Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 71-78RESOLUTION NO. . 71-78- RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ISLAND ANNEXATION NO. 271 (HARRIS NO. 2). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose the annexation to such City of the hereinafter described territory under the authority of Section 35224.5 of the Government Code, which territory is an island under the provisions of Subdivision (f) of Section 35150 of the Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby RESOLVES, FINDS AND DETERMINES as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield proposed the annexation to such City of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth in this Resolution. 4. That the territory proposed to be annexed as des- cribed in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", meets the follow- ing criteria as an island under the provisions of Subdivision (f) of Section 35150 of the Government Code: (1) Does not exceed 100 acres in area and such area constitutes. the entire island. - ..... (2) Is surrounded by the City of Bakersfield to which annexation is proposed. (3) Is substantially developed· (a) (b) (c) Public utility services' are available Public improvements are present Physical improvements are present on the parcels within such area. (4) Is not prime agricultural land as defined in Section 35046 of the Government Code; and (5) Will benefit from such annexation and is receiving benefits from the City of Bakersfield. 5. That this proposal for annexation is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the State of California; it is requested that proceedings be taken for annexation in accordance therewith. 6. follows: (a) That the reasons for the proposed annexation are as to remove an island of unincorporated territory so that the City's jurisdiction will be physically uniform in the area; (b) to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 7. That the City will prezone the area described in Exhibit"A" and that such zone classification will be as stated in Paragraph VI of the Plan for Providing Services set forth in Exhibit "C" herein. 8. That all public utility services are available and presently in use in some instances in the area proposed to be annexed. 9. That the area is developed with single-family and commercial structures. 10. That the benefits the area will receive upon annexa- tion include the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Police protection Fire protection Sewer service. Refuse service Residents' participation in City elections. 11. That the benefits the area is receiving from the City of Bakersfield include the following: (a) Street sweeping in adjacent areas (b) Tree trimming in rights-of-way (c) Disposal of storm water and nuisance drainage (d) Sewer service at residents' expense (e) Street lighting° 12. The names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the executive officer's report and who are to be given mailed notice of hearing are: H. E. Bergen City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 K. W. Hoagland City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 13. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 - 26th Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of July, 1978, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEDDERS, PATTY, ROGERS, SCEALES,~ ! NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~,1~}1-1t 0 , CITY fi k f cio Cler o Council of the City of Bakersfield field -,, ~ - ~, ~ APPROVED as to form: the CITY ATTORNEY of the,~City of Bakersfield ANNEXATION NO. 271 HARRIS NO. 2 A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, being a portion of the west half of Section 23, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the east line of the west 30 feet of said Section 23 with the south line of the north 30 feet of the south half of said Section, said intersection being a point in the existing exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; Thence, clockwise along said exterior Corporate Boundary, completely circumscribing the parcel of land herein described, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 29.1 Acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" (D ' o ~) (1) © o 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 4-) 0 · 1-.} J,--} 4J 4J 0 0 0 0 D rd rO U ~>~ 0 rd 0 U 0 ..IJ' 0 L) J,J 0 0 D r.J 4J O. Z 0 0 .,,4 0 r-- 0 (1) ,~ " O O O .?- O 4J t~ " O I O O · · ~ 0 0 0 ~.H ~ ., 0 ~ " OD ~0 I :'-4 cG, 0 ~-.,~ OG~ ~ D-~ ~O ~ 0 i 0 # Iii. hq~at 'effects, if '-3ny, would anr,,<.:<.'~tion of this territory have on existing level of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel- or con- struction of new facilities, etc.)? __This annexation- wills Jlot auffect tJe~e__~aja_g'~--o-r l e~vel. of }erv~ ces __p_resently being deljJz_e_l~d to .city residents. Would city require any up~rading or change in facili[ies to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydr'~nts, mains, ate.)? If so, would city 9r_ residents be responsible for financing?-- The city would probably install 5 or 6 new fire h.vdrants equally spaced throughout "this territory. - vL Indicate ~nd exp'lain exiszing zoning in affected territory. See attached county zoning map 123-23. Indicate and explain proposed orezoning in areg. (List ~ffects on present land use that' would occur as a result of annexation such as'maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) . VII. List city services t!uit a':.:~ ~,'il! directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance ratg, shorter emergency response time, us~ of com-- mtmity facilities, e~d.' " The delivery o[ public satety serv~-ces will be __---~e;~icienti'Fire f~s should ~e less --- perish-re in the.c~Y as compare~ to the county- VIII. p{~ase provide the fo'~lowing information relative to city and county' taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. ' .. The tax differential characteristics cannot be ascertained · at this time and are subject to the jarvis-Gann amendment considerations. List'.city tax rate(s). How will the difference in tax rates affect, a house with a market value of ~50,000 .- : C~ LJJ hi .~°, .=J