The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 61-78RESOLUTION NO.' 61-78 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 262 (WIBLE NO. 3). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization; to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization is that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive muni- cipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the terri- tory proposed to be annexed. 6. That the City will pre-zone the area described in Exhibit "A" and that such zone classifications will be as stated in Paragraph VI of the Plan For Providing Services set forth in Exhibit "C" herein. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: H. E. BERGEN City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 K. W. HOAGLAND City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June, 1978, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEDDER$, RA1TY, ROGE~I,~, ~t~E, AI,E8, ~RONO NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~~ /~BSENT: COUNCILMEN: ~ ~ 2 ABSTAINING COUNCI~EN~ CITY ._~K_an~d'E Officio Clerk of Council of the'~?t~of Bakersfield the ; ~'_~ ~ :-i...~ '~' .~ ~7, June, 1978 APPROVED ~ t-o"f~rm: CITY ATTORNEY Bakersfield ANNEXATION NO. 262 WIBLE NO. 3 A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, being a portion of Sections I and 2, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. & M., more particularly described as'follows: ~ Beginning. at a point on the west line of said Section 1 lying N 0 36' 05" E, 631.89 feet, from the southwest corner of said Section 1, said point being in the existing exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) westerly along said exterior Corporate Boundary N 89° 20' 26" W, 406.05. feet, to the westerly right of way line of U. S. Freeway Route 99; THENCE-(2) d~parting. from said Corporate Boundary, northerly along said westerly right of way line, N 4° 48' 53" E, 71.10 feet, to the westerly extension of the north line of that parcel of land deeded to Eddie D. Bell and'Dolores Eo Bell recorded in Book 5000 at Page 1136 of the Official Records of' said Kern County; THENCE (3) easterly along said westerly extension S 89° 20' 26'! E, 1007.10 feet, to the northeast corner of last named parcel; THENCE (4) S 3° 22' 26" W, 61.02 feet; THENCE (5) S 5° 55' 45" W, 10.00 feet, to a point in said exterior Corporate Boundary; THENCE (6) westerly along said Corporate Boundary to the Point of Beginning. Containing 1.6 Acres, more. or less. EXHIBIT "A" , t ., 3NIY7 X X X X X X X X X C:: 0 0 c- O 0 ,1~ - U 0 III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing level of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con- strUction of new facilities, etc.)? This small annexation will have no affeci~ whatqne~er on the .level or range of the City'.s ability to provide an~/required public service, Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would'city or residents be responsible for. financing? None -- The applicant will be required to pav for whatever imorovements will be - required, " j' Indicate ~nd exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory. The property is zoned R-S in the County with C-2?zOning north thereof. Property in the City is zoned C-2-'D, VI, Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would'occur'as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The present land use on the subject territory i-s Commercial. The 7~ning upon annexation will be-C-2-D to match that zoning that presently ~×i~f~ in the Citv, ' o--I C) --- (D C ~ ~-~ 0 rO-P (~ ~-~1~ 0 ~ 1~ . .u I~UE s._.c- 0 I CD U 1.4 ~ r, o I~ t"J ~,.,~O '-"s ~.. U · ,q,4 i,-{ ,wlw,44,,l x O "O,--~ :::S c' 0 I= 0 · .p 0 O) U ~-; 0 .,-I 0 0 c- c- rO S.-. 0 c/') o~ S..-. -tJ rO "C31 (D -.I.J rO U O c-' O CD CD O r..J X (D ..C c- X C~ (J 4.-) r~ (D --~ c- O (D rO rO S... rO , c.-- S-.- VII. List city .services that area will directly or indi ,enefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response tfme, u~e of com- munity facilities, etc. lhe City fire and Police Departments can respond much faster than the like County DeDartments. Fire insurance rates will be ]e~s expensive in the City than in the' County. VIII. Please provide the fo'llowing information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. County laxes Tax Code Tax Rate 056-027 $10.96~4 List city tax rateCs). Tax Code 056-027 Tax Rate $10.1874 + 2.57 = $12.7574 How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market valu~ of ~50,000 Assuming $10,750 is net assessed value: Taxes in City Taxes in County 1371.42 1178.~5 $ 193.07 NOTE: The ~ncreased cost due to taxes does not account for the savings that is accrued to the taxpayer because of decreased fire insurance, no charge for trash collection and any sewer fee paid because of not being in the City.