HomeMy WebLinkAboutROI NO 1243RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 1243
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 1243 PRELIMINARILY
ADOPTING, CONFIRMING AND APPROVING PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND THE 2001-2002 BUDGETS;
SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS ON THE
AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED THROUGHOUT
EACH OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS.
(WARD 4)
WHEREAS, Chapter 13.04 of Title 13 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield provides for an alternative procedure by which the City Council may provide for the
payment of the whole or any part of the costs and expenses of maintaining and operating any
public improvements which are local in nature, from annual benefit assessments apportioned
among the several lots or parcels of property within the maintenance district established
therefore; and
WHEREAS, the Council approved Resolution 161-94 on September 28, 1994,
which provides for the collection of maintenance and operating costs for "convenience" traffic
signals (as that term is defined in said resolution) through a maintenance district; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has on this date filed with the Clerk of said
Council his Report, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "][",
containing the following:
(a)
descriptions of the property in each of the Traffic Signal Maintenance
Districts, attached hereto as Exhibits "A";
(b)
the improvements to be maintained by each district specifically are traffic
signals which benefit the areas withip the boundaries as shown on Map and
Assessment Diagram for each of the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts,
attached hereto as Exhibits "B";
(c) the benefit formulas for each district attached hereto as Exhibits "C";
(d)
budgets for each district, containing the matters specified in Section
13.04,120 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code, attached hereto as Exhibits
D, and
(e)
the amount of assessments to be levied against each parcel in each district,
attached hereto as Exhibits "E".
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Bakersfield, State of California, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.
2. The City Council hereby reserves the right to perform the work of
maintenance and operation of the public improvements within each of the Traffic Signal
Maintenance Districts by City forces or by private contractor. Such determination and election
is to be made for each year at the time the budget and assessment is approved for the year in
question.
3. The City Council hereby preliminarily adopts and approves the PublicWorks
Director's Report and declares that the territory within the boundaries so specified and described
are the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts which benefit from said local improvements; that the
expense of maintaining and operating said improvements is hereby made assessable upon the
parcels and lots within each district; and that the exterior boundaries of said Traffic Signal
Maintenance Districts are hereby specified and described on those certain maps now on file in
the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield and in the Office of the Public Works
Director, marked Exhibits "B," entitled "Map and Assessment Diagram for Traffic Signal
Maintenance District, Bakersfield, California."
4. The City Council hereby sets WEDNESDAY, June 13, 2001, AT 7:00 P.M.,
or as soon thereafter as may be heard, at the Council Chambers of the City Council, 1501
Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for hearing protests on the
following matters:
FAIRNESS OF THE BENEFIT FORMULA;
THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSESSMENT ON ANY PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO
BE ASSESSED;
RESERVATION BY CITY OF RIGHT TO ELECT WHETHER TO PROCEED TO
PERFORM WORK BY CITY FORCES OR BY PRIVATE CONTRACTOR.
Any interested person may object to any of the above-listed matters by filing a
written protest with the City Clerk at 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, at or before
said time set for the protest hearing; and said City Clerk shall endorse on each protest the date
and hour of its receipt, and at said time appointed for said hearing shall present to the Council
all such protests filed with said Clerk.
5. The City Clerk is hereby further directed to cause notice of said protest
hearing to be published, posted and mailed in the manner prescribed by Sections 13.04.140
through 13.04.160 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. The form of notice shall be substantially
as follows:
(~F~IGINAL
THIS IS NOT A BILL - ASSESSMENT IS THROUGH YOUR PROPERTY TAXES
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
NOTICE OF HEARING ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
APN
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE
(Bar Code)
Subject Property:
Your proposed assessment for 2001-2002 is $__
Your last years assessment was $
Duration of payment: ongoing on a yearly basis.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Public Works Director of the City of Bakersfield has prepared and filed with
the City Clerk a Report which provides the basis for the benefit assessment for maintaining and operating traffic
signal improvements to be borne by all parcels of property within each of the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts
which includes your property. Said Report sets forth the amounts in the budget for maintenance and operation of
the above public improvements, a description of each parcel of property in each of the Traffic Signal Maintenance
Districts and the amount of assessment levied for fiscal year 2001-2002 against each parcel. Said Report is open
to public inspection.
The estimated revenue to be raised for this fiscal year for each of the Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts is:
$.
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in the Council
Chambers at 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, the City Council will consider the above referenced
report and hold a Protest Hearing. At this hearing, protests will be heard regarding, the fairness of the benefit
formula, the amount of the assessment on any parcel of property to be assessed and the reservation of right by
the City to utilize either City forces or to contract with private industry for the maintenance of the improvements.
Any interested owner objecting to any of these items may file a written pretest, signed by him/her, describing the
parcel of property so that it may be identified and stating the grounds of his/her protest. Any written protest shall
be filed with the City Clerk at 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, 93301 at or before the protest hearing.
Individual property owners may also appear and be heard at the hearing.
Any person challenging in court the decision made at the conclusion of such public hearing may be limited to
raising only those issues raised at such hearing or in correspondence delivered to the City of Bakersfield prior to
close of such hearing.
If you need additional information, please contact M r. Lauren Dimberg of the City Public Works Department at (661 )
326-3585.
Dated: 5/25/2001
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CMC
City Clerk and Ex Officio
Clerk of the Council of the
City of Bakersfield
- 3 -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted
by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
MAY [6 Z0~ , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, MAGGARD, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SALVAGOIO
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNClLMEMBER
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio)fficio _(~rkrk ~of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAY 16 Z00!
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
BART J. THILTGEN
CITY A'I-FORNEY
Attachments:
Exhibit 'T'
Exhibits "l-A, B, C, D and E"
Exhibits "2-A, B, C, D and E"
Exhibits "3-A, B, C, D and E"
Exhibits "4-A, B, C, D and E"
Exhibits "5-A, B, C, D and E"
S:\PROJ ECTS\MAI N DIST\TRAFS IG\Roi\0 IAIl.wpd
- 4
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S REPORT
FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
City of Bakersfield
Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
City of Bakersfield Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts, TS-1 (Marketplace),
TS-2 (NW Promenade), TS-3 (Rosedale, Jet Way), TS-4 (Gleneagles Drive) and TS-5 (NW
Promenade, Phase 2) are generally described in Exhibits "I-A" through "5-A" and are
specifically as shown on Maps and Assessment Diagrams under Exhibits "1 -B" through "5-
B" as Traffic Signal Maintenance Districts within the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern,
State of California. (Exhibits "I-A" through "5-A", "1 -B" through "5-B", "1-C" through "5-C",
"I-D" through "5-D" and "I-E" through "5-E" are attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.)
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 13.04 of Title 13 of the Municipal Code
of the City of Bakersfield, the Public Works Director makes and files this Report and
proposed assessment of and upon all pamels of property within the districts for the cost
of maintaining and operating traffic signals that benefit the various districts. The
assessment includes the cost to operate, maintain, repair and replace signal poles, mast
arms, signal heads, controller, cabinet, machine vision detection system, street light
luminaires, conduits, wires and pull boxes, cost of energy, supervision and any and all
other items necessary for the proper maintenance and operation thereof.
Developers often request permission to install traffic signals on major streets
to enhance access to their development. These "convenience" traffic signals are not
required by the Traffic Authority to regulate traffic flow, but are installed solely at the
discretion of the developer of a commercial site. Such signals do not provide a general
public traffic benefit.
Under the "user pay" concept, the private property deriving benefits should
bear the costs of maintenance and operation of convenience traffic signals. On September
28, 1994 the City Council approved Resolution 161-94 instituting the collection of
maintenance and operating costs of future convenience traffic signals through
maintenance districts.
The traffic signals that are operated and maintained under these
maintenance districts benefit the parcels within the various districts. Each parcel is
assessed an amount based on formulas set forth herein as Exhibits "1-C" through "5-C".
EXHIBIT" !"
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JACQUES R. LA ROCHELLE, Interim Public
Works Director of the City of Bakersfield, by virtue of the power vested in me and per
direction of the Council of said City, hereby submit the Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Budgets as
set forth in Exhibits "I-D" through "5-D" and Assessment Rolls as set forth in Exhibits "I-E"
through "5-E", for all parcels of property within the various Traffic Signal Maintenance
Districts, subject to be assessed to pay the cost of maintenance and operation of the
above described public improvements in said districts.
Dated:
JACQUES R. LA ROCHELLE
INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
~SINAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Sections 5 and 8, T 30 S, R 27 E, M.D.B. & M., and more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning a the intersection of centerlines of Ming Avenue and Haggin Oaks
Boulevard;
THENCE (1) South 00° 52' 31" West along the centerline of Haggin Oaks
Boulevard, a distance of 70.11 feet, to intersect the easterly prolongation of the
south right-of-way line of Ming Avenue;
THENCE (2) North 89° 10' 32" West along the south right-of-way line of Ming
Avenue and easterly prolongation thereof, a distance of 261.00 feet;
THENCE (3) Continuing along said south right-of-way line North 84° 21' 45" West,
a distance of 120.55 feet;
THENCE (4) North 89° 10' 32" West, a distance of 1119.00 feet, to intersect the
centerline of Scarlet Oak Boulevard;
THENCE (5) North 00° 49' 44" East along the centerline of Scarlet Oak Boulevard,
a distance of 1199.53 feet to intersect the centerline of Camino Media;
THENCE (6) South 89° 11' 24" East along the centerline of Camino Media, a
distance of 1500.05 feet, to intersect the centerline of Haggin Oaks Boulevard;
THENCE (7) South 00° 49' 20" West along the centerline of Haggin Oaks
Boulevard, a distance of 1139.91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
S~Proj\MD\Trafsig\Legals\TS- 1
EXHIBIT "I-A"
MAPAND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-1
(Marketplace)
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY
............................. ~. CAMINO MEDIA
.8g~:'2," ~v- ............. ,'~- ...................
. s~Ol~[. ~ ~: ........ :~:~ ...........
OF MING A~.
BY
E~HIBIT ~'1 B"
ORICil~tAIm-, ....
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-1
(Marketplace)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel shall be assessed a percentage of the total operating and maintenance costs
proportional to the trips generated by that parcel using the signalized intersection, adjusted
for prior year fund balance or deficit.
The Marketplace shopping center is divided into 5 zones (see next page). The percentage
of trips of each zone using the signalized intersection is shown below:
Zone 1 20%
Zone 2 50%
Zone 3 25%
Zone 4 60%
Zone 5 45%
These figures are from The Marketplace Traffic Impact Study Report
Bakersfield, Califomia, by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc,
November 10, 1995.
The amount to be assessed to each parcel is calculated as follows:
(1)
Calculate the total number of trips generated by each building using the City
Average Daily Trips (ADT) rates.
(2)
Multiply the number of trips of each building by the percentage of the zone shown
above.
(3) Add the total number of trips (2) of all buildings in each parcel.
(4) Add the total number of trips (2) of all buildings in all zones.
(5)
Divide the total number of trips of each parcel (3) by the total number of trips in all
zones (4). This is the proportionate share of the total assessment for each parcel.
(6)
Multiply the result of (5) times the total cost of the district for each parcel. This is
the amount to be assessed to each parcel.
S\PROJ\MD\Trafsig\Forrn ulas~TS-1
EXHIBIT "1-C"
Page 1 of 2
PROJECT ZONE MAP
K
LEGEND:
I = ZONE B~N~
(~) = ZONE NUMBER
THE MARKETPLACE
Bakersfield, California
EXHIBIT "I-C" ....
Page 2
EXHIBIT "I-D"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
TS-I (MARKETPLACE)
Said assessment is made in accordance with the benefit formula attached hereto.
2001-2002
BUDGET
Gross Budget Amount Required
(City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance/(Deficit)
Less: City Contributions
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$2,600.00
$0.00
$o.oo
$2,600.00
S:\PROJ ECTS\MAJNDIST~TRAFSIG/EXHIBITS/TS-1 D01
EXHIBIT "I-E"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-1
(Marketplace)
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
Assessor's Parcel No.
390-310-07-00-5
390-310-09-00-1
390-310-11-00-6
390-310-15-00-8
390-310-2%00-5
390-310-22-00-8
390-310-25-00-7
390-310-28-00-6
390-310-29-00-9
390-310-32-00-7
Total
Assessment
$77.48
$191.10
$47.84
$82.16
$296.14
$85.28
$87.10
$699.92
$125.32
$907.66
Total
Date:
$2,600.00
City Clerk and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
S:/PROJECTS/MAINDIST~EXHIBITE/TS-1 E01
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 20, T 29 S, R 27 E, MD.B. & M., and more particularly described
as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Section 20, being the intersection of the
centerline of Coffee Road and a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the centerline
of Rosedale Highway;
THENCE (1) North 89° 08' 13" West along the south line of said Section 20, also
being a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the centerline of Rosedale Highway, a
distance of 2644.50 feet, more or less, to the south 1/4 corner of said Section 20,
and the southerly prolongation of the centerline of Main Plaza Drive;
THENCE (2) North 00° 27' 02" East along the centerline of Main Plaza Drive and
southerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 1239.21 feet to the intersection of the
centerline of Granite Falls Drive;
THENCE (3) South 89° 32' 58" East, along the centerline of Granite Falls Drive, a
distance of 494.27 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the north,
having a radius of 1000.00 feet, from which radial point bears North 00° 27' 02"
East;
THENCE (4) Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 11 ° 07' 38", an arc
distance of 194.21 feet;
THENCE (5) North 79° 19' 24" East, a distance of 672.97 feet, to the beginning of
a tangent curve concave to the south with a radius of 1000.00 feet, from which
radial point bears South 10° 40' 36" East;
THENCE (6) Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 24° 35' 53", an arc
distance of 429.32 feet;
THENCE (7) South 760 04' 43" East, a distance of 442.64 feet, to the beginning of
a tangent curve, concave to the north with radius of 1000.00 feet, from which radial
point bears North 13° 55' 17" East;
EXHIBIT "2-A"
1
THENCE (8) Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 18° 43' 11", an arc
distance of 326.72;
THENCE (9) North 85° 12' 06" East, a distance of 116.21 feet, to intersect the east
line of said Section 20;
THENCE (10) South 00° 26' 11" West along said east line, a distance of 1282.41
feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following parcel:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 20, being the intersection of
the centerline of Coffee Road and a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the
centerline of Rosedale Highway; thence North 00° 26' 11" East, along the centerline
of Coffee Road, a distance of 80 feet to intersect the north right-of-way line of
Rosedale Highway; thence North 89° 08' 13" west, along said north right-of-way
line, a distance of 1331.50 feet, to the southwest corner of Parcel C of Certificate
of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment No. 365, and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THENCE (1) Continuing along the north right-of-way line of Rosedale Highway
North 89° 08' 13" West, a distance of 435.00;
THENCE (2) North 00° 47' 47" East, a distance of 1177.40 feet;
THENCE (3) North 82° 25' 47" East, a distance of 327.20 feet;
THENCE (4) North 79° 26' 17" East, a distance of 223.59 feet;
THENCE (5) South 28° 20' 17" West, a distance of 233.40 feet;
THENCE (6) South 00° 47' 47" West, a distance of 1062.60 feet, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
S\PRO J'J~D\Trafsig\Legal\TS-2
2
MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-2
(Northwest Promenade)
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
GRANI1
~_ ROSEDALE HIGHWAY
8Y
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-2
(NW Promenade)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel shall be assessed a percentage of the total operating and maintenance cost*
proportional to the trips generated by that parcel, adjusted for prior year fund balance or
deficit.
The amount to be assessed to each parcel is calculated as follows:
(1)
Calculate the total number of trips generated by each building using the City
Average Daily Trips (ADT) rates.
(2) Add the total number of trips (1) of all buildings in each parcel.
(3) Add the total number of trips (2) of all buildings in all parcels.
(4)
Divide the total number of trips of each parcel (2) by the total number of trips in all
parcels (3). This is the proportionate shara of the total assessment for each
parcel.
(5)
Multiply the result of (4) times the total cost of the district for each parcel. This is
the amount to be assessed to each parcel.
* Since Rosedale Highway is a state highway, the state pays 2/3rds of the cost of the
signal and the district pays 1/3rd.
Assessment amounts will vary during the initial development of the shopping center. Since
only the developed parcels will generate traffic using the signalized intersection, those
parcels will be responsible for the entire cost.
S\P RO J\M D\Trafsig\Form ulas\TS-2
EXHIBIT "2-C"
EXHIBIT "2-D"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
TS-2 (NW PROMENADE)
Said assessment is made in accordance with the benefit formula attached hereto.
2001-2002
BUDGET
Gross Budget Amount Required
(City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance/(Deficit)
Less: City Contributions
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$866.00
$0.00
$866.00
S/PROJ ECTS\MAINDIST~TPJ~,FSIG\EXHIBITS/TS-2D01
EXR~i~irr "2-D"
EXHIBIT "2-E"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-2
(Northwest Promenade)
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
Assessor's Parcel No.
451-160-07-00-6
451-160-08-00-9
451-160-09-00-2
451-160-10-00-4
451-160-11-00-7
451-160-12-00-0
451-160-13-00-3
451~160-14-00-6
451 ~160-15-00-9
451~160-16-00-2
451-160-17-00-5
451-160-18-00-8
451-160-19-00-1
451-160-20-00-3
451-160-21-00-6
451-160-22-00-9
451-160-23-00-2
451-160-24-00-5
451-160-25-00-8
451-160-26-00-1
Total
Total
Assessment
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$26.42
$o.oo
$22.84
$o.oo
$0.00
$23.44
$421.76
$35.78
$8.92
$11.50
$27.10
$50.82
$9.08
$o.oo
$30.48
$197.86
$o.oo
$866.00
Date:
City Clerk and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
S:\PROJ\MD\TRAFSIG\Exhitits~TS2-E01 .wb3
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 28, T 29 S, R 27 E, M.D.B. & M., and more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 28, being the intersection of
the centerline of Coffee Road and a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the
centerline of Rosedale Highway, thence South 89° 48' 45" East, a distance of
249.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE (1) Continuing South 89° 46' 45" East, along said line 25 feet south of and
parallel to the centerline of Rosedale Highway, a distance of 908.40 feet;
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
(2) South 20° 45' 04" East, a distance of 129.92 feet;
(3) South 16° 57' 29" East, a distance of 75.87 feet;
(4) South 08° 38' 32" East, a distance of 49.08 feet;
(5) South 07° 43' 08" West, a distance of 197.04 feet;
(6) South 17° 52' 00" West, a distance of 163.41 feet;
(7) South 24° 05' 21" West, a distance of 370.19 feet;
(8) South 23° 36' 02" West, a distance of 361.47 feet;
(9) South 00° 39' 29" East, a distance of 58.80 feet;
(10) North 89° 47' 45" West, a distance of 265.43 feet;
(11) North 42° 54' 36" West, a distance of 230.52 feet;
(12) North 29° 30' 22" West, a distance of 261.30 feet;
(13) North 14° 22' 36" West, a distance of 219.70 feet;
EXHIBIT "3-A"
THENCE (14) North 00° 19' 42" East, a distance of 262.66 feet;
THENCE (15) North 01° 17' 00" East, a distance of 410.55 feet;
THENCE (16) North 22° 31' 23" West, a distance of 45.08 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
S\PROJ'~lD\Trafsig\]Legals\TS-3
2
MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-.5
(Rosedele, Jet Way)
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
ROSEDALE HIGHWAY
PARCEL
pARCEL 6
N
_ CALLOWAY CANAL
BY
EXHIBIT '~.5. B" 6
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-3
(Rosedale, Jet Way)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel shall be assessed a percentage of the total operating and maintenance cost*
proportional to the trips generated by that parcel, adjusted for prior year fund balance or
deficit.
The amount to be assessed to each parcel is calculated as follows:
Calculate the total number of trips generated by each building using the City
Average Daily Trips (ADT) rates.
(2) Add the total number of trips (1) of all buildings in each parcel.
(3) Add the total number of trips (2) of all buildings in all parcels.
(4)
Divide the total number of trips of each parcel (2) by the total number of trips in all
parcels (3). This is the proportionate share of the total assessment for each
parcel.
(5)
Multiply the result of (4) times the total cost of the district for each parcel. This is
the amount to be assessed to each parcel.
* Since Rosedale Highway is a state highway, the state pays 2/3rds of the cost of the
signal on Rosedale and the district pays 1/3rd. The district pays all of the cost of the signal
on Coffee Road.
At the beginning of the 1998-99 fiscal year none of the parcels were developed and the
costs were spread on a per acre basis. This year five of the parcels are developed and,
therefore, only those parcels will be assessed.
S\P ROJ\M D\Trafsig\Form ulas\TS-3
EXHIBIT "3-C"
EXHIBIT "3-D"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
TS-3 (ROSEDALE, JET WAY)
Said assessment is made in accordance with the benefit formula attached hereto,
2001-2002
BUDGET
Gross Budget Amount Required
(City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance/(Deficit)
Less: City Contributions
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$3,466.00
$o.oo
$o.oo
$3,466.00
S:/PROJECTS/MAIN DIST/TRAFS~G/EXHIB)TS\TS-3D01
¢~ EXHIBt~' "3-D"
EXHIBIT "3-E"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-3
(Rosedale, Jet Way)
FISCAL YEAR 2001 - 2002
Assessor's Parcel No.
368-060-66-00-1
368-060-67-00-4
368-060-68-00-7
368-060-69-00-0
368-060-70-00-2
368-060-71-00-5
368-060-72-00-8
368-060-73-00-1
368-060-74-00-4
Total
Assessment
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$248.32
$301.82
$830.28
$393.18
$1,692.40
$0.00
Total
Date:
$3,466.00
City Clerk and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
S:\PROJECTS/MAINDIST~TRAFSIG/EXHIBITS/TS-3E01
'~XHIBIT ~.5-E"
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Two parcels of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being portions of Section 36, T 29 S, R 26 E and Section 31, T 29 S, R 27 E, MD.B. & M.,
and more particularly described as follows:
Parcel 1: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 10263 recorded August 28, 1996 in book 48 of parcel
maps at page 60, in the office of the Kern County Recorder.
Excepting therefrom: The reservation for the proposed Kern River Freeway.
Parcel 2: Parcel 1 of Lot Line Adjustment and Certificate of Compliance No. 395 recorded
July 21, 1995 as document #0195086304 O.R.
EXHIBIT"4,A"
S\PRO J~lD\Trafsig\]Legals\TS-4
MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-z~
(CGIIowoy, Gleneagles)
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
i
PARCEL~MAP 10265
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-4
(Calloway, Gleneagles)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel shall be assessed a percentage of the total operating and maintenance cost,
adjusted for prior year fund balance or deficit, as calculated below:
Fifty percent (50%) of the total operating and maintenance cost of the district, adjusted for
prior year balance or deficit, shall be assessed to the parcels east of Calloway Drive
(Parcel Map 10406, Parcels 1-4) and fifty percent (50%) shall be assessed to the parcel
west of Calloway Drive (Parcel Map 10263, Parcel 1).
Parcels east of Calloway Drive, (Parcel Map 10406) shall be assessed as follows:
Parcel 1
Pamel 2
Pamel 3
Pamel 4
Total adjusted cost x 50% x 36.7%
Total adjusted cost x 50% x 24.6%
Total adjusted cost x 50% x 38.7%
No charge.
S\P ROJ\M D\Trafsig\Form ulas\TS-4
EXHIBIT "4-C"
EXHIBIT "4-D"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
TS-4 (CALLOWAY, GLENEAGLES)
Said assessment is made in accordance with the benefit formula attached hereto.
2001-2002
BUDGET
Gross Budget Amount Required
(City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance/(Deficit)
Less: City Contributions
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$2,600.00
$0.00
$o.oo
$2,600.00
S:\PROJECTS/MAINDIST~TRAFSIG/EXHIBITS/TS-4D01
EXHIBIT "4-E"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-4
(Calloway, Gleneagles)
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
Assessor's Parcel No.
Total
Assessment
409-260-08-00-9
500-020-40-00~7
500-020-41-00-0
500-020-42-00-3
$1,300.00
$477.10
$319.80
$503.10
Total
$2,600.00
Date:
City Clerk and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
S:/PROJECTS~MAINDIST~TP~,FSIG\EXHIBITS/TS-4E01
,_EXHIBIT ~-E"
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 20, T29 S, R27 E, M.D.B. & M., and more particularly described
as follows:
Beginning at the south quarter corner of said Section 20, being the intersection of
the centerline of Main Plaza Drive and a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the
centerline of Rosedale Highway;
THENCE (1) North 89° 08' 13" West along the south line of said Section 20, also
being a line 25 feet south of and parallel to the centerline of Rosedale Highway, a
distance of 1803.94 feet, more or less, to the southerly prolongation of the west line
of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 10726 and the east line of County Fire Station parcel 451-
020-01;
THENCE (2) North 00° 29' 49" East along said west and east lines and southerly
prolongation thereof, a distance of 230.00 feet to the northeast corner of said Fire
Station parcel;
THENCE (3) North 89° 08' 13" West, along the north line of said Fire Station parcel,
a distance of 150.30 feet;
THENCE (4) North 00° 29' 05" East, a distance of 1096.55 feet;
THENCE (5) South 89° 31' 49" East, a distance of 345.14 feet;
THENCE (6) South 84° 56' 52" East, a distance of 1612.82 feet, to intersect the
centerline of Main Plaza Drive;
THENCE (7) South 00° 26' 27" West, along said Centerline, a distance of 1239.19
feet, to the south quarter corner of said Section 20 and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT "5-A"
S:\Projects\MAI N DIST\TRAFSIG\Legals\TS-5.wpd
3_
MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR ADDITION OF TERRITORY
(TS-5,NW PROMINADE, PHASE 2/3) TO THE 1
CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE ISTRICT
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
NOT TO SCALE
I
ROSEDALE
BY
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TS-5
(NW Promenade, Phase 2)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BENEFIT FORMULA
Each parcel shall be assessed a percentage of the total operating and maintenance cost*
proportional to the trips generated by that parcel, adjusted for prior year fund balance or
deficit.
The amount to be assessed to each parcel is calculated as follows:
(1)
Calculate the total number of trips generated by each building using the City
Average Daily Trips (ADT) rates.
(2) Add the total number of trips (1) of all buildings in each parcel.
(3) Add the total number of trips (2) of all buildings in all parcels.
(4)
Divide the total number of trips of each parcel (2) by the total number of trips in all
parcels (3). This is the proportionate share of the total assessment for each
parcel.
(5)
Multiply the result of (4) times the total cost of the district for each parcel. This is
the amount to be assessed to each parcel.
* Since Rosedale Highway is a state highway, the state pays 2/3rds of the cost of the
signal operation and maintenance costs and the district pays 1/3rd.
Assessment amounts could vary substantially during the initial development of the
shopping center. Since only the developed pamels will generate traffic using the signalized
intersection, those parcels will be responsible for the entire cost. The maximum yearly
assessment for all property within Maintenance District No. TS-5 (NW Promenade, Phase
2) shall not exceed $3,000. None of the parcels will be assessed in 2001-2002 since the
signals were not in operation at the beginning of the fiscal year. Any costs incurred in the
2001-2002 fiscal year will be carried over and added to the 2002-2003 costs.
S:\PROJECTS\MAI N DIST\TRAFSIG\Form ulas\TS-5.wpd
EXHIBIT "5-D"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
TS-5 (NW PROMENADE, PHASE 2)
Said assessment is made in accordance with the benefit formula attached hereto.
2001-2002
BUDGET
Gross Budget Amount Required
(City Staff Services or Contract, Supplies, Materials and Utilities)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance/(Deficit)
Less: City Contributions
NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
S:\PRO J ECTS\MAIN DIST~TRAF SIG\EX HIBITS\TS- Sd01
EXHIBIT "5-E"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. TS-5
(NW Promenade, Phase 2)
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
Assessor's Pamel No.
451-020-04-00-1
451-020~05-00-4
451-020-06-00-7
451-020-07-00-0
451-020-08-00-3
451-020-09-00-6
451-020-10-00-8
451-020-11-00-1
451-020-12-00-4
451-020-13-00-7
451-020-14-00-0
451-020-15-00-3
451-020-16-00-6
451-020-17-00-9
451-020-18-00-2
451-020-19-00-5
451-020-20-00-7
451-020-21-00-0
451-020-22-00-3
451-020-23-00-6
Total
Assessment
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
County of Kern )
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield;
and that on the 17th day of May ,2001 she posted on the Bulletin
Board at City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Resolution of
Intention No. 1243 _passed by the Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the
16th day of May 2001, and entitled:
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO 1243 PRELIMINARILY
ADOPTING, CONFIRMING AND APPROVING PUBLIC
WORKS DIRECTOR'S REPORT FORTHE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND THE 2001-2002 BUDGETS;
SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS ON
THE AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED
THROUGHOUT EACH OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS. (WARD 4)
Isl PAMELA A. McCARTHY
City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield
'De~)uty City Clerk
S:\Document\FORMS~AOP.ROI.w~d
May 17, 2001