HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 89-78 RESOLUTION NO.' 89-78
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ISLAND ANNEXATION
NO. 275 (HARRIS NO. 3).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose the
annexation to such City of the hereinafter described territory
under the authority of Section 35224.5 of the Government Code,
which territory is an island under the provisions of Subdivision
(f) of Section 35150 of the Government Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield
hereby RESOLVES, FINDS AND DETERMINES as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield proposed the annexation
to such City of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set
forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth in this Resolution.
4. That the territory proposed to be annexed as des-
cribed in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", meets the follow-
ing criteria as an island under the provisions of Subdivision (f)
of Section 35150 of the Government Code:
(1) Does not exceed 100 acres in area and such
area constitutes the entire island.
(2) Is surrounded by the City of Bakersfield to
which annexation is proposed.
(3)
Is substantially developed.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Public utility services are available
Public improvements are present
Physical improvements are present on the
parcels within such area.
(4) Is not prime agricultural land as defined in
Section 35046 of the Government Code; and
(5) Will benefit from such annexation and is
receiving benefits from the City of Bakersfield.
5. That this proposal for annexation is made pursuant
to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section
35000 of the Government Code of the State of California; it is
requested that proceedings be taken for annexation in accordance
therewith.
6. That the reasons for the proposed annexation are as
follows: (a) to remove an island of unincorporated territory so
that the City's jurisdiction will be physically uniform in the
area; (b) to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be
given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
7. That the City will prezone the area described in
Exhibit "A" and that such zone classification will be as stated
in Paragraph VI of the Plan for Providing Services set forth in
Exhibit "C" herein.
8. That all public utility services are available and
presently in use in some instances in the area proposed to be
annexed.
9.
tures.
That the area is developed with single-family struc-
That the benefits the area will receive upon annexa-
Police protection
Fire protection
Sewer service
10.
tion include the following:
(b)
<c)
<d)
(e)
(f)
Refuse service
Residents' participation in City elections
Street lighting
Street sweeping.
2.
11. That the benefits the area is receiving from the
City of Bakersfield include the following:
(a) Street sweeping in adjacent areas
(b) Disposal of storm water and nuisance drainage
(c) Sewer service in adjacent areas
(d) Street lighting in adjacent areas.
12. The names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield
who are to be furnished with copies of the executive officer's
report and who are to be given mailed notice of hearing are:
H. E. Bergen
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
K. W. Hoagland
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for Applicant)
13. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the
Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 - 26th
Street, Bakersfield, California.
o0o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 23d day of August, 1978, by the following
vote:
AYES, COUNCILMEN BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEDDERS, PATTY, ROG. ERS, $CEALES,
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
;,~sENT: COUNC,,~EN: ,,-"~_'T_~' ,~,~----~__c~
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN= ,.
I ~.~~E~ and E Officio Clerk of the
C T ~
Council of f Bakersfield
-- ~ A~'~ 0~_~ ~his 23d y f August, 1978
akersfleld~ ~_ !
~ ~?. ... . o form:
ANNEXATION NO. 275
HARRIS NO. 3
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 23, Township 30 South, Range 27 East,
M. D. M., more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the South line of the
North 30 feet of the South half of said Section 23 with
the West line of the East 45 feet of the Northeast
quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section, said
intersection being a point in the existing exterior
Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence, clockwise along said exterior Corporate Boundary,
completely circumscribing the parcel of land herein
described,I to the Pointof Beginning.
Said parcel also being described as a portion of Tract No. 3314
recorded on February 27, 1970 and Tract No..3132 recorded on
May 10, 1968 as said Tracts are recorded in the Office of the
Kern County Recorder.
Containing 62.6 Acres, More or Less
EXHIBIT "A"
®e
®®
c-
>
X
I'--
,~.
¢)
c-
¢>
r~
X
I'--
~.=
c-
>
X
(D ,
r'
>
tY
X
I"-'
c"
c-
>
I::I:
x
c-
~0
0
X X
X X × X X
'C
0
t)
0
0
U'
0
0
,u
O
0
0
0
.,-4
0
0
0
0
~0
0
(D U
>
(D >
)<
0
S- I
0 S-
u,_.(1) c-
r.~.,-
,--'~'0
""~(]JS.-
0,-- rO.,-
>~].J '0
· ,-- (-)',- 0
~ ,--
· ,-',- (J U
IIi.
h~at effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing level
of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con-
struction of new facilities, etc.)?
Ibis annexation wouldnot affect the ]eve] or range
of s.ervices presently existinq in the city.
Would city require any upgrading or change in facili{ies to serve affected terri-
tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or resid&nts be
responsible for financing?-
Additional fire hydrants may be required and would -
be spaced equally throughout the territory.
V. Indicate ~nd exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory.
See' attached zoninq mad 123-23
. VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that' would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.)
There would be no chanqe in land use as the "
result of this annexation
VlI.
List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com-
munity facilities, etc.
City public safety service can respond quicker to called for
services. ~ire insurance rates wo~|d be less expensive in the
city than in ~he county.
VIII.
Please provide the fo'llowing information relative to city and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area.
· . Due to th~ passage of prnpn~itinn 13, fh~r~ i~ nO
difference in the amount of tax~ collected-
List' city tax rate(s).
How will the difference in tax rates affect, a house with a market value of
50,000
N/A