HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 50-79RESOLUTION NO. 50-79
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MAKING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF COMPLETION OF .THE~ FINAL ENVIRON-
MENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON A PROPOSED A~ND-
MENT FROM A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT-
SHOPPING CENTER COMPLEX TO A PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT-OFFICE-RESTAURANT
COMPLEX ON THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED
AT.THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NEW STINE ROAD
AND MING AVENUE.
WHEREAS, approximately 11.5 acres of land at the Northwest corner
of New Stine Road and Ming Avenue is currently shown on the Land Use
Element as Planned Commercial Development-Shopping Center Complex;
and
WHEREAS, the project sponsors are proposing a Planned Commercial
Development-OfficeComplex with. Restaurant upon the said affected
property;
and
WHEREAS, an amended Draft Environmental Impact Report on said
project was prepared by the City of Bakersfield Development Services
Department upon a contract between the City of Bakersfield and
· Grunwald, Crawford and Associates of Hanford, California, and
circulated and distributed in accordance with the requirements of
law and applicable regulations, the distribution list being included
in the Final EIR;
and
WHEREAS, public and private agencies and individuals submitted
written comments on the Draft EIR, as ,listed i~ the Final EIR;
and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held and conducted
by and before the City of'Bakersfield Planning Co~ission in
accordance with the procedures required by the City of Bakersfield
Resolution 39-78, on August 15, 1979, at which ~earing the public
was entitled to comment upon the Draft EIR;
and
-2-
WHEREAS, the City has responded in writing to all significant
points raised by the public and private agencies and individuals
commenting and any such points raised in the consultation review
and public hearing process, and the Final EIR, consisting of.the
Draft EIR, comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR,
a list of persons,~or organizations and public agencies commenting
on the Draft EIR and the responses of the City as aforesaid has been
completed by the Development Services Department and placed on the
Agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of
September 19, 1979, for evaluation and consideration by said Commission;
and
WHEREAS, at the said regular meeting, the Planning Commission
evaluated and considered the Final EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission Hereby Determines,
Finds and Resolves as Follows:
1. That the above recitals are true and correct.
2. That the Final Environmental Impact Report, dated
1979, has been reviewed, evaluated and considered by the Planning
Commission.
3. That the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines
and City of Bakersfield Resolution 39-78.
4. That the said Final EIR is an accurate and objective
discussion of the proposed project and adequately discusses and
describes the environmental considerations and mitigation measures
which need to be considered prior to the approval of the proposed
project. - - -
5. That the Various alternatives to the project, including
"no project" have been considered in the Final EIR.
-3-
6. That in consideration of the above statements and findings.,
the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the
Final EIR be certified as completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and
City of.Bakersfield Resolution 39-78.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Bakers~ield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 19th Day of September, 1979~
by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Baldwin, Prewett, Haddad,
Jones, McCormick
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Phipps, Van Horn
DATED: September 19, 1979
PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
DEWEY ~ALES, Secretary' ~"~""'
Planning Director
a~nd~d ~n~on~nt~ ~p~ct ~epo~t co~e~g ~ PoCoDo (Planned
posed plans of %he new o~e~ and a~e~d~%s %e %he app~ved P.C.Do
Audience %estl~y ~as
wished %oaddres~ the
~l% be p~epa~ed a~d p~esen%ed %o %he Cowa~ss~on, poss~bl~ at the
5eptembe~ 19, 1979 mee%l~g and hea~ng o~ %he subsequen% zone change.
300
~do
the '. .... ,.
build: . ." ':
zone %~ "; 41'
he ha~
7' "',; " 12
';bus
of
qu~ement:
P~e ~
~ $~ne Road ~nd M~ng ~venue~
plan p~ev~ousiy app?oved under th~ PoC~D. An a~ended DEXR ~as p~epa~ed by
at a public hearing held Septe~be~ 5, 197g, at ~hlch tim. public c~nts
· ~J~ po~l;to~ of a tto6~lc~e PoCoDo Z~ne app~oved by the City
street p~rkin~, ~s sho~ o~ thBt PoC~D.
Ce~i~$~one~ P~'e~ett~ Con~ssion ~pp~tved Re$olutio~ 50=7~ reco~nded fo?
ce~tiflca~len by the Cl~y Council of c~mpl~tte~ of the flnai envt~o~nent~l
complex on that ce~i~ p~per~y located at the ~th~est co?ne~ of ~e~ Still
Road a~d Nt~g Aven~e by the fel%oit~g ~otl ca~l vote:
NOES: No~e
blic ~g; ~l ?ty ~ e~s thl~ O0 et
Th o~lgi~ ~Co~o pl - o~ th~s p-:' el ~e~e red by th ty Cou~ci