HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/09/2001 (6 pm) & 07/09/2001 CANCEL BAKERSFIELD
David Couch, Chair
Sue Benham
Mike Maggard
Staff: John W. Stinson
SPECIAL MEETING
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
of the City Council - City of Bakersfield
Monday, July 9, 2001
6:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber - City Hall
1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. ADOPT MAY 14, 2001 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
4. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. Transportation Development Fees
1. Presentation by Public Works Department
2. Discussion and Committee Recommendation
B. URS Greiner Study
1. Presentation by Public Works Department
2. Discussion and Committee Recommendation
5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
6. ADJOURNMENT
S:\John\UrbanDev2001\ud01jul09agen.wpd
FILE C'OP¥
BAKERSFIELD'
. _ ~l) ~ David Couch, Chair
Alan Tandy, City Manager Sue Benham
Staff: John W. Stinson Mike Maggard
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
URBAN ~DEYELOPMENT COMMIT?EE
Meeting of Monday, May 14, 200.1
1:00 p.m.
City Manager's Office - City-Hall
1. ROLL CALL
Called to order: 1:04 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers David Couch, Chair; Sue-Benham; and Mike Maggard
2. ADOPT APRIL 2, 2001 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Adopted as submitted.
3. .PUBLIC STATEMENTS
4. DEFERRED ,BUSINESS
A, Site for High Speed Rail Station - Comments .by Herman Ruddell
Discussion and Committee direction to staff and/or .recommendation
Herman Ruddell stated the Downtown Business and Property Owners Association (DBA)
Board met and are requesting, through the Urban Development Committee, the City join
with the DBA in recommending three sites: Golden State Avenue near M and Q Streets,
Truxtun Avenue near Union Avenue or S Street, and Seventh Standard (the Airport option).
Jack LaRochelle expressed concerns with one point in the DBA's recommendation letter:
"This recommendation is for on-the-main-tine direct service, the highest and best level of
service, and is made without site preference." He explained that the study by the Kern
Transportation Foundation was much more open and showed an indirect type of service
(Italian option), where the High-Speed Rail main line would more than likely be outside of
metropolitan Bakersfield, and have a siting to come into Bakersfield. He expressed
concerns .with the 'DBA recommendation as it seems to preclude the downtown site at the
Amtrak Station. Staff feels the study done by the Kern 'Transportation Foundation is
adequate and it keeps options open. There are-three sites identified and a letter sent to the
High Speed Rail Authority indicated a downtown site was preferable.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, May 14, 2001
Page -2-
Committee member Maggard has spoken with Assemblyman Dean Flores who seems to
prefer a location at Minter Field. Politically it is very important for the CitY and CountY to
unite on a preferred site and make that position known, or the State legislators may be
making the decision for us. He expressed this issue shoUld be on the agenda for the next
Joint CitY/CountY meeting to list and prioritize the site options which serve this area best.
It was discussed that the CountY has requested the joint meeting of-the CitY and CountY be
rescheduled for July 23~ and have a single item, URS Greiner Study, on the agenda. The
CitY is hosting and staff Will contact the CountY regarding the need to meet on the High
Speed Rail site issue.
B. Discussion and Committee recommendation on construction dust control 'in
Brimhall 'Estates area
The Development Streamlining Task Force has had two meetings, which were attended by
interested-parties ~and residents from the affected area. The Task Force-is working to
identify solutions to control construction dust. There are some constraints involving the
regulatory authoritY of the Air Pollution Control Board, which has rules and regulations that
preempt-CitY regulation. Other cities are being contacted for information. Research is
continuing regarding regulation limits.(exempt by State law) for agricultural properties. At ·
the next Task Force meeting, work will-begin on proposed ordinance language. As Soon as
the information is complete, staff will report :back to the Committee.
-Roger Paulson spoke regarding the construction dust issue.
C. Discussion and Committee recommendation regarding Transportation Impact
Fees
Marian Shaw :provided an update. On May 4th staff ~met-with representatives of the Building
Industry Association {BIA) to discuss increasing-the Transportation Impact Fee Program by
the Construction Cost Index, as allowed by the 'Municipal Code. There have not been any
increases since the program 'began in 1997. Staff proposes to raise both the underlying
facilities costs and the fee schedule .by 6.78%. This will enable the CitY to give more
Transportation Impact Fee credit back to-developers who .build facilities on the Impact Fee
.List, as well as collect a fee more in tine with actual costs. The Building Industry Association
· representatives have agreed and will present the proposed increase information to their
Legislative Committee, who will report their recommendation to the BIA board for action at
-its May 24th meeting.
Committee Chair Couch would like to-have the ordinance include a structure for fees to raise
or decrease .to reflect the Construction Cost Index once a year with Council approval to
simplify the process without having to renegotiation each time. Negotiations may still be
necessary to decide the projects to .be included on the list.
Committee member Maggard asked staff to have dialog with the BIA and others who need
to approve the fee schedule changes, so everyone is operating with the same information.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, May 14, 200.1
Page -3-
5. NEW 'BUSINESS
A. Discussion and-Committee recommendation regarding ordinance amending the
Planned Commercial Development Zone to allow for combined zones
Stan Gradyexplained, typically, with a .PCD there is a site plan which shows the building pad
location, the :landscaping around and on the site, any unique features for the front of the
buildings, and the elevations. If a developer has this~information when he applies for a
general-plan amendment and zone change, they can get the PCD and this becomes the
zone. The site plan review for the building-permit has to comply with these plans.
The proposed ordinance will allow a developer who wants a general plan amendment to
request a:PCD or a-PUD to get a zone change with a combining or overlay zone and be able
to get a C-1 zone with a PCD or a C-2 zone with a PCD. When coming for a building permit,
the site plan -review process instead of coming.to the Development Services Directpr would
be before the .Planning Commission. This will allow a developer to get a zone designation
and shop for tenants and go directly to the Planning Commission for approval.
'Committee Chair Couch expressed he would still ~like the site plan to come before the City
Council for final approval, with the hearing occurring :previously at.the Planning Commission
level, which would 'provide a Planning Commission recommendation to the Council.
The Committee unanimously approved forwarding the proposed ordinance with above
change to the Council.
B. Discussion and~Committee recommendation~regarding new zone for commercial
development - Grady
Stan Grady gave an overview of the five commercial zone districts: (C-O) Professional and
· Administrati~/e Office; (C-1)'Neighborhood Commercial; (C-2) Regional Commercial;
(C-B) Central Business; and (C-C) Commercial Center. The Central Business zone was
drafted for the downtown while the Commercial Center zone is used for property within the
Downtown Redevelopment Project Area. The-C-O, C-1 and C-2 zones are used for new
development with C-2 being.the dominant retail commercial zone.
The reason for .proposing to add an addition zone-is two zones do not accurately reflect the
kind Of development projects that are occurring. The name "Regional" being attached to a
C-2 does not.reflect the way in which they are used. The C-1 was intended to be the kind
of zone .that had the least impact, no drive-through windows, etc.
Staff is .proposing a .new zone be create~! with a C-3 zone designation. Change the name
of the C-2 to a Community Commercial zone and shift out the more intensive uses such as
big boxes to-the newC-3 zone. The C-3 will become the Regional zone.
There were concerns expressed regarding developers/owners of existing property with C-2
zone designations if the City changed it by ordinance, they may no longer be able to
URBAN DEVELOPMENT OOMMITTEE ·
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, May 14, 2001
Page -4-
complete their development as planned. Several options were suggested such as, a sunset
provision, using tiers with the :existing C-2 zone, creating a zone between C-1 and C-2, or
including a provision in the ordinance that a conditional use permit would be considered as
long as the use is still appropriate for the site.
The Committee directed staff to forward the proposed ordinance to the Planning
Commission with all of staff's recommendations to protect existing C-2 zoned property and
return with a recommendation to the Urban Development Committee.
'C. ~Discussion and Committee recommendation .regarding .City/County drilling
requirements - Grady
There has been a request from Oxy 'Resources California LLC for the City and County to
have the same drilling ,requirements. Currently, City standards-recognize we are in an urban
environment and there will.be homes built, and not a rural environment where distances and
separations are great enough to accommodate a less restrictive method of providing for oil
drilling sites and-operations.
If the City were to adopt the County's standards, we would be putting these operations too
close'to sensitive uses.-Diesel powered oil. rigs run 24 hours a day and drilling at night both
· create noise. The reason the City-.has thecurrent regulations in.place, is an oil rig exploded
twice and blew oil all over cars, houses and yards in the neighborhood. This brought up a
study on appropriate regulations in a city, followed up with an environmental impact report.
'The regUlations were drawn up with input from oil developers, such as Chevron and
Texaco's divisions of oil and gas, and residents of the neighborhood whose houses were
sprayed with oil.
Staff is recommending.cleaning up a few-inconsistencies.in the ordinance, but not changes
differing from the original .study and environmental impact report. 'The proposed ordinance
changes will be brought to the Committee .for .referral to the Planning Commission.
D. Staff report and Committee recommendation,regarding halfway houses, rehab
and boarding facilities - Hardisty
Staff'has pulled information from the Community Licensing Agency's website, which shows
the facilities that are in'-Bakersfield, but the ~information may not be complete. Information
is being gathered "from other sources for verification.
The City has limited authority depending upon the type of use and licensing issued by the
State, which may Preclude the City's involvement. The City has some authority on the
unlicensed facilities, ~but not the State licensed facilities.
Concern was expressed .regarding facilities becoming heavily concentrated ~in some areas
of the City. Staff Was directed to prepare a report for 'the Committee on the guidelines for
facilities and authority of the City.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DJ AFT
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Monday, May 14, 2001
Page -5-
6. COMMITI~EE COMMENTS
Committee member Maggard spoke-regarding open space and media coverage, which has
raised concern about motorcycles,being allowed free access ever~vhere. He requested to
meet with .staff before the next open space meeting.
7. ADJOURNMENT
'Fhe ~meeting was adjourned at 2:35 ,p.-m.
Attendancestaff: Assistant City Manager John Stinson; Economic.Development~Director,Donna
Kunz; City A. ttorney-Bart Thiltgen; 'Interim Public Works Director Jack LaRochelle; :Development
Services Director Jack Hardisty; Planning Director Stan Grady; Deputy City Attorney Carl
Hernandez; Deputy City Attorney Andrew Thomson; and 'Public Works Civil Engineer Mar-ian
.Shaw.
Others: Herman :Ruddell, DBA; Mike Russo, DBA; Franklin Gordon, Attorney:for homeowners
in Brimhall/Allen; Dr. Roger Paulson, .DVM. :Brimhall/Allen homeowner; Steve Moses, Brimhall
homeowner; Cassie :Daniel,-BakerSfield Association of :Realtors; Roger Mclntosh, Mclntosh and
Associates; Jimmy Yee, Yankee Communications; Leslie Kirk, Channel 23 News; Carlos
Gonzales, Channel 23 News; Kerry Cavinagh, The Bakersfield Californian; and JameS:Burger,
The Bakersfield Californian.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
S:~Jehn\UrbanDev2OOl\UDO1May 14summary.wpd
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Urban Development Committee
FROM: ~~~Rju~~13~~j~i,1 Public Works Director
DATE:
SUBJECT: Transportation Impact Fee - Proposed Increase
A proposal is before you to increase both the Transportation Impact Fee and the associated
Facilities List improvement costs by the Construction Cost Index from the period between 1997
to 2000. This will increase both the fee and the potential credit available to developers by 6.78%.
The current ordinance allows an annual increase of the fee by the Construction Cost Index, but it
is not automatic. This proposed action will be the first time.the fee has been increased since its
imposition in 1992.
Staff has met with the Building Industries Association regarding the proposal and has received
their support (see attached a letter of support from the Building Industries Association). The BIA
has suggested that the ordinance be modified to allow for an automatic annual adjustment in the
fee based upon the annual Construction Cost Index. A draft copy of the changes required to the
pertinent section of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, 15.84.040 E, is attached. The BIA has also
requested that this automatic adjustment be locked in for the next 20 years. Staff does not feel that
a "sunset" period of that length needs to be codified, as the attached change to the ordinance will
keep the annual adjustment in effect tmtil such time as the C6uncil deems it necessary to make a
change to the fee program.
Also attached is the proposed fee schedule which shows the increased fees, as well as a copy of
the Facilities List also showing the increase to the project cost. This change to the dollar amounts
on the Facilities List will enable those developers that construct projects on the list to receive credit
against their impact proportional to the fee increase.
Staff recommends that the proposed fee schedule and facilities list be sent to the City Council for
approval and adoption.
S:\PROJECTS\TII~PHASE2\UrbDev Fee Increase Memo.wpd
mps
xc: Reading File
Project File
Affiliated with
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
OF KERN COUNTY
Bill NAHB
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 PHONE (661) 633-1316 FAX (661) 633-1317 NATIONALASSOClATION
OF HOME BUILDERS
President
David Turner
David A. Turner Homes
First Vice President
Roger Mclntosh May 29, 2001
Mclntosh & Associates
Second Vice President Ms. Marian Shaw, Civil Engineer IV
Gregory Petrini Public Works Department, City of Bakersfield
Petrini Construction ] 501. Truxtun Avenue
Secretary Bakersfield, California 93301
CaMn R. Stead, Esq.
Borton, Petrini & Contort, LLP Dear Marian:
Treasurer As you know, our Board of Directors has met to consider the proposed
John Cicerone increase in the Metropolitan Bakersfield Transportation Impact Fee (TIF).
Mountain View Bravo, LLC
Immediate Past President We will support a 6.78 percent increase in the TIF, provided that it is
David Dmohowski accompanied by a concurrent increase in developer credits, and the adoption
Project Design Consuhants of an automatic, annual increase in the TIF based upon the ENR index, for
the next 20 years.
Board of Directors
Kyle Carter Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter.
Kyle Carter Homes, Inc.
Glenn Davis
Mike Granlee
Stewart Title
Greg Flash
Fallgatter-Rhodes
b~surance Agencies Brian J. Todd
Pat Henneberry Executive Vice President
Castle & Cooke California, Inc.
Mike Kane
Granite Construction
Marion Malamma
First American Title
Ron Ray
Coleman Homes, Inc.
Betsy Teeter
Stroope Realtors - GMA C
Darryl Tucker
McAllister Ranch/Jasman
Development
Executive Vice President
Brian J. Todd
Title 15 BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION
Chapter 15.84 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE
15.84.040 Imposition of transportation impact fee.
E. Each fiscal year, the administrator shall present to the city council a proposed fee schedule
as defined in Section 15.84.030. The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually by the annual
Construction Cost Index. Also, the fee schedule shall be evaluated to account for changes in
the Regional Transportation Facilities List, changes in cost estimates for the various projects
on the list, "~.,~ ...........lu,~,.,' ,~,~.~ ~," .......... ~,,,~,,~.:---,..,.,~ ~'~--'~.,~A'---'--- increase, ~ ..y, and any other item which
would change new development's proportionate share of the cost of the Regional
Transportation Facilities List. This fee schedule shall be adopted by a resolution of the city
council following a noticed public hearing.,..,~,.~,~" .............. ~},,,. a~,.~,.~--4, .... ,,~' .......... ~.~,~ ~,,~,' circ~n~stances by
PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE INCREASES
Based upon the ENR Construction Cost Index
~:,:i:~i :i~!:?::: :.i: :~!~i'i:.i~ .::": ~ i'.'?:: :~:.:::iPhase:l: Phasell prOpoSed
:::::',.:::::::::?:?:: '.~ :' ::.::::': ',: :!~::~:i.i:~: :::'::: '::::: :.:i:i:::i! ?Fee:Pe~:~ Fee Pei': :Feb':Per::,
:: :.:,.:LahdUse TyPe:. i~: TYpe.NO~' ::Unit unit Unit : '
Single Family, Detached 1 $1,179 $2,197 $2,346
Multi-Family 2 $828 $1,471 $1,571
Heavy/Service Industrial I 31 $87 $87 $93
Light Industrial I 41 $38 $38 $41
OFFICE: COMMERC AL:': ': :.:~,:.:':'.: .~:'::.' : :.:.: · ·. ::
Under 100,000 sq.ft. 5 $33 $33 $35
100,000 - 199,999 sq.ft. 6 $39 $39 $42
,200,000 sq.ft. & over 7 $41 $41 $44
RE'FAIL:: 'COMMERCIAL:. ....... ':::' :': :~ :'~.~: ....... : :. :~i: !i': i: '
Under 10,000 sq.ft. 8 $39 $35 $37
10,000 - 49,999 sq.ft. 9 $25 $45 $48
50,000 - 99,999 sq.ft. 10 $28' $60 $64
100,000 - 199,999 sq.ft. 11 $31 N/A N/A
200,000 - 299,999 sq.ft. 12 $35 N/A N/A
300,000 - 399,999 sq.ft. 13 $4.4 N/A N/A
400,000 - 499,999 sq.ft. 14 $53 N/A N/A
500,000 - 999,999 sq.ft. 15 $64 N/A N/A
1,000,000 sq.ft. & over 16 $71 N/A N/A
06/08/92 02/10/97 proposed 02/14/01
Construction Cost Increase = 6.78%
07/02/01 S:\PROJECTS\TIF\Working\fee schedule proposed 2.qpw
: ;:~ .4:=~?~ :::,~.: COST:...; :~i: SIGNAL · ~ ADDiTiONAL.;~ ::~==~i= TOTAL::, ORIGNAIJFEE. REviSEDFEE~:::
Airport Dr. Norris S.R. 204 $0 $473,000 $0 $0 $473,000 $473,000 $505,069
Airport Dr. SP RR Widen RR Bridge $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $320,000 $320,000 $341,696
Airport Dr. Spur Line Grade Seperation @ Spur Line $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,601,700
Akers Rd. A-E Canal Widen canal brid~le/AE Canal) $0 $0
Alfred Harrel Hw)/. Lake Min~ Road Install Si~lnal/Masterson Ali~lnment/ $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $130,000 $138,814
Allen Rd. Kratzmeyer Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Allen Rd. Reina Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Allen Rd. Nodega Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Allen Rd. Meachem Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Allen Rd. S.R. 58 Brimhall $648,739 $430,000 $0 $0 $1,078,739 $1,078,739 $1,151,878
Allen Rd. Palm Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Allen Rd. Brimhall Stockdale $624,970 $430,000 $0 $0 $1,054,970 $1,054,970 $1,126,497
Allen Rd. G L Slough Widen Culvert (~ Sta. 236+60 (Goose Lake) $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $12,000 $12,814
Allen Rd. Panama Ln Ming Ave. $800,000 $1,290,000 $0 $0 $2,090,000 $2,090,000 $2,231,702
Allen Rd. SP RR Improve grade crossing at Sta. 52+80 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Allen Rd. Kern River Canal Construct canal bddge at Sta. 150+00 (River Canal) $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $192,204
Allen Rd. Ming Ave. Stockdale Hv¢ $266,667 $430,000 $0 $0 $696,667 $696,667 $743,901
Allen Rd. Kern River Construct Brid~ie (Kern River) $0 $0 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,271,200
Allen Rd. C Valley Canal Construct Canal Bddge (Cross Valle)/Canal) $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $533,900
Ashe Rd. McKee Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Ashe Rd. Hosking Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Ashe Rd. Berkshire Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Ashe Rd. Panama Ln. Harris Rd. $133,333 $215,000 $0 $0 $348,333 $0 $0
Ashe Rd. A-E Canal Canal bridge at Sra. 28+50 (Arvin-Edison) (50% Dish $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0
Ashe Rd. Distdct Blvd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Ashe Rd. I Harris SJ RR Widen Ashe $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 $186,865
Berkshire Rd. 1320' WI0 Wible 660' W/o Wibl~ $0 $55,900 $0 $0 $55,900 $55,900 $59,690
Berkshire Rd. Kern Island Canal Widen canal bddge (Kern Island) $500,000 $533,900
Breckenridge Rd. Morning Vineland $297,527 $430,000 $0 $0 $727,527 $727,527 $776,854
Breckenridge Rd. Vineiand Edison Rd. $247,152 $430,000 $0 $0 $677,152 $677,152 $723,062
Bdmhall Rd. Renfre Allen $75,316 $430,000 $0 $0 $505,316 $505,316 $539,577
~Brimhall Rd. Jenkins Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Brimhall Rd. Allen Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Brimhall Rd. Allen Old Farm $~33,333 $107,500 $0 $0 $240,833 $240,833 $257,162
Brimhall Rd. Old Farm Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Bdmhall Rd. Old Farm Jewetta $133,333 $215,000 $0 $0 $348,333 $348,333 $371,950!
Brimhall Rd. Jewetta Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Brimhall Rd. Jewetta Verdugo $30,303 $215,000 $0 $0 $245,303 $245,303 $261,935
Bfimhall Rd. Verdugo Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136,
Brimhall Rd. Verdugo Calloway $30,303 $215,000 $0 $0 $245,303 $245,303 $261,935!
Brimhall Rd. Calloway Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Brimhall Rd. Callowa)/ Coffee $113,098 $15,000 $0 $0 $128,098 $128,098 $136,7831
Brimhall Rd. Callowa)/ Coffee Widen Brimhall - Coffee to Windsong North Side) $20,000 $175,000 $25,000 $220,000 $220,000 $234,916!
Brimhall Rd. Harvest Creek Rd. Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Buena Vista Rd. Panama Ln. Pacheco Rd. $195,999 $430,000 $0 $0 $625,999 $625,999 $668,442
Buena Vista Rd. Harris Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Buena Vista Rd. Pacheco Rd. White Lane $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $430,000 $459,154
Buena Vista Rd. White Lane Stockdale Dev. Agrmnt covers construction of 3 SB and 1 NB la $0 $279,500 $0 $0 $279,500 $0 $0
Buena Vista Rd. SJ RR Improve grade crossing at Sta. 52+80 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Buena Vista Rd. Campus Park Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Buena Vista Rd. Kern River Canal Widen canal box culvert at Sta. 175+60 (River Canal $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $42,712
Buena Vista Rd. River Oaks Dr. Install signal $120,000 $128,136
California Oak A St. Widenin~l $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $0 $0
Callowa)/Dr. 7th Standard Hageman $444,131 $1,290,000 $0 $0 $1,734,131 $1,734,131 $1,851,705
Ca!loway Dr. Noriega Rd. Install Signal (50% Funded) $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $60,000 $64,068
S:~PROJECTS~TIF~Working~Phase fl Faci/ity with CCI. qpw Page 1 07/03/01 EXH/BIT "B"
~ i':': SIGNAL ADD T oNA~ TOTAL ?: iii%; i;0R G NAL FEE ~: : ~!REV SEDFEE:;
:' ~:i:"::~ ~.' 'i:;:'i'~ ,.:., ::. ~i. ~.o~::~ ;;i::i,':,~;~!;:~: ~':i::!::.i~i;i;:,':~;~i:~::~:~ ,::' ·,OTis:.....:::: ...,..:~ ::::.:::... ::: :: ruW~i:~i =i~, ,~:i:~.~$~.Uc~. :: cos~ ·' ~.~:,::cOST
Calloway Dr. Friant Kern Canal Widen canal bridge (Combined with Olive bridges) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Calloway Dr. Hageman Meacham $325,079 $430,000 $0 $0 $755,079 $0 $0
Calloway Dr. Meacham S.R. 58 $325,079 $215,000 $0 $0 $540,079 $540,079 $576,696
Calloway Dr. S.R. 58 Brimhall City's portion - $95,000 $1,250,000 $860,000 $0 $0 $2,110,000 $95,000 $101,441
Calloway Dr. AT&SF RR Grade Sep. (~ AT&SF (City's portion - $250,000) $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $250,000 $266,950
Calloway Dr. Brimhall C Valley Cans $160,000 $774,000 $0 $0 $934,000 $0 $0
Calloway Dr. C Valley Canal Kern River Bridges on CVC & Kern River $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,779,445 $4,035,692
Callowa¥ Dr. C Valle)/Canal Stockdale $133,333 $645,000 $0 $0 $778,333 $0 $0
Casa Loma Dr. Union Ave. Cottonwood R :Improve grade crossing at Sra. 1+42 $188,561 $430,000 $0 $100,000 $718,561 $718,561 $767,279
Casa Loma Dr. Union Ave Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Casa Loma Dr. ~Cottonwood Rd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Casa Loma Dr. , .25 mi e/o Madison Widen canal culvert at Sta. 38+50 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $42,712
Casa Loma Dr. Cottonwood Rd. Mt. Vernon R( $312,485 $344,000 $0 $0 $656,485 $0 $0
Chester Avenue 8th St. Install Signal $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $53,390
China Grade Loop Manor Round Mount~ $407,287 $516,000 $0 $0 $923,287 $923,287 $985,886
Coffee Rd. 7th Standard Norris $322,845 $645,000 $(~ $0 $967,845 $967,845 $1,033,465
Coffee Rd. Downing Rd. Install Signal (50% Funded) $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $60,000 $64,068
Coffee Rd. S.R. 58 Truxtun $0 $967,500 $(] $0 $967,500 $967,500 $1,033,097
Coffee Rd. Brimhall Rd. widen $370,057 $372,317 $0 $0
Coffee Rd. .5 mi s/o SR 58 Grade Sep. ~ AT&SF $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $8,828,3821 $9,426,946
College 600 ft w/o Fairfax Rd Fairfax Rd. Widen north side of road $120,000II $290,000 $309,662
Edison Rd. Alfred Harrell Hwy. Install Signal $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,00(3 $128,136
Edison Rd. S.R. 178 Breckenridge $986,040 $967,500 $0i $0 $1,953,540 $1,953,54C $2,085,990
Edison Rd. Breckenridge Edison Hwy. $926,000 $537,500 $0 $0 $1,463,500 $1,463,50~ $1,562,725
Fair[ax Rd. Redbank Rd. S R 58 $184,608 $322,500 $0 $0 $507,108 $507,108 $541,490
Fair[ax Rd. Redbank Rd. ilnstall Signal $0 $0 $120,000~ $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Fair[ax Rd. SR 58 Widen S.H. 58 bridge at Sra. 45+75 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,00(] $1,067,800
Fair[ax Rd. SR 58 Off Ramps Install Signals $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $240,000 $256,272
Fair[ax Rd. AIf. Harrel Widen Int. ~ AIf. Harrel $0 $0 $(] $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,815,260
Fair[ax Rd. AIf. Harrel Paladino $0 $430,000 S0 $286,072 $716,072 $716,072 $764,622
Fair[ax Rd. Panorama Niles $0 $107,500 $0 $0 $107,500 $107,500 $114,789
Fair[ax Rd. SR 178 Const. tnt. (~ 178 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,543,000 $1,647,615
Fair[ax Rd. SR 178 PS R $157,000 $157,000 $157,000 $167,645
Fair[ax Rd. Fairfax Rd.& SR 178 1000 Ft. west ~Add westbound lane $394,000 $0 $0
Fair[ax Rd. Highland Knolls Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Fair[ax Rd. College Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Fairview Rd. Monitor St. Union Ave. $49,586 $145,000 $0 $0 $194,586 $194,586 $207,779
Fruitvale Ave. S.R.99 Snow Travel Link Deficiency $446,333 $215,000 $0 $0 $661,333 $0 $0
Fruitvale Ave. Snow Norris $249,515 $215,000 $0 $0 $464,515 $464,515 $496,009
Fruitvale Ave. 600' s/o Snow Widen Culvert ~ Beardsley Canal $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Fruitvale Ave. Hageman S.R. 58 $825,000 $537,500 $0 $0 $1,362,500 $1,362,500 $1,454,878
Fruitvale Ave. Meany Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Fruitvale Ave. Downing Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Gosford Rd. McKee Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Gosford Rd. McCutcheon Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Gosford Rd. Berkshire Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Gosford Rd. Harris Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. Renfro Santa Fe Wa)/ $125,758 $860,000 $0 $0 $985,758 $985,758 $1,052,592
Hageman Rd. Renfro Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. Jenkins Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. Santa Fe Way Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. AT&SF RR Improve Grade Crossing (~ RR $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0
Hageman Rd. Santa Fe Way Old Farm $60,606 $430,000 $0 $0 $490,606 $490,606 $523,869
Hageman Rd. Allen Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. Old Farm Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
S:tPROJECTSITIFIWorking~Phase II Facility with CCI. qpw Page 2 07/03/01 EXH/BIT "B"
:?'i~,~;~,:STREET~:,..,!~..~ ~.,~.:: ~;~:~.~:,~::~;'::: .~:,?~ ..... = ..~. :::.~., · .'.:COS~ = .COST,:~-?;~? :~...SIGNAE =::~ADDITIONAI~: TOTAE=~:~.~:!~ ORIGINALFEE~;, REVISEDFEE==
':: :~: =:: :::~?i~ i~TO::: ::: : · :., :: .: !~ i' RRV...: ::.%~i ~ONS~RU~...::: :=:;, CoST, ::.:.'~. :C~T.~!:?:!:~ COST:: ,~i,=~:< =::i~; FuNDNG..:.:i
Hageman Rd. Old Farm Jewetta $52,104 $430,000 $0 $0 $482,104 $0 $0
Hageman Rd. Jewetta Install Signal $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $130,000 $138,814
Hageman Rd. Jewetta Verdugo $52,104 $430,000 $0 $0 $482,104 $482,104 $514,790
Hageman Rd. Verdugo Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Hageman Rd. Verdugo Calloway $52,104 $430,000 $0 $0 $482,104 $482,104 $514,790
Hageman Rd. Calloway 1300' E $0 $53,750 $0 $0 $53,75C $0 $0
iHageman Rd. Calloway Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Hageman Rd. Coffee Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Hageman Rd. Patton Way Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hageman Rd. Fruitvale Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 SC $0
Hageman Rd. Fruitvale Mohawk $209,029 $107,500 $0 $0 $316,529 $316,529 $337,990
Hageman Rd. Mohawk Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,0001 $128,136
Ha~leman Rd. Mohawk SR 204 Flyover $275,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,275,000 $4,275,00C $4,564,845
Hards Rd. Buena Vista Rd. Gosford Rd. $0 $580,000 $0 $0 $445,000 $445,000 $475,171
Harris Rd. SJ RR New at grade crossing $135,000 $135,000 $135,000 $144,153
Hosking Rd. Stine Rd. Akers Rd. $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $145,000 $145,000 $154,831
Hosking Rd. Akers Rd. Wible Rd. $478,600 $511,049
Hosking Rd. Wible Rd. So. H St. $753,360 $804,438
Hosking Rd. SR 99 Construct Interchange $10,200,000 $10,891,560
Hosking Rd. So. "H" St. Widen canal bridge ~ K.I. Canal $200,000 $213,560
Hoskin~l Rd. Fenton St. Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Hughes Ln. Ming Ave. Terrace Wy. $289,805 $217,500 $0 $0 $507,305 $507,305 $541,700
Jenkins Rd. Hageman Brimhall Rd. $444,873 $580,000 $0 $0 $1,024,873 $1,024,873 $1,094,359
Jenkins Rd. Bdmhall Rd. 1500' N/o Sto~ $0 $208,800 $0 $0 $208,800 $208,800 $222,957
lenkins Rd. Meacham Rd. Install Si~lnal 0 0 120000 0 120000 $120,000 $128,136
Jewetta Ave. Snow Meachem Rd. $360,824 $1,005,000 $0 $0 $1,365,824 $1,365,824 $1,458,427
Jewetta Ave. Kratzmeyer Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Jewetta Ave. Snow Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Jewetta Ave. Reina Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Jewetta Ave. Nodega Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Jewetta Ave. Meachem Rd. Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Kern Canyon Road Momin9 S,R. 178 $793,724 $1,075,000 $0 $0 $1,868,724 $1,868,724 $1,995,423
Kern Canyon Road Vineland Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
KemCanyon Road Mesa Madn Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Kern Canyon Road Edison Rd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Kern River Express~ J~enfro Coffee Rd. Future Expressway PAN $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,339,000
Kern River Freeway WMB Renfrc Future Freeway Construction, No Fee Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Kern River Freeway Renfm S.R. 99 Cons. Cost from City/Count(10% funded)-$45 Mil. ir $0 $196,000,000 $0 $0 $196,000,000 $19,600,000 $20,928,880
Kroll Way Arvin Edison Canal Widen Canal Culvert IArvin Edison Canal) $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $320,340
Main Plaza Drive Bdmhall Rd. Rosedale Hw,/ $0 $290,000 $0 $0 $290,000 $290,000 $309,662
Main Plaza Drive AT&SF RR Improve grade crossing $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Manor St. Carder Bridge replacement $0 $0
McCutcheon Rd. Progress Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
McKee Rd. SR 99 Construct Interchange $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,00C $3,203,400
Ming Ave. Renfro Rd Buena Vista R $242,424 $860,000 $0 $0 $1,102,424 $1,102,424' $1,177,169
Ming Ave. Allen Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Ming Ave. Buena Vista Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Ming Ave. Kern River Canal Construct canal culvert at Sta. 45+18 (River Canal) $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $533,900
Min~ Ave. Gosford New Stine Expand Intersections $119,500 $119,500 $119,500 $127,602
Mohawk Ave. Olive Hageman $315,570 $645,000 $0 $0 $960,570 $960,570 $1,025,697
Mohawk Ave. Hageman S.R. 58 $1,815,000 $1,075,000 $0 $0 $2,890,000 $2,890,000 $3,085,942
Mohawk Ave. Calloway Canal Construct Calloway Canal Bridge $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $533,900
Mohawk Ave. S.R. 58 .5 s/o SR58 $1,370,500 $215,000 $0 $0 $1,585,500 $1,585,500 $1,692,997
Mohawk Ave. .5 s/o SR58 'rruxtun i $1,370,500 $645,000 $0 $0 $2,015,500 $2,015,500 $2,152,151
Mohawk Ave. Kern River Construct Kern River Bddge; Cross Valley Bddge $0 $0 $0 $3,910,000 $3,910,000 $3,910,000 $4,175,098
S:~PROJECTS~TIF~Working~Phase fl Facility with CCLqpw Page 3 07/03/01 EXHIBIT "B"
: ::~. ~ [~ME ::::-':*.. :j:'.<~:::~- FRO~:::' .~::...:: :~?.~:,.i!~O?i::'~:~ ?.~:-~:?~:NO. TES : ~:T::.~:~.~:i!:~.,::: ~O~STR-UCT :.::~,:,.:COST:: ::: i,':~:~.: COST :: FUNDING
Mohawk Ave. AT&SF RR I Grade Seperation ~ AT&SF RR $0 $0 $0' $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,601,700
Mohawk Ave. TruxtunI California Construct median $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $145,000 0 $0
Monitor St. Astor Ave. Panama Lane $0 $362,500 $0 $0 $362,500 $362,500 $387,078
Monitor St. A-E Canal Construct canal bridge at Sta. 93+32 /A and E Canal $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $533,900
Morning Dr. AIf. Harrel Paladino $480,000 $774,000 $0 $0 $1,254,000 $1,254,000 $1,339,021
Morning] Dr. AIf. Harrel Paladino Construct 3 Culverts/Bridges $0 $0 $0! $540,000 $540,000 $540,000 $576,612
Morning Dr. Paladino Panorama $300,298 $301,000 $0 $0 $601,298 $0 $0
Mornin9 Dr. Panorama S.R. 178 $828,080 $258,000 $0 $0 $1,086,080 $0 $0
Morning Dr. S.R. 178 Const. Int. ~178 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,815,260
Morning] Dr. S.R. 178 College $0 $387,000 $0 $0 $387,000 $387,000 $413,239
Morning] Dr. Auburn Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Morning Dr. College Install Si~]nal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Mornin~l Dr. Colle~le Niles $0 $107,500 $0 $0 $107,500 $107,500 $114,789
Mt. Vernon Ave. Casa Loma Dr. Belle Terrace $538,125 $215,000 $0 $0 $753,125 $753,125 $804,187
Mt. Vernon Ave. SR 58 Signalize Ramps $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $0 $0
Mt. Vernon Ave. SR 178 EB Ramp $250,000; $250,000 $0 $0
Mt. Vista Drive , Pacheco Rd. 600' N/o Pach $0 $36,250 $0 $0 $36,250 $36,250 $38,708
Mt. Vista Drive SJ RR Improve grade crossing at Sta. 52+80 $0 $0 $0 $100,600 $100,600 $93,770 $100,128
Mt. Vista Drive White Install signal $0$0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $0
Norris Rd. Callowa¥ Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Norris Rd. Riveflakes Install Signal (50% Funded) $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $60,000 $64,068
Norris Rd. Coffee Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Norris Rd. Patton Way Install Si~]nal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Norris Rd. S.R. 99 Airport $275,822 $435,000 $0 $0 $710,822 $710,822 $759,016
Norris Rd. Airport Chester Widen for Two Wa)/Left Turn Lane $995,549 $0 $0 $0 $995,549 $0 $0
Norris Rd. Chester Manor $59,505 $145,0001 $0 $01 $204,505 $204,505 $218,371
Norris Rd. Manor Upgrade Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Oak St. SR 58 (24th St/ Sillect Urban intemhan~le and Kern River Crossin~l $15,000,000 $16,017,000
Oak St. California 24th $200,000 $213,560
Old Farm Rd. Reina Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old Farm Rd. Node~la Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. SR 119 Panama Ln. $274,354 $860,000 $0 $0 $1,134,354 $1,134,354 $1,211,263
Old River Rd. McKee Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. McCutcheon Rd. Install Signal · $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. Berkshire Rd. Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. Panama Ln. Pacheco Rd. $153,075 $430,000 $0 $0 $583,075 $583,075 $622,607
Old River Rd. Hards Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. Pacheco Rd. Campus Park D $265,633 $215,000 $0 $0 $480,633 $480,633 $513,220
Old River Rd. SJRR Improve ~lrade crossin,(I at Sta. 52+80 $0 $0 $0 $172,000 $172,000 $172,000 $183,662
Old River Rd. Campus Park Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Old River Rd. N/o SP RR Relocate Tower $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $85,424'
Old Stine Rd. Ming Ave. Belle Terrace $330,000 $145,000 $0 $0 $475,000 $475,000 $507,205
Old Stine Rd. Stine Canal Widen canal culvert (Stine) $0 . $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $85,424
Old Stine Rd. Belle Terrace Stockdale Hw $90,659 $145,000 $0 $0 $235,659 $235,659 $251,636
Olive Dr. Jewetta Calloway $261,818 $516,000 $0 $0 $777,818 $777,818 $830,554
Olive Dr. Jewetta Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Olive Dr. Calloway Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Olive Dr. Calloway Canal F-K Canal Bridges ~ Calloway & Fr. Kern (Including Calloway) $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 $1,227,970
Olive Dr. Calloway Riveriakes $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $430,000 $459,154
Olive Dr. Rivedakes Coffee $0 $53,750 $0 $0 $53,750 $53,750 $57,394
Olive Dr. Coffee Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Olive Dr. Rivedakes Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Olive Dr. , Coffee Airport $564,873 $645,000 $0 $0 $1,209,873 $1,209,873 $1,291,902
Olive Dr. Patton Way Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
S:~PROJECTS~TIF~Working~Phase fl Facility with CCI. qpw Page 4 07/03/01 EXHIBIT "B"
O ive Dr. SR 99 Beards ey Car Widen 99 Interchange; Widen Beardsley Canal CulvE $0 $0 $0 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $501,866
Olive Dr SP RR Grade Seperation $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000! $1,500,000 $1,601,700
Osweil St. S.R. 178 Brundage Median Reconstruction $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $430,000 $459,154
Oswell St. Virginia Ave Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Oswell St. Brundage Lane Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Oswell St. S.R. 58 Ramps Install Signals $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $240,000 $256,272
Osweli St. Sunset RR Const. Grade Sep. ~ AT&SF $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $100,000 $106,780
Pacheco Rd. Renfro Rd. Buena Vista R ,I $436,364 $1,160,000 $0 $0 $1,596,364 $1,596,364 $1,704,597
Pacheco Rd. Allen Rd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pacheco Rd. Buena Vista Rd. Gosford $0 $580,000 $0 $0 $580,000 $580,000 $619,324
Pacheco Rd. B V Canal Widen Canal Culvert (Buena Vista) $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $85,424
Pacheco Rd. Buena Vista Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0! $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pacheco Rd. Old River Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pacheco Rd. Gosford Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pacheco Rd. AT&SF RR Improve grade crossing at Sta. 191+82 (RxR 1/2 Fur $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Pacheco Rd. Mountain Vista Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pacheco Rd. KI Canal-West Widen canal culvert ~ K.l.-West Branch $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $21,356
Paladino Dr. Fairfax Morning $500,143 $559,000 $0 $0 $1,059,143 $1,059,143 $1,130,953
Paladino Dr. Fair[ax Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Paladino Dr. Morning .3 mi w/o Mas' $453,333 $731,000 $0 $0 $1,184,333 $1,184,333 $1,264,631
Paladino Dr. Morning .3 mi w/o Mas~ Construct 5 Culverts (Included in roadway project) $0 $0 $0 $102,000 $102,000 $102,000 $108,916
Paladino Dr. Morning Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Paladino Dr. Masterson Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Paladino Dr. .3 mi w/o Edison 1 mi e/o A H I- $557,024 $559,000 $0 $0 $1,116,024 $1,116,024 $1,191,690
Panama Ln. Renfro Rd. Gosford Rd. $1,408,794 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $3,128,794 $3,128,794 $3,340,926
Panama Ln. Renfro 1.4 mi East Relocate canal parallel w/so. r/w Sta. 0+00 - 74+84 $0 $0 $0 $569,000 $569,000 $569,000 $607,578
Panama Ln. B V Canal Widen canal culvert at Sta. 74+84 (Buena Vista) $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $18,153
Panama Ln. Allen Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. Buena Vista Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. IOId River Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. !Sunset RR Improve grade crossing at Sta. 186+70 (Sunset) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Panama Ln. Gosford Rd itnstat~ Signal $0 $0 $132,000 $0 $132,000 $132,000 $140,950
Panama Ln. Gosford Rd. Ashe Development agreement for 1/2 width W/B and I F_/B $77,459 $215,000 $0 $0 $292,459 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Reliance Dr. Install Signal $0 $0; $1.20,000 $0 $120,000 . $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. Ashe Rd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. Fenton St. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. A-E Canal Widen canal bridge at Sta. 312+80 (A. and E. Canal $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0
I Panama Ln. Farmers Canal Widen canal culvert at Sta. 309+12 (Farmer's Canal) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Farmers Canal Relocate canal parallel w/so r/w Sta 309+ 12 - 312+3( $0 $0 $0 $47,700 $47,700 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Ashe Stine Rd. $103,279 $645,000 $0 $0 $748,279 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Ashe Stine Rd. ~ Project built 2 lanes? $0 $0
Panama Ln. Ashe Stine Rd. !Canal Culvert ~ mid-section (~ A-E Canal $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Stine Rd. :Modify Signal $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Stine Rd. Wible Rd. Widening deficient sections 0nly $129,099 $107,500 $0 $0 $236,599 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Akers Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. Wible Rd. So. H St. $129,099 $860,000 $0 $0 $989,099 $0 $0
Panama Ln. SR 99 Install Signals ~ Ramps $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. SR 99 Widen bridge at S.H. 99 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. So. H St. Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
Panama Ln. So. H St. Union Ave. Widen deficient section only $146,703 $215,000 $0 $0 $361,703 $361,703 $386,226
Panama Ln. Union Ave. Signal Modification $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $85,424
Panama Ln. Union Ave. Fair[ax Rd. $0 $1,720,000 $(3 $0 $1,720,000 $1,720,000 $1,836,616
Panama Ln. Cottonwood Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. Oswell Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Ln. Fairfax Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
S:~PROJECTS~TIFtWorking~Phase II Facility with CCI. qpw Page 5 07/03/01 EXHIBIT "B"
Panama Ln. Fairfax Rd. SR 184 $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $430,000 $459,154
Panama Ln. SR 184 Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Rd. Union Ave. ~.P.R x R $608,553 $1,935,000 $0 $0 $2,543,553 $2,543,553 $2,716,006
Panama Rd. Union Ave. Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Rd. 0.4 mi e/o Union 0.9 mi e/o Uni( Relocate Parallel Canal, So./side rdwy. (~ Std. 21+4 $0 $0 $0 $203,250' $203,250 $203,250 $217,030
Panama Rd. .95 mi e/o Union Widen canal culvert at Std. 50+30, Imp Gr Xing (~ R $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $149,492
Panama Rd. Oswell Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Rd. Fairfax Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panama Rd. 2.0 mi e/o Union 0.3 mi w/o 184 Relocate parallel canal from Std. 106+66 - 247+10 $0 $0 $0 $1,053,300 $1,053,300 $1,053,300 $1,124,714
Panama Rd. SPR x R 0.2 mi w/o 184 $53,398 $129,000 $0 $0 $182,398 $182,398 $194,765
Panama Rd. 0.2 mi w/o 184 SR 184 $435,600 $86,000 $0 $0 $521,600 $521,600 $556,964
Panama Rd. SR 184 Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panorama Dr. River Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $123,122 $131,470
Panorama Dr. Mt. Vernon Install Signal $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $65,000 $65,000 $69,407
Panorama Dr. Columbus Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Panorama Dr. Morning Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Patton Way Mean), Ave. Downing Ave. $0 $72,500 $0 $0 $72,500 $72,500 $77,416
Patton Wa)/ Mean), Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Patton Wa), Downing Ave. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Pioneer Dr. Morning Vineland $118,065 $290,000 $0 $0 $408,065 $408,065 $435,732
Renfro Rd. Santa Fe Wa), Johnson $852,303 $1,505,000 $0 $0 $2,357,303 $2,357,303 $2,517,128
Renfro Rd. Meachem Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Renfro Rd. Johnson Stockdale $186,545 $215,000 $0 $0 $401,545 $401,545 $428,770
Renfm Rd. Stockdale Kern River $186,545 $215,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Renfro Rd. Ming Pacheco $746,182 $860,000 $0 $0 $1,606,182 $1,606,182 $1,715,081
Renfro Rd. Kern River Canal Construct canal culvert at Std. 45+18 (River Canal/ $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $160,170
Santa Fe Wa),' Reina Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Seventh Standard F Allen S.R. 99 $0 $1,505,000 $0 $0 $1,505,000 $1,505,000 $1,607,039
Seventh Standard F Callowa), Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Seventh Standard F Coffee Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Seventh Standard F S.R. 99 Widen 99 Int.; Grade Sep. ~ SP $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000 $10,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,805,100
Seventh Standard F IN/B S.R. 99 Ramp Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Seventh Standard F S.R. 99 S.R. 65 $0; $215,000 $0 $0 $215,000 $215,000 $229,577
Seventh Standard F Airport Dr. Chester Ave. $0; $430,000 $0 $0 $430,000 $430,000 $459,154
Seventh Standard F Airport Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Seventh Standard F !Chester Ave Si~Inal Modification $0i $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000, $120,000 $128,136
Shan non D r. Stable Ave. Taft Hwy. $0i $55,100 $0 $0 $55,100! $55,100 $58,836
Snow Rd. ! Jewetta Verdugo $60,606 $215,000 $0 $0 $275,606 $275,606 $294,292
Snow Rd. iCalloway Canal Friant-Kern C; Reconstruct Calloway and Friant-Kern bddges $01 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,067,800
Snow Rd. Verdugo Install Signal $01 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Snow Rd. ,Verdugo Calloway $60,6061 $215,000 $0 $0 $275,606 $275,606 $294,292
Snow Rd. Callowa¥ Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Snow Rd. Calowa)' Fruitvale . $363,166 $860,000 $0 $0 $1,223,166 $1,223,166 $1,306,097
Snow Rd. Rivedakes Dr. Install Signal $01 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136!
Snow Rd. Coffee Install Signal $01 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136!
Snow Rd. i Patton Wa), Install Signal $01 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Snow Rd. Fruitvale Install Signal
Snow Rd. Golden State Install Signal ~1
$0
$120,000
$0
$120,000
$120,000
$128,136
$0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136~
South "H" St. ;Taff Hwy. Hosking Rd. $171,253 $430,000 $0 $0 $601,253 $601,253 $642,018,
South "H" St. Hoskin~l Rd. A-E Canal $308,168 $322,500 $0 $0 $630,668 $630,668 $673,4271
South "H" St. A-E Canal Widen canal brid~le at Std. 93+32 (A and E Canal/ $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $320,000 $0 $0!
South Union Ave. Hosking Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 119 Buena Vista Rd. SR 99 PJW & Constr. Cost Based on Program Unit Costs $3,115,200 $2,537,000 $0 $0 $5,652,200 $5,652,200 $6,035,419
SR 119 Buena Vista Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 119 Old River Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
S:~PROJECTStTIF~Working~PhasellFacilitywithCCl. qpw Page6 07/03/01 EXHIBIT"B"
SIR 11g Gosford Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 119 Ashe Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,0001 $120,000 $128,136
SR 119 Fenton St. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 119 Stine Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128 136
SR 119 Wible Install Signal $0 $0i $120,000' $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136i
SR 119 S/B/Ramps SR 99 Install Si~lnal $0 $0i $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 Panama Rd. SR 58 $962,565 $2,494,000 $0 $0 $3,456,565 $3,456,565 $3,690,920
SR 184 Mt. View Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 Panama Lane Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 .25 mi n/o Hermosa .35 mi n/o Her Eelocate canal parallel to east r/w Sta. 171+11-176+1 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,00~ $53,390
SR 184 .54 mi n/o Hermosa Widen canal box culvert at Sta. 187+00 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $117,458
SI:{ 184 Muller Rd Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 Edison Hwy. Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 Edison Hwy. Niles $420,598 $537,500 $0 $0 $958,098 $958,098 $1,023,057
SR 184 SP RIR Construct grade separation at Sta. 335+40 $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $500,000 $533,900
SR 184 Breckendd~e Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 184 Eucalyptus Dr. Install Si~lnal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 178 (24th St) Oak St. D St. Add 2 lanes $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,474,600
SR 178 Morning Miramonte Add 2 lanes $2,150,000 $2,150,000 $2,150,000 $2,295,770
SR 178 Comanche Improve intersection $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $373,730
SR 58/Rosedale Enos Lane .5 mi w/o Rent R/W & Constr. Cost Based on Program Unit Costs $2,970,000 $1,935,000 $0 $0 $4,905,000 $4,905,000 $5,237,559
SR 58/Rosedale Enos Lane Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Nord Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Heath Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale .5 mi w/o Renfro Allen/Rd PJVV & Constr. Cost Based on Program Unit Costs $3,457,872 $1,290,000 $0 $0 $4,747,872 $4,747,872 $5,069,778
SR 58/iRosedale IRenfro Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SIR 58/Rosedale Jenkins Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Allen Rd Signal Modification $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 $40,000 $42,712
SR 58/Rosedale Allen Rd Gibson R/W & Constr. Cost Based on Program Unit Costs $5,670,720 $2,257,500 $0 $0 $7,928,220 $7,928,220 $8,465,753
SR 58/Rosedale Old Farm/Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Jewetta Worms $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale AT&SF RR Widen RR Grade Sep. (Jewetta) $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $480,000 $480,000 $512,544
SIR 58/Rosedale Coffee Fruitvale Widen Fdant Kern Canal Bridge $0 $0 $0 $396,000 $396,000 $396,000 $422,849
SR 58/Rosedale Coffee Fruitvale Widen 2 Canal Bridges. $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $640,680
SR 58/Rosedale Verdugo Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
SR 58/Rosedale Calloway Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Coffee Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
SR 58/Rosedale Main Plaza Dr. Install Signal (50% Funded) $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
SR 58/Rosedale Patton Way Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Fruitvale Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/iRosedale Mohawk Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Landco Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale Gibson SR99 Widen Rosedale $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $150,000 $160,170
SR 58/iRosedale Gibson Signal Modification $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
SR 58/Rosedale AT&SF RR Improve RRX ~ AT&SF (W/o Landco/ $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
St/ne Rd./New St/ne Taft Hwy. 'Panama La. $305,024 $860,000 $0 $0 $1,165,024 $1,165,024 $1,244,013
St/ne/Rd./New Stine McKee Rd. Install Signal $0 $01 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
St/ne Rd./New St/ne Hosking Rd. Install Signal $0 $0i $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
St/ne Rd./New Stine Berkshire Rd. Install Signal $0 $01 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
St/ne Rd./New St/ne A-E Canal Widen Canal Culvert at Sta. 92+95 (A-E Canal) $0 $0! $0 $320,000 $320,000 $0 $0
St/ne Rd./New St/ne Panama La. Harris/Rd. $145,867 $53,750! $0 $0 $199,617 $199,617 $213,151
St/ne/Rd./New St/ne Harris Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
St/ne Rd./New Stin~ Farmers canal Widen Canal Culvert (Farmer's Canal) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0
St/ne/Rd./New St/n( i Harris Rd. S.P.R x R $132,565 $215,000 $0 $0 $347,565 $0
Stockdale Hwy. WMB Heath/Road $545,455 $1,935,000 $0 $0 $2,480,455 $2,480,455 $2,648,629
S:~PROJECTSITIF~Working~Phase II Facility with CCI. qpw Page 7 07/03/01 EXHIBIT "B"
? ~i~?: :: ~:~':: · '! '~: :,UMITS · , : :.:, '.~ :" ~":'~ ~'::':,~ :,~ ::; COST ESTIMATE: : .:, : .~ ':: ::~: . :::: ~: ~::% ::
:::::~S;i;~?!.i'!~:i::'.' ~:i::!~:'; ::'~::'.;' :~f.: ~,~!:~:::i:::~:;.~F~,-:~ ::::::::?:::::::: :: !~!: ::::'~'CosT,?~:i':.:~?::::'.:::cOsT ~:'.:?::~ .~:::~::;~GNAE'::: :.~ADD1TIONAL': ~ ~TOTAL ::: ::? ORIGINAL~EE ~:~.:REVISEDFEE~:~:
:: :: ::::::::::::::::::::: :::~?? .;,:FR~M :': ¥~::~:::::~::,:~ :~.:,'~::~: .::.~. : ,:~:. NOTES~:~.::~:~. ':.:.;:..~;:?:::::: :~.~ :.~: .: ~::~::~ ,: ~C~S~RUCT~ :'~ C~T :::: c~T , ~::: ~:,:.. C'~T,: :::::~'.~: :: :.~ND!NG.,::...~:': ~: '~UNDI~G~
Stockdale H~. SP RR Improve R~ ~ Bu~onwillow $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $~00,000 ~100,000 $~06,7~0
Stockdale H~. Nord Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,1361
Stockdale H~. Heath Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $~20,000 $120,000 $128,~36
Stockdale H~. Heath Road Renfm $247,152 ~30,000 $0 $0 $677,152 $677,152 $723,062
Stockdale H~. Renfro Oak St. Median reconstruction $0 $3,010,000 $0 $0 $3,010,000 $3,010,000 $3,214,078
Stockdale H~. Jenkins Rd. Allen Rd $0 $0
Stockdale H~. Coffee Reconst~ct Stockdale ~ Coffee $0 $0
Stockdale H~. Callowa~ Median Improvements $0
California Inte~e~ion Widenin9 $0
Stockdale H~. Renfro Install Signal $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $65,000 $65,00~ $69,407
Stockdale H~. Buena Vista · Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
SR 58 Real Road S.R. 99 ~ & Constr. Cost from CalTrans $0 $2,590,000 $0 $0 $2,590,000 $0 $0
SR 58 S.R. 99 Co~onwood ~ & Constr. Cost from CalTrans $0 $15,579,000 $0 $0 $15,579,000 $0 $0
SR 65 James 7th Standard $0 $990,000 $0 $0 $990,000 $0 $0
Taft H~. SR 99 South "H" St. $0 $86,000 $0 $0 $86,000 $86,000 $91,831
Taft H~. South "H" St. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $~ $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Taft H~. South "H" St. .25 mi e/o "H" $241,415 $215,000 $0 $0 ~56,415 ~56,415 ~87,360
Taft H~. .25 mi e/o "H" .55 mi e/o "H" $36,364 $258,000 $0 $0 $294,364 $294,364 $314,321
Taft H~. .55 mi elo "H" .75 mi e/o "H" $12,121 $172,000 $0 $0 $184,121 $184,121 $196,605
Taft H~. .75 mi e/o "H" Union Ave. $0 $107,500 $0 $0 $107,500 $107,500 $114,789
T~xtun Ave. Oak Widen inte~ection $0 $104,000 $0 $~ $104,000 $0 $0
Union Ave. White Ln. SR 58 $0 $1,075,000 $0 $0' $1,075,000 $1,075,000 $1,147,885
Union Ave. SJ RR Improve ~rade cmssin~ at Sta. 265+16 (SJ RR) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
Union Ave. KI Canal-East Widen ~nal box culve~ at Sra. 295+81 (K.I. - East b~ $0 $0 $0 ~0,000 $40,000 ~0,000 ~2,712
Verdu~o Rd. Reina Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Verduoo Rd. Nodega Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 ~128,136
Verdu~o Rd. Meacham Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Verduoo Rd. Palm Ave. B~mhall rd. $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $154,831
Vineland Rd. SR 58 Edison H~. $14,078 $86,000 $0 $0 $100,078 $100,078 $106,863
Vineland Rd. Edison H~. Eucalyptus Dr $120,577 $322,500 $0 $0, ~43,077 ~3,077 ~73,1
Vineland Rd. SP RR Improve railroad cmssin~ (SPRR) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
~ineland Rd. Eu~lyptus Dr. ,Pioneer Dr. $7,576 $107,500 $0 $0 $115,076 $115,076
White Ln. Renfro Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
White Ln. Allen Install Si~al $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
White Ln. Buena Vista Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0~ $120,000 $0 $0
White Ln. Mountain Vista Dr. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0'1 $120,000 $0 $0
White Ln. Mountain Vista Dr. Old River $0 $53,750 $0 $0~ $53,750 $0 $0
Whiite Ln. Moun~inVista Dr. Saddle D~ve Add eastbund lane $94,303 $0 $0
~Wh te Ln. Grissom I~stall Signal $0 $0 $383,000 $~ $383,000 $383,000 ~08,967
White Ln. KI Canal - Widen culve~ at KI Canal $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0
White Ln. SR 99 Widen interchange ~,400,000 $0 $0 ~,400,000 $2,360,000 $2,520,008
White Ln./Muller Aw Union Ave. Co~onw~d R ~ ~85,151 ~30,000 $0 $0 $915,151 $915,151 $977,198
White Ln./Muller Avl Co~onwood Rd. Fai~ Rd. $962,351 $1,376,000 $0 $0 $2,338,351 $2,338,351 $2,496,891
White Ln./Muller Avl Co~onwood Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0~ $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
White Ln./Muller Av~ Oswell Instil Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0~ $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
White Ln./Muller Av, Awin RR Line Improve grade cmssino at Sta. 734+14 (Awin) $0 $0 $0 $100,00~ $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
White Ln./Muller Aw Eastside canal Widen ~nal culve~ at Sta. 745+19 (Eastside) $0 $0 $0 ~0,000 ~0,000 ~0,000 ~2,712
White LnJMuller Aw ,Fai~ax Install Slonal $0 ~0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
White Ln./Muller Aw ,Fai~ax Rd. SR 1~ $103,030 ~30,0001 $0 $0 $533,030 $533,030 $569,170
Wible Rd. SR 119 Panama Ln. $357,684 $860,000: $0 $0 $1,217,684 $1,2~7,684 $1,300,243
Wible Rd. McKee Rd. Install Signal $0 $0; $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000
Wible Rd. Hosking Rd. Install Signal $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $128,136
Wible Rd. A-E Canal Widen canal brid~e (A~in-Edison) $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $320,000 $O $0
Wible Rd. KI Canal-West Relo~te parallel canal ~ K.l.-West Branch $0 $0 $0 $188,000 $~ 88,00~ $188,000
Wible Rd. I KI Canal-West Widen canal culve~ ~ K.l.-West Branch $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $21,356
S:~PROJECTS~Tl~Working~Phase I/Faci/ity with CCI. qpw Page 8 07/03~01 EXHIBIT "B"
: ~ ::$TREET:~::~ ii?: ::: ~ ~:~:~:~ii~'.:~:~~ ~;i~ :~.? ::. ::~:i ?::~?~!: ':~ : ::: :::::::.:::::,':: :,:,:::::.: i, :. ::~:/ , i :~:~ ! ::,: ~ COST:!~:,: :::1 ¥:~;::COSTy~.!: ?: · SIGNAL, ADDITIONAL: ~:~ TOTAL:::: OR G NALFEE~
:~:~ ~ ~:~:~E~:~::~, :~,~ ~R~:: ":::: ~::~ ,~0~:~ ': ~-: ?::::~,~:~:,N~TE~ : : ~: .... ::~' ::~' ::~:~ :,~:'1 ~coNsY~U~Y. ~ :~: ~ cos~ ~:::~:~:~.: C~T.:, '?:::'~ COST: ,:~ ~UNDNG ~¥:
~ ~i~"~ ~" ~ ~ ~e. Brun~ L~'. $~ ~ ~3 ~50 ~0 $0 $~9:0i'~ .... $66~,~
Transit Costs $0 . $0 $0 $7,688,000 $7,688,000 $7,688,000 $8,209,246
Freeways 50% of Bel~ay ~ and SR 178 $9,318,0721 ~$0 $0 $0 $9,318,072 ~,659,036 ~,974,919
Freeways South Bel~ay Specific Plan Line $0
Administration Computer Tracking System (Ci~ & Count) $0 $0 $0 100000 $100,000 $100,000 $106,780
TOTALS $~,927,500 $336,718,280 $22,745,000 $111,214,422 $S27,~6,597 $269,708,085 $287,994,294
S:~PROJECTStTIF~Working~Phase ll Facility with CCl. qpw Page9 07/03/01 EXHIBIT"B"
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE - DUST CONTROL LIST
MR. FRANKLIN D. GORDON
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1801 OAK STREET #162
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301-3035
STEVE MOSES
12800 LONG MEADOW WAY
BAKERSFIELD CA 93312
GENE AND CHAROLETTE TELESE
12901 BRIMHALL ROAD
BAKERSFI ELD CA 93312
LARRY HERMAN
12900 APPALOOSA AVENUE
BAKERSFI ELD CA 93312
DONNA LANCE
12900 APPALOOSA AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93312
ROGER PAULSON
12601 LONG MEADOW WAY
BAKERSFIELD CA 93312
Notification list for Urban Development Committee meeting
Mike and Laura Fanucchi
10915 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
589-3767
Mr. John Kind
Carriage Homes
P.O. Box 2353
Bakersfield, CA 93303
Ms. Norma Dixon
10906 Cilantro Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93312
(r) 587-6891
Mr. Stuart Baugher (Wants Packet)
7305 Lucille Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
399-6809
inet:mlbaugher@ igalaxy
Mr. Leonard Koch
10931 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
589-3939
Ms. Debra Coyle
10417 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
589-3579 or 589-5169
Stephanie Lynch, Field Representative
Supervisor Patrick's Office
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Room 503
Bakersfield, CA 93301
ph. 868-3670
fax 868-3677
Karen Cox
10810 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
ph. 589-9258
Janet R. Carter
10930 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
ph. 589-2040
Sharon Spanke
Heartland Homes
10915 Cilantro Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93312
ph 588-3002
Fax 588-1919
heartlan @aol.com
Warren and Joy Baker
10627 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
Tim and Susan Schaufelberger
10824 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
ph. 589,0993
Ella Simpson
10010 Shellabarger Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312
589-7949
MS. JOAN-TERESE BIRD
10705 SHELLABARGER ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312
mrsbird @teacher.corn
phone 588-7447
address change June 2001
TIM HOWELL
1091 lClLANTRO AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93312-2892
588-2189
KEITH AND JULIE HUFFMAN
10806 SHELLABARGER
BAKERSFIELD CA 93312
phone 588-0242
Ms. Anne Addis
10905 Melocoton Court
Bakersfield, CA 93312
587-6231
Ms. Cynthialkeda
11209 Bimhhaven Avenue
Bakemfield, CA 93312
589-5609
S:\John\UrbanDev\Shellabarger-list.wpd
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Raul Rojas, Director
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Arnold Ramming
July 5, 2001 (661) 326-3591
On Monday, July 9, 2001, the City of Bakersfield Urban' Development
Committee will be holding a meeting regarding the five 'freeway' alternates that
are currently being studied. The public is invited to attend this meeting and
provide comments and statements regarding the alternates. The meeting will
begin at 6:00 pm and will be held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall,
1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California.
The meeting will also be broadcast on Channel 16 - KGOV on Tuesday, July
10th at 8:30 p.m.
REC'D & PLACED ON FILE
AT O.D ' ,MEETING OF
Downtown Bus,ess 8nd Propc~:y Owners Association
1700 K Street, Suite 120
Bakersfield CA 93301
July 5, 2001
Members of the Bakersfield City Council
Members of the Kern County Board of Supervisors
It is with the full authority and consent of the Downtown Business Association Board of
Directors, and on the behalf of its many business and property owner members and friends,
I am pleased to make this presentation.
As you consider this two-part presentation, you will find it is based on only two
assumptions and three simple criterion, common elements we identified talking with many
area groups and organizations on the freeway topic. Taken together, these elements
became our evaluation tool and consistently lead us to sound workable freeway solutions.
These five tools are:
1. State Route 58 is by default, 1-40, and will continue to be a growing major source
of heavy commercial over the road or OTR truck traffic.
2. Downtown routes lie within the boundaries of California Avenue, Union Avenue,
34~ Street, and F Street.
3. OTR trucking is not an acceptable element within the Kern River Corridor.
4. OTR trucking is not an acceptable element within or through our Downtown
5. The Centennial Corridor 13~/14· Street route offers an unacceptable level of
service and access to Downtown compared to the 23~/24t~ Street Corridor
While the DBA has chosen not to make specific recommendation of one freeway alternative
over another, we have committed ourselves to assessing and evaluating each proposal in
terms of level of service to and impact on downtown. We believe that a strong vibrant
downtown is the single most important indicator of a strong and healthy city. It is in that
spirit the following is offered. We place our trust in all of you to give proper consideration
to our work and findings as you make choices that will achieve a greater good and
wellbeing for all of greater Bakersfield.
The Downtown Business and Property Owners Association for many years has considered
and assessed many opportunities for Greater Bakersfield to complete a grade separated
controlled access freeway system. We are now poised to again attempt that task.
The two elements presented here, taken together with selected proposed major arterial
~mprovements, give ~ of g~-eater Bakersfield the two most important features any
successful comprehensive freeway system must provide.
First
We complete a long awaited and sorely needed cross-town fi-eeway that meets
the service needs of local residents, and
Second
We create a long-term interregional route for heavy east west commercial over
the road truck traffic setting the stage for a future full beltway. And in the
process, we have protected our beautiful Kern River Corridor and our vibrant
growing downtown.
We urge your consideration of the assessment presented here, and encourage your use of
the five tools we identified that lead to long-term successful freeway solutions.
Sincerely
Downtown Business and Property Owner's Association
Herman Ruddell
Member of the Board of Directors
Chairman of the DBA Vision Committee
BAKERSFIELD
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the regular meeting of the Urban
Development Committee of the City Council scheduled for July 9, 2001, at
1:00 p.m., in the City Manager's Conference Room, Second Floor of City Hall,
Suite 201, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, has been canceled.
DATED: June 28, 2001
John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager
JWS::jp