Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 136-78 RESOLUTION NO. 136-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ~KING FINDING THAT A M~JORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN M_~DE AND ORDERING THE TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 264, PROCEEDING NO. 641 (PACHECO NO. 7) ~NNEXED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. WHEREAS, Resolution of Application No. 59-78, dated June 14, 1978, was submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annexation of territory to the City of Bakersfield designated as Annexation No. 264, Proceeding No. 641 (PACHECO NO. 7); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon said proposal was held before the Commission on the 10th day of October, 1978; and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Commission, on October 10, 1978, adopted its Resolution Making Determination being Resolution No. 78-69, recorded in Minute Book 23 of said Commission; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 1978, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, adopted its Resolution No. 117-78, initiating proceed- ings for annexation of the said territory to the City of Bakersfield, and set Wednesday the 20th day of December, 1978, at the hour of 8 P. M. (or as soon thereafter as the matter could be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed annexation where and when any owner of land within the hereinafter- described territory could appear before the Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such territory should not be annexed and owners of land within the said territory were duly informed of their right to file a written protest against the annexation with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly con- ducted by and before the City Council in all respects in accordance with Resolution No. 117-78, on November 8, 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. In accordance with Section 35229 of the Government Code it is hereby found, regarding the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn by owners of land and improvements, at the conclusion of the public hearing, as follows: No written protests against the said annexation were filed with the Clerk of the City of Bakersfield at any time prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on the proposed annexation. 2. The description of the exterior boundaries of the territory annexed is contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated in this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That the said territory designated as Annexation No. 264, Proceeding No. 641 (PACHECO NO. 7) and described herein, and every part thereof, is hereby ordered annexed to the City of Bakersfield. 4. That the Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this resolution ordering a change of organization, along with any required remittance to cover the fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County. 5. That the executive officer of the Commission is hereby requested to prepare and execute a certificate of completion and make the filings required by Chapter 4 of the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 and record a certified copy of the certification of com- pletion with the recorder of Kern County, with the surveyor of Kern County and with the Clerk of the City of Bakersfield. o0o ,fuNNEDC-~TION NO. 264 PACI{ECO NO. 7 POOR ORIGINAL A.parcel of land situate in the County of Kern-, State of' California, being a portion of Secti.ons 13 and 24, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.DoB. & M., more particularly described as foliows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of the north 45 feet of said Section 24 with the 'west line of the east 45 feet of the northwest quarter of said Section 24, said intersection being a point in the existing exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) departing from said exterior Corporate Boundary westerly along said south line a distance of 1030 feet, more or less, to intersect the west right of way line of U. S. Highway Route 99 (VI-KER-99), Bakersfield By-Pass, and said · exterior Corporate Boundary; 'THENCE (2) northerly and along various courses in said exterior Corporate Boundary to the intersection of the west line of the east 45 feet of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 13 with' the northwesterly right of way line of the. Asphalt. o Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad; THENCE (3) departing from said exterior Corporate Boundary southerly along said west line a distance of 1265 feet, more or less, to the Point. of Beginning. Containing 64.3 Acres, more or less, , I EXHIBIT "A" I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December, 1978, by the following vote: A'YE~: COUNCILMEN B,,~R.T-e.N, C I~r_,TEN, P.j::).;, MEDDERS, RATTY, SCEALES, STRONG I~DES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINING COUNLILMEN: ASST. C~~x Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield