HomeMy WebLinkAboutMD Packet 1-01~,,,
PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
This assessment ballot is for the use of the property owner of the parcels} identified below, which are
proposed to be included in the City of Bakersfield Consolidated Maintenance District ~CMD}. This assessment
ballot maybe used to express either support for or opposition to inclusion within the CMD. To be counted, this
assessment ballot must be signed below by the owner or, if the owner is not an individual, by an authorized
representative of the owner.
[TO CAST THIS BALLOT, PLEASE RETURN THIS ENTIRE PAGE]
OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT
o.~~: +~on~,vv ~oYv
~/2'
Pro e descri t~onv ~ M ~~~ ~/
P ~Y p
(address, lot/blocl/tract r~r other legal
Individual annual assessments shall not exceed $12_5.44_. per equivalent dwelling unit.
ASSESSMENT BALLOT MEASURE
Shall the City Council of the City of
Bakersfield include the above described ,~ Yes
property within the Consolidated Maintenance
District and levy an assessment not to exceed ^ No
the amount set forth above?
Owner Signature:
T1tle {if representing owne~~ a
Datea
r- -~
.4PPLlC.gTl4h' PACKET - L414~ D(VIEIOh'Si1PPLEt4fENT DOC ~~larch S, ?009
r'.~' ;t
a,
,~,
~.~
:~
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
R ESa L U TIO N 24-- 7 7
APPENDIX H
Date Filed ~,Z~ l~(~
Environmental .Information Form
(To be completed b~ applicant)
H~1 r:
GENERAL INFnRbiATION
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
~~ ~ ~ ~~
2 . Address of project : ~ X12 01., ~~t at ~o ~~Z n~, ~~~~ Z( '[ 2~ 5 ; (Z 2'~ ~.
Assessor's Block and Lot I~umbe.
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project: _
4. Indicate number of-the permit application for the project to
which this form pertains: _ f- ~~`~~,
~5. List and describe any other related permits ,and. other public
approvals required for this project, including :those required by
city,- regional, state and federal ,agencies:
__~__
6. Existin zon~in district :~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g g
7r
'l, Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed) :
PRGJECT DESCRIPTION
8. Site size. ~,~ ~,~ ~~
9. Square footage. ~;'~ ,,~
~ ~
10. Number of floors of construct ion . ~ ~~
11. Amount of off -street. parking provided . ~ ~,~
`~
~~,.
12, Attach plans. ~ ,~
13 . Proposed scheduling . ; ~.I ~
14. .Associated projects.
15. Anticipated increm~rtal development. ; ~~ ~ ~°
:;
~` ,~; ~•
r..,
~.
Cont.
YES NO
____
30.
H-3
~~.
Substantial.. change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
31. Will the proposal result in; Water service from any
public or private entity? (If so, give the name of
the entity and provide a letter from that entity
outlining its current and future water supply and
demand requirements).
32. Substantially Increase fossil fuel consumption
_~_._
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
'~ 33. Relationshi to a lar er ro'ect or series of
p g p J
projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
34. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, includ-
ing information on topography, soil stabilty,plants and animals,
and any cultural, historical or scenic ripects. .Describe any
existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures.
,Attach photographs of the site... Snapshots or polaroid photos will
be accepted.
35. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants
and animals and any. cultural, historical or scenic aspects.. Indicate
the type of land use (res.idential, commercial, etc.), intensity of
land use (one family, apartment houses, shops, department. stores,
etc..), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear.
yard, etc.). .Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or
polaroid photos will be accepted.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the
attached exhibits present the data and information required for
this initial evalhation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knov~ledge and belief .
Date
~~
(Signature)
For:
November 10, 1994
Marian Shaw
Public Works Department
City, of Bakersfield
1501 Truxton Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
RE: Parcel Map Waiver No. 26-94
Dear Marian,
Pineview Limited, A California Limited Partnership as owner of
the property included within Parcel Map Waiver No. 26-94, hereby
request the formation of a new temporary maintenance district for
the property. This request is pursuant to Condition No. 6.1 of
the "Notice of Decision and Findings" dated October 25, 1994,
which states that the subdivider shall pay all costs for
establishing a new maintenance district, or inclusion of the
subdivision into an existing. maintenance district.
Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,356.00 to cover the costs
mentiond above. Further, Yamabe & Horn Engineering will supply
you with a disc copy of the parcel map waiver for your use.
Lastly, as the sole owner of the property involved in this
request, we hereby waive the public hearing portion of this
district formation, which should help to expedite this process.
Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
PINEVIEW LIMITED, A California Limited Partnership
BY:
5113/93-217
DEWALT • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING • LANDDEVELOPiNENT • CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT
~~
August 13, 2009 {~~~g
M ~ ~~a~ian S~a.~r
Cry of Eakersfeld.
Public U~lorks Department
15Q 1 Tru~un Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 9330 ~
Attu; Deliver letter to Marian Shaw or Dame! Graves
Re: Ves~ng ~~"en~ve ~`re+~~ M~Ip No~ 606
Dear Ms, S#~aw,
On behalf of Prabuiit ~evel~pn~ent ~ ~~-nstr~cti~n~ i~c~, ~~~ in accordance ~h Bakersfield
M~ni~ipal Code Chapter ~ 3,04 1, Kathryn ~~ M~~Uhorter, as agent t~ the l~evel~per ~f pr4per~r
I~cated ~rithin proposed V~sf ~n~ Tentative ~'ract Map Na~ GO$0~ hereby re~ue~t inclusion into the
e~asting maintenance district for the property being subdivided.
At the ti~~ of final Map recordation, any applicable fees to cover the casts of pressing. related
to district inclusion v~rill be paid, ~Ue Mill provide ah electronic fie of the Final Map for your use,
as requestede
Please da not hesitate to call me at 323-4600x120 if you have any questions, ar need any
additional infor~ation to procass this re~uestn
Sincerely,
Kathryn ~e erg ! le~eEt~, Pslee:~e
Vice President 1 Director of Engineering
kath~dewaltcorp.com
~` /_ D!
V ~ ~ ~
cc: Louise Palmer, CC7B Planning Department
Mark Shuman, Probuilt Development & construction
Dennis U~1. DeWalt! DeWalt Corporation
KFP~A~IUVPDOCS'Wwco1101.49bnai~enanco-dis5r'c~~quest.wpd
1930 22ND STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 (661) 323-4600 FAX (661) 323-4674 ~"' °'~~ ~ ~ ~~
email: dwd@dewallcorp.com
i
202S WESTWIND DRIVE
SUITE 1
BAKERSFIELD, CA
93301
661.322.329.1 TE L
061.322.3392 FAX
October 6, 2004
City ofBakersfield- Public Works Department
Attn: Marian Shaw
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
Dear Ms. Shaw,
RE: Inclusion of Tract Map # 6421 in a Maintenance District.
We, the undersigned, as owners of the property included within Tract Map No. 6421
hereby request that the property be included within the Consolidated Maintenance
DlstrlCt. This request is in accordance with the requirements of Bakersfield Municipal
Code section 13.04.021.
. Enclosed is a check in xhe amount of $1792.35 as required by the City to cover the costs
of this inclusion into the Consolidated Maintenance District. Furthermore, our en ineer
g
will supply you with a computer disk copy of the map for your use.
We also waive our right to any and all hearings in accordance with the Brown Act, the
Bakersfield Municipal Code, and / or any other law, concerning the formation of or
inclusion in the maintenance district. We have signed and are returning the enclosed
Proposition 218 ballot (4~cial Assessment Ballot) indicating our consent to the
assessment.
Thank You,
~ Konny L. Boyd Y ~ ~~
President
~ 1~4
u
~,~~-~ ~
~~ ~ 4 ~~
:111 ~
~1 V\
~'
`
q
; '.:,
4
~~`
:.~~ .
J
~~~~{Sl iv1 i1.s~~~N{~~
February 24, lJBf~
-~~ Troy Young, .Assessment Service! County of Kern
FR(7Ni Arthur Lee Moore, Engineer- ~v-Design ~,.,
S~18JECT REQUEST OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS, AND MAILING LABELS ~, .
Please provide this. of~ic~e With a name and address list names in
alphabetical :order) and malling labels fc~r the fol lowing A, P.N, s
.and RDP, '.;
RANCHO LABORDE :ANNEXATION (ROSEDALE H~~~Y. SOUTH
3b8-010-03-00--3c
..
. 3b8-O10-07-00-Sc
~3b8-O1o-08-00-8c _ -
368~020-08-OU-~Ic ~ to 3b8~020=18-00-0c
36$-040-O1-00--6c to 3~8-440-X04-00-5c _ ~ ~ _
3~8-040-12-00-8c to~ 368--Q40-16~p0~Oc ~ ;
X68-X40-20-OQ-1c to :368-.040-23-00-0c .
3~i$-060-QI~-OU~-2c to 3h8-0~0-05-~00-4c
1.
} .
368-070-01-00-5c
3~8-070-OZ-00-$c
3b8-070-05-O1~6c
3b9-030-'Ol-(00-Oc to 369-030-17-02--Sc
~
.
,,:
369-040- ~ 1-~~0.0-2c
36g::050,~g~.OD~~c to 369-050-26-00-9c
359-050-42-00-5c to . 3b9-050-43-Q0=$c
..
.. .
RANCH LA$URliE .ANNEX. (RO~EJA.LE HWY~ NORTH
t,..
RERUN RDPb 0171';'~~lfs~ .and l~.a~e~ls~ '~
Please also place the(Rosedale HWy, South lzst in memor far
Y
possible future recall., ~ ~ ,
.. . .
Any questions can be direc~ec~ ,to Roi~~Young;~~~ity.Dept:~`..c~fi,~~
.
Public Works, 326-3?24.
.:
. _ ~ :.~
. ,_
4
..
..
..
,.
..
'.
~'
i
1 ..
,i. ~
,~.~
:. .'.
- ".
..
~. , . ~ ;',
C~ ~~~ZD~'G~~ ~~~ •
~ro Bakersfield, - .Public works
Attn: Don Hoggatt
FRO~s Troy Young, Chief
Assessment Services Division
SUB CT;
JE Printout
KERN COUNTY
DATE; February 3, 1986
T elephonP No,
RDP 0171
Here is the printout you requested covering Tax Area Codes
070-014, 070-O1S, 099-028 and 070-010.-
when requesting reruns of this .area, please refer to the RDP
number shown above.
TY: m b
PAS 5801151 95-5005 (Rev. 1-841
. TQ: Ernie Reynolds
FROM: Jim h1enagh
DATE: 6/.11/86.
R, E,: LATEST ON PROPOSED MAINTENAIUCE DISTRACT # 16
Dear Ea rn i e ,
1 ~ Tat ked to Don: Hoggatt, Public ~dorks Dept. , 11 A.M. this date, he
is park anal landscape planner for City.
. 2 ~ Purpose of his cal l
a. To inform us that the earliest that # 16 could come
before the counci 1 for vote on the primary initiative was
7/x/86, 1st Wednesday in July,
b. Could not make the June 1`8 meeting because of deadline
far putting items on the agenda had passed,
c. Could not go June 25 because no meeting. The July 2nd is
a tentativeda al o because July lest .starts the
counci 1 s new p ys~`ca year and the new scedul e has not
been made public,
d, There is a 15=20 day period for response after. initiative
is voted on, tentatively July 2nd, so theactual adoption
vote could not occur until .July 23rd at the earliest. He
also said he intends to put ours 7n with similar issues
so w~e' re .not alone.
3~ Jim DelMarter will prepare maps, legals, list of parcel numbers
~~ for the meetings and get them to the city by Friday June 13,
198:6.
j a, He will use existing parcel #`s to set up district
. 16-- S`hul z agreed,
b, There will be zero ~o) assesment` for 1986-- S~ulz
. agreed.
c. Borth S~u1z and DelMarter agreed doing the above would
e~p+~di to ~ormi ng the district ar~d that changes coin d
be made at a later date with no problems...
I ha e told all involved to keep me informed as to any changes . Thais
i t for now. ,.,i ~
+
Best t
r
f
Regard-s",
f
.r
~
j r~
~f..
r- ~~'P, -
.,
..w.~.
v v S,l V 1 w+ `~ i 1 I 1 f 4. ~ j1 4. s .1. , ll V 1L. V V
'tonj~ailloc~f, C~ 93206
.cl~rY c~~FZI;
I3al~ers-f field City Council
Rollie-Moore
211 El Tavar. Ct .
Bal~ersf field, Cat 93309
llear Council r
ire the hearing for. l~iaintenance District No. 2, we obi ect
Concern g
formula used to set our assessment far the park. We own
to the
-- es at 7016 and 7024 cling Ave. that are effected by this
5 Alex .
tae have been charged $176, 45, or 5 'ti.mes the rate charged
assessment.
r of a sin le family dwelling for each 5--plex. ~d~ feel
a homeowne g
it is wrong to charge each apartment unit tie same amount as a
single family home.
'ect to tY~is formula because apartment dwellers are normally
we obi
ler households. Less people per unit will use -the parr t~~an
smal
r. ~~rom sin 71e famil ~ dwellings. j~e understand this formula
.people L g Y
's one of the older formulas used- ~,n Bakersfield with the newer
1
' is usiix 7 a .different formula. .The newer for_mul.a rate. is
da.stric g .
~~ statistics that 3.24 people reside in single family
based on ~.1 e
dwe11.1.n.s w~~i~e only 2.people usually reside in an apartment.
~;
s the formula is f i ured at 3.24 t irises the rate for single family
Thu g
dwellin`s and 2 times the rate for each apartment unit.
g
new
'-~~•• ula is fair as it assesses the people who actually
we feel. thl~ form
' m the ar~~ their fair amount ..without over br~rdening the
benefit fro p
oc~ners of a artment complexes. ~~e appreciate tY~e opportunity to
p
respond -to this proposed assessment.
Sincerely,
r
' lerk Chra,stine Romanini
cc: C~.ty C
u: .r
~. _~'.t.:4 1...+........er..r.viur~~J :..~•~vr.w •/...i ~.. ~~w.. wl 'W J...+Y-... Wlwn.w.Y1N!YM'W'7^x~wwr. N'rMtiJ w.~M nnYYru.Y.v....1n .•~ 1. ... ~...r rn.rw]~ <lr.~: h....r ,~: Yr.~•+x .w?~.x. r.Je-:.v Mr.r.+~Y'•Mw~n•t~`> Mw+ 4 Y.ru:Y"/~.n
zs bounded b~ two (1) major arterial.s~: Because or the nacura ~ , ,r..~..~~~~ ~ x ... _Y.
area, occ~.sioned in part by the character and timing of surrounding development.,
the area within the district will receive the greatest benef~.t from the conten~-
pl.aed imprQVements and maintenance thereof. Ben~fxts from maintenance and
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
,1 The various lots and parcels within the district shall be assessed at the f.ol-
lowing rate:
For each assessable lot or parcel the assessment shall equal the dollar amount
determined by:
(a} the total number of dollars budgeted by the dis-
trict for maintenance and operation of.the assess-
meat district for the year in which the assessment
is levied;
multiplied by fib} in the case of a lot or parcel fo~~ which a.subdi~
e?
.~
and divided by (c)
`~
vision map, indicating t~-e actual number of dwell-
ing units to be constructed on the lot or parcel,
has been appro~red by the City~or has been filed in
the. County Recorder`s Office, or for which the
actual number of dwelling units to be constructed
on the lot or parcel has been otherwise approved
by the City and provided that ,said approvals and
filings occurred before the date set for the
annual hearing on .the assessment district before
the City Council, the number of dwelling units
permitted to be constructed on the lot or parcel
pursuant to said approval;
the number of dwelling units permitted. to be con-
structed in the district.
axb
=Assessment for each
lot o~~ parcel
c
r `
-w iMY,ns t~ I'v«•R P t L.r+'S,..... ~.:. (.Y.~.-'~~~'~._ ~.. i„+~ \..1 ~~`~./ ! f „d ~ ~ ,, ~y.~~ra ~ •nt ~ %~,~Lj ~ ~ ~'^~ ~!'~•rM~..'„,; ~,,.,;.
i 1 wrr ,al _
~~.~m+ ~~ £ , ~ K s *. se^••..u~, ! ~ ~a"'~ ~ a~:~ s ' r 4 ~: ,i ~ d i . r~za.l 1 j t',/~J ~'1 . f~ {, '~Iar~y
,,~~ ~ I
g °" '".'.-x. ~
W' ~. 0. ~~ S
} a y ~ :r fir, ~ h ~ ~ ~~ f"~~ ~ ~!h w ~ ~. ~' e ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '~ ! yr~ ~'+~'' ~'~ ~^~
$. w. ~ -'y 'q„~ti.:.°•• ~'~ ~,~1,~ f•<r. ~ ~ta:•i Jar-},w..~;~~ ~ #~'' ' ~ ~ ~~~,,,~ ~+~,f ~~s t.as cw~ ~ ~'r, y ~r~~. ~ e
}
r
v.
~1, uW x:
,p k
~.
f~ ~ F~
~~,~~
,J
~~
~~tonwillow, CA 93.206
,C11"Y ~~~~~~t
I3akers~f ie~.d City Gauncil _ .
Rollie ~~oore
217-~1 Tovar Ct.
~~akersffield, CA 93309
Dear Counc ~.l
~nin the hearing for l~iaintenance District Na. 2, we object
Conce~. g
the formula llsed t0 set our assessment for the paxk. we own.
to
6 and 7024 rein Aare , that are effected by this
5--plexes at 701 g .
t. we have been charged $176,45,- or 5 times the rate charged
assessmen
.~leowner of a single family dwelling for each 5--~plex. tie ~e~el
a ho
it ~.s tiaror~g to charge each apartment unit the same amount as a
single family home.
obi ' ect to this formula because apartment dwellers are normal~.y
td e ~
alley ~~ausel~lolds , less people per unit will use the parr. t~lan
sm
le froir~ sin le family. dwellings. tiJe understand this formula
peop g
is one of the older formulas used in Ba~~ersf field with the ne~~~er
' ie~~s usi_r~ a different formula. The newer formula rate. is
distr g
n the stat~.stics that 3, 24 people reside in single fam~:ly
based ~
dwelli_~~~s,while only 2~people usually reside in an apartment.
Thus the formula is figured at 3.2~~ times the rate for single f a~~~.l~r
d~aell~.rl rs and 2 .times the .rate for each apartment unit.
g
new
this`formula is fair as it assesses the people who actually
ode feel
-r • from the ark their fair amount ~aa.thout over burdenir~~ the
bene.~ ~t p
oclners of a artment complexes . j~e appreciate t~xe op~~artunity ~.
p
respo~1d ~ro this proposed assessment.
.Sincerely,
.~ ~ .~ 4
~ ,,~
cc; Cit Clerk Chr~,stii1e Ramanini
Y .
. ;.
ii +...... T nY'....9~ V~Cr... K - 0 ~'rT ^l
,. ..... .•. '4. .t.~y...v ~•: N... . ..~ .. ... ~..,.r .....r.y,..y.:~r.l~r. •.~...m.+ +n. r~ .+n.-! .. vi e~A-,i ~ Wn~!.^v+.
... _.. r. _...... ~...
i.s bo~~ded by two (l) major arterzals~: ~eca~xs~e az tt~~e ~a~urd ~ -,~ :c-~" ~ . _
area, orcasi~}neck ~.n part by the character and tir.~~_ng of surrounding deve~:t~pmen~ 3
the area wzthz.n the di.str~.ct wi1.l receive the greatest. her~efi.t from the corEtem-
p~.~~ted mprt~uements and maintenc~r~ee thereof. ~ae:~~~ef its f~ om maintenance anc~
. CrTY 4F BAI~ERSFLELI~ ~ ~'
BENEFIT FORMULA
t`
~- The various lots and parcels .within the district shall be assessed at the fol-
y lowzn.g rate:
~~ For each assessable lot or parcel the assessment shall equal the dollar amount
t m' d b
de er ine y:
(a) the total number of dollars budgeted by the dis~
trict for maintenance anal operation of .the assess
meat district for the year in which the assessment
is levied;
multiplied by (b) in the case of a lot or parcel for which a subdi-
vision map, xndicatin.g the actual. number of dwell--
ing units to be constructed on the lot or parcel,
- has been approved by the City or has been filed in
the County Recorder's office, or for which the
actual number of dwelling units to be constructed
on the-lot or parcel has been otherwise approved
by the City and provided that said approvals and
filings occurred before the date set for the
°' ~ annual hearing. on the assess~~nent district before
the City Council, the number of dwelling units
~ permitted to be constructed on the lot or parcel
pursuant to said apprav~al;
and .divided by (c) the number of dwelling units permitted to be con-
structed in .the district. -
axb
=Assessment for each
lc~t ~:ar parcel
c
~~
i ,;~,,. ,
~.,:
~, 4 f fl ~'j^M7~ S,f? 1 t,~,,~ k ~~ Pv- l,lti )R" t S ~nro 9
~^+,
f :., 'r u : m i. t.,,.:.h, c ~~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ .~3 `.:~. +~~ 4.~~:,rW - ~4 y ~T~, f~~.'
r ~ ~ J'-~
,• ~ ~ _
- ~~ A K E R~~ E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1501. TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301
. X8051 3?6-37?~ .
ED ~~. SCHL~LZ. DIRECTOR ~ CITE` FtiGitiEER
June 17, 1993
Riverlakes Ranch Limited Partnership
Uni-bell International Co.
131 No. Tustin Ave., #100
Tustin, CA 92680. .
~~~ ~~
r°~~~ '`
'~.
~ [}
r°'Fs
P~ ~ ~.
~~ ~~`,~
~~
~~
Re: 1991-92 Maintenance DistrictAssessments for~parcels 360-130-01-00-6~and 360-130-1~1-00-5
Gentlemen:
J
The 2 subject parcels in Maintenance District 1, Division 1 (formerly Maintenance District
167 had their 1991-92 assessments reduced by the County Auditor-Controller's office due to the
dedication of an easement over a proposed lake site. The assessments were reduced based
on the lake site being dedicated to the City. The actual dedication was for a flowage easement
with th,e fee ownership of the lake site remaining with Riverlakes Ranch Limited Partnership. The
Auditor-Controller's office has recalculated the assessments forthese parcels and has asked the
City to bill you directly. These parcels have since been subdivided and are no longer on the
assessment roll. The balances due on the revised assessments are as follows:
360-130-01-00-6 $2,761.54 .
360-1.30-11-00-5 , $164,23 ~ .
Please remit checks to City of Bakersfield, Public Works Department,1501 Truxtun Ave.,
Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attn: Lauren Dimberg. ~ If you have any questions please cal! Lauren
Dimberg at 326-3585 or Sue Benson of the County Auditor-Controller's office at 861-2331 Ext.
3539,
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly .yours,
E. W, SCHULZ
Public W~ . __ .~ irector .
~ h l
~~ ~,
r i
/,
^\
B ~~
--,o
DeWayne Starnes
Civi! Engineer /KI
i
cc: ~ Sue Benson, Auditor-Controller's Office
r ~j
EWSIDSIId
EXHIBIT "A"
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 DIVISION 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All those portions of the South half of Section 8, the South
half of Section 16, Section 17, Section 20 and Lots 5-8 of Section
21, all in Township 29 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Meridian
in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said South half of Section 8,
Thence:
~1} S 0°32'12" W, along the East line of said-South half, 2649.26
feet to the Northeast corner of said Section 17; thence
(:2) S 0°37'57" W, along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of
said Section 17, a distance of 2645.05 feet to the Northwest corner.
of said South half of said Section 16; thence
(3 } S 89 ° 09' 10 " E, along the North line of said South half , 53 03.40
feet to the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said
Section 16;.thence
(4} S 0 ° 00' 11" W, along the East line of said Southeast Quarter,
26.51.78 feet to the Southeast cornier of said Section 16; thence
(5} N 89°03'41" W, along the South line of said Southeast Quarter,
2665.56 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 5, as shown on the
"Sales Map, of Lands of Kern County Land~Company" filed in the
Office of he Kern County Recorder, July 15, 1891;~thence .
(6} S 0°38'30." W, along the East line of said Lot 5, a distance~of
1337.19 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 5; thence
(7 } N 8~9 ° 08' 26" W, .along the South line of Lots 5-8 of said Sales
Map, 2632.21 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 8; thence
(8) S 0°25'09" W, along the East Right of Way of Coffee Road a
distance of 1329..74 feet; thence
(9 } S 0 ° 25' 39" W, a distance of 537.89 feet; thence
(10} S 50°22'21" E, a distance of 187.80 -feet; thence
(11} N 89°09'21" W, a distance of 99.10 .feet; thence
(12 } S 49 ° 25' 21" E, a distance of 69.90 feet; thence
(13} S 39°32'21" E, a~distance of 87.90 feet; thence
(14) S 30°00'21" E, a distance of 144.60 feet; thence
(15}.S 3°08'39" W, a distance of 82.30 feet; thence
(16 } S 84 ° 32'21" E, a distance of 51.60 feet; thence
(17) S 00°25'39" W, a distance of 301.00 feet; thence
(18) S 12°31'39" W, a distance of 142.10 feet; thence
(19) S 06°32'39" W, a distance of 100.50 feet; thence
(20) S 00°.49'39" W, a distance of 1032.13 feet; thence
(21} N 89°08'14" W, along said existing Corp-orate boundary and
being 80.00 feet north of, as measured at right angles to, the
South line of Section 20, a distance of 260 feet (mare or less);
(22) N 89°08'14" W, along the South lines of Parcels 24 and 25 of
said Parcel Map, No. 6521, recorded September 15, 1983 in Book 30,
Page 6 in the Office of the Kern county Recorders, a distance of
1331.50 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 25; thence
(23) N 0°47'47" E, along the West line of said Parcel 25; a
distance of 1062.60 feet, to an angle point in said West line of
said parcel 2.5; thence
(24) N 28°20'17" E, along said West line of Parcel 25, a distance
of 233.40 feet to an angle point in the South line of Parcel 23 .of
said parcel Map; thence.
(2.5} S 79°26'17" W, along said South .line of Parcel 23, a distance
of 223.59-feet to an angle point in said South line of said Parcel
23; thence
(2 6 ) S 82 ° 25' 47 " W, along said. South. line of said Parcel 23 and the
South. line of Parcel 22 of said Parcel Map, 327.20 feet to an angle
point in said South line of said Parcel 22; thence
(27) S 0°47'47" W, along said South line of said Parcel 22 and the
East line of Parcel 26 of said Parcel Map, 1177..40 feet to the
Southeast corner of said Parcel 26; thence
(28} N 89 ° 08' 14" W along the South lines of Parcels 26, 2 and 1 of
said Parcel Map, being 80..00 feet north of, as measured at right
angles to, said South line of Section 20, a distance of 2681.54
feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 1; thence
(29) N 0 °29' 05" E, along the West line of said Parcel 1, a distance
of 150.00 feet to an angle point in said West line of said Parcel
1; thence ~ .
2
X30} N 89°08'14." W, along the South line. of said~Parcel 1, a
distance of 150.00 feet to an angle point in said South line;
thence
(31 } N 0 ° 29' 05" E, ~ along the West line of said Parcel 1, and the
East line of Parcel 6~of said Parcel Map, 1134.35 feet to an angle
point in the South line of said Parcel 6; thence
X32} N 89°08'14" W, along said South line of said Parcel 6, a
distance of 690.77 feet to the Southwest corner~of said Parcel 6,
being a point on the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said
Section 20; thence
(33) N 0°29'05" E, along the West line of said Parcel 6, being the
West line of said Southwest Quarter, 1307.55 feet to the. Southwest
corner of Parcel 7 of said parcel Map being the Southwest corner of
the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; thence
(34) N 0°28'15" E, along the West line of said Parcel 7 and the
West line of Parcel 11 of said Parcel Map, being the West line of
said Northwest Quarter, 2670.29 feet to the Southwest corner of
said Section 17; thence
(35) N 0°35'09" E, along the West line of said Section 17, a
distance of 5280.50 feet to the Southwest corner of said Section 8;
thence
X36) N 0°37'47" E, along the West line of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 8, a distance of 1977.30 feet to the intersection of
said West line with the westerly prolongation of the North line of
Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No . 3 2 4 9 recorded May 21, 197 6 in Book 16 of
Parcel Maps at Page 7 in the Office of the Kern. County Recorder;
thence
(37 } S 88 ° 54'39 "~ E, along .said North line and westerly. prolongation
thereof, 1321.50 feet to the Northeast corner of said Parcel 3,
being a point on the West line of the East half of said Southwest .
Quarter of Se~ctlon ~ 8 ; thence >
(38) N 0°36'12" E, along said West line of the East half, 659.75
feet to the Northwest corner of said East half.; thence
X39) S 88°54'39" E, along the North line of said East half, 360.58
feet to the Northwest corner of the East 300.00 feet of the West
half of said East half of the. Southwest Quarter of Section 8;
thence
(40) S 0°35'24" W, along the. West line of said East 300:00 feet,
145.01 ,feet to the Southwest corner of the North 145.00 feet of
said East 300.00 feet of the West half of the East half of the
Southwest Quarter; thence
3
X4.1 } S 88 ° 54' 39" E, .along the South line of said North 145.00 feet,
300.01 feet to a paint on the East line of said West half of the
East half of the Southwest Quarter; thence
X42} N 0°35'24" E, along said East line,. 145.01 feet to the
Northwest corner of ,the East half of the East half of said
Southwest Quarter; thence
(43 } S 88. ° 54' 3 9 " E, along the North line of said East hal f of the
East half, 660.59 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southeast
Quarter of said Section 8; thence.-
(44} S 88 ° 54'.40" E, along the North line of said Southeast Quarter,
2642.74 feet to the point of beginning..
Excepting therefrom the Friant-Kern Canal in said Sections 8, 17
and 2 0 .
JS:lh
D 6:EXH22493
4