HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 3-53RESOLUTION NO'. 3-53
~'JTIEREAS, a petition was filed· with the Council of. the 'City
of. Bakersfield. on the Ig~hday of January., 1983.~' ~questing that certain
uninhabited territory therein descri.bed be.:annexed' and included within
the incorporated limits 6f the City of Bakersfield, and'~'
~..~>tEHh~-~S~ said petition waSh signed by the' ov~ners- of not less
than one'fourth (1/~) of the areaOf the land in s. Uch territory, and
representing not' less than one-fOurth-(1/~)'of the assessed Value of
Sdch' territory according: to the la'st.'pr'e.ceding equalized assessment
roll of the. Cobu~ty of .Kern. " · "
· NOW. Tk~,~-.i-I~FORE', in compli.anCe with. the provisions of the Annex.
ation of Uninhabited Te~-ritory' Act of' 1989.'Sts~tutes of 1939, Chapter
B9V, as amended: Big .iT Itl~SOLVED by. the Co.un~il "of :the City of Bakers-
field as follox.~s: .-
That the boundaries of the territor. y 'so propos'ed to be annexed
~ogether with a'portion of Myrtle Street,
to the City of Bakersfield/~re' specifically de.scribed as: .
Beginning at the point formed by the intersection. of
,. :. .the. easterly boundary--li'ne of Lot t of. t~rampton Acres,
· , as per map thereof recorded in I~,:£ap Book e, 'Page
,: Official Records of t[ern County, California,. ~vith the .
. .westerly prolongation of the soUntherly boundary line '
of ~nd (Second) Street as said. Street is shoWn.and
de'lineated on the r.~ap of the. Geede ':T~act, recorded. in
I~iap Book l, Page l~, ·Official Records of aforesaid
ifel~n County, which said westerly prolongation is a
portion of 'the corporate boundary of ~he City of Bakers-
field, California, thence southerly along the aforesaid'
easterly boundary line of said Lot I and southerly
.. along the e.a.sterly .boundary line of Lot ~ of-said
FramptOn Acres. said line being a portion of the cor-
porate boundary line of the City of Bakersfield, a ·
distance of 20~.96 feet to a point,. whlc.h .is the true
point of. beginning for this certain description; thence - -
.~ southerly along the easterly boundary'line of said. Lo~ .
;,. ,. ...... n ..........iL"~-a:zdistsnc~-of 8~';-16 feet~' the'nee w~Sterly and p~alk'~'i
with the northerly boundary line of said Lot ~ a dis-
tance of 20V feet to a point in the easterly bomdary
' - ~ line of Lo.t ~ 0f said Frampton Acres; thence .northerly
along-Said easterly bo~dary lin,~ of Lot 3 a distance
~- of 56.16' feet to a point in a Currently existing cor'
porate boundary line of the City of Bakersfield; thence
easterly along. said corporate boundary~ line and. parallel
With the aforesaid northerly boundary line of said Lot
4 a distance of 207 feet to the. point of beginning,
containing 0.2068 acres of land, more or less;
.That a designation appropriately identifying such territory
is: ~FRAF.,PTON ACHES' No. 3.
BE I'IT FURTI-~R i~E~0LVED that L~onday, t'he ~'~th day of FebrUary,
1953, a~·.the hour of eight o'clock P. Li., in 'the Council Chambers
Carpenter'S union Hall, 911 20th Street, Bakersfield,~ California, is
the time when and ·the place w~ere any person owning real property
within such-territory~So proposed to be annexed and' having any objections
to the· proposed annexation may appear be.fore the COunCil' of_ the City
of Bakersfield'and show cause why such territory should not be so
annexed,
...... ooo ......
-. I'HEREBY.CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted by the Council of the.City bf BakersfiOld at a regular meeting
thereof held. on the lg~h day of January, 1953,-by the following vote:
AYES: CARNAl{IS, SAUI'~DERS. SHURLEY, SIvllTH, SULUVAN, VANDERLEI, VEST
.oES:. ..........h,L-n==,~._~ ............: .......... ............
ABSENT: .... i. .......~...~...',,., ..... '?"'~'.'"'--'--'"----'
and E~-0fficio.'Clerk of the.
Co.unoil. of the City of Bakersfield.
AFi~ii0V~D this.:].lg~hday Sf January, 19.53.
.I~YOE of 'the city of ~akersfield-.