The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMD Packet 5-02PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcel(s) identified below, which are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District (CHID). This assessment ballot may be used to express either support for or opposition to inclusion within the CHID. To be counted, this assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized representati ve of the owner. [TO CAST THIS BALLOT,AS~,,RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE] OFFICIAL SESS ENT BALLOT ~e~ Owner: ~rm Fo~,ry~v~~n l/~~~~e$ L L. C descri ti n: ~ ~. ~ ~ ~®~.~'h ~~ tt~~ 1~~~ p. {address, lot~block/tract or other delta! l Indivi~u~l annual assessments shall not exceed 125.00 per equivalent dwelling unit. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described ~ Yes property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed ^ No the amount set forth above? Owner Signature: Title {,It~rrl~scttimgr): Date: r 33~~ APPLICATION PACKET • LAND DMSION SUPPLEMENT,DOC March 3, ?Aa PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcel(s) identified below, which are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District (CMD). This assessment ballot may be used to express either support for or opposition to inclusion within the CMD. To be counted, this assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized representative of the owner. [TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE] OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT Property Owner: ~1 ~ ~~,~,~ p,~ Tt p~ ~~ ~~ a~ s Property description: ,~~ y w ~ ~ p C,o~ ~ c,Tt opt ~ `~" 3 n 5 ~ZS ~ M UM ~ '~7"7"1~0~ ~ ~~ ~3 ~ (address, lot/block/tract or other legal The individual annual assessments shall not exceed $ .146.70 per equivalent dwelling unit. In each subsequent year, annual assessments may increase by the cost of living reflected in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County/All Urban Consumers Consumer Price Index. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described ~i Yes property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed 0 No the amount set forth above? Owner Signature: Title (f representing owner): Date: 2*l Zd /O 5 S:1PlanninglMaintenence DistrictslBallot.doc Olll3/OS PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcels} identified below, which are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District (CMD}. This aJSGSJI~fent bailor maybe used io expr eSJ either Support for or oppositiGn tG inclusion vvithin the CMD. To be counted, this assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized representative of the owner. [TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE) OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT Property Owner: ~ ~~ P~~dIDel~f 1 CSC L ~i Property description: ~ 3~ ~c~,c~~ ~c~ d, ~PIGe3~e.~c~C~433o7 7'4~+Ma~Ma 6S~cj (address, loUblocWfract or otherlegal description) The individual annual assessments shat) not exceed 146.70 per equivalent dwelling unit. In each subsequent year, annual assessments may increase by the costof living reflected in the .Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County All Urban Consumer's Consumer Price Index. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described ~ Yes property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed O No the amount set forth above? Owner Signature: Title (if representing owner): Date: 0.V I (J1,9 t~/LA1 e~l~ YJQ r ~I t~ l~~- APPLICATION PACKET- LAND DIVISION SUPPLEMENT.DOC January 2, 2007 FIRM FUUNDATIUN VENTURES, LLC October 12, 2004 City of Bakersfield Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Ms. Shaw RE: Inclusion of Tract Map #6413 in a Maintenance District We, the undersigned, as owners of the property included within Tract Map No. 6413 hereby request that the property be included within the Consolidated Maintenance District. This request is in accordance with the requirements of Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 13.04.021. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,678.95 as required by the City to cover the costs of this inclusion into the Consolidated Maintenance District. Furthermore, our engineer will supply you with a computer disk copy of the map for your use. We also waive our right to any and all hearings in accordance with the Brown Act, the Bakersfield municipal Code, and/or/ any other law, concerning the formation of or inclusion in the maintenance district. We have signed and are returning the enclosed Proposition 218 ballot (Official Assessment Ballot) indicating our consent to the assessment. Very truly yours, Firm oundation Ventures, LLC `, Geor e L. Benton g ~~~ President ,,` . 23 ~o/% ,-.r 3 ~~~ \ .'~ ~'"~, S+ti,Evl ~G1 .' (/e s-f`r~ f'~n ~ ~r`,.~c T4~ !~ t 3 - l-! w~ C.~ ~9 Disc. of Ta~~,, ~"ti ?~~ ~ ~ «~ ~/ l~' Yid ,~O fet opt p~ ~ ~'l {''~' a°' e~ _~, ~ I ~ f. B A K E R S F I E L r. D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM T0: Sharon Traynor -Accounting Clerk II FROM: 4; Marian P. Shaw -Civil Engineer IV ~~ ~~ DATE: May 11, 2005 10:6AM SUBJECT: Maintenance District Formation Refund of Deposit The City received a ~ check and letter dated October. 12, 2004 from Firm Foundation Ventures, LLC, requesting that Tract 6413 be added to the Consolidated Maintenance District. George Benton paid a higher price because he did not supply the Cit with. an Y AutoCAD computer desk of his Tract Map. Later on he was able to provide the Ci with the AutoCAD drawing of his Tract. Please refund $485.15 to Firm Foundation Ventures, LLC which is the difference between the two Maintenance District fees. Should ou have Y any questions or comments, please call John A. Stinson at (661} 32b-3592. Attachments P:IMEMOS16413refund.doc ~UL-24-9~ ~ K 1 11 s 19 • DIVISIONS OF RECREATION AND PARKS DA'~E: duly ~ 1,19$ ~'~: A1an Tandy, City h~anag~ ~'~t~l~; 5ta~- Ford,l3irectQr S~7BJECT: Request £rom lv~r. Cnceg Pala Regarding Paxk Assessme~.t r, u ' Council at the time of the l~ainticnance Dist~ct ~ssussrnerit Mt. Gr+~g Pa11a addressed the C~~ c a sessment on his family s property. I have had the rotest hearing regarding a p~k inainte~nan e s P v sta~'reseatch his situation. This property of about v i'tunit to speak with 14~r, P~11a and ha a rny' , , 4 pp° +y .~ ` , _ d tt is uric close to S ti ern Park currentl bezn f ~ned~ however, it is zoned R I an ~ 9 17 acres is Y ~ dude an assessment of treets . There~'ore, his 1~~819~ property tax will In (lVion~to~r and Kyner ~ ~ 55~~.7~ for park maintenance. er of his famil ~s ro et'ty. Subsequentty~ the farn~iy lair. P'alla s property vas rezoned by a bray Y P P . a - ' e~ Mr. P~l~a ex ressed the intention to eventually put the received the rc~perty back >n a f ore'c~osur P• . P to continue to farm the parcel, ~n is eri on the market, but the plan for the present is P P Y t o number of a uivalent dwelling units d arcel~ the .assessment amo~tit is based Qn h ~ undevelope p ~. ~ er arcels uilt as o used to a er-parcel charge. Therefc~re~ larg P E~t~s}that are ar~ticiPated to be b PP P , f ~ $ arcel5 III ~ 51In1~~ ' ssments. For the 1 ~~81~~ tax year, these are a total o p f e'Ce1ve larger arse but not et . se arcci~ are roxirnate to developed p~ks~ zoned R-1 ! y' situation to NIr. Pa11a s. The p p , • about four EDUs when built upon. Each of these d~evelc~ cd, aid Prc~~ected to ho~~ pare than P he total amount assessed is appro~im~ately ar~ce~s i~ begin ~s~~~~ed for Pik maintenance, and t P ~ ' ` the roe is zoned sment is initiated when fro conditions ate tnet. 1} P P ~ ~~~iO~Q. The asses residential, and ~~ a ark is developed n~~rby. P lie's xo from the park assessment for the 199199 tax yea Ci Council did nut exempt ~'• Pa P FAY ~ el that ownejs of undeveloped w' be es ~onsible for ayment. In general, we do fe therefore, he iii r p p ... arks + $ttractlVe arks in the vicinltY of their Qropetty. P land beneFit from we~f-maintained ~d P . 't'o ros cctiYe buyers care see that they are re3~eved of game enhance their property values, ~n adds ~ ~, p P sibilit of arl~ development in these parti~nlar areas. of the respon Y p • ~ ' e him can fairs argue that their undeveloped prc~p~~'ty is At the same tune, Mr. P olio acid owners lik Y , ' ark users. If it is decided that the current assessment procedure is not nut associated with actual P ,• w c ursue other a ttonsa such as whether ~lty ~'ouncil might the moist desit~ble to have in place, a an p , P .. z~ ~ ,:... . • e of tract ma recordin ar housing Pen~~lt issuance as the trlggeT lnit2a~ing establish either the ttrn P g JUL-24-98 FR] 1 120 ~, a~ ~'uly ~~ a 1~~~ Page 2 assessment in ~zeas with develo ed arks, ~e might also Pursue ~otne sort oI' interim the park P P , -amount assess~ner~t dot ~e pezlod of time between ~c~~,i,ng ch~n~~s a~ld hous~z~g reduced dev`~~oPment. rovide direction on the action out would like to take I cap, Proceed with it and also If ~rou would p Y with i~formir~g ~~. P~lla~ f } ~ ~ ` 1 r r ~. ~ 1 4 ~ ` f , ' ` _ V j l i f ._ j \ .. ~_ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~'" `., > _. ~' ..~ ~ .. ' 1 ` ~.• r i ' \. ~ ~_ . ~ --~ - 3 l ~ - ,_ ~ _ \ ` - rr* 1 .,~ ~ ..r ~ C1 ~ /~ f ~, ~~ ~~~~~6 [ ~ V /f~ ~ r - m ~ l ~'1 ~ ~6~... / ~ 5?~~J ~~ < C S' ~ t r` ~ G .._.,.o....~_....b...~ ,, ~.: ~ . ~~-~~ ~~~ zJ ~Ql~:~~.~...~- lD~-f 7 ~~jl~ ~ ,~:: .~ ;: ,. _ __ ~ _ _ _ V i .. ~~~ ~ ~ w f~-2c~s ~ ~~~ v s ~~' P~ c' ~ ~~.s , ,, 3. ~ i i ,. _ y ~, , ~..., ~ ~ ~ .~ V t ~ / S ~ ~ ~ /' ~C . r C~( , W ~ ~ ,;-- ~1~ .. ~~ .. y. ,' ' ~ f ' ' ` ~v ~ `~° l I ~. ~ ~ "c 4 Ct~ ~' ~ ~' ~ C~~D ~.~ (S: Ca ,~ ., r __ E..: 7 ~ ~, ', i - J ~ - E E ~ f ~ ~ '~ _ ~ /' . ' t 7 .. # i~ ~ ~ .. .. - / ~/ ~ .. .. ~~ ~, , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ 1 ~ ~' j ~ 3; , '~ , 1 ~ \ \ ~.~ _ A E I wM1Mw~MV ~yyyy~, k ~• e em~~.. ..,,~r. +~ ,~,c.,~.n..,...~.+. ~ ~ e ~ t 3 i...x,.~~..~.. ~ .. ~....,,...~..~:.~,,.,~,w .,,.ao,,.,.a,M.. ~ ..~..,.am..~_~ .~.+ ,R..w.,~.,~.,~«mm.~.w..n..,~.m.,~u 1 1 - . i ~~.~,~.~.,~,.T.~.a.~n,.~.....>~~ q..a ...~,...~.a.w .~A,..~,..~.~:..,~...~.w.,~•..~,•~. ,,..,,..K».,.<„~:..,mob,~.R,.m~..~.,a~,., µ1f'°' i r ~cYwv 1mu~ra~v.er pry..vma vy~rnR rm < ' d _ Vww n .rnw,n ~uaruvrnm+waaW~+ mmas~agt v. ~-./ /