HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/16/2000 BAKERSFIELD
//~' ~ Jeffrey A. Green, Chair
Alan Tandy, City Manager David Couch
Staff: John W. Stinson Mike Maggard
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Meeting of Monday, October 16, 2000
4:00 p.m.
City Manager's Office - City Hall
1. ROLL CALL
Call to Order at 4:03 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers: Jeffrey Green, Chair; Mike Maggard; and David Couch
2. ADOPT SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Adopted as submitted.
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding tree ordinance
Planning Director Stan Grady gave an overview of the draft ordinance with proposed language
changes (included in the Committee packet), which was prepared by Development Services staff in
collaboration with the Planning Commission's Landscaping and Design Standards Committee. The
discussions included a classification of industry standards with respect to tree sizes. The City's tree
ordinance was reviewed and compared with the one from the Tree Foundation and recommendations
include: 1) proposed changes to acknowledge requests by the Tree Foundation; 2) some current
standards not be changed, and 3) proposed that more complex issues be studied on a long-term
basis.
Fred Porter, CELSOC, spoke regarding redevelopment on sites with existing large trees and allowing
replacement tree-size variances to avoid discouraging redevelopment and variances on frontage tree
planting for commercial buildings to allow tree clustering in place of linear spacing.
ADOPTED AS SUB14'rTTED I~IOVEI~ER 13, 2000
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, October 16, 2000
Page -2-
The Committee discussed options and tree planting variances for special architectural building
designs or redevelopment projects on sites with existing large trees. As the Tree Foundation 'and
the building/developer community represented at the meeting did not have ample time to review the
proposed ordinance changes, the Committee directed staffto meet with them for their input and bring
that information back to the next Committee meeting.
B. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding opening Shellabarger Road at
Pepita Way
At the Committee meeting in September, the item relating to potential property acquisition :was
referred to Closed Session of the City Council. Itwas heard in Closed Session on October 11,2000,
and there is nothing new to report at this time.
Karen Cox brought snapshots of the area and spoke about sanitation truck access problems.
Leonard Koch and Norma Dixon spoke about the sanitation trucks on Shellabarger and workable
solutions.
After right-of-way issues have been resolved, this item will return to the Committee for a
recommendation to the City Council.
C. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding Freeway Status Report
Jack LaRochelle reported on the following:
The Route 58 project continues with CalTrans still working on the Tier 1 Environmental Document.
State Fish and Wildlife once again has brought up the San Joaquin Valleywide Kit Fox study that they
requested CalTrans do on all projects including maintenance projects, and although not directly
related to the Route 58 project, it is holding it up. Staff thought this was resolved and is checking
further. CalTrans has begun the design work. The work being done by CalTrans can be used
whether the project continues as a State highway, freeway or parkway.
The Fairfax and Hwy 178 Interchange was funded by Kern COG. Staff is working with CalTrans to
do the project approval environmental document. An offer has been made on property necessary
for the on/off-ramps. There is a possibility that we may be able to use Habitat Conservation'Program
monies to do the biological work. The goal is to have this under construction in about two years.
Staff has been meeting with CalTrans and working on the environmental document for the White
Lane and State Route 99 Interchange.
The URS Greiner Study work is on schedule. Public input has been taken and is being reviewed.
The preliminary report and a list of alternatives should be done by April with the report completed in
July 2001.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, October 16, 2000
Page -3-
D. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding Transportation Development Fees
- Capital Improvement Plan
Marian Shaw and Jack LaRochelle gave an overview of the projects proposed to be addedto the
Metropolitan Bakersfield Regional Transportation Impact Facilities List to address" hot spots" and
growth. This plan is updated annually and is a list of roadway facilities that need to be built in the
20-year horizon to facilitate growth or new development. New development pays for these facilities
or a portion thereof attributed to the traffic mitigation need caused by their new development. As
required by State law, before the end of each year the City Council adopts a Capital Improvement
Plan for the Transportation Impact Fees. This is a 5-year plan and reflects the Capital Improvement
Plan adopted by the City Council for FY 2000-2001. As this is a Metropolitan Plan, it must also be
adopted annually by the County.
The Capital Improvement Plan for the Transportation Impact Fees should go to the City Council on
November 29th. The Committee suggested that after Council review on November 29th, this item
could be placed on the Joint City/County agenda for the meeting scheduled on December 11th for
adoption.
The Committee requested additional information from staff to be brought back to the next meeting.
The Urban Development Committee meeting scheduled for November 20th was moved up one week
to Monday, November 13th to allow the Committee time to make a recommendation to the Council.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding Smart Growth Coalition
presentation of Metropolitan Bakersfield Community Image Survey
Pauline Larwood gave an overview of their image survey (included in the Urban Development
Committee packet). Many of the findings are the same as the issues being reviewed by the
Chamber's 2020 Vision Committee. Ms. Larwood stated that the Smart Growth Coalition would like
to see some ordinance changes to reflect the findings in their survey, but would wait until the 2020
Vision Committee completes its work. It was discussed that many of the tree and landscaping issues
will be addressed by the Metropolitan Bakersfield Tree Advisory Ad Hoc Committee.
To save duplication of efforts, the Committee recommended waiting to review the issues until the
Chamber's 2020 Vision Committee completes its review.
B. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding completing arterials in developing
areas and getting reimbursement from developers at the time of development
Committee member Couch expressed concerns regarding arterials in new developing areas where
the road is three lanes on one side then narrows down to one lane because development has not
occurred in some areas on that side of the road. One example cited was Buena Vista going south
from Stockdale Highway. Because of the heavy traffic going to Stockdale High School, there is a
need to complete Buena Vista Road from Stockdale to White Lane.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, October 16, 2000
Page -4-
City Attorney Bart Thiltgen explained that if the City completes a roadway prior to development
without an agreement with the property owner, the City cannot collect for those improvements. Also,
in some cases right-of-way would have to be obtained and public hearings may be necessary.
The Committee directed staff to brainstorm to see if there are incentives that could be offered or
other creative ways that could be used as encouragement for developers to complete long-standing,
half-finished roadways.
7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Committee member Couch asked to meet with Public Works staff regarding the Transportation
Impact Fees and how the City's ordinance relates to the construction price index to adjust project
fees to keep up with increasing construction and labor costs.
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:05 p.m.
Attendance:
Staff: Assistant City Manager John Stinson, City Attorney Bart Thiltgen, Public Works Engineering
Services Manager Jack LaRochelle, Planning Director Stan Grady, Deputy City Attorney Carl
Hernandez, and Public Works Civil Engineer Marian Shaw
Others: Dana Adams, Tree Foundation; Roger Mclntosh, Martin-Mclntosh; Brian Todd, BIA of Kern
County; Cathy Daniel, Bakersfield Board of Realtors; Fred Porter; CELSOC; Kern County Supervisor
.. Barbara Patrick; Rhonda Knight, County Administrative Office; Leonard Koch; Stuart Baugher;
Norma Dixon, Karen Cox; Michael Fanucchi; Tom Carosella, Carosella Properties; Pauline Larwood,
. Smart Growth Coalition; John Fallgatter, Smart Growth Coalition; Mark Smith, ASU; James Burger,
. The Bakersfield Califomian; and John Kendall, KERN.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
S:John\UrbanDev\UDOOoct16Summary.wpd