HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 56-76RESOLUTION NO. ~56-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OFTHE CITY
OF BAKERSFIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING
REAL PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED
AS '~rHITE LANE NO. 9," PROPOSED TO BE
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the
City of Bakersfield on the 3d day of August, 1976, requesting that
certain uninhabited territory therein described be annexed to and
incorporated within the City of Bakersfield; and
WHEREAS, said petition was signed by the owners of not
less than one-fourth (1/4) of the area of the land in such territory,
and representing not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the assessed value
of such territory according to the last preceding equalized assess-
ment roll of the County of Kern.
NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the
Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as
amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield,
as follows:
A portion of the east one-half (E 1/2) of Section Eighteen (18),
Township Thirty (30) South, Range Twenty-Eight (28) East, Mount
Diablo Meridian, being in the County of Kern, State of California,
more particularly described as follows:
Co~Lmxencing at the center of said section, also being the intersection
of the center lines of Monitor Street and White Lane, and shown as a
witness corner, 30 feet south of the southwest corner of Lot 8 of
said section, as shown on the Kern County Sales Map No. 1 of the
Lands of J. B. Haggin, on the map of Tract No. 2294 recorded in the
office of the County Recorder of said county in Book 10 of Maps on
page 206, thence north 89°51'11'' east, 710.00 feet to a point on the
Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield and the True Point of
Beginning of this description; thence (1)'north 00o01'27'' west, along
said Corporate Boundary, also being the east line of said Tract No.
2294, 1321.87 feet to point on the center line of Merrimac Avenue
as shown on the map of said Tract No. 2294 and also being on the
north line of the aforesaid Lot 8; thence (2) north 89°51'15'' east,
continuing along said Corporate Boundary, being also the last-said
north line, 610.36 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence
leaving said Corporate Boundary, (3) south 00001'38'' east~ alon~ the
east line of said Lot 8, 559.50 feet; thence (4) south 89 51'15'
west, 305.39 feet; thence (5) south 00001'27'' east, 817.37 feet to
a point on the south right-of-way line of White Lane; thence (6)
south 89°51'11'' west,along said south right-of-way line, 305.00
feet to a point on said Corporate Boundary; thence (7) north 00001'27''
west, along said Corporate Boundary, 55.00 feet to the True Point of
Beginning;
Containing 13.563 acres, more or less.
That a designation appropriately naming such territory is
'~hite Lane No. 9."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Monday, the 20th day of
September, 1976, at the hour of 8 P. M., in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is
the time when and the place where any person owning real property'
within such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any
objections to the proposed annexation may appear before the Council
of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should
not be annexed.
o0o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield, at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 9th day of August, 1976, by the follow-
ing vote:
AYES: COUNCtLMEN BARTON, BLEECKER, CHRISTENSEN, M ROGERS, SCEALES, STRONG
HOES: COUNCILMEN: /~j~
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ,/o )
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ~ 2/__,r--y"~--~-------
CITY ATTORNEY of Bakersfield
the