The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMD Packet 3-16 PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property. owner of the parcel(s) identified below, which are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District (CMD). This assessment ballot ma be . .. Y used to express either support for or opposition to inclusion within the CMD. To be counted, this assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized representative of the owner. [TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE] OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT Property Owner: ~,.,--~.' ~d ~~ 'I ~~ FAIRV~AY OAKS SOUTH _ . ~ . ~ c..~~-~~, ,..~. ..~-~ .~e Pro ert descri tion: GENERALLY LOCATED N. OF McCI ~.~ p Y P AND E' OF MOUNTAIN VISTA DRIti I'CHEN ROAD !, (address, lot/block/tract orother The individual annual assessments shall not exceed $ 146.70 per equivalent dwelling unit. In each subsequent year, annual assessments may increase by the cost of living reflected in the Los Angeles - Riverside -Orange County /All Urban Consumer's Consumer Price Index. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described 0 Yes property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed 4 No the amount set forth above? Owner Signature: Title (if representing owner): C-°s -~ - ,.~~,~ ~ ~~ Dace: / ~f///~/n~ APPLICATION PACKET -LAND DIVISION SUPPLEMENT.DOC January 3, 2006 PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcel(s) identified below, which are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District {CMD). This assessment ballot may be used to express either support for or opposition to inclusion within the CMD. To be counted, this assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized representative of the owner. [TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE] OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT Property Owner: FAIRWAY OAKS SOUTH,L. P. , a CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Property description: TRACT 6 0 7 9 UNIT 6 (address, lot/block/tract orother legal) The individual annual assessments for fiscal year 2004-2005 shall not exceed 146.70 per equivalent dwelling unit. NOTE: In each subsequent year, annual assessments may increase by the cost of living reflected in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange. County/All Urban Consumers Consumer Price Index. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described ~ Yes property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed 0 No the amount set forth above .. Owner Signature: ~ Title (if representing owner): PRES ENT OF cDIVITT DE~TELOPMENT INC. , ~~~GEN RAL PAR ER OF FAIRWAY OAKS SOUTH, L . P . .Date: GUST 9, 2007 S:IPROJECTS1MAlNDIST4t~allotWew BallotslBallot.doc ~ 1 ~ 02/5!07 CITE' OF E3AhERSF'[ELD CONSOLID.~TED 1tAI11'TEN,~NCE DISTRICT IMPORTANT OFFICIAL PROPERTY OWNER ASSESSMENT BALLOT This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcel(s) identified below, «~hich are proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated rTaintenance District (hereinafter CMD). This assessment ballot may be used to express either su ort for or o osition ' be PP PP to inclusion within the CMD. To counted, this assessment ballot must be signed belo«~ b ~ the o«~ner or if the o~~~ ' } ner is not an individual, by an authorized representati~~e of the owner. TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT Owner: Property description: S.W. CORNER Of PACHECO ROAD AND OLD RIVER ROAD (address, Iot~lockltract or other legal) `~. ~ ~. Individual annual assessments shall not exceed 125 00 ere uivalent dwelli ' p q rig unit. ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE Owner Signature: Shall the City Council of the City of Bakersfield include the above described !~ Yes Property within the Consolidated Maintenance District and levy an assessment not to exceed 0 No the amount set forth above? Title (ijrepresentingawner); `ate: -~ ~-' / y "~ ~~~ ~~9~ ~{pPl~c~uo~ I'~cb~ • ~.r+1 DI K/fai fwrW p/ E~'icri w Jw~ueiry 1,1000 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION T0: County Clerk COUNTY OF KERN 1415 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Appendix I Project Title: Adding Territor~(Area 3-16, Old River, Pacheco SW} to the Consolidated Maintenance District. Project Location-Specific: ~ enerally bounded by Pacheco Road on the north, Old River Road on the east, a line 114 mile south of Pacheco Road on the south, and Mountain Vista Drive on the west. Project Location-City: Bakersfield Project Location-County: Kern Description of Project: Maintenance of public park, street and median landscapin_q improvements. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Exempt Status: (Check One) FILED KERN COUNTY _ Ministerial (Sec. 21080 (b) (1); 15268 (a); _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080 (b) (4); 15269 (b) (c); APR 2 4 2002 Emergency Project (Sec. 21080 (b) (4); 15269 (b) (c); x Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. DAMES A. oa+o~s, CLE Section 15305(f) Y _ Statutory Exemptions. State code number. Reasons why project is exempt: Minor alteration in land use limitations with addition of territory to an existing Maintenance District, CEQA guideline, City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 212-92. Lead Agency Contact Person: Marian Shaw Area Code/Telephone/Extension:~661} 326-3519 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes x No Signature: Date: ~ • ~~3.~ ~ . ~ ~' Title: i ~ I ~! ~ I~ x Signed by Lead Age cy Date received for filing at OPR: Signed by Applicant Notice of Environmental Docu e # . Posted b Count Clerk on ~ ~ y Y and for 3o days thereafter, Pur u-ant o ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~r~e dad yU~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA} ss. County of Kern ) PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; and that on the 25th day of October , 2001 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following; Resolution of Intention No, 125 passed by the Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 24th day of October 2001, and entitled; A RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ADD TERRITORY, AREA ~-16 SOLD RIVER, PACHECO Sw}, TO THE CONSOLIaATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ADOPTING, CONFIRMING AND APPROVING THE PUBLICU1rOR~CS DIRECTOR'S REPORT, THE BOUNDARIES O~ THE ADDITION, THE FAIRNESS OE THE BENEFIT FORMULA, AND THE AMOUND OF ASSESSMENT TO BE LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL. Is/ PAMELA A. McCARTHY City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield 4 `~'~~~ • By. Depu City Clerk ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~'~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~ ~ BHA PROPERTIES, LLC 6851 McDivitt Dr., Suite B Bakersfield, CA 93313 39d-8800 August 29, 2401 City of Bakersfield Public V~orks Depa~~tment 1501 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Ms. Marian Shaw Subject: Inclusion of Tract No. 609 in a Nlaintenanee District Dear Ms. Shaw: I, the undersigned, as developer of the property included within Tract No. 6079 hereby request that the property be included within the Consolidated Maintenance District. This request is in accordance with the requirements of Bakersfield Municipal Cade Section ~ 3.0.021. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $2,210. to cover the costs of inclusion within the Consolidated Maintenance District. Furthermore, our engineer will supply you with a computer disk copy of the map for your use. We also waive our right to any and all hearings in accordance with the Brown Act, the Bakersfield Municipal Code, and/or any other law, concerning the formation of or inclusion in the maintenance district. I have signed and am retl~rdng the enclosed Praposifion 218 ballot {Uf~icial Assessment Ballot) indicating my consent to the assessment. Sin r ly, C~ on 'ns SmithTech~ USA I N C O R P O R A T E D March 29, 2006 City of Bakersfield Public Works Department 1 SQ 1 Tru~tun Avenue Bakersfield, CA. 93 3 0 ~ Attn: 1Vlarian P. Shaw Subject: Inclusion of Tract b894 in a Maintenance District Dear Ms. Shaw, /~ , ~v ~~~~~~, e~._ ~ ., -~ I, the undersigned, as developer of the property included within Tract No. 6894 hereby request that the property be included within the Consolidated Maintenance District. This request is in accordance with the requireme~its of Bakersf field Municipal Code Section 13.04.21. Enclosed is ~. check in the amount ~f ,1..732._1.0 to cover the cysts of inclusion within the Consolidated Maintenance District Furthermore, our engineer will supply you. with a computer disk copy of the map for your use. We also wai~re cur right to any and all hearings in aec~rdanee with the Brawn Act, the Bakersfield Municipal Code, and/or any other law, concerning the formation of or inclusion in the maintenance district. I have signed and ~n ret~~rning the enclosed Proposition 21 S ballot (QfC~cial Assessment Ballot) indicating my consent to the assessment. very truly yours, ~'airwa~,Qaks South L.P. (Managing partner) THE HABERFELDE BUILDING 142417TH STREET * BAKERSFIELD, CA * 93301 * ~b1-327-8492 * FAX bbl-327-8493 MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR ADDITION OF TERRITORY (AREA 3-16 OLD RIVER, PACHECO SW) TO THE CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I a N.1/4 CDR. OF SECTION 19, 30/27, p.o.e. ~ M. ~PG. P~ ca~5O N 89'12'25' W 126.45 ~~ ~ ~~ rn SW z~ ~~ ~~ ~ O= ~! N 89'1725' W 2633.61 ~ PACHECO ROAD (PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONE N.E CDR. aF SECTION 19, N 89'12'25• W 1 4' 30/27, II.O.B. ~ 1L 7 ~ 8~ g 5 4 3 2 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ~ 9 b~ W 10 U IVERNESS AVENUE 11 ~, a 12 N 14 15 16 17 18 ~ it 12 13 14 15 16 3 17 13 ~ a z U ~O 44 43 42 58 59 80 ® 1 2 3 4 5 653 54 55 56 57 ~ ~ 60 ®p 1 2 ALBANS AVENUE BATH } .COURT Q ~ 3 ~ ~ Q 58 57 56 55 3 9 8 7 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 57 3 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 52 51 50 49 48 8 7 8 5 4 } 3 ~ ~~ F .. ~ 51 52 53 54 ~ 10 It 12 13 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 56 -Wi >s a 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 45 46 47 ~ W ~ ¢ v 9 10 11 12 13 14 .~ ~ ICK }AVENUE COBBLESTONE _ AVENUE YORK AVENUE 8 ~ a ~- ~. } Z 44 43 42 41 44 39 38 3 14 1718 19 20 21 22 23 3 24 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 3 27 28 25 44 43 42 41 40 39 3 18 17 16 15 ~ m = z 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 0 15 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 ~ 9 42 43 44 45 46 41 48 Q 28 2g 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 ~ 19 20 21 ~ N z LANESBOROUGH AVENUE ° LANCASTER AVENUE a N 89'12'32' w 283245 __ asTlacT eouNOUtY ~ aF sECTION 19 X0/27 ------------------~+.~'~'~! ~>.~~----- ------------------------- .B. ~ w F~ ~/1~, ~ ~C1~ION~ 19 FlLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THIS DAY OF . 20_ CITY CLERK OF THE GTY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AN ASSESSMENT WAS LIMED BY THE CITY COUNGL ON THE LOTS, PIECES ANO PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. SAID ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE OAY OF . 20~ SAID ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ANO THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF SAID GTY ON THE DAY OF . 20_. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ASSESSMENT ROLL RECORDED IN THE OFflCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC VYORKS FOR THE EXACT AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. GTY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFlELO, CALIFORNIA flLED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 20_, AT ~M., IN 800K OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AT PAGE ~ IN THE OFFCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. JAMES W. MAPLES COUNTY ASSESSOR-RECORDER BY CHIEF DEPUTY RECORDER RECORDED IN THE OFFCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS THIS DAY of _ . 20 . DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BAKERSflELD, CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "B' FlLE: M03-16 SHEET 1 of t