Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 074-08RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7 4 ~ 8 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 555 LOCATED SOUTH OF SEVENTH STANDARD ROAD, WEST OF THE GALLOWAY CANAL. (WARD 4) WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located south of Seventh Standard Road, west of the Calloway Canal; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation to the City of Bakersfield; and WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annex the site to the North of River Sanitary District; and WHEREAS, the North of River Sanitary District has agreed to annex the territory and serve the site, upon annexation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein, located south of Seventh Standard Road, west of the Calloway Canal. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. ~,AKF~~ °~ ~~"~ .. ~- m r ~-~ C7 0;=3~~S~~AL 5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore, the City prepared an environmental document in accordance with State CEQA guidelines and will use the environmental document for the proposed prezoning and annexation. 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act have been duly followed. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation. 9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary. 10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese- Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. 11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Pamela A. McCarthy City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Virginia Gennaro City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309. ------- -000- ------ 2 ~~gAK~c9cP t.._ Fi r- ~ ~ C~ ~~{~~ ~;-~~Gl~v;~l I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on ...~~2008 by the following vote: AYES COUNCILMEMBER CAR ON BEhfhM~#, WEIR COUCH, HANSON, SUL IL VAN, SCRI NV ER S: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER n-YLQ_ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER P,¢,n hfLvr~ ~~~~ PAMELA A. McCARTHY, ~ CITY CLERK and Ex Offici lerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED MAY ~ 1 2008 ~ HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO Cit By EXHIBITS: A Legal Description B Map C Plan for Services 3 `Q,AKF9 o' ~^, _. ~, ~. ~> {:., EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION N0.555 -SNOW NO. 13 REORGANIZATION TO NORTH OF THE RIVER SANITARY DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.81 BEING ALL OF PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. 10-95, AS EVIDENCE BY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 1996 IN DOCUMENT NO. 0196151074, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER, IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THEREOF AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, THENCE NORTH 89°50'30" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SEVENTH STANDAND ROAD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 151), 659.99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT.OF BEGINNING (T.P.O.B.); (1) THENCE SOUTH 01°40'30" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE GALLOWAY CANAL PER AMENDED PARCEL MAP NO. 1340 RECORDED JANUARY 7, 1974 IN BOOK 8 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 118, 173.97 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; (2) THENCE SOUTH 11°54'30" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CANAL, 80.78 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; (3) THENCE SOUTH 17°33'00" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CANAL, 273.68 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; (4) THENCE SOUTH 09°51'00" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CANAL, 79.57 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; (5) THENCE SOUTH 02°19'59" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CANAL, 405.15 FEET AN ANGLE POINT; (6) THENCE NORTH 89°55'13" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5, 1864.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 5; (7) THENCE NORTH 00°01'00" EAST ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5, 1000.00 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SEVENTH STANDARD ROAD AND THE EXISTING CITY OF SHAFTER CORPORATE BOUNDARY; (8) THENCE SOUTH 89°50'30" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AND EXISTING CITY OF SHAFTER CORPORATE BOUNDARY, 1988.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ___ CONTAINS: 44.03 ACRES 0 ~~ry~~h-- .~ KERF~ COUiiil' `~'l;~iVE"~ ©,135 Or i=iipL J ~~;. ~ , Date ~-17--0 (o ~~j` -~ ~::~~~ ,~~~/ ~ Fxn M .tin . •m~.__..____. Y «-Y b, A u . ~,•~ 4III < C_ ~~9R I l~ w .-x I ~, ':......_ ~f xDNESiEAD WAY ' q R ~ ~ p _ -.. ----- ~ "e vip #i (Ii: GiOF ~: G ~~a;~ m I_y c ,_ ,~ ~, :~ ~~ ~';I; „' f SIIDRTNAIR wAr ~ t-. ,tr.lale-=~ ,~ i I ~ ;16olEm It/O/IIII ' ~ - ..-,. a.W , ~ ~r. - _ 1, ,s ~ L ~Q NcCAY COURTa~eawmx ml i. - f...r 2 A(IOWAY .. 1 -I-- -- „~ 6. ( _.. r V ~ I _ ~_ _. T 3 d _ e nl n R ~• ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~I #t~ 1~ 10 ~- .~P }I r-N I ///-wll-y ooo-ta fRWIT KERN CARAI, n''. n e~ - I ti. }. LIt ~ I.I li i h - ~. I'i, ~ ~ii 4~ E .w 6 . 6 ... -.._ $ ~ f VERDUCO LANE .-_ _- __ - (COUNTY RD NO 62) I~~I,,,,~~~~ ^~ g F Nk-M `Y 5 - ^ d . li ~ ~ ; ~ k` ~- V A ~~ ~ ~ r~` a# ~~. :. J'~~ .~ ~~~~ ae~ N1EN flptD tI~ ~~~ n ~~ ._ ~ N~ 6 G G G: L L C F $~ ~ nCC/S ~~~ Z Q oa ~g~ o ~ i2 3 Ma Z~ ~ s III s ~~~~~ ~Z A Kr d ~ ~ ~ ~ y CALLOwAT C~I41 I~1 CT -fP1AN? I(ERN LINAI ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~Y,E Q I ! ~~ c f- ~ Q,A ,F~^ ,, ~ ( ~ i' / ~~ OZ Zp 00 F~ zz a `~ W W N Z 0 o~ a J a m w ~ ~~ _ w z ~ w ~ w ~ O ~ ~ » p w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ a c ~ ~ o z w W o o Z ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 QN Q~ d~ -a- ~ ~ U J J J J J W ~ J W J W J J w W W `~ ~- Q ~ ~ ~ ~Z - QZ ~Z Q LC LL li LL ~. W z w W z w a W z w Wp zz w WW z> w ~ a Ww z ~ WW z> W z W z ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ _ . ~ ~ ~z c~ ~ c~w w c~ac } m w i c7oc ww c~a~ w c~ w c~ m > cn > cn > _y O U L ~ ~ r 3 p' ~ N M ~ N ~ ~ 1 y a ~ C ~ a x = ~~ ~ ( r z o' ~ ( r z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ v 3 ~a v v v c~ v v v U v v v H J W L a ~ L~L r ~"~ > . ~Y } Wz cWn ~a 3 H v Q ~ ~ ~ a a ~~ _~ w Y~j _ f'G 4 3 ~ iu~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o¢ =a ~z oa ~ ~ .~ z f-~ z ¢ z z F-~_ LLa Q a ~ p O ¢(~ Ow p O W x > O > O > O > O ~ Od' J~ QO > ¢ v z~ v cn v v v v zcn vv a C O = : . .~ W ~ ~ c ~ c ~ ~ p c co c p } ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .,, ~ ~ m -~-~ 3 C t ~ ~ ~ m c'a .. a s ~ a l~ cn ~ ~ cn ~ ~i c~i 3 U x z 5 a ~w r`V m X W ~~'KF .., Ln 1 >. ~_ f ~I ~_ CJ V vi =N v •c0 c ~ ~. ~v,m a i°$~~ eo ,~ ti mU~y~m ?+ > 3 ~ m Ul ~ J ~"•'~ ~~~.$~~ •oZ~~,~a ac~com~' .~ L r q3 .Z y .~ >. C O c~ .~ c m .~ p N c Y c m 4 ~ c ~ $~m z .~ ~>~ ~~ c m a- ~. ~ ~ m ~3a~mi a ~v ~ ~ ~oNi ~'~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ o >, ° J aC m ~° .~ .X ~ ii o 3 c y. $ c~ Q- o ~ i° ~ ~ a •~ ~ ~~ ~o ~, mccor ~ ;~ E•~' NV ~ $ m o m~ c .E °H' mo` ° ~~N ~Oca U m m y t ~ oV ~ ~Q~ m 3~ .- Z t .52 .Em ~(C~ji~ `° ~g'~ ca~ m Q a ao ~ .,~ d s~~ ~~ m m m ~, o-... ~Cnc~ cum '-~co ~~QC~ H LL N •O •~ ~ •C C ~ ~ !. O C •G l0 f0 Y C V m a Ley Q~~ .. ~~£ =m m m .. .. O x~ ax:~ t ~ cca O m~ _~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ c m ~ m~. •m~ ~ e5~0t as m a~ ~ ~ .~' N c1f E li t0 ci Z ~ ~ 5~ cd ir- «Q ~ Q Q U m~ m C m 'O ~~ U_ 'p C vs m C ~ >+ Y ~ ~~ c c~ 3$ ~"' ~' s ~ ~ m ?~ ~. 3% N C) ~ T ~(~ y m Z C A zm m~"'~ ~- m~ g~L.. ~ m W t ~ m = co ~ 2S mC ~ ~ ... O ~ C ~ ++- Y N ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ N mm'~m c• ~~ T ~ ~ cca ~~a .Y! vi E 3 ° o• ~ ~ m ~ o ~~ x z~ m~a ~~ ~ Q ~' ~~~ ~ ~ c.a o .. ~'. ~ 3 ~ y C ~' ~ ~ J ~ C C ~ ~ ~ m (~ ~ t ~. eo c ~' 3 ca c Z ~ ~~ ~~ 55 .. c ~ m ~'- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ Z`°E am~~~ W~ ~ Uw b~wo Q~ ~ r~ N ~~ N ¢~~ m C C ~ .- C ~- C ~;qT $~a•.V ¢Ym ca m~ .~E~ ~~ ~~ ~ a«.m ~° ~~ Oc~v~ a ~~~~.' ';m~ m~ m•~ me E._ 1~ o h o c m Q m ~ c~ ,~ Q m c ~ x ~.Q Q~mc~ m3 Q o~ z~> t ~ ~ =o N ~: ; ~- , - V1 1iVII~ti f\~ 1. What effects, 'rf any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new faciltties, etc)? The annexation of this territory will have minimal effect on the near term level ar capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon future development. additional police officers would possibly be reguired to maintain the current level of city service. The Manned development including public streets or municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance responsibility of the City but should not affect the existing level of service. 2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district qj developers be responsible for financing? No. if any add~~'ional development occurs. the developer provides and pays far maior facilities and dedicates them to the City. No upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation. 3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the territory A (Agriculture Z ne . 4. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.)The City has adopted Ordinance No. 4498 changing the prezoninp from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (One Family Dwelling Zone1 and DI (Drilling Island Zone). 5. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. Parcels within the incorporated area are allowed to connect to available North of the River Sanitary District No. 1 sewer system lines. The present Citv refuse collection rate is substantially bwer than fees county residents now pay to independent companies. No special assessments or 6. Please provide the following information relative to city/c List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in assessed market value. This represents the total proPe percentage of the total property tax of the area will , County for providing health care and social services. Auditor-Controllers 2006 Lien Datel. listrict and county taxes: the area (099-048) equals 1.08514996 of ~rtv tax rate. When annexed a designated accrue to the Citv and remainder to the fRate as shown on 2006-2007 County 7. Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: If so, explain. No, the tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness. 8. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00? jhe property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to annexation. 9. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existing annexation area is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract Q:VINNEXATION\Annez 555\Exhibit C.DOC 3 ~bP.k~c~ry ~~ ,., -. ~ ~ ~- r- <~ U