Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 15-80RESOLUTION NO. 15'80 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, IDENTIFIED AS ~NNEXATION NO. 281 (REAL NO. 4). WHEREAS, the 'City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization; to'wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory under the authority of Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby Resolves, Finds, and Determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto, and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan For Providing Services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 35102 of the Government Code is marked as Exhibit "C" attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code of the State of California, it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi- zation are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive, and in some instances already are receiving, municipal services from the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. The 'zoning upon annexation of Real No. 4 will be essentially the same as presently exists in the county. 7. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with 'copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: H. E. BERGEN City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 K. W. HOAGLAND City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 8. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. o0o I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council 'of the Cityof BakerSfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of March,' 1980, by the following vote: CITY CiR~Kad~n fficio Clerk of 'CoUnCil of ~~B'aker'sf'iel'd the Bakersf ield APPROVED as to form: CIT~TTORNEY of y of Bakersfield I I I ..-I .,u -H (.) , o o c~ .,-i o 0 o o 'E., ,,-4 U 4.a O O E c~ .-~l...to 0,-.4c84-.~rJ O ~D 4J ~ -"' 0-.'.~ .© ~ E rJ ,.4 rJ o "'~.,.-~ c~ ~r'H. 0 ,-'I..C~ · -4 0 ~ 0 "~ U -,-I 0 I::: ~ 0 "O0,..QrJ ,.Q · H ~ 0 ~ -~ 0 Q) Q) · H ~ 0 · H (Dq4 H...QO .D O..,u .-H ¢) *,.-I -,u q-4 ~-H o rclO(D-,u :.~ (]) O ~-,--I *,-.4 c~ O~,.CO I O r~ c',4::>O~ ~ O :::; ,.C,-C OrnmrJ ..C ~-,-I ::s 4J~rn ::::I-H · H .,-I "'O E~ ,-cS -,-t 1> m4JO O ~4 u,..4CO..~ O ,-4 .,u 4J. - rn-,-I O~,-C 4a..CrJ -H~ tel rJ m · rJ-,-I · H m rnmc~,~ ,.Q,-14arn 4J (1) "'0 © {..) O O ~ ,..-.e ~' .rcl =.::O O ~ O O 14 · H 4J 4ar. n mrO ~4,"c1~ 0 .,-IC~O o,-I o,.-I O © rJ ~ m -r-I ~O :>.~m ,-I-H O -IJ -,-I -,-4 4J 0 m~' -,-t -,.-4 r,.) 0 r,.)4J 4J r.n rJ-,-I m -,u,'OO ~ (].).~ (].)r..)~ III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on existing level o'f city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con~ struction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the level or capacitV of the Citv to provide the needed services. Would city require any upgrading or change in.facilities to serve affected terri' tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains', etc.}? If so, would city o_F_rresidents be responsible for financing? No -- the development that is occuring in the area now (i.e., the Wildwest Shoppinq Center). is supplying those needed public improvements. Indicate ind exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory. · See attached Countv zoninq maps. (123,2) C-1-PD C-2 C-O C-O-D R-3~PD C-1 Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The ~oning upon annexation will remain essentially the same as in the County '- The WildweSt Shopping Centeris under construction at the ~resent time. a_ od-~ ~1-:z· · 0 r,,!~'."" "' o') v VII. List city services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com- munity facilities, etc. The City services such as fire protection and sewer services are presently beinq in- stalled per City standards. Public safe~v response can be more readily provided by the City than the CountV. VIII. Please provide the fo'llowing information relative to city and county' taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. There is no substantial difference in taxes whether the territory Is in the county or City. proposition 13 set 1imlts on taxes as 1% of the fair market value. List city' tax rate (s) . (SeeVii}) How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~;50,000 ( none )