The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/29/1996 B A K E R S F I E L D Kevin McDermott, Chair Randy Rowles Patricia M. Smith Staff: Gail E. Waiters AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday, January 29, 1996 12:15 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room Second Floor - City Hall, Suite 201 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 17, 1996 MINUTES 3. PRESENTATIONS 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. TRAILS PLAN- Hardisty 6. NEW BUSINESS A. UPDATE ON FREEWAYS - Rojas 7. ADJOURNMENT GEW:jp BAKERSFIELD ~~Ci~. Kevin McDermott, Chair Alan -- 'ty Manager Randy Rowl~q Staff: Gall E. Waiters Patricia M. Smith AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday, January 17, 1996 12:15 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room 1. ROLL CALL Call to Order at 12:26 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Kevin McDermott, Chair; Randy Rowles and Patdcia M. Smith 2. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6, 1995 MINUTES Approved as submitted 3. PRESENTATIONS None 4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS None URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Wednesday, January 17, 1996 Page -2- 5. DEFERRED BUSINESS A. SPEED HUMP PROGRAM Staff refreshed the Committee's recollection on the pilot program results which were submitted at their July 11, 1995 meeting. The Committee asked staff to develop a policy to addreSS the following issues: what is the zone of benefit and who would pay for the speed hump; what would be the "neighborhood circumference" impacted by the speed hump and who would determine the criteria for placement; what is the traffic criteria that determines that a speed hump is necessary; and how many humps would be on one street and within what distance from each. This proposed policy should be brought back to a future Committee meeting. A public comment addressed the idea of pdvatizing the work, if citizens will be required to pay for the speed hump installation. B. SPECIFIC TRAILS PLAN This item was taken out of sequence at the meeting. The meeting was adjourned before is was discussed thoroughly. The Committee has proposed calling a special meeting for January 29, 1996. -This item will appear under deferred business on that agenda. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE The Committee reviewed a draft ordinance regarding the Transportation Impact Fee for all new development. The Committee asked that staff exclude the mention of dollars under the "Appeal" clause and refer to our cost recovery system instead. It was also recommended that staff propose an appropriate indexing system to base the fee standards, and to develop a process whereby the project list would be revaluated every three years. The BIA will submit a list to staff which addresses those projects they feel should not be on the list. The Committee asked that staff prepare an Administrative Report for a CitY Council meeting which outlines the major changes to the program and ordinance. Staff will also be considering the problems associated with the Transportation Impact Fee such as with timing, budgeting and crediting developers. A list proposing the addition of certain collectors into the program was distributed. URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Wednesday, January 17, 1996 Page -3- B. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY MEDIAN LANDSCAPING The Committee proposed to substantially scale down this project to minimize annual costs. Some property owners are trying to obtain donated funds for an endowment. These changes could reduce the annual costs to below $1,000. Council policy already allows for no assessment on landscaping if the costs are below the $1,000 threshold. This was done on Gordll Street. The project will consist of approximately 10 trees, an 18 inch stdp of decorative concrete on either side of the median, and asphalt between the planters. Total construction costs should not exceed the original landscape budget of $57,000. The neighborhood group has already scheduled a fund raiser and will present to the Council their results at its February 21, 1996 meeting. They anticipate raising at least $2,000. C. DESTEC PARK FUNDING Staff provided the Committee with written alternatives for utilizing the funding contributed by DESTEC. Those alternatives were prioritized as follows: Pdority #1 Improvements to Siemon and University Park at $210,000; Pdority #2 Improvements and open space in the northeast at $385,000; Pdority #3 Improvements on existing City school property (Thomer and Nichols) at $195,000; Pdority #4 Improvements at the Kern County Soccer Park at $125,000 with a like contribution from the County; and Pdority #5 Improvements to Highland High School at $20,000 with a like contribution from the Kern County High School District. The Comh3ittee asked staff to prepare additional information regarding these priorities and the proposed funding. The Kern County High School District meets on January 23, 1996, so the Committee decided to wait until they could review the school district's comments regarding the Pdority #5 proposal. The Committee called a special meeting for January 29, 1996 for this purpose. 7. ADJOURNMENT Adjourned 3:10 p.m. GEW:jp JAN 16 AH cj: B.AKERSFI[LD CII'Y CLFRK 16. lCJ cJ6 Urban Oeveio-gerne~t Co~;;~-r;~-nittee. Bakersfield Citu Council i,S01 ?,'u~tuh Avenue Bakersfield. Ca .q3301 $~bject: T,'ail .ru~ldihg ~ernbe(s oi the CoT;;wdttee: The fiscal]~roblerns. I ¢c~te~d, are actually cultural i~ origin. ~r~ 13 is c~si~e(ed the ,4suai d~. ~uc locally, m ~he ~e~ies ~ubiic cE ~em. k was ~eiea~ed. ~e airead9 had . ,,,~..., ?...~ ,~e~,,,,e. ~d that of agriculture (t~ I.~d c~vetsi~, leaves the area ,..)ith a ,'e,.,~ue ~hort.a~e. ,,bile ~ ciliate state m~talit~ refsiscs. ~ii ~;erested par(les agree ~ ~e ;h~- s~ebod~ else should~ag. or s~e~e ~ill~icg ~ ~he r.ab. Tt ,:ri*~ ~Eordable hous~g ~acts rather th~ ~arr~ted ~osts. Good ~ but poe,' ecor~omios. ~,~h', a,d tT~e public, ~terest ~ouid be served b~ ~h*ir e~eri~ce .~t ~*~* ~,,~,-;~, ** ~,-~ ~m~c~al budgets. ~e Citu seeks a smole t~dm~ source tor both o~mtal ouUay ~d 0~. Is it }us~itied ? 2-1os(ya,'kway lobbies a,'e ho( ormiy ir,(o poii(i~,i aayects, bu~ also t~d raishg.:aok cE ~rocess c~ triplet ~he ~roleCt tot qoal. a lack ct broad based s~o(t ~a~led ,,.,, ouuh ~he [,~d ~ais~g ~rocess itseli. costs are~o~ k~t ~ uie~. For e~a~,~p~e. ~e~vork~q with other gro~smightgroduoe the ,,,,t used ~,'es car, be ,'co,clod ~o~ c~bmg, ~,us, two losses might be learned; ~at ,~o~ts c.~ be nut, .a~ t~at ~ ~viro~r~l a~ar~*ss is ~ot ~ecessaril9 ~ee~e8 ~19 b~. o~her retie. .~sk ,,.~hat I ~eei s~oul,~ be t~e ~.~r.~o~t ,?.~esti~: ~o,~ ~uch? Fr~ this the :.,.,u~,:e.:: ,.viii ~'~*': .................................. ' .... ~"'" ............ ' ..... ~ .......... '; ,.,h~ ~ -utt, ~ high ~.~ce eos~s. More ~robabl?, ?~rkms~'s Lav., o~ the bud~e~ e~dm9 to.eot reei~ts. lie,4 ct _e~ttU,.71~e~ts. i' ,,vi11 ~lace .~ .~la ,::arte ~e~,.~ cE ~ethod~ to ¢~sidef: ~efe costs works m a rural settmq but ~t aptoear$ ct ~sure ~,roliit Iocail.u as would be other schemes such .~s to, II.;, licet~ces, stable asses~-'rn~ts etc..SChe,'e is there a decor Iocatio'n [or a [cod or drir, k [a¢ilits,? ~u al~o reouire Iooal matohi~a ~.[l~or~ o[ [u~dh~9 o~ h~ ~,.h~d labor. ~e,., m~. t-'her./are competitive .~d ~ak~ io~g ~en-n ;eml!icates o[ P.~rtich3adot~ These mau be t~ecessa~',j I!or ca~_ ital curia.us, but ~euer [or rr,~ir,(~r~artce. ~,e~ can be ~aid back. ~ dewluo~m~( ~ees. ~et~ ~aid o~ ~he ~ece~ts ma~el ,~1100i m~adle ~o~e! ~ ~1~00 I.~er mo~eJ ~er be~roovvi '~is ~s the tee .... ~..~.4~ ,t. ~,,...,~ ~.~ D,'e,~twoa~ ~ T,'~c~} ~,~ ~he ~t~ a~.~e ~ ,'ea~il ~igT~ ~'~ow. ~is is all d6ht; ~h~le ~,mic~.~liti~ .we ~e~ cited ~o? co~t c~d~, ~i~ ~e~hod i~ used gleeEull m~ic~a~ saiar~ ~eqouaci~s. Accua,g, ,,,~hile coordmacm~ the ~o~ ~o be recieued .,,~.,,~u~u, ~ ~ ~, cha~ ~ ~e~u ~ ~e~, Ia,' equitg, ~o thGt devel~~ ~ea~est the ~.,'.~ oli ~.rr ce,'r.:,i'r,t~ ,';.~use,:j ,'bu ,;]orca ~iado'n. (-~',.:,t .a~out li[eli'ne r~te r..~:qatio'n'? ~ouidbe Zeruice might ~o~ m~it~, but ~o t~eu ~a~e t~e t~ te ~er~te it. A~ a through mother ~e oE ~e~it. 2rivatizati~ ~i~ i~ ~tla(. 2rivate.~erator~ o~ ~ark~ are actuall~ c~ce~i~ai(es. C~ e~e~ie~ce ia~ely ba~'t ~ee~ afl ~ha~ g~'ea~. ~oul~ ~e be bal~aileO -~ub~idie~ ~.mde? threat o( t~e ~ive?'~ r~ou.~l to ~ ~o?e 2ii~t city. its ¢itiz~'s t.~sage. Perh~s, the Cit~, could divert its subsid~ to the Southwest dis~riocs co ~he ~rL~a~. guch ct Vou as mtqh~ survive. ~oui~oce ~ ~crease~ ~teres~ Fi~aii~, I~or dur~her mdormacio~ ot~ ~tmdi~9 mech~i~s, i ~ouid sugges~ the ,~atio~s. ~' ~ ~r ~c~:co ~:e ~t~a{ P ~rk ~'v~ce ~ '4: z~ rJ~b~ T~ils ~ssist~ce ~rogr~ '::hich ~ettm~ to be mamlu aduisoru. f,'_~e _~:e_~s b :_,:e utilized resource ~i.,'tr!cts to be <ir :..~s roots E:m,']ing and coordinating aqet~CleS. But the local o~e is detu~ct ~d ol~lg _~)romotes the emleept that ! began with. S~ce~el~, ~,o,.~rs. ' .... Dermis Fox ~.~ker-;fiel,']. I~.~ '3:3.;:0~, BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy. City Manager FROM: Raul M. Rojas. Public Works Director DATE: January 17. 1996 SUBJECT: Transportation Impact Fee Addition of Collectors At the request of'the Attorney's Office. my staff has researched the addfion of some needed collectors to the Impact Fee list. The collectors are as follows: ~flW~e[ Fr~m T_o l_nne Mile~i Verdugo Palm Brimhall 1.0 Jenkins Brimhall 1500' n/o Stockdale 1.44 Main Plaza Rosedale Brimhatl 2.0 Patton Way Downing Meany 0.50 Mountain Vista Pacheco 600' north 0.25 Hosking Akers Stine 1.0 Berkshire 660' w/o Wible 1320' w/o Wible 0.25 Hams Gosford Buena Vista 4.0 Monitor Panama Lane Astor 2.5 Shannon Stable 'raft Hwy. lotai 11.32 This will add $1.931.400 to the tee basis, raising it to a total of $236.926.610 over 20 years. A revised fee schedule is attached for your review. County staffhas informed us of a delay in their schedule. The earliest date for a hearing is now sometime in late March or early April. P:\TII~PH2COLL. MEM RMR:m~ Readi~_ File Pm.~n File Iacqu~ R. La ROCaeile Ma',am P. 5haw · DRAFT Transportation Impact Fee Schedule With the addition of collectors January 17, 1996 TABLE 1 FEE PER UNIT CHART FOR BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM LAND USE GENERATOR CATEGORY IMPACT FEE 1 Single Family, Detached Residential, each $2.218 2 Multi-Family Residential, each unit $1,485 3 Industrial, per ADT $42 4 Office Commercial, per ADT $39 Retail Commercial, per ADT 5 Under 100,000 square feet $51 6 100,000 to 399,000 square feet $92 Over 400.000 square feet subject to individual study P:\TIF'xPH2COLSC.TBL mps ' CI~ ~ B~KERSFIELD PARKS DIVISION ESTIMATED COSTS TO MAINTAIN 20 TREE WELLS ALONG STOCKDALE HWY EAST OF GOSFORD FILENAME:P:\MAINDIST~MISC\STOCKGOS PERSONNEL: PARK MAINTAINER (1 HR PER WEEK FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY) 12.952 21.00 272 PARK MAINTAINER (1.5 HRS PER WEEK FROM MARCH TO SEPTEMBER) 12.952 46.50 602 FRINGES 43.00% 376 EQUIPMENT 1.87 67,50 126 MATERIALS 50 WATER (4 5/8-INCH METERS) (NOTE 1): 4 METERS * $9.60 '12 MONTHS 461 ELECTRICITY 110 SUBTOTAL 1,997 DEPARTMENT OVERHEAD 18.00% 359 SUBTOTAL 2,357 CITY OVERHEAD (NOTE 3) 5.00% 118 TOTAL COSTS' 2,475 NOTE 1 -MONTHLY SERVICE COSTS FOR EACH 5/8-INCH METER I$ $6.60 PER MONTH. ESTIMATED $3 MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION CHARGE FOR EACH METER. NOTE 2-ASSUMED 20 15-GALLON TREES WOULD BE PLANTED. NOTE 3-THIS ITEM WAS SUBSIDIZED BY COUNCIL FOR THE 95/96 FISCAL YEAR. NOTE 4-THIS ESTIMATE WAS BASED UPON ANTICIPATED COSTS FOR THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS AFTER THE TREES ARE INSTALLED. THEREFORE, THIS SCHEDULE EXCLUDES TREE PRUNING AND SPRAYING COSTS THAT WILL BE INCURRED IN THE FUTURE AS THE TREES MATURE. 'CITY OF BAKERSFIELDPARKS DIVISION ESTIMATED COSTS TO MAINTAIN 20 TREE WELLS ALONG STOCKDALE HV~ EAST OF GOSFORD FILENAME: C:\123R23~DATA\STOCKGOS PERSONNEl.: TEMPORARY MAINT. PERSON (1 HR PER WEEK) 7.25 21.00 152 (FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY) TEMPORARY MAINT. PERSON (1.5 HRS PER WEEK) 7.25 46.50 337 (FROM MARCH TO SEPTEMBER) FRINGES: 21.00% 103 EQUIPMENT: 1.87 67.50 126 MATERIALS: 50 WATER (4 5/8-INCH METERS) (NOTE 1:) 461 4 METERS * $9.60 * 12 MONTHS ELECTRICITY: 110 SUBTOTAL 1,340 DEPARTMENT OVERHEAD: 18.00% 241 TOTAL COSTS: 1,581 NOTE 1 -MONTHLY SERVICE COSTS FOR EACH 5/8-INCH METER IS $6.60 PER MONTH. ESTIMATED $3 MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION CHARGE FOR EACH METER. NOTE 2- ASSUMED 20 15 GALLON TREES WOULD BE PLANTED. NOTE 3 - THIS ESTIMATE WAS BASED UPON ANTICIPATED COSTS FOR THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS AFTER THE TREES ARE INSTALLED. THEREFORE, THIS SCHEDULE EXCLUDES TREE PRUNING AND SPRAYING COSTS THAT WILL BE INCURRED IN THE FUTURE AS THE TREES MATURE. UITY OF BAKERSFIELD PARKS DIVISION ESTIMATED COSTS TO MAINTAIN 10 TREE WELLS ALONG STOCKDALE HWY EAST OF GOSFORD FILENAME: C:\123R23~DATA\GOSSTOCK PERSONNEL: TEMPORARY MAINT. PERSON (1/2 HR PER WEEK 7.25 10.50 76 (FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY) TEMPORARY MAINT. PERSON (0.75 HRS PER WEEK) 7.25 23.25 169 (FROM MARCH TO SEPTEMBER) FRINGES: 21.00% 51 EQUIPMENT: 1.87 34.25 64 MATERIALS: 25 WATER (4 5/8-INCH METERS) (NOTE 1:) 389 4 METERS * $8.10 * 12 MONTHS ELECTRICITY: 110 SUBTOTAL 884 DEPARTMENT OVERHEAD: 18.00% 159 TOTAL COSTS: 1,043 NOTE 1 -MONTHLY SERVICE COSTS FOR EACH 5/8-.INCH METER IS $6.60 PER MONTH. ESTIMATED $1.50 MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION CHARGE FOR EACH METER. NOTE 2- ASSUMED 10 15 GALLON TREESWOULD BE PLANTED. NOTE 3 - THIS ESTIMATE WAS BASED UPON ANTICIPATED COSTS FOR THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS AFTER THE TREES ARE INSTALLED. THEREFORE, T~IS SCHEDULE EXCLUDES TREE PRUNING AND SPRAYING COSTS THAT WILL BE INCURRED IN THE FUTURE AS THE TREES MATURE. MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: FRANK FABBRI, PARKS SUPERINTENDENT ~', SUBJECT: DESTEC FUNDS DATE: JANUARY 8, 19 9 6 As you are aware, after two neighborhood meetings and a written survey we have been unable to gain property owners support for a maintenance district to fund the maintenance of the proposed Panorama Hills Park. We had anticipated using the majority of the $500,000 Destec .donation to supplement the budgeted $299,000 of park development .fees to construct the park. Since that time we have had two additional neighborhood meetings and met with the City School District staff in an attempt to compile a list of projects that would meet the intent of the Destec Agreement and not require the formation of a maintenance district. We have had requests to use the funds to upgrade our existing Siemon and University Parks. In addition, there have been requests from 1) the City School District to place improvements on their property 2) the Highland High School Stadium Committee to assist in completing their stadium lighting and-renovation project and 3) the Kern County Soccer Foundation to light four soccer fields at their complex. The Destec Agreement was set up to acquire and/or improve parkland property or develop additional recreational facilities in northeast Bakersfield. It is staff's opinion the improvements should serve the varied recreational interests of the northeast residents. At this time staff is making the following recommendations on the use of the $500,000 Destec funds and the $299,000 of park development funds: · Priority ~1 (Park Development Funds) Improvements at our existing Siemon and University Parks. Location: Siemon Park Re-surface tennis courts Modify tennis court lighting Re-surface basketball courts Modify basketball lights Upgrade restroom (ADA) Upgrade play equipment (ADA) Add security lighting Re-surface asphalt parking lot/service drives Install additional landscaping Subtotal $110,000 ~ Destec Donation (cont.) January 8, 1996 Location: University Park ~ Add security lighting Correct drainage problems Upgrade play equipment (ADA) Install additional landscaping Construct Basketball court Construct Sand volleyball court Subtotal $100,000 TOTAL $210.000 · Priority ~2 (Park Development Funds & Destec Funds) Impr0v~ment$ ~nd Open Space in the Northeast. The Destec co-generation plant is located north of Paladino Drive, between Fairfax Road and Morning Drive. As I mentioned before, it was staff's desire and I believe the intent of the Destec Agreement to develop recreational improvements in close proximity to the plant. In case this is not feasible, the agreement does allow for the area to be expanded. There is a City School located near the intersection of Panorama Drive and Morning Drive, with vacant property adjacent to the school. We are working with the City School District to maintain this property and improvements if it was developed. Location: East of Thorner School Acquire vacant land through an exchange of existing City owned park site (approximately 7 acres). Develop site with turf, two lighted soccer fields, fencing and restroom. TOTAL $385,000 · Priority ~3 (Destec Funds) Improvements on existing City School property. If priority ~2 cannot be accomplished, staff is suggesting the improvements be placed on the existing school property at Panorama Drive and Morning Drive. Again we ar working with the City School District to maintain the improvements. Location: Thorner School Install field lighting on the existing turf area at the school. Construct a small Public Restroom. Subtotal $135,000 There is a City School located adjacent to our existing Siemon Park. We are working with the City Schools to maintain improvements placed at this school. Location: Nichols School Install field lighting on the existing turf area at the school Subtotal $60,000 TQTAL $195,000 ~,~ Destec Donation (cont) January 8, 1996 · Priority ~4 (Destec Funds) Improvements at the Kern County Soccer P~rk, We have received a written request from Mr. Robert C. Miller, President of the Kern County Soccer Foundation, to fund a lighting project at their complex on Alfred Harrell Highway, adjacent to Hart Park. The information he provided indicated tournaments could be expanded and summer night time events could be planned to offer additional recreational and competitive opportunities for the local youths. Additional tournaments will attract more visitors to the city and generate more occupancy tax revenue and help the local economy. Their organization would pay all the maintenance costs associated with the improvements. Their construction estimate is $250,000. Location: Kern County Soccer Park Contribute towards field lighting for four of the existing soccer fields at the complex near Hart Park. TOTAL $125. 000 NOTE: CITY STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND A LIKE CONTRIBUTION FROM THE COUNTY OF KERN IF THIS PROJECT WAS FUNDED. · Priority ~5 (Destec Funds) Improvemengs on High School Property. During the course of our public meetings a written request was made by Cyndi Crabtree, Co-Chair, of the Highland High School Stadium Committee to utilize Destec funds to help complete their stadium project-. There has been support from not only the Committee members but the general public which includes a petition with well over 1,000 signatures. The project as planned is estimated at $813,000 and includes stadium lighting, public address system, restrooms, bleachers, concession stand, ticket booth, press box, fencing and landscaping. Although staff feels this is a worthwhile project for the community, we do not feel some of the planned improvements such as bleachers, ticket booth, press box etc. offer recreational opportunities and meet the original intent of the Destec agreement. Based on the above, we recommend a contribution towards the lighting phase of the project. Location: Highland High School Contribute towards the lighting of the stadium. TOTAL $20.000 NOTE: CITY STAFF WOULD RECOMMENDA LIKE CONTRIBUTIONTOTHESTADIUM FUND FROM THE KERN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. SCHOOL DISTRICT WOULD NEED TO ACCEPT MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES AND MAKE THE LIGHTS AND FIELD AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC USE. cc: Lee Andersen, Community Services Manager File: Des-proj