HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 85-78RESOLUTION NO. 85-78.
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 273
(UNION AVENUE NO. 9).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization; to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority
of section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield
hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution
as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed,
marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this
Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected
territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi-
sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit
"C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set
forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act
of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the
State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized
for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization
are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive muni-
cipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to
receive ~ax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the terri-
tory proposed to be annexed.
6. The zoning upon annexation of UNION NO. 9 will be
essentially the same as presently exists in the county.
7. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing,
if any, are:
H. E. BERGEN
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
K' W. HOAGLAND
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for Applicant)
8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California.
o0o.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 9th day of August, 1978, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEDDERS, I~"/:Pf, ROGERS, SCEALES, STRONG
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Jk.J C) i"'d ~" _
ASSENT: COUNCILMEN: ~'?TV
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN: ki O/~[ ~ ,;
CITY'C~K~a'n ~io Cle of
Council of :~e~Cy of Bakers~eld
the
APPROVE-D~ thi's c. Et, b.~ day t, 1978
sf~ield
ANNEXATION NO. 273
UNION AVENUE NO. 9
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, being
portions of Sections 17, 18 and 19, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B. & M.,
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the East S7.75 feet of said
Section 19 with the ~outh line of the north 30 feet of the last named Section,
said intersection being a point in the exterior Corporate-Boundary of the City
of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) westerly and along various courses in said exterior Corporate Boundary
to the intersection of the east line of the west 57.75 feet of said Section 17
with the north line of the south 30 feet of the north half of last named Section,
said intersection being the northeast comer of Union Avenue, of 115.5 feet in
width, and White Lane, of 60 feet in width;
THENCE (2) departing from said Corporate Boundary, southerly along said east line
of the west 57.75 feet of Section 17, 349 feet, more or less, to the south line
of the north 349 feet of the south half of said Section 17;
THENCE (3) easterly along last named south line, 599 feet, more or less, to a.
point in the east line of the west half of the northwest quarter of the southwest
quarter of said Section 17;
THENCE (4) S 00° 02' 16" E, 485,184 feet, to the northeast corner of Parcel 2 as
shown on Parcel Map No. 2754 recorded January 16, 1975 in Book 12 of Parcel Maps
at Page 100,'in the Office of the Kern county Recorder;
THENCE (S) N 89° SS' SS" W, 598.67 feet, to intersect {he east line of the west
57.75 feet, of said Section 17, said intersection being a point on the easterly
right of way line of said Union Avenue;
THENCE (6) along said east line and said easterly right of way line, S 00° 01' 19" E,
495.59 feet, to intersect the south line of the north half of the south half of
said Section 17;
THENCE (7) along last named south line, S 89° 56' 04" E, 1255.36 feet, to inter-
sect the east line of the west half of the southwest quarter of said Section 17;
THENCE (8) along said east line, S 00° 03' 13" E, 1321.38 feet, to intersect the
north line of the south 30 feet of said Section 17, said north line being the
.northerly right of way line of Pacheco Road, of 60 feet in width;
THENCE (9) westerly along last named north line and the north line of the south
30 feet of said Section 18, 1371 feet, more or less, to ~ntersect the west line
of the east·57.TS feet of said Section 18, said intersection being the northwest
comer of Union Avenu~ and Pacheco Road;
THENCE (10) southerly along last named west line 60 feet, more or less, to the
:~oint~f--Be,ginning ........................ "' _, _~ .......... .
Containing 183.7 Acres, more or"iess.
EXHIBIT "A"
I I
0
O
f:::
..
c- c-
:::J ::J
0 0
>.~ X X X >< X X
c-
o 0
C_)
- I
c- c- c- c- c-'
::::J :::J ::::J :::J ::::J
0 0 O. 0 0 0
C_) r~ C_) C_) r_).
x
¢)
C:
0
O ,"::'
-/
0
0
r,~
r~
rOO(]J
(~-~0
0
u,.-,~,,(1J(J
0 J,.J ,t-
O0(]JS-
~"r~r--O
,L",,3S._Or-.~·
-.~
O'
(J
0
0 .
c-
O
O.
.~.
U
U ·
0
,.,,~
'0
q--
n
~ --
0
c--
c.-
rO
0 (]~
N'~,.
c- S-
r-- ~
·
c'- 0
Ou,.-
r J,
c-
O
..I-) 0
r../') -.i.J
0
J~
(]J
U
q-
~_J~
Z
W
..J
~ o
=
I ~'
}-
o
::~
O0ot~otJ, o~
T
III.
h1~at 'e. ffects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing level
of city services (i.e., need for addi'[ional emergency service personnc! or con-
struction of new facilities, ere.t? effect the city's ability
The annexation will not, appreciab Y
or capac.~y to provide the'usual level of publ ~c
IV,
Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terri-
tory (roads, fire hydr~lnts, mains, ~tc.)? If so, would city o_F_rresid~nts be
responsible for financing?-
Sewer lines ar~ presently located on the boundary ]i'n~ of the
territory. A public improvement district could be formed to
" ~rovide sewers throughout the territory,
-.Indicate ~nd exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory.
See ~ttaChed county zoninq map 124-17 and-124~18
·
Indicate.and e,xplain proposed prezoning in area. (List effect~ on present land
· use that' would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.)
The zoning upon annexation will be commensurate with -~
that use presently existin~ within the territory,
.,
VII.
List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com-
munity facilities, etc.
The delivery-of public s~rvices wi]] be more e~ficient. '~lre
rates sho. u]d be less expensive in the city when compared to the
county.
VIII.
Please provide the fo'l!owing information relative to city and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s)'in area,
.The tax differential characteristics cannot be ascerta'i~ed
at this time. There is no a~{~erence in county and city
taxes at this time and are subject to the Jarv~s-Gann
initiative considerations,
List' city tax rate(s).
N/A
How will the difference in tax rates affect, a h'ouse with a market value of
$50,000
N/A