Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 60-78RESOLUTION NO. 60-78 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 265 (PACHECO NO. 8). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization; to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization is that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive muni- cipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the terri- tory proposed to be annexed. 6. That the City will pre-zone the area described in Exhibit "A" and that such zone classifications will be as stated in Paragraph VI of the Plan For Providing Services set forth in Exhibit "C" herein. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: H. E. BERGEN City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 K. W. HOAGLAND City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. .o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June, 1978, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCil/,.&EN BA,qTON, CHR1S'F',:.NS!iN, i,..\;' r}tlT!:,~.':~: ?,NFi"{', F, OS'::C,, SC2:~LF:SI STFtONG VD2S: COU:',!C!'t',:,!: VY%.,~ CITY C~~an~~Ex~io Clerk of the Council of the Citu of Bakersfield ~~~_v.' of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: CITY ATTORNEY of the~ity of Bakersfield ANNEXATION NO. 265 PACHECO NO. 8 A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State.. of California, being a portion of Section 19, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B. & M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 19, said corner being a point in the existing exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) easterly, southerly, easterly and southerly along said exterior Corporate Boundary to intersect the south line of the north half of the north half of said Section 19; THENCE (2) departing from said Corporate Boundary westerly along said south line a distance of 1320 feet, more or less, to intersect the west line of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said section; THENCE (3) northerly along said west line a distance of 1320 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 39.8 Acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" __J L CD 0 r,./'j~: U -iJ o rj > :> :> :> :> :> > ~ ~--I ~-4 ~ ~ H ~-I r-I (]J © © ~ (]J (]J G :>4 >c: :x: × X }< :x: X X ~4 4J O' U :>, :>- ~ ~ ~ ~ 4J 4J 4J 4J 4J 4-J 4J D 0 0 0 0 0 0 {J U U {J (J [J U 0 o o o .,(3q--4-~ r~O0 >.~.--,---~ c.~ CD rOc-- CD O.r-4.~ UI3_...~.~ >C]J)<O (~)r' ,-- U I'-- n .4~o,'- U 0 C~ · (]JS-,'--'> .,-Oc.(U b_c-'O~ c-' S- N O U ¢) O c- 4.J O U ~'~ O 'O O ~ ::~ cn O ._~ ..C: 4J ~ S,.... ~ ~00,J-l-~UOJ 4...JU>c- c- ~--,-- OJ .r-- S.- -N '-EEc"' -.-~:::::~S.-S.-> -¢,4Jr- · ,-CU OJUO~J S_r--4J rO ~'XO_OS-c' '13rO~4J rO ~' X 04J 0 3 ~ c- O0 rt/1 c- O [~ 0 0 ;~ 'U tO ...c ¢) 4-J4-J c-' ~) c- -p X O r~ O U O -p c- ro n &- (D t~ (IJc- rt~ rO S- c- (D 0 t~4J 4J (D ,5.r- (1J D' Iii. What effects,' if any, would annexation of this territory ha~e on ~xisting level of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con- struction of new facilities, etc.)? There would be no affect upon the level or capacity of the city of Bakersfield to provide such service when this ~erritory is annexed. IV. Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be responsible for financing?l The developer installs all necessary facilities and when constructed, they are dedicated to the city. Indicate and exp'lain existinS zoning in affected t~rritory. See attached map VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The present territory is v~c~nt ~n~ upon classified as low density residential ~n c~nF~rm~n~ General Plan. I I II. VII. List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit ~rom such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com- munity facilities, etc. -- Fire insurance rates wi]] bP l~ ~p~sjve, respDnse time is much quicker in the city than in the county for "called for" services. VIII. Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. TAX CODE AREA TAX RATE 074-009 $10.1753 List city tax rate(s). ~y ~a~ rate would be $9.5141 + $2.57 = $12.0841 How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~D0~O00 Assuming net assessed value of $10,750 c~y ~aw S1299.04 Cnnnty tax 1093.85 Net Difference $ 206.19 NOTE: The net difference in costs does not account for' reduced fire insurance, the removal of the trash collection fee, or the hnquantifiable attributes of better public safety services-