HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/29/1991 B A K E R S F I.E L D
Lynn Edwards, Chair
Patricia J. DeMond
Mark Salvaggio
Staff: Maureen Cotner
AGENDA
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Monday, July 29, lggl
12:00 noon
City Manager's Conference Room
1. Interviews of Consultant Firms for Classification Study
Comp Plus
Ralph Andersen & Associates
Reward Strategy Group
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
COMPREHENSIVE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION'STUDY
CONSULTANT SELECTION
SUGGESTED INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
July 29, 1991
1. Please briefly explain your firms experience in conducting a study of this scope.
How do you propose concluding the study successfully in this time frame?'
2. At the conclusion of the study, how will the results be presented to facilitate
implementation by the Council and management?'
3. How do you intend to reflect the compensation philosophy of the Council? How
would you address pOtential differences in compensation philosophy between
Council members?
4. Describe how you would respond in the following scenario: After evaluating an
employee's position, you .determine he/she is OVER classified, and should be
reclassified to a lower position. The employee requests an appeal to your finding,
and during the course of an interview with you, becomes belligerent and verbally
abusive.
5. What number of cities or agencies do you feel constitute an appropriate, valid
base for comparison for compensation purposes? Do you think it appropriate to
use public and private organizations? What cities or agencies do you recommend
for use in conducting the compensation portion of the study? What is the basis
of your justification?
6. What is the role of the 'Civil Service Commissions in relation to this study? What
of the role of the bargaining units?