HomeMy WebLinkAbout01216
'j":
,; ?" I;'
, :/
t
'- ~'
~
~. ' APPLICATION FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
/,
Ii-fD
~~q3
\/ I ((0
TO THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA:
Pursuant to.the provisions of Ordinance No. 3140 New Series of the City of
Bakersfield, the undersigned applies for a permit to place, erect and/or maintain
an encroac~ment.on public property or right df way as therein defined. ~ ~ A
" "Ht\("'t l2- ;;''' .. - <6 '"JTO
The name and address of applicant is: ~ Et:;uJt\flC& 8 -,, .- 75110
4641 CJOLUv\1.&J.s s-r ~ 4A e~r:.bYK.u:J CA '1-::200
the encroachment for which this application is made
wALL AL()/l.J6 II-IE ~l)EL<..IAU(
c.. u 4rLGt:'rt; AJf.: tJUE A.N!)
'\.
The location of the proposed encroachment is: 5305 !1/1IJdlfllJJf// 1JJ2/t/E
tA4Ml:l./J {III 9J~
Applicant agrees that if this application is granted, applicant will indemnify,
defend and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its agents, officers and
employees against and from all damages, judgments, claims, demands, expenses,
costs and expenditures, and against all loss or liability which the City of
Bakersfield or such officers, agents or employees may suffer, or which may be
recoverable from, or obtainable against the City of Bakersfield or such officers,
agents or employees, proximately caused by, growing out of or in any way
connected with the placing, erection or maintenance of said encroachment, the
applicant further agrees to maintain the aforesaid encroachment during the life
of the said encroachment or until such time that this permit is revoked.
Applicant further agrees that upon the expiration of the permit for which this'
application is made, if granted, or upon the revocation thereof by the City
Engineer, applicant will at his own cost and expense remove the same from the
public property or right of way where the same is located, and restore said
public property or right of way to the condition as nearly may be in which it was
before the placing, erection, maint nance or lexistence of said encroachment.
'ft;j(} ~~ tJtl./1Ue /{
Signature of Applicant (Owner or Representative)
Date:
12.-IO...q3
PERMIT
-'
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE MADE AN INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTS
STATED IN THE FOREGOING APPLICATION AND FIND THAT THE MAINTENANCE OF
SAID ENCROACHMENT (1) WILL (NOT) SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH THE USE
OF THE PUBLIC PLACE WHERE THE SAME IS TO BE LOCATED ~D (2) WILL
" ,.: t~(NOT) CONSTITUT~ A HAZARD TO PERSONS USING SAID PUBLIC PLACE; SAID
Date~~~7~!,t:HEREFORE (G~E:) (=~~~~~
t, Signature of City Engineer ,~
~~\j
I
,~
No. 1216
Ol1094/JRL
Distribution: Original - Applicant
Goldenrod - City Clerk
Yellow - Public Works;.020 014-520M
125.00 12/l0/r.':'
REV6/90
\
\
:d
-~ I
-
~
'ii
,,--
.....---
~
~
~ ~ RGf R
~
AVENUE
.'
WALJ.
OC~
6"f3L , .
,
, ,
~ ~-"
,"',
. .
zl . ;'., '_._ ~:.
;I} .: '-' ';. " c~:::;;;~~:
.. ~ ;<...'
..;., l+<;. ' ':
'. 't
~ "'_ ': '. ":,1
PAT' 0
f-/olJsg(l(ltA '"
c: .(J/t~
~/p6 / n
r,
i'~l;~"'" ":~':~~,~! '~~t:~\ '~ ,\
F", FRONT' YARD .' ~"..,", "
'" : :':~i .' ;\'\' ;"~:'J~i.;'..:1.'.. i....Ji.
' .:' :' '~~,~I , . ..~~:- :~ l' \~:'.~
ht. '>';;,$"1
~. ,.~
~ . ,~.
/rl ~,~ ":I\"'lt
f ';., , ~.
. . Ii ~ . t
/f~ ,\? , 't~
~;
,
i"
I j
I I
I I
I I
\
i
! ~ ~Aa.Qs
4B4t Ca..c.JW\6;S ~T ~A
j' ~\9l.<)I1~ QA q~5ot,
871 -IS 110 _
~ ~2.9~COS4'O
i
. SIDEWA&K
PANORAMA DRIVE
EXHIBIT A
i
. i
i
I
N
: I
\" '
"
CITY OF GAKERSrIELD
DEPARTIIENT OF PUBLIC \'laRKS
To \'lhom I t ~lay Concern:
We, the undersigned, have no objection to the construction of a
fence or wall behind the sidewalk on:
Cw A~E.e A \J~
, (Street)
By DOLJq E.1)wAQD~
(Owner r s Name)
of S3c>S ~UO e.AvV\A Orl
(Address)
Phone
87 r - 751 <0
:J
SIG~ED:
1) NA.-tE: --'P~:r.~
ADDRESS: .fZ4?og Al,....tJBL~T,
2) NAME: (P~T l~
ADDRESS: Uo.g., ~ S-7.
3) NA1-1E: {duu () ...5co# I t?-;l1~r~1
jft'q hlCt.M.-ot/ 1-I-i'J It Sc.:hP-o (
AODREs-S: ~'J~~~~!~~~-=-.3d , _
//- /8- q3
DATE:
DATE:
I }.--16 -93
DATE:
;0/9/1'3
.
I,,;
<; 5305 fJtlNchJlIA M.
z
-
Ave
J./16t1U1N[) J.//6J1 .jt!JIotJl.
~
MEMORANDUM
December 30, 1993
TO:
Ted Wright, Engineer III
FROM:
Jim Eggert, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:
Encroachment permit -- 5305 Panorama Drive
With respect to your review of an encroachment permit for a rear yard masonry wall in the
Charger Avenue right-of-way at the above mentioned address, your department noted that a
condition of approval in the parcel map (PM 9679) that created this lot, stated that any fence or
wall along Charger would be required to gain approval of a modification from the Board of
Zoning Adjustment. After reviewing this issue further based on standards in the Zoning
Ordinance for constructing fences and walls (Section 17.08.180), the original interpretation of the
ordinance in the staff report and subsequent condition was in error. A modification will not be
required provided the wall does not exceed a height of six feet.
I trust this clarifies your review of this permit. Please feel free to contact me if there are any
further questions or concerns regarding this matter.
-~~:--:.~_....'._i.._ _.-
.. ._--..:- -----~ =-:: ~.-::..:;.~;:.~--- -.--..
,;
/It
~ eowAt'bZ>
4841 (!oLUM(SVS Sf. :4.4-4
~~t:LO ~4 Or~~of-
811- 7~ ltc ~~ S2.C\-e.9tO
..'
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM .7.3
'16
~
~ Z.
;#
Planning Commission
Meeting of September 19, 1991
PROJECT NO.: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9679
(Application Deemed Complete: August 19, 1991)
ENGINEER:
SUBDrv:rDBR:
Cuesta Engineering
5055 California Avenue
Bakersfield, Ca 93309
Paul Andre
2608 Alder Street
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
LOCATION OF PROJECT:
The south side of Panorama Drive at Charger Avenue.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A proposed tentative parcel map for single family residential
purposes containing 3 lots on .86 acres, zoned R-l (One Family
Dwelling) .
ENVIRONMENTAL SJs-J.-J:J.I{G:
The project site abuts a collector (Panorama Drive) and is depicted
Low Density Residential on the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan.
The site is surrounded by R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zoning on all
sides, and single family residential development on all sides
except the south and east which is a high school.
PROJECT I ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing a three lot. parcel map on .8'6 acres on
a site that has been graded from past developments. The site is
unusual in that it is triangular and fronts on a collector with a
local street to the rear. It is presently graded approximately
level from the rear (Charger Avenue). At a point about 20 feet
from Panorama Drive it slopes downward to Panorama Drive at a slope
of approximately 3:1. At the eastern point of the site there is a
retaining wall which separates Panorama Drive from Charger Avenue.
The side lot lines are perpendicular to Panorama Drive and are at
about a 70 degree angle to Charger Avenue.
The proposed lot sizes consist of two lots of approximately 1/4
acre and one lot of .4 acres. The large lot is triangular with a
significant unbuildable area toward the. eastern tip of the
triangle.
r
Staff Report, PC, 9/19/91
Tentative Parcel MaD 9679
Page 2
Development of the parcel map' as proposed would create some unique
characteristics that will negatively affect the desirability and
marketabili ty of the proposed lots. These characteristics include
unusual lot shape, double frontage lots, the proximity to the high
school and the slope along Panorama Drive. Neighbors across
Panorama Drive expressed a concern regarding the landscaping of the
properties. Front yard landscaping is the responsibility and
choice of the property owner.
Staff has identified a potential traffic hazard if vehicular access
is allowed off of Panorama Drive, and recommends a waiver of
vehicular access along Panorama Drive. Staff also recommends a 25
foot building setback be required from both Charger Avenue and
Panorama Drive. Homes west of the proposed tract front on both
Charger Avenue and Panorama Drive.
~~~4"~.ppli~ant~,hasl~ SUbmitted-'a 'grading' plan that" designates, a'.-' six'
foot'~h1:gli,': fence' . along the, sidewalk on the, north side of:' Charger'
.Ayenue-..,.,', Said. fence is, subj ect~ to'.' the- approva,L,' of" the' Board- .of!
ZOning~Ad~us,tment::,and'issuance"Of- an"Encroachment"-Permtt..;, ::... S t"a f'f:::., is '
~,.... .
~f~,-~, .",t,he~opi~ion~'\,that~,. a - ~ix~~ f oot":hiqh. ..fence, 'behind.:' the::' sidewalk~-"'isJ
appt~,pr;1ate",";"bec'ause'" it""wi'11. provide. privacy' and'; secur1tyf.t'ci'cutheJ
'X;~~9~~;.th_propertles'r -and:~' i t'\ is- Tlkely" that; a landscape:-'-'str1p
'pJ;a~ed~;.between'!~the"':s idewalk\ and:"'a::, fence'" wi 11.' be,:,,"neglected' and" has
the....'potentia-.l., ,to'~' becomer an':: eyesore~i';,/
. , -
. ~ -"
Attached are proposed conditions of approvaL referenced. as
Exhibit "A". A Negative Declaration was advertised regarding
this project on August 26, 1991.
PUBLIC CONTACT:
Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission of the
City of Bakersfield has been advertised in the newspaper and
posted on'!the bulletin board of the Bakersfield City Planning
Department. All property owners within 300 feet of the project
site have been notified about the hearing and the proposed
tentative tract.
FINDINGS:
1. All required pUblic notices have been given.
2. The provisions of CEQA have been followed.
3. The project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of CEQA in accordance with Section 15315 (Class 15 Minor
Land Division).
4 . Urban serVices
dav&i.opment.
are
available
for the proposed
t- .. r
"
Staff Report, PC, 9/19/91
Page 3
Tentative Parcel Mac 9679
5. The proposed Tract, together with the provisions for its
design and improvement, is consistent with the General
Plan. (Required by Government Code 66473.5)
6. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed (as conditioned).
7. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development proposed (as conditioned).
8. The design of the Tract or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat.
9. The design of the Tract for the type of improvements is
not likely to cause serious health problems.
10. The design of the Tract or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through or use of, property ~ithin the
proposed tract.
11. The design of the Tract provides, to the extent feasible,
for the future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the Tract. (Section 66473.1 of the
Subdivision Map Act)
12. Topographical conditions permit no other reasonable form
of platting.
RECOMMENDED ACTrON:
Motion to APPROVE and ADOPT the Negative Declaration, to make
all findings set forth in the staff report, and to APPROVE Proposed
Tentative' !Parcel Map 9679 subject to the conditions outlined in the
attached Exhibit "A."
- - -- - - - .__.. '. .----.- - - ..- ._~---_.-
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD STAFF REPORT
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION S ~. I , r I 7' C, /
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9679 DATE: Septe.ber 12, 1991
THE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS 8E INCORPORATED INTO THE APPROVAL OF THIS
MAP.
PUBLIC WORKS
I. DRAINAGE
Drainage from this subdivision shall be disposed of in a manner approved by the
City Engineer.
II.
SEWERS
A.
8.
-
Sewer service is required for each parcel in the subdivision, and it is
availabla to the subdivision in Charger Avenue westerly of the subdivision.
The subdivider shall extend the line fro. its existing terminus to the site
to serve each parcel in the subdivision or in Panoraaa Avenue if unfeasable
to serve the lots from Charger Avenue facility.
II 1. FEES-
Prior to issuance of a building permit, a sewer connection fee shall be paid. The
fee will be based upon the current adopted charges at the time of issuance of the
permit.
IV. STREET LIGHTS -
A. The Subdivider is required to install one 5,800 lumen high pressure sodium
vapor street light to be located as shown on the map. Installation shall
include but not necessarily be limited to furnishing and installing the
street light poles and all necessary conduits, wires, luminaires, and splice
boxes.
8. If electrical service points aren I t available to be shown on street
iaprove..nt plans, then they shall be shown on utility composite plans to
be tiled with-the City Engineer prior to acceptance of improve.ents.
C. To avoid possible conflicts at the installation stage, the subdivider shall
consult with the utility co.panies to ensure there is sufficient clearance
between the street light foundations and all utility lines.
V. STREET DEDICATIONS AND/OR EASEMENTS _
A. A .siver-of direct street access rights fro. each parcel to Panorama Drive
shall be required. . .
8. Type & location of centralized mail delivery units, the location to =be
approved by the Traffic AuthoritYl shall be determined in consultation with
the Postal Service. If the Posta Service and the Subdivider agree special
ease.ents are required, then said special easements shall be shown on the
Parcel Map.
VI. REFUSE-
A. The type and location of refuse facilities are to be determined in
consultation with the City Sanitation Division.
VII. UTILITIES-
A. Water, Gas, Electrical, Telephone, and Cable TV service shall be provided
to each parcel and in accordance with Section 16.32.080 0.5 & 6 of the City
Municipal Code.
8. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the subdivider shall ensure that
eactt- cab.la,.. TV cOtlpafly- providea- notice to the. City Engineer of its intention
t~ occupy. th. utUity trench.
0__..._", "'............. '7' .."""""" "..'"
. ,
Exhibi t " A"
Public Works
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
Tentative Parcel Map 9679
paqe 2 of ..!i..
STREET PAVING. CURBS. GUTTERS. AND SIDEWALKS -
The subdivider shall construct 4.5' wide sidewalk on Charger Avenue prior
to occupancy and 5.5' wide sidewalk to City standards on Panorama Drive
prior to recordation for the full frontage of the subdivision (to tie into
the existing sidewalk easterly).
TRAFFIC -
A. Vehicular access to each parcel shall be froll Charger Avenue.
S. 'NO PARKING" signs on Panorama Drive shall be removed prior to
occupancy on first parcel.
STREET NAME AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS -
MISCELLANEOUS -
A. The map shall be revised to include the entire property within the
subdivision boundary. It appears there is sliver of land between the
Panora.a Drive right of way and Kern High School District Property which is
part of the property being'subdivided.
S. No occupancy on any parcel will be permitted until all required improvements
have been completed by the subdivider and accepted or approved by the City.
C. Prior to recordation of a Final Map, all improvement plans, including those
for the sewer extension and any required walls, landscaping, and irrigation,
shall be approved by the City Eng1neer.
D. Construction plans for walls shall be an independent set of plans.
E. Prior to a Notice of Co.pletion being filed by the City for the required
improve.ents,
1. Certif1cates of Compliance from the manufacturer of the product shall
be submitted on all materials used in the project, including but not
lillited to manholes, frames and covers, pipe, poles, pull boxes,
concrete.
2. the street light shall be energized and fully operational, and all
coats, including any start-up costs required by the utility company,
shall be borne by the subdivider.
3. all required monuments shall be in place and notice shall be given in
accordance with Section 66497 of the Subdivision Map Act.
4. lIonu.ent elevation data shall be provided to the City Engineer as
required by Section 16.32.100 B. 1 of the Municipal Code.
s. Record Drawings of the improvements, signed by a Registered Civil
Engineer, shall be provided to the City Engineer.
6. a utility co.posite plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer.
7. warranty security as required shall be posted.
F. In accordance with Section 66436 (c) (1) of the Subdivision Map Act, any
public entity or public utility owning rights-of-way, easements, or other
interests Wh1Ch cannot ripen into fee must be advised by certified mail of
the division.of property. The Advisory Agency will require a letter from
these parties stating that the development will not unreasonably interfere
with the free and complete exercise of the right-of-way or easement within
tHe boundaries of this development.
dO:.: \~79d,.,.1t 842
3 1/2' d1". . IUDd1Y1.ion. 11
P,"",OlIre<t 001:(1""" 7 1 OQ1 U,.,
. ....- ..,....--..-'~.._'H~'_'........--.__~~____~'"~..._........_.........._..___.._ p_'___ '- ~.. . _ ~__.....~_.___._
\.
Staff Report
Tent. Tr./P.M. 9679
Page ?, of c:s
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1. A Preliminary Soils Report and Grading Plan shall be
subaitted and approved prior to the filing of the Final
Map.
2.A Pinal Soils Report will be required prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
3. Occupancy will not be permitted on any lot until all
required improvements have been accepted by the City of
Bakersfield.
4. An Acoustical Consultant shall design the structures within
the project to mitigate noise exposures of 60db or greater
in accordance with the CNEL Contours and Title 24 of the
California Administrative Code.
~~
.- - - _. . -.- - -- - -- - - - - .
- - ~ -. - - - - - - --..... ----.. .. - -- - - - - -
-
. . - ~ - - . - - . - -, _.. .
" STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 9679
Page~of-2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. FIRE PROTECIlON WATER SUPPLY
BAKERSFIELD FlREDEP ARTMENT
By: Greg Yates, Planning Technician
September 6, 1991
No Fire Hydrants will be required.
Water mains are to meet 1.5.0. and Gty requirements with dead end mains no less
than 8 inches diameter in size. .
Based upon available information fire flow requirement may be 1000 gallons per
minute.
Pursuant to Sections 10.301c and 10.301d of the Uniform Fire Code, water mains
and fire hydrants to be installed by developer shall be completed, tested and
accepted prior to building construction. All hydrants shall be kept in service and
macfe accessable to the fire department apparatus by roadways meeting the
requirements of Section 10.207.
Under resolution No. 68.78 and Munidple Code Sections 16.32.070(A) and
16.32.070(8): Effective July 1, 1978, all subdividers. and all persons otherwise to
purchase necessary nuts, bolts & gaskets, from the City of Bakersfield and install all
hydrants no more than 6 inches from permanent line and grade and pay the total
cost thereof.
2. All streets and access roads to and around any building under construction must be
at least 20 ft. in width and graded to prevent ponding at all times.
Barricades must be placed where ditches and I or barriers exist in roadways.
Emergency vehicle access must be reliable at all times.
Tentative Parcel Map 9679 - Exhibit A
Page .2 of 5...
PLANHIHG DEPARTMENT
1) Easements for Public Utilities shall be determined, by the
developer, tbJ:ouqh consultation with.. the . public utility company.
An approved p1an for utility easements shall be required prior
to recorrb:t"ion: of the. finaL map. .
2) Pursuant to the authority of, section 66474.9 of the
California. Government Code approval of this map is conditioned
upon the subdivider defending, indemnifying and hOlding harmless
the City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim,
action or processing. against the City, its agents, officers
and/or' ~'p. to. set. ~8~d@,. void-or annuL an approval
concerni.nq.,;. t-hi s::: subcl.i.visicn.-,... if such.- action isbrouqht within the
time peri.o&::prcvided:for in:.sect:i.oIL66499.37 of the California.
Government. COde. The City shall.. promptly notify the subdivider of
any such claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fUlly in
such defense.
3) A habitat conservation plan: interim mitigation fee shal~ be
paid prior to issuance of- a...bui lding.perndt. The fee will be
based on the adopted charges- at- the. time of issuance of the
building pe1:mi t or payment. of.. fee before issuance of the building
permit. The:..current fee is $'680.00 per gross acre.
In addition, the applicant shall consult the attached
advisory notice prepared. by the U. S. Department of the
Interior, ~:and Wildlife s~ice with regard to potential
impacts on:.tbe:~ 5aD;.. Joaquin_ K.1.t: ~ox-_
In:, the: event that a }1~hi 'h:\'t: conservation. plan is adopted.
prior to deveropment, all development. shall comply with the
adopted habitat conservation plan, inclUding any fees assessed
therewi~, unless the interim. fee has been paid for said
development prior to the adoption or a habitat conservation
plan.
4) Subdivider shall conf01:Il1 to Chapter 16.20.040 of the
Subdivisionordi~ance relating to Obtqining mineral rights owners
signatures.. prior' to recordation: or-the final map.
5) Prior to. recordation or a Final Map, the Subdivider shall
pay park. in-lieu fees at a rate or 2.5 useable acres per 1,000
population.
6) Panorama Drive shall be the front property line for purposes
of building setbacks.. There shalL be no building within 25 feet
of the Ch.a.J:ge.r Avenue . right-or~ay- l..ine.
#".......~~":"~~:-..:-:~ ,",'
Advisory Notice
Page 1 of 2
ADVISORY NOTICE
.The San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macro tis mutica), a federally-listed
endangered species, exists throughout the Bakersfield metropolitan
area. Kit foxes excavate dens for shel.ter, to raise pups, and to
escape from predators such as coyotes. Denning sites may occur on
vacan~ lots in the Bakersfield area where development is planned.
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
prohibits the "takell of federally listed endangered and threatened
species. As defined under the Act, take means "to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or the
attempt to engage in any such conduct." "Incidental take" (defined
as take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying
out of an otherwise lawful activity) may be authorized by obtaining
an "incidental take permit" pursuant to Section 10(al of the Act.
The C1 ty of Bakersfield and County of Kern are currently developing a
=egional conservation plan that will balance future urban growth with
the conservation of the San Joaquin kit fox and- other sensitive
plants and ~nim~ls. Once approved, this conservation plan will
fulfill the primary requirement for Obtaining a Section lOCal permit
from the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service to allow incidental take of
the kit fox and other species during development activities.
However, while this plan is being developed.., and. until the Section
lO(a) permit is issued, specific measures must be implemented to
prevent Unauthorized incidental take of San Joaquin kit foxes and to
offset any loss of kit fox habitat resultinq fram ongoing
construction actions. To comply with these measures, all persons and
companies pl~nning to engage in construction or other activities that
may impact San Joaquin kit foxes or their habitats within the
prescribed conservation plan boundaries are required to undertake the
following specific measures for the kit fox:
1) Prior to ground disturbance, biOlogical surveys for kit foxes
and their dens that conform to U. S. Fish and... Wil~e Service
minimum survey recommendations shall be conducted by a qua.l.ified
wildlife biOlogist. A partial. list of biOlogists and COnsulting
firms that are qua.l.ified to conduct such surveys is attached for
your convenience. Persons requiring further information on'
minimum survey recommendations should contact Bill Leh~~n of the
Service's Sacramento Field Office at (916) 978-4866.
2) All known and potential San Joaquin kit fox dens that will be
unavoidably destroyed by project actions shal~ be carefu1ly
excavated by or under the direct supervision of a qualified
wildllie biOlogist. Dens shall be completely excavated and
subsequently back-filled and compacted to prevent later use by
kit foxes prior to onset of project construction. Monitoring of
dens pursuant to Service recommendations shall be conducted prior
to excavation to ensure that dens are not occupied by kit fexes
when excavated. If a kit fox is inadvertently found ii1s.ide a den
during excavationr the. an;m~l (s) s~ be allowed to escape.
= --~-====--:==-~-"''-''=--_.=''~.':'~'''=''''''''';-_'''_".-_,~ - -.. - -
--- - - -
~. __ _ - _ ____________b__
. ._~_.. '_h_ _ _4'. _...~____._._.._.:._..7._:.::.~..:.:::__==:::_:~.:.: _,~.___..__._.__~..____.__
AdVisory Notice
Page 2 of 2.
llnhi nc1ered. Information on den definitions and mOnitoring
recommendations can be obtained by con~acting the Sacramento
Field Office.
3) To protect female San Joaquin kit foxes and their pups durinq: the
breedinq season, no development. activities likely to result in
incidental take of kit foxes and no excavation of kit fox"dens
shall be Permitted on any property within the prescribed
conservation plan bounti;a~ies from January 1 to April 30, if
biologiCal surveys cOnforming to Service minimum survey
recommendations demonstrate the presence of kit foxes on the
subject property. Minimum survey recn~ndations for the period.
from January 1 to Apri~ 30, and for one ca~enti~r week preceding
January 1, shall consist of seven consecutive nights of negative
survey results where methods include spotlighting, scent stations,
and plaCing of tracking medium at all known and potential kit fox
dens on the subj ect property. This shall be enforced unless:
a. Subsequent sw:veys demonstrate that kit foxes have
vacated the property on their own, without any
form of deliberate human disturbance' within 100
feet of or directly to kit fox dens;
b. Circular exclusion zones of 100 feet in radius are
staked and. flagged. around a~l known and potential
kit fox dens on the subject property. Development
could then proceed on the bal~nce of the property
that is outside these exc~usion zones;
c. Survey information collected by a qualified
wildlife biOlogist indicates that incidental take
of kit foxes reSUlting from den excavations should
not occur, provided that such information is
presented in writing to the Service's Sacramento
Field Office and the Service concurs in writing.
4. As a means of offsetting the unavoidable loss of endangered
species habitat associated with development, a fee is required
by bhe City or County. This fee is being assessed upon
submittal of a bui~ding permit. Specific fee amounts wil~ vary
with the size of planned project development.
For further information regarding these measures, please
contact Ms. Michelle Suverkrubbe of the City of Bakersfield
Planning Department, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California 93301 (805/326-3733), or the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office, 2800 Cottage Way,
Room E-1823, Sacramento, CalifOrnia 95825 (916/978-4866).
Prepared by United States Department of the Interior, Fish
and Wildlife Service.
May 1990
.::~-=:.--:..:::-,~-- - :;:::.-:-.=-=-:::-..::: ~_.~.:._~-:...-:;::_.........-
- -~~. _._- -
PARTIAL LIST OF BIOLOGISTS AND CONSULTING FIRlfS wrTH PRIOR
SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX EXPERIENCE
The fOllowing coutractors and consulting firms have conducted endangered species surve~
and biological assesSIlfUJr: work in California 's San Joaquin Valley and adjacent areas.
This list is not intended to ,be an endorsement bv the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of
' ,
any person or coapatJy, appearing or not appearing. o~ the list. Otber firTllS and individu.
.77ay have silllilar expertise. TlJe expertise of consul tants listed here is not necessaril,
limited to the San Joaquin Valley.
Dr. Ted Beedy
Jones & Stokes Associates
1725 - 23rd Street
Sa craJllell to , CA
916/444-5634
Hr. Tho. Ka to
2716 Alturas Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93305
805/324-i019
Dr. Diane Mitchell
Consul tant
1732 COUlJtry Club Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93306
805/872-7746
Mr. Bill Clark
a1ESA
1425 N. Vagedes
Fre.lJO, CA 93728
209/233-6220
Mr. Steve ForeSUJ
Western Ecological Service
COlllpany
14 Galli Drive, Suite A
Nova to , CA 94947
415/883-6425
Mr. Tho... Reid
Tbo... Reid Associates
505 H~lton Avenue,
Suite 201
Palo Alto, CA 94301
415/327-0429.
.~s. Diane Rell.ha"
Box 947
~ontara. CA 94037
415/728-58451
I
Dr.Roger Harris
LSA Associates, Inc.
157 Park Place
Pt. RicbJlloud, CA 94801
415/236-6810
.'1s. Linda Huffllla.n
Biologist
805/322-8628
Mr. Dazti el F.
Williaas
580 Bennington Avenue
Turlock, CA 95380
209/668-4700
Hr. Hark Chichester
8000 Kroll Wa~, Unit 72
Bakersfield, CA 93309
805/832-1880
Dr. Ted Murphy
c/o CSUB
9001 Stockdale Higln1ay
s.Jcersfield, CA 93311
805/664-3021
Dr. Jolm Gray
Da.es and Moore
222 East Anapamu Street
Seta Barbara, CA 93101
805/965-3055
Quad Cousul tants
9801 CamlJo Media
Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93311
805/665-2000
BioSystems Analysis,
Inc.
3152 Paradise Drive
Tiburon, CA 94920
(415) 435-0399
Brown and Caldwell
Consulting Engineers
i23 S. Street
Sacramento. CA 95814
(916) 444-0123
CH2H Hill
6425 Christie Avenue.
Suite 500
Emeryville. CA 94608
(415) 652-2426
Ebasco Environ.ental
555 Capitol ~all,
Suite 625
Sacramento," CA 95814
(916) 442-5356
EG&G Energy
Measur~ents, Inc.
130 Robin Hill Road
Goleta, CA 93116
(805) 967-0456
Bio/West. Inc.
7063 West 1400 North
Logan. Utah 84821
(801) i52-4202
CheBe6IOre.
Dr. David L.
Research Limited
6369 N. Cedar
Fresno. CA 93710
(209) 431-1660
seos, Inc.
Environ.ental
Consul tazzts
1600 Sacramento Inn
WaY'. Suite 116
Sacramento. CA 95815
(916) 922-5807
Environ.ental Science
Associates
760 Harrison Street
San Francisco. CA
94107
(415) 896-5900
g.T. Stanley Associates
P.O. Box 1180
Alviso. CA 95002
(408) 263-1814
I
!.SA
1 Park Plaza,
Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92714
(714) 553-0666
Jones & Stokes
Associates. Inc.
1725 - 23rd Street,
Suite 100
Sacramento. CA 95816
(916) 444-5638
HcClelland
ConBultazzts, Inc.
3780 Rosin Court.
Suite 260
Sacramento. CA 95834
(916) 646-3846
Consultants in Wildlife
and
ECOlogical Services
Agency
1758 N. Academy
Sanger. CA -95814-
(209) 298-8555
Hazzsen1s Biological
Consul ting
1428 W. Howard A venue
Visalia. CA 93277
(209) 627-5401
Conservation Consultants
541 Bryson
Palo Alto. LA 94306
(415) 325-9669
Harding Lawson
Associ a tes
7655 Redwood Boulevard
P.O. Box 578
:Vova to. CA 94948
(415) 892-0821
REeON
Regional Enviro~ental
Consul tants
1276 Morena Boulevard
San Diego. CA 92110
(619) 275-3732
Tbe Planning Center
1801 Oak Street
Suite 164
Bakersfield. CA 93301
(80S) 334-2711
Rado, Theodore A.
3144 Celeste Drive
Riverslde. CA 92507
(i14) 369-8510
Stebbins, John C.
Consulting Botanist
357 Adler Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
(209) 297-0144
Western Ecological Service~
Inc.
14 Galli Drive,
Suite A
Novato. CA 94949
(415) 883-6425
w.oodJlard-Cl yde
Consul tants
Stanford Place 3,
Suite 1000
Denver, CO 80237
~* Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser.vice, Sacramento Endangered Species Office.
2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825. SepteJllber 1989.
!
..,.a
II TENT A T/VE "
PARCEL MAP NO. 9679
A PORTION Of THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of THE SOUTlfEASr
QUARTER OF SECTION 14,. UlfS" R.28E., /oWB" M,
IN THE CITY Of .BAKERSnElD, COUNTY Of l<mN.
NOTE@:
OWN:R:
PAUL ANDRE
2608 ALDER STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805) 322-2256
TOTAL NO. CW PNlCCLS,
DISlIHG ION(,
rllOPOSCD 111m;
A-I
A-I
PllOPOSCO WOltOO
CW 1I4Tt11 SUI'PlYl CAl.. WAlfR SEIMeC CO.
PllOl'OSED WOltOO
Of SLW.\G( 1llSPOSAi, C.IV Of" 8Al<UlsncUl
VICNTY MAP
ENGtEER
CUESTA ENGINEERING I
5055 CALIFORNIA AVE. STE.218
BAKERSFIELD, . CA 93309
(805) 324-5500
.!,
,
r lr-1c
r /vo
/ 8J(,<~ J9JJ
/ ' Pc. 6.} l.J /vIr
/ o.If.~,
1Il._ ...JJ-L _ l-!..:!t-_
Gl'l1lH It PAIlkU . lS4&.l1 EXP. '/30/12
HotH
$~ I. . ~'
~ r
/
/ I
/ /
I /
TRACT NO. 3933
UNIT 'A'
8K.211. PG.63 O.R.
/
/
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
i,
/
I
/
/
/
26' 26
.~!!4.. !:t:...
-
. /'
~~
I'l '
....IIi!.._
\.
HIGH SCHOOL'
/
(.~/
~~
ONE 6I-EEf 0f'L Y
'\. (/ .)
, ,/
· f-t
..
..
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
9679"
I
I
R-1 tii I
R-1 I R-1 tii I
< Rt I
; J
~ I
I
I
I
14 11
R-1
HGII.ANJ
H/;H Sf:'HfJa.
I
o 4CO
I 1
SCAU: " FEET
T2II, IDE:
R-1-Qf
~
\
\
\
1
I
R-1
~
i!1 ~
~
I
NEllE
R-1
[JAWCHJ
R-1
x
I
~ R1
R-2
0-1-0
DRIVE"
R-1
I&l
~
~
...
fNICRAMA
I
I
J
I
~I ~1
FAR ewes DR.
R1
R-1
=1=
8IIOIA
;:~
~
.
~.
-
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ed W Schulz. Public Works Director
FRo'~es R. LaRochelle - Ovil Engineer IV
DATE: January 7, 1994 11:15am
SUBJECT: ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 5305 PANORAMA DRWE . DOUG EDWARDS
INSTALLATION OF A 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL AT BACK OF SIDEWALK
*********************************************************************************************
Engineering and Traffic staff have reviewed the attached encroachment permit for the construction of a 6' high
concrete block wall adjacent to the back of the sidewalk along Charger Avenue (see attached Exhibit A),
Adjacent property owners have signed a petition approving of the construction of the wall (see attached), The
Traffic Division has approved of and initialed the encroachment permit. The lot being built on is Lot 2 of
Parcel Map 9679, Sheet 2 of the attached Planning Commission staff report for this Parcel Map reiterates
the need for this encroachment permit, and also indicates approval of the BZA is required. However, the
attached memo from Jim Eggert of the Planning Department states that this is in error and that no BZA
approval is required,
,dw:m:lencroach\5305P ANO.RAM
f