Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 072-08 RESOLUTION NO. 0 7 2 - 0 8 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 07-2342, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 178 AND MASTERSON STREET. WHEREAS, Spring Hill Development filed a application requesting a General Plan Amendment, an amendment to the land use designation of that certain property in the City of Bakersfield as hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government code, held a public hearing on Monday, March 17, 2008, and on Thursday, March 20,2008, on General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20) calendar days before said March 17, 2008 hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342, an amendment to the land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, is as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342: Spring Hill Development applied to amend the land Use Element ofthe Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan consisting of a change from lR (low Density Residential) to HR (High Density Residential) on approximately 18 acres. The project site is generally located northeast of Highway 178 and Masterson Street; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted for General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342 and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 39-08 on March 20, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342 subject to the "Mitigation/Conditions of Approval" listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution and as restated herein; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, May 7, 2008, on General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342 notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings: 1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct. 2. The Council has considered and concurs with the following findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 39-08 adopted on March 20, ~ -:oAk~1> () ~ >- - s ~ <..) 0 ORIGINAL 2008: a. All required public notices have been provided. b. The provisions of CEQA have been met. c. Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, staff has determined that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA. d. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the amendment to the land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. e. The land use designation change from lR (low Density Residential) to HMR (High Medium Density Residential) on approximately 18 acres is compatible with the land use designations of surrounding properties and is internally consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. f. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city staff and the Planning Commission. 3. That the infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the type of development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Planning Commission ofthe City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein are true and correct. 2. The Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342 is hereby approved and adopted. 3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary ofthe Planning Commission to the City Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved. 4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment No. 07- 2342, constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "S", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located at the northeast corner of Highway 178 and Masterson Street, subject to mitigation/conditions of approval found in attached Exhibit "A". 5. That General Plan Amendment No. 07-2342, approved herein, be combined with other approved General Plan Amendment cases in this same cycle described in separate resolutions, to form a single Amendment to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. ---------o()o-------- Page 2 of 3 -:0 P>.k ~ -9 <!f J' '" )... - . m I::: r- o 0 ORIGINAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on HAY 0 7 2008 by the following vote: ~ COUNCILMEMBER CAR~, aliitJU.~.M, w~ cotJ6:, HA~, SUL~, SC~R ~: COUNCILMEMBER r'\~ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER ~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER rb Ia /VV\ PAMELA A. McCARTHY, C CITY CLERK and Ex Officio erk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: ~(rh~ Exhibit A - Mitigation/Conditions of Approval B - General Plan Amendment Map RB:dc - S:\GPA 1st 2008\07-2342\Res-Ord\CC Res 07-2342.doc Page 3 of 3 -:0 "-kc-9 J ~ >- - I- ~ <:) 0 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A: MITIGATION I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL <(,Mf-9 ~ ~ >-. m I- r- <:) CJ ORIGINAL Mitigation/Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment/Zone Change 07-2342 Cultural Resources (Mitication Measures) 1. Prior to ground-disturbance activities associated with this project, a qualified professional archaeologist shall conduct a field survey of the entire project site. Results of the survey shall be submitted to the Bakersfield Planning Department prior to approval of grading plans. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the field survey shall be the responsibility of the developer to implement. Mitigation for potentially significant archaeological impacts. 2. Prior to ground-disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associated with the grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and archaeological resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, etc.) that may be encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify those resources in the field, and of the regulatory protections afforded to those resources. The personnel shall be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of archaeological remains during grading activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological finds with equipment and not collect artifacts. The applicanVdeveloper of the project site shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they have met this requirement prior to commencement of ground-disturbance activities. This documentation should include information on the date(s) of training activities, the individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of the training, and a list of names of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, the on-site supervisor shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist. Mitigation for potentially significant archaeological impacts. 3. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work would cease pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately. Mitigation for potentially significant archaeological impacts. Traffic and Circulation (Mitication Measures) 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permit within the GPA/ZC area, the developer shall pay the applicable Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) to the satisfaction of the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department. Mitigation for potentially significant traffic impacts. Biolocical Resources 5. Per Department of Fish and Game protocol, an adult season Blunt Nose leopard Lizard Survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. The survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to grading plan approval, tract recordation or approval of a Preliminary Development Plan, whichever occurs first. Department of Fish & Game Condition 6. The project site shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist to determine the existence of burrowing owl. Such determination shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to grading plan approval, tract recordation or approval of a Preliminary Development Plan, whichever occurs first. 'OM/:-9 ~ ~ >- rn I- , <:) 0 ORIGINAL Exhibit A GPA/ZC 07-1135, PUD 07-2345 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 4 The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711). The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take. possession. or destruction of birds. their nests or eaas. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws, project-related disturbance at active nesting territories shall be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle (March 1 -August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. Note: The burrowing owl is not covered under the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan. If any burrowing owl are found on the subject property during ground- disturbance activities, such activities shall be terminated and a qualified biologist shall be contacted immediately. Department of Fish & Game Condition Public Works 7. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement plans, or with the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following shall occur: a. Provide fully executed dedication for Masterson Street to arterial standards for the full frontage of the area within the GPA request. Dedications shall include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the dedication documents. If a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPA/ZC area is submitted, dedication can be provided with the map. b. This GPA/ZC area is within the Breckenridge Drainage Area and shall follow the requirements of the PDA. Submit a comprehensive drainage study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The study shall show the development's proportionate share of the necessary ultimate storm drainage facilities. c. Submit verification to the City Engineer of the existing sewer system's capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through development under the new land use and zoning. d. In order to preserve the permeability of the sump and to prevent the introduction of sediments from construction or from storm events, all retention and detention basins (sumps) shall have a mechanical device in the storm drain system to remove or minimize the introduction of oil, grease, trash, and sediments to the sump. This device shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and shall provide the greatest benefit to the storm drain system with the least maintenance cost. e. Developer is responsible for the construction of all infrastructure, both public and private, within the boundary of the GPA/ZC area. This includes the construction of any and all boundary streets to the centerline of the street, unless otherwise specified. The developer is also responsible for the construction of any off site infrastructure required to support this ~ -:oAk/:-9 () ~ >- - s ~ <..) 0 ORIGINAL Exhibit A GPA/ZC 07-1135, PUD 07-2345 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 4 development, as identified in these conditions. The phasing of the construction all infrastructure will be addressed at the subdivision map stage. For orderly development. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer shall pay a major transportation facility fee in the amount of $0.35 per square foot for commercial and/or $2487 for residential dwelling unit (insert what applies). If prior to issuance of a building permit said fee is merged into the regional TIF program then payment of the regional TIF fee will be deemed to have satisfied the intent of this condition. This fee is a component of the City Council approved action plan to pursue funds needed to complete construction of major transportation facilities to serve growth and development within Metropolitan Bakersfield. For orderly development 9. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidated Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPA area. For orderly development. 10. Payment of the proportionate share of the cost of the median for the arterial frontage of the property within the GPA/ZC request is required prior to recordation of any map or approval of any improvement plan for the GPA/ZC area. For orderly development. 11. Prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property, the applicant shall construct the east half of Masterson Street for the entire frontage of the subject property. Note: The City in the Hills development is responsible for construction of the western 2 lanes of Masterson Street from Paladino Drive to SR 178. For orderly development. Citv Attornev Condition 12. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and/or property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners or boards ("City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for City's sole active negligence or willful misconduct. This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued. The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or preceding, falling under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole discretion, 'OAK/:-9 <!f J' O-{\ >- - ,_ m _ r- o 0 ORIGINAL Exhibit A GPA/ZC 07-1135, PUD 07-2345 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 4 shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party. RB:\\S:\GPA 1st 2008\07-2342\Res Ord\Exhibit A-1 (1).doc -:oM/:-9 <!f ~ >- - I- m _ r- <..) 0 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT B: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT MAP -:oM~-9 ~ ~ >- - I- m _ r- o CJ ORIGINAL Gl o~ ~ ... / 0:: 0:: ~ W ~ LS 0) ~ ~ gsl Z ~ilJ ~ ~ g~ 0:: 0:: ;:? ~ ~ 0:: ::; C") -' 0:: -' 0 0:: W 0:: 0:: W 0:: ~ N S ~ M N I ~a NOAN\!':) aN\!'~E> I'- 0 I- Z 0:: ::; !i ...J W J: W 0:: ~ > -' ~ 0:: 0 0:: ~ -' -' Z () J: 0:: W J: ~ <( "- ..- Z <( ~ .....J a. . , , .....J , co' 0:: ~ ; u <( -' ~ ~: c::: ~: !i J:. (.!). - , W J: J:: , . Z . W , (9 11. 5 , ~ , , , . lS S 'OM~-9 <!f ~ >- m f--- r- o 0 ORIGINAL