Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 117-08RESOLUTION NO. ~ 1 7 - ~ 8 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AS ANNEXATION NO. 568 LOCATED SOUTH OF PANAMA LAND, EAST OF NORD AVENUE. (WARD 5) WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located on the south side of Panama Lane, east of Nord Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the territory upon annexation; and WHEREAS, the property owner of the territory has consented to annexation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B" for the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein, located on the south side of Panama Lane, east of Nord Avenue. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 5. That for this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was adopted by the City Council and an environmental document forthe annexation is determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal. o``gAKF9~ '` m ~ r U O ORIGINAL 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act have been duly followed. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to have 100% of property owners consenting to annexation. 9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary. 10. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the Cortese- Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. 11. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Pamela A. McCarthy City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Virginia Gennaro City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 12. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303, Bakersfield, California 93309. ------- -000-------- 2 ~gRKF9 O ~'-~ > m ~ r v O ORIGINAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on JUL 3 d 2008 , by the following vote: YES:' COUNCILMEMBER: CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR COUCH, HA SN ON, SULLIVAN, SCRIV EN R COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: bl ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: APPROVED JUL 3 0 2008 MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By: EXHIBITS: A -Legal Description B -Map C -Plan for Services S:\Annexation\Res of Applic\ROA 08\ROA 568.doc PAMELA A. McCARTHY, C CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield o~~PKF9J'-c~ 3 ~ o U ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A" PANAMA LANE N0.21 ANNEXATION N0.568 TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Being a portion of West Half of Section 28, Township 30 South, Range 26 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, in the County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 28 as shown in Kern County Surveyor's Field Book No. 1048-pg 66 on file in the Kem County Surveyor's Office, also being a point on the centerline of Panama Lane; thence South 01° 03'25" West 30.00 feet along the west line of Section 28 to a point in the south right of way line of Panama Lane, said point being the True Point of Beginning, Thence (1) Along the south right of way line of said Panama Lane South 89 degrees 25 minutes 43.5 seconds East a distance of 2,640.14 feet to a point in the North-South mid-section line of Section 28 ,said point being 30.00 feet south of the North Quarter Comer of said Section 28; Thence (2) Along the North-South mid-section line South 01 degrees 02 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 2611.60 feet to the center of said Section 28; Thence (3) Along the East-West mid-section line North 89 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds West a distance of 660.19 feet; Thence (4) South 01 degrees 02 minutes 48 seconds West a distance of 660.29 feet; Thence (5) North 89 degrees 26 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 660.23 feet; Thence (6) South 01 degrees 03 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 660.33 feet; Thence (7) North 89 degrees 27 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 660.27 feet; Thence (8) South 01 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 660.36 feet; Thence (9) North 89 degrees 27 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 660.31 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 28; Thence (10) North 01 degrees 03 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 1981.20 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 28; Thence (11) Continuing along said West line North 01 degrees 03 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 2612.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 218.38 Ac. More or less. END OF DESCRIPTION CHE~CKE©~+ KERN CrDUhI'Tl' SUFi1lE~~ ~fiS ~a~e r~/~ /7. red by ~gAKF9 o 't'.a ~- rn r v o ORIGINAL r~sjr~~~7 00 `p ^{ N t/y O z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ o~--++o l~ z o ~ a ~ ~ M 00 z N a ~~~~7 ~~ a ~a a ~~ v e h ,~ .~ N ~ y~ ~ 8 ~~ffi ~ ~~ "~~ ~ h ~~ 0 ~ ~ < ~ ~ a ~ ~ y ~ R ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ v ~ o m a d d Gr ~S' Y/! MN /o /Ir7 lrp3 - (i! 0 0 s s. r ~~ Y! '_° ~~ ~ o s~° H ~ o H ~ ~ K' ~ Z cb ,~ ~ W 8b z ~~ © ~i 3 ~ a .q¢ y, ~ ~ ~ ~~` N~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I n ~~ ~~ ,~ : r.~ 62 M ,YirO.lO S a : r `~ ~. h O n yp O O ~ (DI ~ ~ 1 / F ~ ( ~ a ~ n b .( M .a{!titlO S ~# a d. °~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ a T ~ Z (~ ' ~+ S 9r1 l99 M ,rl,tQ lO S i ~ b 1 ~ (i!) ~ ,rrrr/yr s (o!J ,orl~! 2 ,N, ~ • N O or s /o w~ !qw ffi ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ¢ J ~ n w / / 1 ~ T /~ V7AA m r O N ZZ Z W Q~~ X~ WQ ZZ ~a W V ,W/~ w N w U Z H m _ ~ W a 0 m W Q ~ ® • ~ ~' ~_ W W W W Z W N W ~ W ~"' W W W W N O ~ ~ W W I W J ~ ~ ` Q ~ ~ 2 C7 0 W C7 0 C3 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q W d d ~ ~ ~ J J J J ~ J W > a N J W Q ~ J W Q J Q ~ W W W W W W . Q Q Q Z >• ~ ~Z ~ [[Z (r ~ LL LL ti. ~ W z W W z W Q W z W WQ zz W WW z> W ~ a WW z> W WW z>> W z W z Q w Q w Q w C ._ (.7 C7 ~'Z C7 ~ C7lL. W C7~[ } m W C'31r W~J C72 W C'3 W C3 ~ ~ » y > .~ m w o ' N c"r~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ Y Z LL ~ m } ~ w U ~d U U U U U U U U U U U J fiQ . -" a ~ 0 w a C ~ w ' Y 2 Y ~ } ~ LL ~ ~ ~ W ~ m » ~ > O > W > > ~ ~ 0 0 0 = 0 O O 0 ~ Q U U U lA U U U U U U d ~ ~ o w ~ ~ c 2 c ~ + ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ m ~ c cn ~ n. ~ ~ 3 a m w ~ cA U° ~ ~ 3 v~ ~ w ~i c s . ~ r U .G x W i x~ W z z 'z 0 z o~gAKF ~ s ~' m ~' r v o ORIGfNAL o ,. ~ o j ~ ~ c`o c ~ m Vl C ~~ Q -C= a~ ++ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ 0 ~ o r m .~ •x .~ ii o 3 o m ;~ ° ~i o° `y,' m ~~ c v m c ~' ~ C Q1 ~~ ~ a V N m E~ N U ~ ~ 7 p ~~ C ~' ~ m y E ~ e0 O U ~ ~ +•~ ~ ~ u! ~ ~ ~ c •v U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o ~ 3 3 ~ In to •' ,U7 G ~ Q. E ~ ~j ~ Y p ~' d .~ $'a ~ ~ a LL yj C - ~ C U ~ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ _ c~ _m a~ c~ ~ Eu. e~ z a E- ~ ~ i-- ~ t~ ¢ ¢ U .3 p~ O ~ui C~ V 'p ~ N ~ ~, m ''~ E z~~wM ~'a e° ~nU ~ a~ Z m c 3 ~ ~ ~i m ~ ? o~~Z ~~ cti .. ~ c c z ° ~ m $ ~ ~ c ~ li E ~ ~ ~ ~ a U E c ~' 3 0 _~ ~_ ~ ~ w z ~n ~ N c m m ~ w H ~c a? `al~ ~i ~o oft 3 ~ =~Q.~ c o Q- E~ z ~ ~~~ ~ ~•~ ~ 3 m ~' a~ ~ '~ .. ~ c ~~ ~• c c ~ c .+ m ++ ~ ~~~~ r Y ~ ~~ ~U ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ O ,C ~ X1.0 ~ C = ~ ~ ~ E ~ .a ,~ f/J m ~ '~~ ~' y t ~,Q+ p~ U ~ C o ~:~:. asjX y1a~~3 ~' E 7~~,~n V QyC t°/fo o ~'~ S L ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 a~ V d ~ o•~ m a ~ ca c ~ ~ - ~ c ~~~•~ I Y O ~ ~ ~~ ~ m~ 3 m ~ .Q = ~ ~j ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~, m N C •~ = C 3 o ,~ ~ ,,, o - ~ ~ ~ ro ~ v_, ~ ~3 0 ZZ i~ 3 ° ~ ~ ~oc~' ~ d c~~~ ~~ ~ vE ~ ~ ~ V+~ ~ W c ~U ~ ~ :~ N o m ~ o W~j F o > 2 n. chi wrm ~ ~ H~ ~~~~ ~~ Sao lid #.. $ d. ~A a'S ~ao•~' tl~ ~ ~U r V W i zw 'z ¢~ w 6 vi N o~~AK~9J' "^ U O ORIGINAL t ~ What effects, 'rf any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etcj? The annexation of this territory will have minimal effect on the near term level or c nab~ldy of the City to provide needed services U n future development additional police officers would ossibly be reoui to maintam the current level of ci service The tanned develocment mCiudrna public stn3ets or murlu~innl fnn~l~+~e~ ,....~.... .~_ .__._._ _ ... 2. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.j: If so, would city/district or developer be responsible for financing? ty,Q, if any additional development occurs the developer provides and pav5 for major facilities and dedicates mem to the City No upgradino or chanae in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation. 3. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. County zoned the territory A LAflriculture). 4. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.j. The Citv has adopted Ordinance No 4502 cnA-+~ina the zoning A (Agriculture) to R 1 (One Family Dwellmv) 5. List cityldistrict services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should bB 8bie to rwennnrl in s .v..,.e s:.....~.....___ __ .~ _ _ _ _ City oovemment also provides increased political representation for the -esidentsrwithin the coroorate Ilmlts - 6. 7 8. 9. Please provide the following information relative to cityidistrlct and county taxes: LISt eXlSting tax rate(s) in area. T~ existlno tax rate In iha aron rn~, _rv» i e.,~ Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?: ff so, explain. No. the tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00? The property rate will not Increase due to annexation and re ass aAmant will not occur due to annexatbn. Is the proposed area subject to a Williamson Act Contract? No. the existing annexation area is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract S:\ANNEXA'i'ION\ANNEX 568\Exhibit C1.DOC 3 ~~AKF9 O J'-c~ ~ rn r U O ORIGINAL