The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 103-82 RESOLUTION NO. 103-82 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELDw IDENTIFIED AS ~NNEXATION NO. 287 (KERN RIVER NO. 9). ~HEREASf the City o£ Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organizationf to witr the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW~ THEREFOREr the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby resolves~ finds and determines as £ollows~ 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A"~ attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed~ marked Exhibit "B"f is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation~ in accordance with the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code~ is marked as Exhibit "~"~ attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal £or change of organization, to wit~ annexationf is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 4 of the Government Code of the State of California~ commencing with Section 35000 thereof)~ and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reason for the proposed change of organization is that City of Bakersfieldw as owner of the affected territory~ desires to include such land within the City for tax purposes. 6. That on July 1, 1982, the Bakersfield Planning Commission reviewed, evaluated and considered the annexation request and recommended the annexation of territory to the City of Bakersfield to the City Council. 7. The zoning upon annexation of Kern River No. 9 will allow the same uses as presently existing in the County. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Philip Kelmar City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Richard J. Oberholzer City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of September, 1982, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEANS, PAYNE, RATTY, ROCKOFF, STRONG NOES: COUNCiL_MEN: /~ ABSENT: COUNC LM N: ~; ABs' A,N,NG, C UNEC, , EN, , the _,~ ld ' APPROVED as ~b fermi: ~' C ~N~Y of th of Bakersfield IT ,-~NNEXATION NO. j87 KEPjq RIVER N0.9, A parcel of land situated in the County of Ken, State of California, 'being a portion of Section 33, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, .M.D.B. & M., more particularly described. as follows: .- .. ..' ' Commencing at a point, on the west line of said Section'33 which bears South O0° 40' 24" West a distance of 1600 feet from the northwest comer of said Section 33, said point being a point on the Existing' Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; thence South ;89° 03' 21" East along the last hamed Cotpot'ate Bounaary a'distanCe o~"i644,031'feet to':a'p0int on the easterly line of Parcel 6B of that c~rtain Quitclaim Deed from Tenneco West, Inc., to the City of Bakersfield recorded June 6, 1977 in Official Records Book S032, .at page' 466 in the Office of the Kern County Recorder, said point being the Point of Beginning for this description; THENCE (i) Departing from the existing COrporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield, North 00° 49' 39" East along the last named easterly line, a distance o~ 660.524 feet to a point on the south right of way line of the Cross Valley'Canal; THENCE (2) South 89° 23' 13" East along the last named right of way line a distance 6f 1000.99 feet; THENCE (3) South 00° 37' 54" West a distance of 449.91 feet; THENCE (4) South 80° 02" 26" Eait a distance of 744.04 feet; THENCE (S) South 49° 06'. 32" East a distance of 153.508 feet to a point on the existing Corporate Boundary.of the City.of Bakersfield; THENCE (6)' Westerly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the Point of Beginning. Containing 18.05 Acres EXHIBIT "A" i · '\\ o ',\ \ Z rrl O ::::a Z C::) 0 -. O0 i!, 1 ~ U 0 > 'X X I--- I--- c- c.- 'X X X X X X >< X X I:~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " U ,.,,, 0 ,n-i u 0 k. U' 0 ~m 0 U, ~m 0 ¢) ,'-¢ · -'¢ U 0 U r~ BO ~ ::3 C:: S::: C:: 14 ¢} .H --..I 0 LJ ~ ~ ..,1 0 0~::0 c-J::: ~_ 0 ....... ~ :> C/) .:l .::S 0 c'O~ c~c~O ·: '~' '~' ' '~. :'. .. .'0 :' · O>(r--UO ¢IJ ' U 'U 0 -r- -_- ~_ I 4J~J::~ ~_crlUc- ~::~¢4-0~=0 C~JOc'OJCj~ X: 0 n 0 ~--.,,.J 0 x J:= ~ 0 0 -: -:>~'~ .~. O¢~JO .0~,-.--¢~ = U ¢.~ .,-.~> U o k ok ¢'J 4J III · .What e. ffects, if any, d annexation of this terrily'have on exis.ting level bf city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service pdrsonnel or con- struction of new faci.litie. s,' etc.)? None IV. Would city require any upgrading or change in' facilities to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etci)?' 'If so, would city or~ residents be responsible for financing? No. Access and services are not planned for this terri tory. V.' Indicate ind e~p'lain existing zoning in affected territory. R__-F (Recreational- Forestry), This zoning is consistent with the conservation/Recreational ..-...,-desi'qnation shown on..~ne Kern;Countv Rosedale General.Plan,.. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur'as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) lhe area is desiqnated as ODen SDace on the Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (BMAGP) and Drezoning would reflect that including the Floodplain. Primarv and Secondary zones since the entire property is within the Kern River ,floodplain, ~VlI . List City-services that 'ea will directly or indirecl ~enefit from such as de~creas~ in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time;- use.of com- munity facilities, etc. None !.VIII. Please provide. the following information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The City ct~rrently pay~ $?44 annljally for pFoperty taxes to the County of Kern. Upon annexation this payment wou]~ no ]onqer be required. The existing tax rate is set at one percent of market value'due to PFoposition ]3. List city tax rate(s). See above;.upon annexation,' the City would not be · , ~equired to pay property taxes. ". '. · " ' ·" '. ' "',L · ". · -' ,'., ".' ' '~ .". "" "," ~ ' "' ' .' ':" '. "'~ '~' '" . '.~' · ' ' .... · · .':' .'" '. ' '. '. '. "="' "' " "i · ~' -2 "" '; How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~50,000 None and not applicable.