Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 118-60RESOLUTION NO'.. 118-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF BAKER~FIELD FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEAR- ING PROTESTS BY PERSONS OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "TALISMAN N0. 1," PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO TME CITY. OF BAKERSFIELD. WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the Council of the City Of Bakersfield on the 25th day of NOvember, 1960, requesting that certain uninhabited territory therein described be.annexed to and incorporated within the .City of Bakersfield, and WHEREAS, said petition was signed bythe owners of all of the territory proposed to be annexed. NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the provisions of the Annexa- tion of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, Chapter 297, as amended, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of .the City of Bakersfield, as follows: t That the boundaries of the.territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Bakersfield are described as followsm A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, and being a portion of Lot 48-,~in Section l, Township 30, South, Range 27 East,'M. D. M., and as said Lot 48 is shown on the Kern County'Sales Map No. i of Lands of J. B. Haggin", filed for record May 3, 1889, in the office of the County Recorder cf said Kern County: Beginning at the southwest'(S. W.} corner of said Lot ~, a point on the northerly boundary of that public road feet in width, as same is shown on above said Map, which road is commonly known as Ming Avenue, said point of begin- ~ning also being a point on the current corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield as defined by that Annexation designated as "Benton Park No. 2," as adopted October 15, 1956, by Ordinance No. ll07, New Series, and which was certified November 19, 1956, by the Secretary of State, State of California; thence easterly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 48, on and along said corporate boundary as defined by said Ordinance No. ll07, New Series, to inter- sect a westerly boundary of that certain Annexation desig- nated as "Benton Park," distant N. 89c 57' 22" W., 961.255 feeble. more or-.less, £rom the easterly.bounda~y~.of--maild ......... Section l, as measured along the southerly boundary of said Lot 48, and the prolongation thereof; thence continuing easterly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 48, on and along the corporate boundary of said City of Bakersfield, n" as adopted October 3, 1955, by Ordinance No. 1065, New Series, which was certified November 4, 1955, by the said Secretary of State, to intersect the easterly boundary of the West 60 feet, of .the' West half (W. 1/2) of the East half (E. 1/2}, of the-East half (E.' 1/2), of the West half (W. 1/2), of said Lot 48; thence northerly along last named easterly 'boundary, departing from the corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield, to intersect the northerly boundary of the South half (S. 1/2), of the South half (S. 1/2), of said Lot 48; thence westerly along last named northerly boundary to intersect the easterly boundary of the West half (W. 1/2), of the East half (E. 1/2), of the West half (W. 1/2), of said Lot 48;' thence .northerly along last named easterly boundary to intersect the northerly boundary of said Lot 48; thence westerly along last named northerly boundary to the northwest (N. W.) corner of aaid Lot 48; thence southerly along the westerly boundary of said Lot 48 to the southwest (S. W.) corner thereof, and to the point of beginning of this description, containing an area of ?.235 acres of land, more or less. That a designation appropriately. naming such territory is "TALISMAN NO. 1 ·" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Tuesday, the' 27th day of December, 1960, at the hour of eight o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is the time when and the place where any person owning real property within such territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear..before the Council of the City of Bakersfield, and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. ..... o0o---'- I ~REBY CERTIFY that the.foregoing Resolution'was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of,Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th~day of November, 1960, by the 'following vote: ' City C~e-rk and Ex-Of$tolo Clerk of the