which bear seeds of a cottony, wingy or downy nature; the fruiting variety of Morus albo and Morus nigra tree or trees, commonly known as the fruiting variety of mulberry tree; or any Ailanthus tree, commonly known as tree of heaven within said city. (Ord. 2738 § 1, 1982: prior code § 12.36.120). S:\CO UNCIL\Ords\12.40.CityT rees2. Redline.wpd - - Page 4of 4 Pages - - ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: August 21, 2002 I AGENDA SECTION: Deferred Business I I ITEM: 11.a. APPROVED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD.///1~ FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director CITY ATTORNEY DATE: August 8, 2002 CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ResolUtion increasing hangar and tie-down fees for the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. (Ward 1) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of resolution. BACKGROUND: State law requires new fees and charges, as well as increases in existing fees and charges be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing. A public hearing was held on July 10, 2002. The last rate increase for the Airport was done 10 years ago. Rate increases are recommended to insure operating revenues recover operating costs. These rates are consistent with rates charged at nearby airports. Informational notices were mailed to current lessees at the Airport notifying them of the proposed increase and hearing date. Upon completion of the public hearing, this item was referred back to staff to ensure that the proposed rates are not higher than rates charged at Meadows Field. Only one of the proposed fee increases were higher than what is charged at Meadows Field. The proposed rate for Port-a-Port (owner hangar) is proposed to be $50, not the $60 as originally proposed. On August 8, 2002, City staff met with 40 airport tenants regarding the proposed increase in fees at the Airport and other issues. A summary of issues discussed at this meeting is attached to this Administrative Report. ATTACHMENT: FEE INCREASE SCHEDULE dns G:\GROU PDAT~ADMINRPT~002~,ug 21~AIRPORTFEEINCREASE.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING HANGAR AND TIE-DOWN FEES FOR THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT WHEREAS, state law requires increases in existing fees and charges be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing on said fees and charges; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised twice in the Bakersfield Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, and held on July 10, 2002; and WHEREAS, adoption of increased fees and charges, pursuant to State Law, is necessary for the City to recover the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged. NOW, TI-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings are tree and correct. 2. The fees set forth in Exhibit "A" are hereby adopted and shall become effective on September 1, 2002. ............... 000 ............... EXHIBIT "A" BAKERSFIELD MIINICIPAL AIRPORT Airplane Storage Fee Schedule _Storage Type Current Fees Proposed Fees Tie-down $ 30.00 $ 40.00 Port-a-Pon (owner hangars) $ 40.00 $ 50.00 Shadeport (Watts Dr.) $ 55.00 $ 65.00 Shade port (Quad) $ 60.00 $ 75.00 Community Hangar (EAA) ' $ 80.00 $100.00 T-Hangar $130.00 $160.00 Hex Hangar $140.00 $180.00 Overnight Tie-Down (single) $ 3.00 $ 5.00 Overnight Tie-Down (twin) $ 5.00 $ 5.00 BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director FROM: Brad B. Underwood, Public Works Operations Manager DATE: Aug.ust 13, 2002 SUBJECT: AIRPORT TENANT MEETING As requested by City Council I met on August 8, 2002 with approximately 40 airport tenants regarding the proposed fee increase at the airport and other issues. I began the discussion by soliciting the tenants' input for ideas for improvements at the airport. I also explained the City's ongoing consideration of the possibility of closing the airport. Highlights of the discussion are summarized below: · Airport Closure - I explained that there has been some interest on the City Council to close the airport, motivated primarily by safety concerns voiced by officials at Meadows Field. I told them that Mayor Hall had written to the FAA to request consideration of closure, and that I followed up with a letter requesting information on how to make a formal closure request. I also told them that in my conversations with FAA staff, I was told that they view the Bakersfield Municipal Airport as important to the aviation community. We discussed many things regarding this issue such as FAA grants and the subsequent '~'" ..... ~,-y,=o, obligation incurred by the City in receiving the funds to keep the airport viable. I assured them that ! tell all parties interested in investing their money in building hangars, etc. of the possibility that the airport may close in the future. · Increased Fees - The tenants did not seem to be opposed to the increase in fees, but wanted the City to agree that some improvements be made to enhance the facility. They stated that it seemed as if the only interest the City Council has in the airport is to raise the fees it charges. There was some concern that the fees were being raised to drive away tenants making it easier to close the airport, i explained that interest from a fund balance given to the Aviation Fund via the General Fund several years ago helped meet annual budgetary needs, i told them that I believe the increase is fair and may help eliminate the need for interest funds to be used to meet annual expenditures. · Restaurant- All in attendance would like to see the restaurant replaced and indicated that it is part of a healthy airport environment. They explained that a restaurant on the field is not only attractive to the pilots, but for the residents and business owners in the area that frequented the former restaurant. They asked whether the City was interested in replacing the restaurant, and I indicated that I would discuss that possibility with any interested party. I told them of one interested individual with whom ! am set to meet on August 23, 2002. I told them that ! Would bring any reasonable proposal before City Council for their'consideration.-Their * opinion was that if the City would solicit proposals, many highly qualified r.estaiirant operators would step forward. . :~ .-- i'~'.~'.,!~- .',,~.;; :.j .'_~? ...~;..: .. · Misinformation - They believe theCity Council is being misinforr~ by including Staff. They cited as an example, my statement at th6 ~nc~l regarding people using their port-a-pod for storage. I apologized for mY'statement · regarding this issue, which I subsequently leamed is not occurring, 'but has been the' case in the past. I assured them that the City staff is not in the habit of p~ovi'ding the City Council inaccurate information and that staff is 'not Pushing for Ciosure.:~f the · Nothing to offer - They believe the City is offering nothing to thePilots and just'letting the facility deteriorate. I told them that under the current direction, we are doing the minimal maintenance to stay in compliance with FAA regulations, keep' the facility. safe, while at the same time stay within budget constraints. Frustration - There is a high level of frustration among the tenants and they wanted to know with whom they could communicate. ! indicated they are entitled to speak with any of the City Council members or me, I indicated that there are limitations on what I could do, dependent on the desire of the Council regarding the airport facility. They expressed the desire to keep the airport open. · Other items - Other concerns were discussed such as paving, after-hours public rest rooms access, drinking fountains, sweeping, hangar development and rezoning to allow residential construction. They.indicated that a large group of tenants would be at the next City Council meeting to voice their concerns. G'~ROUPOAT~Airo~rfilermnl rne~fino I~cJ.dr,,c 02 12 8.' 8AKERSFI£LD CI)"Y CLERK MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I have been a renter at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport (IA5) since1958, and I am concerned about the lack of interest by staff and some council members. Of all of the cities capital expenditures, the airport is one of the only ones not losing money. It's said the city does not want to be in a business, but the city has a lot of businesses, centennial gardens, civic auditorium, parking lots etc. The airport budget is hard to interpret, but two expenditures are surely questionable, advertising-$1000.00 and telephone-long distance $825.00. The staffkeeps throwing up these strawmen that are not true. 1. The cities liability because of meadows field traffic. False, once the airplane wheels leave the ground it's the FAA's problem if the pilot violates the rules. Also airplane owners at the airport are required to have liability insurance. 2. Hangers are being used for storage other than airplanes. False, the airport manager said that was a miss statement to the council. 3. We lose because the renters don't pay the rent (restaurant). False, if they don't pay rent, it's called a three day notice to quit and eviction. A statement by a council member that the city wanted to ~ve the airport to the county and they turned it down was not the whole story. The county wanted money from the city to help build the new terminal, not property. Some airplane owners have wanted to build hangers at the airport, but after waiting 6 - 8 months for an answer they have built new hangers at Meadows or Shafter. There are a lot of corporate planes landing at Bakersfield Municipal because it's closer to downtown Bakersfield than Meadows. I think raising the rates at the airport would be a negative act for the airport to prosper. Thanks for your time. Ray Allen 3013 So. Eye St. 831-0411 747-3165 BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director DATE: August 23, 2002 SUBJECT: AIRPORT ISSUES The following is a response to Mr. Ray Allen's letter regarding issues at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. · There has been $1,000 budgeted in the operating budget each of the past several years for advertising. With the City Council's interest in closing the airport, the Airport Manager has not to spent these funds. · There is $825 budgeted in the operating budget for "telephone-long distance." This line item includes a telephone line for the part-time employee at the airport ($180), the pay telephone ($624), and telephone line for the automated gas pump card reader ($156). · City staff has not told City Council that the City is liable if an air accident occurred between air traffic from Bakersfield Municipal and Meadows Field. City staff agrees with Mr. Allen that the City has no jurisdiction over airspace and once an airplane leaves the ground it is under FAA guidelines. However, City staff would also agree with the comment made by Meadows Field officials that the City would be brought into a lawsuit if such an accident did occur. · The statement that hangars have been used for storage other than aircraft has been the case in the past. Although currently all hangars have aircraft stored in them. · The comment regarding the City losing because the renters don't pay is referring to the restaurant tenant. Staff has struggled with the issue of the lessee being late on the rental payment and had discussed this issue with me several times. This is somewhat of a double edged sword. If we evicted the tenant, we were likely to be criticized by these same individuals that the restaurant was closed and we should work with the lessee. So our decision was to keep the lessee operating the business and attempt to keep the lessee up with current obligations and work slowly on the past debt. If we evicted the tenant we were likely to have the restaurant closed more than open. C:\Documents and Settings\rsmiley. BAKERSFIELD\Local Settings\Temp\Airportlssues.doc · There is currently plenty of space available for constructing owner hangars at the Airport. The Airport Manager has assisted many aircraft owners with the procedures necessary for construction of hangars. This year alone a minimum of four potential owners have been given information for construction and sample agreements. However, these potential owners have not followed up on the necessary documentation and no progress has been made. The Airport Manager always tells potential owners of the City Council's interest in closing the airport. This may have an impact on these individuals not moving forward with their projects. · Since there is no staff located at the airport, we are not aware of whether or not "a lot" of corporate planes are landing at Bakersfield Municipal. · Raising the rates will assist the Airport in bringing in the necessary revenue to fully recover costs. Additional questions have been asked and following is the response. · Donna Kunz will meet with the Airport Manager and Mr. Don Doyle to discuss his interest in operating a restaurant at the airport on Friday, August 23, 2002. · The fire damage issue for the restaurant was brought before the City Council on August 22, 2001. The City Council adopted the recommendation by staff to accept the cash insurance settlement. In accepting the cash settlement, the City Council committed to not repair the existing building. The repair settlement offered by the Insurance Company was greater than the cash settlement amount. · Camping facilities do not currently exist at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. Should some facilities be developed in the future, an appropriate fee will be established. C:\Documents and Settings\rsmiley. BAKERSFIELD\Local Settings\TempgAirportlssues.doc BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director DATE: August 21, 2002 SUBJECT: AIRPORT ISSUES The following is a response to Mr. Ray Allen's letter regarding issues at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. · There has been $1,000 budgeted in the operating budget each of the past several years for advertising. With the City Council's interest in closing the airport, the Airport Manager has not to spent these funds. · There is $825 budgeted in the operating budget for "telephone-long distance." This line item includes a telephone line for the pad-time employee at the airport ($180), the pay telephone ($624), and telephone line for the automated gas pump card reader ($156). · City staff has not told City Council that the City is liable if an air accident occurred between air traffic from Bakersfield Municipal and Meadows Field. City staff agrees with Mr. Allen that the City has no jurisdiction over airspace and once an airplane leaves the ground it is under FAA guidelines. However, City staff would also agree with the comment made by Meadows Field officials that the City would be brought into a lawsuit if such an accident did occur. · The statement that hangars have been used for storage other than aircraft has been the case in the past. Although currently all hangars have aircraft stored in them. · The comment regarding the City losing because the renters don't pay is referring to the restaurant tenant. Staff has struggled with the issue of the lessee being late on the rental payment and had discussed this issue with me several times. This is somewhat of a double edged sword. If we evicted the tenant, we were likely to be criticized by these same individuals that the restaurant was closed and we should work with the lessee. So our decision was to keep the lessee operating the business and attempt to keep the lessee up with current obligations and work slowly on the past debt. If we evicted the tenant we were likely to have the restaurant closed more than open. · There is currently plenty of space available for constructing owner hangars at the Airport. The Airport Manager has assisted many aircraft owners with the procedures necessary for construction of hangars. This year alone a minimum of four potential owners have been given information for construction and sample agreements. However, these potential owners have not followed up on the necessary documentation and no progress has been made. The Airport Manager always tells potential owners of the City Council's interest in closing the airport. This may have an impact on these individuals not moving forward with their projects. · Since there is no staff located at the airport, we are not aware of whether or not "a lot" of corporate planes are landing at Bakersfield Municipal. · Raising the rates will assist the Airport in bringing in the necessary revenue to fully recover costs. Additional questions have been asked and following is the response. · Donna Kunz will meet with the Airport Manager and Mr. Don Doyle to discuss his interest in operating a restaurant at the airport on Friday, August 23, 2002. · The fire da.mage issue for the restaurant was brought before the City Council on August 22, 2001. The City Council adopted the recommendation by staff to accept the cash insurance settlement. In accepting the cash settlement, the City Council committed to not repair the existing building. The repair settlement offered by the Insurance Company was greater than the cash settlement amount. · Retaining the shell of the burned out portion of the restaurant building may be cost effective. We recommend a structural engineer review the building to see if significant structural damage occurred. · There is a benefit in keeping the bakery section of the building open as it could be used as a small caf(~ or sandwich shop, etc. A portion of this building is used as a hangar which is currently occupied. It has been the intent of staff to demolish only the restaurant section that was badly damaged from the fire. · Locating the restaurant at the Planz Road terminus is part of the Airport Master plan and would be more centrally located on the airport. This would create a central hub of activity with the FBO, fuel facility and restaurant all located in the same vicinity. This location would also provide better access for aviation visitors. However, this would not be a location seen by drive by traffic on Union Avenue and may make it more difficult for a restaurant operator to be successful. · There is ample space to locate a restaurant at the Planz Road terminus. It is likely that additional cost would be required to provide electrical, telephone and gas service at this location. This cost would be avoided by constructing at the current location. · Camping facilities do not currently exist at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. Should some facilities be developed in the future, an appropriate fee will be established. C:~x:uments and Seltings\straynor.0OO~_ocal Settings\Temp~'esponse 8-20.doc OADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: August 21,2002 I AGENDA SECTION: Hearings I ITEM: 9. I(. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Development Services - Planning DEPARTMENT HEAD'~.////--~- ' DATE: July 30, 2002 CITY ATI'ORNEY /V'~ CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment P01-1025.. (Ward1) The City of Bakersfield has proposed an amendment to the Circulation Element of the general plan by changing the designation of Brundage Lane between Oak Street and the intersection of Brundage Lane and Edison Highway from "arterial" to "collector". Resolution approving the Negative Declaration and adopting the Planning Commission recommended General Plan Amendment to change the Circulation Element designation of Brundage Lane between Wible Road/Oak Street and the intersection of Brundage Lane and Union Avenue from "arterial" to ~collector". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. BACKGROUND: The city Public Words Department proposed this amendment to the Circulation Element changing Brundage Lane from "arterial" to"collector" status. This would require the maximum right-of-way width of 90 feet rather than the maximum 110 foot right-of-way required for an "arterial" street. Right-of-way along the length of Brundage lane is not uniform. Between Oak Street and Union Avenue, the right-of way is approXimately 90 feet wide. East of Union, Avenue the right-of-way ranges between approximately 90 and 110 feet. The traffic model for Metro Bakersfield indicates that Brundage Lane as a collector could carry anticipated traffic to the year 2010. A down class of Brundage Lane would allow future development to occur without additional dedication and widening of the road. Planning Commission public hearing(s) were conducted on April 4 and 18, May 16 and June 6, 2002, and a modified amendment to the General Plan was recommended for City Council approval on June 6, 2002. August15,2002,8:35am ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 Considerable debate occurred during the three public hearings on this item. Many members of the public supported a change in the designation thinking there would be less traffic if Brundage Lane were to become a collector. A considerable amount of Brundage Lane is outside the city and c .ounty staff does not support the change from arterial to collector. The Commission concluded that only the portion of Brundage Lane between Oak Street and Union Avenue should be amended to collector status. Staff conducted an initial study and it was determined that the project would not havea significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on March 1, 2002, in accordance with CEQA. RED:pjt (admin~aug\8-21-1025) August 15, 2002, 8:35am RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPTING OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD 2010 GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on MONDAY, APRIL 1,2002 and THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 2002, MONDAY, APRIL 15, 2002 and THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 2002, MONDAY, May 13, 2002 and THURSDAY, May 16, 2002 MONDAY, JUNE 3, 2002 and THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 2002 on General Plan Amendment P01-1025 of a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, such General Plan Amendment P01-1025 of the prOposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan is as follows: General Plan Amendment P01-1025 The City of Bakersfield Public Works Department is requesting a General Plan Amendment of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan changing the Circulation Element designation of Brundage Lane between Wible Road/Oak Street and the intersection of Brundage Lane and Edison Highway from "arterial to collector"(Exhibit "1"); and WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared; and WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by the city staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 71-02 on, June 6, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of a modified version of the Public Works Department's original version of General Plan Amendment P01-1025 and this Council has fully considered the finding made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that only the segment of Brundage Lane between Wible Road/Oak Street and Union Avenue have the circulation designation changed from arterial to collector (Exhibit "2"); and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, August 21,2002 on the above described General Plan Amendment P01-1025 of the proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings: 1. All required public notices have been given. 2. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act have been followed. 3. Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that the Proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA,. 4. The project, as recommended by the Planning Commission, is consistent with the surrounding land uses. 5. The project as, recommended by the Planning Commission, is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. 6. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. 7. Based on the absence of evidence in the record as required by Section 21082.2 of the State of California Public Resources Code (CEQA) for the purpose of documenting significant effects, it is the conclusion of the Lead Agency that this project will result in impacts that fall below the threshold of significance with regard to wildlife resources and, therefore, must be granted a "de minimis" exemption in accordance with Section 711 of the Sate of California Fish and Game Code. Additionally, the assumption of adverse effect is rebutted by the above-reference absence of evidence in the record and the Lead Agency's. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment P01-1025 is hereby approved and adopted. 3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved. 4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment P01-1025 of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "2", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for Brundage Lane generally located between Wible Road/Oak Street and the intersection of Union Avenue and Brundage Lane. 5. That General Plan Amendment P01-1025, approved herein, be combined with other approved cases described in separate resolutions, to form a single Land Use Element Amendment. ...... o0c I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the . following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO NOES: COUNClLMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney By: RED Dole\1025 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT P01-1025 EXHIBIT ."!" ........ CIRCULATION ELEMENT // \ / / BRUNDAGE LANE CHANGE FROM ARTERIAL TO COLLECTOR .,--,rrz.~-- 11 . CIRCUt~'nON I~ FRaY [ ......... ~ " N 22 ~ EXI ,IT "2" GENERAL PlAN AMENDMENT p01-1025- CIRCULATION ELEM~[qT PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION . , ~ .,' ~ ,' / ,,~:; ~' : · - -. -.~.: .- ~ : - =~ ~ ! : , ....... ~ ..... ~.s.! ,j... · : I : [ : BRUNDAGE LANE : i ~ ~,, ~: : CHANGE FROM ARTERIAL ~ = ; · TO COLLECTOR : . i...~ .' ~ ..... I I ' I : o 20oo EXHIBIT "B" NEGATIVE DECLARATION B A K E R $ F I E L D NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing accepting testimony will be held before the Planning. Commission of the City of Bakersfield. The hearing will begin at 12:15 p.m., or as soon lhereafter, as the matter may be heard on MONDAY,APRIL 1, 2002, in the Council Chambers, City Hall. -The Monday portion will be for presentation of staff testimony only. No action to approve or deny this project will be taken on Monday. The hearing will be continued to take testimony from others at 5:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on THURSDAY,APRIL 4, 2002, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, 93301, to consider the following request: 1. The project to be considered: General Plan Amendment P01-1025 Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan changing the designation of Brundage Lane from Arterial to Collector. 2. Project location: Subject site is Brundage Lane between the intersection of Brundage Lane and Wible Road/Oak Street and the intersection of Brundage Lane and Edison Highway. 3. The name and address of the project applicant: City of Bakersfield Public Works Depadment 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that a-public hearing will be held at the same time and place by the PlAnning Commission to receive input from the public on the potential effect of this project on the environment. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared, describing the degree of possible environmental impact of the proposed project. This study has shown that the proposal (as mitigated) will not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration is proposed. Copies of the Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration are on file and available to the public through the Planning Department located at 1715 Chester Avenue. For information concerning this project contact Marian Shaw in the Public Works building located at 1501 Truxtun Avenue, or by telephoning the department at (661) 326-3724, or by e-mailing the department at mshaw~.ci.bakersfield.ca.us. Our website address i§ ci.bakersfield.ca.us. PUBLIC COMMENT regarding the proposed project and/or adequacy of the Negative Declaration, including requests for additional environmental review, will be accepted in writing on or before the hearing date indicated above at the Plannin.q Department located at 1715 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301. If you challenge the action taken on this proposal in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Bakersfield prior to the close of the hearing. DATED: March 1,2002 POSTED: March 1,2002 RED February 25, 2002 S:\Dole\P01-1025\PC NOPH.wpd BAKERSFIELD Development Services Department Jack Hardisty, Director Dennis C. Fidler Stanley C. Grady Building Director Planning Directo~ (661) 326-3720 Fax (661) 325-0266 March 1, 2002 (661) 326-3733 Fax (661) 327-0646 Dear Property Owner or Other Interested Party: You are being sent the attached notice because the Kern County tax records indicate you own property in a proposed project area or within 300 feet ora proposed project (see attached map), or you have specifically requested this notice be sent to you. The attached notice describes the proposed project and draft environmental document the City of Bakersfield is currently processing. ' Through this notice, we are informing you of your opportunity to comment either in favor or against the proposed project. You should express your comments at the public heating indicated on the attached notice. However, if you are unable to attend this hearing, you may submit written comments to this department or contact me by telephone prior to the hearing so that your comments can be considered by the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Richard Dole Associate Planner RD:djl S :XDolcL°01 - 1025~PropowncrP01 - 1025.wpd City of Bakersfield · 1715 Chester Avenue · Bakersfield, California · 93301 BAKERSFIELD Development Services Department Jack Hardisty, Director Dennis C. Fidler Stanley C. Grady Building Director Planning Director (661) 326-3720 Fax (661) 325-0266 March 1, 2002 (661) 326-3733 Fax (661) 327-0646 TO: Responsible or Other Interested Agency SUBJECT: Notice of Public Hearing and Draft Negative Declaration Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Bakersfield will be the Lead Agency and will prepare a Negative Declaration for the project identified in the attached Initial Study. We would appreciate the views of your agency as to the scope, content and adequacy of the environmental information which is applicable to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency may need to use this Negative Declaration when considering any permits or other approvals needed for this project. In order to review and consider your comments on this project, please send your response no later than 20 days after receipt of this notice to Richard Dole, the project planner assigned to this case, at the address indicated above. In your response, please include the name of the contact person in your agency. Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law of the California Government Code, notice is hereby given that a hearing accepting testimony will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield. Said hearing will begin at 12:15 p.m., or as soon thereafter, as the matter may be heard on MONDAY, April 1, 2002, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Monday portion will be for presentation of staff testimony only. No action to approve or deny this project will be taken on Monday. The hearing will be continued to take testimony from others at 5:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on THURSDAY, April 4, 2002, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, 93301. For more information, please call the department at (805) 326-3733. Sincerely, Richard Dole Associate Planner RD:djl s\forms~l City of Bakersfield · 1715 Chester Avenue · Bakersfield, California ° 93301 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT P01-1025 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -, : 24 19 - I~ : ' EAST BRUNDAGE LANE ~ .... ~ ........ ..~__ ...... ~ ....... ~4- O HANG E I~]~O-_M ./~q~T__E RIAL ' TO 6OLLEOTOR HIGHWAY 58 BRUNDAGE LANE CHANGE FROM ARTERIAL ., ~.. TO COLLECTOR ' '-'r'2 .... 11 CiRcULATION LEGEND .FUTURE FREEWAY FREEWAY EX--AY N APPENDIX G Environmental Checklist Form INITIAL STUDY 1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment P01-1025 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Marian Shaw, Civil Engineer IV (661) 326-3724 4. Project Location: Brundage Lane between Wible Road/Oak Street and Edison Road/Brundage Lane intersection (Attachment 'B"). 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Bakersfield Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 6. General Plan Designation: Arterial 7. Zoning: N/A (Note: General Plan designations are shown on Attachment 8. Description of Project: Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan changing the designation of Brundage Lane from "arterial" to "collector. This segment of Brundage Lane (Wible Road/Oak Street and Edison Road/Brundage Lane intersection) proposed to be changed from artedal to collector is approximately seven and three-fourths miles in length. (See item number 4 above for location). 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: Brundage Lane has been divided into segments with each segment having a predominant land use along the north and south sides of the roadway. These segments are as follows: Oak Street/Wible Road to Chester Avenue (approximately one mile) - predominantly commercial with some offices and single-family residences; Chester Avenue to Union Avenue (approximately one mile) Almost exclusively commercial with very few residences: Union Avenue to Cottonwood 'Road/Lakeview Avenue (one mile) - predominantly commercial with single-family dwellings, industrial, churches and undeveloped land; Cottonwood Road/Lakeview Road to Oswell Street (two miles) - pdmadly industrial and undeveloped land with commercial, church and a post office; Oswell Street to Fairfax Road (one mile) - commercial, residential and churches; Fairfax Road to State Route-184 (one mile) - pdmadly industrial with commercial, residences, a church and undeveloped land; and No impact. February 5, 2002 State Route-184 to ~dison Highway (approximately ~ mile) - pdmadly undeveloped land with commercial, a recreational vehicle park and a orange grove. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement): Kern County ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [--] Aesthetics [~] Agricultural Resources [---} Air Quality [--[ Biological Resources [-'"] Cultural Resources E~] Geology / Soils D Hazards & Hazardous Materials ~-] Hydrology I Water Quality [] Land Use / Planning [~ Mineral Resources [-~ Noise ~] Population/Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [~ Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities / Service Systems ' [] Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [--I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. E] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Sianature . Printed name For 2 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [--1 [] [] [] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but [] E3 r-~ [] not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or [~] r"l [] [] quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which E~ r-'] [] [] would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Pri~e Farmland, Unique Farmland, or [-~ r-] [-] [] Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a I-'-] [--~ I--'] [] Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment [~] [-] [--] [] which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the follow!ng determinations. Would the project: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact : a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the E] r"] r"] ~;~ applicable air quality plan? ,' b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute r-'] r'-'] E] [] substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of [-'] r-] r-] [] any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant [--~ D r"] [] concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial D D D [] number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or F-] D D ~;~ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian D D D [] habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ~ D E] [] protected wetlands as .defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native r-I D ~] [] resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 4 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant I~tigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances r-I r"] r'"] [] protecting biological resoumes, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with' the provisions of an adopted Habitat E] conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a Cause a substantial adverse change in the [-'] r'"'l r--] significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the D [] D significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological r"'] ["] D resource or site or unique geologic feature? al)Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial D D D [] adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on D D r-] the most recent ^lquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? D D D [] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including [] ~ [] [] liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ~ [] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [] [] [] [] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ~ [] [] [] or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 5 Less Than Significant Potentially Wilh Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- D r-] D [] 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use D D D [] of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the D D D ~ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the D D E] ~ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or D E] D C~ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of D [] D ~ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan r"l D D [] or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f') For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, D ['-I r"'i ~ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with D D E] ~;~ an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, D D D ~ injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -WOuld the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge [] [] [~] [] requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere [] r"] r-~ ~;~ substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ['"1 [--~ ~-] [] site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the r'-] ['~ r-~ [] site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed r'"l [] [] [] the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality7. [--~ [-'l F"] [] g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as r-~ r-] ~] [] mapped on a federal Flood H~:,~rd Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures [] r-~ [] [] which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,[~] [] [~] [] injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [] r"'] [] [] ix. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [] [] [] [] 7 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or E] E] [] [] regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan E] [] E] [] or natural community conservation plan? : X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral E] E] E] [] resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important E] E] r"] [] mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, sPecific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ~ ~ ~ [] excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ~ ~ ~ [] groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ~ D D [] levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in D D D [] ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? .......... e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ~ ~ ~ [] or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, [] ~ ~ [] would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: ID ID ID [] ~) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, [] [] [] ID necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ~ ~ E] [] the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse [--~ ~ ['-] ~;~ physical impact{ associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? r-I ~ ~ [] Police protection? ~1 D D ~;~ Schools? [] ~ D [] Parks? D D D [] Other public facilities? D r'~ ~ [] XlV. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing E] ~ ~ ~;~ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or [] [] [] [] require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 9 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in r'~ ['"] O [] relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the . street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? .- ' b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of I--~ O [--] ~;~ service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including 0-'1 [-] either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature [] (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [--I f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [~] r-~ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the D r-~ O [] applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ~--] ~'] O ~ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ~ ['-] ~--] ~ water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the [~] [--~ r-~ C~ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 10 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncorporationImpact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment D E] r"] [] provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill .with sufficient permitted I-'] ['-] r-] [] capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? -- g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and D D r"] ~ regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the D E] E] ~ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually [--~ D E] ~ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which D D D [] will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Revised March 23, 2000 $:~Dole~P01-1025-'~N3pendix G Check List.wpd 11 APPENDIX G Environmental Checklist Form Response Sheet Initial Study General Plan Amendment P01-1025 I AESTHETICS "' a. The project site is located within an area having natural slopes from 0-5%. The area is substantially developed and is not regarded or designated within the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 Plan as visually important or "scenic". There is no scenic vista that would be impacted by the redesignation of Brundage Lane from artedal to collector. No impact. b. The project does not include the removal of trees, the destruction of rock outcroppings or degradation of any historic building. The project is not adjacent to a state highway which is designated as "scenic". No significant impacts are noted. No impact. c. There are no visual impacts associated with this project, the project does not involve any construction. This project will change the Circulation Element designation from arterial to collector. No impact. d. This project does not involve incremental growth of urban development typical of the area. Nor will this project generate light at night or daytime. No impact. II AGRICULTURE 'RESOURCES a. The project does not convert 100 acres or more of any of the farmlands designated Pdme, Unique, or of Statewide significance to nonagricultural uses. The subject site, Brundage Lane, is a paved roadway and will not impact agricultural production. No impact. b. The property is not zoned for agricultural uses nor is it under Williamson Act Contract. The subject site, Brundage Lane, is a paved roadway and will not impact agricultural production. No impact. c. There are no special attributes of this project site, related to location or nature that will cause or could result in the conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use. This project is in an area designated for urban · development by the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. The subject site, Brundage Lane, is a paved roadway and will not impact agricultural production. No impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 2 III AIR QUALITY a. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District encourages local jurisdictions to design all developments in ways that reduce air pollution from vehicles which are the largest single category of air pollution ' in the San Joaquin Valley. The Guide to Assessing and Reducing Air Quality Impacts promulgated by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, (page 16 and section 6)list various land uses and design strategies that reduce air quality impacts of new development. Local ordinance and general plan requirements related to landscaping, sidewalks, street improvements, level of traffic service, energy efficient heating and cooling building code requirements, location of commercial development in proximity to residential development are consistent with the listed strategies. This project is subject to the full range of local ordinances which ensure compliance with these air quality strategies. No significant impacts are noted. No impact. b..The project does not violate the air quality standards set forth on page 24 table 4-1 Ozone Precursor Emissions thresholds for Project Operations ..~ ROG 10 tons/year, Nox 10 tons (Guide to Assessing Mitigation and Air .. Quality Impacts). Nor is the project within the distance triggers noted in table 4-2, "Project screening tdgger levels for potential odor sources (Guide to Assessing Mitigation and Air Quality Impacts). In addition, dust suppression measures listed as Regulation VIII are required for all construction in the City of Bakersfield and are regarded by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District as sufficient mitigation to reduce PM-10 impacts to less than a significant level. No impact. c. The project will not increase any cdteda pollutant (for which the Southem San Joaquin Valley is in nonattainment) beyond the level of significance as defined by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Pollution from this project was taken into consideration in previous environmental analysis which took into account that this area would be urban. This analysis was completed for the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report which identified the amount of urbanization and resultant air pollution which would be generated within the general plan area. Mitigation from the Final Environmental Impact Report was incorporated into vadous policies', implementation measures and ordinances. In addition, no adverse comments were received from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District on this project. No impact. d. There is no evidence that this project creates any pollutant "hot spot" that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollution receptors. The only potential "hot spots" are located at intersections which are "severely" Appendix G Project Title Page 3 congested. There are no adjacent intersections which are at a level of service "F" and therefore by definition no significant pollutant "hot spot" impacts are identified for this project. No impact. e. The land use permitted as a result of this project does not have the potential to create objectionable odors. This proposal is not on the list of those land uses generally regarded as the type to have site odor problems (for the list of projects please see table 4-2, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts). No impact. IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. The project is subject to the terms of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan and associated Section 10 (a) (1) (b) and Section 2081 permits issued to the City of Bakersfield by the United state Fish and Wildlife Services and California State Department of Fish and Game, respectively. Terms of the permit require applicants for all development projects within the plan area to pay habitat mitigation fees, excavate known kit fox dens, and notify agencies prior to grading. Compliance with the plan mitigates biological impacts to a level which is less than significant. In addition, pursuant to Section 15064 (h) of the CEQA Guidelines, a change in the environment is not a significant effect if the change complies with a standard that meets the definition of Section 15064 (h)(3). The Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan as adopted, is an enforceable standard that meets the definition of Section 15064(h)(3). No impact. b. This project is not located within or adjacent to the Kern River. riparian habitat area but does fall within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan area. This plan, in agreement with the Califomia Department of Fish and Game and the United States Wildlife Service mandates certain requirements that by ordinance all development projects must comply. Compliance with the plan mitigates biological impacts to a less than significant level. No impact. c. The project crosses no stream, either perennial or intermittent based on the United States Geological Survey topographic sheet for the area. No impact. d. The project is not within the Kern River flood plain (noted as a wildlife corridor in the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan), or along a canal which has been identified by United States Fish and Wildlife Services as a corridor for native resident wildlife species. There is no Appendix G Project Title Page 4 evidence in the record that the project area is a nursery site for native wildlife species. No impact. e. The Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan has been adopted as policy and is implemented by ordinance. The plan addresses. biological impacts within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Area. The development entitled by this proposal will be required to comply with this plan and therefore will not be in conflict with either local biological policy or ordinance. No impact. f. There are no other adopted plans which are applicable to this area which relate to biological resources, See answer to IV e above. No impact. V CULTURAL RESOURCES ... a. Brundage Lane is a paved roadway having two to four. lanes. This roadway is not listed in or determined to be eligible bythe State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Public Resources Code SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR Section 4850 et. Seq.). Brundage Lane is not listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Section 5020.1 (k) of the Public Resource Code is not found to be a significant historical resource meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1 (g) of the Public Resources Code. No impact. b. The Initial Study will be transmitted to the Califomia Archaeological Inventory at Califomia State University Bakersfield for review. Any comment and/or mitigation measure received from the "university" regarding this project will be placed in the staff report. No impact. c. This project is not located in the Shark Tooth Mountain bone bed which is the only unique paleontological resource identified in the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. In addition, topography of the site is relatively fiat and there is no evidence that construction of the project will destroy any unique geologic structure. No impact. d. In the event that the California State Inventory at California State University Bakersfield determines there is evidence that human remains are located under Brundage Lane pavement and its right-of-way such evidence shall be incorporated into the staff report and attached to the Initial Study as mitigation. In the future, if any construction work is being effected to Brundage Lane and human remains are discovered, all work shall stop until the Kern County Coroner has been notified and has evaluated the remains. If any other archaeological artifacts are discovered dudng such work, all work shall stop until the find has been ~ evaluated by a qualified archaeologist or historian. No impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 5 VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS a.i. Bakersfield, located in the San Joaquin Valley, has been a seismically active area. According to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, major active fault systems border the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley. Among these fault systems are the San Andreas, the Breckenridge-Kem County, the Gadock, the Pond Poso and the White Wolf. There are numerous additional faults suspected to oCcur within the Bakersfield area which may or may not be active. The active faults have a maximum credible Richter magnitude that ranges from 6.0 (BreckenridgeoKern Canyon) to 8.3 (San Andreas). Potential seismic hazards in the planning area involve strong ground shaking, fault rupture,. liquefaction, and earthquake induced landslides. No impact. It is unlikely that future structures will be constructed within the Brundage Lane right,of-way. However, the two lane segments of Brundage Lane may be constructed to four lanes in the future. Such construction will be to current engineer and seismic standards. This will ensure that all seismically related hazards remain less than significant. In addition, because of the relatively fiat topography of the project site, landslides are not considered to be a potentially significant geologic hazard. No impact. a.ii. See answer to VI.ai. a.iii.Liquefaction potential is a combination of soil type, ground water depth and seismic activity. This project site does not demonstrate the three attributes necessary to have a potentially significant impact. See also the answer to a VII i. No impact. a.iv. See answer to Vl.a i. b. Brundage Lane between Wible Road/Oak Street and Edison Road/Brundage Lane intersection is approximately seven and three-fourths miles in length, containing numerous soil types. The soil types are to numerous to be listed here. Soils are covered by pavement two and four lanes wide. The soil types located under the Brundage Lane pavement and along its right- of-way are listed in the Kem County California Soil Survey for the Northwestern region. This survey is located in the City of Bakersfield Planning Department and may be reviewed during regular office hours. No impact. c. See answers to VI a i and VI a ii. in addition, the Seismic Hazard Atlas map of Kem County prepared by the United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey does not indicate that the project area is subject to subsidence, liquefaction or other unique geological hazard. No Appendix G Project Title Page 6 impact. d. See answer t° VI b. e. See answer to VI b. VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a. There is no evidence in the record which indicates this project (or this type of land use in general) involves the transport or use of hazardous materials in any quantity which has been identified by responsible agencies as having the potential to be a significant environmental impact. No impact. b. See answer to VII a. c. There is no evidence that' this project or this category of projects has been identified by responsible agencies as having the potential to emit hazardous emissions at a level which is potentially significant. No impact. d. This project is not located on any site catalogued on the most recent hazardous materials list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact. e. Brundage Lane is located within Zone C of the Bakersfield Municipal Airport, as shown in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Zone C is defined as the area where aircraft are commonly below 1,000 above ground level. Inappropriate uses in Zone C include but are not limited to schools, hospitals and nursing homes. Normally accepted uses in Zone C include but are not limited to parks, playgrounds, most retail uses, duplexes, medium density apartments and two story apartments. Zone C extends approximately 9,000 feet north of the Bakersfield Municipal Airport runway. Brundage Lane is located approximately 7,000 feet north of such runway. No Impact. f. The project is not located within 5,000 feet of the runway of any private airstrip and it is therefore presumed not to have any land use impacts at this distance. Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan (1993) uses this 5,000 foot distance as the maximum for land use considerations. No Impact. g. The proposed project, typical of urban development in Bakersfield, is not inconsistent with the adopted City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Area Plan (Jan. 1997). This plan identifies responsibilities and provides coordination of emergency response at the local level in response to a Appendix G Project Title Page 7 hazardous materials incident. The proposed project could introduce substances typical of a mixed - use planned community. However, hazardous waste facilities guidelines have been adopted for Kern County to provide for adequate designation of hazardous waste disposal facilities to serve the residents and the industries of Kern County and its various incorporated cities thus, reducing the impacts to a less than significant level. No Impact. h. This project is not located adjacent to a wild land area or it is within the area covered by the Hillside Development Ordinance (HD) which has standards required by the Kern County Fire Depadment which address the issue of wildland fires and urban development. No Impact. VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a. The proposed project will be implemented in accordance'with all applicable water quality standards and waste discharge requirements, which will ensure that the quality and quantity of surface water flowing from the site would not be substantially affected. No Impact. b. The proposed development would not result in a need for significant additional systems or substantially alter the existing water utilities in the area. No Impact. c. There are no streams or rivers on the project site, existing drainage pattems will not be altered to an significant degree. All development within the City of Bakersfield is required by ordinance to comply with an approved drainage plan (for every project) which avoids on and off site flooding, erosion and siltation problems. Within the segments of Brundage Lane and adjacent land located within the city, all development must comply with Item VIII a. through f. No Impact. d. See answer to VIII c. e. See answer to VIII c. f. See answer VIII a. g. The project does not propose housing within a 100-year flood plain as identified by a Flood Insurance Rate Map or any other flood hazard map. No Impact. h. The project does not propose any structures within a 100-year flood hazard area. No Impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 8 i. The proposed project is not within the Lake Isabella dam failure inundation area or the 100 year flood plain for the Kern River as depicted on figure VIII-2 of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan (Safety Element). Or the project is within the inundation area but the chances of loss injury and/or death are so remote (worst case scenario, one event in more than 10,000 years, Bakersfield Head Hospital FEIR) that the risk involved is regarded as insignificant (reference also the Kem County Flood Evacuation Plan for County and Greater Bakersfield Area below Lake Isabella Dam). No Impact. j. The project site is not located near any significantly sized body of water and is, therefore, not susceptible to a seiche or tsunami. The site is not located at the foot of any significant topographical feature with the potential to be subject to a mudflow. No Impact. IX LAND USE AND PLANNING a. Brundage Lane is an existing roadway approximately seven and three- fourths miles in length and two to four lanes wide. Considering that the two lane segments may someday be four lanes, it may be considered a continuation of the existing development. The project would not divide and existing community. No impact. The following is a general land use pattem of the north and south sides of segments of Brundage Lane. Brundage Lane has been. divided into segments with each segment having a predominant land use along the nodh and south sides of the roadway. These segments are as follows: I. Oak Street/Wible Road to Chester Avenue (approximately one mile) - predominantly commercial with some offices and single- family residences; II. Chester Avenue to Union Avenue (approximately one mile) - Almost exclusively commercial with very few residences: III. Union Avenue to Cottonwood Road/Lakeview Avenue (one mile) - predominantly commercial with single-family dwellings, industrial, churches and undeveloped land; IV. Cottonwood R0ad/Lakeview Road to Oswell Street (two miles) - primarily industrial and undeveloped land with commerdal, church and a post office; V. Oswell Street to Fairfax Road (one mile) - commercial, residential and churches; Appendix G Project Title Page 9 VI. Fairfax Road to State Route-184 (one mile) - primarily industrial with commercial, residences, a church and undeveloped land; and VII. State Route-184 to Edison Highway (approximately ~A mile) - primarily undeveloped land with commercial, a recreational vehicle park and a orange grove. b. The project is required to be consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan and the City of Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance. There are no identified conflicts with policies or ordinances which were established to avoid or mitigate environmental effects. No Impact. c. See answer to Va. X MINERAL RESOURCES a. The project is not located within a state designated oil field or within an area of other important mineral resources, see figure V-3 Conservation Element, Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. No Impact. b. See answer to X a. XI NOISE a. Brundage Lane is presently constructed to a four and two lane roadway. The Circulation Element amendment from arterial to collector will not be a noise generator. No Impact. b. See answer to XI a. c. See answer to XI a. d. See answer to Xl a. e. See answer to Xl a. f. See answer to Xl a. Xll POPULATION AND HOUSING a. Brundage Lane is presently constructed to a four and two lane roadway and will not induce population growth in this area. No Impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 10 b. The project does not propose the displacement of any existing housing. No Impact. c. The project will not result in the displacement of any persons. No Impact. XIII PUBLIC SERVICES a. Fire Protection? Fire protection services for the Metropolitan Bakersfield area are provided through a joint fire protection agreement between the City and County. Brundage Lane is presently constructed to a four and two lane roadway. This projectwill not induce population growth nor add new buildings in this area. No Impact. Police Protection? Police protection will be provided by the Bakersfield Police Department · upon project build out. Brundage Lane is presently constructed to a four and two lane roadway and will not induce population growth in this area requiring additional police services. No Impact. Schools? The project should not impact school facilities. No Impact. Parks? The project proposes no increase in population for the area and would not result in a impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities or create a substantial need for new parks of recreational facilities. No Impact. Other Public Facilities? Other public facility improvements from the proposed development and eventual buildup of this area will result in an increase in maintenance responsibility for the City of Bakersfield. These increases in services are not deemed significant. No Impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 11 XIV RECREATION a. See answer to "Parks". b. See answer to "Parks "' XV TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC a. Brundage Lane is presently constructed as a four and two lane roadway. Regardless of whether the roadway is designated an arterial or a collector, traffic may increase. A change in designation of an existing four and two lane roadway should not be the catalyst generating traffic. No Impact. b. The project must comply with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan which has a level of service standard C which is higher than the Congestion Management Plan level of service standard D. No Impact. c. The project does not propose air traffic or impact air traffic patterns. No Impact. d. Brundage Lane is presently constructed as a four and two lane .roadway. No roadway improvements are proposed. No Impact. e. Brundage Lane is presently constructed as a four and two lane roadway. All projects are by ordinance subject to the access requirements of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department which includes an evaluation of adequate emergency access. No Impact. f. Brundage Lane is presently constructed as a four and two lane roadway. Where allowed, on .street parking may be provided. No significant parking impacts specific to this project have been identified. No Impact. g. The project is not anticipated to be inconsistent in any way with policies or programs supporting alternative transportation. No Impact. XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a. This project will not impact sanitary sewer. No Impact. b. The proposed development would not result in the need for significant additional systems or substantially alter the existing water or wastewater facilities. No Impact. c. Almost all new development requires the construction of new storm water facilities, the construction of which is typically an extension of the existing Appendix G Project Title Page 12 system. Where new development occurs along either the north or south sides of Brundage Lane within the City of Bakersfield and storm water facilities are required, such facilities will be installed by the developer. This incremental improvement is not considered to be a significant impact. No Impact. d. The proposed development would not result in a need for significant additional systems or substantially alter the existing water utilities in the area. Where new development occurs along either the north or south sides of Brundage Lane within the City of Bakersfield and water utilities are required, such facilities will be installed by the developer. This incremental improvement is not considered to be a significant impact. No Impact. e. This p_roject will not affect the waste water treatment provider. No Impact. f. The Bena Landfill serves the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. The landfill will not need significant new or substantially, altered facilities to accommodate this project. No Impact. g. The project will not breach published national, state or local standards relating to waste reduction, litter control or solid waste disposal. No Impact. XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. The project is subject to the terms of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan and associated Section 10 (a) (1) (b) and Section 2081 permits issued to the City of Bakersfield by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California State Department of Fish and Game, respectively. Terms of the permit require applicants for all development projects within the plan area to pay habitat mitigation fees, excavate known kit fox dens, and notify agencies prior to grading. Compliance with the plan mitigates biological impacts to a level which is less than significant. In addition, pursuant to Section 15064 (h) of the CEQA Guidelines, a change in the environment is not a significant effect if the change complies with a standard that meets the definition of Section 15064 (h)(3). The Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan as adopted, is an enforceable standard that meets the definition of Section 15064(h)(3). Therefore, the proposal would not have a significant effect on the environment. No Impact. Appendix G Project Title Page 13 b. As described in the responses above, the proposal has no impacts that would be defined as individually limited or cumulatively considerable. The project area is currently designated for urban type development. No Impact. c. As described in the responses above, the proposal would not adversely impact human beings, either directly or indirectly. No Impact. RED February 5, 2002 (10:48am) S:\Dole\P01-1025~,ppendix G Response.wpd ATTACHIVlE. N ~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT P01-1025 CIRCULATION ELEMENT ; 25 30: rE HIGHWAY 58 " BRUNDAGE LANE CHANGE FROM ARTERIAL , TO COLLECTOR ,. iRCULATION LEGEND FLfi'URE FREEWAY PFREEWAY EXPRES~NAY COLLECTOR N 0 2O0O 4000 Fed 22 1(32o6 Minutes, PC, Thursday, April 4, 2002 - Page 5 Council Chamber~ City Hall Motion carried by the following roll call vo~'. . _\.. AYES: Commissioners Brady, Gay,~,,cGinnis, Sprague, Tkac, Tragish, Boyle X NOES: None ~ ABSENT: None ~ 7.2 General Plan Amendment No. 01-1025, (City of Bakersfield) (Wards 1 & 2) Ms. Shaw stated that she has received over 20 phone calls in overwhelming support of the collector status. A letter from Kern County has been received requesting a meeting to discuss their cOncerns but it could not be arranged until next week. Ms. Shaw recommended continuing this item until the next meeting. Public portion of the hearing was opened. Mary Leal and Henry Ramirez, residents in the area, agree with the road becoming a collector. They feel there are enough lanes already to meet traffic needs. Public portion of the hearing was closed. Commissioner Sprague stated that he is always against downgrading from arterial to collector because perhaps in 10, 15 or 20 years from now, we could find out we should have left it as an arterial. Commissioner Sprague agreed with the project being continued. Commissioner Brady said that in light of the county's letter raising significant CEQA issues, he thinks not only does staff need to meet with them but they need to address the issues in a form to address the CEQA challenge that they have made. Commissioner Sprague made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tkac, to continue Item 7.2 to the next Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by group vote. 7.3a&b See Consent Agenda Iter~.2d&e 7.4a&b General Plan AmendmentJZone'C,,hanqe No. 01-0916 (City of Bakersfield) (Ward 4) Staff report given recommending appr~. Commissioner Boyle asked Mr. Grady if he'oq.uld give an.example of some of the uses that are possible under C-O zoning? Mr. GradUald an example of some of the uses that would be allowed in a C-O zone are: accounting, 'a~vertising agencies, banks, business management consulting services, professional mem'l~rship organizations, graphic design, commercial photography, day care nurseries, d~ective and security services, engineering, surveying and environmental pi nna lng service, governmental services, medical, dental, etc. Commissioner Boyle asked if you can h~ve a mini-mart, gas station or restaurant ~n the zone w~thout changing it or getting a CUP? dy sa~d no. Minutes~ PC~ Thursday~ April 18~ 2002 Page 5 commissioner Brady asked if ;y needed to add a statement that the shared driveway approaches shall be placed approval of the Traffic Engineer? Mr. Walker said the intent is to give them as much possible but also to comply with Public Works' desire in planning the streets and traffic :hey have as few driveways as needed. Mr. Walker feels that it does not need to be put in ut from the hearing they can be assured that that location has an option as it exceeds the ~um standards for separation. Commissioner Brady asked if it 't read "parcels fronting on both Patton Way and Meany Avenue shall have shared drive les? Ms. Shaw said that neither she nor the Traffic Engineer have any objection to the lan( ge being added to the condition. Motion was made by Commissioner Gay, by Commissioner McGinnis, to approve and adopt Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. the findings and conditions set forth in attached resolution Exhibit "A" in addition to ~e modifications made to items 3 and 5 in the staff · memo dated April 16. 2002. Also, make lat there were modifications in conditions 26 and 28 that all masonry block walls shall be 6 feet height and that condition number 28 refers to lots 1,2 & 3 in the industrial track. And that the driveways meet the approval of the Traffic Engineer. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Brady, Gay, Tkac, Tragish, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Sprague 7. PUBLIC HEARING - General Plan Amendment No. 01-1025 (City of Bakersfield) (Continued from April 4, 2002) (Wards 1 & 2) Ms. Shaw said that she has been unable to schedule a meeting with the county to discuss their comments until the following day and that they are requesting this item be continued until May 16, 2002. Ms. Shaw also told the Commission she has provided the Commissioners with her Level of Service "cheat sheet" per their request during the pre-meeting on Monday. Public portion of the hearing was opened. No one spoke either for or against the item. On a motion by Commissioner Sprague, seconded by Commissioner Tkac, this item was continued until May 16, 2002. Motion carried. Public hearing was reopened. 8. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Ii~EGARDING EXPANDED PUBLIC NOTICE Mr. Grady said that the Commission was p.r~vided with a memorandum from him that provides the Commission with an overview of pubic notic~requirements for land use approvals and regulations. It is intended to provide the Commission with a little background of what some of the requirements are that the department adheres~,o when they are providing public hearing notices. Mr. Grady suggested that the Commission go o~(er this information and then hold this matter over until the new Commissioners are seated and the~form a committee so that some time could be Minutes~ PCp Thursday~ May 16~ 2002 - Council Chamber~ City Hall Pa!Te 11 Sprague asked if there is enough width to have four lanes without the median ithout taking away the required parking for the market? Ms. Shaw said she doesn't how much more width will be needed but one lane takes 20 feet. C er Sprague said he believes by giving up the median it will work and he believes it absolute. £ stated that he thinks they should approve the project tonight with Mr. Walker's nd add a condition to remove the median and provide two lanes egress and two ingress the Home Depot property west to Mt. Vernon. Commissioner S ue asked if the traffic study that was done originally covers the development of ect and is it appropriate for the streets? Mr. Walker said that the traffic study that was~ne for this area included the parcels that are in consideration tonight. Als0, it about 60,000 sq.ft, more retail area than what is being developed. There were ' ;sion comments. Motion was made by sioner Gay, seconded by Commissioner Tkac, to approve and adopt Zone Change )263 with the findings and conditions set forth in attached resolution Exhibit "A" incor :lng the following changes: 1. Two full lanes the east on Mall View Road. 2. Two full lanes outbound he west on Mall View Road. 3. A buffer wall on the south of the truck well shall be incorporated to provide a sound buffer high enough to apartments to the south; and 4. Incorporate the May 16 the Traffic Engineer, Steve Walker. Recommend same to the City Council. Public portion of the hearing was closed. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 'Commissioners Blockley, ;ay, McGinnis, Tkac, Sprague NOES: Commissioner Tragish ABSENT: None Commissioner Tragish said that he voted no because has been shown that Mall View Road needs to be four lanes in each ~. He thinks the testimony of Mr. Chipman and Mr. Walker indicates the roadway as configured is adequate to handle the anticipated traffic from that particular site. He Id like to see four lanes but feels that it might create more problems by cutting into in the process. 8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01-1025 (City of Bakersfield) (Wards 1 & 2) Staff report recommending approval by city staff was given. County staff will not recommend that their portion change to collector. No one spoke either for against the project. Public portion of the hearing was closed. Minutes~ PCp Thursday, May 16~ 2002 - Council Chamber~ City Hall Pacje 12 Commissioner Tragish said he would like to keep it as an arterial. Commissioner Sprague said that he thinks it would be unfair to downgrade this street to a collector. He would like to vote to deny this project. Commissioner Blockley asked what kind of restrictions would be placed on the number of access points that a developer could have? Ms. Shaw said typically during development stages, they will require waiver of access along both collectors and arterials to limit the access. Commissioner McGinnis said that he agrees with Commissioners Sprague and Tragish. Commissioner Blockley asked if there are podions developed to arterial standards now? Ms. Shaw said yes there are several short portions. Ms. Shaw also said that either way, we will have sawtooth development. Ms. Shaw also said that an arterial has a 90 foot curb-to-curb width and a collector has a 68 foot curb-to-curb width. Commissioner Sprague asked if the city can waive the requirements for an arterial? Ms. Shaw said that the only time they can't require that it be brought up to city standards if it doesn't hit cedain thresholds. The thresholds being whether or not the improvement to the property is in excess of 25 percent of the valuation, etc. Commissioner Sprague said that he would like to look at this a little harder and would entertain a motion to continue this item. Commissioner Tragish asked if they could make a motion whereby they say "Brundage Lane to a certain point will be graded to a collector and after that point to the city limits it would be an arterial?" Ms. Shaw said the Commission has the discretion to do that. Commissioner Blockley said he thinks an arterial designation does not make it a better street. He thinks it should be a collector. Commissioner McGinnis said that they should refer this to committee and give it more study before they take action. He would make a motion to continue this item. Commissioner Sprague said he would like to have a report from Public Works presented to them at the next meeting. He doesn't feel it needs to be sent to a committee. There were no other Commission comments. Public portion of the hearing was reopened. Motion was made by Commissioner McGinnis, seconded by Commissioner Gay, to continue this item until June 6, 2002. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Blockley, EIlison, Gay, McGinnis, Tkac, Tragish, Sprague NOES: None ABSENT: None 9. APPEAL OF DECISION OF THEX~EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR DENYING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR SI~VER RHINO. (Ward 5) \ This item was withdrawn by the applicar~. PC Minutes, June 6, 2002 Page 16 Approved on the Consent Agend~ 7. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 01-1025 (City of Bakersfield) (Wards 1 & 2) Staff report given. Public portion of the hearing was opened. No one spoke either for or against the project. Commissioner Sprague made the following suggestion: If between Oak and Vineland there is potential for mitigation of staff's recommendation to downgrade to a collector from Oak Street to Union Avenue as collector status, and then have an arterial status from Union to Vineland? As development occurs from Union east to Vineland, the applicant would bring forward a plan for development which would include curbing and a free flow line to be determined by the traffic engineer and the planning director at the site plan approval process and then it would not have to come back before the planning Commission. Commissioner Gay stated his preference to downgrade Brundage Lane from Oak Street to Union and moving it east to Lakeview and have an arterial from Lakeview out to Vineland. Commissioner Blockley stated his concern for keeping the arterial status is to encourage development along Brundage Lane, and if there is restricted access which is the requirement for arterials, it makes more sense to him to follow the original recommendation of staff to decrease the designation of the street but keep the width as developed as an arterial. Because this is not acceptable to the County he inquired if there is some mechanism for changing the amount of access that can be designated for that particular arterial? Staff responded that where it is an existing situation there is a different rule. With new development there is much more. restrictive access control, especially on arterial streets. With the Brundage situation it would make good engineering sense if a totally new development came in along an existing area as to how much access they would have and how many driveways they would have, but it would not just be a set rule of no access to the arterial street. Commissioner Blockley asked that if a developer wanted to change use what would the CitY's position be on access to which staff responded that it is not a hard rule. Commercial development has access to arterial streets with commercial development. There are policies and standards in effect that limit the amount or spacing of driveways and access to make good engineering sense for accessibility and turns. Commissioner Blockley indicated that he spoke with Irma Carson, and she indicated that she would support Staff's recommendation. The public portion of the hearing is closed. Commissioner Tragish stated that he wants to encourage development along the east side of Brundage, but does not want to penalize those who have already spent the money to widen the street. Would like Brundage from Oak to Union to be downgraded to a collector, and from Lakeview to Vineland to be an arterial. He asked staff that if the Commissioner were to maintain Brundage as an arterial from Lakeview to Vineland if that would have the least amount of impact on property owners? Staff responded that between Lakeview and Mt. Vernon that Calcot owns the most property and that they have already improved that to arterial or collector standard except for an area in front of their office, but it would impact them if they tried to do any future development on their site. Staff indicated that Calcot has a substantial legal parcel that would be under site plan review and anything they do would trigger arterial improvements along Brundage and Calcot is what precipitated staff looking at this. PC Minutes, June 6, 2002 Page 17 Commissioner Tragish asked if from Mt. Vernon to Vineland would have the least amount of . impact to property owners to which staff responded in the affirmative and that staff has received 25 to 30 phone calls from County residents between Oswell and Fairfax who would prefer a collector, but the City does not have jurisdiction over that. Commissioner Sprague commented that improvement costs should be spread evenly among the owner developers. Commissioner Blockley asked if the width would remain the same whether it is an arterial or downgraded to a collector? Staff responded that the ultimate width of an arterial is 110 feet and the curb line to curb line width is 90 feet, and for a collector the right-of-way width is 90 feet, and the curb line to curb line distance is 68 feet. Staff is proposing to change the ultimate requirement from the 90 feet of pavement for an arterial to the 68 feet of pavement for a collector. In the area being discussed of changing from an arterial to a collector from Oak Street to Union, there essentially would be no physical change, because the existing improvements are already at the collector standard.. From Lakeview to the east, it's a 50/50 proposition. There are some limited properties that are at less than arterial standards and close to collector standards. New ones are done to arterial standards. There is a difference of about 10 feet of paving. Commissioner Blockley expressed his concern of unfairly penalizing existingproperty owners. Staff suggested that between Lakeview and Oswell that it be called a collector status, but as developments come in, they would evaluate whether or not the flow line needed to be kept at the same point as the adjacent developments. If the Commission wants to keep a level playing field then Union or Lakeview would be a reasonable demarcation point as there are very few parcels in this area that are currently out to arterial width. Commissioner Tragish reiterated that the least amount of impact would be leaving Brundage as an arterial between Union and Vineland. Commissioner McGinnis moved to adopt the Resolution making findings approving the Negative Declaration approving the request for a General Plan Amendment changing the circulation element designation from Brundage Lane between Wible and Oak to the intersection or, Union Avenue, and incorporating Marian Shaw's memoranda of May 31, 2002 and May 10, 2002, Stanley Grady's memorandum of March 29, 2002, and changing Brundage Lane from an arterial to a collector and recommend same to City Council. Motion seconded by Commissioner Tkac. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Blockley, Gay, McGinnis, Tkac, Tragish, Sprague NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Ellison 8. C O M M U NICA.~TIO..._~.N ~,,X' None ~ 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS ~. ther~,s Public Notice committee meeting tomorrow at noon. Commissioner McGinnis stated a ADMINISTRATIVE .REPORT MEETING DATE: July 31, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: 8. hh. TO: Honorable MayOr and City Council APPROVED FROM: Bart J. Thiltgen, City Attorney DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE: July 18, 2002 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER SUB,~JECT: Sidewalk Inspection Program RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomrhends referral to the Urban Developm'ent Committee. BACKGROUND: In February 1995, Report No. 1-95 from the Urban Development Committee regarding a S~.dewalk Repair Program was presented to the City Council, which dire¢-t~d that the policy outlined in the report be implemented. Recent case law has created a situation which may necessitate a modification to this policy. Staff recommends this matter be referred to the Urban Development Committee to review the current policy in conjunction with this new case law to determine if any modifications to the policy are warranted. BJT:las JU31CA1 .CC July 18, 2002, 10:1lam .., ( CONFIDENTIAL -- ,.~ PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY- ' CLIENT AND ATTORNEY WORK-pRoDUCT PRIVILEGES MEMORANDUM CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE July 11, 2002 TO: ALAN TANDY, City Manager FROM: BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney ~ SUBJECT: SIDEWALK INSPECTION PROGRAM As we discussed a few months ago, recent case law was causing our office to re- evaluate its recommendation whether a formal sidewalk inspection program should be implemented by the City. Prior opinions recommended against implementing such a program from the viewpoint that the City would lose potential "notice" defenses to a trip and fall case, and correspondingly establishment of a program could generate an additional allegation of negligently performing the inspections. Attached is a legal memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Andrew Thomson which reviews the current state of case law decisions and evaluates the benefit of such an inspection program. Summarizing this memorandum, recent case law in California, dealing with private sector dangerous condition litigation, has held that liability will be found if the owner of the premises did not inspect, or take other proper action to ascertain, the condition of the premises and if, by inspecting or taking such action, the owner would have discovered the dangerous condition. I have very little doubt this holding will be extended to public entities in the near future. In addition, the recent Ninth Circuit decision establishes that streets and sidewalks are a "program" under the ADA and failure to maintain them, resulting in a lack of accessibility for the disabled, will be deemed a violation of the ADA. It is important to recognize that the defenses in dangerous condition cases which exist in California do not apply in a federal ADA case. Further, in the event of an ADA plaintiff prevailing in litigation, an award of attorneys' fees will be ordered, in addition to injunctive relief and any direct damages award. The City has been very successful in defending, or settling for small amounts, our trip and fall cases in the past three years. It should be noted that we get relatively few claims for sidewalk trip and fall, but when we do, it normally goes to litigation. The only two cases where substantial awards or settlements occurred was when the 'City was fully indemnified by a third party (those awards/settlements were $25,000 and $30,000). However, a recent review of verdicts and'settlements in the state indicates that the average amount of award or settlement is now up to $45,000 to $55,000. Some awards/settlements have gone into the Iow six figures, but those generally relate to significant injuries, such as severe head trauma, major back or orthopedic medical conditions. Most of those cases were private sector cases, but a few public entity cases did have awards in this range. .- ALAN TANDY, City Manager July 11, 2002 Page 2 Strictly from an economic viewpoint, when our past three years of expenditures is considered, the cost of a formal inspection/maintenance program (one full-time inspector plus vehicle at $60,000/year plus additional repair work, estimated at $25,000/year) is not justified, even if one includes the cost of those cases where we were fully indemnified. It is estimated the City has expended no more than $20,000 in litigation costs (including attorney time), $5,000 in expert costs (medical reviews) and $10,000 in settlements. If you add the $55,000 in settlements (of the indemnified cases) to this cost, our three years of costs would only be equivalent to one year's cost of a formal program. Even if one were to presume that the California case law will create greater exposure and ultimate monetary liability, it is questionable whether this increased cost would, in the near future, rise to the amount which would justify the expenditure associated with establishing a formal program at this time. Despite my view that a formal inspection program is not economically justifiable at this time, I must advise that it is anticipated our legal defense and liability costs will increase in the next few years. Further, in the event the city becomes embroiled in an ADA suit, and loses, we could be exposed to significant attorneys' fees and ultimately be ordered to implement such a formal inspection program. As a final aside, we have been concerned with primarily a sidewalk inspection program. While claims and litigation associated with sidewalks is a relatively small number, we do experience a relatively large number of claims associated with streets (pothole damage to vehicles, paint transfers, dangerous condition, etc.). Most of these claims are handled by Risk Management and do not rise to formal litigation. However, when they do rise to formal litigation, we generally face a sizeable monetary exposure. I would not advocate a formal street inspection program due to our enormous backlog of street maintenance and repair and further due to our inability to address those problems which might be identified by an inspection program. The program would then be used against us in court, both in state court, as well as federal court. I must advise you, however, as in the case with sidewalks, there is a potential for a plaintiff to bring an ADA action which could result in an order to establish such a program. In my opinion, the odds of this occurring are minimal as the plaintiff would have to show the street was not accessible for the disabled and therefore was discriminatory. I believe this would be a significant burden to overcome. Sidewalks, on the other hand, may be much more tenuous for the City as disabled individuals, particularly those limited to a wheelchair, need to have direct accessibility in order to proceed along thoroughfares in the same manner as non-disabled citizens. BJT:las .. Attachment cc: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director S:"J=UBLIC WORKS\MEMOS\SIDEWALK iNSPECTION PROGRAM.DOC ICONFIDENTIAL ' PROTECTEDI IBY ATtORNEY/CLIENT AND M E M O R A N I) IJ M ,A -FORNEY WORK PRODUCT [I PRIVILEGES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FAX 852-2000 PHONE 32~3721 July 3, 2002 TO: BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney FROM: ANDREW C. THOMSON, Deputy City Attorney SUBJECT: INSPECTIONS OF STREETS AND SIDEWALKS ISSUE Would the City benefit from a street/sidewalk inspection program? ANSWER Yes. Recent "dangerous condition" and '"ADA accessibility" cases indicate that in the absence of a sufficient inspection program, the City will face almost :strict liability" for the condition of its sidewalks resulting in a significant increase in expenditures associated with litigation, settlements and judgments. ANALYSIS The City of Bakersfield has many thousands of miles of roads and sidewalks within the City limits. Often holes and cracks appear in roads, and chips, cracks and raising occur in sidewalks; all of which create dangerous conditions of public property which have resulted in personal injury to users. As such occurrences increase, claims increase, litigation costs increase and liability settlement and judgment payments additionally increase. In addition, recent court decisions have required publiC entities to inspect maintain and make safe all sidewalks for the benefit of persons with disabilities. In the absence of compliance with the court decisions, additional litigation on the ADA sidewalk issues should be anticipated. GENERAL CIVIL LIABILITY California Government Code section 835(a) - (b), which discusses dangerous conditions of public property, indicates that liability o.nly attaches for two reasons: (a) a dangerous condition was created by a "negligent or wrongful act or omission of the employee of the public entity within the scope of his employment." (Government Code section 835(a); or (b) that '~the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition.., a sufficient time prior to the injury to have taken measures to ~CONFIDENTIAL 11 BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 2 protect against the dangerous condition" but that the public entity failed to take such measures (Government Code section 835(b)). A plaintiff needs only to prove a negligent act or notice, but not both. It is extremely rare that a public employee, in the course and scope of his employment, creates a dangerous condition. A much more common situation is simply an allegation in the complaint in which the plaintiff alleges that the public entity has actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition of public property and has failed to remedy the dangerous condition within an appropriate time frame. Actual Notice As the term "actual notice" implies, a plaintiff may prove actual notice by showing that an actual inspection of the property was made, that a defect was in fact reported to an appropriate public officer or that measures were taken by the public entity regarding the defect which showed that the public entity realized that the condition of the public property was dangerous. One of the drawbacks to the "actual notice" defense by a public entity (i.e., that the public entity did not have "actual notice" of any dangerous condition of public property) is the recent inclination of the courts to look to inspection programs, maintenance and/or reasonably timed review by the entity of general areas of public property. The courts have increasingly focused on the lack of an inspection program as a bar to a public entity asserting that it did not have "actual notice" of a dangerous condition. Constructive Notice Constructive notice of a dangerous condition is a statutory alternative to actual notice as a basis for public entity liability. As with actual notice, the plaintiff has the burden of proof and must show that a dangerous condition had existed "for such a period of time and was of such an obvious nature that the public entity, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character." A determination as to whether a defect had existed for an adequate length of time, and whether the defect was sufficiently conspicuous that the public entity should be charged with notice of its existence and dangerous character are ordinarily questions of fact to be resolved from all of the relevant circumstances. Questions of fact are usually reserved for a jury's determination thus increasing the chance of a large verdict and judgment. Constructive notice may be proven by various types of evidence including reports of similar accidents at the scene, complaints about the condition, governmental studies prepared by the public entity and application of the "reasonable inspection" test. The BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 3 foregoing is set forth in Government Code section 835.2(b) which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: A public entity had constructive notice of a dangerous condition within the meaning of subdivision (b) of section 835 only if the plaintiff establishes that the condition had existed for such a period of time and was of such an obvious nature that the public entity, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character. On the issue of due care, admissible evidence includes but is not limited to evidence as to: (1) Whether the existence of the condition and its dangerous character would have been discovered by an inspection system that was reasonably. adequate (considering the practicality and cost of inspection weighed against the likelihood and magnitude of potential danger to which failure to inspect would give rise) to inform the public entity whether the property was safe for the use or uses for which the public entity used or intended others to use the public property and for uses that the public entity actually knew others were making of the public property or adjacent property. (2) Whether the public entity maintained and operated such an inspection system with due care and did not discover the condition. In addition, recent cases have shown that constructive notice may be imputed to a public entity if it can be shown that an obvious danger existed for an adequate period of time prior to the accident that the public entity, by reasonable inspection,, should have discovered and remedied the situation. (Carson v. Facilities Development Co. 1~984) 36 C.3d 830; Nishihama v. City and County of San Francisco (2001) 93 Cai.App.4 298.) ADA Issues Recently, in Bardon v. City of Sacramento (2002) DAR 6577, a United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, the court held that public sidewalks (and apparently streets) are considered "programs" under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and an entity must make them usable for ail persons with disabilities. In such a case, the City would substantially benefit by the initiation of an inspection program with respect to maintaining public property, including streets and sidewalks, in a usable manner for disabled persons. In Bardon v. City of Sacramento (2002) DAR 6577 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated, in pertinent part, as follows: BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 4 Requiring a city to maintain its sidewalks so that they are accessible to individuals with disabilities is consistent with the tenor of § 35.150, which requires the provision of curb ramps, "giving priority to walkways serving" government offices, '~ransportation, places of public accommodation, and employers," but then "followed by walkways serving other areas." (28 C.F.R. § 35.150(d)(2).) Section 35.150's requirement of curb ramps in all pedestrian walkways reveals a general concern for the accessibility of public sidewalks, as well as a recognition that sidewalks fall within the ADA's coverage, and would be meaningless if the sidewalks between the curb ramps were inaccessible. The Ninth Circuit continued on to state that Title II's prohibition of discrimination and the provision of public services plus the maintenance of public sidewalks is a normal function of a municipal entity. The Court's decision in Bardon v. City of Sacramento dictates that the City must maintain all of its sidewalks in a manner that would allow disabled persons to use and travel on those sidewalks without interference and, presumably, without the threat of danger to themselves or their property. The Sacramento City suit was brought by a number of disabled persons seeking access and maintenance of the sidewalks in that city. Frequently, groups concerned with such issues, once successful in one location, will pursue the same type remedy in other locations. Cost - Benefit In the last few years, the City has been subjected to a number of lawsuits concerning trip/slip and falls regarding street and sidewalk conditions. One of the most frequent defenses which has been asserted on behalf of the City has been that the City did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition and thus is not subject to liabilitY in the particular suit. This defense has been used with a modicum of success; having helped resolve numerous cases which resulted in dismissal and/or settlements for minimal amounts such as the recent litigation whichwas resolved for $500.00 (which was approximately half of what our medical expert would have charged to initiate his record review in preparation for trial of the matter). In recent years, the courts have looked increasingly to reasonable inspections in order to insure that the public entity had done everything in its power to discover the dangerous conditions and remedy those conditions prior to the occurrence of any accident. BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 5 In Straughter v. State of Cafifornia (1976) 89 CaI.App.3d 102, the court held that the state had constructive notice of icy conditions in the Altamont Pass area since it had not conducted reasonable inspections. The Straughter court stated, in pertinent part, as follows: Constructive notice may be found where the dangerous condition would have been discovered by a reasonable inspection. (Stanford v. City of Ontario... ). The 1972 Stanford v. City of Ontario case resulted from injuries suffered by employees of a plumbing contractor which the city had retained to extend a city's sewer and lateral. In that case, the court stated, in pertinent part, as follows: We are satisfied that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding by the jury that a reasonable inspection would have disclosed the existence of the unshored and unsloped excavation; that there would have been adequate time to take preventative measures; and that the city had constructive notice of the dangerous condition upon its property. Around the same time, the courts continued to focus on a public entity's duty to have its employees discover and remedy dangerous conditions. In Briggs v. State of California (1971) 14 CaI.App.3d 489, the court stated, in pertinent part, as follows: Constructive notice may be imputed if it can be shown that an obvious danger existed for a sufficient period of time before the accident to have permitted [the public entity's] employees, in the exercise of due care, to discover and remedy the situation. (Briggs v. State of Cafifornia (1971 ) 14 CaI.App.3d 489, 494- 495.) The courts, continuing down this path, have gotten increasingly more adamant that public entities need to conduct inspections. In fact, in 2001, in Nishihama v. City.and County of San Francisco (2001) 93 Cai.App.4th 298, the court stated, in pertinent part, as follows: 'Government Code section 835.2, accordingly expressly recognizes that in determining whether a public entity has CONFIDENTIAL BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 6 constructive notice of a dangerous condition, the jury may consider whether "the condition and its dangerous character would have been discovered by an inspection system that was reasonably adequate.., to inform the public entity whether the property was safe for [its intended use]" and "[w]hether the public entity maintained such inspection system with due care and did not discover the condition." The movement towards a requirement of inSpection programs has also been applied by the courts to business and commercial properties in addition to public entities. The courts have looked beyond streets and sidewalks, to commercial buildings and large retail stores. In Lopez v. Superior Court (1996) 45 Cai.App.4th 705, the court held that a landowner's lack of knowledge of a dangerous condition on leased commercial premises was not a defense. The court held that a landowner has an affirmative duty to exercise ordinary care to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition and therefore must inspect them or take other proper means to ascertain their condition, and if by the exercise of reasonable care, the landowner would have discovered the dangerous condition, then the landowner is to be found liable. The courts have gone even further recently in finding that an inspeCtion system must be present. In Ortega v. Kmart Corporation (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1200, the court found that an owner must inspect the premises or take other proper action to ascertain the condition of the premises and if, by the exercise of reasonable care, the owner would have discovered the dangerous condition but did not do so, then the owner is liable for failing to correct the condition. The Ortega court additionally stated that if the evidence showed that an inspection had not been made within a "particular period of time prior to an accident," the evidence may warrant an inference of liability since the defective condition existed long enough so that a person exercising reasonable care would have discovered the dangerous condition. From this and similar decisions, it appears that, in the absence of an appropriate inspection program, the courts will find constructive notice and thus liability. With respect to "actual notice," liability can be imposed upon a public entity if that public entity had actual notice of the dangerous condition a sufficient time prior to the alleged injury to repair the property. In a case where actual notice is an issue, an inspection program could be detrimental to the City in the event that the City inspects the property, becomes aware of dangerous conditions, and does not repair it in a timely fashion. However, based upon past performance by the City Street Maintenance Division, which includes sidewalk repair, the inspection program could be a significant benefit to the City since the Street Maintenance Division has been extremely responsive in correcting citizen's complaints with respect to streets and sidewalks. Based upon the Division's past response times, typically between 24 and 48 hours, the City appears responsive and will BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 7 usually repair a condition shortly after notification, of the proper authorities, of that condition. The past response time has been beneficial in resolving a number of cases which have turned on actual and/or constructive notice. In those cases, the City maintained that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition, but upon notification of the existence of the condition, the problem was rectified within 24 to 48 hours of the notification. Assuming a continuation of such responsiveness by the Street Maintenance Division, an inspection program would be extremely beneficial since a number of potentially dangerous conditions could be alleviated prior to any incident or injury occurring. In such an instance, the inspection system in conjunction with prompt repair could save the City thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of dollars per year in litigation costs, settlements and judgments. In addition to being a benefit for the purposes of arguing that no actual or constructive notice existed in dangerous condition of public property cases, there are other benefits to the implementation of a street/sidewalk inspection system. The inspection and maintenance of sidewalks consistent with the ADA requirements would be beneficial to the City in reducing litigation costs and potential settlements and judgments from not only ADA cases but from all litigation, and would provide safer streets for City residents. On the budget side, initiating an inspection system for the streets and sidewalks within the City of Bakersfield would, by necessity, result in the expenditure of funds for a vehicle or vehicles and an inspector or inspectors. CONCLUSION The aforementioned cases, and other similar cases, reflect the court's increasing tendency to require an inspection program or system, and reasonably timed inspections, before providing a litigation defense through the use of an assertion of the absence of actual or constructive notice. The courts have increasingly gone out of their way to find that in the absence of an inspection system the defendants had constructive knowledge and were thus liable for the dangerous condition. It is simply a matter of time before such an assertion is made with respect to the City, and once the floodgates are opened, it is likely that the majority of plaintiffs' attorneys with dangerous condition cases will assert similar allegations thereby negating the actual and constructive notice defense upon which the City has often relied. In addition, the ADA based decision in Bardon v. City of Sacramento dictates that the City must.maintain all of its sidewalks in a manner that would allow disabled persons to use and travel on those sidewalks without interference and, presumably, without the threat BART J. THILTGEN, City Attorney July 3, 2002 Page 8 of danger to themselves or their property. ADA litigation, being based upon the Federal regulations, will not be concerned with actual or constructive notice, instead focusing on the condition of the sidewalks. In ADA litigation, it appears that in the absence of a sufficient inspection program, the City will face almost a "strict liability" situation for its sidewalks. Based upon the foregoing analysis, it is anticipated that an inspection system, when combined with a prompt response of the Street Maintenance Division, would result in considerable savings to the City on numerous issues but primarily in the area of litigation costs, settlements and judgments. ACT:dll S:~ct\lnspectStrs&Sidewalks2Mmo.doc Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display Requestor: I~.?.!a.?so~ ........................ 1 Wara: I~ ............................... i Ref~,C~ted: Req. Completion Date: [~!~8(2~,0.2.' .................... ! Meeting: 1~.~!.~072 Initial Referral Information Short Description: I'~' EAF BLOWERS Long Description: ***REFERRAL TO .URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** · ' COUNCILMEMBER HANsoN REFERRED TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT coMMiTTE THE' ISSUE OF LEAF BLOWERS FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW. .~ ~ Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Lead: ~- Assigned To: Response? (~) 1.?~.?.6~???t ~?m.. .................. Reassigned To: Response? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: I _i I'" Phone: Phone: .../F~~derPage?Page~Referra~%2524Disp~ay&F~~derID=E~~RK$BAKERSFIELD$~~~~~8542/25/2~~3 /7. PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee' Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: Company/ Organization: Address: ~) ,~)/~' ,'~_~.,~/...,~x.,~,~ ~)~- Fax/o-mail.'~/C~ y' ~-) ~ p Phone: ~ ??- ~ ~ ? ~ ! .~/ · /! PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ~ ~ Company/ Organization: Phone: Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display .~:1.~oo,4~ ~ ~~ David Couch I R~. Completion Date: [ ............................. M~ting: ~ Initial Referral Information Sho~ D~cfiption: IDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES ~ ~ng D~cfiption: ***Ag~ ~O ~ Dg~O~ co~gs*** S~ GAO~ CO~O~ ~ A~AC~gD. A~c~t A' A~e~ent B A~e~ent C .......................... Attachment D - Lead: -- Assigned To: Response? , Reassigned To: Response? Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: .../F~~derPage?Page=Referra~%2524Disp~ay&F~~derID=E~~RK$BAKERSFIELD$~~~~~8432/25/2~~3 A C^~, ~o~-P~om Co~o~to~ ' ' ' ' ' 441 VINELAND ROAD B~FmhD, CAUFORNL~ 93307 F^x(661)(661)363-0218363-0783 ..... . . .:" .. . . Mission Statement The mission of the Smart Growth Coalition is to inform the public about the future impacts of growth and land-use decisions, and to advocate policies that build a quality community and a healthy economy. 24, 2002 officers Councilman David Couch John Fallgatter, President City of Bakersfield Philip Ryall, Vice President 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bill Slocumb, Secretary Barbara Lomas, Chief Financial Officer Bakersfield, Califomia 93301 Executive Director Pauline Larwood Dear Co__Couch: Other Board Members J. Philip BentleyJack Pandol ["he Smart Growth Coalition of Kern County supports efforts to Loren Booth Peter Pankey Holly Hart Pat 5mith encourage infill, redevelopment, and other innovative projects that Wilt Hutchison Tenie Stoner encourage a compact community design. Further revitalization of David Milazzo Jim Wiens downtown Bakersfield will require such innovative projects. Policies 1. IndMdual property rights are fgpndational to I'hese projects should include mixed-use that promotes efficient use of our policy platform, therefore a property owner's existing infrastructure; the adaptation of commercial or industrial buildings right to continue an established property use has priority over a neighboring property owner's allowing residential lofts that attract, among others, artists and artisans; wish to change the use of his property, and projects that will entice residential development which in turn will 2. Land use planning and implementation should attract the broad spectrum of downtown workers with the desire to live in remain fundamentally a local function with fmal land use decksions remaining with local proximity to their work and to downtown amenities. govemmenc 3. Land use policy is best bom of open discussion Two years ago we conducted a Community Image Survey whose and community consensus, respondents represented a significant cross section of Metropolitan 4. Clear and compelling reasons for proposed Bakersfield. An important result of that survey was the consistent and changes to existing General Plans should be demonstrated before our elected or appointed strong comments of respondents that suggested tax and other development officials alter them. incentives were appropriate to avoid inner city blight or decline. We 5. The County and our various cities should believe there is community support for streamlining obstacles and develop compatible land use ordinances and policies through collaborative and cooperative removing roadblocks when it' comes to revitalizing the City's downtown processes. 6. Immediate public notice of General Plan Amendments and Zone Change applications pro~qdes everyone time for valuable community In conclusion, we would be pleased to participate in any streamlining input and consideration, effort that would make this possible. 7. Agricultural, mineral and the defense industries are the foundation of our economy. We should Sincerely, safeguard these industries from the impacts of 8. Development should pay for its own proportionate share of infrastructure and ongoing public services. 9. To promote efficient use of our existing Executive Director I infrastructure, we should encourage infill, redevelopment, and innovative projects that encourage compact design. lO. A vibrant metropolitan center and county seat is a benefit to all citizens. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Member OF KERN COUNTY Biff NAHB NA?ZOZ,~L A.~SOC~T~O~ 'BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 PHONE (661) 633-1316 FaX (661) 633-1317 oFHoM£BuILD£~ President Pat Henneberry Castle & Cooke California, Inc. May 29, 2002 Executive Vice President Brian J. Todd First Vice President Councilman David Couch Roger Mclntosh City of Bakersfield, Ward Four Mclntosh & Associates 1501 Truxtun Avenue Second Vice President Bakersfield, California 93301 Gregory Petrini Petrini Construction, Inc. Dear Dave: Secretary As I indicated in our phone conversation, BIA shares your interest in Calvin R. Stead, Esq. Borton, Petrini & Conron, LLP identifying and streamlining obstacles and disincentives that impede new development activity and adaptation of existing buildings to different uses Treasurer in downtown Bakersfield. John Cicerone Mountain View Bravo, LLC We have always believed that a healthy housing economy should offer the Immediate Past President greatest number of choices possible in order to meet a variety of housing David Turner consumers' needs. While such "infill" housing will not notably offset the DavidA. Turner Homes demand for new subdivisions of single-family homes, we support it as an Board of Directors exciting opportunity for innovative, niche housing including mixed-use and Glenn Davis other higher density units uniquely suited to the downtown area. Bank of Stockdale We will be glad to participate in any discussions of how local ordinances Michael Hair, Jr. Bingley Homes can be modified to encourage this type of development, whether through the Development Streamlining Task Force or other forum. Kyle Carter Kyle Carter Homes, Inc. Thank you for your interest in this important issue. Ron Ray Coleman Homes, Inc. Sincerely, Greg Hash Fallgatter-Rhodes ~ Insurance Agencies Marion Malamma First American Title BRIAN J. TODD Mike Kane Executive Vice President Granite Construction Darryl Tucker McAllister Ranch/Jasman Development David Dmohowski Project Design Consultants Mike Granlee Stewart Title Kern-.Kaweah Chapter Bakersfield, CA 93385 http://ken~ka,veah, sierraclub, or~ ,~ua. 28; 2~2 Co~ci~ Dahd Couch C~y ~I1 1501 T~ Avenu~ B~ersfield, CA 93301 D~ar Co~ei~ Couch, ~e Kem-Kaw~h Chapter of ~e Sie~ Club has long supposed re~mfion of · e do~to~ region of ~e city. ~e p~ciples of ~-fill development, affor~ble hous~g, ~r~ of r~il md co~ercial ~cilifi~s, ~d efficient ~o~fion options ~ould be ~e basis ofpl~g. W~ ~e So~ea~ B~ersfield Redevel~ment Proj~ ~d ~e ar~ g~em]y d~ed as Do~to~ B~ersfi~l( ~e Chapter suppo~ ~ proposal to a~ ~e ~cial co~y ~o ~e ar~, ~g ~e ~meial co~~ ~e economo hub. ~ add,ion we suppo~ ~e ~co~omfion of mixed-use developmenL ~om ~ndom~iums ~d ap~en~ to r~ bus~sses, e~ecia~y food mark~. ~rou~ · e developmem of commercial ~d r~il bus~sses, peopl~ will see d~to~ as a desirable residential ar~. ~e present ~cr~se ~ bus~esses related to ~e a~s a~eres to ~s concur. ~s ~11 reduce co~g ~ces b~ at ~ sam~ t~e w~ shoed ~prove public tm~o~fion by e~c~g GET's schedule ~d se~ce ar~s. We shoed also ~nsider adop~g a li~t m~ commuter s~em. ~e c~ent r~il bus~sses of do~to~ ~11 b~n~ ~om ~ ~cr~s~d residential population. Pr~ently, r~il bus~ess~ have ~ally lo~ ~e~ eu~omer base after 5:00 PM. Us~g a ~cept ~om over 100 y~rs ago, apa~en~ ~ould be ~ncouraged to be l~ted above ~ores ~d bus~ess~. ~eas dedi~ed to ped~s (~d n~ ~e automobile) should be ~ess~d ~d used to co~e~ bus~ss ~d r~sidenfial ~eas. F~ally ~e recr~fional ~cil~ies presently ~ place, ~om Ce~l, B~ch ~d Jato P~ to ~e Kern ~ver co~dor, ~ould be up~ded to en~mge b~ passive ~d a~ve use. ~ '~een belt' ~d '~een ~ace' facil~ies ~11 comp~ent ~ ~cr~sed residential us~ of~e ar~. ~ conclusion ~ Si~a Club is ~llmg to b~m~ ~ a~iv~ 'player' ~ ~e pl~ing process. M~els of success ar~ fo~d ~ ~ny c~es. ~d ~e c~ies are s~lar to Bakersfield. S~cer~ly, ~ Vice-Chaim~ 589-6245 Tom Clegg PO Box 30042 Bakersfield, CA 93385 June 26, 2002 Councilwoman Sue Benham City Council of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Ave Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Councilwoman Benham: Can you please send me a copy of Alternate 15, the proposed cross-town freeway arrangement? If you do not possess a copy of this, can you please direct me to where I can obtain one? I am simply curious. Thank You, Tom Clegg From: <SNMBIKEBRO@cs.com> To: <city_council@ci. bakersfield, ca. us> Date: Sun, Jun 30, 2002 9:28 PM 02 JUL "3 /~H 8.' 03 Subject: (no subject) BAKERSFIELD CITY CLERit Hello I have a question, Recently you built the beach park skate park, they problem is its only for skaters, Us bike riders have, no where to ride for free like the skaters, we would also like a place to go and have fun such as this but there is no such place. So me and along with many bike riders would Distributed to: like to know if we will ever get a place like this and if not then why not? Mayor Every time we go to this skate park to have fun we get kicked out even when there are no skate boarders there, we have to ride in public areas and cops Council give us tickets for trespassing and so on. In closing I would just like to know if it is possible to get a bike park for us to ride for free, a lot of City Mgr young kids ride probably more then skaters, so if you could just get back to City Arty me and let me know I would be grateful thank you. Other ~ez'.+- By City Clerk Date PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority-vote, waive the.time limit. No action will b~ taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ~'~(~ ~ Company/ Organization: y~3,~v/ ~ /_5'__~- Phone: ~ ?~%'-./~>~) Fax/e-mail: ~'~-- Subject= F/oc-~/.~ ~"~/' PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to. three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action-will be taken; this Committee gat,~ers ~nformation and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: Name: '~ ~ ~/~ ~/~ - Company/ v v Organization: Address: Phone: Fax/e-mail: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee - ' Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that ' is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the .time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: '~~~ Company/ Organization: Phone: ~'~'" ~.~a~/e- r~ai,: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban 'Development Committee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers informaticn and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ('~'~)'~""J~-,~. ~ ~-'~S Company/ Organization: \1~.~ ~). ~ /t,-v_)(, Address: Phone: C2-.~ 2':'~7'"~ ~ O Fax/e-mail: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee .Meeting Date You are invited to address .the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, .per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the .time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch (~mm;;ny/ ~ (~ : ~ Organization: Address: Phone: Fax/e-mail: Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date -J ~ I ~ ~ -z~ o-z~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Company/ Organization: Phone: Fax/e-mail: Subject: ~-~ ~ ~tO'~~. PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Commi_ff_ee Committee of the Bakersfield City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David 'Couch Name: ~-~l '~' Company/ Organization: Phone: ~. ~.~-~,-,~ [~x Fax/e-maih Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: D~-~/2~ ./~.,(~'"'-~..'~'7 ~/'"' Company/ Organization: Phone: , ~lson - Chairman ........... i.-~-(66t)--832:8'5-3'~ ...... Cell (661) 204-5775 dwilson@atg, com -Fax 832-1928 P.O. Box 41564, Bakersfield, CA 93309 Ve ~t e lral n ~ M e m o ir i~a [ P allrk C o m m i~ ~t ~t e e , , Lest We Forget , , June 3, 2002 . Allan Tandy, City Manager ,J[Jl~ ~' fr~.-~ 1505 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Tandy, Enclosed are two statements: one made at the community Services Committee meeting on May 15th and another made at our Veterans Committee meeting on May 20th, 2002. We believe the two statements adequately cover our intent and purpose for building a Veterans Memorial Park and Learning Center. We, obviously have a good deal of opposition to our plan and request in locating the Veterans Memorial Park at the Central Park location. This is unfortunate in that we intend to press forward with our goal to locate the park at that site. We hope that these statements will make it more clearly understood just what we are trying to accomplish. We are trying our best to bring something very special to Bakersfield. We will provide a very important learning resource for the general public and in particular our young people. We will be bringing in hundreds if not thousands annually to see this very special memorial park and museum, Learning Center. The business people in downtown Bakersfield will profit greatly with the tourists buying goods and services. Central Park would make this possible, while other alternate sites will be far less adaptable to our vision of an important Learning Center and Memorial Park. Please give this further consideration in your internal deliberations and move this plan forward at the earliest possible time. Yours, Dale R. Wilson, Chairman Kern Veterans Memorial Park Committee Veterans Memorial Park Committee, P.O. Box 41564 Bakersfield, CA 93304 Chairman - Dale Wilson (661) 832-8532 Cell (661) 319-5775 Vice Chairman - Michael Sabol (661) 831-6458 Cell (661) 205-9274 Statement to the Community Services Committee on May 15, 2002. The question before this commission, is what are the veterans to accomplish and where? It is apparent that those not involved in our program, in our planning and in our vision have little sense as to what we are trying to bring to the people of Bakersfield and to Kern County. At the heart of our planning efforts are the Military History Museum and Learning Center. The Museum will have displays from the various conflicts dating back to the French and Indian War in the 1600's, The Revolutionary War, World War I and World War II, Korea, Vietnam and so on. But static displays can't really tell the whole story of what happened, the involvements, the people, the results or the changes these conflicts brought about in our national culture. This museum is planned to be very pro-active using the latest technology with the computer, video and Tel- communications systems available to us. There will be viewing rooms where video presentations will offer the visitors a living experience, an up close and personal involvement through the video presentation of a particular engagement, or acquaintance of the conditions and people from that particular era of our countries history. The places where conflicts occurred, the people involved, the soldiers, the military equipment, the civilians and how they were affected, etc. There should be about 6 viewing rooms and a schedule will be maintained covering all kinds of topics of interest having to do with our country and it's military history. Each viewing room will be operated by a central technical lab where videos will be controlled and scheduled. In keeping with our underlying goal of providing a source of leaming for our military history, there is plans for lecture halls for the public and students to attend classes, lectures etc. given by our local teachers and college professors. This technical lab and the lecture halls, incorporating the video systems, will be connected to the very advanced communication network that the Superintendent of Schools has in their offices a few blocks away. Any of these lectures, video presentations, etc. can be channeled into the high school and college classrooms throughout the County. This will be a learning resource that probably can't be matched anywhere else. As adjunct to this endeavor, we are working on the idea of requesting the Department of Defense to designate this facility as a Department of Defense Learning Center. We believe we have a very good opportunity to achieve this status for the museum/learning center. With two very important military bases within the boundaries of Kern County, the Dep .amnent of Defense is eager to educate the local populace as to the role these bases play in our country's defense system. They now have learning centers all over the world but none, to our knowledge, in the West Coast region. What will this do for us? Several things - (1) Both local military bases will help us set up our program. (2) They will provide some funding. (3) They will make available displays and a lib .rary of videos covering various subjects from the history of the military, to the existing weapon systems now in the field. (4) It will bring hundreds, if not thousands, to Bakersfield to visit the Learning Center. The Veterans Plaza and the Amphitheatre are an important part of our purpose to celebrate the lives of our local veterans here in Kern County. The memorials, the Wall of Valor, the Service Fountain, will all reflect upon the sacrifices so many of our young citizen soldiers have made in the defense of their country. The Wall of Valor will nameeach and every Kern Veteran who gave his life for our way of life. We believe that this plaza should reflect the reverence and the respect we have for these brave and courageous veterans. We plan to have, as a centerpiece, a memorial to the World War II veterans who are leaving us at the rate of approximately 1,100 per day. They, in particular, are the ones who stated clearly and emphatically, that they wanted to leave behind a legacy of leaming of what happened and how to avoid any such conflict again in the future. The Amphitheatre is another place where we can gather to hear and enjoy performances. The military bands, such as US Air Force and US Army, tour every summer. We hope to become a scheduled stop On their itinerary each summer. Local performing Arts should fred this Amphitheatre an ideal place to perform. Maybe even Summer Stock companies would consider this an ideal place to perform. Our goal is not to glorify war, but to learn from what has happened in the past so that we might avoid conflicts and future wars. Our population is much undereducated in this area. Our young people dOn't know about the conflicts we have been in, the wars we fought to bring us independence and freedom, nor who the great men and women were who became our national heroes. They should know who George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson were. They should know who Abraham Lincoln was and what he accomplished and stood for. They should know of Theodore Roosevelt, the president who did so much to control big business and establish the natural resource programs that resulted in many of the National Parks throughout our country. Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Dwight Eisenhower - - the list goes on. And yes, they should know who our local heroes were. Those young people who went away to war and never came home. Oh, so many we owe so much to - - and so few who have any knowledge of who they were and what they did. We veterans believe this is a worthwhile endeavor. We believe in our cause, we believe we can be successful and we're encouraged by all those who are joining us and who are willing to help make this happen. Do we have hard facts, money in the bank, everything in order so we can proceed; is everything in the realm or certainty? We can't fool ourselves into thinking this is the case. So much of what we are doing is visionary, conceptual, involving organization and planning. But we've come a long way. We have formed a coalition of approximately 65 veteran's organizations representing 10,000 to 12,000 veterans and auxiliary members within the jurisdiction of Kem County. You can see the results of some of our efforts. We must admit that it too is visionary and conceptual. But we have put a face on our vision. We are in the process of building an organization. We are forming a non-profit foundation and we are continuing to recruit a strong management team. We are laying a base far-reaching and so strong with many very capable people. Experienced people, people who believe in what we are doing, and people who have so much to contribute. If you will bear with me, I would like to list a few; Dr. Charles Carlson, Retired Dean of Instruction from BC, Dr. Davis Rosales, Professor of History at BC, Dr. Jacquelyn Kegley, Professor of Philosophy at CSUB, Major General USAF retired James Whitehead, currently Manager of Operations AWP6-FAA Westem Pacific Region, A1 Wagner, Dean Florez Chief of Staff, Kevin McCarthy Representative for William Thomas of US Congress, Raymond Sisk, National Commander and Chief of Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States 2002-2003, Bruce Jay, President, Bank of Stockdale, Scott Hair, President Green Frog Markets, Ward Wollensen, Executive Director Central California Association of Public Employees, Andrew Wahrenbrock, President Wahrenbrock Capital Management Inc., Robert Otto, US History teacher East High (ret). In addition, we have been working with several contacts at Edwards AFB one of which is Major General Pearson the Commandant of Edwards AFB. We have also been in touch with the Public Relations Department at China Lake Naval Weapons Center. They too are interested in helping us with the Memorial Park. The list goes on - - capable, experienced, dedicated people, to help us accomplish our goals. We have many more well known names that have an interest, some of which will be coming aboard to help us. Now, the question of where? Last February, we were invited to attend a Community Service Meeting to explain what we are trying to accomplish. From that meeting it was suggested that we might consider Central Park as a possible location. In March, we made a formal proposal to the City Council asking for the opportunity to explore the use of Central Park. At the instruction of the Council, Mr. Tandy invited us to another meeting to begin this exploratory process. From that, the City staff and the Committee Staff got together to see if the facilities we envisioned would indeed fit into Central Park. The answer to that question is a definite yes - - very nicely. We are certainly encouraged by the cooperation we have received fi.om the Recreation and Parks Department. Now is the time to make some far reaching decisions. The Kern Veterans Memorial Park Committee is very interested in working out a plan whereby we can build the veterans park at the Central Park location. But there is one thing central to our program - - the heart of our endeavor - - the one thing to make all of this come together and complete the vision of the veterans. We need a place to build The Military History Museum and Learning Center. The 3 plus acres north of 21 st Street is crucial towards accomplishing our goals. I've been told that the property is available "to whoever comes up with the money first." If I may, and with all due respect, we think that is the wrong position for the City to take. In our opinion, putting housing on that parcel of land is not the "highest and best use" of that land. Putting a profit oriented developer who will bring benefit to but just a few against a use that would benefit hundreds or even thousands is worth further discussion, in our opinion. We are talking about 10,000 citizens of Kern County, 10,000 veterans and their families who are determined to bring a use, a service, and educational experience that will benefit thousands, rather than just a few who would occupy the houses. In our opinion, there is no question that the Museum and Learning center we propose is of a higher and more appropriate use for this property. This property is unique and would be ideal for the learning center. There are few, if any, other properties offering the qualities that this property would provide for our use. Housing is important, but housing can go into many other areas of the city. Housing would be a misuse for this particular parcel, in our opinion. The City has an obligation to study our proposal, and if they find some credibility in our position then our "higher and best use" proposal should prevail. Again, in our opinion, for this property, the Veterans eaming Center and the Veterans Memorial Park is the appropriate use and shOuld be given preference. We hope you can begin to see, as we veterans do, that we are trying to bring something very special to Bakersfield. We are trying to bring all of you into our world with a can-do-attitude. All it takes is believing in our veterans program and getting behind these endeavors - - it is valid, it's for real, it's a workable plan, and we're confident that we can make it happen with community support. I thank you. STATEMENT MADE TO THE KERN VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK COMMITTEE MEETING, MAY 20TH, 2002 The idea of having a Veterans Memorial Park at the Central Park location is a tremendous idea. There are several reasons for the Memorial at that park. First, there are so few of them in the United States and none West of the Mississippi of the scope envisioned for Central Park. It will gain national attention and universally engender affection for Bakersfield among the veterans and their family all across the United States. Having a Memorial Park in close proximity to the Convention Center is very apt to draw many more conventions to Bakersfield, and the need to use Central Park as a Veterans Memorial Park is without question the Convention Center. A stroll along a landscaped route to the Park from the Convention Center is a natural draw for conventioneers. How can one argue that the Park and Center would not compliment one another? Then add to this mix, the Veterans Memorial Museum across the street from the Park on the North, and the War Aircraft Museum at Minter Field, where so many veterans of World War II trained, would greatly enhance the draw of conventions and visitors to this beautiful city of ours and would certainly give Bakersfield the image across the land of being innovative and sensitive to the memory of so many who have fought and died or survived to preserve our way of life. Who then could dispute that Bakersfield is in fact the "All American City"? With the Veterans Memorial Park & Museum so close to the Convention Center and drawing visitors and conventioneers from everywhere is certainly going to go a long way toward overcoming the image 'that Johnny Carson proffered years ago to the effect that Bakersfield is just a "dust bowl town." The other two proposals are not realistic in my opinion. First, having low cost housing at Central Park isn't going to draw one visitor to Bakersfield. Secondly, placing City Hall out there is a misplacement. City Hall should be a part of the down-town city corridor where state, federal and county facilities and services are situated. Additionally, utilizing Central Park for either of those purposes isn't going to draw any visitors to Bakersfield. I came here in 1950 and I've seen a lot of changes, some easy to come by and others hard fought. We have now grown to an urban population in excess of 400,000. It's now time that we do something to create a draw -- a magnate -- to attract people to Bakersfield. Branson Missouri has its national draw with a multiplicity of music entertainment venues, San Antonio with its River Walk, New Orleans with its Bourbon Street, Anaheim with Disney World, etc. Why not Bakersfield with its Veterans Memorial Park & Museum and War Aircraft Museum at Minter Field. And in time, as suggested in the recent Charraettes, 20th Street from Central Park on the East to the Fox Theater on the West becoming a street of country western and other types of entertainment which could only increase and compliment the drawing power of Bakersfield for out oftowners. Lastly, and perhaps of equal or greater importance, the fact that with attractions drawing more visitors to Bakersfield it obviously is going to help the economy of this community. The entrepreneurs of Bakersfield will benefit handsomely from the increased number of visitors to our community. The other two proposals will not have that effect! Thank you. A World War II Veteran and Downtown Businessman HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WASHINGTON, D. C. 20515 William M. THOmas CALIFORNIA November 9, 2001 Dear Friends: I am pleased to welcome you to"A Salute to Veterang and to join with you in paying tribute to Kern County's veterans. It is important to recognize the men and women whose courage secured our freedom for us, not just on Veterans Day, but on every day of the year. I support your efforts to create a veterans memorial park and museum to honor Kem County veterans and to teach our young people about courage, honor and devotion to country. Already the veterans park has received the near unanimous support of Kern County's veterans organizations, and I know that"A Salute to Veterang' will be a successful and enjoyable evening for everyone here tonight. Best regards, WILLIAM M. THOMAS Member of Congress Mr. Dale R. Wilson Chairman Veterans Memorial Park Committee Post Office Box 41564 Bakersfield, California 93304 WILLIAM M. THOMAS 21ST DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA ~ 4100 TRU×TUN AVE, #220 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 (661) 327-3611 CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS 319 WEST MURRAY AVENUE VISALIA, CA 93291 JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION (559) 627-6549 2208 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING www.house.gov/billthornas WASHINGTON, DC 20515-0521 (202,225-2915 ~OU~e of epreaentati e5 i asbin ton, September 17, 2001 Mr. Dale R. Wilson Chairman Kern County Veterans Memorial Park Committee Kern County Veteran Services 1120 Golden State Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Dale: Thank you for your recent letter informing me of the efforts by Kern County veterans to create a memorial park in Bakersfield. I am honored to support your good work and appreciate the invitation to attend a Memorial Park Committee meeting. Recognizing the sacrifices our veterans have made is one of my top priorities. It always gives me great pleasure to meet with veterans and restore rightfully-earned medals to them. It will be my privilege to work with you as you move forward to honor veterans in this most appropriate manner, and I appreciate being involved at the genesis of the project. Again, thank you for the letter, and I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, WILLIAM M. THOMAS Member of Congress WMT/slh TY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS LARRY E. REIDER, Superintendent May 28, 2002 Dale R. Wilson, Chairman Kern Veterans Memorial Park Committee P.O. Box 41564 Bakersfield, CA 93384 Dear Mr. Wilson: For whatever reason, there has been some confusion about our participation in the Veterans Memorial Park proposed to be located in Central Park, along with some adjacent property. For the record, I support the memorial and have committed to assist in your efforts. The confusion seems to center around land this office once owned in the vicinity of R and 21 st streets which your letter of April 18 refers to as the former~ S_outhem Pacific ~ p. roperty. We are re.ce, ivi, ngT reports that this office might contribute a portion ot this property toward the veterans memonat. As ~ smd during our May 2 meeting, this office has previously sold a portion of this property to the Housing Authority of Kern County in December 1998 and the remainder of this property is currently under contract with the Housing Authority of Kern County until December 2002. I know that you are aware of the housing authority ownership because you showed .us a map dePicting parcels that might be incorporated into the memorial. However, others involved in the veteran s memorial maybe unaware that the land is now under contract with the Housing Authority of Kern. Any assistance you can provide to eliminate this confusion would be appreciated. I am committed to assisting you in recording the stories of selected local veterans so these accounts can be preserved and used in our schools as wellas the memorial. At my instruction, Jim Varley has set aside eight dates in our televison studio to record stories from many of these veterans. Each participating veteran will be given a videotape copy for their private use. Jim is working out arrangements with Bob Otto. In addition, I offered to provide web design assistance. At a second meeting attended by you, with Jim, Bob Johnson and others, it was agreed our staff would prepare logos and help design a website to communicate efforts related to the Veterans Memorial Park. My understanding is that Russ Berry of Lake Isabella has arranged to have the site hosted once it is designed and a logo selected. Four suggested logos have been sent to Mr. Berry. As the educational component of the Veterans Memorial Park takes shape, we certainly are willing to discuss other ways in which we might assist. Dale, it goes without saying the Veterans Memorial Park is an ambitious undertaking but well worth the time and effort that you and so many others are providing. We appreciate any help you can provide in communicating the fact that the property that fronts 21 st Street, across from Central Park is no longer controlled by our office. Best of luck in your very worthwhile endeavor and again, please know that I support your efforts and have committed the assistance of our office. I look forwardto meeting you on June 5, 2002. n- tendent of Schools LER:it . . . advocates for children 1300 17th Street - CITY CENTRE, Bakersfield, CA 93301-4533 (661) 636-4000 · FAX (661) 636-4130 · TDD (661) 636-4800 · http://~wv, kern.org ~'r:nrc~. r:,, ~cy¢~ec~ p,,~,~:r Partner - Kern County Network for Children ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT DATE: May 22, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM: 8.cc. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ~ FROM: John W. Stinson, Ass. istant City ManagerDEPARTMENT HEAD ~ DATE: May 13, 2002 CITY ATTORNEY ~-~-~ CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: Tree Trimming- Community & Commercial Education Efforts RECOMMENDATION: The Urban Development Committee Recommends implementation of staff recommendations. BACKGROUND: The Urban Development Committee recently met to discuss tree ordinance enforcement and ways to improve the trimming of trees in Bakersfield. The Comm~ee discussed the need to improve tree trimming techniques used by both pdvate property owners and professional tree trimmers. The committee reviewed' various public educational efforts and discussed the possibility of requiring commercial tree trimmers be Certified Arborists to perform tree trimming work. Staff provided information of the potential licensing through certification of tree trimmers and recommended a program of voluntary certification. This approach would have limited economic impact on the existing tree trimmers and would focus on educational efforts rather than'requiring licensing which could be difficult for some tree tdmmers to obtain (since the tests are not offered locally and some tree trimmers may not speak English) and would be difficult to regulate. This approach would also be more cost effective for the City as it would not require additional staff. There are approximately 60-70+ tree trimming companies in Bakersfield and currently five Certified Arborists through the International Society of Arbodsts (ISA) in Bakersfield. Three of these are City employees in the Recreation and Parks Department including the City's Urban Forester. Several local tree trimming businesses advertise they have Certified Arborists on staff and growing public interest in the proper maintenance of trees is making Certification a plus for their business. Staff recommends the following voluntary educational efforts which would be targeted to educate professional tree trimmers operating in Bakersfield: Provide information on ISA Tree Worker and Arborist certifications. Encourage certification by conducting workshops with local tree maintenance professionals and explaining the benefits of proper tree maintenance from a client satisfaction and good business practices perspective. · Provide information on ISA certification programs and information on proper tree trimming techniques in English and Spanish. · Provide information on courses available through Bakersfield College for ISA certification preparation. .. · Provide information on courses, when available through the UC extension Farm and Home Advisor. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page 2 The Committee also discussed providing general educational information for individuals and businesses who hire professionals to maintain their trees. Since many professional tree trimmers follow the tree trimming directions from their clients (particularly if they are not an International Society of Arborists (ISA) Certified Arborlst) it is important that the public understand proper tree trimming techniques and work with qualified tree maintenance professionals. Therefore staff recommended the following steps be implemented: · Provide public information videos and slide shows which could be broadcast on KGOV-TV which would present basic tree pruning techniques and urban forestry concepts regarding the proper planting and care of trees consistent with (ISA) guidelines. · Include information on proper tree trimming techniques in Recreation and Parks brochures. · Create handeuts and flyers which provide information on proper tree trimming techniques which would be available at various city public counters and can be distributed at home and garden stores, nurseries, the City wood waste facility and through public information sessions with schools, services clubs and at street fairs, etc. · Conduct informational sessions for the public on weekends in city parks demonstrating proper pruning techniques. Based on this information, the Urban Development Committee recommends implementing staff's recommendations. 2300 TmxtunAvenue, Suite 207, B~ersfield, CA 93301 ,~0'~ ~ ~gL~.[:,~:~'~ . 661/325-6650 ' F~: 661/322-8635 e-m~l: treeinfo~urbanforest.org ~ website: www.urb~forest.orglD~ 77-0359397 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Steve McCalley, President K~rn £o,mt,, Em' ........ tal HeaBh Services May 15, 2002 Lmda Robinson, Vice President Ch ........ r, ...... Councilman David Couch, Chair, Urban Development Committee Sriram Kh6, Ph.D., Secretary Councilmember Sue Benham ( 'uhl~rma State IJnivcrstty. Bu~er~field Councilman Mike Maggard John Moorhouse, CFO ~/A ~ ........ ., John Stinson, Assistant City Manager Bo. tmga?mazcraes ........ Lac~.~nd~nflemen: Dana Adams c ...... it> c ........... for Child Care AS Chair of the Ad Hoc Tree Advisory Committee, I am pleased to give you a status Bob Bellue report on the occasion of our first year. Kern CounO' Water Agencl. Maurecn Euschcr-Dang, c,,,,, r,,,,~e, The committee met monthly for a year. Attendance and input have been good and l(cn Delfino we especially appreciate the help'of attorney Genny Gennaro and'urban forester Paul c~ ,~,, r, ...... ~ ~ ~i,,. ~,,,,~,,~,,.. ~., Graham. Planner Jim Eggart is a regular and helps us understand planning policies Jeatma Foy and procedures. Bai~er.~field College Ron Gagnon ~,,., n,x,l,, c,,,,,., ~.,,~To date we have done the following: · , n ..... "~"' ~" 1. Reviewed an assortment of documents relating to street trees t(en }{ersh 2. Redlined existing ordinances governing street trees under MC 12.40 Consulting Geologtzt Bart Bill s.. ~,,~,,,,,, ,.,,~ Currently we are'in the process of developing an administrative plan for city trees. Ken Hooper ' Kern High Sthool l)isttlct Our goal is to have a complete body of work to your committee by the end of this Bill Kelly Baker.~fietd College calendar year. That woUld give our committee one and a half years to follow Emily Knox-Taylor recommended tree ordinances through Urban Development Committee, Planning ~,o' ~c,,. c ......... .~,. Commission and-City Council for implementation, and still be within the allotted Conway Lopez three-year window. Genetal Tree Service Stephanie Lynch KernCount>' Board Of Supcrvisor.~ Thank you for the oppommity to craft a legacy for City of Bakersfield's urban Tm~ Sca~ion _ _ forest! Should you need more detailed information at this time, please let me know. K& tn. DeNtttale, Grddnvt Stephen W. Schilling Very truly yours, Chntta Sie. tra Castle & T. Mark Smith Ctie~ra ~ ~ ...... Dana Adams Jim Weddle Pet.drum (Jeologi.~l. Ret. Cc: . 'Ad Hoc Tree Advisory Committee CITY Ob' BAI(.ERSFIEL_O L(/JSON Tree Foundation of Kern Trustees Sue Bcnham Dana 7mrcher Devra Milam .. t Y'INCE f t~4 Virginia Ferrari ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: May 8, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent ITEM: 8.c. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ./~ROVED FROM: Development Services- Planning DEPARTMENT HEA/,~D .~ DATE: April 22, 2002 CITY ATrORNE~)f//' / CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: 1. An Ordinance amending Title Seventeen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code by amending Chapter 15.66 and repealing Chapter 15.67 relative to oil and mineral drilling and production. 2. An Ordinance amending Title Sixteen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code by amending subsections 16.16.010 E; 16.16.060 A.2; AND 16.20.060 B.3; and adding sections 16.28.170 B.5. AND 16.28.170 D.4 relative to oil wells and production. 3. An Ordinance amending Title Seventeen of the Bakersfield Municipal Code relative to Chapters 17.46 DI (Drilling Island District) and 17.47 PE (Petroleum Extraction Combining District) and subsection 17.64.050 B.3. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends first reading of the ordinances. BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on these proposed amendments to Titles 15, 16 and 17 related to oil and mineral drilling and production regulations. The amendments are based on the changes reviewed by both the Urban Development Committee and the Planning Commission's Oil Well/Drilling Operations Committee. The purpose of the proposed amendments is fourfold: 1) to consolidate the oil and mineral drilling and production regulations contained in various chapters of the Bakersfield Municipal Code into Chapter 15.66 and to reduce redundancy; 2) delete text that limits application of some regulations to areas annexed after 1998; 3) to improve and clarify development standards and; 4) provide additional notice to operators of record as listed with the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. Only one person (Philip L. Ryall, Stockdale Energy Company) spoke during the Planning Commission hearing. In response to his comments, additional wording was included to Section 15.66.080. A. to clarify that as urban development encroaches upon existing petroleum facilities, the proposed urban development must integrate the existing petroleum facilities to satisfy the development standards, including but not limited to setbacks as stated in Chapter 15.66. April 22, 2002, 10:15am ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page2 Between August and November 2001, the Oil Well/Drilling Operations Subcommittee of the Planning Commission met with oil industry and building industry representatives to discuss amendments to oil well drilling and production regulations for the purpose of clarifying regulations and increasing public notice to operators on record with the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. The Planning Commission forwarded proposed amendments to the Urban Development Committee to review. The Urban Development Committee met in January and February 2002, and added minor revisions to the proposed amendments. On March 20, 2002, the City Council accepted the Urban Development Committee Report No. 1-02 and referred the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the City Council to refer ordinance amendments to the Planning Commission for a public hearing. Oil and building industry representatives, including representatives from the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources were sent notice of committee meetings held by both the City Council's Urban Development Committee and the Planning Commission's subcommittee. These participants were also sent a notice of public hearing for the April 4, 2002 Planning Commission meeting. Staff has determined the proposed project will not significantly affect the physical environment and determined the proposed ordinance amendments are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3), general rule. JENG (admin~ay\5-8-owo) April 22, 2002, 10:15am Metastorm e-work client Page 1 of 1 Referral Display Requestor: Isue Benham i Ward: I~ I Referral Created: Req. Completion Date: [~./1_6__/2~,,0.,.2,, ................ t . Meeting: ~/..~,0,,,0.,,2~ Initial Referral Information Short Description: FREE TRIMMING GUIDELINES Long Description: ***DUAL REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, PARKS AND REC, URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE LEAD*** COUNClLMEMBER BENHAM REFERRED TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE A REQUEST TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR REVIEW REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF HEALTHY TREES IN CITY RIGHT-OF- Attachment A WAYS AND PENALTIES FOR NON COMPLIANCE. COUNCILMEMBER BENHAM FURTHER REQUESTS THAT THE URBAN FORESTER BE INVOLVED IN THESE DECISIONS, THAT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PUBLIC WORKS AND REC AND PARKS BE ENHANCED, AND THAT Attachment B PROPERTY OWNERS BE NOTICED WHEN TREES ARE TO BE TRIMMED OR REMOVED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS. COUNCILMEMBER BENHAM WISHES TO BE INFORMED OF CURRENT PROCEDURE. Note: Requested completion date changed to 5/16/02. - jtraylor Attachment C Attachment O - Lead:-] Assigned To: Response? R~I! (1) [Urban Development Comm. I Reassigned To: Response? R2 (2)IRecreation & Parks 1 (3) i2 .................................................. I l Optional Citizen Contact Information Name: Name: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: http://ew~rk/scripts/e~eb~d~~/F~~derPage?Page=Referra~%2524Disp~ay&F~~der~D=E~~R~~~ 5/10/2002 City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0019162 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 3Z20~02 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:37:28 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 3~20~02 COMPLETION: 3/28/02 GEN. LOC: CITY WIDE LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: PMCCARTHY AUTH: PMCCARTHY WORK TYPE: REFERRAL DEVELOPER INCENTIVES REQUEST COMMENTS ***DUAL REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ED/CD - URBAN DEVELOPMENT LEAD*** STAFF IS REQUESTED TO EXPLORE DIFFERENT METHODS OF INCENTIVES FOR DEVELOPERS AND TO PROVIDE A DRAFT LIST OF IDEAS AND PRESENT TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. DEVELOPER INCENTIVES Category code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task coae: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP _ Faci%ity ID_. .. : Assigned Depar~menE: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0019118 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 2~06~02 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:38:00 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 2~06~02 COMPLETION: 2/14/02 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: DSULLIVAN AUTH: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL CITY HALL EXPANSION REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** COUCH REFERRED THE CITY HALL EXPANSION ISSUE TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS. CITY HALL EXPANSION Category code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task code: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP Facility ID . . : Assigned Department: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0019081 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 12Z12~01 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:38:21 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 12~12~01 COMPLETION: 12/20/01 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCI.LMEMBER MAGGARD ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: DSULLIVAN AUTH: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL MR. DECKER'S CONCERNS CONTACT JOHN DECKER Phone 1 - / 511 EAST 18TH STREET Phone 2 - Bakersfield, CA 93301 REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** MAGGARD REQUESTED THAT THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INVITE MR. DECKER TO A FUTURE MEETING SO THAT HE MAY EXPRESS HIS CONCERNS REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA, USE OF PROPERTY, RAILROAD CROSSINGS, ETC. MR. DECKER'S CONCERNS  at~gory code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC ask coae: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP _ Faci%ity ID ~ ~:: Assigned Department: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0019045 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 10~24Z01 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:38:30 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 10~24~01 COMPLETION: 11/01/01 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: DSULLIVAN AUTH: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL GROUP HOME ISSUE REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** COUCH REQUESTED THAT THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INITIATE LEGISLATIVE ACTION REGARDING GROUP HOMES ALLOWING FOR MORE LOCAL CONTROL AND INPUT. GROUP HOME ISSUE Category code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task code: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP . Faci%ity ID.. .. : Assigned Deparumenu: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE REQ/JOB: WF0019030 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 9~19~01 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:38:36 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 9~19~01 COMPLETION: 9/27/01 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: DSULLIVAN AUTH: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL LOT SIZES REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** COUCH REFERRED TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE THE ISSUE OF 7200 SF. AS MINIMUM ON LOT SIZES FOR DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION. LOT SIZES Categorv code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task code: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP ~ Facility ID_. .. : assigned DeparcmenE: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM INSTRUCTIONS ll-Ub-Ul The Committee directed staff to meet with the development community for input and return to the Commit%ee. City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* REQ/JOB: WF0018940 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: ?~8~0~ PRINT DATE: ~/ 01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 1 :38:43 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 7~18~01 COMPLETION: 7/26/01 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER BENHAM ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: RGAFFORD AUTH: RGAFFORD WORK TYPE: REFERRAL LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** BENHAM REQUESTED THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE LOOK INTO THE ISSUE OF LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT. LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT  atggory code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC as~ coae: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP ~ Faci%ity ID. ~ ~. :: assigned Department: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM INSTRUCTIONS 12-u3-u1 '~he Committee requested staff to provide additional information. City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0018908 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 6~27~01 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:38:56 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 6~27~01 COMPLETION: 7/05/01 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUNCILMEMBER COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: DSULLIVAN AUTH: DSULLIVAN WORK TYPE: REFERRAL COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** COUCH REFERRED TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE THE ISSUE OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SPECIFICALLY WALL HEIGHT, YARD REQUIREMENTS, DRIVE-THRU SERVICES AND PARKING LOT LIGHTING FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Category code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task code: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP Faci%ity ID . . : Assigned Department: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM City of Bakersfield *REPRINT* WORK REQUEST PAGE 1 REQ/JOB: WF0018396 / 001 PROJECT: REQUEST DATE: 3~15~00 PRINT DATE: 5/01/02 CREW: PRINT TIME: 10:39:18 SCHEDULE DATES LOCATION: START: 3~15~00 COMPLETION: 3/23/00 GEN. LOC: LOC ID: REF NBR: REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH REQUESTOR: COUCH ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL USER ID: RBARNHAR AUTH: RBARNHAR WORK TYPE: REFERRAL SHELLABARGER ROAD REQUEST COMMENTS ***REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE*** COUCH REFERRED THE SHELLABARGER ROAD ISSUE BACK TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR REVIEW. STAFF TO SEND AGENDA PACKET TO MR. KOCH, MR. BAUGHER AND MR. DIXON PRIOR TO MEETING. SHELLABARGER ROAD Category code : URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM RUDC Task code: . . : RESPONSE TO REFERRAL RESP Facility ID.. .. : Assigned Department: URBAN DEVELOPMENT COM INSTRUCTIONS u~-~-u0 COMMITTEE HAD A LARGE PUBLIC MEETING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC. STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO RESEARCH OPTIONS AND BRING INFORMATION BACK TO THE JUNE 5, 2000 MEETING. 09-21-00 THE COMMITTEE MET AND RECEIVED PUBLIC INPUT. THE COMMITTEE REFERRED THE PROPERTY CONDEMNATION ISSUE TO THE OCTOBER 11, 2000 CLOSED SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. 10-16-00 THE COMMITTEE MET. ITEM STILL IN CLOSED SESSION. RECEIVED PUBLIC INPUT. 04-02-01 STAFF UPDATE. Urban Development Committee Referrals la Freeway Status Report Standing Referral (Status - staff to provide updated information on. phasing of freeway projects - No changes from 4/8/02 meeting per Raul 5/1/02) Public Works m Transportation Development Fees Referred 6/16/99 (Status - 5/14/01 Staff to meet with BIA and review proposed methodology for adjustments to the fees. NOt ready to go back to Committee per Raul 5/1/02) Public Works m Shellabarger Road Referred 3/15/00 (Status - On Hold per Councilmember Couch pending development of alternatives) Public Works a Dust Control Development Streamlining Task Force (Status - Streamlining Committee needs to meet to review research on dust control measures for certain soil types., review of ordinance changes submitted by attorney - waiting on additional information from Dr. Paulson and Attorney so Streamlining Task Force can meet.) John Stinson / Development Stream lining Task Force a City/County drilling requirements Referred 8/3/00 (Status 11/5/01 Planning Commission reviewed proposed ordinance and it is being sent to Council for adoption per Hardisty 5/1/02) Planning la Downtown Business and Property Owners Association . Vision Committee - Referred 10/22/99 High Speed Rail Referred 3/14/01 (StatUs - they have made three presentations before the committee re. traffic circulation and parking, and high speed rat[. 5/14/01 Put High Speed Rail on Joint City/County meeting Agenda for next meeting - Item still being reviewed by Joint City/County group) Public Works / ED/CD la Leaf Blowers - Referred 11/04/99 by Benham (Status - staff preparing information on citizen and industry concerns, costs and noise issues for 1/14/02 meeting - item done per Couch)Trudy/Attorney ~1 ~ ~iiiiii ~iii!iiiii ~ Referred 6/27/01 Couch (Status- need direction from Committee, issues re. wall heights and other standards on hold per Couch) Planning la ~i~ ~i~i - Referred 7/18/01 Benham (Status -Benham requested the Urban Development Committee look into the issue of landscape ordinance enforcement.) Planning la Minimum Residential Lot Sizes - Referred 9/19/01 by Couch (Status - need direction from · Committee, Planning to meet with Developers and Rea[ Estate professionals - On hold per Couch?) Planning la NV.John Decker - Concerns re. Development in East Bakersfield - Referred 12/12/01 by Maggard (Status - Mr. Decker no longer interested in issue as he is satisfied with current zoning and allowed uses after talking with staff per Hardisty - Item done?) ~i~ii'~!~:i~:~s - Referred / /02- (Status- went to Committee Aprit 8, staff to come back with research re. ctosin~ Eye Street and makin~ it a pedestrian matt.) Public Works i!i~iiii~ ~iii~ii~ii:i iiii~?iii~iii~ii~iiii!~. Referred 3/20/02- Couch (Status - was reviewed by Committee at 4/8/02 meeting. Staff provided information on Brea ptan and witt brin~ this back to Committee for further discussion.) CITY HALL EXPANSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In an effort to make City government more efficient and to facilitate growth, staff was asked to develop alternative proposals to consolidate the various City buildings into one central location. Currently, City services are housed in several different buildings Hall and Hall Annex located at 1501 Truxtun Avenue, the including existing City City Police Department located at 1601 Truxtun Avenue, Development Services located at 1715' Chester Avenue, Economic and Community Development located at 515 Truxtun Parks 01 Truxtun Avenue and the Water Avenue, Recreation and at 41 Department located at 1000 Buena Vista Road. Excluded from this list is the Fire Department which is housed in a number of individual stations sites throughout the City and the Corporation Yard which houses various maintenance and operations functions. Each of the aforementioned buildings contain public counter space, conference rooms and other common work areas that if consolidated could result in a much more efficient use of space. In addition, public convenience would be greatly enhanced by a central location making it a truly "one stop" facility. For purposes of this report, space needs for growth in the Police Department will be facilitated through building additions to its existing facility. The attached report proposes to consolidate six (6) buildings (City Hall, City Hall Annex, Development Services, EDCD, Recreation and Parks and Water) into one central location. Currently these building house 298 employees. It is anticipated that this number will grow to approximately 450 employees in 20 years. Space and facility needs, for a City Government facility that houses 450 employees equates to approximately 220,000 square feet of space and 700 parking spaces. Several alternatives were explored including rebuilding on the existing City Hall site with a new larger building, building a new City Government District consistent with that envisioned in the Downtown Charrette process, constructing a City Hall complex with a "campus style" arrangement, purchasing an additional building downtown and possibly constructing a series of skybridge interconnections between the individual buildings and acquiring the downtown Mercy Hospital site and converting it to City Hall. The following report will outline each alternative including costs for land acquiSition (if necessary), buildings and parking. ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 - NEW CITY HALL ON EXISTING SITE I i PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal in general, consists of removing the existing City Hall and Annex i buildings and replacing them with a new single building approximately 220,000 square feet in size. The new City Hall building would house the following departments: · Mayor and City Council i · Executive · Financial · Attorney i · Public Works · Development Services · EDCD I · Water · Recreation and Parks I Space needs for growth in the Police Department wOuld be provided by a series of two 20,000 square foot additions to its existing building. IA parking structure consisting of 700 spaces would be constructed within the existing parking lot for City Hall. This new structure would provide necessary parking for all City Hall and Police Department needs for the next 20 years. I Alternate No. 1 would require all of existing departments utilizing the current City Hall complex to relocate for approximately 18 to 24 months. Therefore, costs associated Iwith moving twice (to temporary facility and back) as well as lease costs for up to two years must be considered. In addition, establishing a temporary City Hall location may present logistical issues that must be addressed prior to the move.' I COSTS I New City Hall cost estimate 1. Leasing space and move expenses $ 3,000,000 2. Demolition of existing buildings $ 3001000 I 3. New City Hall (220,000 sf @ $185/sf) $40,700,000 4. Police Expansion (40,000 sf @ $220/sf) $ 8,800,000 5. Parking Structure (700 spaces @ $8,000/space) $ 5,600,000 I. Sub-total $58,400,000 i Design & Contingency (25%) $14,600,000 Total $73,000,000 ! ! ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 - NEW CITY HALL AS ENVISIONED BY DOWNTOWN CHARRETTE (SINGLE BUILDING APPROACH) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal in general, consists of acquiring a number of blocks downtown and constructing a new City Hall building within a "Government District". The area that has been identified within downtown is generally bounded by 20th Street to the north, Q Street to the east, Truxtun Avenue to the south and N Street to the west. The new City Hall building would house the following departments: · Mayor and City Council · Executive · Financial · Attorney · Police · Public Works · Development Services · EDCD · Water · Recreation and Parks An underground parking structure consisting of 700 spaces would be constructed south of the new City Hall building which would have a park and water element overhead. This new structure would provide necessary parking for all City Hall and Police Department needs for the next 20 years. COSTS New City Hall cost estimate 1. Land acquisition $ 10,000,000 2. Demolition of existing buildings $ 500,000 3. New City Hall (335,000 sf @ $220/sf) $ 73,700,000 4. Police Garage and Communications $ 2,000,000 5. Parking Structure (700 spaces @ $8,000/space) $ 5,600,000 Sub-total $ 91,800,000 Design & Contingency (25%) $ 22,950,000 Total $114,750,000 Say $115,000,000 ALTERNATIVE NO. 3 - NEW CITY HALL AS ENVISIONED BY DOWNTOWN CHARRETTE (CAMPUS BUILDING APPROACH) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal in general, consists of acquiring a number of blocks downtown and constructing a new City Hall building within a "Government District". The area that has been identified within downtown is generallY bounded by 20th Street to the north, Q Street to the east, Truxtun Avenue to the'south and N Street to the west. The new City Hall bUilding would house the following departments: · Mayor and City Council · Executive · Financial · Attorney · Police · Public Works · Development Services · EDCD · Water · Recreation and Parks The approach would construct a main City Hall to house most campus building departments. The Police Department would be housed in a separate building. Public works and Development Services would be housed in another separate building. An underground parking structure consisting of 700 Spaces would be constructed south of the new City Hall building which would have a park and water element overhead. new provide necessary parking for all City Hall and Police This structure would Department needs for the next 20 years. COSTS New City Hall cost estimate 1. Leasing space and move expenses $ 15,000,000 2. Demolition of existing buildings $ 700,000 3. New City Hall (220,000 sf @ $185/sf) $ 40,700,000 4. Police Department (115,000 sf @ $220/sf) $ 25,300,000 5. Police Garage and COmmunications $ 2,000,000 6. Parking Structure (700 spaces @ $8,000/space) $ 51600,000 Sub-total $ 89,300,000 Design & Contingency (25%) $ 22,325,000 Total $111,625,000 Say $112,000,000 ALTERNATIVE NO. 4- EXPAND CITY HALL BY PURCHASING EXISTING DOWNTOWN BUILDINGS & INTERCONNECTING THEM WITH SKY-BRIDGES PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal in general consists of acquiring additional existing buildings nearby to current City Hall and development services locations. All buildings could then be interconnected with a series of sky-bridge walkways enhancing public convenience. The buildings that would be available to purchase will yield approximately 45,000 square feet of office space. Construction will consist of the police expansion, interconnecting sky-bridge, tenant improvements to the buildings to be purchased and a parking structure. Based upon logistics of interconnecting various buildings, staff does not recommend this alternative to be considered further, however, most estimations have been provided for comparative services. COSTS New City Hall cost estimate 1. Building Acquisition $ 4,000,000 2. Police Expansion (40,000 sf @ $220/sf) $ 8,800,000 3. Parking Structure (700 spaces @ $8,000/space) $ 5,600,000 4. Tenant Improvements (45,000 sf @ $25/sf) $ 1,120,000 5. Sky-Bridges $ 6,000,000 Sub-total $ 25,520,000 Design & Contingency (25%) $ 6,380,000 Total $ 31,900,000 Say $32,000,000 ALTERNATIVE NO. 5- ACQUIRE DOWNTOWN MERCY HOSPITAL SITE AND CONVERT TO NEW CITY HALL PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal would entail acquisition of the existing downtown Mercy Hospital site and converting it into City Hall. Mercy Hospital has over 390,000 square feet of building with almost 1,000 available parking spaces. The proposal would, in essence, trade existing City buildings for the Mercy site, thereby precluding the need to purchase land. Improvements to the Mercy site would include tenant improvements, police garage, communications and a new Council chamber. COSTS · New City Hall cost estimate 1. Tenant improvements (391,744 sf @ $25/sf) $ 9,793,600 2. Police garage and communications $ 2,000,000 3. City Council Chamber (5,000 sf @ $300/sf) $ 1,500,000 . Sub-total $13,293,600 Design & Contingency (25%) $ 3,323,400 Total $16,617,000 Say $17,000,000 Cost to acquire hospital approximately $18-36 million ALTERNATIVE NO. 6 - NEW CITY HALL ON EXISTING SITE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION This proposal in general, consists of constructing a new Police Station with room to meet growth need, consolidating City Hall functions into the existing Police building City Hall and Annex buildings and expanding the existing Police building to meet growth needs. The new City Hall would be comprised of a series of buildings intemonnected with sky-bridges and house the following departments: · Mayor and City Council · Executive · Financial · Attorney · Public Works · Development Services · EDCD · Water · Recreation and Parks Space needs for'growth in the Police Department would be provided by a new Police Station located within the downtown area. A parking structure consisting of 500 spaces would be constructed within the existing parking lot for City Hall. This new structure would provide necessary parking for City Hall needs for the next 20 years. COSTS New City Hall cost estimate 1. Purchase Land for new Police Station $ 5,000,000 2. New Police Station (115,000 sf @ $220/sf) $25,300,000 3. Sky-Bridge interconnect $ 1,000,000 4. New Police shops $ 1,600,000 5. Parking Structure (500 spaces @ $8,000/space) $ 4,000,000 Sub-total $36,900,000 Design & Contingency (25%) $ 9,225,000 Total $46,125,000 Say $47.000,000 New City Hall expansion(75,000 sf @ $185/sf) $13,875,000 SUMMARY Note that Alternatives 2 and 3 do not include revenue we would receive from the sale of existing buildings. It is anticipated that the sale of City Hall, the Annex, the Police Department, Development Services, EDCD, and the Water Department may yield approximately 17 million dollars which would be deducted from overall costs. The following will summarize each alternative costs for comparative purposes. Alternative 1 New City Hall on Existing Site $ 73,000,000 Alternative 2 New City Hall as Envisioned by Downtown Charrette (Single Building Approach) $115,000,000 Alternative 3 New City Hall as Envisioned by Downtown Charrette (Campus Building Approach) $112,000,000 Alternative 4 Expand City Hall by Purchasing Existing Downtown Buildings & Interconnecting Them with Sky-bridges $ 32,000,000 Alternative 5 Acquire Downtown Mercy Hospital and Convert to New City Hall $ 17,000,000 Alternative 6 New Police Station and expand City on Existing Site $ 47,000,000 Hall Metastorm e-work client f~-.. "(~" Page 1 of 1 Council Referral .Entry .... Requestor: I David Couch *__.j Ward: 14 "1 Created On: Council Meeting Date: j3/20/2002 j~/22/2002 . Created By: Requested Completion Date: 13/28/2002 tkturner (The Requested Completion Date is usually six working days following the Council Meeting Date.) Short Description: Ji::)EVELOPER INCENTIVES (Five words or less.) Long Description: ***DUAL REFERRAL TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ED/CD - URBAN DEVELOPMENT LEAD*** STAFF IS REQUESTED TO EXPLORE DIFFERENT METHODS OF INCENTIVES FOR ', DEVELOPERS AND TO PROVIDE A DRAFT LIST OF IDEAS AND PRESENT TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. .~ad: Route To: R1 I U;'ban Development Comm. ~ j~ R2 j~D)CD ~ Attachment A Attachment S A~achment C A~achment D Optional Citizen Contact information Print Fo~ ~ Name: Name: I Address: Address: Phone: Phone: http://ew~rk/scripts/~Web.d~~/Acti~nF~rm?Acti~n=Edit%2~%26%2~Appr~ve&F~~der~D=[... 3/22/2002 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I MEETING DATE: March 20, 2002 I AGENDA SECTION: Consent I ITEM: 8.cc. I TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED FROM: Development Services - Planning DEPARTMENT HEA~_,~~-~ .~.-- DATE: March 4, 2002 CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER ~'~'~' SUBJECT: Urban Development Committee Report Number I - 02 regarding recommendation to refer ordinance amendments related to oil drilling and production to the Planning Commission for public hearings. (All Wards) RECOMMENDATION: The Urban Development Committee recommends acceptance of the report and referral of the draft ordinances to the Planning Commission for hearing and recommendation. BACKGROUND: The Urban Development Committee met on January 14, 2002 and February 11, 2002, and voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the City Council to refer ordinance amendments related to oil drilling and production to the Planning Commission for public hearings. The Committee reviewed proposed ordinance amendments the Planning Commission has been considering over the past few months. The revisions were first reviewed by a sub-committee of the Planning Commission. The sub-committee met 4 times between August 2001 and November 2001. Oil and building industry representatives attended these sub-committee meetings. In summary, the proposed amendments are: Chapter 15.66 (Drilling for and Production of Petroleum): Standards from Chapters 15.67 (Oil and Gas Production), 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone) and 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combining Zone) have been integrated into Chapter 15.66 (Drilling for and Production of Petroleum). ltalic represents text from Chapter 15.67. ltalic underline represents new text. Chapter 15.67 (Oil and Gas ProductionS: Proposed to be merged with Chapter 15.66. Chapter 15.67 would be deleted. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page2 Chapter 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. Chapter 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combinino Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. Title 16 Subdivisions: Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of record on file with DOGGR. Require 305 foot minimum lot frontage and width of drill sites located within subdivisions. Chapter 17.64 CUPs: Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of record on file with DOGGR. In addition, the Urban Development Committee also recommended inclusion the following changes for clarification in Chapter 15.66: Page 8, Section I.: Wells;-wel~ sites and production operations established prior to September 19, 1992, may continue to operate pursuant to permits issued for them, shall be exempt from the newprovisions of this chapter. However, significant changes or modifications that necessitate new permits as required by the F-h-e-Mamh~ Director of Prevention Services, or desiqnee, or B.Z.A., shall be required to comply with the provisions of this chapter, or obtain modifiCations as permitted in Section 15.66.030(E). Page 12, Section 19: Site Restoration. Site restoration shall commence within 90 days upon completion of all drilling and/or production activities or upon abandonment of the well site. Well abandonment will be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the~,.,.,.,.,.'" "' '" D.O.G.G.R. Before final abandonment, all drilling/production equipment shall be removed from the site. Fences shall be dismantled, all signage removed, and the site regraded so as to break up impermeable surfaces and fill in all sumps to restore the site as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade. Temporary earthen sumps may be used for clean-out or remedial work on an existing weft or other production facility. However, these sumps shaft be filled and the site restored as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade within ninety (90) days after the clean-out or other remedial work is completed. The Reqional Water Quality Control Board also has additional jurisdiction over sumps .... Page 13, Section 22: ... The front yard and street side yard setbacks of the zone district in which it is located shall requlate the location of fencina. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Page3 Page 14, Section 2: ...The front yard and street side yard setbacks of the zone district in which it is located shall regulate the location of the wall. There has been no public opposition to referring these amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing. The Planning Commission has scheduled a public hearing for testimony on these amendments for their April 4, 2002 Planning Commission meeting. Oil and building industry representatives will be notified of the hearing date. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. JENG (admin~rnar~3-4-oil) CITY Of BAKERSFIELD URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT NUMBER 1 - 02 MARCH 20, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: REFERRAL OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS RELATED TO OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS The Urban Development Committee met on January 14, 2002 and February 11, 2002, and voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the City Council to refer ordinance amendments related to oil drilling and production to the Planning Commission for public hearings. A copy of the entire text of changes is attached. Chapter 15.66 (Drilling for' and Production of Petroleum): Standards from Chapters 15.67 (Oil and Gas Production), 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone) and 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combining Zone) have been integrated into Chapter 15.66 (Drilling for and Production of Petroleum). Italic represents text from Chapter 15.67. Italic underline represents new text. Chapter 15.67 (Oil and Gas Production): Proposed to be merged with Chapter 15.66. Chapter 15.67 would be deleted. Chapter 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No. 1-02 MARCH 20, 2002 PAGE 2 Chapter 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combining Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. Title 16 Subdivisions: "- Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of record on file with DOGGR. Require 305 foot minimum lot frontage and width of drill sites located within subdivisions. Chapter 17.64 CUPs: Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of record on file with DOGGR. In addition, the Urban Development Committee also recommended inclusion of the minor changes contained in the attached memorandum from the Development Services Department. These changes provide clarification to the text. There has been no public opposition to referring these amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing. The Planning Commission has scheduled a public hearing for these amendments for their April 4, 2002 meeting. Oil and building industry representatives will be notified of the heating date. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No. 1-02 MARCH 20, 2002 PAGE 3 Therefore, the Urban Development Committee recommends the City Council refer the proposed oil drilling and production ordinance amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Councilmember David Couch, Chair Councilmember Sue Benham Councilmember Mike Maggard MEMORANDUM February 8, 2002 TO: Urban Development Committee ~r~ FROM: Jack Hardisty, Development Services Di / SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to City Oil Welly Production-Related Ordinances Following is a brief overview of the ordinance changes related to petroleum extraction. Summary statements are followed by a summary comparison of existing, proposed and county ordinances in table form. Chapter 15.66: Standards from Chapters 15.67 (Oil and Gas Production), 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone) and 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combining Zone) have been integrated into Chapter 15.66 (Drilling for and Production of Petroleum). Italic represents text from Chapter 15.67. Italic underline represents new text. Chapter 15.67: Proposed to be merged with Chapter 15.66. Chapter 15.67 would be deleted. Chapter 17.46 (Drilling Island Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. Chapter 17.47 (Petroleum Extraction Combining Zone): Removed provision that limited application of this zone to areas annexed since 1998. Proposed amendment allows zone to apply city-wide. Standards of Chapter 15.66 apply. Title 16 Subdivisions: Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of record on file with DOGGR. Require 305 foot minimum lot frontage and width of drill sites located within subdivisions. Chapter 17.64 CUPs: Amendment to increase public hearing notice requirement to notify operators of recOrd on file with DOGGR. Proposed City Oil Well Production Related Ordinances February 8, 2002 Page 2 COMPARISON TABLE EXISTING CITY ORD. PROPOSED ORD. KERN COUNTY ORD. BMC 15.6.6. BMC 15.66 A. Describes permit A. Same County19.98 classes depending on zoning & distance from Provides similar standards residence. B. Centralized location for B. Includes development operational standards from all standards (setbacks, heights, zones for well drilling. storage etc.) BMC 15.67. BMC 15.67 County 19.98 (above) A. Contains standards for A. This ordinance deleted Provides similar standards. drilling operations, standards placed in 15.66 to ~ consolidate & centralize. B. Only applies to areas annexed after Jan.1, 1998. B. Can apply anywhere in City BMC 17.46 BMC 17.465 County 19.98 (Drilling Island District) ^. Zone district specifically to A. Zone district create drilling opportunities, purpose remains the same. City ord was copied from county. Contains some standards. Refers to 15.67 for B. Standards placed in 15.66 Ordinances essentially the same. additional standards, to consolidate & centralized. B. Only applies to areas C. Can be used anywhere in annexed after Jan. 1, 1998 City. I BMC 17.47 BMC 17.46 19.66 PE (Petroleum Extraction Zone) A. Zone district specifically to A. Zone district purpose remains City PE ordinance was copied from address development in oil the same. county. fields where large residential lots or commemial B. Standards placed in 15.66 to Ordinances essentially the same. - development is planned, consolidate & centralize. B. Contains standards. C. Can be used anywhere in the City. C, Only applies in areas annexed after Jan. 1, 1998, BMC Title 16 {Subdivisions) BMC Title 16 {Subdivisions) County A. Contains requirements for A. Expands mineral rights interest notice to mineral rights owners notice to operators based on County subdivision ordinance & leases shown on title report. DOGGR information, does not contain special provisions - for noticing mineral rights owners. B. Provides subdivisions with B. Requires minimum Drill site options on how to frontage of 305 ft. accommodate drilling operations (existing and C. Requires covenant within 250 ft. future), of drill site. BMC 17.64 County 19.98.040 (Conditional Use Permit) , CUP Drilling by CUP. No special A. Provides for increased noticing A. Added Notice to operators as notice radius referenced. radius for drilling operation provided by DOGGR. No added notice for operations. CUPs.. " Proposed Oil Well and Production Related Ordinances February 8, 2002 Page 3 There are also three changes staff recommends for clarification: Page 8, Section I.: WellsTwe~ sites and production operations established prior to September 19, 1992, ma continue to o rate ursuant to traits issued for them, shall be exempt from the new provisions of this chapter. However, significant changes or modifications that necessitate new permits as required by the ~n Services or des# nee, or B.Z.A., shall be required to comply with the provisions of this chapter, or obtain modifications as permitted in Section 15.66.030(E). Page 12, Section 19: Site Restoration. Site restoration shall commence within 90 days upon completion of all drilling and/or production activities or upon abandonment of the well site. Well abandonment will be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the ~. D.O.G.G.R. Before final abandonment, all drilling/production equipment shall be removed from the site. Fences shall be dismantled, all signage removed, and the site regraded so as to break up impermeable surfaces and fill in all sumps to restore the site as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade. Temporary earthen sumps may be used for clean-out or remedial work on an existing well or other production facility. However, these sumps shall be filled and the site restored as nearly as, practicable to a uniform grade within ninety (90) days after the clean-out or other remedial work is cOmpleted. The Reqional Water Quality Contro.I, Board also has additional 'urisdiction over sum s .... Page 13, Section 22: ... The front ard and street side ard setbacks of the ZOne district in which it is located shall re ulate the location of fencin . Page 14, Section 2: ...The front yard and street side yard., setbacks of the zone district in which it is located shall regulate the location of the wall. cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager Bart Thiltgen, City Attorney John Stinson, Assistant City Manager JM:JH:djl p:Wlemos\PropoSedOWPO.mem°.wPd DRAFT # 3 Chapter 15.66 DRILLING FOR AND PRODUCTION OF PETROLEUM Sections: 15.66.010 Purpose. 15.66.020 Definitions. 15.66.030 Permits. 15.66.040 Well site development standards. 15.66.050 Abandoned and idle wells. 15.66.070 Enforcement. 15.66.080 Development encroachment in petroleum areas. 15.66.010 Purpose. - -- It is the intent and purpose of this chapter to regulate the drilling, redrilling and recovery of oil, gas and other hydrocarbons, including injection wells, so that these activities may be conducted in a manner that: a) protects public health, safety and welfare; b) conforms with established codes and regulations; c) minimizes the potential impact to property and mineral rights owners; d) encourages drill site consolidation; and e) protects the quality of the environment. This chapter provides local regulations for petroleum drilling and production. These Operations are also subject to state and federal regulations administered by those aqencies. 15.66.020 Definitions. The terms set forth in this chapter shall have the meanings herein unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended. A. "Abandonment" means the permanent plugging of a well in accordance with the _ requirements of the Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, ~ Gas, and Geothermal Resources of the State of California, the removal of all equipment related to the well, including restoration of the drill site as required by these regulations. B. "^.N.S.I." means the American National Standards Institute. C. "A.S.T.M." means the American Society for Testing Materials. D. "^.P.I." means the American Petroleum Institute. E. "Blowout" means the uncontrolled riow of gas, liquids or solids (or a mixture thereof) from a well on to the surface. F. "Blowout preventor" means a mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, or other device or combinations of such devices secured to the top of a well's casing including valves, riflings, and control mechanisms connected therewith designed and capable of preventing a blowout. S:UENG~Tiliel 5~UDC draft3~lraft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 I G. "Board of Zoning Adjustment" or "B.Z.A." means the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Bakersfield as defined in Title 2 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. H. "Cellar" means an excavation in which the wellhead is located. I. "Completion of drilling" on a well site is deemed to occur for the purpose of this code upon, (1) initiation of disassembly or removal of the drilling rig from any one well on the drill site, (2) thirty days after setting of a well head on any one well on the drill site, or (3) thirty days after the drilling equipment has been removed from the site. Completion has not occurred if drilling, testing, or remedial operations are resumed on that one well before the end of any thirty-day period. J. "Derrick" means any framework, tower or mast together with all the appurtenances to such structure placed over a well for the purpose of drilling, raising or Iowedng pipe, casing, tubing or other drilling, completion production or injection tools or equipment out of or into the well bore. '- K. "Desertion" means the cessation of operations at a well site where suspension of drilling operations and removal of drilling machinery has occurred where the operator cannot be located or contacted, and no activity has taken place for at least six consecutive months, or production equipment or facilities have been removed and no activity has taken place for at least two consecutive years, unless the,.,.,.,.~."' "" '" D.O.G.G.R has granted an extension of time pursuant to their regulations. This definition does not apply to observation wells. L. "Division of Oil, o,---',,: Gas and Geothermal ResourceS' or ""',.,.,.,. ~"' '-'" "D.O.G.G.R" means that division of the Department of Conservation of the State of California. M. "Drill or Drilling" means to bore a hole in the earth for the purpose of completing a well, exploration Or testing. Drilling includes all operations through the removal of the ddlling equipment from the drill site. N. "Drill site" means the land required to'be reserved in accordance with .... Section 15.66.080 C. as part of a rezoning, subdivision or other development for future drilling and/or production operations. 0.~. "Drill island" means the discrete area zoned Drilling Island (DI) District in accordance with Chapter 17.46 of this Code. P.._N. "Dwelling" means any building or portion thereof providing living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation, and includes both single-family and multiple-family residential facilities. Q.e. "Gas" means the gaseous components or vapors contained in or derived from petroleum or natural gas. _R ~ "Grade" (adjacent ground elevation) means the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground, paving or sidewalk within the area between the structure and the property line or, when the property line is more than five feet from the structure, between the structure' and a line five feet from the structure. S:~IENG~TItIel~UDC draft3~draft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 2 S~ Q. "Hazardous well'' means an oil or gas well that presently poses a danger to life, health, or natural resources as determined by the D.O.C.D.O.G.G.R under the provisions of the Public Resources Code. T. R:. "Idle well" means a well for which production has been suspended for a minimum of five consecutive years, except any well being held for future programs, including those being retained for use under a secondary or tertiary recovery plan or for disposal, which has been approved by the '-',.,.,.,.,.~.'" '" D.O.G.G.R but has not been abandoned or deserted as defined in this code and by the D.O.G.D.O.G.G.R. This definition does not apply to observation wells. U. S:. "Lessee" means the party possessing the right(s) to drill, develop and produce oil, gas or other hydrocarbons from the subsurface of land with said right(s) being specifically conveyed by a written oil, gas, mineral or surface lease. _V. :F:. "Lessor" means the party owning an interest in and to any oil, gas or other hydrocarbons as may be produced from a tract of land who has conveyed the right(s) to drill, develop and produce said substances to another party (lessee) by a written oil, gas, mineral or surface drilling rights lease. This party may or may not be the surface owner. W. U:. "Maintenance" or "Maintain" means the upgrading, repair, cleaning, upkeep and replacement of parts of a structure and equipment. Maintenance of a structure ~ does not alter or lessen the character, strength, or stability of the structure. X. M:. "N.F.P.A." means the National Fire Protection Association. Y. W:. A "Noise sensitive receptor" is a land use associated with human activities which is particularly sensitive to noise. Examples of noise sensitive receptors include hospitals, libraries, schools, residential uses, and those uses deemed noise sensitive by the City Council, Planning Commission or Board of Zoning Adjustment. Z. ~ An "Observation Weli" is a well bore for the purpose of observing petroleum reservoir characteristics, including but not limited to, temperature,, saturation, pressure, and fluid movement; as recognized by the D.C.G. D,O,G.G,R. AA. -Y-:. "Operator" means person, including corporations, partnerships and associations, whether proprietor, lessee, contractor, or agent or officer of the same, in charge of or in control of the drilling, maintenance, and operation of a well or wells as shown on the permit application. BB. ~. "Petroleum" means and includes any and all hydrocarbon substances found in a natural state, including but not limited to crude oil, natural gas, natural gasoline, and other related substances. CC. A~. "Petroleum lease" means a property right with respect towhich a lessee enjoys the right to drill, develop, produce and possess petroleum resources for a determinable period. May also be referenced as a subsurface lease or mineral rights lease. DD. BB. "Production operation" means and includes all oil or gas recovery activities following completion of drilling, reddlling or testing of a well. S:~JENG~TIIJe 15~UDC draft3~raft3-amend15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 3 E£. CC. "Public assembly" refers to a building, structure or site, or portion thereof, for the gathering together or accommodation of 50 or more persons for such purposes of deliberation, education,-werk'shop worship, entertainment, lodging, medical care, amusement, drinking and dining, or awaiting transportation. FF'. DD. "Redrilling" means any drilling operation, including deviation from original well bore, to recomplete the well in the same or different geologic zone, excluding sidetracking. GG. EE. "Remedial" means any work on a well, other than drilling or redrilling. HH. FF. "Sidetracking" means drilling, excluding substantial deviation from the original well bore to recomplete a well in the same or different geologic zone. I1_ GG. "Sump" means a lined or unlined, covered or uncovered excavation pit which holds petroleum or other liquids incidental thereto, or solids associated with drilling or production operations. JJ. HH. "Tank" means a strUcture or container, with a minimum volume of 60 ~_allons. used in conjunction with either the drilling or production of a well used for holding, storing, or treating liquids or solids, or otherwise associated with drilling or producing operations. KK. · "Uniform Building Code" or "U.B.C." means the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of Bakersfield. LL. JJ. "Uniform Fire Code" or "U.F.C." means the most recent edition of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of Bakersfield. MM."",,,,. "Well" means any hole drilled into the earth for the purpose of exploring for or producing oil or gas; injecting fluids or gas for stimulating oil or gas recovery; repressuring or pressure maintenance of oil or gas reservoirs; disposing of oil field waste fluids; seismic testing; or any hole ddlled into the earth within or'adjacent to an oil orgas pool for the purpose of observation of subsurface conditions. NN. LL. "Well servicing" means and includes remedial or maintenance work or work performed to maintain or improve production from an al.ready producing facility. OO. MM. "Well site" means that surface area used for oil or gas drilling or extraction operations, for injection injectmns purposes in enhanced petroleum recovery operations after drilling is completed and oil and gas recovery activities following completion of drilling or redrilling of a well. A well site may include one or more wells. 15.66.030 Permits. A. No person shall ddll, operate or maintain any well or well site for petroleum, natural gas, or related drilling, nor operate or maintain any production operation without first obtaining a permit. Applications for drilling/proi~uction permits shall be made in writing to the Director of Prevention Services, or designee, on such forms as provided by the Director. Permits are classified as follows: S:UENG\Title15\UDC draft3~draff3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 4 1. Class 1 - the well site and/or production operation is: (a) Within an area zoned for residential development; or (b) Located less than 500 feet from a dwelling except those for use by a caretaker or night security on the same parcel, or public assembly as defined in this chapter. 2. Class 2 - the well site and/or production operation is: (a)Within an area zoned for commercial, light manufacturing or open space, or (b) Located between 500 and 1,000 feet from a dwelling unit except those for use by a caretaker or night security on the same parcel, or public assembly as defined in this chapter, provided no well or related structure for production is located less than 500 feet from said uses. . . 3. Class 3 - the well site and/or production operation is: (a) Within an area zoned for general manufacturing, heavy manufacturing, or agricultural, or is within the primary floodplain pursuant to the restrictions in Section 15.66.030 B.I., or the secondary floodplain, provided no well or related structure for production is located less than 500 feet from a dwelling except those for use by a caretaker or night security on the same parcel, or public assembly as defined in this chapter; or (b) Located within the state approved boundaries of the following state designated oil fields as defined by the state D.O.C.D.O.G.G. FL, regardless of the zone district or distance from dwellings or public assembly uses as defined in this chapter. (i) Kern River Oil Field (,.,.,..,.~."' '" '" D.O.G.G.R. Map 457). (ii) Kern Bluff Oil Field ( D.O.C.D.O.G.G.R. Map 439). (iii) Portion of the Fruitvale Oil Field encompassing Section 27, T295, R27E, north of the Cross Valley Canal ( D.O.C.D.O.G.G.R. Map 435). 12 T"'-'"' '-'"'~'- ,,.., ,., ,-, ,,__ A~.~, S:~JENG~oil\UDC~draft3-amend 15-66.wpd February 22, 2002 5 (c) An area zoned DI (Drilling Island District) zone or PE (Petroleum Extraction Combining District) zone. B. Well sites and/or production operations shall be prohibited in the following areas in the city: 1. Primary floodplain of the Kern River, except that area located within the state approved boundary of the Kern River oil field as delineated on Map 457 of the~,.,..,.~.'" '" "' D.O.G.G.R. C. App,,,.om.,, ,o:--- f,~, u, ,,,,, ,~, p,,.,,~,~,.,,~,, ........................ p~,,, ,,Lo:'- o, ,o,, ~,~ made ~n .... vv, ,,,:':--,~ t,., '~'-~, ,~ ,'-irc' r:,r~ I ...... not ~- : Marsh°: -- such ' .............. " .............. '" ........ : - - .........- -':':---' .... ' ............ the '~ ---'~ -' Zon' g A .~: ........ ,,~ -, ^ , ............ u, ,,, c: ,.,,.,, ,,.m,,.,, ,o, uo~ permit,o ,-,,.,o, u ,.,, in ~m(~ml[~:;u uy Ic;,,I. I,[J./...rn,.I '"'- ....... '"' "' ...... ' ........ :- he&F:lFig ..... b ......... '~ .......... pFC, pe~y ........ .... of th6 he&r:,n§ ^-*' ........ I """ ' ..... the prope~y .... cont~-.~nin§ .......... ; .... chapter for - '" .... I perm' Atta:,nmant - perm[ts pursuant to "-: Il IlO 0 rIO00 ii. Uf I.I IlO ~l IOp&~;;L: ~.~J~;° I C. Drilling by conditional use permit ^ --':--':--- '-- ~ .... : ........... : · ~pplm,,..C~Lm~l iO m~, UI limml I~/pm ~Uu~Lm~m Class 1 permits shall not be issued until a conditional use permit is granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment (B.Z.A.) pursuant to Chapter 17.64 (Modifications, Conditional Use Permits, Amendments and Aec)eels). Any conditions required under the conditional use permit shall be in addition to those imposed by this chapter for a Class 1 permit. The B.Z.A. may modify any condition set forth in the development standards and conditions if it determines that there will be no material detriment to the public welfare or safety of persons and property located.within fhe-vicini~ a reasonable distance of such a well. 1_ In addition to the application requirements for a conditional use permit pursuant to pursuant to Chapter 17.64 (Modifications, Conditional Use Permits, Amendments and Appeals). an applicant shall also submit the following: a. A plot plan or site development plan drawn at the scale specified by the Planning Director, which includes the following information: L Topography and proposed grading. #. Location of all proposed well holes and related accessory equipment, structures, and facilities to be installed and any abandoned wefts if such are known to exist. iii. Location of all existing dwellings and buildings used for other purposes, located within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed well holes, identification of the use of each structure, and distances between well holes and existing buildings. S:gENGtTiflel 5\UDC draff3~draft3-amend15-66.wpd January S. 2002 6 iv. North arrow. b. Narrative description of the proposed development, including: i. Acreage or square footage of the property. ii. Nature of hydrocarbon development activity. iii. Description of equipment to be used, includinci hei.clht of derrick. iv. Distance to all existing buildings. v. Phasing or development schedule. .... c_ A copy of the letter, or other official documentation,..from D.O.G.G.R. containing the name and address of the operator of record, if any, as shown in D.O.G.G.R. records as of 30 days prior to the date the conditional use permit application is submitted to the Plannin.q Department or a written statement from D.O.G.G.R. that there is no party of record with D.O.G.G.R. relative to the subject site. d. Additional information may be required, as part of an application for a Conditional Use Permit, as provided in Chapter 17.64 (Modifications, Conditional Use Permits, Amendments and Appeals). 2. Notice of the public hearing shall be expanded to include property owners within 1,000 feet of the property line containing the well site subject of the hearing and the operator of record as shown in D.O.G.G.R. records as of 30 days of the date of application for a conditional use permit. 3. If a producing well or service well is not commenced upon land subject to said conditional use permit within twelve (12) months from the date of . _ issuance of the conditional use permit, or within any extended period thereof, the conditional use permit shall expire and the premises shall be restored as nearly as practicable to its original condition. No permit shall expire while the permittee is continuously conducting drilling, redrilling, completing or abandoning operations, or related operations, in a well on the lands covered by such permit, where operations were commenced while said permit was otherwise in effect. Continuous operations are operations suspended not more than thirty (30) consecutive days. If, at the expiration of the twelve (12) month period, the permittee has not completed the drilling program on the lands covered by such permit, the Plefttti~ ~ Board of Zonin.q Adjustment may, upon a written request of the permittee, extend the permit for the additional time requested by the permittee for the completion of such drilling program. S:UENG~TiIJel 5~UDC draft3~raff3-amend15-66.wpd January 9. 2002 7 4. Any permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter Section 15.66.030 (C) may be revoked or modified pursuant to Section 17.64.060 (H). D. The owner or operator of any well permitted by this Chapter, shall provide the Fi~e-Mamh~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, a copy of the written notice to the P_,.C,.G.D.O.G.G.R. of the sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, or exchange by the owner or operator of the well within 30 days after the sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, or exchange. In addition, the owner or operator shall also acknowledge that they have notified the new owner or operator of all existing terms and conditions of the city's permit. E. Modification to any standards in this chapter sha~l may be approved by the B.Z.A. pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.64. F. Every permit issued by the Rf~-Mamh~ -. Director of Prevention Services, or -. desionee, under the provisions of this chapter shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within one year from the date of such permit. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall be first obtained to do ' so, to determine if the permit classification as defined in Section 15.66.030(A) has changed. G. The Ffl'e-Mamh~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this chapter whenever the permit is issued in error on the basis of incorrect information supplied by the applicant which results in there being a violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this chapter. H. Any city official or employee for the purpose of reviewing a permit application, transfer of operation/ownership, complaint, compliance or any other investigation pursuant to the chapter, shall have the right to enter upon the premises for inspection provided they give prior notice of such to the operator. I. Wells-welt sites and production operations established prior to September 19, , . 1992, shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter. However, significant changes or modifications that necessitate new permits as required by the Fim-Mamfl~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, or B.Z.A., shall be required to comply with the provisions of this chapter, or obtain modifications as permitted in Section 15.66.030(E). J. The city may impose fees to offset the costs associated with permit processing and condition monitoring pursuant to Chapter 3.70. K. Attainment of permits pursuant to this chapter does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility in obtaining permits-as required by law from other local, state.or federal agencies. All required Federal, State, County, and City rules and regulations shall be complied with at ail times including, but not limited to, the rules and regulations of the following agencies: S:~JENG~Title15\UDC draft3~raft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 8 1. Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources 2. City of Bakersfield Fire Department 3. Kern County Health Department 4. Regional Water Quality Control Board 5. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 15.66.040 Well site development standards. A. Class 3 Permits - development standards: 1. Setbacks. No petroleum well shall be drilled nor shall any storage tank and other production related structures be located within: (a) Seventy-five (75) feet of the right-of-way of any dedicated public street, highway, railroad or private street, or adopted specific plan line of any street or highway; (b) One hundred (100) feet of any building including dwellings, except buildings incidental to the operation of the well; (c) Three hundred (300) feet of any public assembly as defined in this chapter; (d) Twenty-five (25) feet of a storage tank or boilers, fired heaters, open flame devices or other sources of ignition pursuant to the U.F.C. 2. Fire Safety. All drilling and production activities shall be subject to all fire and safety regulations as required by the Rfe-Mamhat Director of Prevention Services, or designee, pursuant to the U.F.C. Blowouts, fires, explosions and other life threatening or environmental emergencies shall be reported immediately to the Fire-Mamh~ Director of Prevention Services, or desianee, and D.C.C.D.O.G.G.R. 3. Division of Oil and Gas and Geothermal Resources. All drilling and production operations shall be subject to all regulations of the P_,.C.C. D.O.G.G.R. 4. Production Operations. For producing sites, only storage of hydrocarbon production, vapor recovery on storage vessels, dehydration and separation of produced hydrocarbon products and other processes associated with production are permitted unless otherwise required by the C.C.G.D.O.G.G.R. Ail derricks, boilers, and other drilling equipment employed, pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, to drill any well hole or to repair, clean out, deepen, or redrill any completed weft shaft be removed within ninety (90) days after completion of production tests following completion of such S :U ENG~Title 15~UDC draft3 .~lraft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 9 drilling or after abandonment of any well, unless such derricks, boilers, and drilling equipment are to be used within a reasonable time, as determined by the P:~i;n:ng C:,~cto; Director of Prevention Services, or designee, for the drilling of another approved well(s) on the premises. 5. Signs. Signs relating to drilling and/or production operations shall be limited to directional and warning signs, and signs for identification of wells and facilities as required by the U.F.C. and D.O.G.G.R to ensure employee and public safety. Signs not related to said operations shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.60. 6. Sanitary Facilities. Sanitary toilet and washing facilities shall be installed and maintained at any well site and/or production operation where personnel are stationed pursuant to the Kern County Health Department. 7. Equipment Storage. There shall be no storage at the well site of material, : equipment, machinery or vehicles which is not intended for prompt use in .... connection with petroleum operations. Any equipment or machinery not used for a consecutive period of more than 60 days shall be removed from the site unless a longer period is approved by the ~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, or the zone district in which it is located permits such storage. 8. Derricks. Drilling derricks, if idle for a consecutive period of more than 60 days, shall be lowered and removed from the site unless a longer period is approved by the F.ire-Mers¢~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee. Any derrick used for servicing operations shall be of the portable type, unless proof is provided that the well is of such depth or has some other characteristics such that a portable type derrick will not properly service such well. In that instance, the P:~i;i;:i;g ,.,,, ~,,,~,, Director of Prevention Services, or desic~nee. '"'" may approve the use of a standard type of derrick. 9. Grading and Drainage. Unless otherwise-required by the State Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for those areas that they deem environmentally sensitive, well sites, including vehicle parking and maneuvering areas, shall be graded in a manner so that ponding will not occur. Within ninety (90) days after any well has been placed in production, or after its abandonment, earthen sumps used in drilling and/or production (unless such sumps are to be used within a reasonable time as determined '"" ......Director of Prevention Services, or designee, for by the Pl~.~ii~g ,.,,, ~,.,~,, the drilling of another well) shall be filled and the drilling site restored as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade. Normal wetting or other dust control procedures shall be employed throughout the grading period to control dust. Upon completion of grading, the site shall be compacted and all.graded surfaces either paved, covered with gravel of agregate base, treated with a dust binder, or other method approved by the F-ire-Mm'shat Director of Prevention Services, or designee. The Regional Water Quaflty Control Board may have some /urisdiction relative to drainage and water quality. S:UENG~oil~UDC~raft3-amend 15-66.wpd February 22, 2002 10 10. Waste. Drainage containing drilling muds, cuttings, wastewater, waste oil, grease and other oil field wastes found to be hazardous associated with drilling and/or production including servicing, shall not be discharged into or upon any streets, canals, storm drains or flood control channels. These wastes shall be contained in leak-proof containers, lined earthen sumps or other method as approved by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board, to prevent contamination of potable groundwater supplies. Waste areas shall be cleaned at intervals as required by the F/re,v,a,o, ~ ,_.A,._,,a, Director of Prevention Services, or designee, with all wastes disposed of at an appropriate authorized disposal site as regulated by the State of California. a. Facilities for disposal of nonhazardous oilfield liquid waste, ~,,-,~, production water and USEPA Class II wastes are considered an accessory facility only if the facility complies with the following: i. The nonhazardous oilfield liquid waste or production water is - . produced and disposed of within the same.designated oilfield; or ii. The nonhazardous oilfield liquid waste or production water disposed of outside the designated oilfield of origin is produced by and disposed of solely and only by the same individual, corporation, or entity. 11. Light and Glare. Lighting shall be limited to that necessary for safety and security purposes and shall be directed away from adjacent properties and road rights-of-way. All flares shall be shielded from adjacent properties and road rights-of-way. 12. Blowouts. Protection against blowouts shall be provided in accordance with the ,-,.,..,.,.~. D.O.G.G.R. and U.F.C. 13. Storage Tanks. Storage tanks shall be in accordance with the "' '" '-' D.O.G.G.R. and U.F.C. Whenever oil or gas is produced into and shipped from tanks located on the premises, such tanks, whenever located within five hundred (500) feet of any dwelling or commercial building, shall be surrounded by shrubs or trees, planted and maintained to provide attractive landscaping or be fenced in such a manner as to, insofar as practicable, screen such tanks from public view. Such fencing shall comply with the requirements of D.O.G.G.R. 14. Height. The height of all pumping units, excluding derricks, shall not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet. All other structures shall be regulated by the zone district in which they are located. All heights of structures shall comply with Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, or any corresponding rules or regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, as amended. S:~JENG~oil\UDC~draft3-amend15-66.wpd February 22, 2002 1 1 15. Site Condition. The well site and all associated structures shall be maintained in a neat and clean condition at all times. Proven technological improvements generally accepted and used in drilling and production methods shall be employed as they become available if they are cost effective in reducing nuisances or annoyances. Pumping units and storage tanks shall be painted. Pumping wells shall be operated by electric motors or muffled internal combustion engines. 16. Air Quality. Flaring, venting and odor control shall be subject to the regulations of the San Joaquin Unified Air Pollution Control District, D.O.G.D.O.G.G.R. and U.F.C. 17. Building Permits. Building permits, as required by the City Building Official, shall be secured for all permanent structures to be used in connection with the production and processing of hydrocarbon or related substances in conformance with the U.B.C. Electrical permits shall be required for all electrical connections for drilling and/or pumping units if electrical motors are utilized. 18. Vibration. Vibration from equipment shall not create a nuisance or hazard to nearby land uses. 19. Site Restoration. Site restoration shall commence within 90 days upon completion of all drilling and/or production activities or upon abandonment of the well site. Well abandonment will be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the D.O.G.D.O.G.G.R. Before final abandonment, all drilling/production .equipment shall be removed from the site. Fences shall be dismantled, all signage removed, and the site regraded so as to break up impermeable surfaces and fill in all sumps to restore the site as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade. Temporary earthen sumps may be used for clean-out or remedial work on an existing well or other production facility. However, these sumps shaft be filled and the site restored as nearly as practicable to a uniform grade within ninety (90) days after the clean-out or other remedial work is completed, The Regional Water Quaftt¥ Control Board has jurisdiction over sumps. Prior to filling of sumps, all waste shall be cleaned and disposed of at an appropriate authorized disposal site as regulated by the State of California. Waste cleanup shall be to the satisfaction of the Kern County Department of Environmental Health. The site shall be restored to the surrounding condition, or to the satisfaction of the State Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for those areas that they deem environmentally sensitive. Site restoration activities shall be completed within 90 days of commencement. Failure of permittee to comply with the site restoration within a period of ninety days following the termination of any oil or gas exploration activity or the abandonment of an existing well shall be called to the attention of the permittee by a registered letter addressed to permittee at the permittee's address as shown on the permit application. If, at the end of thirty days after mailing of such letter no steps have been taken to comply with said provisions of this section, the city shall proceed to effect said restoration. Permittee shall be liable for all costs incurred by the city and no additional permit shall be issued a permittee until payment of all such costs has been made. S:~JENG\Title15\UDC draft3~raft3-amend 15-66.wpd Janua~ 9, 2002 1 2 20. Floodplain Development. The ~ Director of Prevention Services, or deskTnee, shall coordinate with the City Building Official to ensure wells ddlled in the primary or secondary floodplain are consistent with the city's involvement in the National Flood Insurance Program and with the requirements of the State Department of Water Resources and Regional Water Quality Control Board. 21. Vehicles. All vehicle parking and maneuvering areas shall be treated and maintained with oiled sand or a similar dust binding material consistent with regulations of the local air pollution control agency. 22. Fencing. Permanent chain-link fencing a minimum of six feet but not to exceed eight feet in height with solid screening shaft be installed encompassing the entire weft site as approved by the Director ot Prevention Services, or desi.qnee. At least three strands of barbed wire shall be mounted on top of the fence. This fence shaft be constructed of chain link with wood or metal slats or other screening materials as may be '~ · Director of Prevention Services, or approved by the P:~;;i;#;g ,.,,, =,.-.,, designee. This fencing and screening requirement shall apply only to those pump sites located within five hundred (500) feet of any dwelling or in an OS (Open Space) zone. Such fencing shall comply with the requirements of D.O.G.G.R. The front yard setback of the zone district in which it is located shall regulate the location of fencing. B. Class 2 Permits - development standards: 1. Class 3 Requirements. In addition to the followin.q development standards, Class 3 permit development standards set forth in Section 15.66.040 (A) shall apply to all Class 2 permits. -3 _2. Off-site Improvements. Where adjacent properties are similarly improved, within 180 days of commencement of commercial production or one (1) year from the completion of drilling of any well on the well site, off-site improvements including street paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and related dedications for such improvements shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the City Public Works Director. 43. Noise. Noise levels from any drilling and/or production operation shall not exceed 65 dB(A) CNEL at the property line of a noise sensitive receptor, except in a case of emergency. Exterior noise levels generated by drilling, redrilling, or production operations shall be monitored as required by the City Building Official to ensure conformance to the noise level standards. The costs of such monitoring shall be bo~ne by the operator conducting such operation. Records of the results of monitoring shall be maintained and provided to the City Building Official upon request. S:UENG~Title15~UDC draft3~lraft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 13 54. Pipelines. Pipelines utilized for all petroleum related operations shall be buried a minimum of three (3) feet below grade. C. Class I Permits - development standards: 1. Class 3 Requirements. In addition to the followin~l development standards, Class 3 permit development standards set forth in Section 15.66.040(A) shall apply to all Class 1 permits. 2. Fencing. A solid masonry wall a minimum of six feet but not to exceed eight feet in height of a color approved by the B.Z.A. consistent with adjacent or nearby development, shall be installed encompassing the entire well site. Any additional fencing required by the,.,.,-,.,-,."' '"' "' D.O.G.G.R. shall be inside the area enclosed by the wall. The front yard setback of the zone district in which it is located shall regulate the location of the wall. 3. Landscapinq. Landscaping shall be required along all street frontages of the well site and around well site pursuant to Chapter 17.53.061 as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustment under the approved conditional use permit. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for approval to the B.Z.A. Landscaping shall be designed to camouflage the full height of petroleum related structures, with the exception of derricks, and create an aesthetically pleasing environment managed in a healthy condition. 4. Off-site Improvements. Where adjacent properties are similarly improved, within 180 days of commencement of commercial production or one (1) year from the completion of drilling of any well on the well site, off-site improvements including street paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and related dedications for such improvements shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the City Public Works Director. 5. Vehicle Routes. Vehicles associated with drilling and/or production in excess of three tons shall be restricted to those public road.s specified by the City Public Works Director. 6. Work Hours. Truck deliveries of equipment and materials associated with drilling and/or production, well servicing, site preparation, and other related work conducted on the well site shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and6 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and prohibited on Sunday and all legal holidays, except in cases of fires, blowouts, explosions and other emergencies where the Fh~Vtarsh~ Director of Prevention Services, or desiqnee, and D.C.G. D.O.G.G.R. were notified. Drilling activities shall be permitted 24 hours a day. 7. Noise. No drilling, producing, or other operations (including workover operations) shall produce noise at the property line of a noise sensitive receptor in excess of the following standards, with respect to these basic reference levels: S:~JENG\TiUe15\UDC draft3~draft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9. 2002 14 BASIC REFERENCE LEVELS 7 a.m. to 10 p.m ............ 55 dB(A) 10 p.m. to 7 a.m ............ 50 dB(A) a. Noise measurements and acoustical analysis shall be conducted by a qualified acoustical consultant experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics. All costs associated with said measurements and analysis shall be borne by the permittee. Frequency of monitoring shall be determined by the B.Z.A. b. All parts of a derrick above the derrick floor including the elevated portion thereof used as a hoist, shall be enclosed with tire-resistive soundproofing material. Such soundproofing shall comply with accepted A.P.I. standards and shall be subject to fire department regulations. All -- ~ ' doors and similar openings shall be kept closed dudng drilling operations, except for ingress and egress and necessary logging, testing and well completion operations. Alternative materials or methods of soundproofing may be used, provided that such alternative has been approved by B.Z.A. The B.Z.A. may approve any such alternative if they find that the proposed matedal and method have equal sound proofing properties and fire resistive qualities to the aforesaid specifications. Either may require the submission of evidence to substantiate any claims that may be made regarding the use of such alternative. 8. Pipelines. Pipelines utilized for all petroleum related operations shall be buried a minimum of three (3) feet below grade. 15.66,050 Abandoned and idle wells, A. Abandoned wells. The surface area of the site.shall be returned to its natural condition including but not limited to cleaning all oil, oil residues, drilling fluids, muds and other substances; leveling, grading or filling of sumps, ditches, and cellars including removal of all lining materials to the satisfaction of the D.C.C. D,O,G,G,R. The permittee shall also be responsible for repairing any streets, sidewalks or other public property that may have been damaged in connection with any operation on the site, except for ordinary wear and tear of said improvements, to substantially the same or better condition as existed before operations commenced as determined by the City Public Works Director. B. Idle wells. Whenever a well becomes idle as defined in this chapter, the Fife Mamhat Director of Prevention Services, or desi~_ nee, shall send notice thereof by registered mail, to the surface owner, mineral rights owner and lessee of land as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll of the county, and permittee, that a request to abandon the well will be sent to the D.O.C.D.O.G.G.R. unless operations are resumed or that the operator provides verification that the well is under the -B:e~:~. D.O.G.G.R. 's idle well program, if there is no response to said notice within 90 days of the receipt of the notice, or the extension of time expires, the F~*e-Mm'sh~ Director of Prevention Services, or desionee, shall request the D.C.C. ~. to commence abandonment proceedings. S:~JENG\Tifle15~UDC draft3~raff3-amend 15-66.wpd 15 January 9, 2002 C. Deserted wells. As defined in this chapter, the Fh'e*-Mam~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, may request that the P_,.O.C.D.O.G.G.R.. commence abandonment proceedings. 15.66.070 Enforcement. A. It shall be the duty of the F~e-Mamh~ Director of Prevention Services, or desic~nee, to enforce the provisions of this chapter. B. Any structure erected or maintained, or any use of property contrary to the provisions of this chapter shall be, and the same is, unlawful and a public nuisance, and the ~ Director of Prevention Services, or designee, in conjunction with the City Attorney shall immediately commence actions and proceedings for the abatement, removal and enjoinment thereof in the manner provided by law. Violators will be liable for all enforcement costs incurred by the city. C. This chapter may also be enforced by injunction issued out of Superior Court upon suit of the city, or the owner or occupant of any real property affected by such violation. D. Permits issued in conflict with the provisions of this chapter shall be null and void. 15.66.080 Development encroachment in petroleum areas. A. On-site petroleum facilities. Where a developer proposes to subdivide, rezone or otherwise develop property which contains existing drilling and/or production operations including disposal wells, the developer shall provide a plan showing how all existing petroleum related facilities will be protected and integrated into the proposed development so as said facilities will satisfy the development standards pursuant to this chapter. The developer shall also submit a plan of the ultimate use of the land after cessation of petroleum operations and abandonment of the wells. Any buildable lot containing an area which may not be built upon because of development standard compliance of the petroleum facilities shall be encumbered by 'the developer with a deed restdcti0n specifying the area so encumbered and identifying the name and location of the well causing the encumbrance. If a,final map is required, s~d ...... ,- ......~-.-,, ,- ...... --- ..............:'~- "-- ,~--', --- the subdivider shall record a covenant affecting all real property within the subdivision that is within 500 feet of the petroleum facilities. Said covenant shall disclose the existence and location of the petroleum facilities. The encumbrance or covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. B. Abandoned wells. Tentative maps, planned development and other development plans submitted to the City shall show the location of all wells drilled on the property. Prior to development of an area, any well shown as abandoned shall be accompanied by written verification from the C.C.C.D.O.G.G.R. that the well was properly abandoned pursuant to their regulations. Any well thereafter abandoned shall also be accompanied bY written verification from the C.C.C.D.O.G.G.R. Development shall be designed such that the City Building Official is satisfied that no structure will be built within 10 feet of any well that has been properly abandoned pursuant to P_,.C,.C.D.O.G.G.R. requirements. Any lot or parcel containing an abandoned well shall be encumbered with a deed restriction specifying the exact location of such well and prohibiting any construction within said 10 feet area. Said encumbrance shall run with the land and be approved by the City Attorney prior to S:UENG~TitIe15~UDC draft3~draft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 16 recordation. If a final map is required, said encumbrance shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. The D.O.C.D.O.G.G.R., at their discretion, may also require that any abandoned well be uncovered, tested for leakage, require remedial work on leaking wells, and accurately located on the final map before said map is recorded. C. Drillinq ts:~nds Site. Lands may be reserved as part of a rezoning, subdivision or -other development for future drilling and/or production operations as drilling isl~,-~ds sites. Such sites shall be no less than two (2) net acres in size and have a minimum lot frontage and width of 305 feet, configured so that the proposed development and petroleum activities can be adequately buffered from one another, prov~ide for adequate ingress and egress, and shall be accompanied with a plan of the ultimate use of the site after abandonment or decision not to pursue petroleum operations. If a final map is required, the subdivider shall record a covenant disclosing the existence and location of the drilling site. Said covenant shall be recorded to affect all real property within the subdivision that is within 500 feet of the drilling site. Said covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded concurrent with the final map. Future ddlling and/or production operations shall be required ' ' to acquire necessary permits as well as satisfy all well site development standards pursuant to this chapter. S:UENG\Title15~UDC draft3~raft3-amend 15-66.wpd January 9, 2002 17 TITLE 16 SUBDIVISIONS Draft #1 16.16.010 FILING. A tentative map (tract or parcel) for which approval is sought for any subdivision shall be filed as follows: D. Every person submitting a tentative map shall also submit 3 copies of a preliminary title report dated no more than 60 days prior to the subdivision application submittal date covedng all easements, ownerships and title with respect to all lots or parcels of the subdivision, including mineral owners and lessees of record. E. Every person submitting a tentative map shall also submit 2 sets of postage prepaid, ...... unsealed envelopes addressed to all mineral owners and lessees of record appearing- on the title report, and as shown in the State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (herein this title referred to as D.O.G.G.R.) records as operator of record as of 30 days of the date of application of the tentative map. The applicant shall submit a copy of the letter from D.O.G.G.R. with the subdivision application. The letter from D.O.G.G.R. shall list said name of operator and/or lessee of record and their addresses as shown in D.O.G.G.R.'s records or a written statement from D.O.G.G.R. that there is no party of record with D.O.G.G.R. relative to the sublect site. If the application includes a request for waiver of signatures as described in Section 16.16.040, the ~ envelopes shall contain a copy of said waiver request. F. A request for waiver of signatures pursuant to Section 16.20.060 shall accompany a tentative map submittal. The request for waiver of signatures shall be in typed letter form addressed to the City of Bakersfield and shall describe the ordinance provisions under which the waiver of signatures is being requested and the nature and location of the project, including a tract or parcel map number and a clearly drawn location map of the project area. 16.16.060 PUBLIC HEARING. A. The Planning Director shall, not less than 10 days before the date of the hearing, give notice of the date, time, place of headng, location of the property and the nature of the request including any request for waiver of signatures pursuant to Section 16.20.060 B. in the following manner: 1. By publishing once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; $:tJ ENGtoiltUDC~draft Title 16. wpd 1 February 22, 2002 2. By mailing a notice, postage prepaid, to the applicant; to the owner of the property to be subdivided or the owner's duly authorized agent; to the owners of interests in mineral or hydrocarbon substances where combined with right of entry; and to lessees of mineral or hydrocarbon substances, using for purposes of notifying owners, mineral owners and lessees the names and addresses as shown on the preliminary title report required by Section 16.16.010 D. and shown on information required by Section 16.16.010 E.; to the owners of all property within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property involved, using for these purposes, the names and addresses as shown on the last equalized county assessment roll; to each local agency (if not the City) expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools or other essential facilities to the project, whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be significantly affected; and any other person filing with the Planning Director a written request for notice. B. After notice as provided in subsection A, the advisory agency shall hold and conduct a public hearing. 16.20.060 STATEMENTS OF PARTIES HAVING RECORD TITLE INTEREST. A. A statement, signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the real property subdivided, consenting to the preparation and recordation of the final tract map is required, except as omitted pursuant to this section. B. The signatures of each party owning a recorded interest in, or right to, minerals, including but not limited to, oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon substances, not including lessees of such rights, shall be required unless his name and the nature of his respective interest are stated on the final map and the advisory agency determines, or on appeal the City Council finds, at least one of the following applies: 1. The party's right of surface entry has been expressly waived by recorded document, including, but not limited to quitclaim deed and/or reservation. 2. The party's interest is less than 20% of the mineral interest estate and the signature or express waiver of right of surface entry by recorded document, including, but not limited to, quitclaim deeds and/or reservations of one or more parties having a combined interest of more than 50% of the mineral interest estate has been obtained. 3. At least 30 days prior to the date of hearing on the tentative map, the subdivider has given written notice, b,y registered mail or if impracticable as determined by the Planning Director, by publication once in a newspaper of general circulation. S:lJ E NG toiltUDCtdraft Title 16. wpd February 22, 2002 a_.,. Notice shall be oiven to each mineral owner and lessee of record who has not waived his right of surface entry underlying the subdivision as set forth in the preliminary title report required by Section 16.16.010 D. and as shown in D.O.G.G.R. records as operator of record as of 30 days of the date of application of the tentative map. b. Said notice shall include a statement of intent to reserve a drill site or sites as defined in Section 15.66.080 C. of the Municipal Code on or within a practicable distance of the subdivision map as determined by the advisory agency, and as to which the owner of the mineral interest had a right of access and use, is or has been reserved and is delineated and labeled as such on the approved tentative map for the subdivision or, if outside the boundaries of the subdivision, is specifically described on the approved tentative map. Said notice shall also include the nature and location of the project, including a tract or parcel map number and a clearly drawn location map of the project area, and the tentative date, time and place of the headng. c_ A copy of the notice and proof of mailing shall be provided to the Planning Director within 10 days of the mailing/publication date. The advisory agency may require the subdivider to install a wall or fence and landscaping around any or all reserved drill sites and that adequate provisions be made for maintenance thereof. Approval by the advisory agency of a reserved drill site shall constitute approval to drill thereon upon compliance with all conditions and mitigation required under other applicable .regulations and processes. d. Such reservation shall remain in effect for a period not less than 10 years from approval of the tentative map. The commencement of drilling and/or extraction of minerals upon that site shall automatically extend the 10 year time period until operations on the drill site are properly abandoned .... t ^ ..... D.O.G.G.R.. If no to the satisfaction of the Ci¥isi~n ,.,, ,.,,, o,,,, ~o.. drilling and/or extraction of minerals occurs on the drill site within 10 years and the surface fee owner has provided notice and documentation as required in Section 16.20.060 B.4., or upon the Planning Director receiving proof of well abandonment to the satisfaction of the Bivision-of eib-and-Gas D.O.G.G.R., the surface fee owner may apply for tentative map approval on a drill site(s) or, by written correspondence to the Planning Director, may request that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider the filing of an amending map to remove the drill site(s) reservation designation from the final map. Said request shall be processed as an amending map in accordance with Section 66472.1 Of the Map Act. Said request shall include a preliminary title report covering all easements, ownerships and title with respect to the drill site parcel(s), including mineral owners and lessees of record as set forth in the preliminary title report required by Section 16.16.010 D., and 2 sets of postage prepaid, unsealed envelopes addressed to all mineral owners and lessees of record appearing on the title report. Notice of public 'hearing shall be in accordance with 16.16.060. S:tJ ENGtolllUDCtdraftTttle16. wpd February 22, 2002 * Prior to approval of an amending map to remove the drill site(s) reservation, the applicant shall either: present evidence to the satisfaction of the advisory agency as required under 16.20.060 B.4 that production of minerals from beneath the subdivision is improbable, or proof of well abandonment for operations on the drill site to the -' '~"' --" '~-- D.O.G.G.R. shall be satisfaction of the '";' '=-=-- ,.,, ,.,,, presented to the advisory agency. Notwithstanding the above, nothing shall prevent an amending map or tentative map from being considered by the advisory agency for purposes of eliminating the drill site(s) designation at any time if the subdivider has obtained waiver(s) of surface entry pursuant to 16.20.060 B.1 or B.2. 4. At least 30 days prior to the date of hearing on the tentative map, the subdivider has given written notice by registered mail, or if impracticable as determined by the Planning Director, by publication once in a newspaper of general circulation, to each owner of record of mineral rights and each mineral lessee of record as set forth in the preliminary title report required by Section 16.16.010 D. and as shown in D.O.G.G.R. records as operator of record as of 30 days of the date of application of the tentative map, who has not waived his right of surface entry underlying the subdivision, of intent to make the showing provided for in this subsection, and has presented at the hearing competent, technical evidence establishing to the satisfaction of the advisory agency that production of minerals from beneath the subdivision is improbable. Said notice shall also include the nature and location of the project, including a tract or parcel map number and a clearly drawn location map of the project area, and the date, time and place of the hearing. A copy of the notice and proof of mailing shall be provided to the Planning Director within 10 days of the mailing/publication date. C. The provisions of subsection B. of this section shall be applicable to any final parcel map unless each parcel created thereby has a gross area of 20 acres or more. D. The provisions of subsection B. of this section shall not be applicable to any tract map or final parcel map which further subdivides property which has been previously subdivided and to which the requirements of subsection B. were applied at the time of the previous subdivision, unless said tract or parcel map proposes subdivision of a drilling site. E. For purposes of subsection B. of this section, a party's ownership of a fractional portion of an undivided interest in minerals shall be considered a separate interest in the mineral estate. For example, ownership of 1/100th's of a ~ undivided interest in the mineral estate shall be considered ownership of ½% of the mineral estate. S:UENGIolltUDCtdraft 77tle16. wpd February 22, 2002 16.28.170 LOTS. A. Lot Sizes. All residential lots shall have a minimum net area as described in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. B. Lot Frontage. All residential lots shall have a minimum street frontage of 55 feet except as follows: 1. The minimum street frontage for interior one family dwelling lots in an R-2 zone shall be 45 feet. 2. The minimum lot frontage for comer lots shall be 60 feet except for one family dwelling lots in an R-2 zone where it is 50 feet. For purposes of measuring frontage on a corner lot with a radius return, the distance shall be measured from the point of intersection of the extensions of the street side property line and the front property line. 3. Cul-de-sac or Elbow lot: 35 lineal feet as measured along the arc. 4. Flag lot: 20 feet. 5. Drill site required pursuant to Section 15.66.080 C: 305 feet. C. Lot Depth., The lot depth is the length of a line that bisects a lot from a point on the front property line measured half way between the side property lines to a point on the rear of the property. The minimum depth for residential lots shall be 100 feet, except as follows: 1. The minimum depth for a lot with a rear yard abutting agricultural or residential suburban zoned property shall be 140 feet. 2. The minimum depth for a lot with a rear yard abutting a freeway or railroad right- of-way shall be 120 feet. 3. The minimum depth for a one family dwelling lot in an R-2 zone shall be 90 feet except as required in subsection C., 1. and 2. $:tJENGtolltUDCtdraft77tle 16. wpd February 22, 2002 D. Lot Width. The lot width is the length of a line between side property lines that is the perpendicular bisect of the lot depth. The minimum width for residential lots shall be 55 feet on interior lots and 60 feet on corner lots, except as follows: 1. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting agricultural or residential suburban zoned property shall be 100 feet. 2. The minimum width for a lot with a side yard abutting a freeway or railroad right- of-way shall be 85 feet on interior lots and 90 feet on corner lots. 3. The minimum width for a one family dwelling lot in the R-2 zone shall be 45 feet on interior lots and 50 feet on corner lots except as required in subsection D., 1. and 2. 4_ The minimum width for a drill site required pursuant to Section 15.66.080 C shah be 305 feet, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 16.28.170 O. S:lJ ENG Ioil~UDCtdrafl Title 16. wpd February 22, 2002 Chapter 17.46 Draft/;2 Dm DRILLING ISLAND DISTRICT - Sections: Chapter page 17.46.010 Purpose and intent ............................................... 2 17.46.020 Permitted uses ......... · ......................................... 2 17.46.030 Reserved Uses permitted '":'~',,L,, c] ,.u, ,u,,,~,, ,a, use per,~it . .. . ........ .... . . 3 17.46.040 Reserved '"--~-;~':'--~ ..... 4 17.46.050 Minimum lot size ............................ ' 4 17.46.060 Reserved Min:,,~u,~ ....... per ............. :' 5 17.46.070 Reserved Yards ---' --'~---"- 5 17.46.080 Reserve~ ........................................... 5 17.46.090 ReservedMin;,-nurn -~ ' ,,.~ bet'weeno~, ........ u,.,u, ~ 5 17.46.100 Reserved~ ............................................... 6 17.46.110 Reserved-~-?igT~s ................................................. 6 17.46.120 Special review procedures and development standards .................. 6 S AJ E,NGtTiIIc 17-OiI~I. JDC draft-2~Ch 17.46.wlXl ,o/,~,o~ Page I of 6 Proposed Ordinance AmendmentStaff Comment 17.46.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT. The purpose of the Drilling Island (DI) District is to Delete text that limits designate single lots and discrete areas within the application of DI zone to boundaries of final map subdivisions and mobile home those outlying areas that parks that contain productive or potentially productive may be annexed to the petroleum resources to allow mineral access to explore City after 1998. for and develop such resources and to promote the development of such resources in a manner compatible Deletion of text allows with surrounding development. Uses in the DI District application of DI zone are limited to oil and gas exploration and development, city-wide. production, storage, transmission, and treatment, and any accessory or ancillary equipment, structure, or facilities thereto and compatible open space and passive recreational uses. , ,,~ ~,, ~,~,~,u, ~o o,,d .... UUI ILOll I~;U II ILI I[~ ~,,;I ICI~JL~:;I 011011 Cl~J~JI)t [IJ 011 ~::~.~,/1~110Ll~JI ..... hyd ' - ....... '": ..... ' - Sph ,,.,,y o exp,r, nsion uf,,o:'- ere of Influence ,.,,, OF IVlO~J I ~,/11 IIIC;: V¥1LII LII~; ~ 17.46.020 PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted in the DI District: A. Oil or gas exploration and development, production, storage, transmission, and treatment, and any accessory or ancillary equipment structure or facilities thereto, pursuant to the pro isions herein -' "'--';-- v . ,.,, ,.,~,.,,,.,,, 15.¢.,7.040 (Development '" .......... '~ "' ........ a) B. Subdivision drainage sump, as part of an application for a tentative tract map, provided that mineral rights owners have given written consent. ,o,r~ Page 2 of 6 17.46.030 RESERVED This Section is not , ,o,-o r-,,-,~ ,,-,-'~-r-r-, ~A,,-,-,, ^ needed. Permitted uses I,,J~,,~L--,~,.,~ FL--I\IVII I ILU VVlll I /'--~ are listed in Section r.,--,,,, r~,-,-,,~,~, ^, ,,or- ~,,~,'~c,,, ,,J,~- ~,.,- r-,~,v,, ,. 17.46.020. Prohibited Uses are covered by ~ Chapter 17.64 Modifications, ,. ~.,,y ou,~,, uo,~, o,,o,, u~ uooo,v, vv,,,, conditional Use Permits, ., ,~,,~w,,,~, .o ,,,,,.~,~ ,,~ ,~,, ,,~o,~,,, ,u, Amendments and · ~. A s~§no,,o,, be ereeted~ JJI UUUL~llUI I '":'~ the pro ' '- S :U F,J'~GXTitk: I 7,.~fi IV~J DC draft-2%Ch I 7.~. wpd ,0~,?~, Page 3 of 6 3. Th~ n~iner2.i rlghts owners ,.,f envlronmenta~ ~ ......... ' provisiOnS ul u,u u,~y o ~uua, CCQA Implementation Procedures. '-,- '-""'" '"':a~ sump, ~^,.,~pt fu, the ~,,,-,v,o,~,, ,.,, VIIC]IJLC;I~ FII~.,I¥1~JT~U LIICIL IIIIIl~lCII II~IILO I,J¥¥11~;;10 II"'~¥v 17.46.040 RESERVED This Section is not nn~,, ,,~,-,-r-r-, ,,c,r-~ needed. Prohibited r Ix~J, ,lul I ~-~.~ uo[-a. Uses are covered by ^, .............. ,.. .... ~ ,.,,.,~ Chapter 17.64 ~" "'"'~' "°~° "~" ~'~'"""~'~ ':Y ~"""'° ""~'~'"'~' Modifications, (rer,'~itted,.,o~oj" .... and I ", .-,,.,.,.,,.,,., conditional Use Permits, '" "' 'Usen ,..,.,, ,,~,,,~,, ,o, r ~,,,,,,/,.,, ,,,o ,..,,op,~,, ,,,,~,,~,~,,,~ ,,~o,~.~ Amendments and ,,,~, ooo,~,~,o,~,~ ~,,,, o w~,,,,,,,~,~ use o, ~ ~,, ,~, ,,~,,,~,~ ,,, ,, ,~. Appeals. ,.,,"" District. 17.46.050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE. No portion of any lot within the DI District shall contain less than 2½ gross acres in size, shall have a minimum width of 305 feet and shall demonstrate that all set-back requirements can be accommodated internally within such lot. 17.46.060 RESERVED ..,k,,.,, ,~, , ,'~"r ^hr-^ nrn Redundant text. ,v,,,,,,,v,~.,,v, ~, ~,x-m r -,., Permitted uses are listed ~vv--LL.,,,,~ ~l,,,,. under Section 17.46.020. Dwellings are '" .................... ' .................... permitted ,,,~,~ ,o ,,,., ,~,~,,,~,,,~,,, ,,.,, ,,,,,,,,,,u,,, ,,.,, o,~o ~,~, not listed as S:UENG~Titl= I ?-oi~UDC d~afl-2xC-'h I ?.46.wlxl ,~,?~, Page 4 of 6 17.46.070 RESERVED ~' A r"~ I'~ t~ A k I1'~ I /'%I%t~.) /'%IN4LJ *.,~l,,- I U~'N%.~[\~.,~. Redundant text. ~,- -: ...............,, ~_ .~ ..... .~ ...... :_ -,6 ,_~, _, ,,__ Development standards _:_~., _, ....... , ....... :_,-~ ............~ _..~.,: are referenced in '~' ""'°Y Section 17.46.120 / ~.__ _:~.._ Chapter 15 66 ~Pc~-"']~ ~[~ , :__ :_ ,t.._ r-,, r-,:_,_:_, · · 17 46 080 RESERVED "~'~"~ ' '~'~° · · I II...1~.~1 I I /llVll I Redundant text. ~o~ -- "~--: ........ ' '~ "- eq 'pine Development standards -~.--:-- ,,- ........ , ,:-- ....... -~ -,-:,,:-- ,- · are reference in Section T. JUI II ~ 17.46.120 / Chapter 15.66. '"~' ........... '-~-- '~' ...... ' : ..... :-':-- ~r~de 17.46.090 RESERVED ~,~,,~, ,~ Redundanttext. IVll lng1 IVl~JlVl n~--,-,^,,-,--,,, ~-,-,-,, ,,'-,-r-, ,,-,,-~ - -Development standards I/Iq.,]I /'~1~1%./~ ME. I VVL..i.-I~I ~ I I%U%.~ I are reference in Section ,,:_: .... ._ : ............ ~. ............. : ....~,, ,-, ....... 17.46.120 / Chapter _~._,, ,_ ..........., .~. ~__ .... ........ ,_~ ~__,..__ 15.66. a[ ,.'][[ t~c ,~a pi uv[ucu i~ ti [c] cHu[[ c][ ici ilo ~' ~ 17.46.100 RESERVED PA-RK-tNG: Redundant text. Development standards , ,,c, ~ i$ ,,u ~ii'iimU,~ park;rig requ~r~,~nt for ~-:":-- and are reference in Section prc~uctlon --': ........ ' 17.46.120 / Chapter o,..,,,,,,,co, provld~d, ho;;'~v~r, '"'-' -" ' ....... 15 66 ---:- -: ..... :,~- -:,-.~ $~ _:_: __ .J .... t. s.~enom~[7-~u~,h~.2,ch~7.~6.~ ,oe[?~t Pagc 5 of 6 17.46.110 RESERVED ,,,~ ,,.,,,,-,,,,,,~ o,u,,o o,~ ~,,,,,-~'-' "' "'~ '--" ,_.,0,,,,., ,,,Redundant text. .. accordance ,,,,,, ,, ,~ requirements ,.,, ,-,, ,ov,~, ".'~'- Development standards ,.,:___ ............................ :___ __ · ....... are reference in Section A, I.~11 ~;~,[IUI I°10l~.Jl lOt VVOl I III I~:~ Ol~.Ul IO~ QI IU IU~;I I[111~.~°1.1~.~11 17.46.120 / Chapter ceed 2 sq ,.,."' T6mporary ,~o, ~o,o,~ signs veCusin ,,,,_. accordance ;;';th the requirements ,-,, 17.46.120 SPECIAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. All ddlling and other hydrocarbon development activity in Revision refers to the DI District shall be carried out in accordance with the applicable development standards and procedures set forth in Section 15.66.040 standards for Class 3 A. 15.87.040 (Deve',opment Standards and __ ,.,,.,, ,,~,,,,.,, ,ol. permits. S:U~<:;XTim~mT-oanU~C~-~C~l~.~.~ Page 6 of 6 10/r//01 DRAFT # 2 Chapter 17.47 PE PETROLEUM EXTRACTION COMBINING DISTRICT Sections: , Chapter page 17.47.010 Purpose and intent ............................................... 2 2 17.47.020 Permitted uses .................................................. 17.47.030 Uses permitted with a conditional use permit ............. ' ............ _.._ 3 17.47.040 Reserved Pmifibifed-uses ......................................... 4 17.47.050 Minimum lot size ................................................ 4 17.47.060 Minimum lot area per dwelling unit ................................... 4 17.47.070 Yards and setbacks .............................................. 5 17.47.080 Height limits .................................................... 5 17.47.090 Minimum distance between structures ................................ 5 17.47.100 .Reserved ~ ............................................... 6 17.47.110 Reserved ~ ................................................ 6 17.47.120 Landscaping ................................................... 6 17.47.130 Special review procedures and development standards .................. 6 $:tJENGt 77tie 17-oillUDC draft-21Ch 1 7. 4 7. wpd January9, 2002 Page I of 6 Proposed Ordinance Amendment Staff Comment 17.47.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT. Delete text that limits The purpose of the Petroleum Extraction (PE) Combining District is to designate lands containing productive or application of DI zone to potentially productive petroleum resources to promote the that those may outlying be areas annexed to development of such resources in a manner compatible with surrounding development. The PE District may be the City after 1 998. applied only to those areas that are zoned Estate (E), Deletion of text allows Residential Suburban (R-S), Professional and Administrative Office Zone (CO), Neighborhood application of DI zone Commercial (C-1), or Regional Commercial (C-2). The city-wide. uses allowed and the regulations established by the PE Distdct shall be in addition to the regulations of the base district with which the PE District is combined. The ~pp,,y,- _,, ....... , ,;__ ~ ............... ___ : W;~ ~o ~,,~..~u OG ,v,~t~ ~ O~ ,,,~ vv,u, u,~ , ,~,,,,,,,~ 17.47.020 PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted in the PE District: A. Wells for the exploration and development, production, storage, transmission, and treatment, and any accessory or ancillary equipment, structure, or facilities thereto, of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon substances if the well(s) are located more than 300 feet away from any existing dwelling or existing building utilized for commercial purposes, excluding those premises utilized solely for storage of equipment, material, household goods, or similar material. S:tJENGt'r'#le l 7-o#~UDC draft-2tCh 17.47. wpd January 9. 2002 Page 2 of 6 B. Deepening or redrilling, within the existing well bore, of any well used for the production or development of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon substances, or the replacement of any production facility which did not require a conditional use permit on the date drilling began or the date the facility was installed. C. Drilling of a replacement well when the original well did not require a conditional use permit, and when the original well has been abandoned in accordance with California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources regulations and drilling of a replacement well commences within 1 year of the conclusion of abandonment procedures, and the replacement well is located within 20 feet of the original well or is farther from any existing dwelling or commercial building than the original well. D. Uses permitted by the base district with which the PE District is combined. 17.47.030 USES PERMITTED WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ~;u~c~,,,,,,~ o,, c~pF,,~wu ~.~,~u.,~,,,.~, USe F'~'~"" U&Gt tv ,, ,~ ~,,.,v,o,,.,,,o ,.,, ,.,, ,o~,~, ,, .,~-- uv,,~,~,,,,-~,,,~,,o, '-,~" "~'"'~' '°' Conditional Use Permits '-'°~ ' ~'""'°. '-""~' "~"'~' "° °' "~ ""~°'°J' are covered by Chapter 17.64 Modifications, While any use may be permitted by conditional use conditional Use permit pursuant to Subsection B of Section 17.64.020, Permits, Amendments the followinp uses are not permitted in the PE zone and Appeals. Text except by conditional use permit issued in accordance revision reflects similar with the procedures provided in Chapter 17.64 of this wording relative to title: CUPs used for other zones. A. Wells for the exploration and development, production, storage, transmission, and treatment, and any accessory or ancillary equipment, structure, or facilities thereto, of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon substances if the well(s) are located within 300 feet of any existing dwelling or existing building utilized for commercial purposes, excluding those premises utilized solely for storage of equipment, material, household goods, or similar material. S:UENGt T~tle 17-oiltUDC draft .2tCh 17. 4 7. wpd January 9, 2002 Page 3 of 6 B. Conditional uses permitted by the base district with which the PE District is combined. 17.47.040 RESERVEDr"'r"'"" J,n,-r,-,',,,,..,, ,,t.,,, -~, ,-,~,-~.' ,c,,-~, This Section is not needed. Permitted uses ,-,,, other uses ,,,.,, ~,~,,,,,,,~,~ by Section I" '-' '~"'~ are listed in Section ,,-,A__:..--,, ,A__, ,, .'~, .,,-,,, v-,o=o Permitted '":'~' n 17.47.020. Prohibited ........... : ..... Uses are covered by T.~T, JI IUII. IUI I."'~1UOC;I ~;;11111[],UI uoC:;O IIUt____W,,,,,,,~'~:_A :----,..-':----"' ,,,~ ,,Oo,~ Chapter 17.64 ..... : ....... '-- --'~-:-~' the P,'- '-' .... :-',o:-,..,.,,,,,.,,,~- ,~,.,,-' ,, ,,..,u,.,,, ,u ,~,o,,,,., ,v,,,, vv,,,,.,,""°" '"' Modifications conditional Use ~ Permits, Amendments and Appeals 17.47.050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE. Minimum lot size requirements in a PE District are per the Drilling & well sites are requirements of the base district with which the PE District subject to development is combined. Esch Pr ":-'-: ..... " .....:- ' ' "~' standards of BMC ........ {}15.66.040. 17.47.060 MINIMUM LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNIT. Requirements for minimum lot area per dwelling unit in a PE District are per the requirements of the base district with which the PE District is combined. 17.47.060 MINIMUM LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNIT. Requirements for minimum lot area per dwelling unit in a PE District are per the requirements of the base district with which the PE District is combined. S:UENGT T"dle 17-oilTUDC draft-2tCh17. 4 7.wpd Jan~ 9. 2O02 Page 4 of 6 17.47.070 YARDS AND SETBACKS. Yard and setback requirements in a PE District for arenas A ~,_ _:, .................. ., ............ :_ -,~, .... , Redundant text. ,-,. ,,,., ,-,,, ~,, u"o v,~,, o,,,.,, ~,~ ,~,,,,~, ,,,,,, ,,,,, -, ,~, ,-,, De elopment standards · ~-- -:-~-' -' ...... ' -' -":-': .... seal -"~":- v ~^,o.,, ,~ ~,, propo ced in u ,~ ,,~, ,,-u,-vvcay v, any Yuu"" refere ,-,,__,: .... ,..___:,:_ ,.,,__, :__ Section 17.47.130 / '-'°" '-"'=' '~' '~'='""~' ·'°" '"'=' Chapter 15.66. ,-,,, other al._~l uses permitted by the base district, except for drilling, shall conform to the yard and setback requirements of the base district with which the PE District is combined. 17.47.080 HEIGHT LIMITS. Height limit requirements in a PE District forafe-as4Cows: Redundant text. Development standards in A. None on ,.,~,,,,..,,.o ,.-,, ,,., ,-,, ,,:, equipment ......... :-- are referenced / ,, ,~ ~,,~,,~,,..,,.,,, o, ,,~ ~,, ,,,,, ,~ phase of deve',op,,,~, ,t. Section 17.47.130 Chapter 15.66. when measured f,,.,,,, '"- exterior -": C. " ............ all uses permitted by the base district, expect for drilling, shall conform to the height limits of the base district with which the PE District is combined. 17.47.090 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN Redundant text. Development standards STRUCTURES. are referenced in Section 17.47.130 / Requirements for minimum distance between structures in . Chapter 15.66. a PE District for afe-as4oHows~ A. Per th~ requirements ,~f Chr~pter ~ ~ ~-" '"':' ~ all uses, except for drillina, shall comply with the base district with which the PE District is combined. S:UENG% Title 17-oiAUDC draft-2~Ch ! 7. 47. wpd January 9. 2002 Page 5 of 6 17.47.100 RESERVED ·,.-,,,,,,, Re~un~nt text. . · · _ ........ · , ,~- Development standards A. There is no minimum p~, ~,,,u r~~, ,~, ~ ......... are referenced in ............ , ........... ~ maneuvenng are~n Section 17.47.130 / ~,, ~ ....... ~ ~-~ ......... ~ wit~ Chapter 15.66. SlIIIII¢I UU)[ UIIIUIII~ II1~[~11~1, B. All .....uses p=,,,,,,,~ ,,,= ~¢~= ~,o,,,~, ~,,¢,, bUIIIgllll tO (11~ I~UII~III~II~3 17.47.110 RESERVED °"-'~'° ,,.,,,,.,v,,, ,u s~gns ,:,, = ~,=,,,,,,,=,-, ,,, a · ,._ ~,,o,, ,,-., ,,, Redundant text. Development standards '~' "~ Section 17.47.130 / D,,u~.uu,,a, 5igFiS, warning signs, ,,u, to =^,.=~u 2 square '-~' iR accordance ......... pFovis:,ons of ° ...... Chapter 15.66. 17.47.120 RESERVED ^,, ~,-,,-,,,r',.*.,'"_ LI"~ NLJ'~-~N-,~/'''~F ii~l~.~. Redundant text. standards ...... ,_,,_ ..... : .......... Development ,o,,,~o~.,~,,,,~ ,=,~u,,~,,,~,,,o ,,, ~ , - '~,o""-' '~'~ ~' "'" referenced in · -, ........................... RE ~' .... :~ are ,=,~u,,=,,,=,,,o ,.,, ,,,= ~,oo= ,~,o.,,., ~,., ~,,,,.,, ,,,= Section 17 47 130/ ~ Chapter 15.66. 17.47.130 SPECIAl' REVIEW PROCEDURES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. All drilling and hydrocarbon development activities in a PE Revision refers to District shall be carried out in accordance with the applicable development standards and procedures set forth in Section standards for Class 3 15.66.040 A. t~ ~" '~ ~'-' "-' ..........""- ~ ,.,.,.,, .,.,.,,_, ~,_,~,,.,~,, ,~, ,, .~,o,-~ard~ and permits. S:IJENGi Title 17-oiI1UDC drafl-21Ch 17. 47. wpd January 9, 2002 Page 6 of 6 Bakersfield Municipal Code - Title ! 7, Zonin$ Ordinance Mods, CUPs, Amendments and Appeals Chapter 17.64 Draft # 2 MODIFICATIONS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AMENDMENTS AND APPEALS 17.64.050 HEARINGS- NOTICES. A. Upon the receipt in proper form of a complete application for a modification, conditional use permit, or zone change, along with the fee adopted pursuant to Section 3.70.040, the Planning Director shall fix a time and place of public heating thereon in the following manner: B. Not less than 10 days before the date of such public hearing, notice of the date, time and place of hearing, along with the location of the property and the nature of the request shall be given in the following manner: 1. Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's duly authorized agent, and to the project applicant. 2. Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to each local agency (if not the City) expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools or other essential facilities or services to the project, whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be significantly affected. S:lJENGt Title 17-oiltUDC draft-21Ch 17.64. wpd January 11, 2002 3. Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to all owners of real property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll within 300 feet of real property that is the subject of the hearing. If the number of' owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to this paragraph or subsection B.1 is greater than 1,000, in-lieu of-mailed or delivered notice, notice may be provided by placing a display advertisement of at least 1/8th page in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Notice of hearing upon each application for a conditional use permit to allow drilling for and production of petroleum pursuant to Chapter 15.66 shall be mailed to such owners of all property within 1,000 feet of the property line containing the well site, and to the mineral owner as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and the production operator and/or lessee of record of subject real property as shown in the State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (herein D.O.G.G.R.) records as of 30 days of the date of application of the conditional use permit. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining the operator and/or lessee's name and address from D.O.G.G.R and submitting such documentation from the Division with the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice shall be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city at least 10 days prior to the hearing. 5. Notice shall be mailed to every person filing with the Planning Director a written request for notice. C. When proceedings are initiated for the amendment of any provision of Title 17, other than amendments changing property from one zone to another, or changing the boundary of any zone, a public headng shall be held. Notice of such headng shall be given once by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, which notice shall state the time, date and place of such hearing and a general description of the nature of the proposed text amendment. S: LIENGI Title 17-oillUOC drafl-21Ch 17. 64. wpd January 11. 2002 March 8, 2002 Ms. Renee Donato Nelson 11916 Borg Court Bakersfield, CA 93306 Dear Ms. Donato Nelson: I'm pleased to send you the official announcement of the first Great Valley Leadership Institute, to be held at Tenaya Lodge near Yosemite, August 14-18, 2002. This is a groundbreaking program with the potentia! ,',e.qtren~hening p-Nic rt~ci~o--moW~,g ;- 0": re,on, v ....... ~... ~... .... ,~ · nominating someone for this program. The Great Valley Leadership Institute, a project of the Great Valley Center in cooperation with the Kenneth L. Maddy Institute, will bring national quality leadership training to the Central Valley. The faculty are from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, and they have designed a stimulating curriculum tailored appropriately for local elected leaders. Our premier class will include 30 city and county elected officials in the Central Valley from Bakersfield to Redding. Participation in the Great Valley Leadership Institute (GVLI) is considered as an honor and participants will be selected through a nomination process. A mayor, city council member or county supervisor, who has served in office for at least one year, may be nominated by anyone from the Central Valley region. All that is required is a letter with a statement of the elected official's qualities that would qualify him or her for the program. The GVLI seeks high potential leaders and nominations should reflect why the nominee is distinguished as a leader among peers. The premier class will be selected from this pool of nominees to represent a balance of city and county officials and cover the various parts of the Valley, and these nominations are due by April 26, 2002. Other sessions will be offered in the future, in February and August of each year. Details about the program and the nomination process are explained in the enclosed brochure. For further information, please refer to www.csufresno.edu/maddy, email us at dwhite.hurst~csufi-esno.eau or call us at the Maddy Institute at 559-2'78-5412. Very truly yours, Daniel K. Whitehurst, Director Kenneth L. Maddy Institute of Public Affairs California State University, Fresno Gt~AT VALLEY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE KENNETH L. ~V[ADD¥ INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 5340 No~ C^,m, us Drove M/S SSl9 F~s~o, C~tsO~L,, 93740 tmo~£ (559) 278-5412 r,c((559) 278-5230 Advisory Board I-Ion. Maria Alegria . GREATVALLEY City Council Member, Pinole and Chair, La tine Caucus, League of California Cities LEADE RS H I P Terry Dugan A National-Quality Program Education Director, league of Calffornia Cities ~,~ ~u~i~.ez INSTITUTE Tailored to the Central Valley GeneralManager, KFTVChannel21-Univision, Fresno ~ Hon. Gary Freeman The Great Valley Leadership Institute (GVLI) provides Supervisor, Glenn County A Program of the Great Valley Center training for already accomplished local elected lion. Patrick Johnston in partnership with the Kenneth L. Maddy Former California State 5enator (Stockton) Institute of Public Affairs at officials who are nominated as having special Marry kinsk¥ California State University, Fresno potential for further growth and development. In John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University particular, the program provides an opportunity to: lion. Trinidad Rodriguez Mayor of Kerman · Engage in a stimulating program about Non. Ch,r~e, Rover Our Central Volley is nat/or}al a leadership with a value base and develop Director, Urban Health Initiative, former mayor of 5eattle .o.. va,er~a.o s..c.do resource with great opportunities. greater wisdom for decision-making Tulare County Superior Court Judge · Become stronger stewards for communities, and formermayorofLindsay but/t a/so face5 Fnc~jor-'; c.a'u=r}sjo5' and more thoughtful, successful leaders steve s~a~aV Giving local leaders the tools to · Challenge assumptions and broaden perspectives Executive Director, California 5tare Association of Counties m~.e ~re,~,o shape the future of the region is an · Examine the ethical and professional Director of Exports, California Department of Food& Agriculture responsibilities of leadership ~:r~ Wara~ow important and worthwhile effort. · Share ideas with and build a network among Senior Vice President, Bank of America outstanding and diverse political figures from lion. Daniel Whitehurst Senator Dianne Feinstein and Maddy Professor, Kenneth t. Maddy Institute of Public Affairs, former mayor of San Francisco throughout the region as well as with nationally csu, Fresno, and former mayor of Fresno recognized faculty lion. Carol Whiteside President, Great Valley Center and former mayor of Modesto '....:,? ?i: ~:.: ~.~ For more information, please contact: Kenneth L. Maddy Institute of Public Affairs 5"'~ '' ~..,.i;~4.. 5340 North Campus Drive MIS SS19 i~:~'~'.~, ....... .:~. Fresno, California 93740 .... ~: · '.-. ~.-,~ ." ,rcg~5~:. .... '~' . . phone (559) 278-5412 fax (559) 278-5230 ~;<~'~ -'..., '...' :~::,3~ ~e::~t~5:~' dwhitehurst@csufresno.edu ~5t4.e'''":r?.:'' '-'2-'.;'7~"~}. ':,"~ E~' ~.~/, .~5~?.a~"iz~· ~ -,~i:,: ';"'~ ' ':':;~ e',' '~ '" ~'*2-~,,r .~~; ~e.~- '" ~~i'*~ t~}~~"~'~'~ ...... v',~,~' ~'~~~ The Great Valley Leadership Institute is funded by ~ :'.. from The James Irvine ~....~}~,; ,.. ,~g ...... ~ ~~:,~,37 Foundation, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and other ~.~~ 4 .2 foun*tionsandbusinessesintere, tedininvestinginther~ion. Program Leadership skills are important at every level of government. A break from daily routines. A retreat with respected Public service demands the best from each of us. colleagues. An experience with first-rate faculty. The special course is a five-day certificated program, running from Ruben Barrales, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Wednesday evening through Sunday for a class of select Intergovernmental Affairs, The White House, and former San Mateo County Supervisor participants nominated by their colleagues and others. The instruction is interactive and discussion-based, using casesFaculty Setting and exercises to draw from the experiences and observations of participants. Examples of discussion topics include: The Great Valley Leadership Institute has assembled The program is conducted at a first class conference center · Exercising Leadership and Exercising Authority a nationally recognized faculty including: in the Sierra near Yosemite. The location allows · Community Building Marty Linsky, GVLI Faculty Chair, is a full-time member of participantS to travel up from the Central Valley floor for a · Working with the Media the faculty at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at change of scenery, a fresh perspective and time away from · Thinking Ethically Harvard University as well as chair of the Program for Senior the pressures and demands of the office and hometown. · Effective Negotiations Executives in State and Local Government. He is a trainer in Participants as Honored Guests · Creating and Nurturing Coalitions leadership, ethics, communications, and strategic planning The Great Valley Leadership Institute is a benefit and · Leadership and Survival for a wide range of public and private sector clients in the reward to hard-working and dedicated local elected · Building Your Legacy U.S. and abroad. He has been a journalist, a lawyer and officials. Program participants are honored guests and will · Personal Style Analysis and Inventory politician, having served as a Member and Assistant Minority receive lodging, meals, tuition and materials paid in full by Leader of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. the Great Valley Center. Participants Saletta Boni, Ph.D., is a Managing Partner for Leadership Attendance should not create a financial hardship for participants, The Great Valley Leadership Institute is designed for Consulting Associates based in New York, and is an and those who may benefit from special assistance should contact elected officials who have served for at least one year in organizational psychologist focusing on the development of the Great Valley Leadership Institute for more information. local government in the Central Valley: mayors, city council leadership and teams. Dr. Boni holds a faculty appointment members, and county supervisors. Each class includes 30 at Columbia University and at Harvard's Kennedy School. participants from the Great Central Valley in cities from Bakersfield to Redding. Participants must be nominated and Xavier de Souza Briggs, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor All nominations for eligible participants should be are chosen based on a record of leadership and potential for of Public Policy at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is a former sent in writing to the Great Valley Leadership future contribution. Each invited participant must be willing Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research at Institute. Nominations should include the nominee's to commit to full participation in the five day program, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, name, current elected position and contact where he advised national leaders on regional problem- information, the nominator's name and title, and a ,~~~ solving, smart growth, and affordable housing and brief statement of the qualities that the nominator ,. community development. :.::,, ~ :, ~,:,;.~;,~,:~,~.~ ~.~,.~ ~ .... .. believes qualifies this person for the program. · ' ;~ : -~~~ · .,:,,,~: ....... =:.,: ....... . ..~......, ,..... ,... .... ..:.~ ......... , .... .,.~,.~.,., ,,. ~~ ~~~'~ ........ · ............ · [John W. St~nson - tree trimmers From: Alan Tandy To: John W. Stinson Stinson; Stan Ford Date: 2/1 2/02 8:21 AM Subject: tree trimmers Looks like- say a week from Friday we will need an analysis of two levels of regulatory effort- one an educational requirement presumably voluntary - the second actual licensing of tree trimmers- we will need to know what such licenses would be based on, how enforced, penalties for violators- include legal and practical issues-- hopefully you can find examples from other cities so you do not have to reinvent it- since many tree trimmers are Hispanic- it would seem all would be in Spanish - if you have a third alternate- such as public education that to. I would like to see a copy of the proposed standards- thank Stan, we are going to need to know what is going on with the tree committee on a regular basis- I was taken by surprise yesterday! I.MIS D'rect°r 1 IDP Manager I I I ~ i ~ Ge°graphic~Databases. & 1 We.b Technical / Information L. Programmlng~ ,. Services Services (. SyStems MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION CHART Technical Services Geographic Inf. Services Web Services Database & Programming Employees Employees Employees Em~31ovees Help Desk [ow,~e/F.~,r--.Y) 2 Supervisor (:6~, A,,.~) I Web Analyst ~m~z.T~y~ I Supervisor ~'1'~ ~-(~.u') 1 Server Support [~/0'u:~') 2 Analyst (..A~.~./ 2 Web Tech (:~) I Info Analysts (..~-~i,,~, ; Wide Area Network SuPl; 4:~,~1' Techs 3 l-~,~.' Technical Support 138 Full-time Employees Full-time Employees 6 Full-time Employee 2 Full-time Employe~ 3J PC and Printer Repair Base Map Maintenance Web Page Design & Maint HTE Maintenance Installation of new computers GIS Application Design Integration with Databases Database Design Replace Computers & Printers Ad Hoc Map Generation User Page setup & Training User Software Training Software Installation Integration with outside Databases E-Work Application Design Server Setup, Monitoring & Maint. E-Work Application Training Network Design & Maintenance Help Desk Phone Support Assigning Help Desk Calls Implementation of new Technology Central AS400 Printer Support MIS Clerical Support Maintenance Maintenance ~" *' Installation f,,..~ Public Works Water Rec & Parks Dev Svcs Finance EDCD Fire Police CM _~1 Maintain all desktop computers, laptops & printers ~'~ X X X X X X X X X ~,ECAD / RMS Convereion.to Verssterm-PD X 3 Install clustered servers (redundant backup) X X X X X X X X X L-/.~A 4 Wide Area Network Upgrade ~c.,~ -~, ~ t~o=..'~ X X X X X X X 5 Treining for Microsoft Word & Excel X X X X X X X X X 6 Upgrade Server Software (Netware 6) X X X X X X X X X 7 Upgrade Groupwise Software X X X X X X X X X 3"E.t~ Upgrade Laserflche (document store_cie) X X X X X X X X X 9 Training for Laserfiche X X X X X X X X X 10 Department moves: relocate & reconfigure PC's X X ~'111 Training for Groupwise X X X X X . X X X X Training for Digital sender ~ ;'...,~. X X X X X X X X X 13 Training for Document storag~ ~ ,,~ .4, ,Z X X X X X X X X X Wireless devices connected to the web/' 40 ~'~"~' ' X X X X X X Maintain PC's in Training Room/.~.~ .~¢,a~.~., ~ X X X X X X X X X 16 Install SQL server (required by many applications) ~-~o~.~- X X X X X X X X X 17 Mobile Data Computers-PD I'~ ~ · X 18 Maintain CAD / RMS-PD ~ ? ~ ,'~/.'~ X 19 Single sign-on/fingerprint signori ~ ~.~[~ ,~ ~P.C~? X X X . X X X X X X 20 New Help Desk software (e-works) (/...,= - ~_t~ X x x x X x x X X 21 Megan's Law website t' ~ X Information Systems Changes "-* ~ -/,O <~"1'~'~. Public Works Water Rec & Parks Dev Svcs Finance EDCD Fire Police CM I Maintain Assessor Parcel file I ~ ~,-~. X X X X X X X X X 2V'~ 3 Maintain address rmint file / -- . X X X X X X X X X /3'4 Train Departments on GIS soft--ware ' X X X X X X X x X 6 Create GIS maps for city websiteEt~,~ s~u~.) X X X X X X X X X 7 Specialized GIS maps on demand X· X X X X X X X X 8 Create base map for utilities, sewers, water, trees, etc. X X X X X X X X X 9 Contract GIS Work for Kern County & Other cities 10 Replace TRW-AssessorDatabase I x I x I x I x I x I x l x I x l x I Web Services Webpage Design Graphics Public Works Water Rec & Parks Dev Svcs Finance EDCD Fire Police CM V4~~/.~' l Webpagechangesandmodiflcations I X I X I X Ix I X Ix Ix Ix Ix I 2 "Click to Gev" - online transactions for permits, ~ ~" bus. License, parks reservations, code enf., etc. ./4~ x x x 3 _r'o;;~il Referral/Service Complaint trackin-~ X X X X X X X X X ""~' 4 e-mail notification of web page changes ~. ~ -- ,~.~.~. ,~-~ ~ X X X X X X X x x 5 e-mail of CrimeWatch by neighborhoods~° X X 6 Miscellanous web projects requested by departments X X X X X X X X X as, & Pro,~ramm'n,q I~ ~z'~ ~ ~! / HTE Maintenance / ~ / Public Works Water Rec & Parks Dev Svcs Finance EDCD Fire Police CM ~.~/ Database Design ~}'/ Software Training  ~ 1 Maintain HTE System (Acctg, Payroll, Permits, etc.) X X X X X X X X X 2 Solid Waste database project X · . 3 Convert Corel files to Microsoft X X X X X X X X X 4 Convert Paradox databases to MS Access X X X X X · 7~ .~ ~nm,~_~_ ~-rksoft data to Rectrack ~z/.*~/----~ X 6 Replace Pavement Management System L.~.f"~-~" :"r '/ X 8 Electronic Payroll changes (e-works) ' X X X X X X X X X 9 e-works forms for the web X X X X X X X X X ~,,.10 QREP support and training (data extraction program) X X X X X X X X X 11 Consolidate Wastewater customer database X /~ \ ' 2 Shift Scheduling software ~ ~/<:; ~'" X x x x 13 Mobile Data Center {~D.~ ~ ~) X · 14 Juvenile Firestarter 5 Defibrulation report (e-works) PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council YOU aC l~ imnvimti~o~ ddMr~ essti~egc~matmettee un (fer~Pu~t~a fe~me nts on any subj eot that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for anyone subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: ~"~ ~ ~ ,/~//-.. ,~ Company/ Organization: Address: 5'-/~_~ff~ Phone: ~/'/'~---~o~ ~ax/o-mai,: ~ ~-/'/' ~' X o~.~ Subject: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date oq~l,t )O7-- You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with'a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch. Company/ Organization: Address: [~"')/~ ~§/X(~ k'~_~ ~ Subject: ~ ~/~l'JV~/-v,,~' fl PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: F P.,ts.l',J C,A LAq Company/ Organization: F__~v/C ~-~"~'D~_-[~) ~ ~,.~ ~, Address: [ ~Z.~-.-7' ['Y~(~"['~-~._~', ~-_.~, 0_.~_ Phone: -7'(~_P ~-'~(~'7 Fax/e-mail: Subject: J--~-~" PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ..}~, [~: ~ You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: Company/ Organization: Address: Phone: Subject: PUBUC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD. Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date ~l ~ I~. I You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Name: Company/ Organization: Phone: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Company/ Organization: '~/"~'/~ ~ Address: '~/~'~ //~ ~ _~ -~_~ _~" ~' ~"' Phone: l~r/~/' d)~,/'// Fax/e-mail: Subject: z;"~',~,,~ PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of the City Council Committee Meeting Date You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council. Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to the Committee Chair: David Couch Company/ Organization: Address: Phone: ~./'~ (0~0~ Fax/e-maih Subject= URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 14, 2002, 1:00 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room - City Hall Verbatim Transcript - Comment by Councilmember Benham 4. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding.leaf blowers Stinson: (overview) Benham: I had requested information on this and I really appreciate the work staff has done, fairly exhaustive, and t do appreciate it. I noticed as I was going through it, and I think I-went through it pretty carefully, that there really is no scientific evidence to support the thought that the particulate matter and dust that is stirred up is a significant factor in our air quality problems. I think that if we were to have information like that, we would need to take a serious look at restricting the use of leaf blowers. But, since we don't have any of that information, I don't think we are justified in moving forward on anything at this time. I share Mr. Rademacher's concerns about the noise problem, and I am happy to listen to any of the gardeners who wish to speak to us, who took their time to come today and I appreciate that, but I am not going to be suggesting that we move forward with anything at this time. And I don't think, I don't say at this time to suggest that a few months from now I am going to be coming back, because I don't think there is going to be the kind of scientific evidence that we would need from the air quality people. I wouldn't feel justified moving forward without something like that, and t don't see any of that on the horizon. Maggard: (comments) Benham: I wish that - I would like to think that out of this session would come, maybe some self-policing by people in the industry. Because, just in my own neighborhood I see some really egregious examples of overuse of these machines. And, I want to note that.we did have a report from the Recreation and .Parks Department talking about how much more efficient it is to use these machines and I am sure people in the.private sector would have that same sort of information to pass on to us. One other thought that I forgot, I wanted to know if Mr. Thiltgen had an answer to Mr. Rademacher's concerns last time about part of the City Code relating to noise. Thiltgen: (response) ' .~ .: PUBLIC STATEMENTS SPEAKER'S CARD Urban Development Committee Committee of* the City Council ,. Committee Meeting Date -J~,~. ~,{,,'~'~- · . · You are invited to address the Committee under Public Statements on any subject that is listed on the Committee Agenda. Public statements are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker with a maximum of.fifteen · (15) minutes, per side, for any one subject. The Committee may, by simple majority vote, waive the time limit. No action will be taken; this Committee gathers information and reports back to the City Council.' Please fill out a Speaker's Card and present it to'the Committee Chair. -. · Company/ ..... Phone: ~ F~e-mail: BAKER'SFIELD City Manager's Office 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE · BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 PHONE (661) 326-3751 · FAX (661) 324-1850 FAX TRANSMISSION TO: Councilmember Benham FAX #: (661) 325-4968 PAGES SENT: 3 INCLUDING COVER FROM: John W. Stinson Attached is a transcript of your main comments. If you want anything further, just let me know. Also attached is Mr. Rademacher's address and phone. JACK M. RADEMACHER ¢on4~ Jii~,~ En~nee~ MECHANICAL ENGINEERING '- CHEMICAL ENG NEERING= TO: Urban Development Committee; Council Members Benham, Couch, Maggard, Et A1 FR: J.M, Rademacher, Et A1 (Watch/Resident Groups) SUBJ: Code Enforcement Date; January 14, 2002 Please recall previous meeting, October, 2001; Agenda: "Leaf Blowers" with discussion Re: enforcement of C.O.B. MUNI- , CODE, Title 9, Noise. Present use of blower equipment affects and infects the Health and Welfare of our neighborhoods, and is not only a violation of Title 9, but defies the Precepts of State of California H. & S Act(CEQA); California Noise Control Act Sects 46000/46001, and Rule 4102 of our Valley Air District... Noise and our serious deteriorating air quality are increasingly hazardous, intolerable, and unacceptable, in lieu of State dec- larations and our own C.O.B. MUNI-CODE... No person(s), Public/Private Entity is exempted by Title 9 to Noise or Air Pollute; which may emanate from animals, stereos, yard blowers, hovering aircraft, etc... C.O.B. Title 9, and General Penalty 1.40, establishes criteria that must .be resol- ved, abided by, and enforced by our Local Agency(s)... Selective Enforcement of just some Muni-Codes is in defiance of California Jurisprudence(Cal-Jurs), which includes many cases in which the Courts have prescribed Mandamus as Remedy vs Agency(s) that ignoredand failed to abide by duly enacted legi- slation or regulations.., and further, that "Excuses" ARE not acceptable reasons for fail~re to do so... Hardship Causes, and Appeals, to regulations of Title 9, have Options to "Request for Variance", OR INSTITUTE Referendum or Revisions/~mmendments to these regulations, thru the appropriate prescribed channels... We respect and expect this Committee to provide Positive Leader- ship regarding this Issue... May we receive your reply... Respectfully, J. M. Rademacher ~~~,~, ~ P.O. Box 1016, BakerS~ield, 93301 ATTACH: C.O.B. Muni-Code TITLE 9, Penal~y 1.~// CAL Noise Control Act Sects 46~0/46001// SJVAPCD Rule 4102// Amer. Juris Noise Pollution Proof Facts pg. 181// U.S. Code Serv. S~ct 4913 "Grants to local Govt QUIET COMMUN. PROGRAMS" cngin~r h~ directexi tl~t work b~ ~dom~ Chap~r 9.22 , such ho~s to ~lcvia~ ~nfi~ ~c cong~fion. B. N0~i~ng ~Y o~cr 'provisions of ~s :.'.. , NO~E chapter, if ~ ci~ m~ag~r dc~ncs ~at ~8 pub~""~ . h~ ~d ~c~ will not ~ imp~ by ~8 ~fion, '. ' Sector: demolition, ~6on or r~p~ of ~y bdil~ng or ~8 9.22.010 No~e gener~ly, cxcava6ng ~d ~ading of l~d, su~ or ~ghways'~ 9.22.0~ No~e dung const~cfon. 9.22.030 ~ment of so.ce fee. ~n ~c ho~ of ~nc p.m. ~d six a.m., ~d if h8 furor dcte~ncs ~at loss or inconvenience would result to ~y P~ in in.rest by v~uc of ~c r~uircmcn~ 9.22.010 No~e gener~ly, provid~ in subs~don A, hc may ~t a pc~t for such A. It shall ~-unla~l for ~y person to willfully m~c or continue, o~o ~ made or con6nu~, ~Y work to ~ done ~tw~n ~ ho~s of nine p.m. ~d six loud, unn~css~ noise w~ch disturbs ~e peace or quiet a.m., u~n applica6on ~in~adc at ~c 6mc ~c ~t of ~Y neigh~rho~ or w~ch causes dlscomfoa or for ~c work is aw~d~ or du~ng ~c pro~ss of ~8 ~noy~c~ to ~ons residing wi~n one ~ous~d f~t work. Such pc~it may ~ ~t~ for a pcH~ not ~. cxc~ ~ days, ~d may ~ extend~ by ~8 ci~ ~ days. · · of ~ noise so~c~. · B. . ~c smd~ w~ch may be considcr~ in deter- m~agcr for a ~H~ not to exc~ ~ning whe~cr a viola6on of ~c provisions of ~s C. ~ prov3'sion of ~s s~6on sh~l not apply ~.'.' s~6on ~xis~ may include, but ~c not li~t~ to, ~e ~y work of cons~c6on ~dom~ on~ ~ous~d.f~t or. mor~ ~om ~c n~est rcsidcnd~ dwelling. (~d. 3254 ~,..~. following: 1, 1989) "" 1. ~e level of ~e noise; 2. ~c level ~d intensity of ~y back~ound noise; 3. ~e proximi~ of ~e noise to rcsidcn6M sloping 9.22.030 Ass~sment of si~ce fee. . In ad~6on to ~e pen~W provided for in Chap~r 1~40 '.: facili~es; of ~s CMo, a propc~ owner shall ~ ~scss~ a s~ic8 . 4. ~c nature and zoning of ~c ~ wi~n which f~ pursuit to Chapter 3.70 herein if ~ B~crsficld ""' ~c no~sc ~curs; police Dep~cnt res~nds more ~ on~ 6m8 in a ,. 5. ~e dcnsi~ of habi~6on of ~e ~ wi~in ~ ~y ~ for violation(s) of ~is chapter. (Ord. w~ch ~e noise ~curs; 3793 ~ 1, 1997) 6. ~c Gme of the day or night the noise ~curs; 7. ~c dura6on of ~c noise; 8. ~cthcr ~c noise is rccurrcut, intc~ittcnt or constant. . C. Refrigerator ~cks sh~l bc pc~itt~ to o~ratc in ~y commcrciM or m~ufacturing zon~ at all hours; .' . provide, however, ~at such use does not emit nolsc or impac6ng ncigh~ng'residcn6al " vibradon dc~mentMly proxies and ~c ~cup~ ~creof bctw~n ten p.m. and seven a.m. For pu~oscs of ~s s~6on, noise mc~udng . fifty d~i~ls at ~e property line of rcsidcn6~ propc~ shall cons6tutc a rcbut~blc presump6on of excessive noise. (~d. 3254 ~ 1, 19~9) 9.22.020 No~e cluing court.etlon. A. Exccpt ~ provid~ herein or in subs~6on B or C of ~is s~don, it is unlawful for any person; finn or co~ra6on to cr~t, demolish, alter or rcp~r any build- ing, or to grade 0r excavate land, str~u or highways, o~cr ~an ~twccn ~e hours of six a.m. and nine p,m, . on w~kdays, and between eight a.m, and nine p.m. on weekends; provide, however, that city crews ~d ~osc of ~c ci~'s con.actors pcdo~ng street work ~twecn nine p.m. and six a.m. ~e cxempt hc. rcfrom if thc city 341 1.40.010 Chapter 1.40 GENERAL PENALTY Sections: 1.40.010 Violation---Penalty. 1.40.010 Violation---PenalD'. A. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this code, a violation of any provision of this code, or a failure to comply with a_ny of the mandatory requirements of this code,~ or counseling, aiding or abetting a violation or failure to comply shall be punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. Any person or entity convicted of an infraction under :' this code where punishment is not otherwise provided in this code, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding fifty dollars for a first violation, one hundred dollars for a second violation within one year, and two hundred fifty dollars for each additional violation within one year. Any person or entity convicted of a misdemeanor under this code where punishment is not otherwise pro- vided in this code, shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county ~ail for a period not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. " Each such person or entity shall be guilty of a separate '..' offense for each and every day during any portion of '' which any violation of any provision of this code is committed, continued, or permitted by any such person or entity and shall be punished accordingly. B. In addition to the penalties provided in this section, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of an)' of the provisions of this code shall be . deemed a public nuisance and may be, by the city, sum- ' rnarily abated as such, and each day such condition con- · tinues shall be deemed a new and separate offense. This code may also be enforced by injunction issued out of the '" superior court upon the suit of the city or the owner or occupant of any real property affected by such violation · .or prospective violation. This method of enforcement. shall be cumulative and in no way affect the penal provi- sig.ns..hereo f. ~'~, ("' ('C.) The Ci~ of Bakersfield shall be e.nfi~.e.d...t,o..._re._s.ti.- I-c, tuti'tn for all expenses incurred enforcmo the provismn~ 30 RULE 4102 NUISANCE (Adopted May 21, 1992, Amended December 17, 1992) 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this rule is to protect the health and safety of the public. 2.0 Applicability This rule shall apply to any source operation which emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials. 3.0 Exemption 3.1 The pro,,4sions of this rule do not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations in the growing of crops or raising of fowl or animals as defined in Rule 4103 (Open Burning). 4.0 Requirements 4A A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other materials which cause injury, detriment, nuisance .. or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such person or the public or which cause or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or propert~ 4102 - 1 SjvI.IAPCD FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS {} 46001 § 46000. Legislative findings and declarations The Legislature hereby finds and declares that: (h) Excessive noise is a serious hazard to th_e public health and welfare. (bi ~xPosure to certain levels of 'noise can result in physiolog'i?i] psychological, and economic damage. (c) There is a continuous and increasing bombardment of noise in the' urban, suburban, and rural areas. (d) Government has not taken the steps necessary to provide for the -control, abatement, and prevention of unwanted and hazardous noise. (e) The State of California has a responsibility to protect the health and welfare of its citizens by the control, prevention, and abatement of noise. (th All Californians are entitled to a peaceful and quiet environment withotit the intrusion of noise ~vhich may be hazardous to their health or welfare. (g) It is the, policy of the state to provide an environment for all Californians free from noise that'jeopardizes their health or welfare. To that end it is the purpose of this division to establish a means for effeC tire coordination of state activities in noise control and to take such action as'will be necessary to achieve the purposes of this section. Added Stats 1975 ch 957 § 16. ltistorical Derivntion: Former H & S C § 39800, as added Stats 1973 ch 1095 § 1. § 46001. Powers and rights not limited or expanded NO provision of this .division or ruling of the Office of Noise Control is a limitation' or expansion: · la) On .the power of a city, county, or city and county to adopt and enforce additional regulations, not in conflict therewith, imposing fur- ther conditions, restrictions, or limitations. (b.) On the power of any city, county, or city and county to declare, prohibit, and abate nuisances. ~(c) On the power of the Attorney General, at the request of the office, Abe state department, or upon his own motion to bring an action in the name of the people of the State of California to enjoin any pollution or nui~nce or to protect the natural resources of the state. ~d) On the poxver of a state agency in the enforcement or administra- tion of any provision of law which it is specifically permitted or required t~enforce or administer. ,tej On the right of any person to maintain at any time any appropriate ~Cllon for o rlvate nuisance /~. '. r~ief a,ainst any p ' ' as defined in the Civil ' ~e or for relief ~ainst ans.' noise pollution. "': Stats 1975 ch 957 ¢ 16. ill /~N0~SE cONTROl, ACT ," .: 14istorical Derivation: Former 14 & S C § 3950l, as added Stats 1973 ch 1095 § l. ' 0ss References: .- '~ , OPficeLp~,,.° I~ 3¢ S C § 4.6723',. ss 46040 et seq.. Ordinances: t4 & S C State awc'' J; ,~trnl' t4 c',: o ~- ~,~ .... ~no noise control . Office of No~se ~-u','~'~',~'~,ql ao_encies m prep ....... . .- Office's assistance tu · ~ . . .. ~5 et seq CCP § 64i.2. Nuisance: CC .~: ive relief: CCP ~§ E.~ ~n e~vironmental action: § 7. -".; Procedure for m.~u_:n~c.t ,malification ot rem~-,- · cit to make and enforce ordinances: ConSt Art XI Objection to techm~-al '*--- ' p,~wer of county o.r Y'-'~v C 8§ 12600 et seq.: .... Gov C § 3'/100. ~vironmental acttons.: ~i,w hc~V to ass orcnnancc~. : EAnt~thority of city's legist ......... P ' lution Control § 205:45. '.; , Forms: _ _ ,~A tReY) Pol ~ --ol Form 21. 3~.819 et - .. AmJur .... LEd bnv~ronmcn -*- Fed Proc pom~>, ' ' · proof of Facts: · - ~n t nun~}2 ~ Am Jut Vroo mineBt oom~,,[',, o i ,n or blllDoaru ao ..;~.,n e 43 Anl lu~ - - no advertlsmv s g · ..~BlO orivgte nu'~"'c ' .-. Colnlnerclal activtt~ Annotations: * to enjoin public nuisance qs affected-by existence of ':,'~ Right to maintain acUon ~ion control agency. 60 ALR3d 665. noise or electric charge transmitted . , ~ for injuD' by line 99 ALKo ' constituting taking or Ai~ort operations or flight of aircraft as 22 ALR4th 863. LiaNht) fo · ~ ~ b" defenOant s .... ;.~ in [ the like o~cas~tn%t; XLR4th 119}. _: organization to ma'nt~'.p.i?~y~r cc public h?~?~Z citizen, a%°ciau°n'~[.-i~l development gr acu~., to envir Standing ot p[,~.a~ ...... lief atainst c°mm~5.~ ~qeeed to ~ nam~jm_~ ~ 1 A' ourt for injunctlxc ~ ,.~nmental Pr°3ec)> ~'~.~ wild life remg~. · . ' ~ion of highways,'or g?~}ilqr recreational area .... ~n public parks, othe~ su ..... cHA general indust~ stanua,.. V~?~ity' consuuctt°n' and apphcatton ot t¢o local to occopational noise. 43 ALR Fed 159. ,in~ exposure Federal Constitution. of federal, state or . .: X~ all'ltv under regulations. 36 L Ed 2d 1042. '.:~ } 46002. Federal standards be construed as giving the Nothing in this division shall - · for adopting or . ..... esnonsibfl~tY , ._~ ~ reoulattOn cmm-ol authont~ ~ .'2,,~, nroduct for wn.~ct~"_,,;~5~nment~ ~,~<<ion standards ~ot ""q.~5,-qloatcd by the ~u .... .. ct, ..... .'~a or prutttt m could be, prescient,' · Agency under tile Noise Control Act of 1972 Added Stats 1975 cb 957 ~ 16. 6