Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 35-79RESOLUTION NO. 35-79 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 278, STOCKDALE NO. 11. WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization; to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organiz~ation Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organiT zation are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. "" 6. The zoning upon annexation of Stockdale No. 11 will be low-density residential. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: H. E. BERGEN City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 K. W. HOAGLAND City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 25th day of April, 1979, by the following vote: AYB: ~OUNcILM'EN bARTON, CHrISTENSEN, MEAN$~ MILLER, PAYN~, RAT~, NOES: COUNCILMEN ~ . .. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINING: GOUNCILMEN: ............................. CITY CL ~ Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield ARPROVED ,as to - form: ' ~ Bakersfield C~.ATTORNEY .of th City of ANNEXATION NO. 278 STOCKDALE N0.11 A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, being a portion of Section 33, T29S, R27E, M.D.B. & M., and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a poin~ in the south line of said Section 33 from which point the southeast corner of said Section 33 bears South 89°~ 43' East, 1324.50 feet; thence North 0° 17' East, 38.25 feet to the east line of the former Buena Vista Canal; thence North 29° 36' 25!' East, along said east line, S3.616 feet to the north line of County Road No. 2341 (Stockdale Highway), being a point on the Corporate Boundary of the City of'Bakersfield, and being also the True Point of Beginning for this. description; THENCE (1) Northerly, Easterly and Southerly along said CorpOrate Boundary to intersect the north ri'ght of way line of said Stockda'le Highway, being also the North line of the South 85 feet of said Section 33; THENCE (2) departing from said Corporate Boundary, westerly along the last named north right of way line, S99.1 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 6.91 Acres, More or Less. EXHIBIT "A" ;'../.'7 .Exisfing Corporate NORTH RH~.,IT OF WAY LINE O~c STOCKDAI_E HIGHWAY AND NORTH LINE OF S(::~JTH POINT OF BEGINNING 3,?1 :1:) (2) (;) ~"12'$°36'2["'E"' I STOCKDALE 53.616' :~ ..................... S89'43'00"E 1324.50' · ........................ : ....... e 4J M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 0 o c~ 0 ,, 0 ¢) s:: m 0 (].) ¢) ~i ~0 · © -,-I m © O~c: rj 0 0 rj 0 ,U' 0 0 0 E~ 0 '0~ q4 4J 0 C.) m O-,u r,,O . ~ 0 (D ~0~ q--{ 0 0 r,.) Oq-i~ -HrJ~ :>-tO.~ ,..O m .~¢)~ C: ¢: 0 : Iii. ~at 'effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing level of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service persom~el or con- struction of new facilities, etc.)? There iS no effect on the city's- ability to supply any public services required. IV. Would City require any upgrading or change in facili[ies to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be responsible for financing?- The future development will"iot require any change in public facilities- The off-site improvements are in place. On-site improvements will be the responsibility of the builder. Indicate.ind exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory. No effect on exisbinq'Dlanned usaqe. The present zoning in the County ~s RS and in the City it will probably be R-3 PUD. , VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that' would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The territory to be annexed will be used for multiple family dwellinq~Droposed and zoned R-3 PUP.. VII. List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com- munity facilities, etc. Outside of more efficient delivery of public services, there, is no direct. or indirect benefits to the __city althouqh it does increase the area' tax VIII. \ , Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. Because of proposition 13, passage of the tax differential in the city or County is nll. City: $5.1209 County: $5.0609 List. city tax rate(s). The only difference in tax rate in the city's six cent bonded indebtedness- This is offset by the dissolption of existing County service areas, How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~50,000 Net average = $]0,750 The only difference in taxes would be a $6.45 increase in taxes per year.