HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 026-01RESOLUTION NO. 0 26-0 ~.
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 418, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MEACHAM ROAD AND
CALLOWAY DRIVE. (WARD 4)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance
with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on
MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1997, and THURSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1997, on the prezoning
for the territory, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20)
calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 110-97 on December 18, 1997, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of the prezoning by this Council and this
Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization,
to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the
City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the property owner has agreed to annex to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the property upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the County has indicated that the territory for annexation was the
subject of a gift deed which had the effect of enlarging a parcel without seeking a necessary lot
line adjustment; and
WHEREAS, the property owner will be required by the County to create a legat
lot line adjustment for the territory to be annexed; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield
that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is
marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth he~E,
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox LocaJ Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested
that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners
of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the
City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed
to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No.
3819, which was adopted January 28, 1998, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on November 7, 1997.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the
environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of
Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to have one hundred percent (100%) consent to annexation.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the
City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary.
10. That the property owner shall, prior to the completion of the annexation,
obtain approval from the County for a lot line adjustment or other approval necessary to create a
legal addition of property to the territory to be annexed.
11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
Pamela A. McCarthy
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Bad Thiltgen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
11. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution,
with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern
County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 ........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the CouncibCLtl'xe_City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
'"~ ~;~' 200! , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNClLMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLiVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNC[LMEMBER
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio ¢~erk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfibld
APPROVED
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BART J. THILTGEN
City Attorney
CARL HERNANDEZ III
Assistant City Attorney
MO:pah
February 23, 2001
S:~,Annexation~,N N418.ROA wpd
EXHIBIT "A"
MEACHAM NO. 2
ANNEXATION NO. 418
A parcel of land being all of Parcel "D" and a portion of Parcel "C" of Parcel Map No. 3117 filed
for record in Book 15 of Parcel Maps, Page 8 in the office of the Kern County recorder, also
being a portion of the southeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M.,
County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the east 1/4 comer of said Section 19, being an established comer (per said
Parcel Map No. 3117) and calculated to be 2,330,355.3263 feet North and 6,230,841.8634 feet
East per California Coordinate System (N.A.D. 83), Zone 5;
Thence South 00 ° 06' 17" East, along the east line of said Section 19 (center line of Calloway
Drive), a distance of 512.25 feet to meet the easterly prolongation of the south boundary line of
said Parcel Map No. 3117;
Thence South 89° 50' 10" West, 30.00 feet to meet the southeast comer of said Parcel Map No.
3117, also being an angle point on the existing exterior corporate boundary line of the City of
Bakersfield;
Thence continuing South 89 ° 50'10" West along the south line of said Parcel Map No. 3117
(and corporate boundary line) 408.38 feet to the southwest comer of Parcel "C" of said parcel
map, also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence (1) North 00°00'11" East, along the west line of said Parcel "C", 80.05 feet;
Thence (2) North 89°50'10'' East, 112.50 feet to meet the west line of the east ½ of said Parcel
C,
Thence (3) North 00 ° 00'11" East, along said west line, 402.20 feet to meet the north line of said
Parcel "C" being a point on the original south right of way line of Meacham Road (Co. Rd. No.
862), said point also being on the existing corporate boundary line of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence easterly, southerly and westerly along said existing corporate boundary line for courses
(4), (5) and (6) as follows:
Thence (4) North 89°50'10'' East, 294.97 feet to meet the original west right of way line of
Calloway Drive (Co. Rd. No. 522);
Thence (5) South 00°06'17'' East, along said fight of way line, 482.25 feet to meet the south tine
of said Parcel Map No. 3117;
Thence (6) South 89°50'10" West, along said south line, 408.38 feet to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 3.48 acres (more or less)
G:\GROUPDAT~Ron\Exhibit A-Annex No. 418.wpd
SCARORA--- DRIVE
-Ii
?L27 E.
19
RO
P.M. 9846
VICINITY MAP
ANNEXATION NO. ~ RESOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION OF
MEACHAM NO. 2
TO tHE CITY OF' BAKERSFIELD
;5.48 t ACRES
SCALE: I F££T ~
IOO O IOO 2OO
EXHIBIT "B" I
ANNEXATION NO, :565
CALLOWAY NO. 4.
7-27-92
ANNEXATION NO. 418
(MEACHAM NO. 2)
PLANS FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
AGENCY WHICH PRESENTLY CHECK SERVICES WHICH INDICATE HOW SERVICES
SERVICES PROVIDES SERVICE CITY/DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE PROVIDED BY CITY/DISTRICT WILL BE
Upon Annexation Future Date FINANCED (I.E., GENERAL TAX RATE OR SPECIAL
(Specify) ASSESSMENT.)
Planning COUN2~ CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Parks & NORTH BAKERSFIELD RECREATION GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Recreation & PARKS DISTRICT
Library COUNTY N/A
Police SHERIFF & CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Protection PATROL
Fire Protection COUNTY GENERAL TAX REVENUES, FIRE FIfND
Street CITY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Construction PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
Maintenance CITY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Sweeping CITY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES
Lighting CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Flood Control COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES
Sewerage CITY USER FEE/PRIVATE CONNECTION
Water VAUGHN WATER SERVICE CO. USER FEE
Other PRIVATE CONTRACT CITY USER FEE
(REFUSE)
EXlqlBIT "C"
G:ksubXS HARED~RONL2001XAmaex 418 Providing Services Plan.wlxl 1
G:Xsub\SHARED\RON\2001~Annex 418 Providing Services Plan.wpd 1
1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station
Library etc.)
Service Level Capaci~
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(I.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergency services, recreation programs, etc.)
POLICE - all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police
Department located at the s/w comer of Tmxtun and Eye Street approximately 7 miles east of the
annexation.
FIRE - Service will be provided by County Station 67 located on the south side of Brimhall Road,
easterly of Renfro Road pursuant to exchange wherein the County protects certain property within
the City jurisdiction. Thus, the City does incur the cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund
collected from the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City and County.
PARKS AND RECREATION -The annexation project is within the jurisdiction of the North
Bakersfield Recreation and Park District and is subject to all adopted requirements and standards of
the district.
LIBRARY - N/A
STREETS - The City Corporation Yard on Tmxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provides necessary
facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING - Maintenance and personnel
will bc dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as nccdccl.
Repair includes streets constructed/maintained, sweeping and lighfmg.
SEWER - The existing City sewer main in Calloway Drive extends from North of Rosedale
Highway to about 160 feet southerly of the annexation area (see page 3, VII).
WATER - The terhtory is in an area being served by the Vaughn Water Service Company and an
option exists whereby City of Bakersfield Water Resources Department could be the provider.
OTHER - (Refuse) - When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by City forces or
.[~ ?~n~acts with a franchise refuse collector.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation. First
priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not affect
City/County Joint Fire service capability.
Existing neighborhood Parks (city and District) are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to
provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
G.~ub\SHA~DXRON5200 l~Annex 418 Providing
Services Plan.wpd
2
III.
IV.
Vo
VI.
VII.
What effects, if any would annexation of this ten/tow have on the existing level ofcity/distriet services (i.e.,
need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of
this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide services. Upon
completion oftheproposed church related development in the area, additional police officers should not
be required to maintain the current level of City service. Any street improvements resulting from
development will not affect the existing level ofsen~ice. The portion of Callowav Drive and Meacham
Road adjacent to the territory will continue to be maintained by the City.
Would city/district require anyupgrading or changein facilitiesto serve affected territory (Roads, fire
hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? As development
occurs, the developer provides and pays for mai or facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upgrading
or change in facilities will be required in the tenitory for annexation.
Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in affected territory. The annexation areais zoned County A
(Agdcultue) Zone.
Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as
a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.): The annexation is pre-zoned City
A (Agriculture) Zone.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance
rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc.: City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff and State Hi,way Patrol services. The
present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now payto independent
companies. The existing sewer main in Calloway Drive is available, however, the applicant most likely
would be required to provide for a sewer pump facility to make a connection to the City system.. City
Government also provides increased political representation for residents within the corporate limits.
VIII.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.280387% of assessed
market value). When annexed a designated percentage of the total nronertv tax for the area will
accrue to the City and the remainder to the County for providing Health Care and Social Services.
(Rates shown are from 2000-2001 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected area be subject to anybonded indebtedness ofthe city/district: If so, explain: No-
Previous last shown (1992-93), City bonded indebtedness has been paid off and the current
2000-2001 tax rate list shows no City bonded indebtedness.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000? The
property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to
annexation.