Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 83-81RESOLUTION NO. 83L~1 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 284 (KERN CITY NO. 2). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. N6W, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby resolves, finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakers field of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan for Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 4 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 35000 thereof), and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organiza- tion are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive, and in some instances already are receiving, municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. The zoning upon annexation of Kern City No. 2 will allow the same uses as presently existing in the county. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Philip Kelmar City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Richard J. Oberholzer City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of November, 1981, by the following vote: OCOUNCILMEN: BARTON, CHRISTENSEN, MEANS, PAYNE, RATTY, ROCKOFF, STRONG~ NOES: COUNCILIV;'ZN: ABS2NT: COUNCIL/~-~EN: ABS""TAINING: COUNCILMEN: CIT of Council of the City of Bakersfield the APP .D..~>tb~i~°4~h-.;~ay of November, 1981 APPROVED as ~to ~dfm::~ AJS:mm 3. 10/30/8l EXHIBIT A KERN CITY NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 284 A parcel of land situated in the Coffnty of Kern, Slate of California, bein.g a portion of the South half of. Section 3, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. & M., more particularly described as follows: Commen6ing at the intersection of the centerline of Pebble Beach Drive and S~ndale Avenue, as' said intersection is shown on the Map of Tract · 2560 recOrded. June 24, 19~, in Map Book 17, at pages 186. to 190, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder; thence South 4° 16' 50" East along the centerline of said'Pebble Beach Drive a distance of 182.26 feet; thence South 85° 43' 10" West a distance of 175.01 feet to the Northwest cbrner of Tract 2622 recorded March 16, 1962, in Book 12 at page 151 in the Office of the Kern County RecOrder, said corner being a point on the exist%ng Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield and the Point of Beginning for this description; THENCE (1) North 85° 43' 01" East a diStanCe of 20 feet to the Southwest comer of Lot 278'of said Tract 2560; THENCE (2) North 4° 16' 50" West along the West line of the last named Lot 278 a distance of 127.26 feet to ~ poin~ on the South line of Sundale Avenue; THENCE (3) Easterly along the last named South line a distance of 1114.04 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of Lot 285 o.f said Tract 2560, said corner being a point on the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (4) Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the Point of Beginning. \\ NEW STINE ROAD COUNTY CITY 0 r..rt 0 O-,-4 C: r~ 0 '0 -,-r '- ~::~ ._--.r.j (D (J, 0 I I::: 0 -,.4 .,u -,-4 r.j 0 ::,.-1 r~ :::,-i D rJ 0 -,.-4 0 r.) :> r._) -,-I -,-I [J ~ ~ H 0 rJ U ~ E~ E~ ~ E~ E~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 rJ r.) r.) r.J rJ rd rO 0 ~4 0 0 ~ 0 "G aJ 0 ~} · .,-4 0 0 0 (J G O .c: .H' .H .p:>,~ . .,u):.(j -H-H q~ m ~ ~ I~ ~ G q3D~G OmOO.c: O ..c:J~mG m ~4J ,-i 4J E-m -H .,u C: q) H fd -H -H -H ~ ,-m-,-I n:l ,Q q3-P (I) H'q4,CI O -,-I,c: -H rcl ,.Q q) -H 0 q).,u D O.-l-P ~ -Pq4O~ O q)(l) Oc: ~ toolO~ -,-I trl ©-H ~ f O-,-I ~ ~ ~) q) O-P f-I.,u ~-H .c: 0 -H n~ ,c: N 0 H-,-I N'~) '-' 0 m ~OaJ ..c: C: -H m 'N 0 P4 tn · H 0 q) ~-H-H 0 (J :> 0 N ~ ,c: m m ,-t · ,-I 0 . -H :> -H -H C: I ).-m o - G -H 0 O.-c:q~ · H b~::> 0 · H,G ~ q> 0 -H ~ 0 0 P-, "el -H 0 I I::: 4J . rd ~ . 0 4J n:l ~$-i:> .,u 0 -H -H ~ -H N C) -H q) ) :l G"O O O. ~,-I :.4 0 O4 h.. · G ..~ · ,-I O O ~-,-I ~ O c: -H (1) .,u -H ..c: o qJ:>O4J -PE.-m ~ ,q:: N -H 0 G :::J,-Io N O4~OO~\ On~ NO 0 c: q-~ bl-H= bl.,u 0 n:l~ c: [.4 -H ) ,-I H O .H O H -,H ~ -H O -,-J . D'~ ~ .c:: 4JO.O-,-4~)= -.D'~ O aJ ~O O~4.JnJ r,.3 -Dl.,u tO o ~ · H-,-I .O O D-4 aJ J::: (D · O r.j :::hi:::.-1 ~ U ' 0 ~ o (~ ~) r-I L) -,-I 0 .p III. What effects, if'any '=ld annexati'on of this terri' y have on existing le~]. of city services (i ~ed for additional emer :rvice personnel or con- structio~n' of new ities, etc.)?' The annexat~ .f this territo~Z will no~ affect'the near term level or capacity of the City te provide needed services..Since the area. is nearly fully developed, the demand for services · is not expected to exceed the current level provided by public agencies. IV. Would city require any upg~ading or change in faciliiies to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants~ mains, etc.)? If so, would city o~ residents be responsible for financing? Upgraded facilities do not appearnecessar] since the area has been developed in recent times and very little vacant and undeveloped land exists within the territory (3 plus acres). Indicate ind' e~p'lain existing zoning in affected territory. see attached zoning map 123-3. VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use-that would occur'as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (BMAGP) Land Use Element designates the residential portion Of the annexation area as Low Density Residential use and the administrative offices as commercial. A__Dy- prezoninq of this area would reflect present urban usaqe. 'T 0 y: ZONE MAP VII. List city services tea will directly or indir benefit from such as,_~ decrease in fire rate, shorter emergency ~e time, use of com- muni~e~ fati li ties, etc. CitV police should be able to .respond in a .~ore ~. timely manner than present. coUntV Sheriff and State' Higt~way Patrol services- RefUse sergices are currently without-~harge to City residents. The sur- 'charge paid'for City sewer col'lection and.treatment'currentlY as non-City residents would be removed. VIII. Please providq the followi~g information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. There is no difference in taxes to be a~crnod~o fhe Coun'ty or City because of the annexation- proposition 13 set limits on taxes at one percent of market Value. List city tax rate(s). See above How will' the difference in tax rates affect ~ house with a market value of SDO, 000 None