HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 44-78RESOLUTION NO.: ,44~78,
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS PROCEEDING NO. 573,
ANNEXATION NO. 243 (STOCKDALE NO. 10).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose'a
change of organization; to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority
of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield
hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to tIE City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution
as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed,
marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this
Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected
territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi-
sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit
"C", attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set
forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit,'annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act
of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the
· State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized
for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization
is that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive muni-
cipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to
receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the terri-
tory proposed to be annexed.
6. That by Resolution No. 25-78, adopted on March 15,
1978, the Council of the City of Bakersfield declared it had
reviewed, evaluated and considered the information contained in
the Final EIR for Stockdale No. 10 Annexation, made findings and
certified that the Final EIR had been completed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guide
lines, and City Resolution No. 24-77.
7. That the City will pre-zone the area described in
Exhibit "A" and that such zone classifications will be as stated
in the Final EIR for the Stockdale No. 10 Annexation.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing
, i f any: '
H. E. BERGEN
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
K. W. HOAGLAND
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for Applicant)
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
offices of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield,'California.
o0o
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May, 1978, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEDDERS, RATTY, ROGERS, SCEALES, $TRONG
NOES= COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ~
ABSTAINING COUNCILMEN:
' CITY~~ and Officio Clerk of
Council ~~ of ~akersfield the
APP ROVED~ -a s ~Q~f'd~m:
ANNEXATION NO. 243
STOCKDALE NO. 10
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, 'and being
pertions of Sections 5, 6, 7, ~ % 16, 17 and 18 of Township 30 South, Range 27
East, M.D.M. and Sections 1, 12 and 13 of Township 30 South, Range 26 East M.D.M.,
and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of said Section 16 with the'north
right-of-way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad, Buttonwillow Branch, said
intersection being northerly along last named east line, a distance of 83.71
feet, more or less, from the southeast corner of said Section 16, said point also
being a point in the exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (1) departing from said exterior Corporate Boundary westerly along last
named north right-of-way line, said line being parallel with and 50 feet north-.
erly of as measured at right angles to the center line of main rails, a dis-
~ance of 2 miles, more or less, to intersect the west line of said Section 17,
said point being northerly along last named west line a distance of 82.5 feet,
more or less, from the southwest corner of said Section 17;
Thence (2) northerly along last named west line, a distance of 1237 feet, more
or less, to intersect the south line of the north half of the'Southeast
Quarter of said Section 18;
Thence (3) westerly along last named south line, a distance of 2640 feet, more
or less, to intersect the east line of the Southwest Quarter of said
Section 18.
Thence (4] southerly along last named east line, a distance of 1222 feet, more
or less to intersect the north right-of-way line of the Southern Pacific
Railway, Buttonwillow Branch, said point being northerly along last named
east line a distance of 98 feet, more or less, from the southeast comer
of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 18;
Thence (5) westerly along last named north right ofway line, a distance of
2670 feet, more or less, to intersect the west line of the east 30 feet of
said Section 13, said point being northerly along last named west line, a
distance of 96 feet,'more"or ~essL, :from the:'sOuth line of'said Section 13;
Thence (6) northerly along last named west line, a distance of 147S feet, more
or less, to intersect the sou'~h line of the north 370~.7 feet of the east
30 feet of said Section 13;
Thence (7) easterly along last named south line and along the south line of
the north 3709.7 feet of said Section 18, a distance of 2670 feet, more or
less, to intersect the west line of the East half of said Section 18;
Thence (8) northerly along last named west line, a distance of 3679.7 feet,
more or less, to intersect the south line of the north 30 feet of said
Section 18;
Thence (9) westerly along last named south line and the south line of the north
30 feet of said Section 13, a distance of 2670 feet, more or less, to inter-
sect the west line of the east 30 feet of said Section 13;
Thence (10) northerly along last named west line and the west line of the east
30 feet of said Sections 12 and 1, a distance of 9344 feet, more or less, to
.... intersect the'north right-of-way line of County Road 1594 (Stockdale Highway)
of 60 feet in width, said point being a point in the existing exterior
Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (11) generally easterly along said Corporate Boundary through said
Secfi6ns 1 and 6 to intersect the east line of said Section 6, said point
being southerly along said east line, a distance of i92.65 feet, more or less,
from the northeast corner of said Section 6;
EXHIBIT "A';
Thence (12) departing from said exterior'Corporate Boundary southerly along last
named east line a distance of 3947 feet, more or less, to intersect the north
line of the south 1140.44 feet of said Section 5;
Thence (13) easterly along last named north line, a distance of 4027.6 feet, more
or less, to intersect the east right-of-way line of the Arvin~Edison Water
Storage District Canal, assaid canal right-of-way is defined in Parcel 1C-1
of that certain Order of Condenmation recorded in Book 3840, at Page 291,
Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder, said point being a
point in the exterior Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (14) southerly and easterly along various courses of said Corporate
Boundary to the Point of Beginning;
Containing 3629 acres, more or less.
O cJ r.j O
i
4.a 44 4J .l-a 4.J 4J .~ .l.a
· H ,H -H ,H ,H ,H -H ,H
(J C.j CJ r.j r...D r.~ Cj r.J
~ OO ~ ~ :~ ,H .H
O O ~ O h ~
cj~> · ~
l) -H C~
03
O
rJ
t-H
,'--I
r.J
-H
..,=.1
U O
~ ,u O
"'
i..-,
O
r-,I
"~
O "'
t--.I
.C~
· H ~
~:-H
t---I D
CD -
0J O
0J O
CJ -H
· H .U
.'H ~
-H 4J
nl:J
0
cJ
-H
:::> cJ
0 0
~.10
0 k
0 r.J
0 0
0 ,H
:::> 0
U
cJ
0 n:~
CU
t-.t.~ 0
Oc~
cJ~ cUc,a
~ H -H
~0~
~OG4J
00",0~
cJ
4J
'O
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation ,Dr this territory hav~ on ~xisting level
of city services (i.e., need for additi,~nai emergency se~zi~e personnel or con-
str~.ction of new facilities, etc.)?
Upon ~nnexation, the effect would be le~gl_i~ As deXelopment takes place,
facilities and personnel will be expanded to accommodate the need.
Would city require any upgrading or change in facili{ies to serve affected terri-
tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc..)? If so, would city o__rresidents be
responsible for financing?
YES. Primary and secondary road construction is shared between applicable _
developers and the City. City funds will be provided by gas taxgrevenue
sharing, FHWA and[or General Funds and improvement districts if required.
Indicate ~nd expkain existing zoning in Rffected territory.
The existing zoning in the County is agricultural. The Environmental ImPact
Report explains in great detail existinK and proposed zonin~ of the affected
territory.
VI..Indicate ~nd explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as m~intenance of livestock
on property, etc.)
Please refer to the Environmental Impact Report.
Vii.
List city' services that area will directly Dr indi= y benefit f~om such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response t'im~, ~e of com-
munity facilities, etc.
Fire insurance r~tes are less expensive in the city h~c~-~ m~ ~ better
fire rate c~ss~f~cat]on- Po]~e~ g~rv~ce re.~ponse ~me is less than that
r~qpmn~e ti~e provided by the Sheriff and/or Highway Patrol.
VIII,
Please provide the fo'llowing information relative to city and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. County Tax only
TAX CODE AREA TAXES
061-002 $8.0006
061-004 8.0106
106-007 10.3847
10.3947
106-018 _-
-- 10.4461
106-020
List city tax rate Cs)-
TAX CODE AREA
061-002
· 061-004
New total tax rate in city
TAXES TAX CODE AREA TAXES
~9.9094 106-007 12.2935
9;9194 106-018 12.3035
106-~20 12.3099
How will t=he differenc~ in tax rates affect ~ house with a market value, of
-~50,000 ~'
$10,750 is net assessed value assumin~1750 Homeowner exempt_ion
The net difference would be an additional $200-35 to $205.19 per year.
(See attached analysis: Tax Rate Differences)
(1)
Police Protection
The level and range of this service will initially be on a scale
equal to those services provided elsewhere in the City. The "called
for" service will initially be minimal due to the present uninhabited
nature of the annexed area. The area will initially be served by Police
District 12. As development occurs, the men and equipment will be ex-
panded as the situation and "called for" services increase. The financ-
ing of the required service will come from the incremental increase in
general property tax revenues as devehopment and subsequent assessed
value increases. There will be no decline in available public safety
service as the result of this annexation.
(2)
Fire Prevention and Suppression
The initial level and range of the fire protection service for the
area to be annexed will be consistent with the services provided to the
urbanized surrounding areas. The nearest City Fire Station is at Akers
and Serrano (Station No. 7). The quality of service will not be less-
ened under city jurisdiction.
The Kern County Fire Station (No. 66) presently serves the County
territory in the southwest Bakersfield area. It is located on Stockdale
Highway near the Country Club. Presently, there is a reciprocal agree-
ment between the County and the City which is called the "Stockdale Plan".
The station nearest the call, whether in the City or County territory,
will respond first. The City Fire Department has determined through a
survey performed by Public Technology, Inc. that an additional fire
station will soon be needed in the southwest portion of Bakersfield if
the present growth rate continues. The proposed site will be located
near the boundaries of the Stockdale No. 10 annexation and will thus
supplement the existing City-wide fire fighting capabilities. It will
be financed by general tax revenue and/or revenue sharing funds.
(3)
Street Sweeping and Construction
The street maintenance service to be provided to the annexed area
does not begin until the City accepts the public improvements installed
and paid for by the developers. The level and range of such service
will be commensurate with existing City service policy. The maintenance
of the streets is paid for by the General Fund of the City of Bakersfield.
Street Lighting
The level and range of street lighting service to be provided to
the annexed area will be the same as provided in any other part of the
City of Bakersfield. All equipment and facilities are initially in-
stalled at the developers expense and dedicated to the City when the
public improvements are accepted by the City, The payment of the util-
ity bill is made via the General Fund.
(4)
Drainage Facilities
The level and range of this service to be provided within the pro-
posed boundaries of the annexation will be consistent with and coordin-
ated with the existing drainage facilities in the southwest portion of
Bakersfield. Any developer will be required to install all necessary
drainage facilities at his cost and will be commensurate with the ex-
existing City drainage system.
(5)
Sewer Service
The proposed annexation lies within the future service area of
Plant No. 3. There is only one existing sewer main within the boundary
of the proposed annexation. There is one interceptor that runs north-
erly along the future alignment of Ashe Road. The facilities that would
initially be required to serve this area will make use of this inter-
ceptor line. The existing Plant No. 3 has enough remaining capacity to
accommodate approximately two years of urban growth assuming that the
growth in the southwest portion of Bakersfield continues at the existing
rate.
The necessary liquid waste facilities will be constructed as the
need dictates and as required. Such service will be provided under City
jurisdiction using the same development basis as now exists for sewer
service provided for other properties within the existing boundaries of
Bakersfield--i.e., the developers will supply the sewer mains as develop-
ment takes place.
(6)
Service' of Various Departments of the City Including Resident's
Participation in City Elections
Upon annexation, residents and owners of property in the affected
territory will receive the same services rendered by the various depart-
ments of the City as is received by other City residents and owners of
property within the City. Most of such services are delivered from the
centralized location in the Civic Center. General Tax Revenues will
finance this service.
(7)
Refuse Service
The level and range of refuse service to be provided to the proposed
annexation area will be the same as now being provided in other areas of
the City. As development takes place, residents will receive twice-weekly
refuse collection and disposal service through a private contractor. The
service to be provided now and in the future will be the same service
offered to other owners and residents of the City who are similarly situ-
ated as to location and use of their property. General Tax Revenue will
finance this service.
(8)
Water Service
The level and range of water service to be provided to the annexed
area will be the same as now being provided by the City in the Ashe Water
Service Area under Chapter 1.6 of the Municipal Code and is operated and
maintained by the California Water Service Company. The developers pay
for all extensions of water mains, and upon completion of the required
facilities, dedicate them to the City. The service is self-supporting
by direct charges to users.
PART VIII TAX- RATE DIFFERENCES
TAX CODE AREA COUNTY TAX RATE CITY TAX RATE
061-002 8,0006 7,3394 + 2.57
061-004 8.0106 7,3494 + 2,57
106-007 10.3847
106-018 10,3947
106-020 1~,4~61
9,7235 + 2,57
9.7335 + 2.57
9,7399 + 2,57
RANGE OF
TAX RATE COUNTY
CITY
HIGHEST $10,6641 $12,3099
LOWEST 8,006 9.9094
$10,750 is net a~sessed value assuming
$1750 Home Owner's exemption.
*NOTE:
.RANGE OF
FAX PAID COUNTY CITY NET DIFF.
HIGHEST $t'~22~,96 $1323,31 $200.35*
LOWEST 860,07 1065,26 205.19'
This does not account for additional
savings that could accrue by being
within the city limits,
example-- (1) lower fire insurance
(2) no trash fee,
(3) no sewer fees
(4) no surcharge water fees
{~') income tax exemption
benefit for 2 & 3 above
.(6) Plus the unquantifiable
attributes of better public
safety capability provided
by the e'ity.